Revision as of 23:24, 10 August 2013 editLevelledout (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,042 edits Deleted a replicated paragraph, added a {{cn}Tag: Mobile edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 18:35, 28 December 2024 edit undoTassedethe (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators1,372,254 editsm v2.05 - fix links - Peter Marshall (author)Tag: WPCleaner | ||
(196 intermediate revisions by 75 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|none}} <!-- "none" is preferred when the title is sufficiently descriptive; see ] --> | |||
{{Refimprove|date=August 2012}} | |||
{{For|the Sex Pistols single|Anarchy in the U.K.}} | |||
{{Anarchism sidebar |By region}} | |||
] | |||
{{Anarchism sidebar |by region}} | |||
'''Anarchism in the United Kingdom''' initially developed within the ] that began after the ]. Anarchism was first seen among the radical republican elements of the ] and following the ] grew within the fringes of ]. The Whig politician ] was the first to expound ], which developed as a tendency that influenced the ] of ], who became the first modern proponent of anarchism with the release of his 1793 book '']''. | |||
The development of ] from ] started in the 1860s with the establishment of the ] (IWA), and saw the foundation of a number of workers' societies demanding radical reform and civil liberties. By the 1870s, anarchism had been introduced to the country from Europe and America and the establishment of the ] (LEL) in 1881 marked the beginning of the organized anarchist movement in the United Kingdom. The LEL was instrumental in the foundation of the ], which in 1888 came under the control of the anarchist ]. | |||
'''] in the ]''' initially developed within the context of radical ] and ] religious dissent. During the ] and the ] English anarchist thought developed in the context of revolutionary ] politics. | |||
The Socialist League's newspaper '']'' and ]'s newspaper '']'' saw anarchism through the turn of the 20th century. ] became a major tendency during the ], when the Glasgow anarchist ] established the ] and later the ]. The rise of ] after the ] eventually resulted in the foundation of the ] in 1950, followed by resurgence of anarcho-communism during the 1980s, when the ] and ] were founded. | |||
==Early development== | |||
{{Refimprove section|date=August 2012}} | |||
Like much of the rest of ], ] England was ruled by a limited ] in coalition with a parliament of wealthy aristocrats and landowners. Unlike ], the parliament of the rich maintained its rights and privileges. When the English monarchy sought to establish ], the English parliament rebelled. During this ], dissenting Protestants and rural workers began forming utopian communities, such as the ], based on common ownership of the tools of production. These revolts can be distinguished from medieval revolts like ]'s on the basis that they occurred inside a commodified production system. (See Christopher Hill, ''Century of Revolution''). As a result of this Civil War, the English aristocratic and capitalist ruling classes united behind Parliament. The Civil War, however, established many civil liberties. | |||
==History== | |||
], who published a pamphlet calling for communal ownership and social and economic organization in small agrarian communities in the 17th century, is considered another of the forerunners of modern anarchism. The first modern author to have published a treatise explicitly advocating the absence of government was ] in '']'' (1793); though he did not use the word ''anarchism'', some today regard him as the "founder of philosophical anarchism".<ref>{{sep entry|godwin|William Godwin}}</ref> | |||
The historian ] traced the roots of British anarchism back to the ] of 1381, during which ]s rose up against the ]'s ], fearing it to be an attempt by the ] to force the yeomanry into ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=89}} The peasants were further agitated by the preaching of the radical priest ], who conceived of the ] as a ] where ] did not yet exist, attacked the institutions of ] and ], and called for everything to be brought under ] and the creation of a ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=89-90}} With ] elected as their ], 100,000 peasant rebels marched from ] to ], where they were joined by the local population. Although ] had promised them that he would free the ]s, the rebels demolished the ], released all the local prisoners and executed ], the ]. Now that the rebels had captured the capital, they issued their demands, which included the introduction of ], the cessation of ] and the establishment of a ]. The King agreed to most of their demands in his meetings with the rebel leaders, during which Tyler called for the total abolition of serfdom and the expansion of ] and ], while his more radical lieutenant ] allegedly declared that the noble and clerical classes would need to be ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=90}} However, the rebel's demands would never be met as ], the ], assassinated Tyler and Straw. The King then revoked his promises and the revolt was definitively crushed.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=90-91}} But John Ball's radical egalitarian philosophy lived on through the centuries, most notably being re-invoked in 1888 by ], in his novel '']''.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=91}} | |||
===The English Revolution=== | |||
] were often labeled "anarchists" by ], even though they did not call for the abolition of hierarchy.{{Citation needed|reason=called anarchists yet they pre-dated anarchism, so confirmation needed|date=August 2013}} Still, they did promote the idea of human equality, ], and the responsibility of the people to judge their governments, which provided a groundwork for the development of anarchist thought. | |||
Throughout the ], the institution of ] had constructed a rigidly ], where the interests of the individual were subordinated to the ]. But following the ] and ], the individual first began to be considered as an autonomous entity with ]. It was during the ] that individual rights took their place alongside the old demands for ] and ], leading to the development of recognizable ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=96}} By the 16th century, the word "]" was primarily associated with ] and ], while the label of "]" was pejoratively applied to anyone that upset the established order or refused to recognize the ruling power.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=487}} | |||
] | |||
]]]In the ], the first to use the term "]" to mean something other than chaos was ], in his ''Nouveaux voyages dans l'Amérique septentrionale,'' (''New voyages in northern America'') (1703) where he described the ] society, which had no state, laws, prisons, priests or private property, as being in anarchy.<ref></ref> | |||
In the lead up to the ], radical republican and democratic ideas were first starting to circulate, advocating the abolition of existing institutions such as the ], ] and ]. In December 1640, 15,000 Londoners presented Parliament with the "]", advocating for the abolition of the ], a proposition which was denounced as "absolute Anarchism" by the royalist MP ].<ref>{{cite book|url=https://archive.org/details/priesthoodofoldn00cald/page/118/mode/2up|title=The Priesthood of the Old and New Testament by Succession|first=Robert|last=Calder|authorlink=Robert Calder (priest)|year=1720|publisher=J. Wilson|location=]|oclc=1050718495|page=118|isbn=1171119941}}</ref> When the Bill itself failed to pass, ] riots erupted in ],<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Smith |first1=Steven |title=Almost Revolutionaries: The London Apprentices during the Civil Wars |journal=Huntington Library Quarterly |date=1979 |volume=42 |issue=4 |pages=315–317 |doi=10.2307/3817210 |jstor=3817210}}</ref> eventually forcing ] to flee the capital, along with royalist MPs and bishops, which allowed parliament the means to pass anti-clerical bills into law.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Manganiello |first1=Stephen |title=The Concise Encyclopedia of the Revolutions and Wars of England, Scotland, and Ireland, 1639-1660 |date=2004 |publisher=Scarecrow Press |isbn=978-0810851009 |page=60}}</ref> | |||
=== William Godwin === | |||
{{Main|William Godwin|Political Justice}} | |||
Modern anarchism sprang from the secular or religious thought of the ], particularly ]'s arguments for the moral centrality of freedom.<ref name="Encarta"/> From this climate ] developed what many consider the first expression of ].<ref name="godwinsep" /> Godwin was, according to ], "the first to formulate the political and economical conceptions of anarchism, even though he did not give that name to the ideas developed in his work". In 1793, ], who has often<ref>Everhart, Robert B. The Public School Monopoly: A Critical Analysis of Education and the State in American Society. Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research, 1982. p. 115.</ref> been cited as the first anarchist, wrote '']'', which some consider to be the first expression of anarchism.<ref name="godwinsep" /><ref>Adams, Ian. Political Ideology Today. Manchester University Press, 2001. p. 116.</ref> Godwin, a philosophical anarchist, from a ] and ] basis opposed revolutionary action and saw a ] as a present "necessary evil" that would become increasingly irrelevant and powerless by the gradual spread of knowledge.<ref name="godwinsep">{{sep entry|godwin|William Godwin|Mark Philip|2006-05-20}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book|title=] |last=Godwin |first=William |authorlink=William Godwin |year=1796 |publisher=G.G. and J. Robinson |oclc=2340417 |origyear=1793}}</ref> | |||
The tensions exacerbated by this situation eventually erupted into the ], in which ] and ] were victorious over the ] forces. Following the conflict, a radical group known as the ] released a ] regarding the creation of a new constitution, which became subject to ] among the parliamentary forces, as the Levellers advocated for a number of issues including ], ] and ].{{Sfn|Foxley|2013|page=207}} The ] theses of the Levellers was rejected by ], who accused them of advocating the ] practices of the ] and declared that such policies would inevitably lead to "anarchy".{{Sfn|Bookchin|1996|page=115}} But the Levellers denied the charge, as they still believed in a form of "]".{{Sfn|Foxley|2013|pages=25-26}} | |||
==Nineteenth century to World War II== | |||
{{Unreferenced section|date=August 2012}} | |||
In the late nineteenth century, opposition to the existing order of society and a feeling that one could do without it, was not uncommon. It varied from the gradualist support for the ] of ] to the revolutionary republicanism of ], to the anarcho-socialism of ] and ] to the full-blown anarchism of ] and his sympathisers. ] provided intellectual stimulus during this period, with key works such as ''Anarchy & Order; Poetry & Anarchism'' (1938), ''Philosophy of Anarchism'' (1940), "Existentialism, Marxism and Anarchism" (1949), ''Revolution & Reason'' (1953), "Icon and Idea" (1955) and ''My Anarchism'' (1966), the latter shortly before his death. | |||
]]] | |||
] (1895–1978) was a ]-born ] and anti-] activist. She is chiefly known today through the work of the ] named in her honour. She married in 1922 and dropped out of anarchist activities until a chance encounter with ] at a train station during an anti-fascist action. After her death, when Brixton anarchists came to name the archives they had collected from the movement, her name was chosen in preference to a more famous one. The ] maintains an archive of original anarchist documents and publishes books and pamphlets based on those materials. | |||
Following the Parliamentarian victory in the ], the ] from the ] and the ], power lay entirely in the hands of the ]s of the ]. Unwilling to implement the radical policies advanced by the Levellers, the Grandees instead turned towards ] and the implementation of a ] religious order. But this new environment of Christian mysticism branched out into a variety of ] strains, with a number of ] separating entirely from the ]. These religious dissenters included the ], ], ], ] and ].{{Sfn|Bookchin|1996|pages=129–130}} Notably, the Ranters and Diggers have been labelled as "anarchists" by historians, due to their radical egalitarian philosophies and ].{{Sfnm|1a1=Bookchin|1y=1996|1pp=131–135|2a1=Marshall|2y=2008|2pp=96–107}} The Diggers believed in creating an egalitarian society of small agrarian communities and put this into practice by occupying a number of tracts of common land for the purposes of farming it, but these settlements were eventually suppressed by the authorities of the ].{{Sfn|Bookchin|1996|pages=133–135}} | |||
==Post-war era== | |||
] (6 October 1900<ref>{{cite web|title=Ethel Mannin - Gilbert Turner Papers, 1922-1981|url=http://irishliterature.library.emory.edu/content.php?id=mannin-turner_101612|publisher=Emory University, Manuscript, Archives, and Rare Book Library|accessdate=19 October 2012}}</ref> – 5 December 1984) was a popular British novelist, travel writer and anarchist. Mannin listed ] and ] as thinkers who influenced her ideas.<ref name="tca"> | |||
''Twentieth century authors, a biographical dictionary of modern literature'', edited by Stanley J. Kunitz and Howard Haycraft; (Third Edition). New York, The H.W. Wilson Company, 1950 (p.905-6)</ref> Mannin's 1944 book ''Bread and Roses: A Utopian Survey and Blue-Print'' has been described by historian ] as setting forth "an ] vision in opposition to the prevailing and destructive ] organization of society".<ref>Robert Graham, ''Anarchism Volume Two: The Anarchist Current (1939-2006)''. Black Rose Books, 2009 ISBN 1551643103, (p.72-5).</ref> When ] and three other editors were arrested at the beginning of 1945 for attempting "to undermine the affections of members of His Majesty's Forces.",<ref name="freedom">''George Orwell at Home'' pp 71-72 Freedom Press (1998)</ref> ], ], ], ], ] (chairman), ] and ]<ref name="Orwell Today">http://www.orwelltoday.com/readerorwellanarchy.shtml</ref> set up the ] to "uphold the essential liberty of individuals and organizations, and to defend those who are persecuted for exercising their rights to freedom of speech, writing and action."<ref name="In Front of Your Nose">Orwell, Sonia and Angus, Ian (eds.). ''The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell Volume 4: In Front of Your Nose (1945-1950)'' (Penguin)</ref> | |||
] in his workroom, October 2003]] | |||
The ] was a syndicalist group in active in post-war Britain,<ref name="Political Encyclopedia">{{cite book|title=Encyclopedia of British and Irish Political Organizations'|year=2000|publisher=Pinter Publishers|location=United Kingdom|isbn=978-1855672642|url=http://www.amazon.com/Encyclopedia-British-Irish-Political-Organizations/dp/1855672642}}</ref> and one of the ]'s earliest predecessors. It was formed in 1950 by members of the dissolved Anarchist Federation of Britain (not to be confused with the current ] which was founded as the Anarchist Communist Federation in 1986). Unlike the AFB, which was influenced by anarcho-syndicalist ideas but ultimately not syndicalist itself, the SWF decided to pursue a more definitely ], worker-centred strategy from the outset. The group joined the ] and during the ] gave particular support to the Spanish resistance and the underground ] anarcho-syndicalist union, previously involved in the 1936 ] and subsequent ] against a right-wing military coup backed by both ] and ]. The SWF initially had some success, but when Tom Brown, a long-term and very active member was forced out of activity, it declined until by 1979 it had only one lone branch in ]. The SWF then dissolved itself into the group founded as the Direct Action Movement. Its by the ], and a . | |||
By 1653, ] had been forcibly dissolved by the New Model Army and the republican Commonwealth was replaced by a ] known as ], with Oliver Cromwell acting as ]. After Cromwell's death, Parliament was reconvened and held a ], which instituted the ] of the monarchy. Within decades the ]-ruled kingdoms of ] and ] were ] into the ] and the ] was formally established. The eventual spread of the ] to Britain and the outbreak of the ] brought about a number of changes to the country, which allowed for the early conception of a formalized ]. | |||
] was editor of the ] ] newspaper ''Freedom'' from 1947 to 1960, and the founder and editor of the monthly ] journal '']'' from 1961 to 1970.<ref></ref> Over the years the Freedom editorial group has included Jack Robinson, Pete Turner, ], ], ], ], Nino Staffa, Dave Mansell, Gillian Fleming, Mary Canipa, ], ] and many others. ] maintained a loose association for 30 years. ] was a contributor in the 1950s to the long-running anarchist paper '']'' before leaving in 1965 to start his own venture Wooden Shoe Press. Soon Meltzer was to be involved in a long and bitter dispute with fellow anarchist and former comrade at Freedom Press ] which entangled many of their associates and the organisations with which they were involved and continued after both their deaths. Although the feud started in a dispute arising from the possibility of Wooden Shoe moving into Freedom premisses, there were also political differences. Meltzer advocated a more firebrand and proletarian variety of anarchism than Richards and often denounced him and the Freedom collective as "liberals". Meltzer was a co-founder of the anarchist newspaper '']'' and was a prolific writer on anarchist topics. Amongst his books were ''Anarchism, Arguments For and Against'' (originally published by ]) , ''The Floodgates of Anarchy'' (co-written with ]) and his ], ''I Couldn't Paint Golden Angels'', published by ] shortly before his death. Meltzer also was involved in the founding of the ]. He joined the ] ] in the early 80s and was a member of it, and its successor organisation the ] until his death. | |||
], English ]]] | |||
===The British Enlightenment=== | |||
A leading ], ] considered himself "an aggressive anti-militarist", and he believed that pacifism rested "solely upon the historical theory of anarchism".<ref name="Obituaries">{{cite news | last = Rayner | first = Claire | title = News: Obituaries: Alex Comfort | publisher = ] | date = 28 March 2000 | url = http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2000/mar/28/guardianobituaries | accessdate = 2008-08-23| archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20080918054049/http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2000/mar/28/guardianobituaries| archivedate= 18 September 2008 <!--DASHBot-->| deadurl= no}}</ref><ref>For discussions of Comfort's political views, see ''Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism'' (1992) by ], and ''Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow'' (2006) by ].</ref> He was an active member of the ] (PPU) and ], and a ] in ]. In 1951 Comfort was a signatory of the | |||
In 1688, the ] definitively established a ] with ] in Britain. The Revolution was most notably defended by ], whose justifications for democratic governance laid the foundations for ]. According to Locke, while the "]" represented a state of total ] and ], competition between individuals had caused ], which made the establishment of a government to protect "life, liberty and property" a necessity. This led Locke to propose the formation of a ] between the British people and their government, which would have the power make laws and protect the institution of ]. The ] soon came to represent a progression from the ] of the established ] (later known as ]) to the ] of the emerging ]es (later known as ]).{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=129}} By the turn of the 18th-century, Lockean liberalism started to give way to ], which centered the individual freedom of citizens within the new constitutional monarchy.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=129-130}} | |||
], but later resigned from its | |||
committee, claiming the AWPA had become dominated by Soviet sympathisers.<ref>Carissa Honeywell, | |||
], although a conservative and misanthrope, became an early champion of ] and an opponent of ]. In his 1726 novel '']'', Swift satirised the prevailing ] of his day, railing against ] and the ], among other subjects.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=130}} In Book IV, Swift writes of the ], an intelligent race of ]s that believed society could ] sufficiently through ] and lived in a kind of ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=130-131}} Their only form of central government was a representative body, which met once every four years to coordinate resource distribution and existed only in an ], having no authority to compel obedience.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=131}} Swift's vision of a ] later inspired ]'s anarchist philosophy, although it would also later be criticized as "]" by ], who referred to Swift as a "Tory anarchist".{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=132}} | |||
{{multiple image | |||
| align = right | |||
| direction = horizontal | |||
| width = | |||
| total_width = 400 | |||
| image1 = EdmundBurke1771.jpg | |||
| image2 = Thomas_Paine_by_Matthew_Pratt,_1785-95.jpg | |||
| caption1 = ], a ] politician that wrote '']'', an early literary expression of ]. Following the ], his political perspective shifted and he became a leading proponent of ]. | |||
| caption2 = ], whose revolutionary works '']'' and '']'' laid the groundwork for the development of modern ]. | |||
| caption_align = center | |||
| footer = | |||
| footer_align = centre | |||
| alt1 = | |||
}} | |||
In 1756, ] espoused a defense of the "state of nature" in '']'', painting a picture of human society being governed by reason until the invention of the ] and the ], in what the historian ] described as "one of the most powerful arguments for anarchist society made in the eighteenth century." Burke denounced the state as the sole reason for all ] and ], arguing that the division of humanity into different ] had created ] and that the ] of society had ] in the hands of those that didn't work for it.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=133}} When looking at the dominant forms of government, Burke found ] to be more preferable to ] and ], but still considered it lacking, calling for a complete rejection of church and state, and the reclamation of "]".{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=133-134}} Burke would later turn towards ] and disown his ''Vindication'', claiming it to be a satire of the parliamentary opposition leader ], but the text still went on to inspire the anarchist philosophy of ] and the ] of ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=134}} | |||
With the outbreak of the ], one thinker that rose to prominence was the radical ], who issued calls for ], the ] and the prevention of ]. In 1776, Paine's pamphlet '']'' drew considerable attention, with its calls for ] of the ] and a ] against the ], in the hope that America could inspire ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=135}} Inspired by the ] that had emerged following the colonial government's dissolution, Paine clearly elaborated a distinction between society and the state, declaring that "society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worse state an intolerable one." Nevertheless, Paine still believed in the establishment of a ] through a social contract, with a written ] guaranteeing the rights to "]".{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=135-136}} The end of the ] was followed soon after by the beginning of the ], with Paine transplanting his revolutionary politics to Europe.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=136}} | |||
The publication of Edmund Burke's '']'' ignited a fierce ] in Britain, which became known as the "]".{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=134}} In this work, Burke espoused a traditionalist conservative view of government, cautioning against radical changes to its functioning, which he believed would transfer power from the clergy and nobility to the "]."{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=136}} The ], many of whom had themselves been inspired by Burke's earlier writings, quickly took to the debate. One of the first responses came from the feminist ], whose '']'' and subsequent '']'' attacked ], ] and ], calling for a reformed government to protect ]. Thomas Paine himself followed up on Wollstonecraft's treatises with his own '']'', which according to Peter Marshall displayed a "libertarian sensibility took him to the borders of anarchism."{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=134}} | |||
Paine took the side of the "swinish multitude" and criticised Burke for subordinating ] to the "authority of the dead", adapting Lockean liberalism in the direction of ] and ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=136-137}} To protect people's natural rights, he again recommended the establishment of a limited government, which would itself have no authority and would be entirely subjected to the people's authority, in order to ensure "]".{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=137}} In Part II of his pamphlet, Paine approached anarchism with his declaration that societal order would prevail even if all government were abolished, claiming that civil society "performs for itself almost everything which is ascribed to government." He asserted that all order stemmed from human nature, itself fundamentally good but corrupted by established governments, and that individuals were chiefly regulated by their own ], rather than by ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=137-138}} Drawing from British history, Paine concluded by calling for the establishment of a ], declaring that "the instant formal government is abolished, society begins to act. A general association takes place, and common interest produces common security." He therefore considered the ideal form of government to be a limited one, solely in place to secure the natural rights of individual people, looking to the nascent ] as an example.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=138}} Despite his libertarian inclinations, it was his advocacy of ], ] and ] that would ultimately separate Paine from modern anarchism.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=138-139}} | |||
], the first modern exponent of ] in his '']'' (1793).]] | |||
It was during the Revolution Controversy that ] published his '']'', which became the first clear expression of ], with his declaration that all government ought to be abolished.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=487-488}} Although the book was rather expensive on release, with the prime minister ] even deciding against banning the book due to its high price, many British workers threw their money together to purchase a copy by subscription, pirated copies were distributed throughout Ireland and Scotland, and Godwin ended up reducing the price.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=191}} When Pitt's government began to carry out the ] against the ], Godwin was among those that came to the defense of the Radicals on trial, eventually securing their release.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=191-192}} Although alienated by the ], Godwin's influence extended on to the next generation of Radicals. His son-in-law ] became a widely-renowned poet, putting much of Godwin's anarchist philosophy into verse, while his disciple ] went on to become the founding father of ]. Following his death, ''Political Justice'' continued to inspire the ] and ], who published new editions of the book, as well as the ] of ] and ], which in turn influenced the ] of the "]".{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=192}} | |||
But by the turn of the 19th century, British radicals still had not adopted the term "anarchist" as their own. Even Godwin associated the word "anarchy" with disorder, although he still considered it preferable to ], due to its resemblance to "true ]". Nevertheless, followers of Godwin's political philosophy found themselves being labelled as "anarchists", most notably by the Tory statesman ], who denounced William Godwin, Thomas Paine and the reformer ] as anarchists in the '']''.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=488}} | |||
<!-- To be reincorporated | |||
From this climate ] developed what many consider the first expression of ].<ref name="godwinsep" /> Godwin was, according to ], "the first to formulate the political and economical conceptions of anarchism, even though he did not give that name to the ideas developed in his work". In 1793, ], who has often<ref>Everhart, Robert B. The Public School Monopoly: A Critical Analysis of Education and the State in American Society. Pacific Institute for Public Policy Research, 1982. p. 115.</ref> been cited as the first anarchist, wrote '']'', which some consider to be the first expression of anarchism.<ref name="godwinsep" /><ref>Adams, Ian. Political Ideology Today. Manchester University Press, 2001. p. 116.</ref> Godwin, a philosophical anarchist, from a ] and ] basis opposed revolutionary action and saw a ] as a present "necessary evil" that would become increasingly irrelevant and powerless by the gradual spread of knowledge.<ref name="godwinsep">{{cite SEP |url-id=godwin |title=William Godwin |last=Philip |first=Mark|date=2006-05-20}}</ref> --> | |||
===19th century to World War II=== | |||
The labour movement first began to take form in Britain during the early 19th century. Spearheaded by the utopian socialist ], himself a disciple of ], the ] contributed to the early development of ] in the country, while the noncomformist priest ] popularized the idea of the ] as a means for ]. However, the rise of the ] instilled the British labour movement with a largely ] character, concerning itself mostly with ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=488}} | |||
It was the arrival of ] and ]s in London that introduced ] to Britain, in the wake of the ]. Over the decades, isolated individuals slowly began to cluster together in ]s, such as the ] in ]. This process was accelerated when ] moved to London and began printing his newspaper '']'', which before long was shut down and forced to move its operations to the ], after friends of Most signalled their approval of the ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=488-489}} | |||
By 1881, the movement of British revolutionary socialists towards anarchism culminated with the establishment of the ] (LEL). The LEL quickly gained support for its ] platform from the workers of London's ], declaring themselves against all forms of government, before they merged into the ] (SDF).{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=489}} But the ] of the SDF's leader ] caused a split within the organization, resulting in the formation of the ] (SL) by a number of libertarian socialists around ]. Though himself a staunch anti-parliamentarian, Morris would end up leaving the SL following the rise of its anarchist faction in 1887, leading to a marked radicalization of the League's publications under ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=489-490}} | |||
] | |||
Other anarchist tendencies also began to emerge around this time, including: ], which was developed by ] in his publication '']''; ], which was propagated by ] through his newspaper '']''; and ], which congregated around the ] journal '']''.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=490}} Anarchist tendencies also worked their way into the popular literature of the time, with William Morris' '']'' depicting a utopian society and ]'s '']'' espousing the importance of ], while libertarian ideas were likewise defended by authors such as ], ] and ].{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=490-491}} | |||
But anarchism was unable to win over the more reform-minded labour movement, with ] only developing at the turn of the 20th century. In the 1910s, ]'s ] attempted to encourage the establishment of ] in Britain, advocating for direct ] with the goal of ]. But the influence of anarcho-syndicalism waned in the wake of ], which caused a ] within the anarchist movement.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=491}} Although anarcho-communists like ] attempted to keep the movement alive, by the mid-1920s, the British anarchist movement had almost dissolved, with only a few anarchist groups remaining in urban centers.{{Sfn|Marshall|2008|pp=491-492}} The outbreak of the ] brought with it a revival of the British anarchist movement, which cultivated a new generation of anarchists by the subsequent outbreak of ]. {{Sfn|Marshall|2008|p=492}} | |||
===Post-war era=== | |||
When ] and three other editors were arrested at the beginning of 1945 for attempting "to undermine the affections of members of His Majesty's Forces.",<ref name="freedom">''George Orwell at Home'' pp 71-72 Freedom Press (1998)</ref> ], ], ], ], ] (chairman), ] and ] set up the ] to "uphold the essential liberty of individuals and organizations, and to defend those who are persecuted for exercising their rights to freedom of speech, writing and action."<ref name="In Front of Your Nose">Orwell, Sonia and Angus, Ian (eds.). ''The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell Volume 4: In Front of Your Nose (1945-1950)'' (Penguin)</ref> | |||
<!-- ] violation: ] in his workroom, October 2003]] --> | |||
The ] was a syndicalist group active in post-war Britain,<ref name="Political Encyclopedia">{{cite book|title=Encyclopedia of British and Irish Political Organizations'|year=2000|publisher=Pinter Publishers|location=United Kingdom|isbn=978-1855672642}}</ref> and one of the ]'s earliest predecessors. It was formed in 1950 by members of the dissolved ] (AFB). Unlike the AFB, which was influenced by anarcho-syndicalist ideas but ultimately not syndicalist itself, the SWF decided to pursue a more definitely ], worker-centred strategy from the outset. The group joined the ] and during the ] gave particular support to the Spanish resistance and the underground ] anarcho-syndicalist union, previously involved in the 1936 ] and subsequent ] against a right-wing military coup backed by both ] and ]. The SWF initially had some success, but when ], a long-term and very active member was forced out of activity, it declined until by 1979 it had only one lone branch in ]. The SWF then dissolved itself into the group founded as the Direct Action Movement. Its archives are held by the ], and a selection of the SWFs publications have been digitally published at ]. | |||
] was an editor of the ] ] newspaper ''Freedom'' from 1947 to 1960, and founder/editor of the monthly ] journal '']'' from 1961 until it ceased publication in 1970. There were 118 issues. It is not to be confused with the subsequent, shorter-lived magazine of the same name, sometimes referred to as Anarchy (Second Series), which was edited/published by a quite separate group.{{Sfn|Goodway|2006|page=312}}<ref name="LyndGrubačić2008">{{cite book|last1=Lynd|first1=Staughton|last2=Grubačić|first2=Andrej|title=Wobblies & Zapatistas: Conversations on Anarchism, Marxism and Radical History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gGT7BgAAQBAJ&pg=PA250|year=2008|publisher=PM Press|isbn=978-1-60486-041-2|page=250|access-date=2018-11-10|archive-date=2021-11-14|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211114035530/https://books.google.com/books?id=gGT7BgAAQBAJ&pg=PA250|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
] | |||
Over the years the Freedom editorial group included ], Pete Turner, ], ], ], ], Nino Staffa, Dave Mansell, Gillian Fleming, Mary Canipa, ], ] and numerous others. ] maintained a loose association for 30 years. | |||
<!-- ], English ]]] --> | |||
The leading ] writer and gerontologist ] characterised himself as an "aggressive anti-militarist". He held that pacifism rested "solely upon the historical theory of anarchism".<ref name="Obituaries">{{cite news | last = Rayner | first = Claire | title = News: Obituaries: Alex Comfort | work = The Guardian | date = 28 March 2000 | url = https://www.theguardian.com/news/2000/mar/28/guardianobituaries | access-date = 2008-08-23| archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080918054049/http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/2000/mar/28/guardianobituaries| archive-date= 18 September 2008 | url-status= live | location=London}}</ref><ref>For discussions of Comfort's political views, see '']'' (1992) by ], and '']'' (2006) by ].</ref> An active member of the ] (PPU) and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, he had been a ] in ]. In 1951 Comfort was a signatory of the | |||
Authors’ World Peace Appeal. He later resigned from its committee, asserting that Soviet sympathisers now dominated the AWPA.<ref>Carissa Honeywell, | |||
''A British Anarchist Tradition: Herbert Read, Alex Comfort and Colin Ward'', Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011 | ''A British Anarchist Tradition: Herbert Read, Alex Comfort and Colin Ward'', Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011 | ||
ISBN |
{{ISBN|1441190171}} (p.112).</ref> He later in the decade actively supported the Direct Action Committee against Nuclear War. A prominent member of the ], he was | ||
imprisoned for a month, |
imprisoned for a month, together with ] and others. They had refused to be bound over, not to take part in a Trafalgar Square mass protest in September 1961. Comfort is ''Peace and Disobedience'' (1946), one of many pamphlets he wrote for ] and PPU, and (1950).<ref name="Obituaries"/> He exchanged public correspondence with ] defending pacifism in the open letter/poem, "Letter to an American Visitor", under the ] "Obadiah Hornbrooke".<ref name="obadiah">''Complete Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell'' volume II, pg. 294-303</ref> Comfort's 1972 book '']'' earned him worldwide fame and $3 million. He regretted that he as a consequence became known as "Dr. Sex" and that his numerous other works received so little attention.<ref>{{cite news | last = Martin | first = Douglas | title = Alex Comfort, 80, Dies; a Multifaceted Man Best Known for Writing 'The Joy of Sex' | work = The New York Times | date = 20 March 2000 | url = https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E4DD173CF93AA15750C0A9669C8B63 | access-date = 2008-08-23 | archive-date = 2020-02-08 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200208193747/https://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9E03E4DD173CF93AA15750C0A9669C8B63 | url-status = live }}</ref> | ||
] | |||
On the last day of July 1964 an 18-year-old ] departed London for ], where he picked up ] from the anarchist organisation ],<ref name="Keeley">{{cite news|url=http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/scotland/article3027528.ece|title=Anarchist jailed over plot to kill Franco fights to clear name|last=Keeley|first=Graham|date=21 May 2011|work=The Times|accessdate=21 May 2011|location=London}}</ref> and then ]d on a mission to kill General Francisco Franco. This was to be one of at least 30 attempts on the dictator's life. After his release he continued his activism in the anarchist movement in the ], re-formed the ] and '']'' with ], was acquitted of involvement with the ], and started the publishing house Cienfuegos Press (later Refract Publications), which for a number of years he operated from the remote island of ], ], where he also edited and published a local Orcadian newspaper, ''The Free-Winged Eagle''. Christie wrote with Meltzer, ''The Floodgates of Anarchy'' and later and ''We, the Anarchists! A study of the ] (FAI) 1927-1937'' (2000).<ref></ref> | |||
On the last day of July 1964 an 18-year-old ] departed London for ], where he picked up ] from the anarchist organisation ],<ref name="Keeley">{{cite news|url=http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/scotland/article3027528.ece|title=Anarchist jailed over plot to kill Franco fights to clear name|last=Keeley|first=Graham|date=21 May 2011|work=The Times|access-date=21 May 2011|location=London|archive-date=22 July 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150722101933/http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/scotland/article3027528.ece|url-status=live}}</ref> and then ]d on a mission to kill General Francisco Franco. This was to be one of at least 30 attempts on the dictator's life. After his release he continued his activism in the anarchist movement in the ], re-formed the ] and '']'' with ], was acquitted of involvement with the ], and started the publishing house Cienfuegos Press (later Refract Publications), which for a number of years he operated from the remote island of ], ], where he also edited and published a local Orcadian newspaper, ''The Free-Winged Eagle''. Christie wrote with Meltzer, ''The Floodgates of Anarchy'' and later ''We, the Anarchists! A study of the ] (FAI) 1927-1937'' (2000).<ref>{{cite web |last=Christie |first=Stuart |title=Review: We, the Anarchists! A study of the Iberian Anarchist Federation (FAI) 1927-1937 |url=http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/spain/review_we_anarchists.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170107114831/http://flag.blackened.net/revolt/spain/review_we_anarchists.html |archive-date=January 7, 2017 |url-status=dead |website=flag.blackened.net}}</ref> | |||
== Contemporary times == | |||
]]] | |||
A surge of popular interest in anarchism occurred during the 1960s and 1970s. In the ] this was associated with the ] movement; the band ] is celebrated{{by whom|date=August 2012}} for its anarchist and ] ideas. Since the turn of the millennium, UK anarchists have expressed their beliefs through the medium of ], ] music, and ]. ] is a ] ] based group and ] originally set up by ] and others in 1983. It subsequently mutated various forms, becoming specifically ]. Inspired by the ] actions of 1983 and 1984, Class War organised a number of 'Bash The Rich' demonstrations, in which supporters were invited to march through and disrupt wealthier areas of London such as ], and ] (during the annual ]), bearing banners and placards with slogans such as "Behold your future executioners!" (a phrase coined by the anarchist ]). A national conference was in held ] in 1986 and proposed that groups and individuals who produced and supported the paper should form "Class War" groups as part of a national federation with common 'aims and principles'. A '''Class War Federation''' developed, gaining particular prominence in the anti-] movement of the late 80s and early 1990s. When Class War spokesman ] praised those who had rioted in the ] ] as "working class heroes",<ref>(here on )</ref> Class War gained wider media exposure (including a 'tea time' interview with Ian Bone on the ''] Show'' (see ])). 1992 saw the publication of ''Unfinished Business - The Politics of Class War'' published jointly with ] that set out where Class War came from, and where it wanted to go. | |||
Around the turn of the century, {{vanchor|Movement Against the Monarchy}} demonstrated against Britain's monarchy in 1998<ref>{{Cite web |title=Anti-monarchists turned away at Palace |work=BBC News |date=1998-10-31 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/204988.stm |access-date=2021-11-13 |archive-date=2021-11-14 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211114035455/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/204988.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> and 2000.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Cheeky anarchists in palace protest |work=BBC News |date=2000-06-03 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/775725.stm |access-date=2021-11-13 |archive-date=2021-10-28 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211028184436/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/775725.stm |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |title=Rioters 'may target Queen' |work=BBC News |date=2000-05-10 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/742894.stm |access-date=2021-11-13 |archive-date=2021-11-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211113081432/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/742894.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> The anarchists planned a campaign for mid 2002.<ref>{{Cite news |last1=Harris |first1=Paul |last2=Wazir |first2=Burhan |title=Anarchists plan jubilee mayhem |work=] |date=2002-03-24 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/mar/24/jubilee.monarchy |language=en-GB |issn=0029-7712 |access-date=2021-11-13 |archive-date=2021-11-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211113081423/https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2002/mar/24/jubilee.monarchy |url-status=live }}</ref> Demonstrators arrested during the 2002 ] were later compensated for unlawful arrest.<ref>{{Cite news |title=Jubilee protesters get damages |work=BBC News |date=2004-02-04 |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/3459393.stm |language=en-GB |access-date=2021-11-13 |archive-date=2021-11-13 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211113081434/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/london/3459393.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
A rejection of industrial ] is also prominent in the views of many ], with ] acting as theorist for this national current. This worldview was associated with the growth of the anti-roads movement in the UK (]), the ] and ]. The magazine '']'' was for a while the principal voice in the ] advocating ], an explicit fusion of ] and ] thinking. Founded after the 1984 ] protests, the magazine was launched in the summer of that year by an editorial collective consisting of ], ] and ]. Early issues featured a range of broadly anarchist and ecological ideas, bringing together groups and individuals as varied as ], veteran anarchist writer ], anarcho-punk band ], as well as the ], anti-nuclear campaigners, ] activists and so on. However the diversity that many saw as the publication's greatest strength quickly led to irreconcilable arguments between the essentially ] approach of Albon and Christo, and the advocacy of violent confrontation with the State favoured by Hunt. During the 1990s ''Green Anarchist'' came under the helm of an editorial collective that included ], ] and others, during which period the publication became increasingly aligned with ], an anti-civilization philosophy advocated by writers such as ], ] and ]. | |||
Anarchists were involved in late-20th-century war opposition, with campaigns like No War but the Class War during the early 1990s ].<ref>{{cite book | url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-Nw0DQAAQBAJ&pg=PT205 | title=The SAGE Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives | isbn=978-1-4833-5991-5 | last1=Joseph | first1=Paul | date=15 June 2016 | publisher=SAGE Publications }}</ref> | |||
The Direct Action Movement was formed in 1979, when the one remaining SWF branch, along with other smaller anarchist groups, decided to form a new organisation of anarcho-syndicalists in Britain.<ref>http://www.katesharpleylibrary.net/x69qfd</ref> The DAM was highly involved in the ] as well as a series of industrial disputes later in the 1980s, including the Ardbride dispute in ], ], involving a supplier to ], for which the DAM received international support. From 1988 in Scotland, then England and Wales, the DAM was active in opposing the ].<ref name="Golden Angels">{{cite book|last=Meltzer|first=Albert|title=I Couldn't Paint Golden Angels|year=2001|publisher=AK Press|location=United Kingdom|isbn=978-1873176931|url=http://libcom.org/library/25-lucky-strike-direct-action-years-poll-tax-battle-trafalgar-square-class-war-leo}}</ref> In the early 1990s, DAM members set up the Despatch Industry Workers Union, which successfully organised workers for a number of inner-city courier firms.<ref>http://libcom.org/library/the-couriers-are-revolting-the-despatch-industry-workers-union-1989-1992</ref> The ], also known by the ] SolFed, is a federation of ] ] active in ]. The organisation advocates a strategy of ] as a method of abolishing ] and the ]. In 1994 it adopted its current name, having previously been the Direct Action Movement since 1979, and before that the '''Syndicalist Workers' Federation''' since 1950. In March 1994, DAM changed its name to the Solidarity Federation. Presently, the Solidarity Federation publishes the quarterly magazine ''Direct Action'' (presently on hiatus) and the newspaper ''''. Several locals and networks also publish their own newsletters. Along with the ] it is one of the two national anarchist federations active in the UK at the present time. | |||
]]] | |||
The ] (AF) is a federation of ] in ] and ]. The Federation was founded as the Anarchist Communist Federation in March 1986 by the ''Anarchist Communist Discussion Group'', which had coalesced around two anarcho-communists who had returned from ] and began selling the pamphlets of the defunct ''Libertarian Communist Group'' tendency, and members of ''] Fight''. The group aimed to provide an anarchist intervention into ] struggles such as the ], and was closely involved with the ] community-based campaign at the end of the 1980s and unemployed struggles through the Groundswell network of claimants' action groups. There is also a student membership, of whom many, including non-student members were involved in the series of ] that began in the beginning of 2009 and swept across British universities in opposition to the ] as well as ] against reforms in further education. ''Organise!'' is the magazine of the ''Anarchist Federation''.<!-- Deleted image removed: ] -->It is published in order to develop anarchist communist ideas and aims to provide a clear anarchist viewpoint on contemporary issues and to initiate debate on ideas not normally covered in ] papers. The AF aims to produce ''Organise!'' twice a year and to meet this target, the AF positively solicits contributions from its readers. The ''Anarchist Federation'' is a member organisation of the Anarchist ] (IAF-IFA),<ref>{{cite web |url= http://afed.org.uk/organisation/international-iaf-ifa.html|title= IAF-IFA membership of the AF}}</ref> but also has its own secretariat responsible for regions of the world that do not have IAF-IFA members. The principles of work within IFA are that of federalism, free arrangement and mutual aid. To improve co-ordination and communication within IFA, as well as to provide an open contact address for the public and other anarchist groups and organisations, an International Secretariat (C.R.I.F.A. - Commission of Relations of the International of Anarchist Federations) was set up. CRIFA irregularly rotates among the IFA federations. It is currently based with the ] (FAI). It changed its name to the ''Anarchist Federation''<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.afed.org.uk/org/issue42/acf10yrs.html|title= ACF - the first ten years}}</ref> in the late 1990s, though advocacy of ] remains at the centre of its politics. Despite this, there are a number of members who do not identify specifically as anarchist-communists, but are ], ] and so forth.{{citation needed|date=January 2011}} The Anarchist Federation places itself amongst a continually developing current of autonomous working class struggle. Important influences on the Anarchist Federation's politics include ], the , ] and the anarchist communist currents within the ], ] and ] Revolutions. The ''Anarchist Federation'' continues this tradition of agitation within the workplace and community, rather than attempting to gain prominent bureaucratic positions in ]s, local councils and other institutions, unlike a number of ] and ] parties and groups. It promotes ] direct ] against the ] and ] and is run in a ] manner. | |||
==Organisations== | |||
In July 2011 the ] called for anti-anarchist whistleblowers stating: "Anarchism is a political philosophy which considers the state undesirable, unnecessary, and harmful, and instead promotes a stateless society, or anarchy. Any information relating to anarchists should be reported to your local police."<ref>{{cite web|title=Anarchists should be reported, advises Westminster anti-terror police|url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/jul/31/westminster-police-anarchist-whistleblower-advice|publisher=The Guardian|accessdate=1 February 2013}}</ref> However, they later retracted this statement.{{citation needed|date=August 2012}} | |||
===Extant=== | |||
*] (1886–) | |||
*] (1897–) | |||
*] (1950–) | |||
*] (1979–) | |||
*] (1983–) | |||
*] (1986–) | |||
*] (2011–) | |||
== |
===Historical=== | ||
*] (1649–1651) | |||
*] | |||
*] (1877–1882) | |||
*] | |||
*] (1881–1884) | |||
*] | |||
*] (1885–1901) | |||
*] | |||
*] (1893–1899) | |||
*] | |||
*] (1898–1909) | |||
*] (1919–1920) | |||
*] (1921–1945) | |||
*] (1934–1965) | |||
*] (1937–1950) | |||
*] (1960–1968) | |||
*] (1970–1972) | |||
*] (1975–1984) | |||
*] (1990–2002) | |||
*] (1995–2003) | |||
*] (1998–2002) | |||
*] (1999–2010) | |||
==See also== | |||
{{Portal|Anarchism|Politics|United Kingdom}} | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*"]", a song by the Sex Pistols | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
== References == | == References == | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
==Bibliography== | |||
* {{cite book|chapter=The English Revolution|title=The Third Revolution|volume=1|first=Murray|last=Bookchin|authorlink=Murray Bookchin|year=1996|location=]|publisher=]|isbn=0304335932|oclc=312686046|pages=61–142|chapter-url=https://archive.org/details/TheThirdRevolutionVolume1MurrayBookchin/page/n97/mode/2up}} | |||
* {{cite book|last=Cross|first=Rich|editor1-last=Smith|editor1-first=Evan|editor2-last=Worley|editor2-first=Matthew|year=2014|title=Against the grain: The British far left from 1956|chapter=British anarchism in the era of Thatcherism|url=http://libcom.org/library/against-grain-british-far-left-1956|location=]|publisher=]|isbn=978-07190-9590-0|oclc=941255608|pages=133–152}} | |||
* {{cite book|first=Rachel|last=Foxley|title=The Levellers: Radical Political Thought in the English Revolution|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c9ySDAAAQBAJ&pg=PA207|year=2013|location=]|publisher=]|isbn=9780719089367|oclc=985096392}} | |||
* {{cite book|first=Benjamin|last=Franks|year=2006|title=]|location=]|publisher=]|isbn=1904859402|oclc=493946935}} | |||
* {{cite book|first=David|last=Goodway|year=2006|title=]|location=]|publisher=]|isbn=1-84631-025-3|oclc=939862412}} | |||
* {{cite book|first1=H.|last1=Gustav Klaus|first2=Stephen Thomas|last2=Knight|author-link2=Stephen Thomas Knight|year=2005|title=To Hell with Culture: Anarchism and Twentieth-Century British Literature|location=]|publisher=]|isbn=0-7083-1898-3|oclc=57575365}} | |||
* {{cite book|first=John|last=Quail|year=2019|orig-year=1978|title=The Slow Burning Fuse: The Lost History of the British Anarchists|location=]|publisher=]|isbn=9781629635828|oclc=1042080070}} | |||
* {{cite book|first=Peter H.|last = Marshall|author-link=Peter Marshall (author, born 1946)|title=]|year=2008|orig-year=1992|location=]|publisher=]|isbn=978-0-00-686245-1|oclc=218212571}} | |||
* {{cite book|title=Anti Parliamentary Communism: the movement for workers' councils in Britain, 1917-45|year=1988|first=Mark|last=Shipway|location=]|publisher=]|isbn=033343613X|oclc=468642120}} | |||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Shpayer-Makov |first1=Haia |title=Anarchism in British Public Opinion 1880-1914 |journal=] |volume=31 |issue=4 |pages=487–516 |year=1988 |location=]|publisher=]|issn=0042-5222 |jstor=3827854 |df=mdy-all |oclc=809574647}} | |||
==Further reading== | ==Further reading== | ||
* {{Cite news |last1=Evans |first1=Rob |title=At least four undercover spies infiltrated anarchist groups |work=] |date=2013-12-03 |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/undercover-with-paul-lewis-and-rob-evans/2013/dec/03/undercover-police-and-policing-surveillance |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077 |df=mdy-all |oclc=757685987}} | |||
* David Goodway (2006) ''Anarchist Seeds beneath the Snow: Left-Libertarian Thought and British Writers from William Morris to Colin Ward''. Liverpool University Press. 2006 ISBN 1-84631-025-3 | |||
* {{Cite book |last1=Evans |first1=Rob |last2=Lewis |first2=Paul |author-link2=Paul Lewis (journalist)|title=] |year=2014 |orig-year=2013 |language=en |isbn=978-1-78335-034-6 |publisher=] |location=] |df=mdy-all |oclc=907626188}} | |||
* John Quail (1978) ''The Slow Burning Fuse: The Lost History of the British Anarchists'' London: Paladin | |||
* George |
* {{cite book|first=George|last=McKay|year=1996|title=Senseless Acts of Beauty: Cultures of Resistance since the Sixties|location=]|publisher=]|isbn=1-85984-028-0|oclc=982679436}} | ||
* George |
* {{cite book|editor-first=George|editor-last=McKay|year=1998|title=DiY Culture: Party & Protest in Nineties Britain|location=]|publisher=]|isbn=1-85984-260-7|oclc=959122840}} | ||
* {{Cite journal |last1=Tranmer |first1=Jeremy |title=London: a capital of protest politics |journal=Observatoire de la société britannique |issue=11 |pages=177–190 |date=December 2011 |url=https://journals.openedition.org/osb/1272 |language=en |doi=10.4000/osb.1272 |issn=1775-4135 |df=mdy-all }} | |||
* Benjamin Franks, (2006) "Rebel Alliances: The Means and Ends of Contemporary British Anarchisms. Edinburgh. AK Press. ISBN 1904859402 | |||
==External links== | |||
* at the ] (IISG) | |||
* at libcom.org | |||
* at the IISG | |||
* – text at Spunk Library | |||
* – text at the Kate Sharpley Library | |||
{{Anarchism by region}} | |||
{{Europe in topic|Anarchism in}} | |||
{{UK far left}} | |||
{{Portal bar|Anarchism|United Kingdom}} | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:United Kingdom, Anarchism in}} | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 18:35, 28 December 2024
For the Sex Pistols single, see Anarchy in the U.K.
Anarchism in the United Kingdom initially developed within the religious dissent movement that began after the Protestant Reformation. Anarchism was first seen among the radical republican elements of the English Civil War and following the Stuart Restoration grew within the fringes of radical Whiggery. The Whig politician Edmund Burke was the first to expound anarchist ideas, which developed as a tendency that influenced the political philosophy of William Godwin, who became the first modern proponent of anarchism with the release of his 1793 book Enquiry Concerning Political Justice.
The development of socialism from radicalism started in the 1860s with the establishment of the International Workingmen's Association (IWA), and saw the foundation of a number of workers' societies demanding radical reform and civil liberties. By the 1870s, anarchism had been introduced to the country from Europe and America and the establishment of the Labour Emancipation League (LEL) in 1881 marked the beginning of the organized anarchist movement in the United Kingdom. The LEL was instrumental in the foundation of the Socialist League, which in 1888 came under the control of the anarchist Frank Kitz.
The Socialist League's newspaper Commonweal and Peter Kropotkin's newspaper Freedom saw anarchism through the turn of the 20th century. Anarcho-communism became a major tendency during the Revolutions of 1917–1923, when the Glasgow anarchist Guy Aldred established the Anti-Parliamentary Communist Federation and later the United Socialist Movement. The rise of anarcho-syndicalism after the Spanish Civil War eventually resulted in the foundation of the Solidarity Federation in 1950, followed by resurgence of anarcho-communism during the 1980s, when the Class War and Anarchist Federation were founded.
History
The historian Peter Marshall traced the roots of British anarchism back to the Peasants' Revolt of 1381, during which yeomans rose up against the Bad Parliament's poll tax, fearing it to be an attempt by the nobility to force the yeomanry into serfdom. The peasants were further agitated by the preaching of the radical priest John Ball, who conceived of the Garden of Eden as a state of nature where class stratification did not yet exist, attacked the institutions of private property and social inequality, and called for everything to be brought under common ownership and the creation of a classless society. With Wat Tyler elected as their captain, 100,000 peasant rebels marched from Essex to London, where they were joined by the local population. Although Richard II had promised them that he would free the villeins, the rebels demolished the Savoy Palace, released all the local prisoners and executed Simon Sudbury, the Archbishop of Canterbury. Now that the rebels had captured the capital, they issued their demands, which included the introduction of wage labour, the cessation of feudal duties and the establishment of a free market. The King agreed to most of their demands in his meetings with the rebel leaders, during which Tyler called for the total abolition of serfdom and the expansion of liberty and social equality, while his more radical lieutenant Jack Straw allegedly declared that the noble and clerical classes would need to be exterminated. However, the rebel's demands would never be met as William Walworth, the Lord Mayor of London, assassinated Tyler and Straw. The King then revoked his promises and the revolt was definitively crushed. But John Ball's radical egalitarian philosophy lived on through the centuries, most notably being re-invoked in 1888 by William Morris, in his novel A Dream of John Ball.
The English Revolution
Throughout the Middle Ages, the institution of feudalism had constructed a rigidly hierarchical society, where the interests of the individual were subordinated to the divine right of kings. But following the Renaissance and Reformation, the individual first began to be considered as an autonomous entity with rights of their own. It was during the English Revolution that individual rights took their place alongside the old demands for liberty and social equality, leading to the development of recognizable anarchist tendencies. By the 16th century, the word "anarchy" was primarily associated with disorder and lawlessness, while the label of "anarchist" was pejoratively applied to anyone that upset the established order or refused to recognize the ruling power.
In the lead up to the English Civil War, radical republican and democratic ideas were first starting to circulate, advocating the abolition of existing institutions such as the monarchy, church and feudalism. In December 1640, 15,000 Londoners presented Parliament with the "Root and Branch petition", advocating for the abolition of the episcopacy, a proposition which was denounced as "absolute Anarchism" by the royalist MP Edward Dering. When the Bill itself failed to pass, anti-clerical riots erupted in London, eventually forcing Charles I to flee the capital, along with royalist MPs and bishops, which allowed parliament the means to pass anti-clerical bills into law.
The tensions exacerbated by this situation eventually erupted into the First English Civil War, in which Parliamentarians and Covenanters were victorious over the royalist forces. Following the conflict, a radical group known as the Levellers released a series of manifestos regarding the creation of a new constitution, which became subject to debate among the parliamentary forces, as the Levellers advocated for a number of issues including progressive taxation, universal manhood suffrage and equality before the law. The radical democratic theses of the Levellers was rejected by Oliver Cromwell, who accused them of advocating the cantonalist practices of the Swiss Confederacy and declared that such policies would inevitably lead to "anarchy". But the Levellers denied the charge, as they still believed in a form of "good government".
Following the Parliamentarian victory in the Second English Civil War, the removal of dissenting voices from the House of Commons and the execution of Charles I, power lay entirely in the hands of the Grandees of the New Model Army. Unwilling to implement the radical policies advanced by the Levellers, the Grandees instead turned towards mysticism and the implementation of a Puritan religious order. But this new environment of Christian mysticism branched out into a variety of anti-authoritarian strains, with a number of English Dissenters separating entirely from the Church of England. These religious dissenters included the Quakers, Ranters, Anabaptists, Familists and Diggers. Notably, the Ranters and Diggers have been labelled as "anarchists" by historians, due to their radical egalitarian philosophies and communist practices. The Diggers believed in creating an egalitarian society of small agrarian communities and put this into practice by occupying a number of tracts of common land for the purposes of farming it, but these settlements were eventually suppressed by the authorities of the Commonwealth.
By 1653, Parliament had been forcibly dissolved by the New Model Army and the republican Commonwealth was replaced by a military dictatorship known as The Protectorate, with Oliver Cromwell acting as Lord Protector. After Cromwell's death, Parliament was reconvened and held a Convention, which instituted the restoration of the monarchy. Within decades the Stuart-ruled kingdoms of England and Scotland were united into the Kingdom of Great Britain and the British Empire was formally established. The eventual spread of the Age of Enlightenment to Britain and the outbreak of the Industrial Revolution brought about a number of changes to the country, which allowed for the early conception of a formalized anarchist philosophy.
The British Enlightenment
In 1688, the Glorious Revolution definitively established a constitutional monarchy with parliamentary supremacy in Britain. The Revolution was most notably defended by John Locke, whose justifications for democratic governance laid the foundations for classical liberalism. According to Locke, while the "state of nature" represented a state of total liberty and social equality, competition between individuals had caused instability, which made the establishment of a government to protect "life, liberty and property" a necessity. This led Locke to propose the formation of a social contract between the British people and their government, which would have the power make laws and protect the institution of private property. The Lockean proviso soon came to represent a progression from the traditionalist conservatism of the established landed gentry (later known as Tories) to the propertarianism of the emerging middle classes (later known as Whigs). By the turn of the 18th-century, Lockean liberalism started to give way to libertarianism, which centered the individual freedom of citizens within the new constitutional monarchy.
Jonathan Swift, although a conservative and misanthrope, became an early champion of Enlightenment ideals and an opponent of British rule in Ireland. In his 1726 novel Gulliver's Travels, Swift satirised the prevailing social mores of his day, railing against social inequality and the Protestant work ethic, among other subjects. In Book IV, Swift writes of the Houyhnhnms, an intelligent race of horses that believed society could govern itself sufficiently through reason and lived in a kind of primitive communism. Their only form of central government was a representative body, which met once every four years to coordinate resource distribution and existed only in an advisory capacity, having no authority to compel obedience. Swift's vision of a stateless society later inspired William Godwin's anarchist philosophy, although it would also later be criticized as "totalitarian" by George Orwell, who referred to Swift as a "Tory anarchist".
Edmund Burke, a Radical Whig politician that wrote A Vindication of Natural Society, an early literary expression of philosophical anarchism. Following the French Revolution, his political perspective shifted and he became a leading proponent of traditionalist conservatism.Thomas Paine, whose revolutionary works Common Sense and Rights of Man laid the groundwork for the development of modern libertarian socialism.In 1756, Edmund Burke espoused a defense of the "state of nature" in A Vindication of Natural Society, painting a picture of human society being governed by reason until the invention of the state and the episcopacy, in what the historian Peter Marshall described as "one of the most powerful arguments for anarchist society made in the eighteenth century." Burke denounced the state as the sole reason for all social conflict and war, arguing that the division of humanity into different nationalities had created bigotry and that the social stratification of society had concentrated wealth in the hands of those that didn't work for it. When looking at the dominant forms of government, Burke found democracy to be more preferable to despotism and aristocracy, but still considered it lacking, calling for a complete rejection of church and state, and the reclamation of "perfect liberty". Burke would later turn towards conservatism and disown his Vindication, claiming it to be a satire of the parliamentary opposition leader Henry St John, but the text still went on to inspire the anarchist philosophy of William Godwin and the libertarian socialism of George Holyoake.
With the outbreak of the American Revolution, one thinker that rose to prominence was the radical Thomas Paine, who issued calls for women's rights, the abolition of slavery and the prevention of cruelty to animals. In 1776, Paine's pamphlet Common Sense drew considerable attention, with its calls for independence of the Thirteen Colonies and a people's war against the British Empire, in the hope that America could inspire future revolutions abroad. Inspired by the spontaneous order that had emerged following the colonial government's dissolution, Paine clearly elaborated a distinction between society and the state, declaring that "society in every state is a blessing, but government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worse state an intolerable one." Nevertheless, Paine still believed in the establishment of a limited government through a social contract, with a written constitution guaranteeing the rights to "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness". The end of the American Revolutionary War was followed soon after by the beginning of the French Revolution, with Paine transplanting his revolutionary politics to Europe.
The publication of Edmund Burke's Reflections on the Revolution in France ignited a fierce pamphlet war in Britain, which became known as the "Revolution Controversy". In this work, Burke espoused a traditionalist conservative view of government, cautioning against radical changes to its functioning, which he believed would transfer power from the clergy and nobility to the "swinish multitude." The Radicals, many of whom had themselves been inspired by Burke's earlier writings, quickly took to the debate. One of the first responses came from the feminist Mary Wollstonecraft, whose Vindication of the Rights of Men and subsequent Vindication of the Rights of Woman attacked class stratification, economic inequality and gender inequality, calling for a reformed government to protect natural rights. Thomas Paine himself followed up on Wollstonecraft's treatises with his own Rights of Man, which according to Peter Marshall displayed a "libertarian sensibility took him to the borders of anarchism."
Paine took the side of the "swinish multitude" and criticised Burke for subordinating individual rights to the "authority of the dead", adapting Lockean liberalism in the direction of libertarianism and direct democracy. To protect people's natural rights, he again recommended the establishment of a limited government, which would itself have no authority and would be entirely subjected to the people's authority, in order to ensure "the good of all". In Part II of his pamphlet, Paine approached anarchism with his declaration that societal order would prevail even if all government were abolished, claiming that civil society "performs for itself almost everything which is ascribed to government." He asserted that all order stemmed from human nature, itself fundamentally good but corrupted by established governments, and that individuals were chiefly regulated by their own common interest, rather than by legal codes. Drawing from British history, Paine concluded by calling for the establishment of a self-governing society, declaring that "the instant formal government is abolished, society begins to act. A general association takes place, and common interest produces common security." He therefore considered the ideal form of government to be a limited one, solely in place to secure the natural rights of individual people, looking to the nascent federal government of the United States as an example. Despite his libertarian inclinations, it was his advocacy of constitutionalism, republicanism and propertarianism that would ultimately separate Paine from modern anarchism.
It was during the Revolution Controversy that William Godwin published his Enquiry Concerning Political Justice, which became the first clear expression of philosophical anarchism, with his declaration that all government ought to be abolished. Although the book was rather expensive on release, with the prime minister William Pitt even deciding against banning the book due to its high price, many British workers threw their money together to purchase a copy by subscription, pirated copies were distributed throughout Ireland and Scotland, and Godwin ended up reducing the price. When Pitt's government began to carry out the political persecutions against the British radical movement, Godwin was among those that came to the defense of the Radicals on trial, eventually securing their release. Although alienated by the defeat of the French Revolution, Godwin's influence extended on to the next generation of Radicals. His son-in-law Percy Bysshe Shelley became a widely-renowned poet, putting much of Godwin's anarchist philosophy into verse, while his disciple Robert Owen went on to become the founding father of British socialism. Following his death, Political Justice continued to inspire the Chartists and Owenites, who published new editions of the book, as well as the Ricardian socialism of Thomas Hodgskin and William Thompson, which in turn influenced the Marxist theory of the "withering away of the state".
But by the turn of the 19th century, British radicals still had not adopted the term "anarchist" as their own. Even Godwin associated the word "anarchy" with disorder, although he still considered it preferable to despotism, due to its resemblance to "true liberty". Nevertheless, followers of Godwin's political philosophy found themselves being labelled as "anarchists", most notably by the Tory statesman George Canning, who denounced William Godwin, Thomas Paine and the reformer John Thelwall as anarchists in the Anti-Jacobin Review.
19th century to World War II
The labour movement first began to take form in Britain during the early 19th century. Spearheaded by the utopian socialist Robert Owen, himself a disciple of William Godwin, the Grand National Consolidated Trades Union contributed to the early development of syndicalism in the country, while the noncomformist priest William Benbow popularized the idea of the general strike as a means for social revolution. However, the rise of the Chartists instilled the British labour movement with a largely reformist character, concerning itself mostly with parliamentary politics.
It was the arrival of migrant workers and asylum seekers in London that introduced classical anarchism to Britain, in the wake of the Revolutions of 1848. Over the decades, isolated individuals slowly began to cluster together in political clubs, such as the Rose Street Club in Soho. This process was accelerated when Johann Most moved to London and began printing his newspaper Freiheit, which before long was shut down and forced to move its operations to the United States, after friends of Most signalled their approval of the Phoenix Park Murders.
By 1881, the movement of British revolutionary socialists towards anarchism culminated with the establishment of the Labour Emancipation League (LEL). The LEL quickly gained support for its libertarian socialist platform from the workers of London's East End, declaring themselves against all forms of government, before they merged into the Social Democratic Federation (SDF). But the authoritarianism of the SDF's leader Henry Hyndman caused a split within the organization, resulting in the formation of the Socialist League (SL) by a number of libertarian socialists around William Morris. Though himself a staunch anti-parliamentarian, Morris would end up leaving the SL following the rise of its anarchist faction in 1887, leading to a marked radicalization of the League's publications under H. B. Samuels.
Other anarchist tendencies also began to emerge around this time, including: individualist anarchism, which was developed by Henry Seymour in his publication The Anarchist; anarcho-communism, which was propagated by Peter Kropotkin through his newspaper Freedom; and Jewish anarchism, which congregated around the Yiddish language journal Arbeter Fraynd. Anarchist tendencies also worked their way into the popular literature of the time, with William Morris' News from Nowhere depicting a utopian society and Oscar Wilde's The Soul of Man Under Socialism espousing the importance of individualism, while libertarian ideas were likewise defended by authors such as George Bernard Shaw, Edward Carpenter and Henry Stephens Salt.
But anarchism was unable to win over the more reform-minded labour movement, with anarcho-syndicalism only developing at the turn of the 20th century. In the 1910s, Tom Mann's Industrial Syndicalist Education League attempted to encourage the establishment of industrial unions in Britain, advocating for direct class conflict with the goal of workers' control. But the influence of anarcho-syndicalism waned in the wake of World War I, which caused a split within the anarchist movement. Although anarcho-communists like Guy Aldred attempted to keep the movement alive, by the mid-1920s, the British anarchist movement had almost dissolved, with only a few anarchist groups remaining in urban centers. The outbreak of the Spanish Civil War brought with it a revival of the British anarchist movement, which cultivated a new generation of anarchists by the subsequent outbreak of World War II.
Post-war era
When Vernon Richards and three other editors were arrested at the beginning of 1945 for attempting "to undermine the affections of members of His Majesty's Forces.", Benjamin Britten, E. M. Forster, Augustus John, George Orwell, Herbert Read (chairman), Osbert Sitwell and George Woodcock set up the Freedom Defence Committee to "uphold the essential liberty of individuals and organizations, and to defend those who are persecuted for exercising their rights to freedom of speech, writing and action." The Syndicalist Workers' Federation was a syndicalist group active in post-war Britain, and one of the Solidarity Federation's earliest predecessors. It was formed in 1950 by members of the dissolved Anarchist Federation of Britain (AFB). Unlike the AFB, which was influenced by anarcho-syndicalist ideas but ultimately not syndicalist itself, the SWF decided to pursue a more definitely syndicalist, worker-centred strategy from the outset. The group joined the International Workers' Association and during the Franco era gave particular support to the Spanish resistance and the underground CNT anarcho-syndicalist union, previously involved in the 1936 Spanish Revolution and subsequent Civil War against a right-wing military coup backed by both Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy. The SWF initially had some success, but when Tom Brown, a long-term and very active member was forced out of activity, it declined until by 1979 it had only one lone branch in Manchester. The SWF then dissolved itself into the group founded as the Direct Action Movement. Its archives are held by the International Institute of Social History, and a selection of the SWFs publications have been digitally published at libcom.org.
Colin Ward was an editor of the British anarchist newspaper Freedom from 1947 to 1960, and founder/editor of the monthly anarchist journal Anarchy from 1961 until it ceased publication in 1970. There were 118 issues. It is not to be confused with the subsequent, shorter-lived magazine of the same name, sometimes referred to as Anarchy (Second Series), which was edited/published by a quite separate group.
Over the years the Freedom editorial group included Jack Robinson, Pete Turner, Colin Ward, Nicolas Walter, Alan Albon, John Rety, Nino Staffa, Dave Mansell, Gillian Fleming, Mary Canipa, Philip Sansom, Arthur Moyse and numerous others. Clifford Harper maintained a loose association for 30 years.
The leading anarcho-pacifist writer and gerontologist Alex Comfort characterised himself as an "aggressive anti-militarist". He held that pacifism rested "solely upon the historical theory of anarchism". An active member of the Peace Pledge Union (PPU) and the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, he had been a conscientious objector in World War II. In 1951 Comfort was a signatory of the Authors’ World Peace Appeal. He later resigned from its committee, asserting that Soviet sympathisers now dominated the AWPA. He later in the decade actively supported the Direct Action Committee against Nuclear War. A prominent member of the Committee of 100, he was imprisoned for a month, together with Bertrand Russell and others. They had refused to be bound over, not to take part in a Trafalgar Square mass protest in September 1961. Comfort is Peace and Disobedience (1946), one of many pamphlets he wrote for Peace News and PPU, and Authority and Delinquency in the Modern State (1950). He exchanged public correspondence with George Orwell defending pacifism in the open letter/poem, "Letter to an American Visitor", under the pseudonym "Obadiah Hornbrooke". Comfort's 1972 book The Joy of Sex earned him worldwide fame and $3 million. He regretted that he as a consequence became known as "Dr. Sex" and that his numerous other works received so little attention.
On the last day of July 1964 an 18-year-old Stuart Christie departed London for Paris, where he picked up plastic explosives from the anarchist organisation Defensa Interior, and then Madrid on a mission to kill General Francisco Franco. This was to be one of at least 30 attempts on the dictator's life. After his release he continued his activism in the anarchist movement in the United Kingdom, re-formed the Anarchist Black Cross and Black Flag with Albert Meltzer, was acquitted of involvement with the Angry Brigade, and started the publishing house Cienfuegos Press (later Refract Publications), which for a number of years he operated from the remote island of Sanday, Orkney, where he also edited and published a local Orcadian newspaper, The Free-Winged Eagle. Christie wrote with Meltzer, The Floodgates of Anarchy and later We, the Anarchists! A study of the Iberian Anarchist Federation (FAI) 1927-1937 (2000).
Around the turn of the century, Movement Against the Monarchy demonstrated against Britain's monarchy in 1998 and 2000. The anarchists planned a campaign for mid 2002. Demonstrators arrested during the 2002 Golden Jubilee of Elizabeth II were later compensated for unlawful arrest.
Anarchists were involved in late-20th-century war opposition, with campaigns like No War but the Class War during the early 1990s First Gulf War.
Organisations
Extant
- Freedom Press (1886–)
- Stapleton Colony (1897–)
- Solidarity Federation (1950–)
- Kate Sharpley Library (1979–)
- Class War (1983–)
- Anarchist Federation (1986–)
- Spirit of Revolt Archive (2011–)
Historical
- Diggers (1649–1651)
- Rose Street Club (1877–1882)
- Labour Emancipation League (1881–1884)
- Socialist League (1885–1901)
- Legitimation League (1893–1899)
- Whiteway Colony (1898–1909)
- Communist League (1919–1920)
- Anti-Parliamentary Communist Federation (1921–1945)
- United Socialist Movement (1934–1965)
- Anarchist Federation of Britain (1937–1950)
- Committee of 100 (1960–1968)
- The Angry Brigade (1970–1972)
- Anarchist Workers Association (1975–1984)
- No War but the Class War (1990–2002)
- Reclaim The Streets (1995–2003)
- Movement Against the Monarchy (1998–2002)
- WOMBLES (1999–2010)
See also
- Category:British anarchists
- List of anarchist movements by region
- "Anarchy in the U.K.", a song by the Sex Pistols
- Anarchism in Ireland
- British Left
- History of the socialist movement in the United Kingdom
- Republicanism in the United Kingdom
References
- Marshall 2008, p. 89.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 89–90.
- Marshall 2008, p. 90.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 90–91.
- Marshall 2008, p. 91.
- Marshall 2008, p. 96.
- Marshall 2008, p. 487.
- Calder, Robert (1720). The Priesthood of the Old and New Testament by Succession. Edinburgh: J. Wilson. p. 118. ISBN 1171119941. OCLC 1050718495.
- Smith, Steven (1979). "Almost Revolutionaries: The London Apprentices during the Civil Wars". Huntington Library Quarterly. 42 (4): 315–317. doi:10.2307/3817210. JSTOR 3817210.
- Manganiello, Stephen (2004). The Concise Encyclopedia of the Revolutions and Wars of England, Scotland, and Ireland, 1639-1660. Scarecrow Press. p. 60. ISBN 978-0810851009.
- Foxley 2013, p. 207.
- Bookchin 1996, p. 115.
- Foxley 2013, pp. 25–26.
- Bookchin 1996, pp. 129–130.
- Bookchin 1996, pp. 131–135; Marshall 2008, pp. 96–107.
- Bookchin 1996, pp. 133–135.
- Marshall 2008, p. 129.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 129–130.
- Marshall 2008, p. 130.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 130–131.
- Marshall 2008, p. 131.
- Marshall 2008, p. 132.
- Marshall 2008, p. 133.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 133–134.
- ^ Marshall 2008, p. 134.
- Marshall 2008, p. 135.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 135–136.
- ^ Marshall 2008, p. 136.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 136–137.
- Marshall 2008, p. 137.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 137–138.
- Marshall 2008, p. 138.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 138–139.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 487–488.
- Marshall 2008, p. 191.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 191–192.
- Marshall 2008, p. 192.
- ^ Marshall 2008, p. 488.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 488–489.
- Marshall 2008, p. 489.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 489–490.
- Marshall 2008, p. 490.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 490–491.
- Marshall 2008, p. 491.
- Marshall 2008, pp. 491–492.
- Marshall 2008, p. 492.
- George Orwell at Home pp 71-72 Freedom Press (1998)
- Orwell, Sonia and Angus, Ian (eds.). The Collected Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell Volume 4: In Front of Your Nose (1945-1950) (Penguin)
- Encyclopedia of British and Irish Political Organizations'. United Kingdom: Pinter Publishers. 2000. ISBN 978-1855672642.
- Goodway 2006, p. 312.
- Lynd, Staughton; Grubačić, Andrej (2008). Wobblies & Zapatistas: Conversations on Anarchism, Marxism and Radical History. PM Press. p. 250. ISBN 978-1-60486-041-2. Archived from the original on 2021-11-14. Retrieved 2018-11-10.
- ^ Rayner, Claire (28 March 2000). "News: Obituaries: Alex Comfort". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 18 September 2008. Retrieved 2008-08-23.
- For discussions of Comfort's political views, see Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism (1992) by Peter Marshall, and Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow (2006) by David Goodway.
- Carissa Honeywell, A British Anarchist Tradition: Herbert Read, Alex Comfort and Colin Ward, Continuum International Publishing Group, 2011 ISBN 1441190171 (p.112).
- Complete Essays, Journalism and Letters of George Orwell volume II, pg. 294-303
- Martin, Douglas (20 March 2000). "Alex Comfort, 80, Dies; a Multifaceted Man Best Known for Writing 'The Joy of Sex'". The New York Times. Archived from the original on 2020-02-08. Retrieved 2008-08-23.
- Keeley, Graham (21 May 2011). "Anarchist jailed over plot to kill Franco fights to clear name". The Times. London. Archived from the original on 22 July 2015. Retrieved 21 May 2011.
- Christie, Stuart. "Review: We, the Anarchists! A study of the Iberian Anarchist Federation (FAI) 1927-1937". flag.blackened.net. Archived from the original on January 7, 2017.
- "Anti-monarchists turned away at Palace". BBC News. 1998-10-31. Archived from the original on 2021-11-14. Retrieved 2021-11-13.
- "Cheeky anarchists in palace protest". BBC News. 2000-06-03. Archived from the original on 2021-10-28. Retrieved 2021-11-13.
- "Rioters 'may target Queen'". BBC News. 2000-05-10. Archived from the original on 2021-11-13. Retrieved 2021-11-13.
- Harris, Paul; Wazir, Burhan (2002-03-24). "Anarchists plan jubilee mayhem". The Observer. ISSN 0029-7712. Archived from the original on 2021-11-13. Retrieved 2021-11-13.
- "Jubilee protesters get damages". BBC News. 2004-02-04. Archived from the original on 2021-11-13. Retrieved 2021-11-13.
- Joseph, Paul (15 June 2016). The SAGE Encyclopedia of War: Social Science Perspectives. SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1-4833-5991-5.
Bibliography
- Bookchin, Murray (1996). "The English Revolution". The Third Revolution. Vol. 1. London: Cassell. pp. 61–142. ISBN 0304335932. OCLC 312686046.
- Cross, Rich (2014). "British anarchism in the era of Thatcherism". In Smith, Evan; Worley, Matthew (eds.). Against the grain: The British far left from 1956. Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 133–152. ISBN 978-07190-9590-0. OCLC 941255608.
- Foxley, Rachel (2013). The Levellers: Radical Political Thought in the English Revolution. Manchester: Manchester University Press. ISBN 9780719089367. OCLC 985096392.
- Franks, Benjamin (2006). Rebel Alliances: The Means and Ends of Contemporary British Anarchisms. Edinburgh: AK Press. ISBN 1904859402. OCLC 493946935.
- Goodway, David (2006). Anarchist Seeds Beneath the Snow: Left-Libertarian Thought and British Writers from William Morris to Colin Ward. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press. ISBN 1-84631-025-3. OCLC 939862412.
- Gustav Klaus, H.; Knight, Stephen Thomas (2005). To Hell with Culture: Anarchism and Twentieth-Century British Literature. Cardiff: University of Wales Press. ISBN 0-7083-1898-3. OCLC 57575365.
- Quail, John (2019) . The Slow Burning Fuse: The Lost History of the British Anarchists. Oakland: PM Press. ISBN 9781629635828. OCLC 1042080070.
- Marshall, Peter H. (2008) . Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism. London: Harper Perennial. ISBN 978-0-00-686245-1. OCLC 218212571.
- Shipway, Mark (1988). Anti Parliamentary Communism: the movement for workers' councils in Britain, 1917-45. London: Macmillan. ISBN 033343613X. OCLC 468642120.
- Shpayer-Makov, Haia (1988). "Anarchism in British Public Opinion 1880-1914". Victorian Studies. 31 (4). Bloomington: Indiana University Press: 487–516. ISSN 0042-5222. JSTOR 3827854. OCLC 809574647.
Further reading
- Evans, Rob (December 3, 2013). "At least four undercover spies infiltrated anarchist groups". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. OCLC 757685987.
- Evans, Rob; Lewis, Paul (2014) . Undercover: The True Story of Britain's Secret Police. London: Faber and Faber. ISBN 978-1-78335-034-6. OCLC 907626188.
- McKay, George (1996). Senseless Acts of Beauty: Cultures of Resistance since the Sixties. London: Verso. ISBN 1-85984-028-0. OCLC 982679436.
- McKay, George, ed. (1998). DiY Culture: Party & Protest in Nineties Britain. London: Verso. ISBN 1-85984-260-7. OCLC 959122840.
- Tranmer, Jeremy (December 2011). "London: a capital of protest politics". Observatoire de la société britannique (11): 177–190. doi:10.4000/osb.1272. ISSN 1775-4135.
External links
- Oral History Collection of Pioneers on Anarchism in post war Britain at the International Institute of Social History (IISG)
- A selection of the SWFs publications at libcom.org
- Syndicalist Workers Federation (UK) Archives at the IISG
- Anarchism: Arguments for and against by Albert Meltzer – text at Spunk Library
- I Couldn't Paint Golden Angels by Albert Meltzer – text at the Kate Sharpley Library
Anarchism by region | |
---|---|
Africa | |
Asia | |
Europe | |
North America | |
Oceania | |
South America | |
Individualist anarchism |
Anarchism in Europe | |
---|---|
Sovereign states |
|
States with limited recognition | |
Dependencies and other entities |
Far-left politics in the United Kingdom | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Groups |
|