Misplaced Pages

Beck v. Washington

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

1962 United States Supreme Court case
Beck v. Washington
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued November 14, 1961
Decided May 14, 1962
Full case nameDavid D. Beck v. State of Washington
Docket no.40
Citations369 U.S. 541 (more)
ArgumentOral argument
ReargumentReargument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Holding
The court held that intensive and voluminous news coverage in the vicinity where the defendant was indicted and tried did not violate the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment
Court membership
Chief Justice
Earl Warren
Associate Justices
Hugo Black · Felix Frankfurter
William O. Douglas · Tom C. Clark
John M. Harlan II · William J. Brennan Jr.
Potter Stewart · Byron White
Case opinions
MajorityClark, joined by Harlan, Brennan, Stewart
DissentBlack, joined by Warren
DissentDouglas
Frankfurter and White took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

Beck v. Washington, 369 U.S. 541 (1962), was a United States Supreme Court case which ruled that intensive and voluminous news coverage in the vicinity where the defendant was indicted and tried did not violate the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment.

References

  1. "Beck v. Washington". Oyez. Archived from the original on August 13, 2020. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
  2. "Beck v. Washington, 369 U.S. 541 (1962)". Justia Law. Retrieved December 27, 2020.
United States Fifth Amendment criminal procedure case law
Grand Jury Clause
Double Jeopardy Clause
Meaning of "same offense"
After acquittal
After conviction
After mistrial
Multiple punishment
Dual sovereignty doctrine
Other
Self-Incrimination Clause


Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: