Misplaced Pages

user talk:Bluerasberry

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Misplaced Pages ad for Misplaced Pages:Deletion discussions
Misplaced Pages adsfile infoshow another – #44
Archiving icon
my talk page archives
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3
Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6
Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12
Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15
Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18
Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21
Archive 22Archive 23Archive 24
Archive 25Archive 26Archive 27
Archive 28Archive 29Archive 30
Archive 31Archive 32Archive 33
Archive 34Archive 35Archive 36
Archive 37Archive 38Archive 39
Archive 40Archive 41Archive 42
Archive 43Archive 44Archive 45
Archive 46Archive 47Archive 48


This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present.

LGBTQ to LGBTQ+

Hi, I see that it seems you were instrumental in getting pages changed from LGBT to LGBTQ. I was thinking it would be beneficial if we alerted this to LGBTQ+. The acronym for LGBTQ doesn't account for aromantic people, asexual people, intersex people, or non-binary people. I think using "+" would account for all these and more without the need for a long acronym like LGBTIQA (which itself omits non-binary). It would also help negate future moving over "why include Q but not A" etc. Many of the pages using LGBTQ in their title cover aromantic people, asexual people, intersex people, and/or non-binary, so I think this would be most relevant and applicable. However, I can't really get my head around how to instigate a discussion for a mass move like this and was wondering if I could please have your help in doing this? Helper201 (talk) 04:20, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Lane talks about LGBT/LGBTQ, and the +
@Helper201: Thanks for writing. Some topics are too complicated to discuss in text discussion. I made a video sharing my thoughts on this, check it out.
If you want I can talk by voice / video.
The way to build a strong case for the plus is to demonstrate off-wiki acceptance of the plus. I do not think that acceptance exists. It would be unusual and unprecedented, but I still think merited for Misplaced Pages, to add the plus. I think the reasons you state are compelling. Check the video then get back to me on where to take the conversation. Bluerasberry (talk) 17:37, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for the reply Bluerasberry. I'm perfectly fine hearing your responses in video, audio, text or whatever medium is most comfortable for you to communicate in, so please do what is most comfortable for you. Apologies but text replies are my only real way of communicating back, so hopefully you are okay with this or you have a system to help in this regard like text-to-speech.
I think you bring up many good points in the video. I especially agree with your statement regarding the importance of representation from outside mainstream western media, like the inclusion of two-spirit, Faʻafafine, fakafifine, takatāpui, vakasalewalewa, māhū or palopa as some examples. All of these aren't included within LGBT or LGBTQ, along with those I previously mentioned above.
Was a strong case for an off-wiki acceptance of LGBTQ brought about during discussions when switching from LGBT to LGBTQ? I'm aware of you mentioning this in the video but don't recall seeing anyone explicitly displaying or laying out these sources. When covering this ground I think we should also be careful not to violate WP:HITS. Its most important we have the most inclusive acronym possible in my view, which I think "+" solves this goal. I noted you mentioned this in the video too, starting at 1:40. As you mentioned there's no one organisation speaking for the whole demographic spectrum but I believe that "+" is the most non-controversial, all-encompassing and inclusive term that has known usage.
I also agree with you regarding the importance of an article for queer. Apologies if I'm missing something but would this not be covered by WP:BOLD? Regardless, I don't think this inhibits a change to LGBTQ+. I also don't think there's really been any major hiccups in the change from LGBT to LGBTQ, so I think the change to LGBTQ+ should also work fairly smoothly. Where would be best for us to place this discussion to involve other editors? Not that I'm not comfortable in continuing the discussion here with you, I just think involving more editors could be helpful in gathering further input.
All the best. Helper201 (talk) 23:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
@Helper201: All these hundreds of thousands of changes have their basis in this discussion - Talk:LGBTQ/Archive_4#Requested_move_14_August_2024. I challenged the close decision of that discussion at Misplaced Pages:Move_review/Log/2024_September#LGBTQ. The result was confirming that LGBT->LGBTQ.
I think the case for moving to LGBTQ was strong by typical Misplaced Pages standards, but also, I do not think typical Misplaced Pages decision making processes apply to this situation. The reason I do not think they apply is because in this case, the topic "LGBT" refers to something international and timeless, but the huge number of sources cited refer to contemporary Western perspectives. Also, the main argument was count of term usage, when I think a better argument would have been looking at sources which specifically try to define either LGBT or queer. I am in favor of the term being international and applying to everyone who is non-cis non-hetero, which is not the direction I see in the name change.
If you were to argue for adding the plus, then I expect that people would ask you to show sources as a precedent, and I do not think strong sources exist which argue for the plus. In my opinion, the article "queer" is not compliant with Misplaced Pages sourcing guidelines, because we do not have a definition for the way that article is framed there. I complained in Talk:Queer/Archive_3#International_use_for_pre-modern_sexual_minorities. I think the same bending of rules to use the term "queer" would also exclude the plus. The current Misplaced Pages use of the Q is to use that as the plus. Bluerasberry (talk) 15:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Joyous Season

I wish that you may have a very Happy Holiday! Whether you celebrate Christmas, Hanukkah, Kwanzaa, Hogmanay, Festivus or your hemisphere's Solstice, this is a special time of year for almost everyone! May the New Year provide you joy and fulfillment! Thanks for everything you do here. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Spread the holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Coffee/Holidays}} to your fellow editors' talk pages.

Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 16:40, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Seattle Misplaced Pages Day, January 11, 2025

Seattle Misplaced Pages Day

Saturday afternoon, January 11, from 1:00–4:30pm PT at the Capitol Hill Meeting Room at Capitol Hill Branch Library (425 Harvard Ave. E., Seattle, WA 98102)

Misplaced Pages Day celebrates the anniversary of the founding of Misplaced Pages. This year we will observe Misplaced Pages Day with an edit-a-thon to improve the Seattle and other articles important to WikiProject Seattle, such as History of Seattle, Puget Sound, Lake Union, Lake Washington, Pioneer Square, Seattle Center, Tacoma, and University of Washington.

Sign up at Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Seattle/Wikipedia Day 2025!

You can also read and add to the task list.

Please remember to check our Seattle meetup schedule each month for upcoming events.

06:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC) To unsubscribe from future messages from Misplaced Pages:Meetup/Seattle, please remove your name from this list.

Happy New Year to you, Bluerasberry!

Happy New Year!
Hello Bluerasberry:

Did you know ... that back in 1885, Misplaced Pages editors wrote Good Articles with axes, hammers and chisels?

Thank you for your contributions to this encyclopedia using 21st century technology. I hope you don't get any unnecessary blisters.

Wil540 art (talk) 14:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message Wil540 art (talk) 14:48, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Falsies has been accepted

The Falsies, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 04:45, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Sat Jan 25: Misplaced Pages Day NYC 2025

January 25: Misplaced Pages Day
Brooklyn Central Library

You are invited to Misplaced Pages Day 2025, hosted by Wikimedia NYC at the Brooklyn Public Library's central branch.

The special focus this year will be the launch of our "400 Neighborhoods" campaign for the city's 400th anniversary and WikiProject New York City/400 Task Force.

We'll also have a lightning talks session and you're invited to sign up for one, though space is somewhat limited.

  • Saturday, January 25, 2025
    12:00 pm – 5:00 pm
    Brooklyn Central Library, Grand Army Plaza
    Afterparty: 6:00 pm – 9:00 pm (off-site venue, TBA)
All attendees at Wikimedia NYC events are subject to the Wikimedia NYC Code of Conduct.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daedalus Books (Virginia) has been accepted

Daedalus Books (Virginia), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Misplaced Pages! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:18, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Your userpage criteria

Hello Bluerasberry. Quite a long time ago on my RfA criteria page i wlinked to your page on userpages and your ideas of what is good, because i really liked it. At some point i discovered (or thought i did) that it had been deleted, so i sadly mentioned that instead. Imagine my surprise when today i was told on my talk page that you hadn't deleted it but moved it! I shall relink to it, if you don't mind, as i still really like it and feel that it encapsulates a lot of how i think. Have a great day ~ Lindsay 22:41, 9 January 2025 (UTC)

CfD nomination at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 9 § Categories:LGBTQ in

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 January 9 § Categories:LGBTQ in on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --MikutoH 23:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)