Misplaced Pages

Fox hunting: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:34, 13 December 2005 edit212.158.245.101 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 18:12, 8 January 2025 edit undo2601:196:180:dc0:d58c:fce0:52aa:9d31 (talk) Attire: Pluralise link. 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Traditional equestrian hunting activity}}
{{limitedgeographicscope}}
{{About|the equestrian sport of hunting foxes|other uses|Fox hunt (disambiguation)}}
:{{otheruses}}
{{redirect|Hunting with hounds|dog breeds used in hunting|Scenthound|and|Sighthound|the amateur radio activity|Amateur radio direction finding}}


{{Use dmy dates|date=July 2022}}
]
{{Use British English|date=February 2014}}
] in Devon, England.]]
'''Fox hunting''' is an activity involving the tracking, chase and, if caught, the killing of a fox, normally a ], by trained ]s or other ]s. A group of unarmed followers, led by a "master of foxhounds" (or "master of hounds"), follow the hounds on foot or on horseback.<ref name="burns">{{cite web|date=9 June 2000|publisher=Her Majesty's Stationery Office |title=The Final Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs in England and Wales|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/mainsections/huntingreport.htm|access-date=10 February 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090410213249/http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/mainsections/huntingreport.htm|archive-date=10 April 2009}}</ref>


Fox hunting with hounds, as a formalised activity, originated in ] in the sixteenth century, in a form very similar to that practised until February 2005, when a law banning the activity in ] came into force.<ref name=BBCNov192004>{{cite news|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/4020453.stm|title=Hunt ban forced through Commons|publisher=BBC News|date=19 November 2004|access-date=22 February 2008}}</ref> A ban on hunting in ] had been passed in 2002, but it continues to be within the law in ] and several other jurisdictions, including ], ], ], ] and the ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Griffin|first=Emma|title=Blood Sport|year=2007|publisher=Yale University Press}}</ref><ref name="BBC1">{{cite news|publisher=BBC News|title=Fox hunting worldwide|date=16 September 1999|access-date=5 October 2007|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/428122.stm}}</ref>
'''Fox hunting''' is a form of (pwning animals) ] for ]es using a pack of ]s. The pack is often followed by riders on ]s. Like all forms of hunting, fox hunting is a ], and as such it is controversial and has been outlawed in some countries. Many ] activists believe that fox hunting is a cruel sport that should be banned, while pro-hunters argue that it is an effective and humane method of vermin control.


The sport is controversial, particularly in the United Kingdom. Proponents of fox hunting view it as an important part of rural culture and useful for reasons of ] and ],<ref name="MFH-social">{{cite web|year=2000|title=Social impact of fox hunting on rural communities|publisher=Masters of Fox Hounds Association|url=http://www.mfha.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=62&Itemid=58|access-date=13 October 2007|archive-date=21 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130521080336/http://www.mfha.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=62&Itemid=58}}</ref><ref name=MFH-conservation>{{cite web|title=Creation and conservation of habitat by foxhunting|publisher=Masters of Fox Hounds Association|access-date=13 October 2007|url=http://www.mfha.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=64&Itemid=56|archive-date=19 February 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120219020605/http://www.mfha.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=64&Itemid=56}}</ref><ref name=MFH-pest>{{cite web|title=The need for wildlife management|publisher=Masters of Fox Hounds Association|url=http://www.mfha.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=65&Itemid=54|access-date=7 October 2007|archive-date=21 May 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130521082603/http://www.mfha.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=65&Itemid=54}}</ref> while opponents argue it is ] and unnecessary.<ref name=LACS-morality>{{cite web|title=The morality of hunting with dogs|url=http://www.league.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_271.pdf|publisher=Campaign to Protect Hunted Animals|access-date=13 October 2007}}{{dead link|date=October 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref>
==The animals==
Foxhounds (of the ] or ] breeds) are specially bred and trained for the purpose of fox hunting. In the course of a hunt, hounds are directed (or "cast") towards areas (known as "coverts") deemed likely to contain foxes. If the foxhound pack manages to pick up the scent of a fox, they will follow it and the horses and riders will follow the hounds by the most direct route possible. The horses used for fox hunting, known as ]s, may jump over any obstacles in their way; indeed, this is the origin of the term ] for horseracing over jumps. The hunt continues either until the fox evades the hounds, goes to ground, or is overtaken and killed by the hounds. In the ], where the fox is the largest predator, it is legally considered ] and a fox that goes to ground may be dug out of its hole and shot at the request of the landowner or tenant. In America there are many predators larger than foxes and so fox numbers are not nearly as dense, nor are they as serious a problem in most areas to livestock farmers. As a result, fox hunting in America does not have a primary goal of killing their quarry and kills are rare.


==The people== ==History==
{{see also|Hunting#History}}
Hunts are generally governed by one or more Masters, who typically take much of the financial responsibility for the overall management of the hunt. The Master (or Mistress) of Foxhounds is often known by the abbreviation 'MFH'. Hunts typically employ a huntsman who is responsible (in conjunction with assistants, known as "whippers-in") for directing the hounds in the course of a hunt.
The use of scenthounds to track ] dates back to ]n, ]n, and ]ian times, and was known as ].<ref name=autogenerated1>{{cite news|newspaper=The Guardian|date=18 February 2005 |title=Ten things you didn't know about hunting with hounds|last=Aslam|first=Dilpazier|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/feb/18/hunting.immigrationpolicy2|access-date=3 November 2007 | location=London}}</ref>


===Europe===
Hunts will also employ a kennelman who looks after hounds in kennels and ensures that all tasks are completed when the pack and other staff return from a day hunting.
], France, 1720]]


Many Greek- and Roman-influenced countries have long traditions of hunting with hounds. Hunting with ] hounds was popular in ], even before the ] arrived, introducing the Castorian and Fulpine hound breeds which they used to hunt.<ref name=guardian1>{{cite news|newspaper=The Guardian|date=18 February 2005 |title=Ten things you didn't know about hunting with hounds | last = Aslam | first =D| url = https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/feb/18/hunting.immigrationpolicy2|access-date=3 November 2007 | location=London}}</ref> ] hunting traditions were brought to Britain when ] arrived, along with the Gascon and ] hounds.
In addition there are voluntary positions of responsibility who assist the master in running the hunt. Usually this will include two secretaries who collect the money (cap) for taking part in the hunt and other administrative tasks. There will also be a Hunt Supporters Club run by a committee who organise fund raising and social events.


Foxes were referred to as ''beasts of the chase'' by ] times, along with the ] (] & hind), ]s, and ]s,<ref>{{cite web|publisher=St John's College, Oxford|title=Forest and Chases in England and Wales c. 1000 to c. 1850|url=http://info.sjc.ox.ac.uk/forests/glossary.htm|access-date=16 February 2008}}</ref> but the earliest known attempt to hunt a fox with hounds was in ], England, in 1534, where farmers began chasing foxes down with their dogs for the purpose of pest control.<ref name=guardian1/> The last ] in England was killed in the late 15th century during the reign of ], leaving the English fox with no threat from larger predators. The first use of packs specifically trained to hunt foxes was in the late 1600s, with the oldest fox hunt being, probably, the Bilsdale in ].<ref>], ''Fox Hunting: a history'' (HarperCollins, October 1990)</ref>
Mounted hunt followers typically wear traditional hunting costumes. The scarlet coats often worn by huntsmen, masters, whippers-in and other officials are sometimes called "Pinks". These help them stand out from the rest of the field. Various theories about the derivation of this term have been advanced, ranging from the colour of a weathered scarlet coat to the name of a purportedly famous tailor. These theories are discussed in detail on the Horse Country article in the external links section.
Other members of the mounted field follow strict rules of clothing etiquette. For example those under eighteen will wear tweed jackets or ratcatcher all season. Those over eighteen will wear ratcatcher during Autumn hunting from late August until November 1st. On November 1st they will switch to regular hunting kit where full subscribers will wear scarlet and the rest black or navy. The highest honour is to be awarded the hunt button by the Hunt Master. This means you can then wear the hunt collar (colour varies from hunt to hunt) and buttons with the hunt crest on them.


By the end of the seventeenth century, deer hunting was in decline. The ] brought fences to separate formerly open land into many smaller fields, deer forests were being cut down, and arable land was increasing.<ref name = "Birley">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qVQiOYkBvV8C&q=%22Inclosure+Acts+%22+deer+hunting&pg=PA130|publisher=Manchester University Press|title=Sport and the Making of Britain|author=Birley, D.|year=1993|access-date=14 February 2008|pages=130–132|isbn=978-0-7190-3759-7}}</ref> With the onset of the ], people began to move out of the country and into towns and cities to find work. Roads, railway lines, and canals all split hunting countries,<ref name=Carr/> but at the same time they made hunting accessible to more people. ]s were improved during the nineteenth century and the shooting of gamebirds became more popular.<ref name=Birley/> Fox hunting developed further in the eighteenth century when ] developed breeds of hound and horse to address the new geography of rural England.<ref name=Birley/>
], there were 318 registered hound packs in England and Wales. by '']'' noted 8000 jobs depend on the hunt.


In Germany, hunting with hounds (which tended to be deer or boar hunting) was first banned on the initiative of ] on 3 July 1934.<ref name="verboten">{{cite news|newspaper=The Daily Telegraph|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1407954/Thanks-to-Hitler-hunting-with-hounds-is-still-verboten.html|title=Thanks to Hitler, hunting with hounds is still verboten|access-date=19 May 2010|date=22 September 2002 | location=London | first1=David | last1=Harrison | first2=Tony | last2=Paterson}}</ref> In 1939, the ban was extended to cover Austria after Germany's annexation of the country. Bernd Ergert, the director of Germany's hunting museum in Munich, said of the ban, "The aristocrats were understandably furious, but they could do nothing about the ban given the totalitarian nature of the regime."<ref name="verboten" />
The role of "whipper-in" in hunts has inspired some parliamentary systems (including the ] and the ]) to use "]" for a member who enforces party discipline and ensure the attendance of other members at important votes.
<!-- Needs to be integated into the section somehow:
The act of ''blooding'' began in antiquity. This was a ceremony in which master of the hunt smeared the blood of the quarry onto the cheeks of a newly ] hunt follower. -->


===United States===
]


According to the ], Englishman ] was the first man to import hunting hounds to what is now the United States, bringing his pack of foxhounds to ] in 1650, along with his horses.<ref name="usmfha1" /> Also around this time, numbers of European red foxes were introduced into the Eastern seaboard of North America for hunting.<ref>{{Cite journal|jstor=3797296|doi=10.2307/3797296|author=Presnall, C.C.|title=The Present Status of Exotic Mammals in the United States |year=1958|journal=The Journal of Wildlife Management|pages=45–50|volume=22|issue=1}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|jstor=1376267|author=Churcher, C.S.|year=1959|title=The Specific Status of the New World Red Fox|journal=Journal of Mammalogy|volume =40|issue=4|pages=513–520|doi=10.2307/1376267}}</ref> The first organised hunt for the benefit of a group (rather than a single patron) was started by ] in 1747.<ref name="usmfha1">{{cite web|url=http://www.mfha.com/abfo.htm#his|year=2008|title=History of American Foxhunting|publisher=]|access-date=10 February 2008|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080603045754/http://www.mfha.com/abfo.htm#his |archive-date = 3 June 2008}}</ref> In the United States, ] and ] both kept packs of foxhounds before and after the ].<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Explore DC|title=Profile – George Washington|year=2001|url=http://www.exploredc.org/index.php?id=69|access-date=14 November 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071005040742/http://www.exploredc.org/index.php?id=69|archive-date=5 October 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|publisher=Freedom Fields Farm|title=A short history of foxhunting in Virginia|access-date=14 November 2007|url=http://www.freedomfields.net/foxhunting_info.html}}</ref>
==History==
Using scenthounds to track prey dates back to ], ] and ] times, and is known as venery. In England, hunting with hounds was popular before the ] arrived, using the Agassaei breed. The Romans brought their Castorian and Fulpine hound breeds, along with importing the brown ] (the mountain hare is native) and additional species of ] as quarry. ] was also hunted. The ] hunting traditions were added when ] arrived, along with the Gascon and Talbot hounds. By ] the four beasts of venery were the hare, the ], the ] and the wild boar. The five beasts of the chase were the ], the ], the fox, the ] and the ].


===Australia===
The earliest known attempt to hunt a fox with hounds was in ], England, in ], where farmers began chasing down foxes with their dogs as pest control. By the end of the seventeenth century many organized packs were hunting both hare and fox, and during the eighteenth century packs specifically for fox hunting were appearing. The passing of the ] from ] to ] had made hunting deer much more difficult in many areas of the country, as that requires great areas of open land. Also, the new fences made jumping the obstacles separating the fields part of the hunting tradition. With the onset of the ], people began to move out of the country and into towns and cities to find work. Roads, rail and canals split the hunting country, but also made hunting accessible to more people. Shotguns were improved during the nineteenth century and game shooting became more popular. To protect the pheasants for the shooters, gamekeepers culled the foxes almost to ] in popular areas, which caused the huntsmen to improve their coverts. Finally the Game Laws were relaxed in 1831 and later abolished, which meant anyone could obtain a permit to take rabbits, hares and gamebirds.
In Australia, the European ] was introduced solely for the purpose of fox hunting in 1855.<ref name=ACF1>{{cite web|publisher=Australian Conservation Foundation |title=Australia's Noah's Ark springs a leak |last=Eastham |first=Jaime |url=http://www.acfonline.org.au/news.asp?news_id=345&c=10032 |access-date=10 February 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110604204347/http://www.acfonline.org.au/news.asp?news_id=345&c=10032 |archive-date=4 June 2011 }}</ref> Native animal populations have been very badly affected, with the extinction of at least 10 species attributed to the spread of foxes.<ref name=ACF1/> Fox hunting with hounds is mainly practised in the east of Australia. In the state of ] there are thirteen hunts, with more than 1000 members between them.<ref name=theage>{{cite news|work=The Age|title=It's the thrill not the kill, they say|url=http://www.theage.com.au/news/National/Its-the-thrill-not-the-kill-they-say/2005/03/19/1111086058304.html?from=moreStories|date=20 March 2005|access-date=2 November 2007 | location=Melbourne}}</ref> Fox hunting with hounds results in around 650 foxes being killed annually in Victoria,<ref name=theage/> compared with over 90,000 shot over a similar period in response to a State government bounty.<ref>{{cite news|work=The Age|title=Bounty fails to win ground war against foxes|url=http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/05/04/1051987602914.html|date=5 May 2003|access-date=2 November 2007 | location=Melbourne}}</ref>
The ] traces its origins to 1840, just a few years after the colonization of ].


==Current status==
Although viewed as a typically traditional rural ] activity, hunting with hounds takes place all over the world. Hunts in the ], ], ] and ] are legacies of the ] to some extent, although some claim that the first pack devoted to hunting only fox was located in the United States. In ] the Masters of Foxhounds Association of America included 170 registered packs in the US and Canada, and there are many additional farmer (non-recognized) packs.
{{see also|Fox hunting legislation|List of foxhound packs of the United Kingdom}}


===United Kingdom===
Many other Greek- and Roman-influenced countries have their own long tradition of hunting with hounds. ] and ] for example, have thriving fox hunts. In ] and ], where fox hunting was once popular, the activity has been outlawed, although Germany continues to allow deer to be driven by dogs to guns. In some countries drag hunting is also popular, either instead of or in addition to quarry hunting, in which a scented bag is dragged over a pre-determined course. Bloodhounds are used in some areas to hunt the "clean boot", a human runner, for sport.
], 3rd Baronet (1746–1819), holding his horse and whip; and Major Vincent Hawkins Gilbert, M.F.H., holding a fox's head. The Heathcote's family seat was ]. ] portrayed the three gentlemen on the hunt in 1790.]]


Fox hunting is prohibited in Great Britain by the ] and the ] (England and Wales), passed under the prime ministership of ], but remains legal in ].<ref>{{cite news|title=Hain lambasted over website backing hunting|newspaper=Belfast Telegraph|url=http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/article2360161.ece|archive-url=https://archive.today/20070404204148/http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/article2360161.ece|archive-date=4 April 2007|last=Hookham|first=Mark|date=15 March 2007|access-date=22 February 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Northern Ireland bans hare coursing, and fox hunting could be next|date=24 June 2010|access-date=29 March 2011|url=http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/local-national/northern-ireland-bans-hare-coursing-and-fox-hunting-could-be-next-14852888.html}}</ref>
When fox hunting in the United States, the fox is rarely caught. In fact, much effort goes into training the foxes so that they do not get caught. In the summer of the year, the hunt take the young hounds out "cubbing". They teach the puppies to hunt while they are teaching the young foxes to give chase. In Britain "cubbing" consists of interesting the young hounds in hunting by setting them upon fox cubs, which are easier to catch and kill than adults.
The ] of the Hunting Act was notable in that it was implemented through the use of the ], after the ] refused to pass the legislation, despite ] passing it by a majority of 356 to 166.<ref>{{cite news|publisher=CNN|title=Protesters storm UK parliament|url=http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/09/15/fox.protest/|access-date=27 October 2008|date=16 September 2004|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20041118064259/http://edition.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/09/15/fox.protest/ |archive-date = 18 November 2004}}</ref>


After the ban on fox hunting, hunts in Great Britain switched to legal alternatives, such as ] and ].<ref name="auto1">{{cite web|url=https://thehuntingoffice.org.uk/what-is-trail-hunting|title=What is trail hunting?|website=thehuntingoffice|access-date=10 July 2022|archive-date=12 July 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220712141512/https://thehuntingoffice.org.uk/what-is-trail-hunting|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref name="auto">{{cite web|url=https://www.huntingact.org/hunting/trail-laying|title=Trail Laying|website=huntingact.co.uk|date=25 August 2016 |access-date=10 July 2022}}</ref> The Hunting Act 2004 also permits some previously unusual forms of hunting wild mammals with dogs to continue, such as "hunting... for the purpose of enabling a bird of prey to hunt the wild mammal".<ref>Stephen Moss, '''' from '']'' dated 7 November 2006, at guardian.co.uk, accessed 29 April 2013</ref>
==Hunting bans in the UK==


Opponents of hunting, such as the ], claim that some of these alternatives are a smokescreen for illegal hunting or a means of circumventing the ban.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.itv.com/news/2020-11-24/what-is-trail-hunting-and-is-it-legal|title=What is trail hunting and is it legal?|website=itv.com|date=24 November 2020 |access-date=10 July 2022}}</ref> Hunting support group ] said in 2006 that there was anecdotal evidence that the number of foxes killed by hunts (unintentionally) and farmers had increased since the Hunting Act came into force, both by the hunts (through lawful methods) and landowners, and that more people were hunting with hounds (although killing foxes had become illegal).<ref>{{cite news|publisher=BBC News|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4724028.stm|title='More foxes dead' since hunt ban|date=17 February 2006|access-date=13 October 2007}}</ref>


Tony Blair wrote in '']'', his memoirs published in 2010, that the Hunting Act of 2004 is 'one of the domestic legislative measures I most regret'.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.countrylife.co.uk/news/blair-regrets-hunting-ban-21293|title=Blair regrets hunting ban|date=1 September 2010|website=Country Life|access-date=23 August 2019}}</ref>
===England and Wales: The Hunting Act 2004===
:''Main article ]''.


===United States===
Anti-hunting protests became more prevalent during the Great Depression, and after the Second World War the British government held the Scott Henderson inquiry about cruelty to British wild mammals. That report judged that shooting, gassing, trapping and poisoning caused greater suffering than hunting, and therefore hunting should continue.
In America, fox hunting is also called "fox chasing", as it is the practice of many hunts not to actually kill the fox (the red fox is not regarded as a significant pest).<ref name=usmfha1/> Some hunts may go without catching a fox for several seasons, despite chasing two or more foxes in a single day's hunting.<ref name=Smart/> Foxes are not pursued once they have "gone to ground" (hidden in a hole). American fox hunters undertake stewardship of the land, and endeavour to maintain fox populations and habitats as much as possible.<ref name=Smart/> In many areas of the eastern United States the coyote, a natural predator of the red and grey fox, is becoming more prevalent and threatens fox populations in a hunt's given territory. In some areas, coyote are considered fair game when hunting with foxhounds, even if they are not the intended species being hunted.


In 2013, the ] listed 163 registered packs in the US and Canada.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mfha.com/memb.htm |publisher=Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America |title=Geographical listing of hunts |year=2013 |access-date=5 April 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090714232532/http://www.mfha.com/memb.htm |archive-date=14 July 2009 }}</ref> This number does not include non-registered (also known as "farmer" or "outlaw") packs.<ref name=Smart>{{cite book|last=Smart |first=Bruce |title=A community of the horse |chapter=9 |chapter-url=http://www.acommunityofthehorse.com/images/pdfs/ChapIX.pdf |year=2004 |access-date=9 April 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060823130127/http://www.acommunityofthehorse.com/images/pdfs/ChapIX.pdf |archive-date=23 August 2006 }}</ref> Baily's Hunting Directory Lists 163 foxhound or draghound packs in the US and 11 in Canada<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bailyshuntingdirectory.com/directory/|title=Directory of Hunts|publisher=Baily's Hunting Directory|access-date=5 April 2013}}</ref> In some arid parts of the ], where foxes in general are more difficult to locate, ]s<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.arapahoehunt.com/history.asp |title=Arapahoe Hunt Club History |publisher=Arapahoe Hunt Club |access-date=12 February 2008 |year=2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080208202017/http://www.arapahoehunt.com/history.asp |archive-date=8 February 2008 }}</ref> are hunted and, in some cases, ]s.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://www.chronofhorse.com/index.php?cat=123009040576283|title=Recognized Hunts|magazine=Chronicle of the Horse|access-date=12 February 2008}}</ref>
The ] manifesto of 1997 pledged "a free vote in Parliament on whether hunting with hounds should be banned by legislation". A private member's bill which would have banned all hunting of wild mammals with dogs was introduced by Michael Foster, Labour MP for ], and won the support of a majority of members of the House of Commons. The bill later ran out of time before clearing the House of Commons. Had the Bill reached the House of Lords it would have faced strong opposition there.


===Other countries===
In ] ] ] arranged for a six-month government Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs in England and Wales. Chaired by ], the Committee presented its Final Report to Parliament in June ]. It was not part of Burns' remit to support or oppose a ban on hunting, but to clear up some of the disputed issues surrounding the issue. Among his other findings, Burns found that banning hunting would have little effect on the number of foxes, and that the number of jobs likely to be lost by a ban was about 700. On the issue of animal welfare, Burns reported that hunting "seriously compromises the welfare of the fox" but that alternative methods of fox control were worse, with the 'tentative' exception of lamping in areas in which that method was possible. The report is available in full at .
]
The other main countries in which organized fox hunting with hounds is practised are Ireland (which has 41 registered packs),<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://irishfoxhunting.com/|title=Welcome to the IMFHA- representing Irish Fox Hunting|publisher=The Irish Masters of Foxhounds Association|access-date=27 December 2016|archive-date=2 February 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110202094113/http://irishfoxhunting.com/}}</ref> Australia, France (this hunting practice is also used for other animals such as deer, wild boar, fox, hare or rabbit), Canada and Italy. There is one pack of foxhounds in Portugal, and one in India. Although there are 32 packs for the hunting of foxes in France, hunting tends to take place mainly on a small scale and on foot, with mounted hunts tending to hunt red or roe deer, or wild boar.<ref name="Venerie">{{cite web|date=9 June 2000|publisher=Venerie|title=Venerie-the Organisation representing hunting with hounds in France |url=http://www.venerie.org/}}</ref>


In Portugal fox hunting is permitted (Decree-Law no. 202/2004) but there have been popular protests<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.publico.pt/2017/03/03/sociedade/noticia/cidadaos-organizam-manifestacao-a-pedir-fim-de-caca-a-raposa-pratica-cruel-e-barbara-1763966|title=Cidadãos organizam manifestação a pedir fim de caça à raposa, "prática cruel e bárbara"|website=PÚBLICO|date=3 March 2017 |access-date=23 August 2019}}</ref> and initiatives to abolish it. A petition<ref>{{cite web|url=http://peticaopublica.com/pview.aspx?pi=PT84351|website=Petição Pública|title=Pelo Fim da Caça à Raposa em Portugal }}</ref> was handed over to the Assembly of the Republic<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parlamento.pt/ActividadeParlamentar/Paginas/DetalhePeticao.aspx?BID=13005 |title=Petição No. 324/XIII/2|website=Parlamento |language=pt}}</ref> on 18 May 2017 and the parliamentary hearing held in 2018.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parlamento.pt/ActividadeParlamentar/Paginas/DetalheAudicao.aspx?bid=107725|website=Parlamento|title=Audição Parlamentar No. 59-CAM-XIII |language=pt}}</ref>
The ] Labour manifesto contained a promise to allow "Parliament to reach a conclusion on this issue". In ], the government introduced its own Bill which would have instituted a system of licensing and regulation of hunting. However, anti-hunting MPs passed a series of amendments to introduce a total ban on hunting with exemptions only for ], ], and ] (]). The government initially described these as ']' but later accepted them as the will of the House of Commons. This Bill did not complete its stages in the House of Lords.


In Canada, the Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America lists seven registered hunt clubs in the province of Ontario, one in Quebec, and one in Nova Scotia.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://mfha.com/hunt-map/ |publisher=Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America |title=Hunt Map |year=2022 |access-date=18 November 2022 }}</ref> Ontario issues licenses to registered hunt clubs, authorizing its members to pursue, chase or search for fox,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/980665 |publisher=Ontario.ca |title=Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997 |access-date=18 November 2022 }}</ref> although the primary target of the hunts is coyotes.<ref>{{cite news |last=O'Connor |first=Joe |date= 11 December 2018 |title=Horses, hounds and coyotes — Meet Canada's only woman employed as a huntsman |url=https://financialpost.com/financial-post-magazine/horses-hounds-coyotes-meet-canadas-only-woman-employed-as-a-huntsman |work=Financial Post Magazine |access-date=18 November 2022}}</ref>
In an attempt to raise animal welfare standards at the same time, allow an escape from legislation that specifically targeted hunting, Lord Donohugh proposed the . This would have made it the case that "any person who intentionally inflicts, or causes or procures, unnecessary suffering on or to any wild mammal shall be guilty of an offence." A matching bill was introduced in the commons with the support of The Middle Way Group (see below). Both bills failed to become law as they were blocked by Labour members who wanted a specific hunting ban.


== Quarry animals ==
In the next session in ] the government re-introduced their Bill in exactly the same form and it passed through the Commons in one day in September, together with a 'suggested amendment' under the ] procedure that would have until ], ], if accepted by the Lords. This Government argued for such a delay as an opportunity for hunts to wind down or adapt before the ban came into force; hunt supporters believed that its primary purpose was to prevent the ban and associated protests from coming into effect a few months before the expected ] in May 2005.


=== Red fox ===
The House of Lords passed a series of amendments to return the Bill to the original government Bill of 2003 for licensing and regulation. Under this proposal, hunting would only be able to take place if they could show "utility" (a need to reduce the local fox population) and "least suffering" (lack of any alternative procedure involving less suffering to the quarry than hunting). The Lords amendments included delaying the Bill coming into force until at least ], ] after the ] had reported on whether hunting involved more or less suffering than the alternatives.
] is the main quarry of European and American fox hunts.]]
The ] (''Vulpes vulpes'') is the normal prey animal of a fox hunt in the US and Europe. A small ] ],<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.derbyfoxes.org/diet.htm | title=Diet | year=2006 | work=Derbyshire Fox Rescue | access-date=9 September 2007 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070829092033/http://www.derbyfoxes.org/diet.htm | archive-date=29 August 2007 }}</ref> the fox lives in burrows called earths,<ref>{{cite web|title=Peatland Wildlife – The Fox|publisher=Northern Ireland Environment and Heritage Service|year=2004|url=http://www.peatlandsni.gov.uk/wildlife/mammals/redfox.htm|access-date=13 October 2007|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120805124711/http://www.peatlandsni.gov.uk/wildlife/mammals/redfox.htm|archive-date=5 August 2012}}</ref> and is predominantly active around twilight (making it a ] animal).<ref name=umad>{{cite web|publisher=University of Michigan – Animal Diversity Web|last=Fox|first=David|title=Vulpes vulpes (red fox)|access-date=13 October 2007|url=http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Vulpes_vulpes.html}}</ref> Adult foxes tend to range around an area of between {{nowrap|5 and 15}} square kilometres ({{nowrap|2–6 square miles}}) in good terrain, although in poor terrain, their range can be as much as {{convert|20|km2|sqmi}}.<ref name=umad/> The red fox can run at up to {{convert|48|km/h|mph||abbr=on}}.<ref name=umad/> The fox is also variously known as a ''Tod'' (old English word for fox),<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Behind the name|year=2007|title=Todd|url=http://www.behindthename.com/name/todd|access-date=14 October 2007}}</ref> '']'' (the name of an ] character in European literature from the twelfth century),<ref>{{cite EB1911 |wstitle=Reynard the Fox |volume=21 |page=226}}</ref> or ''Charlie'' (named for the ] politician ]).<ref name="BBC2">{{cite news|publisher=BBC News|title=Three centuries of hunting foxes|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/422753.stm|access-date=13 October 2007|date=16 September 1999}}</ref> American red foxes tend to be larger than European forms, but according to foxhunters' accounts, they have less cunning, vigour and endurance in the chase than European foxes.<ref>''Sketches in Natural History: History of the Mammalia''.
By Charles Knight Published by C. Cox, 1849</ref>


=== Coyote, grey fox, and other quarry ===
The Commons disagreed with those amendments and insisted on the total ban bill. On ] the Lords insisted on its amendments to the main bill, though it varied their suggested delay until 2007 to decouple it from any RCVS report. This time it was presented as a fairer opportunity for hunts to wind down than the 18 month delay. The next day was the last day of the Parliamentary session. In the Commons, the government's last-ditch attempt to compromise on a delay until ], ] won the support of only 46 MPs, although the delay until 2006 was inserted in the Bill. The Lords would have had to have accepted the Commons' other amendments (including the principle of a ban on hunting) in order for this delay to have been approved, and therefore rejected them by 153 to 114.
], illustrating a group of ]s rushing to the defence of a fallen pack-mate]]
Other species than the red fox may be the quarry for hounds in some areas. The choice of quarry depends on the region and numbers available.<ref name="usmfha1" />
The ] (''Canis latrans'') is a significant quarry for many Hunts in North America, particularly in the west and southwest, where there are large open spaces.<ref name="usmfha1"/> The coyote is an indigenous predator that did not range east of the Mississippi River until the latter half of the twentieth century.<ref>{{cite journal|title=Status and management of coyote depredations in the Eastern United States|journal=US Department of Agriculture|last=Houben|first=JM|url=http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1006&context=icwdmsheepgoat|year=2004|access-date=13 October 2007}}</ref> The coyote is faster than a fox, running at {{convert|65|km/h|mph||abbr=on}} and also wider ranging, with a ] of up to {{convert|283|km2|sqmi}},<ref>{{cite web|publisher=University of Michigan – Animal Diversity Web|title=Canis latrans (coyote)|last=Tokar|first=Eric|access-date=13 October 2007|url=http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Canis_latrans.html}}</ref> so a much larger hunt territory is required to chase it. However, coyotes tend to be less challenging intellectually, as they offer a straight line hunt instead of the convoluted fox line. Coyotes can be challenging opponents for the dogs in physical confrontations, despite the size advantage of a large dog. Coyotes have larger canine teeth and are generally more practised in hostile encounters.<ref>{{cite book|author= Coppinger, Ray|title=Dogs: a Startling New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior and Evolution|url= https://archive.org/details/dogsstartlingnew00raym|url-access= registration| year=2001|page=|publisher= Scribner|location= New York|isbn=978-0-684-85530-1}}</ref>


The ] (''Urocyon cinereoargenteus''), a distant relative of the European red fox, is also hunted in North America.<ref name="usmfha1" /> It is an adept climber of trees, making it harder to hunt with hounds.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=University of Michigan – Animal Diversity Web|last=Jansa|first=Sharon|title=Urocyon cirereoargentus (gray fox)|access-date=13 October 2007|url=http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich.edu/site/accounts/information/Urocyon_cinereoargenteus.html}}</ref> The scent of the gray fox is not as strong as that of the red, therefore more time is needed for the hounds to take the scent. Unlike the red fox which, during the chase, will run far ahead from the pack, the gray fox will speed toward heavy brush, thus making it more difficult to pursue. Also unlike the red fox, which occurs more prominently in the northern United States, the more southern gray fox is rarely hunted on horseback, due to its densely covered habitat preferences.
When the Lords and Commons were unable to come to agreement by the end of the Parliamentary year on ], the Parliament Act was invoked, and the banning bill received Royal Assent that evening, becoming the . With no agreement on the 'suggested amendment' to delay the ban, it came into force three calendar months after Royal Assent on ], ].


Hunts in the southern United States sometimes pursue the ] (''Lynx rufus'').<ref name="usmfha1" /> In countries such as ], and in other areas formerly under British influence, such as ], the ] (''Canis aureus'') is often the quarry.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Horse and Hound|title=Hurworth hound bound for India|url=http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/competitionnews/392/49235.html|date=24 May 2004|access-date=13 October 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071104234723/http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/competitionnews/392/49235.html|archive-date=4 November 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Unusual features of RAF Habbaniya (Iraq)|url=http://www.habbaniya.org/Features.html|publisher=RAF Habbaniya Association|access-date=13 October 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070902002738/http://habbaniya.org/Features.html|archive-date=2 September 2007}}</ref> During the ], British sportsmen in India would hunt jackals on horseback with hounds as a substitute for the fox hunting of their native England. Unlike foxes, golden jackals were documented to be ferociously protective of their pack mates, and could seriously injure hounds.<ref> by Delabere Pritchett Blaine, published by Longman, Orme, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1840</ref><ref> by St. George Mivart, F.R.S, published by Alere Flammam. 1890</ref> Jackals were not hunted often in this manner, as they were slower than foxes and could scarcely outrun greyhounds after 200 yards.<ref> by ], published by T.F. Unwin, 1899</ref>
===England and Wales: the Hunting Act 2004: legal challenges===


== Alternatives to hunting live prey ==
There have been a series of declarations by various groups of hunting activists that they will still go hunting in defiance of the law. According to the website some 56,000 people have signed a that they will do this. A part of that statement reads that they "do not take such action with any expectation of escaping punishment, but rather in the hope of persuading both the legislators and our fellow
Following the ban on fox hunting in Great Britain, hunts switched to legal alternatives in order to preserve their traditional practices, although some hunt supporters had previously claimed this would be impossible and that hound packs would have to be destroyed.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2002/03/20/nhunt120.xml|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20020405082509/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=%2Fnews%2F2002%2F03%2F20%2Fnhunt120.xml|archive-date=5 April 2002|newspaper=The Telegraph|title=Peer warns of a war with countryside|date=19 March 2002|author=Kallenbach, M|access-date=10 April 2008|location=London}}</ref>
citizens of the injustice of a ban." It is expected that many will hunt in defiance and then offer themselves up for prosecution.


Most hunts turned, primarily, to trail hunting,<ref name="auto1"/><ref name="auto"/> which anti-hunt organisations claim is just a smokescreen for illegal hunting.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.itv.com/news/2020-11-24/what-is-trail-hunting-and-is-it-legal|title=What is trail hunting and is it legal?|website=www.itv.com|date=24 November 2020 |access-date=10 July 2022}}</ref> Some anti-hunting campaigners have urged hunts to switch to the established sport of ] instead, as this involves significantly less risk of wild animals being accidentally caught and killed.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.henrysalt.co.uk/bs_drag_hunts.htm|author=Salt, H.|title=Drag Hunting Verses Stag Hunting|year=1915|work=Killing for Sport|access-date=11 February 2008|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080305211816/http://www.henrysalt.co.uk/bs_drag_hunts.htm |archive-date = 5 March 2008}}</ref><ref name="CA submission"/><ref name="New Forest Drag">{{cite web|title=Drag Hunting|publisher=New Forest Drag Hunt|url=http://www.nfdh.org.uk/draghunting.html|access-date=11 February 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20030409101154/http://www.nfdh.org.uk/draghunting.html|archive-date=9 April 2003}}</ref>
The ]'s view of this plan of action has sometimes been unclear. They released a on ] ] which states their position.


===Trail hunting===
The ] has mounted legal challenges to the ] (both in the British ] and ]). These challenges include a ruling on the legality of the Parliament Act 1949 and a quite separate challenge as to whether the anti-hunting legislation contravenes individual rights protected in the ] (ECHR). On ] ] the High Court ruled against the Countryside Alliance, holding that the Parliament Act 1949 is valid. The Alliance has said it will appeal to the House of Lords. On ] ], hunting with dogs became illegal in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
{{Main|Trail hunting}}
A controversial<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.northantstelegraph.co.uk/country-and-farming/call-to-ban-controversial-trail-hunting-on-north-northamptonshire-council-land-3473676|title=Call to ban controversial trail hunting on North Northamptonshire Council land|website=northantstelegraph.co.uk|access-date=10 July 2022}}</ref> alternative to hunting animals with hounds. A trail of animal urine (most commonly ]) is laid in advance of the 'hunt', and then tracked by the hound pack and a group of followers; on foot, horseback, or both. Because the trail is laid using animal urine, and in areas where such animals naturally occur, hounds often pick up the scent of live animals; sometimes resulting in them being caught and killed.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.league.org.uk/media/filer_public/af/0a/af0ae437-6b89-4ee7-9e13-880294ea5515/the_impact_of_hunting_with_dogs_on_wildlife_and_conservation.pdf|title=The impact of hunting with dogs on wildlife and conservation|website=www.league.org.uk|access-date=10 July 2022}}</ref>


===Drag hunting===
The ] are expected to request a court injunction delaying the implementation of the . There are those in the legal profession who have indicated that law can only be delayed by act of parliament, not through a court injunction. However, the Government has indicated that it will not challenge such an injunction.
{{Main|Drag hunting}}
An established sport which dates back to the 19th century. Hounds follow an artificial scent, usually ]ed, laid along a set route which is already known to the huntsmen.<ref name=Goddard>Nicholas Goddard and John Martin, , ''Encyclopedia of traditional British rural sports'', Tony Collins, John Martin and Wray Vamplew (eds), Routledge, Abingdon, 2005, {{ISBN|0-415-35224-X}}, p104.</ref> A drag hunt course is set in a similar manner to a ] course, following a route over jumps and obstacles. Because it is predetermined, the route can be tailored to keep hounds away from sensitive areas known to be populated by animals which could be confused for prey.<ref name="NE Cheshire Drag">{{cite web|title=What is drag hunting?|year=2008|publisher=North East Cheshire Drag Hunt|url=http://www.necdh.co.uk/WhatIsDragHunting.htm|access-date=11 February 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080110041921/http://www.necdh.co.uk/WhatIsDragHunting.htm|archive-date=10 January 2008}}</ref>


===Hound trailing===
The ] have reported 300,000 spectators at over 200 meets on Boxing Day ] ]. The Deputy Prime Minister ] claimed in November that hunting is not a major issue, though feeling across the country is still strong, on both sides of the hunting argument. Prime Minister ] has said that hunting will be an election issue ()
{{Main|Hound trailing}}
Similar to drag hunting, but in the form of a race; usually of around {{convert|10|miles|km|abbr=on}} in length.<ref name=Goddard/> Unlike other forms of hunting, the hounds are not followed by humans.


===Scotland=== ===Clean boot hunting===
{{Main|Hunting the clean boot}}
Clean boot hunting uses packs of ]s to follow the natural trail of a human's scent.<ref name=Goddard/>


== Animals of the hunt ==
In February of ] the ] ] voted by 83 to 36 to ban hunting with dogs. ]s decided not to give compensation to those whose livelihoods or businesses might suffer as a result of the ban. An article in the on ] ] reports that of the 10 Scottish hunts, 9 have survived the ban, as it is still possible to use hounds to flush foxes to guns. As a result, the total number of foxes killed by hunts has doubled because even the healthy foxes rarely escape the bullets.


=== Hounds and other dogs ===
==Controversy over hunting==
]]]


Fox hunting is usually undertaken with a pack of ]s,<ref name=burns/> and, in most cases, these are specially bred '']s''.<ref name=AKC>{{cite web|publisher=American Kennel Club|title=English Foxhound History|url=http://www.akc.org/breeds/english_foxhound/history.cfm|access-date=15 October 2007}}</ref>
{{ActiveDiscuss}}
These dogs are trained to pursue the fox based on its ]. The two main types of foxhound are the ]<ref>{{cite web|publisher=American Kennel Club|title=English Foxhound Breed Standard|url=http://www.akc.org/breeds/english_foxhound/|access-date=15 October 2007|archive-date=12 October 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012223227/http://www.akc.org/breeds/english_foxhound/}}</ref> and the ].<ref>{{cite web|publisher=American Kennel Club|title=American Foxhound Breed Standard|url=http://www.akc.org/breeds/american_foxhound/|access-date=15 October 2007|archive-date=12 October 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071012222919/http://www.akc.org/breeds/american_foxhound/}}</ref> It is possible to use a ] such as a ] or ] to pursue foxes,<ref>{{cite web|publisher=American Kennel Club|title=Greyhound History|url=http://www.akc.org/breeds/greyhound/history.cfm|access-date=15 October 2007}}</ref> though this practice is not common in organised hunting, and these dogs are more often used for ] animals such as ]s.<ref>{{cite web|title=End of the road for illegal hare coursing|publisher=BBC Inside Out|date=24 January 2005|access-date=15 October 2007|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/insideout/east/series7/hare_coursing.shtml}}</ref> There is also one pack of ]s in Virginia that hunt foxes. They are unique in that they are the only hunting beagle pack in the US to be followed on horseback. ]s are also used for hunting ].


Hunts may also use ]s to flush or kill foxes that are hiding underground,<ref name=burns/> as they are small enough to pursue the fox through narrow earth passages. This is not practised in the United States, as once the fox has gone to ground and is accounted for by the hounds, it is left alone.
There are many arguments on all sides of the debate. Not all arguments are used by all advocates of each view, and almost all views stated are disputed by the opposing party.


====]==== === Horses ===
{{main|Field hunter}}
It is argued that no law should curtail the right to do as you wish so long as it does not harm others. The counter argument is that animals are included in the 'harm others' and that interfering with the liberties of non-human animals is as unacceptable as with the liberties of human animals. This counter argument is not accepted by those who consider humans to be morally superior beings.
]
The ]s, called "]s" or ''hunters,'' ridden by members of the field, are a prominent feature of many hunts, although others are conducted on foot (and those hunts with a field of mounted riders will also have foot followers). Horses on hunts can range from specially bred and trained ]s to casual hunt attendees riding a wide variety of horse and ] types. ] and ] crosses are commonly used as hunters, although ] Thoroughbreds and horses of many different ] are also used.


Some hunts with unique territories favour certain traits in field hunters; for example, when hunting coyote in the western US, a faster horse with more stamina is required to keep up, as coyotes are faster than foxes and inhabit larger territories. Hunters must be well-mannered, have the athletic ability to clear large obstacles such as wide ditches, tall fences, and rock walls, and have the stamina to keep up with the hounds. In English foxhunting, the horses are often a cross of half or a quarter Irish Draught and the remainder English thoroughbred.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Waitemata Hunt|title=Hunt Etiquette|url=http://members.tripod.com/horse_hunting/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderfiles/hunt_etiquette.pdf|date=October 2008|access-date=29 December 2010}}</ref>
All sides can agree that it is bad for the State to make anything illegal without purpose. Parliament has on several occasions in the recent past passed Acts whose purpose was to improve animal welfare or reduce animal cruelty without being faced with large demonstrations arguing that these Acts represented an unreasonable curtailment of liberty, so it seems that most people feel that reduction of cruelty to animals is a worthwhile purpose of legislation, and the only question remaining is whether outlawing fox hunting is sufficiently effective for that purpose to justify the cost in curtailment of liberty (among other costs).


Dependent on terrain, and to accommodate different levels of ability, hunts generally have alternative routes that do not involve jumping. The field may be divided into two groups, with one group, the ''First Field,'' that takes a more direct but demanding route that involves jumps over obstacles<ref name=Independence>{{cite web|title=Information and Guidelines for Foxhunters in the Field|publisher=Independence Foxhounds|year=2007|url=http://www.independencefoxhounds.com/protocol.html|access-date=18 January 2008 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080308004907/http://www.independencefoxhounds.com/protocol.html |archive-date = 8 March 2008}}</ref> while another group, the ''Second Field'' (also called ''Hilltoppers'' or ''Gaters''), takes longer but less challenging routes that utilise gates or other types of access on the flat.<ref name=Independence/><ref>{{cite web|title=Hunting Hounds and Polo Ponies |year=1998 |publisher=JoCo History |url=http://www.jocohistory.net/culture/11no3hunting.asp |access-date=18 January 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071025165931/http://www.jocohistory.net/culture/11no3hunting.asp |archive-date=25 October 2007 }}</ref>
This usage, however, is a dilution of the term "civil liberties"; one more usually hears the term used to refer to those liberties whose curtailment threatens the functioning of ] itself, such as ] or ]. By comparison, one may find many references to ] ''resulting in'' unreasonable curtailment of civil liberties (by eg resulting in unreasonable search and seizure powers), but it is rare to hear it argued that it is a curtailment of civil liberties ''in and of itself'', because while it may be seen as a form of liberty it isn't seen specifically as a civil liberty.


=== Birds of prey ===
].]]


In Great Britain, since the introduction of the hunting ban, a number of hunts have employed ] to bring ] to the hunt, due to the exemption in the ] for falconry.<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=The Guardian|title=The banned rode on|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2006/nov/07/hunting.ethicalliving|last=Moss|first=Stephen|access-date=5 October 2007|date=7 November 2006 | location=London}}</ref> Many experts, such as the Hawk Board, deny that any bird of prey can reasonably be used in the British countryside to kill a fox which has been flushed by (and is being chased by) a pack of hounds.<ref>{{Cite journal|author=McLeod, I.|year=2005|title=Birds of prey and the Hunting Act 2004|journal=Justice of the Peace |volume=169|pages=774–775}}</ref>
====Utility====
=====Should we control the fox population?=====
There is a view to the effect that "We are a part of nature, not apart from it" which, though certainly not agreed to by all people does have a good many adherents. The British countryside is far from natural, fox predators like the wolf or bear were eliminated a long time ago. The only predator left are humans, with or without dogs under their control. In such an unnatural landscape, however, predation is far from the only process at work. Wildlife populations, including foxes, are very significantly impacted by death under the wheels of road vehicles. No part of England or Wales is very far from a major road.


== Procedure ==
found: ''"2.4.2.2 National trends in the number of foxes killed''
] Hunt, Yorkshire, drawing a wood in February 2005]]


=== Main hunting season ===
''It is estimated that in Britain 285,000 foxes are killed annually by people (Pye-Smith 1997). Dividing this figure according to the different culling methods the numbers killed are estimated as follows: 100,000 killed on the roads, 80,000 shot, 50,000 dug out with terriers, 30,000 snared, 15,000 killed by foxhunts and 10,000 killed by lurchers. A very small (unknown) number will also have been poisoned. In addition to these anthropogenic factors, an unknown number will have died from natural causes and from disease. Because of the high turnover of foxes in Britain, it is likely that the number dying from old age is very small (e.g. Harris & Smith (1987) estimated that in London and Bristol, where anthropogenic mortality is reduced, only 8-12% of foxes make it to their third year). Until recently, it was also plausible that the number dying from disease was also very small, but the recent increase in the incidence of sarcoptic mange (Anon. 1999a; Wilkinson & Smith unpublished data) has meant that the number dying from disease has probably increased dramatically. However, there are no figures on the magnitude of deaths caused by mange in rural areas, but in Bristol it caused the population to decline by over 90% in two years (Baker et al. 2000).''
]
The main hunting season usually begins in early November, in the northern hemisphere,<ref name=Carr/> and in May in the southern hemisphere.


A hunt begins when the hounds are put, or ''cast'', into a patch of woods or brush where foxes are known to lay up during daylight hours; known as a ''covert'' (pronounced "cover"). If the pack manages to pick up the scent of a fox, they will track it for as long as they are able. Scenting can be affected by temperature, humidity, and other factors. If the hounds lose the scent, a ''check'' occurs.
''The only other estimates for the number of foxes killed in Britain each year are from Edmund Marriage. These estimates are based on an estimated pre-breeding population of 400,000 adults producing 500,000 cubs annually. Marriage states that 200,000 foxes die from natural mortality, 135,000 are shot, 80,000 are killed by vehicles, 35,000 are snared, 28,000 are killed by terriermen, 17,000 killed above ground by packs of foxhounds and 5000 are killed by lurchers. However, these figures appear unrealistic in comparison with other estimates of rural fox densities (e.g. Harris et al. 1995; Heydon et al. 2000).''
<ref>
{{cite book
|last1 = Robards
|first1 = Hugh J.
|date = 16 April 2011
|title = Foxhunting: How to Watch and Listen
|url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ytSForcmcmgC
|series = Foxhunters' Library
|publication-place = Lanham, Maryland
|publisher = Derrydale Press
|pages = 21, 137
|isbn = 978-1-58667-121-1
|access-date = 31 July 2023
|quote = On approaching the road, the hounds ''check'' (lose the scent), then ''cast'' (deploy) themselves over. '''check''' when hounds lose the line of the fox
}}
</ref>


The hounds pursue the trail of the fox and the riders follow, by the most direct route possible. This may involve very athletic skill on the part of horse and rider, and fox hunting has given birth to some traditional equestrian sports including ]<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|title= Steeplechase|encyclopedia= Encyclopædia Britannica Online|year=2008|url=https://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9069520/steeplechase|access-date=10 February 2008}}</ref> and ].<ref>{{cite web|title=A History of Point to Point|publisher=Irish Point to Point|year=2003|url=http://www.p2p.ie/content.php?key=History|access-date=6 November 2011|archive-date=18 November 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111118024214/http://www.p2p.ie/content.php?key=History|url-status=dead}}</ref>
''Natural rates of mortality are extremely hard to estimate. The only quantified data are for Bristol, where roughly 20% of all the known causes of mortality were due to natural causes, mainly disease (10%), fights between foxes (5%) and a variety of accidents (3%). These figures only relate to animals more than four weeks old, when they first emerge above ground. In addition, there are an unknown number of deaths of cubs below ground prior to emergence; comparisons of placental scar counts and post-emergence litter sizes in London showed that 17% of cubs die underground in the first six weeks of life (Harris 1977). Thus, roughly 40% of all mortality is due to natural factors, and it is plausible that the same applies to rural lowland Britain, where the fox population is not suppressed by culling pressure (Heydon & Reynolds 2000a). However, further research is required to validate this estimate, as well as the estimates for the other causes of death."''


The hunt continues until either the fox ''goes to ground'' (evades the hounds and takes refuge in a burrow or den) or is overtaken and usually killed by the hounds.
Finally there is the issue of controlling foxes in order to protect the farm livestock and other species they predate. The Burns report found (''1.4.2.1.2 Predation on poultry'') ''"In conclusion, as with lambs, the impact of foxes on commercial poultry production is significantly less than popularly supposed. And predation by foxes can easily be prevented by adequate housing. However, as with all current rates of loss these must be viewed in the context of current levels of control, although it is unclear how changes in culling will affect levels of damage experienced by farmers."''


Social rituals are important to hunts, although many have fallen into disuse. One of the most notable was the act of ]. In this ceremony, the master or huntsman would smear the blood of the fox onto the cheeks or forehead of a newly ] hunt-follower, often a young child.<ref name=customs>{{cite web|publisher= Icons – A portrait of Britain|title= Customs of Hunting|url=http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/collection/fox-hunting-and-the-ban/features/customs-of-hunting-finished|year=2006|access-date=13 November 2007|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20071120043234/http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/collection/fox-hunting-and-the-ban/features/customs-of-hunting-finished|archive-date= 20 November 2007}}</ref> Another practice of some hunts was to cut off the fox's tail (''brush''), the feet (''pads'') and the head (''mask'') as trophies, with the carcass then thrown to the hounds.<ref name=customs/> Both of these practices were widely abandoned during the nineteenth century, although isolated cases may still have occurred to the modern day.<ref name=customs/>
====="Self regulation of the fox population"=====
It is put forward by some that population control is not necessary, that the fox population will self regulate. Foxes can exhibit a form of self regulation, when resources are scarce. Pairs of foxes instinctively need to establish a territory and, when they cannot, they simply do not breed. It is a common mistake to assume mammals breed all the time. (See ). It should be remembered that death in the wild may mean suffering a long slow death through starvation or disease. The most common UK fox disease is ], a ] that causes irritation and hair loss and may lead to death through hypothermia. Mange becomes prevalent when the fox population becomes dense enough.


== Cubbing ==
====Animal welfare - is fox hunting cruel?====
In the autumn of each year, hunts accustom the young hounds, which by now are full-size, but not yet sexually mature, to hunt and kill foxes through the practice of ''cubbing'' (also called ''cub hunting'', ''autumn hunting'' and ''entering'').<ref name=Carr>], ''English Fox Hunting: A History'' (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1976)</ref><ref name="Misstear">{{cite news|title= Incidents of illegal fox cubbing reported to RSPCA officers|date= 26 March 2013|author= Misstear, R. |access-date= 23 June 2016|url= http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/incidents-illegal-fox-cubbing-reported-2017327|work= Walesonline}}</ref><ref name=umad/> Cubbing also aims to teach hounds to restrict their hunting to foxes, so that they do not hunt other species such as deer or hares.<ref name="burns"/><ref name="Thomas">{{cite web|title= A veterinary opinion on hunting with hounds, Submission to the Burns Inquiry|url= http://www.vet-wildlifemanagement.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=30&Itemid=32|author1= Thomas, L.H.|author2= Allen, W.R.|year= 2000|access-date= 20 November 2007|publisher= Veterinary Association for Wildlife Management}}</ref>


The activity sometimes incorporates the practice of ''holding up''; where hunt supporters, riders and foot followers surround a covert and drive back foxes attempting to escape, before then ''drawing'' the covert with the young hounds and some more experienced hounds, allowing them to find and kill foxes within the surrounded covert.<ref name="burns" /> A young hound is considered to be ''entered'' into the pack once they have successfully joined in a hunt of this fashion. Since one of the objectives of fox hunting is to control fox populations, cubbing is a highly effective way of reaching this{{citation needed|date=August 2023}} as more than one fox could be killed in a covert. Cubbing is also an effective way of dispersing fox populations. Young hounds which do not show sufficient aptitude may be killed by their owners or drafted to other packs, including ] packs.<ref name="Fanshawe">{{cite web|title= Future of hound breeds under threat from hunting bill|year=2003|last=Fanshawe|url= http://www.mfha.org.uk/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=18&Itemid=9|publisher=Masters of Fox Hounds Association|access-date= 11 February 2008}}</ref>
Supporters of a ban on hunting with dogs claim that there are more humane methods of control if required, especially where those applying the methods of control are appropriately trained. Most suggest shooting as the most humane alternative.


The ], established in 1999, reported that an estimated 10,000 fox cubs were killed annually during the cub-hunting season in Great Britain.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2018-08-19 |title= What Is Cubbing?|url=https://www.thecanary.co/discovery/analysis-discovery/2018/08/19/the-most-grotesque-part-of-hunting-season-begins-fox-cubs-are-torn-apart-for-sport/ |access-date=2022-06-08 |website= The Canary |language=en-GB}}</ref> Cub hunting is now illegal in Great Britain,<ref>
Pro-hunters point to the comments of Lord Burns, Chairman of the Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs, who stated in the Lords that "Naturally, people ask whether we were implying that hunting is cruel... The short answer to that question is no. There was not sufficient verifiable evidence or data safely to reach views about cruelty".
{{cite web
| url = https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/incidents-illegal-fox-cubbing-reported-2017327
| title = Incidents
| last = Misstear
| first = Rachael
| date = 26 March 2013
| website = WalesOnline
| access-date = 7 January 2023
| quote = RSPCA inspector Keith Hogben said 'The practice is entirely illegal under the ].'
}}
</ref>
although anti-hunt associations maintain that the practice continues.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2022 |title=What is cubbing? |url=https://www.keeptheban.uk/faqs/what-is-cubbing |access-date=2022-08-19 |website=Keep The Ban |language=en-GB |archive-date=19 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220819102933/https://www.keeptheban.uk/faqs/what-is-cubbing }}</ref>{{request quotation|date=January 2023}}


== People ==
They state that if it is accepted that fox control is desirable it is then our duty to ensure that it is done in a humane way, and that hunting is humane when considered against all reasonable alternative methods of control.
===Hunt staff and officials===
] (1847–1907): "The Master of the ]".<br />Published in '']'' (1906)]]
As a social ritual, participants in a fox hunt fill specific roles, the most prominent of which is the master, who often number more than one and then are called masters or joint masters. These individuals typically take much of the financial responsibility for the overall management of the sporting activities of the hunt, along with the care and breeding of the hunt's foxhounds as well as control and direction of its paid staff.


* The '''Master of Foxhounds''' (who use the post-nominal (and may also be called) MFH<ref>{{cite book|title=This country life:old houses|last=Rusk|first=Eliza|year=2016|page=45|url=https://archive.org/details/thiscountrylifeo0000rusk/page/44/mode/2up?q=MFH}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=The complete idiot's guide to Horseback Riding|last=Jahiel|first=Jessica|page=178|year=2000|url=https://archive.org/details/completeidiotsgu0000jahi/page/178/mode/2up?q=MFH}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Who's Who|year=1983|page=35|url=https://archive.org/details/whoswhoannualbio0000unse_g2g3/page/n37/mode/2up?q=MFH}}</ref>) or Joint Master of Foxhounds operates the sporting activities of the hunt, maintains the kennels, works with (and sometimes is) the huntsman, and spends the money raised by the hunt club. (Often the master or joint masters are the largest of financial contributors to the hunt.) The master will have the final say over all matters in the field.<ref name=staff>{{cite web|title=Organization in the field|publisher=Miami Valley Hunt|url=http://mvhunt.net/foxhunting.htm|access-date=13 August 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080731200432/http://mvhunt.net/foxhunting.htm|archive-date=31 July 2008}}</ref>
The alternative methods are poison, gas, snare, "humane trap", shooting or the use of ]s administered either by dart or bait.
* '''Honorary secretaries''' are volunteers (usually one or two) who look after the administration of the hunt.<ref name=staff/>
* '''The Treasurer''' collects the '''cap''' (money) from guest riders and manages the hunt's finances.<ref name=staff/>
* A '''kennelman''' looks after hounds in kennels, assuring that all tasks are completed when pack and staff return from hunting.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://fresco.ie/imfha/conduct2.htm |title=Code of conduct |publisher=Irish Masters of Foxhounds Association |access-date=11 February 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080921171642/http://fresco.ie/imfha/conduct2.htm |archive-date=21 September 2008 }}</ref>
* '''The huntsman''', who may be a professional, is responsible for directing the hounds. The Huntsman usually carries a horn to communicate to the hounds, followers and whippers in.<ref name=staff/> Some huntsmen also fill the role of kennelman (and are therefore known as the '''kennel huntsman'''). In some hunts the master is also the huntsman.
* '''Whippers-in''' (or "Whips") are assistants to the huntsman. Their main job is to keep the pack all together, especially to prevent the hounds from straying or 'riotting', which term refers to the hunting of animals other than the hunted fox or trail line. To help them to control the pack, they carry hunting ]s (and in the United States they sometimes also carry .22 revolvers loaded with ] or blanks.)<ref name=staff/> The role of ''whipper-in'' in hunts has inspired parliamentary systems (including the ] and the ]) to use '']'' for a member who enforces party discipline and ensures the attendance of other members at important votes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/principal/whips.cfm |publisher=UK Parliament |title=About Parliament – Whips |access-date=17 October 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081005024452/http://www.parliament.uk/about/how/principal/whips.cfm |archive-date=5 October 2008 }}</ref>
*'''Terrier man'''— Carries out fox control. Most hunts where the object is to kill the fox will employ a terrier man, whose job it is to control the ] which may be used underground to corner or flush the fox. Often voluntary terrier men will follow the hunt as well. In the UK and Ireland, they often ride ]s with their terriers in boxes on their bikes.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.diggingout.org/hunt_terriermen.html|publisher=Campaign for the Abolition of Terrier Work|title=Hunt terriermen|access-date=11 February 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080512003440/http://www.diggingout.org/hunt_terriermen.html|archive-date=12 May 2008}}</ref>


In addition to members of the hunt staff, a committee may run the ''Hunt Supporters Club'' to organise fundraising and social events and in the United States many hunts are incorporated and have parallel lines of leadership.
There are no legal poisons or gasses available for fox control in the UK, and such methods invariably wind up killing the wrong species.


The United Kingdom, Ireland, and the United States each have a ''Masters of Foxhounds Association'' (MFHA) which consists of current and past masters of foxhounds. This is the governing body for all foxhound packs and deals with disputes about boundaries between hunts, as well as regulating the activity.
Snares are a wire loop that catches and tightens on an animals neck or leg. They are set on a known path the animal takes. It is not uncommon for animals to gnaw their own legs off when caught by such devices in order to escape. Humane traps are boxes or cages with a one way door in which an animal will be held. Wild animals show considerable distress in such conditions. Both snares and other traps have the sole purpose of holding the animal until such time as someone arrives to kill the animal and put it out of its suffering. There is no relocation for these animals as there is no where for them to go.


=== Attire ===
'''Shooting foxes'''
]


Mounted hunt followers typically wear traditional hunting attire. A prominent feature of hunts operating during the formal hunt season (usually November to March in the northern hemisphere) is hunt members wearing 'colours'. This attire usually consists of the traditional red coats worn by huntsmen, masters, former masters, whippers-in (regardless of sex), other hunt staff members and male members who have been invited by masters to wear colours and hunt buttons as a mark of appreciation for their involvement in the organization and running of the hunt.
There are two predominant methods of shooting foxes. Either in daylight a fast moving fox may be taken by a shot-gun, or at night through the use of a rifle. Both have significant wounding rates. Following Lord Burns' request for further evidence on the matter, the Middle Way Group commissioned a study into what those rates were. The results are available online at .


Since the Hunting Act in England and Wales, only Masters and Hunt Servants tend to wear red coats or the hunt livery whilst out hunting. Gentleman subscribers tend to wear black coats, with or without hunt buttons. In some countries, women generally wear coloured collars on their black or navy coats. These help them stand out from the rest of the field.
The finding of their investigation was that a significant number of animals will be wounded and will suffer a protracted death either through gangrene, or starvation if they are unable to pursue quarry. In this state they anecdotally become a greater threat to domestic farm stock.


]
=====Is foxhunting with dogs effective?=====
The traditional red coats are often misleadingly called "pinks". Various theories about the derivation of this term have been given, ranging from the colour of a weathered scarlet coat to the name of a purportedly famous tailor.<ref>{{cite web|last=Reeds|first=Jim|url=http://www.horse-country.com/jriders/pink.html|publisher=horse-country.com|title=The Legend of Tailor Pink|date=7 December 2003|access-date=13 October 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071010033555/http://www.horse-country.com/jriders/pink.html|archive-date=10 October 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|publisher=Icons – A portrait of Britain|title=Hunting Fashion|url=http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/collection/fox-hunting-and-the-ban/features/hunting-fashion|date=July 2006|access-date=14 November 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071118171211/http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/collection/fox-hunting-and-the-ban/features/hunting-fashion|archive-date=18 November 2007}}</ref>
Foxhunting can be made to be very effective, depending on how intensively it is practised. Hunting is inevitably more likely to catch sick and weak foxes, no other form of culling has this feature. In some terrain, hunting is the only practical option, for example wooded upland areas where using guns is impractical.


Some hunts, including most harrier and beagle packs, wear green rather than red jackets, and some hunts wear other colours such as mustard. The colour of ] vary from hunt to hunt and are generally of one colour, though two or three colours throughout the year may be permitted.<ref name=attire>{{cite web|publisher=Beech Grove Hunt|url=http://www.beechgrovehunt.com/etiquette.shtml|title=Dress Code|access-date=14 November 2007|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071104000503/http://www.beechgrovehunt.com/etiquette.shtml |archive-date = 4 November 2007}}</ref> ]s are generally English dress boots (no laces). For the men they are black with brown leather tops (called tan tops), and for the women, black with a patent black leather top of similar proportion to the men.<ref name=attire/> Additionally, the number of buttons is significant. The Master wears a scarlet coat with four brass buttons while the huntsman and other professional staff wear five. Amateur whippers-in also wear four buttons.
Some intensive sheep farming areas use hounds in combination with guns, with hounds sent in to a wood kill, or to flush foxes out which are then shot using shotguns. If the shot is not clean the hounds are present to dispatch the fox as rapidly as possible. Despite being far more effective than rifles on a moving target, shotguns have a high wounding rate. The current state of the supposed banning law in Scotland, permits the use of hounds for flushing out foxes to be shot.


Another differentiation in dress between the amateur and professional staff is found in the ribbons at the back of the ]. The professional staff wear their hat ribbons down, while amateur staff and members of the field wear their ribbons up.<ref>{{cite web|title=Dress Code|publisher=RMA Sandhurst Draghunt|year=2008|url=http://www.sandhurstdraghunt.co.uk/dress.html|access-date=22 December 2007|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080314000035/http://www.sandhurstdraghunt.co.uk/dress.html |archive-date = 14 March 2008}}</ref>
found (http://www.huntinginquiry.gov.uk/mainsections/research/whitecontracts5and6/report.htm Lord Burns report REPORT ON CONTRACT 5 MANAGEMENT OF THE POPULATION OF FOXES, DEER, HARES AND MINK AND THE IMPACT OF HUNTING WITH DOGS AND REPORT ON CONTRACT 6 METHODS OF CONTROLLING FOXES, DEER, HARE AND MINK FOR LORD BURNS&#8217; COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY INTO HUNTING WITH DOGS
3.4.2 Does culling reduce fox abundance?) ''"At a more general level, there is the perception that fox numbers are increasing (e.g. Tapper 1992, 1999) possibly as a result of the increase in the availability of particular prey species, such as rabbits and pheasants, and the planting of coniferous woodlands in upland areas. At this national level, therefore, control would appear to be ineffective in limiting the growth of the fox population.''


Those members not entitled to wear colours, dress in a black hunt coat and unadorned black buttons for both men and women, generally with pale breeches. Boots are all English dress boots and have no other distinctive look.<ref name=attire/> Some hunts also further restrict the wear of formal attire to weekends and holidays and wear ] (] jacket and tan breeches), at all other times.
''Therefore, the data on whether culling is effective in reducing fox numbers is equivocal. At a national level, fox numbers appear to be increasing but in certain regions there is some data that appears to show culling is effective, although this is by no means clear. At a very local level large scale culling can be effective in reducing fox numbers in the short-term. However, we must reiterate that there is no clear relationship between fox abundance and levels of damage, and that there are virtually no data to assess whether culling is effective at reducing levels of damage to game, livestock and species of conservation concern, these being the most common reasons cited for controlling foxes."''


Other members of the mounted field follow strict rules of clothing ]. For example, for some hunts, those under eighteen (or sixteen in some cases) will wear ratcatcher all season. Those over eighteen (or in the case of some hunts, all followers regardless of age) will wear ratcatcher during autumn hunting from late August until the Opening Meet, normally around 1 November. From the Opening Meet they will switch to formal hunting attire where entitled members will wear scarlet and the rest black or navy.
====Community====
Pro-hunt campaigners have suggested that hunting is an integral part of rural communities, and that it is a prime example of co-operative working. These views are not universally agreed. It should be noted that anti-hunt activists dispute both the likely job losses resulting from a ban and the likely effect on community put forward by pro-hunt organisations.


The highest honour is to be awarded the hunt button by the Hunt Master. This sometimes means one can then wear scarlet if male, or the hunt collar if female (colour varies from hunt to hunt) and buttons with the hunt crest on them. For non-mounted packs or non-mounted members where formal hunt uniform is not worn, the buttons are sometimes worn on a waistcoat. All members of the mounted field should carry a hunting whip (it should not be called a crop). These have a horn handle at the top and a long leather lash (2–3 yards) ending in a piece of coloured cord. Generally all hunting whips are brown, except those of Hunt Servants, whose whips are white.
====Class issues====


== Controversy ==
Pro-hunters believe that that there is a popular perception in the UK that Hunting is elitist and costly, only accessible to wealthy aristocrats. They claim that this view is held by and motivates a large part of the anti-hunt lobby, above and beyond any welfare issues. Whilst the main stream anti-hunt campaigns do not often use the class point, the pro-hunt lobby has felt that class war is a major driver for the wish to ban hunting, and that it needs to respond to it (eg Baroness Mallalieu: " foundations are naked prejudice and wilful ignorance"). The Countryside Alliance's campaign is in part an example of this.
The nature of fox hunting, including the killing of the quarry animal, the pursuit's strong associations with tradition and ], and its practice for sport have made it a source of great controversy within the United Kingdom. In December 1999, the then ], ], announced the establishment of a Government inquiry (the ]) into hunting with dogs, to be chaired by the retired senior civil servant ]. The inquiry was to examine the practical aspects of different types of hunting with dogs and its impact, how any ban might be implemented and the consequences of any such ban.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/mainsections/committeedetails/aboutus.htm|title=Background to the Inquiry|author=Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs|year=1999|access-date=12 February 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090407134938/http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/mainsections/committeedetails/aboutus.htm|archive-date=7 April 2009}}</ref>


Amongst its findings, the Burns Inquiry committee analysed opposition to hunting in the UK and reported that:
Hunters point out that people of all social backgrounds and wealth take part in hunting, not just "toffs". Indeed, historically, fox-hunting has been somewhat looked down upon by some areas of the aristocracy.
<blockquote>There are those who have a moral objection to hunting and who are fundamentally opposed to the idea of people gaining pleasure from what they regard as the causing of unnecessary suffering. There are also those who perceive hunting as representing a divisive social class system. Others, as we note below, resent the hunt trespassing on their land, especially when they have been told they are not welcome. They worry about the welfare of the pets and animals and the difficulty of moving around the roads where they live on hunt days. Finally there are those who are concerned about damage to the countryside and other animals, particularly badgers and otters.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/mainsections/huntingreport.htm|date=2000-06-09|title=Final Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs in England and Wales, para 4.12|access-date=2008-02-09|publisher=Defra|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090410213249/http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/mainsections/huntingreport.htm|archive-date=2009-04-10}}</ref></blockquote>


In a later debate in the House of Lords, the inquiry chairman, ], also stated that "Naturally, people ask whether we were implying that hunting is cruel... The short answer to that question is no. There was not sufficient verifiable evidence or data safely to reach views about cruelty. It is a complex area."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200001/ldhansrd/vo010312/text/10312-06.htm#10312-06_para26|title=Lords Hansard|date=12 March 2001 |access-date=29 February 2008 |publisher=House of Lords|author=Burns, T.}}</ref>
They point out that the social aspects of hunting reflect the social make-up of the area it takes place in, that the Home Counties packs are very different from those in areas of North Wales and Cumbria where the hunts are very much the activity of farmers and the working class. The is sometimes used as an example, though its membership is by no means limited to miners.


] activists who choose to take action in opposing fox hunting can do so through lawful means, such as campaigning for ] and ] for cruelty. Some use unlawful means.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.league.org.uk/content.asp?CategoryID=1704|publisher=League Against Cruel Sports|title=Hunt Crimewatch|access-date=12 February 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080205234021/http://www.league.org.uk/content.asp?CategoryID=1704|archive-date=5 February 2008}}</ref> Main anti-hunting campaign organisations include the ] and the ]. In 2001, the RSPCA took high court action to prevent pro-hunt activists joining in large numbers to change the society's policy in opposing hunting.<ref>{{cite news|newspaper=The Telegraph|date=19 June 2001|title=RSPCA wins right to block hunt lobby|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1319660/RSPCA-wins-right-to-block-hunt-lobby.html|access-date=27 October 2008 | location=London}}</ref>
It has been claimed that at the end of the final vote on the Hunting Bill, back bench MPs on the Government side were heard to shout "That's for the miners". This is a clear indication that for some that this bill is based upon a foundation of class, though it is disputed whether the incident ever took place.


Outside of campaigning, some activists choose to engage in direct intervention such as ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://hsa.enviroweb.org/tactics/tactbook/tactics.html|publisher=Hunt Saboteurs Association|title=HSA hunt tactics book|access-date=12 February 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080304215707/http://hsa.enviroweb.org/tactics/tactbook/tactics.html|archive-date=4 March 2008}}</ref> Hunt sabotage is unlawful in a majority of the United States, and some tactics used in it (such as ] and criminal damage) are offences there and in other countries.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.huntsab.org/hunter_harassment_laws.htm|title=Hunter Harassment Laws|publisher=American Hunt Saboteurs Association|access-date=12 February 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080315020942/http://www.huntsab.org/hunter_harassment_laws.htm|archive-date=15 March 2008}}</ref>
Hunt supporters say that on the hunting field everyone is considered on their ability to ride, and on their "hound sense" rather than on their social background.


Fox hunting with hounds has been happening in Europe since at least the sixteenth century, and strong traditions have built up around the activity, as have related businesses, rural activities, and ]. For this reason, there are large numbers of people who support fox hunting and this can be for a variety of reasons.<ref name = "MFH-social"/>
All hunts have a large turn out of "un-mounted" followers i.e. not on horse back. They may follow on foot, or by vehicle or bicycle. The majority of packs do not use horses at all. For the packs that do use horses, the mounted followers contribute a sum of money "a cap" to the days hunting, but the unmounted followers are not usually asked for any financial contribution at all. For the unmounted packs, known as foot-packs, everyone pays a cap.


=== Pest control ===
Cap for the mounted packs will start at around £20 but can be much higher for certain packs. For the foot packs cap will be around £5. Farmers and supporters of the pack will pay a nominal sum only. Tea and sandwiches are often thrown in.
The fox is referred to as ] in some countries. Some farmers fear the loss of their smaller ],<ref name="CA submission">{{cite web|author=Countryside Alliance|title=Submission to the Burns Inquiry|year=2000|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/alliance.htm|archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130123162956/http:/www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/alliance.htm|archive-date=23 January 2013|publisher=Defra|access-date=14 November 2007}}</ref> while others consider them an ally in controlling rabbits, voles, and other rodents, which eat crops.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence2/drryder.htm|archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130123162956/http:/www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence2/drryder.htm|archive-date=23 January 2013|author= Ryder, R.|year=2000|publisher=Defra|title=Submission to the Burns Inquiry|access-date=11 February 2008}}</ref> A key reason for dislike of the fox by pastoral farmers is their tendency to commit acts of ] toward animals such as chickens, since having killed many they eat only one.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Kruuk|first=H|title=Surplus killing by carnivores|year=1972|journal=Journal of Zoology, London|volume=166|issue=2|pages=435–50|doi=10.1111/j.1469-7998.1972.tb04087.x}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Baldwin|first=Marc|title=Red Fox Vulpes vulpes:Food & Feeding|publisher=Wildlife Online|date=29 April 2007|access-date=22 February 2008|url=http://www.wildlifeonline.me.uk/red_fox.html#feeding}}</ref> Some anti-hunt campaigners maintain that provided it is not disturbed, the fox will remove all of the chickens it kills and conceal them in a safer place.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=National Fox Welfare Society|title=Red fox (Vulpes vulpes) General description|url=http://www.nfws.org.uk/fox_info.html|access-date=13 April 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080608135436/http://www.nfws.org.uk/fox_info.html|archive-date=8 June 2008}}</ref>


Opponents of fox hunting claim that the activity is not necessary for fox control, arguing that the fox is not a pest species despite its classification and that hunting does not and cannot make a real difference to fox populations.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=International Fund for Animal Welfare |url=http://www.ifaw.org/ifaw/general/default.aspx?oid=158534 |title=New research explodes myth that hunting with gun-packs controlled foxes in Wales |year=2006 |access-date=11 February 2008 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080620022132/http://www.ifaw.org/ifaw/general/default.aspx?oid=158534 |archive-date=20 June 2008 }}</ref> They compare the number of foxes killed in the hunt to the many more killed on the roads. They also argue that ] goals of the hunt can be met more effectively by other methods such as '']'' (dazzling a fox with a bright light, then shooting by a competent shooter using an appropriate weapon and load).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence2/deadline20002.htm#research|archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130123162956/http:/www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence2/deadline20002.htm#research|archive-date=23 January 2013|author=Deadline 2000|year=2000|title=Submission to Burns Inquiry|access-date=12 February 2008|publisher=Defra}}</ref>
In response to claims that ] and ] were only banned because they were working class, and hunting survived as it was upper class; they state that animal baiting and fighting sports was outlawed because they are cruel whereas hunting is not (see welfare section). They also point out that fishing is not threatened with a ban whereas hunting is directly because hunting is seen as a minority upper-class pursuit, whereas fishing is enjoyed by persons of all classes, and is reportedly the most popular participation sport in the UK (see also welfare section for welfare implications of fishing vs hunting).


There is scientific evidence that fox hunting has no effect on fox populations, at least in Britain, thereby calling into question the idea it is a successful method of culling. In 2001 there was a 1-year nationwide ban on fox-hunting because of an outbreak of ]. It was found this ban on hunting had no measurable impact on fox numbers in randomly selected areas.<ref name="Baker">{{cite journal |author=Baker, P.J. |author2=Harris, S. |author3=Webbon, C.C.|year=2002|title=Ecology: Effect of British hunting ban on fox numbers|journal=Nature|volume=419|issue=6902|page=34|doi=10.1038/419034a|pmid=12214224|bibcode=2002Natur.419...34B|s2cid=4392265|doi-access=free}}</ref> Prior to the fox hunting ban in the UK, hounds contributed to the deaths of 6.3% of the 400,000 foxes killed annually.<ref>{{Cite journal |author=Leader-Williams, N. |author2=Oldfield, T.E. |author3=Smith, R.J. |author4=Walpole, M.J. |year=2002|title=Science, conservation and fox-hunting|journal=Nature|volume=419|issue=6910|page=878|doi=10.1038/419878a|pmid=12410283|bibcode=2002Natur.419..878L|doi-access=free}}</ref>
Perhaps some of the hostility towards fox hunting does stem from public perception of fox hunters as typifying a disliked aspect of the upper classes. ] once characterised hunting as "The English country gentleman galloping after a fox&mdash;the unspeakable in pursuit of the uneatable", and the British anarchist group ] used to argue explicitly for disruption of the hunt on class warfare grounds.


The hunts claim to provide and maintain a good habitat for foxes and other game,<ref name="CA submission"/> and, in the US, have fostered ] legislation and put land into conservation easements. Anti-hunting campaigners cite the widespread existence of artificial earths and the historic practice by hunts of introducing foxes, as indicating that hunts do not believe foxes to be pests.<ref name = "League submission">{{cite web|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/league.htm|archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130123162956/http:/www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/league.htm|archive-date=23 January 2013|author=League Against Cruel Sports|title=Submission to Burns Inquiry|year=2000|access-date=11 February 2008|publisher=Defra}}</ref>
] wrote on ] ] in in ] shortly after the Hunting Act 2004 was passed that "we ought at last to own up to it: the struggle over the Bill was not just about animal welfare and personal freedom, it was class war." This statement was cited by hunt supporters as evidence of class motivation, and was widely reported as such. The same newspaper published a front page lead article in the same edition titled "". Bradley wrote a letter in response insisting that he had not meant this. He stated that he had meant that the struggle over the bill had "become a clash of political cultures", moving beyond the debate over animal welfare and personal freedom.


It is also argued that hunting with dogs has the advantage of weeding out old, sick, and weak animals because the strongest and healthiest foxes are those most likely to escape. Therefore, unlike other methods of controlling the fox population, it is argued that hunting with dogs resembles ].<ref name="CA submission"/> The counter-argument is given that hunting cannot kill old foxes because foxes have a natural death rate of 65% per annum.<ref name = "League submission"/>
Most supporters of a ban on hunting however, claim that they are not concerned with class issues and that the pro-hunt supporters' arguments that it is not an upper class pastime is a ]. In support of this view, they cite for example their lack of opposition to ]. They also point out that opponents of hunting are drawn from across the social spectrum, and include many people who are not left wing in any way.


In Australia, where foxes have played a major role in the decline in the number of species of wild animals, the Government's ] concluded that "hunting does not seem to have had a significant or lasting impact on fox numbers." Instead, control of foxes relies heavily on shooting, poisoning and fencing.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/invasive/publications/european-red-fox.html|year=2004|title=European Red Fox Fact Sheet|publisher=Environment Department, Australian Government|access-date=19 April 2010}}</ref>
===The Middle Way group===


=== Economics ===
The Parliamentary Middle Way group favours the continuation of hunting under a strict licensing scheme managed by a statutory authority; they argue for this position on both animal welfare and civil liberties grounds. They state that each hunt should apply for a licence to and show that their method of quarry control involves less suffering than any alternative method.
As well as the economic defence of fox hunting that it is necessary to control the population of foxes, lest they cause economic cost to the farmers, it is also argued that fox hunting is a significant economic activity in its own right, providing recreation and jobs for those involved in the hunt and supporting it. The ] identified that between 6,000 and 8,000 full-time jobs depend on hunting in the UK, of which about 700 result from direct hunt employment and 1,500 to 3,000 result from direct employment on hunting-related activities.<ref name=burns/>


Since the ban in the UK, there has been no evidence of significant job losses, and hunts have continued to operate along limited lines, either trail hunting, or claiming to use exemptions in the legislation.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/opinion/Simon-Hart-Hounding-out-a.3619917.jp|author=Simon Hart|title=Hounding out a law that's failed in every way|date=26 December 2007|access-date=11 February 2008|newspaper=The Yorkshire Post}}</ref>
They have commissioned research into The Welfare Aspects of Shooting Foxes, showing the wounding rates caused by different types of fox-control with guns.


===Animal welfare and animal rights===
== External links ==
Many ] groups, campaigners and ] believe that fox hunting is unfair and cruel to animals.<ref name=bbccruel/> They argue that the chase itself causes fear and distress and that the fox is not always killed instantly as is claimed. ] campaigners also object to hunting (including fox hunting), on the grounds that animals should enjoy some basic rights (such as the right to freedom from exploitation and the right to life).<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Uncaged|title=The universal declaration of animal rights|year=2006|url=http://www.uncaged.co.uk/declarat.htm|access-date=3 November 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071102075149/http://www.uncaged.co.uk/declarat.htm|archive-date=2 November 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|publisher=People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA)|title=General FAQs|url=http://www.peta.org/about/faq.asp|access-date=3 November 2007}}</ref>


In the United States and Canada, pursuing quarry for the purpose of killing is strictly forbidden by the Masters of Foxhounds Association.<ref name="usmfha1"/> According to article 2 of the organisation's code:
*'''News reports'''
<blockquote>The sport of fox hunting as it is practised in North America places emphasis on the chase and not the kill. It is inevitable, however, that hounds will at times catch their game. Death is instantaneous. A pack of hounds will account for their quarry by running it to ground, treeing it, or bringing it to bay in some fashion. The Masters of Foxhounds Association has laid down detailed rules to govern the behaviour of Masters of Foxhounds and their packs of hounds.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mfha.com/code.htm|title=MFHA Code of Hunting Practices|year=2000|publisher=Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America|access-date=2008-02-12|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20080315131747/http://www.mfha.com/code.htm |archive-date = 15 March 2008}}</ref></blockquote>
**
There are times when a fox that is injured or sick is caught by the pursuing hounds, but hunts say that the occurrence of an actual kill of this is exceptionally rare.<ref name="usmfha1"/>
**


Supporters of hunting maintain that when foxes or other prey (such as coyotes in the western USA) are hunted, the quarry are either killed relatively quickly (instantly or in a matter of seconds) or escapes uninjured. Similarly, they say that the animal rarely endures hours of torment and pursuit by hounds, and research by Oxford University shows that the fox is normally killed after an average of 17&nbsp;minutes of chase.<ref name=bbccruel>{{cite news|publisher=BBC News|title=Is fox hunting cruel?|url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/418681.stm|date=16 September 1999|access-date=3 November 2007}}</ref> They further argue that, while hunting with hounds may cause suffering, controlling fox numbers by other means is even more cruel. Depending on the skill of the shooter, the type of firearm used, the availability of good shooting positions and luck, shooting foxes can cause either an instant kill, or lengthy periods of agony for wounded animals which can die of the trauma within hours, or of secondary infection over a period of days or weeks. Research from wildlife hospitals, however, indicates that it is not uncommon for foxes with minor shot wounds to survive.&nbsp;<ref>{{cite web |author=Baker, P. |author2=Harris, S. |author3=White, P. |publisher=International Fund for Animal Welfare |title=After the hunt, the future of foxes in Britain |url=http://www.ifaw.org/ifaw/dimages/custom/After%20the%20Hunt%20(Web%20final%20Feb).pdf |access-date=25 November 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071127073352/http://www.ifaw.org/ifaw/dimages/custom/After%20the%20Hunt%20%28Web%20final%20Feb%29.pdf |archive-date=27 November 2007 }}</ref> Hunt supporters further say that it is a matter of humanity to kill foxes rather than allow them to suffer malnourishment and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/hunts/fourburrow.htm|archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130123162956/http:/www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/hunts/fourburrow.htm|archive-date=23 January 2013|author=Four Burrows Hunt|title=Submission to Burns Inquiry|year=2000|access-date=12 February 2008|publisher=Defra}}</ref>
*'''Hunting and pro-hunting organisations'''
** (UK)
** (USA and Canada)
** (UK)
** (UK)
** (UK)
** (US)
** (UK)


Other methods include the use of ], ] and poisoning, all of which also cause considerable distress to the animals concerned, and may affect other species. This was considered in the ] (paras 6.60–11), whose tentative conclusion was that ] using ]s fitted with ]s, if carried out properly and in appropriate circumstances, had fewer adverse welfare implications than hunting.<ref name=burns/> The committee believed that lamping was not possible without vehicular access, and hence said that the welfare of foxes in upland areas could be affected adversely by a ban on hunting with hounds, unless dogs could be used to flush foxes from cover (as is permitted in the ]).
*'''Anti-hunting organisations'''
** (UK)
** (UK)


Some opponents of hunting criticise the fact that the animal suffering in fox hunting takes place for sport, citing either that this makes such suffering unnecessary and therefore cruel, or else that killing or causing suffering for sport is immoral.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.league.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_336.pdf|year=2006|author=Linzey, A.|publisher=Christian Socialist Movement|title=Fox Hunting|access-date=11 February 2008}}{{dead link|date=October 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}</ref> The ], in considering the British Hunting Act, determined that the legislative aim of the Hunting Act was "a composite one of preventing or reducing unnecessary suffering to wild mammals, overlaid by a moral viewpoint that causing suffering to animals for sport is unethical."<ref name=CourtAppeal>{{cite web|url=http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2006/817.html|title=R. (oao The Countryside Alliance; oao Derwin and others) v. Her Majesty's Attorney General and Secretary of State of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs|date=23 June 2006|publisher=EWCA|access-date=11 February 2008}}</ref>
*'''Governmental and other organisations'''

** (UK)
] campaigners also criticised UK hunts of which the ] estimated that foxhound packs put down around 3,000 hounds, and the hare hunts killed around 900 hounds per year, in each case after the hounds' working life had come to an end.<ref name=burns/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence2/hounds.htm|archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130123162956/http:/www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence2/hounds.htm|archive-date=23 January 2013|author=Fanshawe, B.|title=Details of number of hounds involved in hunting, Campaign for Hunting submission to Burns Inquiry|date=17 May 2000|publisher=Defra|access-date=18 February 2008}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence2/amhbmbhanccalc.htm|publisher=Defra|year=2000|access-date=10 April 2008|title=The Hare Hunting Associations, submission to Burns Inquiry|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080824020711/http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence2/amhbmbhanccalc.htm|archive-date=24 August 2008}}</ref>
** (UK Government enquiry)

** (Houses of Parliament Bill Index Database - Links to ]
In June 2016, three people associated with the South Herefordshire Hunt (UK) were arrested on suspicion of causing suffering to animals in response to claims that live fox cubs were used to train hounds to hunt and kill. The organisation Hunt Investigation Team supported by the ], gained video footage of an individual carrying a fox cub into a large kennel where the hounds can clearly be heard baying. A dead fox was later found in a rubbish bin. The individuals arrested were suspended from Hunt membership.<ref name="Huffington2016">{{cite news|work=Huffington Post UK|title=Investigation launched after footage shows 'Fox Cubs Being Put into Hounds' Kennels'|author=Harris, S.|date=23 June 2016|access-date=23 June 2016|url=https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/investigation-launched-after-footage-shows-fox-cubs-being-put-into-hounds-kennels/ar-AAhwEso?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=SL5MDHP|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160812001402/http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/investigation-launched-after-footage-shows-fox-cubs-being-put-into-hounds-kennels/ar-AAhwEso?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=SL5MDHP|archive-date=12 August 2016}}</ref> In August, two more people were arrested in connection with the investigation.<ref>{{cite news|title=Further arrests in South Herefordshire Hunt animal cruelty probe|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-hereford-worcester-37099283|access-date=17 September 2016|publisher=BBC News|date=17 August 2016}}</ref>
**

=== Civil liberties ===
It is argued by some hunt supporters that no law should curtail the right of a person to do as they wish, so long as it does not harm others.<ref name="CA submission"/> ] ] has said, "To criminalise this activity would be to introduce legislation as illiberal as the laws which once deprived Jews and Catholics of political rights, or the laws which outlawed homosexuality".<ref name=scruton>{{cite web|url=http://www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/scruton.htm|archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130123162956/http:/www.defra.gov.uk/rural/hunting/inquiry/evidence/scruton.htm|archive-date=23 January 2013|title=Fox Hunting: The Modern Case. Written submission to the Burns Inquiry|last=Scruton|first=Roger|author-link=Roger Scruton|year=2000|access-date=18 November 2007|publisher=Defra}}</ref> In contrast, liberal philosopher, ] wrote, "The reasons for legal intervention in favour of children apply not less strongly to the case of those unfortunate slaves and victims of the most brutal parts of mankind—the lower animals."<ref>{{cite book|title=The history of economic thought|author1=Medema, S.G. |author2=Samuels, W.J.|publisher=Routledge|year=2003|access-date=18 November 2007|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4PslOtUYstsC&q=%22the+reasons+for+legal+intervention+in+favour+of+children%22&pg=PA360|isbn=978-0-415-20551-1}}</ref> The UK's most senior court, the ], has decided that a ban on hunting, in the form of the ], does not contravene the ],<ref>{{cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd071128/countr-1.htm|title=House of Lords judgement on Hunting Act ECHR challenge|date=28 November 2007|access-date=29 November 2007|publisher=House of Lords|archive-date=7 December 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071207193055/http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd071128/countr-1.htm}}</ref> as did the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://cmiskp.echr.coe.int/tkp197/view.asp?action=html&documentId=859952&portal=hbkm&source=externalbydocnumber&table=F69A27FD8FB86142BF01C1166DEA398649|title=HECtHR judgment in case Friend and Countryside Alliance and Others v. UK|date=24 November 2009|access-date=11 January 2010|publisher=ECtHR}}</ref>

=== Trespass ===
In its submission to the ], the ] presented evidence of over 1,000 cases of ] by hunts. These included trespass on railway lines and into private gardens.<ref name=burns/> Trespass can occur as the hounds cannot recognise human-created boundaries they are not allowed to cross, and may therefore follow their quarry wherever it goes unless successfully called off. However, in the United Kingdom, trespass is a largely civil matter ].

Nonetheless, in the UK, the criminal offence of 'aggravated trespass' was introduced in 1994 specifically to address the problems caused to fox hunts and other field sports by ]s.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Free Beagles |url=http://freebeagles.org/articles/Legal_Booklet_4/lb4-21.html |title=Legal advice for activists |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121029052548/http://freebeagles.org/articles/Legal_Booklet_4/lb4-21.html |archive-date=29 October 2012 }}</ref><ref name=stokes/> Hunt saboteurs trespass on private land to monitor or disrupt the hunt, as this is where the hunting activity takes place.<ref name=stokes/> For this reason, the hunt saboteur ''tactics manual'' presents detailed information on legal issues affecting this activity, especially the Criminal Justice Act.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Hunt Saboteurs Association |title=Legal advice on Public Order and trespass |url=http://hsa.enviroweb.org/tactics/tactbook/legal.html |access-date=3 November 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071124125412/http://hsa.enviroweb.org/tactics/tactbook/legal.html |archive-date=24 November 2007 }}</ref> Some ] also choose to trespass whilst they observe the hunts in progress.<ref name=stokes>{{cite web |author=Stokes, Elizabeth|title=Hunting and Hunt Saboteurs: A Censure Study |website=University of East London |year=1996|url=http://www.uel.ac.uk/lss/staff/elizabethstokes/elizabethstokes/|access-date=20 December 2011|archive-date=13 April 2013|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130413173710/http://www.uel.ac.uk/lss/staff/elizabethstokes/elizabethstokes/}}</ref>

The construction of the law means that hunt saboteurs' behaviour may result in charges of criminal aggravated trespass,<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Crown Prosecution Service|title=Trespass and Nuisance on Land: Legal Guidance|url=http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/trespass_and_nuisance_on_land/#Aggravated_Trespass_Charging|access-date=11 September 2010|archive-date=22 November 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101122114101/http://cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to_u/trespass_and_nuisance_on_land/#Aggravated_Trespass_Charging|url-status=dead}}</ref> rather than the less severe offence of ].<ref>{{cite web|author=Countryside Alliance and the Council of Hunting Associations|title=Hunting without Harassment|year=2006|url=http://heythrophunt.com/picts/huntinghandbook.pdf|access-date=20 December 2011|publisher=Countryside Alliance|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120131104120/http://heythrophunt.com/picts/huntinghandbook.pdf|archive-date=31 January 2012}}</ref> Since the introduction of legislation to restrict hunting with hounds, there has been a level of confusion over the legal status of ] or saboteurs when trespassing, as if they disrupt the hunt whilst it is not committing an illegal act (as all the hunts claim to be hunting within the law) then they commit an offence; however, if the hunt was conducting an illegal act then the criminal offence of trespass may not have been committed.<ref name=stokes/>

=== Social life and class issues in Britain ===
]'s "Mr. Briggs" cartoons illustrated issues over fox hunting during the 1850s.]]
In Britain, and especially in ], supporters of fox hunting regard it as a distinctive part of ] generally, the basis of traditional crafts and a key part of social life in rural areas, an activity and spectacle enjoyed not only by the riders but also by others such as the ''unmounted pack'' which may follow along on foot, bicycle or 4x4 vehicles.<ref name="MFH-social"/> They see the social aspects of hunting as reflecting the demographics of the area; the ] packs, for example, are very different from those in North Wales and Cumbria, where the hunts are very much the activity of farmers and the working class. The Banwen Miners Hunt is such a working class club, founded in a small Welsh mining village, although its membership now is by no means limited to miners, with a more ''cosmopolitan'' make-up.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.banwenminershunt.co.uk/page2.htm|title=Banwen Miners Hunt History|publisher=The Banwen Miners Hunt|access-date=20 December 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120122013357/http://www.banwenminershunt.co.uk/page2.htm|archive-date=22 January 2012}}</ref>

], in his play '']'' (1893), once famously described "the English country gentleman galloping after a fox" as "the unspeakable in full pursuit of the uneatable."<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Bibliomania|title=Oscar Wilde|url=http://www.bibliomania.com/0/2/57/frameset.html|access-date=16 November 2007}}</ref> Even before the time of Wilde, much of the criticism of fox hunting was couched in terms of ]. The argument was that while more "working class" ] such as ] and ] were long ago outlawed,<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Icons- a portrait of England|title=Banned Blood Sports|url=http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/collection/fox-hunting-and-the-ban/features/banned-blood-sports|year=2006|access-date=3 November 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071120043216/http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/collection/fox-hunting-and-the-ban/features/banned-blood-sports|archive-date=20 November 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Jackson |first=Steve |publisher=Badger Pages |title=Badger Baiting |url=http://www.badgers.org.uk/badgerpages/eurasian-badger-11.html |year=2006 |access-date=5 November 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071016051115/http://www.badgers.org.uk/badgerpages/eurasian-badger-11.html |archive-date=16 October 2007 }}</ref> fox hunting persists, although this argument can be countered with the fact that ], a more "working-class" sport, was outlawed at the same time as fox hunting with hounds in England and Wales. The philosopher ] has said that the analogy with cockfighting and badger baiting is unfair, because these sports were more cruel and did not involve any element of pest control.<ref name=scruton/>

A series of "Mr. Briggs" cartoons by ] appeared in the magazine '']'' during the 1850s which illustrated class issues.<ref name=class1>{{cite web|url=http://john-leech-archive.org.uk/keyword/hunting.htm|title=John Leech Hunting archive|publisher=Andrew Cates|access-date=11 February 2008}}</ref> More recently the British anarchist group ] has argued explicitly for disruption of fox hunts on class warfare grounds and even published a book ''The Rich at Play'' examining the subject.<ref name=class2>{{cite web|publisher=London Class War|title=Class War Merchandise|url=http://lemming.mahost.org/classwar/merchandise.htm|access-date=3 November 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080920121124/http://lemming.mahost.org/classwar/merchandise.htm|archive-date=20 September 2008}}</ref> Other groups with similar aims, such as "Revolutions per minute" have also published papers which disparage fox hunting on the basis of the social class of its participants.<ref>{{cite web|publisher=Red Star Research/Revolutions per minute|year=2002|title=The Rich at Play|url=http://www.red-star-research.org.uk/rap/rapframe.html|access-date=14 November 2007 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070915170129/http://www.red-star-research.org.uk/rap/rapframe.html |archive-date = 15 September 2007}}</ref>

Opinion polls in the United Kingdom have shown that the population is equally divided as to whether or not the views of hunt objectors are based primarily on class grounds.<ref name=tele1>{{cite news|newspaper=The Telegraph |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=/archive/1999/07/27/nhunt127.html |title=New poll shows public not prepared to outlaw hunting |last=Clover |first=Charles |date=27 July 1999 |access-date=11 February 2008 |location=London |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071103121423/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/htmlContent.jhtml?html=%2Farchive%2F1999%2F07%2F27%2Fnhunt127.html |archive-date=3 November 2007 }}</ref> Some people have pointed to evidence of class bias in the voting patterns in the ] during the voting on the hunting bill between 2000 and 2001, with traditionally working-class Labour members voting the legislation through against the votes of normally middle- and upper-class Conservative members.<ref name="Orendi">{{cite thesis |last=Orendi |first=Dagmar |title=The Debate About Fox Hunting: A Social and Political Analysis |publisher=] |type=Master's |year=2004 |access-date=13 October 2007 |url=http://www2.hu-berlin.de/gbz/downloads/pdf/DagmarOrendi_MasterThesis.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090318202521/http://www2.hu-berlin.de/gbz/downloads/pdf/DagmarOrendi_MasterThesis.pdf |archive-date=18 March 2009 }}</ref>

==See also==
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]

== References ==
{{Reflist}}

==Further reading==
* Davies, Ross E. (editor). ''Regulation and Imagination: Legal and Literary Perspectives on Fox-hunting'' (Green Bag Press 2021).
* Trench, Charles Chenevix. . ''History Today'' (Aug 1973), Vol. 23 Issue 8, pp 572–580 online.

== External links ==
{{commons category|Foxhunting}}
{{Americana Poster|Fox-hunting}}
;General
;News media
* from ]
* from '']''
;Hunting and pro-hunting organisations
* (UK)
* (USA and Canada)
* (UK)
* (UK)
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050212093342/http://www.vet-wildlifemanagement.org.uk/ |date=12 February 2005 }}
;Anti-hunting organisations
* (UK)
* (UK)
* (UK)
;Government reports
* (UK).


{{Equestrian Sports}}
*'''Directories'''
{{Hunting topics}}
**
**
**
*'''References'''
**JNP Watson, ''The Book of Foxhunting'' (Batsford, 1977) ISBN 0713408073
**, chairman of the official Inquiry, explaining his position against a ban on October 12, 2004
**
**
**
** (information aimed at children)


{{DEFAULTSORT:Fox Hunting}}
]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]


]
]
]
]
] ]
]
]

Latest revision as of 18:12, 8 January 2025

Traditional equestrian hunting activity This article is about the equestrian sport of hunting foxes. For other uses, see Fox hunt (disambiguation). "Hunting with hounds" redirects here. For dog breeds used in hunting, see Scenthound and Sighthound. For the amateur radio activity, see Amateur radio direction finding.

Master of foxhounds leads the field from Powderham Castle in Devon, England.

Fox hunting is an activity involving the tracking, chase and, if caught, the killing of a fox, normally a red fox, by trained foxhounds or other scent hounds. A group of unarmed followers, led by a "master of foxhounds" (or "master of hounds"), follow the hounds on foot or on horseback.

Fox hunting with hounds, as a formalised activity, originated in England in the sixteenth century, in a form very similar to that practised until February 2005, when a law banning the activity in England and Wales came into force. A ban on hunting in Scotland had been passed in 2002, but it continues to be within the law in Northern Ireland and several other jurisdictions, including Australia, Canada, France, Ireland and the United States.

The sport is controversial, particularly in the United Kingdom. Proponents of fox hunting view it as an important part of rural culture and useful for reasons of conservation and pest control, while opponents argue it is cruel and unnecessary.

History

See also: Hunting § History

The use of scenthounds to track prey dates back to Assyrian, Babylonian, and ancient Egyptian times, and was known as venery.

Europe

The Fox Hunt, Alexandre-François Desportes, France, 1720

Many Greek- and Roman-influenced countries have long traditions of hunting with hounds. Hunting with Agassaei hounds was popular in Celtic Britain, even before the Romans arrived, introducing the Castorian and Fulpine hound breeds which they used to hunt. Norman hunting traditions were brought to Britain when William the Conqueror arrived, along with the Gascon and Talbot hounds.

Foxes were referred to as beasts of the chase by medieval times, along with the red deer (hart & hind), martens, and roes, but the earliest known attempt to hunt a fox with hounds was in Norfolk, England, in 1534, where farmers began chasing foxes down with their dogs for the purpose of pest control. The last wolf in England was killed in the late 15th century during the reign of Henry VII, leaving the English fox with no threat from larger predators. The first use of packs specifically trained to hunt foxes was in the late 1600s, with the oldest fox hunt being, probably, the Bilsdale in Yorkshire.

By the end of the seventeenth century, deer hunting was in decline. The Inclosure Acts brought fences to separate formerly open land into many smaller fields, deer forests were being cut down, and arable land was increasing. With the onset of the Industrial Revolution, people began to move out of the country and into towns and cities to find work. Roads, railway lines, and canals all split hunting countries, but at the same time they made hunting accessible to more people. Shotguns were improved during the nineteenth century and the shooting of gamebirds became more popular. Fox hunting developed further in the eighteenth century when Hugo Meynell developed breeds of hound and horse to address the new geography of rural England.

In Germany, hunting with hounds (which tended to be deer or boar hunting) was first banned on the initiative of Hermann Göring on 3 July 1934. In 1939, the ban was extended to cover Austria after Germany's annexation of the country. Bernd Ergert, the director of Germany's hunting museum in Munich, said of the ban, "The aristocrats were understandably furious, but they could do nothing about the ban given the totalitarian nature of the regime."

United States

According to the Masters of Foxhounds Association of America, Englishman Robert Brooke was the first man to import hunting hounds to what is now the United States, bringing his pack of foxhounds to Maryland in 1650, along with his horses. Also around this time, numbers of European red foxes were introduced into the Eastern seaboard of North America for hunting. The first organised hunt for the benefit of a group (rather than a single patron) was started by Thomas, sixth Lord Fairfax in 1747. In the United States, George Washington and Thomas Jefferson both kept packs of foxhounds before and after the American Revolutionary War.

Australia

In Australia, the European red fox was introduced solely for the purpose of fox hunting in 1855. Native animal populations have been very badly affected, with the extinction of at least 10 species attributed to the spread of foxes. Fox hunting with hounds is mainly practised in the east of Australia. In the state of Victoria there are thirteen hunts, with more than 1000 members between them. Fox hunting with hounds results in around 650 foxes being killed annually in Victoria, compared with over 90,000 shot over a similar period in response to a State government bounty. The Adelaide Hunt Club traces its origins to 1840, just a few years after the colonization of South Australia.

Current status

See also: Fox hunting legislation and List of foxhound packs of the United Kingdom

United Kingdom

The Rev. William Heathcote (1772–1802), on horseback (son of the 3rd Baronet); Sir William Heathcote of Hursley, 3rd Baronet (1746–1819), holding his horse and whip; and Major Vincent Hawkins Gilbert, M.F.H., holding a fox's head. The Heathcote's family seat was Hursley House. Daniel Gardner portrayed the three gentlemen on the hunt in 1790.

Fox hunting is prohibited in Great Britain by the Protection of Wild Mammals (Scotland) Act 2002 and the Hunting Act 2004 (England and Wales), passed under the prime ministership of Tony Blair, but remains legal in Northern Ireland. The passing of the Hunting Act was notable in that it was implemented through the use of the Parliament Acts 1911 and 1949, after the House of Lords refused to pass the legislation, despite the Commons passing it by a majority of 356 to 166.

After the ban on fox hunting, hunts in Great Britain switched to legal alternatives, such as drag hunting and trail hunting. The Hunting Act 2004 also permits some previously unusual forms of hunting wild mammals with dogs to continue, such as "hunting... for the purpose of enabling a bird of prey to hunt the wild mammal".

Opponents of hunting, such as the League Against Cruel Sports, claim that some of these alternatives are a smokescreen for illegal hunting or a means of circumventing the ban. Hunting support group Countryside Alliance said in 2006 that there was anecdotal evidence that the number of foxes killed by hunts (unintentionally) and farmers had increased since the Hunting Act came into force, both by the hunts (through lawful methods) and landowners, and that more people were hunting with hounds (although killing foxes had become illegal).

Tony Blair wrote in A Journey, his memoirs published in 2010, that the Hunting Act of 2004 is 'one of the domestic legislative measures I most regret'.

United States

In America, fox hunting is also called "fox chasing", as it is the practice of many hunts not to actually kill the fox (the red fox is not regarded as a significant pest). Some hunts may go without catching a fox for several seasons, despite chasing two or more foxes in a single day's hunting. Foxes are not pursued once they have "gone to ground" (hidden in a hole). American fox hunters undertake stewardship of the land, and endeavour to maintain fox populations and habitats as much as possible. In many areas of the eastern United States the coyote, a natural predator of the red and grey fox, is becoming more prevalent and threatens fox populations in a hunt's given territory. In some areas, coyote are considered fair game when hunting with foxhounds, even if they are not the intended species being hunted.

In 2013, the Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America listed 163 registered packs in the US and Canada. This number does not include non-registered (also known as "farmer" or "outlaw") packs. Baily's Hunting Directory Lists 163 foxhound or draghound packs in the US and 11 in Canada In some arid parts of the Western United States, where foxes in general are more difficult to locate, coyotes are hunted and, in some cases, bobcats.

Other countries

Lithograph. Tourism travel poster issued 1922–1959 (approximate)

The other main countries in which organized fox hunting with hounds is practised are Ireland (which has 41 registered packs), Australia, France (this hunting practice is also used for other animals such as deer, wild boar, fox, hare or rabbit), Canada and Italy. There is one pack of foxhounds in Portugal, and one in India. Although there are 32 packs for the hunting of foxes in France, hunting tends to take place mainly on a small scale and on foot, with mounted hunts tending to hunt red or roe deer, or wild boar.

In Portugal fox hunting is permitted (Decree-Law no. 202/2004) but there have been popular protests and initiatives to abolish it. A petition was handed over to the Assembly of the Republic on 18 May 2017 and the parliamentary hearing held in 2018.

In Canada, the Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America lists seven registered hunt clubs in the province of Ontario, one in Quebec, and one in Nova Scotia. Ontario issues licenses to registered hunt clubs, authorizing its members to pursue, chase or search for fox, although the primary target of the hunts is coyotes.

Quarry animals

Red fox

The red fox is the main quarry of European and American fox hunts.

The red fox (Vulpes vulpes) is the normal prey animal of a fox hunt in the US and Europe. A small omnivorous predator, the fox lives in burrows called earths, and is predominantly active around twilight (making it a crepuscular animal). Adult foxes tend to range around an area of between 5 and 15 square kilometres (2–6 square miles) in good terrain, although in poor terrain, their range can be as much as 20 square kilometres (7.7 sq mi). The red fox can run at up to 48 km/h (30 mph). The fox is also variously known as a Tod (old English word for fox), Reynard (the name of an anthropomorphic character in European literature from the twelfth century), or Charlie (named for the Whig politician Charles James Fox). American red foxes tend to be larger than European forms, but according to foxhunters' accounts, they have less cunning, vigour and endurance in the chase than European foxes.

Coyote, grey fox, and other quarry

Hunting Jackals by Samuel Howitt, illustrating a group of golden jackals rushing to the defence of a fallen pack-mate

Other species than the red fox may be the quarry for hounds in some areas. The choice of quarry depends on the region and numbers available. The coyote (Canis latrans) is a significant quarry for many Hunts in North America, particularly in the west and southwest, where there are large open spaces. The coyote is an indigenous predator that did not range east of the Mississippi River until the latter half of the twentieth century. The coyote is faster than a fox, running at 65 km/h (40 mph) and also wider ranging, with a territory of up to 283 square kilometres (109 sq mi), so a much larger hunt territory is required to chase it. However, coyotes tend to be less challenging intellectually, as they offer a straight line hunt instead of the convoluted fox line. Coyotes can be challenging opponents for the dogs in physical confrontations, despite the size advantage of a large dog. Coyotes have larger canine teeth and are generally more practised in hostile encounters.

The grey fox (Urocyon cinereoargenteus), a distant relative of the European red fox, is also hunted in North America. It is an adept climber of trees, making it harder to hunt with hounds. The scent of the gray fox is not as strong as that of the red, therefore more time is needed for the hounds to take the scent. Unlike the red fox which, during the chase, will run far ahead from the pack, the gray fox will speed toward heavy brush, thus making it more difficult to pursue. Also unlike the red fox, which occurs more prominently in the northern United States, the more southern gray fox is rarely hunted on horseback, due to its densely covered habitat preferences.

Hunts in the southern United States sometimes pursue the bobcat (Lynx rufus). In countries such as India, and in other areas formerly under British influence, such as Iraq, the golden jackal (Canis aureus) is often the quarry. During the British Raj, British sportsmen in India would hunt jackals on horseback with hounds as a substitute for the fox hunting of their native England. Unlike foxes, golden jackals were documented to be ferociously protective of their pack mates, and could seriously injure hounds. Jackals were not hunted often in this manner, as they were slower than foxes and could scarcely outrun greyhounds after 200 yards.

Alternatives to hunting live prey

Following the ban on fox hunting in Great Britain, hunts switched to legal alternatives in order to preserve their traditional practices, although some hunt supporters had previously claimed this would be impossible and that hound packs would have to be destroyed.

Most hunts turned, primarily, to trail hunting, which anti-hunt organisations claim is just a smokescreen for illegal hunting. Some anti-hunting campaigners have urged hunts to switch to the established sport of drag hunting instead, as this involves significantly less risk of wild animals being accidentally caught and killed.

Trail hunting

Main article: Trail hunting

A controversial alternative to hunting animals with hounds. A trail of animal urine (most commonly fox) is laid in advance of the 'hunt', and then tracked by the hound pack and a group of followers; on foot, horseback, or both. Because the trail is laid using animal urine, and in areas where such animals naturally occur, hounds often pick up the scent of live animals; sometimes resulting in them being caught and killed.

Drag hunting

Main article: Drag hunting

An established sport which dates back to the 19th century. Hounds follow an artificial scent, usually aniseed, laid along a set route which is already known to the huntsmen. A drag hunt course is set in a similar manner to a cross country course, following a route over jumps and obstacles. Because it is predetermined, the route can be tailored to keep hounds away from sensitive areas known to be populated by animals which could be confused for prey.

Hound trailing

Main article: Hound trailing

Similar to drag hunting, but in the form of a race; usually of around 10 miles (16 km) in length. Unlike other forms of hunting, the hounds are not followed by humans.

Clean boot hunting

Main article: Hunting the clean boot

Clean boot hunting uses packs of bloodhounds to follow the natural trail of a human's scent.

Animals of the hunt

Hounds and other dogs

An English foxhound

Fox hunting is usually undertaken with a pack of scent hounds, and, in most cases, these are specially bred foxhounds. These dogs are trained to pursue the fox based on its scent. The two main types of foxhound are the English Foxhound and the American Foxhound. It is possible to use a sight hound such as a Greyhound or lurcher to pursue foxes, though this practice is not common in organised hunting, and these dogs are more often used for coursing animals such as hares. There is also one pack of beagles in Virginia that hunt foxes. They are unique in that they are the only hunting beagle pack in the US to be followed on horseback. English Foxhounds are also used for hunting mink.

Hunts may also use terriers to flush or kill foxes that are hiding underground, as they are small enough to pursue the fox through narrow earth passages. This is not practised in the United States, as once the fox has gone to ground and is accounted for by the hounds, it is left alone.

Horses

Main article: Field hunter
A mixed field of horses at a hunt, including children on ponies

The horses, called "field hunters" or hunters, ridden by members of the field, are a prominent feature of many hunts, although others are conducted on foot (and those hunts with a field of mounted riders will also have foot followers). Horses on hunts can range from specially bred and trained field hunters to casual hunt attendees riding a wide variety of horse and pony types. Draft and Thoroughbred crosses are commonly used as hunters, although purebred Thoroughbreds and horses of many different breeds are also used.

Some hunts with unique territories favour certain traits in field hunters; for example, when hunting coyote in the western US, a faster horse with more stamina is required to keep up, as coyotes are faster than foxes and inhabit larger territories. Hunters must be well-mannered, have the athletic ability to clear large obstacles such as wide ditches, tall fences, and rock walls, and have the stamina to keep up with the hounds. In English foxhunting, the horses are often a cross of half or a quarter Irish Draught and the remainder English thoroughbred.

Dependent on terrain, and to accommodate different levels of ability, hunts generally have alternative routes that do not involve jumping. The field may be divided into two groups, with one group, the First Field, that takes a more direct but demanding route that involves jumps over obstacles while another group, the Second Field (also called Hilltoppers or Gaters), takes longer but less challenging routes that utilise gates or other types of access on the flat.

Birds of prey

In Great Britain, since the introduction of the hunting ban, a number of hunts have employed falconers to bring birds of prey to the hunt, due to the exemption in the Hunting Act for falconry. Many experts, such as the Hawk Board, deny that any bird of prey can reasonably be used in the British countryside to kill a fox which has been flushed by (and is being chased by) a pack of hounds.

Procedure

The Bedale Hunt, Yorkshire, drawing a wood in February 2005

Main hunting season

A French staghound pack: moving off

The main hunting season usually begins in early November, in the northern hemisphere, and in May in the southern hemisphere.

A hunt begins when the hounds are put, or cast, into a patch of woods or brush where foxes are known to lay up during daylight hours; known as a covert (pronounced "cover"). If the pack manages to pick up the scent of a fox, they will track it for as long as they are able. Scenting can be affected by temperature, humidity, and other factors. If the hounds lose the scent, a check occurs.

The hounds pursue the trail of the fox and the riders follow, by the most direct route possible. This may involve very athletic skill on the part of horse and rider, and fox hunting has given birth to some traditional equestrian sports including steeplechase and point-to-point racing.

The hunt continues until either the fox goes to ground (evades the hounds and takes refuge in a burrow or den) or is overtaken and usually killed by the hounds.

Social rituals are important to hunts, although many have fallen into disuse. One of the most notable was the act of blooding. In this ceremony, the master or huntsman would smear the blood of the fox onto the cheeks or forehead of a newly initiated hunt-follower, often a young child. Another practice of some hunts was to cut off the fox's tail (brush), the feet (pads) and the head (mask) as trophies, with the carcass then thrown to the hounds. Both of these practices were widely abandoned during the nineteenth century, although isolated cases may still have occurred to the modern day.

Cubbing

In the autumn of each year, hunts accustom the young hounds, which by now are full-size, but not yet sexually mature, to hunt and kill foxes through the practice of cubbing (also called cub hunting, autumn hunting and entering). Cubbing also aims to teach hounds to restrict their hunting to foxes, so that they do not hunt other species such as deer or hares.

The activity sometimes incorporates the practice of holding up; where hunt supporters, riders and foot followers surround a covert and drive back foxes attempting to escape, before then drawing the covert with the young hounds and some more experienced hounds, allowing them to find and kill foxes within the surrounded covert. A young hound is considered to be entered into the pack once they have successfully joined in a hunt of this fashion. Since one of the objectives of fox hunting is to control fox populations, cubbing is a highly effective way of reaching this as more than one fox could be killed in a covert. Cubbing is also an effective way of dispersing fox populations. Young hounds which do not show sufficient aptitude may be killed by their owners or drafted to other packs, including minkhound packs.

The Burns Inquiry, established in 1999, reported that an estimated 10,000 fox cubs were killed annually during the cub-hunting season in Great Britain. Cub hunting is now illegal in Great Britain, although anti-hunt associations maintain that the practice continues.

People

Hunt staff and officials

Caricature of Edgar Lubbock (1847–1907): "The Master of the Blankney".
Published in Vanity Fair (1906)

As a social ritual, participants in a fox hunt fill specific roles, the most prominent of which is the master, who often number more than one and then are called masters or joint masters. These individuals typically take much of the financial responsibility for the overall management of the sporting activities of the hunt, along with the care and breeding of the hunt's foxhounds as well as control and direction of its paid staff.

  • The Master of Foxhounds (who use the post-nominal (and may also be called) MFH) or Joint Master of Foxhounds operates the sporting activities of the hunt, maintains the kennels, works with (and sometimes is) the huntsman, and spends the money raised by the hunt club. (Often the master or joint masters are the largest of financial contributors to the hunt.) The master will have the final say over all matters in the field.
  • Honorary secretaries are volunteers (usually one or two) who look after the administration of the hunt.
  • The Treasurer collects the cap (money) from guest riders and manages the hunt's finances.
  • A kennelman looks after hounds in kennels, assuring that all tasks are completed when pack and staff return from hunting.
  • The huntsman, who may be a professional, is responsible for directing the hounds. The Huntsman usually carries a horn to communicate to the hounds, followers and whippers in. Some huntsmen also fill the role of kennelman (and are therefore known as the kennel huntsman). In some hunts the master is also the huntsman.
  • Whippers-in (or "Whips") are assistants to the huntsman. Their main job is to keep the pack all together, especially to prevent the hounds from straying or 'riotting', which term refers to the hunting of animals other than the hunted fox or trail line. To help them to control the pack, they carry hunting whips (and in the United States they sometimes also carry .22 revolvers loaded with snake shot or blanks.) The role of whipper-in in hunts has inspired parliamentary systems (including the Westminster System and the US Congress) to use whip for a member who enforces party discipline and ensures the attendance of other members at important votes.
  • Terrier man— Carries out fox control. Most hunts where the object is to kill the fox will employ a terrier man, whose job it is to control the terriers which may be used underground to corner or flush the fox. Often voluntary terrier men will follow the hunt as well. In the UK and Ireland, they often ride quadbikes with their terriers in boxes on their bikes.

In addition to members of the hunt staff, a committee may run the Hunt Supporters Club to organise fundraising and social events and in the United States many hunts are incorporated and have parallel lines of leadership.

The United Kingdom, Ireland, and the United States each have a Masters of Foxhounds Association (MFHA) which consists of current and past masters of foxhounds. This is the governing body for all foxhound packs and deals with disputes about boundaries between hunts, as well as regulating the activity.

Attire

Members of the field following a Danish drag hunt

Mounted hunt followers typically wear traditional hunting attire. A prominent feature of hunts operating during the formal hunt season (usually November to March in the northern hemisphere) is hunt members wearing 'colours'. This attire usually consists of the traditional red coats worn by huntsmen, masters, former masters, whippers-in (regardless of sex), other hunt staff members and male members who have been invited by masters to wear colours and hunt buttons as a mark of appreciation for their involvement in the organization and running of the hunt.

Since the Hunting Act in England and Wales, only Masters and Hunt Servants tend to wear red coats or the hunt livery whilst out hunting. Gentleman subscribers tend to wear black coats, with or without hunt buttons. In some countries, women generally wear coloured collars on their black or navy coats. These help them stand out from the rest of the field.

Red fox hunting coat with 4 gold buttons and square skirt, as worn in England by Masters of Foxhounds and hunt staff. Masters who serve as their own huntsman ("hunt their own hounds"), known as "Amateur Masters", and professional huntsmen, wear five buttons with square corners on the skirt. Members of the field who have been "awarded colours" (permitted to wear a red coat and hunt buttons) wear three buttons (and in old tradition with rounded corners on the coat skirt)

The traditional red coats are often misleadingly called "pinks". Various theories about the derivation of this term have been given, ranging from the colour of a weathered scarlet coat to the name of a purportedly famous tailor.

Some hunts, including most harrier and beagle packs, wear green rather than red jackets, and some hunts wear other colours such as mustard. The colour of breeches vary from hunt to hunt and are generally of one colour, though two or three colours throughout the year may be permitted. Riding boots are generally English dress boots (no laces). For the men they are black with brown leather tops (called tan tops), and for the women, black with a patent black leather top of similar proportion to the men. Additionally, the number of buttons is significant. The Master wears a scarlet coat with four brass buttons while the huntsman and other professional staff wear five. Amateur whippers-in also wear four buttons.

Another differentiation in dress between the amateur and professional staff is found in the ribbons at the back of the hunt cap. The professional staff wear their hat ribbons down, while amateur staff and members of the field wear their ribbons up.

Those members not entitled to wear colours, dress in a black hunt coat and unadorned black buttons for both men and women, generally with pale breeches. Boots are all English dress boots and have no other distinctive look. Some hunts also further restrict the wear of formal attire to weekends and holidays and wear ratcatcher (tweed jacket and tan breeches), at all other times.

Other members of the mounted field follow strict rules of clothing etiquette. For example, for some hunts, those under eighteen (or sixteen in some cases) will wear ratcatcher all season. Those over eighteen (or in the case of some hunts, all followers regardless of age) will wear ratcatcher during autumn hunting from late August until the Opening Meet, normally around 1 November. From the Opening Meet they will switch to formal hunting attire where entitled members will wear scarlet and the rest black or navy.

The highest honour is to be awarded the hunt button by the Hunt Master. This sometimes means one can then wear scarlet if male, or the hunt collar if female (colour varies from hunt to hunt) and buttons with the hunt crest on them. For non-mounted packs or non-mounted members where formal hunt uniform is not worn, the buttons are sometimes worn on a waistcoat. All members of the mounted field should carry a hunting whip (it should not be called a crop). These have a horn handle at the top and a long leather lash (2–3 yards) ending in a piece of coloured cord. Generally all hunting whips are brown, except those of Hunt Servants, whose whips are white.

Controversy

The nature of fox hunting, including the killing of the quarry animal, the pursuit's strong associations with tradition and social class, and its practice for sport have made it a source of great controversy within the United Kingdom. In December 1999, the then Home Secretary, Jack Straw MP, announced the establishment of a Government inquiry (the Burns Inquiry) into hunting with dogs, to be chaired by the retired senior civil servant Lord Burns. The inquiry was to examine the practical aspects of different types of hunting with dogs and its impact, how any ban might be implemented and the consequences of any such ban.

Amongst its findings, the Burns Inquiry committee analysed opposition to hunting in the UK and reported that:

There are those who have a moral objection to hunting and who are fundamentally opposed to the idea of people gaining pleasure from what they regard as the causing of unnecessary suffering. There are also those who perceive hunting as representing a divisive social class system. Others, as we note below, resent the hunt trespassing on their land, especially when they have been told they are not welcome. They worry about the welfare of the pets and animals and the difficulty of moving around the roads where they live on hunt days. Finally there are those who are concerned about damage to the countryside and other animals, particularly badgers and otters.

In a later debate in the House of Lords, the inquiry chairman, Lord Burns, also stated that "Naturally, people ask whether we were implying that hunting is cruel... The short answer to that question is no. There was not sufficient verifiable evidence or data safely to reach views about cruelty. It is a complex area."

Anti-hunting activists who choose to take action in opposing fox hunting can do so through lawful means, such as campaigning for fox hunting legislation and monitoring hunts for cruelty. Some use unlawful means. Main anti-hunting campaign organisations include the RSPCA and the League Against Cruel Sports. In 2001, the RSPCA took high court action to prevent pro-hunt activists joining in large numbers to change the society's policy in opposing hunting.

Outside of campaigning, some activists choose to engage in direct intervention such as sabotage of the hunt. Hunt sabotage is unlawful in a majority of the United States, and some tactics used in it (such as trespass and criminal damage) are offences there and in other countries.

Fox hunting with hounds has been happening in Europe since at least the sixteenth century, and strong traditions have built up around the activity, as have related businesses, rural activities, and hierarchies. For this reason, there are large numbers of people who support fox hunting and this can be for a variety of reasons.

Pest control

The fox is referred to as vermin in some countries. Some farmers fear the loss of their smaller livestock, while others consider them an ally in controlling rabbits, voles, and other rodents, which eat crops. A key reason for dislike of the fox by pastoral farmers is their tendency to commit acts of surplus killing toward animals such as chickens, since having killed many they eat only one. Some anti-hunt campaigners maintain that provided it is not disturbed, the fox will remove all of the chickens it kills and conceal them in a safer place.

Opponents of fox hunting claim that the activity is not necessary for fox control, arguing that the fox is not a pest species despite its classification and that hunting does not and cannot make a real difference to fox populations. They compare the number of foxes killed in the hunt to the many more killed on the roads. They also argue that wildlife management goals of the hunt can be met more effectively by other methods such as lamping (dazzling a fox with a bright light, then shooting by a competent shooter using an appropriate weapon and load).

There is scientific evidence that fox hunting has no effect on fox populations, at least in Britain, thereby calling into question the idea it is a successful method of culling. In 2001 there was a 1-year nationwide ban on fox-hunting because of an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease. It was found this ban on hunting had no measurable impact on fox numbers in randomly selected areas. Prior to the fox hunting ban in the UK, hounds contributed to the deaths of 6.3% of the 400,000 foxes killed annually.

The hunts claim to provide and maintain a good habitat for foxes and other game, and, in the US, have fostered conservation legislation and put land into conservation easements. Anti-hunting campaigners cite the widespread existence of artificial earths and the historic practice by hunts of introducing foxes, as indicating that hunts do not believe foxes to be pests.

It is also argued that hunting with dogs has the advantage of weeding out old, sick, and weak animals because the strongest and healthiest foxes are those most likely to escape. Therefore, unlike other methods of controlling the fox population, it is argued that hunting with dogs resembles natural selection. The counter-argument is given that hunting cannot kill old foxes because foxes have a natural death rate of 65% per annum.

In Australia, where foxes have played a major role in the decline in the number of species of wild animals, the Government's Department of the Environment and Heritage concluded that "hunting does not seem to have had a significant or lasting impact on fox numbers." Instead, control of foxes relies heavily on shooting, poisoning and fencing.

Economics

As well as the economic defence of fox hunting that it is necessary to control the population of foxes, lest they cause economic cost to the farmers, it is also argued that fox hunting is a significant economic activity in its own right, providing recreation and jobs for those involved in the hunt and supporting it. The Burns Inquiry identified that between 6,000 and 8,000 full-time jobs depend on hunting in the UK, of which about 700 result from direct hunt employment and 1,500 to 3,000 result from direct employment on hunting-related activities.

Since the ban in the UK, there has been no evidence of significant job losses, and hunts have continued to operate along limited lines, either trail hunting, or claiming to use exemptions in the legislation.

Animal welfare and animal rights

Many animal welfare groups, campaigners and activists believe that fox hunting is unfair and cruel to animals. They argue that the chase itself causes fear and distress and that the fox is not always killed instantly as is claimed. Animal rights campaigners also object to hunting (including fox hunting), on the grounds that animals should enjoy some basic rights (such as the right to freedom from exploitation and the right to life).

In the United States and Canada, pursuing quarry for the purpose of killing is strictly forbidden by the Masters of Foxhounds Association. According to article 2 of the organisation's code:

The sport of fox hunting as it is practised in North America places emphasis on the chase and not the kill. It is inevitable, however, that hounds will at times catch their game. Death is instantaneous. A pack of hounds will account for their quarry by running it to ground, treeing it, or bringing it to bay in some fashion. The Masters of Foxhounds Association has laid down detailed rules to govern the behaviour of Masters of Foxhounds and their packs of hounds.

There are times when a fox that is injured or sick is caught by the pursuing hounds, but hunts say that the occurrence of an actual kill of this is exceptionally rare.

Supporters of hunting maintain that when foxes or other prey (such as coyotes in the western USA) are hunted, the quarry are either killed relatively quickly (instantly or in a matter of seconds) or escapes uninjured. Similarly, they say that the animal rarely endures hours of torment and pursuit by hounds, and research by Oxford University shows that the fox is normally killed after an average of 17 minutes of chase. They further argue that, while hunting with hounds may cause suffering, controlling fox numbers by other means is even more cruel. Depending on the skill of the shooter, the type of firearm used, the availability of good shooting positions and luck, shooting foxes can cause either an instant kill, or lengthy periods of agony for wounded animals which can die of the trauma within hours, or of secondary infection over a period of days or weeks. Research from wildlife hospitals, however, indicates that it is not uncommon for foxes with minor shot wounds to survive.  Hunt supporters further say that it is a matter of humanity to kill foxes rather than allow them to suffer malnourishment and mange.

Other methods include the use of snares, trapping and poisoning, all of which also cause considerable distress to the animals concerned, and may affect other species. This was considered in the Burns Inquiry (paras 6.60–11), whose tentative conclusion was that lamping using rifles fitted with telescopic sights, if carried out properly and in appropriate circumstances, had fewer adverse welfare implications than hunting. The committee believed that lamping was not possible without vehicular access, and hence said that the welfare of foxes in upland areas could be affected adversely by a ban on hunting with hounds, unless dogs could be used to flush foxes from cover (as is permitted in the Hunting Act 2004).

Some opponents of hunting criticise the fact that the animal suffering in fox hunting takes place for sport, citing either that this makes such suffering unnecessary and therefore cruel, or else that killing or causing suffering for sport is immoral. The Court of Appeal, in considering the British Hunting Act, determined that the legislative aim of the Hunting Act was "a composite one of preventing or reducing unnecessary suffering to wild mammals, overlaid by a moral viewpoint that causing suffering to animals for sport is unethical."

Anti-hunting campaigners also criticised UK hunts of which the Burns Inquiry estimated that foxhound packs put down around 3,000 hounds, and the hare hunts killed around 900 hounds per year, in each case after the hounds' working life had come to an end.

In June 2016, three people associated with the South Herefordshire Hunt (UK) were arrested on suspicion of causing suffering to animals in response to claims that live fox cubs were used to train hounds to hunt and kill. The organisation Hunt Investigation Team supported by the League Against Cruel Sports, gained video footage of an individual carrying a fox cub into a large kennel where the hounds can clearly be heard baying. A dead fox was later found in a rubbish bin. The individuals arrested were suspended from Hunt membership. In August, two more people were arrested in connection with the investigation.

Civil liberties

It is argued by some hunt supporters that no law should curtail the right of a person to do as they wish, so long as it does not harm others. Philosopher Roger Scruton has said, "To criminalise this activity would be to introduce legislation as illiberal as the laws which once deprived Jews and Catholics of political rights, or the laws which outlawed homosexuality". In contrast, liberal philosopher, John Stuart Mill wrote, "The reasons for legal intervention in favour of children apply not less strongly to the case of those unfortunate slaves and victims of the most brutal parts of mankind—the lower animals." The UK's most senior court, the House of Lords, has decided that a ban on hunting, in the form of the Hunting Act 2004, does not contravene the European Convention on Human Rights, as did the European Court of Human Rights.

Trespass

In its submission to the Burns Inquiry, the League Against Cruel Sports presented evidence of over 1,000 cases of trespass by hunts. These included trespass on railway lines and into private gardens. Trespass can occur as the hounds cannot recognise human-created boundaries they are not allowed to cross, and may therefore follow their quarry wherever it goes unless successfully called off. However, in the United Kingdom, trespass is a largely civil matter when performed accidentally.

Nonetheless, in the UK, the criminal offence of 'aggravated trespass' was introduced in 1994 specifically to address the problems caused to fox hunts and other field sports by hunt saboteurs. Hunt saboteurs trespass on private land to monitor or disrupt the hunt, as this is where the hunting activity takes place. For this reason, the hunt saboteur tactics manual presents detailed information on legal issues affecting this activity, especially the Criminal Justice Act. Some hunt monitors also choose to trespass whilst they observe the hunts in progress.

The construction of the law means that hunt saboteurs' behaviour may result in charges of criminal aggravated trespass, rather than the less severe offence of civil trespass. Since the introduction of legislation to restrict hunting with hounds, there has been a level of confusion over the legal status of hunt monitors or saboteurs when trespassing, as if they disrupt the hunt whilst it is not committing an illegal act (as all the hunts claim to be hunting within the law) then they commit an offence; however, if the hunt was conducting an illegal act then the criminal offence of trespass may not have been committed.

Social life and class issues in Britain

Punch magazine's "Mr. Briggs" cartoons illustrated issues over fox hunting during the 1850s.

In Britain, and especially in England and Wales, supporters of fox hunting regard it as a distinctive part of British culture generally, the basis of traditional crafts and a key part of social life in rural areas, an activity and spectacle enjoyed not only by the riders but also by others such as the unmounted pack which may follow along on foot, bicycle or 4x4 vehicles. They see the social aspects of hunting as reflecting the demographics of the area; the Home Counties packs, for example, are very different from those in North Wales and Cumbria, where the hunts are very much the activity of farmers and the working class. The Banwen Miners Hunt is such a working class club, founded in a small Welsh mining village, although its membership now is by no means limited to miners, with a more cosmopolitan make-up.

Oscar Wilde, in his play A Woman of No Importance (1893), once famously described "the English country gentleman galloping after a fox" as "the unspeakable in full pursuit of the uneatable." Even before the time of Wilde, much of the criticism of fox hunting was couched in terms of social class. The argument was that while more "working class" blood sports such as cock fighting and badger baiting were long ago outlawed, fox hunting persists, although this argument can be countered with the fact that hare coursing, a more "working-class" sport, was outlawed at the same time as fox hunting with hounds in England and Wales. The philosopher Roger Scruton has said that the analogy with cockfighting and badger baiting is unfair, because these sports were more cruel and did not involve any element of pest control.

A series of "Mr. Briggs" cartoons by John Leech appeared in the magazine Punch during the 1850s which illustrated class issues. More recently the British anarchist group Class War has argued explicitly for disruption of fox hunts on class warfare grounds and even published a book The Rich at Play examining the subject. Other groups with similar aims, such as "Revolutions per minute" have also published papers which disparage fox hunting on the basis of the social class of its participants.

Opinion polls in the United Kingdom have shown that the population is equally divided as to whether or not the views of hunt objectors are based primarily on class grounds. Some people have pointed to evidence of class bias in the voting patterns in the House of Commons during the voting on the hunting bill between 2000 and 2001, with traditionally working-class Labour members voting the legislation through against the votes of normally middle- and upper-class Conservative members.

See also

References

  1. ^ "The Final Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs in England and Wales". Her Majesty's Stationery Office. 9 June 2000. Archived from the original on 10 April 2009. Retrieved 10 February 2008.
  2. "Hunt ban forced through Commons". BBC News. 19 November 2004. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
  3. Griffin, Emma (2007). Blood Sport. Yale University Press.
  4. "Fox hunting worldwide". BBC News. 16 September 1999. Retrieved 5 October 2007.
  5. ^ "Social impact of fox hunting on rural communities". Masters of Fox Hounds Association. 2000. Archived from the original on 21 May 2013. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  6. "Creation and conservation of habitat by foxhunting". Masters of Fox Hounds Association. Archived from the original on 19 February 2012. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  7. "The need for wildlife management". Masters of Fox Hounds Association. Archived from the original on 21 May 2013. Retrieved 7 October 2007.
  8. "The morality of hunting with dogs" (PDF). Campaign to Protect Hunted Animals. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  9. Aslam, Dilpazier (18 February 2005). "Ten things you didn't know about hunting with hounds". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 3 November 2007.
  10. ^ Aslam, D (18 February 2005). "Ten things you didn't know about hunting with hounds". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 3 November 2007.
  11. "Forest and Chases in England and Wales c. 1000 to c. 1850". St John's College, Oxford. Retrieved 16 February 2008.
  12. Jane Ridley, Fox Hunting: a history (HarperCollins, October 1990)
  13. ^ Birley, D. (1993). Sport and the Making of Britain. Manchester University Press. pp. 130–132. ISBN 978-0-7190-3759-7. Retrieved 14 February 2008.
  14. ^ Raymond Carr, English Fox Hunting: A History (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1976)
  15. ^ Harrison, David; Paterson, Tony (22 September 2002). "Thanks to Hitler, hunting with hounds is still verboten". The Daily Telegraph. London. Retrieved 19 May 2010.
  16. ^ "History of American Foxhunting". Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America. 2008. Archived from the original on 3 June 2008. Retrieved 10 February 2008.
  17. Presnall, C.C. (1958). "The Present Status of Exotic Mammals in the United States". The Journal of Wildlife Management. 22 (1): 45–50. doi:10.2307/3797296. JSTOR 3797296.
  18. Churcher, C.S. (1959). "The Specific Status of the New World Red Fox". Journal of Mammalogy. 40 (4): 513–520. doi:10.2307/1376267. JSTOR 1376267.
  19. "Profile – George Washington". Explore DC. 2001. Archived from the original on 5 October 2007. Retrieved 14 November 2007.
  20. "A short history of foxhunting in Virginia". Freedom Fields Farm. Retrieved 14 November 2007.
  21. ^ Eastham, Jaime. "Australia's Noah's Ark springs a leak". Australian Conservation Foundation. Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 10 February 2008.
  22. ^ "It's the thrill not the kill, they say". The Age. Melbourne. 20 March 2005. Retrieved 2 November 2007.
  23. "Bounty fails to win ground war against foxes". The Age. Melbourne. 5 May 2003. Retrieved 2 November 2007.
  24. Hookham, Mark (15 March 2007). "Hain lambasted over website backing hunting". Belfast Telegraph. Archived from the original on 4 April 2007. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
  25. "Northern Ireland bans hare coursing, and fox hunting could be next". 24 June 2010. Retrieved 29 March 2011.
  26. "Protesters storm UK parliament". CNN. 16 September 2004. Archived from the original on 18 November 2004. Retrieved 27 October 2008.
  27. ^ "What is trail hunting?". thehuntingoffice. Archived from the original on 12 July 2022. Retrieved 10 July 2022.
  28. ^ "Trail Laying". huntingact.co.uk. 25 August 2016. Retrieved 10 July 2022.
  29. Stephen Moss, The banned rode on: Eighteen months ago hunting was banned. Or was it? from The Guardian dated 7 November 2006, at guardian.co.uk, accessed 29 April 2013
  30. "What is trail hunting and is it legal?". itv.com. 24 November 2020. Retrieved 10 July 2022.
  31. "'More foxes dead' since hunt ban". BBC News. 17 February 2006. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  32. "Blair regrets hunting ban". Country Life. 1 September 2010. Retrieved 23 August 2019.
  33. ^ Smart, Bruce (2004). "9" (PDF). A community of the horse. Archived from the original (PDF) on 23 August 2006. Retrieved 9 April 2008.
  34. "Geographical listing of hunts". Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America. 2013. Archived from the original on 14 July 2009. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
  35. "Directory of Hunts". Baily's Hunting Directory. Retrieved 5 April 2013.
  36. "Arapahoe Hunt Club History". Arapahoe Hunt Club. 2007. Archived from the original on 8 February 2008. Retrieved 12 February 2008.
  37. "Recognized Hunts". Chronicle of the Horse. Retrieved 12 February 2008.
  38. "Welcome to the IMFHA- representing Irish Fox Hunting". The Irish Masters of Foxhounds Association. Archived from the original on 2 February 2011. Retrieved 27 December 2016.
  39. "Venerie-the Organisation representing hunting with hounds in France". Venerie. 9 June 2000.
  40. "Cidadãos organizam manifestação a pedir fim de caça à raposa, "prática cruel e bárbara"". PÚBLICO. 3 March 2017. Retrieved 23 August 2019.
  41. "Pelo Fim da Caça à Raposa em Portugal". Petição Pública.
  42. "Petição No. 324/XIII/2". Parlamento (in Portuguese).
  43. "Audição Parlamentar No. 59-CAM-XIII". Parlamento (in Portuguese).
  44. "Hunt Map". Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America. 2022. Retrieved 18 November 2022.
  45. "Fish and Wildlife Conservation Act, 1997". Ontario.ca. Retrieved 18 November 2022.
  46. O'Connor, Joe (11 December 2018). "Horses, hounds and coyotes — Meet Canada's only woman employed as a huntsman". Financial Post Magazine. Retrieved 18 November 2022.
  47. "Diet". Derbyshire Fox Rescue. 2006. Archived from the original on 29 August 2007. Retrieved 9 September 2007.
  48. "Peatland Wildlife – The Fox". Northern Ireland Environment and Heritage Service. 2004. Archived from the original on 5 August 2012. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  49. ^ Fox, David. "Vulpes vulpes (red fox)". University of Michigan – Animal Diversity Web. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  50. "Todd". Behind the name. 2007. Retrieved 14 October 2007.
  51. Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Reynard the Fox" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 21 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 226.
  52. "Three centuries of hunting foxes". BBC News. 16 September 1999. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  53. Sketches in Natural History: History of the Mammalia. By Charles Knight Published by C. Cox, 1849
  54. Houben, JM (2004). "Status and management of coyote depredations in the Eastern United States". US Department of Agriculture. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  55. Tokar, Eric. "Canis latrans (coyote)". University of Michigan – Animal Diversity Web. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  56. Coppinger, Ray (2001). Dogs: a Startling New Understanding of Canine Origin, Behavior and Evolution. New York: Scribner. p. 352. ISBN 978-0-684-85530-1.
  57. Jansa, Sharon. "Urocyon cirereoargentus (gray fox)". University of Michigan – Animal Diversity Web. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  58. "Hurworth hound bound for India". Horse and Hound. 24 May 2004. Archived from the original on 4 November 2007. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  59. "Unusual features of RAF Habbaniya (Iraq)". RAF Habbaniya Association. Archived from the original on 2 September 2007. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  60. An Encyclopaedia of Rural Sports: Or a Complete Account, Historical, Practical, and Descriptive, of Hunting, Shooting, Fishing, Racing, and Other Field Sports and Athletic Amusements of the Present Day, Delabere Pritchett Blaine by Delabere Pritchett Blaine, published by Longman, Orme, Brown, Green and Longmans, 1840
  61. A monograph of the canidae by St. George Mivart, F.R.S, published by Alere Flammam. 1890
  62. The Sports Library, Riding, Driving and Kindred Sports by T. F. Dale, published by T.F. Unwin, 1899
  63. Kallenbach, M (19 March 2002). "Peer warns of a war with countryside". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 5 April 2002. Retrieved 10 April 2008.
  64. "What is trail hunting and is it legal?". www.itv.com. 24 November 2020. Retrieved 10 July 2022.
  65. Salt, H. (1915). "Drag Hunting Verses Stag Hunting". Killing for Sport. Archived from the original on 5 March 2008. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  66. ^ Countryside Alliance (2000). "Submission to the Burns Inquiry". Defra. Archived from the original on 23 January 2013. Retrieved 14 November 2007.
  67. "Drag Hunting". New Forest Drag Hunt. Archived from the original on 9 April 2003. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  68. "Call to ban controversial trail hunting on North Northamptonshire Council land". northantstelegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 10 July 2022.
  69. "The impact of hunting with dogs on wildlife and conservation" (PDF). www.league.org.uk. Retrieved 10 July 2022.
  70. ^ Nicholas Goddard and John Martin, "Drag hunting", Encyclopedia of traditional British rural sports, Tony Collins, John Martin and Wray Vamplew (eds), Routledge, Abingdon, 2005, ISBN 0-415-35224-X, p104.
  71. "What is drag hunting?". North East Cheshire Drag Hunt. 2008. Archived from the original on 10 January 2008. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  72. "English Foxhound History". American Kennel Club. Retrieved 15 October 2007.
  73. "English Foxhound Breed Standard". American Kennel Club. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 15 October 2007.
  74. "American Foxhound Breed Standard". American Kennel Club. Archived from the original on 12 October 2007. Retrieved 15 October 2007.
  75. "Greyhound History". American Kennel Club. Retrieved 15 October 2007.
  76. "End of the road for illegal hare coursing". BBC Inside Out. 24 January 2005. Retrieved 15 October 2007.
  77. "Hunt Etiquette" (PDF). Waitemata Hunt. October 2008. Retrieved 29 December 2010.
  78. ^ "Information and Guidelines for Foxhunters in the Field". Independence Foxhounds. 2007. Archived from the original on 8 March 2008. Retrieved 18 January 2008.
  79. "Hunting Hounds and Polo Ponies". JoCo History. 1998. Archived from the original on 25 October 2007. Retrieved 18 January 2008.
  80. Moss, Stephen (7 November 2006). "The banned rode on". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 5 October 2007.
  81. McLeod, I. (2005). "Birds of prey and the Hunting Act 2004". Justice of the Peace. 169: 774–775.
  82. Robards, Hugh J. (16 April 2011). Foxhunting: How to Watch and Listen. Foxhunters' Library. Lanham, Maryland: Derrydale Press. pp. 21, 137. ISBN 978-1-58667-121-1. Retrieved 31 July 2023. On approaching the road, the hounds check (lose the scent), then cast (deploy) themselves over. check when hounds lose the line of the fox
  83. "Steeplechase". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 2008. Retrieved 10 February 2008.
  84. "A History of Point to Point". Irish Point to Point. 2003. Archived from the original on 18 November 2011. Retrieved 6 November 2011.
  85. ^ "Customs of Hunting". Icons – A portrait of Britain. 2006. Archived from the original on 20 November 2007. Retrieved 13 November 2007.
  86. Misstear, R. (26 March 2013). "Incidents of illegal fox cubbing reported to RSPCA officers". Walesonline. Retrieved 23 June 2016.
  87. Thomas, L.H.; Allen, W.R. (2000). "A veterinary opinion on hunting with hounds, Submission to the Burns Inquiry". Veterinary Association for Wildlife Management. Retrieved 20 November 2007.
  88. Fanshawe (2003). "Future of hound breeds under threat from hunting bill". Masters of Fox Hounds Association. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  89. "What Is Cubbing?". The Canary. 19 August 2018. Retrieved 8 June 2022.
  90. Misstear, Rachael (26 March 2013). "Incidents". WalesOnline. Retrieved 7 January 2023. RSPCA inspector Keith Hogben said 'The practice is entirely illegal under the Hunting Act 2004.'
  91. "What is cubbing?". Keep The Ban. 2022. Archived from the original on 19 August 2022. Retrieved 19 August 2022.
  92. Rusk, Eliza (2016). This country life:old houses. p. 45.
  93. Jahiel, Jessica (2000). The complete idiot's guide to Horseback Riding. p. 178.
  94. Who's Who. 1983. p. 35.
  95. ^ "Organization in the field". Miami Valley Hunt. Archived from the original on 31 July 2008. Retrieved 13 August 2008.
  96. "Code of conduct". Irish Masters of Foxhounds Association. Archived from the original on 21 September 2008. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  97. "About Parliament – Whips". UK Parliament. Archived from the original on 5 October 2008. Retrieved 17 October 2008.
  98. "Hunt terriermen". Campaign for the Abolition of Terrier Work. Archived from the original on 12 May 2008. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  99. "Horse Country Life – Questions about Foxhunting Attire, Books, Etiquette, Antiques". horsecountrylife.com.
  100. Reeds, Jim (7 December 2003). "The Legend of Tailor Pink". horse-country.com. Archived from the original on 10 October 2007. Retrieved 13 October 2007.
  101. "Hunting Fashion". Icons – A portrait of Britain. July 2006. Archived from the original on 18 November 2007. Retrieved 14 November 2007.
  102. ^ "Dress Code". Beech Grove Hunt. Archived from the original on 4 November 2007. Retrieved 14 November 2007.
  103. "Dress Code". RMA Sandhurst Draghunt. 2008. Archived from the original on 14 March 2008. Retrieved 22 December 2007.
  104. Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs (1999). "Background to the Inquiry". Archived from the original on 7 April 2009. Retrieved 12 February 2008.
  105. "Final Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Hunting with Dogs in England and Wales, para 4.12". Defra. 9 June 2000. Archived from the original on 10 April 2009. Retrieved 9 February 2008.
  106. Burns, T. (12 March 2001). "Lords Hansard". House of Lords. Retrieved 29 February 2008.
  107. "Hunt Crimewatch". League Against Cruel Sports. Archived from the original on 5 February 2008. Retrieved 12 February 2008.
  108. "RSPCA wins right to block hunt lobby". The Telegraph. London. 19 June 2001. Retrieved 27 October 2008.
  109. "HSA hunt tactics book". Hunt Saboteurs Association. Archived from the original on 4 March 2008. Retrieved 12 February 2008.
  110. "Hunter Harassment Laws". American Hunt Saboteurs Association. Archived from the original on 15 March 2008. Retrieved 12 February 2008.
  111. Ryder, R. (2000). "Submission to the Burns Inquiry". Defra. Archived from the original on 23 January 2013. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  112. Kruuk, H (1972). "Surplus killing by carnivores". Journal of Zoology, London. 166 (2): 435–50. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1972.tb04087.x.
  113. Baldwin, Marc (29 April 2007). "Red Fox Vulpes vulpes:Food & Feeding". Wildlife Online. Retrieved 22 February 2008.
  114. "Red fox (Vulpes vulpes) General description". National Fox Welfare Society. Archived from the original on 8 June 2008. Retrieved 13 April 2008.
  115. "New research explodes myth that hunting with gun-packs controlled foxes in Wales". International Fund for Animal Welfare. 2006. Archived from the original on 20 June 2008. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  116. Deadline 2000 (2000). "Submission to Burns Inquiry". Defra. Archived from the original on 23 January 2013. Retrieved 12 February 2008.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  117. Baker, P.J.; Harris, S.; Webbon, C.C. (2002). "Ecology: Effect of British hunting ban on fox numbers". Nature. 419 (6902): 34. Bibcode:2002Natur.419...34B. doi:10.1038/419034a. PMID 12214224. S2CID 4392265.
  118. Leader-Williams, N.; Oldfield, T.E.; Smith, R.J.; Walpole, M.J. (2002). "Science, conservation and fox-hunting". Nature. 419 (6910): 878. Bibcode:2002Natur.419..878L. doi:10.1038/419878a. PMID 12410283.
  119. ^ League Against Cruel Sports (2000). "Submission to Burns Inquiry". Defra. Archived from the original on 23 January 2013. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  120. "European Red Fox Fact Sheet". Environment Department, Australian Government. 2004. Retrieved 19 April 2010.
  121. Simon Hart (26 December 2007). "Hounding out a law that's failed in every way". The Yorkshire Post. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  122. ^ "Is fox hunting cruel?". BBC News. 16 September 1999. Retrieved 3 November 2007.
  123. "The universal declaration of animal rights". Uncaged. 2006. Archived from the original on 2 November 2007. Retrieved 3 November 2007.
  124. "General FAQs". People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA). Retrieved 3 November 2007.
  125. "MFHA Code of Hunting Practices". Masters of Foxhounds Association of North America. 2000. Archived from the original on 15 March 2008. Retrieved 12 February 2008.
  126. Baker, P.; Harris, S.; White, P. "After the hunt, the future of foxes in Britain" (PDF). International Fund for Animal Welfare. Archived from the original (PDF) on 27 November 2007. Retrieved 25 November 2007.
  127. Four Burrows Hunt (2000). "Submission to Burns Inquiry". Defra. Archived from the original on 23 January 2013. Retrieved 12 February 2008.
  128. Linzey, A. (2006). "Fox Hunting" (PDF). Christian Socialist Movement. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  129. "R. (oao The Countryside Alliance; oao Derwin and others) v. Her Majesty's Attorney General and Secretary of State of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs". EWCA. 23 June 2006. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  130. Fanshawe, B. (17 May 2000). "Details of number of hounds involved in hunting, Campaign for Hunting submission to Burns Inquiry". Defra. Archived from the original on 23 January 2013. Retrieved 18 February 2008.
  131. "The Hare Hunting Associations, submission to Burns Inquiry". Defra. 2000. Archived from the original on 24 August 2008. Retrieved 10 April 2008.
  132. Harris, S. (23 June 2016). "Investigation launched after footage shows 'Fox Cubs Being Put into Hounds' Kennels'". Huffington Post UK. Archived from the original on 12 August 2016. Retrieved 23 June 2016.
  133. "Further arrests in South Herefordshire Hunt animal cruelty probe". BBC News. 17 August 2016. Retrieved 17 September 2016.
  134. ^ Scruton, Roger (2000). "Fox Hunting: The Modern Case. Written submission to the Burns Inquiry". Defra. Archived from the original on 23 January 2013. Retrieved 18 November 2007.
  135. Medema, S.G.; Samuels, W.J. (2003). The history of economic thought. Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-20551-1. Retrieved 18 November 2007.
  136. "House of Lords judgement on Hunting Act ECHR challenge". House of Lords. 28 November 2007. Archived from the original on 7 December 2007. Retrieved 29 November 2007.
  137. "HECtHR judgment in case Friend and Countryside Alliance and Others v. UK". ECtHR. 24 November 2009. Retrieved 11 January 2010.
  138. "Legal advice for activists". Free Beagles. Archived from the original on 29 October 2012.
  139. ^ Stokes, Elizabeth (1996). "Hunting and Hunt Saboteurs: A Censure Study". University of East London. Archived from the original on 13 April 2013. Retrieved 20 December 2011.
  140. "Legal advice on Public Order and trespass". Hunt Saboteurs Association. Archived from the original on 24 November 2007. Retrieved 3 November 2007.
  141. "Trespass and Nuisance on Land: Legal Guidance". Crown Prosecution Service. Archived from the original on 22 November 2010. Retrieved 11 September 2010.
  142. Countryside Alliance and the Council of Hunting Associations (2006). "Hunting without Harassment" (PDF). Countryside Alliance. Archived from the original (PDF) on 31 January 2012. Retrieved 20 December 2011.
  143. "Banwen Miners Hunt History". The Banwen Miners Hunt. Archived from the original on 22 January 2012. Retrieved 20 December 2011.
  144. "Oscar Wilde". Bibliomania. Retrieved 16 November 2007.
  145. "Banned Blood Sports". Icons- a portrait of England. 2006. Archived from the original on 20 November 2007. Retrieved 3 November 2007.
  146. Jackson, Steve (2006). "Badger Baiting". Badger Pages. Archived from the original on 16 October 2007. Retrieved 5 November 2007.
  147. "John Leech Hunting archive". Andrew Cates. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  148. "Class War Merchandise". London Class War. Archived from the original on 20 September 2008. Retrieved 3 November 2007.
  149. "The Rich at Play". Red Star Research/Revolutions per minute. 2002. Archived from the original on 15 September 2007. Retrieved 14 November 2007.
  150. Clover, Charles (27 July 1999). "New poll shows public not prepared to outlaw hunting". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 3 November 2007. Retrieved 11 February 2008.
  151. Orendi, Dagmar (2004). The Debate About Fox Hunting: A Social and Political Analysis (PDF) (Master's). Humboldt Universität zu Berlin. Archived from the original (PDF) on 18 March 2009. Retrieved 13 October 2007.

Further reading

  • Davies, Ross E. (editor). Regulation and Imagination: Legal and Literary Perspectives on Fox-hunting (Green Bag Press 2021).
  • Trench, Charles Chenevix. "Nineteenth-Century Hunting". History Today (Aug 1973), Vol. 23 Issue 8, pp 572–580 online.

External links

General
News media
Hunting and pro-hunting organisations
Anti-hunting organisations
Government reports
Equestrian sports
FEI disciplines, Olympic
FEI disciplines, non-Olympic
Horse racing
Team sports
Games with horses
Driving sports
Working stock sports
Weaponry
Horse show and
exhibition disciplines
Regional and
breed-specific disciplines
Field sports
Related
Hunting topics
History
Forms
Equipment
Game
Infrastructure
By location
Regulation and conservation
Culture
Organizations
Other
Categories: