Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 19:04, January 4, 2025 (JST, Reiwa 7) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
Note: Please do not move this page to "Nanpo". As according to WP:MOS, the more common romanization is used here. Ota Nampo got 500+ hits on Google, while Ota Nanpo got 200+. I have personally, in my experience, only ever seen Nampo, never Nanpo used. Thank you. LordAmeth10:26, 30 May 2006 (UTC)
I did a search today on google but "Ōta Nampo" got 494 hits while "Ōta Nanpo" got 647 hits. If there isn't a drastic difference, official spelling according to an author or company, etc., maybe we should stick with the official romanization. —Tokek (talk) 22:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
