Misplaced Pages

Active reviews for intermediate designs

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from ARID)
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (August 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In software engineering, active reviews for intermediate designs (ARID) is a method to evaluate software architectures, especially on an intermediate level, i.e. for non-finished architectures. It combines aspects from scenario-based design review techniques, such as the architecture tradeoff analysis method (ATAM) and the software architecture analysis method (SAAM), as well as active design reviews (ADR).

See also

References

  1. Active reviews of intermediate designs (ARID) - Software Architect's Handbook
  2. Clements, Paul; Kazman, Rick; Klein, Mark (2002). Evaluating Software Architecture: Methods and Case Studies. Boston: Addison Wesley Professional. pp. 241–242. ISBN 0-201-70482-X.

External links


Stub icon

This software-engineering-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: