Misplaced Pages

User talk:ßlaïsi Furstqurzel

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

Nomination of Sanders-Trump dream ticket for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sanders-Trump dream ticket is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Sanders-Trump dream ticket until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cahk (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, ßlaïsi Furstqurzel, and welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Liz 19:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Welcome to Misplaced Pages: check out the Teahouse!

Teahouse logo Hello! ßlaïsi Furstqurzel, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Misplaced Pages for new editors to ask questions about editing Misplaced Pages, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz 19:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)


I prefer chai latte over actual tea. Sorry. --ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (talk) 19:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   ‑ iridescent 20:00, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked without warning, and I have not been notified about what 'personal attacks' I have made. Please enlighten me. ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (talk) 20:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

So you have no idea? The harassment was here. Good block. Bishonen | talk 20:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That edit was an innocent mistake, I was preparing to use that word (which is scientific, not racist) in a article and I got confused and used it on some editors home page. ßlaïsi Furstqurzel (talk) 20:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I'm sure you meant to use "bloody awful" in an article as well? Obvious troll is obvious. Talk page access revoked. Huon (talk) 20:12, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.