Misplaced Pages

User talk:Viriditas/Archive 2024: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Viriditas Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:54, 11 February 2015 editIjonTichyIjonTichy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users7,586 edits Re: MONGO: respond← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:05, 1 January 2025 edit undoViriditas (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers169,672 edits Precious anniversary: mv 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
{{tmbox
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can ] within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 11:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
| type = speedy
=== Precious anniversary ===
| image = ]
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=One}}
| style = CSS values
] - What a lovely start, with a GA. --] (]) 12:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
| textstyle = CSS values

| text = In this world, hatred has never been defeated by hatred. Only love can overcome hatred. This is an ancient and eternal law. <small>–] (1:5)</small>
:Thank you! Happy New Year to you as well. The ultrawide camera on your Moto G200 is impressive, as I was pleasantly surprised to see the image of ] on the top of this page. The only thing we have remotely resembling it here is ], and that's a tortured comparison. I hope to see more photos from you in the future. ] (]) 17:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
:: Thank you! - I have a DYK on the Main page, but ] would be different, about ], - . --] (]) 16:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
:: On the Main page: ] who ] --] (]) 20:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| image = Hazel, Ehrenbach.jpg
| image_upright = 0.8
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}} }}
:: Yesterday was ], with related music. - I'm on vacation - see places. --] (]) 22:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
{{archive bar}}
]
{{search archives}}


== Your ] nomination of ] ==
== Groundless accusations of COI ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] and ]&nbsp;for issues which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 20:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)


==DYK for Olga Hartman==
If is talking about me, you need to be more careful about slinging baseless accusations around. -- ] (]) 14:09, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that although ''']''' believed that her ] on marine worms had no practical value, it was applied to experimental studies of oysters?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


== Tangential request == == Children of Men ==


I saw that you contributed a lot to ]. I think the article needs some tidying up to get it to modern GA standards and I even see it going to FA. I'm doing some work on it and if you want to help out please do. ] (]) 22:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
Re. the JHunterJ note on ANI, and specifically characterizing a redirect I made: ''This was a blatant run-around the AfD close, and an obvious attempt to enforce his lone "delete"; '' - This is a tangent to your main point, but I don't appreciate the editorializing/hyopthesizing. I don't remember my rationale for the edit, but probably I'd completely forgotten about the previous AfD. Many of the my edits the last 4-5 years are planting redirects atop in-universe concepts, and it's not unknown for me to lose sight of a prior AfD. Anyway, two years is a long time to forget. My motive, lost to memory, is ultimately immaterial; I'd appreciate you excising the guesswork, which I think fails to ]. Thanks! --] (]) 22:57, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
:Can you explain why you redirected the article to a video game, using the rationale outlined at ]? It's pretty clear to the most uninvolved, reasonable user that regardless of the ''Star Trek'' topic, it cannot be a primary topic due to other uses of the term. ] (]) 23:01, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
::No. It was, what, 4 years ago? I have no idea what I was thinking. My best '''guess''' is that I simply wasn't aware of a more appropriate dab item in place now. Even today, I couldn't tell you anything about appropriate dab target/naming conventions; other than removing multiple bluelinks, dab-ness is simply not something I maintain/jump into. --] (]) 23:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
:::Excuse me: '''I have spent the last two days trying to correct this error''', only to get reverted by JHunterJ in every instance. If there is no reasonable basis for this redirect, why is JHunterJ implementing it? ] (]) 23:13, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
::::I don't know. I'm not him. I see you've tried to garner some support at ANI, and that's all swell. All I'm saying is, I take exception to your statement that I was trying to subvert consensus by my 2011 edit; it seems unnecessarily antagonistic and does not assume good-faith. Best I can guess, again, it stems from a combination of a desire to do some general in-universe cleanup coupled with ignorance of disambiguation pages and practices in place. So, again, I'm requesting you remove or strike out the unsubstantiated inference about the motivation between what was really an innocuous edit. Thank you in advance ... or, if you're disinclined to such, can you please offer an explanation? Thanks. --] (]) 02:11, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::I really don't know what kind of changes you're looking for. The entire report is couched in my opinion. My tone could probably be piped down a bit I guess, but I'm not certain how to do that. Why don't you just edit that part of the report directly with a comment explaining how you feel. I won't mind, just indent it or offset it in some way. ] (]) 02:17, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
::::::{{Done}}, and again thanks. I agree, the tone of your post is pretty intense. I understand the frustration of reverting and counter-reverting when you're Right, Dammit! , and that's certainly infiltrated (and I worry detracts from) what might otherwise be a clear case of trying to do some good cleanup/correction. I hope it all comes together properly. --] (]) 03:53, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
:::::::Ah, good job. ] (]) 03:56, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


:Thanks for letting me know, but I abandoned that article a long time ago due to a certain disruptive user. Please consider it your own at this point and have at it. ] (]) 22:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
== Oranges/Schro ==
::@] Luckily that user hasn't been seen for 14 years! But I understand. I think the article needs a full redoing from the ground up. I'll see how I get on. ] (]) 16:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
:::That user is and has been active on Misplaced Pages under another account name the whole time, and last posted a few days ago using that account. Things are not what they always seem to be. ] (]) 17:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)


== K2-18b ==
Posting here instead of at ANI, in the hopes of cooling things down a bit. After SchroCat's post of 23:47, 26 January, it would have been preferable for you to take it up at his talk page, if you felt it needed to be discussed (though personally I might have left it alone). No matter what your intentions were in continuing to post at Oranges' page, it had the effect of escalating the situation into a brawl between you and he on the page of an absent third party. At the time of that post, there were no demands for apologies present, only a request to strike, a request which is permitted per policy and is fair assuming that Oranges' post was a good-faith misinterpretation.


I've replied to your inquiry on my Talk page with the answer that although some of the information is duplicated, an interview with a NASA astrophysicist talking about K2-18b is worthy of a paragraph in WP. Besides, the interview also states about the finding that there isn't much water on K2-18b, which is interesting. Please delete the paragraph if needed. I should put in a sentence or two about how they've found few traces of water in to the article. Also, there is this rumour about a paper... :) Best ] (]) 10:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
I would also suggest that there are more parallels between your actions and SchroCat's than you might think. Just as you are defending Oranges, he is defending Cassianto. If the dispute has nothing to do with him, one could equally say that it has nothing to do with you; but really, anyone may express concern with someone's statements here, whether those statements are addressed to them or not - as you have done with SchroCat's statements towards Oranges. But for the moment, I really think the best way to deescalate here would be to stop posting on the issue. Cheers, ] (]) 04:41, 27 January 2015 (UTC)


==DYK for S. F. Light==
:{{ping|Nikkimaria}} the difference is, I never defended the comments made by Orange. I defended her right to say them and proposed a probable explanation for her thinking and asked for the attacks to stop. I then reached out in the spirit of civility to the offended party. was their response. Given the previous incivility from this user that Orange was responding to in the first place, compounded by the intimidation and harassment from multiple users on Orange's talk page consisting of one accusation after another, I believe my actions were sound and in good faith. The over the top, aggressive and angry response from Schro was uncalled for and unacceptable. Given the above response from Cassianto, we seem to have a larger problem with the community that needs to be addressed. Pointing these things out, requesting that editors follow the civility policy, and taking them to ANI when they don't, is not the problem, so I must disagree with your assessment. ] (]) 06:10, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''' ''(pictured)'' disliked using his full name?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] ] 00:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
{{DYK views|28,094|1,170.6|January 2024|S. F. Light}} ] (] • ]) (he/]) 03:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
:Nice article, interesting read! --] (]) 00:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
::Thank you. I found it odd that there is almost nothing known about his early life, and his death by drowning is almost just as meager. The drowning was most unusual to me, as I used to swim in the lake he died in when I was a child; it was famous for calm waters. His true legacy was with his students who went on themselves to teach others. I wanted to be able to list the number of doctoral students his own students produced to show this continuity, but I never made it that far. It’s definitely a large number, somewhere between 200-300 I think. There’s also other connections with his students who ended up in other major institutions (and ]), so it’s possible more could be said. The reason I created the biography is because his name kept popping out in the strangest of places when I was writing about the Moss Beach area for ]. That led me to ] and finally, Light. ] (]) 01:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can ] within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 15:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)


== A Barnstar for You! == == A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align:middle;" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank you for your patience during the GA review of '']'' and for your many improvements throughout the process!
|}
''']]''' 15:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for Sketches of the Life of the Great Priest==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that Monet decorated his house at Giverny with Kuniyoshi's ''''']''''' ''(pictured)'', one of about 231 Japanese prints in Monet's personal collection?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] ] 00:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

:: disturbs me much. You changed
::::''The Descent of the Star Ichi on the Thirteenth Night of the Ninth Month''
::to
::::''The Star of Wisdom Descends on the Thirteenth Night of the Twelfth'' (九月十三夜依智星)
::The problem is that "九月" seen in the text and in the image *means* "Ninth Month". Try as a simple demonstration.
::Why the change from "Ninth" to "Twelfth" ? ] (]) 03:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
:::Thank you for bringing this to my attention. That title was changed to align with the image title used by the . Should it be changed back, and is the British Museum title in error? ] (]) 03:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Shenme}} I have restored the older title per your request. ] (]) 04:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

== WuXi AppTec Request ==

Hi Viriditas, I found your name on ] and was wondering if you would take a look at my ] to update the ] article. Thank you very much ] (]) 19:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

== Minneapolis discussion ==

Hey, and I'm hoping you would participate. Thank you. ] (]) 15:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

== Seditionists ==

I guess you don't like them, but please do not delete my comments like that, thanks. ] (]) 19:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

:I never saw your comments nor did I intend to delete them, so please assume good faith. You must have responded just before my manual revert, which avoids edit conflicts. The user is promoting January 6 conspiracy theories and their query belongs on the RS noticeboard. ] (]) 20:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for Sun in an Empty Room==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that Edward Hopper wondered what ''']''' with no one to see it?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> —] (]) 00:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
{{DYK views|9,808|817.3|February 2024|Sun in an Empty Room}} ] (] • ]) (he/]) 03:29, 2 February 2024 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| title =
| image = Nordfriedhof München, crocus.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
: Thank you! --] (]) 12:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
: My ] - as you will know - is about ] celebrating his birthday. --] (]) 22:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
::How was your trip? Are you back now? ] (]) 22:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
::: Great, - see places! - Yes, I'm back but images will trickle in. - Today I am happy about ] on ] (at least for the first hours), after ]. --] (]) 15:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
::: ] to ]. --] (]) 22:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
::: The image, taken on a cemetery last year after the funeral of a distant but dear family member, commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page and ], a friend here. Listen to ] (an article where ] is pictured), (whose performance on stage I enjoyed two days ago). --] (]) 18:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
::::Great photo! I'm listening to the music now. It's like having my own curated playlist and photo gallery! ] (]) 18:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::Starting the day with music from ]. Doesn't get any better than that. ] (]) 19:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::: Thank you! - Listen to if you like, - I ], and the November concert (at a different church) raised a truckload of winter clothes. My story today is also from my life: I heard the singer in 3 of the 4 mentioned musical items. I ]. - ] premiered OTD, DYK? --] (]) 10:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
:::::: more music and flowers on ] --] (]) 17:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

== Bias in Authorship ==

Hello, I noticed you had been editing: ] and wasn’t sure if you noticed what the article would look like if Marcus J. Carey was added. He is/was founder of Threatcare, and also authored some of the books Willis is in.

I’ve never worked on an article with this situation before, want to have a look? ] (]) 14:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for Sky Above Clouds==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''''']''''' was inspired by a large, blank white wall?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> —] (]) 00:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==


{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''WikiProject: Star Trek Barnstar''' |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence'''
|- |-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | A big thank you for boldly going where no editor has gone before and really fixing up my articles! The WikiProject appreciates it. ] (]) 18:51, 28 January 2015 (UTC) |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I am glad to have come across a diligent contributor like you. Thanks for being around. I learned a lot with you. Best regards, ─ ] ] 19:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
|} |}


== Well said == == Montrose Chemical company ==


Hi. I was reading about LA toxic ocean dumping, and have a suggestion for renaming the ] article:
This is by far one of the best and most honest posts I've ever seen on wikipedia. It's good to know that there are some decent editors around. Good job! ] ] 23:14, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
:Thank you, ]. ] (]) 01:22, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
::I agree with Caden. Great comment, Viriditas. ] (]) 16:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


]
== Tagteam harassment ==


If you have any suggestions, it would be appreciated. ] (]) 18:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
Sorry, but did you say what Sitush and Eric have done today is good? , , . ] (]) 23:34, 30 January 2015 (UTC)


== Apologies ==
* At 04:46 January 30: Sitush weighs in at ], and says, among other things: "There is no need to obsess over it, although I think the comma issue may be one of Rationalobserver's pet peeves as I've seen this raised by them in a recent GA review somewhere."


hey, Viriditas, I'd like to apologies for the situation with dyk review - I was tired and frustrated with issues IRL, and I was wrong in my comments there. I do appreciate your comments and copyedits, and I'm sorry that I appeared to be a grumpy ass. I'm not asking for forgiveness, but I hope you don't hold a grudge. ] (]) 20:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
* At 15:51, Eric Corbett comes to my talk page, despite having banned me from his three days ago, , and proceded to edit war berating comments onto my page. ] (]) 23:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC)


:Thanks. What I wanted you to understand at the time, was that my only goal was to help you get your hook in the top slot with an image. Admittedly, adding my own hook and bowing out of the review wasn’t going to go over well, so your response was not exactly unexpected. I think we both could have done better. Thanks for reaching out. ] (]) 20:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
::Hi, ]. Take a deep breath and step back for a moment. Remember what I wrote yesterday? (link is above) Read it again. I said that your articles would probably be targeted, that you shouldn't revert, and that you should reply with kindness. So, I'm assuming you've taken a deep breath before reading this. :) Let's review: Eric Corbett left you a message on your talk page about a recent GAN. I realize the two of you have been at each other for the last week or so. But think about this for a minute. This was an incredible opportunity for you guys to patch things up and move on. He was only commenting about the article, not about you or any conflicts you've had. I realize you reverted him because of past problems on his talk page and your interaction, but remember to stay above the fray, to look for opportunities to move beyond conflict, and to avoid reverting. I know, our egos get in the way, there's a little voice saying "fight, fight, fight". That's why it's important to take a deep breath and step back. See the conflict from outside yourself. I told you yesterday that people would be targeting you and focusing on your articles. That's not against any policy. Knowing that, you have to be extra careful in your response and reaction. That's what I was talking about yesterday. So today, two editors made comments on the talk page about your GAN. I saw this coming yesterday and tried to warn you. All you have to do is briefly address their points, and stick to improving the article. AFAICT, Sitush and Corbett are trying to improve the article, and that's good, we want to focus on content, not interpersonal conflict. You might feel harassed, and you might feel like they are picking on you, but at the end of the day, they are allowed to improve articles just as much as you are. That's why I think it's to your benefit to try and patch things up. I know, I know, that little voice is telling you to fight, to hold a grudge, to be angry about what just went down. I am sorry to say that that little voice will also abandon you when you are in hot water. Don't listen to it this time. It's helpful when you're in a tight spot, such as a survival situation, where you need a fight or flight response. But you see how it interferes when it tries to speak to you in an altogether different context? Take a deep breath, take a step back, and respond when you are feeling safe, comfortable, and relaxed. There's nothing to fight about here. Just set it all aside and let it go. You'll be very surprised at what happens when you do. ] (]) 23:46, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 01:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article is ] in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can ] within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 23:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)


== A bot to check DYK QPQ automatically ==
: Three days ago he banned me from his talk page, but now you think he should follow my GA reviews and force mentor me? 30 minutes ago he told you . I'm not hysterical, but I am confused. ] (]) 00:03, 31 January 2015 (UTC)


Hello. I'm sure you're very busy, but if you have the time, I'd love your quick thoughts ]. Thanks in advance. ] (]) 23:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)
::I know all that! :) I know you're upset about it. But think about it for a moment. Of course, you don't have to let him post on your talk page, and frankly, he ''should'' have used the talk page. And he most definitely shouldn't have been edit warring on your talk page. But think about what's happening here. They are pushing your buttons in every way possible. And as a result, you are responding like a puppet. Look at what's happened: you've been edit warring on your own talk page, ignoring comments about an article, and you've become more aggressive, hostile, and even defensive. Isn't that what they want? The entire point of my comments yesterday was to give you a way to ''avoid'' this current situation. So he banned you from his talk page. There are other ways to deal with it. You could have addressed his comments with kindness and then asked, "Btw, if you banned me from your talk page, why are you posting on mine?" Remember, infinite diversity in infinite combinations. You don't have to respond in one way; you're not an actor using a script. ] (]) 00:10, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
::: Okay, I understand now. ] (]) 00:15, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 02:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article is ] in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can ] within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 01:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| image = Yellow ball flowers, levada, Madeira.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
congratulations! - today in memory of the birthday of a friend who showed me art ], and of Vami --] (]) 14:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} Fascinating! Now you've got me interested in Oswald's creative process. How did he approach envisioning the historical likeness of Hildegard? ] (]) 23:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
:: You will have to ask him ;) - what I know is that there are two statues, one at ] (that she founded) and the other at the ] in ], a museum with a large section dedicated to her. He said that this - as a crucifix at the ] - was modeled after a real person, a dancer from Berlin, whose movements he had studied for sculptures of dancers. When I wrote the article about ] I "knew" that it was her face, but this is pure original research ;) - the model for was a black man. Oswald made ] of her sculpture. --] (]) 06:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
:: Rossini's ] was ], - when I I think of ]. --] (]) 23:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
:: I uploaded vacation pics (from back home), at least the first day, - and remember ]. --] (]) 20:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
:: Some days later, a calf in the mist and chocolate cake, and ] --] (]) 21:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
:: I ], - 300 years after it was first performed. --] (]) 20:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
:: Two days later in time, ]! --] (]) 20:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)


== Re you know what == ==Early glassmaking in the United States==
{{Re|Viriditas}} Thank you for reviewing ]. This is an old article that I felt did not do justice to the glass industry, so I make a significant "redo". I have also created ] and am working on a 19th century version. As info, I will be away from my office all day Sunday, but back on Monday. Thanks again, ] (]) 16:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)
* I will be out of the office on Monday (March 18) and probably Tuesday. ] (]) 21:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


{{ping|Viriditas|TwoScars}} (and others) - FWIW - seems my old Wiki article about - see => http://web.archive.org/web/20141108214325/https://en.wikipedia.org/Jan_Bogdan - () - see => https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Drbogdan/sandbox-JanBogdan - and - - see => https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jan_Bogdan - may be of interest - and possibly relevant - in any case - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - ] (]) 22:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
I'm gonna write you privately also, but had made this post before realzing it was his talkpage, not The Interior's, so moving my comments here as they were there, and undid my reply to his typically misdirected and blatantly hyprocritical comments per DISENGAGE.] (]) 07:01, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
:Disengaging is ''good''. Whisper's going on break, so try to leave him be for a while. I am interested, however, in whether you can find anything ] where you two can see eye to eye. I would like to find neutral territory between the both of you. I think we need to nip this thing in the bud and put an end to it. Think about all the useful things you can do with your energy. ] (]) 10:11, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
::In points 1 and 2 there, he repeats his claims that the OR and RS boards agreed with his position on page-cites. ''They did NOT''. As for condescending to investigate other sources than his selected range of POV ones, and POV "clips" from more general histories, he could have done that ''a long time ago'' instead of launching barrage/red-herring objections and writing OR manifestos about what guidelines mean, when they do not say anything like what he claims. Styling my responses to TheMightyquill on the article talkpage as to missing sources/issues that have been derailed/opposed by him, "continuing my behaviour", is typical of the misrepresentation and mis-statement of things I have said or done as being a "problem" and that I "interfered with" his ''choices'' re titles/geographic range and more. That on other side-pages he's since stated that he will pursue further action against me when he returns isn't exactly the most collaborative/cooperative thing, now, is it?


{{Re|Viriditas}} Thank you for all your hard work on ]. You obviously know much more about prose and writing than I ever will. As far as Bogdan goes, I noticed there was some controversy about him, and I do not recall him being mentioned in any sources such as the NPS. Even he was one of the Poles, none of the original glassworkers needed to be mentioned for the article—and it would not make the article better to list all of them. ] (]) 18:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
::The use of procedural warfare = bureaucratic deflection/sanction - to "win" when facts and cites and points-of-correction about his guideline claims persist (as on what you have linked) isn't how good content is built; it's how knowledgeable contributors are silenced/persecuted/harassed for being in the way of what is clearly a POV thesis built on obscure sources and selective clippings from them built up as SYNTH, and not in a style amenable to the general readership. Procedural warfare and red herrings such as contesting long-held Canadian norms on terms and usages are not proper discussion; they are deflections, and because of the POV agenda I see so very clearly, constitute an information-war tactic: shoot the messenger.


==Rock-Lobster eye optics==
::I offered tons of sources that he spent incredible amounts of energy rationalizing into the dustbin, and maintaining the ''even talkpage mentions'' of what's in them ''MUST'' have page-cites or ''he will delete them'' is beyond the pale of ]. What I see also is ]ing me so I respond to his inane arguments in my inimicable style, prolix as it is, as he's found out there are others reading to condemn my style of writing (and who rarely if ever read what I actually have to say). See the quote from TheMightquill about me on my userpage about me voicing facts and perspectives that others ''do'' agree with vs those who trot out NPA/AGF-ish badgerings like ], ], ] and ] so as to derail discussion, as made regularly by people ''uninformed on the subject at hand''.
Regarding the '']'' article that you authored. More recent advances have stepped up this instrument, which enables it to have its own moniker: ''Rock-Lobster eye optics''. Perhaps we can collaborate on new article? Here is a primary source on that . Let me know if you are interested. ---] (]) 21:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
:LOL. I'm a fish, not a crustacean, but I should point out that Viriditas tried to review the DYK nomination, but didn't start the article. But don't mind me, rock on! --] (]) 21:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
::Please cover up your proverbial ]s with your fins for my next comment: {{ping|Steve Quinn}} The real, outstanding question of our time is, why weren't ] featured in ''Stranger Things''? My guess is that it's a major oversight by the ], given that they weren't born until 1984. The point to keep in mind, is that although versions of the song were recorded in 1978 and 1979, it didn't become prominent until the 1980s. Our Misplaced Pages article also fails to mention this. Even stranger, why did the song go to number one in Canada in 1980, but couldn't even break the top 10 in the US? My guess is the length. 6:49 long on the album, 4:52 on the single, and 3:57 on the radio friendly version, which was still too long. This is the most important question of our time. The best minds of our generation are working around the clock on this. ] (]) 21:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
:::I still don't have an answer, but I'm sure that ]. Maybe very far out there. --] (]) 22:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
::::Well it seems all of the above is good fodder for background in the proposed article. And yes, one has to wonder how the B-52's did not wind up on ''Stranger Things'' - at least as a retrospective. Who says we can't have fun on Misplaced Pages? ---] (]) 22:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


== What is with that oppose on the RH BYU AN/I thread ==
::If he really wants to collaborate and not stonewall me, that would be refreshing. But it's ''HIS'' tone and attitude that ''must'' change; lecturing me as if I was a junior student to him, and demanding I buy books (when he knows I'm broke and barely making it day to day) was more than patronizing, it was demeaning. Dictating that I should follow his ''commands'' "ASAP" and his attitude that ''he'' will decide what's allowed in the article and on its talkpage is more than questionable, and makes the OWN allegation against me by a certain party all the more ludicrous....and completely misplaced/misdirected...and made by someone with no knowledge of the subject area, who has an axe to grind and has challenged geographic-region names well-known in BC and Canada as "original research".] (]) 07:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


Is it just me, or are you being petty? I don't see any substantive argument, just sour grapes about something totally unrelated. ] (]) 03:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
:::Thanks for the reply, Skookum1. You've given me a lot to work with in your response. Would it be OK if we deal with one thing at a time, making sure to stick to discussing only that thing? I would like to talk about the use of page numbers, so can we move that to the top of the list for the moment? What's the status on this dispute? Is it still a point of contention? Here's where I stand: page numbers help us verify material. Now, some editors may not be aware that there are ''alternatives'' to page numbers. For example, you can back engineer a range of numbers simply by knowing the name of the chapter and then using any number of sources to verify the associated page numbers. This is one helpful tip of many, there are quite a number of them. Can you give me just ''one'' example of when this came up in the past? I'm asking so that I can understand what led to such a simple idea exploding into a dispute. That should never have happened, so obviously, something went wrong somewhere. I'm hoping we can solve this point first (because it is one of the easiest for me to address) and then move on to your other ones. Again, thanks for such a great response, Skookum1. ] (]) 08:40, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
::::It (the page-cite demand) comes up constantly, and has been asserted by him in his assertions since the DISENGAGE, as if he was right, and as if the RS board had endorsed him (GB Fan said outright and flatly "no they're not needed") and his lengthy SYNTH argument about ] you will find on the OR board, if it's not archived yet; I'll dig out links for both of those, and will link all the diffs on the talkpage where he continued to assert it, even after I pointed out on the OR board that his construct about it was purely SYNTH and ]. The implication all over the talkpage, also, is that things can't be mentioned ''there'' without page-cites; I had simply mentioned events/issues and directed him to sources they can be found in;


==DYK for E. Graham Howe==
::::....''that'' started a series of denigrations of those sources, including his creation of a review-article on one of them '']'' which seemed to have been created simply to assemble all the pejorative reviews on it; the page-cite thing in particular is about the ] story, which is in four or five sources (but not in any "scholarly" source); I had had two of those books in digital form on a hard drive that crashed on Xmas Eve but I know people who own them; asking them to take time to find page-cites for me (not for me, for ''him'') will happen, but not on ''his'' demanding schedule ("ASAP"). That I could tell of such things and be challenged (he's indicating anything ''will'' be challenged by him, indicating he has no good faith in me whatsoever). He now has access, sounds like personal photocopies, to Morton's book (''Sea of Sterile Mountains'') but though I indicated specific things I ''know'' to be in there, because I haven't seen them anywhere before until I read that book, he hasn't posted finding any of the things I said he'd find; I'll not list them so as to keep this short, and will come back with quotes and links. ] issues abound with his style of article-writing and his selectivism on often-obscure sources and quotes and a penchant for using critiques rather than general narratives or actual ''real'' data, vs assertions in those "scholarly" critiques which have so many errors and gaffes it's worth a book all on its own. Also re OVERKILL, the ] is ever-present. ] (]) 11:24, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''' "introduced ] to ] in England"?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &spades;]&spades; ] 12:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)


==DYK for Intermission (Hopper)==
:::::]; note the responses more than my lengthy "ahem" (this being another in a long series of very lengthy side-boards where he sought recourse for his position, I'll link WP:V next; connectivity problems tonight, and getting to be dinnertime and had a lot of non-wiki computer work to do (music conversions) so will get back with WP:V and WP:OR (x2) and other boards; though their content is not my concern, just the lengths he went to try to counter me per my ongoing comment about AGF; not accepting good faith in another (experienced and informed-on-the-subject) editor and seeking a ruling to argue against me with; which he didn't get, but says he did. Is this engaging? No, I'm just explaining to someone who asked me for the specific details, and providing same. At least ''someone'' is listening to me....
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ]'s 1963 painting ''''']''''' can be viewed as a metaphor for the ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
{{DYK views|7,819|651.6|March 2024|Intermission (Hopper)}} ] (] • ]) (he/]) 03:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
:Congrats on the viewership, too! --] (]) 20:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
::I couldn't have done it without you. ] (]) 20:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
:::High fives all around! --] (]) 20:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


== ] ==
:::::BTW because I wasn't notified of those other board discussions, and happened to find them looking at his UC's, I'm having difficulty finding them; I'll have to search for them later, this may take a while (looking back in my UCs quite a ways re those OR board items; the WPV thing was more recent; I mention it on the talkpage more than once. SYNTH and CREEP and claiming you got an endorsement you actually didn't; that may simply be a comprehension or a lack of logic, but it's a core issue of the goings-on - and often in those "screeds" and "rants" I get condemned for, but nobody reads and won't. I'd thought there was a WPV board, don't see it on the board template maybe it was also RS board and now is archived? OR board I've found and will dig into the archives and link them later.... hopefully tomorrow ;-) but maybe later on; going out now.] (]) 13:26, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
:::::::{{ping|Skookum1}} because I work full time, my time on Misplaced Pages for the last decade has generally been limited to breaks, after hours, days off, holidays, and mobile device editing. Because my time is short, it is difficult to get the meat of the matter from your comments. We can safely assume that other people have the same problem. Right now, we are discussing page numbers. I reviewed the linked discussion you gave me, but your comments were so incredibly long that I have had not yet had time to finish them. Please make an effort in the future to shorten your comments. I get the feeling you are trying, so for that I want to thank you. ] (]) 00:16, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
::::::::Sorry, I thought I had mentioned to disregard my response and just note the responses from other editors e.g. GB Fan, vs what was claimed was affirmed there on the talkpage and in other posts on other users' pages. Re other users having similar problems with such claims and conflations of guidelines I will return with a link to a discussion about this widespread and mounting problem on the EXR talkpage, and also with a link to the two OR board "orations"/SYNTH essays and the WP:V board discussion where conflation of what it says into something very much more, and rigid as a supposed rule, was made (and refuted by me) and links to where the claim has been re-made since.


Hello Viriditas, I decided to abandon the GAN ] article to begin working on the ]. Wondering if you’d like to accept the GAN task (I realised you reviewed it nearly nine years ago, but deemed it a failure). Best, <span style="background:#00FFFF;font-family:Cooper Black;">]]</span> 17:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::::I am only temporarily logged in at an office for now and should have time for this later today at some point. That nobody else has taken part in the many articles at issue (not just CCinBC) means that others have not encountered this problem, and of course rather than reading my reports/side of it, I am being condemned for speaking ''at all''. Where the collaborative mood of earlier years within Misplaced Pages has gone isn't so much a mystery, and where the huge amount of ] about guidelines being touted as "policy" has come from remains an open question that I am not alone in observing per ], where yes I added some not-so-lengthy comments....on an even lengthier discussion that, miracle of miracles, nobody has thrown a WoT objection to or condemned for the usual reasons.
:I'm sorry to hear that. Since I previously reviewed General Motors EV1 in June 2015, it's probably best to hand it off to another reviewer. You could also consider skipping GAN and go straight to FAC. However, given that the EV1 has the most controversy of any electric car to its name, I suspect this will not be as easy as you think. I think it's far easier to start an uncontroversial article from the ground up from a stub. But, I wish you good luck, and if you're persistent and put in the work, I'm sure you'll succeed. ] (]) 19:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
::Thanks for the thought. I just thought about asking you considering your consideration for the Volt. Best, <span style="background:#00FFFF;font-family:Cooper Black;">]]</span> 00:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
:::It does raise an interesting question, though: are reviewers allowed to review the same article, multiple times? ] (]) 00:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
::::I don’t see why not. It doesn’t say that in the GAN instructions. <span style="background:#00FFFF;font-family:Cooper Black;">]]</span> 00:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::There are many reasons why it's not a great idea, and as you are likely aware, not everything is spelled out in the policies and guidelines. In a perfect world, it might not be a problem, but one can envision all sorts of ways someone could take advantage of performing multiple reviews of the same article/hook/AfDs, etc. ] (]) 00:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::I see. <span style="background:#00FFFF;font-family:Cooper Black;">]]</span> 00:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)


== Editor experience invitation ==
::::::::That being said, my intent here, given that you have an open mind on the problems I have been encountering for months (on a scale and intensity I have ''never'' seen in all my years on Misplaced Pages), is to try to keep to specific issues, though the page-cite matter is interwoven with ] and ] and what, to me, is clearly a POV agenda on content intended to exclude events, issues and sources that conflict with that agenda and keep a certain pejorative flavour to the assembled and over-cited content and is at wide variance with the tone and content of other related articles; the claim heard I think ] that there is no POV fork, and no POV, is not, to me, valid ''in the slightest''. The page-cite issue is a red herring and ''not called for by ANY guideline'' and is clearly SYNTH in origin/argument.] (]) 04:51, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
:::::::::Re that last paragraph, a summation might be "censure vs discussion" which is what we used to call un-wikipedian is all too much "typically wikipedian".] (]) 05:08, 6 February 2015 (UTC)


Hi Viriditas :) I'm looking for people to interview ]. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. ] ] 10:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
===Page numbers===
;Issue
{{ping|Skookum1}} I'm going to try one more time to reboot this discussion. I'm still interested in seeing how the page number dispute occurred based on one specific example. In this particular discussion, I don't want to discuss the behavior or conduct of editors. I just want to see an example of where at least one page number dispute occurred. Can you show me 1) the name of the article 2) the problem where it was discussed, and 3) a diff or link. Once I can see that, then we can move on to other issues. Please be very brief in your reply, 50 words or less would help. I'm going to get this party started by using ] as an example of the page number dispute. ] (]) 02:31, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


:{{ping|Clovermoss}} I will consider it. I have a few interesting stories to share, but I want to get the details right before I commit to responding. ] (]) 21:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
;Result
::That's completely fine. Feel free to pitch in whenever you're ready. ] ] 23:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Having looked at the issues raised regarding page numbers in just the article "Chinese Canadians in British Columbia" and the current status of the article. I cannot find any flaws in the position taken by WhisperToMe. While each editor may interpret citation guidelines differently, and each editor may have a different approach, during a discussion about verification and sources, page numbers are important for each editor to review the material. That doesn't mean they are required, but it does mean that when a content dispute arises, they may become necessary. This appears to be one of those times. Please note, as this is very important: the discussion about the use of page numbers exists independently of other issues, such as NPOV, civility, etc. ] (]) 02:40, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


== April music ==
;Recommendation
My recommendation is for Skookum1 as follows: to get up to speed on how to best use sources on Misplaced Pages, please pick a topic that you find interesting and write about it. It might help to create a new article in your userspace, for example. Then, plan on taking that article through the article improvement process, from creation to DYK, from GA to FA. Along the way, make special note of how the sourcing requirements get tighter, and how more is demanded from editors. Of course, the quality of sources will vary by topic, so a lot depends on what you are writing about. I think you'll find that if you are writing about Canadian history, the expectation is that the sources will be of the highest quality and that page numbers will be ''de rigueur''. Obviously, this isn't written in stone, since guidelines only make recommendations, but the best way to learn about this is by participating in the process. ] (]) 02:50, 7 February 2015 (UTC)


{{User QAIbox
:See my comments about academic POV on the CCinBC talkpage in response to TheMightyquill. And yes per ] ''nothing'' is written in stone, and most Canadian history articles do ''NOT'' have tons of cites ''per paragraph'' and their tone is not as blatantly POV as what I am seeing unfold in the growth of the article since its foundation, likewise other ethno-political articles by the same author. Selecting negative/pejorative comments, whether from academic-ideological ''critiques'' (not narrative sources e.g.) and seeking to exclude local histories and the much better-quality general sources for BC history is not viable; nor is allowing one author with little knowledge of BC to OWN the article and mounting the ] to construct an article that is ''not'' readable or in the interests of the general readership vs that of specialists, per TITLE, which is a policy.] (]) 06:11, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
| image = Himmelsschlüssel, Engweder Kopf.jpg
::I see those as separate issues. You, however, see them as directly connected to the page number issue, is that correct? Just trying to find out if we are on the same page or not. ] (]) 06:15, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
I like to see ] on the Main page today (not by me, just interested and reviewed), and I also made it ]. How do you like the compromise in the composer's infobox? - How do you like the statue (look up places)? - I was undecided so show three versions ;) --] (]) 17:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
:Yes, Appalachian Spring is a fine article. My only complaint after reading it is that the lead somewhat downplays its influence on American culture (and on the people themselves). The body does go into this, so I felt like the lead should have mentioned this a bit more. Otherwise, it's fine. Your composer infobox looks good; it's difficult to tell the difference. Your places subpage has trouble loading for me so I have to click on the images manually. I see three images of statues, which are quite nice. I note that the artist made her visage very pretty. I don't know which image I prefer, they are all exceptional. It looks like the weather was quite good when you took it. Rhine valley spring? ] (]) 18:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
:: The comment about the ballet lead should go to article talk. - The composer infobox is not by me, - see that article talk. - We talked about the same statue (and the artist's inspiration), in March, remember? --] (]) 18:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
:::Yes, of course. I knew you were alluding to it. Are you enjoying spring? ] (]) 19:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
:::: I enjoy spring, - today temperatures were rather like summer even. More pics to come. However, the German Misplaced Pages told me that spring in the ballet title is supposed to mean "source" rather than a season. The question was already on the ballet talk, and I repeated it, but no answer. --] (]) 19:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::Yes, ] was referring to water, but Graham was referring to the season. "It is essentially the coming of a new life. It has to do with growing things. Spring is the loveliest and saddest time of year." There's a weird tradition in American art of taking a concept from outside of its original context and applying it to a new one. Not sure why that is. ] (]) 19:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
:{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} I would like to use one of your statues of Hildy (I've loved that nick since '']'') on my page. Not sure which one, however. ] (]) 22:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
:: You could rotate ;) - I associate green with her, so love the sprouting rosebush - there were also daffodils on the ground left of her but when I had those I missed the face. I love the wild sky as a portrait of a free spirit. --] (]) 06:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
:: As it happens, her ] is on the Main page today, and ] as ] (by NBC, 1939), and below (on my talk) three people with raised arms (a player in the rock band with the "rock abbot, a large wooden sculpture of Jesus behind a church altar made by handicapped people, and the conductor of the ]), - and the place is the cherry blossom in Frauenstein
:: plum tree blossom for Kalevi Kiviniemi in the snow - see my talk --] (]) 21:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
:::Thank you. ] (]) 21:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
:::: relief: the last of six RD articles in one week is now on the Main page - yesterday I went to ] with many anti-war songs by Jewish composers whose music was banned by the Nazis. --] (]) 20:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::Nice photos. It occurs to me, we still don't have any discussion or mention of Hildy in the ] article based on her vision from the ''Scivias''. It would probably go in the "Modern representations" section. ] (]) 20:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::: more photos ;) - the RD articles were followed by two birthdays in a row, and I prefer those (see my talk) - go ahead with the world egg --] (]) 09:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::: ] a sad task - memory of ] - turned into entertainment (yt at the bottom of his article, actually both) -- the latest pictures capture extreme weather --] (]) 21:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Thank you for letting me know. I am setting up a playlist to listen to his recorded works now. Sad news. ] (]) 21:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::::{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} I just queued up '']''. I won't be able to listen to it for another couple hours. I will let you know how it goes. ] (]) 22:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::::: for more listening: today you can look at the ] or "music" on my talk, and find the same topics, ], ] and (pictured) one row of 8 double basses and another of 5 bassists ;) --] (]) 20:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::Thank you. ] (]) 20:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)


== This one..? ==
:::the claim that page-cites should be used on topics of importance in Canadian history is not in any guideline and a review of major Canadian history articles will ''NOT'' show ] with cite-usages; when well-known and "obvious" items like the cite-demand for Metrotown and Golden Village that's "trivial opposition" given the citations already on those articles. Canadian history should not be written up as ethno-POV diatribes, and challenges to obstruct content that disputes the claims made by academic POV (in all its glorious obscurity and irrelevance and tendency to generalize) and the SYNTH that piles selected bits of those to construct what constitutes anti-"White" invective, and said editor fights off any attempts to moderate it with ''actual facts'' and ''other points of view''.


Hi Viriditas, would you care to review the ] article for GAN? It's extremely short (sub 1700 words) so it shouldn't take too long. I plan to bring it to FAC, but the ] article is already there so thought I might as well do this one. Best, <span style="background:#00FFFF;font-family:Cooper Black;">]]</span> 09:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
:::About that capital-W "White" usage, see ]'s "self-identification" section and note the official Canadian government usage of "European Canadian" and ''NOT'' "White", capitalized or otherwise. It's a long-standing wiki convention to use the former, though some demographics sections have seen it imposed; most have been corrected to the wiki-norm but some remain. The further point about that is the ''gross generalizations'' made by academics and Chinese-origin authors like Paul Yee about "Whites" actually also apply to non-European Canadian groups, and obscure the very sharp distinctions between British, American, and "Canadian" groups in the early colony/province. And t hat they're every bit as rank and negative as the oft-heard complaints about generalizations made against ''them''...which Paul Yee and others complain about, while making the same or worse themselves. Using guideline-games and SYNTH logics to justify challenging the wiki-norms is an ongoing game and has a very clear POV intent.] (]) 06:21, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
:Thank you for thinking of me. Unfortunately, I’m on break from GA reviews for at least another month. I’m working on at least four articles right now, two of which are offline, and it’s something that I’m constantly thinking about, even when I’m sleeping. I’ll check in with you when I return to GA review mode. ] (]) 09:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
::Oh okay. Thanks for the response nonetheless. <span style="background:#00FFFF;font-family:Cooper Black;">]]</span> 09:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)


== May music ==
::::Right, but please remember, I am only discussing page numbers in this thread. When we reach the end of that discussion, we can discuss these other issues. It's really important for us to focus only on the page number issue, discuss it to completion and resolution, and then move on to these other topics. I can't do it any other way. So, with that said, can you focus only on page numbers and address my question up above? I'll repeat it here. Do you think the page number issue is directly related to these other issues? ] (]) 06:26, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| image = Hawthorn in bloom, Ehrenbach.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
On the bicentenary of Beethoven's ], I remember our recent uplifting choral concert in pictures, on my user page and ] (leading to the two at the church's article). --] (]) 21:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)


:Thank you for the reminder. I will play the 9th in his honor today. ] (]) 21:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::Yes, very much so, throughout. Page-cites are ''only'' needed when quotes are used, or when somebody challenges a statement/source......and guess who will challenge anything that disputes the SYNTH/POV construct he's been building? That's already on other wiki pages, and ''NOT'' challenged by ''people who are familiar with Canada'', such as the Metrotown/Golden Village citation-demand. Conflating an intersection in a suburb into a "community" when ''all of Greater Vancouver'' has Chinese populations is ''spurious nonsense'' and ''completely'' SYNTH; taht item is just geo-trivia but quite pointless and constitutes dross/UNDUE as well as SYNTH.] (]) 06:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
:: The reminder was on the Main page, the image ;) --] (]) 21:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
:::I saw it! But I am more motivated by your personalized reminder tailored for me on my talk page. ] (]) 21:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
:::: Thank you, - I like that! --] (]) 21:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} FYI, I did end up listening to ] and the ]. The whole thing is slightly upsetting to me. In 200 years, we have not managed to surpass anything like this. Why not? Has time stopped? Where are all the new Beethovens? ] (]) 08:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::: I don't know where the new Bs are ;) - ] is the Feast of the Ascension for which Bach composed his oratorio, - perhaps how the closing movement was performed in Bach's church. --] (]) 22:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::: ] is on the Main page ], together with an opera that reviewers deemed not interesting and too obscure for our general readers. The soprano thought differently, - . - Also on the Main page: a TFA by sadly missed Vami_IV. --] (]) 10:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::: did you listen and see? - today's story has a pic of a woman holding her cat, a DYK of 5 years ago - the recent pics show 2 orange tip butterflies --] (]) 15:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Just wonderful. Thank you for the joy you bring. ] (]) 19:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} What's the story with Philippine zu Guttenberg? She looks far too pretty to be a nun? ] (]) 19:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::: No article even in German. looks decent but I don't know if it would be enough for Misplaced Pages. The story with the soprano is that some doubt she is notable, and some that the sources are good enough. --] (]) 20:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::: I liked seeing ] on the Main page today, 310 years after the first performance! We sang it in 2000. ] was easier but also spirited. I ] of "I will sing with the spirit", with nature photography, - enjoy. --] (]) 21:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} Thank you! I had been meaning to tell you that I recently listened to ''Songs of a Wayfarer'' ('']'') performed by ] from 1979. It's an impressive recording, as it sounds very modern and current. I noticed that I found the mezzo-soprano range somewhat more relaxing to listen to for some reason. I had never noticed this before. ] (]) 21:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::: Thank you! - ] mentions a concert I loved to hear (yt of another Mahler song, from different performance) and a piece I loved to sing in choir, 150 years old OTD. --] (]) 15:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::: 29 May 1913: ] - ], actually something I saw at that place in a revival. - Why would you assume I get angry? (replied on DYKtalk) --] (]) 10:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::: ] is about ], one of five items on the Main page - more musing on my talk, and while I wasn't angry it made me sad that instead of the precise program of five composers, we had three, only the common-place ones, only Germans, so showing him narrow-minded instead of open. Please listen to his postlude improvisation. --] (]) 23:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::: last offer in May: photos of the river Rhine, and the adjacent Eltville rose garden, - high water and interesting weather --] (]) 19:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)


== Canon EOS R project importance ratings ==
::::::I appreciate your reply. Page numbers are also needed when editors try to verify material and collaborate. This is not something you should be fighting, it's something you should embrace. I understand that part of your frustration stems from not having access to sources, but please understand, there are ways to access them, and editors like myself and Whisper are happy to work with you to help. I use the reference desk, the resource exchange board, and other Misplaced Pages resources for this very purpose. Google books and Amazon also help. There are alternatives to continuing this dispute, and they involve getting what you want. I think your anger is misplaced here. ] (]) 06:48, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


Hello, @].
:::::::I think his opposition to ''anything I have to say'' is what's misplaced. As others have observed he could learn a lot from me ''but doesn't want to''. As for page-cites on some sources mentioned, because of the time/ energy/goodwill exhaustion and the reality that other people's lives don't march to WTM's demanding beat means I haven't yet gotten around to writing people I know who ''do'' have those books and can provide page-cites. Once I do, watch for him to try further attempts to claim the source is not valid, just watch.] (]) 07:10, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


I asked a question on the ] but I'm wondering whether you're best placed to answer it.
::::::::I understand. I've been involved in many different kinds of disputes, so I have a lot of experience. And, since I'm seeing this dispute as an outsider, I can give you a much needed perspective. Don't be stubborn like a tree branch in a storm. Be flexible and bend with the wind. I don't want to see you snap. And right now, you're focusing far too much on interpersonal conflict instead of conflict resolution. Try to separate all of these issues into their constitutent parts. From page numbers to content, from NPOV to RS, stop mixing them all together. The only way we can solve this problem is to keep them separate and deal with them one by one. At the end of this discussion, we can put them all back together again and make them work. If you are willing to give this a try, if you are interested in getting what you want in some areas and compromising in others, if you are willing to admit that you have something to learn as well as to teach, then lay your preconceptions aside and approach this with beginner's mind. Only then will we make progress. You have put so much time and energy into this dispute. Please redirect it now into ending it. It's important for us to finish up the discussion about page numbers and not any other topic. I don't want to talk about the other issues until you acknowledge that Whisper's approach to page numbers is reasonable and based on policies and guidelines, regardless of your differences in opinion and approach. Don't bring up content, because we aren't discussing that yet. ] (]) 07:31, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
:::::::::The validity and NPOV of content ''should'' be the central issue, and his invocation of his claims about page-cites and RS has always been a red herring to avoid addressing the very real issues of content that he has AGF-warred against me for months; yet it's my "conduct" that's under the microscope, and his tactic (and yes it's a tactic) of raising red herring issues about guidelines (and my "conduct") rather than being opened to informed discussion and any GF at all towards the events and sources I raise. "attack/discredit the opponent and ''never'' address the issues" is an old game and very recognizable, as is the use of technical red-herring issues to defray and delay any work on the actual content or any genuinely two-way discussion; he's never wanted one, he claims I 'interfered with' what he clearly sees as ''his'' articles. But who gets accused of WP:OWN? Never mind, we already know...07:22, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
::::::::::I'm happy to address whatever the central issues might be—after we finish discussing page numbers. Imagine, if you will, if you brought your car to your mechanic with a host of problems. After describing the noise in your front end, the problem with the brakes, the warm AC, and the door lock that doesn't work, your mechanic gets to work. As he's fixing the problem with the door, you ask him, what about the AC? He patiently explains to you that he will get to it when he's done with the door. But, you tell him, you don't want to be hot, the AC must be fixed. He notes that it's easy to fix, but if he doesn't fix your lock, someone will steal your car. Is any of this making sense? ] (]) 07:30, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


In short: should the WikiProject Photography importance ratings for an article be cleared when it gains Good Article status, or was that a mistake? I'm also noticing that the page was never part of WikiProject Brands until the GA notice was applied, so that looks like it might have been a copy-paste error too.
no it's not, he's not a mechanic and BC history is not a car; he's an ''information mechanic'' to be sure, but there's a lot of corrupt mechanics out there who will tell you something is wrong with you car ''when it isn't'' so as to get you to engage their services; point blank he doesn't want the ''information'' about BC history I know of, and know in which books, admitted to "his" ''personal thesis'' on BC history and making up rules for me to follow is just a game; he has the one book now ''himself'' and wants ''me'' to spend ''my'' time on ''his'' demands. And as far as I'm concerned, he's already stolen the car (BC history) and waving at with me with a smile as he drives away.] (]) 07:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)


If possible, let me know if the ] article should set back to "Low" importance for WikiProject Photography, and if it should be removed from WikiProject Brands altogether. ] (]) 21:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
:Good answer. I like your style. Listen, I forgot to ask you something: what kind of outcome would you like to see? Do you want to continue this dispute for the rest of your life or would you like to help end it? If you want to end it, what kind of outcome would you like? Please be specific. ] (]) 07:52, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
::I've , now that I have web access at home, and also removed some of his typical "so-and-so-says-this in his/her such-and-so book/article" yada yada which is all over his articles and more than a bit obnoxious; there are many sources (including all the ones he hasn't looked at, and those he doesn't want to make easy to reference) that say the same things; we can't name them all ''in the article''. He also misrepresents Digital Collections as "Government of Canada" as if the federal government authored those pages instead (I'd explained this to him but he asserted his opinion that it was a government statement and appears to not care about facts and Canadian realities, but that's par for the course), likewise the Royal British Columbia Museum in one case (which is, um, outsourced to a Disney subsidiary for management/administration and also display design).


:You ask an interesting question. There’s no right or wrong answer. Many projects have gotten rid of importance ratings altogether because they don’t seem to matter all that much. I would say the answer here is to to use your best judgment. ] (]) 21:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
::As yet I've only added bits from one of the many sources I provided and which have been ignored, but find it difficult to integrate them into the SYNTH-flow and the many biased statements from Chinese authors and others that he has chosen to build content; there's much on the article that's complete dross e.g. "Victoria Chinatown is in Victoria" or something along those lines and extraneous commonalities about a particular Chinatown being mostly male (all were) and "Ashcroft had no Chinese in 2006", as if Ashcroft mattered and there weren't another hundred communities like that and is if there weren't more than 15 in various other towns his chosen source doesn't mention at all.
::Taking a cue from numerous articles about similar cameras, I've set the importance level to "low" for both projects. ] (]) 18:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)


Hey, just wanted to say I greatly appreciated your . It genuinely means a lot. '''] ]''' 15:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
::If I'd been left alone instead of dragged to ]mal Farm (best name for that place, IMHO) and faced with "go get me this and do it now" orders and all that's come of that, adn I hadn't been struggling for survival and/or web access, there's much that could be added and ''FIXED'' both in terms of facts and fairness of coverage,and removing a lot of "junk content". Some sections could almost warrant separate articles now, e.g. Demographics, where he obsesses on detail, and his over-building of Vancouver content sections is likewise full of junk content as ''padding'' to justify his desire to split a "Chinese in Vancouver" title off (NB if that does take place then that title implies also all the stuff do with China's influence on the BC/Canadian economy and investment, not just Canadian Chinese (i.e. citizens). Re any split, the split should be not Vancouver/rest-of-BC so much as pre- and post-influx of the new era Chinese, or at least from the onset of Trudeau's multiculturalism policy and the opening of the door to PRC immigrants; and ''that'' latter part is heavily about Greater Vancouver and not really anywhere else, while earlier provincial history cannot be so neatly separated.


== ] ==
::Anyways to reply to your question: "what kind of outcome would you like to see? Do you want to continue this dispute for the rest of your life or would you like to help end it? If you want to end it, what kind of outcome would you like?" I'll reply one by one and try to be brief


I've hatted a bunch to commentary there that does nothing to advance anybody's arguments and just generates anger. Please resist the urge to get into that kind of conversation, there were personal attacks in both directions. '''<span style="font-family: Arial;">] <small>]</small></span>''' 21:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
::''"what kind of outcome would you like to see?"
::A fair article with less one-sided invective and better writing than the very clunky quasi-formal style has built; an admission that he has much to learn yet and a display of respect for my knowledge of my home province and its history, and an end to his campaign to find those hostile to me, and what I see is ongoing ]ing by talking about another ANI or an RFC/U or ARBCOM; I haven't had ''the time'' to take this to ARBCOM myself, which I should have done long ago btw, and given some comments I've seen about ''me'' I see little point in taking anything to a bureaucracy more focussed on building and enforcing behavioural "rules" than on quality/fairness of content.


== June music ==
::''"Do you want to continue this dispute for the rest of your life or would you like to help end it?
{{User QAIbox
:::The rest of my life may not be all that long, but I will never stop caring about my province's history and will never kowtow to cultural imperialism bent on rewriting it through a one-sided ethno-focussed agenda - one with intense political issues attached, which are even more heightened now due to a new treaty with China ] should have an article by now, otherwise google that).
| image = Rose flowers, Bingen.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
] is about the TFA, by sadly missed ]. In my support in 2018, I hoped to do justice to ] next - which I will begin today, finally, promised. Its Bachsaal was pictured to begin ]. For more related thoughts and music, look on my talk for ]. --] (]) 12:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)


] died 100 years ago OTD, hence the story. Fond memories of collaboration. I uploaded a few pics from the visit of ]. --] (]) 15:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
:::This should never have been a dispute, if not for his hostility towards any correction of his many gaffes and his warring with anything I say, and the red herrings tossed around to redirect discussion on his terms, and that includes directing criticism at me and not on the article and his content/OWNership there. He could have learned a lot from me, but never wanted to; and now wants me to do ''his'' work for ''his'' claims about page-cites rather than read up himself and get acquainted with the full scope of the material; whether he will ever have a fair view of what he likes to capitalize as "Whites" I don't know; I doubt it, it's not in his field of vision.


Today I wanted to write a happy song story, on a friend's birthday, but instead we have ] on top of it, which would have been better on 2 June, this year's first Sunday after Trinity. The new lilypond - thanks to ] - is quite impressive. As ] said: Bach was fired up. - ] is rich in music, also ] and a conductor. --] (]) 14:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
::''"If you want to end it, what kind of outcome would you like?"


:{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} I like the photo of the roses. Did you take it during the ]? If so, was it after sunrise or before sunset? ] (]) 21:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm going to continue trying to fix the POV/SYNTH he's concocted and see no reason not to; his writing style is very clumsy and stilted. As far as end "it" meaning the dispute, that is not possible until he acknowledges that he can learn from me, apologizes for putting me through the wringer and retracts his claims that my long knowledge of my home province is 'original research' as if I was concocting SYNTH = which is what ''he's'' been doing throughout his composition of the article. If the dispute continues to focus on ''me'' rather than on content, and the page-cite b.s. is still asserted as a way to combat information and ''fair content'' he doesn't want to see (or hear about), then don't look to me for an end to the dispute; I'm standing up for NPOV and fairness and Canadian English/contexts and integration with the content and tone of other Misplaced Pages articles; he has wanted control, and styled my correction of his bad "choice" for a title as being "interfered with". To me, it's BC history that's being interfered with by someone who knows little of the place, but has an ethnopolitical agenda and axe-to-grind.
:: I remembered after lunch, and the image description tells me 2:38pm. --] (]) 21:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
:::Very nice. Any chance you can find any German-language sources to add to ]? I notice ] has several articles, but they are behind a paywall. Also, see the discussion at the bottom of Tryptofish’s talk page. Thank you. ] (]) 21:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
:::: With Rheinische Post, I have the same problem. I have dear company and will edit only sporadically for the next few days. Perhaps take a look at the FAC for Schumann. --] (]) 22:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::Thank you. Enjoy your time with friends and/or family. ] (]) 22:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::: The time was great, - pics to come! - Today is "the day" for ], also for Bach's ] (and why does it come before the third?) - the new pics have a mammal I had to look up. --] (]) 16:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Today is the day for Joyce? That's hilarious. Did you mean what I think you meant? ] (]) 20:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::: How would I know what you think? - I read it on the Main page ;) --] (]) 20:23, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Heh. Read the bio. June 16 is a very "funny" day. ] (]) 20:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::: New pics of food and flowers come with ] of Noye's Fludde (premiered on 18 June), written by ]. I nominated ] because he died, and it needs support today! I nominated ] for GA in the Women in Green June run, - review welcome, and more noms planned. --] (]) 14:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::Oh, you tempt me! I very much want to review that article. You know me too well. But I will continue other things due to my GAR hiatus. If nobody takes it in a week, then I might. ] (]) 20:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::: Thank you for that! - ] is a feast day for which Bach composed a chorale cantata in 1724 (and we had a DYK about it in 2012). Can't believe that ] had to die, - don't miss her video from the Opéra-Comique at the end, - story to come. Updating her sufficiently for the Main page was all I got to yesterday, and there could still be more. - The weekend brought ] sung and listened to, and some of it is reflected in the last two stories! + pics of good food with good company --] (]) 14:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Please write a song in honor of Devos named "no one has to die". Would be fitting. ] (]) 03:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::: I'm just a singer not a songwriter. - The image in ] is what I happened to see from my seat in a performance ''before'' the festival (with ] in the title role but sold out of course, and the other was possibly the icier Principessa anyway). I recommend the trailer video, with various scenes to the end of the music that Puccini was able to finish before he died in 1924. --19:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)] (])
:::::::::::::: back home, but too tired for more than pic update --] (]) 21:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)


== Humanities ref. desk ==
One of my colleagues from a BC history course at SFU in 2003 still has our textbook which has a mass of academic articles and chapters from book in photocopy form that he's agreed to scan and send to me (lots of work on his part btw); he may join in editing this and the Indo-Canadian articles (he's Indo-Canadian); here's what he said in response to my request: ''"I'll get right on that. I actually have all those texts in my office. There's nothing I enjoy more than sticking it to a misinformed, ill informed, obtuse and ignorant American."


I'm not too interested in prolonging our discussion at any length, but you should understand that many feminists and lesbians may not have a strong preference when it comes to a choice between your right-wing donor circles who want to put women back into their old patriarchal roles versus transactivists who are just as misogynistic against women who dare to disagree with them or who dare to stand up for their own rights -- especially since the right-wing donors are remote shadowy figures, while the transactivists are nasty and vicious and in your face with their spiteful hatreds and fanatical determination to punish women by fair means or foul, and silence them (literally by shouting them down, or by more sinister methods). If I were half as conspiracy-minded as you, I might make something of the fact that gender ideology allows men to unleash unrestrained virulent hatred against any and all women who disagree in any way with gender ideology, and invoke all the traditional conventional misogynistic stereotypes against them '''combined with''' the latest up-to-date left-wing jargon insult buzzwords, harassing and intimidating and doxxing those women, and trying to destroy their careers and ruin their lives -- while feeling smugly virtuously progressively "woke" the whole time. In this respect, it's kind of Incel for left-wingers (both Men's Rights Activists or MRAs and transactivists or TRAs get extremely angry when mere women dare to stand in the way and try to be obstacles to people with penises doing whatever the hell they want, -- the difference being that MRAs don't try to redefine and misappropriate the word "woman" itself). You can call gender ideology "progressive" all you want, but to those on the sharp edge of struggles over conflicting rights, the willingness of gender ideology adherents to throw women under the bus (in certain case, their positive eagerness to throw women under the bus) really does not feel too "progressive" to them. It's all a little bit similar to those who don't care too much about Arabs, but seize on middle east issues to unleash their hatred of Jews...<br>
Added that because ''exactly'' the same problem occurred in countless situations here on Misplaced Pages (and not just about Americans but also Albertans and Ontarians who know little of BC unless they've lived there a while), whether to do with the round of native endonym RMs this last several months or cross-border articles e.g. ]; and note the collaborative work, with no page-cite demands, on that talkpage since Voltaire's Vaquero started working on it- it was his encouragement that got me back onto Misplaced Pages again after walking away because of the ] matter and my wariness of who it was I was in dispute with there...). Again, too often people who don't know much about BC weigh in on AFD/RM et al who don't know the subject matter and even say they don't care, all they care about is guidelines. That line of thinking is not encyclopedic, it is building a rule-set, not good content.
P.S. The recent ] demands absolute fealty to gender ideology. If enforced strictly, it would mean that truth is irrelevant, facts are irrelevant, evidence is irrelevant, reliable sources are irrelevant, NPOV is completely destroyed, and so on down the line, since the only important thing is conformity to gender ideology (presumably anyone who dares to disagree with Judith Butler would be banned!). ] (]) 19:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)


:I hope you feel better now. ] (]) 20:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Most other BC history editors have "walked" a long time ago; ], who I was able to meet up with in 2011, is dead; the others are aware ofthis problem but don't want to get tangled up in Misplaced Pages again as they are writing their own books and have real lives etc....and don't like the way the place has gone of late, more difficult to edit and more bureaucratic meddling taking up too much energy and goodwill. Point is though is that I intend on writing an article for a zine or blog in BC that echoes the appeal I've vbeen putting out for actual British Columbians to take part in making sure Misplaced Pages has fair and complete content, instead of being full of academicist diatribes and bias; and ''they'' have the sources I don't, or used to; but at this point Misplaced Pages isn't all that welcoming to newcomers ''because'' of the procedural maze and more, including hostile putdowns like I get for speaking my mind about untruth and bias; problem is that not only can edit the encyclopedia, anyone can become an admin too, and many let it go to their heads/egos.
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 13#Matriotism}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <small>—&nbsp;]<sup>&nbsp;(]</sup><sub style="margin-left:-2.0ex;">])</sub></small> 21:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)


== Highlighting Trump's racism ==
So do I want to spend the rest of my life in this dispute? No, of course not; but I get asked all the time to write about BC and perhaps put too much weight on Misplaced Pages's importance in terms of what people find when they look something up; so it's not like I'm not respected for my knowledge of the province, ''rather than disrespected as I have been constantly since this began'', but rather regarded as a valuable resource person with a discerning eye and ear. I ''will'' spend the rest of my life caring about BC history and writing about it; if I walk away from Misplaced Pages again, which I may because it takes time away from me struggling to find food/rent in a foreign country, and because of the dangers of taking on the multi-polar "disinformation state" that I so obviously a presence here (including and especially on ]mal Farm), it will be Misplaced Pages's loss......and BC content will be overrun by people who don't know squat about the place (unless my community outreach works) and who think more in terms of guideline-mongering rather than ''learning'' and ''knowledge'' and ''good content''.] (]) 11:45, 10 February 2015 (UTC)


* Trump is the most racist president since Nixon.
:Summation: I want a fair, readable article without junk content that is accessible and useful for the general readership and an end to oppositional warfare against my person and the information I bear. And yes, an apology for "the burden" his psychological warfare and procedural rabble-rousing has caused me; and when he cites Morton, to not do so in a very selective way as it's clear he has been using (note the "murderer" edit), and junking of a lot of the biased race-baiting commentary from Chinese authors against "Whites". Re that term, he doesn't "get" that Governor Douglas was ''mulatto'' (quadroon actually) and that many government officials were ], or that there were different kidns of "Whites"; but Chinese historians generalize "Whites" negatively every bit as much as they complain that 19th Century politicians do. We're no strangers to double standards in BC, and I'm no stranger to them here in Misplaced Pages, either.
* DOJ found Trump family business refused to rent or negotiate rentals "because of race and color"
* Role in Central Park Five case; insistence the accused were still guilty after being acquited
* Racist attacks on Judge Curiel's Mexican heritage
* Trump wants white European immigrants to come to the US, not black and brown immigrants.
* Trump's role in the Obama birth certificate conspiracy
* Trump's defense of "very fine" Neo-Nazis at Charlottesville
* Trump telling four US-born congresswomen to go back to their "country", even though 3 of them were born in the US. None of them were white.


Time to update the lead section for this convicted felon. ] (]) 00:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
:By the way that last comment about driving away with a smile is a Vancouver-traffic allusion; any Vancouverite would "get" that; getting cut off and then slowed down even though there were two other lanes to choose is par for the course, and pretty much is like what has happened here in Misplaced Pages; Vancouver has 40 different driving cultures all jamming its disorganized street network at once; see the driver's license scandal on the CCinBC talkpage in the issues list I added for TheMightyquill.] (]) 11:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)


Postcript; I'm not sure I used the {{tl|quote}} template right on two edits, maybe the ref shows up in the references, I don't see it. Could you have a look?] (]) 12:06, 10 February 2015 (UTC) :You are a sad, sad individual who is living in a world of brainwashed lies. ] (]) 09:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
::]: age 78; at risk for obesity, heart disease, high cholesterol, family history of dementia. ] (]) 09:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
::Gotta make Misplaced Pages grate again. --] (]) 21:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
:::I mean, I wish I could be angry at the IP, but it's impossible at this point. The projection from them is fierce and overwhelming. Imagine putting your faith in a lifelong charlatan, con man, and grifter who represents a foreign nation. But, they are not alone. I was just coming back from a nice long walk when I ran into a neighbor down the street. He's the nicest guy you'll ever meet. But, unfortunately, he's an ultra MAGA, he believes COVID-19 was a fake "plandemic", and he lives in that world like the rest of the Trump supporters. You can't get through to them, and there's no reason to even try, because for them, facts don't exist, yet he holds down a full time job like most Trump supporters. Only thing I can say is that it's like we live in two different worlds. Rachel Maddow came to the same conclusion, coining the phrase "Earth 1" and "Earth 2" as a kind of recognition of the vast chasm between us. ] (]) 08:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)


== Misplaced Pages Library ==
===Re your comments on telling ''me'' how to best use sources===
I saw this on your comment on his talkpage just now:
:''"After reading the talk page comments, I'm convinced that Skookum1 can benefit from your guidance on how to best use sources. Part of the problem comes from him not having access to these sources. I realize that you've offered to share some sources, and I'm hoping I can help him use online sources like Google books to solve part of the problem."''
You seem unaware of the masses of useful online sources that he continues to ignore and not read, and they have page-cites ''too''. As for you not telling ''him'' that *I* could benefit from his patronizing lecturing on "how to best use sources" you should have also told him that he could and should benefit from listening to ''me'' about what other sources and events/people/issues there are that ''need'' to be in the article. I've been reading BC media and books on its history for over 40 years; I'm not the one who needs to know more about the subject, and it's only ''his'' insistence on page cites re his SYNTH/CREEP claims about what WP:V says that stand in the way of me adding material to the article ''that is already on other articles'' and has ''NEVER'' been subjected to page-cite demands.] (]) 06:34, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
::You are mixing separate issues together. What would you say to a fish who complained about water? Page number requests in the context of verification in the article example provided above are acceptable, justifiable, and reasonable. In this regard, Whisper has the policies and guidelines on his side. Now, that's not to say you don't have a point about academic POV, but as they say, you don't have a choice. You paid for this ticket and you have to ride the ride, and you have to play the game. I get that you object to it, and I understand its limitations, but you don't have a choice. The fact that Whisper can help you with citing sources has no bearing on content. Keep the issues separate. ] (]) 06:42, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
:::The "choice" is that the ] is much in evidence, and that TITLE's statement about the interests of the general readership should be put before those of specialists is not my "choice" but ''policy'' and I have ''that'' on my side, also per "Whites" see ] which is a guideline he doesn't seem to care about...among many. Selective and conflated/SYNTH claims about what guidelines supposedly say and make ''mandatory'' is ''abuse of guidelines''; what he has on his side is a host of people who won't read what I write about such problems but condemn me for saying ''anything'' at all. The article is at wide variance from NPOV norms on other Canadian history articles, and also at variance with content, tone and NPOV established in many more BC history/geography articles long before he ''began writing the article as he researched the article'', having no knowledge of the province before that, as evinced by his repeated gaffes on geography/ terminology. He claimed on The Interior's talkage that "there is no POV fork...there is no POV". Fine for him to say, but race politics is like that....deny deny deny, and accuse ''and generalize'' ...and race politics is what his constructs on the article serve i.e. one-sided condemnations and generalizations. Teh article is not fair in its treatment of non-Chinese and that's not just academia's fault, he's being selective in his sourcing from e.g. Pierre Berton (who, by the way, is not a reliable source and ''doesn't use page-cites''). And exclusionist about what ''he'' will allow in teh way of sources and contents. Challenging sourcing for the sake of challenging is not collaborative, completely AGF and obviously been disruptive and ''not constructive''. Rather than rejecting the input of an informed local editor, he has systematically attempted to claim that as original research; when he's really conducting his own.] (]) 07:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


Hi! Why are you not eligible for Misplaced Pages Library? – ] • <small>]</small> • 23:57, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
:::And re not having access to those sources, many of them I owned and read for 30 years or more, and had two on that crashed hard drive that went down on Xmas Eve. He says if I can't quote them verbatim my memory is not reliable - more AGF and NPA - and that belies the fact that ''he hasn't read them at ALL''. I learn what I read, and while I remember where it was and who said it, I don't have the capacity to memorize page numbers; but I do have t he ability to read something and read all of it, not just the negative tidbits to construct SYNTH/POV ''essays'' full of too-many cites from obscure sources and naming obscure academics in the course of the article, likewise the names of journals that are ''not'' relevant to the general readership or plain English writing. He ''now'' has access to Morton's ''In the Sea of Sterile Mountains'' and should read it cover-to-cover himself, instead of suggesting that I wait for the photocopy he's made of it by mail (and I don't want him having my mailing address...not that mail to here takes any less than 3 or 4 months if not Fedex'd). I know what's in it and have said so, and he disputed those ''talkpage mentions'' demanding page-cites "ASAP" for them ''or he would delete them'' .] (]) 07:06, 8 February 2015 (UTC)


::::Verification entails the need for page numbers. While I respect and appreciate your expert knowledge, Whisper is well within his right to ask for page numbers for verification. As a collaborative project, editors should provide the best sources possible, including page numbers if they are able, so that others can check their work. ] (]) 08:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC) :I got into an argument with the admin of Wikinews who I called a pathological liar. Probably not the smartest move, but that’s what happened. He then blocked me and years later he died from some illness, so he can’t unblock me. Site blocked users can’t have access to Misplaced Pages Library. ] (]) 00:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
::Do you regret your move? Are you sorry about it? Where exactly are you blocked? – ] • <small>]</small> • 00:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::And I'm in my rights for pointing out that they're ''NOT''. He didn't get the endorsement for his position that he claims he did on the WP:V discussion, which I have yet to find in my edit histories for lack of web access; working again now but sheeeeesh you're endorsing ] which disappoints me greatly to suit his SYNTH claims about what WPV and WPRS say when ''they do not''. I can see I'm wasting my time here, as you accept his SYNTH arguments about those guidelines and basically have told me to go away from "his" article and write others instead. You ignore the POV issues I have pointed to which underlie his agenda in challenging cites and facts he doesn't like; "speaking truth to power" doesn't seem to work in Misplaced Pages, where power is being abused by those who have coopted it for themselves in the pursuit of not-innocent agendas re content. Very disappointing. I will vote ''against'' any further hardening of guidelines, of course, which I view as contrary to the openness and inclusiveness of Misplaced Pages' original concept, and of the Fifth Pillar "there are no rules". but there sure are for those who like rules and like writing and enforcing them, and like using them against people who dispute that rule-writing agenda.] (]) 06:00, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
:::Blocked and community banned here:. . I regret being uncivil and rude in my communication on the talk pages, however the discussion and rationale for the community ban (described as "Disruptive, combative nature with clear goal to cause as much trouble as possible) was based on a series of false statements made by others, particularly the unsubstantiated claim that I was socking (I wasn't, and there was zero evidence that I was) and that I was trying to "cause as much trouble as possible". However, it is entirely true that I was unnecessarily combative in my speech, and it is that fact that I regret, and is an ongoing problem that I still struggle with. ] (]) 01:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Skookum1, you're talking about other topics again. Please remember, I'm only focused on the page numbers in this discussion. I would be happy to discuss other topics, many of which you may be entirely right and correct about, but I'm not addressing them here, I'm addressing page numbers only. I've provided constructive criticism regarding your use of page numbers only. Today, Whisper wrote up a wonderful, informal guideline for how to best access sources. Can you comment on it? ] (]) 06:06, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
::::What if we unblock you? What are you going to do then? – ] • <small>]</small> • 01:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::::I'd rather not. his presumptiveness and SYNTH about "how to best access sources" has already been patronizing enough. Those who enjoy using and enforcing rules also have a penchant for re-writing them when it's pointed out that what they claim they say is shown to be wrong; I've seen it before, e.g. re ] and all that transpired when that "rogue guideline" was used by its author to go on a disruptive BOLD rampage that took months of arduous RMs, and a few other attempts to blackball me resulting from that, as it is.
:::::I will not be editing Wikinews, if that's what you mean, and frankly, I don't have any future plans to edit it at all. I can't imagine that would change. If I was unblocked, I would apply for Misplaced Pages Library, that's about it. And of course, I would continue to work on mitigating my verbal aggression here and elsewhere, which I've had some major, measurable success with, but also some minor, yet recent setbacks. ] (]) 01:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::Is there anything I can do to help? --] (]) 21:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Waves from the bottom of the ]. They told me to stop digging! ] (]) 21:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)


== July music ==
::::::::Re page-numbers, I completely disagree with you that he in his rights demanding them when they are ''not needed by existing guidelines''; he's in his rights to challenge anything of course, but that's disruptive as it's clear that what he's challenging disputes the POV/SYNTH he's advancing in is attempted OWNership of a very large subject he actually knows very little about, other than the biased invective-academics whose one-sided view of history and ''lack of actual grounding in FACTS'' he so clearly shares. Compartmentalizing the discussion here on page-cites alone when the reason they're being demanded is both POV and AGF cannot be separated. A holistic understanding of what's been going on is needed, not blinkers-on narrowness of topic. I will state ''again'' that he misrepresented what the RS board folks said, {{ping|User:GB fan}} ''especially'' said 'no they're not required'. Apparently he not only likes selective sourcing, but also selective reporting of the board discussions he claimed endorse him ''when they did NOT''.] (]) 07:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| image = Schloss Tiefurt, day lilies in park.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
The ] about the first published composition by Arnold Schönberg which I was ]. Listen, and perhaps read what ] (to-be-Mahler at the time, to be precise, who was present at the first performance) said, and yes that was too much for the Main page ;) - I completely forgot about this DYK over the travels. Hope to get to M. soon. -- ] (]) 12:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


] is about a Bach cantata premiered 300 years ago OTD. - A meeting of two women - the occasion of the cantata - is pictured in our local church. Today, I was busy with a tenor who died. --] (]) 16:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::I'm happy to talk about all of these other things ''after'' we reach closure on the page numbers issues. You say you disagree with my opinion. I'm not certain I understand your disagreement. If you look at what Whisper wrote on his talk page today, you'll see that he has provided information on how you can best meet the request for page numbers. It's not an unreasonable request. ] (]) 07:21, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
::::::::::Oh, so he's setting out ''his'' parameters for ''me'' to fulfill his ''demand'' (it wasn't a "request") for page cites that are only needed because ''he'' is challenging sources on a knee-jerk basis..... not because guidelines call for them (in RS's case only if they are challenged, but AGF is the nature of all the challenge-mode he's operating in and from). Similar book-cites are all over Misplaced Pages, I've ''never'' seen anyone so anal about ''demanding them'' and launching efforts to change/harden the "rules" while the game is in play. Yes, let's reach closure on the page number issue and get ''him'' to acknowledge that they are not ''required'' as he claims, and to drop the subject; his claims and ongoing rule-conflation about them are ''NOT VALID''.] (]) 07:35, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
:::::::::::I've already addressed this particular points above, so I won't repeat them again. The community parameters for using page numbers is part of the article improvement process, which involves editors working collaboratively together to check each other's work through verification. Currently, the article in question is less than optimal, and has many maintenance tags. If you are familiar with DYK/GA/FA, then you understand what it takes to improve an article. If you aren't familiar with this process, then Whisper, myself, and other editors can help you. Above, I described one way to get up to speed on this process; the easiest is to create a new article and work on it in your user space. ] (]) 08:05, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
{{od}}Articles have sat for ''years'' with unref, refimprove and cite needed tags; whether from neglect or from lack of manpower or from a trait known as ''patience'' there are lots of them yet; I've ''NEVER'' seen anyone so ''demanding'' and ''impatient'' about deleting something ''even mentions of them on the talkpage''. I've offered up pages and previews from online copies of major BC histories which he has ignored and not even looked at, though says somewhere that ''one'' of them has something "useful", by which I'm taking it means another negative comment about "White" people to advance his ongoing POV agenda; as for wanting to mail the ''selected'' pages to me, ''and he's never ONCE said via email until just now'' (on his talkpage); again I don't want him to have my email address; you do, and could serve as a relay; and read them yourself. I have my doubts that ''any'' of it has items I've mentioned that he is so offended by he has mounted this AGF attempt to rewrite "rules" (which are ]) will include ''any'' of the items I've mentioned:
*The massacre of a European Canadian foreman near Lytton during CPR construction at a site called Camp 23
*The abandonment of 2,000 Chinese railway workers by the Chinese labour contractors who did not pay them after the work was done, who were starving and dying in the cold, and how non-Chinese in Vancouver rallied funds to help them out of their predicament (most went back to China)
*the listing of the first tax rolls for Victoria where 18 out of 20 on the list were wealthy Chinese merchants and labour contractors; the other two were Governor Douglas and James Dunsmuir, the coal baron; the HBC itself might have been on the list, so 17 out of 20, then.
*there are passages, one very clear one, detailing the specific points as to why anti-Chinese sentiment among British Columbians was so pronounced. There are also specific arguments made by ], ], and others that are also very clear and ''logical'', not the knee-jerk "racist" generalizations so often made by academics and Chinese politicos. Why shouldn't a British colony have wanted British workers to settle and build a society in the new colony? It ''wasn't'' a colony of China, though in Barkerville the Benevolent Association museum building there, and as a cited in an academic paper called "The Colonies of T'ang" (plus a subtitle I've forgotten for now), where that name was used in Chinese to refer to British Columbia i.e. as a colony of a non-Qing China (T'ang being the name of a previous Han dynasty vs the Manchu one at the time)
*the fact that it was pressure ''from China'', both imperial and nationalist/republican, on Britain to increase the Head Tax to deter Chinese workers from leaving China re trade relations with the Dragon Throne and its republican successor government. Like the 1/3 normal daily rate for labour on the railway, this has been blamed on BC being racist, when really British Columbians, among the many types of Britons and Americans there were in the province, had long accepted Chinese as merchants and miners and farmers/ranchers and so on, while it was others from outside BC who were the ones who perpetrated the riots of 1885 and 1907. This cant is often repeated in Chinese-written histories and political tracts but it is ''wrong''; like a lot of other things that are more myth and conflation than anything to do with ''facts'' and actual sources.


3 July is the birthday of ], and I'm happy I had ] which was about a woman ;) - It's also the birthday of ], and I uploaded pics from his family's album ]. Proud to have had 2 women in green in June already ;) - Now turning to the bass who died. --] (]) 13:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
So, I'll be curious to see what pages ''he'' has "selected" for me to do what ''he'' wants, and express my doubts again that it will be anything to do with any of the above, but rather passages that support his POV version of BC history; in the meantime I'll put to use those links/cites that he's ignored, some of which do contain information which ''puts the lie'' to various things in the article as he's compiled it e.g. the gold rush section where he claims that Chinese were afraid to stake claims because they were afraid of "White" (American) violence but neither he nor his POV source says anything about government measures taken against those "Whites" nor anything about how Justice Begbie and Governor Douglas and other "white" officials made firm statements and addresses to those who had been bothering the Chinese...on ''several very notable occasions''. That's also in Morton's book and in a good dozen more recent books on the early colony and on Governor Douglas and Justice Begbie; links to sources about that may already be on those pages.....some may even be page-cited, but ''nobody'' has ever gone to the incredible lengths that he has to ''demand'' them on ''his'' schedule.] (]) 09:25, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for approving Milashkina! I'd prefer recordings first then awards, but was reverted when I arranged it like that. It doesn't matter much. - ], the subject of yesterday's story, would have turned 100 today, but I missed that ;) - ] went to the Main page. I made my story about his almost unbelievable career, from Luigi in ] in Philadelphia in 1968 (with a nod to ]) up to Calaf in ] in Beijing in 1999 ;) - 4 July is also the birthday of ] who was a pioneer of {{diff|Percyc Grainger|579193399||a concise infobox}} in 2013. --] (]) 12:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

:Do you mean you were reverted on another article? I will restore it, since you say you prefer it. Not sure where to put the documentary, but I will leave it in personal life and you can move it where you like. ] (]) 21:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
::: (I don't remember on which article, understanding now how the question was meant. The answer doesn't relate to positioning of awards, but the list of compositions in a composer's infobox:) I was reverted on Robert Schumann, I {{diff|Robert Schumann|934403149||added a list of compositions}}, and it was reverted on 17 May during many improvements to improve to FAC quality, - when I noticed it was already too long ago for WP:BRD. The place to discuss would be the FAC. One user tried already. I was uninvited. Brian's pioneering infobox had a list of compositions. It was removed not only for Schumann but also for Grainger and Vivaldi. --] (]) 21:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
::::I was talking about ]. ] (]) 22:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
::::: I got it, only it's the other that was on ''my'' mind when I wrote about Brian's pioneering approach. --] (]) 22:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::Understood. I think the translation of the documentary film title might be wrong. I think it's supposed to be ''The Sorceress from the City of Kitezh'', not ''The Wizard from the City of Keitezh''. I'm still looking into this. ] (]) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::As far as I can tell, they are deliberately alluding to ''The Wizard of Oz'', so that would explain the confusion. ] (]) 22:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::I found it. The ''Great Soviet Encyclopedia'' (1979) translates it as ''The Enchantress From the City of Kitezh''. ] (]) 22:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
::{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} I made some minor changes. Feel free to change it back if you like. ] (]) 21:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
:::I just confirmed she played Montreal at ]. ] (]) 23:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
:::: Thank you! - Pictured on the Main page: Brian's ], my ], and ] related to all three items of ] on my talk: our 2023 concert, an opera in a theatre where a Mozart premiere took place, and those remembered, ], a bass, and ], a violinist from Georgia (whose article would be better with more details about her music-making). --] (]) 10:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
:::: ] Bach's 1724 cantata for this Sunday which is unusual in many respects. Another woman needs attention for ], ]. --] (]) 20:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::Hahahah...you kill me, Gerda. You have the most wonderful sense of humor, for a German. Are you sure you are German? ] (]) 20:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::: I'm sure I'm German, and also that sometimes I'm funny without knowing it (which began at school, in German, when I said "lange Dürre", meaning a long drought, but the class laughed, understanding a tall thinny woman ;) --] (]) 20:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Thank you for inviting me to edit ]. That was very kind of you. The only thing I notice is missing section headings. I'm curious, do you think the lack of US sources is indicative of the huge cuts in our federal arts funding? I think Germany still funds the arts, do they not? BTW, I really enjoy watching those German expatriate videos in English that explain to outsiders what its like to live in Germany. It's both super educational and always funny in some way. Like what would happen to someone who just moved to Germany for work and ran the laundry late at night in their building? Or how asking personal questions doesn't go over well there, but in the US, you can learn everything about someone in about five minutes. Stuff like that. ] (]) 22:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::: Thank you, thought-provoking! A friend from the U.S., resident of Germany for a few years, always told his U.S. guests in restaurants that they should speak in a soft voice, leaving the conversation at the table instead of entertaining the whole room, - to no avail. - She's on the Main page now, and there's a talk video of her (at the bottom), also a new NYT review of which I can see only the header, - please add detail if you see more. There are several videos of her dancing, but I'm not sure enough of their licensing to put them in the article. I liked to add a ] quote, - she was in Wiesbaden with her husband for a premiere of his opera, and in the Rheingau for him being the featured composer of the ] which I saw. - My ] is - because of the anniversary of the premiere OTD in 1782 - about ], opera by ], while ] was - because of the TFA - about ], opera by ], - so 3 times Mozart again if you click on "music" ;) --] (]) 13:43, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Americans are way too loud in restaurants. I almost went deaf in Half Moon Bay recently at a restaurant. A table full of tech bros and sisters talking at the top of their voice. My ears are still ringing. ] (]) 09:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::: ] is about a photographer who took iconic pictures, especially ], yesterday's was ], and on Thursday ]. If that's not enough my talk offers chamber music from two amazing concerts, - gentle music, to soothe your ears! --] (]) 12:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::: ... and ] begins with ], paraphrased in 1524, and put to five (!) ]s in one cantata by Bach in 1724, for this Sunday. Nominated for GA. --] (]) 19:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::: Just a look at music (on my talk) shows remembrance of three people who died, and ] or improving one is all I can do. Three are on the Main page today, and three others planned ... - Could you imagine to do the GA review? One week until the day Misplaced Pages thinks is the anniversary. --] (]) 20:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::: ... and then I come with ''Toteninsel'' ;) - I just did the second of the three planned. Same question about the GA - five days left until the day ;) --] (]) 15:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::: ''Toteninsel'': another look at music shows three women remembered there, - a sad record. The Main page also has a ] ], and ] is a 2016 hook. It was connected not only to ]'s death in 1916, remembered then, but also the death of a friend who - and we around him - knew he was dying when he listened to the concert which was his last time leaving home, and music from ] was played for his funeral three months later. --] (]) 19:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::Gerda, I neglected to thank you for surprising me the other day with such a wonderful hook and image of '']'', way back from 2016. That image has always spoken deeply to me because it reminds me so much of ] in ] and ] island in ]. ] (]) 21:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::: Thank you! The day is still today, but no: for me it's already 26 July. I'll switch only after sleep, - to another soprano. The island pic also inspired the Walkürenfelsen in the Bayreuth ]. --] (]) 22:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Gerda, I am sorry to draw your attention back to ''Isle of the Dead'', but to what do you attribute its popularity in Germany (and Europe as a whole) in the late 19th century? Do you think it was just trendy, or is there something more to it? My own guess is that it had more to do with the technology of poster reproduction, and this just happened to be one popular poster that was available, so people tended to buy it. This is my take after reading about Toulouse-Lautrec and the history of lithography. It's funny that I'm discussing this again, because this is an issue I addressed many years ago in '']'' (1871). See the section on "Influence" I wrote about the role of ] in popularizing the reproduction. I wonder, do you think Goupil & Cie were behind ''Isle of the Dead'' as well? ] (]) 10:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::: That sounds like interesting research, but right I'm occupied by two RD articles (one Polish, one Romanian, for struggle with foreign sources ...), a third is postponed, and I am not where I want to be for the Cantata, - sorry for drawing your attention to that a third time ;) --] (]) 12:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::The way you say "occupied" is so funny. My mind immediately went to US commercial airline lavatory. ] (]) 23:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::: Is "busy" better, or what? - Relief for you: That Bach cantata review is under way. (There's another open, if you like.) -- (forgot to sign)
:::::::::::::::: ] will have ], ], a composer and ] (yes the one mentioned just above), - almost too much, and the composer's article, ], should be better, help wanted. - Plenty of music on my parents anniversary day ;) --] (]) 22:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::::I know you said "relief" on purpose. I am no longer accepting your accidental comedy routine. :) ] (]) 22:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

== Thanks ==

Hey I just wanted to thank you for : it's so rare to see someone just choose to be super decent like this on the internet. (Also I will never not be astonished to find that there are people who have been doing good work on here for 20 years and who I've never interacted with!) --] (]) 01:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

== Big Fish edit ==

Hello, I noticed you recently reverted many edits on the Big Fish page. Could you please explain your reasoning for the reverts? Thanks! ] (]) 02:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

:You deleted large swaths of a Good Article and did not use the talk page to explain your edits. You’ve also been warned about doing this before on your talk page and you’ve been repeatedly given tips and tricks to improve your approach yet you removed all these warnings from your talk page and you haven’t followed best practices. How about using the talk page to explain your edits from an incrementalist approach, one section at a time? ] (]) 03:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::I can certainly do that. Could you clarify something for me? Did I do something wrong by blanking my talk page? I was under the impression that it's acceptable to do that. I didn't blank the page to hide the conversations that have happened on it, I just like to have a clear page once conversations are over. ] (]) 03:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::You can probably do whatever you like with your talk pages, but ] is just a bit more overt in terms of what you are doing or trying to do. One of the reasons I reverted is because it isn’t clear if you improved the page. If you think you did, briefly summarize your changes on the article talk page, giving people an idea (don’t write a novel) how your version improved on the previous one. ] (]) 03:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::::Before you sent this message, I posted my version of the lead for editors to review. I was going to do that for every section. Is that too much? Are you saying I should just make one post on the talk page? Thanks for engaging in dialogue about this. ] (]) 03:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::I just took a look at the talk page. It isn’t at all clear why you think this is an improvement or why you are trying to rewrite the article. Again, other editors have brought this up with you on your talk page before about other articles. Looking at what you wrote in regards to the lead, I can’t figure out what you are trying to do. Can you briefly explain why you are compelled to rewrite a stable article that has already gone through the GA process? I think it’s one thing if you were trying to improve it for FAC, but I don’t see that occurring here. I guess what I’m saying is that I’m still very confused by your edits. Instead of copying your changes to the talk page, it might help to give a reason and then point to the diff in the page history where your changes still reside. So, for an example, how do your edits to the lead improve upon the previous version? Or to put it another way, why even make them? That’s where I’m confused. It isn’t at all clear what you are aiming for here. ] (]) 04:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::I guess I'm confused too. If you look at my edit summaries, a lot of them are copyediting—grammar, syntax, etc. There were quite a few sentences or segments which could be condensed and communicate the same thing. There was a lot of trimming that I did to improve the quality of the writing. There were some long quotes which I turned into prose, since I'm under the impression that is encouraged by ]. All in all, I'm being 100% honest with you when I say that I've taken the prior feedback on my talk page to heart. Before, I didn't pay attention to the number of edits I made on a given page per day. Now I do. I usually limit my edits to 3-4 per day so other editors don't get bombarded. If that's still too much, I can reduce it further. Since most of my editing on Big Fish was simply about improving the writing quality and eliminating mistakes, I didn't realize it needed to be posted on the talk page. I thought that by spacing the work out over 21 edits, that would be incremental enough. I apologize if I was wrong in that estimation. ] (]) 04:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Overall, I don’t see the improvements, but I’m willing to take a closer look in a few hours from now. Again, it’s not really clear what you are trying to do. Have you tried experimenting by writing your own article from scratch about a topic you enjoy? There’s a lot of topics to choose from, and I think this might be a better route for you to take. ] (]) 04:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::I appreciate that you're willing to take a closer look. In terms of what I was trying to do, I didn't have any major agenda. I was just doing a thorough copyedit of the entire article, including fact-checking sources, adding missing information to citations, and streamlining the plot summary based on ]. ] (]) 05:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::I’m not sure about any of that. Take a look at Good Article requirements. If you want to restore your edits to the plot section alone, I might agree to that. ] (]) 05:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::{{ping|Wafflewombat}} it occurs to me that you could really help Misplaced Pages by focusing on articles needing targeted maintenance, as it would make use of and harness your skills in a constructive manner. Check out ]. There’s a lot there for you to choose from and I doubt you will encounter any resistance or arguments as you will be following the instructions in place to fix specific problems. Please consider it. ] (]) 05:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::Note, you can sort by topic as well, such as ]. ] (]) 05:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::Did you have a chance to take a closer look at some of my edits?
::::::::::When you've come to a decision about the plot restoration, please let me know 🙂 ] (]) 06:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::Won’t know for another few hours. ] (]) 06:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::No problem. Thanks for the suggestion about doing article maintenance. I will consider it 🙂 ] (]) 06:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::I took a look at your plot section. You honestly have me at a disadvantage as I'm not sure which version is better in that regard. Your version leaves stuff out, but I wonder if it is even necessary to include it. But, given that the plot section was within the acceptable range of ], I am curious why you cut it down. Again, referring back to what I said up above, I'm still unclear as to what you are trying to do. It looks like you are on a mission to make articles shorter? That's the only thing I can figure out. If I'm wrong, let me know. ] (]) 09:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::Do you mind if I ask for input on the plot section from the Film Wikiproject?
::::::::::::::It's too bad we're not understanding each other (at least not yet. I think we can get there!). I didn't have a mission in mind when I started working on this page. Big Fish is one of my favorite movies, so I thought it would be enjoyable to read through the entire page and see if the page needed copyediting. In my view, there was quite a bit that needed doing. My understanding is that when sentences or paragraphs can be condensed, so they use fewer words to say the same thing, that is encouraged. During my time editing WP, I've always been under the impression that trimming is an important part of copyediting. Would you disagree? On my end, it would be helpful if you could point out specific edits in which the trimming of content damaged the section in question. Without examples, it's hard for me to address your concerns (and I am committed to addressing them in full). ] (]) 09:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::I think we are making some progress, but I do have other things to do. You are welcome to take this to whatever project you want. Now that you've told me that Big Fish is one of your fave films, it makes a bit more sense. That's fine, but I'm not sure the page needs copyediting like you think it does. As I said, I'm pretty open to changes to the plot section, so whatever happens there, I really won't argue all that much about it. But as for the rest of the article, I'm not certain that condensing as you describe it is the best approach. I am still curious though, where did you get this idea that articles needed to be condensed? It just seems like an odd approach to me, and I've been in here for some time and can't recall seeing anyone ever edit like this before. Is there a policy or guideline you are using that justifies this approach or did you come to it on your own? Also, I hope you can appreciate the humorous irony of attempting to condense an article about a man who tells long, rambling stories. I think I would feel far more comfortable if you were attempting to turn this into a ]. If you think you can do that, then by all means, have at it. But I'm not sure your "condensing" approach is going to even get us half way there. Let me know what you think. One way for you to really challenge me on this is to take it to a peer review and let them know you want to go for featured article status. That would show me that you were very serious about this, and I would feel much better about your edits. The takeaway here that I hope you are getting, is that "condensing" isn't necessarily going to improve the article. I'm guessing it can very well make it worse. Most importantly, it's going to take actual research, source collecting and reviewing, and doing some serious work to get this article to the next level. If you think you are up for that, let me know. After all, this is your favorite film. ] (]) 09:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::I don't approach every article with the idea that it must be condensed. In fact, it's quite lovely when I find articles that need very little copyediting of any kind, because it's a testament to the work that others have put in. In fact, one of my favorite parts of editing is article expansion. It just so happens that at this point in time, I don't have the time or energy to do that, so I've just been doing copyediting instead. Unfortunately, I do not have the time to get an article to FA status.
::::::::::::::::Is your confusion about my editing stemming from the fact that I'm putting a lot of time and effort into a well-developed Good article that is not in dire need of any major changes? If that's the case, I would offer that any article can use improvement, even Good ones (and Big Fish hasn't been assessed for GA status in 15 years). Perhaps you find it strange that I would want to work with small margins of improvement—say, making a solid article 10% better instead of making a bad one 50% better?
::::::::::::::::It seems your main concern is that I condensed the article significantly. Are you able to see that I wasn't coming at it with an agenda of condensing, but merely found that multiple sections could use condensing, in my view? Since you haven't gone through all my edits in detail, isn't it possible that, in this case, edits that included condensing were warranted? I'm just confused how you are concluding there are problems with my edits if you haven't reviewed them all (that's my impression). Not trying to be rude here, just hoping for clarity.
::::::::::::::::How should we proceed from here, since you've got other things to attend to? In my view, all of my edits make sense, but it doesn't sound like you're able to go through edit-by-edit with me. If it would be helpful, I could write up a short rationale or summary of each of my edits, so that you could review those instead of the entire edit.
::::::::::::::::We could also seek a third party to weigh in generally about this situation.
::::::::::::::::I do appreciate the humor 😄 ] (]) 09:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::::Well, I already did go through your plot section and I don't see much of an improvement. I went through your lead and don't see any improvement. I'm frankly still confused that you are obsessed with condensing the article, because as I've repeatedly said, 1) the article doesn't need or require "condensing", and 2) there's no indication that condensing is an improvement. So, I'm really not convinced there is anything else needed to do here unless you can demonstrate on the talk page how your "condensing" was needed, how it was an improvement, or how the policies and guidelines support what you are doing. You say you don't have time to participate in the article improvement process, yet you appear to be bringing your "condensing" approach to already good articles, so your approach isn't working, IMO. Finally, if you aren't going to participate in the article improvement process, how do you know your "condensing" is an improvement in the first place? I hope you see the problem. There's nothing in the policies and guidelines that I can see that supports your approach and I find it very unusual. I think its best if you use it on 1) articles you start from a stub, as this would prevent you from "condensing" the work of other people and force you to "condense" your own writing. I suspect your articles will not go very far because Misplaced Pages doesn't improve articles by the process of "condensing", but rather the complete opposite, by expansion, and when articles are significantly expanded, they branch off into new articles. So to conclude, I think you are going about things entirely wrong, and I don't think there's anything left to discuss. I apologize if that upsets you, but I really do recommend that you stay away from Good Articles and focus on working through the article improvement process some other way. Once again, I'm sorry if this upsets you, but I think we've talked this thing to death and there's nothing more to say. Alternately, you could try writing your own new policy or guideline, perhaps call it ], and see if the community agrees with it. There's also ], which in fact does use a condensed version of Misplaced Pages, so perhaps you are getting confused with that project? ] (]) 10:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Would you be open to me making edits that do not involve any condensing, such as the addition of sources? ] (]) 10:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

:I'm open to ''all'' edits which objectively improve ''any'' article. But the thing I don't understand is the disconnect between your preference for ''Big Fish'', which you've said is one of your favorite articles, and the amount of time you are dedicating to it, yet your continued resistance to following the article improvement route. I would invite you yet again to go the peer review route and find out what needs to be done before doing it. What that does is it gives you milestones to achieve, and you can point people to them when they ask "how did you improve the article?" It's really that simple, and I hope you choose to do it. ] (]) 11:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
::I just wanted to let you know that after a few hours' sleep, I have a better understanding of your views about my editing. I will be changing how I edit based on your feedback. ] (]) 23:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

:Wait, what, is there a page about me? --] (]) 23:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

== Your offer ==

Is your offer still open about me discussing things on your talk page? I’m afraid I’ve annoyed some editors here too much with my recent messages. I just want to know if you are still alright? ] (]) 16:50, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

:{{ping|Pablothepenguin}} yes, that's fine. I'm curious, when it comes to options, can you get no sugar added ''and'' vegan option at the same time? ] (]) 19:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:: implies they are opening stores in the UK. ] (]) 19:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Cullen328 says he doesn't want you to talk about, so my hands are tied. Here's what I would recommend: work on improving the ] page in a constructive manner. A lot can be done here, and it sounds like a fun project that I might be able to help with. You can then "talk" about improving the article on the talk page. Other than that, you should keep it cool, because I don't want to see you blocked. ] (]) 19:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
::::I don’t believe I can be blocked for a friendly discussion between two consenting people. I wouldn’t expect that Cullen328 has any control over user talk pages. He’s probably more concerned about disrupting the reference desk and other such things. ] (]) 20:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::Well, we should include him in this discussion. ], what do you think? ] (]) 20:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::Viriditas, I have no problem with you discussing the frozen yogurt business if you want to. I do have a problem with the protracted, repeated, unproductive discussions at the Reference Desk that go all the way back to February. In your first comment on this matter, {{u|Pablothepenguin}}, you said that you were obsessed with this franchise. I would not use that word if you didn't, but your obsession is not improving the encyclopedia and has wasted a lot of volunteer time. ] (]) 22:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Very well, I acknowledge that such happened. I thank you very much for your insights here. I will think about what to say and say it carefully. I think Cullen328, you basically confirmed my suspicions that you were mostly concerned about disruption of the reference desk. As such, I will proceed with what I wanted to say to Viriditas. ] (]) 22:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::Pablothepenguin, I want to put in a good word for Cullen328. He's one of the best admins (and editors) we have on this site. Let's try to give him the respect he deserves. ] (]) 22:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Good thinking. Out of respect to him, I will avoid polluting the reference desk and other places. I will only ever use this page, and the pages in my own user and user talk namespaces from now on. ] (]) 22:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::Hey, I was just reading your previous posts on this subject. I had no idea you've been at this for seven years, four of which took place on Misplaced Pages reference desk! That's a long time. Let's think about something constructive you can do, because wasting seven years doing nothing isn't good. ] (]) 23:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::Now you've got me super interested in how you got into this. I see that you cited a 2013 episode of ''Undercover Boss'' as the origin of your obsession. I will now watch it myself to see what all the fuss is about. ], please light a candle in my memory. ] (]) 23:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::Watching it now. ], did you know that Menchie's CEO cites the film '']'' as an influence? ] (]) 23:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::I don’t think I wasted my time. I’m trying to solve an injustice I feel in my area. The explanation is long, so I’ll post it tomorrow after some sleep. ] (]) 00:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::Well, I just started writing Menchie’s fan fiction below. If you’re a fan of '']'' then you know they’ve written entire episodes around this idea. ] (]) 01:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::So this exercise got me thinking. Are there any known planets with the consistency of ice cream or frozen yogurt? ] (]) 01:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::Eureka, all this creative brainstorming and fan fiction writing worked. I figured out how you can move forward on this. ] (]) 02:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
{{outdent|::::::::::::::::}} You’re a musician, right? Okay, it turns out that musicians have been writing music about Menchie’s. There’s a really cool video that you’ve probably seen, by a country artist I think? Well, why not compose music dedicated to Menchie’s, using it as a theme for each song? If it’s good enough, you’re going to get their attention. Think seriously about this. And go listen to the songs other musicians have written in honor of Menchie’s. I think that’s a good way forward. It’s not a petition, but as a cultural work of art that could conceivably reach a lot of people, it could go viral and it might even be featured by corporate. They would have to listen to you if that happened. And you could focus on creating your musical portfolio of compositions while you are at it. What do you think? Shall I prepare an article on the forthcoming Grammy-nominated album, '']''? ] (]) 02:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

:I’m thinking this could be a ]. ] (]) 03:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::Let’s think bigger! How about something like a ]? Think Wizard of Oz meets Wonka? A young Dorothy dreams of froyo on a hot day, but her small town doesn’t have it. Later, she sees a strange show at home about a colorful froyo store but in her excitement to watch, she falls off the couch and hits her head, knocking her out. She wakes up, seemingly in her town, but things seem different. There’s now two froyo shops where there weren’t any before, both in competition with each other. ] (]) 03:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
:::I just learned that there is a Menchies in the town where one of my sons lives. I will check it out. ] (]) 03:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::::As promised, I will offer you a full explanation below for everything. It is fairly long, but I think it will be an interesting read.
::::It all started that day I watched Undercover Boss 7 years ago. Ever since then, I’ve had a significant craving for frozen yogurt. I didn’t act on it much for a few years, but by the time the recent pandemic started, I got bored out of my mind and started thinking about it in a way I hadn’t before and hence my current obsession began. I started to get very frustrated with the frozen dessert places near me which, in my corner of South-West Scotland, are all very generic Italian gelato places and so-called “soft serve” which almost only ever comes in basic vanilla flavour. I also am expected to ask a complete stranger of a worker to dispense my product for me, which is hard for me due to me being on the Autism Spectrum.
::::This obsession kept on going and still goes on in the present day. I continually am frustrated by it, as I feel I do deserve a self-serve frozen yogurt place to call my own. I also come to believe that Glasgow and Edinburgh are perfect places for such a business, and I start to do what I did on the reference desk. Unfortunately, other users are annoyed by this, so I start to worry about being blocked, and then I said all of this to you.
::::I hope this clarifies things, and I am happy to answer any questions you might have. ] (]) 10:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::I almost forgot to mention one more important point. I am also attracted to Menchie’s due to their mascot character. I’ve always adored mascots and I would like to have more businesses in my area that have those. ] (]) 10:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::I get it. I seem to have grown out of my obsessions for whatever reason, after the age of 30. No idea exactly how or why, but the intuitive feeling I have is that my brain rewired itself due to various reasons. I am curious, beyond music, are you actively engaged learning new things and acquiring new experiences? Something tells me that such things can contribute to mitigating obsessions through creating new pathways in the brain, but this is only my pet theory. ] (]) 11:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::I think I have done certain cool things. It is hard for me to focus on too many things at once. I therefore am not really trying to learn much other than music stuff. I do have ambitions, of course. I also feel that I would prefer to keep this obsession, as it doesn’t prevent me from living a normal life. I also need things like this in my life in order to give it purpose and meaning, otherwise, why bother to get up in the morning? ] (]) 12:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::You raise an interesting point. Where is the line between a passion and an obsession? I would say it can be difficult to tell. But if it makes you unhappy, then you should probably try to deal with it. And you don’t sound all that happy about the absence of Menchie’s in your area. Maybe something to think about for a few days? ] (]) 12:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::I’ll certainly think about it. ] (]) 13:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::I took a few days off to try and relax. I think it helped me, and it is something I will do occasionally. If I’m going to see this obsession through to the end goal, I will need these breaks to help myself. I hope I’m on to something here. ] (]) 12:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::I can empathize. I went through a similar period where I was meditating every day, twice a day, for 20 minutes at a time. It really helped, but that kind of regimen can present an entirely different set of problems. Right now, in the present moment, my problem is more physiological than psychological, as my body is slowly breaking down for reasons unknown. I'm being overly dramatic, of course. The reasons are well known. Age-related decline, and one day closer to death. Apologies if that's a bit too macabre for you, but I've fully embraced it. They say the best way to face your fear of the unknown, of the inextricable march to the yawning grave, is to imagine that you have already died. There's a certain freedom in that idea, but you may be far too young to even entertain such a thing. Go outside and enjoy yourself. Live free, and live hard. ] (]) 12:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::I will try my best to live a good life. I am still as always brainstorming ideas for my work. One way or another I will succeed. I am trying to think of more ways to get Menchies here in the UK. I don’t know if I told you before, but I’m based up near Glasgow in a nice area. I focus mainly on Glasgow and Edinburgh as far as cities are concerned. That’s just what is convenient to me. I will get my frozen yogurt eventually. ] (]) 20:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::I, for one, am definitely not too young to understand that, but I do hope you're reasonably OK. --] (]) 23:12, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Thanks. Still raging... {{small|'']'' ruined ] for me. Made me think Nolan had some kind of grudge against him?}} ] (]) 23:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::I think the relaxing and having short breaks technique is working. I think it might fix me in the end. In other news, having just returned from a trip to London and Brighton, I realised how amazing England is. Along with Scotland, they manage to show the diversity and variety of people. I’ll probably move down there in a couple of years after I have graduated from college. I still don’t get the lack of frozen yogurt options in my nation. I can only hope that that will change soon. There is no doubt that the thousands of people I’ve seen over the last few days, in England, would generate enough customers for this. Scotland would also manage there. Overall logic will prevail and hopefully soon. ] (]) 22:31, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::Just to confirm that I’m still well. I hope to continue this trend for as long as I live. I do still wish to see a frozen yogurt business in my area. Such must happen eventually. ] (]) 16:08, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::Glad to hear that you are safe and doing well. Have you given any thought to my idea about writing frozen yogurt music? ] (]) 19:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::::Not yet, I’ve got higher priorities at the moment. For instance, I will be heading back to college to study music production. I am sure to deal with this eventually. ] (]) 20:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::::Please keep me updated with status reports. ] (]) 20:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::::::I’m glad to report that I start college tomorrow. If I get anything done that is relevant, then I’ll pass it your way. Do remember that I am still doing my campaigning at present. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. ] (]) 17:06, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::::::::Good luck with college and enjoy yourself. As for ideas, the ''Simpsons'' said it best: "We've tried nothing, and we're all out of ideas." ] (]) 22:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
{{od|20}} Have details coming soon. Need help with plans. Will notify soon. ] (]) 23:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

== New discovery ==

]
Ice cream scientists working in close collaboration with astronomers and geophysicists in the field of exoplanetary pseudobulbar affect announced today the discovery of Menchie’s 052007FROYO in the ice cream constellation of ]. The planet appears to have a frozen yogurt ocean surrounding a cone-like core. More details will be announced shortly. ] (]) 01:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

:Sounds fascinating ] (]) 09:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::It’s delicious. ] (]) 11:46, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
:::Brings a whole new meaning to ]. (But exercise moderation, or you might have to loosen your ].) --] (]) 19:46, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::::Speaking of ice, have you heard about the latest ] on Earth? It's called the global warming diet. Antarctica is losing 150 billion metric tons of ice per year, and looking mighty thin. Oil companies love this ]. ] (]) 22:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::] --] (]) 23:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::How crazy is it that Misplaced Pages doesn't have an image of the bass line notation (from the original "]") which is probably the most popular bass line in the history of late 20th century modern music? {{ping|Pablothepenguin}}, do you know how to upload musical notation? ] (]) 23:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Ok, I just saw ]. ] (]) 23:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::<score lang="lilypond" sound="1">
\relative { \set Staff.midiInstrument = #"electric bass (finger)"
\clef bass
\key d \major
\time 4/4
\tempo "Andante" 4 = 114
d8 d8 d8 d16 d16 d8 r4
}
</score>

== Wikiproject ==

Hi, I see you're a member of ], would you be interested in a sub project on ] on ]? ] (]) 14:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

:Hi, ]. I think the way forward is to envision a different approach. Have you determined the percentage of active users on the project(s) you are contacting? I think what you should consider is to figure out what you want to do with oral tradition topics and then collect data about the articles and other material, and put together a call for participants in the '']''. That way you will get heightened visibility and your goals will be clear. ] (]) 22:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
::That might be a better idea, at the moment I’m just messaging editors who have contributed a lot to articles involving oral tradition, so far have 15/20 definites and 5 interested but busy. You can see the proposal at ]. I think it might be best for me to keep doing this over the weekend, then start the page and ping everyone to a discussion on scope and objectives. After we’ve outlined the project, then do a signpost? ] (]) 23:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
:::I'm talking about using a ''Signpost'' article to recruit people for whatever it is you want to achieve. You can do it any way you want, but if you see deficiencies in coverage about oral tradition, and you can successfully communicate those problems in a brief article, you would get a lot more people interested than just the small pool of potential members you are dealing with right now. Also, if you take a data driven approach, you would generate far more interest in your goals. This would require you to collect data about what we already have, compare it to existing or comparable material, and identify strengths and weaknesses, finishing up by recommending next steps for improving coverage. By doing this, you are in effect creating an ad hoc roadmap with milestones, and that gives people something to go on. ] (]) 23:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
::::That sounds good, but I wouldn’t know where to start with that. I was just thinking the tasks could be clean up/improve existing articles (most articles involving oral traditions have tags), expand existing articles, and create articles. Objectives would be similar to the ones at ] with the progress bars. We could also standardise the format/method for articles on an oral tradition ] (]) 23:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::As for knowing where to start, the thing to always remember is that the data is already there, you just have to extract it from Misplaced Pages. Some people use bots to do this. I used to use AWB for this purpose, but that was a long time ago. You can even write queries in many different ways. If a progress report is what you want to extract, again, that information is already contained in the articles, you just have to extract it. ] (]) 23:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::Sorry I’m not very tech literate, hopefully someone else can assist in this, unless it’s something you’d be interested in? ] (]) 23:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::{{tq|I was just thinking the tasks could be clean up/improve existing articles (most articles involving oral traditions have tags), expand existing articles, and create articles.}} That's the data I'm referring to here. I used to use ] to help with this, but there are other ways of doing it as long as everything is categorized. This is how the reports are generated. ] (]) 23:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::Would we not first need to tag all oral tradition pages to the taskforce? ] (]) 00:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Now you're getting it. That's what AWB is used for. ] (]) 00:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::Oh I assumed we had to tag articles by hand? ] (]) 08:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::Nope. And why would you do that when AWB will tag all of them for you? ] (]) 08:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::So it just tags any article mentioning oral tradition with the WP parameter? ] (]) 08:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::It tags articles based on whatever rules you give it. One of the easiest ways is to tag by category, but there are others. It comes with a WikiProject plugin, which makes it simple to use. But you don’t have to do that if you don’t feel comfortable. You can also ask authorized users to do it for you or you can submit a bot request elsewhere. I would recommend doing it yourself because it allows you to get a different, hands on look at what you are dealing with, and when you do, you begin to see the issues and problems and whatever maintenance tasks you are interested in emerge from the set. It’s a great way to get a larger perspective on everything. And that view will inform your tasks, and you’ll have a greater handle and understanding of what needs to be done. ] (]) 08:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::::Thanks that sounds great, I’ll do that ] (]) 08:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::It's also got a mode where if you don't want to learn any of the advanced features, you can just feed it a text file of article names you want tagged. It's that simple. ] (]) 08:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

== August music ==
{{User QAIbox
| image = Flower bed of perennials, Idstein.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
Today I have two "musicians" on the Main page, one is also the topic of ], watch and listen, - I like today's especially because you see him at work, hear him talk about his work and the result of his work - rare! -- ] (]) 15:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

:Fascinating. When I lived in SF, I used to take my guitars to ]. He died of brain cancer in late 2011. I always visited at odd hours when nobody was in the store (after lunch), and this gave me the advantage of having him teach me about basic maintenance because he was open to people asking him questions. I believe he was the last luthier in the city when he died. ] (]) 23:10, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
::Looks like luthier ] died a few years before Peacock. I don't recall ever using his services. ] (]) 23:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} As it turns out, and I didn't actually know this, Peacock used to sing in the St. Philip's choir. I think is their website, but I'm not sure. Given that he was exposed to wood dust for his entire life, from his childhood to his adulthood, I'm guessing that led to his brain cancer somehow as people like carpenters are highly susceptible to cancer if they don't wear a mask, and back then, nobody wore masks. It also makes me wonder if that was a somewhat minor contributing cause to the decline of luthiers, in addition to mechanization. ] (]) 10:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
:::: Interesting! - ... and ], like 22 July but with interview and the music to be played today --] (]) 14:52, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
:::: On 13 August, ], and the image one. The cantata is an extraordinary piece, using the chorale's text and famous melody more than others in ]. It's nice to have not only a recent death, but also this "birthday" on the Main page. And a rainbow in my places. --] (]) 12:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
:::: ] is about education, 10 years OTD after ]). Music for today's feast is Monteverdi's, the best concert we ever did (so pictured again on my talk), but it wasn't recorded, substituted with a "Pacific" one that comes with subtitles line by line in Latin and English: I learned something! --] (]) 20:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::{{tq|the best concert we ever did but it wasn’t recorded}}
:::::Only a real musician would say that! Every musician has that story, it’s part of their personal lore. In 2024, it’s super easy to record all the time now, and it’s fairly inexpensive. Search for "portable recorder". ] (]) 21:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::Another thing to consider is just buying a mic for your phone. Zoom makes the iQ7 Rotating Mid-Side Stereo Microphone for iOS. Then you just record using your preferred app. ] (]) 22:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::: I don't think I expressed what I meant to say: we made a conscious decision then to not record but keep it in our hearts. - ] about another of Bach's chorale cantatas, listen, as I listened to ], - music by 16 composers. In the latest cloudy pictures: a hidden deer, a cat and a blaze of a sunset. --] (]) 13:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::::{{ping|Gerda Arendt}} well, that changes things, doesn't it? Thanks for explaining. ] (]) 22:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::::: We decided to record , last year, and the mezzo soloist was second soprano in the Monteverdi, ] being first. The last two concerts (Mozart Requiem and Bach cantatas) were also recorded but for strictly internal use. --] (]) 08:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::Thank you. I'm listening now. ] (]) 08:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::What a great recording. Is Lieselotte Fink related to Franz Fink? And why do so few people in the choir use tablets? Do most feel more comfortable with the paper sheet music/parts/score in case the battery dies? The bandoneon sounds very nice. I just forwarded this video along to someone who is an aficionado of the instrument. ] (]) 09:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::Another thing that is remarkable about the video is how different the stage looks from each angle. I wonder if the semicircle choir space heightens this illusion. ] (]) 09:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::: Lieselotte is the youngest of the five children of Franz and Maria Fink, and was a baby on her mothers lap in rehearsals when I joined the choir in 1987. Maria is my friend, she is standing next to me in the choir, - it was her first performance in the alto section, having switched from second soprano. - We never thought about tablets. People using tablets are perhaps from Belgium. The stage is the choir of ], with semicircle stone benches part of the architecture, and glorious acoustics wherever you sit. --] (]) 09:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::: Help? My ] is about a woman, ] but needing support as I write this. ] whose article is long and mostly unreferenced. And some articles open for review, always. --] (]) 10:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

== August 2024 ==

] Please do not ] other editors, as you did at ]. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please ] and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> ] (]) 13:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

== TESCREAL and User:Jruderman ==

Thank you for ] to contextualize my comments in the recently-concluded TESCREAL deletion discussion. You can read more about my goals for Misplaced Pages in ] and in the linked Twitter thread.

{{mhair}}] (]) 16:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

:{{ping|Jruderman}} That's helpful and informative. Am I wrong in assuming that you have a unique sense of humor? As for ], I would like to get your perspective on where we stand. ] (]) 20:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
::I’ll take that as a compliment :)
::I’d say the TESCREAL page ''has been'' a coatrack attack page masquerading as a definition of a neologism, but that the neologism may have enough legs and enough acceptance in multiple circles to soon allow an okay (if short) article at the title.
::Still, I’d TNT the page and start over. ] (]) 23:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
:::I understand, and I’m sympathetic, but perhaps for different reasons. My operating principle is "let’s get this right", and towards that end, I would like to create a proposed outline moving forward. Could you help me work on this here, in this section? For example, what do you see as major omissions, if any, and what do you propose adding or removing at first glance? No need to get too detailed at this point, but if you could focus on one thing at a time, that would be helpful. ] (]) 00:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
::::There should be a neutral glossary-type section listing the seven ideologies, and a section explaining what they have in common and where they differ.
:::::I’m working on this now. I don’t see it as a glossary, but rather a way to explain how all the interlocking parts work. One thing I would like to see is a graphic in the shape of a pyramid, similar to the kind of hierarchy of disagreement graphic we all know and love. Transhumanism would be on the bottom with longtermism and possibly e/acc together at the top. ] (]) 04:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
::::There should be at most one paragraph mentioning eugenics, supported by multiple types of ''primary'' sources (something from Torres and something from new-eugenics supporters) (in addition to secondary sources).
:::::Secondary sources should come first. Perhaps you mean there should be secondary sources with primary attached for further reference. I tend to do that to provide background info. Also, primary by the own authors about their theory are important. ] (]) 04:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
::::There should be only one small section about ''what Torres and Gebru think''. They can have more space on the Misplaced Pages articles about them as individuals. ] (]) 01:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::I would disagree with that suggestion. I’m more curious why we should not be explaining their theory in depth in an article about tescrealism. This does not belong in their bios. ] (]) 04:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::If we're arguing that the term is notable enough on its own (i.e. separately from the opinions of Gebru and Torres) to have an article, then their opinions probably shouldn't dominate the article. Maybe this is too WP:CRYSTALBALL of me. I'm happy to drop this because I think things will be clearer a year from now. ] (]) 17:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Thank you for explaining your position a bit more. Is this something you came to on your own accord, or did you get the idea elsewhere? I only bring this up because it differs so much from my own understanding and experience. When we write articles about a concept, very often we will include a discussion of the authors of the idea, explaining their reasoning, thought process, and very often even their development. To give you an example: Torres' background as an evangelical Christian is relevant here. As they themselves acknowledge, this familiarity with eschatological thinking allowed them to identify and perhaps even to sidle up to transhumanism, replacing one religion with another. I’ve raised the point many times before, and it upsets people in the tescreal community to no end, many of whom identify as atheists. But to those of us on the outside looking in, it is indeed, in our opinion, another kind of religion. This becomes more and more evident as we move up the bundle pyramid. So discussion of not just the opinions of the authors here but also their life experience has a direct bearing on how they came to write about this topic and is relevant to increasing our understanding of it. When we discuss Ray Kurzweil in the context of ], we are discussing religion in its most original form. Kurzweil has spoken openly about how he is motivated to reunite with his dead father and is himself afraid of death. If you ask anyone why they are religious, they will cite these two exact reasons, the longing to reunite with their dead family members and their fear of dying. Torres and others have talked about this. I myself have been talking about this for many years. We are not dealing with anything new here, we are talking about the oldest problems in human existence. ] (]) 19:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::::This is my own legalistic reasoning, shaped by interactions with {{ping|Grayfell}} and reading Misplaced Pages essays such as Maproom's ]. ] (]) 03:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Ok, I think I understand now. Please read ] and let me know what you think. ] (]) 04:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::I'm not sure what to think because I'm not sure what you mean. ] is a good cognitive bias to be aware of, but that's true of ]. Do you think I've overused legalistic reasoning or overused links to WP:BACKWARDS? ] (]) 04:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::Read the bottom part about computer programming. No need to reply just yet. Let it sink in for a few days. I often have to do that for many ideas. It takes time. ] (]) 04:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
::::::::::::I consider "let it sink in" to be an inadvertently unkind move when deployed against an ] editor who is currently experiencing ] complete with ].
::::::::::::So, instead of following your advice, I'm going to point you at , take ], and ] for a few hours.
::::::::::::See you tomorrow &ndash; I think you'll like the WikiProject I'm cooking up. It's about making Misplaced Pages articles as truthful as possible, including making sure we aren't inflicting cognitive biases on readers. that ''not misleading readers'' is as important, if not more, than making sure each statement in an article is truthful and verifiable.
::::::::::::I've had some success at this lately in the ] and ] articles. I'm hoping to get many more editors doing the similar things on articles that touch on controversies or CTOPs.
::::::::::::I'll have more to share about the <del>greener pastures</del> <ins>new WikiProject</ins> tomorrow.
::::::::::::I'll come back and re-read ] in a few weeks when I'm more... emotionally centered. ] (]) 06:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::"Let it sink in" in this context means "sleep on it". It was not meant to be unkind in any way, and I think I made that clear when I bracketed it with my own experience, explaining that I often need to let things sink in overnight to truly compensate for the natural resistance to different ways of seeing the world that we all share. This is why it is recommended not to immediately reply to comments that involve some kind of dispute, but rather to let them sink in and come back to them with a fresh perspective. This is also integral to letting a discussion breathe. For what it’s worth, I did not respond to you as an "autistic editor", but rather as a fellow human being. I can’t make accommodations or change the way I respond to every editor based on their own state of mind or emotional state. I think you would agree that it would be impossible. ] (]) 06:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::::::::{{tq|I think you'll like the WikiProject I'm cooking up. It's about making Misplaced Pages articles as truthful as possible}}
::::::::::::::Bruh. No, just no. Just find a topic you enjoy and write about it. ] (]) 11:26, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

=== Meta ===

(Meta: let's refactor this back onto the deletion page when we reach a fixed point, so we're not leaving out everyone else for too long.) ] (]) 01:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
:I will reply later when I have free time, but I think we should leave the deletion page alone. ] (]) 02:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
::Looking at the above, I see only one area of major disagreement. ] (]) 04:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
::Or maybe just add a link to this section, rather than trying to refactor everything into the deletion discussion. ] (]) 17:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
:::The deletion discussion is closed. Let’s both move on to greener pastures. ] (]) 19:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

== Lazarus Syndrome ==

Hi! I saw your comment at ANI re: Lazarus Syndrome, but didn't want to clutter it further, so I figured I'd come to your talk page. I'm pretty sure Lazarus Syndrome is when a patient revives after being ''pronounced'' dead, not actually ''being'' ], which is by definition irreversible. Though in that case, I suppose ] himself never actually died, either, since he allegedly came back. Hm.

Anyway, my apologies for inflicting my own pedantry on you, and thank you for your time! ] (]) 12:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

:Premature burial was a very real problem during the first century, and according to some authors, was still a real problem into the 20th century. It's hard to know what is true, as most of what have to go on are just anecdotes. ] (]) 12:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
::Fair enough! And makes sense; very shallow breathing and a weak heartbeat wouldn't be detectable without equipment. Thanks again! ] (]) 12:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
:::See also: ]. ] (]) 12:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

== :( ==

I'm really sorry if I caused you distress. ]] 23:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

==DYK nomination of Rooms by the Sea==
] Hello! Your submission of ] at the ] has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at ''']''' and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! <!--Template:DYKproblem--> ] (]) 22:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
:I took care of it, and it's been approved (with a different hook, alas). --] (]) 21:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

== Continuation of discussions ==

I would like to continue my discussion here. You might remember I was talking about a franchise? ] (]) 17:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

== DYK Nathaniel Coe ==

Thank you for finishing the DYK. I was quite ill and unable to tend things online. ] (]) 02:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

== September music ==
{{User QAIbox
| image = Sunflower against sky, Ehrenbach.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
] has 3 composers, I couldn't decide for the one on the Main page or the one who didn't make it on his bicentenary, so took both, and the pic has a third. Listen if you have a bit of time. The music, played by the ] in Germany in April 2022, impressed me. --] (]) 15:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for good observation! - Recommended reading today: ], by sadly missed ]. -- ] (]) 21:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Happy because ] is about a Czech mezzo soprano who is mentioned on the Main page on her birthday. --] (]) 13:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Today is ]! On display, portrayed by ], with music from ], and with two DYK hooks, one from 2010 and another from 2014; the latter, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday, which made me happy then and now again. - See ''places'' for a stunning sunrise, on the day ]'s 200th birthday was celebrated (just a few days late). --] (]) 13:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

] features a pic I took from my position in the choir, I can also offer varied delightful ], some from Venice, also with pics I took, - note the rose in the clarinet ;) --] (]) 13:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for Nathaniel Coe==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''']''' declined nomination to the ], instead choosing to serve as an inspector for the ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> —] (]) 00:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your attention to accuracy in DYK reviews. ''']'''<span style="border:2px solid #073642;background:rgb(255,156,0);background:linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(255,156,0,1) 0%, rgba(147,0,255,1) 45%, rgba(4,123,134,1) 87%);">]</span> 22:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
|}

== October music ==
{{User QAIbox
| image = Dahlias, Elisengarten, Aachen.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
You may remember ], my ] as ]. ] was unusual: last compositions and eternal light, with ] mentioned in story and music. --] (]) 13:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

today ] - unbelievable story --] (]) 22:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

] is the birthday of ], and you can listen to the exact concert I mentioned last year ;) --] (]) 21:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

] an organist who was pictured on the Main page on his birthday ten years ago, and I found two recent organ concerts to match, - see top of my talk. --] (]) 20:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Today brought ] of ] to the Main page on the day when ] were performed for him. --] (]) 18:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

I made Leif Segerstam my ] story today as you know ;) --] (]) 14:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

My ] is a cantata 300 years old, based on a hymn 200 years old when the cantata was composed, based on a psalm some thousand years old, - so said the 2015 DYK hook. I had forgotten the discussion on the talk. --] (]) 17:41, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Happy whatever you celebrate today, - more who died, more to come, and they made the world ]. Greetings from Madrid where I took the pic of assorted ] in 2016. --] (]) 17:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ] ==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 21:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] and ]&nbsp;for issues which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 15:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 02:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for Rooms by the Sea==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that an art critic felt that ''''']''''' was one of ]'s "strangest" works?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] (]) 00:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)
:Congrats! I wrote the hook(s), but you did the most important parts of the heavy lifting. --] (]) 22:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

== Invitation to participate in a research ==

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

]

<bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi>
<!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Potential_Admins&oldid=27650229 -->

==Disambiguation link notification for October 23 ==

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ].

(].) --] (]) 19:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Tireless Contributor Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For your work over at '']''. ] (]) 08:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
|}
:Thank you. It still needs a lot of work, including expansion and incorporation of the patron saints and more about the so-called "enemies" (an important part that is still missing except for a brief mention); the reception section also needs serious work. I was making some progress, but I had to take a break for various reasons. ] (]) 08:54, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article is ] in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can ] within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 22:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

== October 2024 ==

] Please do not add ] content to Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], especially if it involves ]. Your edits have been ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-defamatory2 --> ] (]) 00:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 06:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article is ] in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can ] within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 06:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article is ] in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can ] within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 04:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
:Big congrats on this! I regret that this happened at a time when I've just been too preoccupied with other things to have helped you with it, but you clearly did fine on your own. A fine article! (And while I'm at it, thanks again for the very kind words at my talk.) --] (]) 20:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

== DYK nomination needs adoption ==

If you have time, ] needs adoption. Best wishes! ] (]) 23:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

:I'm always up for an adoption. I have a GAR on the burner that I've been asked to look at first. I'm also trying to complete a DYK nom right now. I can look at Cannonball later tonight (maybe 9 hours from now). Thanks. ] (]) 23:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

== A barnstar for you! ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Original Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Thank you for the excellent work on all the DYKs, including mine! ] (]) 10:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)
|}

== November music ==
{{User QAIbox
| image = Apple tree in field, detail, Ehrenbach.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
] -- ] (]) 22:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

For a surprise, ] is on the Main page today, where it was last year for the 300th anniversary, and they were too lazy to find something new ;) - Look at my story, and listen to the 3 whole-tone steps and the dialogues of Fear and Hope. - An ] open to be signed (more info on the talk), - I haven't checked if you did, please ignore then. --] (]) 21:01, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

I uploaded more pics, on a mountain in the sun above the fog. - ] - ]. --] (]) 17:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

I will travel today and have no idea if will be able to update my story tomorrow, probably not, lengthy travel, then 2 weeks with doubtful internet, celebrating. Could you do that perhaps if you see it's late? ] is good but I'll change it in case another Recent death gets posted, - 3 are open. Many DYK are open, - your pic expertise might help for ], and I'd appreciate a watchful eye elsewhere. --] (]) 07:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

:I'm happy to help if I can figure out what to do. ] (]) 09:13, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
:: you did it! --] (]) 11:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
:: Thank you for more help in the field! I'll prepare 22 Nov in stories, for an early start tomorrow. If I don't get to it please feel free. --] (]) 16:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
:: Last year's story would be good again for 26 Nov, and I'll be on a plane again. --] (]) 15:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
:::{{yo|Gerda Arendt }} Will do. I forgot to tell you how much I enjoy your Apple tree in field photo. ] (]) 19:31, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
:::: Thank you, for the story work and the appreciation! - I uploaded pics of a trip that was a 10-day celebration of a 16 November event, but the day was also when a dear friend died. We sang ] at his funeral yesterday, and it was good. --] (]) 20:03, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for November 11 ==

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ].

(].) --] (]) 07:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

== ''Childe Hassam: Impressionist in the West'' ==

Hey! In response to ], I finally got a copy of Bullock 2004. The painting is in there, on page 88, with the caption, {{tq|51 ; ''The Silver Veil and the Golden Gate'', 1914 ; Oil on canvas ; Brauer Museum of Art, Valparaiso University, Indiana}} (; = new line). Other than that, from a quick skim through, it doesn't seem to be mentioned with any more detail. ] (<i>] &bull; ] &bull; ]</i>) 04:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

:Thank you. ] (]) 05:19, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for Cannonball (Milwaukee Road train)==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that despite being an ordinary commuter train, the ''''']''''' ''(pictured)'' was known for its Friday-night parties?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;—&nbsp;] (]) 00:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
{{DYK views|28,204|1,175.2|November 2024|Cannonball (Milwaukee Road train)}} ] (] • ]) (he/]) 03:28, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 09:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

:Your admiration for Hopper reminds me of my visit to an amazing 2019 exhibit at the ]. The museum recreated '']'' and people could actually . The lighting was a perfect match. I have photos and a video clip, but not sure it's allowed on Commons. The rest of the exhibit was also a treat. ] (]) 10:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
::What gets me about ''Western Motel'' is the color of the room. That ] color was everywhere in the US up until maybe the late 1970s, at which point people finally had enough and said no more. How did that happen? Why was the color acceptable one minute, and the next, socially verboten? For many years now, I've been fascinated with the idea of ] or paradigm shifts in art. Just yesterday, I was obsessing on ], trying to figure out how his interest in open-air painting laid a small part of the foundation for the Impressionists, who would emerge 50 years after his death. ] (]) 20:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for The Gust of Wind (Renoir)==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''''']''''' is Renoir's attempt to paint air?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> ] ] 00:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
{{DYK views|17,399|725.0|November 2024|The Gust of Wind (Renoir)}} ] (] • ]) (he/]) 03:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

== General George Takei ==

Reporting for duty, sir! ] (]) 00:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
:{{Clarify|date=November 2024}} --] (]) 16:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
::Bluesky. ] (]) 18:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
:::Got it. Certainly better than being an ex-twit. --] (]) 18:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
::::. ] (]) 18:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
:::::As I mentioned on my talk, I really did buy a tire thumper. --] (]) 20:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
::::::]. ] (]) 20:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ] ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article is ] in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can ] within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 02:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
:{{(:}} --] (]) 14:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for Rust Red Hills==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that ''''']''''' is being sold to renovate student housing, a court-approved move that museum associations say violates the ethics of ]?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;—&nbsp;] (]) 00:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for The Silver Veil and the Golden Gate==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that an Indiana university argued in court that ''''']''''', a 1914 painting, was too modern for their art collection in 2024?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;—&nbsp;] (]) 00:03, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
{{User QAIbox
| image = Ehrenbach, snow on grass melting.jpg
| image_upright = 1.3
| bold = ] · ] · ]
}}
Thank you for the article! November was rich in sadness and happiness for me, expressed in ]. Regarding my arb candidate question, I found one so far who looked deeply into the matter, ]. There are two composers on the Main page today, ] and ]. I find the response of my friend ] to a question on Copland's article talk promising. (more ], for less repetition) --] (]) 09:35, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

:] is now gaining more ground as a legitimate practice in the US. This is something that has interested me since 1988. (2024). ] (]) 22:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
::*] (2024). '']''. "In The Schubert Treatment, Oppert recounts her remarkable story of healing suffering through music, alongside portraits of the many people she has helped. Born into a family of doctors and artists, Oppert trained as a classical cellist and began playing at a center for autistic youth, where she witnessed how music could connect with even the most difficult-to-reach patients. Later, she began working as an art therapist with people with neurodegenerative diseases and palliative care patients, eventually conducting clinical trials that proved the effect of her "Schubert treatment": using music as a counter-stimulation to reduce pain and anxiety during stressful procedures." {{ISBN|9781778400803}}. {{OCLC|1417394503}}.
::] (]) 22:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
::: Thank you, interesting! - ] comes from a DYK about a concert that fascinated me, and you can listen! For my taste, the hook has too little music - I miss the unusual scoring and the specific dedication - but it comes instead with a name good for viewcount. --] (]) 17:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
::: On the Main page today ] on his birthday. Listening to Beethoven's ] from the ]. We ] today. --] (]) 21:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
::: Listen today to the (new) ]. --] (]) 11:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
::::Thank you! ] (]) 11:36, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
::::: Listen today to ]'s 3rd cello sonata, on his birthday - it was a hook in the ] when his 250th birthday was remembered. I picked a recording with ], because he was on my ] this year, and I was in Brazil (see places), and I love his playing. --] (]) 17:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
::::: I come to fix the cellist's name, with ] and new pics - look for red birds --] (]) 20:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
::::: Today is ]. --] (]) 16:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
::::: ] it's another great woman, soprano ], and I found a 1963 Christmas Oratorio detail. 10 years earlier than that cycle, Bach wrote ] for the 1724 season, based on seven songs, - my focus this year. Expect three stories for the three days they celebrated in Leipzig ;) - Enjoy the season! --] (]) 21:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
::::: My ] is about ], 300 years today, and its song, 500 years old. Enjoy! --] (]) 15:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
::::: Similarly, my ] is about ], 300 years today, and its song, 500 years old. An aria is inspired by a baby leaping in his mother's womb. Enjoy! --] (]) 22:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
::::: My ] is different. --] (]) 19:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

== Diane Leather ==

] appears to be abandoned by its nominator who has not edited since October 22. If you're interested in adoption, please comment at the nomination page. Best wishes. ] (]) 14:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
:I'm always interested in adoption, ], but it looks like ] is trying to close it out quick, and I'm not a huge fan of working against the clock when I have so many other things going on. If Launchballer can hold off on closing, I would be happy to take a look and see what I can do. ] (]) 21:11, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

:{{yo|Flibirigit}} it's unfortunate, but I don't have access to any of the sources needed to resolve the maintenance tag issue. I also don't have access to the Misplaced Pages Library, which could help resolve this. Due to this set of unique circumstances, I'm not sure how much help I can offer here. It might be the case that these sources are available on the Internet Archive, but I don't see any links to it at this time. ] (]) 21:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
::Note, it looks like a set of similar editorial problems have led to issues in the GA process for their other articles, so this isn't confined to just Diane Leather. This is a far larger problem and doesn't just reflect this one article. In a perfect world, I think if I had access to these sources, I could make some attempt to fix the problem, but I don't. ] (]) 21:28, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
::No worries. We cannot save all DYK nominations. Thanks for thinking about it. ] (]) 21:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
:::I'm happy to hold on.--<span style="background:#FF0;font-family:Rockwell Extra Bold">]]]</span> 23:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
::::No need. I can’t do anything to improve it. See above. ] (]) 23:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ] ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article is ] in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can ] within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 03:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

==DYK for Self-Portrait (Ellen Thesleff)==
{{ivmbox
|image = Updated DYK query.svg
|imagesize=40px
|text = On ], ''']''' was updated with a fact from the article ''''']''''', which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ''... that art historians believe that ''']''' may have been drawn in a ]-like state?'' The nomination discussion and review may be seen at ]. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page <small>(], )</small>, and the hook may be added to ] after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the ].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYK --> &nbsp;—&nbsp;] (]) 00:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ] ==
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've ] the article ] you nominated for ]-status according to the ]. ] This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. <!-- Template:GANotice --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 19:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

== Your ] nomination of ] ==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has been placed on hold ]. The article is close to meeting the ], but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See ] and ]&nbsp;for issues which need to be addressed. <!-- Template:GANotice result=hold --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 21:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

== Happy Holidays ==

{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 4px solid #FFD700;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 2px;" | ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2px 2px 0 2px; height: 1.5em;" | '''Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" |
----
'''Hello Viriditas, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this ]. Spread the ] by wishing another user a ] and a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025. <br />Happy editing,'''<br />
] (]) 23:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)


''{{resize|96%|Spread the love by adding {{tls|Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.}}''
== Thomas D. Brock ‎==
|} ] (]) 23:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Regarding Thomas D. Brock. There were a number of broken links on the page which I either corrected or deleted. Those I deleted did no longer exist. In several cases, I replaced a link with one that did exist. Regarding the Awards section: Most of these do not have an on-line citation. However, deleting them seems harsh. I would put them back. (I'm new to this Misplaced Pages business.) ] (]) 20:14, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
:I can find sources for these awards, but it will take me some time if they are to be on-line. Actually, most of those awards had already been on the page without sources. I just added one or two. I'll also fix up the Pleasant Valley Conservancy material. ] (]) 20:58, 4 February 2015 (UTC)


==Disambiguation link notification for December 26 ==
== Re: MONGO ==


An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ].
Please stop commenting about MONGO. You are going to get yourself blocked if you continue. Should you be unable to drop the issue, go file a request for arbitration. The current notice board thread has deteriorated to useless bickering. ] <sup>]</sup> 06:30, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|Jehochman}}, are you planning on blocking me for requesting enforcement of the civility policy? The evidence shows that the last 50 contributions made by MONGO consist of nothing but civility violations and personal attacks. Is there a reason you haven't blocked him? And why, pray tell, would you be threatening to block me for pointing out this fact? ] (]) 06:34, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
::You missed my point. I am predicting what will happen if you continue. I'm going to bed and won't be blocking you tonight. ] <sup>]</sup> 06:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
:::MONGO has a long-term civility problem documented by numerous ANI reports in the noticeboard archives, resulting in blocks and retirements. Yet, he keeps coming back with the same civility problem, over and over again. Why then, {{ping|Jehochman}} are you "predicting" my block for requesting that the community act to stop the problem? Do see you anything wrong with your statement? You came here to accuse me of "hating" on MONGO, but that is not the case. The evidence shows that this is a long-term behavioral problem with MONGO, and a review of the evidence shows that you are fully aware of it, as you participated in some of those discussions. Yet, you are here threatening me, instead of enforcing the civility policy. Why? ] (]) 19:58, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
::::If you think so, go file a request for arbitration with all the supporting evidence. Continuing to lobby from blocks at every turn on ANI constitutes ], and is unacceptable. ANI is not suitable to evaluate a long term pattern of activity. ] <sup>]</sup> 20:52, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
:::::That's news to me. ANI evaluates LTA on a daily basis, and metes out blocks accordingly. Given that some of the previous ANI civility complaints against MONGO could be interpreted as your defense of his behavior, I'm wondering if your warning and discouragement of using ANI stems from your close relationship. Jehochman, have you ever made a civility block before? Why wouldn't you make one right now in this case? I see at least three editors under attack from MONGO in that thread, one topic area disrupted with page protection in place on two articles, and continued incivility and personal attacks. Given the long history of civility issues by MONGO, I am confused as to why you haven't taken any action. Am I missing something? Perhaps I neglected to read the notice on your user page that says that you don't make civility blocks. ] (]) 21:01, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
::::::Dear Viriditas, thanks for your many contributions to WP. And thank you for your comments on the recent AN/I that was opened against mongo and DHeyward. I agree with all your perspectives. Over the last 2 days I reflected a bit on ''why'' mongo is so extremely disruptive, and I also evaluated some of the specific tactics he employs to disrupt the development of WP articles. My reflections are based on the evidence I gathered on the ''American Sniper (film)'' article, the film article talk page, the related AfD, the recent AN/I, and mongo's comments on the user talk page of ] and on my own user talk page. I summarized some of my reflections on ''why'' and ''how'' mongo behaves uncivilly in my responses to mongo's comments on my user talk page. You are welcome to take a look at my user talk page and let me know what you think. Thanks, ] (]) 17:18, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
:::::::{{reply to|IjonTichyIjonTichy}} Please stop pinging me every time you make a comment latching on to my criticism of MONGO and completely blowing off my criticism of you.--v/r - ]] 17:41, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
:::::::I did not intentionally ping you, I just provided a link to your talk page, in the future I will only mention your name without linking to your page so that you will not be pinged. And I did not blow off your criticism of me. I highly value your feedback. I prepared a response to your criticism of me but it is long, and I did not want to bother you with a long note. If I have your permission to post a long note on your page, I'll post it there. Or if you prefer, I can post it on my own user talk page. Let's continue the conversation with you on your (TP) talk page, and with Viriditas on his own talk page. ] (]) 18:54, 11 February 2015 (UTC)


(].) --] (]) 07:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
== Your ] nomination of ]==
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can ] to appear in Did you know.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 10:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)


== Your ] nomination of ] ==
* Well done. ] <sup>]</sup> 17:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
The article ] you nominated as a ] has passed ]; see ] for comments about the article, and ] for the nomination. Well done! If the article is ] in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can ] within the next seven days.<!-- Template:GANotice result=pass --> <!-- Template:GANotice --> <small>Message delivered by ], on behalf of ]</small> -- ] (]) 14:02, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 21:05, 1 January 2025

Your GA nomination of Lise with a Parasol

The article Lise with a Parasol you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lise with a Parasol for comments about the article, and Talk:Lise with a Parasol/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of GnocchiFan -- GnocchiFan (talk) 11:02, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Precious anniversary

Precious
One year!

Happy New Year! - What a lovely start, with a GA. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:27, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Thank you! Happy New Year to you as well. The ultrawide camera on your Moto G200 is impressive, as I was pleasantly surprised to see the image of File:Abel Fest Köthen.jpg on the top of this page. The only thing we have remotely resembling it here is ʻIolani Palace, and that's a tortured comparison. I hope to see more photos from you in the future. Viriditas (talk) 17:40, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! - I have a DYK on the Main page, but my story would be different, about Figaro, - this Figaro. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:48, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
On the Main page: the person who made the pictured festival possible --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
story · music · places
Yesterday was a friend's birthday, with related music. - I'm on vacation - see places. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:12, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sky Above Clouds

The article Sky Above Clouds you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sky Above Clouds and Talk:Sky Above Clouds/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 20:24, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Olga Hartman

On 5 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Olga Hartman, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that although Olga Hartman believed that her basic research on marine worms had no practical value, it was applied to experimental studies of oysters? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Olga Hartman. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Olga Hartman), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:03, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Children of Men

I saw that you contributed a lot to Children of Men. I think the article needs some tidying up to get it to modern GA standards and I even see it going to FA. I'm doing some work on it and if you want to help out please do. Lankyant (talk) 22:31, 11 January 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, but I abandoned that article a long time ago due to a certain disruptive user. Please consider it your own at this point and have at it. Viriditas (talk) 22:45, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
@Viriditas Luckily that user hasn't been seen for 14 years! But I understand. I think the article needs a full redoing from the ground up. I'll see how I get on. Lankyant (talk) 16:17, 12 January 2024 (UTC)
That user is and has been active on Misplaced Pages under another account name the whole time, and last posted a few days ago using that account. Things are not what they always seem to be. Viriditas (talk) 17:41, 12 January 2024 (UTC)

K2-18b

I've replied to your inquiry on my Talk page with the answer that although some of the information is duplicated, an interview with a NASA astrophysicist talking about K2-18b is worthy of a paragraph in WP. Besides, the interview also states about the finding that there isn't much water on K2-18b, which is interesting. Please delete the paragraph if needed. I should put in a sentence or two about how they've found few traces of water in to the article. Also, there is this rumour about a paper... :) Best Richard Nowell (talk) 10:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)

DYK for S. F. Light

On 19 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article S. F. Light, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that S. F. Light (pictured) disliked using his full name? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/S. F. Light. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, S. F. Light), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 28,094 views (1,170.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of January 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Nice article, interesting read! --Tryptofish (talk) 00:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. I found it odd that there is almost nothing known about his early life, and his death by drowning is almost just as meager. The drowning was most unusual to me, as I used to swim in the lake he died in when I was a child; it was famous for calm waters. His true legacy was with his students who went on themselves to teach others. I wanted to be able to list the number of doctoral students his own students produced to show this continuity, but I never made it that far. It’s definitely a large number, somewhere between 200-300 I think. There’s also other connections with his students who ended up in other major institutions (and Ed Ricketts), so it’s possible more could be said. The reason I created the biography is because his name kept popping out in the strangest of places when I was writing about the Moss Beach area for Pillar Point Bluff. That led me to Olga Hartman and finally, Light. Viriditas (talk) 01:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sky Above Clouds

The article Sky Above Clouds you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sky Above Clouds for comments about the article, and Talk:Sky Above Clouds/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 15:01, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for your patience during the GA review of Sky Above Clouds and for your many improvements throughout the process!
Unexpectedlydiantalk 15:05, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Sketches of the Life of the Great Priest

On 23 January 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sketches of the Life of the Great Priest, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Monet decorated his house at Giverny with Kuniyoshi's In the Snow at Tsukahara, Sado Island (pictured), one of about 231 Japanese prints in Monet's personal collection? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sketches of the Life of the Great Priest. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sketches of the Life of the Great Priest), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

This change disturbs me much. You changed
The Descent of the Star Ichi on the Thirteenth Night of the Ninth Month
to
The Star of Wisdom Descends on the Thirteenth Night of the Twelfth (九月十三夜依智星)
The problem is that "九月" seen in the text and in the image *means* "Ninth Month". Try Google Translate as a simple demonstration.
Why the change from "Ninth" to "Twelfth" ? Shenme (talk) 03:06, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. That title was changed to align with the image title used by the British Museum. Should it be changed back, and is the British Museum title in error? Viriditas (talk) 03:44, 23 January 2024 (UTC)
@Shenme: I have restored the older title per your request. Viriditas (talk) 04:02, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

WuXi AppTec Request

Hi Viriditas, I found your name on WP: Science and was wondering if you would take a look at my edit request to update the WuXi AppTec article. Thank you very much AM WuXi (talk) 19:40, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Minneapolis discussion

Hey, we have a discussion on Minneapolis and I'm hoping you would participate. Thank you. Cleter (talk) 15:03, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Seditionists

I guess you don't like them, but please do not delete my comments like that, thanks. Selfstudier (talk) 19:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

I never saw your comments nor did I intend to delete them, so please assume good faith. You must have responded just before my manual revert, which avoids edit conflicts. The user is promoting January 6 conspiracy theories and their query belongs on the RS noticeboard. Viriditas (talk) 20:35, 30 January 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Sun in an Empty Room

On 1 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sun in an Empty Room, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Edward Hopper wondered what an empty room would look like with no one to see it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sun in an Empty Room. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sun in an Empty Room), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Kusma (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 9,808 views (817.3 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of February 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:29, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places
Thank you! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:11, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
My calendar story today - as you will know - is about Michael Herrmann celebrating his birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:07, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
How was your trip? Are you back now? Viriditas (talk) 22:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
Great, - see places! - Yes, I'm back but images will trickle in. - Today I am happy about a singer on the Main page (at least for the first hours), after TFA the same day last year. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:50, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks to Seiji Ozawa. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:19, 12 February 2024 (UTC)
The image, taken on a cemetery last year after the funeral of a distant but dear family member, commemorates today, with thanks for their achievements, four subjects mentioned on the Main page and Vami_IV, a friend here. Listen to music by Tchaikovsky (an article where one of the four is pictured), sung by today's subject (whose performance on stage I enjoyed two days ago). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:31, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Great photo! I'm listening to the music now. It's like having my own curated playlist and photo gallery! Viriditas (talk) 18:57, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Starting the day with music from Kelsey Lauritano. Doesn't get any better than that. Viriditas (talk) 19:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! - Listen to music from Ukraine if you like, - I heard it in 2022, and the November concert (at a different church) raised a truckload of winter clothes. My story today is also from my life: I heard the singer in 3 of the 4 mentioned musical items. I sang in yesterday's. - Rinaldo (opera) premiered OTD, DYK? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:57, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
more music and flowers on Rossini's rare birthday --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Bias in Authorship

Hello, I noticed you had been editing: Robert Willis (hacker) and wasn’t sure if you noticed what the article would look like if Marcus J. Carey was added. He is/was founder of Threatcare, and also authored some of the books Willis is in.

I’ve never worked on an article with this situation before, want to have a look? Twillisjr (talk) 14:34, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Sky Above Clouds

On 11 February 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sky Above Clouds, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Sky Above Clouds IV was inspired by a large, blank white wall? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sky Above Clouds. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Sky Above Clouds), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Kusma (talk) 00:03, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
I am glad to have come across a diligent contributor like you. Thanks for being around. I learned a lot with you. Best regards, ─ Aafī (talk) 19:37, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Montrose Chemical company

Hi. I was reading about LA toxic ocean dumping, and have a suggestion for renaming the Montrose Chemical Corporation of California article:

Talk:Montrose_Chemical_Corporation_of_California#Rename_article_to_a_broader_name?

If you have any suggestions, it would be appreciated. Noleander (talk) 18:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Apologies

hey, Viriditas, I'd like to apologies for the situation with dyk review - I was tired and frustrated with issues IRL, and I was wrong in my comments there. I do appreciate your comments and copyedits, and I'm sorry that I appeared to be a grumpy ass. I'm not asking for forgiveness, but I hope you don't hold a grudge. Artem.G (talk) 20:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks. What I wanted you to understand at the time, was that my only goal was to help you get your hook in the top slot with an image. Admittedly, adding my own hook and bowing out of the review wasn’t going to go over well, so your response was not exactly unexpected. I think we both could have done better. Thanks for reaching out. Viriditas (talk) 20:54, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pillar Point Bluff

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pillar Point Bluff you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bruxton -- Bruxton (talk) 01:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pillar Point Bluff

The article Pillar Point Bluff you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pillar Point Bluff for comments about the article, and Talk:Pillar Point Bluff/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Bruxton -- Bruxton (talk) 23:23, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

A bot to check DYK QPQ automatically

Hello. I'm sure you're very busy, but if you have the time, I'd love your quick thoughts here. Thanks in advance. Mokadoshi (talk) 23:47, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Olga Hartman

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Olga Hartman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lightburst -- Lightburst (talk) 02:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Olga Hartman

The article Olga Hartman you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Olga Hartman for comments about the article, and Talk:Olga Hartman/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lightburst -- Lightburst (talk) 01:24, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places

congratulations! - today in memory of the birthday of a friend who showed me art such as this, and of Vami --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:06, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Fascinating! Now you've got me interested in Oswald's creative process. How did he approach envisioning the historical likeness of Hildegard? Viriditas (talk) 23:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
You will have to ask him ;) - what I know is that there are two statues, one at Eibingen Abbey (that she founded) and the other at the Museum am Strom in Bingen, a museum with a large section dedicated to her. He said that this - as a crucifix at the Mainz Cathedral - was modeled after a real person, a dancer from Berlin, whose movements he had studied for sculptures of dancers. When I wrote the article about Steffi Scherzer I "knew" that it was her face, but this is pure original research ;) - the model for Jesus on the Cross with an upward gesture was a black man. Oswald made bozzetti of her sculpture. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:55, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
Rossini's Petite messe solennelle was premiered on 14 March 1864, - when I listen to the desolate Agnus Dei I think of Vami. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
I uploaded vacation pics (from back home), at least the first day, - and remember Aribert Reimann. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:26, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
Some days later, a calf in the mist and chocolate cake, and a story of collaboration --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
I listen to Bach's St John Passion today, - 300 years after it was first performed. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Two days later in time, Bach music for Easter! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Early glassmaking in the United States

@Viriditas: Thank you for reviewing Early glassmaking in the United States. This is an old article that I felt did not do justice to the glass industry, so I make a significant "redo". I have also created 18th century glassmaking in the United States and am working on a 19th century version. As info, I will be away from my office all day Sunday, but back on Monday. Thanks again, TwoScars (talk) 16:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)

@Viriditas and TwoScars: (and others) - FWIW - seems my old Wiki article about *Jan Bogdan,* possibly associated with glassblowers in Jamestown, Virginia in 1608 - see => http://web.archive.org/web/20141108214325/https://en.wikipedia.org/Jan_Bogdan - (a Wiki article not entirely ok for Misplaced Pages due to the lack of better historical support?) - see => https://en.wikipedia.org/User:Drbogdan/sandbox-JanBogdan - and - Wiki deletion discussion - see => https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jan_Bogdan - may be of interest - and possibly relevant - in any case - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 22:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

@Viriditas: Thank you for all your hard work on Early glassmaking in the United States. You obviously know much more about prose and writing than I ever will. As far as Bogdan goes, I noticed there was some controversy about him, and I do not recall him being mentioned in any sources such as the NPS. Even he was one of the Poles, none of the original glassworkers needed to be mentioned for the article—and it would not make the article better to list all of them. TwoScars (talk) 18:28, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Rock-Lobster eye optics

Regarding the Lobster-eye optics article that you authored. More recent advances have stepped up this instrument, which enables it to have its own moniker: Rock-Lobster eye optics. Perhaps we can collaborate on new article? Here is a primary source on that . Let me know if you are interested. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 21:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

LOL. I'm a fish, not a crustacean, but I should point out that Viriditas tried to review the DYK nomination, but didn't start the article. But don't mind me, rock on! --Tryptofish (talk) 21:24, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Please cover up your proverbial otoliths with your fins for my next comment: @Steve Quinn: The real, outstanding question of our time is, why weren't The B-52s featured in Stranger Things? My guess is that it's a major oversight by the Duffer brothers, given that they weren't born until 1984. The point to keep in mind, is that although versions of the song were recorded in 1978 and 1979, it didn't become prominent until the 1980s. Our Misplaced Pages article also fails to mention this. Even stranger, why did the song go to number one in Canada in 1980, but couldn't even break the top 10 in the US? My guess is the length. 6:49 long on the album, 4:52 on the single, and 3:57 on the radio friendly version, which was still too long. This is the most important question of our time. The best minds of our generation are working around the clock on this. Viriditas (talk) 21:47, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
I still don't have an answer, but I'm sure that the truth is out there. Maybe very far out there. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:15, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
Well it seems all of the above is good fodder for background in the proposed article. And yes, one has to wonder how the B-52's did not wind up on Stranger Things - at least as a retrospective. Who says we can't have fun on Misplaced Pages? ---Steve Quinn (talk) 22:55, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

What is with that oppose on the RH BYU AN/I thread

Is it just me, or are you being petty? I don't see any substantive argument, just sour grapes about something totally unrelated. jps (talk) 03:11, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK for E. Graham Howe

On 26 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article E. Graham Howe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that E. Graham Howe "introduced Eastern philosophy to psychotherapy in England"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/E. Graham Howe. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, E. Graham Howe), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

PMC(talk) 12:02, 26 March 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Intermission (Hopper)

On 28 March 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Intermission (Hopper), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Edward Hopper's 1963 painting Intermission can be viewed as a metaphor for the world as theater? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Intermission (Hopper). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Intermission (Hopper)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 7,819 views (651.6 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of March 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Congrats on the viewership, too! --Tryptofish (talk) 20:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
I couldn't have done it without you. Viriditas (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
High fives all around! --Tryptofish (talk) 20:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

General Motors EV1

Hello Viriditas, I decided to abandon the GAN Chevrolet Volt (first generation) article to begin working on the General Motors EV1. Wondering if you’d like to accept the GAN task (I realised you reviewed it nearly nine years ago, but deemed it a failure). Best,  750h+ | Talk  17:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

I'm sorry to hear that. Since I previously reviewed General Motors EV1 in June 2015, it's probably best to hand it off to another reviewer. You could also consider skipping GAN and go straight to FAC. However, given that the EV1 has the most controversy of any electric car to its name, I suspect this will not be as easy as you think. I think it's far easier to start an uncontroversial article from the ground up from a stub. But, I wish you good luck, and if you're persistent and put in the work, I'm sure you'll succeed. Viriditas (talk) 19:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the thought. I just thought about asking you considering your consideration for the Volt. Best,  750h+ | Talk  00:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
It does raise an interesting question, though: are reviewers allowed to review the same article, multiple times? Viriditas (talk) 00:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
I don’t see why not. It doesn’t say that in the GAN instructions.  750h+ | Talk  00:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
There are many reasons why it's not a great idea, and as you are likely aware, not everything is spelled out in the policies and guidelines. In a perfect world, it might not be a problem, but one can envision all sorts of ways someone could take advantage of performing multiple reviews of the same article/hook/AfDs, etc. Viriditas (talk) 00:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
I see.  750h+ | Talk  00:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Editor experience invitation

Hi Viriditas :) I'm looking for people to interview here. Feel free to pass if you're not interested. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 10:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

@Clovermoss: I will consider it. I have a few interesting stories to share, but I want to get the details right before I commit to responding. Viriditas (talk) 21:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
That's completely fine. Feel free to pitch in whenever you're ready. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 23:59, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

April music

story · music · places

I like to see Appalachian Spring on the Main page today (not by me, just interested and reviewed), and I also made it my story. How do you like the compromise in the composer's infobox? - How do you like the statue (look up places)? - I was undecided so show three versions ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

Yes, Appalachian Spring is a fine article. My only complaint after reading it is that the lead somewhat downplays its influence on American culture (and on the people themselves). The body does go into this, so I felt like the lead should have mentioned this a bit more. Otherwise, it's fine. Your composer infobox looks good; it's difficult to tell the difference. Your places subpage has trouble loading for me so I have to click on the images manually. I see three images of statues, which are quite nice. I note that the artist made her visage very pretty. I don't know which image I prefer, they are all exceptional. It looks like the weather was quite good when you took it. Rhine valley spring? Viriditas (talk) 18:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
The comment about the ballet lead should go to article talk. - The composer infobox is not by me, - see that article talk. - We talked about the same statue (and the artist's inspiration), in March, remember? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Yes, of course. I knew you were alluding to it. Are you enjoying spring? Viriditas (talk) 19:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
I enjoy spring, - today temperatures were rather like summer even. More pics to come. However, the German Misplaced Pages told me that spring in the ballet title is supposed to mean "source" rather than a season. The question was already on the ballet talk, and I repeated it, but no answer. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Yes, Hart Crane was referring to water, but Graham was referring to the season. "It is essentially the coming of a new life. It has to do with growing things. Spring is the loveliest and saddest time of year." There's a weird tradition in American art of taking a concept from outside of its original context and applying it to a new one. Not sure why that is. Viriditas (talk) 19:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: I would like to use one of your statues of Hildy (I've loved that nick since His Girl Friday) on my page. Not sure which one, however. Viriditas (talk) 22:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
You could rotate ;) - I associate green with her, so love the sprouting rosebush - there were also daffodils on the ground left of her but when I had those I missed the face. I love the wild sky as a portrait of a free spirit. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
As it happens, her Physica is on the Main page today, and Marian Anderson as my top story (by NBC, 1939), and below (on my talk) three people with raised arms (a player in the rock band with the "rock abbot, a large wooden sculpture of Jesus behind a church altar made by handicapped people, and the conductor of the Youth Symphony Orchestra of Ukraine), - and the place is the cherry blossom in Frauenstein
plum tree blossom for Kalevi Kiviniemi in the snow - see my talk --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 21:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
relief: the last of six RD articles in one week is now on the Main page - yesterday I went to a great recital with many anti-war songs by Jewish composers whose music was banned by the Nazis. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:02, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Nice photos. It occurs to me, we still don't have any discussion or mention of Hildy in the world egg article based on her vision from the Scivias. It would probably go in the "Modern representations" section. Viriditas (talk) 20:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
more photos ;) - the RD articles were followed by two birthdays in a row, and I prefer those (see my talk) - go ahead with the world egg --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:50, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
today a sad task - memory of Andrew Davis - turned into entertainment (yt at the bottom of his article, actually both) -- the latest pictures capture extreme weather --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for letting me know. I am setting up a playlist to listen to his recorded works now. Sad news. Viriditas (talk) 21:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: I just queued up Frederica von Stade – Mahler Songs. I won't be able to listen to it for another couple hours. I will let you know how it goes. Viriditas (talk) 22:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
for more listening: today you can look at the last three stories or "music" on my talk, and find the same topics, Youth Symphony Orchestra of Ukraine, Samuel Kummer and (pictured) one row of 8 double basses and another of 5 bassists ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

This one..?

Hi Viriditas, would you care to review the Aston Martin Rapide article for GAN? It's extremely short (sub 1700 words) so it shouldn't take too long. I plan to bring it to FAC, but the Aston Martin DB9 article is already there so thought I might as well do this one. Best,  750h+ | Talk  09:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for thinking of me. Unfortunately, I’m on break from GA reviews for at least another month. I’m working on at least four articles right now, two of which are offline, and it’s something that I’m constantly thinking about, even when I’m sleeping. I’ll check in with you when I return to GA review mode. Viriditas (talk) 09:38, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
Oh okay. Thanks for the response nonetheless.  750h+ | Talk  09:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

May music

story · music · places

On the bicentenary of Beethoven's Ninth Symphony, I remember our recent uplifting choral concert in pictures, on my user page and in my concerts (leading to the two at the church's article). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:23, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for the reminder. I will play the 9th in his honor today. Viriditas (talk) 21:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
The reminder was on the Main page, the image ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:31, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
I saw it! But I am more motivated by your personalized reminder tailored for me on my talk page. Viriditas (talk) 21:35, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, - I like that! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: FYI, I did end up listening to Claudio Abbado and the Berliner Philharmoniker. The whole thing is slightly upsetting to me. In 200 years, we have not managed to surpass anything like this. Why not? Has time stopped? Where are all the new Beethovens? Viriditas (talk) 08:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
I don't know where the new Bs are ;) - Today is the Feast of the Ascension for which Bach composed his oratorio, - perhaps watch a bit how the closing movement was performed in Bach's church. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
Magdalena Hinterdobler is on the Main page today, together with an opera that reviewers deemed not interesting and too obscure for our general readers. The soprano thought differently, - listen and see. - Also on the Main page: a TFA by sadly missed Vami_IV. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
did you listen and see? - today's story has a pic of a woman holding her cat, a DYK of 5 years ago - the recent pics show 2 orange tip butterflies --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
Just wonderful. Thank you for the joy you bring. Viriditas (talk) 19:41, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: What's the story with Philippine zu Guttenberg? She looks far too pretty to be a nun? Viriditas (talk) 19:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
No article even in German. This looks decent but I don't know if it would be enough for Misplaced Pages. The story with the soprano is that some doubt she is notable, and some that the sources are good enough. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:22, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
I liked seeing Erschallet, ihr Lieder on the Main page today, 310 years after the first performance! We sang it in 2000. Today's program was easier but also spirited. I found a nice video of "I will sing with the spirit", with nature photography, - enjoy. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:41, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: Thank you! I had been meaning to tell you that I recently listened to Songs of a Wayfarer (Lieder eines fahrenden Gesellen) performed by Frederica von Stade from 1979. It's an impressive recording, as it sounds very modern and current. I noticed that I found the mezzo-soprano range somewhat more relaxing to listen to for some reason. I had never noticed this before. Viriditas (talk) 21:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! - Today's story mentions a concert I loved to hear (yt of another Mahler song, from different performance) and a piece I loved to sing in choir, 150 years old OTD. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
29 May 1913: The Rite of Spring - today's story, actually something I saw at that place in a revival. - Why would you assume I get angry? (replied on DYKtalk) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:50, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Today's story is about Samuel Kummer, one of five items on the Main page - more musing on my talk, and while I wasn't angry it made me sad that instead of the precise program of five composers, we had three, only the common-place ones, only Germans, so showing him narrow-minded instead of open. Please listen to his postlude improvisation. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:22, 30 May 2024 (UTC)
last offer in May: photos of the river Rhine, and the adjacent Eltville rose garden, - high water and interesting weather --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:15, 31 May 2024 (UTC)

Canon EOS R project importance ratings

Hello, @Viriditas.

I asked a question on the WikiProject Photography page but I'm wondering whether you're best placed to answer it.

In short: should the WikiProject Photography importance ratings for an article be cleared when it gains Good Article status, or was that a mistake? I'm also noticing that the page was never part of WikiProject Brands until the GA notice was applied, so that looks like it might have been a copy-paste error too.

If possible, let me know if the Canon EOS R article should set back to "Low" importance for WikiProject Photography, and if it should be removed from WikiProject Brands altogether. Bob (talk) 21:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

You ask an interesting question. There’s no right or wrong answer. Many projects have gotten rid of importance ratings altogether because they don’t seem to matter all that much. I would say the answer here is to to use your best judgment. Viriditas (talk) 21:45, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Taking a cue from numerous articles about similar cameras, I've set the importance level to "low" for both projects. Bob (talk) 18:44, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

Hey, just wanted to say I greatly appreciated your comment here. It genuinely means a lot. Toa Nidhiki05 15:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Ebrahim Raisi

I've hatted a bunch to commentary there that does nothing to advance anybody's arguments and just generates anger. Please resist the urge to get into that kind of conversation, there were personal attacks in both directions. Acroterion (talk) 21:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

June music

story · music · places

Today's story is about the TFA, by sadly missed Vami_IV. In my support in 2018, I hoped to do justice to Schloss Köthen next - which I will begin today, finally, promised. Its Bachsaal was pictured to begin the year. For more related thoughts and music, look on my talk for 1 June. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Franz Kafka died 100 years ago OTD, hence the story. Fond memories of collaboration. I uploaded a few pics from the visit of Graham87. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)

Today I wanted to write a happy song story, on a friend's birthday, but instead we have the word of thunder on top of it, which would have been better on 2 June, this year's first Sunday after Trinity. The new lilypond - thanks to DanCherek - is quite impressive. As my 2 Jun story said: Bach was fired up. - Today's Main page is rich in music, also Franz Liszt and a conductor. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: I like the photo of the roses. Did you take it during the golden hour? If so, was it after sunrise or before sunset? Viriditas (talk) 21:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I remembered after lunch, and the image description tells me 2:38pm. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Very nice. Any chance you can find any German-language sources to add to Barbara's Rhubarb Bar? I notice Rheinische Post has several articles, but they are behind a paywall. Also, see the discussion at the bottom of Tryptofish’s talk page. Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 21:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
With Rheinische Post, I have the same problem. I have dear company and will edit only sporadically for the next few days. Perhaps take a look at the FAC for Schumann. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Enjoy your time with friends and/or family. Viriditas (talk) 22:21, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
The time was great, - pics to come! - Today is "the day" for James Joyce, also for Bach's fourth chorale cantata (and why does it come before the third?) - the new pics have a mammal I had to look up. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:20, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Today is the day for Joyce? That's hilarious. Did you mean what I think you meant? Viriditas (talk) 20:17, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
How would I know what you think? - I read it on the Main page ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:23, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
Heh. Read the bio. June 16 is a very "funny" day. Viriditas (talk) 20:25, 16 June 2024 (UTC)
New pics of food and flowers come with the story of Noye's Fludde (premiered on 18 June), written by Brian Boulton. I nominated Éric Tappy because he died, and it needs support today! I nominated another women for GA in the Women in Green June run, - review welcome, and more noms planned. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:04, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Oh, you tempt me! I very much want to review that article. You know me too well. But I will continue other things due to my GAR hiatus. If nobody takes it in a week, then I might. Viriditas (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for that! - Today is a feast day for which Bach composed a chorale cantata in 1724 (and we had a DYK about it in 2012). Can't believe that Jodie Devos had to die, - don't miss her video from the Opéra-Comique at the end, - story to come. Updating her sufficiently for the Main page was all I got to yesterday, and there could still be more. - The weekend brought plenty of music sung and listened to, and some of it is reflected in the last two stories! + pics of good food with good company --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:20, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Please write a song in honor of Devos named "no one has to die". Would be fitting. Viriditas (talk) 03:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
I'm just a singer not a songwriter. - The image in my DYK story is what I happened to see from my seat in a performance before the festival (with Anna Netrebko in the title role but sold out of course, and the other was possibly the icier Principessa anyway). I recommend the trailer video, with various scenes to the end of the music that Puccini was able to finish before he died in 1924. --19:58, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Gerda Arendt (talk)
back home, but too tired for more than pic update --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:41, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

Humanities ref. desk

I'm not too interested in prolonging our discussion at any length, but you should understand that many feminists and lesbians may not have a strong preference when it comes to a choice between your right-wing donor circles who want to put women back into their old patriarchal roles versus transactivists who are just as misogynistic against women who dare to disagree with them or who dare to stand up for their own rights -- especially since the right-wing donors are remote shadowy figures, while the transactivists are nasty and vicious and in your face with their spiteful hatreds and fanatical determination to punish women by fair means or foul, and silence them (literally by shouting them down, or by more sinister methods). If I were half as conspiracy-minded as you, I might make something of the fact that gender ideology allows men to unleash unrestrained virulent hatred against any and all women who disagree in any way with gender ideology, and invoke all the traditional conventional misogynistic stereotypes against them combined with the latest up-to-date left-wing jargon insult buzzwords, harassing and intimidating and doxxing those women, and trying to destroy their careers and ruin their lives -- while feeling smugly virtuously progressively "woke" the whole time. In this respect, it's kind of Incel for left-wingers (both Men's Rights Activists or MRAs and transactivists or TRAs get extremely angry when mere women dare to stand in the way and try to be obstacles to people with penises doing whatever the hell they want, -- the difference being that MRAs don't try to redefine and misappropriate the word "woman" itself). You can call gender ideology "progressive" all you want, but to those on the sharp edge of struggles over conflicting rights, the willingness of gender ideology adherents to throw women under the bus (in certain case, their positive eagerness to throw women under the bus) really does not feel too "progressive" to them. It's all a little bit similar to those who don't care too much about Arabs, but seize on middle east issues to unleash their hatred of Jews...
P.S. The recent "no queerphobia" thing demands absolute fealty to gender ideology. If enforced strictly, it would mean that truth is irrelevant, facts are irrelevant, evidence is irrelevant, reliable sources are irrelevant, NPOV is completely destroyed, and so on down the line, since the only important thing is conformity to gender ideology (presumably anyone who dares to disagree with Judith Butler would be banned!). AnonMoos (talk) 19:57, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

I hope you feel better now. Viriditas (talk) 20:08, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

"Matriotism" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Matriotism has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 June 13 § Matriotism until a consensus is reached. — GodsyCONT) 21:14, 13 June 2024 (UTC)

Highlighting Trump's racism

  • Trump is the most racist president since Nixon.
  • DOJ found Trump family business refused to rent or negotiate rentals "because of race and color"
  • Role in Central Park Five case; insistence the accused were still guilty after being acquited
  • Racist attacks on Judge Curiel's Mexican heritage
  • Trump wants white European immigrants to come to the US, not black and brown immigrants.
  • Trump's role in the Obama birth certificate conspiracy
  • Trump's defense of "very fine" Neo-Nazis at Charlottesville
  • Trump telling four US-born congresswomen to go back to their "country", even though 3 of them were born in the US. None of them were white.

Time to update the lead section for this convicted felon. Viriditas (talk) 00:24, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

You are a sad, sad individual who is living in a world of brainwashed lies. 68.132.71.22 (talk) 09:31, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Age and health concerns about Donald Trump: age 78; at risk for obesity, heart disease, high cholesterol, family history of dementia. Viriditas (talk) 09:41, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
Gotta make Misplaced Pages grate again. --Tryptofish (talk) 21:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)
I mean, I wish I could be angry at the IP, but it's impossible at this point. The projection from them is fierce and overwhelming. Imagine putting your faith in a lifelong charlatan, con man, and grifter who represents a foreign nation. But, they are not alone. I was just coming back from a nice long walk when I ran into a neighbor down the street. He's the nicest guy you'll ever meet. But, unfortunately, he's an ultra MAGA, he believes COVID-19 was a fake "plandemic", and he lives in that world like the rest of the Trump supporters. You can't get through to them, and there's no reason to even try, because for them, facts don't exist, yet he holds down a full time job like most Trump supporters. Only thing I can say is that it's like we live in two different worlds. Rachel Maddow came to the same conclusion, coining the phrase "Earth 1" and "Earth 2" as a kind of recognition of the vast chasm between us. Viriditas (talk) 08:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages Library

Hi! Why are you not eligible for Misplaced Pages Library? – Doc TaxonTalk23:57, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

I got into an argument with the admin of Wikinews who I called a pathological liar. Probably not the smartest move, but that’s what happened. He then blocked me and years later he died from some illness, so he can’t unblock me. Site blocked users can’t have access to Misplaced Pages Library. Viriditas (talk) 00:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Do you regret your move? Are you sorry about it? Where exactly are you blocked? – Doc TaxonTalk00:51, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Blocked and community banned here:. Global account description of block and ban. I regret being uncivil and rude in my communication on the talk pages, however the discussion and rationale for the community ban (described as "Disruptive, combative nature with clear goal to cause as much trouble as possible) was based on a series of false statements made by others, particularly the unsubstantiated claim that I was socking (I wasn't, and there was zero evidence that I was) and that I was trying to "cause as much trouble as possible". However, it is entirely true that I was unnecessarily combative in my speech, and it is that fact that I regret, and is an ongoing problem that I still struggle with. Viriditas (talk) 01:12, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
What if we unblock you? What are you going to do then? – Doc TaxonTalk01:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
I will not be editing Wikinews, if that's what you mean, and frankly, I don't have any future plans to edit it at all. I can't imagine that would change. If I was unblocked, I would apply for Misplaced Pages Library, that's about it. And of course, I would continue to work on mitigating my verbal aggression here and elsewhere, which I've had some major, measurable success with, but also some minor, yet recent setbacks. Viriditas (talk) 01:53, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Is there anything I can do to help? --Tryptofish (talk) 21:06, 30 June 2024 (UTC)
Waves from the bottom of the Kola Superdeep Borehole. They told me to stop digging! Viriditas (talk) 21:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

July music

story · music · places

The story is today about the first published composition by Arnold Schönberg which I was blessed to hear. Listen, and perhaps read what Alma Mahler (to-be-Mahler at the time, to be precise, who was present at the first performance) said, and yes that was too much for the Main page ;) - I completely forgot about this DYK over the travels. Hope to get to M. soon. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:36, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Today's story is about a Bach cantata premiered 300 years ago OTD. - A meeting of two women - the occasion of the cantata - is pictured in our local church. Today, I was busy with a tenor who died. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:53, 2 July 2024 (UTC)

3 July is the birthday of Leoš Janáček, and I'm happy I had a meaningful DYK in 2021 which was about a woman ;) - It's also the birthday of Franz Kafka, and I uploaded pics from his family's album seen in Berlin. Proud to have had 2 women in green in June already ;) - Now turning to the bass who died. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:55, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for approving Milashkina! I'd prefer recordings first then awards, but was reverted when I arranged it like that. It doesn't matter much. - Libuše Domanínská, the subject of yesterday's story, would have turned 100 today, but I missed that ;) - Lando Bartolini went to the Main page. I made my story about his almost unbelievable career, from Luigi in Il tabarro in Philadelphia in 1968 (with a nod to Liberty) up to Calaf in Turandot in Beijing in 1999 ;) - 4 July is also the birthday of Brian Boulton who was a pioneer of a concise infobox in 2013. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:45, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Do you mean you were reverted on another article? I will restore it, since you say you prefer it. Not sure where to put the documentary, but I will leave it in personal life and you can move it where you like. Viriditas (talk) 21:30, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
(I don't remember on which article, understanding now how the question was meant. The answer doesn't relate to positioning of awards, but the list of compositions in a composer's infobox:) I was reverted on Robert Schumann, I added a list of compositions, and it was reverted on 17 May during many improvements to improve to FAC quality, - when I noticed it was already too long ago for WP:BRD. The place to discuss would be the FAC. One user tried already. I was uninvited. Brian's pioneering infobox had a list of compositions. It was removed not only for Schumann but also for Grainger and Vivaldi. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:59, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I was talking about Tamara Milashkina. Viriditas (talk) 22:15, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I got it, only it's the other that was on my mind when I wrote about Brian's pioneering approach. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:19, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Understood. I think the translation of the documentary film title might be wrong. I think it's supposed to be The Sorceress from the City of Kitezh, not The Wizard from the City of Keitezh. I'm still looking into this. Viriditas (talk) 22:33, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
As far as I can tell, they are deliberately alluding to The Wizard of Oz, so that would explain the confusion. Viriditas (talk) 22:36, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I found it. The Great Soviet Encyclopedia (1979) translates it as The Enchantress From the City of Kitezh. Viriditas (talk) 22:49, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: I made some minor changes. Feel free to change it back if you like. Viriditas (talk) 21:44, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
I just confirmed she played Montreal at Expo 67. Viriditas (talk) 23:28, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! - Pictured on the Main page: Brian's Mozart family grand tour, my story today, and Mozart related to all three items of music on my talk: our 2023 concert, an opera in a theatre where a Mozart premiere took place, and those remembered, Martti Wallén, a bass, and Liana Isakadze, a violinist from Georgia (whose article would be better with more details about her music-making). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:46, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
I remember today Bach's 1724 cantata for this Sunday which is unusual in many respects. Another woman needs attention for RD, Marina Kondratyeva. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Hahahah...you kill me, Gerda. You have the most wonderful sense of humor, for a German. Are you sure you are German? Viriditas (talk) 20:02, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm sure I'm German, and also that sometimes I'm funny without knowing it (which began at school, in German, when I said "lange Dürre", meaning a long drought, but the class laughed, understanding a tall thinny woman ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:12, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for inviting me to edit Marina Kondratyeva. That was very kind of you. The only thing I notice is missing section headings. I'm curious, do you think the lack of US sources is indicative of the huge cuts in our federal arts funding? I think Germany still funds the arts, do they not? BTW, I really enjoy watching those German expatriate videos in English that explain to outsiders what its like to live in Germany. It's both super educational and always funny in some way. Like what would happen to someone who just moved to Germany for work and ran the laundry late at night in their building? Or how asking personal questions doesn't go over well there, but in the US, you can learn everything about someone in about five minutes. Stuff like that. Viriditas (talk) 22:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, thought-provoking! A friend from the U.S., resident of Germany for a few years, always told his U.S. guests in restaurants that they should speak in a soft voice, leaving the conversation at the table instead of entertaining the whole room, - to no avail. - She's on the Main page now, and there's a talk video of her (at the bottom), also a new NYT review of which I can see only the header, - please add detail if you see more. There are several videos of her dancing, but I'm not sure enough of their licensing to put them in the article. I liked to add a Plisetskaya quote, - she was in Wiesbaden with her husband for a premiere of his opera, and in the Rheingau for him being the featured composer of the Rheingau Musik Festival which I saw. - My story today is - because of the anniversary of the premiere OTD in 1782 - about Die Entführung aus dem Serail, opera by Mozart, while yesterday's was - because of the TFA - about Les contes d'Hoffmann, opera by Offenbach, - so 3 times Mozart again if you click on "music" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:43, 16 July 2024 (UTC)
Americans are way too loud in restaurants. I almost went deaf in Half Moon Bay recently at a restaurant. A table full of tech bros and sisters talking at the top of their voice. My ears are still ringing. Viriditas (talk) 09:58, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
Today's story is about a photographer who took iconic pictures, especially View from Williamsburg, Brooklyn, on Manhattan, 9/11, yesterday's was a great mezzo, and on Thursday we watched a sublime ballerina. If that's not enough my talk offers chamber music from two amazing concerts, - gentle music, to soothe your ears! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:17, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
... and today's story begins with Psalm 124, paraphrased in 1524, and put to five (!) chorale settings in one cantata by Bach in 1724, for this Sunday. Nominated for GA. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:45, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
Just a look at music (on my talk) shows remembrance of three people who died, and creating an article or improving one is all I can do. Three are on the Main page today, and three others planned ... - Could you imagine to do the GA review? One week until the day Misplaced Pages thinks is the anniversary. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:54, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
... and then I come with Toteninsel ;) - I just did the second of the three planned. Same question about the GA - five days left until the day ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Toteninsel: another look at music shows three women remembered there, - a sad record. The Main page also has a Mozart symphony I love, and my story is a 2016 hook. It was connected not only to Max Reger's death in 1916, remembered then, but also the death of a friend who - and we around him - knew he was dying when he listened to the concert which was his last time leaving home, and music from Reger's Requiem was played for his funeral three months later. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:26, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Gerda, I neglected to thank you for surprising me the other day with such a wonderful hook and image of Isle of the Dead, way back from 2016. That image has always spoken deeply to me because it reminds me so much of Fannette Island in Lake Tahoe and Phantom Ship island in Crater Lake. Viriditas (talk) 21:50, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! The day is still today, but no: for me it's already 26 July. I'll switch only after sleep, - to another soprano. The island pic also inspired the Walkürenfelsen in the Bayreuth Jahrhundertring. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:40, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Gerda, I am sorry to draw your attention back to Isle of the Dead, but to what do you attribute its popularity in Germany (and Europe as a whole) in the late 19th century? Do you think it was just trendy, or is there something more to it? My own guess is that it had more to do with the technology of poster reproduction, and this just happened to be one popular poster that was available, so people tended to buy it. This is my take after reading about Toulouse-Lautrec and the history of lithography. It's funny that I'm discussing this again, because this is an issue I addressed many years ago in Cleopatra and Caesar (1871). See the section on "Influence" I wrote about the role of Goupil & Cie in popularizing the reproduction. I wonder, do you think Goupil & Cie were behind Isle of the Dead as well? Viriditas (talk) 10:14, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
That sounds like interesting research, but right I'm occupied by two RD articles (one Polish, one Romanian, for struggle with foreign sources ...), a third is postponed, and I am not where I want to be for the Cantata, - sorry for drawing your attention to that a third time ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:18, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
The way you say "occupied" is so funny. My mind immediately went to US commercial airline lavatory. Viriditas (talk) 23:00, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Is "busy" better, or what? - Relief for you: That Bach cantata review is under way. (There's another open, if you like.) -- (forgot to sign)
Misplaced Pages:Main Page history/2024 July 30b will have a baritone, a violinist, a composer and a Bach cantata (yes the one mentioned just above), - almost too much, and the composer's article, Wolfgang Rihm, should be better, help wanted. - Plenty of music on my parents anniversary day ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:07, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
I know you said "relief" on purpose. I am no longer accepting your accidental comedy routine. :) Viriditas (talk) 22:33, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Thanks

Hey I just wanted to thank you for this: it's so rare to see someone just choose to be super decent like this on the internet. (Also I will never not be astonished to find that there are people who have been doing good work on here for 20 years and who I've never interacted with!) --JBL (talk) 01:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Big Fish edit

Hello, I noticed you recently reverted many edits on the Big Fish page. Could you please explain your reasoning for the reverts? Thanks! Wafflewombat (talk) 02:44, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

You deleted large swaths of a Good Article and did not use the talk page to explain your edits. You’ve also been warned about doing this before on your talk page and you’ve been repeatedly given tips and tricks to improve your approach yet you removed all these warnings from your talk page and you haven’t followed best practices. How about using the talk page to explain your edits from an incrementalist approach, one section at a time? Viriditas (talk) 03:01, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I can certainly do that. Could you clarify something for me? Did I do something wrong by blanking my talk page? I was under the impression that it's acceptable to do that. I didn't blank the page to hide the conversations that have happened on it, I just like to have a clear page once conversations are over. Wafflewombat (talk) 03:08, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
You can probably do whatever you like with your talk pages, but archiving talk pages is just a bit more overt in terms of what you are doing or trying to do. One of the reasons I reverted is because it isn’t clear if you improved the page. If you think you did, briefly summarize your changes on the article talk page, giving people an idea (don’t write a novel) how your version improved on the previous one. Viriditas (talk) 03:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Before you sent this message, I posted my version of the lead for editors to review. I was going to do that for every section. Is that too much? Are you saying I should just make one post on the talk page? Thanks for engaging in dialogue about this. Wafflewombat (talk) 03:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I just took a look at the talk page. It isn’t at all clear why you think this is an improvement or why you are trying to rewrite the article. Again, other editors have brought this up with you on your talk page before about other articles. Looking at what you wrote in regards to the lead, I can’t figure out what you are trying to do. Can you briefly explain why you are compelled to rewrite a stable article that has already gone through the GA process? I think it’s one thing if you were trying to improve it for FAC, but I don’t see that occurring here. I guess what I’m saying is that I’m still very confused by your edits. Instead of copying your changes to the talk page, it might help to give a reason and then point to the diff in the page history where your changes still reside. So, for an example, how do your edits to the lead improve upon the previous version? Or to put it another way, why even make them? That’s where I’m confused. It isn’t at all clear what you are aiming for here. Viriditas (talk) 04:06, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I guess I'm confused too. If you look at my edit summaries, a lot of them are copyediting—grammar, syntax, etc. There were quite a few sentences or segments which could be condensed and communicate the same thing. There was a lot of trimming that I did to improve the quality of the writing. There were some long quotes which I turned into prose, since I'm under the impression that is encouraged by MOS:QUOTE. All in all, I'm being 100% honest with you when I say that I've taken the prior feedback on my talk page to heart. Before, I didn't pay attention to the number of edits I made on a given page per day. Now I do. I usually limit my edits to 3-4 per day so other editors don't get bombarded. If that's still too much, I can reduce it further. Since most of my editing on Big Fish was simply about improving the writing quality and eliminating mistakes, I didn't realize it needed to be posted on the talk page. I thought that by spacing the work out over 21 edits, that would be incremental enough. I apologize if I was wrong in that estimation. Wafflewombat (talk) 04:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Overall, I don’t see the improvements, but I’m willing to take a closer look in a few hours from now. Again, it’s not really clear what you are trying to do. Have you tried experimenting by writing your own article from scratch about a topic you enjoy? There’s a lot of topics to choose from, and I think this might be a better route for you to take. Viriditas (talk) 04:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I appreciate that you're willing to take a closer look. In terms of what I was trying to do, I didn't have any major agenda. I was just doing a thorough copyedit of the entire article, including fact-checking sources, adding missing information to citations, and streamlining the plot summary based on WP:STREAMLINE. Wafflewombat (talk) 05:05, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I’m not sure about any of that. Take a look at Good Article requirements. If you want to restore your edits to the plot section alone, I might agree to that. Viriditas (talk) 05:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
@Wafflewombat: it occurs to me that you could really help Misplaced Pages by focusing on articles needing targeted maintenance, as it would make use of and harness your skills in a constructive manner. Check out Category:Misplaced Pages article cleanup. There’s a lot there for you to choose from and I doubt you will encounter any resistance or arguments as you will be following the instructions in place to fix specific problems. Please consider it. Viriditas (talk) 05:46, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Note, you can sort by topic as well, such as Category:Film articles needing attention. Viriditas (talk) 05:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Did you have a chance to take a closer look at some of my edits?
When you've come to a decision about the plot restoration, please let me know 🙂 Wafflewombat (talk) 06:45, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Won’t know for another few hours. Viriditas (talk) 06:47, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
No problem. Thanks for the suggestion about doing article maintenance. I will consider it 🙂 Wafflewombat (talk) 06:58, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I took a look at your plot section. You honestly have me at a disadvantage as I'm not sure which version is better in that regard. Your version leaves stuff out, but I wonder if it is even necessary to include it. But, given that the plot section was within the acceptable range of MOS:PLOT, I am curious why you cut it down. Again, referring back to what I said up above, I'm still unclear as to what you are trying to do. It looks like you are on a mission to make articles shorter? That's the only thing I can figure out. If I'm wrong, let me know. Viriditas (talk) 09:10, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Do you mind if I ask for input on the plot section from the Film Wikiproject?
It's too bad we're not understanding each other (at least not yet. I think we can get there!). I didn't have a mission in mind when I started working on this page. Big Fish is one of my favorite movies, so I thought it would be enjoyable to read through the entire page and see if the page needed copyediting. In my view, there was quite a bit that needed doing. My understanding is that when sentences or paragraphs can be condensed, so they use fewer words to say the same thing, that is encouraged. During my time editing WP, I've always been under the impression that trimming is an important part of copyediting. Would you disagree? On my end, it would be helpful if you could point out specific edits in which the trimming of content damaged the section in question. Without examples, it's hard for me to address your concerns (and I am committed to addressing them in full). Wafflewombat (talk) 09:22, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I think we are making some progress, but I do have other things to do. You are welcome to take this to whatever project you want. Now that you've told me that Big Fish is one of your fave films, it makes a bit more sense. That's fine, but I'm not sure the page needs copyediting like you think it does. As I said, I'm pretty open to changes to the plot section, so whatever happens there, I really won't argue all that much about it. But as for the rest of the article, I'm not certain that condensing as you describe it is the best approach. I am still curious though, where did you get this idea that articles needed to be condensed? It just seems like an odd approach to me, and I've been in here for some time and can't recall seeing anyone ever edit like this before. Is there a policy or guideline you are using that justifies this approach or did you come to it on your own? Also, I hope you can appreciate the humorous irony of attempting to condense an article about a man who tells long, rambling stories. I think I would feel far more comfortable if you were attempting to turn this into a featured article. If you think you can do that, then by all means, have at it. But I'm not sure your "condensing" approach is going to even get us half way there. Let me know what you think. One way for you to really challenge me on this is to take it to a peer review and let them know you want to go for featured article status. That would show me that you were very serious about this, and I would feel much better about your edits. The takeaway here that I hope you are getting, is that "condensing" isn't necessarily going to improve the article. I'm guessing it can very well make it worse. Most importantly, it's going to take actual research, source collecting and reviewing, and doing some serious work to get this article to the next level. If you think you are up for that, let me know. After all, this is your favorite film. Viriditas (talk) 09:41, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I don't approach every article with the idea that it must be condensed. In fact, it's quite lovely when I find articles that need very little copyediting of any kind, because it's a testament to the work that others have put in. In fact, one of my favorite parts of editing is article expansion. It just so happens that at this point in time, I don't have the time or energy to do that, so I've just been doing copyediting instead. Unfortunately, I do not have the time to get an article to FA status.
Is your confusion about my editing stemming from the fact that I'm putting a lot of time and effort into a well-developed Good article that is not in dire need of any major changes? If that's the case, I would offer that any article can use improvement, even Good ones (and Big Fish hasn't been assessed for GA status in 15 years). Perhaps you find it strange that I would want to work with small margins of improvement—say, making a solid article 10% better instead of making a bad one 50% better?
It seems your main concern is that I condensed the article significantly. Are you able to see that I wasn't coming at it with an agenda of condensing, but merely found that multiple sections could use condensing, in my view? Since you haven't gone through all my edits in detail, isn't it possible that, in this case, edits that included condensing were warranted? I'm just confused how you are concluding there are problems with my edits if you haven't reviewed them all (that's my impression). Not trying to be rude here, just hoping for clarity.
How should we proceed from here, since you've got other things to attend to? In my view, all of my edits make sense, but it doesn't sound like you're able to go through edit-by-edit with me. If it would be helpful, I could write up a short rationale or summary of each of my edits, so that you could review those instead of the entire edit.
We could also seek a third party to weigh in generally about this situation.
I do appreciate the humor 😄 Wafflewombat (talk) 09:55, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Well, I already did go through your plot section and I don't see much of an improvement. I went through your lead and don't see any improvement. I'm frankly still confused that you are obsessed with condensing the article, because as I've repeatedly said, 1) the article doesn't need or require "condensing", and 2) there's no indication that condensing is an improvement. So, I'm really not convinced there is anything else needed to do here unless you can demonstrate on the talk page how your "condensing" was needed, how it was an improvement, or how the policies and guidelines support what you are doing. You say you don't have time to participate in the article improvement process, yet you appear to be bringing your "condensing" approach to already good articles, so your approach isn't working, IMO. Finally, if you aren't going to participate in the article improvement process, how do you know your "condensing" is an improvement in the first place? I hope you see the problem. There's nothing in the policies and guidelines that I can see that supports your approach and I find it very unusual. I think its best if you use it on 1) articles you start from a stub, as this would prevent you from "condensing" the work of other people and force you to "condense" your own writing. I suspect your articles will not go very far because Misplaced Pages doesn't improve articles by the process of "condensing", but rather the complete opposite, by expansion, and when articles are significantly expanded, they branch off into new articles. So to conclude, I think you are going about things entirely wrong, and I don't think there's anything left to discuss. I apologize if that upsets you, but I really do recommend that you stay away from Good Articles and focus on working through the article improvement process some other way. Once again, I'm sorry if this upsets you, but I think we've talked this thing to death and there's nothing more to say. Alternately, you could try writing your own new policy or guideline, perhaps call it WP:CONDENSEARTICLES, and see if the community agrees with it. There's also Misplaced Pages:Simple English Misplaced Pages, which in fact does use a condensed version of Misplaced Pages, so perhaps you are getting confused with that project? Viriditas (talk) 10:31, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Would you be open to me making edits that do not involve any condensing, such as the addition of sources? Wafflewombat (talk) 10:50, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

I'm open to all edits which objectively improve any article. But the thing I don't understand is the disconnect between your preference for Big Fish, which you've said is one of your favorite articles, and the amount of time you are dedicating to it, yet your continued resistance to following the article improvement route. I would invite you yet again to go the peer review route and find out what needs to be done before doing it. What that does is it gives you milestones to achieve, and you can point people to them when they ask "how did you improve the article?" It's really that simple, and I hope you choose to do it. Viriditas (talk) 11:04, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
I just wanted to let you know that after a few hours' sleep, I have a better understanding of your views about my editing. I will be changing how I edit based on your feedback. Wafflewombat (talk) 23:18, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Wait, what, is there a page about me? --Tryptofish (talk) 23:23, 14 July 2024 (UTC)

Your offer

Is your offer still open about me discussing things on your talk page? I’m afraid I’ve annoyed some editors here too much with my recent messages. I just want to know if you are still alright? Pablothepenguin (talk) 16:50, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

@Pablothepenguin: yes, that's fine. I'm curious, when it comes to options, can you get no sugar added and vegan option at the same time? Viriditas (talk) 19:44, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
This page implies they are opening stores in the UK. Viriditas (talk) 19:48, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Cullen328 says he doesn't want you to talk about, so my hands are tied. Here's what I would recommend: work on improving the Menchie's Frozen Yogurt page in a constructive manner. A lot can be done here, and it sounds like a fun project that I might be able to help with. You can then "talk" about improving the article on the talk page. Other than that, you should keep it cool, because I don't want to see you blocked. Viriditas (talk) 19:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I don’t believe I can be blocked for a friendly discussion between two consenting people. I wouldn’t expect that Cullen328 has any control over user talk pages. He’s probably more concerned about disrupting the reference desk and other such things. Pablothepenguin (talk) 20:07, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Well, we should include him in this discussion. User:Cullen328, what do you think? Viriditas (talk) 20:33, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Viriditas, I have no problem with you discussing the frozen yogurt business if you want to. I do have a problem with the protracted, repeated, unproductive discussions at the Reference Desk that go all the way back to February. In your first comment on this matter, Pablothepenguin, you said that you were obsessed with this franchise. I would not use that word if you didn't, but your obsession is not improving the encyclopedia and has wasted a lot of volunteer time. Cullen328 (talk) 22:19, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Very well, I acknowledge that such happened. I thank you very much for your insights here. I will think about what to say and say it carefully. I think Cullen328, you basically confirmed my suspicions that you were mostly concerned about disruption of the reference desk. As such, I will proceed with what I wanted to say to Viriditas. Pablothepenguin (talk) 22:27, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Pablothepenguin, I want to put in a good word for Cullen328. He's one of the best admins (and editors) we have on this site. Let's try to give him the respect he deserves. Viriditas (talk) 22:49, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Good thinking. Out of respect to him, I will avoid polluting the reference desk and other places. I will only ever use this page, and the pages in my own user and user talk namespaces from now on. Pablothepenguin (talk) 22:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Hey, I was just reading your previous posts on this subject. I had no idea you've been at this for seven years, four of which took place on Misplaced Pages reference desk! That's a long time. Let's think about something constructive you can do, because wasting seven years doing nothing isn't good. Viriditas (talk) 23:32, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Now you've got me super interested in how you got into this. I see that you cited a 2013 episode of Undercover Boss as the origin of your obsession. I will now watch it myself to see what all the fuss is about. If you never hear from me again, please light a candle in my memory. Viriditas (talk) 23:35, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
Watching it now. Pablothepenguin, did you know that Menchie's CEO cites the film The Secret of My Success as an influence? Viriditas (talk) 23:53, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
I don’t think I wasted my time. I’m trying to solve an injustice I feel in my area. The explanation is long, so I’ll post it tomorrow after some sleep. Pablothepenguin (talk) 00:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Well, I just started writing Menchie’s fan fiction below. If you’re a fan of Rick & Morty then you know they’ve written entire episodes around this idea. Viriditas (talk) 01:23, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
So this exercise got me thinking. Are there any known planets with the consistency of ice cream or frozen yogurt? Viriditas (talk) 01:27, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Eureka, all this creative brainstorming and fan fiction writing worked. I figured out how you can move forward on this. Viriditas (talk) 02:49, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

You’re a musician, right? Okay, it turns out that musicians have been writing music about Menchie’s. There’s a really cool video that you’ve probably seen, by a country artist I think? Well, why not compose music dedicated to Menchie’s, using it as a theme for each song? If it’s good enough, you’re going to get their attention. Think seriously about this. And go listen to the songs other musicians have written in honor of Menchie’s. I think that’s a good way forward. It’s not a petition, but as a cultural work of art that could conceivably reach a lot of people, it could go viral and it might even be featured by corporate. They would have to listen to you if that happened. And you could focus on creating your musical portfolio of compositions while you are at it. What do you think? Shall I prepare an article on the forthcoming Grammy-nominated album, Music for Menchie’s? Viriditas (talk) 02:55, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

I’m thinking this could be a concept album. Viriditas (talk) 03:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Let’s think bigger! How about something like a rock opera? Think Wizard of Oz meets Wonka? A young Dorothy dreams of froyo on a hot day, but her small town doesn’t have it. Later, she sees a strange show at home about a colorful froyo store but in her excitement to watch, she falls off the couch and hits her head, knocking her out. She wakes up, seemingly in her town, but things seem different. There’s now two froyo shops where there weren’t any before, both in competition with each other. Viriditas (talk) 03:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I just learned that there is a Menchies in the town where one of my sons lives. I will check it out. Cullen328 (talk) 03:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
As promised, I will offer you a full explanation below for everything. It is fairly long, but I think it will be an interesting read.
It all started that day I watched Undercover Boss 7 years ago. Ever since then, I’ve had a significant craving for frozen yogurt. I didn’t act on it much for a few years, but by the time the recent pandemic started, I got bored out of my mind and started thinking about it in a way I hadn’t before and hence my current obsession began. I started to get very frustrated with the frozen dessert places near me which, in my corner of South-West Scotland, are all very generic Italian gelato places and so-called “soft serve” which almost only ever comes in basic vanilla flavour. I also am expected to ask a complete stranger of a worker to dispense my product for me, which is hard for me due to me being on the Autism Spectrum.
This obsession kept on going and still goes on in the present day. I continually am frustrated by it, as I feel I do deserve a self-serve frozen yogurt place to call my own. I also come to believe that Glasgow and Edinburgh are perfect places for such a business, and I start to do what I did on the reference desk. Unfortunately, other users are annoyed by this, so I start to worry about being blocked, and then I said all of this to you.
I hope this clarifies things, and I am happy to answer any questions you might have. Pablothepenguin (talk) 10:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I almost forgot to mention one more important point. I am also attracted to Menchie’s due to their mascot character. I’ve always adored mascots and I would like to have more businesses in my area that have those. Pablothepenguin (talk) 10:17, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I get it. I seem to have grown out of my obsessions for whatever reason, after the age of 30. No idea exactly how or why, but the intuitive feeling I have is that my brain rewired itself due to various reasons. I am curious, beyond music, are you actively engaged learning new things and acquiring new experiences? Something tells me that such things can contribute to mitigating obsessions through creating new pathways in the brain, but this is only my pet theory. Viriditas (talk) 11:28, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I think I have done certain cool things. It is hard for me to focus on too many things at once. I therefore am not really trying to learn much other than music stuff. I do have ambitions, of course. I also feel that I would prefer to keep this obsession, as it doesn’t prevent me from living a normal life. I also need things like this in my life in order to give it purpose and meaning, otherwise, why bother to get up in the morning? Pablothepenguin (talk) 12:04, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
You raise an interesting point. Where is the line between a passion and an obsession? I would say it can be difficult to tell. But if it makes you unhappy, then you should probably try to deal with it. And you don’t sound all that happy about the absence of Menchie’s in your area. Maybe something to think about for a few days? Viriditas (talk) 12:50, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I’ll certainly think about it. Pablothepenguin (talk) 13:06, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
I took a few days off to try and relax. I think it helped me, and it is something I will do occasionally. If I’m going to see this obsession through to the end goal, I will need these breaks to help myself. I hope I’m on to something here. Pablothepenguin (talk) 12:02, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I can empathize. I went through a similar period where I was meditating every day, twice a day, for 20 minutes at a time. It really helped, but that kind of regimen can present an entirely different set of problems. Right now, in the present moment, my problem is more physiological than psychological, as my body is slowly breaking down for reasons unknown. I'm being overly dramatic, of course. The reasons are well known. Age-related decline, and one day closer to death. Apologies if that's a bit too macabre for you, but I've fully embraced it. They say the best way to face your fear of the unknown, of the inextricable march to the yawning grave, is to imagine that you have already died. There's a certain freedom in that idea, but you may be far too young to even entertain such a thing. Go outside and enjoy yourself. Live free, and live hard. Viriditas (talk) 12:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I will try my best to live a good life. I am still as always brainstorming ideas for my work. One way or another I will succeed. I am trying to think of more ways to get Menchies here in the UK. I don’t know if I told you before, but I’m based up near Glasgow in a nice area. I focus mainly on Glasgow and Edinburgh as far as cities are concerned. That’s just what is convenient to me. I will get my frozen yogurt eventually. Pablothepenguin (talk) 20:10, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I, for one, am definitely not too young to understand that, but I do hope you're reasonably OK. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:12, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks. Still raging... Interstellar ruined Dylan Thomas for me. Made me think Nolan had some kind of grudge against him? Viriditas (talk) 23:18, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
I think the relaxing and having short breaks technique is working. I think it might fix me in the end. In other news, having just returned from a trip to London and Brighton, I realised how amazing England is. Along with Scotland, they manage to show the diversity and variety of people. I’ll probably move down there in a couple of years after I have graduated from college. I still don’t get the lack of frozen yogurt options in my nation. I can only hope that that will change soon. There is no doubt that the thousands of people I’ve seen over the last few days, in England, would generate enough customers for this. Scotland would also manage there. Overall logic will prevail and hopefully soon. Pablothepenguin (talk) 22:31, 30 July 2024 (UTC)
Just to confirm that I’m still well. I hope to continue this trend for as long as I live. I do still wish to see a frozen yogurt business in my area. Such must happen eventually. Pablothepenguin (talk) 16:08, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Glad to hear that you are safe and doing well. Have you given any thought to my idea about writing frozen yogurt music? Viriditas (talk) 19:07, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Not yet, I’ve got higher priorities at the moment. For instance, I will be heading back to college to study music production. I am sure to deal with this eventually. Pablothepenguin (talk) 20:01, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
Please keep me updated with status reports. Viriditas (talk) 20:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC)
I’m glad to report that I start college tomorrow. If I get anything done that is relevant, then I’ll pass it your way. Do remember that I am still doing my campaigning at present. Any ideas would be greatly appreciated. Pablothepenguin (talk) 17:06, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
Good luck with college and enjoy yourself. As for ideas, the Simpsons said it best: "We've tried nothing, and we're all out of ideas." Viriditas (talk) 22:35, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

Have details coming soon. Need help with plans. Will notify soon. Pablothepenguin (talk) 23:08, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

New discovery

Artist’s impression of Menchie’s 052007 FROYO

Ice cream scientists working in close collaboration with astronomers and geophysicists in the field of exoplanetary pseudobulbar affect announced today the discovery of Menchie’s 052007FROYO in the ice cream constellation of Bootes. The planet appears to have a frozen yogurt ocean surrounding a cone-like core. More details will be announced shortly. Viriditas (talk) 01:16, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

Sounds fascinating Pablothepenguin (talk) 09:54, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
It’s delicious. Viriditas (talk) 11:46, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Brings a whole new meaning to ice planet. (But exercise moderation, or you might have to loosen your asteroid belt.) --Tryptofish (talk) 19:46, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Speaking of ice, have you heard about the latest fad diet on Earth? It's called the global warming diet. Antarctica is losing 150 billion metric tons of ice per year, and looking mighty thin. Oil companies love this one weird trick. Viriditas (talk) 22:34, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
This. --Tryptofish (talk) 23:11, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
How crazy is it that Misplaced Pages doesn't have an image of the bass line notation (from the original "Under Pressure") which is probably the most popular bass line in the history of late 20th century modern music? @Pablothepenguin:, do you know how to upload musical notation? Viriditas (talk) 23:29, 19 July 2024 (UTC)
Ok, I just saw Help:Score. Viriditas (talk) 23:35, 19 July 2024 (UTC)

\relative { \set Staff.midiInstrument = #"electric bass (finger)"
  \clef bass
  \key d \major
  \time 4/4
  \tempo "Andante" 4 = 114
   d8 d8 d8 d16 d16 d8 r4
}

Wikiproject

Hi, I see you're a member of WP:Mythology, would you be interested in a sub project on WP:Anthropology on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 14:13, 26 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi, Kowal2701. I think the way forward is to envision a different approach. Have you determined the percentage of active users on the project(s) you are contacting? I think what you should consider is to figure out what you want to do with oral tradition topics and then collect data about the articles and other material, and put together a call for participants in the Signpost. That way you will get heightened visibility and your goals will be clear. Viriditas (talk) 22:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
That might be a better idea, at the moment I’m just messaging editors who have contributed a lot to articles involving oral tradition, so far have 15/20 definites and 5 interested but busy. You can see the proposal at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Council#New proposals. I think it might be best for me to keep doing this over the weekend, then start the page and ping everyone to a discussion on scope and objectives. After we’ve outlined the project, then do a signpost? Kowal2701 (talk) 23:12, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I'm talking about using a Signpost article to recruit people for whatever it is you want to achieve. You can do it any way you want, but if you see deficiencies in coverage about oral tradition, and you can successfully communicate those problems in a brief article, you would get a lot more people interested than just the small pool of potential members you are dealing with right now. Also, if you take a data driven approach, you would generate far more interest in your goals. This would require you to collect data about what we already have, compare it to existing or comparable material, and identify strengths and weaknesses, finishing up by recommending next steps for improving coverage. By doing this, you are in effect creating an ad hoc roadmap with milestones, and that gives people something to go on. Viriditas (talk) 23:24, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
That sounds good, but I wouldn’t know where to start with that. I was just thinking the tasks could be clean up/improve existing articles (most articles involving oral traditions have tags), expand existing articles, and create articles. Objectives would be similar to the ones at WP:Military history with the progress bars. We could also standardise the format/method for articles on an oral tradition Kowal2701 (talk) 23:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
As for knowing where to start, the thing to always remember is that the data is already there, you just have to extract it from Misplaced Pages. Some people use bots to do this. I used to use AWB for this purpose, but that was a long time ago. You can even write queries in many different ways. If a progress report is what you want to extract, again, that information is already contained in the articles, you just have to extract it. Viriditas (talk) 23:35, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Sorry I’m not very tech literate, hopefully someone else can assist in this, unless it’s something you’d be interested in? Kowal2701 (talk) 23:49, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
I was just thinking the tasks could be clean up/improve existing articles (most articles involving oral traditions have tags), expand existing articles, and create articles. That's the data I'm referring to here. I used to use Misplaced Pages:AutoWikiBrowser to help with this, but there are other ways of doing it as long as everything is categorized. This is how the reports are generated. Viriditas (talk) 23:51, 26 July 2024 (UTC)
Would we not first need to tag all oral tradition pages to the taskforce? Kowal2701 (talk) 00:01, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Now you're getting it. That's what AWB is used for. Viriditas (talk) 00:07, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Oh I assumed we had to tag articles by hand? Kowal2701 (talk) 08:04, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Nope. And why would you do that when AWB will tag all of them for you? Viriditas (talk) 08:08, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
So it just tags any article mentioning oral tradition with the WP parameter? Kowal2701 (talk) 08:13, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
It tags articles based on whatever rules you give it. One of the easiest ways is to tag by category, but there are others. It comes with a WikiProject plugin, which makes it simple to use. But you don’t have to do that if you don’t feel comfortable. You can also ask authorized users to do it for you or you can submit a bot request elsewhere. I would recommend doing it yourself because it allows you to get a different, hands on look at what you are dealing with, and when you do, you begin to see the issues and problems and whatever maintenance tasks you are interested in emerge from the set. It’s a great way to get a larger perspective on everything. And that view will inform your tasks, and you’ll have a greater handle and understanding of what needs to be done. Viriditas (talk) 08:18, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
Thanks that sounds great, I’ll do that Kowal2701 (talk) 08:27, 27 July 2024 (UTC)
It's also got a mode where if you don't want to learn any of the advanced features, you can just feed it a text file of article names you want tagged. It's that simple. Viriditas (talk) 08:31, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

August music

story · music · places

Today I have two "musicians" on the Main page, one is also the topic of my story, watch and listen, - I like today's especially because you see him at work, hear him talk about his work and the result of his work - rare! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:22, 7 August 2024 (UTC)

Fascinating. When I lived in SF, I used to take my guitars to George Peacock. He died of brain cancer in late 2011. I always visited at odd hours when nobody was in the store (after lunch), and this gave me the advantage of having him teach me about basic maintenance because he was open to people asking him questions. I believe he was the last luthier in the city when he died. Viriditas (talk) 23:10, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
Looks like luthier Richard Collopy died a few years before Peacock. I don't recall ever using his services. Viriditas (talk) 23:26, 7 August 2024 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: As it turns out, and I didn't actually know this, Peacock used to sing in the St. Philip's choir. I think this is their website, but I'm not sure. Given that he was exposed to wood dust for his entire life, from his childhood to his adulthood, I'm guessing that led to his brain cancer somehow as people like carpenters are highly susceptible to cancer if they don't wear a mask, and back then, nobody wore masks. It also makes me wonder if that was a somewhat minor contributing cause to the decline of luthiers, in addition to mechanization. Viriditas (talk) 10:31, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
Interesting! - ... and a third, like 22 July but with interview and the music to be played today --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:52, 8 August 2024 (UTC)
On 13 August, Bach's cantata was 300 years old, and the image one. The cantata is an extraordinary piece, using the chorale's text and famous melody more than others in the cycle. It's nice to have not only a recent death, but also this "birthday" on the Main page. And a rainbow in my places. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
today's story is about education, 10 years OTD after lecturing our founder). Music for today's feast is Monteverdi's, the best concert we ever did (so pictured again on my talk), but it wasn't recorded, substituted with a "Pacific" one that comes with subtitles line by line in Latin and English: I learned something! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
the best concert we ever did but it wasn’t recorded
Only a real musician would say that! Every musician has that story, it’s part of their personal lore. In 2024, it’s super easy to record all the time now, and it’s fairly inexpensive. Search for "portable recorder". Viriditas (talk) 21:36, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Another thing to consider is just buying a mic for your phone. Zoom makes the iQ7 Rotating Mid-Side Stereo Microphone for iOS. Then you just record using your preferred app. Viriditas (talk) 22:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
I don't think I expressed what I meant to say: we made a conscious decision then to not record but keep it in our hearts. - Sunday story about another of Bach's chorale cantatas, listen, as I listened to two impressive very different choral concerts, - music by 16 composers. In the latest cloudy pictures: a hidden deer, a cat and a blaze of a sunset. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:51, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: well, that changes things, doesn't it? Thanks for explaining. Viriditas (talk) 22:31, 25 August 2024 (UTC)
We decided to record our 4-choirs-project, last year, and the mezzo soloist was second soprano in the Monteverdi, her teacher being first. The last two concerts (Mozart Requiem and Bach cantatas) were also recorded but for strictly internal use. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:22, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. I'm listening now. Viriditas (talk) 08:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
What a great recording. Is Lieselotte Fink related to Franz Fink? And why do so few people in the choir use tablets? Do most feel more comfortable with the paper sheet music/parts/score in case the battery dies? The bandoneon sounds very nice. I just forwarded this video along to someone who is an aficionado of the instrument. Viriditas (talk) 09:20, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Another thing that is remarkable about the video is how different the stage looks from each angle. I wonder if the semicircle choir space heightens this illusion. Viriditas (talk) 09:23, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Lieselotte is the youngest of the five children of Franz and Maria Fink, and was a baby on her mothers lap in rehearsals when I joined the choir in 1987. Maria is my friend, she is standing next to me in the choir, - it was her first performance in the alto section, having switched from second soprano. - We never thought about tablets. People using tablets are perhaps from Belgium. The stage is the choir of the church, with semicircle stone benches part of the architecture, and glorious acoustics wherever you sit. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:59, 26 August 2024 (UTC)
Help? My story today is about a woman, nominated for RD but needing support as I write this. A composer died whose article is long and mostly unreferenced. And some articles open for review, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)

August 2024

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Project 2025. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Skyerise (talk) 13:12, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

TESCREAL and User:Jruderman

Thank you for summarizing my weird views to contextualize my comments in the recently-concluded TESCREAL deletion discussion. You can read more about my goals for Misplaced Pages in a new section of my userpage and in the linked Twitter thread.

— Jruderman (talk) 16:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)

@Jruderman: That's helpful and informative. Am I wrong in assuming that you have a unique sense of humor? As for tescrealism, I would like to get your perspective on where we stand. Viriditas (talk) 20:01, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
I’ll take that as a compliment :)
I’d say the TESCREAL page has been a coatrack attack page masquerading as a definition of a neologism, but that the neologism may have enough legs and enough acceptance in multiple circles to soon allow an okay (if short) article at the title.
Still, I’d TNT the page and start over. Jruderman (talk) 23:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
I understand, and I’m sympathetic, but perhaps for different reasons. My operating principle is "let’s get this right", and towards that end, I would like to create a proposed outline moving forward. Could you help me work on this here, in this section? For example, what do you see as major omissions, if any, and what do you propose adding or removing at first glance? No need to get too detailed at this point, but if you could focus on one thing at a time, that would be helpful. Viriditas (talk) 00:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
There should be a neutral glossary-type section listing the seven ideologies, and a section explaining what they have in common and where they differ.
I’m working on this now. I don’t see it as a glossary, but rather a way to explain how all the interlocking parts work. One thing I would like to see is a graphic in the shape of a pyramid, similar to the kind of hierarchy of disagreement graphic we all know and love. Transhumanism would be on the bottom with longtermism and possibly e/acc together at the top. Viriditas (talk) 04:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
There should be at most one paragraph mentioning eugenics, supported by multiple types of primary sources (something from Torres and something from new-eugenics supporters) (in addition to secondary sources).
Secondary sources should come first. Perhaps you mean there should be secondary sources with primary attached for further reference. I tend to do that to provide background info. Also, primary by the own authors about their theory are important. Viriditas (talk) 04:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
There should be only one small section about what Torres and Gebru think. They can have more space on the Misplaced Pages articles about them as individuals. Jruderman (talk) 01:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
I would disagree with that suggestion. I’m more curious why we should not be explaining their theory in depth in an article about tescrealism. This does not belong in their bios. Viriditas (talk) 04:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
If we're arguing that the term is notable enough on its own (i.e. separately from the opinions of Gebru and Torres) to have an article, then their opinions probably shouldn't dominate the article. Maybe this is too WP:CRYSTALBALL of me. I'm happy to drop this because I think things will be clearer a year from now. Jruderman (talk) 17:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for explaining your position a bit more. Is this something you came to on your own accord, or did you get the idea elsewhere? I only bring this up because it differs so much from my own understanding and experience. When we write articles about a concept, very often we will include a discussion of the authors of the idea, explaining their reasoning, thought process, and very often even their development. To give you an example: Torres' background as an evangelical Christian is relevant here. As they themselves acknowledge, this familiarity with eschatological thinking allowed them to identify and perhaps even to sidle up to transhumanism, replacing one religion with another. I’ve raised the point many times before, and it upsets people in the tescreal community to no end, many of whom identify as atheists. But to those of us on the outside looking in, it is indeed, in our opinion, another kind of religion. This becomes more and more evident as we move up the bundle pyramid. So discussion of not just the opinions of the authors here but also their life experience has a direct bearing on how they came to write about this topic and is relevant to increasing our understanding of it. When we discuss Ray Kurzweil in the context of singularitarianism, we are discussing religion in its most original form. Kurzweil has spoken openly about how he is motivated to reunite with his dead father and is himself afraid of death. If you ask anyone why they are religious, they will cite these two exact reasons, the longing to reunite with their dead family members and their fear of dying. Torres and others have talked about this. I myself have been talking about this for many years. We are not dealing with anything new here, we are talking about the oldest problems in human existence. Viriditas (talk) 19:38, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
This is my own legalistic reasoning, shaped by interactions with @Grayfell: and reading Misplaced Pages essays such as Maproom's WP:BACKWARDS. Jruderman (talk) 03:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Ok, I think I understand now. Please read law of the instrument and let me know what you think. Viriditas (talk) 04:04, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
I'm not sure what to think because I'm not sure what you mean. Law of the instrument is a good cognitive bias to be aware of, but that's true of most of them. Do you think I've overused legalistic reasoning or overused links to WP:BACKWARDS? Jruderman (talk) 04:07, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
Read the bottom part about computer programming. No need to reply just yet. Let it sink in for a few days. I often have to do that for many ideas. It takes time. Viriditas (talk) 04:10, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
I consider "let it sink in" to be an inadvertently unkind move when deployed against an autistic editor who is currently experiencing a bit of mania complete with racing thoughts.
So, instead of following your advice, I'm going to point you at a weird Twitter sub-thread, take my new meds, and sleep for a few hours.
See you tomorrow – I think you'll like the WikiProject I'm cooking up. It's about making Misplaced Pages articles as truthful as possible, including making sure we aren't inflicting cognitive biases on readers. I believe that not misleading readers is as important, if not more, than making sure each statement in an article is truthful and verifiable.
I've had some success at this lately in the YIMBY and Eugenics articles. I'm hoping to get many more editors doing the similar things on articles that touch on controversies or CTOPs.
I'll have more to share about the greener pastures new WikiProject tomorrow.
I'll come back and re-read Law of the instrument in a few weeks when I'm more... emotionally centered. Jruderman (talk) 06:09, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
"Let it sink in" in this context means "sleep on it". It was not meant to be unkind in any way, and I think I made that clear when I bracketed it with my own experience, explaining that I often need to let things sink in overnight to truly compensate for the natural resistance to different ways of seeing the world that we all share. This is why it is recommended not to immediately reply to comments that involve some kind of dispute, but rather to let them sink in and come back to them with a fresh perspective. This is also integral to letting a discussion breathe. For what it’s worth, I did not respond to you as an "autistic editor", but rather as a fellow human being. I can’t make accommodations or change the way I respond to every editor based on their own state of mind or emotional state. I think you would agree that it would be impossible. Viriditas (talk) 06:28, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
I think you'll like the WikiProject I'm cooking up. It's about making Misplaced Pages articles as truthful as possible
Bruh. No, just no. Just find a topic you enjoy and write about it. Viriditas (talk) 11:26, 22 August 2024 (UTC)

Meta

(Meta: let's refactor this back onto the deletion page when we reach a fixed point, so we're not leaving out everyone else for too long.) Jruderman (talk) 01:49, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

I will reply later when I have free time, but I think we should leave the deletion page alone. Viriditas (talk) 02:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Looking at the above, I see only one area of major disagreement. Viriditas (talk) 04:18, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Or maybe just add a link to this section, rather than trying to refactor everything into the deletion discussion. Jruderman (talk) 17:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
The deletion discussion is closed. Let’s both move on to greener pastures. Viriditas (talk) 19:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)

Lazarus Syndrome

Hi! I saw your comment at ANI re: Lazarus Syndrome, but didn't want to clutter it further, so I figured I'd come to your talk page. I'm pretty sure Lazarus Syndrome is when a patient revives after being pronounced dead, not actually being dead, which is by definition irreversible. Though in that case, I suppose Lazarus himself never actually died, either, since he allegedly came back. Hm.

Anyway, my apologies for inflicting my own pedantry on you, and thank you for your time! EducatedRedneck (talk) 12:22, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Premature burial was a very real problem during the first century, and according to some authors, was still a real problem into the 20th century. It's hard to know what is true, as most of what have to go on are just anecdotes. Viriditas (talk) 12:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
Fair enough! And makes sense; very shallow breathing and a weak heartbeat wouldn't be detectable without equipment. Thanks again! EducatedRedneck (talk) 12:38, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
See also: Swoon hypothesis. Viriditas (talk) 12:55, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

:(

I'm really sorry if I caused you distress. EEng 23:20, 1 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Rooms by the Sea

Hello! Your submission of Rooms by the Sea at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! 4meter4 (talk) 22:36, 3 September 2024 (UTC)

I took care of it, and it's been approved (with a different hook, alas). --Tryptofish (talk) 21:45, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Continuation of discussions

I would like to continue my discussion here. You might remember I was talking about a franchise? Pablothepenguin (talk) 17:17, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK Nathaniel Coe

Thank you for finishing the DYK. I was quite ill and unable to tend things online. AnotherColonialHistorian (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

September music

story · music · places

Today's story has 3 composers, I couldn't decide for the one on the Main page or the one who didn't make it on his bicentenary, so took both, and the pic has a third. Listen if you have a bit of time. The music, played by the Kyiv Symphony Orchestra in Germany in April 2022, impressed me. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for good observation! - Recommended reading today: Frye Fire, by sadly missed Vami_IV. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)

Happy because my story today is about a Czech mezzo soprano who is mentioned on the Main page on her birthday. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Today is Schoenberg's 150th birthday! On display, portrayed by Egon Schiele, with music from Moses und Aron, and with two DYK hooks, one from 2010 and another from 2014; the latter, about his 40th birthday, appeared on his 140th birthday, which made me happy then and now again. - See places for a stunning sunrise, on the day Bruckner's 200th birthday was celebrated (just a few days late). --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

My story today features a pic I took from my position in the choir, I can also offer varied delightful music, some from Venice, also with pics I took, - note the rose in the clarinet ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:46, 25 September 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Nathaniel Coe

On 10 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Nathaniel Coe, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Nathaniel Coe declined nomination to the United States Senate, instead choosing to serve as an inspector for the United States Postal Service? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nathaniel Coe. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Nathaniel Coe), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Kusma (talk) 00:12, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Barnstar of Diligence
For your attention to accuracy in DYK reviews. Andre🚐 22:17, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

October music

story · music · places

You may remember Maryvonne Le Dizès, my story today as on 28 August. Some September music was unusual: last compositions and eternal light, with Ligeti mentioned in story and music. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:24, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

today Rohan de Saram - unbelievable story --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:43, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Today is the birthday of Tabea Zimmermann, and you can listen to the exact concert I mentioned last year ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)

Today I remember an organist who was pictured on the Main page on his birthday ten years ago, and I found two recent organ concerts to match, - see top of my talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:31, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Today brought a timely promotion of Helmut Bauer to the Main page on the day when pieces from Mozart's Requiem were performed for him. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 18:41, 12 October 2024 (UTC)

I made Leif Segerstam my big story today as you know ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:05, 16 October 2024 (UTC)

My story today is a cantata 300 years old, based on a hymn 200 years old when the cantata was composed, based on a psalm some thousand years old, - so said the 2015 DYK hook. I had forgotten the discussion on the talk. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:41, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

Happy whatever you celebrate today, - more who died, more to come, and they made the world richer. Greetings from Madrid where I took the pic of assorted Cucurbita in 2016. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of S. F. Light

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article S. F. Light you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 21:06, 4 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of S. F. Light

The article S. F. Light you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:S. F. Light and Talk:S. F. Light/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 15:06, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Lady in White (Bracquemond)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Lady in White (Bracquemond) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 02:01, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Rooms by the Sea

On 15 October 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rooms by the Sea, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an art critic felt that Rooms by the Sea was one of Edward Hopper's "strangest" works? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rooms by the Sea. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rooms by the Sea), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:12, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Congrats! I wrote the hook(s), but you did the most important parts of the heavy lifting. --Tryptofish (talk) 22:01, 15 October 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Gust of Wind (Renoir), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alizarin crimson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your work over at Techno-Optimist Manifesto. Biohistorian15 (talk) 08:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. It still needs a lot of work, including expansion and incorporation of the patron saints and more about the so-called "enemies" (an important part that is still missing except for a brief mention); the reception section also needs serious work. I was making some progress, but I had to take a break for various reasons. Viriditas (talk) 08:54, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of S. F. Light

The article S. F. Light you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:S. F. Light for comments about the article, and Talk:S. F. Light/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of It is a wonderful world -- It is a wonderful world (talk) 22:04, 24 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

Information icon Please do not add defamatory content to Misplaced Pages, as you did to Freedom Caucus, especially if it involves living persons. Your edits have been reverted. Thank you. Bettering the Wiki (talk) 00:17, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Intermission (Hopper)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Intermission (Hopper) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 06:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Lady in White (Bracquemond)

The article The Lady in White (Bracquemond) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Lady in White (Bracquemond) for comments about the article, and Talk:The Lady in White (Bracquemond)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Rollinginhisgrave -- Rollinginhisgrave (talk) 06:05, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Intermission (Hopper)

The article Intermission (Hopper) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Intermission (Hopper) for comments about the article, and Talk:Intermission (Hopper)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 04:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

Big congrats on this! I regret that this happened at a time when I've just been too preoccupied with other things to have helped you with it, but you clearly did fine on your own. A fine article! (And while I'm at it, thanks again for the very kind words at my talk.) --Tryptofish (talk) 20:37, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination needs adoption

If you have time, Template:Did you know nominations/Cannonball (MILW train) needs adoption. Best wishes! Flibirigit (talk) 23:03, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

I'm always up for an adoption. I have a GAR on the burner that I've been asked to look at first. I'm also trying to complete a DYK nom right now. I can look at Cannonball later tonight (maybe 9 hours from now). Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 23:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
Thank you for the excellent work on all the DYKs, including mine! FortunateSons (talk) 10:48, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

November music

story · music · places

memories -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

For a surprise, a Bach cantata is on the Main page today, where it was last year for the 300th anniversary, and they were too lazy to find something new ;) - Look at my story, and listen to the 3 whole-tone steps and the dialogues of Fear and Hope. - An open letter open to be signed (more info on the talk), - I haven't checked if you did, please ignore then. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:01, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

I uploaded more pics, on a mountain in the sun above the fog. - Madeleine Riffaud - remember. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:07, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

I will travel today and have no idea if will be able to update my story tomorrow, probably not, lengthy travel, then 2 weeks with doubtful internet, celebrating. Could you do that perhaps if you see it's late? Last year's is good but I'll change it in case another Recent death gets posted, - 3 are open. Many DYK are open, - your pic expertise might help for Perplexities after Escher, and I'd appreciate a watchful eye elsewhere. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:22, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

I'm happy to help if I can figure out what to do. Viriditas (talk) 09:13, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
you did it! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:11, 14 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for more help in the field! I'll prepare 22 Nov in stories, for an early start tomorrow. If I don't get to it please feel free. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Last year's story would be good again for 26 Nov, and I'll be on a plane again. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:46, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
@Gerda Arendt: Will do. I forgot to tell you how much I enjoy your Apple tree in field photo. Viriditas (talk) 19:31, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, for the story work and the appreciation! - I uploaded pics of a trip that was a 10-day celebration of a 16 November event, but the day was also when a dear friend died. We sang Hevenu shalom aleichem at his funeral yesterday, and it was good. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:03, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited California series by Childe Hassam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santa Barbara.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Childe Hassam: Impressionist in the West

Hey! In response to your request, I finally got a copy of Bullock 2004. The painting is in there, on page 88, with the caption, 51 ; The Silver Veil and the Golden Gate, 1914 ; Oil on canvas ; Brauer Museum of Art, Valparaiso University, Indiana (; = new line). Other than that, from a quick skim through, it doesn't seem to be mentioned with any more detail. Bsoyka (tcg) 04:30, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you. Viriditas (talk) 05:19, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Cannonball (Milwaukee Road train)

On 14 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cannonball (Milwaukee Road train), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that despite being an ordinary commuter train, the Cannonball (pictured) was known for its Friday-night parties? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cannonball (MILW train). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cannonball (Milwaukee Road train)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 14 November 2024 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 28,204 views (1,175.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sun in an Empty Room

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sun in an Empty Room you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 09:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Your admiration for Hopper reminds me of my visit to an amazing 2019 exhibit at the Virginia Museum of Fine Arts. The museum recreated Western Motel and people could actually spend in the night in there. The lighting was a perfect match. I have photos and a video clip, but not sure it's allowed on Commons. The rest of the exhibit was also a treat. APK hi :-) (talk) 10:27, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
What gets me about Western Motel is the color of the room. That pea green color was everywhere in the US up until maybe the late 1970s, at which point people finally had enough and said no more. How did that happen? Why was the color acceptable one minute, and the next, socially verboten? For many years now, I've been fascinated with the idea of sea changes or paradigm shifts in art. Just yesterday, I was obsessing on Pierre-Henri de Valenciennes, trying to figure out how his interest in open-air painting laid a small part of the foundation for the Impressionists, who would emerge 50 years after his death. Viriditas (talk) 20:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

DYK for The Gust of Wind (Renoir)

On 19 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Gust of Wind (Renoir), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that The Gust of Wind is Renoir's attempt to paint air? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Gust of Wind (Renoir). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Gust of Wind (Renoir)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Hook update
Your hook reached 17,399 views (725.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of November 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talkcontribs) (he/it) 03:28, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

General George Takei

Reporting for duty, sir! Viriditas (talk) 00:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

--Tryptofish (talk) 16:24, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Bluesky. Viriditas (talk) 18:20, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Got it. Certainly better than being an ex-twit. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:25, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
See this. Viriditas (talk) 18:28, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
As I mentioned on my talk, I really did buy a tire thumper. --Tryptofish (talk) 20:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
"Do not obey in advance". Viriditas (talk) 20:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Sun in an Empty Room

The article Sun in an Empty Room you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sun in an Empty Room for comments about the article, and Talk:Sun in an Empty Room/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of APK -- APK (talk) 02:24, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

--Tryptofish (talk) 14:22, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Rust Red Hills

On 25 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Rust Red Hills, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Rust Red Hills is being sold to renovate student housing, a court-approved move that museum associations say violates the ethics of deaccessioning? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rust Red Hills. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Rust Red Hills), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

DYK for The Silver Veil and the Golden Gate

On 2 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Silver Veil and the Golden Gate, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that an Indiana university argued in court that The Silver Veil and the Golden Gate, a 1914 painting, was too modern for their art collection in 2024? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Silver Veil and the Golden Gate. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Silver Veil and the Golden Gate), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:03, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

story · music · places

Thank you for the article! November was rich in sadness and happiness for me, expressed in music. Regarding my arb candidate question, I found one so far who looked deeply into the matter, Simonm223. There are two composers on the Main page today, Siegfried Thiele and Aaron Copland. I find the response of my friend Jerome Kohl to a question on Copland's article talk promising. (more on my talk, for less repetition) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:35, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Music therapy is now gaining more ground as a legitimate practice in the US. This is something that has interested me since 1988. "Three New Books Make the Case for Music as Medicine" (2024). Viriditas (talk) 22:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
  • Claire Oppert (2024). The Schubert Treatment: A Story of Music and Healing. "In The Schubert Treatment, Oppert recounts her remarkable story of healing suffering through music, alongside portraits of the many people she has helped. Born into a family of doctors and artists, Oppert trained as a classical cellist and began playing at a center for autistic youth, where she witnessed how music could connect with even the most difficult-to-reach patients. Later, she began working as an art therapist with people with neurodegenerative diseases and palliative care patients, eventually conducting clinical trials that proved the effect of her "Schubert treatment": using music as a counter-stimulation to reduce pain and anxiety during stressful procedures." ISBN 9781778400803. OCLC 1417394503.
Viriditas (talk) 22:26, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you, interesting! - Today's story comes from a DYK about a concert that fascinated me, and you can listen! For my taste, the hook has too little music - I miss the unusual scoring and the specific dedication - but it comes instead with a name good for viewcount. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:10, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
On the Main page today Jean Sibelius on his birthday. Listening to Beethoven's Fifth from the opening of Notre-Dame de Paris. We sang in choirs today. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Listen today to the (new) Perplexities after Escher. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Thank you! Viriditas (talk) 11:36, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Listen today to Beethoven's 3rd cello sonata, on his birthday - it was a hook in the 2020 DYK set when his 250th birthday was remembered. I picked a recording with Antônio Meneses, because he was on my sad list this year, and I was in Brazil (see places), and I love his playing. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
I come to fix the cellist's name, with a 10-years-old DYK and new pics - look for red birds --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Today is a woman poet's centenary. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Today it's another great woman, soprano Sigrid Kehl, and I found a 1963 Christmas Oratorio detail. 10 years earlier than that cycle, Bach wrote seven cantatas for the 1724 season, based on seven songs, - my focus this year. Expect three stories for the three days they celebrated in Leipzig ;) - Enjoy the season! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:33, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
My first Christmas story is about Gelobet seist du, Jesu Christ, BWV 91, 300 years today, and its song, 500 years old. Enjoy! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:28, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
Similarly, my second Christmas story is about Christum wir sollen loben schon, BWV 121, 300 years today, and its song, 500 years old. An aria is inspired by a baby leaping in his mother's womb. Enjoy! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:34, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
My third Christmas story is different. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 19:03, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Diane Leather

Template:Did you know nominations/Diane Leather appears to be abandoned by its nominator who has not edited since October 22. If you're interested in adoption, please comment at the nomination page. Best wishes. Flibirigit (talk) 14:26, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I'm always interested in adoption, User:Flibirigit, but it looks like User:Launchballer is trying to close it out quick, and I'm not a huge fan of working against the clock when I have so many other things going on. If Launchballer can hold off on closing, I would be happy to take a look and see what I can do. Viriditas (talk) 21:11, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
@Flibirigit: it's unfortunate, but I don't have access to any of the sources needed to resolve the maintenance tag issue. I also don't have access to the Misplaced Pages Library, which could help resolve this. Due to this set of unique circumstances, I'm not sure how much help I can offer here. It might be the case that these sources are available on the Internet Archive, but I don't see any links to it at this time. Viriditas (talk) 21:22, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Note, it looks like a set of similar editorial problems have led to issues in the GA process for their other articles, so this isn't confined to just Diane Leather. This is a far larger problem and doesn't just reflect this one article. In a perfect world, I think if I had access to these sources, I could make some attempt to fix the problem, but I don't. Viriditas (talk) 21:28, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No worries. We cannot save all DYK nominations. Thanks for thinking about it. Flibirigit (talk) 21:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
I'm happy to hold on.--Launchballer 23:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
No need. I can’t do anything to improve it. See above. Viriditas (talk) 23:09, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Portrait of Toulouse Lautrec, in Villeneuve-sur-Yonne, with the Natansons

The article Portrait of Toulouse Lautrec, in Villeneuve-sur-Yonne, with the Natansons you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Portrait of Toulouse Lautrec, in Villeneuve-sur-Yonne, with the Natansons for comments about the article, and Talk:Portrait of Toulouse Lautrec, in Villeneuve-sur-Yonne, with the Natansons/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Matthew Yeager -- Matthew Yeager (talk) 03:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Self-Portrait (Ellen Thesleff)

On 22 December 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Self-Portrait (Ellen Thesleff), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that art historians believe that Ellen Thesleff's self-portrait may have been drawn in a trance-like state? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Self-Portrait (Ellen Thesleff). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Self-Portrait (Ellen Thesleff)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Hangover (Suzanne Valadon)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Hangover (Suzanne Valadon) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 19:04, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Hangover (Suzanne Valadon)

The article The Hangover (Suzanne Valadon) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Hangover (Suzanne Valadon) and Talk:The Hangover (Suzanne Valadon)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:05, 23 December 2024 (UTC)

Happy Holidays

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2025!

Hello Viriditas, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2025.
Happy editing,

Abishe (talk) 23:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 23:14, 24 December 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Hangover (Suzanne Valadon), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mirliton.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 26 December 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Hangover (Suzanne Valadon)

The article The Hangover (Suzanne Valadon) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Hangover (Suzanne Valadon) for comments about the article, and Talk:The Hangover (Suzanne Valadon)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:02, 26 December 2024 (UTC)