Your comments may be archived here after 48hrs |
Word/quotation of the moment:
Astrology has no effect on reality, so why should reality have any effect on astrology? – J.S. Stenzel, commenting on astrological planets that astrologers acknowledge don't really exist
(Previous quotes) |
---|
— response to the scale-wandering rendition of the national anthem at CPAC 2021
|
Nomination for merger of Template:Infobox language
Template:Infobox language has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox proto-language. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PK2 (talk; contributions) 09:21, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Hawaiian place names
You and I seem to be the two active people on this front, and I've noticed a lot of your accurate moves for island names were undone by people who don't seem to understand how Hawaiian works or what the actual place names are locally. I think our conversation last year in the Maui fires was actually met with a pretty broad consensus to remedy this, but I suspect there's going to be some slight issues with the (never followed) MOS:HAWAII, which is frankly just wrong in treating a consonant as a diacritic, and people who assume their understanding as a tourist reflects the reality on the ground. We've already got a tension in articles that accurately render the place names being titled inaccurately, as well as general Wikipedians thinking the ʻokina isn't a consonant.
I've posted in the Hawaii Wikiproject, but I was wondering if you'd be interested in helping me rework the Hawaii MOS to stop it from validating this English vs Hawaiian tension that simply doesn't exist in reality? Warrenᚋᚐᚊᚔ 14:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- Sure. But we do need to consider whether the English or Hawaiian form of the name is more appropriate for an article. I'd argue that the state should be 'Hawaii', just as we have 'Mexico' rather than 'México' for that country. — kwami (talk) 18:15, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Original Barnstar | |
As a speaker of an indigenous language, I greatly appreciate your work! Newyorkwildcat (talk) 20:20, 8 January 2025 (UTC) |
- Thanks.
- Nez Perce? It's good to have native speakers here. — kwami (talk) 21:49, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ta'c meeywi! VanIsaac, GHTVabout 05:47, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Use of U+1AE2 as an IPA retraction diacritic
Hi! I’ve noticed your recent edits on uvular consonant and back-released click and I’m curious about your use of — in what font does the diacritic character display for you? This character, U+1AE2 is seemingly currently unassigned by the Unicode consortium, and thus displays as a fallback glyph in most users’ devices, including mine. Maybe there’s a suitable substitution for it, or maybe we should use an embedded image for in the meantime, as it’s practice with unencoded characters
Cheers! —rariteh (talk) 05:05, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
- Hi rariteh,
- U+1AE2 is scheduled for publication this year. In the meantime it could be substituted with a macron, but I was afraid if I did that, I'd forget to fix it once the proper character became available. The SIL fonts should be updated to support it relatively quickly after publication — kwami (talk) 05:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)
Edits on Praenestinian and Lanuvian language
Hi, while making a merger for the Praenestinian and Lanuvian language, I saw that you added the era for both articles to be from around 500 BC on the 7th of September, 2013 at around 1:00. I was just wondering if you would have had and still have a source for these dates and to add them onto both pages. Thank You. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 04:16, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- Might've been LingList, but they're now defunct. — kwami (talk) 06:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think so. I checked the archived versions for both languages and it does not mention 500 BC at any moment and I don't believe they would have changed it. If you do find the source or a source, please put it onto both pages. Thank You. Spino-Soar-Us (talk) 10:12, 19 January 2025 (UTC)