1983 United States Supreme Court case
| Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. Commissioner | |
|---|---|
 Supreme Court of the United States | |
| Argued January 12, 1983 Decided March 29, 1983 | |
| Full case name | Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. Commissioner |
| Citations | 460 U.S. 575 (more)103 S. Ct. 1365; 75 L. Ed. 2d 295; 1983 U.S. LEXIS 6 |
| Case history | |
| Prior | 314 N.W.2d 201 (Min. 1981) |
| Holding | |
| Special taxes imposed on ink and paper are unconstitutional under the First Amendment. | |
| Court membership | |
| |
| Case opinions | |
| Majority | O'Connor, joined by Burger, Brennan, Marshall, Stevens, Powell (in full); White (in part; Blackmun (in part) |
| Concur/dissent | White |
| Dissent | Rehnquist |
| Laws applied | |
| U.S. Const. amend. I | |
Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. Commissioner, 460 U.S. 575 (1983), was an opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States authored by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor overturning a use tax on paper and ink in excess of $100,000 consumed in any calendar year. The Minneapolis Star Tribune initially paid the tax and sued for a refund.
Opinion of the Court
On its face, this ruling finds that state tax systems cannot treat the press differently from any other business without significant and substantial justification. Writing for the Court Justice O'Connor explains that "y creating this special use tax, which to our knowledge is without parallel in the State's tax scheme, Minnesota has singled out the press for special treatment". The state of Minnesota demonstrated no such justification to impose a special tax on a select few newspaper publishers. Therefore, this tax was in violation of the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of the press.
Justice O'Connor writes that there is evidence that "differential taxation of the press would have troubled the Framers of the First Amendment". The Antifederalists objected that no guarantee of free press was included in the initial proposal of the Constitution. She quotes Richard Henry Lee.
An alternative means exists of achieving the state interest of raising revenue like general taxation of businesses.
See also
Further reading
- Schwartz, Bernard (1992). Freedom of the Press. New York: Facts on File. ISBN 0-8160-2505-3.
External links
- Text of Minneapolis Star Tribune Co. v. Commissioner, 460 U.S. 575 (1983) is available from: CourtListener Findlaw Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress OpenJurist Oyez (oral argument audio)
 | This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |