Misplaced Pages

Heine–Cantor theorem

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Heine-Cantor theorem) Not to be confused with Cantor's theorem.
This article includes a list of references, related reading, or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please help improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (April 2019) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In mathematics, the Heine–Cantor theorem states that a continuous function between two metric spaces is uniformly continuous if its domain is compact. The theorem is named after Eduard Heine and Georg Cantor.

Heine–Cantor theorem — If f : M N {\displaystyle f\colon M\to N} is a continuous function between two metric spaces M {\displaystyle M} and N {\displaystyle N} , and M {\displaystyle M} is compact, then f {\displaystyle f} is uniformly continuous.

An important special case of the Cantor theorem is that every continuous function from a closed bounded interval to the real numbers is uniformly continuous.

Proof of Heine–Cantor theorem

Suppose that M {\displaystyle M} and N {\displaystyle N} are two metric spaces with metrics d M {\displaystyle d_{M}} and d N {\displaystyle d_{N}} , respectively. Suppose further that a function f : M N {\displaystyle f:M\to N} is continuous and M {\displaystyle M} is compact. We want to show that f {\displaystyle f} is uniformly continuous, that is, for every positive real number ε > 0 {\displaystyle \varepsilon >0} there exists a positive real number δ > 0 {\displaystyle \delta >0} such that for all points x , y {\displaystyle x,y} in the function domain M {\displaystyle M} , d M ( x , y ) < δ {\displaystyle d_{M}(x,y)<\delta } implies that d N ( f ( x ) , f ( y ) ) < ε {\displaystyle d_{N}(f(x),f(y))<\varepsilon } .

Consider some positive real number ε > 0 {\displaystyle \varepsilon >0} . By continuity, for any point x {\displaystyle x} in the domain M {\displaystyle M} , there exists some positive real number δ x > 0 {\displaystyle \delta _{x}>0} such that d N ( f ( x ) , f ( y ) ) < ε / 2 {\displaystyle d_{N}(f(x),f(y))<\varepsilon /2} when d M ( x , y ) < δ x {\displaystyle d_{M}(x,y)<\delta _{x}} , i.e., a fact that y {\displaystyle y} is within δ x {\displaystyle \delta _{x}} of x {\displaystyle x} implies that f ( y ) {\displaystyle f(y)} is within ε / 2 {\displaystyle \varepsilon /2} of f ( x ) {\displaystyle f(x)} .

Let U x {\displaystyle U_{x}} be the open δ x / 2 {\displaystyle \delta _{x}/2} -neighborhood of x {\displaystyle x} , i.e. the set

U x = { y d M ( x , y ) < 1 2 δ x } . {\displaystyle U_{x}=\left\{y\mid d_{M}(x,y)<{\frac {1}{2}}\delta _{x}\right\}.}

Since each point x {\displaystyle x} is contained in its own U x {\displaystyle U_{x}} , we find that the collection { U x x M } {\displaystyle \{U_{x}\mid x\in M\}} is an open cover of M {\displaystyle M} . Since M {\displaystyle M} is compact, this cover has a finite subcover { U x 1 , U x 2 , , U x n } {\displaystyle \{U_{x_{1}},U_{x_{2}},\ldots ,U_{x_{n}}\}} where x 1 , x 2 , , x n M {\displaystyle x_{1},x_{2},\ldots ,x_{n}\in M} . Each of these open sets has an associated radius δ x i / 2 {\displaystyle \delta _{x_{i}}/2} . Let us now define δ = min 1 i n δ x i / 2 {\displaystyle \delta =\min _{1\leq i\leq n}\delta _{x_{i}}/2} , i.e. the minimum radius of these open sets. Since we have a finite number of positive radii, this minimum δ {\displaystyle \delta } is well-defined and positive. We now show that this δ {\displaystyle \delta } works for the definition of uniform continuity.

Suppose that d M ( x , y ) < δ {\displaystyle d_{M}(x,y)<\delta } for any two x , y {\displaystyle x,y} in M {\displaystyle M} . Since the sets U x i {\displaystyle U_{x_{i}}} form an open (sub)cover of our space M {\displaystyle M} , we know that x {\displaystyle x} must lie within one of them, say U x i {\displaystyle U_{x_{i}}} . Then we have that d M ( x , x i ) < 1 2 δ x i {\displaystyle d_{M}(x,x_{i})<{\frac {1}{2}}\delta _{x_{i}}} . The triangle inequality then implies that

d M ( x i , y ) d M ( x i , x ) + d M ( x , y ) < 1 2 δ x i + δ δ x i , {\displaystyle d_{M}(x_{i},y)\leq d_{M}(x_{i},x)+d_{M}(x,y)<{\frac {1}{2}}\delta _{x_{i}}+\delta \leq \delta _{x_{i}},}

implying that x {\displaystyle x} and y {\displaystyle y} are both at most δ x i {\displaystyle \delta _{x_{i}}} away from x i {\displaystyle x_{i}} . By definition of δ x i {\displaystyle \delta _{x_{i}}} , this implies that d N ( f ( x i ) , f ( x ) ) {\displaystyle d_{N}(f(x_{i}),f(x))} and d N ( f ( x i ) , f ( y ) ) {\displaystyle d_{N}(f(x_{i}),f(y))} are both less than ε / 2 {\displaystyle \varepsilon /2} . Applying the triangle inequality then yields the desired

d N ( f ( x ) , f ( y ) ) d N ( f ( x i ) , f ( x ) ) + d N ( f ( x i ) , f ( y ) ) < ε 2 + ε 2 = ε . {\displaystyle d_{N}(f(x),f(y))\leq d_{N}(f(x_{i}),f(x))+d_{N}(f(x_{i}),f(y))<{\frac {\varepsilon }{2}}+{\frac {\varepsilon }{2}}=\varepsilon .}

For an alternative proof in the case of M = [ a , b ] {\displaystyle M=} , a closed interval, see the article Non-standard calculus.

See also

External links

Categories: