Misplaced Pages

User talk:*90Aa

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

*90Aa (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is extremely unfair, rude and discriminating. Just because I want to report users at SPI does not give you administrators the right to block me. I come to light, in good faith, hoping to benefit the Misplaced Pages project in at least one way, but you administrators and SPI helpers take everything the wrong way. It happens every time. I've read numerous unblock requests with legitimate reasons acknowledging their block and intent to help Misplaced Pages, yet, you administrators like to cause misery in one's life. And I know what you admins will say: "Checkuser has confirmed that although you have no connection with Blu Aardvark, you have connections with Paquito590." Who the hell is Paquito590? Not even once did I mention that user in my reports. Oh and I know another excuse you admins will create to prevent unblocking me: "Attempting to connect unrelated accounts is grounds for blocking." Well let me explain. First of all, I had no idea if the accounts were related or not; that's why I brought up the topic at Aardvark's SPI. And second, no where in the blocking policy does it say that "if a user's first edits are getting involved with SPI, or anti-vandalism fighting, administrators must block those users." I feel this block is completely unjust and based on discrimination. And if indeed, I am connected with Paquito590, please know that I just looked at his contributions, and at no point in time did he ever commit acts of vandalism or destruction in Misplaced Pages. He always did his best to help the project. I feel that I have done nothing wrong, and that I have been blocked just because I wanted to engage in vandalism-fighting. And fine, fine, I admit that I my conclusions that Mr. Cookie 715, 204.108.65.36 and that third IP user, was related to Blu Aardvark were wrong. I just had no clue whether the accounts were connected since I have no ability to run checks like checkusers can. But I was wrong about my assumptions as Bbb23 pointed out. Please unblock me, I never intended to hurt Misplaced Pages, in fact, I think you are the ones hurting me. *90Aa (talk) 00:39, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you've read many unblock requests you'll understand that  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me. Max Semenik (talk) 01:13, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block Discussion

*90Aa will remain indefinitely blocked due to abusing WP:SPI. 64.60.149.69 (talk) 00:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

@MaxSem: Oh, so you what you are basically telling me is that you are siding with the other admins and claiming that it is completely acceptable to discriminate a user for anti-vandalism efforts? From your response, it seems to me that you clearly refused to understand my point of view and are claiming that I am indeed related to Paquito590. Why? Why do you administrators always pride yourself in bashing users when they actually have proved they are good to Misplaced Pages? But oh well, I guess Adding The Truth is right, you guys completely ignore our reasoning and choose to punish people for simply correctly claiming they have done nothing wrong. *90Aa (talk) 01:33, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Yup, exactly what I thought. No response. Oh well, at least I now know that my theory is correct, that you administrators discriminate users just for engaging in anti-vandalistic POSITIVE actions. Ok, well in that case maybe a lawsuit against Misplaced Pages administration should be in order?
On another note, many of you administrators have the tendency to just decline unblock requests, no unblock request is ever good enough for consideration, in spite of editors like me actually demonstrating intent to positively contribute. I hope Wikimedia staff look into Misplaced Pages's administration practices and stop these abusive administrator actions. *90Aa (talk) 05:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
I know your talk page access was removed and you can't reply, but it looks like MaxSem (or Max Semenik) really hates you or something. He didn't even respond to your messages. He just straight up revoked your talk page access because he didn't like your message. These actions indeed prove MaxSem is discriminating you by preventing you from making your argument. I'd indeed recommend you sue Misplaced Pages administration and let your lawyer know how MaxSem refused to work with you to find a reasonable unblock. (By the way, any admin removing this comment also proves they are discriminating people and don't deserve to be admins. Sorry if this offends you admins, but how else can we tell you the truth?) If you're interested *90Aa, you can appeal again at WP:UTRS. Cheers. 2602:306:CC0B:CD20:493B:7EEF:B4A4:C3D (talk) 05:37, 9 August 2018 (UTC)
I disagree with both of you. *90Aa clearly abused SPI by claiming blocked accounts had an association with the banned user. He wasted administrator's time. As for why Max Semenik revoked your talk page access without discussing with you, I believe he saw no need to argue with you given the arrogant tone you used in your messages and unblock request. He already foresaw that this discussion would break out into a massively long line of arguments leading to no consensus in understanding the block or in finding a more reasonable ground to unblock. Also, you marked your unblock request as accepted when in reality it was declined. That's why Max Semenik refused to discuss with you and cut your talk page access. The World Atlas (talk) 05:50, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Supporters of unblock

Calling all Wikipedians! We need your help in voicing support for the unblock of *90Aa. He claims to have been blocked unfairly and attempted to discuss with a reviewing admin (MaxSem) about his block. MaxSem revoked his talk page access just because he didn't like the message and the idea of discussing the block with him. Please show support for *90Aa's unblock! Together we can prove his innocence and the fact that admins wrongly blocked him. Please sign using four tildes below if you think *90Aa is correct and should at least be given the opportunity to discuss his block on this talk page.

Opposers of unblock

If you believe *90Aa incorrectly interpreted his block and there are indeed good reasons to keep him blocked, sign with four tildes below. Please give an explanation or endorse another user's explanation for why *90Aa should remain blocked.

  • Strong oppose - Clearly this user incorrectly accused three already blocked users of being associated with Blu Aardvark and made administrators waste their time in not only determining that those accounts had no connection with the banned editor but also in investigating whether this user had any correlation with the banned editor. He clearly abused SPI and was blocked fair and square. Keep him blocked indefinitely. The World Atlas (talk) 05:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)

Neutral

Vote neutral by signing with four tildes below if you do not have an opinion about *90Aa's block or if you are unsure of taking a position on the matter.

Discussion pertaining to this unblock petition

Feel free to discuss *90Aa's block below. You may present arguments for or against *90Aa prior to making a vote. It is recommended that the blocking admin and unblock request reviewer state their points of view so all parties get a better understanding of *90Aa's block.

IMPORTANT: Administrators who remove the above sections and block the proposer (creator of this discussion) are subject to intense penalties on behalf of the Misplaced Pages Arbitration Committee, including potential desysopping on the basis of discrimination, violation of Freedom of Speech as outlined in the 1st amendment of the United States Constitution and refusal to work with the blocked user to find a reasonable understanding and validity for his block. Please respect these sections and give opportunity to understand *90Aa's block in-depth.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.