Misplaced Pages

Quasi-syllogism

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Categorical syllogism
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Quasi-syllogism" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Quasi-syllogism is a categorical syllogism where one of the premises is singular, and thus not a categorical statement.

For example:

  1. All men are mortal
  2. Socrates is a man
  3. Socrates is mortal

In the above argument, while premise 1 is a categorical, premise 2 is a singular statement referring to one individual. While this is a valid logical form, it is not strictly a categorical syllogism.

Of course, it has been suggested that you can translate any singular statement into a categorical.

For example:

  1. Socrates is a man
  2. All members of a class of which the only member is Socrates are men

The above two premises may be considered identical, but the first is a singular and the second is a categorical.

See also

References

  1. Hamby, Benjamin. "ISSA Proceedings 2010 – "Toulmin's Analytic Arguments" : Rozenberg Quarterly". Retrieved 2024-08-12.
Categories: