| Revision as of 02:30, 6 September 2004 editGeogre (talk | contribs)25,257 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:36, 6 September 2004 edit undoNetoholic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users39,916 edits refactor to remove personal attack. this is a discussion page about this article, not what you perceive is proper use of Peer Review. My talk page is open to you, instead.Next edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| *Come on - the article has been up for all of 2 minutes, and marked VfD. It should go through ''']''', or perhaps ] first, since it is the ''event'' that is being described, not just a simple source or quote from a single person. Rather than immediately choose to delete, use editorial solutions first. -- ] ] 01:00, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC) | *Come on - the article has been up for all of 2 minutes, and marked VfD. It should go through ''']''', or perhaps ] first, since it is the ''event'' that is being described, not just a simple source or quote from a single person. Rather than immediately choose to delete, use editorial solutions first. -- ] ] 01:00, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC) | ||
| *Verbatim text for speeches go to Wikisource (after they've been verified as public domain or GFDL.) Articles about speeches go here. ''That'' was verbatim text combined with unencyclopedic commentary; the relevant information is in ] already. The choice seems simple enough to my inexperienced eyes: '''transwiki to both Wikiquote and Wikisource'''. --].] 01:36, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC) | *Verbatim text for speeches go to Wikisource (after they've been verified as public domain or GFDL.) Articles about speeches go here. ''That'' was verbatim text combined with unencyclopedic commentary; the relevant information is in ] already. The choice seems simple enough to my inexperienced eyes: '''transwiki to both Wikiquote and Wikisource'''. --].] 01:36, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC) | ||
| *Wikisource and delete: A description of the event would go in the Academy Awards for that year. It is not known so well outside of that context to be sought. The Janet Little Feather acceptance is more famous. |
*Wikisource and delete: A description of the event would go in the Academy Awards for that year. It is not known so well outside of that context to be sought. The Janet Little Feather acceptance is more famous. ] 02:28, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 02:36, 6 September 2004
Move to Wikiquote or Wikisource. RickK 00:30, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Come on - the article has been up for all of 2 minutes, and marked VfD. It should go through Cleanup, or perhaps Peer review first, since it is the event that is being described, not just a simple source or quote from a single person. Rather than immediately choose to delete, use editorial solutions first. -- Netoholic @ 01:00, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)
- Verbatim text for speeches go to Wikisource (after they've been verified as public domain or GFDL.) Articles about speeches go here. That was verbatim text combined with unencyclopedic commentary; the relevant information is in Paddy Chayefsky already. The choice seems simple enough to my inexperienced eyes: transwiki to both Wikiquote and Wikisource. --Ardonik.talk() 01:36, Sep 6, 2004 (UTC)
- Wikisource and delete: A description of the event would go in the Academy Awards for that year. It is not known so well outside of that context to be sought. The Janet Little Feather acceptance is more famous. Geogre 02:28, 6 Sep 2004 (UTC)