| Revision as of 01:30, 10 April 2009 editMuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,094 edits →Beef O'Brady's: Articles on notable subjects aren't deleted simply because they are unsourced (BLPs might be different, though).← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:16, 10 April 2009 edit undoDreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 edits →Graeae Theatre Company: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| If there truly so many sources out there to prove notability, how come they aren't in the article as well as the info those sources supposedly have? I will check back on the article in a few days. If the sources aren't there, I am putting it up again to be deleted. ] (]) 01:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC) | If there truly so many sources out there to prove notability, how come they aren't in the article as well as the info those sources supposedly have? I will check back on the article in a few days. If the sources aren't there, I am putting it up again to be deleted. ] (]) 01:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :It just needs to be shown that sources exist for notability; they need not necessarily to be in the article to establish that. AFD or PROD are not for cleanup; we don't delete unsourced articles that clearly demonstrate notability (though for ]s that is currently being hotly debated and is on the forefront of the ] drive, but that's beside the point), and ] in doing so. As far as notability is concerned (apologies for not showing explicitly on the article's talk page), but Google news search comes back with plenty of good sources, and I am sure there are more in the regular Google search. ] 01:30, 10 April 2009 (UTC) | :It just needs to be shown that sources exist for notability; they need not necessarily to be in the article to establish that. AFD or PROD are not for cleanup; we don't delete unsourced articles that clearly demonstrate notability (though for ]s that is currently being hotly debated and is on the forefront of the ] drive, but that's beside the point), and ] in doing so. As far as notability is concerned (apologies for not showing explicitly on the article's talk page), but Google news search comes back with plenty of good sources, and I am sure there are more in the regular Google search. ] 01:30, 10 April 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| You were one of the people who voted to Speedy Keep this article as obviously notable. The same editor who put it up for AFD under flimsy rationale is now tagging it with a notability tag, despite overwhelming consensus of the AFD. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look. ] (]) 17:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:16, 10 April 2009
Or: The War Room
|
We all know what we can and cannot do in the War Room, correct, gentlemen?
Stacey NelsonI dont personally know Stacey Nelson but I do know that she is one of the top women athletes in the entire country and I was surprised she didnt have a wikipedia page. As for my username, I couldnt think of a good one so I just created this one so it was a name I could easily remember. I edited the page, I didn't want to be hit by the conflict of interest banner. Thank you for your time. UFGatorsSports (talk) 08:15, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
The WPVG Newsletter (March 2009)
Roblox on Misplaced Pages .Hello, You removed my link to the roblox Sup-page and said that once it is back in the Main space it can be listed again. The problem is we can't get it back in the main space. I thought that the purpose of that section was to further the coverage of video games on Misplaced Pages. If you search roblox up, you will see it is one of the most popular online games on the web, yet there is still no Misplaced Pages coverage.--gordonrox24 (talk) 20:25, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
Okay thanks!--gordonrox24 (talk) 00:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC) RPGFan as an unreliable sourceI've noticed you listed Final Fantasy V for Good Article Reassessment. However, you've placed unreliable source templates next to statements by RPGFan. I'm sure this has been brought up in the past, but this website is sourced by numerous Good and Featured Articles; see pages that link to it. If you question it in on one articles, shouldn't you question it on all of these articles? If need be, we can begin a discussion with WikiProject Video games. ~ Hibana 00:41, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Beef O'Brady'sIf there truly so many sources out there to prove notability, how come they aren't in the article as well as the info those sources supposedly have? I will check back on the article in a few days. If the sources aren't there, I am putting it up again to be deleted. Postcard Cathy (talk) 01:19, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Graeae Theatre CompanyYou were one of the people who voted to Speedy Keep this article as obviously notable. The same editor who put it up for AFD under flimsy rationale is now tagging it with a notability tag, despite overwhelming consensus of the AFD. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look. DreamGuy (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2009 (UTC) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
