Misplaced Pages

1901 Chicago mayoral election

← 1899 April 2, 1901 1903 →
Turnout	74% 11 pp
Nominee Carter Harrison Jr. Elbridge Hanecy Party Democratic Republican Popular vote 156,766 128,413 Percentage 52.69% 43.16%
Mayor before election Carter Harrison Jr. Democratic Elected mayor Carter Harrison Jr. Democratic

Elections in Illinois
Federal government U.S. Presidential elections 1820 1824 1828 1832 1836 1840 1844 1848 1852 1856 1860 1864 1868 1872 1876 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1900 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1980 1984 Dem Rep 1988 1992 1996 Dem Rep 2000 Dem Rep 2004 Dem Rep 2008 Dem Rep 2012 Dem Rep 2016 Dem Rep 2020 Dem Rep 2024 Dem Rep U.S. Senate elections 1818 1819 1823 1824 1824 sp 1825 1830 sp 1831 1835 1837 1843 1846 1849 1849 sp 1853 1859 1861 1863 sp 1867 1879 1882 1885 1885 sp 1887 sp 1888 1890 1894 1896 1897 1901 1903 1907 1909 1913 1913 sp 1914 1918 1920 1924 1926 1928 sp 1930 1932 1936 1938 1940 sp 1942 1944 1948 1950 1954 1956 1960 1962 1966 1968 1970 sp 1972 1974 1978 1980 1984 1986 1990 1992 1996 1998 2002 2004 2008 2010 2010 sp 2014 2016 2020 2022 2026 U.S. House elections 1818 1819 1820 1822 1824 1826 1828 1831 1832 1834 1836 1838 1840 1842 1844 1846 1848 1850 1852 1854 1856 1858 1859 6th sp 1860 1861 6th sp 1862 1864 1866 1868 1870 1871 AL sp 1872 1874 1876 1878 1880 1882 1884 1886 1888 1890 1892 1894 1895 10th sp 18th sp 1896 1898 1900 1902 1904 1906 1908 1910 1912 1914 1916 1918 4th sp 1920 1922 AL sp 1923 2nd sp 4th sp 1924 1926 1928 1930 1932 1934 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 19th sp 1946 1948 1950 1952 1953 7th sp 1954 1956 1957 7th sp 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1969 13th sp 1970 6th sp 1972 15th sp 1973 7th sp 1974 1975 5th sp 1976 1978 1980 10th sp 1982 1983 1st sp 1984 1985 14th sp 1986 1988 21st sp 1990 1991 15th sp 1992 1994 1995 2nd sp 1996 1998 2000 1st 2002 2004 2006 2008 14th sp 2009 5th sp 2010 17th 2012 2013 2nd sp 2014 2015 18th sp 2016 2018 2020 2022 1st 2024
State government General elections 1936 1938 1940 1942 1944 1946 1948 1950 1952 1954 1956 1958 1960 1962 1964 1966 1968 1969 1970 1972 1974 1976 1978 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Gubernatorial elections 1818 1822 1826 1830 1834 1838 1842 1846 1848 1852 1856 1860 1864 1868 1872 1876 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1900 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 1972 1976 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 2010 2014 2018 2022 Lieutenant Gubernatorial elections 1818 1822 1826 1830 1834 1838 1842 1846 1848 1852 1856 1860 1864 1868 1872 1876 1880 1884 1888 1892 1896 1900 1904 1908 1912 1916 1920 1924 1928 1932 1936 1940 1944 1948 1952 1956 1960 1964 1968 Attorney General elections 2018 2022 Secretary of State elections 2022 Comptroller elections 2016 Senate elections 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 House of Representatives elections 1964 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 Judicial elections 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Ballot measures and referendums State capitol referendum (1834) Cutback Amendment (1980) Crime Victim Rights Amendment (1992) Illinois Governor Recall Amendment (2010) Public Pension Amendment (2012) Marsy's Law (2014) Right to Vote Amendment (2014) Transportation Taxes and Fees Lockbox Amendment (2016) Fair Tax (2020) Right to Collective Bargaining Amendment (2022)
Chicago General elections 2019 2023 Mayoral elections 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1865 1867 1869 1871 1873 1876 1877 1879 1881 1883 1885 1887 1889 1891 1893 1893 sp 1895 1897 1899 1901 1903 1905 1907 1911 1915 1919 1923 1927 1931 1935 1939 1943 1947 1951 1955 1959 1963 1967 1971 1975 1977 sp 1979 1983 1987 1989 sp 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 2011 2015 2019 2023 2027 Aldermanic elections 1923 1925 1927 1929 2011 2015 2019 2023 Chicago Board of Education elections 2024 2026
Cook County County elections 1946 1980 State's Attorney 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Rockford Mayoral elections 2021
v t e

In the Chicago mayoral election of 1901, Democrat Carter Harrison Jr. was reelected to a third term, defeating Republican nominee Elbridge Hanecy by a 9.5% margin of victory.

The election took place on April 2. Until 2019, no subsequent election had more candidates running on its ballot.

Ahead of the election, there were competitive races to receive the two major party's nominations at their municipal nominating conventions. Mayor Harrison was challenged for the Democratic Party nomination by former governor John Peter Altgeld. However, Altgeld was politically weaker than he once had been, and Harrison easily fended him off. In the March indirect primary to elect the delegates to the city's nominating convention, delegates supporting Harrison won a broad majority. At the convention, Harrison received the party's nomination by acclamation. The Republican Party had a large field of candidates seeking its nomination. Along with Hanecy (who was a judge on the Circuit Court of Cook County), the two other front-running contenders for the Republican nomination were Sanitary District of Chicago president William Boldenweck and former alderman John Maynard Harlan. and incumbent alderman Walter J. Raymer. Other contenders that Henry beat were Judge Marcus Kavanaugh and aldermen William Mavor and Frank T. Fowler. Additionally, Alderman William Hale Thompson had initially declared candidacy, but did not ultimately contest for the nomination at the convention.

Democratic nomination

Contenders

• Carter Harrison Jr., incumbent mayor
• John Peter Altgeld, former governor and third-party candidate for mayor in 1899

Primary and convention

Incumbent mayor Carter Harrison Jr. was renominated by the Democratic Party. Harrison's opponent for the nomination was former governor John Peter Altgeld, who had been a third-party challenger in the previous election. Atgelds 1901 candidacywas not considered a serious threat to Harrison, as Altgeld had lost much of his influence over the preceding two years. There had been rumors that Roger Charles Sullivan and John Patrick Hopkins might recruit a candidate of their own to challenge Harrison, but this never materialized.

In the March primary to elect delegates to the city nominating convention, Harrison-supporting delegate candidates won a large majority. At the convention, Harrison was renominated by acclamation.

Republican nomination

Contenders

• William Boldenweck, board president of the Chicago Sanitary District
• Frank T. Fowler alderman on the Chicago City Council
• John Maynard Harlan, former alderman on the Chicago City Council
• Elbridge Hanecy, judge of the Cook County Circuit Court and candidate for governor in 1900
• Marcus Kavanaugh, judge on the Cook County Superior Court
• William Mavor, alderman on the Chicago City Council
• Walter J. Raymer, alderman on the Chicago City Council

Additionally, there was early speculation that Graeme Stewart (an attorney and member of the Chicago Board of Education) might be a candidate. Initially, alderman William Hale Thompson declared himself a candidate, though he ultimately did not contest at the convention.

Convention balloting (overview)

The Republican Party nominated Cook County Circuit Court judge Elbridge Hanecy at its city convention on March 2. He captured the nomination on the eighth round of balloting. The top three contenders for the nomination were Hanecy, Harlan, and Boldenweck. Machine Republicans largely backed Hanecy. Independent Republicans largely backed Harlan. German Republicans largely backed Boldenweck.

Hanecy had been a judge on the Cook County Circuit Court for a number of years. The previous year, Hanecy had sought the gubernatorial nomination, being defeated by Richard Yates Jr. at the state convention by a thin margin. Hanecy was politically allied with William Lorimer, being Lorimer's candidate both in this mayoral election and in the previous year's gubernatorial election.

Despite speculation, Harlan denied any intentions of running as an independent if he lost the nomination.

Since every round of voting saw all 940 delegate votes cast, each round required candidates to win 471 votes in order to secure the majority needed for the nomination.

Convention balloting (ward results, by round)

First round

Second round (before shifts)

After the first ballot, Mavor's name was withdrawn. While Hanecy gained a sizable number of votes on the second ballot, little else changed. At the end of the ballot, the 28 votes cast for Kavanaugh in the first ward were silently shifted to Hanecy, although Kavanaugh's name was not withdrawn.

Second round (after shifts)

Third round

Fourth round

Fifth round

During the vote, sixth ward chairman declared 28 votes for Hanecy, 21 for Halan, and 2 for Boldenweck. However, this was challenged and the delegation was polled twice resulting in it casting 27 votes for Hanecy and 24 votes for Harlan.

Sixth round

Seventh round

Eighth round

Third-party nominations

The Prohibition Party nominated Avery E. Hoyt. Ahead of their city nominating convention (held February 21 at Willard Hall), those discussed as possible nominees included Hoyt, J. P. Tracey, and John H. Leslie.

The Social Democratic Party nominated Guy Hoyt, the Socialist Party nominated John Collins, and the Socialist Labor Party nominated John R. Peptin.

The Single Tax Party nominated Thomas Rhodes. The Single Tax Party was a national organization. It championed Georgism.

General election

Campaigning

Henacy campaigned actively, delivering many speeches. Henacy aimed to present himself as a positive alternative to Harrison. He advocated changing the fee system practiced by some city officials and also proposed stronger measures to regulate the streetcar companies. However, his attempts to adopt reformist policies were weakened in their effectiveness by his association with William Lorimer. Reform-minded Republicans were upset that the seedy Lorimer managed to get his preferred candidate nominated by the Republican Party over reformist favorite John Maynard Harlan. Some Republicans unsuccessfully sought to persuade Harlan to run as an independent.

The Republican Party's platform criticized the Harrison administration as "inefficient", "notorious", "scandalous", "dishonest", and cowardly negligent in its,

manner of defending correct and dishonest damage suits against the city, its prostitution of our public schools, its pernicious effect upon the realty and industrial values whereby the property of the individual has been depreciated in value while manufacturing and other industrial interests have been driven from our city.

The traction issue surfaced in this election. The Democratic platform advocated for municipal ownership of street railways. The Democratic platform did not advocate for immediate public ownership, however, making provisions in its platform for the extension of franchises. The Democratic platform advocated for,

Twenty years as the maximum of franchises pending the final ownership by the city with the percentage of the gross receipts as compensation, lower fares in rush hours and better facilitites, and weaver of rights claimed under the 99-year act.

Not only did Henacy propose stronger measures to regulate streetcar companies, but the Republican convention had declared that,

The franchise question must be settled fairly, honestly and promptly between all parties. Long franchises will not be granted. Full and fair compensation must be paid for special privileges in all streets, alleys, and public grounds. The extension of street railway franchises and lowering of the tunnels are questions which demand the immediate attention of the city and must be promptly and fearlessly met. These question should be settled and adjusted simultaneously with each other, and all interests should receive fair and honest treatment.

The Democratic platform also advocated municipal ownership of other public utilities, including gas, electricity, and water.

Harrison took his Republican challenger serious, and campaigned vigorously against him.

Results

By the standards of the era in Chicago politics, Harrison's margin of victory was viewed as a decisive one.

Harrison carried 26 wards while Hanecy carried the remaining nine.

In some of the most Republican parts of the city, Hanecy only managed to win a plurality of the vote, and in others he lost the vote to Harrison. However, Harrison, likewise, suffered in some of the city's Democratic strongholds.

Harrison received 72.96% of the Polish-American vote, while Hanecy received 23.54% and Collins received 2.74%.

References

1. ^ Hewitt, Oscar (March 28, 1923). "Election Results Shows Accuracy of Tribune Poll". Newspapers.com. Oscar Hewitt. Retrieved October 23, 2022.
2. ^ The Chicago Daily News Almanac and Year Book for 1912. Chicago Daily News, Incorporated. 1911. p. 464. Retrieved May 12, 2020.
3. Mayor Carter Henry Harrison IV Biography
4. Currey, Josiah Seymour (1912). Chicago: Its History and Its Builders, a Century of Marvelous Growth. S. J. Clarke publishing Company. p. 335.
5. ^ Morton, Richard Allen (June 29, 2016). Roger C. Sullivan and the Making of the Chicago Democratic Machine, 1881-1908. McFarland. p. 133. ISBN 9781476623788. Retrieved May 11, 2020.
6. ^ "Chicago Mayoralty Contest.; Judge Elbridge Hanecy Nominated by the Republicans". The New York Times. March 3, 1901.
7. "To Fight Harrison". Newspapers.com. Brooklyn Eagle. December 24, 1900. Retrieved December 20, 2024.
8. "Thompson Enters Mayoralty Race". Chicago Tribune. February 10, 1901. Retrieved December 23, 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
9. ^ "San Francisco Call 3 March 1901 — California Digital Newspaper Collection".
10. Tarr, Joel A. (1966). "J. R. Walsh of Chicago: A Case Study in Banking and Politics, 1881–1905". Business History Review. 40 (4): 451–466. doi:10.2307/3112123. JSTOR 3112123. S2CID 154701950. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
11. "William Boldenweck Support for Mayor". The Inter Ocean. February 21, 1901. p. 5.
12. ^ "Convention Work In Detail". Chicago Tribune. March 3, 1901 – via Newspapers.com.
13. "Not An Independent". The Inter Ocean. February 21, 1901. p. 5. Retrieved December 15, 2024 – via Newspapers.com.
14. McKee, Thomas Hudson (1901). "The National Conventions and Platforms of All Parties, 1789-1901: Convention, Popular, and Electoral Vote. Also the Political Complexion of Both Houses of Congress at Each Biennial Period".
15. Marden, Orison Swett; Devitt, George Raywood (1907). "The Consolidated Library".
16. ^ "The World Review: An Illustrated Weekly Magazine". The World Review: An Illustrated Weekly Magazine. Vol. 1. World Review Company. 1901. pp. 7–8. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
17. ^ "Indianapolis Journal 3 April 1901 — Hoosier State Chronicles: Indiana's Digital Historic Newspaper Program". newspapers.library.in.gov. Retrieved May 15, 2020.
18. Kantowicz, Edward. “The Emergence of the Polish-Democratic Vote in Chicago.” Polish American Studies, vol. 29, no. 1/2, 1972, pp. 67–80. JSTOR, JSTOR, www.jstor.org/stable/20147849.