Misplaced Pages

Complex structure theory in English law

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Complex structure theory in English law" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
The article's lead section may need to be rewritten. Please help improve the lead and read the lead layout guide. (March 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

Complex structure theory in English law refers to an attempt to circumvent the general rule that one cannot sue for solely pure economic loss in English tort law.

Example

A faulty boiler is fitted into a house and causes structural damage to the property when it explodes. The owner of the property has no contractual relationship with the company which built the boiler. Proponents of complex structure theory argue that the end user should be able to recover the full cost of reinstating the item on the basis that the objective is to rectify damage to recover damage to the adjacent property, in this example, damage to the property.

Status

Complex structure theory was mooted obiter in Murphy v Brentwood District Council.

References

  1. Banakas, Efstathios. Civil Liability for Pure Economic Loss. United Kingdom National Committee of Comparative Law. p. 32.
  2. Murphy v Brentwood District Council 1 AC 398


Stub icon

This article related to English law is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: