Misplaced Pages

United States v. Tsarnaev

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
An editor has performed a search and found that sufficient sources exist to establish the subject's notability. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "United States v. Tsarnaev" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "United States v. Tsarnaev" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (November 2024) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)
2022 United States Supreme Court case
United States v. Tsarnaev
Supreme Court of the United States
Argued October 13, 2021
Decided March 4, 2022
Full case nameUnited States v. Tsarnaev
Docket no.20-443
Citations595 U.S. ___ (more)
ArgumentOral argument
Holding
A defendant is entitled to an impartial panel of jurors, not necessarily a panel of jurors who know nothing about the case. Death sentence reinstated.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Clarence Thomas · Stephen Breyer
Samuel Alito · Sonia Sotomayor
Elena Kagan · Neil Gorsuch
Brett Kavanaugh · Amy Coney Barrett
Case opinions
MajorityThomas, joined by Roberts, Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Barrett
ConcurrenceBarrett, joined by Gorsuch
DissentBreyer, joined by Sotomayor, Kagan (except part II-C)

United States v. Tsarnaev, 595 U.S. ___ (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that a defendant is entitled to an impartial panel of jurors, not necessarily a panel of jurors who know nothing about the case. The decision reinstated Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's death sentence for his role in the Boston Marathon bombing.

Description

Principally, the majority opinion written by Justice Thomas emphasized that the abuse of discretion standard only allows reviewing courts to reverse decisions that are "manifestly unreasonable." He disposed of most arguments by saying the trial court was not so "manifestly unreasonable."

In dissent, Justice Breyer asserted that the trial court did not meet the abuse of discretion standard. In one part, Breyer alluded to his general opposition to the death penalty; Justices Kagan and Sotomayor declined to join that part of the dissent.

References

  1. ^ United States v. Tsarnaev, No. 20-443, 595 U.S. ___ (2022).
  2. "In 6-3 ruling, court reinstates death penalty for Boston Marathon bomber". SCOTUSblog. 2022-03-04. Retrieved 2024-10-31.

External links

  • Text of United States v. Tsarnaev, No. 20-443, 595 U.S. ___ (2022) is available from: Justia
Stub icon

This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: