Revision as of 22:52, 15 October 2007 edit189.15.143.56 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:18, 13 November 2024 edit undoGreenC bot (talk | contribs)Bots2,555,770 edits Move 2 urls. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#community.seattletimes.nwsource.com | ||
(650 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|Global open publishing network of activist journalist collectives}} | |||
{{Articleissues|OR = June 2007|POV = June 2007|Citations missing=June 2007}} | |||
{{Use mdy dates|date=May 2012}} | |||
] covering protests at the ]]] | |||
{{Use American English|date=November 2020}} | |||
The '''Independent Media Center''' (aka '''Indymedia''' or '''IMC''') is a global network of participatory journalists that reports with a generally ] perspective on political and social issues. It originated in and remains closely associated with the ], which criticizes ], and its associated institutions. Indymedia uses an ] process that allows anybody to contribute. | |||
{{Infobox newspaper | |||
| name = Indymedia | |||
| image = ] | |||
| caption = Indymedia logo | |||
| type = ] | |||
| format = ] | |||
| owners = None | |||
| foundation = {{start date and age|November 24, 1999}} | |||
| language = ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] | |||
| headquarters = Various | |||
| website = {{official URL}} | |||
}} | |||
The '''Independent Media Center''', better known as '''Indymedia''', is an ] network of activist journalist collectives that report on political and social issues. Following beginnings during the 1999 ] and ], Indymedia became closely associated with the ]. The Indymedia network extended internationally in the early 2000s with volunteer-run centers that shared software and a common format with a newswire and columns. Police raided several centers and seized computer equipment. The centers declined in the 2010s with the waning of the global justice movement. | |||
Its motto reads: <blockquote>''Indymedia is a collective of independent media organizations and hundreds of journalists offering grassroots, non-corporate coverage. Indymedia is a democratic media outlet for the creation of radical, accurate, and passionate tellings of truth''<ref>[http://www.indymedia.org/en/index.shtml Indymedia global home page}}</ref></blockquote> | |||
== Content and distribution == | |||
==Overview== | |||
], Belgium]] | |||
The first Indymedia project was started in late November of ] to report on protests against the ] that took place in ], ], and to act as an alternative media source. This followed a successful experiment in June that year, reporting the events of the "Carnival Against Capital". The Media team there used software and unmediated reports from protest participants <ref>Anonymous, "June 18th 1999 Carnival Against Capital", in Days of Dissent!, 2004, accessed online at http://web.archive.org/web/20050508150407/daysofdissent.org.uk/j18.htm</ref>. | |||
Indymedia is a website for ] that promotes activism and counters ] news and commentary perspectives.<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Haas |first1=Tanni |title=Do citizen-based media of communication advance public journalism's ideals? Evidence from the empirical research literature |journal=] |volume=17 |issue=2 |pages=7–21 |date=2007-07-01 |id={{gale|A172249382}} |language=English |issn=0975-640X |df=mdy-all }}</ref><!-- more to paraphrase in source --> Indymedia originated from protests against the concentrated ownership and perceived biases in corporate media reporting. The first Indymedia node, attached to the Seattle anti-corporate globalization protests, was seen by ] as an alternative news source to that of the corporate media, which they accused of only showing violence and confrontation, and portraying all protesters negatively.<ref>{{cite news| url=https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/19991223/A19991224010135/alternative-news-services-hourlong-wto-video-a-hit | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110519093045/http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19991223&slug=A19991224010135 | url-status=live | archive-date=2011-05-19 | work=The Seattle Times | title=Archives}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/?date=19991218&slug=3002212"Independent+Media+Center" | work=The Seattle Times | title=Archives | access-date=January 28, 2022 | archive-date=January 28, 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220128065633/https://archive.seattletimes.com/archive/?date=19991218&slug=3002212%22Independent+Media+Center%22 | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=https://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Media-center-fighting-FBI-over-Web-data-1054185.php | work=Seattle Post-Intelligencer | first1=Paul | last1=Shukovsky | title=Media center fighting FBI over Web data | date=August 5, 2001 | access-date=January 28, 2022 | archive-date=December 10, 2021 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211210110529/https://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Media-center-fighting-FBI-over-Web-data-1054185.php | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | url=http://www.seattlepi.com/local/19980_security24.shtml | work=Seattle Post-Intelligencer | first1=Paul | last1=Shukovsky | title=FBI raids media center | date=April 23, 2001 | access-date=August 11, 2009 | archive-date=January 28, 2022 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220128065626/https://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/FBI-raids-media-center-1052916.php | url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Seattle|first=National Lawyers Guild WTO Legal Group|title=Waging War on Dissent|url=http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/NLG-REPORT.pdf|access-date=3 April 2014|archive-date=March 3, 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160303175849/http://www.ratical.org///////////////co-globalize/NLG-REPORT.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Indymedia initially covered protests between 1999 and 2001. As protests began to wane, Indymedia covered global social justice movements, such as opposition to the war in Iraq. Indymedia was purported to be the first network on-the-scene in reporting the ] and the resistance towards the ].<ref name=":0">{{Citation|last=Kidd|first=Dorothy|title=Indymedia (The Independent Media Center)|date=2011|url=https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/216982176.pdf|encyclopedia=Encyclopedia of Social Movement Media|pages=4|place=]|publisher=]|access-date=July 2, 2021|archive-date=July 9, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210709182049/https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/216982176.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> The network also has a focus in covering the ] campaigns of students, Indigenous people, immigrants, and peace activists.<ref name=":0" /> A slogan was "Don't Hate the Media, Become the Media!"{{r|Downing|p=254}} | |||
Active, the software used as the basis for the first Indymedia center websites, was written by activists in Sydney. It went live in January 1999 and featured open publishing, calendars, events and contacts.<ref name=future>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-LHKAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA94|title=Future Active: Media Activism and the Internet|first=Graham|last=Meikle|date=February 4, 2014|publisher=Routledge|via=Google Books|isbn=9781136727016|access-date=May 11, 2020|archive-date=January 28, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220128065625/https://books.google.com/books?id=-LHKAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA94|url-status=live}}</ref> Indymedia also ran a global radio project which aggregated audio RSS feeds from around the world.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://radio.indymedia.org/|title=Radio Indymedia|publisher=radio.indymedia.org|access-date=August 11, 2009|archive-date=August 2, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090802105443/http://radio.indymedia.org/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
After Seattle the idea and network spread rapidly. By ], there were 89 Indymedia websites covering 31 countries (plus ]){{Fact|date=August 2007}}, growing to over 150 by January 2006. The country with the most IMCs is the ] with 60, followed by ] with 15.{{Fact|date=August 2007}} | |||
==History== | |||
IMC Collectives distribute ], ], ], and ] journalism, but are most well known for their ] newswires. Sites where anyone with internet access can publish ''their'' news. The content of an IMC is determined by its participants, both the users who post content, and members of the local Indymedia collective who administer the site. While Indymedias worldwide are run autonomously and differ according to the concerns of their users, they share a commitment to provide ] content. The general rule is that content on Indymedia sites can be freely reproduced for non-commercial purposes.<ref>See </ref> | |||
] in ], Brazil, hosting a free radio broadcast in 2004]] | |||
] covering protests at the ]]] | |||
The origins of Indymedia can be traced to the ] protest ], which took place in over forty countries on June 18, 1999.{{r|Ainger}} In late November 1999, the first dedicated Indymedia project was ready to cover the ]. The first post was made on November 24.{{r|"Pickard"}} It read: | |||
{{Blockquote | |||
|text=The resistance is global ... The web dramatically alters the balance between multinational and activist media. With just a bit of coding and some cheap equipment, we can set up a live automated website that rivals the corporates'. Prepare to be swamped by the tide of activist media makers on the ground in Seattle and around the world, telling the real story behind the World Trade Agreement. | |||
|author=Maffew & Manse | |||
|source={{r|"Pickard"}} | |||
}} | |||
When the protests began, a hundred videographers were on the streets filming, joined by photographers and journalists, all working as volunteers.{{r|Downing|p=251}} | |||
After Seattle, local, autonomous collectives formed. Local sociopolitical context determined each individual center's focus.{{r|"Pickard"}} However, it was a core theme that centers would have both an open publishing structure to which anyone could contribute and an open archive.{{r|Downing|p=252}} Centers tended to be set up in response to meetings of groups such as the ] or ], to world forum events, or to party conventions, such as Democrat or Republican meetings in the US.{{r|Downing|p=243}} By 2002, there were 90 Indymedia websites, mainly in the US, Canada and Western Europe but also Australia, New Zealand and Latin America.{{r|Downing|p=243}} The number of centers continued growing, especially in Europe, reaching 142 in 2004 and 175 by 2010.{{r|radpar|p=426}} | |||
==Content and Focus== | |||
]]] | |||
The origins of IMCs themselves came out of protests against the concentrated ownership and perceived biases in ] reporting. The first IMC node, attached as it was to the Seattle anti-corporate globalization protests, was seen by ] as an alternative news source to that of the ], which they accused of only showing violence and confrontation, and portraying all protesters negatively. <ref></ref> | |||
<ref></ref> | |||
<ref></ref> | |||
<ref></ref> | |||
<ref></ref> | |||
<ref></ref> | |||
The Indymedia movement reached its peak in the mid-2000s.{{r|radpar|p=423}} Centers in the United States began to atrophy around 2008,<ref name="Glaser2019">{{cite journal |last1=Glaser |first1=April |title=Another Network is Possible |journal=Logic |date=Summer 2019 |issue=8 |pages=155–169 |issn=2573-4504 |url=https://logicmag.io/bodies/another-network-is-possible/ |access-date=August 19, 2020 |archive-date=August 9, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809114524/https://logicmag.io/bodies/another-network-is-possible/ |url-status=live }}</ref> and by 2014, the global network had declined significantly, with the number of active sites down to 68.{{r|radpar|p=426}} A number of reasons for the decline have been put forward. In February 2013, Ceasefire magazine had noted a decline in the use of Nottingham Indymedia, stating that activist usage of commercial social media had increased. The poverty of activist collectives to invest in resources was contrasted with the massive investments made by corporations such as ] and ].<ref name="Ceasefire">{{cite web|url=https://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/indymedia-its-time-move/|title=Indymedia: It's time to move on|date=17 February 2013|publisher=Ceasfire Magazine|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191209180339/https://ceasefiremagazine.co.uk/indymedia-its-time-move/|archive-date=9 December 2019}}</ref> In an article published by the journal '']'' Eva Giraud summarised some of the different arguments that had been made by academics and activists, which included ], ], security issues including ] logging, lack of regional engagement, lack of ] politics, increase in ] social media use, website underdevelopment, decline in volunteers and decline in the global justice movement.{{r|radpar}} ] saw the rise of social media sites and the normalization of 'open publishing' as recommodifying Indymedia's key innovations for the cultural industry.{{r|Corpwatch}} | |||
As a result, between 1999 and 2001, IMC newswires tended to be focused on up-to-the-minute coverage of protests: from local demonstrations to summits where ] protests were occurring. In 2007, this is still the case <ref>e.g. </ref> but some IMCs are attempting to broaden their coverage to include more of what "traditional" journalism ignores.<ref>I don't have a source for this, need links to left criticism of IMCs</ref> | |||
In a 2019 article published on occasion of Indymedia's 20th anniversary, April Glaser suggested that factors such as volunteer burnout, lack of resources, lack of centralized accountability, lack of leadership development, and the waning of the ] all contributed to the decline of Indymedia.<ref name="Glaser2019"/> | |||
==Organisational Structure== | |||
===Local=== | |||
Local IMC collectives are expected to be open and inclusive of individuals from a variety of different local revolutionary, ], ], ] and other anti-capitalist stances, whether or not these have any definite political philosophy, so that even those without internet access can participate both in content creation and in content consumption. Editorial policies, locally chosen by any Indymedia collective, generally involve removing articles which the Indymedia editors believe promote ], ], ], and ]. Some local IMC collectives remove articles written from ] or ] perspectives<ref></ref>. | |||
==By region== | |||
All Indymedia collectives are expected to have a locally chosen, thoroughly discussed and clearly stated editorial policy for posts to their website.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
===United Kingdom=== | |||
] in ], United Kingdom, advertising the local chapter of Indymedia with the slogan "Read it, write it, your site, your news"]] | |||
Police seized servers in the UK in June 2005. An ] on the Bristol Indymedia server came to police attention for suggesting an "action" against a freight train carrying new cars as part of a protest against cars and climate change in the run up to that year's Gleneagles G8 summit.<ref>John Leyden, '' {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810135639/https://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/28/indymedia_server_seizure_bristol/ |date=August 10, 2017 }}'', The Register, June 28, 2005</ref> A member of the Bristol Indymedia group was arrested.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090316040147/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/bristol/somerset/4629399.stm |date=March 16, 2009 }}, BBC News, June 28, 2005, Retrieved August 25, 2007</ref> Indymedia was supported in this matter by the ] and ].{{r|bbc2005}} | |||
In August 2014, Bristol Indymedia's servers were again seized by police after a string of attacks in the Bristol area were claimed on the Indymedia service, including a communique signed by ] claiming the successful arson of a police firearms training centre.<ref name=post>{{cite web|url=http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/anarchist-website-bristol-indymedia-close/story-22848036-detail/story.html|title=Anarchist website Bristol Indymedia to close following police raid|date=August 29, 2014|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151015153857/http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Anarchist-website-Bristol-Indymedia-close/story-22848036-detail/story.html|archive-date=October 15, 2015|df=mdy-all}}</ref> Bristol Indymedia stated that they would not cooperate with the authorities and that they "do not intend to voluntarily hand over information to the police as they have requested".<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/28/indymedia_server_seizure_bristol/|title=Legal row after police seize Bristol Indymedia server|access-date=2018-02-13|language=en|archive-date=August 10, 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810135639/https://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/06/28/indymedia_server_seizure_bristol/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Global=== | |||
The overall Indymedia network is decentralized to the extent that the local IMCs operate independently once they are authenticated into the IMC network. The process of admission into the IMC network is somewhat centralized but is relatively relaxed and transparent compared to the occasionally contentious disputes within local IMCs and has not generated a great deal of criticism. Local IMC collectives vary widely in their openness, editorial policies and tolerance of different viewpoints. Along with the locally-organised ]s are IMC websites dealing with particular topics (such as biotechnology) or for different media (such as video). Along with contributing their own media, core organizers maintain IMC's ] infrastructure, enabling different people throughout the internet to publish their news. IMC editing is done by a system of layered admin which contributors apply to join for each site, by participating on open email lists and attending open meetings.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
===United States=== | |||
held at the Decoy Centre, ], Birmingham, Jan 2005]] | |||
]man wielding a baton towards an Athens Indymedia photographer during a protest at courts in ], Greece]] | |||
] shootings in the ]]] | |||
On October 7, 2004, the ] took possession of several ] hard drives used by a number of IMCs and hosted by U.S.-based ] Managed Hosting. The servers in question were located in the United Kingdom and managed by the British arm of Rackspace, but some 20 mainly European IMC websites were affected, and several unrelated websites were affected, including the website of a ].<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041101092924/http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/10/08/1097089554894.html |date=November 1, 2004 }}, ''], 2004-10-08</ref> Some, but not all, of the legal documents relating to the confiscation of the servers were unsealed by a Texas district court in August 2005, following legal action by the ]. The documents revealed that the only action requested by the government was to surrender server log files.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2005/08/02|title=Secret Documents About Indymedia Server Disappearance Unsealed|date=August 2, 2005|access-date=November 30, 2012|archive-date=November 3, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103134629/https://www.eff.org/press/archives/2005/08/02|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>John Lettice, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170810131626/https://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/08/03/indymedia_texas_docs_unsealed/ |date=August 10, 2017 }}, The Register, August 3, 2005, Retrieved August 25, 2005</ref> | |||
The move was condemned by the ], who stated that, "The way this has been done smacks more of intimidation of legitimate journalistic inquiry than crime-busting" and called for an investigation.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090206025407/http://www.ifj.org/en/articles/more-intimidation-than-crime-busting-says-ifj-as-police-target-independent-media-network |date=February 6, 2009 }}, IFJ press release, October 8, 2004, Retrieved August 28, 2007</ref> European civil liberties organization ] and the ] (AMARC) also voiced criticism.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20041013012438/http://www.statewatch.org/news/2004/oct/04uk-usa-indymedia.htm |date=October 13, 2004 }}, Statewatch Press release, October 2004, Retrieved August 25, 2007</ref><ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110928060333/http://www.ifex.org/united_kingdom/2004/10/08/fbi_seizes_indymedia_servers_in/ |date=September 28, 2011 }}, bulletin, October 8, 2004, Retrieved August 28, 2007</ref> EFF attorney Kurt Opsahl compared the case with '']''.<ref name="WhoNabbed"> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150427214408/http://www.salon.com/2004/11/09/indymedia/ |date=April 27, 2015 }} By Mathew Honan, Nov 9, 2004</ref> | |||
As an example of different models for collective internal organizing, the DC IMC (one of the older IMCs in the network) adopted a different and more formal model of organizing as a Coop. Members pay small monthly dues (waived for any who need it to be) and put labor into a volunteer task of some sort that helps with the day-to-day needs of the coop. In contrast, other IMC local collectives are without any formally-defined membership and have minimal organizational structure.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
New York–based journalist and Indymedia volunteer ] was killed in October 2006 along with two Mexican protesters in the city of ]. People had been demonstrating in the city since May as part of an ] prompted by a teachers strike. Reporters Without Borders condemned the actions of the Mexican government in allowing the accused gunmen to go free.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220128065625/https://rsf.org/en/news/two-suspects-cameraman-brad-wills-murder-freed-lack-evidence |date=January 28, 2022 }}, RSF press release, December 5, 2006, Retrieved August 25, 2007</ref> | |||
Some IMC memberships require its members to sign a mission statement -- not every IMC has a formalized policy. Some collectives do ban members for repeated rules violations. Some feel that membership includes only those actively doing organizing or other IMC work, while some feel that it actually extends to every IMC contributor.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
On January 30, 2009, one of the system administrators of the server that hosts indymedia.us received a grand jury subpoena from the ] federal court. The subpoena asked the administrator to provide all "]es, times, and any other identifying information" for every visitor to the site on June 25, 2008.<ref name="subpoena">Electronic Frontier Foundation {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170223044231/https://www.eff.org/wp/anatomy-bogus-subpoena-indymedia |date=February 23, 2017 }}, Retrieved on 2009-11-11.</ref> The subpoena also included a ] that stated that the recipient is "not to disclose the existence of this request unless authorized by the Assistant U.S. Attorney."<ref name="subpoena" /> The administrator of indymedia.us could not have provided the information because Indymedia sites generally do not keep IP address logs. The ] determined that there was no legal basis for the gag order, and that the subpoena request "violated the ] restrictions on what types of data the government could obtain using a subpoena."<ref name="subpoena" /> Under ], subpoenas to news media must have the authorization of the attorney general. According to a CBS News blog, the subpoena of indymedia.us was never submitted to the Attorney General for review.<ref name="cbs">Declan McCullagh {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091111123120/http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/11/09/taking_liberties/entry5595506.shtml |date=November 11, 2009 }}, Retrieved on 2009-11-11.</ref> On February 25, 2009, a United States Attorney sent a letter to an attorney with the ] stating that the subpoena had been withdrawn.<ref name="cbs" /> | |||
==Stated goals of independence== | |||
Indymedia was founded as an alternative to government and mainstream media, and seeks to facilitate people being able to publish their media as directly as possible. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
== |
===Europe=== | ||
IMCs tend to be funded solely by donations of money and equipment from individuals. In maintaining its independence and anti-corporate stance, Indymedia has had struggles with funding issues. For example, in September 2002, the ] proposed funding for an Indymedia regional meeting{{Fact|date=August 2007}}. This was ultimately refused because many volunteers, especially some from IMC Argentina, were uncomfortable with accepting money from the Foundation, which some believe to be linked to the ].{{Fact|date=August 2007}} | |||
At the ] in ], Italian police assaulted Indymedia journalists at the Armando Diaz School where Indymedia had set up a temporary office and radio station. Twenty-nine police officers were indicted for beating people, planting evidence and wrongful arrest during the night-time raid. Thirteen were convicted.<ref>{{cite news | title = Campaigners fear Italy G8 trouble | work = BBC News | date = December 5, 2008 | url = http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7767412.stm | access-date = June 1, 2009 | archive-date = December 8, 2008 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20081208071658/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7767412.stm | url-status = live }}</ref> | |||
==Political criticism of Indymedia== | |||
===Hate Speech=== | |||
Open publishing has left some IMCs in Europe vulnerable to legal action or threats of legal action related to questions of libel or hate speech.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} In some such cases, local IMC collectives took autonomous decisions to temporarily suspend the site while the different activist groups reorganized to find a consensual, constructive method of dealing with these problems and to increase openness and non-authoritarian organizing methods. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
In the aftermath of the ] protests, the German ] banned a chapter of the network called Linksunten. This had been set up in 2008, in southwestern Germany.{{r|"NYT17"}} The ministry described the network as "the central communications platform among far-left extremists prone to violence" and stated that it was used to spread information about violent protest tactics.{{r|"BBC2017"}} German ]s were ordered to block communication to the website, on which police were referred to as "pigs" and "murderers" and instructions for making ] could be found.{{r|"NYT17"}}{{r|"BBC2017"}} The German police also raided the home addresses of several activists in the ] region, seizing computers and weapons.{{r|"BBC2017"}} | |||
===Informal hierarchy=== | |||
The structure of IMCs is formally non-hierarchical in terms of authority within the projects; however, there do exist ''de facto'' hierarchies, due either to control over physical resources (e.g. servers); access to funds; accuracy determination; the fact that certain "global" functions are needed; or simply because it makes sense to coordinate within geographically close regions, without any formal link to geographical borders. | |||
==See also== | |||
Some operational decisions are made by a small core of individuals holding administrator passwords, but Indymedia strives to make decisions in an open, community level. Some decision-making, collaboration and mutual aid is required at the network, or "global" level, such as maintenance of the technical resources. | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*'']'' | |||
{{clear}} | |||
==References== | |||
Another aspect of informal hierarchy is the perceived emergence of "Indymedia specialists". Rather than participants in protests writing the report themselves, some people go to a protest to "do Indymedia", as if they were professional journalists, thus reproduing the separation (''mediation'') between reporter and participant that Indymedia is supposed to break down.<ref>There is an article about this ''somewhere''....</ref> | |||
{{Reflist|refs= | |||
<ref name=Ainger>{{Cite web |url=http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Global_Economy/GlobalCarnival.html |title=Katherine Ainger, "Global Carnival Against Capital", ''Z Magazine'', September 1999. |access-date=August 6, 2016 |archive-date=November 11, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191111153737/http://www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Global_Economy/GlobalCarnival.html |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
In addition to email and ], meetings and real-time communication are done via the Indymedia ] network: . Various technical and other organizing documentation is available at the Indymedia documentation ]: . | |||
<ref name=bbc2005>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/bristol/somerset/4634479.stm|title=Freedom of press under attack?|work=BBC Bristol News|publisher=BBC News|date=June 30, 2005|access-date=July 6, 2009|archive-date=April 30, 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130430142730/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/bristol/somerset/4634479.stm|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Editorial policy=== | |||
Although attempts have been made to formalize global editorial standards, the autonomous and independent nature of Indymedia has meant that many IMCs prefer their own local policies. As a result, many deal with similar issues and complaints, particularly around matters of distinguishing between criticism and hateful comments ("hate speech"); and the criteria for selecting issues and authors for the websites' "featured articles". While ] is valued highly by Indymedia collectives, it is rarely the overriding principle guiding editorial policy. <ref></ref>. | |||
<ref name="BBC2017">{{cite web |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-41047166 |title=Germany bans far-left protest website over G20 riots |date=August 25, 2017 |website=BBC |access-date=4 June 2018 |archive-date=October 4, 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181004031158/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-41047166 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Many IMCs now routinely remove from the front page "newswire" articles copied from corporate-run or state-run press sources. This policy (where implemented) is intended by those IMCs to keep Indymedia as an independent news source, rather than a ] of articles from existing news sources. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
<ref name=Corpwatch>{{cite web|url=https://corporatewatch.org/news/2014/oct/28/facebook-killed-internet-star-reflections-radical-media|title=Facebook killed the internet star: reflections on radical media – Corporate Watch|access-date=December 13, 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171020001536/https://corporatewatch.org/news/2014/oct/28/facebook-killed-internet-star-reflections-radical-media|archive-date=October 20, 2017|url-status=dead|df=mdy-all}}</ref> | |||
There is generally an editorial ], to which questions and complaints may be directed. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
<ref name="Downing">{{cite book |last1=Downing |first1=John D.H.|chapter= The Independent Media Center Movement and the Anarchist Socialist Tradition|editor1-last=Curran |editor1-first=James |editor2-last=Couldry |editor2-first=Nick |title=Contesting media power : alternative media in a networked world |date=2003 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |isbn=9780742523852}}</ref> | |||
==Reputation== | |||
Indymedia lacks representation from any currently Communist nation, or from most Muslim countries away from the Eastern Mediterranean. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
<ref name="NYT17">{{cite web |url=https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/25/world/europe/germany-bans-far-left-antifa-website.html |title=Germany, in a First, Shuts Down Left-Wing Extremist Website |last=Heaphy |first=Edmund |date=August 25, 2017 |website= The New York Times |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190806132523/https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/25/world/europe/germany-bans-far-left-antifa-website.html|archive-date= 6 August 2019|access-date=4 June 2018}}</ref> | |||
] in media bias debate at the ], March 2006]] | |||
Indymedia has a variable reputation, both amongst its users and outside critics. | |||
While some{{Who|date=June 2007}} criticize Indymedia for adopting a position hostile to the interests of capital, others believe that this is the purpose of the media. Still others{{Who|date=August 2007}} believe that its editorial policy on feature selection and hiding or deletion of articles is overly biased in certain topic areas, such as the ]. Some critics argue that since anyone can publish with little to no editorial process, unsubstantiated allegations and ] are often published as fact, along with inaccurate articles and content that can offend.{{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
<ref name="Pickard">{{cite journal |last1=Pickard |first1=Victor W. |title=Assessing the Radical Democracy of Indymedia: Discursive, Technical, and Institutional Constructions |journal=Critical Studies in Media Communication |date=March 2006 |volume=23 |issue=1 |pages=19–38 |doi=10.1080/07393180600570691 |s2cid=36900124 |url=https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/445 |access-date=January 22, 2020 |archive-date=June 18, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200618223351/https://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/445/ |url-status=live }}{{closed access}}</ref> | |||
In its favor, others{{Who|date=June 2007}} argue Indymedia is a viable or preferable alternative to ]. Its operations are conducted by ] around the world, who, though they may be lacking in journalistic training and corporate funding, tend to make up for this with enthusiasm for reporting issues of social justice and unique related events, which in their view, the ] under-reports or ]. For example, the ] in 2003 was virtually unheard of in the US media, while it received extensive worldwide and multilingual reporting through Indymedia. Another example is the ] in many US and European cities, which received detailed coverage written by its participants. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
<ref name=radpar>{{cite journal|title=Has radical participatory online media really 'failed'? Indymedia and its legacies|first=Eva|last=Giraud|date=November 1, 2014|journal=Convergence|volume=20|issue=4|pages=419–437|doi=10.1177/1354856514541352|doi-access=free}}{{open access}}</ref> | |||
While Indymedia has global aspirations, the vast majority of IMCs are in North America, Latin America and Europe. Although the Middle East is an area of considerable interest to Indymedia, there are only three IMCs in the region, located in ], ] and ], although there was a ] IMC in ] between 2001 and 2003. The Lebanon center is one of three IMCs in Muslim nations; the other two are in ] and ]. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
}} | |||
===Temporary removal from Google News searches=== | |||
In early May ], after receiving numerous complaints about newswire stories that referred to the ]i military (]) as "Zionazi forces" (<ref></ref>) or to Israelis as "]" <ref></ref>, Google temporarily stopped including some IMCs in ] searches (many non-English IMCs remained in the search){{Fact|date=August 2007}}. ] described the term "Zionazi" as a "degrading, hateful slur" and refused to index the ] because it had appeared there; SF Bay Area Indymedia agreed that it "could be considered ]"<ref></ref>. This spawned a petition which sought to promise that content the Indymedia community finds offensive will be moderated from the front page as a matter of editorial policy{{Fact|date=August 2007}}. IMCs were still included in normal Google web searches. As of ], IMC articles were restored to Google News searches.{{Fact|date=August 2007}} | |||
==Further reading== | |||
==Indymedia servers seizures== | |||
Indymedia has had interactions with authorities in more than one country. For example, on ], ], several of IMC's servers based in the ] at Rackspace in ] were temporarily seized pursuant to a court order, disabling about 20 IMC websites which were hosted there. Proponents of Indymedia will counter these seizures as unconstitutional or unwarranted, while authorities have cited legal concerns to explain their actions. However, ] has documented the unconstitutional nature of the server seizure at http://www.eff.org/Censorship/Indymedia/ | |||
{{refbegin}} | |||
===Seizure of servers by the FBI=== | |||
On ], ], the ] seized the ]s used by a number of IMCs and hosted by US-based ] Managed Hosting. The servers in question were located in the ] and managed by the British arm of Rackspace, but some 20 mainly European IMC websites were affected, and several unrelated websites were affected (including the website of a ] distribution). No reasons were given at first by the FBI and Rackspace for the seizure, in particular IMC was not informed. Rackspace claimed that it was banned from giving further information about the incident<ref></ref>. | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Böhm |first1=Steffen |last2=Frenzel |first2=Fabian |last3=Quinton |first3=Pennie |last4=Spicer |first4=André |last5=Sullivan |first5=Sian |last6=Young |first6=Zoe |title=Comparing Alternative Media in North and South: The Cases of IFIWatchnet and Indymedia in Africa |journal=Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space |date=May 2011 |volume=43 |issue=5 |pages=1173–1189 |doi=10.1068/a43539|bibcode=2011EnPlA..43.1173F |s2cid=3723431 |url=http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/15574/1/EPAreview%2013%2011%2010.pdf }}{{closed access}} | |||
Some (but not all) of the legal documents relating to the confiscation of the servers were unsealed by a Texas district court in August 2005, following legal action by the ]<ref></ref> <ref>John Lettice, , The Register, 3rd August 2005, accessed 25th August 2005</ref>. | |||
* {{cite web| last=Handel| first=Peter|url=https://www.popularresistance.org/the-birth-of-digital-indy-media/|title=The Birth Of Digital Indy Media|date=February 9, 2015|website=Popular Resistance}} | |||
The documents revealed that the government never officially demanded the computer servers -- the subpoena to Rackspace only requested server log files. This contradicted previous statements by the web host that it took the servers offline because the government had demanded the hardware. Thus, it is unclear whether it correct to say the servers were seized by the FBI. The documents also contradicted Rackspace's claim that it had been ordered by the court not to discuss publicly the government's demand. | |||
* {{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-LHKAgAAQBAJ|title=Future Active: Media Activism and the Internet|first=Graham|last=Meikle|date=2003|publisher=Routledge|via=Google Books|isbn=9781136727016}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=McDonald |first1=Kevin |title=From Indymedia to Anonymous: rethinking action and identity in digital cultures |journal=Information, Communication & Society |date=18 May 2015 |volume=18 |issue=8 |pages=968–982 |doi=10.1080/1369118X.2015.1039561 |s2cid=142600534 |url=https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/17306/1/From%20Indymedia%20to%20Anonymous%20July%202015.pdf |access-date=June 27, 2020 |archive-date=June 27, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200627205007/https://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/17306/1/From%20Indymedia%20to%20Anonymous%20July%202015.pdf |url-status=dead }}{{closed access}} | |||
* {{cite journal |last1=Milioni |first1=Dimitra L. |title=Probing the online counterpublic sphere: the case of Indymedia Athens |journal=Media, Culture & Society |date=20 May 2009 |volume=31 |issue=3 |pages=409–431 |doi=10.1177/0163443709102714|s2cid=144877478 }}{{closed access}} | |||
{{refend}} | |||
The following paragraphs portrait the facts prior to the unsealing of the documents. | |||
==External links== | |||
The seized servers were returned on ], ]. | |||
{{commons category|Indymedia}} | |||
* {{official website}} | |||
{{Citizen journalism}} | |||
A statement by Rackspace <ref>Quoted in , accessed 25th August 2007</ref> stated that the company had been forced to comply with a court order under the procedures laid out by the ], which governs international police co-operation on "international terrorism, kidnapping and money laundering". The investigation that led to the court order was said to have arisen outside of the U.S. Rackspace stated that they were prohibited on giving further detail. | |||
{{Anarchism}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] reported FBI spokesman Joe Parris<ref></ref>, who said the incident was not an FBI operation, but that the subpoena had been issued at the request of the ] and the Swiss governments. Again, no further details on specific allegations were given. UK involvement was denied in an answer given to a parliamentary question posed by Richard Allan, Liberal Democrat MP.<ref></ref> | |||
] | |||
Indymedia pointed out that they were not contacted by the FBI and that no specific information was released on the reasons of seizing the servers. Indymedia also sees the incident in the context of "numerous attacks on independent media by the US Federal Government", including a subpoena to obtain IP logs from Indymedia at the occasion of the Republican National Conference <ref>http://www.aclu.org/freespeech/protest/11476prs20040830.html</ref>, the shut-down of several community radio stations in the US by the ], and a request by the FBI to remove a post on Nantes IMC containing a photograph of alleged undercover Swiss police. <ref></ref> | |||
The move was condemned by the ], who stated that "The way this has been done smacks more of intimidation of legitimate journalistic inquiry than crime-busting" and called for an investigation <ref>, IFJ press release, 8th October 2004, accessed 28th August 2007</ref>. Criticism was also voiced by European civil liberties organisation ] <ref>, Statewatch Press release, October 2004, accessed 25th August 2007</ref> and the ] (AMARC)<ref> , bulletin, 8th October 2004, accessed 28th august 2007</ref>. | |||
In Italy, the federal prosecutor of Bologna Marina Plazzi confirmed that an investigation against Indymedia had been opened because of suspected "support of terrorism", in the context of Italian troops in the Iraqi city of ]. The Italian minister of justice, Roberto Castelli, has refused further details. In November 2003, 17 members of parliament belonging to the extreme right wing, self-described "post-]" ] (AN), including ], granddaughter of ], had demanded that Indymedia be shut down. A senior AN member and government official had announced the co-operation with US authorities (AN was a member of the Italian coalition government), and AN spokesman Mario Landolfi welcomed the FBI's seizure of the Indymedia servers. Left-wing Italian politicians denounced the move and called for an investigation. <ref>Damiano Valgolio, ''The Censorers Trace leads to Rome and Zurich'', Junge Welt, 11th October 2004, cited at , accessed 25th August 2007</ref> | |||
===Bristol Server Seizure=== | |||
Not long after the Rackspace affair another server in the UK was seized by police in June 2005. An anonymous post on the ] server, came to police attention for suggesting an "action" against a freight train carrying new cars as part of a protest against cars and climate change in the run up to that year's Gleneagles G8 summit. <ref>John Leyden, '''', The Register, 28th June 2005</ref> The police claimed that the poster broke the law by "incitement to criminal damage", and sought access logs from the server operators. Despite being warned by lawyers that the servers were "journalistic equipment" and subject to special laws, <ref>, Bristol IMC press release, 24th June 2005, accessed 25th August 2007</ref> the police proceeded with the seizure and a member of the Bristol Indymedia group was arrested <ref>, BBC News, 28 June 2005, accessed 25th August 2007</ref>. Indymedia was supported in this matter by the ], ] and ], along with others. | |||
This incident ended several months later with no charges being brought by the police and the equipment returned.{{Fact|date=August 2007}} | |||
===Other Legal Attacks - IMC UK=== | |||
In 2005, Indymedia UK was threatened with a libel action by the US arms company ], for publishing articles accusing their UK branch ] of ] (who supply the US, UK, and Israel armed forces) of being 'warmongers'. Their lawyers withdrew the threat at about the same time (Feb 2005) that the ] Two won the right to Legal Aid in the ], setting a new precedent in favour of defendants in libel cases brought by corporations against individuals and activist groups.{{Fact|date=August 2007}} | |||
] then launched a further High Court lawsuit against the protest group ] in April 2005, under anti-stalker laws, presenting as evidence articles that had been posted anonymously on Indymedia UK, including items that some believe were actually posted by employees of the company to fabricate evidence of harassment. Although a controversial interim injunction was imposed on this evidence, the suit collapsed without reaching a trial in early 2006, losing the company millions of dollars after a year long court battle, and the resignation of the Managing Director of EDO MBM David Jones. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} See ] for more details. | |||
==Assaults on Indymedia journalists== | |||
] | |||
In July, ] at the ] in ], Indymedia journalists and others were seriously assaulted at the Diaz school where Indymedia had set up a temporary journalism center and radio station. In an ongoing trial, twenty-nine Italian police officers were indicted for grievous bodily harm, planting evidence and wrongful arrest during a night-time raid on the Diaz School, A further 45 state officials, including police officers, prison guards and doctors, were charged with physically and mentally abusing demonstrators and journalists held in a detention centre in the nearby town of ]. from Indymedia and from the video activist group ], is being used as key evidence for the prosecution. | |||
On ], Indymedia journalist Guy Smallman was seriously injured by a police grenade <ref>, NUJ report, June 2 2003, accessed 25th August 2007</ref> <ref>, Switzerland IMC, 10th June 2006, accessed 25th August 2007</ref> in ]. He was covering protests against the ] in nearby ] for Indymedia and ]. | |||
On ], Alejandro Goldín, a photographer for Indymedia Argentina was assaulted by Federal Police officers while covering an incident between police and factory workers at the ] in Buenos Aires. <ref>, open letter to Argentina's amabassador in Canada, June 13th 2003, accessed 25th August 2007</ref> Although Goldín identified himself as press and showed his credentials, police tried to smash his equipment. Goldín was beaten on the head with a shotgun, shoved to the ground and kicked repeatedly by officers. | |||
On May 19, 2005, two videographers were roughed up by the ]'s Mounted Patrol during the Halliburton Shareholders Meeting - both videographers were contributors to Houston Indymedia. Both videographers were charged with assault on a police officer which was fabricated since mainstream media from ]-TV (ABC13), ]-TV (Local 2 Houston), and ]-TV (Channel 11 Houston) provided the Harris County District Attorney's office video footage that the videographers were exonerated of the assault charges. Subsequently, a townhall meeting was held at the ] main campus in response to the alleged police abuse where HPD Assistant Chief Martha Montalvo was present, alongside a police sergeant from Special Operations. Mayor Bill White and members of the Houston City Council were invited, but a staff member from the Office of Houston City Controller ] showed up since a member of HPD's Citizens Review Committee was present. One photographer who photographed the HPD Mounted Patrol jumping their horses on the sidewalk had two of his pictures used in the ] (the anonymous photographer would photograph the anti-KKK rally in Tomball, TX on 6.11.05 that prompted his retirement from photojournalism). It is alleged that ] was rowdy when he shoved police barricades (as seen by a photographer) right before relocating to Australia and later deported in September 2005.{{Fact|date=August 2007}} | |||
On ], Ernesto Torres, a journalist with Indymedia ] and Free Air Community Radio, was assaulted by members of the pro-government group Movimiento Barrios de Pie, while covering a march in opposition to the regime of the ] president ]. | |||
===Brad Will shot in Mexico=== | |||
{{main|Brad Will}} | |||
On ], 2006, New York-based journalist ] was killed along with two Mexican protesters in the city of ]. People had been demonstrating in the city since May as part of an ] prompted by a teachers strike. Lizbeth Cana, attorney general of Oaxaca, claimed the conflict was caused by the protesters and that the gunmen who engaged them were upset residents from the area{{Fact|date=August 2007}}. The U.S. ambassador to Mexico, ], however, claimed the men may have been local police{{Fact|date=August 2007}}. Reporters Without Borders condemened the actions of the Mexican government in allowing the accused to go free.<ref>, RSF press release, 5th December 2006, accessed 25th August 2007</ref> | |||
Protesters also allege that the men were police and not local residents. Associated Press initially alleged that the protesters also had guns, describing the conflict as a "shootout".<ref></ref> | |||
==Print Projects== | |||
There have been a number of print-based projects under the Indymedia banner, including short-run papers and longer-running ]. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
New York City IMC has produced ], a bi-weekly "free paper for free people" for over five years. Winner of numerous awards from the Independent Press Association (unrelated media organization) for original writing, photography, design and art, the Indypendent is currently the largest circulation "underground" paper in North America. During the 2004 Republican National Convention in NYC, the Indypendent printed hundreds of thousands of copies and briefly attained a mass circulation. Contentious issues have included standardized editorial practice, commercial advertising and a genuine diversity of perspectives rare among radical publications. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
Short-run papers for protests have included the ] during the ] "R2K" protests during the Republican National Convention in 2000. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
Other newspapers include the Bay Area's ], and papers in Connecticut, Maine, Baltimore and St. Louis in the United States, and W(((i)))ndy in Wellington, Aotearoa/New Zealand. {{Fact|date=September 2007}} | |||
==Software== | |||
Indymedia sites run on a number of ] platforms, many developed especially for the purpose. | |||
* DadaIMC | |||
* Mir | |||
* Oscait | |||
* Active | |||
* SF-Active | |||
* Activismo | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
==See also== | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==References== | |||
<references /> | |||
==External links== | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* (]) | |||
* (chat, help, online meetings) | |||
* (]) | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* (] ''Morning Herald'') | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* | |||
* in Poland | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 03:18, 13 November 2024
Global open publishing network of activist journalist collectives
Indymedia logo | |
Type | Open publishing |
---|---|
Format | Online |
Owner(s) | None |
Founded | November 24, 1999; 25 years ago (November 24, 1999) |
Language | English, Spanish, Greek, French, Italian, German, Portuguese, Dutch, Swedish, Finnish, Russian, Polish, Romanian, Hebrew and Arabic |
Headquarters | Various |
Website | indymedia |
The Independent Media Center, better known as Indymedia, is an open publishing network of activist journalist collectives that report on political and social issues. Following beginnings during the 1999 Carnival Against Capital and 1999 Seattle WTO protests, Indymedia became closely associated with the global justice movement. The Indymedia network extended internationally in the early 2000s with volunteer-run centers that shared software and a common format with a newswire and columns. Police raided several centers and seized computer equipment. The centers declined in the 2010s with the waning of the global justice movement.
Content and distribution
Indymedia is a website for citizen journalism that promotes activism and counters mainstream media news and commentary perspectives. Indymedia originated from protests against the concentrated ownership and perceived biases in corporate media reporting. The first Indymedia node, attached to the Seattle anti-corporate globalization protests, was seen by activists as an alternative news source to that of the corporate media, which they accused of only showing violence and confrontation, and portraying all protesters negatively. Indymedia initially covered protests between 1999 and 2001. As protests began to wane, Indymedia covered global social justice movements, such as opposition to the war in Iraq. Indymedia was purported to be the first network on-the-scene in reporting the 2008 Greek riots and the resistance towards the 2009 Honduran coup. The network also has a focus in covering the social justice campaigns of students, Indigenous people, immigrants, and peace activists. A slogan was "Don't Hate the Media, Become the Media!"
Active, the software used as the basis for the first Indymedia center websites, was written by activists in Sydney. It went live in January 1999 and featured open publishing, calendars, events and contacts. Indymedia also ran a global radio project which aggregated audio RSS feeds from around the world.
History
The origins of Indymedia can be traced to the global justice protest Carnival Against Capital, which took place in over forty countries on June 18, 1999. In late November 1999, the first dedicated Indymedia project was ready to cover the 1999 Seattle WTO protests. The first post was made on November 24. It read:
The resistance is global ... The web dramatically alters the balance between multinational and activist media. With just a bit of coding and some cheap equipment, we can set up a live automated website that rivals the corporates'. Prepare to be swamped by the tide of activist media makers on the ground in Seattle and around the world, telling the real story behind the World Trade Agreement.
— Maffew & Manse,
When the protests began, a hundred videographers were on the streets filming, joined by photographers and journalists, all working as volunteers.
After Seattle, local, autonomous collectives formed. Local sociopolitical context determined each individual center's focus. However, it was a core theme that centers would have both an open publishing structure to which anyone could contribute and an open archive. Centers tended to be set up in response to meetings of groups such as the World Bank or G8, to world forum events, or to party conventions, such as Democrat or Republican meetings in the US. By 2002, there were 90 Indymedia websites, mainly in the US, Canada and Western Europe but also Australia, New Zealand and Latin America. The number of centers continued growing, especially in Europe, reaching 142 in 2004 and 175 by 2010.
The Indymedia movement reached its peak in the mid-2000s. Centers in the United States began to atrophy around 2008, and by 2014, the global network had declined significantly, with the number of active sites down to 68. A number of reasons for the decline have been put forward. In February 2013, Ceasefire magazine had noted a decline in the use of Nottingham Indymedia, stating that activist usage of commercial social media had increased. The poverty of activist collectives to invest in resources was contrasted with the massive investments made by corporations such as Facebook and Twitter. In an article published by the journal Convergence Eva Giraud summarised some of the different arguments that had been made by academics and activists, which included informal hierarchy, bureaucracy, security issues including IP address logging, lack of regional engagement, lack of class politics, increase in web 2.0 social media use, website underdevelopment, decline in volunteers and decline in the global justice movement. Corporate Watch saw the rise of social media sites and the normalization of 'open publishing' as recommodifying Indymedia's key innovations for the cultural industry.
In a 2019 article published on occasion of Indymedia's 20th anniversary, April Glaser suggested that factors such as volunteer burnout, lack of resources, lack of centralized accountability, lack of leadership development, and the waning of the anti-globalization movement all contributed to the decline of Indymedia.
By region
United Kingdom
Police seized servers in the UK in June 2005. An anonymous post on the Bristol Indymedia server came to police attention for suggesting an "action" against a freight train carrying new cars as part of a protest against cars and climate change in the run up to that year's Gleneagles G8 summit. A member of the Bristol Indymedia group was arrested. Indymedia was supported in this matter by the National Union of Journalists and Liberty.
In August 2014, Bristol Indymedia's servers were again seized by police after a string of attacks in the Bristol area were claimed on the Indymedia service, including a communique signed by Informal Anarchist Federation claiming the successful arson of a police firearms training centre. Bristol Indymedia stated that they would not cooperate with the authorities and that they "do not intend to voluntarily hand over information to the police as they have requested".
United States
On October 7, 2004, the Federal Bureau Investigation took possession of several server hard drives used by a number of IMCs and hosted by U.S.-based Rackspace Managed Hosting. The servers in question were located in the United Kingdom and managed by the British arm of Rackspace, but some 20 mainly European IMC websites were affected, and several unrelated websites were affected, including the website of a Linux distribution. Some, but not all, of the legal documents relating to the confiscation of the servers were unsealed by a Texas district court in August 2005, following legal action by the Electronic Frontier Foundation. The documents revealed that the only action requested by the government was to surrender server log files.
The move was condemned by the International Federation of Journalists, who stated that, "The way this has been done smacks more of intimidation of legitimate journalistic inquiry than crime-busting" and called for an investigation. European civil liberties organization Statewatch and the World Association of Community Radio Broadcasters (AMARC) also voiced criticism. EFF attorney Kurt Opsahl compared the case with Steve Jackson Games, Inc. v. United States Secret Service.
New York–based journalist and Indymedia volunteer Bradley Roland Will was killed in October 2006 along with two Mexican protesters in the city of Oaxaca. People had been demonstrating in the city since May as part of an uprising prompted by a teachers strike. Reporters Without Borders condemned the actions of the Mexican government in allowing the accused gunmen to go free.
On January 30, 2009, one of the system administrators of the server that hosts indymedia.us received a grand jury subpoena from the Southern District of Indiana federal court. The subpoena asked the administrator to provide all "IP addresses, times, and any other identifying information" for every visitor to the site on June 25, 2008. The subpoena also included a gag order that stated that the recipient is "not to disclose the existence of this request unless authorized by the Assistant U.S. Attorney." The administrator of indymedia.us could not have provided the information because Indymedia sites generally do not keep IP address logs. The Electronic Frontier Foundation determined that there was no legal basis for the gag order, and that the subpoena request "violated the SCA's restrictions on what types of data the government could obtain using a subpoena." Under Justice Department guidelines, subpoenas to news media must have the authorization of the attorney general. According to a CBS News blog, the subpoena of indymedia.us was never submitted to the Attorney General for review. On February 25, 2009, a United States Attorney sent a letter to an attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation stating that the subpoena had been withdrawn.
Europe
At the 2001 G8 summit in Genoa, Italian police assaulted Indymedia journalists at the Armando Diaz School where Indymedia had set up a temporary office and radio station. Twenty-nine police officers were indicted for beating people, planting evidence and wrongful arrest during the night-time raid. Thirteen were convicted.
In the aftermath of the 2017 G20 Hamburg summit protests, the German Federal Ministry of the Interior, Building and Community banned a chapter of the network called Linksunten. This had been set up in 2008, in southwestern Germany. The ministry described the network as "the central communications platform among far-left extremists prone to violence" and stated that it was used to spread information about violent protest tactics. German internet service providers were ordered to block communication to the website, on which police were referred to as "pigs" and "murderers" and instructions for making Molotov cocktails could be found. The German police also raided the home addresses of several activists in the Baden-Württemberg region, seizing computers and weapons.
See also
References
- Haas, Tanni (July 1, 2007). "Do citizen-based media of communication advance public journalism's ideals? Evidence from the empirical research literature". International Journal of Communication. 17 (2): 7–21. ISSN 0975-640X. Gale A172249382.
- "Archives". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on May 19, 2011.
- "Independent+Media+Center" "Archives". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on January 28, 2022. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
- Shukovsky, Paul (August 5, 2001). "Media center fighting FBI over Web data". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Archived from the original on December 10, 2021. Retrieved January 28, 2022.
- Shukovsky, Paul (April 23, 2001). "FBI raids media center". Seattle Post-Intelligencer. Archived from the original on January 28, 2022. Retrieved August 11, 2009.
- Seattle, National Lawyers Guild WTO Legal Group. "Waging War on Dissent" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on March 3, 2016. Retrieved April 3, 2014.
- ^ Kidd, Dorothy (2011), "Indymedia (The Independent Media Center)" (PDF), Encyclopedia of Social Movement Media, University of San Francisco: SAGE Publications, p. 4, archived (PDF) from the original on July 9, 2021, retrieved July 2, 2021
- ^ Downing, John D.H. (2003). "The Independent Media Center Movement and the Anarchist Socialist Tradition". In Curran, James; Couldry, Nick (eds.). Contesting media power : alternative media in a networked world. Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 9780742523852.
- Meikle, Graham (February 4, 2014). Future Active: Media Activism and the Internet. Routledge. ISBN 9781136727016. Archived from the original on January 28, 2022. Retrieved May 11, 2020 – via Google Books.
- "Radio Indymedia". radio.indymedia.org. Archived from the original on August 2, 2009. Retrieved August 11, 2009.
- "Katherine Ainger, "Global Carnival Against Capital", Z Magazine, September 1999". Archived from the original on November 11, 2019. Retrieved August 6, 2016.
- ^ Pickard, Victor W. (March 2006). "Assessing the Radical Democracy of Indymedia: Discursive, Technical, and Institutional Constructions". Critical Studies in Media Communication. 23 (1): 19–38. doi:10.1080/07393180600570691. S2CID 36900124. Archived from the original on June 18, 2020. Retrieved January 22, 2020.
- ^ Giraud, Eva (November 1, 2014). "Has radical participatory online media really 'failed'? Indymedia and its legacies". Convergence. 20 (4): 419–437. doi:10.1177/1354856514541352.
- ^ Glaser, April (Summer 2019). "Another Network is Possible". Logic (8): 155–169. ISSN 2573-4504. Archived from the original on August 9, 2020. Retrieved August 19, 2020.
- "Indymedia: It's time to move on". Ceasfire Magazine. February 17, 2013. Archived from the original on December 9, 2019.
- "Facebook killed the internet star: reflections on radical media – Corporate Watch". Archived from the original on October 20, 2017. Retrieved December 13, 2018.
- John Leyden, Legal row after police seize Bristol Indymedia server Archived August 10, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Register, June 28, 2005
- Indymedia server seized in raid Archived March 16, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, BBC News, June 28, 2005, Retrieved August 25, 2007
- "Freedom of press under attack?". BBC Bristol News. BBC News. June 30, 2005. Archived from the original on April 30, 2013. Retrieved July 6, 2009.
- "Anarchist website Bristol Indymedia to close following police raid". August 29, 2014. Archived from the original on October 15, 2015.
- "Legal row after police seize Bristol Indymedia server". Archived from the original on August 10, 2017. Retrieved February 13, 2018.
- FBI seizes Indymedia servers Archived November 1, 2004, at the Wayback Machine, Sydney Morning Herald, 2004-10-08
- "Secret Documents About Indymedia Server Disappearance Unsealed". August 2, 2005. Archived from the original on November 3, 2012. Retrieved November 30, 2012.
- John Lettice, US court files reveal Italian link to Indymedia server grab Archived August 10, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, The Register, August 3, 2005, Retrieved August 25, 2005
- "More Intimidation Than Crime-Busting" Says IFJ As Police Target Independent Media Network Archived February 6, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, IFJ press release, October 8, 2004, Retrieved August 28, 2007
- Was the seizure of Indymedia's servers in London unlawful or did the UK government collude? Archived October 13, 2004, at the Wayback Machine, Statewatch Press release, October 2004, Retrieved August 25, 2007
- FBI seizes Indymedia servers in the United Kingdom Archived September 28, 2011, at the Wayback Machine, bulletin, October 8, 2004, Retrieved August 28, 2007
- Who nabbed Indymedia's computers? The freewheeling network of Web sites has a history of clashing with authority. But usually it knows who is trying to shut it up. Archived April 27, 2015, at the Wayback Machine By Mathew Honan, Nov 9, 2004
- Two suspects in cameraman Brad Will's murder freed for lack of evidence Archived January 28, 2022, at the Wayback Machine, RSF press release, December 5, 2006, Retrieved August 25, 2007
- ^ Electronic Frontier Foundation "Anatomy of a Bogus Subpoena" Archived February 23, 2017, at the Wayback Machine, Retrieved on 2009-11-11.
- ^ Declan McCullagh "Justice Dept. Asked For News Site's Visitor Lists" Archived November 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, Retrieved on 2009-11-11.
- "Campaigners fear Italy G8 trouble". BBC News. December 5, 2008. Archived from the original on December 8, 2008. Retrieved June 1, 2009.
- ^ Heaphy, Edmund (August 25, 2017). "Germany, in a First, Shuts Down Left-Wing Extremist Website". The New York Times. Archived from the original on August 6, 2019. Retrieved June 4, 2018.
- ^ "Germany bans far-left protest website over G20 riots". BBC. August 25, 2017. Archived from the original on October 4, 2018. Retrieved June 4, 2018.
Further reading
- Böhm, Steffen; Frenzel, Fabian; Quinton, Pennie; Spicer, André; Sullivan, Sian; Young, Zoe (May 2011). "Comparing Alternative Media in North and South: The Cases of IFIWatchnet and Indymedia in Africa" (PDF). Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 43 (5): 1173–1189. Bibcode:2011EnPlA..43.1173F. doi:10.1068/a43539. S2CID 3723431.
- Handel, Peter (February 9, 2015). "The Birth Of Digital Indy Media". Popular Resistance.
- Meikle, Graham (2003). Future Active: Media Activism and the Internet. Routledge. ISBN 9781136727016 – via Google Books.
- McDonald, Kevin (May 18, 2015). "From Indymedia to Anonymous: rethinking action and identity in digital cultures" (PDF). Information, Communication & Society. 18 (8): 968–982. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2015.1039561. S2CID 142600534. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 27, 2020. Retrieved June 27, 2020.
- Milioni, Dimitra L. (May 20, 2009). "Probing the online counterpublic sphere: the case of Indymedia Athens". Media, Culture & Society. 31 (3): 409–431. doi:10.1177/0163443709102714. S2CID 144877478.
External links
Citizen journalism | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
News outlets |
| ||||
Citizen journalists |
| ||||