Misplaced Pages

Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of N. Y. State Crime Victims Bd.)

This article relies largely or entirely on a single source. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help improve this article by introducing citations to additional sources.
Find sources: "Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (March 2011)
1991 United States Supreme Court case
Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 15, 1991
Decided December 9, 1991
Full case nameSimon & Schuster, INC., petitioner v. Members of New York State Crime Victims Board et al.
Citations502 U.S. 105 (more)112 S. Ct. 501; 116 L. Ed. 2d 476; 1991 U.S. LEXIS 7172
Case history
Prior724 F. Supp. 170 (S.D.N.Y. 1989); affirmed, 916 F.2d 777 (2d Cir. 1990); cert. granted, 498 U.S. 1081 (1991).
Holding
The New York Son of Sam law violated the First Amendment.
Court membership
Chief Justice
William Rehnquist
Associate Justices
Byron White · Harry Blackmun
John P. Stevens · Sandra Day O'Connor
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
David Souter · Clarence Thomas
Case opinions
MajorityO'Connor, joined by Rehnquist, White, Stevens, Scalia, Souter
ConcurrenceBlackmun
ConcurrenceKennedy
Thomas took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. I, Son of Sam law

Simon & Schuster v. Crime Victims Board, 502 U.S. 105 (1991), was a Supreme Court case dealing with Son of Sam laws, which are state laws that prevent convicted criminals from publishing books about their crime for profit. Simon & Schuster challenged the law's application to profits from Nicholas Pileggi's book Wiseguy: Life in a Mafia Family, which was written with paid assistance from former mobster Henry Hill. The court struck down the Son of Sam law in New York on the ground that the law was violative of the First Amendment, which protects free speech. Nevertheless, similar laws in other states remain unchallenged. The opinion of the court was written by Sandra Day O'Connor.

In the wake of this case, New York modified its law to apply to any economic benefits derived from criminal activities, not just proceeds from publications.

References

  1. Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Crime Victims Board, 502 U.S. 105 (1991).
  2. "Son-of-Sam Law". Gale Encyclopedia of US History. The Gale Group. 2006. Retrieved October 24, 2012.

External links

U.S. Supreme Court Freedom of Speech Clause case law
First Amendment to the United States Constitution
Unprotected speech
Clear and
present danger

and imminent
lawless action
Defamation and
false speech
Fighting words and
the heckler's veto
True threats and
threatening the
President of the
United States
Obscenity
Speech integral
to criminal conduct
Strict scrutiny
Overbreadth and
Vagueness doctrines
Symbolic speech
versus conduct
Content-based
restrictions
Content-neutral
restrictions
In the
public forum
Designated
public forum
Nonpublic
forum
Compelled speech
Compelled subsidy
of others' speech
Government grants
and subsidies
Government speech
Loyalty oaths
School speech
Public employees
Hatch Act and
similar laws
Licensing and
restriction of speech
Commercial speech
Campaign finance and
political speech
Anonymous speech
State action
Official retaliation
Boycotts
Prisons
Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: