Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
It states that for every context-free language there is a such that for all for any collection of length words there is a with , and decompositions such that each of , , is independent of , moreover, , and the words are in for every and .
The first application of the interchange lemma was to show that the set of repetitive strings (i.e., strings of the form with ) over an alphabet of three or more characters is not context-free.
William Ogden, Rockford J. Ross, and Karl Winklmann (1982). "An "Interchange Lemma" for Context-Free Languages". SIAM Journal on Computing. 14 (2): 410–415. doi:10.1137/0214031.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Each category of languages, except those marked by a , is a proper subset of the category directly above it. Any language in each category is generated by a grammar and by an automaton in the category in the same line.