Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Anglia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of East Anglia on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.East AngliaWikipedia:WikiProject East AngliaTemplate:WikiProject East AngliaEast Anglia
I notice two separate editors references to a negative story (100 hours working time) that has received significant news coverage in relation to Dr Dan Poulter have now been rapidly removed from this page. I'm worried this is affecting the 'Neutral Point of View' position of this article, particularly as the negative story has been reported in multiple sources. (eg New Statesman / HSJ). Also, on both occasions, the edits have left a very promotional quote as the final comment on the article, which should equally be deleted if we are avoiding personal discussion as part of this biography stub.
Would there be any way the editor who has removed the reference both times be happy for this reference to be included, and does anyone else think it should be included? - eg an expanded section with the reference from the Hansard, and Dr Poulter's subsequent response. I didn't include this detail, as I thought it would change the weight of the article and over focus on it. Happy to add an extended comment with referenced quotes from both points of view on the issue.
Quesh 08:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrQuesh (talk • contribs)
.svg){kind=small}
