Revision as of 08:01, 28 January 2013 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,573,840 edits Rescuing orphaned refs ("SlutWalkIndiaNYT001" from rev 535295718)← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:10, 28 January 2013 edit undoDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 edits Reverted to revision 535203716 by Darkness Shines: Restore reliably sourced content removed without discussion or consensus. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Feminism sidebar |expanded=Waves}} | {{Feminism sidebar |expanded=Waves}} | ||
⚫ | Within sociology, '''Rape culture''' is a concept of disputed origin and meaning<ref name="Blackwell Publishing Inc - Encyclopedia - Prof Joyce E Williams - Rape Culture">{{cite encyclopedia | title=Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology - Rape Culture | encyclopedia=Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology | url=http://www.blackwellreference.com/public/tocnode?id=g9781405124331_yr2012_chunk_g978140512433124_ss1-19#citation | publisher=Blackwell Publishing Inc. | accessdate=January 21, 2013 | author=Wiliams, Joyce E. | editor=Ritzer, George | year=2007 | doi=10.1111/b.9781405124331.2007.x | isbn=9781405124331 | archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6Dpy0NZWD | archivedate=Jan 21, 2013}}</ref> used to describe a ] in which ] and ] are common and in which prevalent ], ], practices, and ] ], excuse, tolerate, or even condone rape. | ||
Within ], '''rape culture''' is a concept used to describe a ] in which ] and ] are common and in which prevalent ], ], practices, and ] ], excuse, tolerate, or even condone rape. | |||
Examples of behaviors commonly associated with rape culture include ], ], and trivializing rape. Rape culture has been used to model behaviour within social groups, including prison systems where ] is common and conflict areas where ] is used as psychological warfare. Entire countries have also been alleged to be rape cultures.<ref name=leaderu /><ref name=rozee>{{cite web |url=http://www.raperesistance.org/research/rape_culture.html |title=Resisting a Rape Culture |author=Rozee, Patricia |publisher=Rape Resistance |accessdate=11 January 2012}}</ref><ref name=Steffes>{{cite web |url=http://hpr1.com/feature/article/the_rape_culture/ |title=The American Rape Culture |author=Steffes, Micah |date=January 2008 |publisher=High Plains Reader |accessdate=11 January 2012}}</ref><ref name="Maitse1998">{{cite journal|last1=Maitse|first1=Teboho|title=Political change, rape, and pornography in postapartheid South Africa|journal=Gender & Development|volume=6|issue=3|year=1998|pages=55–59|issn=1355-2074|doi=10.1080/741922834}}</ref><ref name="Prof Upendra Baxi India = Rape Culture">{{cite journal|last=Baxi|first=Upendra|title=THE SECOND GUJARAT CATASTROPHE|journal=Economic and Political Weekly|year=2002|month=August|volume=37|issue=34|pages=3519–3531|url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4412519|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref> | Examples of behaviors commonly associated with rape culture include ], ], and trivializing rape. Rape culture has been used to model behaviour within social groups, including prison systems where ] is common and conflict areas where ] is used as psychological warfare. Entire countries have also been alleged to be rape cultures.<ref name=leaderu /><ref name=rozee>{{cite web |url=http://www.raperesistance.org/research/rape_culture.html |title=Resisting a Rape Culture |author=Rozee, Patricia |publisher=Rape Resistance |accessdate=11 January 2012}}</ref><ref name=Steffes>{{cite web |url=http://hpr1.com/feature/article/the_rape_culture/ |title=The American Rape Culture |author=Steffes, Micah |date=January 2008 |publisher=High Plains Reader |accessdate=11 January 2012}}</ref><ref name="Maitse1998">{{cite journal|last1=Maitse|first1=Teboho|title=Political change, rape, and pornography in postapartheid South Africa|journal=Gender & Development|volume=6|issue=3|year=1998|pages=55–59|issn=1355-2074|doi=10.1080/741922834}}</ref><ref name="Prof Upendra Baxi India = Rape Culture">{{cite journal|last=Baxi|first=Upendra|title=THE SECOND GUJARAT CATASTROPHE|journal=Economic and Political Weekly|year=2002|month=August|volume=37|issue=34|pages=3519–3531|url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4412519|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref> | ||
Line 13: | Line 12: | ||
|class=noprint Template-Fact | |class=noprint Template-Fact | ||
|title=This claim needs references to reliable sources | |title=This claim needs references to reliable sources | ||
}}, there is disagreement over what defines a rape culture and to what degree a given society meets the criteria to be considered a rape culture. | |||
⚫ | |||
Rape culture has been observed to correlate with other social factors and behaviours. Research identifies correlation between rape myths, victim blaming and trivialisation of rape with increased incidence of racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, religious intolerance and other forms of discrimination.<ref name=AOSVOD001>{{cite journal|last=Aosved|first=Allison C.|coauthors=Long, Patricia J.|title=Co-occurrence of Rape Myth Acceptance, Sexism, Racism, Homophobia, Ageism, Classism, and Religious Intolerance|journal=Sex Roles|date=28 November 2006|volume=55|issue=7–8|pages=481–492|doi=10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Suarez|first=E.|coauthors=Gadalla, T. M.|title=Stop Blaming the Victim: A Meta-Analysis on Rape Myths|journal=Journal of Interpersonal Violence|date=11 January 2010|volume=25|issue=11|pages=2010–2035|doi=10.1177/0886260509354503}}</ref> | Rape culture has been observed to correlate with other social factors and behaviours. Research identifies correlation between rape myths, victim blaming and trivialisation of rape with increased incidence of racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, religious intolerance and other forms of discrimination.<ref name=AOSVOD001>{{cite journal|last=Aosved|first=Allison C.|coauthors=Long, Patricia J.|title=Co-occurrence of Rape Myth Acceptance, Sexism, Racism, Homophobia, Ageism, Classism, and Religious Intolerance|journal=Sex Roles|date=28 November 2006|volume=55|issue=7–8|pages=481–492|doi=10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Suarez|first=E.|coauthors=Gadalla, T. M.|title=Stop Blaming the Victim: A Meta-Analysis on Rape Myths|journal=Journal of Interpersonal Violence|date=11 January 2010|volume=25|issue=11|pages=2010–2035|doi=10.1177/0886260509354503}}</ref> | ||
Line 22: | Line 21: | ||
The term was used 1974 in ''Rape: The First Sourcebook for Women'', edited by ] and Cassandra Wilson<!-- careful before wikilinking - currently leads to a singer --> for the ].<ref name="FeministsConnell1974">{{cite book|author1=New York Radical Feminists|author2=Noreen Connell|author3=Cassandra Wilson|title=Rape: the first sourcebook for women|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?ei=04yuT9qECsfB0QWW_ZikCQ&id=ej1BAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Rape+Culture%22|accessdate=14 May 2012|date=31 October 1974|publisher=New American Library|isbn=9780452250864|page=105|chapter=3}}</ref> It was one of the first books to include first-person accounts of rape, which were one reason for rape entering the public view.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/10/11/letters/letters.html |title=Letters to the Editor: Speaking Out |newspaper=New York Times |date=11 October 1998 |author=] |accessdate=15 June 2012}}</ref> In the book, the group stated that "our ultimate goal is to eliminate rape and that goal cannot be achieved without a revolutionary transformation of our society."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.faar-aegis.org/NovDec_74/review_NovDec74.html |title=Book Review: Rape: The First Sourcebook for Women (New York Radical Feminists) |author=Freada Klein |work=Feminist Alliance Against Rape Newsletter |date=November/December 1974 |publisher=Feminist Alliance Against Rape Newsletter |accessdate=15 June 2012}}</ref> | The term was used 1974 in ''Rape: The First Sourcebook for Women'', edited by ] and Cassandra Wilson<!-- careful before wikilinking - currently leads to a singer --> for the ].<ref name="FeministsConnell1974">{{cite book|author1=New York Radical Feminists|author2=Noreen Connell|author3=Cassandra Wilson|title=Rape: the first sourcebook for women|url=http://books.google.co.uk/books?ei=04yuT9qECsfB0QWW_ZikCQ&id=ej1BAAAAIAAJ&q=%22Rape+Culture%22|accessdate=14 May 2012|date=31 October 1974|publisher=New American Library|isbn=9780452250864|page=105|chapter=3}}</ref> It was one of the first books to include first-person accounts of rape, which were one reason for rape entering the public view.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.nytimes.com/books/98/10/11/letters/letters.html |title=Letters to the Editor: Speaking Out |newspaper=New York Times |date=11 October 1998 |author=] |accessdate=15 June 2012}}</ref> In the book, the group stated that "our ultimate goal is to eliminate rape and that goal cannot be achieved without a revolutionary transformation of our society."<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.faar-aegis.org/NovDec_74/review_NovDec74.html |title=Book Review: Rape: The First Sourcebook for Women (New York Radical Feminists) |author=Freada Klein |work=Feminist Alliance Against Rape Newsletter |date=November/December 1974 |publisher=Feminist Alliance Against Rape Newsletter |accessdate=15 June 2012}}</ref> | ||
Dr Joyce E. Williams traces the origin and first usage of rape culture <ref name="Blackwell Publishing Inc - Encyclopedia - Prof Joyce E Williams - Rape Culture"/> to the 1975 documentary film '']'', produced and directed by ] and ] for ]. Prof Williams says that the film "..takes credit for first defining the concept.".<ref name="Blackwell Publishing Inc - Encyclopedia - Prof Joyce E Williams - Rape Culture"/>. No earlier defining source has been located. | |||
The film discussed rape of both men and women in the context of a larger cultural normalization of rape.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.cambridgedocumentaryfilms.org/rapeculture.html |title=Rape Culture |publisher=Cambridge Documentary Films |accessdate=8 January 2012}}</ref><ref name="Norsigian 29–30">{{cite journal|last=Norsigian|first=Judy|title=Women, Health, and Films|journal=Women & Health|date=20 January 1975|volume=1|issue=1|pages=29–30|doi=10.1300/J013v01n01_07|url=http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J013v01n01_08#preview|accessdate=11 May 2012}}</ref> In 2000, Lazarus stated that she believed the movie was the first use of the term.<ref>{{cite web |title=Rape Culture |url=http://userpages.umbc.edu/~korenman/wmst/rapeculture2.html |date=15 March 2000<!-- 10:15:39 -->|accessdate=8 January 2012 |author=Lazarus, Margaret}}</ref> The film featured the work of the DC Rape Crisis Centre in co-operation with Prisoners Against Rape Inc.<ref name="smith">{{cite journal|last=Follet|first=Joyce|title=LORETTA ROSS|journal=Voices of Feminism Oral History Project, Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063|year=2004–2005|pages=122–124|url=http://www.smith.edu/libraries/libs/ssc/vof/vof-intro.html|accessdate=7 May 2012}}</ref> It included interviews with rapists and victims as well prominent anti-rape activists like feminist philosopher and theologian ] and author and artist Emily Culpepper. The film also explored the mass media, how film-makers, song writers, writers and magazines perpetuated attitudes towards rape.<ref name="Norsigian 29–30"/> | |||
In a 1992 paper in the ''Journal of Social Issues'' entitled "A Feminist Redefinition of Rape and Sexual Assault: Historical Foundations and Change," Patricia Donat and John D'Emilio suggested that the term originated as "rape-supportive culture"<ref>Patricia Donat and John D'Emilio, "A Feminist Redefinition of Rape and Sexual Assault: Historical Foundations and Change", ''Journal of Social Issues'', vol. 48, n. 1, 1992; published in Di Karen J. Maschke, "The legal response to violence against women", Routledge 1997, ISBN 978-0-8153-2519-2.</ref> in ]'s 1975 book '']''. Brownmiller, a member of the New York Radical Feminists, showed how both academia and the general public ignored the existence of rape.<ref name=rutherford>{{cite journal |title=Sexual Violence Against Women: Putting Rape Research in Context |author=Rutherford, Alexandra |journal=Psychology of Women Quarterly |doi=10.1177/0361684311404307 |date=June 2011 |volume=35 |issue=2 |pages=342–347 |accessdate=15 June 2012 |url=http://pwq.sagepub.com/content/35/2/342.extract}}</ref> The book is considered a "landmark" work on feminism and sexual violence and one of the pillars of modern rape studies.<ref>{{cite book |title=Transforming a Rape Culture | editor1-last =Buchwald | editor1-first =Emilie | editor2-last =Fletcher | editor2-first =Pamela | editor3-last =Roth | editor3-first =Martha |publisher=Milkweed Editions |year=1993 |chapter=Editor's Preface |last1=Buchwald |first1=Emilie |last2=Fletcher |first2=Pamela |last3=Roth |first3=Martha |isbn=0915943069 |page=1}}</ref> | In a 1992 paper in the ''Journal of Social Issues'' entitled "A Feminist Redefinition of Rape and Sexual Assault: Historical Foundations and Change," Patricia Donat and John D'Emilio suggested that the term originated as "rape-supportive culture"<ref>Patricia Donat and John D'Emilio, "A Feminist Redefinition of Rape and Sexual Assault: Historical Foundations and Change", ''Journal of Social Issues'', vol. 48, n. 1, 1992; published in Di Karen J. Maschke, "The legal response to violence against women", Routledge 1997, ISBN 978-0-8153-2519-2.</ref> in ]'s 1975 book '']''. Brownmiller, a member of the New York Radical Feminists, showed how both academia and the general public ignored the existence of rape.<ref name=rutherford>{{cite journal |title=Sexual Violence Against Women: Putting Rape Research in Context |author=Rutherford, Alexandra |journal=Psychology of Women Quarterly |doi=10.1177/0361684311404307 |date=June 2011 |volume=35 |issue=2 |pages=342–347 |accessdate=15 June 2012 |url=http://pwq.sagepub.com/content/35/2/342.extract}}</ref> The book is considered a "landmark" work on feminism and sexual violence and one of the pillars of modern rape studies.<ref>{{cite book |title=Transforming a Rape Culture | editor1-last =Buchwald | editor1-first =Emilie | editor2-last =Fletcher | editor2-first =Pamela | editor3-last =Roth | editor3-first =Martha |publisher=Milkweed Editions |year=1993 |chapter=Editor's Preface |last1=Buchwald |first1=Emilie |last2=Fletcher |first2=Pamela |last3=Roth |first3=Martha |isbn=0915943069 |page=1}}</ref> | ||
Line 46: | Line 47: | ||
India's rape laws are seen as archaic,<ref name="Roy">{{cite news|last=Roy|first=Nilanjana S.|title=THE FEMALE FACTOR; For Indian Rape Laws, Change Is Slow to Come|work=The New York Times|date=22 September 2010|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/world/asia/22iht-letter.html}}</ref> dating from 1860.<ref name="indiapc354">{{cite web|title=THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 ACT NO. 45 OF 1860|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67rEob7ti|work=Central Government Act Section 354|publisher=Indian Kanoon|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref><ref name="indiapc509">{{cite web|title=THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 ACT NO. 45 OF 1860|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67rFGTCnh|work=Section 509|publisher=Indian Kanoon|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Sections 354 & 509|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20100314224518/http://www.indg.in/social-sector/socialwelfare-faqs/9.molestation.pdf|publisher=India Development Gateway}}</ref> They refer to the "outraging" or "insulting" of a woman's modesty. In 1996 research into violence against Indian women showed that every 54 minutes a woman was raped, every 26 minutes a woman was molested. Every five minutes a woman was subjected to ] and every 43 minutes a woman was kidnapped and every 103 minutes a woman was killed in a ].<ref name="Singh1996">{{cite book|author=Mohinder Singh|title=Social Policy And Administration In India|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=PCPvnwpFUbAC&pg=PA87|accessdate=22 May 2012|date=1 January 1996|publisher=M.D. Publications Pvt. Ltd.|isbn=978-81-7533-010-8|page=87}}</ref> | India's rape laws are seen as archaic,<ref name="Roy">{{cite news|last=Roy|first=Nilanjana S.|title=THE FEMALE FACTOR; For Indian Rape Laws, Change Is Slow to Come|work=The New York Times|date=22 September 2010|url=http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/22/world/asia/22iht-letter.html}}</ref> dating from 1860.<ref name="indiapc354">{{cite web|title=THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 ACT NO. 45 OF 1860|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67rEob7ti|work=Central Government Act Section 354|publisher=Indian Kanoon|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref><ref name="indiapc509">{{cite web|title=THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 ACT NO. 45 OF 1860|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67rFGTCnh|work=Section 509|publisher=Indian Kanoon|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Sections 354 & 509|url=http://web.archive.org/web/20100314224518/http://www.indg.in/social-sector/socialwelfare-faqs/9.molestation.pdf|publisher=India Development Gateway}}</ref> They refer to the "outraging" or "insulting" of a woman's modesty. In 1996 research into violence against Indian women showed that every 54 minutes a woman was raped, every 26 minutes a woman was molested. Every five minutes a woman was subjected to ] and every 43 minutes a woman was kidnapped and every 103 minutes a woman was killed in a ].<ref name="Singh1996">{{cite book|author=Mohinder Singh|title=Social Policy And Administration In India|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=PCPvnwpFUbAC&pg=PA87|accessdate=22 May 2012|date=1 January 1996|publisher=M.D. Publications Pvt. Ltd.|isbn=978-81-7533-010-8|page=87}}</ref> | ||
In pre-independence India, rape was politicised with repeated reference to the failures by the British Colonial government and excuses made to not address rape. Post independence the same issue of government failure has been polarised along political divides.<ref name="Kumar1997" /> | |||
⚫ | The two most common forms or rape in India have been describe as ]<ref name="Kumar1997">{{cite book|author=Radha Kumar|title=The History of Doing: An Illustrated Account of Movements for Women's Rights and Feminism in India 1800-1990|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=68xTBT1-H4IC&pg=PA127|accessdate=22 May 2012|year=1997|publisher=Zubaan|isbn=978-81-85107-76-9|page=127|chapter=8|chapter=The Agitation Against Rape }}</ref> or authority rape: rape of tenants rape of female employees or the female spouses of male employees. Rape of female subordinates in the workplace as well as caste related and tribal rape. Rape by police, army and the security forces is also seen a specific category. Rape and sexual violence against minors, against wives and within the family is poorly recognised. India's complex social structure is seen to prevent people of lower ], or from rural India from having access to legal support and the Justice system.<ref name="Narula1999">{{cite book | url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Kd28Ay09adgC&pg=PA177 | title=Broken People: Caste Violence Against India's "untouchables". | publisher=Human Rights Watch | author=Smita Narula | year=1999 | pages=166–178 | isbn=978-1-56432-228-9}}</ref> The ] or untouchable caste have been identified as particularly vulnerable. Bias by police, medical professionals and the Judiciary concerning ] is identified as a factor. Police have been willing to accept bribes from defendants in rape cases, thwarting the legal process.<ref name="Narula1999" /> | ||
⚫ | Cultural differences hide the nature and extent of rape. The two most common forms or rape in India have been describe as ]<ref name="Kumar1997">{{cite book|author=Radha Kumar|title=The History of Doing: An Illustrated Account of Movements for Women's Rights and Feminism in India 1800-1990|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=68xTBT1-H4IC&pg=PA127|accessdate=22 May 2012|year=1997|publisher=Zubaan|isbn=978-81-85107-76-9|page=127|chapter=8|chapter=The Agitation Against Rape }}</ref> or authority rape: rape of tenants rape of female employees or the female spouses of male employees. Rape of female subordinates in the workplace as well as caste related and tribal rape. Rape by police, army and the security forces is also seen a specific category. Rape and sexual violence against minors, against wives and within the family is poorly recognised. India's complex social structure is seen to prevent people of lower ], or from rural India from having access to legal support and the Justice system.<ref name="Narula1999">{{cite book | url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Kd28Ay09adgC&pg=PA177 | title=Broken People: Caste Violence Against India's "untouchables". | publisher=Human Rights Watch | author=Smita Narula | year=1999 | pages=166–178 | isbn=978-1-56432-228-9}}</ref> The ] or untouchable caste have been identified as particularly vulnerable. Bias by police, medical professionals and the Judiciary concerning ] is identified as a factor. Police have been willing to accept bribes from defendants in rape cases, thwarting the legal process.<ref name="Narula1999" /> | ||
⚫ | In the 1992 ], Bhateri rape case,<ref name="BhateriRapeCase">{{cite journal | url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4398990 | title=Bhateri Rape Case: Backlash and Protest | author=Kanchan, Mathur | journal=Economic and Political Weekly | year=1992 | month=Oct | volume=27 | issue=41 | pages=2221–2224}}</ref> the police dismissed the case citing that Devi was too old and unattractive.<ref name="Narula1999">{{cite book|author=Smita Narula|title=Broken People: Caste Violence Against India's "untouchables".|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Kd28Ay09adgC&pg=PA176|accessdate=20 June 2012|year=1999|publisher=Human Rights Watch|isbn=978-1-56432-228-9|page=176}}</ref> Devi, a 40 year old health worker employed by Rajastan state government, was a member of the ] or "potter" caste. She was gang raped whilst acting to prevent child marriage. On November 15, 1995 a judge dismissed the case for ""conjectural" reasons".<ref name="ControversialVerdict06-12-1995">{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/689Fv1CiC | title=Controversial Verdict | work=Outlookindia | date=06 Dec 1995 | agency=Outlook Publishing (India) Pvt. Ltd. | author=Kang, Bhavdeep}}</ref> He was of the opinion that only teenagers committed rape and the accused were all middle aged, that an upper caste man would not defile himself by raping a ] woman. The judge was of the opinion that the accusations of rape were "Prima Fascia" impossible.<ref name="Narula1999" /><ref name="Banwari Devi001">{{cite book | title=Women’s Livelihood Rights: Recasting Citizenship for Development | publisher=Sage Publications | author=Edited by Sumi Krishna | authorlink=Rajesh Ramakrishnan, Viren Lobo, Depinder Kapur | year=2007 | pages=378 | isbn=978-0-7619-3600-8 | ISBN (India-HB)=978-81-7829-763-7 | Section Title=Women’s Development under Patriarchy The Experience of the Sathins}}</ref> The case did lead to action by a number of groups which led to a Public Interests Petition which resulted in a Supreme Court judgement (1997) that women employees were to be protected from all forms of sexual harassment by their employers.<ref name="Vishaka 001">{{cite journal | url=http://www.webcitation.org/6891WS3sS | title=Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 13 August, 1997 | author=S V Manohar, B N Kirpal | journal=Supreme Court of India - | year=1997 | month=Aug | volume=241 | SCC Ref=(1997)6. SCC 241 : (1997 AIR SCW 3043)}}</ref> The 1995 regional court decision was appealed, with a single hearing at the Rajasthan High Court opening in 2007. The judge refused to transfer the case to the fast-track court system.<ref name="BigHeart1">{{cite web | url=http://www.webcitation.org/689HULVJG | title=A Mighty Heart | publisher=Anant Media Pvt. Ltd | work=Tehelka.com | date=13 Oct 2007 | author=Vij, Shivam}}</ref> | ||
In 1999, ] writing in ] newspaper "A dalit goes to court" revealed how dalit women were told they had to pay to both enter a police station and to file a report of rape.<ref name="Palagummi Sainath 001">{{cite web | url=http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/pdfid/3b83b6f17.pdf | title=Document - India: The battle against fear and discrimination: The impact of violence against women in Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan | publisher=] | work=AI Index: ASA 20/016/2001 | date=7 May 2001 | pages=27 | archiveurl= http://www.webcitation.org/6DohWzJ4r) | archivedate=Jan 20, 2013}}</ref><ref name="Palagummi Sainath 002">{{cite news | title=A dalit goes to court | work=] | date=Jun 13, 1999 | author=]}}</ref><ref name="Palagummi Sainath 003">{{cite news | url=http://www.religion-online.org/showarticle.asp?title=1499 | title=Caste Off by Palagummi Sainath - A Dalit Goes to Court | work=A Dalit Goes to Court | agency=religion-online.org, ] | author=Sainath, Palagummi | archiveurl=http://www.webcitation.org/6Dp3nsRqI | archivedate=Jan 20, 2013}}</ref> Police were challenged over this issue by ], but whilst claiming the issue was being addressed legally were unable to explain any mechanism or records that showed any such action. | |||
In 2002 Law Professor ] stated that the political and government systems of India were Rape Culture.<ref name="Prof Upendra Baxi India = Rape Culture">{{cite journal|last=Baxi|first=Upendra|title=THE SECOND GUJARAT CATASTROPHE|journal=Economic and Political Weekly|year=2002|month=August|volume=37|issue=34|pages=3519–3531|url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4412519|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref> Baxi produces a detailed critique of how the governance and politics of India disenfranchise women, prevent them from being able to report sexual violence along with other crime, and concludes that this sets the stage for such violence to be a "perfect crime". It does not require evidence to be suppressed, only that the victim have no recourse before the law. | |||
Baxi stated; <blockquote>"''Rape culture signifies ways of doing party politics and managing governance in which brutal collective sexual assaults on women remain enclosed in contrived orders of impunity.''"<ref name="Prof Upendra Baxi India = Rape Culture"></ref></blockquote>He stated that he was obliged to speak out under the Indian Constitution<ref name="Prof Upendra Baxi India = Rape Culture"></ref> which obliged citizens "to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women;"<ref>{{cite web|title=Fundamental Duties prescribed by the Constitution of the nation under PART IV-A to its every citizen.|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67qjdmxJP|work=Constitution of the nation|publisher=The Government Of India|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref> | |||
Baxi further said; <blockquote>"''The ‘strong’ state makes itself possible by lawless and unconstitutional exertions and endeavours. It fosters practices of national integration that remain deeply and pervasively human rights violative; it emerges for the minorities as an ‘institutionalized riot system’; it remains a - ‘state in search of a nation’ and embodies a resilient rape culture.''".<ref name=baxi2>{{cite book|last=Sudarshan|first=edited by Zoya Hasan, E. Sridharan, R.|title=India's living constitution : ideas, practices, controversies|year=2002|publisher=Permanent Black|location=Delhi|isbn=978-8178240350|pages=54|url=http://www.cscsarchive.org/dataarchive/textfiles/textfile.2008-09-01.1418627479}}</ref></blockquote> | |||
Baxi spoke out after the ]. The police, regional government and state government failed to act. Independent reports highlighted how the police, local government and agencies were complicit in the violence. Some reported police taking part in “combing operations” (house-to-house searches for Muslims) while shouting, “Kill them before they are born!”.<ref name="Gujarat2003">{{cite book|author=International Initiative for Justice in Gujarat|title=Threatened existence: a feminist analysis of the genocide in Gujarat|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=nsTbAAAAIAAJ|accessdate=22 May 2012|year=2003|publisher=Copies available at Forum Against Oppression of Women}}</ref><ref name="IIJ1">{{cite journal|title=Threatened Existence: A Feminist Analysis of the Genocide in Gujarat Report by the International Initiative for Justice (IIJ) December 2003|journal=OnlineVolunteers.org|year=2003|month=December|url=http://www.onlinevolunteers.org/gujarat/reports/iijg/2003/}}</ref> Reports of sexual violence in many forms were widespread from verbal abuse and innuendo, exposing genitals as an act of threat through to rape, gang-rape, genital mutilation and rape murder.<ref name="Gujarat2003" /> | |||
Prof Paul R. Brass wrote of the events highlighting the levels of sexual violence, rape and gang rape against women and children and of reports of women being killed, unborn children cut out of the uterus and the foetus symbolically killed. Relief Organisations, NGO's and international observers were hampered in their work to investigate events and assist the victims in seeking justice.<ref name="IIJ1" /> | |||
in 2005, K. R. Narayanan, the tenth president of India has stated that he believed that there was a conspiracy between members of the Indian national and Gujurat regional government which empowered the 2002 Gujurat events in.<ref>{{cite news|title=Narayanan criticises Vajpayee for Gujarat riots|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67qlGmpRq|accessdate=22 May 2012|newspaper=The Hindu|date=Mar 03, 2005}}</ref> | |||
Baxi was also critical of government which allows rape and gang rape to occur, be filmed and for the films to be traded in what he refers to as "]". Baxi also highlighted the conduct of business which benefited from trading in such films.<ref name="Prof Upendra Baxi India = Rape Culture"></ref> | |||
⚫ | India has its own cultural language to describe the sexual harassment of women and sexual aggression - "]".<ref name="Puri1999">{{cite book|author=Jyoti Puri|title=Woman, Body, Desire in Post-Colonial India: Narratives of Gender and Sexuality|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ecmhtsFyBL8C&pg=PA87|accessdate=22 May 2012|date=21 June 1999|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=978-0-415-92128-2|page=87}}</ref> The term ] is seen to trivialise the and empower the public sexual harassment of women.<ref>{{cite web|last=Baxi|first=PRATIKSHA|title=Sexual harassment|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67rK9Xs0s|publisher=Seminar Publications|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref> It manifests as "touching, rubbing, groping, staring, pinching, slapping, display of private parts and even pornographic material.".<ref name="evetease002">{{cite web | url=http://www.webcitation.org/689b0qkEv | title=Menace of Eve Teasing: The Problem and the Solution | publisher=MightyLaws.in | work=MightyLaws.in | date=28 Aug 2011 | author=Manocha, Akshita}}</ref> It has been a growing and known issue across India since the 1960s.<ref name="HerbelGaines2011">{{cite book|author1=Susan Herbel|author2=Danena Gaines|title=Women's Issues in Transportation: Summary of the 4th International Conference. Technical papers|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=1tuqWy006SAC&pg=PA75|accessdate=22 May 2012|year=2011|publisher=Transportation Research Board|isbn=978-0-309-16083-4|page=75}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Foreign News: Eve-Teasing|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67rNRTXse|accessdate=22 May 2012|newspaper=Time Magazine|date=1960-09-12}}</ref> It has been linked to the emancipation of women and independence in the work place. The shift from past cultural values of women being chaperoned by a male relative to independence has allowed "]" to grow to levels that provoke national concern<ref>{{cite news|last=VENKATARAMAN|first=RAJESH|title=Controlling eve-teasing|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67qx2XXlx|accessdate=22 May 2012|newspaper=The Hindu|date=13 Apr 2004}}</ref> ] is still reported as high as 90% with only 1 in 10,000 cases being reported to police.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Ramasubramanian|first=Srividya|coauthors=Oliver, Mary Beth|journal=Sex Roles|date=1 January 2003|volume=48|issue=7/8|pages=327–336|doi=10.1023/A:1022938513819|url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/v88l78510375v753/|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref> Eve teasing has been linked to the Bollywood film industry.<ref>{{cite news|last=Shaina N C|title=Is it really ‘eve-teasing’?|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67r67dr91|accessdate=22 May 2012|newspaper=The Times Of India|date=2011-11-19}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | The ], 1974 -1981, is seen as a landmark in the field of gender justice in India. Mathura reported she was raped by two police officers inside Desai Ganj Police Station. The officers were tried at the local court and found innocent. Appeal to the Bombay High Court overturned the judgement and the two officers were convicted. This led to an appeal to the Indian Supreme Court. There the case was overturned (1979).<ref name="MathiraSCC">{{cite journal | url=http://www.webcitation.org/689be5k6H | title=Tuka Ram And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 September, 1978 - Equivalent citations: 1979 AIR 185, 1979 SCR (1) 810 | author=Koshal, A.D. | journal=India Supreme Court Journal | year=1978 | month=Sept}}</ref> The Supreme Court judged that as Mathura had not raised the alarm, had no injuries and was also reported to have had an ongoing sexual relationship with her Boyfriend, her reports were not credible and the officers were found innocent. Mathura's lack of alarm raising, lack of injury and perceived Loose Morals were accepted as evidence of consent. These findings promoted four young law professors, ], ], ] and ] to issue an open letter<ref name="BaxiOpenLetter SCC">{{cite journal | title=An Open Letter to the Chief Justice of India | author=Upendra Baxi, Lotika Sarkar, Raghunath Kelkar & Vasudha Dhaganwar | journal=SCC | year=1979 | volume=4}}</ref> to the Chief Justice of India questioning their judgement and condemning what they believed to be an “''extraordinary decision sacrificing human rights in the Indian law and the Constitution''”.<ref name="BaxiOpenLetter SCC" /> They called for the case to be reheard before a larger bench so as to not “''snuff out all aspirations for the protection of human rights of millions of Mathurars in the Indian countryside''”.<ref name="BaxiOpenLetter SCC" /> | ||
The letter questioned whether the supreme court had assessed the differences between consent and coercion. It also questioned the stance of the Supreme Court concerning Human Rights, The Indian Constitution and the imbalance between authorities, such as the police, and the ordinary people of India emphasising the social contexts: “''the young victim’s low socio-economic status, lack of knowledge of legal rights and lack of access to legal services, and the fear complex which haunts the poor and the exploited in Indian police stations''”.<ref name="BaxiOpenLetter SCC" /> The letter raised fundamental questions concerning the people of India, “''must illiterate, labouring, politically, mute Mathuras of India be condemned to their pre-constitutional Indian fate?''".<ref name="BaxiOpenLetter SCC" /> The letter also made it clear that the authors were highly critical when they wrote “''Nothing short of protection of human rights and coonstitutionalism is at stake''”.<ref name="BaxiOpenLetter SCC" /> Media coverage at the time with the letter being published by the media caused much debate. Eventually the Supreme Court agreed to review the case and in 1981 upheld its own decision. The case and open letter had caused much debate that prompted some reform of Indian rape laws, with the acceptance of "custodial rape": the criminalisation of any from of sexual act between a police officer and a person in detention. Women's rights activists coined the slogan "Raped Twice, First By The Police then By the Courts", as they campaigned for legal change.<ref name="FlaviaStudies1995">{{cite book|author1=Flavia|author2=Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women's University. Research Centre for Women's Studies|title=State, gender and the rhetoric of law reform|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=eMWRAAAAMAAJ|year=1995|publisher=Research Centre for Women's Studies, Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women's University}}</ref> | |||
In 2004 the rape and murder of ] brought wide attention to the issues of institutionalised rape.<ref>{{cite web|title=INDIA: Torture and murder of a woman by armed forces in India|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67r91Y4DS|work=ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT APPEALS PROGRAM|publisher=Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC)|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref> The Armed Forces Special Powers Act, 1958, allowed members of the army and militias to act with virtual impunity.<ref>{{cite web|title=An analysis of Armed Forces Special Powers Act, 1958|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67r9gdqah|publisher=People\'s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL)|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref> Following the rape and murder of ] a group of women brought international attention to bear by protesting naked outside the barracks of the Assam Riffles on July 15, 2004.<ref>{{cite news|title=Woman's death sparks protest|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67rAYqR7I|accessdate=22 May 2012|newspaper=The Hindu|date=2004-07-17}}</ref> Memchaoubi Devi, president of the women's rights group Porei Lemarol Meira Phaibi Apunba Manipur, stated "''It is better to protest naked than allow the soldiers to kill and rape our women.''"<ref>{{cite web|title=Women Rage Against 'Rape' in Northeast India|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67rB2qT56|publisher=commondreams.org|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref> The women also challenged security personnel to come out of the army barracks and outrage their modesty,<ref>{{cite web|title=Women give vent to naked fury in front of 17 AR at Kangla|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67rBbrJ43|publisher=E-Pao|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref> a reference to the Indian laws on rape concerning "''Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty''"<ref name="indiapc354" /> - Section 354 in The Indian Penal Code, written in 1860. The authorities were also concerned with potential breaches of section 509, "''insult the modesty of a woman''".<ref name="indiapc509" /> | |||
In the 1992 ], Bhateri rape case,<ref name="BhateriRapeCase">{{cite journal | url=http://www.jstor.org/stable/4398990 | title=Bhateri Rape Case: Backlash and Protest | author=Kanchan, Mathur | journal=Economic and Political Weekly | year=1992 | month=Oct | volume=27 | issue=41 | pages=2221–2224}}</ref> the police dismissed the case citing that Devi was too old and unattractive.<ref name="Narula1999">{{cite book|author=Smita Narula|title=Broken People: Caste Violence Against India's "untouchables".|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=Kd28Ay09adgC&pg=PA176|accessdate=20 June 2012|year=1999|publisher=Human Rights Watch|isbn=978-1-56432-228-9|page=176}}</ref> Devi, a 40 year old health worker employed by Rajastan state government, was a member of the ] or "potter" caste. She was gang raped whilst acting to prevent child marriage. On November 15, 1995 a judge dismissed the case for ""conjectural" reasons".<ref name="ControversialVerdict06-12-1995">{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/689Fv1CiC | title=Controversial Verdict | work=Outlookindia | date=06 Dec 1995 | agency=Outlook Publishing (India) Pvt. Ltd. | author=Kang, Bhavdeep}}</ref> The judge was of the opinion that the accusations of rape were "Prima Fascia" impossible, | |||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | ] attacked a number of women in the Amnesi pub, Mangalore, on 25 January 2009 - ], which was recorded by news agencies.<ref name="Sengupta">{{cite news|last=Sengupta|first=Somini|title=Attack on Women at an Indian Bar Intensifies a Clash of Cultures|work=The New York Times|page=5|date=9 February 2009|http://www.webcitation.org/68YpwLUpD}}</ref> Reaction to the growing independence of women and attempts by some to impose older cultural values led to the The ] (or Pink Underwear Campaign) of 2009. ], a right wing right-wing Hindu extremist group, threatened to marry off and take other action on any young couples found together on Valentine's Day.<ref name="Valentinesthreat001">{{cite web | url=http://www.webcitation.org/68YrLuSFa | title=We’ll not spare dating couples on Valentine’s Day: Muthalik | publisher=Kasturi and Sons Ltd | work=The Hindu | date=06 Feb 2009 | author=Bangalore Bureau}}</ref> Women responded by having Pink Chaddi/Underwear posted from all over India to the organisation and its members.<ref>{{cite news|last=Dhawan|first=Himanshi|title='Pink chaddi' campaign a hit, draws over 34,000 members|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67qyshecO|accessdate=22 May 2012|newspaper=The Times Of India|date=14 Feb 2009}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | India has its own cultural language to describe the sexual harassment of women and sexual aggression - "]".<ref name="Puri1999">{{cite book|author=Jyoti Puri|title=Woman, Body, Desire in Post-Colonial India: Narratives of Gender and Sexuality|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=ecmhtsFyBL8C&pg=PA87|accessdate=22 May 2012|date=21 June 1999|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=978-0-415-92128-2|page=87}}</ref>It manifests as "touching, rubbing, groping, staring, pinching, slapping, display of private parts and even pornographic material.".<ref name="evetease002">{{cite web | url=http://www.webcitation.org/689b0qkEv | title=Menace of Eve Teasing: The Problem and the Solution | publisher=MightyLaws.in | work=MightyLaws.in | date=28 Aug 2011 | author=Manocha, Akshita}}</ref> It has been a growing and known issue across India since the 1960s.<ref name="HerbelGaines2011">{{cite book|author1=Susan Herbel|author2=Danena Gaines|title=Women's Issues in Transportation: Summary of the 4th International Conference. Technical papers|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=1tuqWy006SAC&pg=PA75|accessdate=22 May 2012|year=2011|publisher=Transportation Research Board|isbn=978-0-309-16083-4|page=75}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Foreign News: Eve-Teasing|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67rNRTXse|accessdate=22 May 2012|newspaper=Time Magazine|date=1960-09-12}}</ref> It has been linked to the emancipation of women and independence in the work place. The shift from past cultural values of women being chaperoned by a male relative to independence has allowed "]" to grow to levels that provoke national concern<ref>{{cite news|last=VENKATARAMAN|first=RAJESH|title=Controlling eve-teasing|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67qx2XXlx|accessdate=22 May 2012|newspaper=The Hindu|date=13 Apr 2004}}</ref> ] is still reported as high as 90% with only 1 in 10,000 cases being reported to police.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Ramasubramanian|first=Srividya|coauthors=Oliver, Mary Beth|journal=Sex Roles|date=1 January 2003|volume=48|issue=7/8|pages=327–336|doi=10.1023/A:1022938513819|url=http://www.springerlink.com/content/v88l78510375v753/|accessdate=22 May 2012}}</ref> | ||
In 2011 Rosalyn D’Mello and others launched "Please Mend The Gap" as a movement to force the authorities to enforce the law and protect women in public spaces. The movement was also to educate men about women's safety. They used flashmobs and socials networking.<ref name="SlutWalkIndiaNYT001">{{cite web | url=http://www.webcitation.org/686RTE9dy | title=Ready or Not, New Delhi Gets a Women’s Street Protest | publisher=The New York Times Company | work=The New York Times | date=14 Jun 2011 | author=S. Roy, Nilanjana}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | In response to the advent of Slutwalk in 2011, Indian Women organised ']'('Shameless Protest'), the first event was in Bhopal on 17 July 2011. Low attendance was linked to rules at local hostels for single working women which prevented them from leaving the hostels on Sunday.<ref name="Aaron Pereira, Hindustan Times">{{cite news|last=Pereira|first=Aaron|title=Bhopal Besharmi Morcha gets lukewarm response|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67r4wUSsY|accessdate=22 May 2012|newspaper=Hindustan Times|date=2011-06-18}}</ref> There was criticism of the idea of ] in advance, as it was seen by many as a Westernised idea, apaing "white, educated, middle-class females in the West" and that the match did not address the realities of the lives of the majority of Indian Woman. The word slut does not translate into Indian languages.<ref name="HindustanTimes19July">{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/686PbIaBp | title='SlutWalk mocks Indian women, real issues' | work=Hindustan Times | date=19 Jul 2011 | agency=HT Media Limited | author=Dhillon, Amrit}}</ref> An Indian journalist commented "‘slut.’ It’s hard to reclaim a word that isn’t used."<ref name="SlutWalkIndiaNYT001" /> | ||
⚫ | The ], 1974 -1981, is seen as a landmark in the field of gender justice in India. Mathura reported she was raped by two police officers inside Desai Ganj Police Station. The officers were tried at the local court and found innocent. Appeal to the Bombay High Court overturned the judgement and the two officers were convicted. This led to an appeal to the Indian Supreme Court. There the case was overturned (1979) |
||
⚫ | ']' Delhi tool place on July 31, 2011.<ref name="Besharmi Morcha001">{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/686MgauVr | title=Delhi stages ‘Slutwalk’ against sexual violence | date=31 July 2011 | agency=The Hindu}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/686N1Uu1w | title=Indian Women Take SlutWalk to New Delhi's Streets | date=Aug. 01, 2011 | agency=Time Inc. | author=Hannon, Elliot}}</ref> Unlike other Slutwalk linked events, the Indian women protested whilst dressed modestly, in jeans and T Shirt rathern than the ] or ]. A number of men attended with what was believed to be the expectation of seeing provocatively dressed women, as had occurred in other countries.<ref name="IndianExpress001">{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/686OZzc1G | title=‘It’s a walk against the besharam men’ | date=01 Aug 2011 | agency=The Indian Express | author=Bhardwaj, Ananya}}</ref> Actress Nafisa Ali said of india, “The laws are there to protect women but they are not manifested on ground. It becomes imperative on every Indian to show more respect towards the women,”.<ref name="Aaron Pereira, Hindustan Times" /> There was criticism of some of the none Indian women who took part as they acted in culturally inappropriate ways, causing sensationalism by their dress.<ref name="dress001">{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/686QXZ2WB | title=Expats Find Delhi ‘Slut Walk’ Too Conservative | work=The Wall St Journal | date=01 Aug 2011 | agency=Dow Jones & Company, Inc | accessdate=June 1, 2012 | author=Garia, Nikita}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | ] attacked a number of women in the Amnesi pub, Mangalore, on 25 January 2009 - ], which was recorded by news agencies.<ref name="Sengupta">{{cite news|last=Sengupta|first=Somini|title=Attack on Women at an Indian Bar Intensifies a Clash of Cultures|work=The New York Times|page=5|date=9 February 2009|http://www.webcitation.org/68YpwLUpD}}</ref> Reaction to the growing independence of women and attempts by some to impose older cultural values led to the The ] (or Pink Underwear Campaign) of 2009. ] threatened to marry off and take other action on any young couples found together on Valentine's Day.<ref name="Valentinesthreat001">{{cite web | url=http://www.webcitation.org/68YrLuSFa | title=We’ll not spare dating couples on Valentine’s Day: Muthalik | publisher=Kasturi and Sons Ltd | work=The Hindu | date=06 Feb 2009 | author=Bangalore Bureau}}</ref> Women responded by having Pink Chaddi/Underwear posted from all over India to the organisation and its members.<ref>{{cite news|last=Dhawan|first=Himanshi|title='Pink chaddi' campaign a hit, draws over 34,000 members|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67qyshecO|accessdate=22 May 2012|newspaper=The Times Of India|date=14 Feb 2009}}</ref> | ||
In November 2011,Andhra Pradesh Director-General of Police V Dinesh Reddy caused controversy when he linked rape to women's dress during a live TV broadcast press conference. In 2010 reported rapes were at 1228 and by 2011 they had risen to 2191. Reddy expressed the view that the ] was a fashionable and more provocative form of dress compared to more traditional dress such as the ]. He later clarified his statement indicating that the police had no control over how people dressed, even if such dress was perceived as causing or contributing to rape. | |||
⚫ | In response to the advent of Slutwalk in 2011, Indian Women organised ']'('Shameless Protest'), the first event was in Bhopal on 17 July 2011. Low attendance was linked to rules at local hostels for single working women which prevented them from leaving the hostels on Sunday.<ref name="Aaron Pereira, Hindustan Times">{{cite news|last=Pereira|first=Aaron|title=Bhopal Besharmi Morcha gets lukewarm response|url=http://www.webcitation.org/67r4wUSsY|accessdate=22 May 2012|newspaper=Hindustan Times|date=2011-06-18}}</ref> There was criticism of the idea of ] in advance, as it was seen by many as a Westernised idea, apaing "white, educated, middle-class females in the West" and that the match did not address the realities of the lives of the majority of Indian Woman. The word slut does not translate into Indian languages.<ref name="HindustanTimes19July">{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/686PbIaBp | title='SlutWalk mocks Indian women, real issues' | work=Hindustan Times | date=19 Jul 2011 | agency=HT Media Limited | author=Dhillon, Amrit}}</ref> An Indian journalist commented "‘slut.’ It’s hard to reclaim a word that isn’t used."<ref name="SlutWalkIndiaNYT001" |
||
Reddy's comments were condemned by Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram, who expressed the view that the police were not responsible for policing what a person wears. | |||
⚫ | ']' Delhi tool place on July 31, 2011.<ref name="Besharmi Morcha001">{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/686MgauVr | title=Delhi stages ‘Slutwalk’ against sexual violence | date=31 July 2011 | agency=The Hindu}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/686N1Uu1w | title=Indian Women Take SlutWalk to New Delhi's Streets | date=Aug. 01, 2011 | agency=Time Inc. | author=Hannon, Elliot}}</ref> Unlike other Slutwalk linked events, the Indian women protested whilst dressed modestly, in jeans and T Shirt rathern than the ] or ]. A number of men attended with what was believed to be the expectation of seeing provocatively dressed women, as had occurred in other countries.<ref name="IndianExpress001">{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/686OZzc1G | title=‘It’s a walk against the besharam men’ | date=01 Aug 2011 | agency=The Indian Express | author=Bhardwaj, Ananya}}</ref> Actress Nafisa Ali said of india, “The laws are there to protect women but they are not manifested on ground. It becomes imperative on every Indian to show more respect towards the women,”.<ref name="Aaron Pereira, Hindustan Times" /> There was criticism of some of the none Indian women who took part as they acted in culturally inappropriate ways, causing sensationalism by their dress.<ref name="dress001">{{cite news | url=http://www.webcitation.org/686QXZ2WB | title=Expats Find Delhi ‘Slut Walk’ Too Conservative | work=The Wall St Journal | date=01 Aug 2011 | agency=Dow Jones & Company, Inc | accessdate=June 1, 2012 | author=Garia, Nikita}}</ref> | ||
===South Africa=== | ===South Africa=== | ||
Line 108: | Line 136: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist|30em}} | {{Reflist|3|30em}} | ||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== |
Revision as of 09:10, 28 January 2013
This article is about the concept of rape culture. For the similarly named 1975 film, see Rape Culture (film).
Within sociology, Rape culture is a concept of disputed origin and meaning used to describe a culture in which rape and sexual violence are common and in which prevalent attitudes, norms, practices, and media normalize, excuse, tolerate, or even condone rape.
Examples of behaviors commonly associated with rape culture include victim blaming, sexual objectification, and trivializing rape. Rape culture has been used to model behaviour within social groups, including prison systems where prison rape is common and conflict areas where war rape is used as psychological warfare. Entire countries have also been alleged to be rape cultures.
Although the concept of rape culture is a generally accepted theory in feminist academia, there is disagreement over what defines a rape culture and to what degree a given society meets the criteria to be considered a rape culture.
Rape culture has been observed to correlate with other social factors and behaviours. Research identifies correlation between rape myths, victim blaming and trivialisation of rape with increased incidence of racism, homophobia, ageism, classism, religious intolerance and other forms of discrimination.
Origins and usage
During the early 1970s, feminists began to engage in consciousness-raising efforts to educate the public about the reality of rape. Until then, rape was rarely discussed or acknowledged: "Until the 1970s, most Americans assumed that rape, incest, and wife-beating rarely happened." The idea of rape culture was one result of these efforts. According to the Encyclopedia of Rape, "The term 'rape culture' originated in the 1970s during the 2nd wave feminist movement and is often used by feminists to describe contemporary American culture as a whole." The concept appeared in multiple forms of media during the mid 1970s.
The term was used 1974 in Rape: The First Sourcebook for Women, edited by Noreen Connell and Cassandra Wilson for the New York Radical Feminists. It was one of the first books to include first-person accounts of rape, which were one reason for rape entering the public view. In the book, the group stated that "our ultimate goal is to eliminate rape and that goal cannot be achieved without a revolutionary transformation of our society."
Dr Joyce E. Williams traces the origin and first usage of rape culture to the 1975 documentary film Rape Culture, produced and directed by Margaret Lazarus and Renner Wunderlich for Cambridge Documentary Films. Prof Williams says that the film "..takes credit for first defining the concept.".. No earlier defining source has been located.
The film discussed rape of both men and women in the context of a larger cultural normalization of rape. In 2000, Lazarus stated that she believed the movie was the first use of the term. The film featured the work of the DC Rape Crisis Centre in co-operation with Prisoners Against Rape Inc. It included interviews with rapists and victims as well prominent anti-rape activists like feminist philosopher and theologian Mary Daly and author and artist Emily Culpepper. The film also explored the mass media, how film-makers, song writers, writers and magazines perpetuated attitudes towards rape.
In a 1992 paper in the Journal of Social Issues entitled "A Feminist Redefinition of Rape and Sexual Assault: Historical Foundations and Change," Patricia Donat and John D'Emilio suggested that the term originated as "rape-supportive culture" in Susan Brownmiller's 1975 book Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape. Brownmiller, a member of the New York Radical Feminists, showed how both academia and the general public ignored the existence of rape. The book is considered a "landmark" work on feminism and sexual violence and one of the pillars of modern rape studies.
Slutwalk
Although it had been in academic usage since its inception, the term "rape culture" was scarcely used in popular culture and the media until 2011. The Slutwalk and Besharmi Morcha movements are credited with popularizing the term via certain mass media reports about the protesters in the English speaking, Western media. The rallies aim to raise awareness of rape culture – which they define as a culture where "sexual violence is both made to be invisible and inevitable"—and to end slut-shaming and victim blaming.
Feminist theory
According to the rape culture theory, acts of sexism are commonly employed to validate and rationalize normative misogynistic practices. For instance, sexist jokes may be told to foster disrespect for women and an accompanying disregard for their well-being. An example would be a female rape victim being blamed for her being raped because of how she dressed or acted. In rape culture, sexualized violence towards women is regarded as a continuum in a society that regards women's bodies as sexually available by default.
The root cause of rape culture is generally agreed to be the "domination and objectification of women". However, academic theory holds that rape culture does not necessarily have a single cause, and causes may be localized based on other social aspects of culture. For example, in South Africa the overriding "war culture" which emphasized masculinity and violence led to a culture in which rape was normalized. A University of California Davis public document alleged that the enforcement of the following of social rules by women and the conditioning of gender roles were major causes. In a study of date rape, gender-based miscommunications were held to be a major factor supporting a campus rape culture. The general unwillingness of police and district attorneys to prosecute rapes where force was not involved or where the victim had some sort of relationship with the aggressor is also cited as a motivation for date rape and campus rape. Rape culture is also closely related to slut-shaming and victim blaming, where rape victims are considered at fault for being raped, and it is argued that this connection is due to the presence of a culture that shames all female sexuality. That some rapes are not reported to the police due to fear that they would not be believed is often cited as a symptom of a rape culture, that they thought the police would not believe them is cited as a reason by 6% of women who did not report rape. Pornography has also been commonly targeted as a contributor to rape culture because it is said to contribute to larger patterns of oppression. One of the ways that it is said to do this is by reducing the female body to a commodity.
Although much of its early use as a theory to explain the occurrence of rape and domestic violence was focused on the rape of women, rape culture has been described as detrimental to men as well as women. Some writers and speakers, such as Jackson Katz, Michael Kimmel, and Don McPherson, have said that it is intrinsically linked to gender roles that limit male self-expression and cause psychological harm to men.
Rape culture and incidents by nation
India
India's rape laws are seen as archaic, dating from 1860. They refer to the "outraging" or "insulting" of a woman's modesty. In 1996 research into violence against Indian women showed that every 54 minutes a woman was raped, every 26 minutes a woman was molested. Every five minutes a woman was subjected to Eve teasing and every 43 minutes a woman was kidnapped and every 103 minutes a woman was killed in a dowry death.
In pre-independence India, rape was politicised with repeated reference to the failures by the British Colonial government and excuses made to not address rape. Post independence the same issue of government failure has been polarised along political divides.
Cultural differences hide the nature and extent of rape. The two most common forms or rape in India have been describe as Droit du seigneur or authority rape: rape of tenants rape of female employees or the female spouses of male employees. Rape of female subordinates in the workplace as well as caste related and tribal rape. Rape by police, army and the security forces is also seen a specific category. Rape and sexual violence against minors, against wives and within the family is poorly recognised. India's complex social structure is seen to prevent people of lower caste, or from rural India from having access to legal support and the Justice system. The Dalit or untouchable caste have been identified as particularly vulnerable. Bias by police, medical professionals and the Judiciary concerning caste is identified as a factor. Police have been willing to accept bribes from defendants in rape cases, thwarting the legal process.
In the 1992 Bhanwari Devi, Bhateri rape case, the police dismissed the case citing that Devi was too old and unattractive. Devi, a 40 year old health worker employed by Rajastan state government, was a member of the Kumhar or "potter" caste. She was gang raped whilst acting to prevent child marriage. On November 15, 1995 a judge dismissed the case for ""conjectural" reasons". He was of the opinion that only teenagers committed rape and the accused were all middle aged, that an upper caste man would not defile himself by raping a Kumhar woman. The judge was of the opinion that the accusations of rape were "Prima Fascia" impossible. The case did lead to action by a number of groups which led to a Public Interests Petition which resulted in a Supreme Court judgement (1997) that women employees were to be protected from all forms of sexual harassment by their employers. The 1995 regional court decision was appealed, with a single hearing at the Rajasthan High Court opening in 2007. The judge refused to transfer the case to the fast-track court system.
In 1999, Palagummi Sainath writing in The Hindu newspaper "A dalit goes to court" revealed how dalit women were told they had to pay to both enter a police station and to file a report of rape. Police were challenged over this issue by Amnesty International, but whilst claiming the issue was being addressed legally were unable to explain any mechanism or records that showed any such action.
In 2002 Law Professor Upendra Baxi stated that the political and government systems of India were Rape Culture. Baxi produces a detailed critique of how the governance and politics of India disenfranchise women, prevent them from being able to report sexual violence along with other crime, and concludes that this sets the stage for such violence to be a "perfect crime". It does not require evidence to be suppressed, only that the victim have no recourse before the law.
Baxi stated;
"Rape culture signifies ways of doing party politics and managing governance in which brutal collective sexual assaults on women remain enclosed in contrived orders of impunity."
He stated that he was obliged to speak out under the Indian Constitution which obliged citizens "to renounce practices derogatory to the dignity of women;" Baxi further said;
"The ‘strong’ state makes itself possible by lawless and unconstitutional exertions and endeavours. It fosters practices of national integration that remain deeply and pervasively human rights violative; it emerges for the minorities as an ‘institutionalized riot system’; it remains a - ‘state in search of a nation’ and embodies a resilient rape culture.".
Baxi spoke out after the 2002 Gujarat violence. The police, regional government and state government failed to act. Independent reports highlighted how the police, local government and agencies were complicit in the violence. Some reported police taking part in “combing operations” (house-to-house searches for Muslims) while shouting, “Kill them before they are born!”. Reports of sexual violence in many forms were widespread from verbal abuse and innuendo, exposing genitals as an act of threat through to rape, gang-rape, genital mutilation and rape murder.
Prof Paul R. Brass wrote of the events highlighting the levels of sexual violence, rape and gang rape against women and children and of reports of women being killed, unborn children cut out of the uterus and the foetus symbolically killed. Relief Organisations, NGO's and international observers were hampered in their work to investigate events and assist the victims in seeking justice.
in 2005, K. R. Narayanan, the tenth president of India has stated that he believed that there was a conspiracy between members of the Indian national and Gujurat regional government which empowered the 2002 Gujurat events in.
Baxi was also critical of government which allows rape and gang rape to occur, be filmed and for the films to be traded in what he refers to as "Grey Markets". Baxi also highlighted the conduct of business which benefited from trading in such films.
India has its own cultural language to describe the sexual harassment of women and sexual aggression - "Eve teasing". The term Eve teasing is seen to trivialise the and empower the public sexual harassment of women. It manifests as "touching, rubbing, groping, staring, pinching, slapping, display of private parts and even pornographic material.". It has been a growing and known issue across India since the 1960s. It has been linked to the emancipation of women and independence in the work place. The shift from past cultural values of women being chaperoned by a male relative to independence has allowed "Eve teasing" to grow to levels that provoke national concern Eve teasing is still reported as high as 90% with only 1 in 10,000 cases being reported to police. Eve teasing has been linked to the Bollywood film industry.
The Mathura rape case, 1974 -1981, is seen as a landmark in the field of gender justice in India. Mathura reported she was raped by two police officers inside Desai Ganj Police Station. The officers were tried at the local court and found innocent. Appeal to the Bombay High Court overturned the judgement and the two officers were convicted. This led to an appeal to the Indian Supreme Court. There the case was overturned (1979). The Supreme Court judged that as Mathura had not raised the alarm, had no injuries and was also reported to have had an ongoing sexual relationship with her Boyfriend, her reports were not credible and the officers were found innocent. Mathura's lack of alarm raising, lack of injury and perceived Loose Morals were accepted as evidence of consent. These findings promoted four young law professors, Upendra Baxi, Lotika Sarkar, Raghunath Kelkar and Vasudha Dhagamwar to issue an open letter to the Chief Justice of India questioning their judgement and condemning what they believed to be an “extraordinary decision sacrificing human rights in the Indian law and the Constitution”. They called for the case to be reheard before a larger bench so as to not “snuff out all aspirations for the protection of human rights of millions of Mathurars in the Indian countryside”.
The letter questioned whether the supreme court had assessed the differences between consent and coercion. It also questioned the stance of the Supreme Court concerning Human Rights, The Indian Constitution and the imbalance between authorities, such as the police, and the ordinary people of India emphasising the social contexts: “the young victim’s low socio-economic status, lack of knowledge of legal rights and lack of access to legal services, and the fear complex which haunts the poor and the exploited in Indian police stations”. The letter raised fundamental questions concerning the people of India, “must illiterate, labouring, politically, mute Mathuras of India be condemned to their pre-constitutional Indian fate?". The letter also made it clear that the authors were highly critical when they wrote “Nothing short of protection of human rights and coonstitutionalism is at stake”. Media coverage at the time with the letter being published by the media caused much debate. Eventually the Supreme Court agreed to review the case and in 1981 upheld its own decision. The case and open letter had caused much debate that prompted some reform of Indian rape laws, with the acceptance of "custodial rape": the criminalisation of any from of sexual act between a police officer and a person in detention. Women's rights activists coined the slogan "Raped Twice, First By The Police then By the Courts", as they campaigned for legal change.
In 2004 the rape and murder of Thangjam Manorama brought wide attention to the issues of institutionalised rape. The Armed Forces Special Powers Act, 1958, allowed members of the army and militias to act with virtual impunity. Following the rape and murder of Thangjam Manorama a group of women brought international attention to bear by protesting naked outside the barracks of the Assam Riffles on July 15, 2004. Memchaoubi Devi, president of the women's rights group Porei Lemarol Meira Phaibi Apunba Manipur, stated "It is better to protest naked than allow the soldiers to kill and rape our women." The women also challenged security personnel to come out of the army barracks and outrage their modesty, a reference to the Indian laws on rape concerning "Assault or criminal force to woman with intent to outrage her modesty" - Section 354 in The Indian Penal Code, written in 1860. The authorities were also concerned with potential breaches of section 509, "insult the modesty of a woman".
Sri Ram Sena attacked a number of women in the Amnesi pub, Mangalore, on 25 January 2009 - 2009 Mangalore pub attack, which was recorded by news agencies. Reaction to the growing independence of women and attempts by some to impose older cultural values led to the The Pink Chaddi Campaign (or Pink Underwear Campaign) of 2009. Sri Ram Sena, a right wing right-wing Hindu extremist group, threatened to marry off and take other action on any young couples found together on Valentine's Day. Women responded by having Pink Chaddi/Underwear posted from all over India to the organisation and its members.
In 2011 Rosalyn D’Mello and others launched "Please Mend The Gap" as a movement to force the authorities to enforce the law and protect women in public spaces. The movement was also to educate men about women's safety. They used flashmobs and socials networking.
In response to the advent of Slutwalk in 2011, Indian Women organised 'Besharmi Morcha'('Shameless Protest'), the first event was in Bhopal on 17 July 2011. Low attendance was linked to rules at local hostels for single working women which prevented them from leaving the hostels on Sunday. There was criticism of the idea of Besharmi Morcha in advance, as it was seen by many as a Westernised idea, apaing "white, educated, middle-class females in the West" and that the match did not address the realities of the lives of the majority of Indian Woman. The word slut does not translate into Indian languages. An Indian journalist commented "‘slut.’ It’s hard to reclaim a word that isn’t used."
'Besharmi Morcha' Delhi tool place on July 31, 2011. Unlike other Slutwalk linked events, the Indian women protested whilst dressed modestly, in jeans and T Shirt rathern than the Sari or Shalwar kameez. A number of men attended with what was believed to be the expectation of seeing provocatively dressed women, as had occurred in other countries. Actress Nafisa Ali said of india, “The laws are there to protect women but they are not manifested on ground. It becomes imperative on every Indian to show more respect towards the women,”. There was criticism of some of the none Indian women who took part as they acted in culturally inappropriate ways, causing sensationalism by their dress.
In November 2011,Andhra Pradesh Director-General of Police V Dinesh Reddy caused controversy when he linked rape to women's dress during a live TV broadcast press conference. In 2010 reported rapes were at 1228 and by 2011 they had risen to 2191. Reddy expressed the view that the Shalwar kameez was a fashionable and more provocative form of dress compared to more traditional dress such as the Sari. He later clarified his statement indicating that the police had no control over how people dressed, even if such dress was perceived as causing or contributing to rape.
Reddy's comments were condemned by Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram, who expressed the view that the police were not responsible for policing what a person wears.
South Africa
As far back as the 1970s, activist Steve Biko wrote about the issues of rape, politics, and apartheid in South Africa. Rape was common in the black townships. Biko also highlighted how the issues of powerlessness and impotence and an induced inferiority complex were known issues or "Black Consciousness".
In 1982, Stellenbosch University sociologist Cherryl Walker highlighted how black women's issues were made invisible by the larger issue of apartheid. Even the management of known rape issues through rape crisis centres were still for the future due to lack of funding and government support.
Under apartheid, there were multiple levels of oppression against both men and women. Some were legally based, while others were caused by the suppression of cultural values and practices. There were concerns as to how these would manifest with the end of Apartheid and the arrival of the new South Africa constitution as of 1993.
In 1996, Taboho Maitse (Presently a commissioner of the South African Commission for gender Equality appointed 30 November 2011 ) researched the post-Apartheid cultural change. Women identified how under Apartheid they had no protection from male violence, white or coloured. Apartheid suppressed the non-white majority, and oppressed women the most. Maitse concluded that there was a confusion of how the roles of women had changed under the new constitution. Meiste observed the ongoing clashes of traditional culture with the new constitutional order. Both men and women wished to preserve traditional cultural and tribal identity but this also promoted gender conflict. The new South African Constitution fundamentally changed the rights of women, but they lacked knowledge and support in exercising those rights. Lobolo – a traditional dowry system both emphasised women as possessions and also made them unable to speak out about treatment. Maitse found that Apartheid, nationalism and the liberation struggle had played a clear part in how women were perceived and also perceived themselves. In 1998 Maitse concluded:
In answer to the question why men are violent toward women in South Africa, two primary inter-connected theories emerge. The first is that of sexist ideology and the male preoccupation with all the qualities assigned to the male sex role. The second draws a shocking picture of South African society as a "rape culture", in which violence against women is tacitly accepted.
Maitse has further linked the use of pornography and the emergence of Information and Communication Technologies to the issues. Under the Apartheid regime pornography was illegal, even if available. Under the new constitution pornography is legal and has been embraced as sign of post Apartheid liberation. This mixed with the free market economy and consumerism where mobile phones and other ITC products have also been adopted as signs of wealth, freedom and nationalism, the dissemination of pornography ion all forms has exploded since 1992/4. Ongoing concerns as to the role of ITC in South Africa were expressed by Shereen Essof in 2009.
In 1997 Interpol reported that South Africa had, on a Global analysis the highest per capita rates of murder and rape, the second highest rate of robbery and violent theft and the fourth highest rates of serious assault and sexual offences of the 110 counties reported on.
Interpol reported in 2001 that South Africa had the highest reported statistics of rape from any member country. It was recognised even then that the statistical findings were believed to be low due to lack of infrastructure, and the complexities of how sexual coercion were perceived. The South African government concluded in 2001 that multiple statistical research efforts dealing with rape all correlated with a high incidence.
The subject started to gain Global attention and was covered by the international media. The incidence of child rape had increased and was linked to beliefs that sex with a virgin could cure HIV/Aids – the Virgin cleansing myth. Some reports indicated that up to 50% of rape victims acquired Aids due to the rape.
FEW: The Forum for the Empowerment of Women was founded in 2001/2. Their research through the project "This Rose Has Thorns" helped to quantify the extent and nature of corrective rape came from the work of Zanele Muholi, who worked with women who had been raped and also interviewed rapist who targeted lesbians. Yolanda Mufweba, writing in The Star Newspaper pointed to how lesbianism by white women was seen as a none African issue. The rape of black South African lesbians was to "turn you into a real African woman", and indicating how the subject was racially linked and polarised. Whilst the subject did receive some international attention afterwards, it was not until the 2006 corrective rape and murder of Zoliswa Nkonyana and the 2008 murder of Eudy Simelane, national women's team soccer player and gay rights activist, that international media interest and attention on the issue developed. Further international attention resulted from the Action Aid 2009 report "Hate crimes: The rise of 'corrective' rape in South Africa".
Research carried out by The Gallup Organization in March–April 2009 showed that 97% of South Africans believed rape to be "a major problem".
In April 2012, there was debate in the South African parliament converging the issues of rape. Further evidence from Interpol listed South Africa as having the highest rape statistics globally. The findings indicated that a South African woman was more likely to be raped than learn to read, and that a rape took place every 17 seconds. Members of the legislature were concerned that when visiting centres that dealt with rape victims they found services overwhelmed. Annelize van Wyk was concerned to find forensic samples from child rape cases left and unprocessed months after the samples were taken. A recent police study estimated that only one in 36 rape cases are reported. Approximately 33% of reported rape cases were prosecuted. In child rape cases only 22% reached court. The South African government appointed a further 800 forensic experts to deal with the levels of crime has been put on hold.
United States
As the United States is a major purveyor of entertainment and culture, as well as the primary site of many feminism and anti-rape movements, many prominent examples of alleged rape culture have occurred there. Various commentators have also labeled the United States itself as a rape culture.
In February 2011, seventeen United States veterans filed suit against the Pentagon and defense secretary Robert Gates and former secretary Donald Rumsfeld, alleging that they allowed a culture in the military where rape was unevenly reported and punished. In several of the plaintiffs' cases, the victim was forced to work with the accused rapist after reporting them for sexual assault. Unit commanders often have heavy influence over military rape cases, and less than one in five cases are prosecuted. According to a 2011 Newsweek report, one in five females and one in 15 males in the United States Air Force would report having been sexually assaulted by service members. (See also: Sexual assault in the United States military)
In March 2011, a group of 16 current and former Yale University students filed a Title IX complaint against the school with the US Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights, alleging that the administration did not respond decisively to misogyny on campus, such as Delta Kappa Epsilon fraternity members chanting sexist slogans. The fraternity was subsequently suspended for five years. Academic studies have examined fraternity cultures at other universities and discussed their roles in the creation of rape culture.
In March 2011, editorials on Salon.com and The Huffington Post criticised a New York Times article, saying that the article focused on victim-blaming on an eleven-year-old girl rather than the fact that she was raped. The article in question dealt with the November 2010 gang rape of the child in Cleveland, Texas.
Other incidents
In 2010, the webcomic Penny Arcade published a strip which featured a male rape victim in the setting of a video game. After complaints about the content of the strip, a follow-up apology strip was published which many bloggers alleged was offensive to and made light of rape victims. This "dickwolves" controversy generated reactions even in mainstream media, particularly after Wil Wheaton made a statement opposing the actions of Penny Arcade's creators.
In August and September 2011, Facebook faced criticism for refusing to remove pages that allegedly supported rape culture. Those criticizing the site claimed the pages violated Facebook's own content policies, which prohibit hate speech. A prominent petition to Facebook stated "Allowing such groups to congregate serves only to further normalise rape culture and the high instance of sexual violence that exists in society."
Criticisms
Christina Hoff Sommers has disputed the existence of rape culture, arguing that the common "one in four women will be raped in her lifetime" is based on a flawed study, but frequently cited because it leads to campus anti-rape groups receiving public funding. Sommers has also examined and criticized many other rape studies for their methodology, and states "There are many researchers who study rape victimization, but their relatively low figures generate no headlines."
Joyce E. Williams has criticised the monolithic nature of the concept of rape culture, due to the implication that ultimately all women are victimised by all men.
Other writers, such as bell hooks, have criticized the rape culture paradigm on the grounds that it ignores rape's place in an overarching "culture of violence."
References
- ^ Wiliams, Joyce E. (2007). "Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology - Rape Culture". In Ritzer, George (ed.). Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Blackwell Publishing Inc. doi:10.1111/b.9781405124331.2007.x. ISBN 9781405124331. Archived from the original on 21 January 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2013.
- ^ Sommers, Dr. Christina Hoff. Researching the "Rape Culture" of America. Retrieved 4 March 2010.
- ^ Rozee, Patricia. "Resisting a Rape Culture". Rape Resistance. Retrieved 11 January 2012.
- ^ Steffes, Micah (January 2008). "The American Rape Culture". High Plains Reader. Retrieved 11 January 2012.
- ^ Maitse, Teboho (1998). "Political change, rape, and pornography in postapartheid South Africa". Gender & Development. 6 (3): 55–59. doi:10.1080/741922834. ISSN 1355-2074.
- ^ Baxi, Upendra (2002). "THE SECOND GUJARAT CATASTROPHE". Economic and Political Weekly. 37 (34): 3519–3531. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - Aosved, Allison C. (28 November 2006). "Co-occurrence of Rape Myth Acceptance, Sexism, Racism, Homophobia, Ageism, Classism, and Religious Intolerance". Sex Roles. 55 (7–8): 481–492. doi:10.1007/s11199-006-9101-4.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - Suarez, E. (11 January 2010). "Stop Blaming the Victim: A Meta-Analysis on Rape Myths". Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 25 (11): 2010–2035. doi:10.1177/0886260509354503.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - Review of Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape quoted in Rutherford, Alexandra (June 2011). "Sexual Violence Against Women: Putting Rape Research in Context". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 35 (2): 342–347. doi:10.1177/0361684311404307. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
- Smith, Merril D. (2004). Encyclopedia of Rape (1st ed.). Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press. p. 174. ISBN 0-313-32687-8.
- New York Radical Feminists; Noreen Connell; Cassandra Wilson (31 October 1974). "3". Rape: the first sourcebook for women. New American Library. p. 105. ISBN 9780452250864. Retrieved 14 May 2012.
- Helen Benedict (11 October 1998). "Letters to the Editor: Speaking Out". New York Times. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
- Freada Klein (November/December 1974). "Book Review: Rape: The First Sourcebook for Women (New York Radical Feminists)". Feminist Alliance Against Rape Newsletter. Feminist Alliance Against Rape Newsletter. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - "Rape Culture". Cambridge Documentary Films. Retrieved 8 January 2012.
- ^ Norsigian, Judy (20 January 1975). "Women, Health, and Films". Women & Health. 1 (1): 29–30. doi:10.1300/J013v01n01_07. Retrieved 11 May 2012.
- Lazarus, Margaret (15 March 2000). "Rape Culture". Retrieved 8 January 2012.
- Follet, Joyce (2004–2005). "LORETTA ROSS". Voices of Feminism Oral History Project, Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, Northampton, MA 01063: 122–124. Retrieved 7 May 2012.
- Patricia Donat and John D'Emilio, "A Feminist Redefinition of Rape and Sexual Assault: Historical Foundations and Change", Journal of Social Issues, vol. 48, n. 1, 1992; published in Di Karen J. Maschke, "The legal response to violence against women", Routledge 1997, ISBN 978-0-8153-2519-2.
- Rutherford, Alexandra (June 2011). "Sexual Violence Against Women: Putting Rape Research in Context". Psychology of Women Quarterly. 35 (2): 342–347. doi:10.1177/0361684311404307. Retrieved 15 June 2012.
- Buchwald, Emilie; Fletcher, Pamela; Roth, Martha (1993). "Editor's Preface". In Buchwald, Emilie; Fletcher, Pamela; Roth, Martha (eds.). Transforming a Rape Culture. Milkweed Editions. p. 1. ISBN 0915943069.
- Gibson, Megan (12 August 2011). "Will SlutWalks Change the Meaning of the Word Slut?". TIME Magazine. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
- "FAQ". Slutwalk NYC. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
- ^ "Slutwalk Joburg takes to the streets". Times LIVE. 23 September 2011. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
- Chris O'Sullivan, "Fraternities and the Rape Culture", in Transforming a Rape Culture, edited by Emilie Buchwald, Pamela R. Fletcher & Martha Roth, ISBN 0-915943-06-9
- ^ Vogelman, L. "Sexual Face of Violence: Rapists on Rape (abstract)". Raven Press Ltd (book); National Criminal Justice Reference Service (abstract). Retrieved 18 October 2011.
- ^ Herman, Dianne F. "The Rape Culture." Printed in Women: A Feminist Perspective (ed. Jo Freeman). Mcgraw Hill, 1994. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
- "Defining a Rape Culture" (PDF). University of California Davis. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
- Mills, Crystal S. and Granoff, Barbara J. (November 1992). "Date and acquaintance rape among a sample of college students (abstract)". Social Work. 37 (6): 504–509. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Ketterling, Jean (23 September 2011). "Rape culture is real". The Xaverian Weekly. Canadian University Press. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
- Backman, Ronet (1988). "The factors related to rape reporting behavior and arrest: new evidence from the National Crime Victimization Survey". Criminal Justice and Behavior. 25 (1): 8.
- Willis, Ellen. "Feminism, Moralism, and Pornography". Wesleyan University Press. Retrieved 8 May 2012.
- Jackson Katz, "Tough Guise" videorecording, Media Education Foundation, 2002
- Roy, Nilanjana S. (22 September 2010). "THE FEMALE FACTOR; For Indian Rape Laws, Change Is Slow to Come". The New York Times.
- ^ "THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 ACT NO. 45 OF 1860". Central Government Act Section 354. Indian Kanoon. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- ^ "THE INDIAN PENAL CODE, 1860 ACT NO. 45 OF 1860". Section 509. Indian Kanoon. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- "Sections 354 & 509" (PDF). India Development Gateway.
- Mohinder Singh (1 January 1996). Social Policy And Administration In India. M.D. Publications Pvt. Ltd. p. 87. ISBN 978-81-7533-010-8. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- ^ Radha Kumar (1997). "The Agitation Against Rape". The History of Doing: An Illustrated Account of Movements for Women's Rights and Feminism in India 1800-1990. Zubaan. p. 127. ISBN 978-81-85107-76-9. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- ^ Smita Narula (1999). Broken People: Caste Violence Against India's "untouchables". Human Rights Watch. pp. 166–178. ISBN 978-1-56432-228-9. Cite error: The named reference "Narula1999" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- Kanchan, Mathur (1992). "Bhateri Rape Case: Backlash and Protest". Economic and Political Weekly. 27 (41): 2221–2224.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - Kang, Bhavdeep (06 Dec 1995). "Controversial Verdict". Outlookindia. Outlook Publishing (India) Pvt. Ltd.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - Edited by Sumi Krishna (2007). Women’s Livelihood Rights: Recasting Citizenship for Development. Sage Publications. p. 378. ISBN 978-0-7619-3600-8.
{{cite book}}
:|author=
has generic name (help); Unknown parameter|ISBN (India-HB)=
ignored (help); Unknown parameter|Section Title=
ignored (help) - S V Manohar, B N Kirpal (1997). "Vishaka & Ors vs State Of Rajasthan & Ors on 13 August, 1997". Supreme Court of India -. 241.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|SCC Ref=
ignored (help); Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - Vij, Shivam (13 October 2007). "A Mighty Heart". Tehelka.com. Anant Media Pvt. Ltd.
- "Document - India: The battle against fear and discrimination: The impact of violence against women in Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan". AI Index: ASA 20/016/2001. Amnesty International. 7 May 2001. p. 27. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 January 2013.
- Sainath, Palagummi (13 June 1999). "A dalit goes to court". The Hindu.
- Sainath, Palagummi. "Caste Off by Palagummi Sainath - A Dalit Goes to Court". A Dalit Goes to Court. religion-online.org, Claremont School of Theology. Archived from the original on 20 January 2013.
- "Fundamental Duties prescribed by the Constitution of the nation under PART IV-A to its every citizen". Constitution of the nation. The Government Of India. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- Sudarshan, edited by Zoya Hasan, E. Sridharan, R. (2002). India's living constitution : ideas, practices, controversies. Delhi: Permanent Black. p. 54. ISBN 978-8178240350.
{{cite book}}
:|first=
has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ International Initiative for Justice in Gujarat (2003). Threatened existence: a feminist analysis of the genocide in Gujarat. Copies available at Forum Against Oppression of Women. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- ^ "Threatened Existence: A Feminist Analysis of the Genocide in Gujarat Report by the International Initiative for Justice (IIJ) December 2003". OnlineVolunteers.org. 2003.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - "Narayanan criticises Vajpayee for Gujarat riots". The Hindu. Mar 03, 2005. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - Jyoti Puri (21 June 1999). Woman, Body, Desire in Post-Colonial India: Narratives of Gender and Sexuality. Psychology Press. p. 87. ISBN 978-0-415-92128-2. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- Baxi, PRATIKSHA. "Sexual harassment". Seminar Publications. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- Manocha, Akshita (28 August 2011). "Menace of Eve Teasing: The Problem and the Solution". MightyLaws.in. MightyLaws.in.
- Susan Herbel; Danena Gaines (2011). Women's Issues in Transportation: Summary of the 4th International Conference. Technical papers. Transportation Research Board. p. 75. ISBN 978-0-309-16083-4. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- "Foreign News: Eve-Teasing". Time Magazine. 12 September 1960. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- VENKATARAMAN, RAJESH (13 April 2004). "Controlling eve-teasing". The Hindu. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- Ramasubramanian, Srividya (1 January 2003). Sex Roles. 48 (7/8): 327–336. doi:10.1023/A:1022938513819 http://www.springerlink.com/content/v88l78510375v753/. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
{{cite journal}}
: Missing or empty|title=
(help); Unknown parameter|coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (help) - Shaina N C (19 November 2011). "Is it really 'eve-teasing'?". The Times Of India. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- Koshal, A.D. (1978). "Tuka Ram And Anr vs State Of Maharashtra on 15 September, 1978 - Equivalent citations: 1979 AIR 185, 1979 SCR (1) 810". India Supreme Court Journal.
{{cite journal}}
: Unknown parameter|month=
ignored (help) - ^ Upendra Baxi, Lotika Sarkar, Raghunath Kelkar & Vasudha Dhaganwar (1979). "An Open Letter to the Chief Justice of India". SCC. 4.
{{cite journal}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Flavia; Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women's University. Research Centre for Women's Studies (1995). State, gender and the rhetoric of law reform. Research Centre for Women's Studies, Shreemati Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women's University.
- "INDIA: Torture and murder of a woman by armed forces in India". ASIAN HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION - URGENT APPEALS PROGRAM. Asian Human Rights Commission (AHRC). Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- "An analysis of Armed Forces Special Powers Act, 1958". People\'s Union for Civil Liberties (PUCL). Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- "Woman's death sparks protest". The Hindu. 17 July 2004. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- "Women Rage Against 'Rape' in Northeast India". commondreams.org. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- "Women give vent to naked fury in front of 17 AR at Kangla". E-Pao. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- Sengupta, Somini (9 February 2009). "Attack on Women at an Indian Bar Intensifies a Clash of Cultures". The New York Times. p. 5.
{{cite news}}
: Text "http://www.webcitation.org/68YpwLUpD" ignored (help) - Bangalore Bureau (06 Feb 2009). "We'll not spare dating couples on Valentine's Day: Muthalik". The Hindu. Kasturi and Sons Ltd.
{{cite web}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - Dhawan, Himanshi (14 February 2009). "'Pink chaddi' campaign a hit, draws over 34,000 members". The Times Of India. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- ^ S. Roy, Nilanjana (14 June 2011). "Ready or Not, New Delhi Gets a Women's Street Protest". The New York Times. The New York Times Company.
- ^ Pereira, Aaron (18 June 2011). "Bhopal Besharmi Morcha gets lukewarm response". Hindustan Times. Retrieved 22 May 2012.
- Dhillon, Amrit (19 July 2011). "'SlutWalk mocks Indian women, real issues'". Hindustan Times. HT Media Limited.
- "Delhi stages 'Slutwalk' against sexual violence". The Hindu. 31 July 2011.
- Hannon, Elliot (Aug. 01, 2011). "Indian Women Take SlutWalk to New Delhi's Streets". Time Inc.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - Bhardwaj, Ananya (01 Aug 2011). "'It's a walk against the besharam men'". The Indian Express.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - Garia, Nikita (01 Aug 2011). "Expats Find Delhi 'Slut Walk' Too Conservative". The Wall St Journal. Dow Jones & Company, Inc. Retrieved June 1, 2012.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - Steve Biko (1987). I Write What I Like. Heinemann. ISBN 978-0-435-90598-9. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- ^ Susie M. Jacobs; Ruth Jacobson; Jen Marchbank (8 April 2000). States of Conflict: Gender, Violence, and Resistance. Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 198–. ISBN 978-1-85649-656-8. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- Walker, Cherryl (1982). Women and resistance in South Africa. London: Onyx Press. ISBN 9780906383148.
- Campbell, Catherine (1992). "Learning to kill? Masculinity, the family and violence in Natal". Journal of Southern African Studies. 18 (3): 614. doi:10.1080/03057079208708328.
- Caroline Sweetman (1 January 1999). Violence Against Women. Oxfam. ISBN 978-0-85598-401-4. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- Linda M. Richter; Andrew Dawes; Craig Higson-Smith (2004). Sexual Abuse Of Young Children In Southern Africa. HSRC Press. ISBN 978-0-7969-2053-9. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- Essof, Shereen. "South Africa: Violence against Women and ICT". genderit.org. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- Schönteich, Martin (2000). "South Africa's position in Africa's crime rankings". African Security Review. 9 (4): 51–65. doi:10.1080/10246029.2000.9628065. ISSN 1024-6029.
- Lucy Valerie Graham (June 2012). State of Peril: Race and Rape in South African Literature. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-979637-3. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- Jewkes, Rachel; Abrahams, Naeema (2002). "The epidemiology of rape and sexual coercion in South Africa: an overview". Social Science & Medicine. 55 (7): 1231–1244. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00242-8. ISSN 0277-9536.
- Government Of South Africa. "Quantitative research findings on rape in South Africa,". Statistics South Africa – statssa.gov.za. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- Forum for the Empowerment of Women (FEW). "Forum for the Empowerment of Women (FEW)". The Joint Working Group (JWG).
- Forum for the Empowerment of Women (FEW). "Her Story". few.org.za.
- Zanele Muholi (2006). Mapping Our Histories: A Visual History of Black Lesbians in Post-Apartheid. South Africa. Zanele Muholi. p. 45.
- "Campaign to stop violence against lesbian women in South Africa". Sister Namibia. THEFREELIBRARY.COM, Farlex, Inc. 1 November 2003.
- Yolanda Mufweba (7 November 2003). "Corrective rape makes you an African woman". The Star. Johannesburg. Independent Newspapers (Pty) Limited.
- Annmarie Conte (May 2005). "Men who rape gay women to turn them straight". Cleo Magazine. ninemsn Pty Ltd. pp. 93–96.
- Marianne Thamm (26 February 2006). "Not just another murder". Mail & Guardian. Johannesburg. M&G Media. Retrieved 1 June 2012.
- Andrew Martin, Annie Kelly, Laura Turquet,Stephanie Ross. (12 March 2009). "Hate crimes: The rise of 'corrective' rape in South Africa". ActionAid. p. 11.
{{cite web}}
: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Rebecca Harrison (13. März 2009). "South African gangs use rape to "cure" lesbians". Reuters Deutschland.
{{cite news}}
: Check date values in:|date=
(help) - "Lesbians subjected to "corrective rape" in South Africa". The Telegraph. 13 March 2009.
- Gallup, Inc. "Rape Troubles Nearly All in South Africa". The Gallup Organization. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- Samira Ahmed (12 March 2009). "'Corrective rape' in South Africa". Channel 4 News.
- "South Africa, world's rape capital: Interpol". SABC. 19 April 2012. Retrieved 25 May 2012.
- Parker, Ashley (15 February 2011). Lawsuit Says Military Is Rife With Sexual Abuse. New York Times. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
- Hefling, Kimberly (16 February 2011). U.S. Veterans Say Military is Mishandling Rape Case. The Day.
- Ellison, Jesse (3 April 2011). "The Military's Secret Shame". Newsweek. Retrieved 11 April 2011.
- "Yale is Subject of Title IX Inquiry". New York Times. 31 March 2011. Retrieved 10 April 2011.
- Foderaro, Lisa (17 May 2011). "Yale Restricts a Fraternity for Five Years". New York Times.
- Boswell, A. Ayres and Spade, Joan Z. (April 1996). "Fraternities and Collegiate Rape Culture: Why Are Some Fraternities More Dangerous Places for Women?". Gender and Society. 10 (2): 133–147. JSTOR 189830.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - Williams, Mary Elizabeth (9 March 2011). The New York Times' sloppy, slanted child rape story. Salon.com. Retrieved 16 March 2011.
- DelVecchio, Marina (21 March 2011). "Rape Culture and How it Betrays Women". The Huffington Post.
- "Shaker". "Rape Is Hilarious, Part 53 in an Ongoing Series". Retrieved 9 May 2011.
{{cite web}}
:|first=
missing|last=
(help) - Wheaton, Wil (@wilw) (3 September 2010). "Don't be a dickwolf! http://twitpic.com/2kxpej". Twitter. Retrieved 15 May 2012.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|title=
- Myers, Maddy (16 August 2010). Penny Arcade surprised to find that rape jokes offend people. The Boston Phoenix. Retrieved 5 March 2011.
- Myers, Maddy (2 March 2011). Gaming, rape culture, and how I stopped reading Penny Arcade. The Boston Phoenix. Retrieved 5 March 2011.
- ^ Davies, Lizzy (30 September 2011). "Facebook refuses to take down rape joke pages". The Guardian. Retrieved 18 October 2011.
- "Facebook community standards". Facebook Inc. Retrieved 23 May 2012.
- Edited by George Ritzer. The concise encyclopedia of sociology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. p. 493. ISBN 978-1-4051-8352-9.
{{cite book}}
:|last=
has generic name (help); More than one of|author=
and|last=
specified (help) - bell hooks, Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center, quoted in Feminism is for Everybody by bell hooks, ISBN 0-89608-628-3
Further reading
- Emilie Buchwald, Pamela R. Fletcher and Martha Roth, ed. (1993). Transforming a Rape Culture. ISBN 1-57131-204-8.
- M. R. Burt (1980). "Cultural myths and supports for rape". Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 38: 217–230. PMID 7373511.
- M. R. Burt and R. S. Albin (1981). "Rape myths, rape definitions, and probability of conviction". Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 11: 212–230.
Sexual abuse | |
---|---|
Forms | |
Sociological theories | |
Laws | |
Related topics | |