Misplaced Pages

Hitaffer v. Argonne Co.

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Hitaffer v. Argonne Co.
CourtUnited States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Full case name Hitaffer v. Argonne Co.
ArguedJanuary 9, 1950
DecidedMay 29, 1950
Citations183 F.2d 811; 87 U.S. App. D.C. 57; 23 A.L.R. 2d 1366
Case history
Subsequent historyCertiorari denied October 16, 1950
Court membership
Judges sittingBennett Champ Clark, Wilbur Kingsbury Miller, Charles Fahy
Case opinions
MajorityClark, joined by Miller
ConcurrenceFahy
Keywords

Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., 183 F.2d 811 (D.C. Cir. 1950), was a case decided by the D.C. Circuit that first recognized a wife's right to bring a cause of action for loss of consortium.

The plaintiff's husband had been injured at work, and had received compensation, however his injuries had left the married couple unable to enjoy sexual relations. The wife filed for additional damages on grounds of loss of consortium, but the defendant argued that a wife could not suffer loss of consortium.

References

  1. ^ Hitaffer v. Argonne Co., 183 F.2d 811 (D.C. Cir. 1950).
  2. Henderson, J.A., et al. The Torts Process, Seventh Edition. Aspen Publishers, New York, NY: 2007, p. 321

External links

United States tort law
Intentional Torts
Assault & Battery
Abuse of process
intentional infliction of emotional distress
Trespass to land & Trespass to chattels
Conversion
Privacy, Publicity rights
Tortious interference
DefamationSee United States defamation law
Negligence
Duty of care
Medical malpractice
Wrongful death, Loss of consortium
Common employment
Public Authority, Fireman's rule, Negligence per se
Causation
Negligent infliction of emotional distress
Nuisance
Public
Private
Strict liability
Ultrahazardous activity
Product liability
Damages
Joint and several liability
Comparative negligence
Punitive damages


Stub icon

This article relating to case law in the United States or its constituent jurisdictions is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: