Revision as of 10:42, 24 January 2004 editGuy Peters (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,506 edits Integrating← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 20:04, 2 January 2025 edit undo80.62.29.4 (talk) →Hussite Wars: link | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Czech theologian and philosopher (c. 1369–1415)}} | |||
<div style = "float:right">]</div> | |||
{{for|the films|Jan Hus (1954 film)|Jan Hus (2015 film)|John Hus (1977 film)}} | |||
{{Distinguish|J Hus}} | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=October 2020}} | |||
{{Infobox philosopher | |||
|region = ] | |||
|era = ] | |||
|image = Stimmer Jan Hus.jpg | |||
|caption = ] of Jan Hus, {{c.}} 1587 | |||
|name = Jan Hus | |||
|other_names = John Hus, John Huss | |||
|birth_date = {{Circa|1369}} | |||
|birth_place = ], ], ]<br/>(now ]) | |||
|death_date = {{death date and age|df=yes|1415|7|6|1372}} | |||
|death_place = ], ], Holy Roman Empire<br/>(now ]) | |||
|death_cause=] | |||
|alma_mater = ] | |||
|school_tradition = ] | |||
|main_interests = ] | |||
|notable_ideas = | |||
|influences = ] | |||
|influenced = ], ], ], ], ], ], ] | |||
}} | |||
NATO 1415 IO HVS; (and across the center), CONDEM / NATVR|thumb|German 16th Century. ''John Huss Centenary Medal'' . Silver, 4.33 cm. National Gallery of Art, Washington. Samuel H. Kress Collection]] | |||
'''Jan Hus''' ({{IPAc-en|h|ʊ|s}}; {{IPA|cs|ˈjan ˈɦus|lang|Cs-Jan_Hus.ogg}}; {{c.}} 1370 – 6 July 1415), sometimes ] as '''John Hus''' or '''John Huss''', and referred to in historical texts as ''Iohannes Hus'' or ''Johannes Huss'', was a ] ] and ] who became a Church reformer and the inspiration of ], a key predecessor to ], and a seminal figure in the ]. Hus is considered to be the first Church reformer, even though some designate the theorist ].{{efn|"John Wycliffe may be thought of as the theorist of ecclesiastical Reformation, but Hus is considered the first church reformer, the antecedent of Luther, Calvin, and Zwingli, as such. His teachings had a strong influence on the states of Western Europe in the formation of a reformist Bohemian religious denomination and, more than a century later, on Martin Luther himself. Hus was burned at the stake for heresy against the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, including those on ecclesiology, the Eucharist, and other theological dogma."{{sfn|Lamport|Forrest|Whaley|2019|p=227}}}}<ref>{{cite book |last1=Demy |first1=Timothy J. |last2=Larson |first2=Mark J. |last3=Charles |first3=J. Daryl |title=The Reformers on War, Peace, and Justice |date= 2019 |publisher=Wipf and Stock Publishers |isbn=978-1-4982-0698-3 |page=5 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=50e6DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT5 |access-date=21 January 2022 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Lamport |first1=Mark A. |last2=Forrest |first2=Benjamin K. |last3=Whaley |first3=Vernon M. |title=Hymns and Hymnody: Historical and Theological Introductions, Volume 2: From Catholic Europe to Protestant Europe |date= 2019 |publisher=Wipf and Stock Publishers |isbn=978-1-5326-5125-0 |page=227 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HPCaDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA227 |access-date=21 January 2022 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Walker |first1=Williston |title=A History of the Christian Church |date= 2014 |publisher=Ravenio Books |page=56 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VW3QCwAAQBAJ&pg=PT56 |access-date=21 January 2022 |language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last1=Verhoeven |first1=Ludo |last2=Perfetti |first2=Charles |title=Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems |date= 2017 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-09588-5 |page=372 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t-w0DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA372 |access-date=21 January 2022 |language=en}}</ref> His teachings had a strong influence, most immediately in the approval of a reformed ] religious denomination and, over a century later, on ]. | |||
After being ordained as a ], Hus began to preach in Prague. He opposed many aspects of the ] in Bohemia, such as its views on ], ], the ], and other theological topics. Hus was a master, dean and rector at the ] in ] between 1409 and 1410. | |||
<b>Jan Hus</b> (] ], Southern ] - ], ] ]) was a religious thinker and reformer. He initiated a religious movement based on the ideas of ]. His followers became known as ]s. The ] did not condone such uprisings, and Hus was ] in ], condemned by the ], and ]. | |||
] issued a ] that excommunicated Hus; however, it was not enforced, and Hus continued to preach. Hus then spoke out against Alexander V's successor, ], for his selling of indulgences. Hus' excommunication was then enforced, and he spent the next two years living in exile. | |||
Hus was a precursor to the ] movement. His extensive writings earn him a promiment place in Czech literary history. He is also responsible for introducing the use of accents (especially the ]) into Czech spelling in order to represent each ] by a single ]. Today, a statue of Jan Hus can be seen at the ] old town square, the ''Staroměstské náměstí''. | |||
When the ] assembled, Hus was asked to be there and present his views on the dissension within the Church. When he arrived, with a promise of ],{{sfn|Gillett|1863|pp=464–466}} he was arrested and put in prison. He was eventually taken in front of the council and asked to recant his views. He refused. On 6 July 1415, he was ] for ] against the teachings of the Catholic Church. | |||
== Early Life and Studies == | |||
John Hus, the famous reformer from Bohemia, was born at Husinec (75 km s. s. w. of ]) July 6, 1369, as commonly given; but the day is an inference from the fact that his followers honored his memory on July 6, the day of his death, and the year is probably too late; he was burned at the stake in Constance, June 6, 1415. John Huss is his common English designation, but the name is more correctly written, according to Czech spelling, Hus. It is an abbreviation from his birthplace made by himself about 1399; in earlier life he was always known as Jan Husinecký, or, in Latin, ''Johannes de Hussinetz''. His parents were Czechs, in narrow circumstances. | |||
After Hus was executed, the followers of his religious teachings (known as ]s) refused to elect another Catholic monarch and defeated five consecutive papal ] between 1420 and 1431 in what became known as the ]. Both the ] and the ] populations remained majority Hussite until the 1620s, when a Protestant defeat in the ] resulted in the ] coming under ] dominion for the next 300 years and being subject to immediate and forced conversion in an intense ] of return to Catholicism. | |||
Like ], he had to earn his living by singing and performing humble services in the ]. He felt inclined toward the clerical profession, not so much by an inner impulse as by the attraction of the tranquil life of the clergy. He studied at Prague, where he must have been as early as the middle of the eighties. He was greatly influenced by ], who later was long | |||
his intimate friend, but finally his bitter enemy. As a student Hus did not distinguish himself. The learned quotations of which he boasted in his writings were mostly taken from Wyclif's works. A hot temper and arrogance were traits of his character, and he was not free from sophistry. In ] he became ], in ] ], and in ] ]. In ] he was ordained ], in ] he became ] of the ], and in the following year | |||
] of ]. In ] he was appointed also preacher of the Bethlehem Church in Prague, where he preached | |||
in the ]. | |||
==Early life== | |||
== Influence of Wyclif in Bohemia == | |||
The exact date of Hus's birth is disputed. Some claim he was born around 1369,{{sfn|Kuhns|1907|p=40}} while others claim he was born between 1373 and 1375.{{sfn|Lützow|1909|p=64}} Though older sources state the latter,{{sfn|Gillett|1863|p=43}} more contemporary research states that 1372 is more likely.{{sfn|Kuhns|1907|p=64}} The belief that he was born on 6 July, also his death day, has no factual basis.{{sfn|Lützow|1909|p=64}} Hus was born in ], southern Bohemia, to peasant parents.{{sfn|Lützow|1909|p=65}} It is well known that Hus took his name from the village where he lived (Husinec). The reason behind him taking his name from his village rather than from his father is up to speculation; some believe that it was because Hus did not know of his father, while others say it was simply a custom at that time.{{sfn|Gillett|1863|p=44}} The name "Hus," however, means "goose" in Bohemian (now called Czech), and he was a century later referenced as a "Bohemian goose" in a ] given to ]. Nearly all other information known about Hus's very early life is unsubstantiated.{{sfn|Gillett|1863|pp=43–44}} Similarly, we know little of Hus's family. His father's name was Michael; his mother's name is unknown. It is known that Hus had a brother due to him expressing concerns for his nephew while awaiting execution at Constance. Whether or not Hus had any other family is unknown.{{sfn|Fudge|2010|p=9}} | |||
Following the marriage of King Wenceslaus' sister, Anne, to Richard II of England in 1382, the philosophical writings of Wyclif became known in Bohemia. As a student, Hus had been greatly attracted by them, particularly by his philosophical ]. His inclination toward ecclesiastical reforms was awakened only by the acquaintance with Wyclif's theological writings. The so-called Hussism in the first decades of the fifteenth century was nothing but Wyclifism transplanted into Bohemian soil. As such, it maintained itself | |||
until the death of Hus, then turned into Utraquism, and was followed by Taboritism. | |||
At the age of roughly 10, Hus was sent away to a monastery. The exact reason is not known; some claim that his father had died,{{sfn|Gilpin|1809|p=141}} others say he went there due to his devotion to God.{{sfn|Gillett|1863|pp=44–45}} He impressed the teachers with his studies, and they recommended him to move to ], one of the largest cities in Bohemia at that time. Hus apparently supported himself by securing employment in Prague, which allowed him to fulfill his basic necessities, and access to the Prague Library.{{sfn|Gillett|1863|pp=46–48}} | |||
The theological writings of Wyclif spread widely in Bohemia. They had been brought over, as is said, in ] or ] by ], and Hus was greatly moved by them. The ] arose against the spread of the new ]s, and in ] prohibited a disputation on forty-five theses taken in part from Wyclif. Under ] ] (from 1403), Hus initially enjoyed a great reputation. In ] he was active as a synodical preacher, but the bishop was compelled to depose him on account of his severe attacks upon the ]. | |||
Three years later, he was admitted to the ].{{sfn|Gillett|1863|pp=47–50}} Though not an exceptional student, he pursued his studies with ferocity.{{sfn|Lützow|1909|pp=70–71}} In 1393, Hus earned a ] degree at the University of Prague, and he earned his master's degree in 1396.{{sfn|Gilpin|1809|p=142}} The strongly anti-papal views that were held by many of the professors there likely influenced Hus's future works.{{sfn|Lützow|1909|pp=73–76}} During his studies, he served as a choir boy, to supplement his earnings.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Spinka|first=Matthew|url=https://www.worldcat.org/oclc/975125037|title=John Hus : a biography.|date=2017|publisher=Princeton University Press|isbn=978-0-691-62219-4|location=|oclc=975125037}}</ref> | |||
== The Papal Schism == | |||
The development of conditions at the University of Prague depended to a great extent on the question of the ]. King Wenceslaus, | |||
who was on the point of assuming the reins of government, but whose plans were in no way furthered by ], renounced the latter and ordered his ]s to observe a strict neutrality toward both ]s, and he expected the same of the university. The archbishop remained faithful to Gregory, and at the university it was only the Bohemian nation, with Hus as its spokesman, which avowed neutrality. Incensed by this attitude, Wenceslaus, at the instigation of Hus and other Czech leaders, issued in ] a decree according to which there should be conceded to the Bohemian nation three votes in all affairs of the university, while the foreign ]s, principally the ], should have only one vote. As a consequence many German doctors, masters, and students left the university in ], and the ] was founded. Thus Prague lost its international importance and became a Czech school; but the emigrants spread the fame of the Bohemian heresies into the most distant countries. | |||
==Career== | |||
The archbishop was then isolated and Hus at the height of his fame. He became the first rector of the Czech university, and enjoyed the favor of the ]. In the meantime, the doctrinal views of Wyclif had spread over the whole country. As long as ] remained obedient to Gregory XII, all opposition to the new spirit was in vain; but as soon as he submitted to Alexander V, conditions changed. The archbishop brought his complaints before the papal see, accusing the Wyclifites as the instigators of all ecclesiastical disturbances in Bohemia. Thereupon the pope issued his ] of December 20, 1409, which empowered the archbishop to proceed against Wyclifism--all books of Wyclif were to be given up, his doctrines revoked, and free preaching discontinued. After the publication of the bull in 1410, Hus appealed to the pope, but in vain. All books and valuable manuscripts of Wyclif were burned, and Hus and his adherents put under the ban. This procedure caused an indescribable commotion among the people down to the lowest classes; in some places turbulent scenes occurred. | |||
Hus began teaching at the University of Prague in 1398 and in 1399, he first publicly defended propositions of Wycliffe.{{sfn|Kuhns|1907|p=40}} He was ordained as a ] in 1400.<ref name="OD Renaissance">{{cite book |last1=Campbell |first1=Gordon |title=The Oxford Dictionary of the Renaissance |date=2003 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=Oxford |isbn=9780191727795 |chapter=Hus, Jan or Jan Huss (c.1372–1415)}}</ref> In 1401, his students and faculty promoted him to dean of the philosophical department, and a year later, he became a ] of the University of Prague.{{sfn|Kuhns|1907|p=43}} He was appointed a preacher at the ] in 1402.{{sfn|Kuhns|1907|p=47}} Hus was a strong advocate for the Czechs and the ], and he was influenced by the writings of ].{{sfn|Kuhns|1907|pp=45–46}} Although Church authorities banned many of Wycliffe's works in 1403, Hus translated ''Trialogus'' into ] and helped to distribute it.{{sfn|Wilhelm|1910}}] | |||
The government took the part of Hus, and the power of his adherents increased from day to day. He continued to preach in the Bethlehem chapel, and became bolder and bolder in his accusations of the Church. The churches of the city were put under the ban, and the interdict was pronounced against Prague, but without result. | |||
Hus denounced the moral failings of clergy, bishops, and even the papacy from his pulpit.{{sfn|Gillett|1863|pp=76–78}}{{sfn|Gilpin|1809|p=143}} Archbishop ] tolerated this, and even appointed Hus a preacher at the clergy's biennial synod. On 24 June 1405, ] directed the Archbishop to counter Wycliffe's teachings, especially the idea of ] in the ].{{sfn|Wilhelm|1910}} The archbishop complied by issuing a ] decree against Wycliffe, as well as forbidding any further attacks on the clergy.{{sfn|Wilhelm|1910}} | |||
== Indulgences == | |||
] died in ], and with his death the religious movement in Bohemia entered a new phase--the disputes concerning indulgences arose. In 1411 ] issued his ] against King Ladislaus of Naples, the protector of Gregory XII. In Prague also the cross was preached, and preachers | |||
of indulgences urged people to crowd the churches and give their offerings. There developed a traffic in indulgences. Hus, following the example of Wyclif, lifted up his voice against it and wrote his famous ]. But he could not carry with him the men of the university. In ] a disputation took place, on which occasion Hus delivered his ''Quaestio magistri Johannis Hus de indulgentiis''. It was taken literally from the last chapter of Wyclif's book, ''De ecclesia'', and his treatise, ''De absolutione a pena et culpa''. No pope or bishop, according to Wyclif and Hus, had the right to take up the sword in the name of the Church; he should pray for his enemies and bless those that curse him. Man obtains forgiveness of sins by real repentance, not for money. The doctors of the theological faculty replied, but without success. A few days afterward the people, led by ], burnt the papal bulls. Hus, they said, should be obeyed rather than the fraudulent mob of ]s | |||
and ]s. Three men from the lower classes who openly contradicted the preachers during their sermons and called indulgences a fraud were beheaded. They were the first martyrs of the Hussite Church. The theological faculty requested Hus to present his speeches and doctrines to the dean for an examination, but he refused. | |||
In 1406, two Bohemian students brought to Prague a document bearing the seal of the ] and praising Wycliffe. Hus proudly read the document from his pulpit.{{sfn|Wilhelm|1910}} Then, in 1408, ] warned Archbishop Zajic that the Church in Rome had been informed of Wycliffe's heresies and of the sympathies of King ] for nonconformists.{{sfn|Gillett|1863|pp=140–141}} In response, the king and university ordered all of Wycliffe's writings surrendered to the archdiocesan chancery for correction. Hus obeyed, declaring that he condemned the errors in those writings.{{sfn|Hus|1372–1415|p=69}} | |||
In the meantime, the faculty had condemned the forty-five articles anew and added several other heretical theses which had originated with Hus. The king forbade the teaching of these articles, but neither Hus nor the university approved of this summary condemnation, requesting that the unscripturalness of the articles should be first proved. | |||
===Papal Schism=== | |||
== Further Dissentions == | |||
In 1408, the ] was divided by the ], in which Gregory XII in Rome and ] in ] both claimed the papacy. Wenceslaus felt Gregory XII might interfere with his plans to be crowned ]. He denounced Gregory, ordered the clergy in Bohemia to observe a strict neutrality in the schism and said that he expected the same of the university. Archbishop Zajíc remained faithful to Gregory. At the University, only the scholars of the Bohemian "nation" (one of the four governing sections), with Hus as their leader, vowed neutrality.{{sfn|Kuhns|Dickie|2017|pp=67–70}} | |||
The tumults at Prague had stirred up a sensation, unpleasant for the Roman party; papal legates and Archbishop ] tried to persuade Hus to give up his opposition against the bulls, and the king made an unsuccessful attempt to reconcile the two parties. In the mean time the clergy of Prague, through ], had brought their complaints before the pope, and he ordered the ] of ] to proceed against Hus without mercy. The cardinal put him under the great church ban. He was to be seized and delivered to the archbishop, and his chapel was to be destroyed. Stricter measures against Hus and his adherents, the counter-measures of the Hussites, and the appeal of Hus from the pope to Jesus Christ as the supreme judge only intensified the excitement among the people and forced Hus to depart from Prague, in compliance with the wish of the king; but his absence had not the expected effect. The excitement continued. The king, being grieved by the disrepute of his country on account of the ], made great efforts to harmonize the opposing parties. In 1412 he convoked the heads of his kingdom for a consultation, and at their suggestion ordered a synod to be held at ] on Feb. 2, 1412. It did not take place there, but in the palace of the archbishops at Prague, Hus being thus excluded from participation. Propositions were made for the restitution of the peace of the Church, Hus requiring especially that Bohemia should have the same freedom in regard to ecclesiastical affairs as other countries and that approbation and condemnation should therefore be announced only with the permission of the state power. This is wholly the doctrine of Wyclif (''Sermones'', iii. 519, etc.). There followed treatises from both parties, but no harmony was obtained. "Even if I should stand before the stake which has been prepared for me," Hus wrote in those days, "I would never accept the recommendation of the theological faculty." The synod did not produce any results, | |||
but the king did not yet give up his hope--he ordered a commission to continue the work of reconciliation. The doctors of the university required from Hus and his adherents an approval of their conception of the Church, according to which the pope is the head, the cardinals the body of the Church, and that all regulations of this Church must be obeyed. Hus protested vigorously against this conception since it made pope and cardinals alone the Church. Nevertheless the Hussite party seems to have approached the standpoint of their opponents as closely as possible. To the article that the Roman Church must be obeyed, they added "so far as every pious Christian is bound." ] and ] protested against this addition and left the convention. The king exiled them, with two other spokesmen. Of the writings occasioned by these controversies, that of Hus on the Church ''(De ecclesia)'' has been most frequently quoted and admired or criticized, and yet it is in the first ten chapters but a meagre epitome of Wyclif's work of the same title, and in the following chapters an abstract of a work by the same author ''(De potentate pape)'' on the power of the pope Wyclif had written his book to oppose the common view that the Church consisted only of the clergy, and Hus now found himself in a similar condition. He wrote his work at the castle of one of his protectors in ], near ], and sent it to Prague, where it was publicly read in the Bethlehem chapel. It was answered by ] and ] with treatises of the same title. After the most vehement opponents of Hus had left Prague, his adherents occupied the whole ground. Hus wrote his treatises and preached in the neighborhood of ]. Bohemian Wyclifism was carried into Poland, Hungary, Croatia, and Austria; but at the same time the papal court was not inactive. In Jan., 1413, there assembled at Rome a general council which condemned the writings of Wyclif and ordered them to be burned. | |||
====Kutná Hora Decree==== | |||
== The Council of Constance == | |||
{{see|Decree of Kutná Hora}} | |||
To put an end to the papal schism and to take up the long desired reform of the Church, a general council was convened for Nov. 1, 1414, at Constance. The Emperor ], | |||
In January 1409, ] summoned representatives of the four nations comprising the university to the Czech city of ] to demand statements of allegiance. The Czech nation agreed, but the other three nations declined. The king then decreed that the Czech nation would have three votes in university affairs, while the "German nation" (composed of the former ]n, ], and ] nations) would have one vote in total. Due to the change in voting structure by May 1409 the German dean and rector were deposed and replaced by Czechs. The ] called the Germans to his own University of Heidelberg, while the ] started a new ] in Leipzig. It is estimated that over one thousand students and masters left Prague. The emigrants also spread accusations of Bohemian heresy.{{sfn|Fudge|2010|pp=97–100}} | |||
brother of Wenceslaus, and heir to the Bohemian crown, was anxious to clear the country from the blemish of heresy. Hus likewise was willing to make an end of all dissensions, and gladly followed the request of Sigismund to go to Constance. From the sermons which he took along, it is evident that he purposed to convert the assembled fathers to his own (i.e., Wyclif's) principal doctrines. Sigismund promised him safe-conduct. Provided with sufficient testimonies concerning his orthodoxy, and after having made his will as if he had divined his death, he started on his journey (Oct. 11, 1414). On Nov. 3 he arrived at Constance, and on the following day the bulletins on the church doors announced that ] would be the opponent of Hus, the heretic. In the beginning Hus was at liberty, making his abode at the house of a widow, but after a few weeks his opponents succeeded in imprisoning him, on the strength of a rumor that he intended to flee. He was first brought into the residence of a canon, and thence, on Dec. 8, into the dungeon of the Dominican monastery. Sigismund was greatly angered at the abuse of his letter of safe-conduct and threatened the prelates with dismissal, but when it was hinted that in such a case the council would be dissolved, there was nothing left for him but to accommodate himself to the circumstances. Thus the fate of Hus was sealed. | |||
====Antipope Alexander V==== | |||
On Dec. 4 the pope had entrusted a committee of three bishops with a preliminary investigation against him. The witnesses for the prosecution were heard, but Hus was refused an advocate for his defense. His situation became worse after the catastrophe of ], who had left Constance to evade the necessity of abdicating. So far Hus had been the captive of the pope and in constant intercourse with his friends, but now he was delivered to the archbishop of Constance and brought to his castle, ] on | |||
{{More citations needed section|date=July 2020}} | |||
the ]. Here he remained seventy-three days, separated from his friends, chained day and night, poorly fed, and tortured by disease. | |||
In 1409, the ] tried to end the schism by electing ] as Pope, but Gregory and Benedict did not submit. (Alexander was declared an "]" by the ] in 1418.) Hus, his followers, and Wenceslaus IV transferred their allegiance to Alexander V. Under pressure from | |||
King Wenceslaus IV, Archbishop Zajíc did the same. Zajíc then lodged an accusation of "ecclesiastical disturbances" against Wycliffites in Prague with Alexander V. | |||
On 20 December 1409, Alexander V issued a ] that empowered the Archbishop to proceed against Wycliffism in Prague. All copies of Wycliffe's writings were to be surrendered and his views repudiated, and free preaching discontinued. After the publication of the bull in 1410, Hus appealed to Alexander V, but in vain. The Wycliffe books and valuable manuscripts were burned, and Hus and his adherents were ] by Alexander V. | |||
== Trial of Hus == | |||
On June 5 he was tried for the first time, and for that purpose was transferred to the Franciscan monastery, where he spent the last weeks of his life. He acknowledged the writings on the Church against | |||
Palecz and Stanislaus of Znaim as his own, and declared himself willing to recant, if errors should be proven to him. Hus conceded his veneration of Wyclif, and said that he could only wish his soul might some time attain unto that place where Wyclif's was. On the other hand, he denied having defended Wyclif's doctrine of the Lord's | |||
Supper, or the forty-five articles; he had only opposed their summary condemnation. The king admonished him to deliver himself up to the mercy of the council, as he did not desire to protect a heretic. At the last trial, on June 8, there were read to him thirty-nine sentences, twenty-six of which had been excerpted from his book on the Church, seven from his treatise against ], and six from that against ]. Almost all of his articles may be traced back to Wyclif. The danger of some of these doctrines as regards worldly power was explained to the emperor to incite him against Hus. The latter declared himself willing to submit if he could be convinced of errors. He desired only a fairer trial and more time to explain the reasons for his views. If his reasons and ] texts did not suffice, he would be glad to be instructed. This declaration was considered an unconditional surrender, and he was asked to confess | |||
====Crusade against Naples==== | |||
# that he had erred in the theses which he had hitherto maintained; | |||
Alexander V died in 1410, and was succeeded by ] (also later declared an antipope). In 1411, John XXIII proclaimed a ] against King ], the protector of rival ]. This crusade was preached in Prague as well. John XXIII also authorized ]s to raise money for the war. Priests urged the people on, and they crowded into churches to give their offerings. This traffic in indulgences was a sign of the corruption of the Church needing remediation.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Archaeological and Historical Evidence – Falling Away from the Pure Gospel of Jesus Christ|url=http://www.supportingevidences.net/falling-away-from-the-pure-gos/|access-date=2020-12-11|website=www.supportingevidences.net|language=en}}</ref> | |||
# that he renounced them for the future; | |||
# that he recanted them; and | |||
# that he declared the opposite of these sentences. | |||
====Condemnation of indulgences and Crusade==== | |||
He asked to be exempted from recanting doctrines which he had never taught; others, which the assembly considered erroneous, he was willing to revoke; to act differently would be against his conscience. These words found no favorable reception. After the trial on June 8, several other attempts were made to induce him to recant, but he resisted all of them. | |||
Archbishop Zajíc died in 1411 and with his death the ] entered a new phase during which the disputes concerning ] assumed great importance. Hus spoke out against indulgences, but he could not carry with him the men of the university. In 1412, a dispute took place, on which occasion Hus delivered his address ''Quaestio magistri Johannis Hus de indulgentiis''. It was taken literally from the last chapter of Wycliffe's book, ''De ecclesia'', and his treatise, ''De absolutione a pena et culpa''. Hus asserted that no pope or bishop had the right to take up the sword in the name of the Church; he should pray for his enemies and bless those who curse him; man obtains forgiveness of sins by true repentance, not money. The doctors of the theological faculty replied, but without success. A few days afterward some of Hus followers led by Vok Voksa z Valdštejna, burned the ]s. Hus, they said, should be obeyed rather than the Church, which they considered a fraudulent mob of adulterers and ].{{sfn|Schaff|1953|pp=415–420}} | |||
In response, three men from the lower classes who openly called the indulgences a fraud were beheaded. They were later considered the first martyrs of the ] Church. In the meantime, the faculty had condemned the forty-five articles of Wycliffe and added several other theses, deemed heretical, which had originated with Hus. The king forbade the teaching of these articles but neither Hus nor the university complied with the ruling. They requested that the articles should be first proven to be un-scriptural. The tumults at Prague had stirred up a sensation. Papal legates and Archbishop Albik tried to persuade Hus to give up his opposition to the papal bulls and the king made an unsuccessful attempt to reconcile the two parties.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/newschaffherzog26haucgoog|quote=Archbishop Albik tried to persuade Hus to give up his opposition to the papal bulls and the king made an unsuccessful attempt to reconcile the two parties.|title=The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge: Embracing Biblical, Historical, Doctrinal, and Practical Theology and Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Biography from the Earliest Times to the Present Day|last1=Herzog|first1=Johann Jakob|last2=Hauck|first2=Albert|last3=Jackson|first3=Samuel Macauley|last4=Sherman|first4=Charles Colebrook|last5=Gilmore|first5=George William|date=1909|publisher=Funk and Wagnalls Company|pages=|language=en}}</ref> | |||
The attitude of Sigismund was due to political considerations--he looked upon the return of Hus to his country as dangerous, and thought the terror of execution would not be without effect. Hus no | |||
longer hoped for life, indeed martyrdom responded to an inner desire of his being. | |||
====Attempts at reconciliation==== | |||
== Condemnation and Execution == | |||
King Wenceslaus IV made efforts to harmonize the opposing parties. In 1412, he convoked the heads of his kingdom for a consultation and, at their suggestion, ordered a ] to be held at ] on 2 February 1412. The synod was instead held in the palace of the archbishops at Prague in order to exclude Hus from participation. Propositions were made to restore peace in the Church. Hus declared that Bohemia should have the same freedom in regard to ecclesiastical affairs as other countries <!-- what other countries?? --> and that approbation and condemnation should therefore be announced only with the permission of the state power. This was the view of Wycliffe (''Sermones'', iii. 519, etc.). | |||
The condemnation took place on July 6 in the presence of the solemn assembly of the council in the cathedral. After the performance of high mass and liturgy, Hus was led into the church. The bishop of ] delivered an oration on the duty of eradicating heresy; then some theses of Hus and Wyclif and a report of his trial were read. He protested loudly several times, and when his appeal to Christ was rejected as a condemnable heresy, he exclaimed, "O God and Lord, now the council condemns even thine own act and thine own law as heresy, since thou thyself didst lay thy cause before thy Father as the just judge, as an example for us, whenever we are sorely oppressed." An | |||
Italian prelate pronounced the sentence of condemnation upon Hus and his writings. Again he protested loudly, saying that even at this hour he did not wish anything but to be convinced from ]. He fell upon his knees and asked God with a low voice to forgive all his enemies. Then followed his degradation--he was enrobed in priestly vestments and again asked to recant; again he refused. With curses his ornaments were taken from him, his priestly tonsure was destroyed, and the sentence was pronounced that the Church had deprived him of all rights and delivered him to the secular powers. Then a high paper hat was put upon his head, with the inscription ''Haeresiarcha''. Thus Hus was led away to the stake under a strong guard of armed men. At the place of execution he | |||
knelt down, spread out his hands, and prayed aloud. Some of the people asked that a confessor should he given him, but a bigoted priest exclaimed, a heretic should neither be heard nor given a confessor. The executioners undressed Hus and tied his hands behind his back with ropes, and his neck with a chain to a stake around which wood and straw had been piled up so that it covered him to the neck. Still at the last moment, the imperial marshal, Von | |||
Pappenheim, in the presence of the ], asked him to save his life by a recantation, but Hus declined with the words "God is my witness that I have never taught that of which I have been | |||
accused by false witnesses. In the truth of the Gospel which I have written, taught, and preached I will die to-day with gladness." There | |||
upon the fire was kindled. With uplifted voice Hus sang, "Christ, thou Son of the living God, have mercy upon me." When he started this | |||
for the third time and continued "who art born of Mary the virgin," the wind blew the flame into his face; he still moved lips and head, and then died of suffocation. His clothes were thrown into the fire, his ashes gathered and cast into the nearby Rhine. | |||
There followed treatises from both parties, but no harmony was obtained. "Even if I should stand before the stake which has been prepared for me," Hus wrote at the time, "I would never accept the recommendation of the theological faculty." The synod did not produce any results but the king ordered a commission to continue the work of reconciliation. The doctors of the university demanded Hus and his followers approve the university's conception of the Church. According to this conception, the pope is the head of the Church and the ] are the body of the Church. Hus protested vigorously. The Hussite party seems to have made a great effort toward reconciliation. To the article that the Roman Church must be obeyed, they added only "so far as every pious Christian is bound".{{sfn|Kuhns|1907|p=75}} Stanislav ze Znojma and Štěpán Páleč protested against this addition and left the convention; they were exiled by the king, with two others.{{citation needed|date=July 2018}} | |||
== Hus' Character, Writings, and Teachings == | |||
The Czech people, who in his lifetime had loved Hus as their prophet and apostle, now adored him as their saint and martyr. He possessed high virtues, but in his struggles with the University of Prague and his ecclesiastical opponents he can not be freed altogether from the reproach of slander and abuse. His learning was not of a universal range; wherever he goes beyond Wyclif, he falters and becomes dull or verbose. He left only a few reformatory writings in the proper sense of the word, most of his works being polemical treatises against ] and ]. It is doubtful whether he knew all the works of Wyclif. He translated the ''Trialogus'', and was very familiar with his works on the body of the Lord, on the Church, on the power of the pope, and especially with his sermons. The book on the Church and on the power of the pope contains the essence of the doctrine of Hus. According to it, the Church is not that hierarchy which is generally designated as Church; the Church is the entire body of those who from eternity have been predestined for | |||
salvation. Christ, not the pope, is its head. It is no article of faith that one must obey the pope to be saved. Neither external membership in the Church nor churchly offices and dignities are a surety that the persons in question are members of the true Church. What he says in his sermons on the corruption of the Church, clergy, and monks, on the duties of secular powers, etc., he has taken almost literally from Wyclif. His three great sermons, ''De suffcientia legis Christi'', ''De fidei suae elucidatione'', and ''De pace'', | |||
with which he thought to carry away the whole council at Constance, are exact reproductions of Wyclif's sermons. He claims not to have shared Wyclif's views regarding the sacraments, but this is not certain. The soil had been well prepared for this very doctrine in Bohemia. There are reasons to suppose that Wyclif's doctrine of the Lords' Supper had spread to Prague as early as 1399. It gained an even wider circulation after it had been prohibited in 1403, and Hus preached and taught it, although it is possible that he simply repeated it without advocating it. But the doctrine was seized eagerly by the radical party, the Taborites, who made it the central | |||
point of their system. | |||
==== Hus leaves Prague and appeals to Jesus Christ ==== | |||
== Source of his influence == | |||
By this time, Hus's ideas had become widely accepted in Bohemia and there was broad resentment against the Church hierarchy. The attack on Hus by the pope and archbishop caused riots in parts of Bohemia. King Wenceslaus IV and his government took the side of Hus and the power of his adherents increased from day to day. Hus continued to preach in the ]. The churches of the city were put under the ban, and an ] was pronounced against ]. To protect the city, Hus left and went into the countryside where he continued to preach and write.{{sfn|Kuhns|1907|pp=77–78}} | |||
The great success of Hus in his native country was due mainly to his unsurpassed pastoral activity, which far excelled that of the famous | |||
old preachers of Bohemia. But even here Hus was the docile pupil of the Englishman. Hus himself put the highest value on the sermon and knew how to awaken the enthusiasm of the masses. His sermons were often inflammatory as regards their content; he introduces his quarrels with his spiritual superiors, criticizes contemporaneous events, or appeals to his congregation as witness or judge. It was this bearing which multiplied his adherents, and thus he became the true apostle of his English master without being himself a theorist in theological questions. In the art of governing and leading masses he was unexcelled. Hus' warm friend and devoted follower, ], shared his fate, although he did not suffer death till nearly a year later. | |||
Before Hus left Prague, he decided to take a step which gave a new dimension to his endeavors. He wanted to become a preacher and then taught at the university he studied at before. He no longer put his trust in an indecisive king, a hostile pope or an ineffective council. On 18 October 1412, he appealed to Jesus Christ as the supreme judge.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Funda |first1=Otakar A. |title=Když se rákos chvěje nad hladinou|language=cs |date=2009 |publisher=Karolinum Press |isbn=978-8024615929 |page=145 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0wZNBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA145}}</ref> By appealing directly to the highest Christian authority, Christ himself, he bypassed the laws and structures of the medieval Church. For the ], this step was as significant as the ] posted in ] by Martin Luther in 1517. | |||
== Source == | |||
* Schaff-Herzog: Encyclopedia of Religion | |||
After Hus left Prague for the country, he realized what a gulf there was between university education and theological speculation and the life of uneducated country priests and the laymen entrusted to their care.{{sfn|Nodl|2010|pp=530–531}} Therefore he started to write many texts in Czech, such as basics of the Christian faith or preachings, intended mainly for the priests whose knowledge of Latin was poor.{{sfn|Šmahel|2013|p=143}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
====Writings of Hus and Wycliffe==== | |||
] | |||
Of the writings occasioned by these controversies, those of Hus on the Church, entitled ''De Ecclesia'', were written in 1413 and have been most frequently quoted and admired or criticized, yet their first ten chapters are an epitome of Wycliffe's work of the same title and the following chapters are an abstract of another of Wycliffe's works (''De potentate papae'') on the power of the pope. Wycliffe had written his book to oppose the common position that the Church consisted primarily of the clergy, and Hus now found himself making the same point. He wrote his work at the castle of one of his protectors in Kozí Hrádek and sent it to Prague where it was publicly read in the Bethlehem Chapel. It was answered by Stanislav ze Znojma and Štěpán z Pálče (also Štěpán Páleč) with treatises of the same title.{{citation needed|date=July 2018}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
After the most vehement opponents of Hus had left Prague, his adherents occupied the whole ground. Hus wrote his treatises and preached in the neighborhood of Kozí Hrádek. Bohemian Wycliffism was carried into Poland, Hungary, ], and Austria. But in January 1413, a general council in Rome condemned the writings of Wycliffe and ordered them to be burned.{{citation needed|date=June 2020}} | |||
===Council of Constance=== | |||
King Wenceslaus's brother ], who was "]" (that is, head of the Holy Roman Empire though not then Emperor) and heir to the Bohemian crown, was anxious to put an end to religious dissension within the Church. To put an end to the papal schism and to take up the long-desired reform of the Church, he arranged for a general council to convene on 1 November 1414, at ] (Constance).{{sfn|Lützow|1909|pp=224–228}} The ] (1414–1418) became the 16th ecumenical council recognized by the Catholic Church. Hus, willing to make an end to all dissensions, agreed to go to Constance, under Sigismund's promise of ].{{sfn|Gillett|1863|pp=464–466}} | |||
====Imprisonment and preparations for trial==== | |||
]. 19th-century painting by ]]] | |||
It is not known whether Hus knew what his fate would be, however, he made his ] before setting out. He started on his journey on 11 October 1414, arriving in Constance on 3 November 1414. The following day, the bulletins on the church doors announced that Michal z Německého Brodu (Michal de Causis) would be opposing Hus. In the beginning, Hus was at liberty under his safe-conduct from Sigismund and lived at the house of a widow. But he continued celebrating mass and preaching to the people, in violation of restrictions decreed by the Church. After a few weeks on 28 November 1414, his opponents succeeded in imprisoning him on the strength of a rumor that he intended to flee. He was first brought into the residence of a canon and then on 6 December 1414 into the prison of the ] monastery. Sigismund, as the guarantor of Hus's safety, was greatly angered and threatened the prelates with dismissal. The prelates convinced him that he could not be bound by promises to a heretic.{{sfn|Fudge|2010|pp=125–127}} | |||
On 4 December 1414, John XXIII entrusted a committee of three bishops with a preliminary investigation against Hus. As was common practice, witnesses for the prosecution were heard but Hus was not allowed an advocate for his defense. His situation became worse after the downfall of John XXIII, who had left Constance to avoid abdicating. Hus had been the captive of John XXIII and in constant communication with his friends, but now he was delivered to the bishop of Constance and brought to his castle, ''Gottlieben on the Rhine''. Here he remained for 73 days, separated from his friends, chained day and night, poorly fed, and ill. | |||
===Trial=== | |||
On 5 June 1415, he was tried for the first time and was transferred to a ] monastery, where he spent the last weeks of his life. Extracts from his works were read and witnesses were heard. He refused all formulae of submission but declared himself willing to recant if his errors should be proven to him from the Bible. Hus conceded his veneration of Wycliffe and said that he could only wish his soul might some time attain unto that place where Wycliffe's was. On the other hand, he denied having defended Wycliffe's view of ] or the forty-five articles; he had only opposed their summary condemnation. King Sigismund admonished him to deliver himself up to the mercy of the council, as he did not desire to protect a heretic.{{sfn|Shahan|1908|p=III}} | |||
At the last trial, on 8 June 1415, thirty-nine sentences were read to him. Of these, twenty-six had been excerpted from his book on the Church (''De ecclesia''), seven from his treatise against Páleč (Contra Palecz), and six from that against Stanislav ze Znojma (''Contra Stanislaum''). The danger of some of these views to worldly power was explained to Sigismund to incite him against Hus. Hus again declared himself willing to submit if he could be convinced of errors. This declaration was considered an unconditional surrender, and he was asked to confess: | |||
1. That he had erred in the theses which he had hitherto maintained; | |||
2. That he renounced them for the future; | |||
3. That he recanted them; and | |||
4. That he declared the opposite of these sentences. | |||
He asked to be exempted from recanting teachings which he had never taught. Other views, which the assembly considered erroneous, he was not willing to revoke and to act differently would be against his conscience. These words found no favorable reception. After the trial on 8 June, several other attempts were purportedly made to induce him to recant, which he resisted.{{sfn|Kuhns|1907|pp=126–127}} | |||
====Condemnation==== | |||
], where reformer Jan Hus was executed (1862)]] | |||
{{More citations needed section|date=July 2020}} | |||
The condemnation of Jan Hus took place on 6 July 1415 in the presence of the assembly of the council in the cathedral. After the ] and Liturgy, Hus was led into the church. The ] (then ]) delivered an oration on the duty of eradicating heresy; various theses of Hus and Wycliffe and a report of his trial were then read. | |||
An Italian prelate pronounced the sentence of condemnation upon Hus and his writings. Hus protested, saying that even at this hour he did not wish anything but to be convinced from Scripture.{{citation required|date=September 2023}} He fell upon his knees and asked God with a soft voice to forgive all his enemies.{{citation required|date=September 2023}} Then followed his degradation from the priesthood. He was dressed in priestly vestments and again asked to recant and again he refused. With curses, Hus's ornaments were taken from him, his priestly ] was destroyed. The judgment of the Church was pronounced: | |||
{{Blockquote|text=This holy synod of Constance, seeing that God’s church has nothing more that it can do, relinquishes John Hus to the judgment of the secular authority and decrees that he is to be relinquished to the secular court.|source=Council of Constance, Session 15 – 6 July 1415<ref>{{cite web |last1=Fathers |first1=Council |title=Council of Constance 1414-18 Council Fathers |url=https://www.papalencyclicals.net/Councils/ecum16.htm |website=Papal Encyclicals |language=en |date=5 November 1414}}</ref>}} | |||
A tall paper hat was allegedly put upon his head with the inscription "'']''" (''i.e.'', the leader of a heretical movement).<ref>{{Cite book |last=De Schweinitz |first=Edmund |title=The History of the Church Known as the Unitas Fratrum: Or the Unity of the Brethren, Founded by the Followers of John Hus, the Bohemian Reformer and Martyr |publisher=Moravian Publication Office |year=1885 |location=Bethlehem, PA. |pages=74}}</ref> Hus was led away to the stake under a strong guard of armed men.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Huss, John, Hussites |url=https://www.ccel.org/s/schaff/encyc/encyc05/htm/v.xii.ii.htm |access-date=2024-05-11 |website=www.ccel.org}}</ref> | |||
Before his execution, Hus is said to have declared, "You may kill a weak goose , but more powerful birds, eagles and falcons, will come after me."{{Citation needed|date=January 2024}} ] modified the statement and reported that Hus had said that they might have roasted a goose, but that in a hundred years a swan would sing to whom they be forced to listen. In 1546, in his ] for Luther, ] gave a further twist to Hus's declaration: "You may burn a goose, but in a hundred years will come a swan you will not be able to burn." Twenty years later, in 1566, ], Luther's first biographer, found Hus's prophecy to be evidence of Luther's divine inspiration.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Scribner|first=R. W.|date=1986|title=Incombustible Luther: The Image of the Reformer in Early Modern Germany|url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/650648|journal=Past & Present|issue=110|pages=38–68|doi=10.1093/past/110.1.38|jstor=650648|issn=0031-2746}}</ref> | |||
===Execution=== | |||
] | |||
] | |||
], Jena codex (c. 1500)]] | |||
At the place of execution, he knelt down, spread out his hands and prayed aloud. The executioner undressed Hus and tied his hands behind his back with ropes. His neck was bound with a chain to a stake around which wood and straw had been piled up so that it covered him to the neck. At the last moment, the imperial marshal, von Pappenheim, in the presence of the ], asked Hus to recant and thus save his own life. Hus declined, stating: | |||
{{Blockquote|God is my witness that the things charged against me I never preached. In the same truth of the Gospel which I have written, taught, and preached, drawing upon the sayings and positions of the holy doctors, I am ready to die today.{{sfn|Schaff|1953|pp=415–420}}}} | |||
Anecdotally, it has been said that the executioners had trouble intensifying the fire. An old woman then came to the stake and threw a relatively small amount of ] on it. Upon seeing her act, a suffering Hus then exclaimed, "O ''Sancta Simplicitas!''" ("O holy simplicity!"). It is said that when he was about to expire, he cried out, "Christ, son of the Living God, have mercy on us!" (a variant of the ]). Hus's ashes were later thrown into the ] river as a means of preventing the veneration of his remains. | |||
==Aftermath== | |||
=== Bohemian Protest === | |||
As news of Hus's death spread outrage was brewing from the local nobles and doctors.<ref name=":0">{{Cite book |last=Cuthbertson |first=David |title=The Protest Against the Burning of John Huss |publisher=Alexander Moring Limited |year=1913 |location=London |page=11 |language=en}}</ref> On 2 September 1415, a document now called the Bohemian Protest was signed with corresponding attached wax seals by 100 notable people from Bohemia and Moravia in protest of Jan Hus's burning. There is evidence that four documents of this kind were made in total, however only this one is known to survive and is currently held at the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=Bohemian Protest, Recto |url= https://images.is.ed.ac.uk/luna/servlet/detail/UoEgal~5~5~51570~103970:Bohemian-Protest,-Recto |access-date=2022-11-30 |website = ED}}</ref> The statement inside reads that "Master John Hus was a good, just and catholic man" that "consistently detested all error and heresies" and that anyone that believed that heresy was arising within Bohemia or Moravia to be "the worst of traitors".<ref name=":0"/> | |||
===Hussite Wars=== | |||
{{Main|Hussite Wars}} | |||
] leading troops of Hussites]] | |||
] mines by pro-Catholic townsmen]] | |||
Responding with horror to the execution of Hus, the people of Bohemia moved even more rapidly away from Papal teachings. Rome then pronounced a ] against them (1 March 1420): ] issued a ] authorizing the execution of all supporters of Hus and Wycliffe. King Wenceslaus IV died in August 1419, and his brother, ], was unable to establish a real government in Bohemia due to the Hussite revolt.{{sfn|Lützow|1914|pp=177–79}} | |||
The Hussite community included most of the Czech population of the Kingdom of Bohemia. Under the leadership of ] (c. 1360–1424) and later of ] (c. 1380–1434)—both excellent commanders—the Hussites defeated the crusade and the other three crusades that followed (1419–1434). Fighting ended after a compromise between the ] Hussites and the Catholic ] in 1436. It resulted in the ], in which the Catholic Church officially allowed Bohemia to practice its own version of Christianity (Hussitism). A century later as much as ninety percent of the inhabitants of the ] still followed Hussite teachings. | |||
===Hus's scholarship and teachings=== | |||
{{More citations needed section|date=July 2020}} | |||
] and Hus serving ] together; picture from 16th-century Saxony demonstrating the affinity of Lutherans with Hussites]] | |||
Hus left reformatory writings. He translated Wycliffe's ''Trialogus'' and was very familiar with his works on the body of ], the Church, and the power of the pope, as well as and especially with his sermons. There are reasons to suppose that Wycliffe's view of the Lord's Supper (] rather than ]{{sfn|Lechler|1904|p=381}}) had spread to Prague as early as 1399, with strong evidence that students returning from England had brought the work back with them. It gained an even wider circulation after it had been prohibited in 1403, and Hus preached and taught it. The view was seized eagerly by the ], who made it the central point of their system. According to their book, the Church is not the clerical hierarchy that was generally accepted as 'the Church'; the Church is the entire body of those who from eternity have been predestined for salvation. Christ, not the pope, is its head. It is no article of faith that one must obey the pope to be saved. Neither internal membership in the Church nor churchly offices and dignities are a surety that the persons in question are members of the true Church. | |||
Hus's efforts were designed to rid the Church of its ethical abuses. The seeds of the Reformation are clear in Hus's and Wycliffe's writings. In explaining the plight of the average Christian in Bohemia, Hus wrote, "One pays for confession, for Mass, for the sacrament, for indulgences, for ], for a blessing, for burials, for funeral services and prayers. The very last penny which an old woman has hidden in her bundle for fear of thieves or robbery will not be saved. The villainous priest will grab it."{{Sfn | Macek | 1958 | p = 16}} After Hus's death, his followers, known as ], split off into several groups including the ], ]s and ]. | |||
===Apology of the Catholic Church=== | |||
Nearly six centuries later in 1999, ] expressed "deep regret for the cruel death inflicted" on Hus and added "deep sorrow" for Hus's death and praised his "moral courage".<ref name=JohnLAllenJr/> Cardinal ] of the Czech Republic was instrumental in crafting John Paul II's statement.<ref name= "JohnLAllenJr">{{cite news |last=Allen |first=John L. Jr. |date=15 September 2009 |title=The German shepherd bids farewell to a 'wolf in winter' |url= http://ncronline.org/news/german-shepherd-bids-farewell-wolf-winter |website=National Catholic Reporter }}</ref> Members of the Moravian Church believe that it remains for God to judge those who were involved in the death of Hus. | |||
===Hus and the Czech language=== | |||
The works of Jan Hus incorporate reforms to medieval ], including the "hook" (]) diacritic which was used to form the ]s {{angle bracket|č}}, {{angle bracket|ě}}, {{angle bracket|š}}, {{angle bracket|ř}} and {{angle bracket|ž}}, which replaced ] like {{angle bracket|cz}}, {{angle bracket|ie}}, {{angle bracket|sch}}, {{angle bracket|rz}} and {{angle bracket|zs}}; the "dot" above letters for strong accent,{{clarify|date=October 2019}} as well as the acute accent to mark long vowels {{angle bracket|á}}, {{angle bracket|é}}, {{angle bracket|í}}, {{angle bracket|ó}}, and {{angle bracket|ú}}, in order to represent each ] by a single ]. Some sources mention documented use of the special symbols in Bible translations (1462), the Schaffhausen Bible, and handwritten notes in the Bible. The symbol {{angle bracket|ů}} (instead of {{angle bracket|uo}}) came later. The book '']'' (1406) was attributed to Hus by ], but it is possible that it was compiled by another author from Charles University. | |||
==Legacy== | |||
] at ] in ] built in 1915]] | |||
A century after the ] began, as many as 90% of inhabitants of the ] were Hussites (although in the ] tradition following a joint Utraquist—Catholic victory in the Hussite Wars).{{sfn|Václavík|2010|p=53}} ] was the site of ],<ref name="museeprotestant.org">{{Cite web|url=https://museeprotestant.org/en/notice/protestantism-in-the-republic-of-czechoslovakia/|title=Protestantism in Bohemia and Moravia (Czech Republic)}}</ref> and there are still Protestant adherents remaining in modern times;<ref>{{cite web|language=cs |url=http://www.czso.cz/sldb2011/eng/redakce.nsf/i/tab_7_1_population_by_religious_belief_and_by_municipality_size_groups/$File/PVCR071_ENG.pdf |title=Tab 7.1 Population by religious belief and by municipality size groups |publisher=Czso.cz |access-date=19 November 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150221184947/http://www.czso.cz/sldb2011/eng/redakce.nsf/i/tab_7_1_population_by_religious_belief_and_by_municipality_size_groups/%24File/PVCR071_ENG.pdf |archive-date=21 February 2015 }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|language=cs |url=http://www.czso.cz/sldb2011/eng/redakce.nsf/i/tab_7_2_population_by_religious_belief_and_by_regions/$File/PVCR072_ENG.pdf |title=Tab 7.2 Population by religious belief and by regions |publisher=Czso.cz |access-date=19 November 2013 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131104224923/http://www.czso.cz/sldb2011/eng/redakce.nsf/i/tab_7_2_population_by_religious_belief_and_by_regions/%24File/PVCR072_ENG.pdf |archive-date= 4 November 2013 }}</ref> though they no longer comprise the majority: suggested historical reasons include the persecution of Protestants by the ] ],<ref>{{cite book |isbn=978-0-470-29323-2 |first1=Hana |last1=Mastrini |title=Frommer's Prague & the Best of the Czech Republic |year=2008 |edition=7th |publisher=Wiley }}{{page needed|date=July 2018}}</ref> particularly after the ] in 1620; restrictions during the ]; and also the ongoing ].<ref name="museeprotestant.org"/> Modern Czechs exhibit very high distrust of religious and other institutions.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Halík |first1=Tomáš |last2=Hošek |first2=Pavel |title=Czech Perspective on Faith in a Secular Age: Czech Philosophical Studies, V |date=2015 |publisher=Council for Research into Values and Philosophy |location=Washington, DC, USA |isbn=9781565183001 |url=https://www.crvp.org/publications/Series-VIII/10-master-czech.pdf |access-date=24 September 2023}}</ref>{{rp|27}} | |||
Jan Hus was a key contributor to ], whose teachings had a strong influence on the states of Europe and on ].{{sfn|Oberman|Walliser-Schwarzbart|2006|pp=54–55}} The ] resulted in the Basel Compacts, which allowed for a reformed Church in the Kingdom of Bohemia—almost a century before such developments would take place in the Lutheran Reformation. ] is the modern-day home of Hus's followers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.unitasfratrum.org/index.php/origin-growth-of-the-unitas-fratrum/ |title=The Origin & Growth |website=Unitas Fratrum |access-date=17 September 2011 |archive-date=26 September 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110926192935/http://www.unitasfratrum.org/index.php/origin-growth-of-the-unitas-fratrum/ |url-status=dead }}</ref> Hus's extensive writings earned him a prominent place in Czech literary history. | |||
In 1883 the Czech composer ] composed his ] based on melodies used by Hussite soldiers. It was often performed by the German conductor ]. | |||
Professor ] used Hus's name in his speech at Geneva University on 6 July 1915, for defense against Austria and in July 1917 for the title of the first corps of troops of his legions in Russia.<ref>Preclík, Vratislav. Masaryk a legie (Masaryk and legions), váz. kniha, 219 str., vydalo nakladatelství Paris Karviná, Žižkova 2379 (734 01 Karviná) ve spolupráci s Masarykovým demokratickým hnutím (Masaryk Democratic Movement, Prague, CZ), 2019, {{ISBN|978-80-87173-47-3}}, pp. 17–25, 33–45, 70–76, 159–184, 187–199</ref> | |||
Today, the ] is located at the Prague ] ({{langx|cs|Staroměstské náměstí|links=no}}), and there are many smaller memorials in other towns throughout the Czech Republic. | |||
In New York City, a church in ] (located at 153 Ocean Avenue) and a church and a theatre in ] (located at 351 ]) are named for Hus, the John Hus Moravian Church and the Jan Hus Playhouse, respectively. Although Manhattan's church and theatre share a single building and management, the playhouse's productions are usually nonreligious or nondenominational. | |||
A statue of Jan Hus was erected at the Union Cemetery in ] (on ]) by Czech immigrants to the New York area in 1893. | |||
In contrast to the popular perception that Hus was a ], some Eastern Orthodox Christians have argued that his theology was far closer to ]. Jan Hus is considered a martyr saint in some jurisdictions of the Orthodox Church.<ref name="husodox">{{cite web|url=http://journeytoorthodoxy.com/2011/11/19/jan-hus-jerome-of-prague-and-orthodoxy-in-czechia-slovakia/|title=Jan Hus, Jerome of Prague and Orthodoxy in Czechia & Slovakia|access-date=26 January 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131213205339/http://journeytoorthodoxy.com/2011/11/19/jan-hus-jerome-of-prague-and-orthodoxy-in-czechia-slovakia/|archive-date=13 December 2013|url-status=dead}}</ref> The ] claims to trace its origin to Hus, to be "neo-Hussite", and contains mixed Eastern Orthodox and Protestant elements. Nowadays, he is considered a saint by the Orthodox churches of ], ], ], and several others.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.pravoslavie.ru/49048.html|title = More and More People in Czechia and Slovakia Are Giving Preference to the Orthodox Church}}</ref> | |||
Hus was voted the greatest hero of the Czech nation in a 2015 survey by Czech Radio.<ref name="Anketa: KDO JE PRO VÁS HRDiNA.CZ? HRDiNA.CZ">{{cite web|title=Anketa: Kdo Je Pro Vás hrdina.cz?|url=http://www.rozhlas.cz/hrdina/anketa|website=www.rozhlas.cz|access-date=20 June 2017|language=cs}}</ref> | |||
==In popular culture== | |||
Hus appears in the '']'' trilogy by writer ]. | |||
Jan Hus is a major character of the "Hussite Revolutionary Trilogy" directed by ]. He is played by ] in the 1954 film ''].'' | |||
Jan Hus is played by ] in the 1977 American film '']''. | |||
Jan Hus is a major character in the stage play '']''. | |||
The Czech television film '']'' was released in 2015. It starred ]. | |||
Jan Hus is mentioned multiple times in the 2018 video game '']'' | |||
Hus appears in the 2022 film '']'' played by ]. | |||
The lives of Hus and ] are the subject of the 2014 ''Hus a Chelčický'' book for older children, written and illustrated by ]. The book won the Association of Czech Graphic Artists HOLLAR award for its illustrations.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Výsledky 2014 |url=https://www.en.pamatniknarodnihopisemnictvi.cz/184-2014/ |access-date=2023-02-22 |website=Památník národního písemnictví}}</ref> | |||
=== Holidays commemorating Hus === | |||
* ] – 6 July. Members of the Unitas Fratrum and ] claim Hus as a spiritual forerunner. | |||
* {{flagicon|CZE}} – Jan Hus Day (''Den upálení mistra Jana Husa'', literally: The day of burning of Master Jan Hus) on 6 July, the anniversary of Hus ]. It is a ]. | |||
* {{flagicon|USA}} He is also commemorated as a martyr on the ] of the ].<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.czso.cz/sldb/sldb2001.nsf/tabx/CZ0000|archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20141103104641/http://www.czso.cz/sldb/sldb2001.nsf/tabx/CZ0000|url-status=dead|title=Český statistický úřad|archivedate=3 November 2014}}</ref> | |||
==Famous followers of Jan Hus== | |||
* ], Hus's friend and devoted follower shared his fate and on 30 May 1416 was also burned at ] | |||
* ] (1375–1428) ({{langx|de|Johannes Cardinalis von Bergreichenstein}})<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.phil.muni.cz/fil/scf/komplet/kardin.html|title=Jan Kardinál z Rejnštejna|publisher=Phil.muni.cz|access-date=5 September 2008}}</ref> | |||
* ] (c. 1360–1424), Czech general and Hussite leader | |||
* ] (died 26 March 1410) (in German: Matthäus von ]) | |||
* ] (1385 Pelhřimov – 1460 Poděbrady) (in ]: ], in German: ]) | |||
* ] (1592–1670) ({{langx|cs|Jan Amos Komenský}}) – pastor, teacher, philosopher, educator and writer. The last bishop of ] prior to its renewal (as the ]). Early champion of universal education, and education in one's mother language. | |||
==Gallery== | |||
<gallery class="center" widths="200" heights="150"> | |||
File:Jan Hus 2.jpg|Portrait of Jan Hus, 16th century | |||
File:Vaclav Brozik - Hus.jpg|Painting of Jan Hus at the ] by ] (1883) | |||
File:Burning of jan hus at the stake at council of constance.jpg|Preparing the execution of Jan Hus | |||
File:Kazani mistra jana husa v kapli betlemske 81x61m.jpg|]: Master Jan Hus Preaching at the Bethlehem Chapel: Truth prevails, 1916; part of the 20-painting work, '']'' | |||
File:Betlemska kaple.jpg|] (exterior) in Prague | |||
File:Betlémská kaple interior.JPG|Bethlehem Chapel (interior) in Prague | |||
File:Portrait of Jan Hus.jpg|Medallion portrait of Jan Hus | |||
File:Execution of Jan Hus.jpg|Preparing to burn Jan Hus at the stake | |||
File:Medallion of Jan Hus.jpg|Medallion of Jan Hus, showing his portrait and execution | |||
File:6664 - Roma - Ettore Ferrari, Monumento a Giordano Bruno (1889) - Foto Giovanni Dall'Orto, 6-Apr-2008.jpg|Profile of Jan Hus on the ] | |||
</gallery> | |||
==Works== | |||
* ''Iohannes Hus. Postilla adumbrata'', ed. G. Silagi (''Corpus Christianorum. Continuatio Mediaevalis'' 261), Turnhout: Brepols Publishers ({{ISBN|978-2-503-55275-0}}) | |||
* ], Jan Hus; ], translator, New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1915. | |||
* ], Jan Hus; Campbell Mackenzie, translator, Edinburgh, William Whyte & co., 1846 | |||
* ], Jan Hus; Herbert B. Workman; R. Martin Pope, London, Hodder and Stoughton, 1904. | |||
* The Letters of John Hus, Jan Hus; Matthew Spinka, translator. | |||
* | |||
==See also== | |||
{{Portal|Saints|Christianity|Czech Republic}} | |||
*], a treatise thought to have been written by Jan Hus | |||
*], a New York City parish of the ] and named after Jan Hus | |||
==Notes== | |||
{{Reflist|group=note}} | |||
{{notelist}} | |||
==References== | |||
===Citations=== | |||
{{Reflist|colwidth=30em}} | |||
===Sources=== | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Fudge |first=Thomas A. |year=2010 |title=Jan Hus: Religious Reform and Social Revolution in Bohemia |location=Adams County Public Library |publisher=I.B. Tauris }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Gillett |first=E.H. |date=1863 |title=The life and times of John Huss; or, The Bohemian reformation of the fifteenth century (pt.1) |url= https://archive.org/details/lifetimesofjohnhuss01gill/ |location= Princeton Theological Seminary Library |publisher=Gould and Lincoln }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Gilpin |first=William |date=1809 |title=The Lives of the Reformers |url= https://archive.org/details/livesofreformers01gilp/ |location= Princeton Theological Seminary Library |publisher=T. Cadell and W. Davies |author-link=William Gilpin (priest) }} | |||
* {{cite book|first1=Heiko Augustinus |last1=Oberman|first22=Eileen |last2=Walliser-Schwarzbart|title=Luther: Man Between God and the Devil|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vuES0JdltfcC&pg=PA54|year=2006|publisher=Yale University Press|isbn=0-300-10313-1 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Hus |first=Jan |date=1372–1415 |title=The Letters of John Hus |url= https://archive.org/details/lettersofjohnhus00husjuoft/page/xvi |location=Trinity College-University of Toronto |publisher=Hodder and Stoughton }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Kuhns |first=Oscar |date=1907 |title=John Huss: The Witness |url= https://archive.org/details/johnhusswitness00kuhn/page/40 | place = Cincinnati; New York | publisher = Jennings & Graham; Eaton & Mains | via =New York Public Library }} | |||
* {{cite book|last1=Kuhns|first1=Oscar|last2=Dickie|first2=Robert|date=2017 |title=Jan Hus: Reformation in Bohemia| place = Morrisville, NC | publisher = Lulu |url= https://books.google.com/books?id=3r4yDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA67 |isbn= 978-1-87255629-1 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Lützow |first=Francis |author-link=Count Francis Lützow|date=1909 |title=The Life & Times of Master John Hus |url= https://archive.org/details/lifetimesofmaste00lt/page/64 |location= Princeton Theological Seminary Library |publisher=E.P. Dutton }} | |||
* {{cite book |last=Lützow |first=Francis |date=1914 |title=The Hussite Wars |url= https://archive.org/details/hussitewars00ltgoog|location=Toronto Public Library |publisher=London:Dent, New York:Dutton }} | |||
* {{cite book|first=Gotthard Victor |last=Lechler |url= https://archive.org/details/johnwycliffehise00lechuoft |page= |title=John Wycliffe and His English Precursors |publisher= Religious Tract Society |date=1904 }} | |||
* {{Citation | first = Josef | last = Macek | title = The Hussite Movement in Bohemia | publisher = Orbis | place = Prague | year = 1958}} | |||
* {{cite book|last1=Nodl|first1=Martin|editor1-last=Horníčková|editor1-first=Kateřina|editor2-last=Šroněk|editor2-first=Michal|title=Umění české reformace (1380–1620)|trans-title=The Art of the Bohemian Reformation (1380–1620)|date=2010|publisher=Academia|location=Praha|isbn=978-80-200-1879-3 }} | |||
* {{Cite encyclopedia |url=http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/encyc05/Page_415.html |title=Huss, John, Hussites |last=Schaff |first=Philip |date=1953 |encyclopedia=The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge }} | |||
* {{CathEncy|wstitle= Council of Constance |volume= 4 |last= Shahan |first= Thomas Joseph |author-link= Thomas Joseph Shahan |short=1 }} | |||
* {{cite book |last1=Šmahel |first1=František |title=Jan Hus : život a dílo |trans-title=Jan Hus: Life and Work |language=cs |date=2013 |publisher=Argo |location=Praha |isbn=978-80-257-0875-0 }} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Václavík |first=David |title=Náboženství a moderní česká společnost |trans-title=Religion and Modern Czech Society |language=cs | publisher=Grada Publishing a.s. |year=2010 |page=53 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1A5P3H2gT0sC&pg=PA53 |isbn= 9788024724683}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Wilhelm |first=Joseph |year=1910 |title=The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 7. |publisher=New York: Robert Appleton Company|url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07584b.htm}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
==Further reading== | |||
* Budgen, Victor. "On Fire For God." Evangelical Press, 2007. | |||
* Jan Blahoslav Lášek and Angelo Shaun Franklin, ''Jan Hus: Faithful Witness to Truth'' (Rowman and Littlefield: 2022). | |||
* Richard Friedenthal: ''Jan Hus. Der Ketzer und das Jahrhundert der Revolutionskriege. 2.'' Auflage 1987, {{ISBN|3-492-10331-6}} | |||
* Fudge, Thomas A. ''Jan Hus: Religious Reform and Social Revolution in Bohemia'', I.B. Tauris, London, 2010 | |||
* Fudge, Thomas A. ''The Memory and Morivation of Jan Hus, Medieval Priest and Martyr'', Turnhout, Brepols, 2013 | |||
* Fudge, Thomas A. ''The Trial of Jan Hus: Medieval Heresy and Criminal Procedure'', Oxford University Press, New York, 2013 | |||
* Fudge, Thomas A. n''Jan Hus Between Time and Eternity: Reconsidering a Medieval Heretic'', Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, 2016 | |||
* Fudge, Thomas A. ''Living With Jan Hus: A Modern Journey Across a Medieval Landscape'', Center for Christian Studies, Portland, OR, 2015 | |||
* Count Lützow: ''Life & Times of Master John Hus'', E. P. Dutton & Co. London, 1909 | |||
* Pietro Ratto: ''Il gioco dell'oca. I retroscena segreti del processo al riformatore Jan Hus'', Bibliotheka Edizioni , Rome, 2020. {{ISBN|978-88-6934-644-6}} | |||
* Philip Schaff-Herzog: ''Encyclopedia of Religion'' | |||
*{{Cite book|last=Spinka|first=Matthew|title= The Letters of John Hus |publisher=] | |||
|year= 1972|place=Totowa, ] |oclc=590290}} | |||
*{{Cite book|last=Spinka|first=Matthew | author-mask = 3 |title= John Hus: A Biography|publisher=]| | |||
year= 1968 |place=Princeton, NJ |oclc=441706}} | |||
*{{Cite book|last=Spinka|first=Matthew | author-mask = 3 |title= John Hus' Concept of the Church|publisher=] |year=1966|place=Princeton, NJ |oclc =390635}} | |||
* Matthew Spinka: ''John Hus at the Council of Constance'' ], 1965 (Includes the eye-witness account by Peter of Mladonovice) | |||
* Wilhelm, J. (1910). . In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 16 May 2011 from New Advent. | |||
==External links== | |||
{{Sister project links|wikt=no|b=no|s=Author:Jan Hus|v=no|n=no|voy=no}} | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081030032221/http://www.czech.cz/en/czech-republic/history/all-about-czech-history/hussitism-and-the-heritage-of-jan-hus/ |date=30 October 2008 }} – Official Website of the Czech Republic | |||
* written on 1 July 1415 – ''Modern History Sourcebook'', ] | |||
*, with a preface by ], by Jan Hus, François Paul Émile Boisnormand de Bonnechose, tr. Campbell Mackenzie, Edinburgh, William Whyte & Co., 1846 | |||
*{{Librivox author |id=14370}} | |||
* | |||
* – online translation of a Czech academic journal | |||
* on | |||
* (historical Jan Hus Birth-house in Husinec, Czech Republic) | |||
{{Jan Hus|collapsed}} | |||
{{Christian History|collapsed}} | |||
{{Proto-Protestantism}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Hus, Jan}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 20:04, 2 January 2025
Czech theologian and philosopher (c. 1369–1415) For the films, see Jan Hus (1954 film), Jan Hus (2015 film), and John Hus (1977 film). Not to be confused with J Hus.
Jan Hus | |
---|---|
Woodcut of Jan Hus, c. 1587 | |
Born | c. 1369 Husinec, Kingdom of Bohemia, Holy Roman Empire (now Czech Republic) |
Died | 6 July 1415(1415-07-06) (aged 42–43) Konstanz, Bishopric of Constance, Holy Roman Empire (now Germany) |
Cause of death | Execution by burning |
Other names | John Hus, John Huss |
Alma mater | University of Prague |
Era | Renaissance philosophy |
Region | Western philosophy |
School | Hussite |
Main interests | Theology |
Jan Hus (/hʊs/; Czech: [ˈjan ˈɦus] ; c. 1370 – 6 July 1415), sometimes anglicized as John Hus or John Huss, and referred to in historical texts as Iohannes Hus or Johannes Huss, was a Czech theologian and philosopher who became a Church reformer and the inspiration of Hussitism, a key predecessor to Protestantism, and a seminal figure in the Bohemian Reformation. Hus is considered to be the first Church reformer, even though some designate the theorist John Wycliffe. His teachings had a strong influence, most immediately in the approval of a reformed Bohemian religious denomination and, over a century later, on Martin Luther.
After being ordained as a Catholic priest, Hus began to preach in Prague. He opposed many aspects of the Catholic Church in Bohemia, such as its views on ecclesiology, simony, the Eucharist, and other theological topics. Hus was a master, dean and rector at the Charles University in Prague between 1409 and 1410.
Alexander V issued a Papal bull that excommunicated Hus; however, it was not enforced, and Hus continued to preach. Hus then spoke out against Alexander V's successor, Antipope John XXIII, for his selling of indulgences. Hus' excommunication was then enforced, and he spent the next two years living in exile.
When the Council of Constance assembled, Hus was asked to be there and present his views on the dissension within the Church. When he arrived, with a promise of safe-conduct, he was arrested and put in prison. He was eventually taken in front of the council and asked to recant his views. He refused. On 6 July 1415, he was burned at the stake for heresy against the teachings of the Catholic Church.
After Hus was executed, the followers of his religious teachings (known as Hussites) refused to elect another Catholic monarch and defeated five consecutive papal crusades between 1420 and 1431 in what became known as the Hussite Wars. Both the Bohemian and the Moravian populations remained majority Hussite until the 1620s, when a Protestant defeat in the Battle of the White Mountain resulted in the Lands of the Bohemian Crown coming under Habsburg dominion for the next 300 years and being subject to immediate and forced conversion in an intense campaign of return to Catholicism.
Early life
The exact date of Hus's birth is disputed. Some claim he was born around 1369, while others claim he was born between 1373 and 1375. Though older sources state the latter, more contemporary research states that 1372 is more likely. The belief that he was born on 6 July, also his death day, has no factual basis. Hus was born in Husinec, southern Bohemia, to peasant parents. It is well known that Hus took his name from the village where he lived (Husinec). The reason behind him taking his name from his village rather than from his father is up to speculation; some believe that it was because Hus did not know of his father, while others say it was simply a custom at that time. The name "Hus," however, means "goose" in Bohemian (now called Czech), and he was a century later referenced as a "Bohemian goose" in a dream given to Frederick, the Elector of Saxony. Nearly all other information known about Hus's very early life is unsubstantiated. Similarly, we know little of Hus's family. His father's name was Michael; his mother's name is unknown. It is known that Hus had a brother due to him expressing concerns for his nephew while awaiting execution at Constance. Whether or not Hus had any other family is unknown.
At the age of roughly 10, Hus was sent away to a monastery. The exact reason is not known; some claim that his father had died, others say he went there due to his devotion to God. He impressed the teachers with his studies, and they recommended him to move to Prague, one of the largest cities in Bohemia at that time. Hus apparently supported himself by securing employment in Prague, which allowed him to fulfill his basic necessities, and access to the Prague Library.
Three years later, he was admitted to the University of Prague. Though not an exceptional student, he pursued his studies with ferocity. In 1393, Hus earned a Bachelor of Arts degree at the University of Prague, and he earned his master's degree in 1396. The strongly anti-papal views that were held by many of the professors there likely influenced Hus's future works. During his studies, he served as a choir boy, to supplement his earnings.
Career
Hus began teaching at the University of Prague in 1398 and in 1399, he first publicly defended propositions of Wycliffe. He was ordained as a Catholic priest in 1400. In 1401, his students and faculty promoted him to dean of the philosophical department, and a year later, he became a rector of the University of Prague. He was appointed a preacher at the Bethlehem Chapel in 1402. Hus was a strong advocate for the Czechs and the Realists, and he was influenced by the writings of John Wycliffe. Although Church authorities banned many of Wycliffe's works in 1403, Hus translated Trialogus into Czech and helped to distribute it.
Hus denounced the moral failings of clergy, bishops, and even the papacy from his pulpit. Archbishop Zbyněk Zajíc tolerated this, and even appointed Hus a preacher at the clergy's biennial synod. On 24 June 1405, Pope Innocent VII directed the Archbishop to counter Wycliffe's teachings, especially the idea of impanation in the Eucharist. The archbishop complied by issuing a synod decree against Wycliffe, as well as forbidding any further attacks on the clergy.
In 1406, two Bohemian students brought to Prague a document bearing the seal of the University of Oxford and praising Wycliffe. Hus proudly read the document from his pulpit. Then, in 1408, Pope Gregory XII warned Archbishop Zajic that the Church in Rome had been informed of Wycliffe's heresies and of the sympathies of King Wenceslaus IV of Bohemia for nonconformists. In response, the king and university ordered all of Wycliffe's writings surrendered to the archdiocesan chancery for correction. Hus obeyed, declaring that he condemned the errors in those writings.
Papal Schism
In 1408, the Charles University in Prague was divided by the Western Schism, in which Gregory XII in Rome and Benedict XIII in Avignon both claimed the papacy. Wenceslaus felt Gregory XII might interfere with his plans to be crowned Holy Roman Emperor. He denounced Gregory, ordered the clergy in Bohemia to observe a strict neutrality in the schism and said that he expected the same of the university. Archbishop Zajíc remained faithful to Gregory. At the University, only the scholars of the Bohemian "nation" (one of the four governing sections), with Hus as their leader, vowed neutrality.
Kutná Hora Decree
Further information: Decree of Kutná HoraIn January 1409, Wenceslaus summoned representatives of the four nations comprising the university to the Czech city of Kutná Hora to demand statements of allegiance. The Czech nation agreed, but the other three nations declined. The king then decreed that the Czech nation would have three votes in university affairs, while the "German nation" (composed of the former Bavarian, Saxon, and Polish nations) would have one vote in total. Due to the change in voting structure by May 1409 the German dean and rector were deposed and replaced by Czechs. The Palatine Elector called the Germans to his own University of Heidelberg, while the Margrave of Meissen started a new university in Leipzig. It is estimated that over one thousand students and masters left Prague. The emigrants also spread accusations of Bohemian heresy.
Antipope Alexander V
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
In 1409, the Council of Pisa tried to end the schism by electing Alexander V as Pope, but Gregory and Benedict did not submit. (Alexander was declared an "antipope" by the Council of Constance in 1418.) Hus, his followers, and Wenceslaus IV transferred their allegiance to Alexander V. Under pressure from King Wenceslaus IV, Archbishop Zajíc did the same. Zajíc then lodged an accusation of "ecclesiastical disturbances" against Wycliffites in Prague with Alexander V.
On 20 December 1409, Alexander V issued a papal bull that empowered the Archbishop to proceed against Wycliffism in Prague. All copies of Wycliffe's writings were to be surrendered and his views repudiated, and free preaching discontinued. After the publication of the bull in 1410, Hus appealed to Alexander V, but in vain. The Wycliffe books and valuable manuscripts were burned, and Hus and his adherents were excommunicated by Alexander V.
Crusade against Naples
Alexander V died in 1410, and was succeeded by John XXIII (also later declared an antipope). In 1411, John XXIII proclaimed a crusade against King Ladislaus of Naples, the protector of rival Pope Gregory XII. This crusade was preached in Prague as well. John XXIII also authorized indulgences to raise money for the war. Priests urged the people on, and they crowded into churches to give their offerings. This traffic in indulgences was a sign of the corruption of the Church needing remediation.
Condemnation of indulgences and Crusade
Archbishop Zajíc died in 1411 and with his death the religious movement in Bohemia entered a new phase during which the disputes concerning indulgences assumed great importance. Hus spoke out against indulgences, but he could not carry with him the men of the university. In 1412, a dispute took place, on which occasion Hus delivered his address Quaestio magistri Johannis Hus de indulgentiis. It was taken literally from the last chapter of Wycliffe's book, De ecclesia, and his treatise, De absolutione a pena et culpa. Hus asserted that no pope or bishop had the right to take up the sword in the name of the Church; he should pray for his enemies and bless those who curse him; man obtains forgiveness of sins by true repentance, not money. The doctors of the theological faculty replied, but without success. A few days afterward some of Hus followers led by Vok Voksa z Valdštejna, burned the Papal bulls. Hus, they said, should be obeyed rather than the Church, which they considered a fraudulent mob of adulterers and Simonists.
In response, three men from the lower classes who openly called the indulgences a fraud were beheaded. They were later considered the first martyrs of the Hussite Church. In the meantime, the faculty had condemned the forty-five articles of Wycliffe and added several other theses, deemed heretical, which had originated with Hus. The king forbade the teaching of these articles but neither Hus nor the university complied with the ruling. They requested that the articles should be first proven to be un-scriptural. The tumults at Prague had stirred up a sensation. Papal legates and Archbishop Albik tried to persuade Hus to give up his opposition to the papal bulls and the king made an unsuccessful attempt to reconcile the two parties.
Attempts at reconciliation
King Wenceslaus IV made efforts to harmonize the opposing parties. In 1412, he convoked the heads of his kingdom for a consultation and, at their suggestion, ordered a synod to be held at Český Brod on 2 February 1412. The synod was instead held in the palace of the archbishops at Prague in order to exclude Hus from participation. Propositions were made to restore peace in the Church. Hus declared that Bohemia should have the same freedom in regard to ecclesiastical affairs as other countries and that approbation and condemnation should therefore be announced only with the permission of the state power. This was the view of Wycliffe (Sermones, iii. 519, etc.).
There followed treatises from both parties, but no harmony was obtained. "Even if I should stand before the stake which has been prepared for me," Hus wrote at the time, "I would never accept the recommendation of the theological faculty." The synod did not produce any results but the king ordered a commission to continue the work of reconciliation. The doctors of the university demanded Hus and his followers approve the university's conception of the Church. According to this conception, the pope is the head of the Church and the Cardinals are the body of the Church. Hus protested vigorously. The Hussite party seems to have made a great effort toward reconciliation. To the article that the Roman Church must be obeyed, they added only "so far as every pious Christian is bound". Stanislav ze Znojma and Štěpán Páleč protested against this addition and left the convention; they were exiled by the king, with two others.
Hus leaves Prague and appeals to Jesus Christ
By this time, Hus's ideas had become widely accepted in Bohemia and there was broad resentment against the Church hierarchy. The attack on Hus by the pope and archbishop caused riots in parts of Bohemia. King Wenceslaus IV and his government took the side of Hus and the power of his adherents increased from day to day. Hus continued to preach in the Bethlehem Chapel. The churches of the city were put under the ban, and an interdict was pronounced against Prague. To protect the city, Hus left and went into the countryside where he continued to preach and write.
Before Hus left Prague, he decided to take a step which gave a new dimension to his endeavors. He wanted to become a preacher and then taught at the university he studied at before. He no longer put his trust in an indecisive king, a hostile pope or an ineffective council. On 18 October 1412, he appealed to Jesus Christ as the supreme judge. By appealing directly to the highest Christian authority, Christ himself, he bypassed the laws and structures of the medieval Church. For the Bohemian Reformation, this step was as significant as the Ninety-five Theses posted in Wittenberg by Martin Luther in 1517.
After Hus left Prague for the country, he realized what a gulf there was between university education and theological speculation and the life of uneducated country priests and the laymen entrusted to their care. Therefore he started to write many texts in Czech, such as basics of the Christian faith or preachings, intended mainly for the priests whose knowledge of Latin was poor.
Writings of Hus and Wycliffe
Of the writings occasioned by these controversies, those of Hus on the Church, entitled De Ecclesia, were written in 1413 and have been most frequently quoted and admired or criticized, yet their first ten chapters are an epitome of Wycliffe's work of the same title and the following chapters are an abstract of another of Wycliffe's works (De potentate papae) on the power of the pope. Wycliffe had written his book to oppose the common position that the Church consisted primarily of the clergy, and Hus now found himself making the same point. He wrote his work at the castle of one of his protectors in Kozí Hrádek and sent it to Prague where it was publicly read in the Bethlehem Chapel. It was answered by Stanislav ze Znojma and Štěpán z Pálče (also Štěpán Páleč) with treatises of the same title.
After the most vehement opponents of Hus had left Prague, his adherents occupied the whole ground. Hus wrote his treatises and preached in the neighborhood of Kozí Hrádek. Bohemian Wycliffism was carried into Poland, Hungary, Croatia, and Austria. But in January 1413, a general council in Rome condemned the writings of Wycliffe and ordered them to be burned.
Council of Constance
King Wenceslaus's brother Sigismund of Hungary, who was "King of the Romans" (that is, head of the Holy Roman Empire though not then Emperor) and heir to the Bohemian crown, was anxious to put an end to religious dissension within the Church. To put an end to the papal schism and to take up the long-desired reform of the Church, he arranged for a general council to convene on 1 November 1414, at Konstanz (Constance). The Council of Constance (1414–1418) became the 16th ecumenical council recognized by the Catholic Church. Hus, willing to make an end to all dissensions, agreed to go to Constance, under Sigismund's promise of safe-conduct.
Imprisonment and preparations for trial
It is not known whether Hus knew what his fate would be, however, he made his will before setting out. He started on his journey on 11 October 1414, arriving in Constance on 3 November 1414. The following day, the bulletins on the church doors announced that Michal z Německého Brodu (Michal de Causis) would be opposing Hus. In the beginning, Hus was at liberty under his safe-conduct from Sigismund and lived at the house of a widow. But he continued celebrating mass and preaching to the people, in violation of restrictions decreed by the Church. After a few weeks on 28 November 1414, his opponents succeeded in imprisoning him on the strength of a rumor that he intended to flee. He was first brought into the residence of a canon and then on 6 December 1414 into the prison of the Dominican monastery. Sigismund, as the guarantor of Hus's safety, was greatly angered and threatened the prelates with dismissal. The prelates convinced him that he could not be bound by promises to a heretic.
On 4 December 1414, John XXIII entrusted a committee of three bishops with a preliminary investigation against Hus. As was common practice, witnesses for the prosecution were heard but Hus was not allowed an advocate for his defense. His situation became worse after the downfall of John XXIII, who had left Constance to avoid abdicating. Hus had been the captive of John XXIII and in constant communication with his friends, but now he was delivered to the bishop of Constance and brought to his castle, Gottlieben on the Rhine. Here he remained for 73 days, separated from his friends, chained day and night, poorly fed, and ill.
Trial
On 5 June 1415, he was tried for the first time and was transferred to a Franciscan monastery, where he spent the last weeks of his life. Extracts from his works were read and witnesses were heard. He refused all formulae of submission but declared himself willing to recant if his errors should be proven to him from the Bible. Hus conceded his veneration of Wycliffe and said that he could only wish his soul might some time attain unto that place where Wycliffe's was. On the other hand, he denied having defended Wycliffe's view of The Lord's Supper or the forty-five articles; he had only opposed their summary condemnation. King Sigismund admonished him to deliver himself up to the mercy of the council, as he did not desire to protect a heretic.
At the last trial, on 8 June 1415, thirty-nine sentences were read to him. Of these, twenty-six had been excerpted from his book on the Church (De ecclesia), seven from his treatise against Páleč (Contra Palecz), and six from that against Stanislav ze Znojma (Contra Stanislaum). The danger of some of these views to worldly power was explained to Sigismund to incite him against Hus. Hus again declared himself willing to submit if he could be convinced of errors. This declaration was considered an unconditional surrender, and he was asked to confess: 1. That he had erred in the theses which he had hitherto maintained; 2. That he renounced them for the future; 3. That he recanted them; and 4. That he declared the opposite of these sentences.
He asked to be exempted from recanting teachings which he had never taught. Other views, which the assembly considered erroneous, he was not willing to revoke and to act differently would be against his conscience. These words found no favorable reception. After the trial on 8 June, several other attempts were purportedly made to induce him to recant, which he resisted.
Condemnation
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
The condemnation of Jan Hus took place on 6 July 1415 in the presence of the assembly of the council in the cathedral. After the High Mass and Liturgy, Hus was led into the church. The Bishop of Lodi (then Giacomo Balardi Arrigoni) delivered an oration on the duty of eradicating heresy; various theses of Hus and Wycliffe and a report of his trial were then read.
An Italian prelate pronounced the sentence of condemnation upon Hus and his writings. Hus protested, saying that even at this hour he did not wish anything but to be convinced from Scripture. He fell upon his knees and asked God with a soft voice to forgive all his enemies. Then followed his degradation from the priesthood. He was dressed in priestly vestments and again asked to recant and again he refused. With curses, Hus's ornaments were taken from him, his priestly tonsure was destroyed. The judgment of the Church was pronounced:
This holy synod of Constance, seeing that God’s church has nothing more that it can do, relinquishes John Hus to the judgment of the secular authority and decrees that he is to be relinquished to the secular court.
— Council of Constance, Session 15 – 6 July 1415
A tall paper hat was allegedly put upon his head with the inscription "Haeresiarcha" (i.e., the leader of a heretical movement). Hus was led away to the stake under a strong guard of armed men.
Before his execution, Hus is said to have declared, "You may kill a weak goose , but more powerful birds, eagles and falcons, will come after me." Luther modified the statement and reported that Hus had said that they might have roasted a goose, but that in a hundred years a swan would sing to whom they be forced to listen. In 1546, in his funeral sermon for Luther, Johannes Bugenhagen gave a further twist to Hus's declaration: "You may burn a goose, but in a hundred years will come a swan you will not be able to burn." Twenty years later, in 1566, Johannes Mathesius, Luther's first biographer, found Hus's prophecy to be evidence of Luther's divine inspiration.
Execution
At the place of execution, he knelt down, spread out his hands and prayed aloud. The executioner undressed Hus and tied his hands behind his back with ropes. His neck was bound with a chain to a stake around which wood and straw had been piled up so that it covered him to the neck. At the last moment, the imperial marshal, von Pappenheim, in the presence of the Count Palatine, asked Hus to recant and thus save his own life. Hus declined, stating:
God is my witness that the things charged against me I never preached. In the same truth of the Gospel which I have written, taught, and preached, drawing upon the sayings and positions of the holy doctors, I am ready to die today.
Anecdotally, it has been said that the executioners had trouble intensifying the fire. An old woman then came to the stake and threw a relatively small amount of brushwood on it. Upon seeing her act, a suffering Hus then exclaimed, "O Sancta Simplicitas!" ("O holy simplicity!"). It is said that when he was about to expire, he cried out, "Christ, son of the Living God, have mercy on us!" (a variant of the Jesus Prayer). Hus's ashes were later thrown into the Rhine river as a means of preventing the veneration of his remains.
Aftermath
Bohemian Protest
As news of Hus's death spread outrage was brewing from the local nobles and doctors. On 2 September 1415, a document now called the Bohemian Protest was signed with corresponding attached wax seals by 100 notable people from Bohemia and Moravia in protest of Jan Hus's burning. There is evidence that four documents of this kind were made in total, however only this one is known to survive and is currently held at the University of Edinburgh. The statement inside reads that "Master John Hus was a good, just and catholic man" that "consistently detested all error and heresies" and that anyone that believed that heresy was arising within Bohemia or Moravia to be "the worst of traitors".
Hussite Wars
Main article: Hussite WarsResponding with horror to the execution of Hus, the people of Bohemia moved even more rapidly away from Papal teachings. Rome then pronounced a crusade against them (1 March 1420): Pope Martin V issued a Papal bull authorizing the execution of all supporters of Hus and Wycliffe. King Wenceslaus IV died in August 1419, and his brother, Sigismund of Hungary, was unable to establish a real government in Bohemia due to the Hussite revolt.
The Hussite community included most of the Czech population of the Kingdom of Bohemia. Under the leadership of Jan Žižka (c. 1360–1424) and later of Prokop the Great (c. 1380–1434)—both excellent commanders—the Hussites defeated the crusade and the other three crusades that followed (1419–1434). Fighting ended after a compromise between the Utraquist Hussites and the Catholic Council of Basel in 1436. It resulted in the Basel Compacts, in which the Catholic Church officially allowed Bohemia to practice its own version of Christianity (Hussitism). A century later as much as ninety percent of the inhabitants of the Czech Crown lands still followed Hussite teachings.
Hus's scholarship and teachings
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources in this section. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (July 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Hus left reformatory writings. He translated Wycliffe's Trialogus and was very familiar with his works on the body of Jesus, the Church, and the power of the pope, as well as and especially with his sermons. There are reasons to suppose that Wycliffe's view of the Lord's Supper (consubstantiation rather than transubstantiation) had spread to Prague as early as 1399, with strong evidence that students returning from England had brought the work back with them. It gained an even wider circulation after it had been prohibited in 1403, and Hus preached and taught it. The view was seized eagerly by the Taborites, who made it the central point of their system. According to their book, the Church is not the clerical hierarchy that was generally accepted as 'the Church'; the Church is the entire body of those who from eternity have been predestined for salvation. Christ, not the pope, is its head. It is no article of faith that one must obey the pope to be saved. Neither internal membership in the Church nor churchly offices and dignities are a surety that the persons in question are members of the true Church.
Hus's efforts were designed to rid the Church of its ethical abuses. The seeds of the Reformation are clear in Hus's and Wycliffe's writings. In explaining the plight of the average Christian in Bohemia, Hus wrote, "One pays for confession, for Mass, for the sacrament, for indulgences, for churching a woman, for a blessing, for burials, for funeral services and prayers. The very last penny which an old woman has hidden in her bundle for fear of thieves or robbery will not be saved. The villainous priest will grab it." After Hus's death, his followers, known as Hussites, split off into several groups including the Utraquists, Taborites and Orphans.
Apology of the Catholic Church
Nearly six centuries later in 1999, Pope John Paul II expressed "deep regret for the cruel death inflicted" on Hus and added "deep sorrow" for Hus's death and praised his "moral courage". Cardinal Miloslav Vlk of the Czech Republic was instrumental in crafting John Paul II's statement. Members of the Moravian Church believe that it remains for God to judge those who were involved in the death of Hus.
Hus and the Czech language
The works of Jan Hus incorporate reforms to medieval Czech orthography, including the "hook" (háček) diacritic which was used to form the graphemes ⟨č⟩, ⟨ě⟩, ⟨š⟩, ⟨ř⟩ and ⟨ž⟩, which replaced digraphs like ⟨cz⟩, ⟨ie⟩, ⟨sch⟩, ⟨rz⟩ and ⟨zs⟩; the "dot" above letters for strong accent, as well as the acute accent to mark long vowels ⟨á⟩, ⟨é⟩, ⟨í⟩, ⟨ó⟩, and ⟨ú⟩, in order to represent each phoneme by a single symbol. Some sources mention documented use of the special symbols in Bible translations (1462), the Schaffhausen Bible, and handwritten notes in the Bible. The symbol ⟨ů⟩ (instead of ⟨uo⟩) came later. The book Orthographia Bohemica (1406) was attributed to Hus by František Palacký, but it is possible that it was compiled by another author from Charles University.
Legacy
A century after the Hussite Wars began, as many as 90% of inhabitants of the Czech lands were Hussites (although in the Utraquist tradition following a joint Utraquist—Catholic victory in the Hussite Wars). Bohemia was the site of one of the most significant pre-reformation movements, and there are still Protestant adherents remaining in modern times; though they no longer comprise the majority: suggested historical reasons include the persecution of Protestants by the Catholic Habsburgs, particularly after the Battle of White Mountain in 1620; restrictions during the Communist rule; and also the ongoing secularization. Modern Czechs exhibit very high distrust of religious and other institutions.
Jan Hus was a key contributor to Protestantism, whose teachings had a strong influence on the states of Europe and on Martin Luther. The Hussite Wars resulted in the Basel Compacts, which allowed for a reformed Church in the Kingdom of Bohemia—almost a century before such developments would take place in the Lutheran Reformation. The Unitas Fratrum (or Moravian Church) is the modern-day home of Hus's followers. Hus's extensive writings earned him a prominent place in Czech literary history.
In 1883 the Czech composer Antonín Dvořák composed his Hussite Overture based on melodies used by Hussite soldiers. It was often performed by the German conductor Hans von Bülow.
Professor Tomáš Garrigue Masaryk used Hus's name in his speech at Geneva University on 6 July 1915, for defense against Austria and in July 1917 for the title of the first corps of troops of his legions in Russia.
Today, the Jan Hus Memorial is located at the Prague Old Town Square (Czech: Staroměstské náměstí), and there are many smaller memorials in other towns throughout the Czech Republic.
In New York City, a church in Brooklyn (located at 153 Ocean Avenue) and a church and a theatre in Manhattan (located at 351 East 74th Street) are named for Hus, the John Hus Moravian Church and the Jan Hus Playhouse, respectively. Although Manhattan's church and theatre share a single building and management, the playhouse's productions are usually nonreligious or nondenominational.
A statue of Jan Hus was erected at the Union Cemetery in Bohemia, New York (on Long Island) by Czech immigrants to the New York area in 1893.
In contrast to the popular perception that Hus was a proto-Protestant, some Eastern Orthodox Christians have argued that his theology was far closer to Eastern Orthodox Christianity. Jan Hus is considered a martyr saint in some jurisdictions of the Orthodox Church. The Czechoslovak Hussite Church claims to trace its origin to Hus, to be "neo-Hussite", and contains mixed Eastern Orthodox and Protestant elements. Nowadays, he is considered a saint by the Orthodox churches of Greece, Cyprus, Czechoslovakia, and several others.
Hus was voted the greatest hero of the Czech nation in a 2015 survey by Czech Radio.
In popular culture
Hus appears in the Mezi proudy trilogy by writer Alois Jirásek.
Jan Hus is a major character of the "Hussite Revolutionary Trilogy" directed by Otakar Vávra. He is played by Zdeněk Štěpánek in the 1954 film Jan Hus.
Jan Hus is played by Rod Colbin in the 1977 American film John Hus.
Jan Hus is a major character in the stage play České nebe.
The Czech television film Jan Hus was released in 2015. It starred Matěj Hádek.
Jan Hus is mentioned multiple times in the 2018 video game Kingdom Come Deliverance
Hus appears in the 2022 film Medieval played by Viktor Krištof.
The lives of Hus and Petr Chelčický are the subject of the 2014 Hus a Chelčický book for older children, written and illustrated by Renáta Fučíková. The book won the Association of Czech Graphic Artists HOLLAR award for its illustrations.
Holidays commemorating Hus
- Moravian Church – 6 July. Members of the Unitas Fratrum and Czech Brethren claim Hus as a spiritual forerunner.
- – Jan Hus Day (Den upálení mistra Jana Husa, literally: The day of burning of Master Jan Hus) on 6 July, the anniversary of Hus martyrdom. It is a public holiday in the Czech Republic.
- He is also commemorated as a martyr on the Calendar of Saints of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America.
Famous followers of Jan Hus
- Jerome of Prague, Hus's friend and devoted follower shared his fate and on 30 May 1416 was also burned at Konstanz
- Jan Kardinál z Rejnštejna (1375–1428) (German: Johannes Cardinalis von Bergreichenstein)
- Jan Žižka z Trocnova a Kalicha (c. 1360–1424), Czech general and Hussite leader
- Matěj z Knína (died 26 March 1410) (in German: Matthäus von Knin)
- Mikuláš of Pelhřimov (1385 Pelhřimov – 1460 Poděbrady) (in Latin: Nicolaus Pilgramensis, in German: Nikolaus von Pelgrims)
- John Amos Comenius (1592–1670) (Czech: Jan Amos Komenský) – pastor, teacher, philosopher, educator and writer. The last bishop of Unitas Fratrum prior to its renewal (as the Moravian Church). Early champion of universal education, and education in one's mother language.
Gallery
- Portrait of Jan Hus, 16th century
- Painting of Jan Hus at the Council of Constance by Václav Brožík (1883)
- Preparing the execution of Jan Hus
- Alphonse Mucha: Master Jan Hus Preaching at the Bethlehem Chapel: Truth prevails, 1916; part of the 20-painting work, The Slav Epic
- Bethlehem Chapel (exterior) in Prague
- Bethlehem Chapel (interior) in Prague
- Medallion portrait of Jan Hus
- Preparing to burn Jan Hus at the stake
- Medallion of Jan Hus, showing his portrait and execution
- Profile of Jan Hus on the Giordano Bruno Statue
Works
- Iohannes Hus. Postilla adumbrata, ed. G. Silagi (Corpus Christianorum. Continuatio Mediaevalis 261), Turnhout: Brepols Publishers (ISBN 978-2-503-55275-0)
- De Ecclesia. The Church, Jan Hus; David S. Schaff, translator, New York, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1915.
- Letters of John Huss Written During His Exile and Imprisonment, Jan Hus; Campbell Mackenzie, translator, Edinburgh, William Whyte & co., 1846
- The letters of John Hus, Jan Hus; Herbert B. Workman; R. Martin Pope, London, Hodder and Stoughton, 1904.
- The Letters of John Hus, Jan Hus; Matthew Spinka, translator.
- The Letters of John Hus
See also
- Orthographia bohemica, a treatise thought to have been written by Jan Hus
- Jan Hus Presbyterian Church, a New York City parish of the Presbyterian Church (USA) and named after Jan Hus
Notes
- "John Wycliffe may be thought of as the theorist of ecclesiastical Reformation, but Hus is considered the first church reformer, the antecedent of Luther, Calvin, and Zwingli, as such. His teachings had a strong influence on the states of Western Europe in the formation of a reformist Bohemian religious denomination and, more than a century later, on Martin Luther himself. Hus was burned at the stake for heresy against the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, including those on ecclesiology, the Eucharist, and other theological dogma."
References
Citations
- Lamport, Forrest & Whaley 2019, p. 227.
- Demy, Timothy J.; Larson, Mark J.; Charles, J. Daryl (2019). The Reformers on War, Peace, and Justice. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 5. ISBN 978-1-4982-0698-3. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
- Lamport, Mark A.; Forrest, Benjamin K.; Whaley, Vernon M. (2019). Hymns and Hymnody: Historical and Theological Introductions, Volume 2: From Catholic Europe to Protestant Europe. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 227. ISBN 978-1-5326-5125-0. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
- Walker, Williston (2014). A History of the Christian Church. Ravenio Books. p. 56. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
- Verhoeven, Ludo; Perfetti, Charles (2017). Learning to Read across Languages and Writing Systems. Cambridge University Press. p. 372. ISBN 978-1-107-09588-5. Retrieved 21 January 2022.
- ^ Gillett 1863, pp. 464–466.
- ^ Kuhns 1907, p. 40.
- ^ Lützow 1909, p. 64.
- Gillett 1863, p. 43.
- Kuhns 1907, p. 64.
- Lützow 1909, p. 65.
- Gillett 1863, p. 44.
- Gillett 1863, pp. 43–44.
- Fudge 2010, p. 9.
- Gilpin 1809, p. 141.
- Gillett 1863, pp. 44–45.
- Gillett 1863, pp. 46–48.
- Gillett 1863, pp. 47–50.
- Lützow 1909, pp. 70–71.
- Gilpin 1809, p. 142.
- Lützow 1909, pp. 73–76.
- Spinka, Matthew (2017). John Hus : a biography. : Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-62219-4. OCLC 975125037.
- Campbell, Gordon (2003). "Hus, Jan or Jan Huss (c.1372–1415)". The Oxford Dictionary of the Renaissance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780191727795.
- Kuhns 1907, p. 43.
- Kuhns 1907, p. 47.
- Kuhns 1907, pp. 45–46.
- ^ Wilhelm 1910.
- Gillett 1863, pp. 76–78.
- Gilpin 1809, p. 143.
- Gillett 1863, pp. 140–141.
- Hus 1372–1415, p. 69.
- Kuhns & Dickie 2017, pp. 67–70.
- Fudge 2010, pp. 97–100.
- "Archaeological and Historical Evidence – Falling Away from the Pure Gospel of Jesus Christ". www.supportingevidences.net. Retrieved 11 December 2020.
- ^ Schaff 1953, pp. 415–420.
- Herzog, Johann Jakob; Hauck, Albert; Jackson, Samuel Macauley; Sherman, Charles Colebrook; Gilmore, George William (1909). The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge: Embracing Biblical, Historical, Doctrinal, and Practical Theology and Biblical, Theological, and Ecclesiastical Biography from the Earliest Times to the Present Day. Funk and Wagnalls Company. pp. 416.
Archbishop Albik tried to persuade Hus to give up his opposition to the papal bulls and the king made an unsuccessful attempt to reconcile the two parties.
- Kuhns 1907, p. 75.
- Kuhns 1907, pp. 77–78.
- Funda, Otakar A. (2009). Když se rákos chvěje nad hladinou (in Czech). Karolinum Press. p. 145. ISBN 978-8024615929.
- Nodl 2010, pp. 530–531.
- Šmahel 2013, p. 143.
- Lützow 1909, pp. 224–228.
- Fudge 2010, pp. 125–127.
- Shahan 1908, p. III.
- Kuhns 1907, pp. 126–127.
- Fathers, Council (5 November 1414). "Council of Constance 1414-18 Council Fathers". Papal Encyclicals.
- De Schweinitz, Edmund (1885). The History of the Church Known as the Unitas Fratrum: Or the Unity of the Brethren, Founded by the Followers of John Hus, the Bohemian Reformer and Martyr. Bethlehem, PA.: Moravian Publication Office. p. 74.
- "Huss, John, Hussites". www.ccel.org. Retrieved 11 May 2024.
- Scribner, R. W. (1986). "Incombustible Luther: The Image of the Reformer in Early Modern Germany". Past & Present (110): 38–68. doi:10.1093/past/110.1.38. ISSN 0031-2746. JSTOR 650648.
- ^ Cuthbertson, David (1913). The Protest Against the Burning of John Huss. London: Alexander Moring Limited. p. 11.
- "Bohemian Protest, Recto". ED. Retrieved 30 November 2022.
- Lützow 1914, pp. 177–79.
- Lechler 1904, p. 381.
- Macek 1958, p. 16.
- ^ Allen, John L. Jr. (15 September 2009). "The German shepherd bids farewell to a 'wolf in winter'". National Catholic Reporter.
- Václavík 2010, p. 53.
- ^ "Protestantism in Bohemia and Moravia (Czech Republic)".
- "Tab 7.1 Population by religious belief and by municipality size groups" (PDF) (in Czech). Czso.cz. Archived from the original (PDF) on 21 February 2015. Retrieved 19 November 2013.
- "Tab 7.2 Population by religious belief and by regions" (PDF) (in Czech). Czso.cz. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 November 2013. Retrieved 19 November 2013.
- Mastrini, Hana (2008). Frommer's Prague & the Best of the Czech Republic (7th ed.). Wiley. ISBN 978-0-470-29323-2.
- Halík, Tomáš; Hošek, Pavel (2015). Czech Perspective on Faith in a Secular Age: Czech Philosophical Studies, V (PDF). Washington, DC, USA: Council for Research into Values and Philosophy. ISBN 9781565183001. Retrieved 24 September 2023.
- Oberman & Walliser-Schwarzbart 2006, pp. 54–55.
- "The Origin & Growth". Unitas Fratrum. Archived from the original on 26 September 2011. Retrieved 17 September 2011.
- Preclík, Vratislav. Masaryk a legie (Masaryk and legions), váz. kniha, 219 str., vydalo nakladatelství Paris Karviná, Žižkova 2379 (734 01 Karviná) ve spolupráci s Masarykovým demokratickým hnutím (Masaryk Democratic Movement, Prague, CZ), 2019, ISBN 978-80-87173-47-3, pp. 17–25, 33–45, 70–76, 159–184, 187–199
- "Jan Hus, Jerome of Prague and Orthodoxy in Czechia & Slovakia". Archived from the original on 13 December 2013. Retrieved 26 January 2019.
- "More and More People in Czechia and Slovakia Are Giving Preference to the Orthodox Church".
- "Anketa: Kdo Je Pro Vás hrdina.cz?". www.rozhlas.cz (in Czech). Retrieved 20 June 2017.
- "Výsledky 2014". Památník národního písemnictví. Retrieved 22 February 2023.
- "Český statistický úřad". Archived from the original on 3 November 2014.
- "Jan Kardinál z Rejnštejna". Phil.muni.cz. Retrieved 5 September 2008.
Sources
- Fudge, Thomas A. (2010). Jan Hus: Religious Reform and Social Revolution in Bohemia. Adams County Public Library: I.B. Tauris.
- Gillett, E.H. (1863). The life and times of John Huss; or, The Bohemian reformation of the fifteenth century (pt.1). Princeton Theological Seminary Library: Gould and Lincoln.
- Gilpin, William (1809). The Lives of the Reformers. Princeton Theological Seminary Library: T. Cadell and W. Davies.
- Oberman, Heiko Augustinus; Walliser-Schwarzbart (2006). Luther: Man Between God and the Devil. Yale University Press. ISBN 0-300-10313-1.
- Hus, Jan (1372–1415). The Letters of John Hus. Trinity College-University of Toronto: Hodder and Stoughton.
- Kuhns, Oscar (1907). John Huss: The Witness. Cincinnati; New York: Jennings & Graham; Eaton & Mains – via New York Public Library.
- Kuhns, Oscar; Dickie, Robert (2017). Jan Hus: Reformation in Bohemia. Morrisville, NC: Lulu. ISBN 978-1-87255629-1.
- Lützow, Francis (1909). The Life & Times of Master John Hus. Princeton Theological Seminary Library: E.P. Dutton.
- Lützow, Francis (1914). The Hussite Wars. Toronto Public Library: London:Dent, New York:Dutton.
- Lechler, Gotthard Victor (1904). John Wycliffe and His English Precursors. Religious Tract Society. p. 381.
- Macek, Josef (1958), The Hussite Movement in Bohemia, Prague: Orbis
- Nodl, Martin (2010). Horníčková, Kateřina; Šroněk, Michal (eds.). Umění české reformace (1380–1620) [The Art of the Bohemian Reformation (1380–1620)]. Praha: Academia. ISBN 978-80-200-1879-3.
- Schaff, Philip (1953). "Huss, John, Hussites". The New Schaff-Herzog Encyclopedia of Religious Knowledge.
- Shahan, Thomas Joseph (1908). "Council of Constance" . Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 4.
- Šmahel, František (2013). Jan Hus : život a dílo [Jan Hus: Life and Work] (in Czech). Praha: Argo. ISBN 978-80-257-0875-0.
- Václavík, David (2010). Náboženství a moderní česká společnost [Religion and Modern Czech Society] (in Czech). Grada Publishing a.s. p. 53. ISBN 9788024724683.
- Wilhelm, Joseph (1910). The Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 7. New York: Robert Appleton Company.
Further reading
- Budgen, Victor. "On Fire For God." Evangelical Press, 2007.
- Jan Blahoslav Lášek and Angelo Shaun Franklin, Jan Hus: Faithful Witness to Truth (Rowman and Littlefield: 2022).
- Richard Friedenthal: Jan Hus. Der Ketzer und das Jahrhundert der Revolutionskriege. 2. Auflage 1987, ISBN 3-492-10331-6
- Fudge, Thomas A. Jan Hus: Religious Reform and Social Revolution in Bohemia, I.B. Tauris, London, 2010
- Fudge, Thomas A. The Memory and Morivation of Jan Hus, Medieval Priest and Martyr, Turnhout, Brepols, 2013
- Fudge, Thomas A. The Trial of Jan Hus: Medieval Heresy and Criminal Procedure, Oxford University Press, New York, 2013
- Fudge, Thomas A. nJan Hus Between Time and Eternity: Reconsidering a Medieval Heretic, Lexington Books, Lanham, MD, 2016
- Fudge, Thomas A. Living With Jan Hus: A Modern Journey Across a Medieval Landscape, Center for Christian Studies, Portland, OR, 2015
- Count Lützow: Life & Times of Master John Hus, E. P. Dutton & Co. London, 1909
- Pietro Ratto: Il gioco dell'oca. I retroscena segreti del processo al riformatore Jan Hus, Bibliotheka Edizioni , Rome, 2020. ISBN 978-88-6934-644-6
- Philip Schaff-Herzog: Encyclopedia of Religion
- Spinka, Matthew (1972). The Letters of John Hus. Totowa, NJ: Manchester University Press. OCLC 590290.
- ——— (1968). John Hus: A Biography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. OCLC 441706.
- ——— (1966). John Hus' Concept of the Church. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. OCLC 390635.
- Matthew Spinka: John Hus at the Council of Constance Columbia University Press, 1965 (Includes the eye-witness account by Peter of Mladonovice)
- Wilhelm, J. (1910). Jan Hus. In The Catholic Encyclopedia. New York: Robert Appleton Company. Retrieved 16 May 2011 from New Advent.
External links
- John Hus, a movie produced by Faith for Today (1977)
- Jan Hus, a Czechoslovak movie directed by Otakar Vávra (1955)
- Hussitism and the heritage of Jan Hus Archived 30 October 2008 at the Wayback Machine – Official Website of the Czech Republic
- Final Declaration written on 1 July 1415 – Modern History Sourcebook, Fordham University
- Letters of John Huss Written During His Exile and Imprisonment, with a preface by Martin Luther, by Jan Hus, François Paul Émile Boisnormand de Bonnechose, tr. Campbell Mackenzie, Edinburgh, William Whyte & Co., 1846
- Works by Jan Hus at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
- The life and times of John Huss "btm" format
- Bohemian Reformation and Religious Practice – online translation of a Czech academic journal
- Jan Hus and the Hussite Wars on Medieval Archives Podcast
- Jan Hus Centre (historical Jan Hus Birth-house in Husinec, Czech Republic)
Jan Hus | ||
---|---|---|
Works | ||
Topics and events | ||
Legacy and memorials | ||
Cultural depictions | ||
Related | ||
Proto-Protestantism | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
400–1100 AD |
| |||||
1100–1400 AD |
| |||||
1400–1500 AD |
| |||||
Events | ||||||
Literature | ||||||
Other | ||||||
Italics indicate their inclusion to be controversial or disputed. |
- Jan Hus
- 14th-century births
- 1415 deaths
- Hussite martyrs
- People executed for heresy
- Executed Czech people
- 14th-century Christian theologians
- 15th-century Christian theologians
- Executed philosophers
- Genocide victims
- Executed Roman Catholic priests
- Christian humanists
- Czech theologians
- Czech philosophers
- Czech religious leaders
- Protestant Reformers
- People excommunicated by the Catholic Church
- Pre-Reformation saints of the Lutheran liturgical calendar
- Charles University alumni
- People from Husinec
- People executed by the Papal States by burning
- Czech evangelicals
- 15th-century executions
- 14th-century writers from Bohemia
- 15th-century Roman Catholic theologians from Bohemia
- People executed for blasphemy
- Academic staff of Charles University
- Proto-Protestants
- Lutheran saints
- Founders of new religious movements
- Eastern Orthodox saints
- Bohemian nobility
- Victims of the Inquisition