Misplaced Pages

Estate of Tawney v. Columbia Natural Resources, LLC

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.
Find sources: "Estate of Tawney v. Columbia Natural Resources, LLC" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2012)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Estate of Tawney v. Columbia Natural Resources, LLC" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

The Tawney Case In 2006, plaintiffs, Estate of Garrison G. Tawney, Richard L. Ashley, Janice E. Cooper, Clifford R. Cooper, Myrtle Jones, Larry G. Parker, and John W. Parker, all oil and natural gas royalty owners of West Virginia, filed suit against Columbia Natural Resources (CNR) claiming CNR had "fraudulently, intentionally, and knowingly" underpaid royalties by deducting post-production costs and by entering into futures contracts that resulted in "below-market-value sale prices." CNR routinely subtracted fees for gathering and transporting the gas to interstate pipelines, as well as, assessed volume deductions. The Plaintiffs argued the deductions were improper under the leases, which consisted of "varying language on calculation of royalties."

West Virginia Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plaintiffs, declaring CNR had wrongfully calculated the royalty payments. The verdict included $134.3 million in compensatory damages and $270 million in punitive damages; total judgment to the plaintiffs amounted in $405 million. The case was recently upheld against an appeal filed by CNR in 2007.

References

External links

Categories: