Misplaced Pages

Fault coverage

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
(Redirected from Test quality)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Fault coverage" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

Fault coverage refers to the percentage of some type of fault that can be detected during the test of any engineered system. High fault coverage is particularly valuable during manufacturing test, and techniques such as Design For Test (DFT) and automatic test pattern generation are used to increase it.

Applications

Digital electronics

In digital electronics, fault coverage refers to stuck-at fault coverage. It is measured by sticking each pin of the hardware model at logic '0' and logic '1', respectively, and running the test vectors. If at least one of the outputs differs from what is to be expected, the fault is said to be detected. Conceptually, the total number of simulation runs is twice the number of pins (since each pin is stuck in one of two ways, and both faults should be detected). However, there are many optimizations that can reduce the needed computation. In particular, often many non-interacting faults can be simulated in one run, and each simulation can be terminated as soon as a fault is detected.

A fault coverage test passes when at least a specified percentage of all possible faults can be detected. If it does not pass, at least three options are possible. First, the designer can augment or otherwise improve the vector set, perhaps by using a more effective automatic test pattern generation tool. Second, the circuit may be re-defined for better fault detectability (improved controllability and observability). Third, the designer may simply accept the lower coverage.

See also

References

  1. Williams, Thomas W.; Sunter, Stephen K. (2000). How Should Fault Coverage Be Defined?. 18th IEEE VLSI Test Symposium (VTS 2000), 30 April - 4 May 2000, Montreal, Canada. pp. 325–328. doi:10.1109/VTS.2000.10003.

External links

Categories: