The page "Misplaced Pages:Quackwatch" does not exist. You can request that it be created, but consider checking the search results below to see whether the topic is already covered.
View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Quackwatch page. The result was Keep -- zzuuzz (talk) 10:34, 4 September 2007 (UTC) Quackwatch (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)... 40 KB (5,451 words) - 17:47, 21 August 2023
- Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 282 (section Is Quackwatch an SPS and thus not allowed as a source on BLPs?) discussion. Contents Workshop on Quackwatch RfC Straw polls for Quackwatch RfC Draft 2 of Quackwatch RfC RfC: Quackwatch WP:SPS says: Never use self-published... 317 KB (43,543 words) - 03:36, 3 January 2020
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Quackpotwatch saying "keep" here approve of the idea of this being covered only in Quackwatch.. it already is. Mangojuicetalk 18:38, 26 July 2006 (UTC) Non-notable... 15 KB (2,012 words) - 20:22, 8 February 2023
- Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Quackwatch/FAQ discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 14:44, 31 March 2020 (UTC) Talk:Quackwatch/FAQ (edit | subject | history | links | watch | logs) Non sequitur questions:... 3 KB (199 words) - 14:44, 31 March 2020
- Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 24 (section Quackwatch is "occasionally informative") _Rosenthal#Use_of_unreliable_sources_by_Fyslee names Quackwatch as an unreliable source. Quackwatch has been recommended by major medical organisations... 184 KB (24,299 words) - 22:28, 4 February 2023
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/D. Gary Young information on him. Outside of his own advertising, it appears that only Quackwatch and similar have written about him at all. FisherQueen (talk · contribs)... 7 KB (804 words) - 16:47, 2 February 2022
- Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard/Archive 61 (section Quackwatch as reliable source for expert opinion relevant to this topic) contribs) Dispute overview 1) Using quackwatch as a reliable source for a biomedical claim. 2) Using old statement from quackwatch site from 2005 as a source for... 204 KB (8,993 words) - 15:58, 5 March 2023
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/American Association of Nutritional Consultants About the Quackwatch article, I was just referred to WP:RSP by a comment on the AANC article talk page. WP:RSP says that articles on Quackwatch by Stephen... 9 KB (1,135 words) - 22:42, 31 March 2021
- Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/quackpotwatch.org records: 2008-06-05 15:32:16 (UTC): User Baadcatj (talk - contribs; 15) to Quackwatch (diff - undo) - Link: www.quackpotwatch.org/index.html. * Links added... 6 KB (610 words) - 18:21, 30 November 2009
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Earl Mindell very sound. Ref's 1 & 2 are awkward, but still valid. Ref 5 is Quackwatch and Quackwatch's usability in BLPs is debated, but I beleive that most editors... 6 KB (682 words) - 16:39, 22 November 2019
- Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/healthfinder.gov quackwatch&submit1=search. * Links added in this diff: www.quackwatch.com/10bio/bio.html (427, 211, 1, 1) www.quackwatch.org/09advisors/advbd... 94 KB (10,437 words) - 06:18, 4 November 2009
- Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Youwontseemyiplol/Archive original case name) IP's first (and only) edit () was trying to make Quackwatch seem unreliable. The minute after they made that edit, the account "Youwontseemyiplol"... 1 KB (149 words) - 06:09, 1 April 2022
- Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/BullRangifer/Archive fact that Quackwatch was not peer reviewed BullRangifer has fought to have Quackwatch accepted as a reliable source, citing the Quackwatch article on... 19 KB (2,581 words) - 09:31, 27 February 2023
- Misplaced Pages:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 32 (section Usage of Quackwatch as RS in medical quackery) agreed: (1) Quackwatch is a reliable source. (2) Quackwatch is a partisan source. (3) The earlier ruling against an editor for using Quackwatch in a specific... 257 KB (31,803 words) - 05:43, 10 May 2024
- Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Levine2112 . We were very close to a consensus with a long-running issue at Quackwatch, a consensus which ScienceApologist has ignored and trampled. Can something... 60 KB (8,041 words) - 22:08, 4 February 2023
- Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Spam/LinkReports/bolenreport.com bolenreport.com (14, 23, 3, 1) www.canlyme.com/quackwatch.html (14, 31, 2, 1) www.canlyme.com/quackwatch.html (14, 31, 2, 1) www.korenpublications.com... 4 KB (533 words) - 18:21, 30 November 2009
- Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-10-07 Advocates for Children in Therapy/copypage Stephen Barrett's Quackwatch. Membership statistics are not available on the ACT website. Attachment Therapy Candace Newmaker Quackwatch Rebirthing Stephen... 6 KB (659 words) - 17:48, 19 May 2020
- Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Drgrisanti/Archive giving the opinion of Stephen Barrett from Quackwatch. Again this has been raised on the talk page and Quackwatch has consensus as a reliable source on this... 5 KB (651 words) - 05:04, 22 June 2014
- Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Spam/LinkSearch/proboards3.com Talk:FanFiction.Net Talk:Helix_(genus) Talk:Helix_aspersa Talk:Quackwatch/Archive_5 Talk:Trigger_point Talk:Vertebral_subluxation User_talk:Fyslee/Archive_1... 1 KB (129 words) - 00:22, 26 April 2008
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Hallelujah diet JSTOR · TWL) I couldn't find any independent reliable sources except for Quackwatch and two "human interest" type news stories from 2007. (The journal... 14 KB (1,928 words) - 23:47, 27 March 2022