Misplaced Pages

Government: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:12, 14 December 2009 view sourceBeland (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators237,143 edits See also: add a list of "Levels of civil government"← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:31, 8 January 2025 view source TessiDon (talk | contribs)164 edits I made copyedits 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|System or group governing an organized community}}
{{article issues
{{Redirect|Gov}}
| essay=February 2009
{{pp-vandalism|small=yes}}
| disputed=October 2009
{{For-multi|the executive power referred to as "the government"|Executive (government)|other uses}}
| rewrite=October 2009
{{Use dmy dates|date=September 2021}}
| POV=October 2009
{{Use British English|date=January 2016}}
| original research=October 2009
{{Systems of government}}
| citations=October 2009
{{Governance}}
| citecheck=October 2009
<!-- For future edits, consider avoid filling up the lead with unwanted, unreliable sources, because as per Misplaced Pages:Manual_of_Style/Layout#Order_of_article_elements, the lead will usually repeat information that is in the body, editors should balance the desire to avoid redundant citations in the lead with the desire to aid readers in locating sources for challengeable material. -->
| article=September 2009
}}
{{pp-move-indef}}
{{About||government as a state|sovereign state|government in linguistics|Government (linguistics)}}
], ''Government'' (1896). Library of Congress ], Washington, D.C.]]


A '''government''' is the system or group of people governing an organized community, generally a ].
A '''government''' is the body within a community, political entity or ] which has the ] to make and enforce rules, laws, and regulations.{{Citation needed|October 2009|date=October 2009}}.


In the case of its broad associative definition, government normally consists of ], ], and ]. Government is a means by which organizational ] are enforced, as well as a mechanism for determining policy. In many countries, the government has a kind of ], a statement of its governing principles and philosophy.
Typically, the term "government" refers to a ] or ] which can be either local, national, or international. However, ], academic, ], or other formal organizations are also governed by internal bodies. Such bodies may be called ], managers, or ]s or they may be known as the administration (as in schools) or ] (as in churches). The size of governments can vary by region or purpose.


While all types of organizations have ], the term ''government'' is often used more specifically to refer to the approximately 200 ] and ].
Growth of an organization advances the ] of its government, therefore small towns or small-to-medium privately-operated enterprises will have fewer officials than typically larger organizations such as multinational corporations which tend to have multiple interlocking, ] layers of administration and governance. As complexity increases and the nature of governance becomes more complicated, so does the need for formal policies and procedures.


The main types of modern ]s recognized are ], ]s, and, sitting between these two, ] with a variety of ]s.<ref name="Dobratz 2015 p. 47">{{Cite book |last=Dobratz |first=B.A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RoK9CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA47 |title=Power, Politics, and Society: An Introduction to Political Sociology |date=2015 |publisher=Taylor & Francis |isbn=978-1-317-34529-9 |page=47 |access-date=Apr 30, 2023 |archive-date=30 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230430083243/https://books.google.com/books?id=RoK9CgAAQBAJ&pg=PA47 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="LinzLinz2000">{{Cite book |last=Linz |first=Juan José |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8cYk_ABfMJIC&pg=PA143 |title=Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes |date=2000 |publisher=Lynne Rienner Publisher |isbn=978-1-55587-890-0 |pages=143 |oclc=1172052725 |author-link=Juan José Linz |access-date=20 October 2022 |archive-date=22 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230422130238/https://books.google.com/books?id=8cYk_ABfMJIC&pg=PA143 |url-status=live }}</ref> Modern classification systems also include ] as a standalone entity or as a hybrid system of the main three.<ref name="Garcia-AlexanderWooCarlson2017">{{Cite book |last1=Garcia-Alexander |first1=Ginny |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y-M8DwAAQBAJ&pg=PA137 |title=Social Foundations of Behavior for the Health Sciences |last2=Woo |first2=Hyeyoung |last3=Carlson |first3=Matthew J. |date=2017 |publisher=Springer |isbn=978-3-319-64950-4 |pages=137– |oclc=1013825392}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=8 April 2016 |title=14.2 Types of Political Systems |url=https://opentextbooks.uregina.ca/sociology/chapter/14-2-types-of-political-systems/#:~:text=The%20major%20types%20of%20political,and%20instead%20rule%20through%20fear |access-date=20 October 2022 |archive-date=22 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221022061920/https://opentextbooks.uregina.ca/sociology/chapter/14-2-types-of-political-systems/#:~:text=The%20major%20types%20of%20political,and%20instead%20rule%20through%20fear |url-status=dead }}</ref> Historically prevalent forms of government include monarchy, ], ], ], ], ], and ]. These forms are not always mutually exclusive, and ]s are common. The main aspect of any philosophy of government is how political power is obtained, with the two main forms being ] and ].
== Types of governments==
{{sync|Form of government}}
]


==Definitions and etymology==
{{main|Form of government}}
A government is the ] to ] a ] or community. The '']'' defines government as "a system of social control under which the right to make laws, and the right to enforce them, is vested in a particular group in society".<ref>{{Cite book |title=Columbia Encyclopedia |title-link=Columbia Encyclopedia |date=2000 |publisher=Columbia University Press |edition=6th}}{{full citation needed|date=July 2022}}<!--missing the specific entry/pages and author--></ref> While all types of organizations have ], the word ''government'' is often used more specifically to refer to the approximately 200 ] on Earth, as well as their subsidiary organizations, such as ] as well as ]s.{{sfn|Smelser|Baltes|2001|p={{page needed|date=July 2022}}}}
*] - Absence of the State as compulsory or external government. Here people directly govern themselves, and make group decisions through consensus, or via direct democracy.
*] – Authoritarian governments are characterized by an emphasis on the authority of the state in a republic or union. It is a political system controlled by nonelected rulers who usually permit some degree of individual freedom.
*] – A government that has a ], but one whose powers are limited by law or by a formal constitution. Example: ]<ref> ], ''The Multidimensional Crisis and ]''. (Athens: Gordios, 2005).( of the book with the same title published in Greek).</ref><ref name="victoria"> {{cite web|url=http://www.parliament.vic.gov.au/SARC/E-Democracy/Final_Report/Glossary.htm |title=Victorian Electronic Democracy : Glossary |date=July 28, 2005| accessdate=2007-12-14}}</ref>
*] – A government whose powers are limited by law or a formal constitution, and which is chosen by a vote amongst at least some sections of the populace (Ancient Sparta was in its own terms a repubic, though most inhabitants were disenfranchised : The early United States was a republic but the large numbers of slaves did not have the vote). Republics which exclude sections of the populace from participation will typically claim to represent all citizens (by defining people without the vote as "non-citizens").
] houses the ], the ] legislature.]]
*] – Rule by a government (usually a Constitutional Republic or Constitutional Monarchy) chosen by election where most of the populace are enfranchised. The key distinction between a democracy and other forms of constitutional government is usually taken to be that the right to vote is not limited by a person's wealth or race (the main qualification for enfranchisement is usually having reached a certain age). A Democratic government is therefore one supported (at least at the time of the election) by a ] of the populace (provided the election was held fairly). A "majority" may be defined in different ways. There are many "power-sharing" (usually in countries where people mainly identify themselves by race or religion) or "electoral-college" or "constituency" systems where the government is not chosen by a simple one-vote-per-person headcount.
*] – Rule by an individual who has full power over the country. The term may refer to a system where the Dictator came to power, and holds it, purely by force - but it also includes systems where the Dictator first came to power legitimately but then was able to amend the constitution so as to, in effect, gather all power for themselves.<ref>American 503</ref> See also ] and ].
*] – Rule by an individual who has inherited the role and expects to bequeath it to their heir.<ref>American 1134</ref>
*] – Rule by a small group of people who share similar interests or family relations.<ref>American 1225</ref>
*] – A government composed of the wealthy class. Any of the forms of government listed here can be plutocracy. For instance, if all of the voted representatives in a republic are wealthy, then it is a republic and a plutocracy.
*] – Rule by a religious elite.<ref>American 1793</ref>
*] – Totalitarian governments regulate nearly every aspect of public and private life.


The word ''government'' derives from the Greek verb {{lang|grc|κυβερνάω}} meaning ''to steer'' with a ] (rudder), the metaphorical sense being attested in the literature of ], including ]'s ].{{sfn|Brock|2013|p=53–62}} In ], "government" sometimes refers to what's also known as a "]" or an "]", i.e., the policies and government officials of a particular executive or governing ]. Finally, ''government'' is also sometimes used in English as a ] for rule or governance.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Government English Definition and Meaning |url=https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/government |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220717193211/https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/government |archive-date=17 July 2022 |access-date=2022-07-17 |website=Lexico |language=en}}</ref>
==Origin==
For many thousands of years when people were ]s and small scale farmers, humans lived in small, ] and ] communities.


In other languages, ]s may have a narrower scope, such as the ], which is more similar to the concept of ].
The development of agriculture resulted in ever increasing population densities.<ref name="christian 245">Christian 245</ref> David Christian explains how this helped result in states with laws and governments:


==History==
{{quote|As farming populations gathered in denser and larger communities, interactions between different groups increased and the social pressure rose until, in a striking parallel with star formation, new structures suddenly appeared, together with a new level of complexity. Like stars, cities and states reorganize and energize the smaller objects within their gravitational field.|David Christian, p. 245|<u>Maps of Time</u>}}
{{main|Political history of the world|Political philosophy}}


=== Earliest governments ===
The exact moment and place that the phenomenon of human government developed is lost in time; however, history does record the formations of very early governments. About 5,000 years ago, the first small city-states appeared.<ref name="christian 245"/> By the third to second millenniums BC, some of these had developed into larger governed areas: ], ], the ], and the ].<ref name="christian 294"/>
The moment and place that the phenomenon of human government developed is lost in time; however, history does record the formations of early governments. About 5,000 years ago, the first small city-states appeared.{{sfn|Christian|2004|p=245}} By the third to second millenniums BC, some of these had developed into larger governed areas: ], ], the ], and the ].{{sfn|Christian|2004|p=294}}


One reason that explains the emergence of governments includes agriculture. Since the ], agriculture has been an efficient method to create food surplus. This enabled people to specialize in non-agricultural activities. Some of them included being able to rule over others as an external authority. Others included social experimentation with diverse governance models. Both these activities formed the basis of governments.<ref name="Eagly99">{{cite journal |author1=Eagly, Alice H. |author2=Wood, Wendy |date=June 1999 |title=The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions Versus Social Roles |url=http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/fiske/facets/eagly&wood.htm |url-status=dead |journal=American Psychologist |volume=54 |issue=6 |pages=408–423 |doi=10.1037/0003-066x.54.6.408 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20000817071347/http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/fiske/facets/eagly&wood.htm |archive-date=17 August 2000}}</ref> These governments gradually became more complex as agriculture supported larger and denser populations, creating new ] and ] that the government needed to control. ] explains
States formed as the results of a positive feedback loop where ''population growth'' results in ''increased information exchange'' which results in ''innovation'' which results in ''increased resources'' which results in further population growth.<ref>Christian 253</ref><ref>
Most of this sentence is in the present tense because the process is still ongoing.
</ref> The role of cities in the feedback loop is important. Cities became the primary conduits for the dramatic increases in information exchange that allowed for large and densely packed populations to form, and because cities concentrated knowledge, they also ended up concentrating power.<ref>Christian 271</ref><ref>The concept of the city itself became a self-reinforcing cycle. "The creation of such large and dense communities ''required'' new forms of power", and since cities concentrate power, the new (sovereign) rulers had incentives to build and expand cities to further increase their power.(Christian 271,321)</ref> "Increasing population density in farming regions provided the demographic and physical raw materials used to construct the first cities and states, and increasing congestion provided much of the motivation for creating states."<ref name="christian 248">Christian 248</ref>


{{blockquote|As farming populations gathered in larger and denser communities, interactions between different groups increased and the social pressure rose until, in a striking parallel with star formation, new structures suddenly appeared, together with a new level of complexity. Like stars, cities and states reorganize and energize the smaller objects within their gravitational field.{{sfn|Christian|2004|p=245}}}}
===Fundamental purpose===
According to supporters of government,the fundamental purpose of government is the maintenance of basic security and ].<ref>Schulze 81</ref> The philosopher ] figured that people were rational animals and thus saw submission to a government dominated by a sovereign as preferable to ].<ref name="dietz 68">Dietz 68</ref><ref name="hobbes"/> According to Hobbes, people in a community ''create'' and ''submit to'' government for the purpose of establishing for themselves, safety and public order.<ref name="hobbes"></ref><ref name="hobbes transfer">Dietz 65-66</ref><ref>Hobbes idea of the necessity of the formation of government is known as the ] theory.</ref><ref>The field of study and thought about the necessity of governments and governments' relationships with people is known as ].</ref>


Another explanation includes the need to properly manage infrastructure projects such as water infrastructure. Historically, this required centralized administration and complex social organisation, as seen in regions like Mesopotamia.<ref name="Fukuyama-2012">{{Cite book |last=Fukuyama |first=Francis |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=i9xRAQAAMAAJ&q=origins+of+political+order+amazon |title=The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution |date=2012-03-27 |publisher=Farrar, Straus and Giroux |isbn=978-0-374-53322-9 |pages=70 |language=en}}</ref> However, there is archaeological evidence that shows similar successes with more egalitarian and decentralized complex societies.<ref>{{cite book |author=Roosevelt, Anna C. |title=Cambridge history of the Native peoples of the Americas: South America, Volume 3 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=1999 |isbn=978-0-521-63075-7 |editor=Salomon, Frank |pages=266–267 |chapter=The Maritime, Highland, Forest Dynamic and the Origins of Complex Culture |editor2=Schwartz, Stuart B. |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hxqgDcCrzjkC&pg=PA266 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160624045250/https://books.google.com/books?id=hxqgDcCrzjkC&pg=PA266 |archive-date=24 June 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref>
===Early examples===
These are examples of some of the earliest known states:


=== Modern governments ===
* ''']'''—5200 BC<ref name="christian 294"/>
]
* ''']'''—3000 BC<ref name="christian 294">Christian 294</ref>
Starting at the end of the 17th century, the prevalence of republican forms of government grew. The ] and ] in England, the ], and the ] contributed to the growth of representative forms of government. The ] was the first large country to have a ] government.{{sfn|Smelser|Baltes|2001|p={{page needed|date=July 2022}}}} Since the fall of the ], ] has become an even more prevalent form of government.{{sfn|Kuper|Kuper|2008|p={{page needed|date=July 2022}}}}
* ''']'''—2600 BC<ref name="christian 294"/><ref name="higham">Higham, "Indus Valley Civilization"</ref>
* '''Yellow River Civilization (])'''—2000 BC<ref name="christian 294"/>
* ''']'''-3rd millennium BC
* ''']'''-3000 BC<ref>{{cite journal | last = Haas | first = Jonathan | coauthors = Winifred Creamer, Alvaro Ruiz | date = 23 December 2004 | title = Dating the Late Archaic occupation of the Norte Chico region in Peru | journal = Nature | volume = 432 | issue = | pages = 1020–1023 | doi = 10.1038/nature03146 | accessdate = 2009-08-03}}</ref>


In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, there was a significant increase in the size and scale of government at the national level.{{sfn|Haider-Markel|2014|p={{page needed|date=July 2022}}}} This included the regulation of corporations and the development of the ].{{sfn|Kuper|Kuper|2008|p={{page needed|date=July 2022}}}}
===Expanded roles===
====Military defense====


==Political science==
The fundamental purpose of government is to maintain ] and protect property. “Security of person and property, and equal justice between individuals, are the first needs of society, and the primary ends of government: if these things can be left to any responsibility below the highest, there is nothing, except war and treaties, which requires a general government at all.” <ref> John Stuart Mill in Representative Government, 1861 </ref>
{{main|Political science}}
{{Politics sidebar|expanded=Subseries}}


=== Classification ===
Militaries are created to deal with the highly complex task of confronting large numbers of enemies.
In political science, it has long been a goal to create a typology or taxonomy of ], as typologies of political systems are not obvious.{{sfn|Lewellen|2003|p={{page needed|date=July 2022}}}} It is especially important in the ] fields of ] and ]. Like all categories discerned within forms of government, the boundaries of government classifications are either fluid or ill-defined.


Superficially, all governments have an official '']'' or ideal form. The United States is a federal constitutional republic, while the former ] was a federal ]. However self-identification is not objective, and as Kopstein and Lichbach argue, defining regimes can be tricky, especially '']'', when both its government and its economy deviate in practice.{{sfn|Kopstein|Lichbach|2005|p=4}} For example, ] argued that "the ] is neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire".{{sfn|Renna|2015}} In practice, the Soviet Union was a centralized autocratic one-party state under ].
Once governments came onto the scene, they began to form and use armies for conflicts with neighboring states, and for conquest of new lands. Governments seek to maintain monopolies on the use of force,<ref name="adler 80">Adler 80-81</ref> and to that end, they usually suppress the development of private armies within their borders.


Identifying a form of government is also difficult because many ] originate as socio-economic movements and are then carried into governments by parties naming themselves after those movements; all with competing political ideologies. Experience with those movements in power, and the strong ties they may have to particular forms of government, can cause them to be considered as forms of government in themselves.
====Social security====


Other complications include general non-consensus or deliberate "]" of reasonable technical definitions of political ideologies and associated forms of governing, due to the nature of politics in the modern era. For example: The meaning of "conservatism" in the United States has little in common with the way the word's definition is used elsewhere. As Ribuffo notes, "what Americans now call conservatism much of the world calls liberalism or ]"; a "conservative" in Finland would be labeled a "]" in the United States.{{sfn|Ribuffo|2011|pp=2–6|loc=quote on p. 6}} Since the 1950s conservatism in the United States has been chiefly associated with ] and the ]. However, during the era of ] many ] were conservatives, and they played a key role in the ] that controlled Congress from 1937 to 1963.{{sfn|Frederickson|2000|p=12}}{{efn|{{harvnb|Frederickson|2000|p=12}}, quote: "...conservative southern Democrats viewed warily the potential of New Deal programs to threaten the region's economic dependence on cheap labor while stirring the democratic ambitions of the disfranchised and undermining white supremacy."}}
Social security is related to economic security. Throughout most of human history, parents prepared for their old age by producing enough children to ensure that some of them would survive long enough to take care of the parents in their old age.<ref name="nebel 165">Nebel 165-166</ref> In modern, relatively high-income societies, a mixed approach is taken where the government shares a substantial responsibility of taking care of the elderly.<ref name="nebel 165"/>


===Social-political ambiguity===
This is not the case everywhere since there are still many countries where social security through having many children is the norm. Although social security is a relatively recent phenomenon, prevalent mostly in developed countries, it deserves mention because the existence of social security substantially changes reproductive behavior in a society, and it has an impact on reducing the ''cycle of poverty''.<ref name="nebel 165"/> By reducing the cycle of poverty, government creates a self-reinforcing cycle where people see the government as friend both because of the financial support they receive late in their lives, but also because of the overall reduction in national poverty due to the government's social security policies—which then adds to public support for social security.<ref>
Opinions vary by individuals concerning the types and properties of governments that exist. "Shades of gray" are commonplace in any government and its corresponding classification. Even the most liberal democracies limit rival political activity to one extent or another while the most tyrannical dictatorships must organize a broad base of support thereby creating difficulties for "]" governments into narrow categories. Examples include the claims of the ] rather than a democracy since some American voters believe elections are being manipulated by wealthy ].{{sfn|Freeland|2012}} Some consider that government is to be reconceptualised where in times of climatic change the needs and desires of the individual are reshaped to generate sufficiency for all.<ref>"". Deflorian, Michel (2015). Retrieved 2 October 2023</ref>
Bruce Bartlett. . <u>COMMENTARY</u>. March 2005, Vol. 119, No. 3, pp. 52-56. In the online<!-- available for free for those with library cards through a library database called SIRS --> version on paragraph 13 it suggests that, During the ], Roosevelt wanted to suppress revolutionary tendencies by tying workers to the state—hence a state-run social security system. Also read the paragraphs above where it talks about populist demagogues and socialist revolutions in other countries. Tying workers to the state through social security was a politically strategic move designed to preserve the United States of America and its democracy.
</ref>


==Aspects of government== ==Measurement of governing==
The quality of a government can be measured by ], which relates to ] and ].<ref name=Guisan>{{cite journal |last1=Guisan |first1=Maria-Carmen |title=Government effectiveness, education, economic development and well-being: analysis of European countries in comparison with the United States and Canada, 2000-2007 |journal=Applied Econometrics and International Development |date=2009 |volume=9 |issue=1 |page=1 |url=http://www.usc.es/economet/reviews/aeid914.pdf |access-date=25 April 2019}}</ref>
]']]


==Forms==
Governments vary greatly, as do the relationships of ] of a state to its government.
{{Main|List of forms of government}}
{{Further|Mixed government}}


{{Basic forms of government}}
===Abuse of power===
{{POV-section|date=September 2009}}
The leaders of governments are human beings, and given human nature, what constitutes good governance has been a subject written about since the earliest books known. In the western tradition ] wrote extensively on the question, most notably in ]. He (in the voice of ]) asked if the purpose of government was to help ones friends and hurt ones enemies, for example. ], Plato's student picked up the subject in his treatise on '']''. Many centuries later, ] addressed the question of abuse of power by writing on the importance of checks and balances <ref>http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/john-locke-natural-rights-to-life-liberty-and-property/</ref> to prevent or at least constrain abuse. It is believed that ] was influenced by John Locke.<ref>http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/locke/influence.html</ref>


] in his book '']'' (375 BC) divided governments into five basic types (four being existing forms and one being Plato's ideal form, which exists "only in speech"):<ref name="Abjorensen2019">{{Cite book |last=Abjorensen |first=Norman |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cNSSDwAAQBAJ&pg=PA288 |title=Historical Dictionary of Democracy |date=2019 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1-5381-2074-3 |pages=288– |oclc=1081354236}}</ref>
==Legitimacy==
The concept of ] is central to the study of governments. ] have attempted to formalize ways to legitimize government or ] authority.


* ] (rule by ], like ideal traditional "benevolent" kingdoms that are not tyrannical)
] theorists, such as ] and ], believe that governments reduce people's freedom/rights in exchange for protecting them, and maintaining order. Many people question however, whether this is an actual exchange (where people voluntarily give up their freedoms), or whether they are taken by threat of force by the ruling party.
* ] (rule by pure ] and ], like a ] citizen)
* ] (rule by wealth and market-based-ethics, like a ] capitalist state)
* ] (rule by honor and duty, like a "benevolent" military; Sparta as an example)
* ] (], like a ])


These five regimes progressively degenerate starting with aristocracy at the top and tyranny at the bottom.{{sfn|Brill|2016}}
Other statist theorists, like ], reject social contract theory on the grounds that, in reality, consent is not involved in state-individual relationships and instead offer different definitions of legitimacy based on practicality and usefulness.


In his '']'', Aristotle elaborates on Plato's five regimes discussing them in relation to the government of one, of the few, and of the many.<ref name="Jordović2019">{{Cite book |last=Jordović |first=Ivan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=if7vxwEACAAJ |title=Taming Politics: Plato and the Democratic Roots of Tyrannical Man |date=2019 |publisher=Franz Steiner Verlag |isbn=978-3-515-12457-7 |page=intro |oclc=1107421360}}</ref> From this follows the classification of forms of government according to which people have the authority to rule: either one person (an ], such as monarchy), a select group of people (an aristocracy), or the people as a whole (a democracy, such as a republic).
], on the other hand, claim that legitimacy for an authority must be consensual and reject the concept of states altogether; For them, authority must be earned not self-legitimated. For example, a police officer does not earn his authority as a doctor does since the authority is voluntarily transferred to the doctor while the police officer just takes it.


] stated on their classification:
==Criticised aspects==
===War===
In the most basic sense, people of one nation will see the government of another nation as the enemy when the two nations are at war.{{Or|date=October 2009}} For example, the people of ] saw the ] government as the enemy during the ].<ref>
{{cite web
|url=http://history.boisestate.edu/WESTCIV/punicwar/
|title=The Punic Wars
|last=E.L. Skip Knox
|accessdate=2007-12-14
|publisher=Department of History, Boise State University
}}
</ref>


{{blockquote|The difference of ]s consisteth in the difference of the ], or the person representative of all and every one of the multitude. And because the sovereignty is either in one man, or in an assembly of more than one; and into that assembly either every man hath right to enter, or not everyone, but certain men distinguished from the rest; it is manifest there can be but three kinds of Commonwealth. For the representative must need to be one man or more; and if more, then it is the assembly of all, or but of a part. When the representative is one man, then is the Commonwealth a monarchy; when an assembly of all that will come together, then it is a democracy or popular Commonwealth; when an assembly of a part only, then it is called an aristocracy. In other kinds of Commonwealth there can be none: for either one, or more, or all, must have the sovereign power (which I have shown to be indivisible) entire.<ref name="Leviathan">{{Cite wikisource |last1=Hobbes |first1=Thomas |title=Leviathan |wslink=Leviathan/The Second Part}}</ref>}}
===Enslavement===
In early ], the outcome of war for the defeated was often enslavement. The enslaved people would not find it easy to see the conquering government as a friend.


===Modern basic political systems===
===Religious opposition===
According to ] professor ], there a three main types of ]s today: ],
People with religious views opposed to the official state religion will have a greater tendency to view that government as their enemy. A good example would be the condition of ] before the ]. Protestants—who were politically dominant in ]—used political, economic and social means to reduce the size and strength of Catholicism in England over the 16th to 18th centuries, and as a result, Catholics in England felt that their religion was being oppressed.<ref>
]s and, sitting between these two, ] with ]s.<ref name="LinzLinz2000" /><ref name="Michie2014">{{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ip_IAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA95 |title=Reader's Guide to the Social Sciences |date=3 February 2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1-135-93226-8 |editor-last=Jonathan Michie |page=95 |access-date=20 October 2022 |archive-date=22 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230422130238/https://books.google.com/books?id=ip_IAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA95 |url-status=live }}</ref> Another modern classification system includes ] as a standalone entity or as a hybrid system of the main three.<ref name="Garcia-AlexanderWooCarlson2017" /> Scholars generally refer to a ] as either a form of authoritarianism or totalitarianism.<ref name="ToddWaller2015">{{Cite book |last1=Todd |first1=Allan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y_pfCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA10 |title=History for the IB Diploma Paper 2 AuthoritariaAuthoritarian States (20th Century) |last2=Waller |first2=Sally |date=10 September 2015 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1-107-55889-2 |editor-last=Todd |editor-first=Allan |pages=10– |editor-last2=Waller |editor-first2=Sally |access-date=20 October 2022 |archive-date=22 April 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230422130238/https://books.google.com/books?id=y_pfCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA10 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="LinzLinz2000" /><ref name="Sondrol">{{Cite journal |last=Sondrol |first=P. C. |date=2009 |title=Totalitarian and Authoritarian Dictators: A Comparison of Fidel Castro and Alfredo Stroessner |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/157386 |journal=Journal of Latin American Studies |volume=23 |issue=3 |pages=599–620 |doi=10.1017/S0022216X00015868 |jstor=157386 |s2cid=144333167 |access-date=20 October 2022 |archive-date=8 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230308100323/https://www.jstor.org/stable/157386 |url-status=live |issn=0022-216X }}</ref>
{{cite web
|url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05445a.htm
|title=CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA: England (Since the Reformation)
|accessdate=2007-12-14
|date=1913
|publisher=www.newadvent.org
}}
</ref>


===Class oppression=== ===Autocracy===
{{Main|Autocracy}}
Whereas capitalists in a capitalist country may tend to see that nation's government positively, a class-conscious group of industrial workers—a ]—may see things very differently.{{Or|date=October 2009}} If the proletariat wishes to take control of the nation's ], and they are blocked in their endeavors by continuing adjustments in the law made by capitalists in the government,<ref>
Christian 358
</ref> then the proletariat will come to see the government as their enemy—especially if the conflicts become violent.


An autocracy is a system of government in which supreme ] is concentrated in the hands of one person, whose decisions are subject to neither external legal restraints nor regularized mechanisms of popular control (except perhaps for the implicit threat of a ] or mass ]).<ref>{{Cite web |last=Johnson |first=Paul M. |title=Autocracy: A Glossary of Political Economy Terms |url=http://www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/autocracy |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181226063927/http://www.auburn.edu/~johnspm/gloss/autocracy%20 |archive-date=26 December 2018 |access-date=14 September 2012 |publisher=Auburn.edu}}</ref> ] is a historically prevalent form of autocracy, wherein a ] governs as a singular ] with no limitation on ]. Most absolute monarchies are ], however some, notably the ], are ] by an ] (such as the ], or ]s). Other forms of autocracy include ], ], and ].
The same situation can occur among peasants. The peasants in a country, e.g. Russia during the reign of ], may revolt against their landlords, only to find that their revolution is put down by government.{{Or|date=October 2009}}


===Aristocracy===
== Critical views and alternatives ==
{{Main|Aristocracy}}
The relative merits of various forms of government have long been debated by philosophers, politicians and others. However, in recent times, the traditional conceptions of government and the role of government have also attracted increasing criticism from a range of sources. Some argue that the traditional conception of government, which is heavily influenced by the zero-sum perceptions of state actors and focuses on obtaining security and prosperity at a national level through primarily unilateral action, is no longer appropriate or effective in a modern world that is increasingly connected and interdependent.


Aristocracy{{efn|{{langx|grc|ἀριστοκρατία}} {{transliteration|grc|aristokratía}}, from {{lang|grc|ἄριστος}} {{transliteration|grc|]}} "excellent", and {{lang|grc|κράτος}} {{transliteration|grc|]}} "]".}} is a form of government that places power in the hands of a small, ] ],<ref name="OED">{{Cite OED|aristocracy}}</ref> such as a hereditary ] or ]d ]. This class exercises ], often as a ] ], wealthy ], or ].
===Human security===
One such school of thought is ], which advocates for a more people-based (as opposed to state-based) conception of security, focusing on protection and empowerment of individuals. Human security calls upon governments to recognise that insecurity and instability in one region affects all and to look beyond national borders in defining their interests and formulating policies for security and development. Human security also demands that governments engage in a far greater level of cooperation and coordination with not only domestic organisations, but also a range of international actors such as foreign governments, intergovernmental organisations and non-government organisations.


Many monarchies were aristocracies, although in modern constitutional monarchies, the monarch may have little effective power. The term ''aristocracy'' could also refer to the non-], non-servant, and non-] classes in the ].{{citation needed|date=July 2022}}
Whilst human security attempts to provide a more holistic and comprehensive approach to world problems, its implementation still relies to a large extent on the will and ability of governments to adopt the agenda and appropriate policies. In this sense, human security provides a critique of traditional conceptions of the role of government, but also attempts to work within the current system of state-based international relations. Of course, the unique characteristics of different countries and resources available are some constraints for governments in utilising a human security framework.


===Anarchism=== ===Democracy===
{{Main|Democracy|Types of democracy}}
]
]'' survey{{efn|Conducted by the American ] ], which is largely funded by the ].}}]]


Democracy is a system of government where ]s exercise power by ] and ]. In a ], the citizenry as a whole directly forms a ] governing body and vote directly on each issue. In ], the citizenry governs indirectly through the selection of ] or ] from among themselves, typically by ] or, less commonly, by ]. These select citizens then meet to form a governing body, such as a legislature or ].
] are those who disagree with using government violence as a means to solve complex social issues - or, in other words, they say that no entity can be self-legitimated to use force and explicit ] is necessary for legitimacy within a collective group or government. There are many forms of anarchist theories but under anarchy, these many different groups and individuals would seemingly need to deal with each other in the same way that people deal with their neighbors in the real world. Some anarchists, such as ] or ], advocate ] and ] societies while others, such as ], advocate ], ] and ].
{{See also|anarchy in international relations}}


Some governments combine both direct and indirect democratic governance, wherein the citizenry selects representatives to administer day-to-day governance, while also reserving the right to govern directly through ]s, ]s (plebiscites), and the ]. In a ] the powers of the majority are exercised within the framework of representative democracy, but the constitution limits ], usually through the provision by all of certain ]s, such as ] or ].<ref>'']'': "democracy".</ref><ref name="britannica">{{Cite encyclopedia |last=Watkins |first=Frederick |date=1970 |title=Democracy |edition=Expo '70 hardcover |volume=7 |encyclopedia=] |publisher=William Benton |pages=215–223 |language=en |isbn=978-0-85229-135-1}}</ref>
==See also==
* ]
* ]


==== Republics ====
Levels of civil government:
{{Main|Republic}}

A republic is a form of government in which the country is considered a "public matter" ({{langx|la|res publica}}), not the private concern or property of the rulers, and where offices of states are subsequently directly or indirectly elected or appointed rather than inherited. The people, or some significant portion of them, have supreme control over the government and where offices of state are elected or chosen by elected people.{{sfn|Montesquieu|1748|loc=book 2, chapters 1}}<ref name="Britannica">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Republic |encyclopedia=Encyclopædia Britannica}}{{full citation needed|date=July 2022}}<!--Author? Edition?--></ref>

A common simplified definition of a republic is a government where the head of state is not a monarch.<ref name="WordNet">{{Cite journal |title=republic |url=http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/republic |url-status=live |journal=WordNet 3.0 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090312065659/http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/republic |archive-date=12 March 2009 |access-date=20 March 2009}}</ref><ref name="M-W">{{Cite encyclopedia |title=Republic |encyclopedia=Merriam-Webster |url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/republic |access-date=14 August 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180612162708/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/republic |archive-date=12 June 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> ] included both ], where all the people have a share in rule, and ] or ], where only some of the people rule, as republican forms of government.{{sfn|Montesquieu|1748|loc=book 2, chapters 2–3}}

Other terms used to describe different republics include ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].

==== Federalism ====
{{Main|Federalism}}

Federalism is a political concept in which a ''group'' of members are bound together by ] with a governing ]. The term "federalism" is also used to describe a system of government in which ] is constitutionally divided between a central governing authority and constituent political units, variously called states, provinces or otherwise. Federalism is a system based upon democratic principles and institutions in which the power to govern is shared between national and provincial/state governments, creating what is often called a ].<ref>{{Cite book |last1=Cane |first1=Peter |title=The new Oxford companion to law |last2=Conaghan |first2=Joanne |date=2008 |publisher=Oxford university press |isbn=978-0-19-929054-3 |location=Oxford |chapter=Federalism}}</ref> Proponents are often called ]s.

== Branches ==
], demonstrating the ''trias politica'' model]]
{{further|Separation of powers|Fusion of powers}}

Governments are typically organised into distinct institutions constituting branches of government each with particular ]s, functions, duties, and responsibilities. The distribution of powers between these institutions differs between governments, as do the functions and number of branches. An independent, parallel distribution of powers between branches of government is the ]. A shared, intersecting, or overlapping distribution of powers is the ].

Governments are often organised into three branches with separate powers: a legislature, an executive, and a judiciary; this is sometimes called the {{lang|la|trias politica}} model. However, in ]ary and ]s, branches of government often intersect, having shared membership and overlapping functions. Many governments have fewer or additional branches, such as an independent ] or ] branch.{{sfn|Needler|1991|pp=–118}}

== Party system ==
{{Party politics|expanded=party systems}}
{{Redirect|One-party government|a state in which a single political party controls the ruling system|One-party state}}
{{Further|Political party|Party system}}

Presently, most governments are administered by members of an explicitly constituted ] which coordinates the activities of associated government ]s and ]s for office. In a ] of government, multiple political parties have the capacity to gain control of government offices, typically by competing in ]s, although the ] may be limited.

A ] is a government by one or more ] together holding an absolute majority of seats in the parliament, in contrast to a ] in which they have only a plurality of seats and often depend on a ] arrangement with other parties. A ] is one in which multiple parties cooperate to form a government as part of a ]. In a single-party government, a single party forms a government without the support of a coalition, as is typically the case with majority governments,{{sfn|Gallagher|Laver|Mair|2006}}{{sfn|Kettle|2015}} but even a minority government may consist of just one party unable to find a willing coalition partner at the moment.{{sfn|Duxbury|2021}}

A state that continuously maintains a single-party government within a (nominally) multiparty system possesses a ]. In a (nondemocratic) ] a single ] has the (more-or-less) exclusive right to form the government, and the formation of other parties may be obstructed or illegal. In some cases, a government may have a ], as is the case with ] or ].

== Maps ==
{{see also|List of countries by system of government}}

Democracy is the most popular form of government. More than half of the nations in the world are democracies—97 of 167, as of 2021.<ref name=IDEA/> However, the world is becoming more authoritarian with a quarter of the world's population under ] governments.<ref name="IDEA"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220809193024/https://www.idea.int/gsod/sites/default/files/2021-11/the-global-state-of-democracy-2021_0.pdf |date=9 August 2022 }}, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance</ref>

] by the ], 2017<ref>{{Cite web |title=Democracy Index 2017 – Economist Intelligence Unit |url=http://pages.eiu.com/rs/753-RIQ-438/images/Democracy_Index_2017.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201221004840/http://pages.eiu.com/rs/753-RIQ-438/images/Democracy_Index_2017.pdf |archive-date=21 December 2020 |access-date=17 February 2018 |website=EIU.com}}</ref>
----
{{col-begin}}
{{col-break}}

'''Full Democracies'''
{{legend|#006837|9–10}}
{{legend|#1a9850|8–9}}
{{col-break}}

'''Flawed Democracies'''
{{legend|#66bd63|7–8}}
{{legend|#a6d96a|6–7}}
{{col-break}}

'''Hybrid Regimes'''
{{legend|#fee08b|5–6}}
{{legend|#fdae61|4–5}}
{{col-break}}

'''Authoritarian Regimes'''
{{legend|#f46d43|3–4}}
{{legend|#d73027|2–3}}
{{legend|#a50026|0–2}}
{{col-end}}]]
]

]s (<span style="color: #0000b0">'''blue'''</span>)
----
{{legend|#0000b0|]s}}
{{legend|#00e000|]}}]]
{{Clear}}

==See also==
{{Portal|Politics}}
{{columnslist|colwidth=20em|
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
}}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] or ]
* ]
* ]


==Notes== ==Notes==
{{reflist|2}} {{Notelist}}


=== References === ==References==
{{refbegin}} {{Reflist}}

* {{cite book
===Bibliography===
|title=The Common Sense of Politics
{{Refbegin|colwidth=30em|indent=yes}}
|last=Adler
* {{Cite journal |last=Brill |first=Sara |date=2016 |title=Political Pathology in Plato's Republic |url=https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/apeiron-2015-0003/html |journal=Apeiron |language=en |volume=49 |issue=2 |pages=127–161 |doi=10.1515/apeiron-2015-0003 |issn=2156-7093 |s2cid=148505083 |access-date=4 August 2022 |archive-date=27 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221027215252/https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/apeiron-2015-0003/html |url-status=live }}
|first=Mortimer J.
* {{Cite book |last=Brock |first=Roger |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QCSGircE9WwC |title=Greek Political Imagery from Homer to Aristotle |date=2013 |publisher=Bloomsbury |isbn=978-1-4725-0218-6 |location=London |oclc=1040413173 |access-date=14 July 2022 |archive-date=9 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231109175722/https://books.google.com/books?id=QCSGircE9WwC |url-status=live }}
|date=1996
* {{Cite book |last=Christian |first=David |url=https://archive.org/details/mapsoftimeintrod00chri |title=Maps of Time: an Introduction to Big History |date=2004 |publisher=University of California Press |isbn=978-0-520-24476-4 |location=Berkeley, CA |oclc=966003275 |url-access=registration }}
|publisher=Fordham University Press, New York
* {{Cite news |last=Duxbury |first=Charlie |date=29 November 2021 |title=Magdalena Andersson named Swedish prime minister (again) |work=Politico |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/magdalena-andersson-sweden-prime-minister-again-resignation |url-status=live |access-date=2022-07-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220415130747/https://www.politico.eu/article/magdalena-andersson-sweden-prime-minister-again-resignation/ |archive-date=15 April 2022 }}
|isbn=0-8232-1666-7
* {{Cite book |last=Frederickson |first=Kari |title=The Dixiecrat Revolt and the End of the Solid South, 1932–1968 |date=2000 |publisher=University of North Carolina Press |isbn=978-0-8078-4910-1 |location=Chapel Hill |oclc=475254808}}
}}
* {{Cite book |last=Freeland |first=Chrystia |title=Plutocrats: the Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else |title-link=Plutocrats (book) |date=2012 |publisher=Allen Lane |isbn=978-1-84614-252-9 |location=London |oclc=795857028 |author-link=Chrystia Freeland}}
* {{cite book
* {{Cite book |last1=Gallagher |first1=Michael |title=Representative Government in Western Europe |last2=Laver |first2=M. |last3=Mair |first3=P. |date=2006 |publisher=McGraw-Hill |isbn=978-0070366848 |edition=4th |location=New York |oclc=906939909}}
|title=American Heritage dictionary of the English language
* {{Cite book |last=Haider-Markel |first=Donald P. |title=The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government |date=2014 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0-19-957967-9 |location=Oxford, UK |oclc=904484428}}
|edition=4th
* {{Cite news |last=Kettle |first=Martin |date=17 April 2015 |title=Coalition and minority governments are not so unusual in UK elections; The first-past-the-post system has led to fewer one-party majority governments in Britain than might be expected -- only half of all those in the 20th century |work=Guardian |url=https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A410102999/ITOF?u=wikipedia&sid=bookmark-ITOF&xid=fe0349d5 |url-status=live |access-date=2022-07-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220730081416/https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=ITOF&u=wikipedia&id=GALE%7CA410102999&v=2.1&it=r&sid=bookmark-ITOF&asid=fe0349d5 |archive-date=30 July 2022 |via=Gale General OneFile }}
|publisher=] Company
* {{Cite book |title=Comparative politics: interests, identities, and institutions in a changing global order |date=2005 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=0521708400 |editor-last=Kopstein |editor-first=Jeffrey |edition=2nd |location=Cambridge, UK |oclc=1293165230 |editor-last2=Lichbach |editor-first2=Mark}}
|location=222 Berkeley Street, Boston, MA 02116
* {{Cite book |title=The Social Science Encyclopedia |date=2008 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-0-415-47635-5 |editor-last=Kuper |editor-first=Adam |location=London |oclc=789658928 |editor-last2=Kuper |editor-first2=Jessica}}
|isbn=0-395-82517-2
* {{Cite book |last=Lewellen |first=Ted C. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gwJBNWbrXeIC |title=Political Anthropology: An Introduction |date=2003 |publisher=Praeger |isbn=978-0-89789-891-1 |edition=3rd |location=Westport, CT |oclc=936497371 |access-date=20 May 2020 |archive-date=9 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231109175725/https://books.google.com/books?id=gwJBNWbrXeIC |url-status=live }}
|pages=572, 770
* {{Cite book |last=Montesquieu |title=The Spirit of the Laws |title-link=The Spirit of Law |date=1748 |author-link=Montesquieu}}
|ids=american
* {{Cite book |last=Needler |first=Martin C. |title=The Concepts of Comparative Politics |date=1991 |publisher=Praeger |isbn=978-0-275-93653-2 |location=New York |oclc=925042067}}
|author=executive editor, Joseph P. Pickett
* {{Cite journal |last=Renna |first=Thomas |date=September 2015 |title=The Holy Roman Empire was neither holy, nor Roman, nor an empire |journal=Michigan Academician |volume=42 |issue=1 |pages=60–75 |doi=10.7245/0026-2005-42.1.60}}
|year=1992
* {{Cite journal |last=Ribuffo |first=Leo P. |date=2011 |title=20 Suggestions for Studying the Right now that Studying the Right is Trendy |journal=Historically Speaking |volume=12 |issue=1 |pages=2–6 |doi=10.1353/hsp.2011.0013 |s2cid=144367661}}
}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Smelser |first1=Neil J. |title=International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences |last2=Baltes |first2=Paul B. |date=2001 |publisher=Elsevier Science |isbn=978-0-08-043076-8 |location=New York |oclc=43548228}}
* {{cite book
{{Refend}}
|title=Maps of Time

|last=Christian
== Further reading ==
|first=David
* {{Cite book |last1=de Mesquita |first1=Bruce Bueno |title=The Dictator's Handbook: Why Bad Behavior Is Almost Always Good Politics |last2=Smith |first2=Alastair |date=2012 |publisher=] |isbn=978-1610390446 |location=New York |oclc=1026803822 |author-link=Bruce Bueno de Mesquita}}
|date=2004
* {{Cite book |last1=de Mesquita |first1=Bruce Bueno |title=The Logic of Political Survival |title-link=The Logic of Political Survival |last2=Smith |first2=Alastair |last3=Siverson |first3=Randolph M. |last4=Morrow |first4=James D. |date=2003 |publisher=] |isbn=978-0262025461 |location=Cambridge, Massachusetts |oclc=475265120 |author-link=Bruce Bueno de Mesquita |author-link4=James D. Morrow}}
|publisher=University of California Press
* {{Cite book |last=Dobson |first=William J. |title=The Dictator's Learning Curve: Inside the Global Battle for Democracy |date=2013 |publisher=Anchor |isbn=978-0307477552 |location=New York |oclc=849820048 |author-link=William J. Dobson}}
|isbn=0-520-24476-1
* {{Cite book |last1=Friedrich |first1=Carl J. |url=https://archive.org/details/totalitariandict0000frie |title=Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy |last2=Brzezinski |first2=Zbigniew K. |date=1966 |publisher=Frederick A. Praeger |isbn=978-0674895652 |edition=2nd |location=New York |oclc=826626632 |author-link2=Zbigniew Brzezinski |orig-date=1965 |url-access=registration}}
}}
* {{Cite book |last=Krader |first=Lawrence |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rIyZAAAAIAAJ |title=Formation of the State |date=1968 |publisher=Prentice-Hall |isbn=0133294900 |series=Foundations of Modern Anthropology |location=Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey |oclc=266086412}}
* {{cite book

|title=Thomas Hobbes &amp; Political Theory
{{Navboxes
|last=Dietz
|title=Related Navboxes
|first=Mary G.
| titlestyle = background: lightblue
|date=1990
|list=
|publisher=University Press of Kansas
{{Government}}
|isbn=0-7006-0420-0
{{Autonomous types of first-tier administration}}
}}
{{World government}}
* {{cite web
{{Political culture}}
|url=http://www.chinahistoryforum.com/index.php?showtopic=565
{{Political ideologies}}
|title=WANG MANG: China History Forum
{{Political philosophy}}
|last=General Zhaoyun
{{Political spectrum}}
|publisher=China History Forum
|date=2004-08-04
|accessdate=2007-11-02
}}
* {{cite web
|url=http://www.1911encyclopedia.org/Government
|title=LoveToKnow Classic Encyclopedia
|publisher=LoveToKnow Corp.
|accessdate=2007-12-04
|date=1911
}} }}
{{Subject bar |auto=yes |book=Government |commons=yes |wikt=yes |wikt-search=government |n=yes |q=yes |s=yes |s-search=Portal:Government |b=yes |b-search=Subject:Government |v=yes |d=yes |d-search=Q7188}}
* {{cite book
{{Authority control}}
|title=A History of World Societies
|last=McKay
|first=John P.
|coauthors=Bennett D. Hill, John Buckler
|date=1996
|publisher=] Company
|isbn=0-395-75379-1
}}
* {{cite web
|url=http://wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn?s=government
|title=WordNet Search 3.0
|accessdate=2007-11-10
|work=WordNet a lexical database for the English language
|publisher=Princeton University/Cognitive Science Laboratory /221 Nassau St./ Princeton, NJ 08542
|first=George A.
|last=Miller
|coauthors=Christiane Fellbaum, and Randee Tengi, and Pamela Wakefield, and Rajesh Poddar, and Helen Langone, and Benjamin Haskell
|date=2006
|id=wordnet:earth science
}}
* {{cite book
|title=Environmental Science (7th ed.)
|last=Nebel
|first=Bernard J.
|coauthors=Richard T. Wright
|publisher=Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458
|date=2007
|isbn=0-13-083134-4
}}
* {{cite book
|title=States, Nations and Nationalism
|last=Schulze
|first=Hagen
|date=1994
|publisher=Blackwell Publishers Inc, 350 Main Street, Malden, Massachusetts 02148, USA
}}
*{{cite web|author=Higham, Charles F. W.|title=Indus Valley Civilization|work=Encyclopedia of Ancient Asian Civilizations|location=New York|year=2004|work=Ancient and Medieval History Online|publisher=Facts On File, Inc.|url=http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?ItemID=WE49&iPin=EAAC0309&SingleRecord=True|accessdate=2007-12-07}}<!-- name: higham indus -->
:*Kenoyer, J. M. ''Ancient Cities of the Indus Civilization''. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998
:*] ''Harappan Civilization: A Recent Perspective''. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 1993
:*''Indus Age: The Writing System''. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996
:*“Revolution in the Urban Revolution: The Emergence of Indus Urbanisation,” ''Annual Review of Anthropology'' 19 (1990): 261–282.
*{{cite web|author=Higham, Charles F. W.|title=History of ancient and medieval Asia|location=New York|publisher=Facts On File, Inc.|year=2004|work=Ancient and Medieval History Online|url=http://www.fofweb.com/activelink2.asp?ItemID=WE49&iPin=EAAC0871&SingleRecord=True|accessdate=2007-12-07}}<!-- name: higham history -->
{{refend}}
== External links ==
{{Wiktionary|government}}
{{wikiquote}}
*{{dmoz|Society/Government}}


{{DEFAULTSORT:Government, Forms of}}
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 20:31, 8 January 2025

System or group governing an organized community "Gov" redirects here. For other uses, see Gov (disambiguation).

For the executive power referred to as "the government", see Executive (government). For other uses, see Government (disambiguation).

World's states coloured by systems of government:
Parliamentary systems: Head of government is elected or nominated by and accountable to the legislature   Constitutional monarchy with a ceremonial monarch   Parliamentary republic with a ceremonial president   Parliamentary republic with an executive president
Presidential system: Head of government (president) is popularly elected and independent of the legislature   Presidential republic
Hybrid systems:   Semi-presidential republic: Executive president is independent of the legislature; head of government is appointed by the president and is accountable to the legislature   Assembly-independent republic: Head of government (president or directory) is elected by the legislature, but is not accountable to it
Other systems:   Theocratic republic: Supreme Leader holds significant executive and legislative power   Semi-constitutional monarchy: Monarch holds significant executive or legislative power   Absolute monarchy: Monarch has unlimited power   One-party state: Power is constitutionally linked to a single political party   Military junta: Committee of military leaders controls the government; constitutional provisions are suspended   Provisional government: No constitutionally defined basis to current regime   Dependent territories or places without governments
Note: this chart represents the de jure systems of government, not the de facto degree of democracy.
Part of a series on
Governance
Models
By level
By field
Measures
Related topics

A government is the system or group of people governing an organized community, generally a state.

In the case of its broad associative definition, government normally consists of legislature, executive, and judiciary. Government is a means by which organizational policies are enforced, as well as a mechanism for determining policy. In many countries, the government has a kind of constitution, a statement of its governing principles and philosophy.

While all types of organizations have governance, the term government is often used more specifically to refer to the approximately 200 independent national governments and subsidiary organizations.

The main types of modern political systems recognized are democracies, totalitarian regimes, and, sitting between these two, authoritarian regimes with a variety of hybrid regimes. Modern classification systems also include monarchies as a standalone entity or as a hybrid system of the main three. Historically prevalent forms of government include monarchy, aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, theocracy, and tyranny. These forms are not always mutually exclusive, and mixed governments are common. The main aspect of any philosophy of government is how political power is obtained, with the two main forms being electoral contest and hereditary succession.

Definitions and etymology

A government is the system to govern a state or community. The Columbia Encyclopedia defines government as "a system of social control under which the right to make laws, and the right to enforce them, is vested in a particular group in society". While all types of organizations have governance, the word government is often used more specifically to refer to the approximately 200 independent national governments on Earth, as well as their subsidiary organizations, such as state and provincial governments as well as local governments.

The word government derives from the Greek verb κυβερνάω meaning to steer with a gubernaculum (rudder), the metaphorical sense being attested in the literature of classical antiquity, including Plato's Ship of State. In British English, "government" sometimes refers to what's also known as a "ministry" or an "administration", i.e., the policies and government officials of a particular executive or governing coalition. Finally, government is also sometimes used in English as a synonym for rule or governance.

In other languages, cognates may have a narrower scope, such as the government of Portugal, which is more similar to the concept of "administration".

History

Main articles: Political history of the world and Political philosophy

Earliest governments

The moment and place that the phenomenon of human government developed is lost in time; however, history does record the formations of early governments. About 5,000 years ago, the first small city-states appeared. By the third to second millenniums BC, some of these had developed into larger governed areas: Sumer, ancient Egypt, the Indus Valley civilization, and the Yellow River civilization.

One reason that explains the emergence of governments includes agriculture. Since the Neolithic Revolution, agriculture has been an efficient method to create food surplus. This enabled people to specialize in non-agricultural activities. Some of them included being able to rule over others as an external authority. Others included social experimentation with diverse governance models. Both these activities formed the basis of governments. These governments gradually became more complex as agriculture supported larger and denser populations, creating new interactions and social pressures that the government needed to control. David Christian explains

As farming populations gathered in larger and denser communities, interactions between different groups increased and the social pressure rose until, in a striking parallel with star formation, new structures suddenly appeared, together with a new level of complexity. Like stars, cities and states reorganize and energize the smaller objects within their gravitational field.

Another explanation includes the need to properly manage infrastructure projects such as water infrastructure. Historically, this required centralized administration and complex social organisation, as seen in regions like Mesopotamia. However, there is archaeological evidence that shows similar successes with more egalitarian and decentralized complex societies.

Modern governments

Forms of government in 1908 from The Harmsworth atlas and Gazetter

Starting at the end of the 17th century, the prevalence of republican forms of government grew. The English Civil War and Glorious Revolution in England, the American Revolution, and the French Revolution contributed to the growth of representative forms of government. The Soviet Union was the first large country to have a Communist government. Since the fall of the Berlin Wall, liberal democracy has become an even more prevalent form of government.

In the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, there was a significant increase in the size and scale of government at the national level. This included the regulation of corporations and the development of the welfare state.

Political science

Main article: Political science
Part of the Politics series
Politics
Primary topics
Political systems
Academic disciplines
Public administration
Policy
Government branches
Related topics
Subseries
icon Politics portal

Classification

In political science, it has long been a goal to create a typology or taxonomy of polities, as typologies of political systems are not obvious. It is especially important in the political science fields of comparative politics and international relations. Like all categories discerned within forms of government, the boundaries of government classifications are either fluid or ill-defined.

Superficially, all governments have an official de jure or ideal form. The United States is a federal constitutional republic, while the former Soviet Union was a federal socialist republic. However self-identification is not objective, and as Kopstein and Lichbach argue, defining regimes can be tricky, especially de facto, when both its government and its economy deviate in practice. For example, Voltaire argued that "the Holy Roman Empire is neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire". In practice, the Soviet Union was a centralized autocratic one-party state under Joseph Stalin.

Identifying a form of government is also difficult because many political systems originate as socio-economic movements and are then carried into governments by parties naming themselves after those movements; all with competing political ideologies. Experience with those movements in power, and the strong ties they may have to particular forms of government, can cause them to be considered as forms of government in themselves.

Other complications include general non-consensus or deliberate "distortion or bias" of reasonable technical definitions of political ideologies and associated forms of governing, due to the nature of politics in the modern era. For example: The meaning of "conservatism" in the United States has little in common with the way the word's definition is used elsewhere. As Ribuffo notes, "what Americans now call conservatism much of the world calls liberalism or neoliberalism"; a "conservative" in Finland would be labeled a "socialist" in the United States. Since the 1950s conservatism in the United States has been chiefly associated with right-wing politics and the Republican Party. However, during the era of segregation many Southern Democrats were conservatives, and they played a key role in the conservative coalition that controlled Congress from 1937 to 1963.

Social-political ambiguity

Opinions vary by individuals concerning the types and properties of governments that exist. "Shades of gray" are commonplace in any government and its corresponding classification. Even the most liberal democracies limit rival political activity to one extent or another while the most tyrannical dictatorships must organize a broad base of support thereby creating difficulties for "pigeonholing" governments into narrow categories. Examples include the claims of the United States as being a plutocracy rather than a democracy since some American voters believe elections are being manipulated by wealthy Super PACs. Some consider that government is to be reconceptualised where in times of climatic change the needs and desires of the individual are reshaped to generate sufficiency for all.

Measurement of governing

The quality of a government can be measured by Government effectiveness index, which relates to political efficacy and state capacity.

Forms

Main article: List of forms of government Further information: Mixed government
Part of the Politics series
Basic forms of government
List of forms · List of countries
Source of power
Democracy (rule by many)

Oligarchy (rule by few)

Autocracy (rule by one)

Anarchy (rule by none)

Power ideology
(socio-political ideologies)

(socio-economic ideologies)

  • Religious
  • Secular

(geo-cultural ideologies)
Power structure
Unitarism

Client state

Federalism

International relations

Related
icon Politics portal

Plato in his book The Republic (375 BC) divided governments into five basic types (four being existing forms and one being Plato's ideal form, which exists "only in speech"):

These five regimes progressively degenerate starting with aristocracy at the top and tyranny at the bottom.

In his Politics, Aristotle elaborates on Plato's five regimes discussing them in relation to the government of one, of the few, and of the many. From this follows the classification of forms of government according to which people have the authority to rule: either one person (an autocracy, such as monarchy), a select group of people (an aristocracy), or the people as a whole (a democracy, such as a republic).

Thomas Hobbes stated on their classification:

The difference of Commonwealths consisteth in the difference of the sovereign, or the person representative of all and every one of the multitude. And because the sovereignty is either in one man, or in an assembly of more than one; and into that assembly either every man hath right to enter, or not everyone, but certain men distinguished from the rest; it is manifest there can be but three kinds of Commonwealth. For the representative must need to be one man or more; and if more, then it is the assembly of all, or but of a part. When the representative is one man, then is the Commonwealth a monarchy; when an assembly of all that will come together, then it is a democracy or popular Commonwealth; when an assembly of a part only, then it is called an aristocracy. In other kinds of Commonwealth there can be none: for either one, or more, or all, must have the sovereign power (which I have shown to be indivisible) entire.

Modern basic political systems

According to Yale professor Juan José Linz, there a three main types of political systems today: democracies, totalitarian regimes and, sitting between these two, authoritarian regimes with hybrid regimes. Another modern classification system includes monarchies as a standalone entity or as a hybrid system of the main three. Scholars generally refer to a dictatorship as either a form of authoritarianism or totalitarianism.

Autocracy

Main article: Autocracy

An autocracy is a system of government in which supreme power is concentrated in the hands of one person, whose decisions are subject to neither external legal restraints nor regularized mechanisms of popular control (except perhaps for the implicit threat of a coup d'état or mass insurrection). Absolute monarchy is a historically prevalent form of autocracy, wherein a monarch governs as a singular sovereign with no limitation on royal prerogative. Most absolute monarchies are hereditary, however some, notably the Holy See, are elected by an electoral college (such as the college of cardinals, or prince-electors). Other forms of autocracy include tyranny, despotism, and dictatorship.

Aristocracy

Main article: Aristocracy

Aristocracy is a form of government that places power in the hands of a small, elite ruling class, such as a hereditary nobility or privileged caste. This class exercises minority rule, often as a landed timocracy, wealthy plutocracy, or oligarchy.

Many monarchies were aristocracies, although in modern constitutional monarchies, the monarch may have little effective power. The term aristocracy could also refer to the non-peasant, non-servant, and non-city classes in the feudal system.

Democracy

Main articles: Democracy and Types of democracy
  •   National governments which self-identify as democracies
  •   National governments which do not self-identify as democracies
Governments recognised as "electoral democracies" as of 2022 by the Freedom in the World survey

Democracy is a system of government where citizens exercise power by voting and deliberation. In a direct democracy, the citizenry as a whole directly forms a participatory governing body and vote directly on each issue. In indirect democracy, the citizenry governs indirectly through the selection of representatives or delegates from among themselves, typically by election or, less commonly, by sortition. These select citizens then meet to form a governing body, such as a legislature or jury.

Some governments combine both direct and indirect democratic governance, wherein the citizenry selects representatives to administer day-to-day governance, while also reserving the right to govern directly through popular initiatives, referendums (plebiscites), and the right of recall. In a constitutional democracy the powers of the majority are exercised within the framework of representative democracy, but the constitution limits majority rule, usually through the provision by all of certain universal rights, such as freedom of speech or freedom of association.

Republics

Main article: Republic

A republic is a form of government in which the country is considered a "public matter" (Latin: res publica), not the private concern or property of the rulers, and where offices of states are subsequently directly or indirectly elected or appointed rather than inherited. The people, or some significant portion of them, have supreme control over the government and where offices of state are elected or chosen by elected people.

A common simplified definition of a republic is a government where the head of state is not a monarch. Montesquieu included both democracies, where all the people have a share in rule, and aristocracies or oligarchies, where only some of the people rule, as republican forms of government.

Other terms used to describe different republics include democratic republic, parliamentary republic, semi-presidential republic, presidential republic, federal republic, people's republic, and Islamic republic.

Federalism

Main article: Federalism

Federalism is a political concept in which a group of members are bound together by covenant with a governing representative head. The term "federalism" is also used to describe a system of government in which sovereignty is constitutionally divided between a central governing authority and constituent political units, variously called states, provinces or otherwise. Federalism is a system based upon democratic principles and institutions in which the power to govern is shared between national and provincial/state governments, creating what is often called a federation. Proponents are often called federalists.

Branches

Separation of powers in the US government, demonstrating the trias politica model
Further information: Separation of powers and Fusion of powers

Governments are typically organised into distinct institutions constituting branches of government each with particular powers, functions, duties, and responsibilities. The distribution of powers between these institutions differs between governments, as do the functions and number of branches. An independent, parallel distribution of powers between branches of government is the separation of powers. A shared, intersecting, or overlapping distribution of powers is the fusion of powers.

Governments are often organised into three branches with separate powers: a legislature, an executive, and a judiciary; this is sometimes called the trias politica model. However, in parliamentary and semi-presidential systems, branches of government often intersect, having shared membership and overlapping functions. Many governments have fewer or additional branches, such as an independent electoral commission or auditory branch.

Party system

Part of the Politics series
Party politics
Political spectrum
Left-wing
Centre
Right-wing
Major ideologies
Types
Leaders and organization
Internal elections
Party discipline
Party systems
Coalitions between parties
Lists of political parties
icon Politics portal
"One-party government" redirects here. For a state in which a single political party controls the ruling system, see One-party state. Further information: Political party and Party system

Presently, most governments are administered by members of an explicitly constituted political party which coordinates the activities of associated government officials and candidates for office. In a multiparty system of government, multiple political parties have the capacity to gain control of government offices, typically by competing in elections, although the effective number of parties may be limited.

A majority government is a government by one or more governing parties together holding an absolute majority of seats in the parliament, in contrast to a minority government in which they have only a plurality of seats and often depend on a confidence-and-supply arrangement with other parties. A coalition government is one in which multiple parties cooperate to form a government as part of a coalition agreement. In a single-party government, a single party forms a government without the support of a coalition, as is typically the case with majority governments, but even a minority government may consist of just one party unable to find a willing coalition partner at the moment.

A state that continuously maintains a single-party government within a (nominally) multiparty system possesses a dominant-party system. In a (nondemocratic) one-party system a single ruling party has the (more-or-less) exclusive right to form the government, and the formation of other parties may be obstructed or illegal. In some cases, a government may have a non-partisan system, as is the case with absolute monarchy or non-partisan democracy.

Maps

See also: List of countries by system of government

Democracy is the most popular form of government. More than half of the nations in the world are democracies—97 of 167, as of 2021. However, the world is becoming more authoritarian with a quarter of the world's population under democratically backsliding governments.

Democracy Index by the Economist Intelligence Unit, 2017
Full Democracies   9–10   8–9 Flawed Democracies   7–8   6–7 Hybrid Regimes   5–6   4–5 Authoritarian Regimes   3–4   2–3   0–2
World first-and-second degree administrative levels
A world map distinguishing countries of the world as federations (green) from unitary states (blue)
  Unitary states   Federations

See also

Notes

  1. Frederickson 2000, p. 12, quote: "...conservative southern Democrats viewed warily the potential of New Deal programs to threaten the region's economic dependence on cheap labor while stirring the democratic ambitions of the disfranchised and undermining white supremacy."
  2. Ancient Greek: ἀριστοκρατία aristokratía, from ἄριστος aristos "excellent", and κράτος kratos "power".
  3. Conducted by the American think tank Freedom House, which is largely funded by the US government.

References

  1. Dobratz, B.A. (2015). Power, Politics, and Society: An Introduction to Political Sociology. Taylor & Francis. p. 47. ISBN 978-1-317-34529-9. Archived from the original on 30 April 2023. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
  2. ^ Linz, Juan José (2000). Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes. Lynne Rienner Publisher. p. 143. ISBN 978-1-55587-890-0. OCLC 1172052725. Archived from the original on 22 April 2023. Retrieved 20 October 2022.
  3. ^ Garcia-Alexander, Ginny; Woo, Hyeyoung; Carlson, Matthew J. (2017). Social Foundations of Behavior for the Health Sciences. Springer. pp. 137–. ISBN 978-3-319-64950-4. OCLC 1013825392.
  4. "14.2 Types of Political Systems". 8 April 2016. Archived from the original on 22 October 2022. Retrieved 20 October 2022.
  5. Columbia Encyclopedia (6th ed.). Columbia University Press. 2000.
  6. ^ Smelser & Baltes 2001, p. .
  7. Brock 2013, p. 53–62.
  8. "Government English Definition and Meaning". Lexico. Archived from the original on 17 July 2022. Retrieved 17 July 2022.
  9. ^ Christian 2004, p. 245.
  10. Christian 2004, p. 294.
  11. Eagly, Alice H.; Wood, Wendy (June 1999). "The Origins of Sex Differences in Human Behavior: Evolved Dispositions Versus Social Roles". American Psychologist. 54 (6): 408–423. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.54.6.408. Archived from the original on 17 August 2000.
  12. Fukuyama, Francis (27 March 2012). The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. p. 70. ISBN 978-0-374-53322-9.
  13. Roosevelt, Anna C. (1999). "The Maritime, Highland, Forest Dynamic and the Origins of Complex Culture". In Salomon, Frank; Schwartz, Stuart B. (eds.). Cambridge history of the Native peoples of the Americas: South America, Volume 3. Cambridge University Press. pp. 266–267. ISBN 978-0-521-63075-7. Archived from the original on 24 June 2016.
  14. ^ Kuper & Kuper 2008, p. .
  15. Haider-Markel 2014, p. .
  16. Lewellen 2003, p. .
  17. Kopstein & Lichbach 2005, p. 4.
  18. Renna 2015.
  19. Ribuffo 2011, pp. 2–6, quote on p. 6.
  20. Frederickson 2000, p. 12.
  21. Freeland 2012.
  22. "Governing the "Enough" in a Warming World The Discourse of "Sufficiency" from a Climate Governmentality Perspective". Deflorian, Michel (2015). Retrieved 2 October 2023
  23. Guisan, Maria-Carmen (2009). "Government effectiveness, education, economic development and well-being: analysis of European countries in comparison with the United States and Canada, 2000-2007" (PDF). Applied Econometrics and International Development. 9 (1): 1. Retrieved 25 April 2019.
  24. Abjorensen, Norman (2019). Historical Dictionary of Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield. pp. 288–. ISBN 978-1-5381-2074-3. OCLC 1081354236.
  25. Brill 2016.
  26. Jordović, Ivan (2019). Taming Politics: Plato and the Democratic Roots of Tyrannical Man. Franz Steiner Verlag. p. intro. ISBN 978-3-515-12457-7. OCLC 1107421360.
  27. Hobbes, Thomas. Leviathan  – via Wikisource.
  28. Jonathan Michie, ed. (3 February 2014). Reader's Guide to the Social Sciences. Routledge. p. 95. ISBN 978-1-135-93226-8. Archived from the original on 22 April 2023. Retrieved 20 October 2022.
  29. Todd, Allan; Waller, Sally (10 September 2015). Todd, Allan; Waller, Sally (eds.). History for the IB Diploma Paper 2 AuthoritariaAuthoritarian States (20th Century). Cambridge University Press. pp. 10–. ISBN 978-1-107-55889-2. Archived from the original on 22 April 2023. Retrieved 20 October 2022.
  30. Sondrol, P. C. (2009). "Totalitarian and Authoritarian Dictators: A Comparison of Fidel Castro and Alfredo Stroessner". Journal of Latin American Studies. 23 (3): 599–620. doi:10.1017/S0022216X00015868. ISSN 0022-216X. JSTOR 157386. S2CID 144333167. Archived from the original on 8 March 2023. Retrieved 20 October 2022.
  31. Johnson, Paul M. "Autocracy: A Glossary of Political Economy Terms". Auburn.edu. Archived from the original on 26 December 2018. Retrieved 14 September 2012.
  32. "aristocracy". Oxford English Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford University Press. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
  33. Oxford English Dictionary: "democracy".
  34. Watkins, Frederick (1970). "Democracy". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 7 (Expo '70 hardcover ed.). William Benton. pp. 215–223. ISBN 978-0-85229-135-1.
  35. Montesquieu 1748, book 2, chapters 1.
  36. "Republic". Encyclopædia Britannica.
  37. "republic". WordNet 3.0. Archived from the original on 12 March 2009. Retrieved 20 March 2009.
  38. "Republic". Merriam-Webster. Archived from the original on 12 June 2018. Retrieved 14 August 2010.
  39. Montesquieu 1748, book 2, chapters 2–3.
  40. Cane, Peter; Conaghan, Joanne (2008). "Federalism". The new Oxford companion to law. Oxford: Oxford university press. ISBN 978-0-19-929054-3.
  41. Needler 1991, pp. 116–118.
  42. Gallagher, Laver & Mair 2006.
  43. Kettle 2015.
  44. Duxbury 2021.
  45. ^ The Global State of Democracy 2021 Archived 9 August 2022 at the Wayback Machine, International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance
  46. "Democracy Index 2017 – Economist Intelligence Unit" (PDF). EIU.com. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 December 2020. Retrieved 17 February 2018.

Bibliography

Further reading

Related Navboxes
Government
Politics and government
Overviews
Systems
Philosophies
Functions
Components
Governance
processes
Politics
Academic
History
International
Related
Categories
Common types of government ministers and ministries
Leadership
Titles
Defence /
foreign affairs /
public safety
Economics/
infrastructure
Environment /
natural resources
Social
Other
Lists
Public services
Concepts
Basic services
Public utility
Public works
Social services
See also
Autonomous types of first-tier subdivision administration
Federalism
Unitary state
Unions
Subordinacy
Development
See also
Global governance and identity
Proposals
Theories
Organisations
Provisional government
World portal
Political culture
Types of political culture
Country-specific articles
Political ideologies
See also
Political philosophy
Terms
Government
Ideologies
Concepts
Philosophers
Antiquity
Middle Ages
Early modern
period
18th and 19th
centuries
20th and 21st
centuries
Works
Related
Political spectrum
Political positions
Political ideologies
  • Anarchism
  • Marxism
  • Communism
  • Socialism
  • Social democracy
  • Liberalism
  • Christian democracy
  • Conservatism
  • Nationalism
  • Fascism
  • Nazism
  • Religious politics
  • Buddhist socialism
  • Christian left
  • Jewish left
  • Islamic socialism
  • Christian right
  • Hindutva
  • Islamism
  • Religious Zionism
  • Political pejoratives
  • Baizuo
  • Champagne socialist
  • Hard left
  • Liberal elite
  • Loony left
  • Moonbat
  • Red fascist
  • Regressive left
  • Social fascism
  • Social imperialism
  • Social justice warrior
  • Soft left
  • Wingnut
  • Models
  • Horseshoe theory
  • Left–right political spectrum
  • Nolan Chart
  • Overton window
  • Open–closed political spectrum
  • Pournelle chart
  • Right-wing authoritarianism
  • See also
  • Anti-authoritarianism
  • Democratic transition
  • Libertarianism
  • Syndicalism
  • Progressivism
  • Green politics
  • Identity politics
  • Corporatism
  • Authoritarianism
  • Totalitarianism
  • Revolutionary
  • Reactionary
  • Anti-establishment
  • Collectivism
  • Communitarianism
  • The Establishment
  • Individualism
  • Hardline
  • Populism
  • Radical politics
  • Triangulation
  • Government at Misplaced Pages's sister projects: Categories: