Misplaced Pages

Talk:(144898) 2004 VD17

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconAstronomy: Astronomical objects / Solar System Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Misplaced Pages.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Astronomical objects, which collaborates on articles related to astronomical objects.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Solar System task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Apophis

I do believe Apophis topped the list until Feb. I will look into it. -- 67.175.129.59 15 March 2006‎

Update

Please update the data @ http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/a144898.html -- 83.10.113.145 31 January 2007

Orbital speed

Can someone compute the mean orbital speed. It is straight forward given the orbital data we have but I don't have enough facility with mathematical tools to be at all confident in my own calculations. 15,000 km/s can't be right, can it? Eluchil404 13:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

You are off by a roughly a factor of 10^4, but that is just me doing the calculations in my head. Michaelbusch 16:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

New data on (144898) 2004 VD17

Note that this object has been removed from the JPL Risk page following observations in February 2008. It is still on the NEODys site but the Palermo Scale ratings have fallen. Pdthomas23 (talk) 11:59, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Estimated diameter

Article says 580 metres diameter, and infobox says 0.5-1.1 km - Which is latest/best estimate ? (The Torino scale values depend on the mass estimate) - Rod57 (talk) 08:58, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Neither. 580m assumes an albedo of ~0.15 with H=18.8. 500-1100 meters in more the albedo range 0.25 (460m) to 0.05 (1000m). -- Kheider (talk) 12:50, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Categories: