Misplaced Pages

Talk:.500 Maximum

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the .500 Maximum article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
This article is rated Stub-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFirearms Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I have removed the statement from this article that the .500 Maxnimum "is more powerful than the .500 S&W Magnum" this statement is completely false, even comparing the ballistics charts on their respective wiki pages shows far higher KE numbers listed for the S&W. The statement was likely a biased remark by a .500 Maximum owner, and the sourcing behind the statement led only to a dead link. Regardless the difference in energy between the two is vast, and in favor of the .500 S&W, I have changed the page to omit comparisons between the two. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.205.213.53 (talk) 21:25, 8 February 2011 (UTC)

Categories: