Misplaced Pages

Foederati: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:07, 24 April 2007 edit169.226.147.250 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:51, 27 December 2024 edit undoBraganza (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users30,966 edits External links 
(203 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Peoples and cities bound by a treaty, typically in relation to Rome (Antiquity)}}
{{Multiple issues|
{{Expand Italian|topic=hist|date=March 2024}}
{{more citations needed|date=October 2012}}
}}
{{italic title}}
{{RomanMilitary}} {{RomanMilitary}}
'''''Foederati''''' ({{IPAc-en|ˌ|f|ɛ|d|ə|ˈ|r|eɪ|t|aɪ}} {{respell|FED|ə|RAY|ty}}; singular: '''''foederatus''''' {{IPAc-en|ˌ|f|ɛ|d|ə|ˈ|r|eɪ|t|ə|s}} {{respell|FED|ə|RAY|təs}}) were peoples and cities bound by a ], known as ''foedus'', with Rome. During the ], the term identified the '']'', but during the ], it was used to describe foreign states, client kingdoms or barbarian tribes to which the empire provided benefits in exchange for military assistance. The term was also used, especially under the empire, for groups of ] mercenaries of various sizes who were typically allowed to settle within the empire.
'''''Foederatus'' (plural:'' 'foederati')'',''' is a term whose definition and usage drifted in the time between the early Republic and the end of the Western Roman Empire. Early in the history of the ], a ''Foederatus'' identified one of the tribes bound by ] (''foedus''), who were neither ] nor had they been granted ] ] (''civitas'') but were expected to provide a contingent of fighting men when trouble arose, thus were allies. The ] tribe were considered blood allies, but the rest were federates or ''socii''.


==Roman Republic==
During the Roman republic, the friction between these treaty obligations without the corresponding benefits of Romanity led to the ] between Romans, with a few close allies, and the disaffected ''Socii.'' A ] of 90 BCE (''Lex Julia'') offered Roman citizenship to the federate states that accepted the terms. Not all cities were prepared to be absorbed into the Roman '']'' (e.g. ] and ]). Other foederati lay beyond ]: ] in ], and ] (Marseilles).{{unclear|So not offered the settlement, or just turned it down?}} In the early ], ''foederati'' were tribes that were bound by a ] ('''''foedus''''' {{IPAc-en|ˈ|f|iː|d|ə|s}}) to come to the defence of Rome but were neither ] nor beneficiaries of ] (''civitas''). Members of the ] tribe were considered blood allies, but the rest were federates or '']''. The friction between the treaty obligations without the corresponding benefits of Romanity led to the ] between the Romans, with a few close allies, and the disaffected ''socii''. A ] of 90 BC (''Lex Julia'') offered Roman citizenship to the federate states that accepted the terms. Not all cities were prepared to be absorbed into the Roman '']'' (] and ]). Other ''foederati'' lay outside ] such as ] (Cádiz) and ] (Marseilles).{{Clarify|So not offered the settlement, or just turned it down?|date=March 2008}}


==Roman Empire==
Later the sense of the term '''foederati''' and it's usage and meaning was extended by the Roman practice of subsidizing entire ] tribes — which included the ], ], ], ] and, best known, the ] — in exchange for providing soldiers to fight in the Roman armies. ] began his career leading a band of Gothic foederati. The term ''foederati'' had its usage and meaning extended by the Romans' practice of subsidising entire ] tribes such as the ], ], ], ] and the ], the last being the best known, in exchange for providing warriors to fight in the Roman armies. ] began his career leading a band of Gothic ''foederati''.


The word ''federations'' came from the ] word ''foedus'', which indicated a solemn binding treaty of mutual assistance between ] and another nation for perpetuity. At first, the Roman subsidy took the form of money or food, but as tax revenues dwindled in the ] and ] centuries, the ''foederati'' were billeted on local landowners, which came to be identical to being allowed to settle on Roman territory. Large local landowners living in distant border provinces (see "]") on extensive, largely self-sufficient villas, found their loyalties to the central authority, already conflicted by other developments, further compromised in such situations. Then, as loyalties began to fractionate and become more local, the Empire began to crumble into smaller and smaller territories. At first, the Roman subsidy took the form of money or food, but as tax revenues dwindled in the 4th and the 5th centuries, the ''foederati'' were billeted on local landowners, which became identical to being allowed to settle on Roman territory. Large local landowners living in distant border provinces (see "]") on extensive villas, which were largely self-sufficient, found their loyalties to the central authority, which were already conflicted by other developments, further compromised in such situations. As loyalties wavered and became more local, the empire then began to devolve into smaller territories and closer personal ].


===4th century===
The Franks became foederati in ], when ] let them keep the areas in northern ], which had been depopulated during the preceding century. Roman soldiers defended the ] and had major armies a 100 miles south and west of the Rhine. Frankish settlers were established in the areas north and east of the Romans and helped with the Roman defense by providing intellegence and a buffer state in place. The breach of the Rhine borders in the winter of ] and ] made an end to the Roman presence at the Rhine when both the Romans and the allied Franks were defeated by an incursion of ] and ].
The first Roman treaty with the Goths was after the defeat of ] in 332, but whether or not it was a ''foedus'' is unclear.<ref> Thomas F. X. Noble. ed. 2006, p.245</ref>


The Franks became foederati in 358, when Emperor ] let them keep the areas in northern ], which had been depopulated during the preceding century. Roman soldiers defended the ] and had major armies {{convert|100|mi|km|-1}} south and west of the Rhine. Frankish settlers were established in the areas north and east of the Romans and helped the Roman defence by providing intelligence and a buffer state. The ] in the frozen winter of 406 and 407 ended the Roman presence along the Rhine when both the Romans and the allied Franks were overrun by a massive tribal migration of ] and ].
In ] certain ] asked Emperor ] to allow them to settle on the southern bank of the ] river, and were accepted into the empire as ''foederati''. In ] the Goths then rose in rebellion and defeated the Romans in the ]. The serious loss of military manpower forced the Roman Empire to rely much more on foederati thereafter.


In 376, some of the ] asked Emperor ] to allow them to settle on the southern bank of the ] and were accepted into the empire as ''foederati''. The same Goths then revolted in retaliation for abuses and defeated the Romans in the ] in 378. The critical loss of military manpower thereafter forced the Empire to rely much more on ''foederati'' levies.
The loyalty of the tribes and their leaders was not reliable and in ] the Visigoths, this time under the lead of ], once again rose in rebellion. One of the most powerful late Roman generals, a Vandal called ], was born of parents who were from the ''foederati''.


The loyalty of the tribes and their chieftains was never reliable, and in 395, the Visigoths, now under the lead of ], once again rose in rebellion. The father of one of the most powerful late Roman generals, ], rose from the ranks of the ''foederati''.
By the fifth century lacking the riches of the Eastern Empire needed to pay a professional army, the Western Roman military strength was almost completely based upon ''foederati'' units. In ], ] was defeated only with help of the ''foederati'' (who included the Visigoths and Alans). The ''foederati'' delivered the fatal blow to the dying ] in ] when their ] ] deposed the last ] emperor ].


==Notes== ===5th century===
At the ] in 406 AD, Stilicho defeated the Gothic king ] and his combined Vandal and Gothic army only with the support of the Gothic chieftain ] and the Hunnic ruler ].
<div class="references-small">

<references/>
In 423, the general ] entered the service of the usurper ] as '']'' and was sent by Joannes to ask the ] for assistance. Joannes, a high-ranking officer, lacked a strong army and fortified himself in his capital, ], where he was killed in the summer of 425. Soon, Aetius returned to Italy with a large force of Huns to find that power in the west was now in the hands of ] and his mother, ]. After fighting against Aspar's army, Aetius managed a compromise with Galla Placidia. He sent back his Hunnic army and in return obtained the rank of ''comes et ] per Gallias'', the commander-in-chief of the Roman Army in Gaul.
</div>

Around 418 (or 426), ], the king of the ], fell in battle against the ], who were still allies of Rome in Hispania, and most of the surviving Alans appealed to ]. Their request was accepted by Gunderic, who thus became King of the Vandals and Alans.

Late in Gunderic's reign, the Vandals themselves began to clash more and more with the Visigothic ''foederati'' and often got the worse of these battles because the Visigoths were so much more numerous. After Gunderic died early in 428, the Vandals elected his half-brother, ], as the successor, and Genseric left ] to the Visigoths to invade ].

By the 5th century, lacking the wealth needed to pay and train a professional army, the Western Roman Empire's military strength was almost entirely reliant on ''foederati'' units. In 451, ] was defeated only with help of the ''foederati'', who included the Visigoths, Franks, Alans and Saxons. The ''foederati'' would deliver the fatal blow to the dying nominal ] in 476, when their ], ], deposed the usurping Western Emperor ] and sent the imperial insignia back to ] with the Senate's request for the 81-year-old west–east subdivision of the empire to be abolished. Even before the eventual ] in 476, several kingdoms with the status of ''foederati'' had managed to gain a full independence that was formally recognised by the ], such as the ] in the peace treaty concluded in 442 between their king, ], and ]<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IjSqCwAAQBAJ&q=Vandals++treaty++442+++first++independent&pg=PA64|title=Christianity in Roman Africa: The Development of Its Practices and Beliefs– Google Knihy|date=November 30, 2014|access-date=2016-12-25|isbn=978-0-8028-6931-9|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161226060050/https://books.google.sk/books?id=IjSqCwAAQBAJ&pg=PA64&lpg=PA64&dq=Vandals++treaty++442+++first++independent&source=bl&ots=3lheIzcTYd&sig=JdhUyvpSkkhfTRuOueh3vReljoU&hl=cs&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiUgoCx1I_RAhWJLMAKHS0WD1kQ6AEINjAE#v=onepage&q=Vandals%20%20treaty%20%20442%20%20%20first%20%20independent&f=false|archive-date=2016-12-26|url-status=live|last1=Patout Burns|first1=J.|last2=Jensen|first2=Robin M.|publisher=Wm. B. Eerdmans }}</ref> and the Visigoths through the peace treaty concluded in 475 between their king ] and ].<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bI9_AwAAQBAJ&q=475+Visigoths+independent+Euric&pg=PA443|title=Faiths Across Time: 5,000 Years of Religious History – Google Knihy |date= January 15, 2014|access-date=2018-10-17|isbn=978-1-61069-025-6|last1=Gordon Melton |first1=J. |publisher=Abc-Clio }}</ref>

After the collapse of the Hunnic Empire, the ] entered relations with the ] and were settled in ] to become ''foederati'' of the Byzantines. During the latter half of the 5th century, the Ostrogoths' relationship with the Byzantines started to shift from friendship to enmity, just like the Visigoths before them, and Ostrogoth King, ] frequently led armies that ravaged the provinces of the Eastern Roman Empire and eventually threatened Constantinople itself. Eventually, Theoderic and Emperor ] worked out an arrangement beneficial to both sides in which Theoderic invaded Odoacer's kingdom and eventually conquered Italy.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Costambeys|first=Marios|date=November 2016|title=The Legacy of Theoderic|url=https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-roman-studies/article/legacy-of-theoderic/3E2C27F54F317F996C9A74490D92B4FB|journal=The Journal of Roman Studies|volume=106|pages=249–263|doi=10.1017/S0075435816000587|s2cid=163532641|via=Cambridge Journals Online}}</ref>

===6th century===
''Foederati'' (transliterated in Greek as Φοιδερᾶτοι or translated as Σύμμαχοι) were still present in the ] during the 6th century. ]' and ]' victorious armies included many ''foederati'', but by this time the term in Greek refers to units that may once have included large numbers of non-Romans but have become professional, regular units in the Roman army that included Romans.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=McMahon |first1=Lucas |title=The Foederati, the Phoideratoi, and the Symmachoi of the Late Antique East (ca. A.D. 400-650) |journal=Ma Thesis - University of Ottawa |date=2014 |pages=9–44 |url=https://www.academia.edu/15110353}}</ref> These armies also included non-Roman elements such as Hunnic archers and Herule mercenaries who were more akin to traditional ''foederati'' but who were now referred to as symmachoi.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=McMahon |first1=Lucas |title=The Foederati, the Phoideratoi, and the Symmachoi of the Late Antique East (ca. A.D. 400-650) |journal=Ma Thesis - University of Ottawa |date=2014 |pages=52–69 |url=https://www.academia.edu/15110353}}</ref> At the ], a large contingent of the Byzantine army was made up of ], ] and ].

In the east, foederati were formed out of several Arab tribes to protect against the Persian-allied Arab ] and the tribes of the Arabian peninsula. Among these foederati were the ], ], ] and the ]. The term continues to be attested in the Eastern Roman armies until around the reign of ].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=McMahon |first1=Lucas |year=2014 |title=The Foederati, the Phoideratoi, and the Symmachoi of the Late Antique East (ca. A.D. 400-650) |url=https://www.academia.edu/15110353 |website=academia.edu |access-date=2018-11-20 }}</ref> Although no longer as important as in the sixth century, a unit of ''foederati'' appear in the Byzantine ''thema'' of the Anatolikon in the ninth century.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Haldon |first1=John |title=Byzantine Praetorians: An Administrative, Institutional, and Social Survey of the Opsikion and Tagmata, c. 580-900 |date=1984 |publisher=Rudolf Habelt |location=Bonn |pages=245–253}}</ref>

==See also==
{{Portal|Ancient Rome}}
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]


==References== ==References==
{{reflist|1}}
===Primary Sources===
(none yet)


==Bibliography==
===Secondary Sources===
* {{cite journal |last1=Maspero |first1=Jean |title=Φοιδερᾶτοι et Στρατιῶται dans l'armée byzantine au VI siècle |journal=Byzantinische Zeitschrift |date=1912 |volume=21 |issue=1 |pages=97–109 |doi=10.1515/byzs.1912.21.1.97|s2cid=192034477 }}
(none yet)
* {{cite journal|last1=McMahon |first1=Lucas |year=2014 |title=The Foederati, the Phoideratoi, and the Symmachoi of the Late Antique East (ca. A.D. 400-650) |url=https://www.academia.edu/15110353 |website=academia.edu |access-date=2018-11-20 }}


==External links== ==External links==
* (English). An essay by a 19th-century Roman law scholar. * (English). An essay by a 19th-century Roman law scholar.
*: Foederati *: Foederati


{{Barbarian kingdoms}}
==See also==
{{Portal|Military of ancient Rome|image=Scutum_1.jpg}}
(no links yet)


] ]
]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 21:51, 27 December 2024

Peoples and cities bound by a treaty, typically in relation to Rome (Antiquity)
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Italian. (March 2024) Click for important translation instructions.
  • Machine translation, like DeepL or Google Translate, is a useful starting point for translations, but translators must revise errors as necessary and confirm that the translation is accurate, rather than simply copy-pasting machine-translated text into the English Misplaced Pages.
  • Do not translate text that appears unreliable or low-quality. If possible, verify the text with references provided in the foreign-language article.
  • You must provide copyright attribution in the edit summary accompanying your translation by providing an interlanguage link to the source of your translation. A model attribution edit summary is Content in this edit is translated from the existing Italian Misplaced Pages article at ]; see its history for attribution.
  • You may also add the template {{Translated|it|Socii e foederati}} to the talk page.
  • For more guidance, see Misplaced Pages:Translation.
This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Foederati" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
(Learn how and when to remove this message)

Part of a series on the
Military of ancient Rome 753 BCAD 476
Structural history
Army
Navy
Campaign history
Technological history
Military engineering
Political history 
Strategy and tactics
Frontiers and fortifications
Ancient Rome portal

Foederati (/ˌfɛdəˈreɪtaɪ/ FED-ə-RAY-ty; singular: foederatus /ˌfɛdəˈreɪtəs/ FED-ə-RAY-təs) were peoples and cities bound by a treaty, known as foedus, with Rome. During the Roman Republic, the term identified the socii, but during the Roman Empire, it was used to describe foreign states, client kingdoms or barbarian tribes to which the empire provided benefits in exchange for military assistance. The term was also used, especially under the empire, for groups of barbarian mercenaries of various sizes who were typically allowed to settle within the empire.

Roman Republic

In the early Roman Republic, foederati were tribes that were bound by a treaty (foedus /ˈfiːdəs/) to come to the defence of Rome but were neither Roman colonies nor beneficiaries of Roman citizenship (civitas). Members of the Latini tribe were considered blood allies, but the rest were federates or socii. The friction between the treaty obligations without the corresponding benefits of Romanity led to the Social War between the Romans, with a few close allies, and the disaffected socii. A law of 90 BC (Lex Julia) offered Roman citizenship to the federate states that accepted the terms. Not all cities were prepared to be absorbed into the Roman res publica (Heraclea and Naples). Other foederati lay outside Roman Italy such as Gades (Cádiz) and Massilia (Marseilles).

Roman Empire

The term foederati had its usage and meaning extended by the Romans' practice of subsidising entire barbarian tribes such as the Franks, Vandals, Alans, Huns and the Visigoths, the last being the best known, in exchange for providing warriors to fight in the Roman armies. Alaric I began his career leading a band of Gothic foederati.

At first, the Roman subsidy took the form of money or food, but as tax revenues dwindled in the 4th and the 5th centuries, the foederati were billeted on local landowners, which became identical to being allowed to settle on Roman territory. Large local landowners living in distant border provinces (see "marches") on extensive villas, which were largely self-sufficient, found their loyalties to the central authority, which were already conflicted by other developments, further compromised in such situations. As loyalties wavered and became more local, the empire then began to devolve into smaller territories and closer personal fealties.

4th century

The first Roman treaty with the Goths was after the defeat of Ariaric in 332, but whether or not it was a foedus is unclear.

The Franks became foederati in 358, when Emperor Julian let them keep the areas in northern Roman Gaul, which had been depopulated during the preceding century. Roman soldiers defended the Rhine and had major armies 100 miles (160 km) south and west of the Rhine. Frankish settlers were established in the areas north and east of the Romans and helped the Roman defence by providing intelligence and a buffer state. The breach of the Rhine borders in the frozen winter of 406 and 407 ended the Roman presence along the Rhine when both the Romans and the allied Franks were overrun by a massive tribal migration of Vandals and Alans.

In 376, some of the Goths asked Emperor Valens to allow them to settle on the southern bank of the Danube River and were accepted into the empire as foederati. The same Goths then revolted in retaliation for abuses and defeated the Romans in the Battle of Adrianople in 378. The critical loss of military manpower thereafter forced the Empire to rely much more on foederati levies.

The loyalty of the tribes and their chieftains was never reliable, and in 395, the Visigoths, now under the lead of Alaric, once again rose in rebellion. The father of one of the most powerful late Roman generals, Stilicho, rose from the ranks of the foederati.

5th century

At the Battle of Faesulae in 406 AD, Stilicho defeated the Gothic king Radagaisus and his combined Vandal and Gothic army only with the support of the Gothic chieftain Sarus and the Hunnic ruler Uldin.

In 423, the general Flavius Aetius entered the service of the usurper Joannes as cura palatii and was sent by Joannes to ask the Huns for assistance. Joannes, a high-ranking officer, lacked a strong army and fortified himself in his capital, Ravenna, where he was killed in the summer of 425. Soon, Aetius returned to Italy with a large force of Huns to find that power in the west was now in the hands of Valentinian III and his mother, Galla Placidia. After fighting against Aspar's army, Aetius managed a compromise with Galla Placidia. He sent back his Hunnic army and in return obtained the rank of comes et magister militum per Gallias, the commander-in-chief of the Roman Army in Gaul.

Around 418 (or 426), Attaces, the king of the Alans, fell in battle against the Visigoths, who were still allies of Rome in Hispania, and most of the surviving Alans appealed to Gunderic. Their request was accepted by Gunderic, who thus became King of the Vandals and Alans.

Late in Gunderic's reign, the Vandals themselves began to clash more and more with the Visigothic foederati and often got the worse of these battles because the Visigoths were so much more numerous. After Gunderic died early in 428, the Vandals elected his half-brother, Genseric, as the successor, and Genseric left Iberia to the Visigoths to invade Roman Africa.

By the 5th century, lacking the wealth needed to pay and train a professional army, the Western Roman Empire's military strength was almost entirely reliant on foederati units. In 451, Attila the Hun was defeated only with help of the foederati, who included the Visigoths, Franks, Alans and Saxons. The foederati would deliver the fatal blow to the dying nominal Western Roman Empire in 476, when their commander, Odoacer, deposed the usurping Western Emperor Romulus Augustulus and sent the imperial insignia back to Constantinople with the Senate's request for the 81-year-old west–east subdivision of the empire to be abolished. Even before the eventual fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476, several kingdoms with the status of foederati had managed to gain a full independence that was formally recognised by the Western Roman Empire, such as the Vandals in the peace treaty concluded in 442 between their king, Genseric, and Valentinian III and the Visigoths through the peace treaty concluded in 475 between their king Euric and Julius Nepos.

After the collapse of the Hunnic Empire, the Ostrogoths entered relations with the Eastern Roman Empire and were settled in Pannonia to become foederati of the Byzantines. During the latter half of the 5th century, the Ostrogoths' relationship with the Byzantines started to shift from friendship to enmity, just like the Visigoths before them, and Ostrogoth King, Theoderic the Great frequently led armies that ravaged the provinces of the Eastern Roman Empire and eventually threatened Constantinople itself. Eventually, Theoderic and Emperor Zeno worked out an arrangement beneficial to both sides in which Theoderic invaded Odoacer's kingdom and eventually conquered Italy.

6th century

Foederati (transliterated in Greek as Φοιδερᾶτοι or translated as Σύμμαχοι) were still present in the East Roman army during the 6th century. Belisarius' and Narses' victorious armies included many foederati, but by this time the term in Greek refers to units that may once have included large numbers of non-Romans but have become professional, regular units in the Roman army that included Romans. These armies also included non-Roman elements such as Hunnic archers and Herule mercenaries who were more akin to traditional foederati but who were now referred to as symmachoi. At the Battle of Taginae, a large contingent of the Byzantine army was made up of Lombards, Gepids and Bulgars.

In the east, foederati were formed out of several Arab tribes to protect against the Persian-allied Arab Lakhmids and the tribes of the Arabian peninsula. Among these foederati were the Tanukhids, Banu Judham, Banu Amela and the Ghassanids. The term continues to be attested in the Eastern Roman armies until around the reign of Maurice. Although no longer as important as in the sixth century, a unit of foederati appear in the Byzantine thema of the Anatolikon in the ninth century.

See also

References

  1. From Roman Provinces to Medieval Kingdoms. Thomas F. X. Noble. ed. 2006, p.245
  2. Patout Burns, J.; Jensen, Robin M. (November 30, 2014). Christianity in Roman Africa: The Development of Its Practices and Beliefs– Google Knihy. Wm. B. Eerdmans. ISBN 978-0-8028-6931-9. Archived from the original on 2016-12-26. Retrieved 2016-12-25.
  3. Gordon Melton, J. (January 15, 2014). Faiths Across Time: 5,000 Years of Religious History [4 Volumes]– Google Knihy. Abc-Clio. ISBN 978-1-61069-025-6. Retrieved 2018-10-17.
  4. Costambeys, Marios (November 2016). "The Legacy of Theoderic". The Journal of Roman Studies. 106: 249–263. doi:10.1017/S0075435816000587. S2CID 163532641 – via Cambridge Journals Online.
  5. McMahon, Lucas (2014). "The Foederati, the Phoideratoi, and the Symmachoi of the Late Antique East (ca. A.D. 400-650)". Ma Thesis - University of Ottawa: 9–44.
  6. McMahon, Lucas (2014). "The Foederati, the Phoideratoi, and the Symmachoi of the Late Antique East (ca. A.D. 400-650)". Ma Thesis - University of Ottawa: 52–69.
  7. McMahon, Lucas (2014). "The Foederati, the Phoideratoi, and the Symmachoi of the Late Antique East (ca. A.D. 400-650)". academia.edu. Retrieved 2018-11-20.
  8. Haldon, John (1984). Byzantine Praetorians: An Administrative, Institutional, and Social Survey of the Opsikion and Tagmata, c. 580-900. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt. pp. 245–253.

Bibliography

External links

Barbarian kingdoms established around the Migration Period
Categories: