Revision as of 00:36, 12 February 2007 editMichaelbusch (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,765 editsm moved Cosmic winter to Impact winter over redirect: Stop. Now.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:06, 14 November 2024 edit undoSkullers (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,127 edits →See also: +AnnotatedListOfLinksTag: 2017 wikitext editor | ||
(244 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Short description|Hypothesized climate effects due to an asteroid or comet impact on Earth}} | |||
An '''impact winter''' is a period of prolonged cold weather caused by the impact on the Earth of a large ] or ]. If such an impact occurred on land or the floor of a shallow sea, it could cause large amounts of dust or ash to be thrown into the Earth's atmosphere, blocking the Sun's light and dramatically lowering the amount of sunlight reaching the earth's surface. Impact winter is one of the mechanisms proposed for ]s, such as the asteroid impact at ] in ] which led to the ]. | |||
{{For|the episode of ''The West Wing''|Impact Winter (The West Wing)}} | |||
] in what is today ]. The aftermath of this immense asteroid collision, which occurred approximately 66 million years ago, is believed to have caused ] of non-avian ] and many other species on Earth. The impact spewed hundreds of billions of tons of sulfur into the atmosphere, producing a worldwide blackout and freezing temperatures which persisted for at least a decade.<ref name="nhm.ac.uk">{{cite web |last=Osterloff |first=Emily |date=2018 |title=How an asteroid ended the age of the dinosaurs |url=https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/how-an-asteroid-caused-extinction-of-dinosaurs.html |url-status=live |location=] |publisher=] |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220426174952/https://www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/how-an-asteroid-caused-extinction-of-dinosaurs.html |archive-date=26 April 2022 |access-date=18 May 2022}}</ref>]] | |||
Depending on the size of the object, and the location and angle at which it hits the earth, material can be thrown into the atmosphere by two mechanisms: | |||
# The impact could eject large amounts of ] (and perhaps shattered ]) into the atmosphere | |||
# The impact could produce a ] or strike a heavily forested area, throwing up large amounts of smoke and ash into the atmosphere. | |||
An '''impact winter''' is a hypothesized period of ] due to the impact of a large ] or ] on the ]'s surface. If an asteroid were to strike land or a shallow body of water, it would eject an enormous amount of dust, ash, and other material into the ], blocking the ] from the ]. This would cause the global temperature to decrease drastically.{{quantify|date=May 2022}}<ref name="ChampmanEtA107">{{Citation|url=http://schillerlab.bio-toolkit.com/media/pdfs/2010/03/16/367033a0.pdf|last1= CHAPMAN|first1= CR|last2= MORRISON|first2=D.| title=Impacts on the Earth by Asteroids and Comets - Assessing the Hazard|journal=Nature|volume=367|issue=6458|pages= 33–40|date=1994|doi=10.1038/367033a0|bibcode=1994Natur.367...33C|s2cid= 4305299}}</ref><ref name="MaccrackenEtA107">{{Citation|last1=MACCRACKEN|first1=MC|last2=Covey|first2=C.|last3=Thompson|first3=S.L.|last4=Weissman|first4=P.R.|title=Global Climatic Effects of Atmospheric Dust from An Asteroid or Comet Impact on Earth|journal=Global and Planetary Change|volume= 9|issue=3–4 |pages=263–273|doi=10.1016/0921-8181(94)90020-5|bibcode=1994GPC.....9..263C|year=1994}}</ref> If an asteroid or comet with the diameter of about {{convert|5|km|mi|abbr=on}} or more were to hit in a large deep body of water or explode before hitting the surface, there would still be an enormous amount of debris ejected into the atmosphere.<ref name="ChampmanEtA107"/><ref name="MaccrackenEtA107"/><ref name="LewisEtA107">{{Citation|last=Lewis|first=John S.|title=Rain Of Iron And Ice: The Very Real Threat Of Comet And Asteroid Bombardment|publisher=Helix Books|year=1997|isbn=978-0-201-48950-7|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/rainofironicever00lewi}}</ref> It has been proposed that an impact winter could lead to ], wiping out many of the world's existing species. The ] probably involved an impact winter, and led to mass extinction of most ] weighing more than 25 kilograms (55 pounds).<ref name="PrimalF">{{cite book |title=Primal Forces |publisher=Graphic Arts Center Publishing |last1=Muench |first1=David | last2=Muench |first2=Marc |last3=Gilders |first3=Michelle A. |year=2000 |location=Portland, Oregon |pages=20 |isbn=978-1-55868-522-2}}</ref> | |||
The latter scenario is the more dangerous, as the lighter particles from the fire would take weeks or months to fall back to earth, and could be distributed by ]s around the world, making the cooling a global event. | |||
==Possibility of impact== | |||
The mechanism of impact winter is very similar to that which occurs after ], leading to ]. Volcanoes also eject large amounts of opaque material into the higher parts of the atmosphere, with large explosions such as the ] explosion of ] and the much larger ] ] erruption, having measurable effects on the world's climate. The simultaneous eruption of a number of large volcanoes, a catastrophic ] scenario, is another proposed mechanism for extinction events. | |||
Each year, the Earth is hit by {{convert|5|m|ft|abbr=on|adj = on}} diameter ] that deliver an explosion {{convert|50|km|mi|abbr=on}} above the surface with the power equivalent of one kiloton of TNT.<ref name="EngvildEtA107">{{Citation|last=Engvild|first=Kjeld C.|title=A Review of the Risks of Sudden Global Cooling and Its Effects on Agriculture|journal=Agricultural and Forest Meteorology |volume=115|issue=3–4|pages=127–137|doi=10.1016/s0168-1923(02)00253-8|bibcode=2003AgFM..115..127E|year=2003}}</ref> The Earth is hit every day by a ] less than {{convert|5|m|ft|abbr=on}} in diameter that disintegrates before reaching the surface. The meteors that do make it to the surface tend to strike unpopulated areas and cause no harm. A human is more likely to die in a fire, flood, or other natural disaster than to die because of an asteroid or comet impact.<ref name="ChampmanEtA107"/> Another study in 1994 found a 1-in-10,000 chance that the Earth will be hit by a large ] or ] with a diameter of about {{convert|2|km|mi|abbr=on}} during the next century. This object would be capable of disrupting the ] and would kill a large fraction of the world's population.<ref name="ChampmanEtA107"/> One such object, ], currently has a 0.005% chance of colliding with Earth in the year 2880,<ref name="risk-table">{{cite web | |||
|date=9 December 2014 | |||
|title=Sentry Risk Table | |||
|publisher=NASA/JPL Near-Earth Object Program Office | |||
|url=http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/ | |||
|access-date=2014-12-10 | |||
|url-status=dead | |||
|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141231154154/http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/risk/ | |||
|archive-date=December 31, 2014 | |||
}}</ref> though when first discovered the probability was 0.3%.<ref name="EngvildEtA107"/> The probability goes down as orbits are refined with additional measurements. | |||
Over 300 short-period ] pass near larger planets, such as ] and ], which can change the comets' trajectories and could potentially put them into an Earth-crossing orbit. This could happen for long-period comets also but the chance is highest for short-period comets. The chance of these directly impacting Earth is far lower than a ] (NEO) impact. ] and ] support a controversial theory that a short-period comet in an Earth-crossing orbit does not need to impact to be hazardous, as it could disintegrate and cause a dust veil with possibilities of a "]" scenario with long-term global cooling lasting for thousands of years (which they consider to be similar in probability to a 1 km impact).<ref>{{cite news|title=Was a giant comet responsible for a North American catastrophe in 11,000 BC?|url=https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/04/100401101527.htm|access-date=5 November 2014|publisher=]|date=1 April 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Roach|first1=John|title=Comet "Shower" Killed Ice Age Mammals?|url=http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/04/100407-ice-age-extinction-comet-meteor-shower/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100410090538/http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/04/100407-ice-age-extinction-comet-meteor-shower|url-status=dead|archive-date=April 10, 2010|access-date=5 November 2014|publisher=National Geographic|date=7 April 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Hecht|first1=John|title=Did a comet swarm strike America 13,000 years ago?|url=https://www.newscientist.com/blogs/shortsharpscience/2010/04/did-a-comet-swarm-strike-ameri.html|access-date=5 November 2014|publisher=]|date=2 April 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Jenniskens|first1=Petrus Matheus Marie|title=Meteor Showers and Their Parent Comets|date=2006|publisher=]|isbn=978-0521853491|page=455|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QpajMuyXG8AC&q=clube+napier+%22cosmic+winter%22&pg=PA455}}</ref> | |||
==Impact winters in popular culture== | |||
Impact winter (along with nuclear and volcanic winters) are often the subject of ] ]s and short stories. | |||
==Necessary impact factors== | |||
In the episode "Impact Winter" of the popular television show '']'', ] sights a large asteroid that could possibly collide with Earth. President Bartlet recounts the worst case scenario, saying "If the asteroid hits , a shower of burning rock rains down on those woods and starts a fire that burns, that shrouds the hemisphere in a blanket of soot and ash that blocks out the sun for weeks. 'Impact Winter', they call it." | |||
The Earth experiences a never-ending barrage of cosmic debris. Small particles burn up as they enter the ] and are visible as ]. Many of them go unnoticed by the average person even though not all of them burn up before they hit the Earth's surface. Those that strike the surface are known as ].<ref name="LewisEtA107"/> Thus, not every object that hits the Earth will cause an ] or even cause any real harm. Objects release most of their ] in the ] and will explode if they experience a column of ] greater than or equal to their ].<ref name="ChampmanEtA107"/> Extinction-level impacts on the Earth occur about every 100 million years.<ref name="MaccrackenEtA107"/><ref name="LewisEtA107"/><ref name="CoveyEtA107">{{Citation|last1=Covey|first1=C|last2=Morrison|first2=D.|last3=Toon|first3=O.B.|last4=Turco|first4=R.P.|last5=Zahnle|first5=K.|title=Environmental Perturbations Caused By the Impacts of Asteroids and Comets|journal= Reviews of Geophysics|volume=35|issue=1|pages= 41–78|doi=10.1029/96rg03038|bibcode=1997RvGeo..35...41T|year=1997|doi-access=free}}</ref> Although extinction events happen very rarely, large projectiles can do severe damage.<ref name="ChampmanEtA107"/><ref name="CoveyEtA107"/> This section will discuss the nature of the hazards posed by projectiles as a function of their size and composition. | |||
===Size=== | |||
The '']'' ] '']'' is set on a human colony world which has suffered an asteroid strike and is undergoing an impact winter. | |||
A large ] or ] could collide with the Earth's surface with the force of hundreds to thousands of times the force of all the ] on the Earth.<ref name="LewisEtA107"/> For example, the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event has been proposed to have caused extinction of all non-avian dinosaurs 66 million years ago. Early estimates of this ]'s size put it at about {{convert|10|km|mi|abbr=on}} in diameter. This means it hit with nearly a force of 100,000,000 MT (418 ZJ).<ref name="Alvarez">{{cite journal |last1=Alvarez |first1=L.W. |last2=Alvarez |first2=W. |last3=Asaro |first3=F. |last4=Michel |first4=H. V. |year=1980 |title=Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction |journal=Science |volume=208 |issue=4448 |pages=1095–1108 |bibcode=1980Sci...208.1095A |doi=10.1126/science.208.4448.1095 |pmid=17783054|citeseerx=10.1.1.126.8496 |s2cid=16017767 }}</ref> That is over six billion times larger than the atomic bomb yield (16 kilotons, 67 TJ) that was dropped on ] during WW2. This impactor excavated the ] that is {{convert|180|km|mi|abbr=on}} in diameter. With an object this size, dust and debris would still be ejected into the ] even if it hit the ocean, which is only {{convert|4|km|mi|abbr=on}} deep.<ref name="MaccrackenEtA107"/> An ], ], or ] would remain intact through the ] by virtue of its sheer mass. However, an object smaller than {{convert|3| km|mi|abbr=on}} would have to have a strong ] composition to breach the ] - the ] or the lower levels of the ].<ref name="ChampmanEtA107"/> | |||
===Composition=== | |||
There are three different composition types for an asteroid or comet: ]lic, ] and ]. The composition of the object determines whether or not it will make it to the Earth's surface in one piece, disintegrate before breaching the atmosphere, or break up and explode just before reaching the surface.<ref name="ChampmanEtA107"/><ref name="LewisEtA107"/> A metallic object tends to be made up of iron and ] alloys.<ref name="ChampmanEtA107"/> These metallic objects are the most likely to impact the surface because they stand up better to the stresses of ] induced ] and fragmentation during ].<ref name="ChampmanEtA107"/> The stony objects, like chondritic meteorites, tend to burn, break up, or explode before leaving the upper atmosphere. Those that do make it to the surface need a minimum energy of about {{convert|10|MtonTNT|J|sigfig=1|abbr=on|lk=on}} or about {{convert|50|m|ft|abbr=on}} diameter to breach the ] (this is for a stony object hitting at {{convert|20|km/s|mph|sigfig=1}}). The porous comet-like objects are made up of ], ], ice, ] and often burn up in the ] because of their ] (≤{{convert|1|g/cm3|lb/ft3|sigfig=1|abbr=on}}).<ref name="ChampmanEtA107"/> | |||
==Possible mechanisms== | |||
{{See also|Younger Dryas impact hypothesis}} | |||
Although the ] and ] that impact the Earth hit with many times the explosive force of a ], the mechanisms of an impact winter are similar to those that occur after a mega-]-induced ]. In this scenario massive amounts of debris injected into the ] would block some of the ] for an extended period of time and lower the mean global temperature by as much as 20 °C after a year.<ref name="MaccrackenEtA107"/> The two main mechanisms that could lead to an impact winter are mass ejection of ] and multiple ]. | |||
===Mass ejection of regolith=== | |||
{{See also|Supervolcano|Toba catastrophe theory|Yellowstone caldera#Hazards}} | |||
].]] | |||
In a study conducted by Curt Covey et al., it was found that an ] about {{convert|10|km|mi|abbr=on}} in diameter with the ] of about 10<sup>8</sup> MT could send upward of about 2.5x10<sup>15</sup> kg of 1 ] sized ] particles into the ]. Anything larger would fall quickly back to the surface.<ref name="MaccrackenEtA107"/> These particles would then be spread throughout the atmosphere and absorb or ] the sunlight before it is able to reach the surface, cooling the planet in a similar fashion as the ] rising from a ], producing deep ].<ref name="MaccrackenEtA107"/><ref name="BainsEtA107">{{Citation|last1=Bains|first1=KH|last2=Ianov|first2=BA|last3=Ocampo|first3=AC|last4=Pope|first4=KO|title=Impact Winter and the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinctions - Results Of A Chicxulub Asteroid Impact Model|journal= Earth and Planetary Science Letters |volume=128|issue=3–4|pages= 719–725|doi=10.1016/0012-821x(94)90186-4|bibcode=1994E&PSL.128..719P|year=1994|pmid=11539442}}</ref> This is ] purported to have occurred following the ]. | |||
These pulverized rock particles would remain in the ] until ] and due to their size, they would also act as ] and would be washed out by ]/precipitation, but even then, about 15% of the ] might not reach the surface.{{why|date=December 2013}} After the first 20 days, the land temperature might drop quickly, by about 13 °C. After about a year, the temperature could rebound by about 6 °C, but by this time about one-third of the Northern Hemisphere might be covered in ice.<ref name="MaccrackenEtA107"/> | |||
However, this effect could be largely mitigated, even reversed, by a release of enormous quantities of water vapor and carbon dioxide caused by the initial global heat pulse after the impact. If the asteroid hit an ocean (which would be the case with the majority of impact events), water vapor would form the majority of any ejected matter, and would likely result in a major ] and a net increase in temperature.{{cn|date=December 2019}} | |||
If the impact event is sufficiently energetic it might cause ] (volcanism) at the ] (the opposite side of the world).<ref name="Hagstrum 2005">{{Cite journal| last1 = Hagstrum | first1 = Jonathan T. | title = Antipodal Hotspots and Bipolar Catastrophes: Were Oceanic Large-body Impacts the Cause? | journal = ] | volume = 236 | issue = 1–2 | pages = 13–27 | date = 2005 | url=http://www.mantleplumes.org/WebDocuments/Antip_hot.pdf| doi = 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.02.020 | bibcode=2005E&PSL.236...13H}}</ref> This volcanism could alone therefore create a ], irrespective of the other impact effects. | |||
===Multiple firestorms=== | |||
{{see also|Nuclear winter}} | |||
In combination with the initial debris ejected into the ], if the impactor is extremely large ({{convert|3|km|mi|abbr=on}} or more), like at the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (estimated {{convert|10|km|mi|abbr=on}}), there might be the ignition of multiple ]s, possibly with a global reach into every dense and therefore firestorm-prone forest. These wood fires might release enough amounts of water vapor, ash, soot, tar and carbon dioxide into the atmosphere to ] and cause the pulverized rock dust cloud blocking the sun to last longer. Alternatively it could cause it to last for a much shorter time, as there would be more water vapor for the rocky aerosol particles to form ]. If it causes the dust cloud to last longer, it would prolong the Earth's cooling time, possibly causing thicker ice sheets to form.<ref name="MaccrackenEtA107"/><ref name="BainsEtA107"/> | |||
== Past events== | |||
{{main|Chicxulub crater|Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event}} | |||
In 2016, a scientific drilling project drilled deep into the ] of the Chicxulub impact crater to obtain ] samples from the impact itself. This crater is one of the best known impact craters and was the impact responsible for the extinction of the non-avian ]s. | |||
The discoveries were widely seen as confirming current theories related to both the crater impact and its effects. They confirmed that the rock comprising the peak ring had been subjected to immense pressures and forces, and had been melted by immense heat and shocked by immense pressure from its usual state into its present form in just minutes. The fact that the peak ring was made of granite was also significant, since granite is not a rock found in sea-floor deposits – it originates much deeper in the earth and had been ejected to the surface by the immense pressures of impact. ], a ]-containing rock that ''is'' usually present in the shallow seabed of the region, had been almost entirely removed and must therefore have been almost entirely vaporized and entered the atmosphere, and that the event was immediately followed by a huge ] (a massive movement of sea waters) sufficient to lay down the largest known layer of sand separated by grain size directly above the peak ring. | |||
These strongly support the hypothesis that the impactor was large enough to create a 120-mile peak ring, eject molten granite from deep within the earth, create colossal water movements, and eject an immense quantity of vaporized rock and sulfates into the atmosphere, where they would have persisted for a long time. This global dispersion of dust and sulfates would have led to a sudden and catastrophic effect on the climate worldwide by causing large temperature drops, devastating the ].<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.science.org/content/article/updated-drilling-dinosaur-killing-impact-crater-explains-buried-circular-hills | title=Updated: Drilling of dinosaur-killing impact crater explains buried circular hills| date=2016-05-03}}</ref><ref>{{Cite news | url=https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/18/science/chicxulub-crater-dinosaur-extinction.html | title=Drilling into the Chicxulub Crater, Ground Zero of the Dinosaur Extinction| newspaper=The New York Times| date=2016-11-17| last1=Fleur| first1=Nicholas St}}</ref> | |||
==Impact on humans== | |||
], circa 74,000 years ago. Some scientists believe this eruption led to a population collapse and subsequent ] in humans.<ref>Michael R. Rampino, Stanley H. Ambrose, 2000. ], Volcanic Hazards and Disasters in Human Antiquity, Floyd W. McCoy, Grant Heiken</ref>]] | |||
An impact winter would have a devastating effect on humans, as well as the other species on Earth. With the ] being severely diminished, the first species to die would be plants and animals who survive through the process of ]. This lack of food would ultimately lead to other mass extinctions of other animals that are higher up on the ] and possibly kill up to 25% of the human population.<ref name="EngvildEtA107"/> Depending on location and size of the initial impact, the cost of clean-up efforts could be so high as to cause an ] for the survivors.<ref name="BobEtA107">{{Citation|last1=Bobrowsky|first1=Peter T.|last2= Rickman|first2=Hans|title=Comet/Asteroid Impacts and Human Society: An Interdisciplinary Approach|publisher= Springer|year= 2007|bibcode=2007caih.book.....B|isbn=978-3-540-32711-0}}</ref> These factors would make life on Earth, for humans, extremely difficult. | |||
===Agriculture=== | |||
{{see also|Svalbard seedbank}} | |||
With the ] full of dust and other material, ] would be refracted and scattered back into space and absorbed by this debris. The first effect on the Earth, after the ] and potential multiple ]s, would be the death of most, if not all, of the ] on Earth. Those in the ocean that survive would possibly become dormant until the sun came out again.<ref name="MaccrackenEtA107"/><ref name="EngvildEtA107"/> Those on land could possibly be kept alive in underground ]s, with one such example being the ]. Greenhouses in underground complexes with fossil or nuclear energy power stations could conceivably keep artificial sunlight ]s on until the atmosphere began to clear. Meanwhile, those outside that were not killed by the lack of sunlight would most likely be killed or kept dormant by the extreme cold of the impact winter. This death of plants might lead to a long period of ] if enough people survived the initial blast wave and would result in increased food costs in undeveloped countries only a few months after the first crop failures. Developed countries wouldn't encounter ] unless the cooling event was to last longer than a year, due to larger ] and ] stockpiles in these countries. However, if the impactor was similar in size to the K/T boundary impactor, agricultural losses might not be compensated with imports to the northern hemisphere from the southern hemisphere or vice versa.<ref name="EngvildEtA107"/><ref name="BobEtA107"/> The only way to keep from starving would be for each country to amass at least a year's worth of food for their people. Not many countries have this; the world's average cereal stock levels are only about 30% of the yearly production.<ref name="EngvildEtA107"/><ref name="LewisEtA108">{{Citation|last=Lewis|first= John S.|title=Comet and Asteroid Impact Hazards on a Populated Earth: Computer Modeling |publisher= ]| year=2000|isbn=978-0-12-446760-6}}</ref> | |||
===Economics=== | |||
The cost to clean up after an asteroid or comet impact would cost billions to trillions of dollars, depending on the location impacted.<ref name="BobEtA107"/><ref name="LewisEtA108"/> An impact in ] (the 16th most populated city in the world) could cost billions of dollars in financial losses and it could take years for the financial sector (i.e. ]) to recover.<ref name="BobEtA107"/> However, the probability of such a naturally specifically aimed impact would be exceedingly low. | |||
===Survivability=== | |||
{{see also|Asteroid impact avoidance|Duck and cover|Civil defense}} | |||
{{As of|2018|02|20|df=US}}, there are 17,841 ]s known. 8,059 potentially hazardous objects are known; they are larger than {{convert|140|m|ft|abbr=on}} and may approach the Earth closer than 20 times the distance to the ].<ref name="EngvildEtA107"/> 888 NEAs larger than 1 km have been discovered,<ref name="neo-jpl-stats">{{cite web | |||
|title = Discovery Statistics – Cumulative Totals | |||
|publisher = NASA/JPL CNEOS | |||
|url = https://cneos.jpl.nasa.gov/stats/totals.html | |||
|date = February 5, 2018 | |||
|access-date = 2018-02-08}}</ref> or 96.5% of an estimated total of about 920.<ref name="NEA1km-est-2017">{{cite news |url=https://www.universetoday.com/137583/good-news-everyone-less-deadly-undiscovered-asteroids-thought/ |title=Good News Everyone! There are Fewer Deadly Undiscovered Asteroids than we Thought |author=Matt Williams |work=Universe Today |date=October 20, 2017 |access-date=2017-11-14}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
*] | |||
*] | |||
* {{Annotated link |Asteroid deflection strategies}} | |||
==External links== | |||
* {{Annotated link |Earth Impact Database}} | |||
* | |||
* {{Annotated link |global dimming}} | |||
* | |||
* {{Annotated link |Impact event}} | |||
* {{Annotated link |List of notable asteroids}} | |||
* {{Annotated link |Near-Earth objects}} | |||
* {{Annotated link |Nuclear winter}} | |||
* {{Annotated link |Volcanic winter}} | |||
*] | |||
] | |||
*] | |||
==References== | |||
{{Reflist|33em}} | |||
==External links== | |||
* | |||
* | |||
{{Doomsday}} | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 12:06, 14 November 2024
Hypothesized climate effects due to an asteroid or comet impact on Earth For the episode of The West Wing, see Impact Winter (The West Wing).An impact winter is a hypothesized period of prolonged cold weather due to the impact of a large asteroid or comet on the Earth's surface. If an asteroid were to strike land or a shallow body of water, it would eject an enormous amount of dust, ash, and other material into the atmosphere, blocking the radiation from the Sun. This would cause the global temperature to decrease drastically. If an asteroid or comet with the diameter of about 5 km (3.1 mi) or more were to hit in a large deep body of water or explode before hitting the surface, there would still be an enormous amount of debris ejected into the atmosphere. It has been proposed that an impact winter could lead to mass extinction, wiping out many of the world's existing species. The Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event probably involved an impact winter, and led to mass extinction of most tetrapods weighing more than 25 kilograms (55 pounds).
Possibility of impact
Each year, the Earth is hit by 5 m (16 ft) diameter meteoroids that deliver an explosion 50 km (31 mi) above the surface with the power equivalent of one kiloton of TNT. The Earth is hit every day by a meteor less than 5 m (16 ft) in diameter that disintegrates before reaching the surface. The meteors that do make it to the surface tend to strike unpopulated areas and cause no harm. A human is more likely to die in a fire, flood, or other natural disaster than to die because of an asteroid or comet impact. Another study in 1994 found a 1-in-10,000 chance that the Earth will be hit by a large asteroid or comet with a diameter of about 2 km (1.2 mi) during the next century. This object would be capable of disrupting the ecosphere and would kill a large fraction of the world's population. One such object, Asteroid 1950 DA, currently has a 0.005% chance of colliding with Earth in the year 2880, though when first discovered the probability was 0.3%. The probability goes down as orbits are refined with additional measurements.
Over 300 short-period comets pass near larger planets, such as Saturn and Jupiter, which can change the comets' trajectories and could potentially put them into an Earth-crossing orbit. This could happen for long-period comets also but the chance is highest for short-period comets. The chance of these directly impacting Earth is far lower than a near-Earth object (NEO) impact. Victor Clube and Bill Napier support a controversial theory that a short-period comet in an Earth-crossing orbit does not need to impact to be hazardous, as it could disintegrate and cause a dust veil with possibilities of a "nuclear winter" scenario with long-term global cooling lasting for thousands of years (which they consider to be similar in probability to a 1 km impact).
Necessary impact factors
The Earth experiences a never-ending barrage of cosmic debris. Small particles burn up as they enter the atmosphere and are visible as meteors. Many of them go unnoticed by the average person even though not all of them burn up before they hit the Earth's surface. Those that strike the surface are known as meteorites. Thus, not every object that hits the Earth will cause an extinction-level event or even cause any real harm. Objects release most of their kinetic energy in the atmosphere and will explode if they experience a column of atmosphere greater than or equal to their mass. Extinction-level impacts on the Earth occur about every 100 million years. Although extinction events happen very rarely, large projectiles can do severe damage. This section will discuss the nature of the hazards posed by projectiles as a function of their size and composition.
Size
A large asteroid or comet could collide with the Earth's surface with the force of hundreds to thousands of times the force of all the nuclear bombs on the Earth. For example, the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event has been proposed to have caused extinction of all non-avian dinosaurs 66 million years ago. Early estimates of this asteroid's size put it at about 10 km (6.2 mi) in diameter. This means it hit with nearly a force of 100,000,000 MT (418 ZJ). That is over six billion times larger than the atomic bomb yield (16 kilotons, 67 TJ) that was dropped on Hiroshima during WW2. This impactor excavated the Chicxulub crater that is 180 km (110 mi) in diameter. With an object this size, dust and debris would still be ejected into the atmosphere even if it hit the ocean, which is only 4 km (2.5 mi) deep. An asteroid, meteor, or comet would remain intact through the atmosphere by virtue of its sheer mass. However, an object smaller than 3 km (1.9 mi) would have to have a strong iron composition to breach the lower atmosphere - the troposphere or the lower levels of the stratosphere.
Composition
There are three different composition types for an asteroid or comet: metallic, stony and icy. The composition of the object determines whether or not it will make it to the Earth's surface in one piece, disintegrate before breaching the atmosphere, or break up and explode just before reaching the surface. A metallic object tends to be made up of iron and nickel alloys. These metallic objects are the most likely to impact the surface because they stand up better to the stresses of ram pressure induced flattening and fragmentation during deceleration in the atmosphere. The stony objects, like chondritic meteorites, tend to burn, break up, or explode before leaving the upper atmosphere. Those that do make it to the surface need a minimum energy of about 10 Mt (4×10 J) or about 50 m (160 ft) diameter to breach the lower atmosphere (this is for a stony object hitting at 20 kilometres per second (40,000 mph)). The porous comet-like objects are made up of low-density silicates, organics, ice, volatile and often burn up in the upper atmosphere because of their low bulk density (≤1 g/cm (60 lb/cu ft)).
Possible mechanisms
See also: Younger Dryas impact hypothesisAlthough the asteroids and comets that impact the Earth hit with many times the explosive force of a volcano, the mechanisms of an impact winter are similar to those that occur after a mega-volcanic eruption-induced volcanic winter. In this scenario massive amounts of debris injected into the atmosphere would block some of the Sun's radiation for an extended period of time and lower the mean global temperature by as much as 20 °C after a year. The two main mechanisms that could lead to an impact winter are mass ejection of regolith and multiple firestorms.
Mass ejection of regolith
See also: Supervolcano, Toba catastrophe theory, and Yellowstone caldera § HazardsIn a study conducted by Curt Covey et al., it was found that an asteroid about 10 km (6.2 mi) in diameter with the explosive force of about 10 MT could send upward of about 2.5x10 kg of 1 μm sized aerosol particles into the atmosphere. Anything larger would fall quickly back to the surface. These particles would then be spread throughout the atmosphere and absorb or refract the sunlight before it is able to reach the surface, cooling the planet in a similar fashion as the sulfurous aerosol rising from a megavolcano, producing deep global dimming. This is controversially purported to have occurred following the Toba eruption.
These pulverized rock particles would remain in the atmosphere until dry deposition and due to their size, they would also act as cloud condensation nuclei and would be washed out by wet deposition/precipitation, but even then, about 15% of the sun's radiation might not reach the surface. After the first 20 days, the land temperature might drop quickly, by about 13 °C. After about a year, the temperature could rebound by about 6 °C, but by this time about one-third of the Northern Hemisphere might be covered in ice.
However, this effect could be largely mitigated, even reversed, by a release of enormous quantities of water vapor and carbon dioxide caused by the initial global heat pulse after the impact. If the asteroid hit an ocean (which would be the case with the majority of impact events), water vapor would form the majority of any ejected matter, and would likely result in a major greenhouse effect and a net increase in temperature.
If the impact event is sufficiently energetic it might cause mantle plume (volcanism) at the antipodal point (the opposite side of the world). This volcanism could alone therefore create a volcanic winter, irrespective of the other impact effects.
Multiple firestorms
See also: Nuclear winterIn combination with the initial debris ejected into the atmosphere, if the impactor is extremely large (3 km (1.9 mi) or more), like at the Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction event (estimated 10 km (6.2 mi)), there might be the ignition of multiple fire storms, possibly with a global reach into every dense and therefore firestorm-prone forest. These wood fires might release enough amounts of water vapor, ash, soot, tar and carbon dioxide into the atmosphere to perturb the climate on their own and cause the pulverized rock dust cloud blocking the sun to last longer. Alternatively it could cause it to last for a much shorter time, as there would be more water vapor for the rocky aerosol particles to form cloud condensation nuclei. If it causes the dust cloud to last longer, it would prolong the Earth's cooling time, possibly causing thicker ice sheets to form.
Past events
Main articles: Chicxulub crater and Cretaceous–Paleogene extinction eventIn 2016, a scientific drilling project drilled deep into the peak ring of the Chicxulub impact crater to obtain rock core samples from the impact itself. This crater is one of the best known impact craters and was the impact responsible for the extinction of the non-avian dinosaurs.
The discoveries were widely seen as confirming current theories related to both the crater impact and its effects. They confirmed that the rock comprising the peak ring had been subjected to immense pressures and forces, and had been melted by immense heat and shocked by immense pressure from its usual state into its present form in just minutes. The fact that the peak ring was made of granite was also significant, since granite is not a rock found in sea-floor deposits – it originates much deeper in the earth and had been ejected to the surface by the immense pressures of impact. Gypsum, a sulfate-containing rock that is usually present in the shallow seabed of the region, had been almost entirely removed and must therefore have been almost entirely vaporized and entered the atmosphere, and that the event was immediately followed by a huge megatsunami (a massive movement of sea waters) sufficient to lay down the largest known layer of sand separated by grain size directly above the peak ring.
These strongly support the hypothesis that the impactor was large enough to create a 120-mile peak ring, eject molten granite from deep within the earth, create colossal water movements, and eject an immense quantity of vaporized rock and sulfates into the atmosphere, where they would have persisted for a long time. This global dispersion of dust and sulfates would have led to a sudden and catastrophic effect on the climate worldwide by causing large temperature drops, devastating the food chain.
Impact on humans
An impact winter would have a devastating effect on humans, as well as the other species on Earth. With the sun's radiation being severely diminished, the first species to die would be plants and animals who survive through the process of photosynthesis. This lack of food would ultimately lead to other mass extinctions of other animals that are higher up on the food chain and possibly kill up to 25% of the human population. Depending on location and size of the initial impact, the cost of clean-up efforts could be so high as to cause an economic crisis for the survivors. These factors would make life on Earth, for humans, extremely difficult.
Agriculture
See also: Svalbard seedbankWith the Earth's atmosphere full of dust and other material, radiation from the sun would be refracted and scattered back into space and absorbed by this debris. The first effect on the Earth, after the blast wave and potential multiple fire storms, would be the death of most, if not all, of the photosynthetic life forms on Earth. Those in the ocean that survive would possibly become dormant until the sun came out again. Those on land could possibly be kept alive in underground microclimates, with one such example being the Zbrašov aragonite caves. Greenhouses in underground complexes with fossil or nuclear energy power stations could conceivably keep artificial sunlight growing lamps on until the atmosphere began to clear. Meanwhile, those outside that were not killed by the lack of sunlight would most likely be killed or kept dormant by the extreme cold of the impact winter. This death of plants might lead to a long period of famine if enough people survived the initial blast wave and would result in increased food costs in undeveloped countries only a few months after the first crop failures. Developed countries wouldn't encounter famine unless the cooling event was to last longer than a year, due to larger canned food and grain stockpiles in these countries. However, if the impactor was similar in size to the K/T boundary impactor, agricultural losses might not be compensated with imports to the northern hemisphere from the southern hemisphere or vice versa. The only way to keep from starving would be for each country to amass at least a year's worth of food for their people. Not many countries have this; the world's average cereal stock levels are only about 30% of the yearly production.
Economics
The cost to clean up after an asteroid or comet impact would cost billions to trillions of dollars, depending on the location impacted. An impact in New York City (the 16th most populated city in the world) could cost billions of dollars in financial losses and it could take years for the financial sector (i.e. stock market) to recover. However, the probability of such a naturally specifically aimed impact would be exceedingly low.
Survivability
See also: Asteroid impact avoidance, Duck and cover, and Civil defenseAs of February 20, 2018, there are 17,841 near-Earth objects known. 8,059 potentially hazardous objects are known; they are larger than 140 m (460 ft) and may approach the Earth closer than 20 times the distance to the Moon. 888 NEAs larger than 1 km have been discovered, or 96.5% of an estimated total of about 920.
See also
- Asteroid deflection strategies – Methods to prevent destructive asteroid hitsPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
- Earth Impact Database – Database of impact structures on Earth
- global dimming – Reduction in the amount of sunlight reaching Earth's surface
- Impact event – Collision of two astronomical objects
- List of notable asteroids
- Near-Earth objects – Small Solar System body with an orbit that can bring it close to EarthPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
- Nuclear winter – Hypothetical climatic effect of nuclear war
- Volcanic winter – Temperature anomaly event caused by a volcanic eruption
References
- Osterloff, Emily (2018). "How an asteroid ended the age of the dinosaurs". London: Natural History Museum. Archived from the original on 26 April 2022. Retrieved 18 May 2022.
- ^ CHAPMAN, CR; MORRISON, D. (1994), "Impacts on the Earth by Asteroids and Comets - Assessing the Hazard" (PDF), Nature, 367 (6458): 33–40, Bibcode:1994Natur.367...33C, doi:10.1038/367033a0, S2CID 4305299
- ^ MACCRACKEN, MC; Covey, C.; Thompson, S.L.; Weissman, P.R. (1994), "Global Climatic Effects of Atmospheric Dust from An Asteroid or Comet Impact on Earth", Global and Planetary Change, 9 (3–4): 263–273, Bibcode:1994GPC.....9..263C, doi:10.1016/0921-8181(94)90020-5
- ^ Lewis, John S. (1997), Rain Of Iron And Ice: The Very Real Threat Of Comet And Asteroid Bombardment, Helix Books, ISBN 978-0-201-48950-7
- Muench, David; Muench, Marc; Gilders, Michelle A. (2000). Primal Forces. Portland, Oregon: Graphic Arts Center Publishing. p. 20. ISBN 978-1-55868-522-2.
- ^ Engvild, Kjeld C. (2003), "A Review of the Risks of Sudden Global Cooling and Its Effects on Agriculture", Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 115 (3–4): 127–137, Bibcode:2003AgFM..115..127E, doi:10.1016/s0168-1923(02)00253-8
- "Sentry Risk Table". NASA/JPL Near-Earth Object Program Office. 9 December 2014. Archived from the original on December 31, 2014. Retrieved 2014-12-10.
- "Was a giant comet responsible for a North American catastrophe in 11,000 BC?". Science Daily. 1 April 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2014.
- Roach, John (7 April 2010). "Comet "Shower" Killed Ice Age Mammals?". National Geographic. Archived from the original on April 10, 2010. Retrieved 5 November 2014.
- Hecht, John (2 April 2010). "Did a comet swarm strike America 13,000 years ago?". New Scientist. Retrieved 5 November 2014.
- Jenniskens, Petrus Matheus Marie (2006). Meteor Showers and Their Parent Comets. Cambridge University Press. p. 455. ISBN 978-0521853491.
- ^ Covey, C; Morrison, D.; Toon, O.B.; Turco, R.P.; Zahnle, K. (1997), "Environmental Perturbations Caused By the Impacts of Asteroids and Comets", Reviews of Geophysics, 35 (1): 41–78, Bibcode:1997RvGeo..35...41T, doi:10.1029/96rg03038
- Alvarez, L.W.; Alvarez, W.; Asaro, F.; Michel, H. V. (1980). "Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction". Science. 208 (4448): 1095–1108. Bibcode:1980Sci...208.1095A. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.126.8496. doi:10.1126/science.208.4448.1095. PMID 17783054. S2CID 16017767.
- ^ Bains, KH; Ianov, BA; Ocampo, AC; Pope, KO (1994), "Impact Winter and the Cretaceous-Tertiary Extinctions - Results Of A Chicxulub Asteroid Impact Model", Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 128 (3–4): 719–725, Bibcode:1994E&PSL.128..719P, doi:10.1016/0012-821x(94)90186-4, PMID 11539442
- Hagstrum, Jonathan T. (2005). "Antipodal Hotspots and Bipolar Catastrophes: Were Oceanic Large-body Impacts the Cause?" (PDF). Earth and Planetary Science Letters. 236 (1–2): 13–27. Bibcode:2005E&PSL.236...13H. doi:10.1016/j.epsl.2005.02.020.
- "Updated: Drilling of dinosaur-killing impact crater explains buried circular hills". 2016-05-03.
- Fleur, Nicholas St (2016-11-17). "Drilling into the Chicxulub Crater, Ground Zero of the Dinosaur Extinction". The New York Times.
- Michael R. Rampino, Stanley H. Ambrose, 2000. "Volcanic winter in the Garden of Eden: The Toba supereruption and the late Pleistocene human population crash", Volcanic Hazards and Disasters in Human Antiquity, Floyd W. McCoy, Grant Heiken
- ^ Bobrowsky, Peter T.; Rickman, Hans (2007), Comet/Asteroid Impacts and Human Society: An Interdisciplinary Approach, Springer, Bibcode:2007caih.book.....B, ISBN 978-3-540-32711-0
- ^ Lewis, John S. (2000), Comet and Asteroid Impact Hazards on a Populated Earth: Computer Modeling, Academic Press, ISBN 978-0-12-446760-6
- "Discovery Statistics – Cumulative Totals". NASA/JPL CNEOS. February 5, 2018. Retrieved 2018-02-08.
- Matt Williams (October 20, 2017). "Good News Everyone! There are Fewer Deadly Undiscovered Asteroids than we Thought". Universe Today. Retrieved 2017-11-14.
External links
- Geotimes story on the Chicxulub impact and the possibility of an impact winter
- NASA's Near Earth Object Program