This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:
- 23:50, 12 April 2015 Reaper Eternal talk contribs changed block settings for Cali11298 talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked, cannot edit own talk page) (Continued socking)
6 April 2015
- 23:5323:53, 6 April 2015 diff hist +1,148 User talk:Cali11298 →April 2015: reply
- 17:4017:40, 6 April 2015 diff hist +113 User talk:Cali11298 →April 2015
- 17:0717:07, 6 April 2015 diff hist +745 User talk:Cali11298 reply
- 16:2916:29, 6 April 2015 diff hist +1,041 User talk:Cali11298 there's more to me.
- 01:5901:59, 6 April 2015 diff hist +1,535 User talk:Cali11298 →April 2015: reply
- 00:5900:59, 6 April 2015 diff hist +822 User talk:Cali11298 →April 2015: reply
5 April 2015
- 18:2918:29, 5 April 2015 diff hist +921 User talk:Cali11298 →April 2015: reply
- 18:0318:03, 5 April 2015 diff hist +66 User talk:Cali11298 →April 2015: reply
- 18:0118:01, 5 April 2015 diff hist +907 User talk:Cali11298 →April 2015: reply
- 15:4715:47, 5 April 2015 diff hist +1,955 User talk:Cali11298 →April 2015: request
- 15:2115:21, 5 April 2015 diff hist +317 Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.: reply
- 15:1815:18, 5 April 2015 diff hist −2 Roy Spencer (meteorologist) →Energy lost to space as compared to climate models
- 15:1315:13, 5 April 2015 diff hist 0 m Elizabeth Dole this directly conflicts with her bio info. It says she became a republican in 1975, not 1969. I'm changing it so that it matches with the bio.
- 15:1015:10, 5 April 2015 diff hist +261 Talk:Jesse Helms →helms's votes on black, federal judicial nominees.: reply
- 15:0715:07, 5 April 2015 diff hist +2,237 Jesse Helms →Social and political views: look at talk page, I'm not adding this as a rebuttal. compromise has been reached. NOTE: THIS IS NOT AN EDIT WAR. I'm following another user's request.
- 14:3314:33, 5 April 2015 diff hist +453 Talk:Jesse Helms →helms's votes on black, federal judicial nominees.: reply
- 14:2914:29, 5 April 2015 diff hist 0 m Ruth Bader Ginsburg →U.S. Court of Appeals: replaced dead link with a live one
- 14:1214:12, 5 April 2015 diff hist −3 m David Scott (Georgia politician) →Healthcare Reform: tweak
- 14:1214:12, 5 April 2015 diff hist −169 m David Scott (Georgia politician) →Healthcare Reform: removing unsourced claim – the following links make no reference of anyone being planted there.
- 14:0414:04, 5 April 2015 diff hist −600 User talk:Cali11298 →Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
- 04:1004:10, 5 April 2015 diff hist +33 m Jesse Helms →Views on minorities: adding publisher to source
- 03:4903:49, 5 April 2015 diff hist +10 Talk:Jesse Helms →helms's votes on black, federal judicial nominees.: wrong link
- 03:4203:42, 5 April 2015 diff hist +1,504 Talk:Jesse Helms →helms's votes on black, federal judicial nominees.: new section
- 03:3403:34, 5 April 2015 diff hist +701 Jesse Helms Undid revision. Stop edit warring (I'l report you).There's a talk page for a reason. it's explicit that he voted for thomas. it says he "blocked black judges from the federal bench"; just adding info that he did vote for a black judicial nominee.
- 02:4502:45, 5 April 2015 diff hist +355 Jesse Helms (edit summary removed)
- 00:0200:02, 5 April 2015 diff hist +105 m John Swallow Indictment info belongs in lede
4 April 2015
- 23:3123:31, 4 April 2015 diff hist +181 m Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.: reply
- 22:5722:57, 4 April 2015 diff hist +491 Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.: reply
- 22:5422:54, 4 April 2015 diff hist +103 User talk:Cali11298 →Welcome!
- 22:4122:41, 4 April 2015 diff hist 0 m Aaron Schock →Committee assignments: change to past tense
- 22:3622:36, 4 April 2015 diff hist +191 Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.: .........silence
- 22:2422:24, 4 April 2015 diff hist −1,798 User talk:Cali11298 →April 2015
- 22:2422:24, 4 April 2015 diff hist +241 Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.
- 22:2222:22, 4 April 2015 diff hist +437 Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.: why
- 22:1322:13, 4 April 2015 diff hist +528 Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.: response to VQuakr
- 22:0322:03, 4 April 2015 diff hist +31 m Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.
- 22:0222:02, 4 April 2015 diff hist +26 Soon and Baliunas controversy changing second sentence per consensus on talk page
- 22:0122:01, 4 April 2015 diff hist +215 Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.: no objections
- 21:5821:58, 4 April 2015 diff hist +21 m Joe Klein →Later career
- 21:2521:25, 4 April 2015 diff hist +786 Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.
- 21:0121:01, 4 April 2015 diff hist +438 Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.
- 20:5620:56, 4 April 2015 diff hist +584 User talk:William M. Connolley →Soon and baliunas: new section
- 20:3420:34, 4 April 2015 diff hist +86 m Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.
- 20:3420:34, 4 April 2015 diff hist +744 Talk:Soon and Baliunas controversy →NPOV problem in second sentence.: new section
- 20:2920:29, 4 April 2015 diff hist +26 m Soon and Baliunas controversy soon and baliunas stand by the paper, the lead sentence should make clear it is only the opinion of scientists that they misused data. It shouldn't be the opinion of this Misplaced Pages article.
- 19:2619:26, 4 April 2015 diff hist −5 Talk:PolitiFact →Center for Economic Policy and Research
- 19:2519:25, 4 April 2015 diff hist −3 m Talk:PolitiFact →Center for Economic Policy and Research
- 19:2519:25, 4 April 2015 diff hist −213 m Talk:PolitiFact →Center for Economic Policy and Research
- 19:2319:23, 4 April 2015 diff hist −1 m PolitiFact →Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: tweak
- 19:2019:20, 4 April 2015 diff hist +1,004 PolitiFact →Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: removing CEPR (not relevant) and adding their defense