Talk:Ifeoma Ozoma - Misplaced Pages

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated C-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Google Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Google, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Google and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GoogleWikipedia:WikiProject GoogleTemplate:WikiProject GoogleGoogle

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Google To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Articles for most of the other products listed here and here.
Assess : All articles in the Category:Unknown-importance Google articles and Category:Unassessed Google articles using the project's assessment scale
Expand : Google Mapathon, Google Talkback
Maintain : This WikiProject
Merge : Google mobile services into List of Google products
Stubs : Category:Stub-Class Google articles and Category:Google stubs
Update : List of features in Android and Gmail interface#Product integration. Update logos of Google Marketing Platform products
Other :
- Add more stuff to this to do list if you like! (click here...)
- create:
- Help the Google article for a good article status
- Improve the Outline of Google
- Get more members using :
{{subst:Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Google/Invite Members}}
- Infobox Images with transparent areas needing a different background color

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Feminism Low‑importance

	Feminism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Feminism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Feminism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FeminismWikipedia:WikiProject FeminismTemplate:WikiProject FeminismFeminism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alaska Low‑importance

	Alaska portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Red: Black women (2022)

This article was created or improved during the Black women edit-a-thon hosted by the Women in Red project in February 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red

Influence on WA Legislation

One of the sources cited on Cher Scarlett's work on legislative work in Washington state is a profile about Ozoma. I believe it make sense to re-instate that here, given that context.SquareInARoundHole (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

References

Woo, Erin (24 November 2021). "A Tech Whistle-Blower Helps Others Speak Out". Retrieved 29 November 2021.

Potential incorrect use of the language "sponsor" ?

This page mentions as is that Ifeoma "authorized" and "sponsored" Silence No More Legislation. While she was an inspiration and powerful advocate for the legislation, my understanding is that citizens can't sponsor and authorize legislation; those are actions of the legislators who supported the bill. She's not, for example, listed as a "sponsor" of the bill on the bill's official page: https://legiscan.com/CA/sponsors/SB331/2021 Thistechworkertoo (talk) 01:26, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Have you read the footnote? The "sponsor" wording is explained there. It also says she "authored" (not "authorized") the bill. Both descriptors, by the way, are supported in the inline citations. GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 01:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Oh, I'm so sorry for misreading the "authored" text! Also, unfortunately the footnote that was recently added is under paywall and from over ten years ago. It could be though that California is an exception here and I'm not aware of it. Just double checking that the correct language is being used so there isn't confusion for others trying to mirror this important work in other states. Are there other supporting references here that speak to a citizen being able to "sponsor" legislation in the same way that legislators do? Thistechworkertoo (talk) 01:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

That's odd, I'm not hitting a paywall. Regardless, that source in the footnote just explains the terminology that is unusual; the other two sources (The Hill and The Verge, at the end of the sentence) support that Ozoma is a "cosponsor". GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 02:05, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Reporters don't always understand the legislative process and regurgitate whatever language is told to them or will get the most attention and clicks. I think it's important that we fact check via government sources that it's appropriate to state that Silence No More California legislation was sponsored by Ifeoma vs. inspired and informed by her; the official bill page doesn't list her as a "sponsor". Either way she obviously had an important and critical role in passing the legislation. Thistechworkertoo (talk) 02:19, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

We reflect what reliable sources write. You are free to find a RS supporting that this naming has changed in the past ten years, but until then it should stay as it is. That said, it seems pretty easily verified that this is still the case: "SPONSOR: The legislator, private individual, or group who developed a piece of legislation and advocates its passage." GorillaWarfare (she/her • talk) 03:15, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Totally fair! From the California Senate's website, here's the process: "All legislation starts off as an idea. These ideas can come from anybody and the process begins when either an individual or group persuades a Member of the Legislature to author a bill. The Member then sends the idea and the language for the bill to the Legislative Counsel's Office, where it is drafted into the actual bill. The drafted bill is returned to the legislator for his or her review. Persons or groups that originated the idea for the bill may also review it to ensure that the provisions they desire are in the bill in the correct form." Once the bill is introduced it is then reflected as being "sponsored" by the drafting legislator(s), for example per this link I already shared specific to Silence No More California legislation. Thistechworkertoo (talk) 03:23, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Also, if you look at the meeting notes for the bill hearings, Ifeoma's non-profit Earthseed is listed as being among several non-profit "co-sources" in support of the bill, but there's no reference to Ifeoma being a sponsor of the bill. I did find that in an April 13th, 2021 hearing about the bill it was stated, "To illustrate this point, the author and sponsors highlight the case of Ifeoma Ozoma..." Thistechworkertoo (talk) 03:33, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

But wait, here it is, there are August 26th hearing notes that refer to the bill being "sponsored" by the California Employment Lawyers Association, Earthseed, and Equal Rights Advocates. Thanks for your patience as I track down this specific information, which I'm going to reflect in an edit now. Thistechworkertoo (talk) 04:06, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Please wait for consensus from editors before re-making edits that have been challenged by other editors. While I understand you disagree, and commend you for your dedication in finding a reference to back-up your position, the senator herself confirmed Ozoma as a co-sponsor (and co-author) on KQED Public Radio. Adding a note stating that in the legislative documents, her business name is used, would be what I would support as an appropriate edit that does not diminish the work of the subject of this WP:BLP. SquareInARoundHole (talk) 08:21, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

References

"California Considers New Law to Protect Workers Who Break NDAs to Speak Out Against Discrimination". KQED Public Radio. Retrieved 2 December 2021.

Categories: