This account is currently blocked. (Show block details) The latest block log entry is provided below for reference:
- 10:16, 19 October 2007 Ryulong talk contribs blocked Dr. Seaweed talk contribs with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Abusing multiple accounts)
19 October 2007
- 10:0810:08, 19 October 2007 diff hist +1 Talk:Herbert Dingle →The Fanatics
- 10:0710:07, 19 October 2007 diff hist −1 Talk:Herbert Dingle →The Fanatics
- 10:0610:06, 19 October 2007 diff hist +1,299 Talk:Herbert Dingle The pimple faced cult
- 09:5809:58, 19 October 2007 diff hist −1,029 Herbert Dingle I read you warning. I prefer the real thing to the sandbox. This is not vandalism. You are the vandal
- 09:2909:29, 19 October 2007 diff hist −322 Herbert Dingle →Controversies: These references are dishonest in the context as they don't relate to the assertion
- 09:2809:28, 19 October 2007 diff hist −707 Herbert Dingle →Controversies: This is a totally inapropriate section to put into the main article. It is highly POV.
18 October 2007
- 11:5811:58, 18 October 2007 diff hist +113 Talk:Herbert Dingle →Comments on Latest Version
- 11:5611:56, 18 October 2007 diff hist +1,191 Talk:Herbert Dingle →Comments on Latest Version
- 09:5309:53, 18 October 2007 diff hist 0 Talk:Herbert Dingle →The Lorentz Transformation - Placement?
- 09:5209:52, 18 October 2007 diff hist +1 Talk:Herbert Dingle →Talk page semi-protection?
- 09:5109:51, 18 October 2007 diff hist +1 Talk:Herbert Dingle →Talk page semi-protection?
- 09:5109:51, 18 October 2007 diff hist +662 Talk:Herbert Dingle →Talk page semi-protection?: DVdm is a coward and a wretch
- 09:3909:39, 18 October 2007 diff hist +71 Talk:Herbert Dingle →Talk page semi-protection?
- 09:3809:38, 18 October 2007 diff hist +525 Talk:Herbert Dingle →Improper reference and possible link to copyvio: So the Dingle quotes weren't such a good idea after all?
- 09:3409:34, 18 October 2007 diff hist +90 Talk:Herbert Dingle →Talk page semi-protection?
- 09:3309:33, 18 October 2007 diff hist +350 Talk:Herbert Dingle →The Lorentz Transformation - Placement?: No POV!
- 09:3009:30, 18 October 2007 diff hist +763 Talk:Herbert Dingle →Comments on Latest Version: Remove all the technical details
10 October 2007
- 15:5715:57, 10 October 2007 diff hist +712 Herbert Dingle Can you please discuss exactly what it is that you disapprove of in this version that you keep reverting. You seem to be immune to the 3 revert rule and yet you warn everybody else about it.
- 10:0610:06, 10 October 2007 diff hist +12 Herbert Dingle change 'He'
- 10:0610:06, 10 October 2007 diff hist 0 Herbert Dingle paragraphing
- 10:0410:04, 10 October 2007 diff hist +26 Herbert Dingle paragraphing
- 10:0210:02, 10 October 2007 diff hist +71 Herbert Dingle paragraphing
- 09:4009:40, 10 October 2007 diff hist +92 Herbert Dingle A few examples
- 09:3409:34, 10 October 2007 diff hist +276 Herbert Dingle The marginalized Fringe
8 October 2007
- 11:4311:43, 8 October 2007 diff hist −38 Tusk African Elephants are now in abundance
2 October 2007
- 10:4210:42, 2 October 2007 diff hist +7 Talk:Herbert Dingle →The Dispute: spelling
- 10:3910:39, 2 October 2007 diff hist −227 Herbert Dingle Wwoods, I don't think it's misleading at all, and neither do you. Please read the discussion pages
- 10:3810:38, 2 October 2007 diff hist −325 Herbert Dingle Undid revision 161619842 by DVdm (talk)
- 10:3810:38, 2 October 2007 diff hist +2,289 Talk:Herbert Dingle MWoods, please study a debate before reverting
30 September 2007
- 19:4119:41, 30 September 2007 diff hist −227 Herbert Dingle DVdm watch the 3 Revert rule!
- 19:3619:36, 30 September 2007 diff hist +100 Talk:Herbert Dingle What's sauce for the goose is sauce for the gander
- 19:3319:33, 30 September 2007 diff hist +972 Talk:Herbert Dingle Chang is a nobody who has been elevated to a sage simply because he made a comment undermining Dingle
- 16:5116:51, 30 September 2007 diff hist +526 Talk:Herbert Dingle Keating Hafele is not an experiment. It is claim that an experiment took place
- 16:4516:45, 30 September 2007 diff hist +824 Talk:Herbert Dingle Supressing claims of suppression
- 16:3916:39, 30 September 2007 diff hist −236 Herbert Dingle DVdm is proving Dingle's point right now by suppressing his message
- 16:3816:38, 30 September 2007 diff hist +9 Herbert Dingle Undid revision 161343224 by DVdm (talk)
- 16:3616:36, 30 September 2007 diff hist +157 Talk:Herbert Dingle Let's have some names
- 16:3316:33, 30 September 2007 diff hist +579 Talk:Herbert Dingle →The meaning of a dispute: Chang may have written an interesting book but he is not an authority on consensus
- 16:2516:25, 30 September 2007 diff hist −236 Herbert Dingle Who is this Chang guy that is given so much credibility?
- 16:2016:20, 30 September 2007 diff hist +9 Herbert Dingle Keating Hafele is a claim. It is not an experimental proof
- 16:1616:16, 30 September 2007 diff hist +790 Talk:Herbert Dingle →"Assessments of Dingle's Anti-Relativity Arguments": I detect double standards
- 16:0416:04, 30 September 2007 diff hist −1 Talk:Herbert Dingle 's' removed
- 16:0316:03, 30 September 2007 diff hist +312 Talk:Herbert Dingle →The meaning of a dispute: Lines crossed
- 15:5915:59, 30 September 2007 diff hist +1 Herbert Dingle spelling
- 15:5915:59, 30 September 2007 diff hist +1 Herbert Dingle gap
- 15:5815:58, 30 September 2007 diff hist +74 Herbert Dingle Re-inserting overt reference to McRea
- 15:5415:54, 30 September 2007 diff hist +628 Talk:Herbert Dingle No need for a special article
- 15:4815:48, 30 September 2007 diff hist +545 Talk:Herbert Dingle I'll put McRea's name back again in the main text, although I don't think it is necessary
- 15:4015:40, 30 September 2007 diff hist −563 Herbert Dingle I've removed this section because the very fact of a dispute automatically means that somebody was in opposition. See the talk pages
- 07:4507:45, 30 September 2007 diff hist −217 Talk:Herbert Dingle →References to Misplaced Pages Editors confirming the message of Dingle's Book: forgot to sign
 |