Revision as of 16:40, 8 December 2007 editCoren (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,492 editsm Unprotected User talk:Alexia Death: Allow user to post {{unblock}}← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 06:35, 17 November 2022 edit undoಮಲ್ನಾಡಾಚ್ ಕೊಂಕ್ಣೊ (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users94,900 edits orphaned {{Auto archiving notice}} per TFD | ||
(46 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
] | ] | ||
{{mbox | |||
{{AutoArchivingNotice|age=14|target=./Archive {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}|dounreplied=no|index=./Archive index|bot=Werdnabot|botlink=User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Howto}}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-14 Target-User talk:Alexia Death/Archive {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}--><!--werdnabot-index User talk:Alexia Death/Archive index--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
| demospace = <!-- Used in the /doc, don't remove. --> | |||
| type = notice | |||
| image = ] | |||
| style = | |||
| text = | |||
This {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}|talk}} page is automatically ]{{#if:Werdnabot| by ]}}. Any threads with no replies in '''14 days''' may be automatically moved{{#if:|./Archive {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}|{{#ifexist:{{#rel2abs:./Archive {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}| to ]}}. {{#ifeq:no|no|Threads with fewer than two timestamps (no replies) are not archived|Sections without timestamps are not archived}}. {{#if:./Archive index|An archive index is available ].}}}} | |||
| small = | |||
| smallimage = ] | |||
| smalltext = | |||
This {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{TALKSPACE}}|talk}} page is automatically ]{{#if:Werdnabot| by ]}}. Threads with no replies in '''14 days''' may be automatically moved.{{#if:./Archive {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}|{{#ifexist:{{#rel2abs:./Archive {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}}}| ]}}. {{#if:./Archive index|An archive index is available ].}}}} | |||
}}<!-- BEGIN WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE --><!-- This page is automatically archived by Werdnabot-->{{User:Werdnabot/Archiver/Linkhere}} <!--This is an empty template, but transcluding it counts as a link, meaning Werdnabot is directed to this page - DO NOT SUBST IT --><!--Werdnabot-Archive Age-14 Target-User talk:Alexia Death/Archive {{CURRENTMONTHABBREV}} {{CURRENTYEAR}}--><!--werdnabot-index User talk:Alexia Death/Archive index--><!--END WERDNABOT ARCHIVAL CODE--> | |||
==Merry XMAS== | |||
===Military history Baltic states task force=== | |||
] ], in the midsts of ], wish you to enjoy this ]!]] | |||
please take a look at this ] --] 18:08, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== |
== asking for an interview == | ||
Hello Alexia! | |||
Hello! As we did for last year's election, we are again compiling a ]. This table contains a column "Portfolio" for links that display candidates' pertinent skills. I will be going through each candidate's statements and gradually populate the column, but this may take some time. Please feel free to add some links in the form <nowiki></nowiki> if you feel it shows conflict resolution skills, or <nowiki></nowiki> otherwise. It would also be helpful if you can check if the information about you is correct. | |||
I'm a research student currently working on the power structure of Misplaced Pages. It looks like you have a very critical view on how the things have been done, and your point is interesting me. Could we talk together about that in a time? | |||
All Best, | |||
Sylvain | |||
==Pics== | |||
My motivation is that as a voter, I don't want to just rely on a candidate's words, but also see {{genderneutral|eir}} actions. Moreover, I believe a portfolio of "model cases" to remember in difficult situations can be useful for each candidate, as well. I believe that conflict resolution skills are most pertinent to the position, but if you want to highlight other skills, please feel free to use a new letter and add it to ]. — ] 05:45, 28 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Hey, could you upload some of your pics to Commons? Right now, Sõrve säär picture can't be used in other wikis. ] (]) 14:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC) | |||
==Image copyright problem with File:Mindflayer.jpg== | |||
: It appears you have been inactive except for one edit in the last 10 days. — ] 02:05, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
Thanks for uploading ]. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of ], but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets ]. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an ] linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check | |||
:* That there is a ] on the image's description page for each article the image is used in. | |||
::I have and will be inactive due to real life situations for a little while more. I will see early December how this will translate to my candidacy for arbcom. Most likely I will withdraw it. There are more rewarding projects calling out to me and my time is limited, tho I will always be around as a watchful eye.--] (]) 05:12, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
:* That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page. | |||
<!-- Additional 10c list header goes here --> | |||
This is an automated notice by ]. For assistance on the image use policy, see ]. --] (]) 10:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: Thank you for your openness! I know how it feels when our time is limited! If you like, we could chat about what kind of tasks you enjoy. — ] 06:34, 30 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Your post to User talk:Jimbo Wales == | |||
==RE: "I cant say I will join in on the I wait you back thing"== | |||
Are you looking to get blocked, revert warring over adding that, obviously, harassing line? Tread lightly. ] 17:57, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
: No I'm not, I'm just being truthful AND kind, wishing all the good things for someone away. Nothing derogatory or baiting or harassing in saying what I think. Really, I do NOT appreciate the reactions, this place is going nowhere really fast if this keeps up. Relax dude. And FYI I reverted just ONCE. Would not have done even that if the one removing my remark would have not been somebody taking offense by association to a truthful expression of good will.--] 19:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
::You are taking too much liberty with innuendo and escalating disputes, so just stop right now. ] 19:50, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
:No "little sunshine," no needing "chocolate" — limit that to your friends. You are still not trying to remain professional and matter of fact. ] 19:53, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
:Escalating!? See my post on Jerochimans page before you got involved. "Thus is life." I said. I was done with it. And now YOU are escalating it. Really do relax man. This is ridiculous.--] 19:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
::This dispute, which you started for naught, and your interactions therefrom, has not been to your credit. Now, go do something else. ] 19:58, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Per my comments I have redacted your post to Jimbo's talkpage. I have noted Newyorkbrad's request at the ArbCom page that participants to the matter should refrain from acting without due consideration to the sensitive nature of the matter, and it is my belief that your question to Jimbo fails that test. Your comment remains in the history, so Jimbo is easily able to review it and decide to answer if he chooses - but it is my belief that he will not do so under the circumstances. I strongly suggest that you constrain yourself to commenting on this matter only on the ArbCom pages relating to it. ] (]) 12:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Since you revert warred with me, over restoring the inflammatory "you guys could do with little sunshine in your lives," you've been blocked. ] 20:01, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
:It was posted in good faith that such an important issue needs his attention. I do not agree with your rationale that he should be somehow protected from this nor do I accept your authority to make such a decision. However I will not restore the comment, because it would be quite pointless. --] (]) 13:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
:You just cant stop cant you... I started? Thats rich, the dispute stared at some people reverting my expression of good will and others like you overreacting. BTW, I WAS doing something else before you arrived things went south thank you. And thanks for the block too. It makes very clear where you stand and what you represent, and sadly where this project is going. The Durova style at work I see. Were you part of that particular gang up list?--] 20:06, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
::My ''"authority"'' is that this is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit - I have no authority other than that. I am however experienced enough to know that Jimbo is generally aware of matters involving ArbCom and I am fairly certain he is aware of this specific issue. If indeed I was protecting anyone with my action, that person is you. The ArbCom have specifically requested that concerned individuals be very circumspect with regard to their actions or comments relating to this matter, and my actions were generally in relation to that request. I would again confirm that I have no other authority than my desire to serve as I see the best interests of the project, and in closing I would express my gratitude that you took no action in respect of mine (other than to voice your disagreement.) ] (]) 19:08, 18 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
::Saying to someone who recently left that you're not looking forward to them coming back is taking what you call "truthful" a bit too far. You defending it, with the "chocolate," and the "sunshine" and other types innuendo, and also the support you got from someone who views said user as "a liar and a hate monger" (unsurprisingly, you found his block for that indignant insult "uncalled for"), does not paints a pretty picture. Certainly, not one that speaks of goodwill and "true" friendliness (as in, one that utilizes one's diplomatic faculties and sensitive skills, for good). Rather, it appears as slow, gradual provocations. So, again, please limit that sort of "chat" to your friends, and with everyone else (at least your opponents), remain professional, also, when they're absent and unable to respond. ] 20:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::What happened to ]? Did it die out of disregard while I was inactive? shesh...--] 20:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Please comment here == | |||
::::What do you expect me to say to that? AGF is not a suicide pact. ] 20:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
]. --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]|]</span></sub> 19:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::PS: Where is my block notice so I can ignore it?--] 20:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
::::I'm not sure I understand your question. ] 20:17, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Re : ] == | |||
:::::You are supposed to put a Block notice on my talk page so I can request for unblock. You haven't.--] 20:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
::::::No, there is nothing formal set out like that. And, at the event, I have already placed a notice a few comments up. ] 20:27, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
This arbitration case has been closed, and the final decision may be viewed at the link above. | |||
:::::::Really? I seem to remember a big template just for that...--] 20:40, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
::::::::There's {{tl|blocked}}, but it's not mandatory. As for your (irrelevant) question : no, sadly, I was not in Durova's close confidence. If I was, that incident simply would not have happened, as I knew exactly who User:!! was. ] 20:44, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
*''']''' resigned the administrator tools during the case proceedings and may only seek to regain adminship by a new request for adminship or by request to the Arbitration Committee. | |||
:::::::::Oh well... I guess a girl has to provide for herself then.--] 20:55, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
*''']''' is banned for '''three months'''. At the conclusion of his ban, a '''one year''' topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed, shall take effect. | |||
::::::::::I don't know how to read that. ] 21:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
*''']''' is banned for '''one year'''. He is directed to edit Misplaced Pages from only a single user account, and advise the Arbitration Committee of the name of the account that he will use. Should he not advise the committee by the end of the one year ban, he will remain indefinitely banned until a single account is chosen. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
*''']''' is placed on a '''one year''' topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed. This shall take effect following the expiration of both above mentioned bans. | |||
*The following users are topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for '''one year''': | |||
:*''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''', ''']''' | |||
*''']''' is topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for '''six months'''. | |||
*''']''' is strongly admonished for having shared his account password. He is directed to keep his account for his own exclusive use, and not to allow any other person to use it under any circumstance. | |||
*The editors sanctioned above (], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ]) are prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with ] on any page of Misplaced Pages, except for purposes of legitimate and necessary dispute resolution. | |||
*All the participants to the mailing list are strongly admonished against coordinating on-wiki behavior off-wiki and directed to keep discussion of editing and dispute resolution strictly on wiki and in public. All editors are reminded that the editorial process and dispute resolution must take place on Misplaced Pages itself, using the article talk pages and project space for this purpose. No discussion held off-wiki can lead to a valid consensus, the basis of our editorial process. Off-wiki coordination is likely to lead to echo chambers where there is a false appearance of neutrality and consensus. | |||
''For the Arbitration Committee'', | |||
] 17:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC) - | |||
] | |||
== December 2009 == | |||
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The <span class="plainlinks"></span> that you made to the page ] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the ] for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ] for further information. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle1 --> -- ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>\<sup>]</sup>) 20:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to the page ]. Such edits constitute ] and are ]. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the ] for testing. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-huggle2 --> -- ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>\<sup>]</sup>) 20:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
] Please do not ] pages, as you did with <span class="plainlinks"></span> to ]. If you continue to do so, you will be ] from editing. <!-- Template:uw-huggle3 --> -- ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>\<sup>]</sup>) 20:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::* What's the deal here? This isn't the way to get your voice heard. -- ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>\<sup>]</sup>) 20:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::There is no way to get your voice heard. you cant even talk to people on a >curseword< private mail list these days. So Im getting my ban by doing what what people AKA ArbCom assume people, even constructive editors do.--] (]) 20:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
There. Now please make that ban LONGER. Seriously. If ArbCom treats people that bother with this project as rabid loons to be kept away, Id like to be looked OUTSIDE the asylum please.--] (]) 20:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
===Blocked=== | |||
Obviously, for the same reason as on Commons. Protesting is not a legitimate reason for vandalism. ] (]) 20:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::* That was so pointless and sad I want to punch this guy in the noes. If he wanted to get banned, why not just leave and never come back? What the heck? -- ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>\<sup>]</sup>) 20:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: I left. About a year ago. Didnt come back until people started considering my private communication with other people public matter to be discussed in ArbCom. And now Im pissed. Reason took a break. Its probaly not back by 25. please make it longer.--] (]) 20:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::: Also, please point me to a correct venue for wiki equivalent of a picket. Wait... There isnt one.--] (]) 20:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::::* Sure there is. You are given the chance to argue at the ArbCom. Either way, this isn't life, it's a project. If a cool off period is what is prescribed, then take a break (again) and come back with a fresh start. I didn't see the logs, and I don't know the whole story. I can only trust that what was decided was accurate. Even if it wasn't (which I doubt) take a break, take a breath, and come back and write following the guidelines and procedures the editors here have built, or just don't come back. We want you to stay, but if you're going to be like this all the time, I don't want you. -- ] (<sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub>\<sup>]</sup>) 20:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
:::::: All you say at ArbCom is just blabber, nobody cares. Ive been part of two different ones. Same. That trust of yours is misplaced. And why the fuck would I actually bother to edit anything here? Theres this little thing called motivation. Its gone. this little rampage was all that was left of giving a damn. May be pathetic and hey theres fresh blood always incoming to be abused so none of you give a damn but... Some day you might feel the same way... or not. Some people like stress and abuse. Have a nice wikilife while it lasts.--] (]) 20:38, 22 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
Block changed to indef. ] ] 05:03, 23 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
::thanks.--] (]) 09:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC) | |||
== Arbitration motion regarding ] == | |||
Following a <span class="plainlinks"></span> at ]: | |||
Remedy 20 of ] ("Miacek topic banned") is lifted. | |||
''On behalf of the Arbitration Committee,'' ] ''(])'' 00:14, 21 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
:''']''' | |||
== File:Mindflayer.jpg listed for deletion == | |||
A file that you uploaded or altered, ], has been listed at ]. Please see the ] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:Fdw --> ] - ] 16:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC) | |||
== A barnstar for you! == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Surreal Barnstar''' | |||
|- | |- | ||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For being a true eye-opener when the world needed it. —] ''<sup>(])</sup>, 05:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
! I AM BLOCKED FOR SAYING NICE THINGS TO PEOPLE | |||
|- | |||
| Yes, that is so. This is my sin, and then of course reverting THE WRONG PEOPLE(TM) stopping me from explaining my side. | |||
|- | |||
| Why I wont file for an unblock if I find this so unfair? Because a good editor ] is blocked because of me. And why is he blocked? Because the blocking admin went and harassed him until he stepped over the line and said something rather rude. I will sit this one out in solidarity with him. Aggravating situations that are just tempests in a teacup anyway is not what an admin should do. | |||
|} | |} | ||
== Looking for help == | |||
:For my part, I rather doubt you would get such a request granted, but at that is patently false, I did not harass anyone. I said: <tt>Stop trying to demoralize an inactive user (who is your content opponent) when others are attempting to the opposite, both of you.</tt> He responded with: <tt>Content opponent? No, see ]. Just a liar and hate-monger.</tt> Then I issued a 24-hr block, which an unblock-review later concurred with. But I'm evidently outliving my usefulness here. ] 21:03, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
My name is Ivan Robaina Bychko, I´m 18 years old and I´m Cuban. I write to you because right now I´m working in several works about your country in the Spanish wikipedia and outside it. I would need some help of you for translating some text from Estonian into Spanish and knowing some facts about your country that are hard to find in bibliographies. I wrote to you several weeks ago but it seems that somebody erased my request. If you agree to help me, in order to inform me, please write to me at:nayesda.daria@medired.scu.sld.cu | |||
::The review held because of the provoked incivilities. The notice is my self expression. I do not need to show that you are biased to prove this block to be unwarranted. But i wont even try, no point. I will take it up however someday in your admin review.--] 21:08, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
PD: Please, help me. | |||
:::Again, I don't see how my one sentence above preceding the "incivility" (read: gross personal attack) can be seen as a provocation — i.e. implying I attempted to induce it with that single sentence certainly assumes the worse from me. You are, of course, entitled to think whatever you wish and submit any review you see fit at any time, regardless of these considerations. ] 21:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
Why were you really blocked?--] (]) 19:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
== Notification of automated file description generation == | |||
Your upload of ] or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page. | |||
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions ]. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill-null--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
*Another one of your uploads, ], has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill-null--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
*Another one of your uploads, ], has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks!<!--Template:Un-botfill--> ''Message delivered by ] (])'' 14:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
== Clarification motion == | |||
A case (]) in which you were involved has been modified by {{oldid2|631252824|Motion|motion}} which changed the wording of the ] to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --]] 15:32, 27 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
:::PS: Also, having a "conversation" with people you have blocked on pages you know they cant respond is pretty low. Much lower than I expected of you.--] 21:14, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
==MfD nomination of ]== | |||
::::I am not having a conversation with anyone who is blocked; that is a comment to Jehochman and is indented accordingly. ] 21:16, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
] ], a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for ]. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ] and please be sure to ] with four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>). You are free to edit the content of ] during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.<!-- Template:MFDWarning --> ] (]) 11:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
:::::Yes you are. What negativity may I ask!? The source of negativity is you. And now you have driven Sander away. I will NEVER forgive you for that. EVER. You have been on this case the image of what an admin should not be and done what an admin should not do. Somebody should make a textbook case of it for future admins. Really. Fueling the fire with all your might. And you won too. Sander left in disgust. This is incredible. This project is really sinking fast... --] 21:36, 7 December 2007 (UTC) | |||
::::::Of course, you say nothing about the "Hitler with adrenaline overdose" poison in his "temporarily" goodbye message. ] 21:43, 7 December 2007 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:35, 17 November 2022
User talk:Alexia Death/Archive1
This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any threads with no replies in 14 days may be automatically moved. Threads with fewer than two timestamps (no replies) are not archived. An archive index is available here. |
Merry XMAS
asking for an interview
Hello Alexia! I'm a research student currently working on the power structure of Misplaced Pages. It looks like you have a very critical view on how the things have been done, and your point is interesting me. Could we talk together about that in a time? All Best, Sylvain
Pics
Hey, could you upload some of your pics to Commons? Right now, Sõrve säär picture can't be used in other wikis. Avjoska (talk) 14:37, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with File:Mindflayer.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Mindflayer.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Misplaced Pages's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
- That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Misplaced Pages:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:44, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Your post to User talk:Jimbo Wales
Per my comments here I have redacted your post to Jimbo's talkpage. I have noted Newyorkbrad's request at the ArbCom page that participants to the matter should refrain from acting without due consideration to the sensitive nature of the matter, and it is my belief that your question to Jimbo fails that test. Your comment remains in the history, so Jimbo is easily able to review it and decide to answer if he chooses - but it is my belief that he will not do so under the circumstances. I strongly suggest that you constrain yourself to commenting on this matter only on the ArbCom pages relating to it. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- It was posted in good faith that such an important issue needs his attention. I do not agree with your rationale that he should be somehow protected from this nor do I accept your authority to make such a decision. However I will not restore the comment, because it would be quite pointless. --Alexia Death the Grey (talk) 13:07, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
- My "authority" is that this is the encyclopedia that anyone can edit - I have no authority other than that. I am however experienced enough to know that Jimbo is generally aware of matters involving ArbCom and I am fairly certain he is aware of this specific issue. If indeed I was protecting anyone with my action, that person is you. The ArbCom have specifically requested that concerned individuals be very circumspect with regard to their actions or comments relating to this matter, and my actions were generally in relation to that request. I would again confirm that I have no other authority than my desire to serve as I see the best interests of the project, and in closing I would express my gratitude that you took no action in respect of mine (other than to voice your disagreement.) LessHeard vanU (talk) 19:08, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Please comment here
User:Piotrus/ArbCom. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 19:26, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Re : Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern European mailing list
This arbitration case has been closed, and the final decision may be viewed at the link above.
- User:Piotrus resigned the administrator tools during the case proceedings and may only seek to regain adminship by a new request for adminship or by request to the Arbitration Committee.
- User:Piotrus is banned for three months. At the conclusion of his ban, a one year topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed, shall take effect.
- User:Digwuren is banned for one year. He is directed to edit Misplaced Pages from only a single user account, and advise the Arbitration Committee of the name of the account that he will use. Should he not advise the committee by the end of the one year ban, he will remain indefinitely banned until a single account is chosen.
- User:Digwuren is placed on a one year topic ban on articles about Eastern Europe, their talk pages, and any related process discussion, widely construed. This shall take effect following the expiration of both above mentioned bans.
- The following users are topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for one year:
- User:Jacurek is topic banned from articles about Eastern Europe, their associated talk pages, and any process discussion about same, widely construed, for six months.
- User:Tymek is strongly admonished for having shared his account password. He is directed to keep his account for his own exclusive use, and not to allow any other person to use it under any circumstance.
- The editors sanctioned above (Piotrus, Digwuren, Martintg, Tymek, Jacurek, Radeksz, Dc76, Vecrumba, Biruitorul, Miacek) are prohibited from commenting on or unnecessarily interacting with Russavia on any page of Misplaced Pages, except for purposes of legitimate and necessary dispute resolution.
- All the participants to the mailing list are strongly admonished against coordinating on-wiki behavior off-wiki and directed to keep discussion of editing and dispute resolution strictly on wiki and in public. All editors are reminded that the editorial process and dispute resolution must take place on Misplaced Pages itself, using the article talk pages and project space for this purpose. No discussion held off-wiki can lead to a valid consensus, the basis of our editorial process. Off-wiki coordination is likely to lead to echo chambers where there is a false appearance of neutrality and consensus.
For the Arbitration Committee, Mailer Diablo 17:41, 22 December 2009 (UTC) - Discuss this
December 2009
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit that you made to the page User talk:Jehochman has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. -- Matthew Glennon (/C\) 20:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did with this edit to the page Estonian Centre Party. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. -- Matthew Glennon (/C\) 20:05, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Estonian ID card. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. -- Matthew Glennon (/C\) 20:06, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- What's the deal here? This isn't the way to get your voice heard. -- Matthew Glennon (/C\) 20:07, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- There is no way to get your voice heard. you cant even talk to people on a >curseword< private mail list these days. So Im getting my ban by doing what what people AKA ArbCom assume people, even constructive editors do.--Alexia Death the Grey (talk) 20:09, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
There. Now please make that ban LONGER. Seriously. If ArbCom treats people that bother with this project as rabid loons to be kept away, Id like to be looked OUTSIDE the asylum please.--Alexia Death the Grey (talk) 20:13, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Blocked
Obviously, for the same reason as on Commons. Protesting is not a legitimate reason for vandalism. Adambro (talk) 20:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- That was so pointless and sad I want to punch this guy in the noes. If he wanted to get banned, why not just leave and never come back? What the heck? -- Matthew Glennon (/C\) 20:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- I left. About a year ago. Didnt come back until people started considering my private communication with other people public matter to be discussed in ArbCom. And now Im pissed. Reason took a break. Its probaly not back by 25. please make it longer.--Alexia Death the Grey (talk) 20:19, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Also, please point me to a correct venue for wiki equivalent of a picket. Wait... There isnt one.--Alexia Death the Grey (talk) 20:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- Sure there is. You are given the chance to argue at the ArbCom. Either way, this isn't life, it's a project. If a cool off period is what is prescribed, then take a break (again) and come back with a fresh start. I didn't see the logs, and I don't know the whole story. I can only trust that what was decided was accurate. Even if it wasn't (which I doubt) take a break, take a breath, and come back and write following the guidelines and procedures the editors here have built, or just don't come back. We want you to stay, but if you're going to be like this all the time, I don't want you. -- Matthew Glennon (/C\) 20:31, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
- All you say at ArbCom is just blabber, nobody cares. Ive been part of two different ones. Same. That trust of yours is misplaced. And why the fuck would I actually bother to edit anything here? Theres this little thing called motivation. Its gone. this little rampage was all that was left of giving a damn. May be pathetic and hey theres fresh blood always incoming to be abused so none of you give a damn but... Some day you might feel the same way... or not. Some people like stress and abuse. Have a nice wikilife while it lasts.--Alexia Death the Grey (talk) 20:38, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
Block changed to indef. Prodego 05:03, 23 December 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Eastern European mailing list
Following a motion at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Amendment:
Remedy 20 of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Eastern European mailing list ("Miacek topic banned") is lifted.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, NW (Talk) 00:14, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Mindflayer.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Mindflayer.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward: not at work) - talk 16:55, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Surreal Barnstar | |
For being a true eye-opener when the world needed it. —烏Γ , 05:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC) |
Looking for help
My name is Ivan Robaina Bychko, I´m 18 years old and I´m Cuban. I write to you because right now I´m working in several works about your country in the Spanish wikipedia and outside it. I would need some help of you for translating some text from Estonian into Spanish and knowing some facts about your country that are hard to find in bibliographies. I wrote to you several weeks ago but it seems that somebody erased my request. If you agree to help me, in order to inform me, please write to me at:nayesda.daria@medired.scu.sld.cu PD: Please, help me. Why were you really blocked?--201.220.215.12 (talk) 19:14, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Chaotic Evil.gif or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:16, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Chaotic Good.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- Another one of your uploads, File:Chaotic Neutral.gif, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:22, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
Clarification motion
A case (Eastern Europe) in which you were involved has been modified by motion which changed the wording of the discretionary sanctions section to clarify that the scope applies to pages, not just articles. For the arbitration committee --S Philbrick(Talk) 15:32, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
MfD nomination of User:Alexia Death
User:Alexia Death, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alexia Death and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Alexia Death during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Firestar464 (talk) 11:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)