This is a Wikipedia user page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user in whose space this page is located may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:%D0%A8%D0%B8%D0%B7%D0%BE%D0%BC%D0%B1%D0%B8/Brainstorming_PORNBIO. |
On this subpage I'm drafting some thoughts to present for discussion on Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (people) regarding WP:PORNBIO and/or to develop into a notability essay but am not ready to do so yet.
Articles regarding pornographic actors have presented problems on Misplaced Pages. This may also be true of articles regarding pornographic directors, pornographic movies, etc. but that does not seem to be as big an issue. (But porn is probably dealt with more strictly than the guidelines of Misplaced Pages:Notability (people)#Creative professionals Misplaced Pages:Notability (films).)
Some past discussions of PORNBIO:
- pornbio prefix:Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (pornographic actors)
- pornbio prefix:Misplaced Pages talk:Notability (people)
Some search links for prior AfDs on pornographic actors:
- intitle:"porn star" prefix:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion (definitely AfDs on pornographic actor articles) 66 as of 08:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- intitle:"pornographic actor" prefix:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion (definitely AfDs on pornographic actor articles) 4 as of 08:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- intitle:"pornographic actress" prefix:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion (definitely AfDs on pornographic actor articles) 8 as of 08:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- PORNBIO prefix:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion (probably mostly AfDs on pornographic actor articles) 717 as of 08:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- porn prefix:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion (probably more of a mix of articles) 1,665 as of 08:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- pornography prefix:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion (probably more of a mix of articles) 1,073 as of 08:20, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Pornography/Deletion
- Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Pornography/Article alerts
Problems with articles
A number have little more than:
- a statement that “X is an actor in pornography”
- the appropriate categories, including at least one that is Category:Pornographic film actors or one or more subcategories thereof
- a {{Infobox adult male}} or {{Infobox adult female}}
- sourcing may be limited to two or three of the potential site links in the infobox, the Internet Adult Film Database, the European Girls Adult Film Database, British Girls Adult Film Database, the Internet Movie Database, and the Internet Adult Film Database.
Stub articles can be problematic, e.g. Misplaced Pages:Avoiding common mistakes#Creating... (an unclassified Misplaced Pages: namespace projectpage) asserts that there are "Articles which are too short to have encyclopedic value." Stubs such as described above come close to meeting the "A3. No content" criterion for speedy deletion, "Any article consisting only of external links, category tags".
Problems with Articles for Deletion discussions
Things that seem to recur:
- Articles for Deletion’s Before nominating an article for deletion is often not followed.
- some Wikipedians have an open contempt for pornography and want most or all such articles deleted
- a nominator's reason for deletion: "Delete because it is offensive, pornographic, and can serve no possible purpose." Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Peter North (porn star)
- a contributor's reason for deletion: "Misplaced Pages should not tolerate or promote obscenity." Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Abihail
- a nominator's subsequent comment: "Its absolutely disgusting that we have something on the order of 1,000+ porn actor articles, when there probably aren't more than a a few dozen (and I'm being charitable with that figure) who genuinely merit authentic notability." Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Aja (pornographic actress)
- some pornography fans may want all or most such articles kept
- some argue saying an individual is an actor in pornography is a BLP violation
- some argue the birthname or legal name of the actor must be known
- part of a nominator's reason: "We don't even know her birth name for sure." Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Asia Carrera
- a contributor's comment: "She's a porn star and so she has this stage last name related to orgasm and semen. I think if that is not her real name then it detracts from the article's notability." Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Cummings
- part of a contributor's reason for deletion "we don't even have the real name" Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Cameo (porn star)
- some argue the actor must have notability outside of pornography, such as mainstream media coverage.
- WP:PORNBIO is seen as overly restrictive or permissive
- some articles which are kept are resubmitted until deleted:
- pornbio intitle:"2nd nomination" prefix:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion 90 as of 08:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- pornbio intitle:"second nomination" prefix:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion 10 as of 08:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- 100 2nd nominations total, about 1.5% of all 2nd nominations using my searches and totals at Template talk:Afdx#Repeated AfD nominations
- pornbio intitle:"3rd nomination" prefix:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion 15 as of 08:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- 15 3rd nominations total, about 2.2% of all 3rd nominations using my searches and totals at Template talk:Afdx#Repeated AfD nominations
- porn* intitle:nomination prefix:Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion (includes some additional porn actor AfDs, AfDs of lists of porn stars, lists of porn movies, sex acts, and non-pornography-related AfDs that referenced porn) 270 as of 08:24, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- Resubmission is permissible, see Misplaced Pages:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions#Repeated nominations AKA WP:KEEPLISTINGTILITGETSDELETED and see also Misplaced Pages:Perennial proposals#Numerical rules for deletion, but it has the potential for abuse. I haven't found a guide indicating why/when it should be done or noting the potential for abuse so far. Шизомби (talk) 08:37, 21 December 2009 (UTC)
- the existence or keeping of articles on actors in pornography sometimes is resented by editors arguing for the notability of authors or other people
- "one of England's 'leading cultural critics' is apparently not, by Misplaced Pages editor consensus, as notable as a moderately obese middle-aged woman who films herself having sex with dogs, and the TLS is apparently by the same consensus not a "major" publication with the stature and reputation of Color Climax Anal Sex or Big Fuckin' Tits, or even Juggs," Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Ophelia Benson
Notability and Verifiability
It is likely that general indicators of notability can be found for many actors, and specific indicators can be found for some. The problem with articles about them might be less one of notability and more that secondary sources can be hard to come by.
Notability
One of the more concrete measures of notability are Category:Pornographic film awards and mainstream media coverage. However, there are other things to look for.
Verifiability
Pornography is somewhat emphemeral in nature; older movies and magazines are generally harder to find as there is a promotion of and/or interest in the newest performers, in the newest movies, doing new things. This was true of non-pornographic films as well; most silent-era films are lost. As the articles on lost films and ephemera note, (also garbology and probably others as well); things that may have been considered to have little or no value at the moment of their creation or things considered to have lost their value after their initial intended use are now objects of study and collectibles. Pornography has further suffered in that it is also widely considered obscene and taboo, and thus has often historically been kept secretive and been subject to censorship, including destruction by authorities.
Pornographic periodicals are relatively unlikely to have created their own indexes, and there may not even be many indexes created by others such as are available for many magazines and journals.
Pornography Studies as a distinct academic field seems relatively new; Professor Linda Williams’ Hard Core: Power, Pleasure and the Frenzy of the Visible and Porn Studies are examples. Nevertheless, many libraries have holdings for long-running, prominent pornographical periodicals such as Playboy Holdings for publications specializing in adult films such as Adam Film WorldAdult Video Newsappear to be more limited. ] may have some; some in Category:Sexology may, e.g. the Kinsey Institute for Research in Sex, Gender, and Reproduction does. Sex-positive feminism and Anti-pornography feminism#Feminist objections have also studied the subject; the Andrea Dworkin Papers at the Schlesinger Library at Harvard University have print and film pornography she collected for her research, and this may be true of other special collections as well.