Misplaced Pages

Mayfair Ltd v Pears

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Mayfair Ltd v Pears
CourtCourt of Appeal of New Zealand
Full case name Mayfair Ltd v Brian George Pears
Citation 1 NZLR 459
TranscriptHigh Court judgment
Court membership
Judges sittingCooke P, McMullin J, Somers J
Keywords
negligence

Mayfair Ltd v Pears 1 NZLR 459 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding whether or not strict liability applies in tort.

Background

Brian Pears parked his car on a parking deck of a Wellington building, without the permission of the building's owner, Mayfair Limited, effectively trespassing. Later that night, for unknown reasons, the car mysteriously exploded, starting a fire in the building, causing $8,475.81 in damage to the building.

Pears refused to pay for the damage.

Held

The court ruled that whilst there was strict liability in tort for the escape of fire, the court limited this to cases where the escape of fire was from land or buildings. Here the escape of fire was merely from a chattel (a car), meaning there was no strict liability for the resulting damage, and as the fire was not attributed to any negligence on his part, Mayfair's claim was struck out.

References

  1. McLay, Geoff (2003). Butterworths Student Companion Torts (4th ed.). LexisNexis. ISBN 0-408-71686-X.


Stub icon

This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: