This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources. Find sources: "Hampson v Dept of Education and Science" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2016) |
Hampson v Department of Education and Science | |
---|---|
Court | Court of Appeal |
Citation | 2 All ER 25, IRLR 69, ICR 179 |
Keywords | |
Objective justification, indirect discrimination |
Hampson v Department of Education and Science ICR 179 is a UK labour law case, concerning the test for justification of discrimination.
Facts
A language teacher from Hong Kong had done a two-year training course at home. She came to the UK where the requirement was for three year qualifications. She did a further one-year training course. The Secretary of State refused to recognise her qualification as comparable, because her three years was not consecutive. She argued this was race discrimination. However, the Secretary of State argued it fell within the exception under the Race Relations Act 1976 section 41 (acts done under statutory authority).
Judgment
The Court of Appeal, upholding the EAT, found for the Department under RRA 1976 section 41. Balcombe LJ, dissenting, would have remitted the case to tribunal to assess justification. He set out the current approach for justification, relying on Rainey v Greater Glasgow Health Board which incorporated the test given in Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz.
requires an objective balance between the discriminatory effect of the condition and the reasonable needs of the party who applies the condition…. the employer had to show a real need on the part of the undertaking, objectively justified, although that need was not confined to economic grounds; it might, for instance, include administrative efficiency in a concern not engaged in commerce or business. Clearly it may, as in the present case, be possible to justify by reference to grounds other than economic or administrative efficiency.
The approach given in the dissent was preferred on appeal to the Lords, who overturned the decision on the issue of immunity.
See also
Direct discrimination cases | |
---|---|
Equality Act 2010 ss 13 and 136 | |
Stefanko v Doherty and Maritime Hotel Ltd IRLR 322 | |
Horsey v Dyfed County Council ICR 755 | |
R (EOC) v Birmingham City Council AC 1155 | |
James v Eastleigh BC UKHL 6 | |
Webb v EMO Air Cargo (UK) Ltd (No 2) UKHL 13 | |
Smith v Safeway plc ICR 868 | |
Grant v South-West Trains Ltd ICR 449 (C-249/96) | |
Chief Constable of Yorkshire Police v Khan UKHL 48 | |
Shamoon v Royal Ulster Constabulary UKHL 11 | |
Roma Rights Centre v Prague Immigration UKHL 55 | |
Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire UKSC 15 | |
Coleman v Attridge Law (2008) C-303/06 | |
English v Sanderson Blinds Ltd EWCA Civ 1421 | |
Grainger plc v Nicholson IRLR 4 (EAT) | |
see UK labour and equality law |
Sources on justifying discrimination | |
---|---|
Equality Act 2010 Sch 9 | |
Etam plc v Rowan IRLR 150 | |
Johnston v Royal Ulster Constabulary (1986) C-222/84 | |
R (Amicus) v SS for Trade and Industry EWHC 860 | |
Sirdar v The Army Board (1999) C-273/97 | |
Kreil v Germany (2000) C-285/98 | |
Lambeth LBC v Commission for Racial Equality ICR 768 | |
Tottenham Green Nursery v Marshall (No 2) ICR 320 | |
Equality Act 2010 s 19(2)(d) | |
Bilka-Kaufhaus GmbH v Weber von Hartz (1984) C-170/84 | |
Kontofunktionaerernes Forbund v Danfoss (1989) C-109/88 | |
Rinner-Kühn v FWW Gebäudereinigung KG (1989) C-171/88 | |
Nimz v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (1991) C-184/89 | |
Kutz-Bauer v Freie und Hansestadt Hamburg (2003) C-187/00 | |
Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College (2004) C-256/01 | |
see UK labour law |
References
- "Hampson v Department of Education and Science". vLex. Retrieved 5 October 2024.
- Hampson v Department of Education And Science [1990] UKHL 15, 1 AC 171, 3 WLR 42, 2 All ER 513, IRLR 302, ICR 511 (7 June 1990)
- Ellis, Evelyn (1990). "Justifiability and statutory immunity for indirect discrimination: Hampson v Department of Education and Science". Public Law (Winter): 461–467.