Misplaced Pages

Shattock v Devlin

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.
Find sources: "Shattock v Devlin" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (August 2019)

Shattock v Devlin
CourtHigh Court of New Zealand
Full case name W R Shattock (senior) First Plaintiff, B A Clements Second Plaintiff, W R Shattock (junior) Third Plaintiff v E J Devlin First Defendant, J P McDonnell Second Defendant, The Attorney-General sued in respect of the New Zealand Police Third Defendant
Decided8 January 1990
Citation 2 NZLR 88
Court membership
Judge sittingWylie J
Keywords
negligence

Shattock v Devlin 2 NZLR 88 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the defence of Implied license to enter a property to a trespass claim.

References

  1. McLay, Geoff (2003). Butterworths Student Companion Torts (4th ed.). LexisNexis. ISBN 0-408-71686-X.


Stub icon

This article relating to case law in New Zealand is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: