Misplaced Pages

Parthian Empire: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:26, 23 January 2009 editMejda (talk | contribs)410 edits Golden Age of Parthia← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:22, 31 December 2024 edit undoOst316 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers86,670 edits WP:AWB WP:CHECKWIKI 16/90/91 cleanup, et. al., replaced: → , Ānxī → {{ill|Ānxī|zh|安息|vertical-align=sup}}Tag: AWB 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Iranian empire (247 BC – 224 AD)}}
{{Infobox Former Country
{{Infobox country
|native_name = اشکانیان<br> ''Pahlava''
| native_name =
|conventional_long_name = Parthian Empire
| conventional_long_name = Parthian Empire
|common_name = Parthia
| common_name = Parthian Empire|
|
|continent = Asia | era = ]
| government_type = ] ]<ref name="sheldon_2010_231">{{harvnb|Sheldon|2010|p=231}}</ref>|
|region = ], ], and ]
|country = Iran | year_start = 247 BC
|era = ] | year_end = 224 AD|
|status = Empire | p1 = Seleucid Empire
|status_text = '''Empires of Persia''' | border_p1 = no
|empire = Persia | s1 = Sasanian Empire
| symbol_type =
|government_type = ] ]
| image_map = Map of the Parthian Empire under Mithridates II.svg
|
| image_map_caption = The Parthian Empire in 94 BC at its greatest extent, during the reign of ] ({{reign|124|91|era=BC}})
|<!--- Rise and fall, events, years and dates --->
| image_coat =
|<!-- only fill in the start/end event entry if a specific article exists. Don't just say "abolition" or "declaration"-->
| capital = ],<ref name=IP>{{cite book|last=Fattah|first=Hala Mundhir|title=A Brief History of Iraq|year=2009|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-8160-5767-2|page=|quote=One characteristic of the ]ns that the kings themselves maintained was their ]ic urge. The kings built or occupied numerous cities as their capitals, the most important being ] on the ], which they built from the ancient town of ].|url=https://archive.org/details/briefhistoryofir0000fatt/page/46}}</ref> ], ], ], ], ], ]
|
|year_start = 238 BC | common_languages = {{plainlist|
*] (official, court, literature){{sfn|Skjærvø|2004|pp=348–366}}{{sfn|Canepa|2018|p=6}}
|year_end = 226 AD
*] (official)<ref name="Green 1992 45"/>
|
*] ('']'')<ref name="Green 1992 45">{{harvnb|Green|1992|p=45}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Chyet|first=Michael L.|author-link=Michael L. Chyet|editor1-last=Afsaruddin|editor1-first=Asma|editor2-last=Krotkoff|editor2-first=Georg|editor3-last=Zahniser|editor3-first=A. H. Mathias|editor1-link=Asma Afsaruddin|title=Humanism, Culture, and Language in the Near East: Studies in Honor of Georg Krotkoff|year=1997|publisher=]|isbn=978-1-57506-020-0|page=284|quote=In the Middle Persian period (Parthian and ]s), ] was the medium of everyday writing, and it provided ] for writing ], ], ], and ].}}</ref>}}
|year_exile_start =
| title_leader = ]
|year_exile_end =
| leader1 = ] <small>(first)</small>
|
| year_leader1 = 247–211 BC
|event_start = ]
| leader2 = ] <small>(last)</small>
|date_start =
|event_end = ] | year_leader2 = 208–224 AD
| stat_year1 = 1 AD<ref name="Turchin223">{{cite journal|last2=Adams|first2=Jonathan M.|last3=Hall|first3=Thomas D|date=December 2006|title=East-West Orientation of Historical Empires|url=http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/369/381|journal=Journal of World-Systems Research|volume=12|issue=2|page=223|issn=1076-156X|last1=Turchin|first1=Peter|access-date=16 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160917031715/http://jwsr.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/jwsr/article/view/369/381|archive-date=17 September 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Taagepera121">{{cite journal|date=1979|title=Size and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D.|journal=Social Science History|volume=3|issue=3/4|page=121|doi=10.2307/1170959|last1=Taagepera|first1=Rein|jstor=1170959}}</ref>
|date_end =
| stat_area1 = 2800000|
|
| legislature = ]|
|event1 = <!--- Optional: other events between "start" and "end" --->
|date_event1 = | religion = {{plainlist|
*]<ref>{{harvnb|De Jong|2008|p=24|loc="It is impossible to doubt that the Parthians were Zoroastrians. The evidence from the Nisa ostraca and the Parthian parchment from Avroman suffice to prove this, by the use of the Zoroastrian calendar, which was restricted in use, as it had been previously, to communication with Iranians only, yielding to the Seleucid calendar whenever the Parthians dealt with non-Zoroastrians. There are indications, however, that the practice of Zoroastrianism had reserved a large place for the cult of divine images, either those of ancestors in the Fravashi cult, or of deities, and for the existence of sanctuaries dedicated to named deities other than Ahura Mazda, and including deities that are of a non-Avestan background. The Parthian god Sasan is a case in point, but better evidence comes from Armenia, where alongside Aramazd and Anahit, Mher and Vahagn, the West Semitic god Barshamin, and Babylonian Nane were worshipped, as well as the Anatolian Tork and the goddess Astghik of disputed origins."}}</ref>
|event2 =
*]<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=|loc="The Parthians and the peoples of the Parthian empire were ]. Each ethnic group, each city, and each land or kingdom was able to adhere to its own gods, their respective cults and religious rituals. In ] the city-god ] continued to be the main deity alongside the goddesses ] and ], while ]'s main god, the sun-god ], was revered alongside a multiplicity of other gods."}}</ref>
|date_event2 =
*]<ref>{{harnvb|Koshelenko|Pilipko|1996|p=149-150|loc="Buddhism was practiced in the easternmost reaches of the Parthian Empire."}}</ref>}}
|event3 =
|date_event3 = | currency = ]
|event4 =
|date_event4 =
|
|event_pre = <!--- Optional: A crucial event that took place before before "event_start"--->
|date_pre =
|event_post = <!--- Optional: A crucial event that took place before after "event_end"--->
|date_post =
|
|<!--- Flag navigation: Preceding and succeeding entities p1 to p5 and s1 to s5 --->
|p1 = Seleucid Empire
|flag_p1 = Seleucid Empire 323 - 60 (BC).GIF
|image_p1 = ]
|p2 =
|flag_p2 =
|p3 =
|flag_p3 =
|p4 =
|flag_p4 =
|p5 =
|flag_p5 =
|s1 = Sassanid Empire
|flag_s1 = Sassanid empire map.PNG
|image_s1 = ]
|s2 =
|flag_s2 =
|s3 =
|flag_s3 =
|s4 =
|flag_s4 =
|s5 =
|flag_s5 =
|
|image_flag = <!--- Default: Flag of {{{common_name}}}.svg --->
|flag = <!--- Link target under flag image. Default: Flag of {{{common_name}}} --->
|flag_type = <!--- Displayed text for link under flag. Default "Flag" --->
|
|image_coat = <!--- Default: Coat of arms of {{{common_name}}}.svg --->
|symbol = <!--- Link target under symbol image. Default: Coat of arms of {{{common_name}}} --->
|symbol_type = <!--- Displayed text for link under symbol. Default "Coat of arms" --->
|
|image_map = Parthian Empire 248 – 224 (BC).PNG|250px|center
|image_map_caption = Parthia at its greatest extent under ] (]–])
|
|image_map2 = <!-- If second map is needed - does not appear by default -->
|image_map2_caption =
|
|capital = ] 238 BC to<br>] 139 BC to<br>] c. 129 BC
|capital_exile = <!-- If status="Exile" -->
|latd= |latm= |latNS= |longd= |longm= |longEW=
|
|national_motto =
|national_anthem =
|common_languages = Middle Iranian
|religion = ]<br>]<br>]
|currency =
|
|<!--- Titles and names of the first and last leaders and their deputies --->
|leader1 = <!--- Name of king or president --->
|leader2 =
|leader3 =
|leader4 =
|year_leader1 = <!--- Years served --->
|year_leader2 =
|year_leader3 =
|year_leader4 =
|title_leader = Shāhanshāh
|representative1 = <!--- Name of representative of head of state (eg. colonial governor) --->
|representative2 =
|representative3 =
|representative4 =
|year_representative1 = <!--- Years served --->
|year_representative2 =
|year_representative3 =
|year_representative4 =
|title_representative = <!--- Default: "Governor"--->
|deputy1 = <!--- Name of prime minister --->
|deputy2 =
|deputy3 =
|deputy4 =
|year_deputy1 = <!--- Years served --->
|year_deputy2 =
|year_deputy3 =
|year_deputy4 =
|title_deputy = <!--- Default: "Prime minister" --->
|
|<!--- Legislature --->
|legislature = <!--- Name of legislature --->
|house1 = <!--- Name of first chamber --->
|type_house1 = <!--- Default: "Upper house"--->
|house2 = <!--- Name of second chamber --->
|type_house2 = <!--- Default: "Lower house"--->
|
|<!--- Area and population of a given year --->
|stat_year1 = <!--- year of the statistic, specify either area, population or both --->
|stat_area1 = <!--- area in square kílometres (w/o commas or spaces), area in square miles is calculated --->
|stat_pop1 = <!--- population (w/o commas or spaces), population density is calculated if area is also given --->
|stat_year2 =
|stat_area2 =
|stat_pop2 =
|stat_year3 =
|stat_area3 =
|stat_pop3 =
|stat_year4 =
|stat_area4 =
|stat_pop4 =
|stat_year5 =
|stat_area5 =
|stat_pop5 =
|footnotes = <!--- Accepts wikilinks --->
}} }}
{{History of Iran|معبد كاريوس ...اوروك .... مدينة الوركاء ... المثنى.jpg}}


The '''Parthian Empire''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|p|ɑr|θ|i|ən}}), also known as the '''Arsacid Empire''' ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|ɑr|s|ə|s|ɪ|d}}),{{efn|]: {{lang|grc|Ἀρσάκης}}, {{Small|]:}} ''Arsakēs'', from ]: {{lang|xpr|𐭀𐭓𐭔𐭊}}, {{Small|romanized:}} ''Aršak''}} was a major ] political and cultural power centered in ] from 247&nbsp;BC to 224&nbsp;AD.<ref>{{harvnb|Waters|1974|p=424}}.</ref> Its latter name comes from its founder, ],<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=84}}</ref> who led the ] tribe in ] the region of ]<ref>"roughly western ]", see {{harvnb|Bickerman|1983|p=6}}.</ref> in ]'s northeast, then a ]y (province) under ], who was rebelling against the ].
{{also|Persian Empire}}
'''Arsacid Persian Empire''' or the '''Parthian Empire''' (238 BC – 226 AD) was the third ] kingdom to dominate ] in ancient times. ] itself was located south-east of the ], between the ] and the ].<ref name=livius>. Retrieved: March 2, 2008.</ref> The empire was ruled by the Arsacid Dynasty, and at its height they controlled most of ], ], ], and ].


] ({{reign|{{c.|171}}|132}} BC) greatly expanded the empire by seizing ] and ] from the Seleucids. At its height, the Parthian Empire stretched from the northern reaches of the ], in what is now central-eastern Turkey, to present-day ] and western Pakistan. The empire, located on the ] trade route between the ] in the ] and the ] of ], became a center of trade and commerce.
The Iranian Parthians were consummate horsemen, known for a military tactic called the '']''. They are noted in western history for defeating the (]) ] in Iran. Their empire subsequently became a rival to the ].


The Parthians largely adopted the ], ], religious beliefs, and regalia of their culturally heterogeneous empire, which encompassed ], ], and regional cultures. For about the first half of its existence, the Arsacid court adopted elements of ], though it eventually saw a gradual revival of ]. The ] were titled "]", claiming inheritance of the ]; indeed, they accepted many local kings as ]s, although the Achaemenids would have had centrally appointed, albeit largely autonomous, ]s. The court did appoint a small number of satraps, largely outside Iran, but these satrapies were smaller and less powerful than the Achaemenid potentates. With the expansion of Arsacid power, the seat of central government shifted from ] to ] along the ] (south of ]), although several other sites also served as capitals.
==Origins==
:'''See Also:''' '']'' and '']''.


The earliest enemies of the Parthians were the ] in the west and the ] in the north. However, as Parthia expanded westward, they came into conflict with the ], and eventually the late ]. Rome and Parthia competed with each other to establish the ] as their ]. The Parthians destroyed the army of ] at the ] in 53&nbsp;BC, and in 40–39&nbsp;BC, Parthian forces captured the whole of the ] except ] from ]; ] led a Roman ]. Several Roman emperors invaded Mesopotamia in the ] of the next few centuries, capturing the cities of ] and Ctesiphon. Frequent civil wars between Parthian contenders to the throne proved more dangerous to the Empire's stability than foreign invasion, and Parthian power evaporated when ], ruler of ] in ], revolted against the Arsacids and killed their last ruler, ], in 224&nbsp;AD. Ardashir established the ], which ruled Iran and much of the Near East until the ] of the 7th century AD, although the Arsacid dynasty lived on through branches of the family that ruled ], ], and ].
The predecessors of the Parthians were a ] tribe known as the ], who were part of the ] Confederacy. Ancient ] texts mention a country named ''Partakka'' or ''Partukka'' in the seventh century BC.<ref name=livius/> At some point it was subjugated by the ], who were later overthrown in ] by their ] vassals, led by ].


Native Parthian sources, written in ], ] and other languages, are scarce when compared to ] and even earlier ] sources. Aside from scattered ] tablets, fragmentary ], rock inscriptions, ] coins, and the chance survival of some ] documents, much of Parthian history is only known through external sources. These include mainly ] and ], but also ], prompted by the Han Chinese ].<ref>{{harvnb|Ball|2016|p=155}}</ref> ]work is a means of understanding aspects of society and culture that are otherwise absent in textual sources.
For the next two centuries, the ] was part of the Persian ]. In ], Parthia joined King Phraortes of Media in a rebellion that was suppressed by ].<ref name=livius/> They fought with King ] during the ] against the ] led by ] (October 1st, 331 BC). They were commanded by Phrataphernes, who surrendered his satrapy to Alexander in the summer of 330. Phrataphernes was reappointed Satrap and also given control over ] in 323 BC.


==History==
After Alexander's death, his ] controlled Parthia during the reigns of ] and ]. After the empire's unity was shattered during the wars of the ], Parthia became part of the ] of ]. Around 245 BC, the Parthian Satrap ] allied with ] of Bactria and revolted against the Seleucids to form his own kingdom. Dr. Ranajit Pal suggests<ref>Ranajit Pal, "Non-Jonesian Indology and Alexander, New Delhi, 2002, p. 53</ref> that Diodotus-I was the great Ashoka.


===Origins and establishment===
==Founding an Empire==
{{Further|Parni conquest of Parthia}}
] became the leader of the ] tribe. Under pressure from the Bactrians, the Parni sought refuge in Parthia. In ], Arsaces killed ], the rebellious ] of the ].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |year=2008 |title =Andragoras |encyclopedia=Encyclopedia Brittanica |publisher=Encyclopedia Britannica Online|url=http://original.britannica.com/eb/article-9002268/Andragoras#21089.hook}}</ref>
] of ] ({{reign|{{circa|247}}|211 BC}}) with the Greek language inscription ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ "of Arsaces"|alt=Two sides of a silver coin. The one on the left bears the imprint of a man's head, while the one on the right a sitting individual.]]


Before ] founded the Arsacid dynasty, he was chieftain of the ], an ancient ]n tribe of ] and one of several ]ic tribes within the confederation of the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|p=41}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=7}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=24–27}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=83–84}}</ref> The Parni most likely spoke an ], in contrast to the ] spoken at the time in ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=24}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=84}}</ref> The latter was a northeastern province, first under the ], and then the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=24–27}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=83–84}}</ref> After conquering the region, the Parni adopted ] as the official court language, speaking it alongside ], ], ], ], ] and other languages in the multilingual territories they would conquer.<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=7–8}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=83–84}}</ref>
According to Arrian, Arsaces was then killed and was succeeded by his brother; however modern historians believe that he ruled Parthia until 211 BC, when he was succeeded by his son Arsaces II.


Why the Arsacid court retroactively chose 247&nbsp;BC as the first year of the Arsacid era is uncertain. ] concludes that this was the year the Seleucids lost control of Parthia to ], the appointed ] who rebelled against them. Hence, Arsaces I "backdated his ]s" to the moment when Seleucid control over Parthia ceased.<ref name="bivar_1983_28-29">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=28–29}}</ref> However, Vesta Sarkhosh Curtis asserts that this was simply the year Arsaces was made chief of the Parni tribe.<ref name="curtis_2007_7">{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=7}}</ref> Homa Katouzian<ref name="katouzian 2009 41">{{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|p=41}}</ref> and Gene Ralph Garthwaite<ref name="garthwaite_2005_67">{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=67}}</ref> claim it was the year Arsaces conquered Parthia and expelled the Seleucid authorities, yet Curtis<ref name="curtis_2007_7"/> and Maria Brosius<ref name="brosius_2006_85">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=85}}</ref> state that Andragoras was not ] until 238&nbsp;BC.
:According to Justin, "He (Arsaces) was used to a life of pillage and theft, when he heard about the defeat of Seleucus against the Gauls. Relieved from his fear of the king, he attacked the Parthians with a band of thieves, vanquished their prefect Andragoras, and, after having killed him took the power over the nation" Justin, xli. 4.


It is unclear who immediately succeeded Arsaces I. Bivar<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=29–31}}</ref> and Katouzian<ref name="katouzian 2009 41"/> affirm that it was his brother ], who in turn was succeeded by his son ] in 211&nbsp;BC. Yet Curtis<ref name="curtis_2007_8">{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=8}}</ref> and Brosius<ref name="brosius_2006_86">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=86}}</ref> state that Arsaces II was the immediate successor of Arsaces I, with Curtis claiming the succession took place in 211&nbsp;BC, and Brosius in 217&nbsp;BC. Bivar insists that 138&nbsp;BC, the last regnal year of Mithridates I, is "the first precisely established regnal date of Parthian history."<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=36}}</ref> Due to these and other discrepancies, Bivar outlines ] accepted by historians.<ref name="bivar_1983_98-99">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=98–99}}</ref> A fictitious claim was later made from the 2nd-century BC onwards by the Parthians, which represented them as descendants of the Achaemenid king of kings, ] ({{reign|404|358 BC}}).{{sfn|Daryaee|2012|p=179}}
] (R. 171-138 BC). The reverse shows ], and the inscription ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΜΕΓΑΛΟΥ ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ ΦΙΛΕΛΛΗΝΟΣ (Great King Arsaces, friend of the ]).]]


], shaded yellow, alongside the ] (blue) and the ] (purple) around 200&nbsp;BC|alt=A map centered on the Mediterranean and Middle East showing the extent of the Roman Republic (Purple), Selucid Empire (Blue), and Parthia (Yellow) around 200&nbsp;BC.]]
In ], ] invaded Parthia during his campaign to restore the Seleucid Empire's eastern territories. Antiochus occupied Parthia's capital at ], then pushed into ] before King Arsaces II recognized Seleucid authority. With Parthia secured, Antiochus moved against the ] and fought King ] for 3 years before securing peace. Antiochus concluded his eastern campaign with an expedition into India. Soon afterwards Antiochus was defeated by the Romans, which severely weakened the Seleucids and allowed Parthia to maintain its freedom from the Seleucids. Arsaces II died in ] and was succeeded by ].


For a time, Arsaces I consolidated his position in Parthia and ] by taking advantage of the invasion of Seleucid territory in the west by ] (''r''.&nbsp;246–222&nbsp;BC) of ]. This conflict with Ptolemy, the ] (246–241&nbsp;BC), also allowed ] to rebel and form the ] in Central Asia.<ref name="brosius_2006_85"/> The latter's successor, ], formed an alliance with Arsaces I against the Seleucids, but Arsaces was temporarily driven from Parthia by the forces of ] ({{reign|246|225 BC}}).<ref name="brosius_2006_85-86">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=85–86}}</ref> After spending some time in exile among the nomadic ] tribe, Arsaces I led a counterattack and recaptured Parthia. Seleucus II's successor, ] ({{reign|222|187 BC}}), was unable to immediately retaliate because his troops were engaged in putting down the rebellion of ] in ].<ref name="brosius_2006_85-86"/>
In ], King ] subdued the Mardi tribe, but was killed in battle against ] nomads. His brother ] survived the battle and became one of Parthia's greatest Kings. Profiting from the continuing erosion of the Seleucid Empire, Mithridates captured ] in ], which disrupted the trade routes to India and effectively split the Hellenistic world into two parts.


Antiochus III launched a massive campaign to retake Parthia and Bactria in 210 or 209&nbsp;BC. Despite some ] he was unsuccessful, but did negotiate a peace settlement with Arsaces II. The latter was granted the title of king (]: '']'') in return for his submission to Antiochus III as his superior.<ref name="bivar_1983_29 brosius_2006_86 kennedy_1996_74">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=29}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=86}}; {{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=74}}</ref> The Seleucids were unable to further intervene in Parthian affairs following increasing encroachment by the ] and the Seleucid ] in 190&nbsp;BC.<ref name="bivar_1983_29 brosius_2006_86 kennedy_1996_74"/> ] ({{reign|{{circa|191}}|176 BC}}) succeeded Arsaces II, and ] ({{reign|{{circa| 176}}|171 BC}}) eventually ascended the Parthian throne. Phraates I ruled Parthia without further Seleucid interference.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=29–31}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=86}}</ref>
The Seleucid monarchs resisted Parthian expansion as best as they could; ] spent his last years campaigning against the newly emerging Iranian states. After initial successes in Armenia, his sudden death in 164 BC allowed the Parthians to take advantage of the ensuing dynastic squabbles to make even greater gains.


===Expansion and consolidation===
==Golden Age of Parthia==
{{Main|Seleucid–Parthian wars}}
]
] of ], showing him wearing a beard and a royal ] on his head. Reverse side: ]/], holding a club in his left hand and a cup in his right hand; Greek inscription reading ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΜΕΓΑΛΟΥ ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ ΦΙΛΕΛΛΗΝΟΣ "of the Great King Arsaces the ]"|alt=Two sides of a coin. The side on the left showing the head of a bearded man, while the right a standing individual.]]


Phraates I is recorded as expanding Parthia's control past the ] and occupied ]. The locations of these are unknown.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=31}}</ref> Yet the greatest expansion of Parthian power and territory took place during the reign of his brother and successor ] (r. c.&nbsp;171–132 BC),<ref name="brosius_2006_86"/> whom Katouzian compares to ] (d. 530 BC), founder of the Achaemenid Empire.<ref name="katouzian 2009 41"/>
Mario Bussagli writes in the Encyclopedia of World Art (Parthian Art) that at the time of its maximum expansion the Parthian kingdom covered an area greater than that of Iran proper and included the Indian subcontinent, Mesopotamia, Armenia and some of the regions where Indian and Iranian influences overlap. To appreciate this one has to note that Diodotus-I was Ashoka.<ref>Ranajit Pal, "An Altar of Alexander Now Standing Near Delhi", Scholia, vol. 15, 2006, p. 91</ref>
In 139 BC, the Parthian king Mithridates I captured the Seleucid monarch Demetrius II Nicator, holding him captive for ten years while Parthian troops overwhelmed ] and ].


Relations between Parthia and Greco-Bactria deteriorated after the death of Diodotus II, when forces under Mithridates I captured two ] of the latter kingdom, then under ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;170–145&nbsp;BC).<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=33}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=86}}</ref> Turning his sights on the Seleucid realm, Mithridates I invaded Media and occupied ] in 148 or 147&nbsp;BC; the region had been destabilized by a recent Seleucid suppression of a rebellion there led by ].<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=10–11}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=33}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=76}}</ref> This victory was followed by the Parthian conquest of ] in ], where Mithridates I had coins minted at ] in 141&nbsp;BC and held an official ] ceremony.<ref name="curtis_2007_10-11 brosius_2006_86-87 Bivar_1983_34 Garthwaite_2005_76">{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=10–11}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=86–87}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=34}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=76}};</ref> While Mithridates I retired to Hyrcania, his forces subdued the kingdoms of ] and ] and occupied ].<ref name="curtis_2007_10-11 brosius_2006_86-87 Bivar_1983_34 Garthwaite_2005_76"/> By this time, Parthian authority extended as far east as the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=76}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=35}}</ref>
By 129 BC, the Parthians were in control of the lands east of the ] river, and established a winter encampment at ], downstream from modern ]. Ctesiphon was then a small suburb directly across the river from Seleucia on the Tigris, the most ] city of western Asia. Because of their need of the wealth and trade provided by Seleucia, the Parthian armies limited their incursions to harassment, allowing the city to preserve its independence. In the heat of the Mesopotamian summer, the Parthian army would withdraw to the ancient Persian capitals of ] and ] (modern ]).


Whereas ] had served as the first Parthian capital, Mithridates I established royal residences at Seleucia, Ecbatana, ] and his newly founded city, Mithradatkert (]), where the tombs of the Arsacid kings were built and maintained.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=103, 110–113}}</ref> Ecbatana became the main summertime residence for the Arsacid royalty.<ref>{{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=73}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=77}}</ref> Ctesiphon may not have become the official capital until the reign of ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;90–80&nbsp;BC).<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=77}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=38–39}}</ref> It became the site of the royal ] ceremony and the representational city of the Arsacids, according to Brosius.<ref name="brosius_2006_103"/>
From around 130 BC, the Parthians suffered numerous incursions by ] nomads (also called the ] from ], possibly the Yuezhi), in which kings Phraates II and Artabanus I were successively killed. Scythians again invaded Parthia around 90 BC, putting king Sanatruces on the Parthian throne. In the early part of the first century BC, the Parthian empire seems to have suffered a very short and intense ], where little in writing survived.


The Seleucids were unable to retaliate immediately as general ] led a rebellion at the capital ] in 142 BC.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=34}}</ref> However, by 140&nbsp;BC ] was able to launch a counter-invasion against the Parthians in Mesopotamia. Despite early successes, the Seleucids were defeated and Demetrius himself was captured by Parthian forces and taken to Hyrcania. There Mithridates I treated his captive with great hospitality; he even married his daughter ] to Demetrius.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=89}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=35}}; {{harvnb|Shayegan|2007|pp=83–103}}</ref>
After the conquests of ], ], ] and ], the Parthians had to organize their empire. The former elites of these countries were ], and the new rulers had to adapt to their customs if they wanted their rule to last. As a result, the cities retained their ancient rights and civil administrations remained more or less undisturbed. An interesting detail is coinage: legends were written in the ], a practice that continued until the 2nd century AD, when local knowledge of the language was in decline and few people knew how to read or write the Greek alphabet.


] (''r''.&nbsp;138–129&nbsp;BC), a brother of Demetrius, assumed the Seleucid throne and married the latter's wife ]. After defeating Diodotus Tryphon, Antiochus initiated a campaign in 130&nbsp;BC to retake Mesopotamia, now under the rule of ] (''r''.&nbsp;c.&nbsp;132–127&nbsp;BC). The Parthian general Indates was defeated along the ], followed by a local uprising where the Parthian governor of Babylonia was killed. Antiochus conquered Babylonia and occupied Susa, where he minted coins.<ref name="bivar_1983_36-37 curtis_2007_11">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=36–37}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=11}}; {{harvnb|Shayegan|2011|pp=121–150}}</ref> After Antiochus advanced his army into Media, the Parthians pushed for peace, which Antiochus refused to accept unless the Arsacids relinquished all lands to him except Parthia proper, paid heavy tribute, and released Demetrius from captivity. Arsaces released Demetrius and sent him to ], but refused the other demands.<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|pp=76–77}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=36–37}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=11}}</ref> By spring 129&nbsp;BC, the Medes were in open revolt against Antiochus, whose army had exhausted the resources of the countryside during winter. While Antiochus attempted to put down the revolts, the main Parthian force swept into the region and killed Antiochus at the ] in 129 BC. His body was sent back to Syria in a silver coffin; his son Seleucus was made a Parthian hostage<ref>{{harvnb|Shayegan|2011|pp=145–150}}</ref> and a daughter joined Phraates' ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=37–38}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=77}}; see also {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=90}} and {{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|pp=41–42}}</ref>
Another source of inspiration was the Achaemenid dynasty that had once ruled the Persian Empire. Courtiers spoke Persian and used the ]; the royal court traveled from capital to capital, and the Arsacid kings styled themselves "king of kings". It was an apt title, as in addition to his own kingdom the Parthian monarch was the overlord of some eighteen vassal kings, such as the rulers of the city state ], the kingdom of ] and the ancient kingdom of ].


] (''r''.&nbsp;c.&nbsp;124–91&nbsp;BC). Reverse side: seated archer carrying a bow; inscription reading "of the ] Arsaces the Renowned/Manifest Philhellene."]]
==Decline==
The empire was not very centralized. There were several languages, many peoples, and a number of different economic systems. The loose ties between the separate parts of the empire were a key to its survival. In the 2nd century AD, the most important capital, ], was captured no less than three times by the ] (in 116, 165 and 198), but the empire survived because there were other centers of power. On the other hand, the fact that the empire was a mere conglomeration of kingdoms, provinces and city-states did at times seriously weaken the Parthian state. This was a major factor in the halt of the Parthian expansion after the conquests of ] and ].


While the Parthians regained the territories lost in the west, another threat arose in the east. In 177–176&nbsp;BC the nomadic confederation of the ] dislodged the nomadic ] from their homelands in what is now ] province in ];<ref>{{harvnb|Torday|1997|pp=80–81}}</ref> the Yuezhi then migrated west into Bactria and displaced the ] (Scythian) tribes. The Saka were forced to move further west, where they invaded the Parthian Empire's northeastern borders.<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=76}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=36–37}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=89, 91}}</ref> Mithridates I was thus forced to retire to Hyrcania after his conquest of Mesopotamia.<ref name="brosius_2006_89">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=89}}</ref>
Local potentates played important roles, and the king had to respect their privileges. Several noble families had votes in the Royal council; the ] had the right to crown the Parthian king, and every aristocrat was allowed and expected to retain an ] of his own. When the throne was occupied by a weak ruler, divisions among the nobility became dangerous.


Some of the Saka were enlisted in Phraates' forces against Antiochus. However, they arrived too late to engage in the conflict. When Phraates refused to pay their wages, the Saka revolted, which he tried to put down with the aid of former Seleucid soldiers, yet they too abandoned Phraates and joined sides with the Saka.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=38}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=77}}</ref> Phraates II marched against this combined force, but he was killed in battle.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=38–39}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=77}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=11}}; {{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|p=42}}</ref> The Roman historian ] reports that his successor ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;128–124&nbsp;BC) shared a similar fate fighting nomads in the east. He claims Artabanus was killed by the Tokhari (identified as the Yuezhi), although Bivar believes Justin conflated them with the Saka.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=38–39}}</ref> ] (r. c.&nbsp;124–91&nbsp;BC) later recovered the lands lost to the Saka in ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=40–41}}; {{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|p=42}}</ref>
The constituent parts of the empire were surprisingly independent. For example, they were allowed to strike their own ], a privilege which in antiquity was very rare. As long as the local elite paid tribute to the Parthian king, there was little interference. The system worked well: towns such as ], ], ], ], ], ], and ] flourished.


] Chinese ] from ], 2nd century BC, silk from ] was perhaps the most lucrative luxury item the Parthians traded at the western end of the ].<ref name="garthwaite_2005_78">{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=78}}</ref>]]
] was one source of royal income; another was ]. Parthia controlled the ], the trade route between the ] and ] during ].

Following the Seleucid withdrawal from Mesopotamia, the Parthian governor of Babylonia, Himerus, was ordered by the Arsacid court to conquer ], then ruled by ] from ]. When this failed, Hyspaosines invaded Babylonia in 127&nbsp;BC and occupied Seleucia. Yet by 122&nbsp;BC, Mithridates II forced Hyspaosines out of Babylonia and made the kings of Characene ]s under Parthian ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=40}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=11–12}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=90}}</ref> After Mithridates II extended Parthian control further west, occupying ] in 113&nbsp;BC, he became embroiled in a conflict with the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=11–12}}</ref> His forces defeated and deposed ] in 97&nbsp;BC, taking his son Tigranes hostage, who would later become ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;95–55&nbsp;BC).<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=91–92}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=40–41}}</ref>

The ], located in modern-day Afghanistan and Pakistan made an alliance with the Parthian Empire in the 1st century BC.<ref name="bivar_2007_26">{{harvnb|Bivar|2007|p=26}}</ref> Bivar claims that these two states considered each other political equals.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=41}}</ref> After the Greek philosopher ] visited the court of ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;40–47&nbsp;AD) in 42&nbsp;AD, Vardanes provided him with the protection of a caravan as he traveled to Indo-Parthia. When Apollonius reached Indo-Parthia's capital ], his caravan leader read Vardanes' official letter, perhaps written in Parthian, to an Indian official who treated Apollonius with great hospitality.<ref name="bivar_2007_26"/>

Following the ] of ] into Central Asia during the reign of ] (''r''.&nbsp;141–87&nbsp;BC), the ] of China sent a delegation to Mithridates II's court in 121&nbsp;BC. The Han embassy ] with Parthia via the ] yet did not achieve a desired military alliance against the confederation of the Xiongnu.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=90–91}}; {{harvnb|Watson|1983|pp=540–542}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|pp=77–78}}</ref> The Parthian Empire was enriched by taxing the Eurasian caravan trade in ], the most highly priced luxury good ].<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=78}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=122–123}}</ref> Pearls were also a highly valued import from China, while the Chinese purchased Parthian spices, perfumes, and fruits.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=123–125}}</ref> Exotic animals were also given as gifts from the Arsacid to Han courts; in 87 AD ] sent lions and Persian gazelles to ] (''r''.&nbsp;75–88&nbsp;AD).<ref>{{harvnb|Wang|2007|pp=100–101}}</ref> Besides silk, Parthian goods purchased by Roman merchants included ], ], and fine leather.<ref>{{harvnb|Kurz|1983|p=560}}</ref> Caravans traveling through the Parthian Empire brought West Asian and sometimes ] to China.<ref>{{harvnb|Ebrey|1999|p=70}}; for an archaeological survey of Roman glasswares in ancient Chinese burials, see {{harvnb|An|2002|pp=79–84}}</ref> The merchants of ], speaking an ], served as the primary middlemen of this vital silk trade between ].<ref>{{harvnb|Howard|2012|p=133}}</ref>

===Rome and Armenia===
{{Main|Roman–Persian relations|Roman–Parthian Wars|}}
] from the sanctuary at Shami in ] (modern-day ], ], along the Persian Gulf), now located at the ]. Dated 50 BC – 150 AD, Parthian School.}}]]

The Yuezhi ] in northern India largely guaranteed the security of Parthia's eastern border.<ref name="brosius_2006_92">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=92}}</ref> Thus, from the mid-1st century BC onwards, the Arsacid court focused on securing the western border, primarily against Rome.<ref name="brosius_2006_92"/> A year following Mithridates II's subjugation of Armenia, ], the Roman ] of ], convened with the Parthian diplomat ] at the ] river. The two agreed that the river would serve as the border between Parthia and Rome, although several historians have argued that Sulla only had authority to communicate these terms back to Rome.<ref>{{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|pp=73–78}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=91}}; {{harvnb|Sheldon|2010|pp=12–16}}</ref>

Despite this agreement, in 93 or 92&nbsp;BC Parthia fought a war in Syria against the tribal leader ] and her Seleucid ally ] (''r''.&nbsp;95–92?&nbsp;BC), killing the latter.<ref name="kennedy_1996_77–78">{{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|pp=77–78}}</ref> When one of the last Seleucid monarchs, ], attempted to besiege Beroea (modern ]), Parthia sent military aid to the inhabitants and Demetrius was defeated.<ref name="kennedy_1996_77–78"/>

Following the rule of Mithridates II, his son ] succeeded him.<ref>{{harvnb|Assar|2006|p=62}}; {{harvnb|Shayegan|2011|p=225}}; {{harvnb|Rezakhani|2013|p=770}}</ref> He reigned during a period coined in scholarship as the "]," due to the lack of clear information on the events of this period in the empire, except a series of, apparently overlapping, reigns.{{sfn|Shayegan|2011|pp=188–189}}{{sfn|Sellwood|1976|p=2}} It is only with the beginning of the reign of ] in {{circa|57 BC}}, that the line of Parthian rulers can again be reliably traced.{{sfn|Sellwood|1976|p=2}} This system of split monarchy weakened Parthia, allowing Tigranes II of Armenia to annex Parthian territory in western Mesopotamia. This land would not be restored to Parthia until the reign of ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;78–69&nbsp;BC).<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=91–92}}</ref>

Following the outbreak of the ], ] (''r''.&nbsp;119–63&nbsp;BC), an ally of Tigranes II of Armenia, requested aid from Parthia against Rome, but Sinatruces refused help.<ref name="bivar_1983_44-45">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=44–45}}</ref> When the Roman commander ] marched against the Armenian capital ] in 69&nbsp;BC, Mithridates VI and Tigranes II requested the aid of ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;71–58). Phraates did not send aid to either, and after the ] he reaffirmed with Lucullus the Euphrates as the boundary between Parthia and Rome.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=45–46}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=94}}</ref>

Tigranes the Younger, son of Tigranes II of Armenia, failed to usurp the Armenian throne from his father. He fled to Phraates III and convinced him to march against Armenia's new capital at ]. When this siege failed, Tigranes the Younger once again fled, this time to the Roman commander ]. He promised Pompey that he would act as a guide through Armenia, but, when Tigranes II submitted to Rome as a ], Tigranes the Younger was brought to Rome as a hostage.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=46–47}}</ref> Phraates demanded Pompey return Tigranes the Younger to him, but Pompey refused. In retaliation, Phraates launched an invasion into ] (southeastern Turkey) where, according to two conflicting Roman accounts, the Roman consul ] forced the Parthians out by either military or diplomatic means.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=47}}; ] writes that Lucius Afranius reoccupied the region without confronting the Parthian army, whereas ] asserts that Afranius drove him out by military means.</ref>

Phraates III was assassinated by his sons ] and ], after which Orodes turned on Mithridates, forcing him to flee from Media to ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=48–49}}; see also {{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|pp=42–43}}</ref> ], the Roman proconsul of Syria, marched in support of Mithridates to the Euphrates, but had to turn back to aid ] (''r''.&nbsp;80–58; 55–51&nbsp;BC) against a rebellion in Egypt.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=48–49}}; also, {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=94–95}} mentions this in passing.</ref> Despite losing his Roman support, Mithridates managed to conquer Babylonia, and minted coins at Seleucia until 54&nbsp;BC. In that year, Orodes' general, known only as ] after his noble family's clan name, recaptured Seleucia, and Mithridates was executed.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=49}}</ref>

], who was ] by ]]]

], one of the ], who was now proconsul of Syria, invaded Parthia in 53&nbsp;BC in belated support of Mithridates.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=49–50}}; {{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|pp=42–43}}</ref> As his army ] (modern ], southeastern Turkey), Orodes II invaded Armenia, cutting off support from Rome's ally ] (''r''.&nbsp;53–34&nbsp;BC). Orodes persuaded Artavasdes to a marriage alliance between the crown prince ] (d.&nbsp;38&nbsp;BC) and Artavasdes' sister.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=55–56}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=79}}; see also {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=94–95}} and {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=12–13}}</ref>

Surena, with an army entirely on horseback, rode to meet Crassus.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=52–55}}</ref> Surena's 1,000 ]s (armed with lances) and 9,000 ]s were outnumbered roughly four to one by Crassus' army, comprising seven ]s and auxiliaries including mounted ]s and light infantry.<ref name="bivar_1983_52">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=52}}</ref> Using a baggage train of about 1,000 camels, the Parthian army provided the horse archers with a constant supply of arrows.<ref name="bivar_1983_52"/> The horse archers employed the "]" tactic: feigning retreat to draw enemy out, then turning and shooting at them when exposed. This tactic, executed with heavy ]s on the flat plain, devastated Crassus' infantry.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=52–55}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=94–95}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|pp=78–79}}</ref>

With some 20,000 Romans dead, approximately 10,000 captured, and roughly another 10,000 escaping west, Crassus fled into the Armenian countryside.<ref>{{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|pp=42–43}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=79}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=52–55}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=96}}</ref> At the head of his army, Surena approached Crassus, offering a ], which Crassus accepted. However, he was killed when one of his junior officers, suspecting a trap, attempted to stop him from riding into Surena's camp.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=52–55}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=96}}</ref> Crassus' defeat at Carrhae was one of the worst military defeats of Roman history.<ref name="kennedy_1996_78"/> Parthia's victory cemented its reputation as a formidable if not equal power with Rome.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=55–56}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=96}}</ref> With his camp followers, war captives, and precious Roman booty, Surena traveled some 700&nbsp;km (430&nbsp;mi) back to Seleucia where his victory was celebrated. However, fearing his ambitions even for the Arsacid throne, Orodes had Surena executed shortly thereafter.<ref name="kennedy_1996_78">{{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=78}}</ref>

] bearing the portraits of ] (left) and ] (right), issued in 41&nbsp;BC to celebrate the establishment of the ] by Octavian, Antony and ] in 43&nbsp;BC]]
Emboldened by the victory over Crassus, the Parthians attempted to capture Roman-held territories in ].<ref>{{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=80}} asserts that permanent occupation was the obvious goal of the Parthians, especially after the cities of Roman Syria and even the Roman garrisons submitted to the Parthians and joined their cause.</ref> ] Pacorus I and his commander Osaces raided Syria as far as Antioch in 51 BC, but were repulsed by ], who ambushed and killed Osaces.<ref>{{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|pp=78–79}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=56}}</ref> The Arsacids sided with Pompey in ] and even sent troops to support the anti-Caesarian forces at the ] in 42&nbsp;BC.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=56–57}}; {{harvnb|Strugnell|2006|p=243}}</ref>

], a general loyal to Cassius and ], sided with Parthia against the ] in 40 BC; the following year he invaded Syria alongside Pacorus I.<ref name="bivar_1983_57 strugnell_2006_244 kennedy_1996_80">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=57}}; {{harvnb|Strugnell|2006|p=244}}; {{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=80}}</ref> The triumvir ] was unable to lead the Roman defense against Parthia due to his departure to Italy, where he amassed his forces to confront his rival ] and eventually conducted negotiations with him at Brundisium.<ref>{{harvnb|Syme|2002|pp=214–217}}</ref>

After Syria was occupied by Pacorus' army, Labienus split from the main Parthian force to invade ] while Pacorus and his commander ] invaded the Roman ].<ref name="bivar_1983_57 strugnell_2006_244 kennedy_1996_80"/> They subdued all settlements along the Mediterranean coast as far south as Ptolemais (modern ]), with the lone exception of ].<ref name="bivar_1983_57">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=57}}</ref> In ], the pro-Roman Jewish forces of high priest ], ], and ] were defeated by the Parthians and their Jewish ally ] (r.&nbsp;40–37&nbsp;BC); the latter was made king of Judea while Herod fled to his fort at ].<ref name="bivar_1983_57 strugnell_2006_244 kennedy_1996_80"/>

Despite these successes, the Parthians were soon driven out of the Levant by a Roman counteroffensive. ], an officer under Mark Antony, defeated and then executed Labienus at the ] (in modern ], Turkey) in 39 BC.<ref name="bivar_1983_57-58 strugnell_2006_239, 245 brosius_2006_96 kennedy 1996_80">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=57–58}}; {{harvnb|Strugnell|2006|pp=239, 245}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=96}}; {{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=80}}</ref> Shortly afterward, a Parthian force in Syria led by general Pharnapates was defeated by Ventidius at the ].<ref name="bivar_1983_57-58 strugnell_2006_239, 245 brosius_2006_96 kennedy 1996_80"/>

As a result, Pacorus I temporarily withdrew from Syria. When he returned in the spring of 38&nbsp;BC, he faced Ventidius at the ], northeast of Antioch. Pacorus was killed during the battle, and his forces retreated across the Euphrates. His death spurred a succession crisis in which Orodes II chose ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;38–2&nbsp;BC) as his new heir.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=58}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=96}}; {{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|pp=80–81}}; see also {{harvnb|Strugnell|2006|pp=239, 245–246}}</ref>

] (''r''.&nbsp;c.&nbsp;38–2&nbsp;BC). Inscription reading ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΝ ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ ΕΥΕΡΓΕΤΟΥ ΕΠΙΦΑΝΟΥΣ ΦΙΛΕΛΛΗΝΟΣ "of the ] Arsaces the Renowned/Manifest Benefactor Philhellene"]]

Upon assuming the throne, Phraates IV eliminated rival claimants by killing and exiling his own brothers.<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=79}}</ref> One of them, Monaeses, fled to Antony and persuaded him to ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=58–59}}; {{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=81}}</ref> Antony defeated Parthia's Judaean ally Antigonus in 37&nbsp;BC, installing Herod as a client king in his place.

The following year, when Antony marched to ], Artavasdes II of Armenia once again switched alliances by sending Antony additional troops. Antony invaded Media ] (modern ]), then ruled by Parthia's ally ], with the intention of seizing the capital Praaspa, the location of which is now unknown. However, Phraates IV ambushed Antony's rear detachment, destroying a giant ] meant for the siege of Praaspa; after this, Artavasdes II abandoned Antony's forces.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=58–59}}</ref>

The Parthians pursued and harassed Antony's army as it fled to Armenia. Eventually, the greatly weakened force reached Syria.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=60–63}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=80}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=13}}; see also {{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=81}} for analysis on Rome's shift of attention away from Syria to the Upper Euphrates, starting with Antony.</ref> Antony lured Artavasdes II into a trap with the promise of a marriage alliance. He was taken captive in 34 BC, paraded in Antony's mock ] in ], Egypt,<ref>{{harvnb|Roller|2010|p=99}}</ref> and eventually executed by ] of the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Burstein|2004|p=31}}</ref><ref name="bivar_1983_64-65">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=64–65}}</ref>

Antony attempted to strike an alliance with Artavasdes I of Media Atropatene, whose relations with Phraates IV had recently soured. This was abandoned when Antony and his forces withdrew from Armenia in 33&nbsp;BC; they escaped a Parthian invasion while Antony's rival Octavian attacked his forces to the west.<ref name="bivar_1983_64-65"/> After the defeat and suicides of Antony and Cleopatra in 30 BC,<ref>{{harvnb|Roller|2010|pp=145–151}}</ref> Parthian ally ] reassumed the throne of Armenia.

===Peace with Rome, court intrigue, and contact with Chinese generals===
{{Further|Pax Romana}}

Following the defeat and deaths of Antony and ] of ] after the ] in 31&nbsp;BC, Octavian consolidated his political power and in 27&nbsp;BC was named ] by the ], becoming the first ].<ref>{{harvnb|Roller|2010|pp=138–151}}; {{harvnb|Bringmann|2007|pp=304–307}}</ref> Around this time, ] briefly overthrew Phraates IV, who was able to quickly reestablish his rule with the aid of Scythian nomads.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=65–66}}</ref> Tiridates fled to the Romans, taking one of Phraates' sons with him. In negotiations conducted in 20&nbsp;BC, Phraates arranged for the release of his kidnapped son. In return, the Romans received the lost ] taken at Carrhae in 53&nbsp;BC, as well as any surviving prisoners of war.<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=80}}; see also {{harvnb|Strugnell|2006|pp=251–252}}</ref> The Parthians viewed this exchange as a small price to pay to regain the prince.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=66–67}}</ref> Augustus hailed the return of the standards as a political victory over Parthia; this propaganda was celebrated in the minting of new coins, the ] to house the standards, and even in fine art such as the ] scene on his statue ].<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=96–97; 136–137}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=66–67}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=12–13}}</ref>

] on the statue of ], showing a Parthian man returning to ] the ] lost by ] at ]]]

Along with the prince, Augustus also gave Phraates IV an Italian slave-girl, who later became Queen ]. To ensure that her child Phraataces would inherit the throne without incident, Musa convinced Phraates IV to give his other sons to Augustus as hostages. Again, Augustus used this as propaganda depicting the submission of Parthia to Rome, listing it as a great accomplishment in his '']''.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=67}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=96–99}}</ref> When Phraataces took the throne as ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;2&nbsp;BC – 4&nbsp;AD), Musa ruled alongside him, and according to ], married him. The Parthian nobility, disapproving of the notion of a king with non-Arsacid blood, forced the pair into exile in Roman territory.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=68}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=97–99}}; see also {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=80}}</ref> Phraates' successor ] lasted just two years on the throne, and was followed by ], who had adopted many Roman mannerisms during time in Rome. The Parthian nobility, angered by Vonones' sympathies for the Romans, backed a rival claimant, ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;10–38&nbsp;AD), who eventually defeated Vonones and drove him into exile in Roman Syria.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=68–69}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=97–99}}</ref>

During the reign of Artabanus II, two Jewish commoners and brothers, ] from ] (near modern ], Iraq),<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=69–71}}</ref> led a revolt against the Parthian governor of Babylonia. After defeating the latter, the two were granted the right to govern the region by Artabanus II, who feared further rebellion elsewhere.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=71}}</ref> Anilai's Parthian wife poisoned Asinai out of fear he would attack Anilai over his marriage to a ]. Following this, Anilai became embroiled in an armed conflict with a son-in-law of Artabanus, who eventually defeated him.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=71–72}}</ref> With the Jewish regime removed, the native Babylonians began to harass the ], forcing them to emigrate to Seleucia. When that city rebelled against Parthian rule in 35–36&nbsp;AD, the Jews were expelled again, this time by the local ] and ]. The exiled Jews fled to Ctesiphon, Nehardea, and ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=72–73}}</ref>

] struck in 19&nbsp;BC during the reign of ], with the goddess ] depicted on the obverse, and on the reverse a Parthian man kneeling in submission while offering the Roman ] taken at the ]<ref>See {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=137–138}} for more information on Roman coins depicting Parthians returning the lost military standards to Rome.</ref>]]

Although at peace with Parthia, Rome still interfered in its affairs. The Roman emperor ] (r.&nbsp;14–37&nbsp;AD) became involved in a plot by ] to place his brother ] on the throne of Armenia by assassinating the Parthian ally King Arsaces of Armenia.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=73}}</ref> Artabanus II tried and failed to restore Parthian control of Armenia, prompting an aristocratic revolt that forced him to flee to ]. The Romans released a hostage prince, ], to rule the region as an ally of Rome. Shortly before his death, Artabanus managed to force Tiridates from the throne using troops from Hyrcania.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=73–74}}</ref> After Artabanus' death in 38&nbsp;AD, a long civil war ensued between the rightful successor ] and his brother ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=75–76}}</ref> After Vardanes was assassinated during a hunting expedition, the Parthian nobility appealed to Roman emperor ] (''r''. 41–54&nbsp;AD) in 49&nbsp;AD to release the hostage prince ] to challenge Gotarzes. This backfired when Meherdates was betrayed by the governor of ] and ] of ]; he was captured and sent to Gotarzes, where he was allowed to live after having his ears mutilated, an act that disqualified him from inheriting the throne.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=76–78}}</ref>

In 97&nbsp;AD, the Chinese general ], the ], sent his emissary ] on a diplomatic mission to reach the Roman Empire. Gan visited the court of ] at Hecatompylos before departing towards Rome.<ref name="watson_1983_543-544">{{harvnb|Watson|1983|pp=543–544}}</ref> He traveled as far west as the ], where Parthian authorities convinced him that an arduous sea voyage around the ] was the only means to reach Rome.<ref>{{harvnb|Watson|1983|pp=543–544}}; {{harvnb|Yü|1986|pp=460–461}}; {{harvnb|de Crespigny|2007|pp=239–240}}; see also {{harvnb|Wang|2007|p=101}}</ref> Discouraged by this, Gan Ying returned to the Han court and provided ] (''r''.&nbsp;88–105&nbsp;AD) with a detailed report on the Roman Empire based on oral accounts of his Parthian hosts.<ref>{{harvnb|Wood|2002|pp=46–47}}; {{harvnb|Morton|Lewis|2005|p=59}}</ref> William Watson speculates that the Parthians would have been relieved at the failed efforts by the Han Empire to open diplomatic relations with Rome, especially after Ban Chao's ] against the ] in ].<ref name="watson_1983_543-544"/> However, Chinese records maintain that a ], perhaps only a group of ], ] ] by way of ] (northern ]) in 166&nbsp;AD, during the reigns of ] (''r''. 161–180&nbsp;AD) and ] (''r''. 146–168&nbsp;AD).<ref>{{harvnb|Yü|1986|pp=460–461}}; {{harvnb|de Crespigny|2007|p=600}}</ref> Although it could be coincidental, ] Roman golden ]lions dated to the reigns of Marcus Aurelius and his predecessor ] have been discovered at ], Vietnam (among other Roman artefacts in the ]), a site that is one of the suggested locations for the port city of "]" along the '']'' (i.e. ] and ]) in ]'s '']''.<ref>{{harvnb|Young|2001|p=29}}; {{harvnb|Mawer|2013|p=38}}; {{harvnb|Ball|2016|p=153}}</ref>

===Continuation of Roman hostilities and Parthian decline===
{{Main|Roman–Parthian War of 58–63|Trajan's Parthian campaign|Roman–Parthian War of 161–166|Parthian war of Caracalla}}
{{Further|Roman Armenia}}
] AD over the ], detailing the Roman offensive into ] and capture of the country by ]]]
]-]. ], ]. 2nd–3rd century AD. Louvre Museum Sb 7302.<ref>{{cite web|title=Louvre Museum Sb 7302|url=https://www.louvre.fr/oeuvre-notices/bas-relief}}</ref>]]

After the ] Pharasmanes I had his son ] (''r''.&nbsp;51–55&nbsp;AD) invade Armenia to depose the Roman client king Mithridates, ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;51–77&nbsp;AD) planned to invade and place his brother, the later ], on the throne.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=79}}</ref> Rhadamistus was eventually driven from power, and, beginning with the reign of Tiridates, Parthia would retain firm control over Armenia—with brief interruptions—through the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=79–81}}; {{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=81}}</ref> Even after the fall of the Parthian Empire, the Arsacid line lived on through the Armenian kings.<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=82}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=79–81}}</ref> However, not only did the Arsacid line continue through the Armenians, it also continued through the ] kings with the ], and for many centuries afterwards in ] through the ].<ref name="Bausani 1971 41">{{harvnb|Bausani|1971|p=41}}</ref>

When ] rebelled against his father Vologases I in 55&nbsp;AD, Vologases withdrew his forces from Armenia. Rome quickly attempted to fill the political vacuum left behind.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=81}}</ref> In the ]&nbsp;AD, the commander ] achieved some military successes against the Parthians while installing ] as a Roman client.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=81–85}}</ref> However, Corbulo's successor ] was soundly defeated by Parthian forces and fled Armenia.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=83–85}}</ref> Following a peace treaty, Tiridates I traveled to ] and Rome in 63 AD. At both sites the Roman emperor ] (''r''.&nbsp;54–68&nbsp;AD) ceremoniously crowned him king of Armenia by placing the royal ] on his head.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=99–100}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=85}}</ref>

A long period of peace between Parthia and Rome ensued, with only the invasion of ] into Parthia's eastern territories around 72&nbsp;AD mentioned by Roman historians.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=86}}</ref> Whereas Augustus and Nero had chosen a cautious military policy when confronting Parthia, later Roman emperors invaded and attempted to conquer the eastern ], the heart of the Parthian Empire along the ] and ]. The heightened aggression can be explained in part by Rome's military reforms.<ref>{{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|pp=67, 87–88}}</ref> To match Parthia's strength in missile troops and mounted warriors, the Romans at first used foreign allies (especially ]), but later established a permanent '']'' force to complement their heavy legionary infantry.<ref name="kennedy_1996_87">{{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=87}}</ref> The Romans eventually maintained regiments of horse archers ('']'') and even mail-armored ]s in their eastern provinces.<ref>{{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|pp=87–88}}; see also {{harvnb|Kurz|1983|pp=561–562}}</ref> Yet the Romans had no discernible ] in dealing with Parthia and gained very little territory from these invasions.<ref>{{harvnb|Sheldon|2010|pp=231–232}}</ref> The primary motivations for war were the advancement of the personal glory and political position of the emperor, as well as defending Roman honor against perceived slights such as Parthian interference in the affairs of Rome's client states.<ref>{{harvnb|Sheldon|2010|pp=9–10, 231–235}}</ref>

] of Parthian king at ], most likely ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;110–147&nbsp;AD){{sfn|Olbrycht|2016|p=96}}]]

Hostilities between Rome and Parthia were renewed when ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;109–128&nbsp;AD) deposed the Armenian king ] and replaced him with ], son of Pacorus II, without consulting Rome.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=86–87}}</ref> The Roman emperor ] (''r''.&nbsp;98–117&nbsp;AD) had the next Parthian nominee for the throne, Parthamasiris, killed in 114&nbsp;AD, instead making Armenia a Roman province.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=88}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=13}}; {{harvnb|Lightfoot|1990|p=117}}</ref> His forces, led by ], also captured Nisibis; its occupation was essential to securing all the major routes across the northern Mesopotamian plain.<ref>{{harvnb|Lightfoot|1990|pp=117–118}}; see also {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=90–91}}</ref> The following year, Trajan invaded Mesopotamia and met little resistance from only ] of Adiabene, since Osroes was engaged in a civil war to the east with ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=88–89}}</ref> Trajan spent the winter of 115–116 at Antioch, but resumed his campaign in the spring. Marching down the Euphrates, he captured Dura-Europos, the capital Ctesiphon<ref>{{cite book|author=Dr. Aaron Ralby|title=Atlas of Military History|chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/atlasofworldmili0000ralb|chapter-url-access=registration|year=2013|publisher=Parragon|isbn=978-1-4723-0963-1|page=|chapter=Emperor Trajan, 98–117: Greatest Extent of Rome}}</ref> and Seleucia, and even subjugated Characene, where he watched ships depart to India from the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=88–90}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=81}}; {{harvnb|Lightfoot|1990|p=120}}; see also {{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|p=44}}</ref>

In the last months of 116&nbsp;AD, Trajan captured the Persian city of Susa. When ] gathered forces in eastern Parthia to challenge the Romans, his cousin ] betrayed and killed him: Trajan crowned him the new king of Parthia.<ref name="bivar_1983_90-91">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=90–91}}</ref> Never again would the Roman Empire advance so far to the east. On Trajan's return north, the Babylonian settlements revolted against the Roman garrisons.<ref>{{harvnb|Lightfoot|1990|p=120}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=90–91}}</ref> Trajan was forced to retreat from Mesopotamia in 117&nbsp;AD, overseeing a failed siege of ] during his withdrawal.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=91}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=13}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=81}}</ref> His retreat was—in his intentions—temporary, because he wanted to renew the attack on Parthia in 118 AD and "make the subjection of the Parthians a reality,"<ref>{{harvnb|Mommsen|2004|p=69}}</ref> but Trajan died suddenly in August 117&nbsp;AD. During his campaign, Trajan was granted the title ''Parthicus'' by the Senate and coins were minted proclaiming the conquest of Parthia.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=90–91}}; see also {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=137}} and {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=13}}</ref> However, only the 4th-century AD historians ] and ] allege that he attempted to establish a ] in lower Mesopotamia.<ref>{{harvnb|Lightfoot|1990|pp=120–124}}</ref>

], depicted as a prisoner of war in chains held by a Roman (left); ], Rome, 203&nbsp;AD]]

Trajan's successor ] (''r''.&nbsp;117–138&nbsp;AD) reaffirmed the ] border at the Euphrates, choosing not to invade Mesopotamia due to Rome's now limited military resources.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=100}}; see also {{harvnb|Lightfoot|1990|p=115}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=81}}; and {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=91}}</ref> Parthamaspates fled after the Parthians revolted against him, yet the Romans made him king of ]. Osroes I died during his conflict with Vologases III, the latter succeeded by ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;147–191&nbsp;AD) who ushered in a period of peace and stability.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=92–93}}</ref> However, the ]&nbsp;AD began when Vologases invaded Armenia and Syria, retaking Edessa. Roman emperor ] (''r''.&nbsp;161–180&nbsp;AD) had co-ruler ] (''r''.&nbsp;161–169&nbsp;AD) guard Syria while ] invaded Armenia in 163&nbsp;AD, followed by the invasion of Mesopotamia by ] in 164&nbsp;AD.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=93}}</ref> The Romans captured and burnt Seleucia and Ctesiphon to the ground, yet they were forced to retreat once the Roman soldiers contracted a ] (possibly ]) that soon ravaged the Roman world.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=100}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=93–94}}</ref> Although they withdrew, from this point forward the city of Dura-Europos remained in Roman hands.<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=13}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=93–94}}</ref> When Roman emperor ] (''r''.&nbsp;193–211&nbsp;AD) invaded Mesopotamia in 197&nbsp;AD during the reign of ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;191–208&nbsp;AD), the Romans once again marched down the Euphrates and captured Seleucia and Ctesiphon. After assuming the title ''Parthicus Maximus'', he retreated in late 198&nbsp;AD, failing as Trajan once did to capture Hatra during a siege.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=100}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=13}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=94}}; {{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|p=44}}</ref>

Around 212&nbsp;AD, soon after ] (''r''. c.&nbsp;208–222&nbsp;AD) took the throne, his brother ] (d.&nbsp;224&nbsp;AD) rebelled against him and gained control over a greater part of the empire.<ref name="bivar_1983_94-95">{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=94–95}}</ref> Meanwhile, the Roman emperor ] (''r''.&nbsp;211–217&nbsp;AD) deposed the kings of Osroene and Armenia to make them Roman provinces once more. He marched into Mesopotamia under the pretext of marrying one of Artabanus' daughters, but the marriage was not allowed. Consequently, Caracalla made war on Parthia, conquering ]<ref name="bivar_1983_94-95"/> and sacking the Parthian tombs there.{{sfn|Chegini|Nikitin|1996|p=35}} Caracalla was assassinated the next year on the road to Carrhae by his soldiers.<ref name="bivar_1983_94-95"/> At the ], the Parthians were able to defeat the Romans, but both sides suffered heavy losses.<ref>Herodian, IV.15.5</ref> After this debacle, the Parthians made a settlement with ] (''r''.&nbsp;217–218) where the Romans paid Parthia over two-hundred million '']'' with additional gifts.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=100–101}}; see also {{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|p=44}}, who mentions this in passing</ref>

The Parthian Empire, weakened by internal strife and wars with Rome, was soon to be followed by the ]. Indeed, shortly afterward, ], the local Iranian ruler of Persis (modern ], Iran) from ] began subjugating the surrounding territories in defiance of Arsacid rule.<ref name="brosius_2006_101 bivar_1983_95-96 curtis_2007_14 katouzian_2009_44">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=101}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=95–96}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=14}}; see also {{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|p=44}}</ref> He confronted Artabanus IV at the ] on 28 April 224&nbsp;AD, perhaps at a site near ], defeating him and establishing the Sasanian Empire.<ref name="brosius_2006_101 bivar_1983_95-96 curtis_2007_14 katouzian_2009_44"/> There is evidence, however, that suggests Vologases VI continued to mint coins at Seleucia as late as 228&nbsp;AD.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=95–96}}</ref>

The Sassanians would not only assume Parthia's legacy as Rome's Persian nemesis, but they would also attempt to restore the boundaries of the Achaemenid Empire by ] the Levant, Anatolia, and Egypt from the ] during the reign of ] (''r''.&nbsp;590–628&nbsp;AD).<ref>{{harvnb|Frye|1983|pp=173–174}}</ref> However, they would lose these territories to ]—the last Roman emperor before the ]. Nevertheless, for a period of more than 400 years, they succeeded the Parthian realm as Rome's principal rival.<ref>Norman A. Stillman ''The Jews of Arab Lands'' pp 22 Jewish Publication Society, 1979 {{ISBN|0-8276-1155-2}}</ref><ref>International Congress of Byzantine Studies ''Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Byzantine Studies, London, 21–26 August 2006, Volumes 1–3'' pp 29. Ashgate Pub Co, 30 sep. 2006 {{ISBN|0-7546-5740-X}}</ref>

===Native and external sources===
{{multiple image| align = right | direction = horizontal | header = | header_align = left/right/center | footer = Parthian gold jewelry items found at a burial site in ] (near modern ], ]) in the ]| footer_align = left | image1 = Parthian gold funerary objects by Nickmard Khoey.jpg | width1 = 126 | caption1 = | image2 = Parthian jewelry from Nineveh by Nickmard Khoey.jpg | width2 = 174 | caption2 = }}

Local and foreign written accounts, as well as non-textual artifacts, have been used to reconstruct Parthian history.<ref name="widengren_1983_1261-1262">{{harvnb|Widengren|1983|pp=1261–1262}}</ref> Although the Parthian court maintained records, the Parthians had no formal study of ]; the earliest ] of Iran, the '']'', was not compiled until the reign of the last Sasanian ruler ] (r. 632–651&nbsp;AD).<ref>{{harvnb|Yarshater|1983|p=359}}</ref> Indigenous ] on Parthian history remain scarce, with fewer of them available than for any other period of Iranian history.<ref name="widengren_1983_1261">{{harvnb|Widengren|1983|p=1261}}</ref> Most contemporary written records on Parthia contain Greek as well as Parthian and Aramaic inscriptions.<ref name="garthwaite_2005_75-76">{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|pp=75–76}}</ref> The Parthian language was written in a distinct script derived from the ] of the Achaemenids, and later developed into the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Boyce|1983|pp=1151–1152}}</ref>

]

The most valuable indigenous sources for reconstructing an accurate chronology of Arsacid rulers are the metal ] coins issued by each ruler.<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=67}}; {{harvnb|Widengren|1983|p=1262}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=79–80}}</ref> These represent a "transition from non-textual to textual remains," according to historian ].<ref name="widengren_1983_1262">{{harvnb|Widengren|1983|p=1262}}</ref> Other Parthian sources used for reconstructing chronology include ] astronomical tablets and colophons discovered in Babylonia.<ref name="widengren_1983_1265">{{harvnb|Widengren|1983|p=1265}}</ref> Indigenous textual sources also include stone ]s, ] and ] documents, and pottery ].<ref name="widengren_1983_1262"/> For example, at the early Parthian capital of Mithradatkert/Nisa in Turkmenistan, large caches of pottery ostraca have been found yielding information on the sale and storage of items like wine.<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|pp=75–76}}; {{harvnb|Widengren|1983|p=1263}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=118–119}}</ref> Along with parchment documents found at sites like Dura-Europos, these also provide valuable information on Parthian governmental administration, covering issues such as taxation, military titles, and provincial organization.<ref>{{harvnb|Widengren|1983|p=1263}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=118–119}}</ref>

]]]
], ], Iran, ]]]

The ] and ], which represent the majority of materials covering Parthian history, are not considered entirely reliable since they were written from the perspective of rivals and wartime enemies.<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|pp=67, 75}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=22}}</ref> These external sources generally concern major military and political events, and often ignore social and cultural aspects of Parthian history.<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=75}}; {{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=80–81}}</ref> The Romans usually depicted the Parthians as fierce warriors but also as a culturally refined people; recipes for Parthian dishes in the cookbook '']'' exemplifies their admiration for Parthian cuisine.<ref>{{harvnb|Kurz|1983|p=564}}; see also {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=138}} for further analysis: "Curiously, at the same time as the Parthian was depicted as uncivilised, he was also 'orientalised' in traditional fashion, being described as luxury-loving, leading an effeminate lifestyle, and demonstrating excessive sexuality."</ref> ] and ] wrote histories focusing on Parthia, which are now lost and survive only as quoted extracts in other histories.<ref>{{harvnb|Widengren|1983|pp=1261, 1264}}</ref> ], who lived during the reign of Augustus, provides an account of Parthian territories, perhaps from a Parthian government survey.<ref name="widengren_1983_1264">{{harvnb|Widengren|1983|p=1264}}</ref> To a lesser extent, people and events of Parthian history were also included in the histories of ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{harvnb|Widengren|1983|pp=1265–1266}}</ref>

Parthian history can also be reconstructed via the ] of events.<ref name="widengren_1983_1265, 1267">{{harvnb|Widengren|1983|pp=1265, 1267}}</ref> In contrast to Greek and Roman histories, the early Chinese histories maintained a more neutral view when describing Parthia,<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=80}}; {{harvnb|Posch|1998|p=363}}</ref> although the habit of Chinese chroniclers to copy material for their accounts from older works (of undetermined origin) makes it difficult to establish a chronological order of events.<ref>{{harvnb|Posch|1998|p=358}}</ref> The Chinese called Parthia ''{{ill|Ānxī|zh|安息|vertical-align=sup}}'' (Chinese: ] ], ]: '''ansjək''), perhaps after the Greek name for the Parthian city ] (Greek: Ἀντιόχεια ἡ ἐν τῇ Μαργιανῇ).<ref>{{harvnb|Watson|1983|pp=541–542}}</ref> However, this could also have been a transliteration of "Arsaces", after the dynasty's eponymous founder.<ref>{{harvnb|Wang|2007|p=90}}</ref> The works and historical authors include the '']'' (also known as the ''Records of the Grand Historian'') by ], the '']'' (Book of Han) by ], ], and ], and the '']'' (Book of Later Han) by ].<ref>{{harvnb|Wang|2007|p=88}}</ref> They provide information on the nomadic migrations leading up to the early ] invasion of Parthia and valuable political and geographical information.<ref name="widengren_1983_1265, 1267"/> For example, the ''Shiji'' (ch. 123) describes diplomatic exchanges, exotic gifts given by Mithridates II to the ], types of agricultural crops grown in Parthia, production of wine using grapes, itinerant merchants, and the size and location of Parthian territory.<ref>{{harvnb|Wang|2007|pp=89–90}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=90–91, 122}}</ref> The ''Shiji'' also mentions that the Parthians kept records by "writing horizontally on strips of leather," that is, parchment.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=118}}; see also {{harvnb|Wang|2007|p=90}} for a similar translation</ref>

In Islamic sources, the Parthian dynasty is mentioned with three dynastic branch names: Aškāniān (اشکانیان), Ašġāniān (اشغانیان), and Afquršāhān (افقورشاهان). The obvious differences between the names of Parthian dynastic branches in Islamic sources has been forgotten by modern Persian-speaking historians. Intentionally or unintentionally, because the translators and correctors of Arabic to Persian sources changed the letter "ġ" (غ) to "k" (ک) in all historical texts and also changed the word of "Persia" to "Iran", the true intention of the Islamic historical sources have been forgotten. As the consequence, these different dynastic branches have become a single dynasty in the form of the name Aškāniān (اشکانیان) in the new editions of Islamic sources.<ref>Kalani, Reza. 2022. ''Indo-Parthians and the Rise of Sasanians'', Tahouri Publishers, Tehran, pp. 95-111.</ref> It is known, however, that the Arsacid royal family line survived within three ruling dynasties belonging to ], ], and ] in the Caucasus.<ref name="Bausani 1971 41"/>

==Government and administration==

===Central authority and semi-autonomous kings===
{{Main|List of Parthian kings}}
], king of ] (modern ]), and his wife Queen ], 1st century BC]]

Compared with the earlier Achaemenid Empire, the Parthian government was notably ].<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|pp=67–68}}</ref> An indigenous historical source reveals that territories overseen by the central government were organized in a similar manner to the Seleucid Empire. They both had a threefold division for their provincial hierarchies: the Parthian ], xšatrap, and dizpat, similar to the Seleucid ], ], and hyparchy.<ref name="widengren_1983_1263">{{harvnb|Widengren|1983|p=1263}}</ref> The Parthian Empire also contained several subordinate semi-autonomous kingdoms, including the states of ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name="lukonin_1983_701">{{harvnb|Lukonin|1983|p=701}}</ref> The state rulers governed their own territories and minted their own coinage distinct from the royal coinage produced at the imperial mints.<ref>{{harvnb|Lukonin|1983|p=701}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=19–21}}</ref> This was not unlike the earlier Achaemenid Empire, which also had some city-states, and even distant satrapies who were semi-independent but "recognised the supremacy of the king, paid tribute and provided military support", according to Brosius.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=113–114}}</ref> However, the satraps of Parthian times governed smaller territories, and perhaps had less prestige and influence than their Achaemenid predecessors.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=115–116}}</ref> During the Seleucid period, the trend of local ruling dynasties with semi-autonomous rule, and sometimes outright rebellious rule, became commonplace, a fact reflected in the later Parthian style of governance.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=114–115}}</ref>

===Nobility===
{{Further|Seven Great Houses of Iran|List of rulers of Parthian sub-kingdoms}}
] at ], early 3rd century AD]]

The King of Kings headed the Parthian government. He maintained ] relations, and was usually succeeded by his first-born son.<ref name="brosius_2006_103-104">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=103–104}}</ref> Like the Ptolemies of Egypt, there is also record of Arsacid kings marrying their nieces and perhaps even half-sisters; ] is said by ] to have married her own son, though this would be an extreme and isolated case.<ref name="brosius_2006_103-104"/> Brosius provides an extract from a letter written in Greek by King Artabanus II in 21&nbsp;AD, which addresses the governor (titled "]") and citizens of the city of ]. Specific government offices of Preferred Friend, Bodyguard and Treasurer are mentioned and the document also proves that "while there were local jurisdictions and proceedings to appointment to high office, the king could intervene on behalf of an individual, review a case and amend the local ruling if he considered it appropriate."<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=119}}</ref>

The hereditary titles of the hierarchic nobility recorded during the reign of the first Sasanian monarch Ardashir I most likely reflect the titles already in use during the Parthian era.<ref>{{harvnb|Lukonin|1983|pp=699–700}}</ref> There were three distinct tiers of nobility, the highest being the regional kings directly below the King of Kings, the second being those related to the King of Kings only through marriage, and the lowest order being heads of local clans and small territories.<ref>{{harvnb|Lukonin|1983|pp=700–704}}</ref>

By the 1st century AD, the Parthian nobility had assumed great power and influence in the succession and deposition of Arsacid kings.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=99–100, 104}}</ref> Some of the nobility functioned as court advisers to the king, as well as holy priests.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=104–105, 117–118}}</ref> ], in his '']'', preserved a claim by the Greek philosopher and historian ] that the Council of Parthia consisted of noble kinsmen and ], two groups from which "the kings were appointed."<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0198:book=11:chapter=9:section=3|title=Strabo, Geography, Book 11, chapter 9, section 3|website=perseus.tufts.edu|access-date=2017-09-11|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161221063316/http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0198%3Abook%3D11%3Achapter%3D9%3Asection%3D3|archive-date=2016-12-21|url-status=live}}</ref> Of the great noble Parthian families listed at the beginning of the Sassanian period, only two are explicitly mentioned in earlier Parthian documents: the ] and the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Lukonin|1983|pp=704–705}}</ref> The historian ] noted that members of the Suren family, the first among the nobility, were given the privilege of crowning each new Arsacid King of Kings during their coronations.<ref>{{harvnb|Lukonin|1983|p=704}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=104}}</ref>

===Military===
{{Further|Parthian army}}

The Parthian Empire had no ], yet were able to quickly recruit troops in the event of local crises.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=116, 122}}; {{harvnb|Sheldon|2010|pp=231–232}}</ref> There was a permanent armed guard attached to the person of the king, comprising nobles, ]s and ], but this royal retinue was small.<ref name="kennedy_1996_84">{{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=84}}</ref> Garrisons were also permanently maintained at border forts; Parthian inscriptions reveal some of the military titles granted to the commanders of these locations.<ref name="kennedy_1996_84"/> Military forces could also be used in diplomatic gestures. For example, when Chinese envoys visited Parthia in the late 2nd century BC, the '']'' maintains that 20,000 horsemen were sent to the eastern borders to serve as escorts for the embassy, although this figure is perhaps an exaggeration.<ref>{{harvnb|Wang|2007|pp=99–100}}</ref>

{{multiple image
| image1 = ParthianHorseman.jpg
| caption1 = Parthian ], now on display at the ]
| image2 = ParthianCataphract.JPG
| caption2 = Parthian ] fighting a lion
| image3 = Zahhak castle stucco 2.JPG
| caption3 = Relief of an infantryman, from ], Iran
| total_width = 500
| footer = The combination of horse archers and cataphracts formed an effective backbone for the Parthian military
}}

The main striking force of the Parthian army was its ]s, heavy cavalry with man and horse decked in ].<ref name="brosius_2006_120 garthwaite_2005_78">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=120}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=78}}</ref> The cataphracts were equipped with a lance for charging into enemy lines, but were not equipped with bows and arrows which were restricted to horse archers.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=120}}; {{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=84}}</ref> Due to the cost of their equipment and armor, cataphracts were recruited from among the aristocratic class who, in return for their services, demanded a measure of autonomy at the local level from the Arsacid kings.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=116–118}}; see also {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=78}} and {{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=84}}</ref> The light cavalry was recruited from among the commoner class and acted as ]s; they wore a simple tunic and trousers into battle.<ref name="brosius_2006_120 garthwaite_2005_78"/> They used ]s and were able to shoot at enemies while riding and facing away from them; this technique, known as the ], was a highly effective tactic.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=120}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=78}}; {{harvnb|Kurz|1983|p=561}}</ref> It appears that most of the Parthian army was cavalry, for tactical and strategic reasons. The light cavalry is thought to have carried a sword into battle as well, while cataphracts likely were also armed with short swords or knives.{{sfn|Shahbazi|1986|pp=489–499}} The Parthians also made use of the ] in armed combat.{{sfn|Shahbazi|1986|pp=489–499}} The heavy and light cavalry of Parthia proved to be a decisive factor in the ] where a Parthian force defeated a much larger Roman army under Crassus. Light infantry units, composed of ] and mercenaries, were used to disperse enemy troops after cavalry charges.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=122}}</ref>

The Parthians do not appear to have ever used ] in battle. However, royal Parthian women accompanied the king on military campaigns and were known to have ridden on chariots and wagons.{{sfn|Shahbazi|1986|pp=489–499}} Similarly, the Parthians appeared to have used ]s infrequently. There is one mention, by ] and ], of the use of one war elephant by ] during the ].<ref name=Daryaee>{{cite book|last1=Daryaee|first1=Touraj|chapter=From Terror to Tactical Usage: Elephants in the Partho-Sasanian Period,&quot; The Parthian and Early Sasanian Empires: Adaptation and Expansion|editor-first=V. Sarkhosh|editor-last1=Curtis|editor-first2=Michael|editor-last2=Alram|editor-first3=Touraj|editor-last3=Daryaee|publisher=Oxford University Press|title=The Parthian and Early Sasanian Empires|year=2016|page=36|doi=10.2307/j.ctvh1dkb6.7|url=https://www.academia.edu/27081447|language=en}}</ref>

The size of the Parthian army is unknown, as is the size of the empire's overall population. However, archaeological excavations in former Parthian urban centers reveal settlements which could have sustained large populations and hence a great resource in manpower.<ref name="kennedy_1996_83">{{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=83}}</ref> Dense population centers in regions like Babylonia were no doubt attractive to the Romans, whose armies could afford to live off the land.<ref name="kennedy_1996_83"/> The largest army raised by the Parthians appears to have been 50,000.{{sfn|Shahbazi|1986|pp=489–499}}

===Currency===
{{Further|Parthian coinage}}

Usually made of silver,<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=9, 11–12, 16}}</ref> the ] coin, including the ], was the standard currency used throughout the Parthian Empire.<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=7–25}}; {{harvnb|Sellwood|1983|pp=279–298}}</ref> The Arsacids maintained ] at the cities of Hecatompylos, Seleucia, and Ecbatana.<ref name="brosius_2006_103">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=103}}</ref> They most likely operated a mint at Mithridatkert/Nisa as well.<ref name="curtis_2007_8"/> From the empire's inception until its collapse, drachmas produced throughout the Parthian period rarely weighed less than 3.5&nbsp;g or more than 4.2&nbsp;g.<ref>{{harvnb|Sellwood|1983|p=280}}</ref> The first Parthian tetradrachms, weighing in principle around 16&nbsp;g with some variation, appear after Mithridates I conquered Mesopotamia and were minted exclusively at Seleucia.<ref>{{harvnb|Sellwood|1983|p=282}}</ref>

==Society and culture==

===Hellenism and the Iranian revival===
]. The clothing is Parthian, while the style is Hellenistic (sitting on an ]). The Greek inscription reads "King Arsaces, the ]"]]

Although ] of the Seleucids was widely adopted by peoples of the ] during the ], the Parthian era witnessed an ] in religion, the arts, and even clothing fashions.<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=14–15}}; see also {{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|p=45}}</ref> Conscious of both the Hellenistic and Persian cultural roots of their kingship, the Arsacid rulers styled themselves after the Persian King of Kings and affirmed that they were also '']'' ("friends of the Greeks").<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=85}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|pp=14–15}}</ref> The word "philhellene" was inscribed on Parthian coins until the reign of Artabanus II.<ref name="curtis_2007_11">{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=11}}</ref> The discontinuation of this phrase signified the revival of Iranian culture in Parthia.<ref name="curtis_2007_16">{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=16}}</ref> Vologases I was the first Arsacid ruler to have the ] and ] appear on his minted coins alongside the now almost illegible Greek.<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|pp=80–81}}; see also {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=21}} and {{harvnb|Schlumberger|1983|p=1030}}</ref> However, the use of Greek-alphabet legends on Parthian coins remained until the collapse of the empire.<ref>{{harvnb|Schlumberger|1983|p=1030}}</ref>

]

Greek cultural influence did not disappear from the Parthian Empire, however, and there is evidence that the Arsacids enjoyed ]. When the head of Crassus was brought to Orodes II, he, alongside Armenian king Artavasdes II, were busy watching a performance of '']'' by the playwright ] (c.&nbsp;480–406 BC). The producer of the play decided to use Crassus' actual severed head in place of the ] head of ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=56}}</ref>

On his coins, Arsaces I is depicted in apparel similar to Achaemenid satraps. According to A. Shahbazi, Arsaces "deliberately diverges from Seleucid coins to emphasize his nationalistic and royal aspirations, and he calls himself Kārny/Karny (Greek: Autocrator), a title already borne by Achaemenid supreme generals, such as Cyrus the Younger."<ref name=shahbazi525/> In line with Achaemenid traditions, rock-relief images of Arsacid rulers were carved at ], where ] (r. 522–486 BC) made ].<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=85}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=128–129}}</ref> Moreover, the Arsacids claimed familial descent from ] (''r''.&nbsp;404–358 BC) as a means to bolster their legitimacy in ruling over former Achaemenid territories, i.e. as being "legitimate successors of glorious kings" of ancient Iran.<ref>{{harvnb|Lukonin|1983|p=697}}</ref> ] named one of his sons Darius and laid claim to ]' heritage.<ref name=shahbazi525>{{harvnb|Shahbazi|1987|p=525}}</ref> The Arsacid kings chose typical Zoroastrian names for themselves and some from the "]" of the ], according to V.G. Lukonin.<ref>{{harvnb|Lukonin|1983|p=687}}; {{harvnb|Shahbazi|1987|p=525}}</ref> The Parthians also adopted the use of the ] with names from the Achaemenid ], replacing the ] of the Seleucids.<ref>{{harvnb|Duchesne-Guillemin|1983|pp=867–868}}</ref>

===Religion===
]

The Parthian Empire, being culturally and politically heterogeneous, had a variety of religious systems and beliefs, the most widespread being those dedicated to ] and ] cults.<ref name="katouzian_2009_45">{{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|p=45}}</ref> Aside from a minority of ]<ref>{{harvnb|Neusner|1983|pp=909–923}}</ref> and early ],<ref>{{harvnb|Asmussen|1983|pp=924–928}}</ref> most Parthians were ].<ref name="brosius_2006_125">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=125}}</ref> Greek and Iranian deities were often blended together as one. For example, ] was often equated with ], ] with ], ] and ] with ], ] with ], and ] with ].<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|pp=68, 83–84}}; {{harvnb|Colpe|1983|p=823}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=125}}</ref> Aside from the main gods and goddesses, each ethnic group and city had their own designated deities.<ref name="brosius_2006_125"/> As with Seleucid rulers,<ref>{{harvnb|Duchesne-Guillemin|1983|pp=872–873}}</ref> Parthian art indicates that the Arsacid kings viewed themselves as gods; this ] was perhaps the most widespread.<ref>{{harvnb|Colpe|1983|p=844}}</ref>

The extent of Arsacid patronage of ] is debated in modern scholarship.<ref>{{harvnb|Katouzian|2009|p=45}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=102–103}}</ref> The followers of ] would have found the bloody sacrifices of some Parthian-era Iranian cults to be unacceptable.<ref name="katouzian_2009_45"/> However, there is evidence that ] encouraged the presence of Zoroastrian ] priests at court and sponsored the compilation of sacred Zoroastrian texts which later formed the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=85–86}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|pp=80–81}}; {{harvnb|Duchesne-Guillemin|1983|p=867}}</ref> The Sasanian court would later adopt Zoroastrianism as the official state religion of the empire.<ref>{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=67}}; {{harvnb|Asmussen|1983|pp=928, 933–934}}</ref>

Although ] (216–276 AD), the founding prophet of ], did not proclaim his first religious revelation until 228/229 AD, Bivar asserts that his new faith contained "elements of ] belief, Iranian cosmogony, and even echoes of Christianity&nbsp;... may be regarded as a typical reflection of the mixed religious doctrines of the late Arsacid period, which the Zoroastrian orthodoxy of the Sasanians was soon to sweep away."<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|p=97}}</ref>

There is scant archaeological evidence for the spread of ] from the ] into Iran proper.<ref>{{harvnb|Emmerick|1983|p=957}}</ref> However, it is known from Chinese sources that ] (fl. 2nd century AD), a Parthian nobleman and Buddhist monk, traveled to ] in Han China as a ] and translated several ] into ].<ref>{{harvnb|Demiéville|1986|p=823}}; {{harvnb|Zhang|2002|p=75}}</ref>

===Art and architecture===
{{Further|Parthian art}}
]ed '']'' at the entrance at the ancient site of ], modern-day ], built c.&nbsp;50 AD]]
].]]

Parthian art can be divided into three geo-historical phases: the art of Parthia proper; the art of the ]; and the art of Parthian Mesopotamia.<ref name="brosius_2006_127">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=127}}</ref> The first genuine Parthian art, found at Mithridatkert/Nisa, combined elements of Greek and Iranian art in line with Achaemenid and Seleucid traditions.<ref name="brosius_2006_127"/> In the second phase, Parthian art found inspiration in ], as exemplified by the investiture relief of Mithridates II at Mount Behistun.<ref name="brosius_2006_128"/> The third phase occurred gradually after the Parthian conquest of Mesopotamia.<ref name="brosius_2006_128"/>

Common ] of the Parthian period include scenes of royal hunting expeditions and the ] of Arsacid kings.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=127}}; see also {{harvnb|Schlumberger|1983|pp=1041–1043}}</ref> Use of these motifs extended to include portrayals of local rulers.<ref name="brosius_2006_127"/> Common art mediums were rock-reliefs, ]s, and even ].<ref name="brosius_2006_127"/> Geometric and stylized plant patterns were also used on ] and ] walls.<ref name="brosius_2006_128"/> The common motif of the Sasanian period showing two horsemen engaged in combat with lances first appeared in the Parthian reliefs at Mount Behistun.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=129, 132}}</ref>

In ]ure the Parthians favored and emphasized frontality, meaning the person depicted by painting, sculpture, or raised-relief on coins faced the viewer directly instead of showing his or her profile.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=127}}; {{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=84}}; {{harvnb|Schlumberger|1983|pp=1049–1050}}</ref> Although frontality in portraiture was already an old artistic technique by the Parthian period, ] explains the innovation of Parthian frontality:<ref name="schlumberger_1983_1051"/>

<blockquote>'Parthian frontality', as we are now accustomed to call it, deeply differs both from ancient Near Eastern and from Greek frontality, though it is, no doubt, an offspring of the latter. For both in Oriental art and in Greek art, frontality was an exceptional treatment: in Oriental art it was a treatment strictly reserved for a small number of traditional characters of cult and myth; in Greek art it was an option resorted to only for definite reasons, when demanded by the subject, and, on the whole, seldom made use of. With Parthian art, on the contrary, frontality becomes the normal treatment of the figure. For the Parthians frontality is really nothing but the habit of showing, in relief and in painting, all figures full-face, even at the expense (as it seems to us moderns) of clearness and intelligibility. So systematic is this use that it amounts to a complete banishment ''de facto'' of the side-view and of all intermediate attitudes. This singular state of things seems to have become established in the course of the 1st century A.D.<ref name="schlumberger_1983_1051">{{harvnb|Schlumberger|1983|p=1051}}</ref></blockquote>

] at the ], dated 245 AD, which Curtis<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=18}}</ref> and Schlumberger<ref>{{harvnb|Schlumberger|1983|pp=1052–1053}}</ref> describe as a fine example of 'Parthian frontality']]

Parthian art, with its distinct use of frontality in portraiture, was lost and abandoned with the profound cultural and political changes brought by the Sasanian Empire.<ref>{{harvnb|Schlumberger|1983|p=1053}}</ref> However, even after the Roman occupation of Dura-Europos in 165 AD, the use of Parthian frontality in portraiture continued to flourish there. This is exemplified by the early 3rd-century AD wall murals of the ], a temple in the same city dedicated to Palmyrene gods, and the local ].<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=18}}; {{harvnb|Schlumberger|1983|pp=1052–1053}}</ref>

Parthian architecture adopted elements of ] and ], but remained distinct from the two. The style is first attested at Mithridatkert/Nisa.<ref name="brosius_2006_111-112">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=111–112}}</ref> The Round Hall of Nisa is similar to Hellenistic palaces, but different in that it forms a circle and ] inside a square space.<ref name="brosius_2006_111-112"/> However, the artwork of Nisa, including marble statues and the carved scenes on ivory ] vessels, is unquestionably influenced by Greek art.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=111–112, 127–128}}; {{harvnb|Schlumberger|1983|pp=1037–1041}}</ref>

A signature feature of Parthian architecture was the '']'', an audience hall supported by arches or ]s and open on one side.<ref name="garthwaite_2005_84 brosius_2006_128 schlumberger_1983_1049">{{harvnb|Garthwaite|2005|p=84}}; {{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=128}}; {{harvnb|Schlumberger|1983|p=1049}}</ref> Use of the barrel vault replaced the Hellenic use of columns to support roofs.<ref name="brosius_2006_128">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=128}}</ref> Although the ''iwan'' was known during the Achaemenid period and earlier in smaller and subterranean structures, it was the Parthians who first built them on a monumental scale.<ref name="garthwaite_2005_84 brosius_2006_128 schlumberger_1983_1049"/> The earliest Parthian ''iwans'' are found at Seleucia, built in the early 1st century AD.<ref name="brosius_2006_128"/> Monumental ''iwans'' are also commonly found in the ancient temples of Hatra and perhaps modeled on the Parthian style.<ref name="brosius_2006_134-135">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=134–135}}</ref> The largest Parthian ''iwans'' at that site have a span of 15&nbsp;m (50&nbsp;ft).<ref>{{harvnb|Schlumberger|1983|p=1049}}</ref>

===Clothing and apparel===
], from the Parthian royal residence and necropolis of ], 2nd century BC]]

The typical ] is exemplified by ] of a Parthian nobleman found at Shami, Elymais. Standing 1.9&nbsp;m (6&nbsp;ft), the figure wears a V-shaped jacket, a V-shaped ] fastened in place with a belt, loose-fitting and many-folded trousers held by garters, and a diadem or band over his coiffed, bobbed hair.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=132–134}}</ref> His outfit is commonly seen in relief images of Parthian coins by the mid-1st century BC.<ref name="curtis_2007_16"/>

Examples of clothing in Parthian inspired sculptures have been found in excavations at Hatra, in northwestern Iraq. Statues erected there feature the typical Parthian shirt (''qamis''), combined with trousers and made with fine, ornamented materials.<ref>{{harvnb|Bivar|1983|pp=91–92}}</ref> The aristocratic elite of Hatra adopted the bobbed hairstyles, headdresses, and belted tunics worn by the nobility belonging to the central Arsacid court.<ref name="brosius_2006_134-135"/> The trouser-suit was even worn by the Arsacid kings, as shown on the reverse images of coins.<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=15}}</ref> The Parthian trouser-suit was also adopted in ], Syria, along with the use of Parthian frontality in art.<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=17}}</ref>

Parthian sculptures depict wealthy women wearing long-sleeved robes over a dress, with necklaces, earrings, bracelets, and headdresses bedecked in jewelry.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=108, 134–135}}</ref> Their many-folded dresses were fastened by a ] at one shoulder.<ref name="brosius_2006_134-135"/> Their headdresses also featured a veil which was draped backwards.<ref name="brosius_2006_134-135"/>

As seen in Parthian coinage, the headdresses worn by the Parthian kings changed over time. The earliest Arsacid coins show rulers wearing the soft cap with cheek flaps, known as the ] (Greek: ''kyrbasia'').<ref name="brosius_2006_101">{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=101}}</ref> This may have derived from an Achaemenid-era satrapal headdress and the ]s depicted in the Achaemenid reliefs at Behistun and ].<ref>{{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=8}}; see also {{harvnb|Sellwood|1983|pp=279–280}} for comparison with Achaemenid satrapal headdresses</ref> The earliest coins of Mithridates I show him wearing the soft cap, yet coins from the latter part of his reign show him for the first time wearing the royal Hellenistic diadem.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=101–102}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=9}}</ref> Mithridates II was the first to be shown wearing the Parthian ], embroidered with pearls and jewels, a headdress commonly worn in the late Parthian period and by Sasanian monarchs.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|pp=101–102}}; {{harvnb|Curtis|2007|p=15}}</ref>

===Language===
As culturally and religiously tolerant as the Parthians were, they adopted ] as their ], while ] remained the '']'' in the empire.<ref name="Green 1992 45"/> The native ], ], and ] were also used.{{sfn|Skjærvø|2004|pp=348–366}}{{sfn|Canepa|2018|p=6}}

===Literature and music===
{{Further|Parthian music}}
]

It is known that during the Parthian period the court ] (''gōsān'') recited poetic ] accompanied by music. However, their stories, composed in verse form, were not written down until the subsequent Sassanian period.<ref>{{harvnb|Brosius|2006|p=106}}</ref> In fact, there is no known Parthian-language literature that survives in original form; all of the surviving texts were written down in the following centuries.<ref>{{harvnb|Boyce|1983|p=1151}}</ref> It is believed that such stories as the romantic tale '']'' and ] of the ] were part of the corpus of oral literature from Parthian times, although compiled much later.<ref>{{harvnb|Boyce|1983|pp=1158–1159}}</ref> Although literature of the Parthian language was not committed to written form, there is evidence that the Arsacids acknowledged and respected written ].<ref>{{harvnb|Boyce|1983|pp=1154–1155}}; see also {{harvnb|Kennedy|1996|p=74}}</ref>

===Women in the Parthian Empire===
There are very few written and archeological sources about the position of women in the Parthian Empire, and the fragmentary information that does exist is only about royal women, whose position shows many similarities to their ] and their ].<ref name="Maria Brosius"/>

The Parthian kings were polygamous and had several wives with the title "queen" (referred to with the Babylonian spelling šarratu or the Greek basilisse), as well as concubines.<ref name="Maria Brosius">Maria Brosius, "WOMEN i. In Pre-Islamic Persia", Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, 2021, available at WOMEN i. In Pre-Islamic Persia (accessed on 26 January 2021). Originally Published: January 1, 2000. Last Updated: March 15, 2010. Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, New York, 1996– https://iranicaonline.org/articles/women-i {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201103225101/https://iranicaonline.org/articles/women-i |date=2020-11-03 }}</ref> It is known that kings often married their sisters, but it is unknown if they were the kings' full sisters or half sisters.<ref name="Maria Brosius"/> According to Roman sources, Parthian kings had ]s full of female slaves and ]s secluded from contact with men, and royal women were not allowed to participate in the royal banquets.<ref>Lerouge, Ch. 2007. L’image des Parthes dans le monde gréco-romain. Stuttgart.</ref> Whether the royal women lived in seclusion from men is unknown, as no evidence of that has been found, but it is known that women at least participated in the royal banquets as entertainers, as women are shown in archeological images entertaining at such occasions with music and dance.<ref>Kaim, B. 2016. "Women, Dance and the Hunt: Splendour and Pleasures of Court Life in Arsacid and Early Sasanian Art." In V. S. Curtis, E. J. Pendleton, M. Alram and T. Daryaee (eds.), The Parthian and Early Sasanian Empires: Adaptation and Expansion, Oxford, 90–105</ref>

It is assumed that royal Parthian women could own and manage their own property, land and manufactures, as could their predecessors in the Achaemenid and Seleucid Empire and their successors in the Sasanian Empire. It is fully attested that royal women, as well as noblewomen, accompanied their husbands in battle with their own entourage.<ref name="Maria Brosius"/> This was the reason why female members of the royal family could sometimes be taken captive by enemies and had to be ransomed, such as the famous occasion when the daughter of King Osroes was held captive by emperor Trajan from the occupation of Ctesiphon in 116 until 129, but also the reason why kings sometimes killed the women of his company after a defeat to prevent them from being taken prisoners.<ref name="Maria Brosius"/>

Royal women appear to have been less included in royal representation.<ref name="Maria Brosius"/> Artwork depicts royal women dressed similarly to those of the Achaemenid period: in long-sleeved, many-folded dresses tied by a belt, with a tiara or a veil hanging down their back.<ref name="Maria Brosius"/> While their names and titles did appear in official documents, Parthian women were rarely depicted in art. Only two royal women were ever depicted on Parthian coins: Queen ] and Queen ] of Elymais.<ref name="Maria Brosius"/> Only two women are known to have ruled the Parthian Empire, one as monarch and one as regent. Musa of Parthia is the only woman confirmed to have ruled as ] of the Parthian Empire, while ], mother of underage king ], is the only other woman believed to have been a ruler, in her case as a ] instead of a queen regnant.<ref>N. C. Debevoise, A Political History of Parthia, Chicago, 1938.</ref><ref>J. Oelsner, "Recht im hellenistischen Babylon," in Legal Documents of the Hellenistic World, ed. M. J. Geller and H. Maehler, London, 1995, pp. 106–148.</ref>


==See also== ==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ] * ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{clear}}

==Notes==
{{notelist}}


==References== ==References==
{{reflist}} {{reflist}}


==Sources==
]
{{refbegin|colwidth=30em}}
{{sfn whitelist|CITEREFSkjærvø2004|CITEREFWatson1983|CITEREFDuchesne-Guillemin1983|CITEREFNeusner1983|CITEREFAsmussen1983|CITEREFColpe1983|CITEREFEmmerick1983}}
* {{citation|last=An|first=Jiayao|chapter=When Glass Was Treasured in China|pages=79–94|title=Silk Road Studies: Nomads, Traders, and Holy Men Along China's Silk Road|volume=7|year=2002|publisher=Brepols Publishers|location=Turnhout|editor-last=Juliano, Annette L. and Judith A. Lerner|isbn=978-2-503-52178-7}}.
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3b|last=Asmussen|first=J.P.|chapter=Christians in Iran|pages=924–948}}
* {{Cite journal|last=Assar|first=Gholamreza F.|year=2006|title=A Revised Parthian Chronology of the Period 91–55 BC|journal=Parthica. Incontri di Culture Nel Mondo Antico|publisher=Istituti Editoriali e Poligrafici Internazionali|volume=8: Papers Presented to David Sellwood|isbn=978-8-881-47453-0|issn=1128-6342}}
* {{citation|last=Ball|first=Warwick|title=Rome in the East: Transformation of an Empire, 2nd Edition|year=2016|publisher=Routledge|location=London & New York|isbn=978-0-415-72078-6}}.
* {{citation|last=Bausani|first=Alessandro|pages=|title=The Persians, from the earliest days to the twentieth century|year=1971|publisher=St. Martin's Press|location=New York|isbn=978-0-236-17760-8|url=https://archive.org/details/persiansfromearl0000baus/page/41}}.
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3a|last=Bickerman|first=Elias J.|chapter=The Seleucid Period|pages=3–20}}
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3a|last=Bivar|first=A.D.H.|chapter=The Political History of Iran Under the Arsacids|pages=21–99}}
* {{citation|last=Bivar|first=A.D.H.|chapter=Gondophares and the Indo-Parthians|pages=26–36|title=The Age of the Parthians: The Ideas of Iran|volume=2|year=2007|publisher=I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd., in association with the London Middle East Institute at SOAS and the British Museum|location=London & New York|editor-last=Curtis, Vesta Sarkhosh and Sarah Stewart|isbn=978-1-84511-406-0}}.
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3b|last=Boyce|first=Mary|chapter=Parthian Writings and Literature|pages=1151–1165}}
* {{cite book|last=Bringmann|first=Klaus|title=A History of the Roman Republic|year=2007|orig-year=2002|location=Cambridge|publisher=Polity Press|isbn=978-0-7456-3371-8|translator=W. J. Smyth|language=en|url=http://www.polity.co.uk/book.asp?ref=9780745633701}}.
* {{citation|last=Brosius|first=Maria|title=The Persians: An Introduction|year=2006|publisher=Routledge|location=London & New York|isbn=978-0-415-32089-4}}.
* {{citation|last=Burstein|first=Stanley M.|title=The Reign of Cleopatra|location=Westport, CT|publisher=Greenwood Press|year=2004|url=https://archive.org/stream/ReignOfCleopatra/Reign%20of%20cleopatra_djvu.txt|isbn=978-0-313-32527-4|postscript=.}}
* {{cite book|last=Canepa|first=Matthew|author-link=Matthew P. Canepa|title=The Iranian Expanse: Transforming Royal Identity Through Architecture, Landscape, and the Built Environment, 550 BCE–642 CE|year=2018|location=Oakland|publisher=]|isbn=978-0520379206}}
* {{cite book|first1=N.N.|last1=Chegini|first2=A.V.|last2=Nikitin|chapter=Sasanian Iran – economy, society, arts and crafts|title=History of Civilizations of Central Asia|volume=III: The Crossroads of Civilization: AD 250 to 750|editor-first1=B.A.|editor-last1=Litvinsky|editor-first2=Zhang|editor-last2=Guang-da|editor-first3=R. Shabani|editor-last3=Samghabadi|publisher=UNESCO Publishing|year=1996}}35
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3b|last=Colpe|first=Carsten|chapter=Development of Religious Thought|pages=819–865}}
* {{citation|last=Curtis|first=Vesta Sarkhosh|chapter=The Iranian Revival in the Parthian Period|pages=7–25|title=The Age of the Parthians: The Ideas of Iran|volume=2|year=2007|publisher=I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd., in association with the London Middle East Institute at SOAS and the British Museum|location=London & New York|editor-last=Curtis, Vesta Sarkhosh and Sarah Stewart|isbn=978-1-84511-406-0}}.
* {{citation|last=de Crespigny|first=Rafe|title=A Biographical Dictionary of Later Han to the Three Kingdoms (23–220 AD)|year=2007|publisher=Koninklijke Brill|location=Leiden|isbn=978-90-04-15605-0}}.
* {{cite journal|last1=De Jong|first1=Albert|title=Regional Variation in Zoroastrianism: The Case of the Parthians|journal=Bulletin of the Asia Institute|date=2008|volume=22|pages=17–27|jstor=24049232}}.
* {{citation|last=Demiéville|first=Paul|chapter=Philosophy and religion from Han to Sui|pages=808–872|title=Cambridge History of China: the Ch'in and Han Empires, 221 B.C. – A.D. 220|volume=1|year=1986|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge|editor-last=Twitchett and Loewe|isbn=978-0-521-24327-8}}.
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3b|last=Duchesne-Guillemin|first=J.|chapter=Zoroastrian religion|pages=866–908}}.
* {{citation|last=Ebrey|first=Patricia Buckley|title=The Cambridge Illustrated History of China|year=1999|publisher=]|location=Cambridge|isbn=978-0-521-66991-7|url=https://archive.org/details/cambridgeillustr00ebre}} (paperback).
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3b|last=Emmerick|first=R.E.|chapter=Buddhism Among Iranian Peoples|pages=949–964}}.
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3a|last=Frye|first=R.N.|chapter=The Political History of Iran Under the Sasanians|pages=116–180}}
* {{citation|last=Garthwaite|first=Gene Ralph|title=The Persians|year=2005|publisher=Blackwell Publishing, Ltd.|location=Oxford & Carlton|isbn=978-1-55786-860-2}}.
* {{citation|last=Green|first=Tamara M.|title=The City of the Moon God: Religious Traditions of Harran|year=1992|publisher=Brill|isbn=978-90-04-09513-7}}.
* {{citation|last=Howard|first=Michael C.|title=Transnationalism in Ancient and Medieval Societies: the Role of Cross Border Trade and Travel|year=2012|publisher=McFarland & Company|location=Jefferson}}.
* {{citation|last=Katouzian|first=Homa|title=The Persians: Ancient, Medieval, and Modern Iran|year=2009|publisher=]|location=New Haven & London|isbn=978-0-300-12118-6}}.
* {{citation|last=Kennedy|first=David|author-link=David L. Kennedy|editor-given1=David L.|editor-surname1=Kennedy|editor-given2=David|editor-surname2=Braund|chapter=Parthia and Rome: eastern perspectives|pages=67–90|title=The Roman Army in the East|year=1996|location=Ann Arbor|publisher=Cushing Malloy Inc., Journal of Roman Archaeology: Supplementary Series Number Eighteen|isbn=978-1-887829-18-2}}
* {{cite book|editor-first1=G.A.|editor-last1=Koshelenko|editor-first2=V.N.|editor-last2=Pilipko|chapter=Parthia|title=History of Civilizations of Central Asia|volume=II|publisher=UNESCO Publishing|year=1996|url=https://depts.washington.edu/silkroad/exhibit/parthians/essay.html}}
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3a|last=Kurz|first=Otto|chapter=Cultural Relations Between Parthia and Rome|pages=559–567}}
* {{Citation|doi=10.2307/300283|last=Lightfoot|first=C.S.|year=1990|title=Trajan's Parthian War and the Fourth-Century Perspective|journal=The Journal of Roman Studies|volume=80|pages=115–126|jstor=300283|s2cid=162863957}}.
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3b|last=Lukonin|first=V.G.|chapter=Political, Social and Administrative Institutions: Taxes and Trade|pages=681–746}}.
* {{citation|last=Mawer|first=Granville Allen|chapter=The Riddle of Cattigara|pages=38–39|title=Mapping Our World: Terra Incognita to Australia|year=2013|via=National Library of Australia|editor-given1=Robert|editor-surname1=Nichols|editor-given2=Martin|editor-surname2=Woods|isbn=978-0-642-27809-8}}.
* {{citation|last=Mommsen|first=Theodor|author-link=Theodor Mommsen|title=The Provinces of the Roman Empire: From Caesar to Diocletian|year=2004|orig-year=original publication 1909 by Ares Publishers, Inc.|volume=2|publisher=Gorgias Press|location=Piscataway (New Jersey)|isbn=978-1-59333-026-2}}.
* {{citation|last1=Morton|first1=William S.|last2=Lewis|first2=Charlton M.|title=China: Its History and Culture|year=2005|publisher=McGraw-Hill|location=New York|isbn=978-0-07-141279-7}}.
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3b|last=Neusner|first=J.|chapter=Jews in Iran|pages=909–923}}.
* {{cite journal|last=Olbrycht|first=Marek Jan|title=The Sacral Kingship of the early Arsacids. I. Fire Cult and Kingly Glory|journal=Anabasis|date=2016|volume=7|pages=91–106|url=https://www.academia.edu/33754166|url-access=registration}}.
* {{citation|last=Posch|first=Walter|chapter=Chinesische Quellen zu den Parthern|pages=355–364|title=Das Partherreich und seine Zeugnisse|editor-last=Weisehöfer|editor-first=Josef|series=Historia: Zeitschrift für alte Geschichte, vol. 122|location=Stuttgart|publisher=Franz Steiner|year=1998|language=de}}.
* {{cite book|last1=Rezakhani|first1=Khodadad|author-link1=Khodadad Rezakhani|editor-last=Potts|editor-first=Daniel T.|title=The Oxford Handbook of Ancient Iran|date=2013|publisher=]|isbn=978-0199733309|chapter=Arsacid, Elymaean, and Persid Coinage}}.
* {{Citation|last=Roller|first=Duane W.|title=Cleopatra: a biography|year=2010|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|isbn=978-0-19-536553-5|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EZo6DwAAQBAJ|postscript=.}}
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3b|last=Schlumberger|first=Daniel|chapter=Parthian Art|pages=1027–1054}}
* {{cite journal|last=Sellwood|first=David|year=1976|title=The Drachms of the Parthian "Dark Age"|journal=The Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland|publisher=Cambridge University Press|volume=1|issue=1|pages=2–25|doi=10.1017/S0035869X00132988|jstor=25203669|s2cid=161619682}}{{Registration required}}
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3a|last=Sellwood|first=David|chapter=Parthian Coins|pages=279–298}}
* {{Citation|last=Shahbazi|first=Shahpur A.|year=1987|title=Arsacids. I. Origin|journal=Encyclopaedia Iranica|volume=2|page=255}}.
* {{Citation|last=Shayegan|first=Rahim M.|year=2007|title=On Demetrius II Nicator's Arsacid Captivity and Second Rule|journal=Bulletin of the Asia Institute|volume=17|pages=83–103}}.
* {{Citation|last=Shayegan|first=Rahim M.|title=Arsacids and Sasanians: Political Ideology in Post-Hellenistic and Late Antique Persia|year=2011|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge|isbn=978-0-521-76641-8}}.
* {{citation|last=Sheldon|first=Rose Mary|title=Rome's Wars in Parthia: Blood in the Sand|year=2010|publisher=Valentine Mitchell|location=London & Portland|isbn=978-0-85303-981-5}}.
* {{Encyclopaedia Iranica | volume=13 | fascicle=4 | title = Iran vi. Iranian languages and scripts | last = Skjærvø | first = Prods Oktor | authorlink = Prods Oktor Skjaervo | url = https://iranicaonline.org/articles/iran-vi2-documentation | pages = 348–366 }}
* {{Citation|doi=10.1556/AAnt.46.2006.3.3|last=Strugnell|first=Emma|year=2006|title=Ventidius' Parthian War: Rome's Forgotten Eastern Triumph|journal=Acta Antiqua|volume=46|issue=3|pages=239–252}}.
* {{citation|last=Syme|first=Ronald|author-link=Ronald Syme|title=The Roman Revolution|year=2002|orig-year=1939|publisher=Oxford University Press|location=Oxford|isbn=978-0-19-280320-7}}.
* {{citation|last=Torday|first=Laszlo|title=Mounted Archers: The Beginnings of Central Asian History|year=1997|publisher=The Durham Academic Press|location=Durham|isbn=978-1-900838-03-0}}.
* {{citation|last=Wang|first=Tao|chapter=Parthia in China: a Re-examination of the Historical Records|pages=87–104|title=The Age of the Parthians: The Ideas of Iran|volume=2|year=2007|publisher=I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd., in association with the London Middle East Institute at SOAS and the British Museum|location=London & New York|editor-last=Curtis, Vesta Sarkhosh and Sarah Stewart|isbn=978-1-84511-406-0}}.
* {{citation|last=Waters|first=Kenneth H.|chapter=The Reign of Trajan, part VII: Trajanic Wars and Frontiers. The Danube and the East|pages=415–427<!--381-431-->|title=Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt. Principat. II.2|year=1974|editor-last=Temporini|editor-first=Hildegard|location=Berlin|publisher=Walter de Gruyter}}.
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3a|last=Watson|first=William|chapter=Iran and China|pages=537–558}}
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3b|last=Widengren|first=Geo|chapter=Sources of Parthian and Sasanian History|pages=1261–1283}}{{sfn whitelist|CITEREFWidengren1983}}
* {{citation|last=Wood|first=Frances|title=The Silk Road: Two Thousand Years in the Heart of Asia|year=2002|publisher=]|location=Berkeley and Los Angeles|isbn=978-0-520-24340-8|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/silkroadtwothous0000wood}}.
* {{Cambridge History of Iran|volume=3a|last=Yarshater|first=Ehsan|chapter=Iranian National History|pages=359–480}}
* {{citation|last=Yü|first=Ying-shih|chapter=Han Foreign Relations|pages=377–462|title=Cambridge History of China: the Ch'in and Han Empires, 221 B.C. – A.D. 220|volume=1|year=1986|publisher=Cambridge University Press|location=Cambridge|editor-last=Twitchett, Denis and Michael Loewe|isbn=978-0-521-24327-8}}.
* {{citation|last=Young|first=Gary K.|title=Rome's Eastern Trade: International Commerce and Imperial Policy, 31 BC – AD 305|year=2001|publisher=Routledge|location=London & New York|isbn=978-0-415-24219-6}}.
* {{citation|last=Zhang|first=Guanuda|chapter=The Role of the Sogdians as Translators of Buddhist Texts|pages=75–78|title=Silk Road Studies: Nomads, Traders, and Holy Men Along China's Silk Road|volume=7|year=2002|publisher=Brepols Publishers|location=Turnhout|editor-last=Juliano, Annette L. and Judith A. Lerner|isbn=978-2-503-52178-7}}.
* {{cite book|title=The Oxford Handbook of Iranian History|year=2012|publisher=Oxford University Press|last=Daryaee|first=Touraj|author-link=Touraj Daryaee|pages=1–432|isbn=978-0-19-987575-7|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K-poAgAAQBAJ|access-date=2019-02-10|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190101051501/https://books.google.dk/books?id=K-poAgAAQBAJ&pg|archive-date=2019-01-01|url-status=dead}}
* {{cite encyclopedia|title=Army i. Pre-Islamic Iran|last=Shahbazi|first=A. Shapur|author-link=Alireza Shapour Shahbazi|url=http://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/army-i|encyclopedia=Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. II, Fasc. 5|pages=489–499|year=1986}}.

{{refend}}

==Further reading==
{{refbegin}}
* {{cite book|last=Ellerbrock|first=Uwe|year=2021|title=The Parthians: The Forgotten Empire|publisher=]|location=Abingdon-on-Thames|isbn=978-1-000-35848-3}}
* {{citation|last=Neusner|first=J.|title=Parthian Political Ideology|journal=Iranica Antiqua|volume=3|year=1963|pages=40–59|ref=none}}
* {{citation|last=Schippmann|first=Klaus|chapter=Arsacid ii. The Arsacid dynasty|pages=526–535|title=Encyclopaedia Iranica|volume=2|year=1987|location=New York|publisher=Routledge & Kegan Paul|title-link=Encyclopædia Iranica|ref=none}}
{{refend}}

==External links==
{{Commons category|Parthia|the Parthian Empire}}
* Various articles from Iran Chamber Society (, , )
* (a website featuring the history, geography, coins, arts and culture of ancient Parthia, including a bibliographic list of scholarly sources)
* {{cite EB1911 |wstitle=Persia |volume=21 |pages=187–252 |short=1}}

{{Parthian Empire}}
{{Navboxes
|list=
{{Parthian kings}}
{{Rulers of the Ancient Near East}}
{{Ancient Syria and Mesopotamia}}
{{Ancient Mesopotamia}}
{{Iran topics}}
{{Empires}}
}}
{{Authority control}}
{{featured article}}
{{coord|33|05|37|N|44|34|51|E|region:IQ_type:country_source:kolossus-dewiki|display=title}}


]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 01:22, 31 December 2024

Iranian empire (247 BC – 224 AD)
Parthian Empire
247 BC–224 AD
The Parthian Empire in 94 BC at its greatest extent, during the reign of Mithridates II (r. 124–91 BC)The Parthian Empire in 94 BC at its greatest extent, during the reign of Mithridates II (r. 124–91 BC)
CapitalCtesiphon, Ecbatana, Hecatompylos, Susa, Mithradatkirt, Asaak, Rhages
Common languages
Religion
GovernmentFeudal monarchy
Monarch 
• 247–211 BC Arsaces I (first)
• 208–224 AD Artabanus IV (last)
LegislatureMegisthanes
Historical eraClassical antiquity
• Established 247 BC
• Disestablished 224 AD
Area
1 AD2,800,000 km (1,100,000 sq mi)
CurrencyDrachma
Preceded by Succeeded by
Seleucid Empire
Sasanian Empire
Part of a series on the
History of Iran

The Gate of All Nations in Fars
Prehistoric periodBCE / BC
Baradostian culture c. 36,000–18,000
Zarzian culture c. 20,000–10,000
Shulaveri–Shomu culture c. 6000–5000
Zayandeh River Culture c. 6th millennium
Dalma culture c. 5th millennium
Ancient period
Kura–Araxes culture 3400–2000
Helmand culture/Jiroft culture c. 3300–2200
Proto-Elamite 3200–2700
Lullubi Kingdom/Zamua c. 3100-675
Elam 2700–539
Marhaši c. 2550-2020
Oxus Civilization c. 2400–1700
Akkadian Empire 2400–2150
Kassites c. 1500–1155
Avestan period c. 1500–500
Neo-Assyrian Empire 911–609
Urartu 860–590
Mannaea 850–616
Zikirti 750-521
Saparda 720-670
Imperial period
Median Empire 678–550 BC
Scythian Kingdom 652–625 BC
Anshanite Kingdom 635 BC–550 BC
Neo-Babylonian Empire 626 BC–539 BC
Sogdia c. 6th century BC–11th century AD
Achaemenid Empire 550 BC–330 BC
Kingdom of Armenia 331 BC–428 AD
Atropatene c. 323 BC–226 AD
Kingdom of Cappadocia 320s BC–17 AD
Seleucid Empire 312 BC–63 BC
Kingdom of Pontus 281 BC–62 BC
Fratarakas 3rd-century BC–132 BC
Parthian Empire 247 BC–224 AD
Elymais 147 BC–224 AD
Characene 141 BC–222 AD
Kings of Persis 132 BC–224 AD
Indo-Parthian Kingdom 19 AD–224/5
Paratarajas 125–300
Sasanian Empire 224–651
Zarmihrids 6th century–785
Qarinvandids 550s–11th century
Medieval periodCE / AD
Rashidun Caliphate 632-661
Umayyad Caliphate 661–750
Abbasid Caliphate 750–1258
Dabuyids 642–760
Bavandids 651–1349
Masmughans of Damavand 651–760
Baduspanids 665–1598
Justanids 791 – 11th century
Alid dynasties 864 – 14th century
Tahirid dynasty 821–873
Samanid Empire 819–999
Saffarid dynasty 861–1003
Ghurid dynasty pre-879 – 1215
Sajid dynasty 889–929
Sallarid dynasty 919–1062
Ziyarid dynasty 930–1090
Ilyasids 932–968
Buyid dynasty 934–1062
Rawadid dynasty 955–1070
Hasanwayhids 959–1095
Ghaznavid dynasty 977–1186
Annazids 990/1–1117
Kakuyids 1008–1141
Nasrid dynasty 1029–1236
Shabankara 1030–1355
Seljuk Empire 1037–1194
Khwarazmian dynasty 1077–1231
Eldiguzids 1135–1225
Atabegs of Yazd 1141–1319
Salghurids 1148–1282
Hazaraspids 1155–1424
Pishkinid dynasty 1155–1231
Khorshidi dynasty 1184-1597
Qutlugh-Khanids 1223-1306
Mihrabanids 1236–1537
Kurt dynasty 1244–1396
Ilkhanate Empire 1256–1335
Chobanid dynasty 1335–1357
Muzaffarid dynasty 1335–1393
Jalayirid Sultanate 1337–1376
Sarbadars 1337–1376
Injuids 1335–1357
Afrasiyab dynasty 1349–1504
Mar'ashis 1359–1596
Timurid Empire 1370–1507
Kar-Kiya dynasty 1370s–1592
Qara Qoyunlu 1406–1468
Aq Qoyunlu 1468–1508
Early modern period
Safavid Iran 1501–1736
(Hotak dynasty) 1722–1729
Afsharid Iran 1736–1796
Zand dynasty 1751–1794
Modern period
Qajar Iran 1789–1925
Pahlavi Iran 1925–1979
Contemporary period
Iranian Revolution 1979
Interim Government 1979
Islamic Republic 1979–present
Related articles
Timeline
flag Iran portal

The Parthian Empire (/ˈpɑːrθiən/), also known as the Arsacid Empire (/ˈɑːrsəsɪd/), was a major Iranian political and cultural power centered in ancient Iran from 247 BC to 224 AD. Its latter name comes from its founder, Arsaces I, who led the Parni tribe in conquering the region of Parthia in Iran's northeast, then a satrapy (province) under Andragoras, who was rebelling against the Seleucid Empire.

Mithridates I (r.c. 171 – 132 BC) greatly expanded the empire by seizing Media and Mesopotamia from the Seleucids. At its height, the Parthian Empire stretched from the northern reaches of the Euphrates, in what is now central-eastern Turkey, to present-day Afghanistan and western Pakistan. The empire, located on the Silk Road trade route between the Roman Empire in the Mediterranean Basin and the Han dynasty of China, became a center of trade and commerce.

The Parthians largely adopted the art, architecture, religious beliefs, and regalia of their culturally heterogeneous empire, which encompassed Persian, Hellenistic, and regional cultures. For about the first half of its existence, the Arsacid court adopted elements of Greek culture, though it eventually saw a gradual revival of Iranian traditions. The Arsacid rulers were titled "King of Kings", claiming inheritance of the Achaemenid Empire; indeed, they accepted many local kings as vassals, although the Achaemenids would have had centrally appointed, albeit largely autonomous, satraps. The court did appoint a small number of satraps, largely outside Iran, but these satrapies were smaller and less powerful than the Achaemenid potentates. With the expansion of Arsacid power, the seat of central government shifted from Nisa to Ctesiphon along the Tigris (south of Baghdad), although several other sites also served as capitals.

The earliest enemies of the Parthians were the Seleucids in the west and the Scythians in the north. However, as Parthia expanded westward, they came into conflict with the Kingdom of Armenia, and eventually the late Roman Republic. Rome and Parthia competed with each other to establish the kings of Armenia as their tributaries. The Parthians destroyed the army of Marcus Licinius Crassus at the Battle of Carrhae in 53 BC, and in 40–39 BC, Parthian forces captured the whole of the Levant except Tyre from the Romans; Mark Antony led a Roman counterattack. Several Roman emperors invaded Mesopotamia in the Roman–Parthian Wars of the next few centuries, capturing the cities of Seleucia and Ctesiphon. Frequent civil wars between Parthian contenders to the throne proved more dangerous to the Empire's stability than foreign invasion, and Parthian power evaporated when Ardashir I, ruler of Istakhr in Persis, revolted against the Arsacids and killed their last ruler, Artabanus IV, in 224 AD. Ardashir established the Sasanian Empire, which ruled Iran and much of the Near East until the Muslim conquests of the 7th century AD, although the Arsacid dynasty lived on through branches of the family that ruled Armenia, Caucasian Iberia, and Caucasian Albania.

Native Parthian sources, written in Parthian, Greek and other languages, are scarce when compared to Sasanian and even earlier Achaemenid sources. Aside from scattered cuneiform tablets, fragmentary ostraca, rock inscriptions, drachma coins, and the chance survival of some parchment documents, much of Parthian history is only known through external sources. These include mainly Greek and Roman histories, but also Chinese histories, prompted by the Han Chinese desire to form alliances against the Xiongnu. Parthian artwork is a means of understanding aspects of society and culture that are otherwise absent in textual sources.

History

Origins and establishment

Further information: Parni conquest of Parthia
Two sides of a silver coin. The one on the left bears the imprint of a man's head, while the one on the right a sitting individual.
The silver drachma of Arsaces I (r.c. 247 – 211 BC) with the Greek language inscription ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ "of Arsaces"

Before Arsaces I founded the Arsacid dynasty, he was chieftain of the Parni, an ancient Central Asian tribe of Iranian peoples and one of several nomadic tribes within the confederation of the Dahae. The Parni most likely spoke an eastern Iranian language, in contrast to the northwestern Iranian language spoken at the time in Parthia. The latter was a northeastern province, first under the Achaemenid Empire, and then the Seleucid Empire. After conquering the region, the Parni adopted Parthian as the official court language, speaking it alongside Middle Persian, Aramaic, Greek, Babylonian, Sogdian and other languages in the multilingual territories they would conquer.

Why the Arsacid court retroactively chose 247 BC as the first year of the Arsacid era is uncertain. A. D. H. Bivar concludes that this was the year the Seleucids lost control of Parthia to Andragoras, the appointed satrap who rebelled against them. Hence, Arsaces I "backdated his regnal years" to the moment when Seleucid control over Parthia ceased. However, Vesta Sarkhosh Curtis asserts that this was simply the year Arsaces was made chief of the Parni tribe. Homa Katouzian and Gene Ralph Garthwaite claim it was the year Arsaces conquered Parthia and expelled the Seleucid authorities, yet Curtis and Maria Brosius state that Andragoras was not overthrown by the Arsacids until 238 BC.

It is unclear who immediately succeeded Arsaces I. Bivar and Katouzian affirm that it was his brother Tiridates I of Parthia, who in turn was succeeded by his son Arsaces II of Parthia in 211 BC. Yet Curtis and Brosius state that Arsaces II was the immediate successor of Arsaces I, with Curtis claiming the succession took place in 211 BC, and Brosius in 217 BC. Bivar insists that 138 BC, the last regnal year of Mithridates I, is "the first precisely established regnal date of Parthian history." Due to these and other discrepancies, Bivar outlines two distinct royal chronologies accepted by historians. A fictitious claim was later made from the 2nd-century BC onwards by the Parthians, which represented them as descendants of the Achaemenid king of kings, Artaxerxes II of Persia (r. 404 – 358 BC).

A map centered on the Mediterranean and Middle East showing the extent of the Roman Republic (Purple), Selucid Empire (Blue), and Parthia (Yellow) around 200 BC.
Parthia, shaded yellow, alongside the Seleucid Empire (blue) and the Roman Republic (purple) around 200 BC

For a time, Arsaces I consolidated his position in Parthia and Hyrcania by taking advantage of the invasion of Seleucid territory in the west by Ptolemy III Euergetes (r. 246–222 BC) of Egypt. This conflict with Ptolemy, the Third Syrian War (246–241 BC), also allowed Diodotus I to rebel and form the Greco-Bactrian Kingdom in Central Asia. The latter's successor, Diodotus II, formed an alliance with Arsaces I against the Seleucids, but Arsaces was temporarily driven from Parthia by the forces of Seleucus II Callinicus (r. 246 – 225 BC). After spending some time in exile among the nomadic Apasiacae tribe, Arsaces I led a counterattack and recaptured Parthia. Seleucus II's successor, Antiochus III the Great (r. 222 – 187 BC), was unable to immediately retaliate because his troops were engaged in putting down the rebellion of Molon in Media.

Antiochus III launched a massive campaign to retake Parthia and Bactria in 210 or 209 BC. Despite some victories he was unsuccessful, but did negotiate a peace settlement with Arsaces II. The latter was granted the title of king (Greek: basileus) in return for his submission to Antiochus III as his superior. The Seleucids were unable to further intervene in Parthian affairs following increasing encroachment by the Roman Republic and the Seleucid defeat at Magnesia in 190 BC. Priapatius (r.c. 191 – 176 BC) succeeded Arsaces II, and Phraates I (r.c. 176 – 171 BC) eventually ascended the Parthian throne. Phraates I ruled Parthia without further Seleucid interference.

Expansion and consolidation

Main article: Seleucid–Parthian wars
Two sides of a coin. The side on the left showing the head of a bearded man, while the right a standing individual.
Drachma of Mithridates I, showing him wearing a beard and a royal diadem on his head. Reverse side: Heracles/Verethragna, holding a club in his left hand and a cup in his right hand; Greek inscription reading ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΜΕΓΑΛΟΥ ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ ΦΙΛΕΛΛΗΝΟΣ "of the Great King Arsaces the Philhellene"

Phraates I is recorded as expanding Parthia's control past the Gates of Alexander and occupied Apamea Ragiana. The locations of these are unknown. Yet the greatest expansion of Parthian power and territory took place during the reign of his brother and successor Mithridates I (r. c. 171–132 BC), whom Katouzian compares to Cyrus the Great (d. 530 BC), founder of the Achaemenid Empire.

Relations between Parthia and Greco-Bactria deteriorated after the death of Diodotus II, when forces under Mithridates I captured two eparchies of the latter kingdom, then under Eucratides I (r. c. 170–145 BC). Turning his sights on the Seleucid realm, Mithridates I invaded Media and occupied Ecbatana in 148 or 147 BC; the region had been destabilized by a recent Seleucid suppression of a rebellion there led by Timarchus. This victory was followed by the Parthian conquest of Babylonia in Mesopotamia, where Mithridates I had coins minted at Seleucia in 141 BC and held an official investiture ceremony. While Mithridates I retired to Hyrcania, his forces subdued the kingdoms of Elymais and Characene and occupied Susa. By this time, Parthian authority extended as far east as the Indus River.

Whereas Hecatompylos had served as the first Parthian capital, Mithridates I established royal residences at Seleucia, Ecbatana, Ctesiphon and his newly founded city, Mithradatkert (Nisa), where the tombs of the Arsacid kings were built and maintained. Ecbatana became the main summertime residence for the Arsacid royalty. Ctesiphon may not have become the official capital until the reign of Gotarzes I (r. c. 90–80 BC). It became the site of the royal coronation ceremony and the representational city of the Arsacids, according to Brosius.

The Seleucids were unable to retaliate immediately as general Diodotus Tryphon led a rebellion at the capital Antioch in 142 BC. However, by 140 BC Demetrius II Nicator was able to launch a counter-invasion against the Parthians in Mesopotamia. Despite early successes, the Seleucids were defeated and Demetrius himself was captured by Parthian forces and taken to Hyrcania. There Mithridates I treated his captive with great hospitality; he even married his daughter Rhodogune of Parthia to Demetrius.

Antiochus VII Sidetes (r. 138–129 BC), a brother of Demetrius, assumed the Seleucid throne and married the latter's wife Cleopatra Thea. After defeating Diodotus Tryphon, Antiochus initiated a campaign in 130 BC to retake Mesopotamia, now under the rule of Phraates II (r. c. 132–127 BC). The Parthian general Indates was defeated along the Great Zab, followed by a local uprising where the Parthian governor of Babylonia was killed. Antiochus conquered Babylonia and occupied Susa, where he minted coins. After Antiochus advanced his army into Media, the Parthians pushed for peace, which Antiochus refused to accept unless the Arsacids relinquished all lands to him except Parthia proper, paid heavy tribute, and released Demetrius from captivity. Arsaces released Demetrius and sent him to Syria, but refused the other demands. By spring 129 BC, the Medes were in open revolt against Antiochus, whose army had exhausted the resources of the countryside during winter. While Antiochus attempted to put down the revolts, the main Parthian force swept into the region and killed Antiochus at the Battle of Ecbatana in 129 BC. His body was sent back to Syria in a silver coffin; his son Seleucus was made a Parthian hostage and a daughter joined Phraates' harem.

Drachma of Mithridates II (r. c. 124–91 BC). Reverse side: seated archer carrying a bow; inscription reading "of the King of Kings Arsaces the Renowned/Manifest Philhellene."

While the Parthians regained the territories lost in the west, another threat arose in the east. In 177–176 BC the nomadic confederation of the Xiongnu dislodged the nomadic Yuezhi from their homelands in what is now Gansu province in Northwest China; the Yuezhi then migrated west into Bactria and displaced the Saka (Scythian) tribes. The Saka were forced to move further west, where they invaded the Parthian Empire's northeastern borders. Mithridates I was thus forced to retire to Hyrcania after his conquest of Mesopotamia.

Some of the Saka were enlisted in Phraates' forces against Antiochus. However, they arrived too late to engage in the conflict. When Phraates refused to pay their wages, the Saka revolted, which he tried to put down with the aid of former Seleucid soldiers, yet they too abandoned Phraates and joined sides with the Saka. Phraates II marched against this combined force, but he was killed in battle. The Roman historian Justin reports that his successor Artabanus I (r. c. 128–124 BC) shared a similar fate fighting nomads in the east. He claims Artabanus was killed by the Tokhari (identified as the Yuezhi), although Bivar believes Justin conflated them with the Saka. Mithridates II (r. c. 124–91 BC) later recovered the lands lost to the Saka in Sakastan.

Han dynasty Chinese silk from Mawangdui, 2nd century BC, silk from China was perhaps the most lucrative luxury item the Parthians traded at the western end of the Silk Road.

Following the Seleucid withdrawal from Mesopotamia, the Parthian governor of Babylonia, Himerus, was ordered by the Arsacid court to conquer Characene, then ruled by Hyspaosines from Charax Spasinu. When this failed, Hyspaosines invaded Babylonia in 127 BC and occupied Seleucia. Yet by 122 BC, Mithridates II forced Hyspaosines out of Babylonia and made the kings of Characene vassals under Parthian suzerainty. After Mithridates II extended Parthian control further west, occupying Dura-Europos in 113 BC, he became embroiled in a conflict with the Kingdom of Armenia. His forces defeated and deposed Artavasdes I of Armenia in 97 BC, taking his son Tigranes hostage, who would later become Tigranes II "the Great" of Armenia (r. c. 95–55 BC).

The Indo-Parthian Kingdom, located in modern-day Afghanistan and Pakistan made an alliance with the Parthian Empire in the 1st century BC. Bivar claims that these two states considered each other political equals. After the Greek philosopher Apollonius of Tyana visited the court of Vardanes I (r. c. 40–47 AD) in 42 AD, Vardanes provided him with the protection of a caravan as he traveled to Indo-Parthia. When Apollonius reached Indo-Parthia's capital Taxila, his caravan leader read Vardanes' official letter, perhaps written in Parthian, to an Indian official who treated Apollonius with great hospitality.

Following the diplomatic venture of Zhang Qian into Central Asia during the reign of Emperor Wu of Han (r. 141–87 BC), the Han Empire of China sent a delegation to Mithridates II's court in 121 BC. The Han embassy opened official trade relations with Parthia via the Silk Road yet did not achieve a desired military alliance against the confederation of the Xiongnu. The Parthian Empire was enriched by taxing the Eurasian caravan trade in silk, the most highly priced luxury good imported by the Romans. Pearls were also a highly valued import from China, while the Chinese purchased Parthian spices, perfumes, and fruits. Exotic animals were also given as gifts from the Arsacid to Han courts; in 87 AD Pacorus II of Parthia sent lions and Persian gazelles to Emperor Zhang of Han (r. 75–88 AD). Besides silk, Parthian goods purchased by Roman merchants included iron from India, spices, and fine leather. Caravans traveling through the Parthian Empire brought West Asian and sometimes Roman luxury glasswares to China. The merchants of Sogdia, speaking an Eastern Iranian language, served as the primary middlemen of this vital silk trade between Parthia and Han China.

Rome and Armenia

Main articles: Roman–Persian relations and Roman–Parthian Wars
Bronze statue of a Parthian nobleman from the sanctuary at Shami in Elymais (modern-day Khūzestān Province, Iran, along the Persian Gulf), now located at the National Museum of Iran. Dated 50 BC – 150 AD, Parthian School.

The Yuezhi Kushan Empire in northern India largely guaranteed the security of Parthia's eastern border. Thus, from the mid-1st century BC onwards, the Arsacid court focused on securing the western border, primarily against Rome. A year following Mithridates II's subjugation of Armenia, Lucius Cornelius Sulla, the Roman proconsul of Cilicia, convened with the Parthian diplomat Orobazus at the Euphrates river. The two agreed that the river would serve as the border between Parthia and Rome, although several historians have argued that Sulla only had authority to communicate these terms back to Rome.

Despite this agreement, in 93 or 92 BC Parthia fought a war in Syria against the tribal leader Laodice and her Seleucid ally Antiochus X Eusebes (r. 95–92? BC), killing the latter. When one of the last Seleucid monarchs, Demetrius III Eucaerus, attempted to besiege Beroea (modern Aleppo), Parthia sent military aid to the inhabitants and Demetrius was defeated.

Following the rule of Mithridates II, his son Gotarzes I succeeded him. He reigned during a period coined in scholarship as the "Parthian Dark Age," due to the lack of clear information on the events of this period in the empire, except a series of, apparently overlapping, reigns. It is only with the beginning of the reign of Orodes II in c. 57 BC, that the line of Parthian rulers can again be reliably traced. This system of split monarchy weakened Parthia, allowing Tigranes II of Armenia to annex Parthian territory in western Mesopotamia. This land would not be restored to Parthia until the reign of Sinatruces (r. c. 78–69 BC).

Following the outbreak of the Third Mithridatic War, Mithridates VI of Pontus (r. 119–63 BC), an ally of Tigranes II of Armenia, requested aid from Parthia against Rome, but Sinatruces refused help. When the Roman commander Lucullus marched against the Armenian capital Tigranocerta in 69 BC, Mithridates VI and Tigranes II requested the aid of Phraates III (r. c. 71–58). Phraates did not send aid to either, and after the fall of Tigranocerta he reaffirmed with Lucullus the Euphrates as the boundary between Parthia and Rome.

Tigranes the Younger, son of Tigranes II of Armenia, failed to usurp the Armenian throne from his father. He fled to Phraates III and convinced him to march against Armenia's new capital at Artaxata. When this siege failed, Tigranes the Younger once again fled, this time to the Roman commander Pompey. He promised Pompey that he would act as a guide through Armenia, but, when Tigranes II submitted to Rome as a client king, Tigranes the Younger was brought to Rome as a hostage. Phraates demanded Pompey return Tigranes the Younger to him, but Pompey refused. In retaliation, Phraates launched an invasion into Corduene (southeastern Turkey) where, according to two conflicting Roman accounts, the Roman consul Lucius Afranius forced the Parthians out by either military or diplomatic means.

Phraates III was assassinated by his sons Orodes II of Parthia and Mithridates IV of Parthia, after which Orodes turned on Mithridates, forcing him to flee from Media to Roman Syria. Aulus Gabinius, the Roman proconsul of Syria, marched in support of Mithridates to the Euphrates, but had to turn back to aid Ptolemy XII Auletes (r. 80–58; 55–51 BC) against a rebellion in Egypt. Despite losing his Roman support, Mithridates managed to conquer Babylonia, and minted coins at Seleucia until 54 BC. In that year, Orodes' general, known only as Surena after his noble family's clan name, recaptured Seleucia, and Mithridates was executed.

A Roman marble head of the triumvir Marcus Licinius Crassus, who was defeated at Carrhae by Surena

Marcus Licinius Crassus, one of the triumvirs, who was now proconsul of Syria, invaded Parthia in 53 BC in belated support of Mithridates. As his army marched to Carrhae (modern Harran, southeastern Turkey), Orodes II invaded Armenia, cutting off support from Rome's ally Artavasdes II of Armenia (r. 53–34 BC). Orodes persuaded Artavasdes to a marriage alliance between the crown prince Pacorus I of Parthia (d. 38 BC) and Artavasdes' sister.

Surena, with an army entirely on horseback, rode to meet Crassus. Surena's 1,000 cataphracts (armed with lances) and 9,000 horse archers were outnumbered roughly four to one by Crassus' army, comprising seven Roman legions and auxiliaries including mounted Gauls and light infantry. Using a baggage train of about 1,000 camels, the Parthian army provided the horse archers with a constant supply of arrows. The horse archers employed the "Parthian shot" tactic: feigning retreat to draw enemy out, then turning and shooting at them when exposed. This tactic, executed with heavy composite bows on the flat plain, devastated Crassus' infantry.

With some 20,000 Romans dead, approximately 10,000 captured, and roughly another 10,000 escaping west, Crassus fled into the Armenian countryside. At the head of his army, Surena approached Crassus, offering a parley, which Crassus accepted. However, he was killed when one of his junior officers, suspecting a trap, attempted to stop him from riding into Surena's camp. Crassus' defeat at Carrhae was one of the worst military defeats of Roman history. Parthia's victory cemented its reputation as a formidable if not equal power with Rome. With his camp followers, war captives, and precious Roman booty, Surena traveled some 700 km (430 mi) back to Seleucia where his victory was celebrated. However, fearing his ambitions even for the Arsacid throne, Orodes had Surena executed shortly thereafter.

Roman aurei bearing the portraits of Mark Antony (left) and Octavian (right), issued in 41 BC to celebrate the establishment of the Second Triumvirate by Octavian, Antony and Marcus Lepidus in 43 BC

Emboldened by the victory over Crassus, the Parthians attempted to capture Roman-held territories in West Asia. Crown prince Pacorus I and his commander Osaces raided Syria as far as Antioch in 51 BC, but were repulsed by Gaius Cassius Longinus, who ambushed and killed Osaces. The Arsacids sided with Pompey in the civil war against Julius Caesar and even sent troops to support the anti-Caesarian forces at the Battle of Philippi in 42 BC.

Quintus Labienus, a general loyal to Cassius and Brutus, sided with Parthia against the Second Triumvirate in 40 BC; the following year he invaded Syria alongside Pacorus I. The triumvir Mark Antony was unable to lead the Roman defense against Parthia due to his departure to Italy, where he amassed his forces to confront his rival Octavian and eventually conducted negotiations with him at Brundisium.

After Syria was occupied by Pacorus' army, Labienus split from the main Parthian force to invade Anatolia while Pacorus and his commander Barzapharnes invaded the Roman Levant. They subdued all settlements along the Mediterranean coast as far south as Ptolemais (modern Acre, Israel), with the lone exception of Tyre. In Judea, the pro-Roman Jewish forces of high priest Hyrcanus II, Phasael, and Herod were defeated by the Parthians and their Jewish ally Antigonus II Mattathias (r. 40–37 BC); the latter was made king of Judea while Herod fled to his fort at Masada.

Despite these successes, the Parthians were soon driven out of the Levant by a Roman counteroffensive. Publius Ventidius Bassus, an officer under Mark Antony, defeated and then executed Labienus at the Battle of the Cilician Gates (in modern Mersin Province, Turkey) in 39 BC. Shortly afterward, a Parthian force in Syria led by general Pharnapates was defeated by Ventidius at the Battle of Amanus Pass.

As a result, Pacorus I temporarily withdrew from Syria. When he returned in the spring of 38 BC, he faced Ventidius at the Battle of Mount Gindarus, northeast of Antioch. Pacorus was killed during the battle, and his forces retreated across the Euphrates. His death spurred a succession crisis in which Orodes II chose Phraates IV (r. c. 38–2 BC) as his new heir.

Drachma of Phraates IV (r. c. 38–2 BC). Inscription reading ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΣ ΒΑΣΙΛΕΩΝ ΑΡΣΑΚΟΥ ΕΥΕΡΓΕΤΟΥ ΕΠΙΦΑΝΟΥΣ ΦΙΛΕΛΛΗΝΟΣ "of the King of Kings Arsaces the Renowned/Manifest Benefactor Philhellene"

Upon assuming the throne, Phraates IV eliminated rival claimants by killing and exiling his own brothers. One of them, Monaeses, fled to Antony and persuaded him to invade Parthia. Antony defeated Parthia's Judaean ally Antigonus in 37 BC, installing Herod as a client king in his place.

The following year, when Antony marched to Theodosiopolis, Artavasdes II of Armenia once again switched alliances by sending Antony additional troops. Antony invaded Media Atropatene (modern Iranian Azerbaijan), then ruled by Parthia's ally Artavasdes I of Media Atropatene, with the intention of seizing the capital Praaspa, the location of which is now unknown. However, Phraates IV ambushed Antony's rear detachment, destroying a giant battering ram meant for the siege of Praaspa; after this, Artavasdes II abandoned Antony's forces.

The Parthians pursued and harassed Antony's army as it fled to Armenia. Eventually, the greatly weakened force reached Syria. Antony lured Artavasdes II into a trap with the promise of a marriage alliance. He was taken captive in 34 BC, paraded in Antony's mock Roman triumph in Alexandria, Egypt, and eventually executed by Cleopatra VII of the Ptolemaic Kingdom.

Antony attempted to strike an alliance with Artavasdes I of Media Atropatene, whose relations with Phraates IV had recently soured. This was abandoned when Antony and his forces withdrew from Armenia in 33 BC; they escaped a Parthian invasion while Antony's rival Octavian attacked his forces to the west. After the defeat and suicides of Antony and Cleopatra in 30 BC, Parthian ally Artaxias II reassumed the throne of Armenia.

Peace with Rome, court intrigue, and contact with Chinese generals

Further information: Pax Romana

Following the defeat and deaths of Antony and Cleopatra of Ptolemaic Egypt after the Battle of Actium in 31 BC, Octavian consolidated his political power and in 27 BC was named Augustus by the Roman Senate, becoming the first Roman emperor. Around this time, Tiridates II of Parthia briefly overthrew Phraates IV, who was able to quickly reestablish his rule with the aid of Scythian nomads. Tiridates fled to the Romans, taking one of Phraates' sons with him. In negotiations conducted in 20 BC, Phraates arranged for the release of his kidnapped son. In return, the Romans received the lost legionary standards taken at Carrhae in 53 BC, as well as any surviving prisoners of war. The Parthians viewed this exchange as a small price to pay to regain the prince. Augustus hailed the return of the standards as a political victory over Parthia; this propaganda was celebrated in the minting of new coins, the building of a new temple to house the standards, and even in fine art such as the breastplate scene on his statue Augustus of Prima Porta.

A close-up view of the breastplate on the statue of Augustus of Prima Porta, showing a Parthian man returning to Augustus the legionary standards lost by Marcus Licinius Crassus at Carrhae

Along with the prince, Augustus also gave Phraates IV an Italian slave-girl, who later became Queen Musa of Parthia. To ensure that her child Phraataces would inherit the throne without incident, Musa convinced Phraates IV to give his other sons to Augustus as hostages. Again, Augustus used this as propaganda depicting the submission of Parthia to Rome, listing it as a great accomplishment in his Res Gestae Divi Augusti. When Phraataces took the throne as Phraates V (r. c. 2 BC – 4 AD), Musa ruled alongside him, and according to Josephus, married him. The Parthian nobility, disapproving of the notion of a king with non-Arsacid blood, forced the pair into exile in Roman territory. Phraates' successor Orodes III of Parthia lasted just two years on the throne, and was followed by Vonones I, who had adopted many Roman mannerisms during time in Rome. The Parthian nobility, angered by Vonones' sympathies for the Romans, backed a rival claimant, Artabanus II of Parthia (r. c. 10–38 AD), who eventually defeated Vonones and drove him into exile in Roman Syria.

During the reign of Artabanus II, two Jewish commoners and brothers, Anilai and Asinai from Nehardea (near modern Fallujah, Iraq), led a revolt against the Parthian governor of Babylonia. After defeating the latter, the two were granted the right to govern the region by Artabanus II, who feared further rebellion elsewhere. Anilai's Parthian wife poisoned Asinai out of fear he would attack Anilai over his marriage to a gentile. Following this, Anilai became embroiled in an armed conflict with a son-in-law of Artabanus, who eventually defeated him. With the Jewish regime removed, the native Babylonians began to harass the local Jewish community, forcing them to emigrate to Seleucia. When that city rebelled against Parthian rule in 35–36 AD, the Jews were expelled again, this time by the local Greeks and Aramaeans. The exiled Jews fled to Ctesiphon, Nehardea, and Nisibis.

A denarius struck in 19 BC during the reign of Augustus, with the goddess Feronia depicted on the obverse, and on the reverse a Parthian man kneeling in submission while offering the Roman military standards taken at the Battle of Carrhae

Although at peace with Parthia, Rome still interfered in its affairs. The Roman emperor Tiberius (r. 14–37 AD) became involved in a plot by Pharasmanes I of Iberia to place his brother Mithridates on the throne of Armenia by assassinating the Parthian ally King Arsaces of Armenia. Artabanus II tried and failed to restore Parthian control of Armenia, prompting an aristocratic revolt that forced him to flee to Scythia. The Romans released a hostage prince, Tiridates III of Parthia, to rule the region as an ally of Rome. Shortly before his death, Artabanus managed to force Tiridates from the throne using troops from Hyrcania. After Artabanus' death in 38 AD, a long civil war ensued between the rightful successor Vardanes I and his brother Gotarzes II. After Vardanes was assassinated during a hunting expedition, the Parthian nobility appealed to Roman emperor Claudius (r. 41–54 AD) in 49 AD to release the hostage prince Meherdates to challenge Gotarzes. This backfired when Meherdates was betrayed by the governor of Edessa and Izates bar Monobaz of Adiabene; he was captured and sent to Gotarzes, where he was allowed to live after having his ears mutilated, an act that disqualified him from inheriting the throne.

In 97 AD, the Chinese general Ban Chao, the Protector-General of the Western Regions, sent his emissary Gan Ying on a diplomatic mission to reach the Roman Empire. Gan visited the court of Pacorus II at Hecatompylos before departing towards Rome. He traveled as far west as the Persian Gulf, where Parthian authorities convinced him that an arduous sea voyage around the Arabian Peninsula was the only means to reach Rome. Discouraged by this, Gan Ying returned to the Han court and provided Emperor He of Han (r. 88–105 AD) with a detailed report on the Roman Empire based on oral accounts of his Parthian hosts. William Watson speculates that the Parthians would have been relieved at the failed efforts by the Han Empire to open diplomatic relations with Rome, especially after Ban Chao's military victories against the Xiongnu in eastern Central Asia. However, Chinese records maintain that a Roman embassy, perhaps only a group of Roman merchants, arrived at the Han capital Luoyang by way of Jiaozhi (northern Vietnam) in 166 AD, during the reigns of Marcus Aurelius (r. 161–180 AD) and Emperor Huan of Han (r. 146–168 AD). Although it could be coincidental, Antonine Roman golden medallions dated to the reigns of Marcus Aurelius and his predecessor Antoninus Pius have been discovered at Oc Eo, Vietnam (among other Roman artefacts in the Mekong Delta), a site that is one of the suggested locations for the port city of "Cattigara" along the Magnus Sinus (i.e. Gulf of Thailand and South China Sea) in Ptolemy's Geography.

Continuation of Roman hostilities and Parthian decline

Main articles: Roman–Parthian War of 58–63, Trajan's Parthian campaign, Roman–Parthian War of 161–166, and Parthian war of Caracalla Further information: Roman Armenia
Map of the troop movements during the first two years of the Roman–Parthian War of 58–63 AD over the Kingdom of Armenia, detailing the Roman offensive into Armenia and capture of the country by Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo
Parthian king making an offering to god Herakles-Verethragna. Masdjid-e Suleiman, Iran. 2nd–3rd century AD. Louvre Museum Sb 7302.

After the Iberian king Pharasmanes I had his son Rhadamistus (r. 51–55 AD) invade Armenia to depose the Roman client king Mithridates, Vologases I of Parthia (r. c. 51–77 AD) planned to invade and place his brother, the later Tiridates I of Armenia, on the throne. Rhadamistus was eventually driven from power, and, beginning with the reign of Tiridates, Parthia would retain firm control over Armenia—with brief interruptions—through the Arsacid dynasty of Armenia. Even after the fall of the Parthian Empire, the Arsacid line lived on through the Armenian kings. However, not only did the Arsacid line continue through the Armenians, it also continued through the Georgian kings with the Arsacid dynasty of Iberia, and for many centuries afterwards in Caucasian Albania through the Arsacid dynasty of Caucasian Albania.

When Vardanes II of Parthia rebelled against his father Vologases I in 55 AD, Vologases withdrew his forces from Armenia. Rome quickly attempted to fill the political vacuum left behind. In the Roman–Parthian War of 58–63 AD, the commander Gnaeus Domitius Corbulo achieved some military successes against the Parthians while installing Tigranes VI of Armenia as a Roman client. However, Corbulo's successor Lucius Caesennius Paetus was soundly defeated by Parthian forces and fled Armenia. Following a peace treaty, Tiridates I traveled to Naples and Rome in 63 AD. At both sites the Roman emperor Nero (r. 54–68 AD) ceremoniously crowned him king of Armenia by placing the royal diadem on his head.

A long period of peace between Parthia and Rome ensued, with only the invasion of Alans into Parthia's eastern territories around 72 AD mentioned by Roman historians. Whereas Augustus and Nero had chosen a cautious military policy when confronting Parthia, later Roman emperors invaded and attempted to conquer the eastern Fertile Crescent, the heart of the Parthian Empire along the Tigris and Euphrates. The heightened aggression can be explained in part by Rome's military reforms. To match Parthia's strength in missile troops and mounted warriors, the Romans at first used foreign allies (especially Nabataeans), but later established a permanent auxilia force to complement their heavy legionary infantry. The Romans eventually maintained regiments of horse archers (sagittarii) and even mail-armored cataphracts in their eastern provinces. Yet the Romans had no discernible grand strategy in dealing with Parthia and gained very little territory from these invasions. The primary motivations for war were the advancement of the personal glory and political position of the emperor, as well as defending Roman honor against perceived slights such as Parthian interference in the affairs of Rome's client states.

Rock relief of Parthian king at Behistun, most likely Vologases III (r. c. 110–147 AD)

Hostilities between Rome and Parthia were renewed when Osroes I of Parthia (r. c. 109–128 AD) deposed the Armenian king Sanatruk and replaced him with Axidares, son of Pacorus II, without consulting Rome. The Roman emperor Trajan (r. 98–117 AD) had the next Parthian nominee for the throne, Parthamasiris, killed in 114 AD, instead making Armenia a Roman province. His forces, led by Lusius Quietus, also captured Nisibis; its occupation was essential to securing all the major routes across the northern Mesopotamian plain. The following year, Trajan invaded Mesopotamia and met little resistance from only Meharaspes of Adiabene, since Osroes was engaged in a civil war to the east with Vologases III of Parthia. Trajan spent the winter of 115–116 at Antioch, but resumed his campaign in the spring. Marching down the Euphrates, he captured Dura-Europos, the capital Ctesiphon and Seleucia, and even subjugated Characene, where he watched ships depart to India from the Persian Gulf.

In the last months of 116 AD, Trajan captured the Persian city of Susa. When Sanatruces II of Parthia gathered forces in eastern Parthia to challenge the Romans, his cousin Parthamaspates of Parthia betrayed and killed him: Trajan crowned him the new king of Parthia. Never again would the Roman Empire advance so far to the east. On Trajan's return north, the Babylonian settlements revolted against the Roman garrisons. Trajan was forced to retreat from Mesopotamia in 117 AD, overseeing a failed siege of Hatra during his withdrawal. His retreat was—in his intentions—temporary, because he wanted to renew the attack on Parthia in 118 AD and "make the subjection of the Parthians a reality," but Trajan died suddenly in August 117 AD. During his campaign, Trajan was granted the title Parthicus by the Senate and coins were minted proclaiming the conquest of Parthia. However, only the 4th-century AD historians Eutropius and Festus allege that he attempted to establish a Roman province in lower Mesopotamia.

A Parthian (right) wearing a Phrygian cap, depicted as a prisoner of war in chains held by a Roman (left); Arch of Septimius Severus, Rome, 203 AD

Trajan's successor Hadrian (r. 117–138 AD) reaffirmed the Roman-Parthian border at the Euphrates, choosing not to invade Mesopotamia due to Rome's now limited military resources. Parthamaspates fled after the Parthians revolted against him, yet the Romans made him king of Osroene. Osroes I died during his conflict with Vologases III, the latter succeeded by Vologases IV of Parthia (r. c. 147–191 AD) who ushered in a period of peace and stability. However, the Roman–Parthian War of 161–166 AD began when Vologases invaded Armenia and Syria, retaking Edessa. Roman emperor Marcus Aurelius (r. 161–180 AD) had co-ruler Lucius Verus (r. 161–169 AD) guard Syria while Marcus Statius Priscus invaded Armenia in 163 AD, followed by the invasion of Mesopotamia by Avidius Cassius in 164 AD. The Romans captured and burnt Seleucia and Ctesiphon to the ground, yet they were forced to retreat once the Roman soldiers contracted a deadly disease (possibly smallpox) that soon ravaged the Roman world. Although they withdrew, from this point forward the city of Dura-Europos remained in Roman hands. When Roman emperor Septimius Severus (r. 193–211 AD) invaded Mesopotamia in 197 AD during the reign of Vologases V of Parthia (r. c. 191–208 AD), the Romans once again marched down the Euphrates and captured Seleucia and Ctesiphon. After assuming the title Parthicus Maximus, he retreated in late 198 AD, failing as Trajan once did to capture Hatra during a siege.

Around 212 AD, soon after Vologases VI of Parthia (r. c. 208–222 AD) took the throne, his brother Artabanus IV of Parthia (d. 224 AD) rebelled against him and gained control over a greater part of the empire. Meanwhile, the Roman emperor Caracalla (r. 211–217 AD) deposed the kings of Osroene and Armenia to make them Roman provinces once more. He marched into Mesopotamia under the pretext of marrying one of Artabanus' daughters, but the marriage was not allowed. Consequently, Caracalla made war on Parthia, conquering Arbil and sacking the Parthian tombs there. Caracalla was assassinated the next year on the road to Carrhae by his soldiers. At the Battle of Nisibis, the Parthians were able to defeat the Romans, but both sides suffered heavy losses. After this debacle, the Parthians made a settlement with Macrinus (r. 217–218) where the Romans paid Parthia over two-hundred million denarii with additional gifts.

The Parthian Empire, weakened by internal strife and wars with Rome, was soon to be followed by the Sasanian Empire. Indeed, shortly afterward, Ardashir I, the local Iranian ruler of Persis (modern Fars province, Iran) from Istakhr began subjugating the surrounding territories in defiance of Arsacid rule. He confronted Artabanus IV at the Battle of Hormozdgān on 28 April 224 AD, perhaps at a site near Isfahan, defeating him and establishing the Sasanian Empire. There is evidence, however, that suggests Vologases VI continued to mint coins at Seleucia as late as 228 AD.

The Sassanians would not only assume Parthia's legacy as Rome's Persian nemesis, but they would also attempt to restore the boundaries of the Achaemenid Empire by briefly conquering the Levant, Anatolia, and Egypt from the Eastern Roman Empire during the reign of Khosrau II (r. 590–628 AD). However, they would lose these territories to Heraclius—the last Roman emperor before the Arab conquests. Nevertheless, for a period of more than 400 years, they succeeded the Parthian realm as Rome's principal rival.

Native and external sources

Parthian gold jewelry items found at a burial site in Nineveh (near modern Mosul, Iraq) in the British Museum

Local and foreign written accounts, as well as non-textual artifacts, have been used to reconstruct Parthian history. Although the Parthian court maintained records, the Parthians had no formal study of history; the earliest universal history of Iran, the Khwaday-Namag, was not compiled until the reign of the last Sasanian ruler Yazdegerd III (r. 632–651 AD). Indigenous sources on Parthian history remain scarce, with fewer of them available than for any other period of Iranian history. Most contemporary written records on Parthia contain Greek as well as Parthian and Aramaic inscriptions. The Parthian language was written in a distinct script derived from the Imperial Aramaic chancellery script of the Achaemenids, and later developed into the Pahlavi writing system.

A Sarmatian-Parthian gold necklace and amulet, 2nd century AD. Located in Tamoikin Art Fund

The most valuable indigenous sources for reconstructing an accurate chronology of Arsacid rulers are the metal drachma coins issued by each ruler. These represent a "transition from non-textual to textual remains," according to historian Geo Widengren. Other Parthian sources used for reconstructing chronology include cuneiform astronomical tablets and colophons discovered in Babylonia. Indigenous textual sources also include stone inscriptions, parchment and papyri documents, and pottery ostraca. For example, at the early Parthian capital of Mithradatkert/Nisa in Turkmenistan, large caches of pottery ostraca have been found yielding information on the sale and storage of items like wine. Along with parchment documents found at sites like Dura-Europos, these also provide valuable information on Parthian governmental administration, covering issues such as taxation, military titles, and provincial organization.

Parthian golden necklace, 2nd century AD, Iran, Reza Abbasi Museum
A Parthian ceramic oil lamp, Khūzestān Province, Iran, National Museum of Iran

The Greek and Latin histories, which represent the majority of materials covering Parthian history, are not considered entirely reliable since they were written from the perspective of rivals and wartime enemies. These external sources generally concern major military and political events, and often ignore social and cultural aspects of Parthian history. The Romans usually depicted the Parthians as fierce warriors but also as a culturally refined people; recipes for Parthian dishes in the cookbook Apicius exemplifies their admiration for Parthian cuisine. Apollodorus of Artemita and Arrian wrote histories focusing on Parthia, which are now lost and survive only as quoted extracts in other histories. Isidore of Charax, who lived during the reign of Augustus, provides an account of Parthian territories, perhaps from a Parthian government survey. To a lesser extent, people and events of Parthian history were also included in the histories of Justin, Strabo, Diodorus Siculus, Plutarch, Cassius Dio, Appian, Josephus, Pliny the Elder, and Herodian.

Parthian history can also be reconstructed via the Chinese historical records of events. In contrast to Greek and Roman histories, the early Chinese histories maintained a more neutral view when describing Parthia, although the habit of Chinese chroniclers to copy material for their accounts from older works (of undetermined origin) makes it difficult to establish a chronological order of events. The Chinese called Parthia Ānxī (Chinese: , Old Chinese pronunciation: 'ansjək), perhaps after the Greek name for the Parthian city Antiochia in Margiana (Greek: Ἀντιόχεια ἡ ἐν τῇ Μαργιανῇ). However, this could also have been a transliteration of "Arsaces", after the dynasty's eponymous founder. The works and historical authors include the Shiji (also known as the Records of the Grand Historian) by Sima Qian, the Han shu (Book of Han) by Ban Biao, Ban Gu, and Ban Zhao, and the Hou Han shu (Book of Later Han) by Fan Ye. They provide information on the nomadic migrations leading up to the early Saka invasion of Parthia and valuable political and geographical information. For example, the Shiji (ch. 123) describes diplomatic exchanges, exotic gifts given by Mithridates II to the Han court, types of agricultural crops grown in Parthia, production of wine using grapes, itinerant merchants, and the size and location of Parthian territory. The Shiji also mentions that the Parthians kept records by "writing horizontally on strips of leather," that is, parchment.

In Islamic sources, the Parthian dynasty is mentioned with three dynastic branch names: Aškāniān (اشکانیان), Ašġāniān (اشغانیان), and Afquršāhān (افقورشاهان). The obvious differences between the names of Parthian dynastic branches in Islamic sources has been forgotten by modern Persian-speaking historians. Intentionally or unintentionally, because the translators and correctors of Arabic to Persian sources changed the letter "ġ" (غ) to "k" (ک) in all historical texts and also changed the word of "Persia" to "Iran", the true intention of the Islamic historical sources have been forgotten. As the consequence, these different dynastic branches have become a single dynasty in the form of the name Aškāniān (اشکانیان) in the new editions of Islamic sources. It is known, however, that the Arsacid royal family line survived within three ruling dynasties belonging to Armenia, Caucasian Iberia, and Aghbania in the Caucasus.

Government and administration

Central authority and semi-autonomous kings

Main article: List of Parthian kings
Coin of Kamnaskires III, king of Elymais (modern Khūzestān Province), and his wife Queen Anzaze, 1st century BC

Compared with the earlier Achaemenid Empire, the Parthian government was notably decentralized. An indigenous historical source reveals that territories overseen by the central government were organized in a similar manner to the Seleucid Empire. They both had a threefold division for their provincial hierarchies: the Parthian marzbān, xšatrap, and dizpat, similar to the Seleucid satrapy, eparchy, and hyparchy. The Parthian Empire also contained several subordinate semi-autonomous kingdoms, including the states of Caucasian Iberia, Armenia, Atropatene, Gordyene, Adiabene, Edessa, Hatra, Mesene, Elymais, and Persis. The state rulers governed their own territories and minted their own coinage distinct from the royal coinage produced at the imperial mints. This was not unlike the earlier Achaemenid Empire, which also had some city-states, and even distant satrapies who were semi-independent but "recognised the supremacy of the king, paid tribute and provided military support", according to Brosius. However, the satraps of Parthian times governed smaller territories, and perhaps had less prestige and influence than their Achaemenid predecessors. During the Seleucid period, the trend of local ruling dynasties with semi-autonomous rule, and sometimes outright rebellious rule, became commonplace, a fact reflected in the later Parthian style of governance.

Nobility

Further information: Seven Great Houses of Iran and List of rulers of Parthian sub-kingdoms
A statue of a young Palmyran in fine Parthian trousers, from a funerary stele at Palmyra, early 3rd century AD

The King of Kings headed the Parthian government. He maintained polygamous relations, and was usually succeeded by his first-born son. Like the Ptolemies of Egypt, there is also record of Arsacid kings marrying their nieces and perhaps even half-sisters; Queen Musa is said by Josephus to have married her own son, though this would be an extreme and isolated case. Brosius provides an extract from a letter written in Greek by King Artabanus II in 21 AD, which addresses the governor (titled "archon") and citizens of the city of Susa. Specific government offices of Preferred Friend, Bodyguard and Treasurer are mentioned and the document also proves that "while there were local jurisdictions and proceedings to appointment to high office, the king could intervene on behalf of an individual, review a case and amend the local ruling if he considered it appropriate."

The hereditary titles of the hierarchic nobility recorded during the reign of the first Sasanian monarch Ardashir I most likely reflect the titles already in use during the Parthian era. There were three distinct tiers of nobility, the highest being the regional kings directly below the King of Kings, the second being those related to the King of Kings only through marriage, and the lowest order being heads of local clans and small territories.

By the 1st century AD, the Parthian nobility had assumed great power and influence in the succession and deposition of Arsacid kings. Some of the nobility functioned as court advisers to the king, as well as holy priests. Strabo, in his Geographica, preserved a claim by the Greek philosopher and historian Poseidonius that the Council of Parthia consisted of noble kinsmen and magi, two groups from which "the kings were appointed." Of the great noble Parthian families listed at the beginning of the Sassanian period, only two are explicitly mentioned in earlier Parthian documents: the House of Suren and the House of Karen. The historian Plutarch noted that members of the Suren family, the first among the nobility, were given the privilege of crowning each new Arsacid King of Kings during their coronations.

Military

Further information: Parthian army

The Parthian Empire had no standing army, yet were able to quickly recruit troops in the event of local crises. There was a permanent armed guard attached to the person of the king, comprising nobles, serfs and mercenaries, but this royal retinue was small. Garrisons were also permanently maintained at border forts; Parthian inscriptions reveal some of the military titles granted to the commanders of these locations. Military forces could also be used in diplomatic gestures. For example, when Chinese envoys visited Parthia in the late 2nd century BC, the Shiji maintains that 20,000 horsemen were sent to the eastern borders to serve as escorts for the embassy, although this figure is perhaps an exaggeration.

Parthian horse archer, now on display at the Palazzo Madama, TurinParthian cataphract fighting a lionRelief of an infantryman, from Zahhak Castle, IranThe combination of horse archers and cataphracts formed an effective backbone for the Parthian military

The main striking force of the Parthian army was its cataphracts, heavy cavalry with man and horse decked in mailed armor. The cataphracts were equipped with a lance for charging into enemy lines, but were not equipped with bows and arrows which were restricted to horse archers. Due to the cost of their equipment and armor, cataphracts were recruited from among the aristocratic class who, in return for their services, demanded a measure of autonomy at the local level from the Arsacid kings. The light cavalry was recruited from among the commoner class and acted as horse archers; they wore a simple tunic and trousers into battle. They used composite bows and were able to shoot at enemies while riding and facing away from them; this technique, known as the Parthian shot, was a highly effective tactic. It appears that most of the Parthian army was cavalry, for tactical and strategic reasons. The light cavalry is thought to have carried a sword into battle as well, while cataphracts likely were also armed with short swords or knives. The Parthians also made use of the camel in armed combat. The heavy and light cavalry of Parthia proved to be a decisive factor in the Battle of Carrhae where a Parthian force defeated a much larger Roman army under Crassus. Light infantry units, composed of levied commoners and mercenaries, were used to disperse enemy troops after cavalry charges.

The Parthians do not appear to have ever used war chariots in battle. However, royal Parthian women accompanied the king on military campaigns and were known to have ridden on chariots and wagons. Similarly, the Parthians appeared to have used war elephants infrequently. There is one mention, by Tacitus and Cassius Dio, of the use of one war elephant by Vologases I during the Roman–Parthian War of 58–63.

The size of the Parthian army is unknown, as is the size of the empire's overall population. However, archaeological excavations in former Parthian urban centers reveal settlements which could have sustained large populations and hence a great resource in manpower. Dense population centers in regions like Babylonia were no doubt attractive to the Romans, whose armies could afford to live off the land. The largest army raised by the Parthians appears to have been 50,000.

Currency

Further information: Parthian coinage

Usually made of silver, the Greek drachma coin, including the tetradrachm, was the standard currency used throughout the Parthian Empire. The Arsacids maintained royal mints at the cities of Hecatompylos, Seleucia, and Ecbatana. They most likely operated a mint at Mithridatkert/Nisa as well. From the empire's inception until its collapse, drachmas produced throughout the Parthian period rarely weighed less than 3.5 g or more than 4.2 g. The first Parthian tetradrachms, weighing in principle around 16 g with some variation, appear after Mithridates I conquered Mesopotamia and were minted exclusively at Seleucia.

Society and culture

Hellenism and the Iranian revival

Coin of Mithridates II of Parthia. The clothing is Parthian, while the style is Hellenistic (sitting on an omphalos). The Greek inscription reads "King Arsaces, the philhellene"

Although Greek culture of the Seleucids was widely adopted by peoples of the Near East during the Hellenistic period, the Parthian era witnessed an Iranian cultural revival in religion, the arts, and even clothing fashions. Conscious of both the Hellenistic and Persian cultural roots of their kingship, the Arsacid rulers styled themselves after the Persian King of Kings and affirmed that they were also philhellenes ("friends of the Greeks"). The word "philhellene" was inscribed on Parthian coins until the reign of Artabanus II. The discontinuation of this phrase signified the revival of Iranian culture in Parthia. Vologases I was the first Arsacid ruler to have the Parthian script and language appear on his minted coins alongside the now almost illegible Greek. However, the use of Greek-alphabet legends on Parthian coins remained until the collapse of the empire.

A ceramic Parthian water spout in the shape of a man's head, dated 1st or 2nd century AD

Greek cultural influence did not disappear from the Parthian Empire, however, and there is evidence that the Arsacids enjoyed Greek theatre. When the head of Crassus was brought to Orodes II, he, alongside Armenian king Artavasdes II, were busy watching a performance of The Bacchae by the playwright Euripides (c. 480–406 BC). The producer of the play decided to use Crassus' actual severed head in place of the stage-prop head of Pentheus.

On his coins, Arsaces I is depicted in apparel similar to Achaemenid satraps. According to A. Shahbazi, Arsaces "deliberately diverges from Seleucid coins to emphasize his nationalistic and royal aspirations, and he calls himself Kārny/Karny (Greek: Autocrator), a title already borne by Achaemenid supreme generals, such as Cyrus the Younger." In line with Achaemenid traditions, rock-relief images of Arsacid rulers were carved at Mount Behistun, where Darius I of Persia (r. 522–486 BC) made royal inscriptions. Moreover, the Arsacids claimed familial descent from Artaxerxes II of Persia (r. 404–358 BC) as a means to bolster their legitimacy in ruling over former Achaemenid territories, i.e. as being "legitimate successors of glorious kings" of ancient Iran. Artabanus II named one of his sons Darius and laid claim to Cyrus' heritage. The Arsacid kings chose typical Zoroastrian names for themselves and some from the "heroic background" of the Avesta, according to V.G. Lukonin. The Parthians also adopted the use of the Babylonian calendar with names from the Achaemenid Iranian calendar, replacing the Macedonian calendar of the Seleucids.

Religion

Parthian votive relief from Khūzestān Province, Iran, 2nd century AD

The Parthian Empire, being culturally and politically heterogeneous, had a variety of religious systems and beliefs, the most widespread being those dedicated to Greek and Iranian cults. Aside from a minority of Jews and early Christians, most Parthians were polytheistic. Greek and Iranian deities were often blended together as one. For example, Zeus was often equated with Ahura Mazda, Hades with Angra Mainyu, Aphrodite and Hera with Anahita, Apollo with Mithra, and Hermes with Shamash. Aside from the main gods and goddesses, each ethnic group and city had their own designated deities. As with Seleucid rulers, Parthian art indicates that the Arsacid kings viewed themselves as gods; this cult of the ruler was perhaps the most widespread.

The extent of Arsacid patronage of Zoroastrianism is debated in modern scholarship. The followers of Zoroaster would have found the bloody sacrifices of some Parthian-era Iranian cults to be unacceptable. However, there is evidence that Vologases I encouraged the presence of Zoroastrian magi priests at court and sponsored the compilation of sacred Zoroastrian texts which later formed the Avesta. The Sasanian court would later adopt Zoroastrianism as the official state religion of the empire.

Although Mani (216–276 AD), the founding prophet of Manichaeism, did not proclaim his first religious revelation until 228/229 AD, Bivar asserts that his new faith contained "elements of Mandaean belief, Iranian cosmogony, and even echoes of Christianity ... may be regarded as a typical reflection of the mixed religious doctrines of the late Arsacid period, which the Zoroastrian orthodoxy of the Sasanians was soon to sweep away."

There is scant archaeological evidence for the spread of Buddhism from the Kushan Empire into Iran proper. However, it is known from Chinese sources that An Shigao (fl. 2nd century AD), a Parthian nobleman and Buddhist monk, traveled to Luoyang in Han China as a Buddhist missionary and translated several Buddhist canons into Chinese.

Art and architecture

Further information: Parthian art
A barrel vaulted iwan at the entrance at the ancient site of Hatra, modern-day Iraq, built c. 50 AD
The Parthian Temple of Charyios in Uruk.

Parthian art can be divided into three geo-historical phases: the art of Parthia proper; the art of the Iranian plateau; and the art of Parthian Mesopotamia. The first genuine Parthian art, found at Mithridatkert/Nisa, combined elements of Greek and Iranian art in line with Achaemenid and Seleucid traditions. In the second phase, Parthian art found inspiration in Achaemenid art, as exemplified by the investiture relief of Mithridates II at Mount Behistun. The third phase occurred gradually after the Parthian conquest of Mesopotamia.

Common motifs of the Parthian period include scenes of royal hunting expeditions and the investiture of Arsacid kings. Use of these motifs extended to include portrayals of local rulers. Common art mediums were rock-reliefs, frescos, and even graffiti. Geometric and stylized plant patterns were also used on stucco and plaster walls. The common motif of the Sasanian period showing two horsemen engaged in combat with lances first appeared in the Parthian reliefs at Mount Behistun.

In portraiture the Parthians favored and emphasized frontality, meaning the person depicted by painting, sculpture, or raised-relief on coins faced the viewer directly instead of showing his or her profile. Although frontality in portraiture was already an old artistic technique by the Parthian period, Daniel Schlumberger explains the innovation of Parthian frontality:

'Parthian frontality', as we are now accustomed to call it, deeply differs both from ancient Near Eastern and from Greek frontality, though it is, no doubt, an offspring of the latter. For both in Oriental art and in Greek art, frontality was an exceptional treatment: in Oriental art it was a treatment strictly reserved for a small number of traditional characters of cult and myth; in Greek art it was an option resorted to only for definite reasons, when demanded by the subject, and, on the whole, seldom made use of. With Parthian art, on the contrary, frontality becomes the normal treatment of the figure. For the Parthians frontality is really nothing but the habit of showing, in relief and in painting, all figures full-face, even at the expense (as it seems to us moderns) of clearness and intelligibility. So systematic is this use that it amounts to a complete banishment de facto of the side-view and of all intermediate attitudes. This singular state of things seems to have become established in the course of the 1st century A.D.

A wall mural depicting a scene from the Book of Esther at the Dura-Europos synagogue, dated 245 AD, which Curtis and Schlumberger describe as a fine example of 'Parthian frontality'

Parthian art, with its distinct use of frontality in portraiture, was lost and abandoned with the profound cultural and political changes brought by the Sasanian Empire. However, even after the Roman occupation of Dura-Europos in 165 AD, the use of Parthian frontality in portraiture continued to flourish there. This is exemplified by the early 3rd-century AD wall murals of the Dura-Europos synagogue, a temple in the same city dedicated to Palmyrene gods, and the local Mithraeum.

Parthian architecture adopted elements of Achaemenid and Greek architecture, but remained distinct from the two. The style is first attested at Mithridatkert/Nisa. The Round Hall of Nisa is similar to Hellenistic palaces, but different in that it forms a circle and vault inside a square space. However, the artwork of Nisa, including marble statues and the carved scenes on ivory rhyton vessels, is unquestionably influenced by Greek art.

A signature feature of Parthian architecture was the iwan, an audience hall supported by arches or barrel vaults and open on one side. Use of the barrel vault replaced the Hellenic use of columns to support roofs. Although the iwan was known during the Achaemenid period and earlier in smaller and subterranean structures, it was the Parthians who first built them on a monumental scale. The earliest Parthian iwans are found at Seleucia, built in the early 1st century AD. Monumental iwans are also commonly found in the ancient temples of Hatra and perhaps modeled on the Parthian style. The largest Parthian iwans at that site have a span of 15 m (50 ft).

Clothing and apparel

A sculpted head (broken off from a larger statue) of a Parthian soldier wearing a Hellenistic-style helmet, from the Parthian royal residence and necropolis of Nisa, Turkmenistan, 2nd century BC

The typical Parthian riding outfit is exemplified by the famous bronze statue of a Parthian nobleman found at Shami, Elymais. Standing 1.9 m (6 ft), the figure wears a V-shaped jacket, a V-shaped tunic fastened in place with a belt, loose-fitting and many-folded trousers held by garters, and a diadem or band over his coiffed, bobbed hair. His outfit is commonly seen in relief images of Parthian coins by the mid-1st century BC.

Examples of clothing in Parthian inspired sculptures have been found in excavations at Hatra, in northwestern Iraq. Statues erected there feature the typical Parthian shirt (qamis), combined with trousers and made with fine, ornamented materials. The aristocratic elite of Hatra adopted the bobbed hairstyles, headdresses, and belted tunics worn by the nobility belonging to the central Arsacid court. The trouser-suit was even worn by the Arsacid kings, as shown on the reverse images of coins. The Parthian trouser-suit was also adopted in Palmyra, Syria, along with the use of Parthian frontality in art.

Parthian sculptures depict wealthy women wearing long-sleeved robes over a dress, with necklaces, earrings, bracelets, and headdresses bedecked in jewelry. Their many-folded dresses were fastened by a brooch at one shoulder. Their headdresses also featured a veil which was draped backwards.

As seen in Parthian coinage, the headdresses worn by the Parthian kings changed over time. The earliest Arsacid coins show rulers wearing the soft cap with cheek flaps, known as the bashlyk (Greek: kyrbasia). This may have derived from an Achaemenid-era satrapal headdress and the pointy hats depicted in the Achaemenid reliefs at Behistun and Persepolis. The earliest coins of Mithridates I show him wearing the soft cap, yet coins from the latter part of his reign show him for the first time wearing the royal Hellenistic diadem. Mithridates II was the first to be shown wearing the Parthian tiara, embroidered with pearls and jewels, a headdress commonly worn in the late Parthian period and by Sasanian monarchs.

Language

As culturally and religiously tolerant as the Parthians were, they adopted Greek as their official language, while Aramaic remained the lingua franca in the empire. The native Parthian language, Middle Persian, and Akkadian were also used.

Literature and music

Further information: Parthian music
Parthian long-necked lute, c. 3 BC – 3 AD

It is known that during the Parthian period the court minstrel (gōsān) recited poetic oral literature accompanied by music. However, their stories, composed in verse form, were not written down until the subsequent Sassanian period. In fact, there is no known Parthian-language literature that survives in original form; all of the surviving texts were written down in the following centuries. It is believed that such stories as the romantic tale Vis and Rāmin and epic cycle of the Kayanian dynasty were part of the corpus of oral literature from Parthian times, although compiled much later. Although literature of the Parthian language was not committed to written form, there is evidence that the Arsacids acknowledged and respected written Greek literature.

Women in the Parthian Empire

There are very few written and archeological sources about the position of women in the Parthian Empire, and the fragmentary information that does exist is only about royal women, whose position shows many similarities to their predecessors in the Achaemenid Empire and their successors in the Sasanian Empire.

The Parthian kings were polygamous and had several wives with the title "queen" (referred to with the Babylonian spelling šarratu or the Greek basilisse), as well as concubines. It is known that kings often married their sisters, but it is unknown if they were the kings' full sisters or half sisters. According to Roman sources, Parthian kings had harems full of female slaves and hetairas secluded from contact with men, and royal women were not allowed to participate in the royal banquets. Whether the royal women lived in seclusion from men is unknown, as no evidence of that has been found, but it is known that women at least participated in the royal banquets as entertainers, as women are shown in archeological images entertaining at such occasions with music and dance.

It is assumed that royal Parthian women could own and manage their own property, land and manufactures, as could their predecessors in the Achaemenid and Seleucid Empire and their successors in the Sasanian Empire. It is fully attested that royal women, as well as noblewomen, accompanied their husbands in battle with their own entourage. This was the reason why female members of the royal family could sometimes be taken captive by enemies and had to be ransomed, such as the famous occasion when the daughter of King Osroes was held captive by emperor Trajan from the occupation of Ctesiphon in 116 until 129, but also the reason why kings sometimes killed the women of his company after a defeat to prevent them from being taken prisoners.

Royal women appear to have been less included in royal representation. Artwork depicts royal women dressed similarly to those of the Achaemenid period: in long-sleeved, many-folded dresses tied by a belt, with a tiara or a veil hanging down their back. While their names and titles did appear in official documents, Parthian women were rarely depicted in art. Only two royal women were ever depicted on Parthian coins: Queen Musa of Parthia and Queen Anzaze of Elymais. Only two women are known to have ruled the Parthian Empire, one as monarch and one as regent. Musa of Parthia is the only woman confirmed to have ruled as queen regnant of the Parthian Empire, while Rinnu, mother of underage king Phraates II, is the only other woman believed to have been a ruler, in her case as a queen regent instead of a queen regnant.

See also

Notes

  1. Greek: Ἀρσάκης, romanized: Arsakēs, from Parthian: 𐭀𐭓𐭔𐭊, romanized: Aršak

References

  1. Fattah, Hala Mundhir (2009). A Brief History of Iraq. Infobase Publishing. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-8160-5767-2. One characteristic of the Parthians that the kings themselves maintained was their nomadic urge. The kings built or occupied numerous cities as their capitals, the most important being Ctesiphon on the Tigris River, which they built from the ancient town of Opis.
  2. ^ Skjærvø 2004, pp. 348–366.
  3. ^ Canepa 2018, p. 6.
  4. ^ Green 1992, p. 45
  5. Chyet, Michael L. (1997). Afsaruddin, Asma; Krotkoff, Georg; Zahniser, A. H. Mathias (eds.). Humanism, Culture, and Language in the Near East: Studies in Honor of Georg Krotkoff. Eisenbrauns. p. 284. ISBN 978-1-57506-020-0. In the Middle Persian period (Parthian and Sasanian Empires), Aramaic was the medium of everyday writing, and it provided scripts for writing Middle Persian, Parthian, Sogdian, and Khwarezmian.
  6. De Jong 2008, p. 24, "It is impossible to doubt that the Parthians were Zoroastrians. The evidence from the Nisa ostraca and the Parthian parchment from Avroman suffice to prove this, by the use of the Zoroastrian calendar, which was restricted in use, as it had been previously, to communication with Iranians only, yielding to the Seleucid calendar whenever the Parthians dealt with non-Zoroastrians. There are indications, however, that the practice of Zoroastrianism had reserved a large place for the cult of divine images, either those of ancestors in the Fravashi cult, or of deities, and for the existence of sanctuaries dedicated to named deities other than Ahura Mazda, and including deities that are of a non-Avestan background. The Parthian god Sasan is a case in point, but better evidence comes from Armenia, where alongside Aramazd and Anahit, Mher and Vahagn, the West Semitic god Barshamin, and Babylonian Nane were worshipped, as well as the Anatolian Tork and the goddess Astghik of disputed origins."
  7. Brosius 2006, p. 125, "The Parthians and the peoples of the Parthian empire were polytheistic. Each ethnic group, each city, and each land or kingdom was able to adhere to its own gods, their respective cults and religious rituals. In Babylon the city-god Marduk continued to be the main deity alongside the goddesses Ishtar and Nanai, while Hatra's main god, the sun-god Shamash, was revered alongside a multiplicity of other gods."
  8. Koshelenko & Pilipko 1996, p. 149-150, "Buddhism was practiced in the easternmost reaches of the Parthian Empire."
  9. Sheldon 2010, p. 231
  10. Turchin, Peter; Adams, Jonathan M.; Hall, Thomas D (December 2006). "East-West Orientation of Historical Empires". Journal of World-Systems Research. 12 (2): 223. ISSN 1076-156X. Archived from the original on 17 September 2016. Retrieved 16 September 2016.
  11. Taagepera, Rein (1979). "Size and Duration of Empires: Growth-Decline Curves, 600 B.C. to 600 A.D.". Social Science History. 3 (3/4): 121. doi:10.2307/1170959. JSTOR 1170959.
  12. Waters 1974, p. 424.
  13. Brosius 2006, p. 84
  14. "roughly western Khurasan", see Bickerman 1983, p. 6.
  15. Ball 2016, p. 155
  16. Katouzian 2009, p. 41; Curtis 2007, p. 7; Bivar 1983, pp. 24–27; Brosius 2006, pp. 83–84
  17. Bivar 1983, p. 24; Brosius 2006, p. 84
  18. Bivar 1983, pp. 24–27; Brosius 2006, pp. 83–84
  19. Curtis 2007, pp. 7–8; Brosius 2006, pp. 83–84
  20. Bivar 1983, pp. 28–29
  21. ^ Curtis 2007, p. 7
  22. ^ Katouzian 2009, p. 41
  23. Garthwaite 2005, p. 67
  24. ^ Brosius 2006, p. 85
  25. Bivar 1983, pp. 29–31
  26. ^ Curtis 2007, p. 8
  27. ^ Brosius 2006, p. 86
  28. Bivar 1983, p. 36
  29. Bivar 1983, pp. 98–99
  30. Daryaee 2012, p. 179.
  31. ^ Brosius 2006, pp. 85–86
  32. ^ Bivar 1983, p. 29; Brosius 2006, p. 86; Kennedy 1996, p. 74
  33. Bivar 1983, pp. 29–31; Brosius 2006, p. 86
  34. Bivar 1983, p. 31
  35. Bivar 1983, p. 33; Brosius 2006, p. 86
  36. Curtis 2007, pp. 10–11; Bivar 1983, p. 33; Garthwaite 2005, p. 76
  37. ^ Curtis 2007, pp. 10–11; Brosius 2006, pp. 86–87; Bivar 1983, p. 34; Garthwaite 2005, p. 76;
  38. Garthwaite 2005, p. 76; Bivar 1983, p. 35
  39. Brosius 2006, pp. 103, 110–113
  40. Kennedy 1996, p. 73; Garthwaite 2005, p. 77
  41. Garthwaite 2005, p. 77; Bivar 1983, pp. 38–39
  42. ^ Brosius 2006, p. 103
  43. Bivar 1983, p. 34
  44. Brosius 2006, p. 89; Bivar 1983, p. 35; Shayegan 2007, pp. 83–103
  45. Bivar 1983, pp. 36–37; Curtis 2007, p. 11; Shayegan 2011, pp. 121–150
  46. Garthwaite 2005, pp. 76–77; Bivar 1983, pp. 36–37; Curtis 2007, p. 11
  47. Shayegan 2011, pp. 145–150
  48. Bivar 1983, pp. 37–38; Garthwaite 2005, p. 77; see also Brosius 2006, p. 90 and Katouzian 2009, pp. 41–42
  49. Torday 1997, pp. 80–81
  50. Garthwaite 2005, p. 76; Bivar 1983, pp. 36–37; Brosius 2006, pp. 89, 91
  51. Brosius 2006, p. 89
  52. Bivar 1983, p. 38; Garthwaite 2005, p. 77
  53. Bivar 1983, pp. 38–39; Garthwaite 2005, p. 77; Curtis 2007, p. 11; Katouzian 2009, p. 42
  54. Bivar 1983, pp. 38–39
  55. Bivar 1983, pp. 40–41; Katouzian 2009, p. 42
  56. Garthwaite 2005, p. 78
  57. Bivar 1983, p. 40; Curtis 2007, pp. 11–12; Brosius 2006, p. 90
  58. Curtis 2007, pp. 11–12
  59. Brosius 2006, pp. 91–92; Bivar 1983, pp. 40–41
  60. ^ Bivar 2007, p. 26
  61. Bivar 1983, p. 41
  62. Brosius 2006, pp. 90–91; Watson 1983, pp. 540–542; Garthwaite 2005, pp. 77–78
  63. Garthwaite 2005, p. 78; Brosius 2006, pp. 122–123
  64. Brosius 2006, pp. 123–125
  65. Wang 2007, pp. 100–101
  66. Kurz 1983, p. 560
  67. Ebrey 1999, p. 70; for an archaeological survey of Roman glasswares in ancient Chinese burials, see An 2002, pp. 79–84
  68. Howard 2012, p. 133
  69. ^ Brosius 2006, p. 92
  70. Kennedy 1996, pp. 73–78; Brosius 2006, p. 91; Sheldon 2010, pp. 12–16
  71. ^ Kennedy 1996, pp. 77–78
  72. Assar 2006, p. 62; Shayegan 2011, p. 225; Rezakhani 2013, p. 770
  73. Shayegan 2011, pp. 188–189.
  74. ^ Sellwood 1976, p. 2.
  75. Brosius 2006, pp. 91–92
  76. Bivar 1983, pp. 44–45
  77. Bivar 1983, pp. 45–46; Brosius 2006, p. 94
  78. Bivar 1983, pp. 46–47
  79. Bivar 1983, p. 47; Cassius Dio writes that Lucius Afranius reoccupied the region without confronting the Parthian army, whereas Plutarch asserts that Afranius drove him out by military means.
  80. Bivar 1983, pp. 48–49; see also Katouzian 2009, pp. 42–43
  81. Bivar 1983, pp. 48–49; also, Brosius 2006, pp. 94–95 mentions this in passing.
  82. Bivar 1983, p. 49
  83. Bivar 1983, pp. 49–50; Katouzian 2009, pp. 42–43
  84. Bivar 1983, pp. 55–56; Garthwaite 2005, p. 79; see also Brosius 2006, pp. 94–95 and Curtis 2007, pp. 12–13
  85. Bivar 1983, pp. 52–55
  86. ^ Bivar 1983, p. 52
  87. Bivar 1983, pp. 52–55; Brosius 2006, pp. 94–95; Garthwaite 2005, pp. 78–79
  88. Katouzian 2009, pp. 42–43; Garthwaite 2005, p. 79; Bivar 1983, pp. 52–55; Brosius 2006, p. 96
  89. Bivar 1983, pp. 52–55; Brosius 2006, p. 96
  90. ^ Kennedy 1996, p. 78
  91. Bivar 1983, pp. 55–56; Brosius 2006, p. 96
  92. Kennedy 1996, p. 80 asserts that permanent occupation was the obvious goal of the Parthians, especially after the cities of Roman Syria and even the Roman garrisons submitted to the Parthians and joined their cause.
  93. Kennedy 1996, pp. 78–79; Bivar 1983, p. 56
  94. Bivar 1983, pp. 56–57; Strugnell 2006, p. 243
  95. ^ Bivar 1983, p. 57; Strugnell 2006, p. 244; Kennedy 1996, p. 80
  96. Syme 2002, pp. 214–217
  97. Bivar 1983, p. 57
  98. ^ Bivar 1983, pp. 57–58; Strugnell 2006, pp. 239, 245; Brosius 2006, p. 96; Kennedy 1996, p. 80
  99. Bivar 1983, p. 58; Brosius 2006, p. 96; Kennedy 1996, pp. 80–81; see also Strugnell 2006, pp. 239, 245–246
  100. Garthwaite 2005, p. 79
  101. Bivar 1983, pp. 58–59; Kennedy 1996, p. 81
  102. Bivar 1983, pp. 58–59
  103. Bivar 1983, pp. 60–63; Garthwaite 2005, p. 80; Curtis 2007, p. 13; see also Kennedy 1996, p. 81 for analysis on Rome's shift of attention away from Syria to the Upper Euphrates, starting with Antony.
  104. Roller 2010, p. 99
  105. Burstein 2004, p. 31
  106. ^ Bivar 1983, pp. 64–65
  107. Roller 2010, pp. 145–151
  108. Roller 2010, pp. 138–151; Bringmann 2007, pp. 304–307
  109. Bivar 1983, pp. 65–66
  110. Garthwaite 2005, p. 80; see also Strugnell 2006, pp. 251–252
  111. Bivar 1983, pp. 66–67
  112. Brosius 2006, pp. 96–97, 136–137; Bivar 1983, pp. 66–67; Curtis 2007, pp. 12–13
  113. Bivar 1983, p. 67; Brosius 2006, pp. 96–99
  114. Bivar 1983, p. 68; Brosius 2006, pp. 97–99; see also Garthwaite 2005, p. 80
  115. Bivar 1983, pp. 68–69; Brosius 2006, pp. 97–99
  116. Bivar 1983, pp. 69–71
  117. Bivar 1983, p. 71
  118. Bivar 1983, pp. 71–72
  119. Bivar 1983, pp. 72–73
  120. See Brosius 2006, pp. 137–138 for more information on Roman coins depicting Parthians returning the lost military standards to Rome.
  121. Bivar 1983, p. 73
  122. Bivar 1983, pp. 73–74
  123. Bivar 1983, pp. 75–76
  124. Bivar 1983, pp. 76–78
  125. ^ Watson 1983, pp. 543–544
  126. Watson 1983, pp. 543–544; Yü 1986, pp. 460–461; de Crespigny 2007, pp. 239–240; see also Wang 2007, p. 101
  127. Wood 2002, pp. 46–47; Morton & Lewis 2005, p. 59
  128. Yü 1986, pp. 460–461; de Crespigny 2007, p. 600
  129. Young 2001, p. 29; Mawer 2013, p. 38; Ball 2016, p. 153
  130. "Louvre Museum Sb 7302".
  131. Bivar 1983, p. 79
  132. Bivar 1983, pp. 79–81; Kennedy 1996, p. 81
  133. Garthwaite 2005, p. 82; Bivar 1983, pp. 79–81
  134. ^ Bausani 1971, p. 41
  135. Bivar 1983, p. 81
  136. Bivar 1983, pp. 81–85
  137. Bivar 1983, pp. 83–85
  138. Brosius 2006, pp. 99–100; Bivar 1983, p. 85
  139. Bivar 1983, p. 86
  140. Kennedy 1996, pp. 67, 87–88
  141. Kennedy 1996, p. 87
  142. Kennedy 1996, pp. 87–88; see also Kurz 1983, pp. 561–562
  143. Sheldon 2010, pp. 231–232
  144. Sheldon 2010, pp. 9–10, 231–235
  145. Olbrycht 2016, p. 96.
  146. Bivar 1983, pp. 86–87
  147. Bivar 1983, p. 88; Curtis 2007, p. 13; Lightfoot 1990, p. 117
  148. Lightfoot 1990, pp. 117–118; see also Bivar 1983, pp. 90–91
  149. Bivar 1983, pp. 88–89
  150. Dr. Aaron Ralby (2013). "Emperor Trajan, 98–117: Greatest Extent of Rome". Atlas of Military History. Parragon. p. 239. ISBN 978-1-4723-0963-1.
  151. Bivar 1983, pp. 88–90; Garthwaite 2005, p. 81; Lightfoot 1990, p. 120; see also Katouzian 2009, p. 44
  152. Bivar 1983, pp. 90–91
  153. Lightfoot 1990, p. 120; Bivar 1983, pp. 90–91
  154. Bivar 1983, p. 91; Curtis 2007, p. 13; Garthwaite 2005, p. 81
  155. Mommsen 2004, p. 69
  156. Bivar 1983, pp. 90–91; see also Brosius 2006, p. 137 and Curtis 2007, p. 13
  157. Lightfoot 1990, pp. 120–124
  158. Brosius 2006, p. 100; see also Lightfoot 1990, p. 115; Garthwaite 2005, p. 81; and Bivar 1983, p. 91
  159. Bivar 1983, pp. 92–93
  160. Bivar 1983, p. 93
  161. Brosius 2006, p. 100; Bivar 1983, pp. 93–94
  162. Curtis 2007, p. 13; Bivar 1983, pp. 93–94
  163. Brosius 2006, p. 100; Curtis 2007, p. 13; Bivar 1983, p. 94; Katouzian 2009, p. 44
  164. ^ Bivar 1983, pp. 94–95
  165. Chegini & Nikitin 1996, p. 35.
  166. Herodian, IV.15.5
  167. Brosius 2006, pp. 100–101; see also Katouzian 2009, p. 44, who mentions this in passing
  168. ^ Brosius 2006, p. 101; Bivar 1983, pp. 95–96; Curtis 2007, p. 14; see also Katouzian 2009, p. 44
  169. Bivar 1983, pp. 95–96
  170. Frye 1983, pp. 173–174
  171. Norman A. Stillman The Jews of Arab Lands pp 22 Jewish Publication Society, 1979 ISBN 0-8276-1155-2
  172. International Congress of Byzantine Studies Proceedings of the 21st International Congress of Byzantine Studies, London, 21–26 August 2006, Volumes 1–3 pp 29. Ashgate Pub Co, 30 sep. 2006 ISBN 0-7546-5740-X
  173. Widengren 1983, pp. 1261–1262
  174. Yarshater 1983, p. 359
  175. Widengren 1983, p. 1261
  176. Garthwaite 2005, pp. 75–76
  177. Boyce 1983, pp. 1151–1152
  178. Garthwaite 2005, p. 67; Widengren 1983, p. 1262; Brosius 2006, pp. 79–80
  179. ^ Widengren 1983, p. 1262
  180. Widengren 1983, p. 1265
  181. Garthwaite 2005, pp. 75–76; Widengren 1983, p. 1263; Brosius 2006, pp. 118–119
  182. Widengren 1983, p. 1263; Brosius 2006, pp. 118–119
  183. Garthwaite 2005, pp. 67, 75; Bivar 1983, p. 22
  184. Garthwaite 2005, p. 75; Bivar 1983, pp. 80–81
  185. Kurz 1983, p. 564; see also Brosius 2006, p. 138 for further analysis: "Curiously, at the same time as the Parthian was depicted as uncivilised, he was also 'orientalised' in traditional fashion, being described as luxury-loving, leading an effeminate lifestyle, and demonstrating excessive sexuality."
  186. Widengren 1983, pp. 1261, 1264
  187. Widengren 1983, p. 1264
  188. Widengren 1983, pp. 1265–1266
  189. ^ Widengren 1983, pp. 1265, 1267
  190. Brosius 2006, p. 80; Posch 1998, p. 363
  191. Posch 1998, p. 358
  192. Watson 1983, pp. 541–542
  193. Wang 2007, p. 90
  194. Wang 2007, p. 88
  195. Wang 2007, pp. 89–90; Brosius 2006, pp. 90–91, 122
  196. Brosius 2006, p. 118; see also Wang 2007, p. 90 for a similar translation
  197. Kalani, Reza. 2022. Indo-Parthians and the Rise of Sasanians, Tahouri Publishers, Tehran, pp. 95-111.
  198. Garthwaite 2005, pp. 67–68
  199. Widengren 1983, p. 1263
  200. Lukonin 1983, p. 701
  201. Lukonin 1983, p. 701; Curtis 2007, pp. 19–21
  202. Brosius 2006, pp. 113–114
  203. Brosius 2006, pp. 115–116
  204. Brosius 2006, pp. 114–115
  205. ^ Brosius 2006, pp. 103–104
  206. Brosius 2006, p. 119
  207. Lukonin 1983, pp. 699–700
  208. Lukonin 1983, pp. 700–704
  209. Brosius 2006, pp. 99–100, 104
  210. Brosius 2006, pp. 104–105, 117–118
  211. "Strabo, Geography, Book 11, chapter 9, section 3". perseus.tufts.edu. Archived from the original on 2016-12-21. Retrieved 2017-09-11.
  212. Lukonin 1983, pp. 704–705
  213. Lukonin 1983, p. 704; Brosius 2006, p. 104
  214. Brosius 2006, pp. 116, 122; Sheldon 2010, pp. 231–232
  215. ^ Kennedy 1996, p. 84
  216. Wang 2007, pp. 99–100
  217. ^ Brosius 2006, p. 120; Garthwaite 2005, p. 78
  218. Brosius 2006, p. 120; Kennedy 1996, p. 84
  219. Brosius 2006, pp. 116–118; see also Garthwaite 2005, p. 78 and Kennedy 1996, p. 84
  220. Brosius 2006, p. 120; Garthwaite 2005, p. 78; Kurz 1983, p. 561
  221. ^ Shahbazi 1986, pp. 489–499.
  222. Brosius 2006, p. 122
  223. Daryaee, Touraj (2016). "From Terror to Tactical Usage: Elephants in the Partho-Sasanian Period," The Parthian and Early Sasanian Empires: Adaptation and Expansion". In Curtis, V. Sarkhosh; Alram, Michael; Daryaee, Touraj (eds.). The Parthian and Early Sasanian Empires. Oxford University Press. p. 36. doi:10.2307/j.ctvh1dkb6.7.
  224. ^ Kennedy 1996, p. 83
  225. Curtis 2007, pp. 9, 11–12, 16
  226. Curtis 2007, pp. 7–25; Sellwood 1983, pp. 279–298
  227. Sellwood 1983, p. 280
  228. Sellwood 1983, p. 282
  229. Curtis 2007, pp. 14–15; see also Katouzian 2009, p. 45
  230. Garthwaite 2005, p. 85; Curtis 2007, pp. 14–15
  231. Curtis 2007, p. 11
  232. ^ Curtis 2007, p. 16
  233. Garthwaite 2005, pp. 80–81; see also Curtis 2007, p. 21 and Schlumberger 1983, p. 1030
  234. Schlumberger 1983, p. 1030
  235. Bivar 1983, p. 56
  236. ^ Shahbazi 1987, p. 525
  237. Garthwaite 2005, p. 85; Brosius 2006, pp. 128–129
  238. Lukonin 1983, p. 697
  239. Lukonin 1983, p. 687; Shahbazi 1987, p. 525
  240. Duchesne-Guillemin 1983, pp. 867–868
  241. ^ Katouzian 2009, p. 45
  242. Neusner 1983, pp. 909–923
  243. Asmussen 1983, pp. 924–928
  244. ^ Brosius 2006, p. 125
  245. Garthwaite 2005, pp. 68, 83–84; Colpe 1983, p. 823; Brosius 2006, p. 125
  246. Duchesne-Guillemin 1983, pp. 872–873
  247. Colpe 1983, p. 844
  248. Katouzian 2009, p. 45; Brosius 2006, pp. 102–103
  249. Bivar 1983, pp. 85–86; Garthwaite 2005, pp. 80–81; Duchesne-Guillemin 1983, p. 867
  250. Garthwaite 2005, p. 67; Asmussen 1983, pp. 928, 933–934
  251. Bivar 1983, p. 97
  252. Emmerick 1983, p. 957
  253. Demiéville 1986, p. 823; Zhang 2002, p. 75
  254. ^ Brosius 2006, p. 127
  255. ^ Brosius 2006, p. 128
  256. Brosius 2006, p. 127; see also Schlumberger 1983, pp. 1041–1043
  257. Brosius 2006, pp. 129, 132
  258. Brosius 2006, p. 127; Garthwaite 2005, p. 84; Schlumberger 1983, pp. 1049–1050
  259. ^ Schlumberger 1983, p. 1051
  260. Curtis 2007, p. 18
  261. Schlumberger 1983, pp. 1052–1053
  262. Schlumberger 1983, p. 1053
  263. Curtis 2007, p. 18; Schlumberger 1983, pp. 1052–1053
  264. ^ Brosius 2006, pp. 111–112
  265. Brosius 2006, pp. 111–112, 127–128; Schlumberger 1983, pp. 1037–1041
  266. ^ Garthwaite 2005, p. 84; Brosius 2006, p. 128; Schlumberger 1983, p. 1049
  267. ^ Brosius 2006, pp. 134–135
  268. Schlumberger 1983, p. 1049
  269. Brosius 2006, pp. 132–134
  270. Bivar 1983, pp. 91–92
  271. Curtis 2007, p. 15
  272. Curtis 2007, p. 17
  273. Brosius 2006, pp. 108, 134–135
  274. Brosius 2006, p. 101
  275. Curtis 2007, p. 8; see also Sellwood 1983, pp. 279–280 for comparison with Achaemenid satrapal headdresses
  276. Brosius 2006, pp. 101–102; Curtis 2007, p. 9
  277. Brosius 2006, pp. 101–102; Curtis 2007, p. 15
  278. Brosius 2006, p. 106
  279. Boyce 1983, p. 1151
  280. Boyce 1983, pp. 1158–1159
  281. Boyce 1983, pp. 1154–1155; see also Kennedy 1996, p. 74
  282. ^ Maria Brosius, "WOMEN i. In Pre-Islamic Persia", Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, 2021, available at WOMEN i. In Pre-Islamic Persia (accessed on 26 January 2021). Originally Published: January 1, 2000. Last Updated: March 15, 2010. Encyclopædia Iranica, online edition, New York, 1996– https://iranicaonline.org/articles/women-i Archived 2020-11-03 at the Wayback Machine
  283. Lerouge, Ch. 2007. L’image des Parthes dans le monde gréco-romain. Stuttgart.
  284. Kaim, B. 2016. "Women, Dance and the Hunt: Splendour and Pleasures of Court Life in Arsacid and Early Sasanian Art." In V. S. Curtis, E. J. Pendleton, M. Alram and T. Daryaee (eds.), The Parthian and Early Sasanian Empires: Adaptation and Expansion, Oxford, 90–105
  285. N. C. Debevoise, A Political History of Parthia, Chicago, 1938.
  286. J. Oelsner, "Recht im hellenistischen Babylon," in Legal Documents of the Hellenistic World, ed. M. J. Geller and H. Maehler, London, 1995, pp. 106–148.

Sources

Further reading

  • Ellerbrock, Uwe (2021). The Parthians: The Forgotten Empire. Abingdon-on-Thames: Taylor & Francis. ISBN 978-1-000-35848-3.
  • Neusner, J. (1963), "Parthian Political Ideology", Iranica Antiqua, 3: 40–59
  • Schippmann, Klaus (1987), "Arsacid ii. The Arsacid dynasty", Encyclopaedia Iranica, vol. 2, New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 526–535

External links

Parthian Empire
Origins
Dynasty
Noble clans
Culture
Wars
Related
Lists
Links to related articles
Rulers of the Parthian Empire (247 BC – 224 AD)
usurpers or rival claimants
Rulers of the ancient Near East
Territories/
dates
Egypt Canaan Ebla Mari Kish/
Assur
Akshak/
Akkad
Uruk Adab Umma
Lagash Ur Elam
4000–3200 BCE Naqada I
Naqada II
Gebel el-Arak Knife
Egypt-Mesopotamia relations Pre-Dynastic period (4000–2900 BCE) Susa I

Uruk period
(4000–3100 BCE)


(Anu Ziggurat, 4000 BCE)

(Anonymous "King-priests")
Susa II
Susa II Priest-King with bow and arrows
(Uruk influence or control)
3200–3100 BCE Proto-Dynastic period
(Naqada III)
Early or legendary kings:
Upper Egypt
Finger Snail Fish Pen-Abu Animal Stork Canide Bull Scorpion I Shendjw Iry-Hor Ka Scorpion II Narmer / Menes
Lower Egypt
Hedju Hor Ny-Hor Hsekiu Khayu Tiu Thesh Neheb Wazner Nat-Hor Mekh Double Falcon Wash
3100–2900 BCE Early Dynastic Period
First Dynasty of Egypt
Narmer Palette
Narmer Palette

Narmer Menes Neithhotep (regent) Hor-Aha Djer Djet Merneith (regent) Den Anedjib Semerkhet Qa'a Sneferka Horus Bird
Canaanites Jemdet Nasr period
(3100–2900 BCE)
Proto-Elamite
period
(Susa III)
(3100–2700 BCE)
2900 BCE Second Dynasty of Egypt

Hotepsekhemwy Nebra/Raneb Nynetjer Ba Nubnefer Horus Sa Weneg-Nebty Wadjenes Senedj Seth-Peribsen Sekhemib-Perenmaat Neferkara I Neferkasokar Hudjefa I Khasekhemwy
Khasekhemwy
Early Dynastic Period I (2900–2700 BCE)
First Eblaite
Kingdom

First kingdom of Mari
Kish I dynasty
Jushur, Kullassina-bel
Nangishlishma,
En-tarah-ana
Babum, Puannum, Kalibum
2800 BCE


Kalumum Zuqaqip Atab
Mashda Arwium Etana
Balih En-me-nuna
Melem-Kish Barsal-nuna
Uruk I dynasty
Mesh-ki-ang-gasher
Enmerkar ("conqueror of Aratta")
2700 BCE Early Dynastic Period II (2700–2600 BCE)
Zamug, Tizqar, Ilku
Iltasadum
Lugalbanda
Dumuzid, the Fisherman
Enmebaragesi ("made the land of Elam submit")
Aga of Kish Aga of Kish Gilgamesh Old Elamite period
(2700–1500 BCE)

Indus-Mesopotamia relations
2600 BCE Third Dynasty of Egypt

Djoser
Saqqarah Djeser pyramid
(First Egyptian pyramids)
Sekhemkhet Sanakht Nebka Khaba Qahedjet Huni
Early Dynastic Period III (2600–2340 BCE)
Sagisu
Abur-lim
Agur-lim
Ibbi-Damu
Baba-Damu
Kish II dynasty
(5 kings)
Uhub
Mesilim
Ur-Nungal
Udulkalama
Labashum
Lagash
En-hegal
Lugal-
shaengur
Ur
A-Imdugud
Ur-Pabilsag
Meskalamdug
(Queen Puabi)
Akalamdug
Enun-dara-anna
Mes-he
Melamanna
Lugal-kitun
Adab
Nin-kisalsi
Me-durba
Lugal-dalu
2575 BCE Old Kingdom of Egypt
Fourth Dynasty of Egypt
Snefru Khufu

Djedefre Khafre Bikheris Menkaure Shepseskaf Thamphthis
Ur I dynasty
Mesannepada
"King of Ur and Kish", victorious over Uruk
2500 BCE Phoenicia (2500-539 BCE) Second kingdom of Mari

Ikun-Shamash
Iku-Shamagan
Iku-Shamagan


Ansud
Sa'umu
Ishtup-Ishar
Ikun-Mari
Iblul-Il
Nizi
Kish III dynasty
Ku-Baba
Akshak dynasty
Unzi
Undalulu
Uruk II dynasty
Ensha-
kushanna
Mug-si Umma I dynasty

Pabilgagaltuku
Lagash I dynasty

Ur-Nanshe


Akurgal
A'annepada
Meskiagnun
Elulu
Balulu
Awan dynasty
Peli
Tata
Ukkutahesh
Hishur
2450 BCE Fifth Dynasty of Egypt

Userkaf Sahure Neferirkare Kakai Neferefre Shepseskare Nyuserre Ini Menkauhor Kaiu Djedkare Isesi Unas
Enar-Damu
Ishar-Malik
Ush
Enakalle
Elamite invasions
(3 kings)
Shushun-
tarana

Napilhush
2425 BCE Kun-Damu Eannatum
(King of Lagash, Sumer, Akkad, conqueror of Elam)
2400 BCE Adub-Damu
Igrish-Halam
Irkab-Damu
Kish IV dynasty
Puzur-Suen
Ur-Zababa
Urur Lugal-kinishe-dudu
Lugal-kisalsi
E-iginimpa'e
Meskigal
Ur-Lumma
Il
Gishakidu
(Queen Bara-irnun)
Enannatum
Entemena
Enannatum II
Enentarzi
Ur II dynasty
Nanni
Mesh-ki-ang-Nanna II
Kiku-siwe-tempti
2380 BCE Sixth Dynasty of Egypt
Teti Userkare Pepi I Merenre Nemtyemsaf I Pepi II Merenre Nemtyemsaf II Netjerkare Siptah
Kneeling statuette of Pepy I
Adab dynasty
Lugalannemundu
"King of the four quarters of the world"
2370 BCE Isar-Damu Enna-Dagan
Ikun-Ishar
Ishqi-Mari
Invasion by Mari
Anbu, Anba, Bazi, Zizi of Mari, Limer, Sharrum-iter
Ukush Lugalanda
Urukagina
Luh-ishan
2350 BCE Puzur-Nirah
Ishu-Il
Shu-Sin
Uruk III dynasty
Lugalzagesi
(Governor of Umma, King of all Sumer)
2340 BCE Akkadian Period (2340–2150 BCE)
Akkadian Empire

Sargon of Akkad Rimush Manishtushu
Akkadian Governors:
Eshpum
Ilshu-rabi
Epirmupi
Ili-ishmani
2250 BCE Naram-Sin Lugal-ushumgal
(vassal of the Akkadians)
2200 BCE First Intermediate Period
Seventh Dynasty of Egypt
Eighth Dynasty of Egypt
Menkare Neferkare II Neferkare Neby Djedkare Shemai Neferkare Khendu Merenhor Neferkamin Nikare Neferkare Tereru Neferkahor Neferkare Pepiseneb Neferkamin Anu Qakare Ibi Neferkaure Neferkauhor Neferirkare
Second Eblaite
Kingdom
Third kingdom of Mari
(Shakkanakku
dynasty)

Ididish
Shu-Dagan
Ishma-Dagan
(Vassals of the Akkadians)

Shar-Kali-Sharri
Igigi, Imi, Nanum, Ilulu (3 years)
Dudu
Shu-turul
Uruk IV dynasty
Ur-nigin
Ur-gigir
Lagash II dynasty
Puzer-Mama
Ur-Ningirsu I
Pirig-me
Lu-Baba
Lu-gula
Ka-ku
Hishep-Ratep
Helu
Khita
Puzur-Inshushinak
2150 BCE Ninth Dynasty of Egypt
Meryibre Khety Neferkare VII Nebkaure Khety Setut
Ur III period (2150–2000 BCE)
Nûr-Mêr
Ishtup-Ilum

Ishgum-Addu
Apil-kin
Gutian dynasty
(21 kings)

La-erabum
Si'um
Kuda (Uruk)
Puzur-ili
Ur-Utu
Umma II dynasty
Lugalannatum
(vassal of the Gutians)
Ur-Baba
Gudea

Ur-Ningirsu
Ur-gar
Nam-mahani

Tirigan
2125 BCE Tenth Dynasty of Egypt
Meryhathor Neferkare VIII Wahkare Khety Merykare


Uruk V dynasty
Utu-hengal
2100 BCE (Vassals of UR III) Iddi-ilum
Ili-Ishar
Tura-Dagan
Puzur-Ishtar
(Vassals of Ur III)
Ur III dynasty
"Kings of Ur, Sumer and Akkad"
Ur-Nammu Shulgi Amar-Sin Shu-Sin
2025-1763 BCE Amorite invasions Ibbi-Sin Elamite invasions
Kindattu (Shimashki Dynasty)
Middle Kingdom of Egypt
Eleventh Dynasty of Egypt
Mentuhotep I Intef I Intef II Intef III Mentuhotep II Mentuhotep III Mentuhotep IV
Third Eblaite
Kingdom

(Amorites)
Ibbit-Lim

Immeya Indilimma
(Amorite Shakkanakkus)
Hitial-Erra
Hanun-Dagan
(...)


Lim Dynasty
of Mari
(Amorites)
Yaggid-Lim Yahdun-Lim Yasmah-Adad Zimri-Lim (Queen Shibtu)
Old Assyria
Puzur-Ashur I
Shalim-ahum
Ilu-shuma
Erishum I
Ikunum
Sargon I
Puzur-Ashur II
Naram-Sin
Erishum II
Isin-Larsa period
(Amorites)
Dynasty of Isin: Ishbi-Erra Shu-Ilishu Iddin-Dagan Ishme-Dagan Lipit-Eshtar Ur-Ninurta Bur-Suen Lipit-Enlil Erra-imitti Enlil-bani Zambiya Iter-pisha Ur-du-kuga Suen-magir Damiq-ilishu
Dynasty of Larsa: Naplanum Emisum Samium Zabaia Gungunum Abisare Sumuel Nur-Adad Sin-Iddinam Sin-Eribam Sin-Iqisham Silli-Adad Warad-Sin Rim-Sin I (...) Rim-Sin II
Uruk VI dynasty: Alila-hadum Sumu-binasa Naram-Sin of Uruk Sîn-kāšid Sîn-iribam Sîn-gāmil Ilum-gamil An-am Irdanene Rîm-Anum Nabi-ilišu
Sukkalmah dynasty

Siwe-Palar-Khuppak
Twelfth Dynasty of Egypt
Amenemhat I Senusret I Amenemhat II Senusret II Senusret III Amenemhat III Amenemhat IV Sobekneferu
1800–1595 BCE Thirteenth Dynasty of Egypt
Fourteenth Dynasty of Egypt
Abraham
(Biblical)
Kings of Byblos
Kings of Tyre
Kings of Sidon
Yamhad
(Yamhad dynasty)
(Amorites)
Old Assyria

(Shamshi-Adad dynasty
1808–1736 BCE)
(Amorites)
Shamshi-Adad I Ishme-Dagan I Mut-Ashkur Rimush Asinum Ashur-dugul Ashur-apla-idi Nasir-Sin Sin-namir Ipqi-Ishtar Adad-salulu Adasi

(Non-dynastic usurpers
1735–1701 BCE)
Puzur-Sin Ashur-dugul Ashur-apla-idi Nasir-Sin Sin-namir Ipqi-Ishtar Adad-salulu Adasi

(Adaside dynasty
1700–722 BCE)
Bel-bani Libaya Sharma-Adad I Iptar-Sin Bazaya Lullaya Shu-Ninua Sharma-Adad II Erishum III Shamshi-Adad II Ishme-Dagan II Shamshi-Adad III Ashur-nirari I Puzur-Ashur III Enlil-nasir I Nur-ili Ashur-shaduni Ashur-rabi I Ashur-nadin-ahhe I Enlil-Nasir II Ashur-nirari II Ashur-bel-nisheshu Ashur-rim-nisheshu Ashur-nadin-ahhe II

First Babylonian dynasty
("Old Babylonian Period")
(Amorites)

Sumu-abum Sumu-la-El Sin-muballitSabium Apil-Sin Sin-muballit Hammurabi Samsu-iluna Abi-eshuh Ammi-ditana Ammi-saduqa Samsu-Ditana

Early Kassite rulers


Second Babylonian dynasty
("Sealand Dynasty")

Ilum-ma-ili Itti-ili-nibi Damqi-ilishu
Ishkibal Shushushi Gulkishar
DIŠ+U-EN Peshgaldaramesh Ayadaragalama
Akurduana Melamkurkurra Ea-gamil

Second Intermediate Period
Sixteenth
Dynasty
Abydos
Dynasty
Seventeenth
Dynasty

Fifteenth Dynasty of Egypt
("Hyksos")
Pharaoh Ahmose I slaying a Hyksos
Pharaoh Ahmose I slaying a Hyksos

Semqen 'Aper-'Anati Sakir-Har Khyan Apepi Khamudi
Mitanni
(1600–1260 BCE)
Kirta Shuttarna I Parshatatar
1531–1155 BCE
Tutankhamun
Tutankhamun
New Kingdom of Egypt
Eighteenth Dynasty of Egypt
Ahmose I Amenhotep I
Third Babylonian dynasty (Kassites)
Agum-Kakrime Burnaburiash I Kashtiliash III Ulamburiash Agum III Karaindash Kadashman-harbe I Kurigalzu I Kadashman-Enlil I Burnaburiash II Kara-hardash Nazi-Bugash Kurigalzu II Nazi-Maruttash Kadashman-Turgu Kadashman-Enlil II Kudur-Enlil Shagarakti-Shuriash Kashtiliashu IV Enlil-nadin-shumi Kadashman-Harbe II Adad-shuma-iddina Adad-shuma-usur Meli-Shipak II Marduk-apla-iddina I Zababa-shuma-iddin Enlil-nadin-ahi
Middle Elamite period

(1500–1100 BCE)
Kidinuid dynasty
Igehalkid dynasty
Untash-Napirisha

Thutmose I Thutmose II Hatshepsut Thutmose III
Amenhotep II Thutmose IV Amenhotep III Akhenaten Smenkhkare Neferneferuaten Tutankhamun Ay Horemheb Hittite Empire

Ugarit
Nineteenth Dynasty of Egypt
Ramesses I Seti I Ramesses II Merneptah Amenmesses Seti II Siptah Twosret
Elamite Empire
Shutrukid dynasty
Shutruk-Nakhunte
1155–1025 BCE Twentieth Dynasty of Egypt

Setnakhte Ramesses III Ramesses IV Ramesses V Ramesses VI Ramesses VII Ramesses VIII Ramesses IX Ramesses X Ramesses XI

Third Intermediate Period

Twenty-first Dynasty of Egypt
Smendes Amenemnisu Psusennes I Amenemope Osorkon the Elder Siamun Psusennes II

Phoenicia
Kings of Byblos
Kings of Tyre
Kings of Sidon

Kingdom of Israel
Saul
Ish-bosheth
David
Solomon
Syro-Hittite states Middle Assyria
Eriba-Adad I Ashur-uballit I Enlil-nirari Arik-den-ili Adad-nirari I Shalmaneser I Tukulti-Ninurta I Ashur-nadin-apli Ashur-nirari III Enlil-kudurri-usur Ninurta-apal-Ekur Ashur-dan I Ninurta-tukulti-Ashur Mutakkil-Nusku Ashur-resh-ishi I Tiglath-Pileser I Asharid-apal-Ekur Ashur-bel-kala Eriba-Adad II Shamshi-Adad IV Ashurnasirpal I Shalmaneser II Ashur-nirari IV Ashur-rabi II Ashur-resh-ishi II Tiglath-Pileser II Ashur-dan II
Fourth Babylonian dynasty ("Second Dynasty of Isin")
Marduk-kabit-ahheshu Itti-Marduk-balatu Ninurta-nadin-shumi Nebuchadnezzar I Enlil-nadin-apli Marduk-nadin-ahhe Marduk-shapik-zeri Adad-apla-iddina Marduk-ahhe-eriba Marduk-zer-X Nabu-shum-libur
Neo-Elamite period (1100–540 BCE)
1025–934 BCE Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Babylonian dynasties ("Period of Chaos")
Simbar-shipak Ea-mukin-zeri Kashshu-nadin-ahi Eulmash-shakin-shumi Ninurta-kudurri-usur I Shirikti-shuqamuna Mar-biti-apla-usur Nabû-mukin-apli
911–745 BCE Twenty-second Dynasty of Egypt
Shoshenq I Osorkon I Shoshenq II Takelot I Osorkon II Shoshenq III Shoshenq IV Pami Shoshenq V Pedubast II Osorkon IV

Twenty-third Dynasty of Egypt
Harsiese A Takelot II Pedubast I Shoshenq VI Osorkon III Takelot III Rudamun Menkheperre Ini

Twenty-fourth Dynasty of Egypt
Tefnakht Bakenranef

Kingdom of Samaria

Kingdom of Judah
Neo-Assyrian Empire
Adad-nirari II Tukulti-Ninurta II Ashurnasirpal II Shalmaneser III Shamshi-Adad V Shammuramat (regent) Adad-nirari III Shalmaneser IV Ashur-Dan III Ashur-nirari V
Eight Babylonian Dynasty
Ninurta-kudurri-usur II Mar-biti-ahhe-iddina Shamash-mudammiq Nabu-shuma-ukin I Nabu-apla-iddina Marduk-zakir-shumi I Marduk-balassu-iqbi Baba-aha-iddina (five kings) Ninurta-apla-X Marduk-bel-zeri Marduk-apla-usur Eriba-Marduk Nabu-shuma-ishkun Nabonassar Nabu-nadin-zeri Nabu-shuma-ukin II Nabu-mukin-zeri
Humban-Tahrid dynasty

Urtak
Teumman
Ummanigash
Tammaritu I
Indabibi
Humban-haltash III
745–609 BCE Twenty-fifth Dynasty of Egypt
Taharqa
Taharqa
("Black Pharaohs")
Piye Shebitku Shabaka Taharqa Tanutamun
Neo-Assyrian Empire

(Sargonid dynasty)
Tiglath-Pileser Shalmaneser Marduk-apla-iddina II Sargon Sennacherib Marduk-zakir-shumi II Marduk-apla-iddina II Bel-ibni Ashur-nadin-shumi Nergal-ushezib Mushezib-Marduk Esarhaddon Ashurbanipal Ashur-etil-ilani Sinsharishkun Sin-shumu-lishir Ashur-uballit II

Assyrian conquest of Egypt Assyrian conquest of Elam
626–539 BCE Late Period
Twenty-sixth Dynasty of Egypt
Necho I Psamtik I Necho II Psamtik II Wahibre Ahmose II Psamtik III
Neo-Babylonian Empire
Nabopolassar Nebuchadnezzar II Amel-Marduk Neriglissar Labashi-Marduk Nabonidus
Median Empire
Deioces Phraortes Madyes Cyaxares Astyages
539–331 BCE Twenty-seventh Dynasty of Egypt
(First Achaemenid conquest of Egypt)
Kings of Byblos
Kings of Tyre
Kings of Sidon
Achaemenid Empire
Cyrus Cambyses Darius I Xerxes Artaxerxes I Darius II Artaxerxes II Artaxerxes III Artaxerxes IV Darius III
Twenty-eighth Dynasty of Egypt
Twenty-ninth Dynasty of Egypt
Thirtieth Dynasty of Egypt
Thirty-first Dynasty of Egypt
331–141 BCE Argead dynasty and Ptolemaic Egypt
Ptolemy I Soter Ptolemy Keraunos Ptolemy II Philadelphus Arsinoe II Ptolemy III Euergetes Berenice II Euergetis Ptolemy IV Philopator Arsinoe III Philopator Ptolemy V Epiphanes Cleopatra I Syra Ptolemy VI Philometor Ptolemy VII Neos Philopator Cleopatra II Philometor Soter Ptolemy VIII Physcon Cleopatra III Ptolemy IX Lathyros Cleopatra IV Ptolemy X Alexander Berenice III Ptolemy XI Alexander Ptolemy XII Auletes Cleopatra V Cleopatra VI Tryphaena Berenice IV Epiphanea Ptolemy XIII Ptolemy XIV Cleopatra VII Philopator Ptolemy XV Caesarion Arsinoe IV
Hellenistic Period
Seleukos I Nikator Tetradrachm from Babylon
Seleukos I Nikator Tetradrachm from Babylon
Argead dynasty: Alexander III Philip III Alexander IV
Antigonid dynasty: Antigonus I
Seleucid Empire: Seleucus I Antiochus I Antiochus II Seleucus II Seleucus III Antiochus III Seleucus IV Antiochus IV Antiochus V Demetrius I Alexander III Demetrius II Antiochus VI Dionysus Diodotus Tryphon Antiochus VII Sidetes
141–30 BCE Kingdom of Judea
Simon Thassi John Hyrcanus Aristobulus I Alexander Jannaeus Salome Alexandra Hyrcanus II Aristobulus II Antigonus II Mattathias
Alexander II Zabinas Seleucus V Philometor Antiochus VIII Grypus Antiochus IX Cyzicenus Seleucus VI Epiphanes Antiochus X Eusebes Antiochus XI Epiphanes Demetrius III Eucaerus Philip I Philadelphus Antiochus XII Dionysus Antiochus XIII Asiaticus Philip II Philoromaeus Parthian Empire
Mithridates I Phraates Hyspaosines Artabanus Mithridates II Gotarzes Mithridates III Orodes I Sinatruces Phraates III Mithridates IV Orodes II Phraates IV Tiridates II Musa Phraates V Orodes III Vonones I Artabanus II Tiridates III Artabanus II Vardanes I Gotarzes II Meherdates Vonones II Vologases I Vardanes II Pacorus II Vologases II Artabanus III Osroes I
30 BCE–116 CE Roman Empire
(Roman conquest of Egypt)
Province of Egypt
Judea Syria
116–117 CE Province of Mesopotamia under Trajan Parthamaspates of Parthia
117–224 CE Syria Palaestina Province of Mesopotamia Sinatruces II Mithridates V Vologases IV Osroes II Vologases V Vologases VI Artabanus IV
224–270 CE Sasanian Empire
Province of Asoristan
Coin of Ardashir I, Hamadan mint.
Coin of Ardashir I, Hamadan mint.
Ardashir I Shapur I Hormizd I Bahram I Bahram II Bahram III Narseh Hormizd II Adur Narseh Shapur II Ardashir II Shapur III Bahram IV Yazdegerd I Shapur IV Khosrow Bahram V Yazdegerd II Hormizd III Peroz I Balash Kavad I Jamasp Kavad I Khosrow I Hormizd IV Khosrow II Bahram VI Chobin Vistahm
270–273 CE Palmyrene Empire
Vaballathus Zenobia Antiochus
273–395 CE Roman Empire
Province of Egypt Syria Palaestina Syria Province of Mesopotamia
395–618 CE Byzantine Empire
Byzantine Egypt Palaestina Prima, Palaestina Secunda Byzantine Syria Byzantine Mesopotamia
618–628 CE (Sasanian conquest of Egypt)
Province of Egypt
Shahrbaraz Sahralanyozan Shahrbaraz
Sasanian Empire
Province of Asoristan
Khosrow II Kavad II
628–641 CE Byzantine Empire Ardashir III Shahrbaraz Khosrow III Boran Shapur-i Shahrvaraz Azarmidokht Farrukh Hormizd Hormizd VI Khosrow IV Boran Yazdegerd III Peroz III Narsieh
Byzantine Egypt Palaestina Prima, Palaestina Secunda Byzantine Syria Byzantine Mesopotamia
639–651 CE Muslim conquest of Egypt Muslim conquest of the Levant Muslim conquest of Mesopotamia and Persia
Chronology of the Neolithic period Rulers of Ancient Central Asia
  1. Rulers with names in italics are considered fictional.
  2. Hallo, W.; Simpson, W. (1971). The Ancient Near East. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich. pp. 48–49.
  3. "Rulers of Mesopotamia". cdli.ox.ac.uk. University of Oxford, CNRS.
  4. Thomas, Ariane; Potts, Timothy (2020). Mesopotamia: Civilization Begins. Getty Publications. p. 14. ISBN 978-1-60606-649-2.
  5. Roux, Georges (1992). Ancient Iraq. Penguin Books Limited. pp. 532–534 (Chronological Tables). ISBN 978-0-14-193825-7.
  6. ^ Per Sumerian King List
  7. Unger, Merrill F. (2014). Israel and the Aramaeans of Damascus: A Study in Archaeological Illumination of Bible History. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 5. ISBN 978-1-62564-606-4.
Timeline of Mesopotamia
Northwestern Mesopotamia Northern Mesopotamia Southern Mesopotamia
c. 3500–2350 BCE Late Chalcolithic 4-5 / Early Jezirah 1-3 Uruk period / Jemdet Nasr period / Early Dynastic period
c. 2350–2200 BCE Akkadian Empire
c. 2200–2100 BCE Gutians
c. 2100–2000 BCE Third Dynasty of Ur
c. 2000–1800 BCE Mari and other Amorite city-states Old Assyrian period Isin/Larsa and other Amorite city-states
c. 1800–1600 BCE Old Hittite Kingdom Old Babylonian Empire (Southern Akkadians)
c. 1600–1400 BCE Mitanni (Hurrians) Karduniaš (Kassites)
c. 1400–1200 BCE Middle Hittite Kingdom Middle Assyria
c. 1200–1150 BCE Bronze Age Collapse ("Sea Peoples") Arameans
c. 1150–911 BCE Phoenicia Neo-Hittite
city-states
Aram-
Damascus
Arameans Middle Babylonia Chal-
de-
ans
911–729 BCE Neo-Assyrian Empire
729–609 BCE
626–539 BCE Neo-Babylonian Empire (Chaldeans)
539–331 BCE Achaemenid Empire
336–301 BCE Macedonian Empire (Ancient Greeks and Macedonians)
311–129 BCE Seleucid Empire
129–63 BCE Seleucid Empire Parthian Empire
63 BCE–224 CE Ancient Rome - Byzantine Empire (Syria)
224–mid 7C Sassanid Empire
Ancient Mesopotamia
Geography
Modern
Ancient
Ishtar Gate in the city of Babylon
(Pre)history
Prehistory
History
Languages
Culture/society
Archaeology
Religion
Academia
Iran topics
History
Prehistory
Ancient
3400–539 BC
550 BC–AD 224
AD 224–651
Medieval and
early modern
632–1090
977–1432
1370–1925
Modern
1925–1979
Islamic Republic
1979–present
See also
Geography
Politics
General
Councils
Officials
Economy
General
Sectors
State-owned
companies
Places
Society
Demographics
Languages
Peoples
Religion
Other
Culture
Music
Other topics
Empires
Ancient
(colonies)
Post-classical
Modern
Colonial
Lists
Miscellaneous

33°05′37″N 44°34′51″E / 33.09361°N 44.58083°E / 33.09361; 44.58083

Categories: