Misplaced Pages

User:"kadderley/Novella Bridges/Atom (Jack B) Peer Review

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User:"kadderley | Novella Bridges

General info

Whose work are you reviewing?

Users: kadderly, CIS50-F24-MTL, Washington1996

Link to draft you're reviewing
User:"kadderley/Novella Bridges
Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
User:"kadderley/Novella Bridges

Evaluate the drafted changes

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Your team's drafted article about Novella Bridges does a great job of giving the reader an understanding of who Novella is and her contributions to the STEM world, especially her contributions to nuclear security. The lead adequately portrays her general expertise and importance; however, it could benefit from a small addition about her career trajectory and largest achievement to recognize her extensive achievements and one specific achievement that stands out to her. A more comprehensive lead would provide the reader with all the information they need from the get-go about the purpose of the article.

Lead

  • Strengths: It effectively introduces Bridges, setting a strong foundation for her profile.
  • Suggestions: Expand on the Lead to concisely outline all main sections, particularly her work and contributions, so readers can easily follow the structure of the article.

Content

  • Relevance: The article appropriately focuses on her education, career, and impact.
  • Suggestions: Consider adding recent developments in her career or key achievements in nuclear security to make the article more comprehensive. These additions would provide a better picture of her ongoing influence.

Tone and Balance

  • Strengths: The article maintains a neutral and factual tone.
  • Suggestions: Ensure that any notable recognitions are backed by reliable sources to prevent any appearance of bias.

Sources and References

  • Strengths: Existing references are credible, lending validity to the article.
  • Suggestions: Look for additional recent or scholarly sources to further support her accomplishments and confirm that all reference links work properly.

Organization

  • Strengths: The article follows a logical and clear structure.
  • Suggestions: Simplify or explain technical terms related to nuclear security for broader accessibility.