Revision as of 06:28, 11 September 2015 editSpeccy4Eyes (talk | contribs)505 edits Cites required for all these facts← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 22:15, 4 January 2025 edit undoProgress and on (talk | contribs)10 edits Inserted correct year.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description|British high-speed rail project}} | |||
{{other uses}} | |||
{{redirect|HS2}} | {{redirect|HS2}} | ||
{{Use British English|date= |
{{Use British English|date=May 2018}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=December 2024}} | |||
{{Infobox rail line | {{Infobox rail line | ||
|name = High Speed 2 | | name = High Speed 2 | ||
|color = | | color = Red | ||
|logo = | | logo = High Speed 2 logo.svg | ||
|logo_width = | | logo_width = 115 | ||
|image |
| image = High Speed 2 map 2023.png | ||
|image_width = |
| image_width = | ||
| caption = The planned extent of HS2 as of October 2023 | |||
|caption = Preliminary High Speed 2, High Speed 1 and Channel Tunnel Rail links | |||
|type = ]way | | type = ]way | ||
|system = ] | | system = ] | ||
|status |
| status = Under construction | ||
| locale = {{Unbulleted list | ] | ] | ] }} | |||
|locale = England <br />Phase 1: ], West Midlands <br />Phase 2: ], Yorkshire <br />Potential future phases: ], Scotland | |||
|start |
| start = {{rws|London Euston}} | ||
| end = {{rws|Birmingham Curzon Street}} | |||
|end = Phase 1: {{rws|Birmingham Curzon Street}} & <br />] near ] <br />Phase 2: {{rws|Manchester Piccadilly}} & {{rws|Leeds New Lane}} <br />Potential future termini: {{stnlnk|Newcastle Central}}, {{stnlnk|Edinburgh Waverley}} and {{stnlnk|Glasgow Central}} | |||
| connectinglines = ] | |||
|stations = 4 (phase 1) | |||
| stations = 4 | |||
|linelength = {{convert|119|mi|order=flip}} (phase 1, to WCML connection) | |||
| linelength = {{cvt|140|mi|disp=flip}}<ref>{{cite web |title=What is HS2 |url=https://www.hs2.org.uk/what-is-hs2/ |url-status=live |publisher=HS2 |access-date=29 October 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200219205351/https://www.hs2.org.uk/what-is-hs2/ |archive-date=19 February 2020}}</ref> | |||
|notrack = ] throughout | |||
| tracks = ] | |||
|routes = | |||
| routes = | |||
|ridership = | |||
| |
| daily_ridership = | ||
|owner = | | owner = | ||
|character = | | character = | ||
|gauge = {{ |
| gauge = {{track gauge|sg|allk=on}} | ||
| |
| load_gauge = ] | ||
| |
| electrification = {{25 kV 50 Hz AC}} ] | ||
|speed |
| speed = {{convert|360|kph|round=5|abbr=on}} maximum, {{convert|330|kph|round=5|abbr=on}} routinely<ref name="FBC"/> | ||
|elevation = | | elevation = | ||
| |
| website = {{Official URL}} | ||
| yearcommenced = 2017 | |||
|map_state = collapsed | |||
| planopen = 2029 to 2033<ref name="FBC">{{cite web |title=HS2 Phase One full business case |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-phase-one-full-business-case |website=DfT |access-date=17 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200419044453/https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-phase-one-full-business-case |archive-date=19 April 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
| map = {{High Speed 2 RDT|inline=yes}} | |||
| map_state = collapsed | |||
| map_name = Schematic map | |||
}} | }} | ||
{{High Speed 2 RDT|collapse=yes}} | |||
'''High Speed 2''' (HS2) is a |
'''High Speed 2''' ('''HS2''') is a ]way which has been under construction in England since 2019. The line's planned route is between ], in southern ], and London, with a ] to ]. HS2 is to be Britain's second purpose-built ] after ], which connects London to the ]. London and ] are to be served directly by new high-speed track. Services to ], ] and ] are to use a mix of new high-speed track and the existing ]. The majority of the project is planned to be completed by 2033. | ||
The new track is being built between ] and Handsacre, near ] in southern Staffordshire, where a junction connects HS2 to the north-south ]. Stations are planned for ] in northwest London, ], near ], and ]. The ] are being designed to reach a maximum speed of {{cvt|360|km/h}} when operating on HS2 track, dropping to {{cvt|125|mph|disp=flip}} on conventional track. | |||
Phase one of HS2 is to run between ] and the proposed new ]. Phase two will create two branch lines: a western section to ], and an eastern section to the proposed ] via the ] (serving ], ] and ]) and ] (serving ]). | |||
The length of the planned new line has been reduced substantially since the first announcement in 2013. The scheme was originally to split into eastern and western branches north of Birmingham Interchange. The eastern branch would have connected to the ] at ] in ] and the ] south of ], with a branch to a terminus in ]. The western branch would have had connections to the West Coast Main Line at Crewe and south of Wigan, branching to a terminus in Manchester. Between November 2021 and October 2023 the project was progressively cut until only the London to Handsacre and Birmingham section remained. | |||
Other cities and towns such as ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ] will be linked directly to the network by HS2 trains running on existing slower classic tracks or edge-of-town HS2 stations. Potential future extensions of HS2 to Newcastle and the ] of ] have been suggested. | |||
The project has both ] and ]. Supporters of HS2 believe that the additional capacity provided will accommodate passenger numbers rising to pre-] levels while driving a further ] to rail. Opponents believe that the project is neither environmentally nor financially sustainable. | |||
Although ] has approved the first two phases of construction, precise details of the plan and route have not been formalised, and are still open to negotiation. For example, the spur to ] was dropped from phases one and two in March 2015.<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-31814933</ref> | |||
{{TOC limit|5}} | |||
==History== | |||
The project is being developed by '''High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd''', a ] and established by the ]. The Department for Transport estimated the cost to be £43 billion; a study by the ] suggested a total cost of £80 billion. On English soil a comparable development is ]. | |||
{{main|History of High Speed 2}} | |||
{{See also|High-speed rail in the United Kingdom}} | |||
] | |||
In 2003, modern ] arrived in the United Kingdom with the opening of the first part of ] (HS1), then known as the {{convert|67|mi|km|adj=mid|-long}} Channel Tunnel Rail Link between London and the ]. In 2009, the ] (DfT) under the ] proposed to assess the case for a second high-speed line, which was to be developed by a new company, ] (HS2 Ltd).<ref>{{cite book |title=Britain's Transport Infrastructure High Speed Two |date=January 2009 |publisher=DfT |isbn=978-1-906581-80-0 |page=5 |url=http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedtwo/highspeedtwo.pdf |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100203063942/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedtwo/highspeedtwo.pdf |archive-date=3 February 2010|access-date=17 December 2017|ref=DfT2009}}</ref> | |||
In December 2010, following a review by the ],<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/general/2010/11/29-transport-secretary-unveils-hs2-tunnel.html |newspaper=] |location=Stevenage, UK |title=Transport secretary unveils HS2 compensation plan |date=29 November 2010 |access-date=10 December 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101206002811/http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/general/2010/11/29-transport-secretary-unveils-hs2-tunnel.html |archive-date=6 December 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref> a route was proposed, subject to public consultation,<ref name="bbc20decroute">{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12035524 |title=London-to-Birmingham high speed train route announced |date=20 December 2010 |publisher=] |access-date=21 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180410033523/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12035524 |archive-date=10 April 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.channel4.com/news/redrawn-high-speed-rail-plan-unveiled |title='Redrawn' high speed rail plan unveiled |date=20 December 2010 |work=] |access-date=21 December 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101222170153/http://www.channel4.com/news/redrawn-high-speed-rail-plan-unveiled |archive-date= 22 December 2010 |url-status= live}}</ref> based on a Y-shaped route from London to ] with branches to ] and ], as originally put forward by the previous Labour government,<ref>{{cite web |title=High Speed Rail – Oral Answers to Questions – Education – House of Commons debates |url=https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2010-12-20a.1201.0&m=40274 |url-status=live |at=question to the Minister by ], shadow secretary for Transport, 1st para |date=20 December 2010 |access-date=31 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170707044503/https://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2010-12-20a.1201.0&m=40274 |archive-date=7 July 2017}}</ref> with alterations designed to minimise the visual, noise, and other environmental impacts of the line.<ref name="bbc20decroute"/> | |||
], high-speed rail is officially supported in principle by the ], ] and ] parties, and opposed by the ] and ]. Some Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat politicians do not support their ], and oppose the HS2 scheme in detail; some support a cheaper, more complete plan called ]; and some reject the whole principle of high-speed rail. The ] formed in May 2010 stated in its initial programme for government its commitment to creating a high-speed rail network.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/documents/digitalasset/dg_187876.pdf |title= The Coalition: our programme for government |page= 31 |publisher= HM Government |date= May 2010}}</ref> | |||
In January 2012, the ] announced that HS2 would go ahead in two phases and the legislative process would be achieved through two ]s.<ref name="govannouncement">{{cite web|date=10 January 2012|title=Britain to have new national high-speed rail network|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/britain-to-have-new-national-high-speed-rail-network|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160105065214/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/britain-to-have-new-national-high-speed-rail-network|archive-date=5 January 2016|access-date=27 December 2015|website=gov.uk}}</ref><ref name="TransSelect"> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170709175614/https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmtran/1185/1185.pdf |date=9 July 2017}}. Retrieved 1 July 2012</ref> The ], authorising the construction of Phase 1, passed both Houses of Parliament and received Royal Assent in February 2017.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.railjournal.com/passenger/high-speed/hs2-hybrid-bill-gets-royal-assent/|title=HS2 Hybrid Bill receives Royal Assent|date=23 February 2017|access-date=28 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190728222423/https://www.railjournal.com/passenger/high-speed/hs2-hybrid-bill-gets-royal-assent/|archive-date=28 July 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> A Phase 2a ], seeking the power to construct Phase 2 as far as Crewe and to make decisions on the remainder of the Phase 2b route, was introduced in July 2017.<ref>{{cite web|title=Oral statement to Parliament, HS2 update: Phase 2a and Phase 2b|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/hs2-update-phase-2a-and-phase-2b|access-date=17 December 2017|publisher=GOV.UK|date=18 July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180210003648/https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/hs2-update-phase-2a-and-phase-2b|archive-date=10 February 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Phase 2a received royal assent in February 2021.<ref>{{cite web |date=11 February 2021|title=Phase 2a Act to bring HS2 to the north|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/phase-2a-act-to-bring-hs2-to-the-north|access-date=11 February 2021|website=gov.uk |archive-date=11 February 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210211135230/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/phase-2a-act-to-bring-hs2-to-the-north|url-status=live}}</ref> The ] for ] was paused under the ].<ref name="Select Committee" /> | |||
==History== | |||
One of the stated aims of the project is to increase the capacity of the railway network. It is envisaged that the introduction of HS2 will free up space on existing railway lines by removing a number of express services, thus allowing additional local train services to accommodate increased passenger numbers.<ref>{{cite web |title=Capacity - helping reduce overcrowding |url=https://www.hs2.org.uk/why/capacity/ |website=High Speed 2 |access-date=26 September 2020 |archive-date=11 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201011162307/https://www.hs2.org.uk/why/capacity/ |url-status=live }}</ref> ] considers that constructing a new high-speed railway will be more cost-effective and less disruptive than upgrading the existing conventional rail network.<ref name="The Independent-2020" /> The DfT has forecast that improved connectivity will have a positive economic impact, and that favourable journey times and ample capacity will generate a modal shift from air and road to rail.<ref name="FBC" /> In December 2024 the DfT stated there will be no WCML extensions from HS2 until the current project is completed.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/hs2-lite-replacement-between-manchester-and-birmingham-kicked-into-long-grass-3420608| url-access = registration | title=HS2 'lite' replacement between Manchester and Birmingham kicked into long grass|first=Richard|last=Vaughan|date=8 December 2024|website=The i Paper}}</ref> | |||
{{main|High-speed rail in the United Kingdom}} | |||
]]] | |||
] | |||
High-speed rail has been expanding across the ] since the 1980s, with several member countries – notably France, Spain and Germany – investing heavily in new lines capable of operating at over {{convert|170|mph|sigfig=2|order=flip|abbr=on}}. In 2009 there were reportedly {{convert|3480|mi|sigfig=3|order=flip|abbr=on}} of high-speed line in operation in Europe; a further {{convert|2160|mi|sigfig=3|order=flip|abbr=on}} were under construction and another {{convert|5280|mi|sigfig=3|order=flip|abbr=on}} were planned.<ref>] page 4 paragraph 5.</ref> | |||
===Oakervee Review=== | |||
High-speed rail arrived in the United Kingdom with the opening in 2003 of the first part of ] (then known as the {{convert|67|mi|km|adj=on|order=flip|abbr=on}} Channel Tunnel Rail Link) between London and the ]. The development of a second high-speed line was proposed in 2009 by the ] to address capacity constraints on the West Coast Main Line railway, which is forecast to be at full capacity in 2025.<ref>{{cite news| url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/apr/11/railways-hs2-fewer-economic-benefits?newsfeed=true | location=London | work=The Guardian | first=Gwyn | last=Topham | title=HS2 revises down economic benefits of £33bn railway | date=11 April 2012}}</ref> Most of the rail network in Britain consists of lines constructed during the ], which are limited to speeds no greater than {{convert|125|mph|sigfig=2|order=flip|abbr=on}}. A document published by the ] in January 2009 described an increase of 50% in rail passenger traffic and an increase of 40% in freight in the preceding 10 years in the UK and detailed several infrastructure problems. The report proposed that new high-speed lines be constructed to address these issues and, following assessment of various options,<ref>].</ref> concluded that the most appropriate initial route for a new line was from London to the ].<ref>] page 11 paragraph 29.</ref> | |||
On 21 August 2019, the DfT ordered an independent review of the project. The review was chaired by ], a British ], who had been HS2's non-executive chairman for nearly two years.<ref>{{cite press release |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-announces-independent-review-into-hs2-programme |title=Government announces independent review into HS2 programme |date=21 August 2019 |publisher=Department for Transport |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190821150953/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-announces-independent-review-into-hs2-programme |archive-date=21 August 2019 |access-date=21 August 2019}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-independent-review-terms-of-reference |title=HS2 independent review: terms of reference|website=gov.uk |access-date=21 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190821090858/https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-independent-review-terms-of-reference |archive-date=21 August 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> The review was published by the DfT on 11 February 2020, alongside a statement from the ] confirming that HS2 would go ahead in full, with reservations.<ref name="Oakervee-Review">{{cite web |title=Oakervee Review of HS2 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/oakervee-review-of-hs2 |publisher=Department for Transport |date=11 February 2020 |access-date=12 February 2020 |quote=original rationale for HS2 – still holds: there is a need for greater capacity (both more trains on tracks and more seats on trains and reliability on the GB rail network) |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200219205147/https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/oakervee-review-of-hs2 |archive-date=19 February 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite press release |title=PM confirms HS2 will go ahead alongside revolution in local transport |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-confirms-hs2-will-go-ahead-alongside-revolution-in-local-transport |publisher=Department for Transport |date=11 February 2020 |access-date=12 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200211142842/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-confirms-hs2-will-go-ahead-alongside-revolution-in-local-transport |archive-date=11 February 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> Oakervee's conclusions were that the original rationale for High Speed 2—to provide capacity and reliability on the rail network—was still valid, and that no "shovel-ready" interventions existed that could be deployed within the timeframe of the project. As a consequence, Oakervee recommended that the project go ahead as planned, subject to a series of further recommendations. After concluding that the project should proceed, the review recommended a further review of HS2 that would be undertaken by the ] and would concentrate on reducing costs and over-specification.<ref>{{cite news |last=Walker |first=Jonathan |title=New review of HS2 will look at cutting the speed of the trains |url=https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/new-review-hs2-look-cutting-17820174 |url-status=live |newspaper=Birmingham Mail |date=26 February 2020 |access-date=27 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200227092134/https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/new-review-hs2-look-cutting-17820174 |archive-date=27 February 2020}}</ref> | |||
On 15 April 2020, formal approval was given to construction companies to start work on the project.<ref>{{cite news |title=Construction on HS2 can begin, government says |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/apr/15/construction-on-hs2-can-begin-government-says |url-status=live |newspaper=The Guardian |location=London |date=15 April 2020 |access-date=15 April 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200415085257/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/apr/15/construction-on-hs2-can-begin-government-says |archive-date=15 April 2020}}</ref> | |||
===High Speed Two Limited=== | |||
In July 2023 the Infrastructure Projects Authority annual report gave Phases 1 and 2A project a "red" , meaning "Successful delivery of the project appears to be unachievable. There are major issues with project definition, schedule, budget, quality and/or benefits delivery, which at this stage do not appear to be manageable or resolvable. The project may need re-scoping and/or its overall viability reassessed." Measures such as reducing the speed of trains and their frequency, and general cost-cutting predominately affecting Phase 2b, would be assessed. | |||
In January 2009 the ] established High Speed Two Limited (HS2 Ltd), chaired by ],<ref>], page 5 paragraph 8.</ref> to examine the case for a new high-speed line and present a potential route between London and the West Midlands.<ref name="Transport, High Speed Two page 6" >], page 5 paragraph 9.</ref> The government report suggested that the line could be extended to reach Scotland.<ref>], page 17 paragraph 40.</ref> | |||
The ] ], in a January 2024 report, in relation to the revised planned route, stated that:<blockquote>"HS2 now offers very poor value for money to the taxpayer, and the Department and HS2 Ltd do not yet know what it expects the final benefits of the programme to be".<ref>{{Cite web |date=7 February 2024 |title=House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts - HS2 and Euston - Tenth Report of Session 2023–24 |url=https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/43184/documents/214904/default/ |access-date=8 February 2024 |website=UK Parliament}}</ref></blockquote>This report was clarified to mean following the cancellation of Phase 2.<ref>{{Cite web |title=HS2 verdict: Scheme now very poor value for money after Northern leg cancellation |url=https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/127/public-accounts-committee/news/199769/hs2-verdict-scheme-now-very-poor-value-for-money-after-northern-leg-cancellation/ |access-date=21 February 2024 |website=UK Parliament - Committees}}</ref> | |||
Drawing on consultations carried out for the Department for Transport (DfT) and ],<!--<ref name="Transport, High Speed Two page 24"/> --> HS2 Ltd would provide advice on options for a Heathrow International interchange station, access to central London, connectivity with HS1 and the existing rail network, and financing and construction,<ref>], page 24 paragraph 63.</ref> and report to the government on the first stage by the end of 2009.<ref>], page 24 paragraph 65.</ref> | |||
===Integrated Rail Plan=== | |||
In August 2009 ] published its own study independent of HS2's work, outlining somewhat different proposals for the expansion of the railway network, which included a new high-speed rail line between London and Glasgow/Edinburgh, following a route through the West Midlands and the North-West of England.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.networkrail.co.uk/documents/About%20us/New%20Lines%20Programme/5886_NewLineStudy_synopsis.pdf |work=Meeting the capacity challenge |title= The case for new lines |publisher= ]}}</ref> | |||
On 18 November 2021, the government's delayed Integrated Rail Plan was published.{{sfn|IRP North and Midlands|2021}} The plan significantly affected parts of the HS2 programme, including curtailing much of the eastern leg. | |||
Under the original proposal for the eastern leg, the high-speed line would have been built with a link to the ] south of York for trains to continue to Newcastle. A branch would take trains into Leeds. There would also have been a branch to the ] north of Derby for trains to continue to Sheffield. The original scheme also included a through station at ], between Nottingham and Derby. The HS2 eastern section was largely eliminated, leaving a branch from ] near Birmingham to East Midlands Parkway station, just south of Nottingham and Derby, where the HS2 track would end, with trains continuing north onto the Midland Main Line to serve the existing stations at Nottingham, Derby, Chesterfield, and Sheffield. HS2 trains would serve the centres of Nottingham and Derby, unlike in the previous proposal. | |||
For the HS2 report, a route was investigated to an accuracy of {{convert|18|in|cm|order=flip|abbr=on}}.<ref name="bbc-submitted">{{cite news |url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8432051.stm |title=High-speed rail plans to be submitted to government |date= 27 December 2009 |accessdate= 28 December 2009 |work= BBC News}}<!--This BBC report appears to confuse HS2 and Network Rail "New Lines" report by using text from one and images from the other--></ref> In December 2009 HS2 presented its report to the government. The study investigated the possibility of links to ] and connections with ], the ], and the ] (HS1), as displayed in the map shown. | |||
Upgrades to the East Coast Main Line were proposed to offer time improvements on the London to Leeds and Newcastle routes. Services from Birmingham to Leeds and Newcastle were planned to use the remaining section of the HS2 eastern leg. The London to Sheffield service will remain on the Midland Main Line, equalling the proposed original HS2 journey times. The integrated Rail Plan proposed a study to determine the best method for HS2 trains to reach Leeds. | |||
On 11 March 2010 the HS2 report and supporting studies were published, together with the government's ] on high-speed rail.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8561286.stm |title= High-speed rail plans announced by government |work= BBC News |accessdate=11 March 2010 |date= 11 March 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/ |title= High Speed Rail |publisher= ] |accessdate= 12 March 2010}}</ref> | |||
In June 2022, the ] spur was removed from the Crewe-to-Manchester Parliamentary Bill.<ref>{{cite news |last=Dhillon |first=Aran |title=Will controversial HS2 Golborne spur be scrapped? |url=https://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/news/20055900.will-controversial-hs2-golborne-spur-scrapped/ |url-status=live |work=Warrington Guardian |date=8 April 2022 |access-date=11 April 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220411163607/https://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/news/20055900.will-controversial-hs2-golborne-spur-scrapped/ |archive-date=11 April 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite press release |title= Government takes action to ensure Scotland receives best possible HS2 service |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-takes-action-to-ensure-scotland-receives-best-possible-hs2-service |date=6 June 2022 |access-date=6 June 2022 |publisher=Department for Transport |archive-date=6 June 2022 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20220606202126/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-takes-action-to-ensure-scotland-receives-best-possible-hs2-service |url-status=live}}</ref> Without this link, trains to Scotland would join the existing ] further south at Crewe, instead of south of ]. The Department of Transport stated that the government was considering the recommendations of the Union Connectivity Review, which gave alternatives such as a more northerly HS2 connection to the West Coast Main Line than ] and upgrades to the West Coast Main Line from Crewe to ]. The Department of Transport will publish its response subject to the funding allocated in the integrated Rail Plan.<ref>{{cite web|title=Will controversial HS2 Golborne spur be scrapped?|url=https://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/news/20055900.will-controversial-hs2-golborne-spur-scrapped/|date=8 April 2022|access-date=11 April 2022|archive-date=11 April 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220411163607/https://www.warringtonguardian.co.uk/news/20055900.will-controversial-hs2-golborne-spur-scrapped/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Government takes action to ensure Scotland receives best possible HS2 service |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-takes-action-to-ensure-scotland-receives-best-possible-hs2-service |access-date=6 June 2022 |website=GOV.UK |archive-date=6 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220606202126/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-takes-action-to-ensure-scotland-receives-best-possible-hs2-service |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition government review=== | |||
===Phase 2=== | |||
The ], on taking office in May 2010, undertook a review of HS2 plans inherited from the previous government. The ] in opposition had backed the idea of a high-speed terminus at {{rws|St Pancras}} with a direct link to ]<ref>{{cite news |url= http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7641094.stm |title= Tories would scrap Heathrow plan |work= BBC News |date= 29 September 2008}}</ref> and had adopted a policy to connect London, ], ] and ] with Heathrow by high-speed rail with construction starting in 2015.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.conservatives.com/policy/where_we_stand/transport.aspx |title=Where we stand: Transport |publisher=Conservative Party |accessdate=10 January 2012}}</ref> In March 2010 ] had stated ''"The idea that some kind of ] International station is the best rail solution for Heathrow is just not credible"''.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.birminghampost.net/news/west-midlands-transport-news/2010/03/11/tories-say-high-speed-rail-plans-for-birmingham-are-flawed-65233-26012377/ |title= Tories say high-speed rail plans for Birmingham are flawed |newspaper= ] |date= 11 March 2010 |archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20120908064555/http://www.birminghampost.net/news/west-midlands-transport-news/2010/03/11/tories-say-high-speed-rail-plans-for-birmingham-are-flawed-65233-26012377/ |archivedate=8 September 2012}}</ref> | |||
{{Main|High Speed 2 Phase Two}} | |||
==== Cancellation of Phase 2, October 2023 ==== | |||
The new Secretary of State for Transport, ], asked ], a former Conservative Transport Secretary, to conduct an urgent review of the proposed route. The coalition government wished the high-speed line to be routed via Heathrow Airport, an idea rejected by HS2 Ltd.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.transportxtra.com/magazines/local_transport_today/news/?id=22691 |title= Ministers order re-think of high-speed rail route |work=TransportXtra.com |location= London |date= 28 May 2010}}</ref> | |||
In October 2023, Prime Minister ] announced at the Conservative Party conference that Phase 2 would be abandoned. The cancellation left a new high-speed track from London to ], northeast of Birmingham, with a branch to central Birmingham.<ref>{{cite web |title=North West to benefit from £19.8 billion transport investment |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/north-west-to-benefit-from-198-billion-transport-investment |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231004174624/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/north-west-to-benefit-from-198-billion-transport-investment |archive-date=4 October 2023 |access-date=5 October 2023 |website=gov.uk}}</ref> The construction of Euston station would depend on private sector funding: if funding were to be secured for the station access tunnel, construction would be the responsibility of HS2 Ltd.<ref name="es-09112023">{{cite news |last=Lydall |first=Ross |title=Digging for victory: HS2 contractor has Euston tunnel vision |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/hs2-tunnel-euston-contractor-old-oak-common-rishi-sunak-b1119226.html |url-status=live |work=Evening Standard |date=9 November 2023 |access-date=10 November 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231110035625/https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/hs2-tunnel-euston-contractor-old-oak-common-rishi-sunak-b1119226.html |archive-date=10 November 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Weinfass |first=Ian |title=HS2 Euston: uncertainty over awarded contracts after plans scrapped |url=https://www.constructionnews.co.uk/civils/hs2/hs2-euston-uncertainty-over-awarded-contracts-after-plans-scrapped-16-10-2023/ |access-date=23 October 2023 |work=Construction News |date=16 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231017095527/https://www.constructionnews.co.uk/civils/hs2/hs2-euston-uncertainty-over-awarded-contracts-after-plans-scrapped-16-10-2023/ |archive-date=17 October 2023 |language=en-US |quote=Prime minister Rishi Sunak announced two weeks ago that the Euston station project would be privately funded and removed from the responsibilities of HS2 Ltd.}}</ref> Euston station was initially proposed to have 11 platforms to accommodate HS2 trains. There is a reduction to six platforms, as a proposal from October 2023 will cap the throughput to 9–11 trains per hour, rather than the 18 of which the HS2 track would otherwise be capable.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Hakimian |first=Rob |title=HS2 {{!}} Euston with only 7 platforms is not fit for the future network, experts say |url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-euston-with-only-7-platforms-is-not-fit-for-the-future-network-experts-say-09-08-2023/ |url-status=live |magazine=New Civil Engineer |date=9 August 2023 |access-date=23 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230809130439/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-euston-with-only-7-platforms-is-not-fit-for-the-future-network-experts-say-09-08-2023/ |archive-date=9 August 2023 |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Spocchia |first=Gino |title=Grimshaw's Euston HS2 station loses more platforms under Sunak rethink |url=https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/grimshaws-euston-hs2-station-loses-more-platforms-under-sunak-rethink |work=Architects' Journal |date=5 October 2023 |access-date=23 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231007203322/https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/grimshaws-euston-hs2-station-loses-more-platforms-under-sunak-rethink |archive-date=7 October 2023 |language=en-GB}}</ref> | |||
Sunak said the £36{{nbsp}}billion saved by not building the northern leg of HS2 would instead be spent on roads, buses, and railways in every region of the country, under the title ''Network North''. The locations of these projects would range from southern Scotland to ]. Money would be distributed in the North, Midlands and South of England according to where the reduction of costs (not benefits) will lie.<ref>{{cite book| title = Network North: Transforming British Transport – CP 946| publisher = Department for Transport| date = October 2023| pages = 4| url = https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65294b416b6fbf0014b75641/network-north-transforming-british-transport.pdf}}</ref> Around 30 per cent of the cost savings would be spent on railway projects.<ref>{{cite journal| last = Williams| first = Alan| title = Warning! This Government may damage rail's health| journal = Modern Railways| volume = 81| issue = 904| pages = 96, 97| publisher = Key Publishing| location = Stamford| date = January 2024}}</ref> After it was found that the list of projects included schemes that had already been built or were swiftly deleted, Sunak said the list was intended to provide illustrative examples.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Walker |first=Peter |date=9 October 2023 |title=List of projects to be funded by HS2 money 'only illustrative', Sunak says |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/oct/09/list-of-projects-to-be-funded-by-hs2-money-only-illustrative-sunak-says |access-date=17 January 2024 |work=The Guardian |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> | |||
Mawhinney's conclusions contradicted Villiers' view and Conservative policy in opposition, stating that HS2 should not go to Heathrow Airport until it reaches northern England. Routing the whole line via Heathrow would add seven minutes to the journey time of all services.<ref name="No Business Case">{{cite news |title= 'No business case' to divert HS2 via Heathrow, says Mawhinney' |pages= 6–7 |work=Rail |location= Peterborough |last= Harris |first= Nigel |issue= 649 |date= 28 July 2010}}</ref> | |||
In January 2024, opposition leader ] said it would not be possible for any future Labour government to reinstate Phase 2, since contracts would have been cancelled.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Ames |first=Chris |date=12 January 2024 |title=HS2 Phase 2 'not possible', Starmer claims |url=https://www.transport-network.co.uk/HS2-Phase-2-not-possible-Starmer-claims/19191 |access-date=17 January 2024 |website=The Transport Network}}</ref> This was confirmed in April 2024 by ], the shadow transport minister.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Browning |first=Oliver |date=11 April 2024 |title=Labour's HS2 plans confirmed by shadow transport secretary |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/tv/news/hs2-cancelled-london-birmingham-labour-b2527051.html |access-date=27 April 2024 |work=Independent}}</ref> | |||
In December 2008 an article in '']'' noted the increasing political popularity of high-speed rail in Britain as a solution to transport congestion, and as an alternative to unpopular schemes such as road-tolls and runway expansion, but concluded that its future would depend on it being commercially viable.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.economist.com/node/12861513 |newspaper= ] |location= London |title=High-speed rail: A surprising conversion |date= 30 December 2008}}</ref> In November 2010 Philip Hammond stated that government support for HS2 did not require it to break even directly (financially), what ''The Economist'' had called the "financial viability" test for new rail infrastructure: <blockquote>If we used financial accounting we would never have any public spending, we would build nothing ... Financial accounting would strike a dagger through the whole case for public sector investment.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/general/2010/11/29-transport-secretary-unveils-hs2-tunnel.html |newspaper= ] |location= Stevenage |title= Transport secretary unveils HS2 compensation plan |date= 29 November 2010}}</ref></blockquote> | |||
==== Ongoing review in 2024 for revival to Manchester ==== | |||
===Public consultation=== | |||
In January 2024, ], ], and ], ], held talks to "revive the high speed rail project with private investment" after meeting private investors, ] (]), and ] (]).<ref name="Constructive-Mayors">{{Cite web |last=Scott |first=Jennifer |date=31 January 2024 |title=Mayors hold 'constructive' HS2 talks with transport secretary |url=https://news.sky.com/story/mayors-hold-constructive-hs2-talks-with-transport-secretary-13060826 |access-date=31 January 2024 |website=] |language=en}}</ref> Harper said that he was considering the plans with an "open mind".<ref>{{Cite web |last=Scott |first=Jennifer |date=23 January 2024 |title=Transport secretary to look at HS2 revival plans with 'open mind' |url=https://news.sky.com/story/transport-secretary-to-look-at-hs2-revival-plans-with-open-mind-13054736 |access-date=31 January 2024 |website=Sky News |language=en}}</ref> Burnham told the ] of the ] that the gist of the plans were to revive the part of ] between Handsacre and ] in Cheshire; trains would then proceed on ] to ].<ref name="Constructive-Mayors" /><ref>{{Cite web |last=Timan |first=Joseph |date=31 January 2024 |title=HS2 is not coming back - but a new business-backed train line could replace it |url=https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/hs2-isnt-coming-back-new-28545231 |access-date=31 January 2024 |website=Manchester Evening News |language=en}}</ref> Burnham said the cost could be "considerably less" than earlier plans if the maximum speed of trains was reduced.<ref>{{Cite web |date=7 February 2024 |title=Alternatives to HS2 would cost 'considerably less' – Andy Street |url=https://www.shropshirestar.com/news/uk-news/2024/02/07/alternatives-to-hs2-would-cost-considerably-less--andy-street/ |access-date=9 February 2024 |website=www.shropshirestar.com |language=en}}</ref> The ] remains in the ] but the Committee paused its work after the October 2023 announcement.<ref name="Select Committee">{{Cite web |title=Committee publishes Second Special Report - High Speed Rail (Crewe - Manchester) Bill Select Committee (Commons) |url=https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/597/high-speed-rail-crewe-manchester-bill-select-committee-commons/news/198174/committee-publishes-second-special-report/ |access-date=31 January 2024 |website=UK Parliament - Committees}}</ref> | |||
On 20 December 2010 the government published a slightly revised line of route for public consultation,<ref name="bbc20decroute">{{cite news |url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12035524 |title= London-to-Birmingham high speed train route announced |date= 20 December 2010 |work= BBC News}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.channel4.com/news/redrawn-high-speed-rail-plan-unveiled |title= 'Redrawn' high speed rail plan unveiled |date= 20 December 2010 |work= ]}}</ref> based on a Y-shaped route from London to Birmingham with branches to Leeds and Manchester, as originally put forward by ] as ] under the previous government,<ref>{{cite web |title= High Speed Rail – Oral Answers to Questions – Education – House of Commons debates |date=20 December 2010 |url= http://www.theyworkforyou.com/debates/?id=2010-12-20a.1201.0&m=40274 |at= question to the Minister by ], shadow secretary for Transport, 1st para}}</ref> with alterations designed to minimise the visual, noise, and other environmental impacts of the line.<ref name="bbc20decroute"/> In a statement to parliament, the Secretary of State confirmed that the first phase of construction would include a high-speed line from London to Birmingham as well as a connection to High Speed 1. High-speed lines north of the West Midlands would be built in later stages, and a link to ] would be initially provided by a connection at ], with a high-speed link to the airport to be added later. The high-speed line would connect to the existing network, allowing through trains from London to northern destinations.<ref name="hamdec">{{cite web |url= http://www.dft.gov.uk/press/speechesstatements/statements/hammond20101220 |title= High Speed Rail: Oral statement by: The Rt Hon Philip Hammond MP |date= 20 December 2010 |publisher= Department for Transport}}</ref><ref name="hamdec2">{{cite press release |url= http://nds.coi.gov.uk/clientmicrosite/Content/Detail.aspx?ClientId=202&NewsAreaId=2&ReleaseID=417186&SubjectId=36 |title= New High Speed Rail Proposals Unveiled |date= 20 December 2010 |publisher= Department for Transport}}</ref> The consultation documents were published on 11 February 2011 and the consultation period was set to run until July 2011.<ref name="DTF CONS"/> When the results were published, they revealed that over 90% of respondents to the consultation were against HS2. | |||
A provisional report commissioned by the mayors concluded in March 2024 that the best option would be a new line between Handsacre and ], to meet Northern Powerhouse Rail. The cost could be covered by a combination of government funding and private finance.<ref>{{Cite web |date=21 March 2024 |title=New Staffordshire-Manchester rail line proposed |url=https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cw0z72qnnypo |access-date=21 March 2024 |website=BBC News |language=en-GB}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Williams |first=Jennifer |date=21 March 2024 |title=City mayors put forward alternative to axed HS2 northern leg |url=https://www.ft.com/content/183e3afc-099a-4cee-9bed-6416a97d981a |access-date=21 March 2024 |website=Financial Times}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=Brock |first=Alexander |date=21 March 2024 |title=New rail line between Midlands and Manchester proposed |url=https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/new-rail-line-between-midlands-28861151 |access-date=21 March 2024 |website=Birmingham Live |language=en}}</ref> | |||
===Decision to proceed with HS2=== | |||
==Route== | |||
In January 2012 the Secretary of State for Transport announced that HS2 would go ahead. It would comprise a "Y-shaped" network with stations at London, Birmingham, Leeds, Manchester, Sheffield and the East Midlands conveying up to 26,000 people each hour at speeds of up to {{convert|400|km/h|sigfig=2}}.{{cn|reason=No source cited and not mentioned in the other sources in the paragraph}} It would be built in two stages. Phase one would be a {{convert|225|km|sigfig=2|abbr=on}} route from London to the West Midlands which would be constructed by 2026.{{cn|reason=No source cited and not mentioned in the other sources in the paragraph}} Phase two, from Birmingham to both Leeds and Manchester, would be constructed by 2033. Consultation on this phase would begin in early 2014 with a final route chosen by the end of 2014. Additional tunnelling and other measures to meet local communities' and environmental concerns were also announced.<ref name="Dft Go ahead">{{cite web |url= http://www.dft.gov.uk/news/press-releases/dft-press-20120110/ |title= Go-ahead given to new railway |publisher= Department for Transport |date = January 2012}}</ref> The legislative process would be achieved through two ]s, one for each phase.<ref name="TransSelect">. Retrieved 1 July 2012</ref> | |||
{{hatnote|See also: {{osmrelation|1986960|proposed route of HS2, phase 1}}.}} | |||
===London to Handsacre and Birmingham=== | |||
===Legal challenges=== | |||
] | |||
HS2 parallels the ] (WCML), merging with the WCML at Handsacre. The line will be between ] in London and a junction with the WCML outside the village of Handsacre north of Lichfield in ]. There will be a branch to a new station at ].<ref>{{cite news |title=Transport Secretary confirms work will continue on HS2 in and around Lichfield |url=https://lichfieldlive.co.uk/2023/10/05/transport-secretary-confirms-work-will-continue-on-hs2-in-and-around-lichfield/ |work=Lichfield Live |date=5 October 2023}}</ref> There will also be new stations at ], in northwest London, and ], near ].<ref>{{cite web |title=London to West Midlands (Phase One) |url=https://www.hs2.org.uk/the-route/london-to-west-midlands/ |access-date=4 October 2023 |website=HS2 |language=en-GB |archive-date=1 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001155849/https://www.hs2.org.uk/the-route/london-to-west-midlands/ |url-status=live}}</ref> The section between Old Oak Common and the West Midlands is scheduled to open around 2030, with the link to Euston following between 2031 and 2035.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/hs2-timeline-issues-delays-costs-history-government-b1064523.html |title=Will HS2 be cancelled? Government refuses to guarantee Manchester branch |first1=Jessica |last1=Knibbs |first2=Sian |last2=Hewitt |first3=Beril |last3=Naz Hassan |first4=William|last4=Mata |date=26 September 2023|website=Evening Standard|access-date=21 September 2023|archive-date=20 September 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230920020742/https://www.standard.co.uk/news/uk/hs2-timeline-issues-delays-costs-history-government-b1064523.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The high speed track, including the branch to Birmingham, is {{convert|225|km|mi}} long.<ref>{{cite web |title=HS2 route map |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/378424/C224-ARP-CV-DPP-040-226700_0.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190724215319/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/378424/C224-ARP-CV-DPP-040-226700_0.pdf |archive-date=24 July 2019 |access-date=21 January 2021 |publisher=HS2 Ltd}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=High Speed Rail – Department for Transport |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228887/7827.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190725081703/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/228887/7827.pdf |archive-date=25 July 2019 |access-date=29 April 2020}}</ref><ref name="FBC" /> It is flanked by the WCML and the ]. | |||
Upon opening, HS2 and West Coast Main Line compatible trains will operate from London, reaching Birmingham in 49 minutes and Birmingham Interchange in 38 minutes. Trains will journey to other destinations on a mix of HS2 and conventional track. Journeys to Liverpool will take 1 hour 50 minutes, to Glasgow 4 hours, and to Manchester 1 hour 40 minutes.{{update inline|reason=The source for these figures was written before the line to Manchester was cancelled.|date=November 2023}} Trains will progress on HS2 track to Handsacre, then use the West Coast Main Line.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.hs2.org.uk/stations/liverpool/ |title=Liverpool |website=HS2 Ltd |date=4 May 2022 |access-date=21 September 2023 |archive-date=1 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231001141432/https://www.hs2.org.uk/stations/liverpool/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/259487/NTS_for_web_ES_3.0.0.pdf |title=London-West Midlands Environmental Statement |date=November 2013 |access-date=21 October 2018 |archive-date=21 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181021152935/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/259487/NTS_for_web_ES_3.0.0.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
At the end of March 2012 the ] (BBOWT) announced that it had submitted a complaint to the ] that the UK government, in failing to carry out a strategic environmental assessment ahead of deciding on the route of Phase 1 of HS2, was in breach of European Union legislation. BBOWT said that the complaint would only be considered by the EU Commission after the UK Courts had concluded consideration of various ]s submitted to them.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.buckinghamtoday.co.uk/community/environment/our-world-in-your-hands/trust-makes-appeal-to-europe-over-hs2-route-1-3686936 |title= Trust makes appeal to Europe over HS2 route |work= Bicester Advertiser |date=30 March 2012}}</ref> | |||
The route to the north begins at Euston station in London, entering a twin-bore tunnel near the Mornington Street Bridge at the station's throat. After continuing through to the Old Oak Common station, trains proceed through a second, {{convert|8|mi||0|abbr=|adj=on}} tunnel, emerging at its northwestern portal.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/hs2-tunnel-extended-under-west-london-to-cut-chaos-8584820.html|title=HS2 tunnel extended under west London to cut chaos|date=23 April 2013|website=Evening Standard|access-date=28 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190728224442/https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/hs2-tunnel-extended-under-west-london-to-cut-chaos-8584820.html|archive-date=28 July 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> The line crosses the ] on the ] and then enters a {{convert|9.8|mi||1|abbr=|adj=on}} tunnel under the ], to emerge near ], northwest of ]. The route will roughly parallel the ] road and the ], to the west of ]. This is a green ] under farmland, with soil spread over the final construction in order to reduce visual impact and noise, and allow use of the land above the tunnels for agriculture.<ref>{{cite web |title=Glossary of terms and list of abbreviations |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-phase-one-environmental-statement-glossary-and-abbreviations |website=gov.uk |publisher=DfT |access-date=15 October 2018 |ref=HS2glossary |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181016032739/https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-phase-one-environmental-statement-glossary-and-abbreviations |archive-date=16 October 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> After passing west of ], the route will pass through the corridor of the former ], joining the alignment north of ] to travel through rural Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire up to ], south of ], from where it will cross the ] and open countryside through South Northamptonshire and Warwickshire, passing immediately south of ]. After progressing through a tunnel bored under ] Wood, the route will pass through rural areas between ] and ], crossing the ] to enter the West Midlands. | |||
In April 2012 five requests for judicial review were submitted, two by HS2 Action Alliance (HS2AA) and one each by the 51m Group, Aylesbury Park Golf Club, and ]. In its applications HS2AA claimed that the government failed to carry out a proper strategic environmental assessment and that it provided inadequate information to the public during the public consultation. As a consequence the HS2AA claimed that the Secretary of State's decision to approve Phase 1 of HS2 was made without proper justification, that it ignored the government's own processes and assessment criteria, and relied on undisclosed material.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-17598342 |title= Legal fight over high-speed rail |work= BBC News |date=3 April 2012}}</ref> In a separate judicial review request the 51m Group challenged the government on several grounds. Firstly, that it failed to consult properly on the original or the revised route. Secondly, that it failed to consider the impact of HS2 on the ] network. Thirdly, that it did not take proper account of the environmental impact on the Chilterns ] and several important wildlife habitats, and finally that the hybrid bill approach was 'incompatible with the ].<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/9181888/Councils-launch-bid-to-block-high-speed-rail.html |author=Millward, David |title= Councils launch bid to block high speed rail |work= The Daily Telegraph |location =London |date=2 April 2012}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.51m.co.uk/news/challenging-hs2 |title= Challenging HS2 |publisher= 51M Group |date=5 April 2012}}</ref> Aylesbury Park Golf Club's proceedings are based on the impact of the proposed route which will pass through part of the club.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.knightfrank.co.uk/news/HS2--Government-wants-to-face-all-its-critics-at-once-as-delay-threat-mounts-0913.aspx/|title= HS2: Government wants to face all its critics at once as delay threat mounts |work= Knight Frank|date= 3 May 2012}}</ref> Heathrow Hub Ltd, a company owned by ], announced it has also started proceedings on the grounds that the UK Government could choose an alternative route which would provide an improved connection between HS2 and ] via a transport hub built on land owned by the company.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.out-law.com/en/articles/2012/april/another-challenge-to-hs2-launched/|title= Another challenge to HS2 launched|work= Out-Law.com|date=12 April 2012}}</ref> | |||
Birmingham Interchange Station will be on the outskirts of ], close to the strategic road network, including the ], ], ], and ]. These roads will be crossed on viaducts. The station is adjacent to Birmingham Airport and the National Exhibition Centre. North of the station west of ] there will be a complex triangular branch junction, with six tracks at one section, will link the HS2 Birmingham city centre spur with the main spine. The spine continues north from the branch to the northerly limit of the high speed track which is a connection onto the WCML at Handsacre. The Birmingham city centre spur will be routed along the ] rail corridor, the ] through ], and through a tunnel past ].{{citation needed|date=October 2023}} | |||
At the end of July 2012 a High Court Judge gave permission for the five judicial reviews to proceed with individual hearings set for an eight-day period in early December 2012. The judge confirmed that the cases of the HS2AA, 51M and Heathrow Hub, whose consultation responses had been lost by HS2 Ltd, could be amended to incorporate this defect in their claims. A further hearing was set for October 2012 for the Government to explain its continued refusal to release passenger data relating to the ].<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/9431123/High-speed-train-opponents-granted-court-hearing.html |title= High speed train opponents granted court hearing |work= The Daily Telegraph |author=Millward, David |date=27 July 2012 |location=London}}</ref> | |||
==Branches to other lines== | |||
On 15 March 2013 Mr Justice Ouseley rejected all but one of the claims. In paragraph 843 of the judgment he concluded that "The consultation process in respect of blight and compensation was all in all so unfair as to be unlawful."<ref name="HS2 Judgement">{{cite court |litigants= R (on the application of Buckingham Borough Council and others) v Secretary of State for Transport |vol= 481 |pinpoint=Para 843 |court=UKHC (Admin) |date= 2013 |url= http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resources/JCO/Documents/Judgments/hs2-judgment.pdf}}</ref> | |||
Permission to appeal has been granted on two grounds: applicability of Strategic Environmental Assessment to the project and re-consultation of 'optimised alternative'.<ref name="BDB HS2 Judgement">{{cite web |last=Walker |first=Angus |title=433: nine out of ten – what the HS2 judgment means |url= http://www.bdb-law.co.uk/our-insights/blogs/planning-act-2008-blog/2013/03/433-nine-out-of-ten-what-the-hs2-judgment-means |date=15 March 2013 |publisher= Bircham Dyson Bell blog |accessdate=16 March 2013}}</ref> | |||
===West Coast Main Line=== | |||
A further rebuff by the court of appeal in July 2013 meant the prospect of a showdown at the Supreme Court.<ref>{{Cite news |author=Meikle, James |date=24 July 2013 |title=HS2 high-speed rail challenge rejected by court of appeal |url= http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2013/jul/24/hs2-challenge-rejected-court-appeal |work=] |accessdate=24 July 2013 |location=London}}</ref> | |||
A key feature of the HS2 proposals is that the new high-speed track will be connected to the existing West Coast Main Line track at Handsacre, north of Birmingham, taking trains north on the existing track. This is the only connection between the new and existing track. This connection allows HS2 services to serve the cities of Liverpool, Manchester and Glasgow on a mix of new high-speed track and the existing West Coast Main Line. Purpose-built trains will be capable of operating on new and existing tracks.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/adonis-in-allparty-talks-on-highspeed-rail-link-1855392.html |title=Adonis in all-party talks on high-speed rail link |newspaper=] |date=2 February 2010 |access-date=4 January 2010 |location=London |first=Michael |last=Savage |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100105034116/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/adonis-in-allparty-talks-on-highspeed-rail-link-1855392.html |archive-date=5 January 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref>{{sfn|DfT|2009|p=16 para. 37}}<ref>{{cite news |last=Rogers |first=Alexandra |title=HS2 won't be high speed between Manchester and Birmingham |url=https://news.sky.com/story/hs2-will-go-to-manchester-but-from-birmingham-it-will-run-on-existing-tracks-12976020 |publisher=Sky News |access-date=5 October 2023 |archive-date=5 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231005171411/https://news.sky.com/story/hs2-will-go-to-manchester-but-from-birmingham-it-will-run-on-existing-tracks-12976020 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
== |
==Stations== | ||
===Central London=== | |||
{{dablink|See also: {{osmrelation|1986960|proposed route of HS2}}.}} | |||
{{main|London Euston railway station}} | |||
] at St Pancras]] | |||
High Speed 2 is to share a southern terminus with the ] at London Euston, which is to be remodelled to integrate six new HS2 platforms and concourse with the current conventional rail station.<ref>https://www.modernrailways.com/article/rail-minister-confirms-six-platform-plan-euston-hs2-station</ref> There will be an improved connection to the adjacent ], which serves the ], ], and ] lines.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Smale |first=Katherine|url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-euston-station-design-development-released-20-11-2018/|title=HS2 Euston station design development released|date=20 November 2018|magazine=New Civil Engineer |access-date=13 February 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200213221532/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-euston-station-design-development-released-20-11-2018/|archive-date=13 February 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> The government announced that this aspect of the project would only commence if the private sector were to agree funding.<ref name="BBC 5/10/23">{{cite news |last1=Race |first1=Michael |last2=Austin |first2=Katy |title=HS2 will not go to Euston without private funds |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-67021225 |publisher=BBC News |date=5 October 2023}}</ref> | |||
=== |
===West London=== | ||
{{main|Old Oak Common railway station}} | |||
] | |||
{{rws|Old Oak Common}} station, between {{rws|Paddington}} and {{stnlnk|Acton Main Line}} station, is under construction and scheduled to be completed before Euston. It will be the temporary London terminus of HS2 until Euston is completed. There will be connections with the ], ] to ], and the ] to ], ], and ].{{Sfn|DfT|2010|p=107}} ] will also be connected, via ]s, with ] stations at ] on the ] and ] on the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/34._old_oak_strategic_transport_study.pdf|title=Old Oak Strategic Transport Study|date=June 2018|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200213221540/https://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/34._old_oak_strategic_transport_study.pdf|archive-date=13 February 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=Planning permission granted for Britain's largest new-build railway station |url=https://www.theconstructionindex.co.uk/news/view/planning-permission-granted-for-largest-new-build-railway-station |access-date=30 July 2020 |work=The Construction Index |date=20 May 2020 |archive-date=7 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200607080039/https://www.theconstructionindex.co.uk/news/view/planning-permission-granted-for-largest-new-build-railway-station |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Birmingham Airport=== | |||
] As proposed in March 2010, the line would run from London {{rws|Euston}}, mainly in a tunnel, to an interchange with ] west of London {{rws|Paddington}}, then along the ] (Acton-Northolt Line) past ] and alongside the ] with a {{convert|2.5|mi|adj=on|order=flip|abbr=on}} viaduct over the ] and ], and then from the M25 to ] in a new {{convert|6|mi|adj=on|order=flip|sigfig=1|abbr=on}} tunnel. After emerging from the tunnel, the line would run parallel to the existing ] road and ], through the {{convert|29|mi|adj=on|order=flip|abbr=on}} wide Chiltern Hills ], passing close by ] to the east, alongside ] immediately to the west, then on to ]. After Aylesbury, the line would run alongside the Aylesbury {{snd}} ] line, joining it north of ] and then striking out to the north-west across open countryside through North Buckinghamshire, Oxfordshire, South Northamptonshire, Warwickshire and Staffordshire. Several alignments were studied, and in September 2010 HS2 Ltd set out recommendations for altering the course at certain locations.<ref>. Department for Transport HS2 website archive. Retrieved 21 March 2012</ref> | |||
{{main|Birmingham Interchange}} | |||
] | |||
Birmingham Interchange will be a through station situated in suburban Solihull, within a triangle of land enclosed by the ], ], and ] highways. A ] with a capacity of over 2,100 passengers per hour in each direction will connect the station to the ], ], and the existing ].{{Sfn|DfT|2010|p=118}}<ref>{{cite web|title=High Speed Two Phase One Information Paper H2: Birmingham Interchange Station|url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/672460/H2_-_Birmingham_Interchange_Station_v1.5.pdf|website=gov.uk|publisher=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited|access-date=23 May 2018|pages=3, 10|date=23 February 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180524005837/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/672460/H2_-_Birmingham_Interchange_Station_v1.5.pdf|archive-date=24 May 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> The ] people-mover already operates between Birmingham International station and the airport. In addition, there is a proposal to extend the ] to serve the station.<ref>{{Cite web|title=East Birmingham to Solihull Metro Extension – Midland Metro Alliance|url=https://metroalliance.co.uk/projects/east-birmingham-solihull-extension/|access-date=30 July 2020|language=en-GB|archive-date=29 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191129002536/http://metroalliance.co.uk/projects/east-birmingham-solihull-extension/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In 2010, Birmingham Airport's chief executive, Paul Kehoe, stated that HS2 is a key element in increasing the number of flights using the airport, with added patronage by inhabitants of London and the ], as HS2 will reduce travel times from London to Birmingham Airport to under 40{{nbsp}}minutes.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://blogs.birminghampost.net/business/2010/10/up-up-and-away---birmingham-ai.html |title=Up, Up and Away – Birmingham Airport spreads its wings as powerful driver of growth and jobs |newspaper=] Business Blog |date=29 October 2010 |last=Nielsen |first=Beverley |access-date=10 December 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101129220437/http://blogs.birminghampost.net/business/2010/10/up-up-and-away---birmingham-ai.html |archive-date=29 November 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In December 2010 the Transport Secretary announced several amendments to the route aimed at mitigating vibration, noise, or visual impact. These changes include, at ], in north London, moving the tunnel {{convert|100|m|abbr=on}} further north, and in west London reducing the width of the ''] Corridor''; lowering the alignment and creating a {{convert|900|m|adj=on|abbr=on}} ] in Buckinghamshire at ]; at nearby ], where two ] would otherwise be severed, at ] in Northamptonshire and ] in Warwickshire, '']s'' would be constructed; the alignment would be moved away from the settlements of ], in Northamptonshire, ] and ] in Warwickshire and ] in southern Staffordshire, and from the Grade I ]s ] in Buckinghamshire and ] in Northamptonshire.<ref>{{cite press release |url= http://www.hs2.org.uk/assets/x/77425 |title= Changes to the HS2 proposed line of route |date= 20 December 2010 |publisher= HS2 Ltd}}</ref>{{fv}} | |||
===Birmingham city centre=== | |||
In January 2012 the Transport Secretary announced further revisions to the Phase 1 route. The key revisions included a new {{convert|2.7|mi|adj=on|order=flip|abbr=on}} tunnel at ] avoiding the Chiltern Line and mitigating the impact in the ] area; realignment of the route and extension of the continuous tunnel, originally from the M25 to Amersham, to near ]; at ] and nearby ] extension to the green tunnels to reduce impact on local communities; an extension to the green tunnel beside ] and ]; and realignment to avoid heritage sites around ]. The revised route would comprise {{convert|22.5|mi|order=flip|abbr=on}} in tunnel or green tunnel compared to {{convert|14.5|mi|order=flip|abbr=on}}, a 55% increase. Overall, {{convert|79|mi|order=flip|abbr=on}} of the {{convert|140|mi|adj=on|order=flip|abbr=on}} route will be in tunnel or cutting, while {{convert|40|mi|order=flip|abbr=on}} will be on viaduct or embankment, a reduction of {{convert|10|mi|order=flip|abbr=on}} from the route in the original consultation documents.<ref name="BBC go ahead"/><ref name="Dft Go ahead"/> | |||
{{main|Birmingham Curzon Street railway station}} | |||
] | |||
Birmingham Curzon Street will be the terminal station at the end of a branch that connects to the HS2 spine via a junction at ].<ref>{{cite book|url=http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/hs2ltd/hs2report/pdf/chapter3c.pdf |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100409201346/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/hs2ltd/hs2report/pdf/chapter3c.pdf |archive-date=9 April 2010 |title=High Speed Rail: London to the West Midlands and Beyond. A Report to Government by High Speed Two Limited. |chapter=3 |page=117 |access-date=12 March 2010}}</ref> A ] existed on the Curzon Street site between 1838 and 1966; the surviving ] station building will be retained and renovated.<ref name="AJ" /> | |||
The site is immediately adjacent to ], and approximately {{convert|400|m|mi}} northeast of ], which is separated from Curzon and Moor streets by the ]. Passenger interchange with Moor Street would be at street level, across Moor Street Queensway; interchange with New Street would be via a pedestrian walkway between Moor Street and New Street (opened in 2013).<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.networkrail.co.uk/news/2013/mar/The-first-half-of-the-new-concourse-at-Birmingham-New-Street-station-will-open-on-28-April-2013/ |title=The first half of the new concourse at Birmingham New Street station will open on 28 April 2013 |publisher=Network Rail |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130622012036/http://www.networkrail.co.uk/news/2013/mar/The-first-half-of-the-new-concourse-at-Birmingham-New-Street-station-will-open-on-28-April-2013/ |archive-date=22 June 2013 |access-date=2 November 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=High Speed Two Information Paper H4: Birmingham Curzon Street Station|url=http://assets.hs2.org.uk/sites/default/files/hb_pdf/H4%20-%20Curzon%20Street%20Station.pdf |website=gov.uk |publisher=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited|access-date=23 May 2018|pages=4.1 and 6.3|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180904225715/http://assets.hs2.org.uk/sites/default/files/hb_pdf/H4%20-%20Curzon%20Street%20Station.pdf|archive-date=4 September 2018}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=http://www.newstreetnewstart.co.uk/home.aspx|title=Transforming Birmingham New Street|author=Network Rail|access-date=28 October 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100828225653/http://www.newstreetnewstart.co.uk/home.aspx|archive-date=28 August 2010}}</ref> In September 2018, one of Birmingham's oldest pubs, the ], was demolished to make way for the new developments.<ref>{{cite news |last=Young |first=Graham |title=Outrage at demolition of landmark city centre pub |url=https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/mystifying-upsetting-disgusting--outrage-15138783 |access-date=30 July 2020 |work=Birmingham Mail |date=14 September 2018 |archive-date=27 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200727000800/https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/mystifying-upsetting-disgusting--outrage-15138783 |url-status=live}}</ref> The ] will be extended to serve the station.<ref>{{cite web|title=Birmingham Eastside Metro Extension – Midland Metro Alliance |url=https://metroalliance.co.uk/projects/birmingham-eastside-extension/|access-date=30 July 2020|language=en-GB|archive-date=6 September 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190906081019/http://metroalliance.co.uk/projects/birmingham-eastside-extension/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In April 2013 a decision by HS2 Ltd and the ] to recommend further bore tunnelling under the {{convert|9|km|0|adj=on|abbr=on}} '] Corridor' in the ] was announced in an HS2 Ltd press release. The tunnel will minimise blight for residents and businesses and eliminate the substantial impact of traffic which a surface route would otherwise have caused.<ref>{{cite press release |publisher=HS2 Ltd |url=http://www.hs2.org.uk/press/hs2-ltd-recommends-tunnel-under-ealing-and-northolt |title=HS2 Ltd Recommends Tunnel Under Ealing and Northolt |date=23 April 2013 |accessdate=23 April 2013}}</ref> The further bore tunnelling will link up the tunnels already planned beneath ] and ] and ] to ]. HS2 Ltd found in a study they had undertaken that bore tunnelling this specific stretch of the HS2 route will take 15 months less time than constructing a surface HS2 route through this area would have done, and in addition will be at least cost neutral. The cost neutrality is due to the fact that 20 bridge replacements, including three and a half years to replace both road bridges at the ], amenity disruption, the construction of two tunnel portals and the likelihood of substantial compensation payments will all be avoided.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.globalrailnews.com/2013/04/23/hs2-to-recommend-ealing-and-northolt-tunnel/ |title=HS2 To Recommend Ealing and Northolt Tunnel Tunnel |work= Global Rail News |location= Coalville |date=23 April 2013 |accessdate=23 April 2013}}</ref> The proposed tunnel will be included as the preferred option in the draft Environmental Statement for the first phase of ]. The decision to recommend tunnelling the section of ] route through the ] has been well received and has been billed as a victory for local residents and local grassroots activism.<ref>{{cite news |work=Ealing Gazette |url= http://www.ealinggazette.co.uk/ealing-news/local-ealing-news/2013/04/23/hs2-tunnel-decision-is-a-victory-for-ealing-64767-33223237/ |title=HS2 Tunnel is a Victory for Ealing |date=23 April 2013 |accessdate=23 April 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |work=BBC News |url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-22265586/ |title=HS2 Scraps Ealing Bridge Demolition Plan for Tunnelling |date=23 April 2013 |accessdate=23 April 2013}}</ref> In addition to preventing blight to homes, schools and businesses the decision will also help to preserve the tranquility of ], an ancient wood, bird sanctuary and Britain's second oldest nature reserve,<ref>{{cite web |author=sandrafirebird |url= http://wildinlondon.blogspot.com/2007/02/perivale-wood.html |title=Perivale Wood |publisher=Wild in London blog |date=27 February 2007 |accessdate=26 March 2013}}</ref> Tunnelling HS2 in this section of the route will additionally free up the ] for future local rail services. | |||
Development planning for the Fazeley Street quarter of Birmingham has changed as a result of HS2. Prior to the announcement of the HS2 station, ] had planned to build a new campus in ].<ref name="BPost20100316">{{cite news |url=http://www.birminghampost.net/news/west-midlands-news/2010/03/16/birmingham-city-university-wants-30m-refund-after-high-speed-rail-hits-campus-plan-65233-26044757/ |title=Birmingham City University wants £30m refund after high speed rail hits campus plan |date=16 March 2010 |access-date=17 March 2010 |newspaper=] |first=Jonathan |last=Walker |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100323004206/http://www.birminghampost.net/news/west-midlands-news/2010/03/16/birmingham-city-university-wants-30m-refund-after-high-speed-rail-hits-campus-plan-65233-26044757/ |archive-date=23 March 2010}}</ref>{{Sfn|DfT|2010|p=115}} The proposed Eastside development will now include a new museum quarter, with the original station building becoming a new museum of photography, fronting onto a new Curzon Square, which will also be home to ], a museum of contemporary art.<ref>{{cite book|url=http://www.ikon-gallery.co.uk/Repository/pages/197/0485f379-66d0-48f3-b585-88cce714e9b1.pdf|title=Curzon Square – A vision for Birminghams New Museum Quarter|author=Ikon Gallery|access-date=28 October 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130513020407/http://www.ikon-gallery.co.uk/Repository/pages/197/0485f379-66d0-48f3-b585-88cce714e9b1.pdf|archive-date=13 May 2013}}</ref> | |||
====Heathrow access==== | |||
Clearing the site for construction commenced in December 2018.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.railway-technology.com/news/hs2-begins-curzon-street-station |title=HS2 begins search for contractors to build Curzon Street station |date=20 November 2018 |access-date=3 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191003121211/https://www.railway-technology.com/news/hs2-begins-curzon-street-station |archive-date=3 October 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://hs2inbirmingham.commonplace.is/news/2018/11/28/notice-of-land-preparation-works-curzon-street-station-site |title=Notice of land preparation works – Curzon Street Station site |access-date=3 October 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191003121937/https://hs2inbirmingham.commonplace.is/news/2018/11/28/notice-of-land-preparation-works-curzon-street-station-site |archive-date=3 October 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> ] received planning permission for three applications in April 2020. The new station is expected to have a zero-carbon rating and over {{convert|2,800|m2}} of solar panels.<ref name="AJ">{{cite news |last1=Ing |first1=Will |title=First HS2 station approved: Grimshaw's Curzon Street plans waved though |url=https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/first-hs2-station-approved-grimshaws-curzon-street-plans-waved-though/10046927.article |access-date=30 July 2020 |work=Architects Journal |date=23 April 2020 |archive-date=15 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200715105221/https://www.architectsjournal.co.uk/news/first-hs2-station-approved-grimshaws-curzon-street-plans-waved-though/10046927.article |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Proposals have been considered for several years for the construction of a spur connecting the HS2 route to ]. | |||
==Interchanges with other lines== | |||
While in opposition, the ] outlined plans in their 2009 policy paper to construct a high-speed line connecting London to Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester, with connections to cities on the Great Western main line (Bristol and Cardiff) and a long-term aim of linking to Scotland. It also expressed support for a plan put forward by the engineering firm ] for a new ''{{rws|Heathrow Hub}}'' which would include a link connecting Heathrow Airport to the new high-speed rail route and to the ], with the possibility of connections to European destinations.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.conservatives.com/~/media/files/downloadable%20files/railreview.ashx |title= Conservative rail review: Getting the best for passengers |format= PDF |publisher= ] |at=Long Term Strategy, section 5.1 High Speed Rail, pp.10–11}}</ref> | |||
=== London Old Oak Common === | |||
The plan makes provision for HS2 service passenger interchanges to the ] and ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Vickers |first1=Noah |date=5 September 2024 |title=New HS2 station could be redesigned to allow level boarding for Elizabeth line services |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/old-oak-common-hs2-elizabeth-line-redesign-level-boarding-access-tfl-b1180401.html |url-status=live |work=The Standard |publisher=Evening Standard Ltd. |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240905215410/https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/old-oak-common-hs2-elizabeth-line-redesign-level-boarding-access-tfl-b1180401.html |archive-date=5 September 2024 |access-date=22 October 2024}}</ref> | |||
=== London Euston === | |||
Arup had previously suggested in ''Heathrow Hub Arup Submission to HS2'' that an {{convert|200|acre|ha|adj=on|order=flip|sigfig=1|abbr=on}} site at ], north-east of the intersection of the M25 and M4, could house a railway station of 12 or more platforms, as well as a coach and bus station and a 6th airport terminal. Under this proposal, the high-speed line would then follow a different route to Birmingham, running parallel to existing motorways and railways as with HS1 in Kent.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/lordmawhinneyreport/pdf/appendix3_4.pdf |date= 15 April 2010 |title= A submission to Lord Mawhinney's Review |author= Arup}}</ref> | |||
The plan makes provision for HS2 service passenger interchanges on foot to the West Coast main Line and ] ("Tube") services via the adjacent ] and Euston square tube station.{{citation needed|date=December 2023}} | |||
===Birmingham Curzon Street=== | |||
According to ]'s July 2010 report, the Heathrow station should be directly beneath ] (not at ], as proposed by Arup) and the London terminus for HS2 should be at the 2018 Crossrail station {{rws|Old Oak Common}}, not Euston.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/lordmawhinneyreport/ |publisher= Department for Transport |title= High speed rail access to Heathrow: a report by Lord Mawhinney |date= 21 July 2010 |accessdate=3 December 2012 }}</ref> This plan, properly named "A Heathrow Hub with Old Oak Common terminus", was initially supported by the Conservative Party,<ref>{{cite press release |url= http://www.arup.com/News/2009-02%20February/26_Feb_2009_Shadow_Secretary_confirms_support_for_Heathrow_Hub_Plan.aspx |title= Shadow Secretary confirms support for Heathrow Hub Plan |date= 26 February 2009 |publisher= ] |accessdate=3 December 2012}}</ref> although in the final consultation plan, HS2 was proposed to terminate at Euston with a high-speed spur to Heathrow.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://data.nce.co.uk/majorprojects/Update.aspx?ProjectInt=5654 |title= Government drops Heathrow Hub option for spur on High Speed 2 route |date= 20 December 2010 |work= ] |location= London |accessdate=3 December 2012 }}</ref> | |||
The ], a tram service, is to serve Curzon Street, providing access to onward services from {{rws|Birmingham Snow Hill}}, {{rws|Birmingham New Street}} and {{rws|Wolverhampton}}.{{citation needed|date=December 2023}} | |||
== Tunnelling == | |||
In December 2010 the government announced{{citation needed|date=March 2015}} that a high-speed connection with Heathrow Airport would be built as part of the second phase of the project and that until then connections would be made at ], where HS2 would have an interchange station with the ] and ]. However, in March 2015 transport minister ] stated to the ] that the proposed Heathrow spur would no longer be considered as part of Phase 1 or Phase 2 of the HS2 scheme.<ref>{{cite news|title=HS2: Heathrow spur plans dropped by transport minister|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-31814933|accessdate=11 March 2015|work=BBC News|date=11 March 2015}}</ref> | |||
There are five twin-bore tunnel sections on the route from London to Birmingham. The ] will take passengers from Euston railway station to ]. The ] will cover the area between Old Oak Common and the ] in West Ruislip. The ] will be the longest tunnel on the route and will travel {{convert|10|mi}} underneath the ]. The Long Itchington Wood tunnel is the shortest on the route and will take passengers underneath an ancient woodland. The ] will take trains into ]. | |||
=== Euston tunnel === | |||
===Phase 2 – West Midlands to Manchester and Leeds=== | |||
{{Main|Euston tunnel}} | |||
In April 2023, HS2 announced that work on the Euston tunnels linking Old Oak Common to Euston was being deferred and that tunnel-boring had been rescheduled to start in summer 2025.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Smart |first=Belinda |date=18 April 2023 |title=HS2 confirms that work on the Euston Tunnel is to be paused |url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-confirms-that-work-on-the-euston-tunnel-is-to-be-paused-18-04-2023/ |url-access=subscription |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230506205220/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-confirms-that-work-on-the-euston-tunnel-is-to-be-paused-18-04-2023/ |archive-date=6 May 2023 |access-date=23 April 2023 |magazine=New Civil Engineer |publisher=EMAP Publishing}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=HS2 Presentation Euston Tunnel May 2023 Update |url=https://assets.hs2.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2205-Presentation-Euston-Tunnel-Update-May-2023.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230609065233/https://assets.hs2.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/2205-Presentation-Euston-Tunnel-Update-May-2023.pdf |archive-date=9 June 2023 |access-date=9 June 2023}}</ref> In October 2023, the Government announced that any Euston terminus would not be government-funded.<ref name="BBC 5/10/23" /> However, in May 2024, the Government was reportedly prepared to pay the upfront tunnelling cost of around £1bn to avoid further costly delays to the project. It would then recoup costs from the wider development of the Euston station site.<ref name="Morby-08May2024">{{cite news |last1=Morby |first1=Aaron |date=8 May 2024 |title=Government set to fund £1bn final HS2 London tunnel drive |url=https://www.constructionenquirer.com/2024/05/08/government-set-to-fund-1bn-final-hs2-london-tunnel-drive/ |access-date=8 May 2024 |work=Construction Enquirer}}</ref> | |||
=== Northolt tunnel === | |||
{{Main|High Speed 2 Phase Two}} | |||
{{Main|Northolt tunnel}} | |||
] | |||
The Northolt tunnels are being constructed with four TBMs; two tunnelling West to East and two tunnelling East to West, with the plan to meet in the middle. TBM ''Sushila'' and ''Caroline'', the first two of the four TBMs to be used, were launched from the West Ruislip portal in October 2022. The third launched in February 2024 and the fourth followed in April 2024, with the all the tunnels planned to be finished by the end of 2025.<ref>{{Cite web |title=HS2 launches third giant tunnelling machine under capital building the Northolt Tunnel |url=https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/hs2-launches-third-giant-tunnelling-machine-under-capital-building-the-northolt-tunnel |access-date=25 February 2024 |website=HS2 News and Information |language=english}}</ref><ref>{{Cite magazine |last=Hakimian |first=Rob |date=8 April 2024 |title=HS2 {{!}} Fourth TBM launched to bore 13.5km Northolt tunnel under London |url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-fourth-tbm-launched-to-bore-13-5km-northolt-tunnel-under-london-08-04-2024/ |access-date=8 April 2024 |magazine=New Civil Engineer |language=en}}</ref> Sushila broke through in December 2024.<ref>{{cite web |url= https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/resources/x7eiz-tkboa-p3ows-2c4i8-hacfm |title= It’s in the can! – HS2 tunnelling machine finishes its 5-mile journey}}</ref> | |||
Phase 2 envisages a Y-shaped route extending north of Birmingham to ] and ].<ref name=dft-phase2-preferred>{{cite web |title=HS2 phase two initial preferred route plan and profile maps |url= https://www.gov.uk/hs2-phase-two-initial-preferred-route-plan-and-profile-maps |work=Transport planning and infrastructure |publisher=Department for Transport |accessdate=2 February 2013 |date=January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite press release |title= Proposed high speed rail network North of Birmingham confirmed |publisher= Department for Transport |date= 4 October 2010 |url= http://nds.coi.gov.uk/clientmicrosite/Content/Detail.aspx?ClientId=202&NewsAreaId=2&ReleaseID=415781&SubjectId=36 |accessdate= 7 October 2010}}</ref> Consultation on the route is planned to take place in 2014, and the line is expected to be built by 2033.<ref name="Dft Go ahead"/> The Leeds branch would diverge just north of ] and head in a north-easterly direction roughly parallel to the ]. A high speed spur line will serve the new ], with the main line of the branch heading north-east to meet the ] near ].<ref name="ERM_report">{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/68971/hs2-phase-two-initial-preferred-scheme-sustainability-summary.pdf | |||
|title=HS2 Phase Two Initial Preferred Scheme : Sustainability Summary |author=Nick Giesler et al., for Environmental Resources Management (ERM) |publisher=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited |section=4.2.13 | |||
|page=21}}</ref> | |||
=== Chiltern tunnel === | |||
The Manchester branch would be an extension of the Phase 1 line north of ] beyond the connecting spur to the ] (WCML). The line will continue north, with a second connection to the WCML at {{stnlnk|Crewe}}, although there will be no high-speed station there.<ref name=bbc-stoke>{{cite news |title=Stoke-on-Trent 'ignored' under HS2 rail route plans |url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-21232583 |accessdate=2 February 2013 |newspaper=BBC News|date=28 January 2013}}</ref> At ] in Cheshire, the line will divide at a ], with the Manchester branch veering east, a connecting spur to the West Coast Main Line and a third line linking the Manchester branch to the West Coast route. Close to Manchester Airport, the route will enter a {{convert|10|mi|adj=on|order=flip}} tunnel, emerging at ] where the line will continue to its terminus at {{stnlnk|Manchester Piccadilly}}. | |||
{{Main|Chiltern tunnel}} | |||
The {{convert|10|mi|adj=on}} Chiltern tunnels was scheduled to take three years to dig, using two {{convert|2,000|t|adj=on}} ]s (TBM).<ref>{{cite web |title=Progress at Chiltern tunnel site as HS2 prepares for arrival of first tunnelling machines |url=https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/progress-at-chiltern-tunnel-site-as-hs2-prepares-for-arrival-of-first-tunnelling-machines |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200916223348/https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/progress-at-chiltern-tunnel-site-as-hs2-prepares-for-arrival-of-first-tunnelling-machines |archive-date=16 September 2020 |access-date=30 July 2020}}</ref> In July 2020, work was completed on a {{convert|17|m|adj=on}}-high headwall at the southern portal of the twin-bore tunnel.<ref>{{cite web |last=Wareham |first=Stephanie |date=1 October 2021 |title=Video shows what the first mile of the HS2 Chilterns tunnel looks like |url=https://www.bucksfreepress.co.uk/news/19618731.video-shows-first-mile-hs2-chilterns-tunnel-looks-like/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220404192717/https://www.bucksfreepress.co.uk/news/19618731.video-shows-first-mile-hs2-chilterns-tunnel-looks-like/ |archive-date=4 April 2022 |access-date=4 December 2022 |website=Bucks Free Press}}</ref><ref name="tunnellingstart">{{cite news |date=13 May 2021 |title=HS2 high-speed rail project begins underground tunnel |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-57093884 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210512232434/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-57093884 |archive-date=12 May 2021 |access-date=13 May 2021 |publisher=BBC News}}</ref> The tunnels are lined with concrete that is cast in sections at a purpose-built facility at the southern portal; the first sections were cast in March 2021.<ref>{{cite news |date=19 March 2021 |title=HS2 Casts First of 112,000 Chiltern Tunnel Wall Segments |url=https://railway-news.com/hs2-casts-first-of-112000-chiltern-tunnel-wall-segments/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210323014820/https://railway-news.com/hs2-casts-first-of-112000-chiltern-tunnel-wall-segments/ |archive-date=23 March 2021 |access-date=19 March 2021 |website=Railway-News}}</ref> Tunnelling began in May 2021, with TBM ''Florence'', moving at a speed of up to {{convert|15|m|abbr=on}} per day.<ref name="tunnellingstart" /> The second TBM, ''Cecilia'', was launched in July 2021.<ref>{{cite web |title=Momentum builds as HS2 launches second giant tunnelling machine |url=https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/momentum-builds-as-hs2-launches-second-giant-tunnelling-machine |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210701091324/https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/momentum-builds-as-hs2-launches-second-giant-tunnelling-machine |archive-date=1 July 2021 |access-date=1 July 2021 |website=HS2 News and Information}}</ref> Florence, the first of two TBMs, completed tunnelling and broke through in late February 2024,<ref name="Longest-tunnel:10">{{Cite press release |title=Historic breakthrough for HS2's longest tunnel |url=https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/breakthrough-for-hs2s-longest-tunnel |language=english |access-date=27 February 2024 |website=HS2 News and Information}}</ref> and in March 2024, the second TBM, Cecilia, completed tunnelling.<ref>{{Cite web |date=21 March 2024 |title=HS2 hails 'remarkable achievement' as it completes excavation of longest tunnel |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/hs2-florence-chiltern-hills-florence-nightingale-london-b2516655.html |access-date=21 March 2024 |website=The Independent |language=en}}</ref> | |||
=== Long Itchington Wood tunnel === | |||
The route to the ] will be the first stage of a line to Scotland,<ref>], page 16 paragraph 37.</ref> and passengers travelling to or from Scotland will be able to use through trains with a saving of 45 minutes from day one.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/adonis-in-allparty-talks-on-highspeed-rail-link-1855392.html |title= Adonis in all-party talks on high-speed rail link |newspaper= ] |date=2 February 2010 |accessdate=4 January 2010 |location=London |first=Michael |last=Savage}}</ref> It was recommended by a Parliamentary ] on HS2 in November 2011 that a statutory clause should be in the bill that will guarantee HS2 being constructed beyond Birmingham so that the economic benefits are spread farther.<ref>{{cite web |title=Conclusions and recommendations – conclusions and the way ahead |url= http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmtran/1185/118511.htm |publisher= UK Parliament |date=1 November 2011 |accessdate=6 January 2012}}</ref> | |||
In December 2021, TBM ''Dorothy'' was launched, tunnelling under Long Itchington Wood. It completed the first bore in July 2022, and was returned to its initial position to complete the second, parallel bore.<ref>{{cite web |date=16 March 2022 |title=HS2 6-monthly report to Parliament: March 2022 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/hs2-6-monthly-report-to-parliament-march-2022 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220316142229/https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/hs2-6-monthly-report-to-parliament-march-2022 |archive-date=16 March 2022 |access-date=16 March 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=29 October 2021 |title=Breakthrough! Dorothy completes HS2 tunnel bore |url=https://www.modernrailways.com/article/breakthrough-dorothy-completes-hs2-tunnel-bore |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220830174822/https://www.modernrailways.com/article/breakthrough-dorothy-completes-hs2-tunnel-bore |archive-date=30 August 2022 |access-date=30 August 2022}}</ref> ''Dorothy'' started the second bore in November 2022, and finished it in March 2023.<ref>{{cite magazine |last1=Griffiths |first1=Eliot |date=24 November 2022 |title=Dorothy's second tunnel boring mission begins underneath Long Itchington Wood |url=https://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/articles/dorothys-second-tunnel-boring-mission-begins-underneath-long-itchington-wood |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230125221548/https://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/articles/dorothys-second-tunnel-boring-mission-begins-underneath-long-itchington-wood |archive-date=25 January 2023 |access-date=26 January 2023 |magazine=Rail Technology Magazine}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=HS2 Tunnelling team celebrate milestone TBM breakthrough in Warwickshire |url=https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/hs2-tunnelling-team-celebrate-milestone-tbm-breakthrough-in-warwickshire |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230621100600/https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/hs2-tunnelling-team-celebrate-milestone-tbm-breakthrough-in-warwickshire |archive-date=21 June 2023 |access-date=21 June 2023}}</ref> | |||
=== Bromford tunnel === | |||
===Future phases – Scotland / Newcastle / Liverpool=== | |||
{{Main|Bromford tunnel}} | |||
The Bromford tunnels from ] in ] to Birmingham are being bored by TBMs Mary Ann and Elizabeth. Mary Ann started tunnelling in June 2023 and will finish in 2024, while Elizabeth started in March 2024 and will finish in Autumn 2025.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/the-last-hs2-tunnel-boring-machine-in-the-west-midlands-starts-digging-towards-birmingham|title=The last HS2 tunnel boring machine in the West Midlands starts digging towards Birmingham|website=HS2 News and Information}}</ref> | |||
==Main construction== | |||
In Scotland, business and governmental organisations including ], ] and ] (the transport agency of the Scottish Government) formed the Scottish Partnership Group for High-Speed Rail in 2001 to ] for the extension of the HS2 project north to Edinburgh and Glasgow.<ref name=fasttrackscotland>{{cite book |title=Fast track Scotland: Making the Case for High Speed Rail Connections with Scotland |publisher=Scottish Government |date=December 2011 |isbn=9781908181213 |page=V |url= http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/files/documents/reports/j202923/j202923.pdf}}</ref> The Scottish Partnership Group published a study which outlined a case for extending high-speed rail to Scotland, proposing a route north of Manchester to Edinburgh and Glasgow as well as an extension to ].<ref name=transportscotland>{{cite web|title=Fast Track Scotland – Making the Case for High Speed Rail Connections with Scotland|url=http://www.transportscotland.gov.uk/strategy-and-research/publications-and-consultations/j202923-03.htm#figureone|publisher=Transport Scotland|accessdate=30 January 2013}}</ref> At present there are no DfT proposals to extend high-speed lines north of either Leeds or Manchester or to Liverpool. | |||
] in August 2021]] | |||
The main stages of construction officially began on 4 September 2020,<ref>{{cite news|title=HS2 rail project work begins with pledge of 22,000 jobs|publisher=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54010727|date=4 September 2020|access-date=4 September 2020|archive-date=4 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200904000202/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-54010727|url-status=live}}</ref> following previous delays. The ] aspect of the construction of Phase 1 is worth roughly £6.6{{nbsp}}billion, with preparation including over 8,000 boreholes for ground investigation.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.constructionnews.co.uk/companies/clients/hs2/hs2-civils-start-delayed-another-three-months/10033161.article|title=HS2 civils start delayed another three months| last1 = Simpson| first1 = Jack|date=19 July 2018|website=Construction News|access-date=11 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181012054019/https://www.constructionnews.co.uk/companies/clients/hs2/hs2-civils-start-delayed-another-three-months/10033161.article|archive-date=12 October 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Euston station in London=== | |||
In November 2012 the ] announced plans to build a {{convert|46|mi|adj=on|abbr=on|order=flip}} high-speed rail link between ] and ]. The proposed link would reduce journey times between the two cities to under 30 minutes and is planned to open by 2024, eventually connecting to the high-speed network being developed in England.<ref name=bbc-hs-scotland>{{cite news|title=High-speed rail plan for Glasgow to Edinburgh line|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-20296195|accessdate=30 January 2013|newspaper=BBC News|date=12 November 2012}}</ref> | |||
In October 2018, demolition began on the former ]. This will allow the start of construction at the throat of the station at Mornington Street Bridge, and twin-bore {{Convert|8|mi||0|abbr=|adj=on}} tunnels to ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/first-look-at-hs2s-euston-tunnel-portal-site|title=First look at HS2's Euston tunnel portal site|date=4 October 2018|publisher=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited|access-date=11 October 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181006195515/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/first-look-at-hs2s-euston-tunnel-portal-site|archive-date=6 October 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Euston Station Throat (C221-MMD-CV-DPP-010-200500-FPD) |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/529461/C221-MMD-CV-DPP-010-200500-FPD.pdf |website=gov.uk |access-date=13 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181013172504/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/529461/C221-MMD-CV-DPP-010-200500-FPD.pdf |archive-date=13 October 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> In January 2019, the ] at Euston was moved to a temporary site at the front of the station so that demolition of the One Euston Square and Grant Thornton House tower blocks could commence. The demolition period was scheduled to last ten months.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/euston-hs2-works-ramp-up-with-towers-demolition-08-01-2019/ |title=Euston HS2 works ramp up with towers demolition |newspaper=New Civil Engineer |date=8 January 2019 |access-date=28 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190728223414/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/euston-hs2-works-ramp-up-with-towers-demolition-08-01-2019/ |archive-date=28 July 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> In June 2020, workers finished the demolition of the western ramp and canopy of the station. This part of the station had housed the ] depot, which fell into disuse after parcel traffic shifted to being serviced by road.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.globalrailwayreview.com/news/102633/construction-preparation-hs2-euston-station-milestone/ |title=Construction preparation for HS2 Euston station reaches milestone |author=<!--Not stated--> |date=25 June 2020 |publisher=Global Railway Review |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200905170641/https://www.globalrailwayreview.com/news/102633/construction-preparation-hs2-euston-station-milestone/ |url-status=live |archive-date=5 September 2020 |access-date=5 September 2020}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=https://railway-news.com/hs2-euston-station-demolition-milestone-reached/ |title=HS2 Euston Station Demolition Milestone Reached |last=Sapién |first=Josephine Cordero |date=26 June 2020 |publisher=Railway-News |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200905171109/https://railway-news.com/hs2-euston-station-demolition-milestone-reached/ |url-status=live |archive-date=5 September 2020 |access-date=5 September 2020}}</ref> | |||
In March 2023, the government postponed works on Euston station, saying that this was necessary to "manage inflationary pressures and work on an affordable design for the station". Delivery of services between Birmingham and Old Oak Common would instead be prioritised, with the ] providing passenger transfer between Old Oak Common and central London until at least 2035, the earliest time at which Euston would be available under the new plans.<ref>{{cite news |title=HS2 Euston delays to cost more, National Audit Office warns |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-65085872 |access-date=23 April 2023 |publisher=BBC News |date=27 March 2023 |archive-date=6 May 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230506114442/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-65085872 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Proposed service pattern=== | |||
===Colne Valley Viaduct=== | |||
The Department for Transport's economic case for HS2, updated for Phase 2, gives a provisional service pattern:<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69743/updated-economic-case-for-hs2-_august-2012_-explanation-of-the-service-patterns.pdf|title=Updated Economic Case for High Speed 2|date=August 2012|publisher=Department for Transport|accessdate=2 February 2013}}</ref> | |||
{{Main|Colne Valley Viaduct}} | |||
The Colne Valley Viaduct is a {{convert|2.1|mi|adj=on}}-long bridge to carry the line over the ] in ], West London.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Work begins to form HS2's Colne Valley Viaduct foundations|url=https://www.globalrailwayreview.com/news/119361/hs2-colne-valley-viaduct-foundations/|access-date=15 December 2021|website=Global Railway Review|language=en|archive-date=15 December 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211215175051/https://www.globalrailwayreview.com/news/119361/hs2-colne-valley-viaduct-foundations/|url-status=live}}</ref> The viaduct is situated between the ] and ] tunnels. The bridge-building machine was launched in May 2022, signalling the start of construction.<ref>{{cite web |title=HS2 celebrates start of construction on UK's longest railway bridge |url=https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/hs2-celebrates-start-of-construction-on-uks-longest-railway-bridge |access-date=2 June 2022 |website=HS2 News and Information |archive-date=1 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220601161130/https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/hs2-celebrates-start-of-construction-on-uks-longest-railway-bridge |url-status=live}}</ref> The final deck segment was put into place in September 2024.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Colne Valey Viaduct becomes UK's longest rail bridge |url=https://www.srm.com/news-and-comment/colne-valey-viaduct-becomes-uks-longest-rail-bridge/ |access-date=26 October 2024 |website=Sir Robert McAlpine |language=en}}</ref> The viaduct is expected to be fully complete in May 2025. | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;" | |||
===Other sites=== | |||
|+Phase 1 | |||
Construction of ] began in June 2021.<ref>{{cite web |title=Progress at HS2 Superhub station Old Oak Common as construction of main station box begins |url=https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/progress-at-hs2-superhub-station-old-oak-common-as-construction-of-main-station-box-begins |access-date=2 June 2022 |website=HS2 News and Information |archive-date=2 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220602173717/https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/progress-at-hs2-superhub-station-old-oak-common-as-construction-of-main-station-box-begins |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
==Operation== | |||
Earlier government proposals were that by 2033 HS2 would provide up to 18 trains an hour to and from London.<ref>{{cite web|title=High Speed Two From Concept to Reality July 2017|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/629380/high-speed-two-from-concept-to-reality.pdf|website=GOV.UK|publisher=Department for Transport|access-date=18 November 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171201082420/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/629380/high-speed-two-from-concept-to-reality.pdf|archive-date=1 December 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> The 2020 business case contained a suggested service pattern, although this was never finalised. Some services were to operate as two connected units that would be subsequently detached to serve multiple northern destinations.<ref name="DoT-2020">{{Cite web|url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/879445/full-business-case-hs2-phase-one.pdf|title=Full Business Case: High Speed 2 Phase One|date=15 April 2020|publisher=Department for Transport|pages=132–133|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200423060936/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/879445/full-business-case-hs2-phase-one.pdf|archive-date=23 April 2020|access-date=15 April 2020}}</ref> | |||
===Previously proposed service patterns=== | |||
{{Update|part=section|date=October 2023|reason=HS2 phases 2A and 2B have been cancelled}} | |||
After an initial period with reduced services north from Old Oak Common, a full nine-train-per-hour service from London Euston was proposed to operate after the opening of Phase 1. | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
! colspan="4" | London to Birmingham | |||
|- | |- | ||
! width="250" | Route !! {{abbr|tph|trains per hour}} !! Calling at !! Train<br />length | |||
!Start!!Destination!!Trains per hour!!Intermediate stations | |||
|- | |- | ||
| |
| {{rws|London Euston}} – {{rws|Birmingham Curzon Street}} || 3 || {{rws|Old Oak Common}}, {{rws|Birmingham Interchange}} || 400{{nbsp}}m | ||
|- | |- | ||
! colspan="4" | London to the North West and Scotland | |||
|Birmingham Interchange||1 train (every 4 hours)||Old Oak Common | |||
|} | |||
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%;" | |||
|+Phase 2 | |||
!Start!!Destination!!Trains per hour!!Intermediate stations | |||
|- | |- | ||
! width="250" | Route !! {{abbr|tph|trains per hour}} !! Calling at !! Train<br />length | |||
|rowspan=14|London Euston||Curzon Street||Three||Old Oak Common and Birmingham Interchange (2tph) | |||
|- | |- | ||
| {{rws|London Euston}} – {{rws|Manchester Piccadilly}} || 3 || {{rws|Old Oak Common}}, {{rws|Wilmslow}} ({{abbr|1tph|1 train per hour}}), {{rws|Stockport}} || 200{{nbsp}}m | |||
|Birmingham Interchange||1 (every 4 hours)||Old Oak Common | |||
|- | |- | ||
| {{rws|London Euston}} – {{rws|Macclesfield}} || 1 || Old Oak Common, {{rws|Stafford}}, {{rws|Stoke-on-Trent}} <br />Would only operate if phase 2a was open. || 200{{nbsp}}m | |||
|{{stnlnk|Stafford}}||1 (every 4 hours)||Old Oak Common, Birmingham Interchange and Birmingham Curzon Street | |||
|- | |- | ||
| rowspan="2"| London Euston – {{rws|Liverpool Lime Street}} || 1 || Old Oak Common, Stafford, {{rws|Runcorn}}<br />Would call at Crewe in lieu of Stafford if phase 2a was open. || 200{{nbsp}}m | |||
|{{stnlnk|Crewe}}||One||Old Oak Common and Birmingham Interchange | |||
|- | |- | ||
| 1 || Old Oak Common, {{rws|Crewe}}, Runcorn <br />Would operate combined with the Lancaster train (see below) between London and Crewe if phase 2a was open. || 200{{nbsp}}m | |||
|Manchester Piccadilly||Three||Old Oak Common, Birmingham Interchange and {{stnlnk|Manchester Airport}} (1tph) | |||
|- | |- | ||
| London Euston – {{rws|Lancaster}} || 1 || Old Oak Common, Crewe, {{rws|Warrington Bank Quay}}, {{rws|Wigan North Western}}, {{rws|Preston}} <br />Would operate combined with the Liverpool train (see above) between London and Crewe if phase 2a was open. || 200{{nbsp}}m | |||
|{{stnlnk|Liverpool Lime Street}}||Two||Old Oak Common, Birmingham Interchange, Stafford (1tph), Crewe (1tph) and {{stnlnk|Runcorn}} | |||
|- | |- | ||
|{{ |
| London Euston – {{rws|Glasgow Central}} || 1 || Old Oak Common, Preston, {{rws|Carlisle}} || 200{{nbsp}}m | ||
|} | |||
] | |||
===Operator=== | |||
The ongoing servicing and maintenance of High Speed 2 is included within the ] ], which was awarded to ]—a joint venture between ] and ]—when the franchise commenced in December 2019. Avanti West Coast will be responsible for maintaining all aspects of the service, including ticketing, trains, and the maintenance of the infrastructure.<ref>{{cite magazine|title=West Coast Mainline and HS2 franchise race started|url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/business-culture/west-coast-mainline-and-hs2-franchise-race-started/10029621.article|access-date=2 April 2018|magazine=New Civil Engineer|date=29 March 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180402225445/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/business-culture/west-coast-mainline-and-hs2-franchise-race-started/10029621.article|archive-date=2 April 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37869643|title=New West Coast rail franchise to run HS2 services|date=4 November 2016|publisher=BBC News|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161107060803/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-37869643|archive-date=7 November 2016|access-date=27 September 2019}}</ref> The initial franchise contract is for the first three-to-five years of HS2's operation.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180330014530/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/694762/wcp-stakeholder-briefing-document.pdf |date=30 March 2018}} Department for Transport 27 March 2018</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14821876.West_Coast_franchise_winner___39_will_run_first_HS2_trains__39_/|title=West Coast franchise winner 'will run first HS2 trains'| last1 = McArdle| first1 = Helen|date=25 October 2016|website=The Herald, Scotland|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170816002449/http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14821876.West_Coast_franchise_winner___39_will_run_first_HS2_trains__39_/|archive-date=16 August 2017|access-date=27 September 2019}}</ref> | |||
===Fares=== | |||
The government has stated that it would "assume a fares structure in line with that of the existing railway", and HS2 should attract sufficient passengers to not have to charge premium fares.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16473296|title=High-speed rail's long journey|date=17 March 2014|access-date=21 June 2018 |publisher=BBC News |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180430214825/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16473296|archive-date=30 April 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> Paul Chapman, in charge of HS2's public relations strategy, suggested that there could be last-minute tickets sold at discount rates. He said, "when you have got a train departing on a regular basis, maybe every five or ten minutes, in that last half-hour before the train leaves and you have got empty seats...you can start selling tickets for £5 and £10 at a standby rate."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/hs2-tickets-could-cost-little-6324870 |title=HS2 tickets could cost as little as five pounds |date=20 November 2013 |access-date=15 November 2015 |work = Manchester Evening News | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117020400/http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/hs2-tickets-could-cost-little-6324870 |archive-date=17 November 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Capacity=== | |||
{{Update|part=section|date=November 2021|reason=reflecting on the Nov 2021 Integrated Rail Plan}} | |||
{|class="wikitable sortable floatright" | |||
|+ Peak hour capacity at Euston<ref name="tele15102016">{{Cite news|url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/15/hs2-should-be-renamed-the-grand-union-railway-as-the-controversi/ | url-access = subscription |title=HS2 should be renamed 'Grand Union Railway'| last1 = McCann| first1 = Kate|newspaper=The Telegraph|date=15 October 2016|access-date=14 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170824121554/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/15/hs2-should-be-renamed-the-grand-union-railway-as-the-controversi/|archive-date=24 August 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
! Type | |||
|{{stnlnk|Carlisle}}||1 (every 2 hours)||Old Oak Common, Crewe, Warrington Bank Quay, Wigan North Western and Preston | |||
! Current capacity | |||
! Capacity post{{nbh}}HS2 | |||
|- | |- | ||
| Slow commuter||3,900||6,500 | |||
|{{stnlnk|Glasgow Central}}||Two||Old Oak Common, Birmingham Interchange (1tph), Crewe, Manchester Interchange, Wigan North Western, Preston and Carlisle | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Fast commuter||1,600||6,800 | |||
|]||Two||Old Oak Common, Birmingham Interchange (1tph), Manchester Interchange, Wigan North Western, Preston and Carlisle | |||
|- | |- | ||
|Intercity||5,800||1,800 | |||
|{{stnlnk|Leeds New Lane}}||Three||Old Oak Common, Birmingham Interchange, ] (1tph) and ] (1tph) | |||
|- | |- | ||
|High-speed||0||19,800 | |||
|{{stnlnk|Meadowhall}}||Two||Old Oak Common, Birmingham Interchange and East Midlands Hub | |||
|- style="font-weight:bold" | |||
|- | |||
|Total||11,300||34,900 | |||
|{{stnlnk|York}}||One||Old Oak Common, East Midlands Hub and Meadowhall | |||
|- | |||
|{{stnlnk|Newcastle}}||Two||Old Oak Common (1tph), Birmingham Interchange and York | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=2|Birmingham Interchange||Curzon Street||One||No intermediate stops | |||
|- | |||
|Liverpool Lime Street||2tpd||Crewe and Runcorn | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=12|Curzon Street||Stafford||(1 (every 2 hours)||No intermediate stops | |||
|- | |||
|Crewe|| 1 (every 2 hours)||No intermediate stops | |||
|- | |||
||Manchester Piccadilly||One||Crewe and Manchester Interchange | |||
|- | |||
||Liverpool Lime Street||Two||Crewe (1tph) and Runcorn | |||
|- | |||
||Preston||2tpd||Crewe, Manchester Interchange and Wigan North Western | |||
|- | |||
||Carlisle||2tpd||Manchester Interchange, Wigan North Western and Preston | |||
|- | |||
||Glasgow Central||One||Warrington Bank Quay, Wigan North Western, Preston and Carlisle | |||
|- | |||
||Edinburgh||One||Crewe, Warrington Bank Quay, Wigan North Western, Preston and Carlisle | |||
|- | |||
|Meadowhall||One||East Midlands Hub | |||
|- | |||
|Leeds New Lane||One||East Midlands Hub and Meadowhall | |||
|- | |||
|York||One||Midlands Hub and Meadowhall | |||
|- | |||
|Newcastle||One||York | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=2|Stafford||Crewe||1tpd||No intermediate stops | |||
|- | |||
|Liverpool Lime Street||One||Runcorn | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=3|Crewe||Liverpool Lime Street||One||Runcorn | |||
|- | |||
|Manchester Piccadilly||One||Manchester Interchange | |||
|- | |||
|Glasgow Central||One||Warrington Bank Quay, Wigan North Western, Preston and Carlisle | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=3|Manchester Interchange||Preston||One||Wigan North Western | |||
|- | |||
|Glasgow Central||1 (every 2 hours)||Wigan North Western, Preston and Carlisle | |||
|- | |||
|Edinburgh||1 (every 2 hours)||Preston and Carlisle | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=1|Preston||Glasgow Central||One||Carlisle | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=1|Carlisle||Glasgow Central||One||No intermediate stops | |||
|- | |||
|rowspan=1|York||Newcastle||One||No intermediate stops | |||
|} | |} | ||
HS2 will carry up to 26,000 people per hour,<ref name=govannouncement/> with anticipated annual passenger numbers of 85{{nbsp}}million.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.railwaygazette.com/analysis/single-news/view/competition-is-key-as-high-speed-rail-keeps-growing.html|title=Competition is key as high-speed rail keeps growing|publisher=DVV Media International Ltd|website=Railway Gazette|access-date=28 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190728222412/https://www.railwaygazette.com/analysis/single-news/view/competition-is-key-as-high-speed-rail-keeps-growing.html|archive-date=28 July 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> The line will be used intensively, with up to 17 trains per hour travelling to and from Euston. As all trains will be capable of the same speed, capacity is increased as faster trains will not need to reduce speed for slower freight and commuter trains. | |||
==Connection to other lines== | |||
] | |||
By diverting the fastest services to HS2, capacity is released on the West Coast Main Line, East Coast Main Line, and Midland Main Line, allowing for more slow freight trains and local, regional, and commuter services.{{Sfn|DfT|2010|p=130}} Andrew McNaughton, Chief Technical Director, said, "Basically, as a dedicated passenger railway, we can carry more people per hour than two motorways. It's phenomenal capacity. It pretty much triples the number of seats long-distance to the North of England".<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.railengineer.uk/2015/11/05/hs2-the-story-so-far/ |title=HS2 – The story so far |date=5 November 2015 |access-date=27 December 2015 | work = Rail Engineer | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160105111404/http://www.railengineer.uk/2015/11/05/hs2-the-story-so-far/ |archive-date=5 January 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | |||
===Existing main lines=== | |||
A key feature of the HS2 proposals is that the new lines will include connections to existing, standard-speed main lines. It is proposed that these connections will allow the running of special "classic compatible" trains which are capable of operating on both high-speed lines - at the same speed as "captive" trains - and on "classic" lines – at speeds of 200 kph (125 mph) or below. This will enable rail services to operate via HS2 which will run directly to destinations beyond the high speed network such as Liverpool, Glasgow, Edinburgh and Newcastle. The proposed connections will be at junctions on the phase 2 network at the following locations:<ref name=cmd-paper-summary2013>{{cite web|title=High speed rail: investing in Britain 's future phase two - the route to Leeds, Manchester and beyond summary|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69739/hs2-phase-two-command-paper-summary.pdf|publisher=DfT|accessdate=13 May 2014|date=23 January 2013|pages=5, 16–17}}</ref> | |||
;]<ref name=cmd-paper-summary2013/> | |||
:east of {{rws|Lichfield Trent Valley}}, {{convert|2.2|miles|order=flip}} north-west of ] | |||
:south of {{rws|Crewe}} | |||
:south of {{rws|Wigan North Western}} | |||
;] | |||
: at ] {{convert|5|mi|km}} south east ], joining the existing ] line | |||
: {{convert|2|mi|km}} north of that the line meets the ] at Colton Junction near ].<ref name="ERM_report"/> | |||
=== |
===Infrastructure=== | ||
The DfT report on High Speed Rail published in March 2010 sets out the specifications for a high-speed line. It will be built to a Continental European ] (as was HS1) and will conform to ].{{Sfn|DfT|2010|p=127 s.8.4}} HS2 is being built with a ] loading gauge (also assumed for passenger capacity estimations){{Sfn|HS2 Report|2010|p=40–41 Chapter 2, section 2.3.11}} with a maximum design speed of {{convert|250|mph|round=5|abbr=on|order=flip}}.{{Sfn|DfT|2010|p=127}} Initially, trains would reach a maximum speed of {{convert|225|mph|round=5|abbr=on|order=flip}}.{{Sfn|DfT|2010|p=129}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
The proposed route of HS2 into London will bring the line very close to the existing ] line which terminates at St Pancras station; at their closest points, the two high-speed lines will be only {{convert|0.4|mi}} apart. The Department for Transport has outlined plans to link the two high-speed lines in order to allow HS2 trains from the North of England to bypass London Euston and connect straight to HS1. This connection would enable direct rail services to be run from Manchester, Leeds and Birmingham to Paris, Brussels and other continental European destinations, realising the aims of the ] scheme, first proposed in the 1980s.<ref name=dft-HS1-HS2-May2013>{{cite web|title=3. HS1-HS2 Link|work=HS2 London – West Midlands Design Refinement Consultation|publisher=Department for Transport|url=http://assets.hs2.org.uk/sites/default/files/inserts/Design%20Refinement%20Consultation%20-%20Complete.pdf|accessdate=12 May 2014|page=21|date=May 2013}}</ref> | |||
Signalling will be based on the ] (ERTMS) with in-cab signalling, in order to resolve the visibility issues associated with lineside signals at speeds over {{convert|125|mph|round=5|abbr=on|order=flip}}. ] Level 2 will be used on the line, with ] (ATO) operating at GoA2 (Grade of Automation 2), where trains will be semi-automatic (on the HS2 line alone, with drivers operating the doors, driving the train if needed and handling emergencies). ] will be used for operational communications.<ref name="Contracts-2022">{{Cite web |date=27 April 2022 |title=Railway systems contracts – scope document 'Compendium Version' |url=https://assets.hs2.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Railway-Systems-Scope-Document.pdf |website=High Speed 2}}</ref> | |||
Several possible solutions were considered. In 2010 the Government ] stated: | |||
Electrification at {{25 kV 50 Hz AC}} will be provided by overhead lines, designed to ] Reseau's V360 standard, on licence to contractors.<ref>{{Cite web |last= |first= |date=2 July 2020 |title=SNCF catenary design adopted as HS2 begins electrification procurement |url=https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/sncf-catenary-design-adopted-as-hs2-begins-electrification-procurement/56874.article |access-date=16 November 2023 |website=Railway Gazette International |language=en}}</ref> | |||
<blockquote>''…the new British high speed rail network should be connected to the wider European high speed rail network via ] and the ], subject to cost and value for money. This could be achieved through either or both of a dedicated rapid transport system linking Euston and St Pancras and a direct rail link to High Speed One.''<ref>], page 9.</ref></blockquote> | |||
The line will use pre-cast ] on most open sections, with the Slab Track Austria system supplied by ], except in tunnels and stations where cast in situ track will be used.<ref name="Contracts-2022" /><ref>{{Cite web |title=PORR slab track technology for High Speed Two (HS2) |url=https://porr-group.com/en/projects/porr-slab-track-technology-for-high-speed-two-hs2/ |access-date=16 November 2023 |website=porr-group.com |language=en}}</ref> | |||
The March 2010 engineering study conducted by ] for HS2 Ltd costed a "classic speed" ] ] direct HS2-HS1 rail link at £458m (single track) or £812m (double track). This link would go from Old Oak Common feeding into the High Speed 1 network at St Pancras, via tunnel and the ] with a high-level junction north of St Pancras station for non-stopping services. The study found that double-track high-speed connection on the same route would cost £3.6bn (4.4 times greater than for classic speed).<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/hs2ltd/routeengineering/pdf/chapter9.pdf |title= Route Engineering Study Final Report: A Report for HS2, chapter 9 |author= Arup |accessdate= 17 March 2010}}</ref> The Department for Transport HS2 report of the same date recommended that, if a direct rail link is built, it should be the classic-speed, double-track option.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/hs2ltd/hs2report/pdf/chapter3d.pdf |title= High Speed Rail: London to the West Midlands and Beyond. A Report to Government by High Speed Two Limited. Chapter 3, p. 134 |accessdate= 17 March 2010}}</ref> | |||
At first, platform height was to be {{convert|760|mm|ftin}}, which is one of the European standard heights;<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.hs2.org.uk/about-hsr |publisher= High Speed 2 Ltd |title= About High Speed Rail |at= Table 3 |access-date= 9 February 2011 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20100314164105/http://www.hs2.org.uk/about-hsr |archive-date= 14 March 2010}}</ref> however, new HS2 stations will use a platform height of {{convert|1115|mm|ftin}} to improve accessibility and allow for step-free, level access.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Lords/2016-12-08/HL3980/ |title=High Speed 2 Railway Line:Written question – HL3980 |access-date=21 February 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200221065356/https://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-question/Lords/2016-12-08/HL3980/ |archive-date=21 February 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> Trains continuing on to the conventional rail network will encounter platforms at the standard UK height of {{convert|915|mm|ftin}} with some variation.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Written questions and answers - Written questions, answers and statements - UK Parliament|url=https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2018-10-01/HL10382|access-date=3 December 2021|website=questions-statements.parliament.uk|language=en|archive-date=3 December 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211203125338/https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2018-10-01/HL10382|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
This route proposal was supported by Arup's final report in December 2010, which concluded the best option would be to construct a tunnel between ] and ], and then to use existing widened lines along the ] to connect to HS1 north of St Pancras.<ref name="hamdec"/><ref name="hamdec2"/> The proposed connection would be built to GC loading gauge and would not be suitable for trains running at high speed.<ref name="hs1hs2">{{cite web |url= http://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/assets.dft.gov.uk/hs2-hs1connection.pdf |title= Review of HS1 to HS2 Connection Final Report |author=Arup |date=20 December 2010 |at=Section 2.1 "Structural modifications" , p.4 |publisher= Department for Transport}}</ref> Detailed route plans published in January 2012 indicate a {{convert|2|km|adj=on}} link which runs from a tunnel exit just west of the former ], eastwards along the route of the North London Line and joining HS2 at a bridge junction on the west side of York Way.<ref name=Arup-Camden-2012>{{cite web|title=Plan of the route connecting HS2 to HS1 showing which map covers which area - drawing number HS2-ARP-00-DR-RW-05140|url=http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2-maps-20120110/hs2arp00drrw05140issue2.pdf|publisher=Arup/DfT|accessdate=12 May 2014|date=5 January 2012}}</ref> | |||
===Rolling stock=== | |||
Concerns were raised by ] about the impact on housing, ] and other local businesses from construction work and bridge widening along the proposed railway link.<ref>{{cite web|title=HS2’s cost to Camden|url=http://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/cms-service/download/asset?asset_id=3099681|publisher=London Borough of Camden|accessdate=12 May 2014|date=July 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=HS2 plans 'threaten jobs' in Camden's markets|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-25022253|accessdate=12 May 2014|newspaper=BBC News|date=21 November 2013}}</ref> In August 2012 the Secretary of State for Transport, ], asked HS2 Ltd to consider alternative routes for connecting HS2 and HS1. An alternative scheme for the HS1-HS2 link was put forward by TfL, who proposed incorporating the link into the projected ] route (]).<ref name=indo812>{{cite news |url= http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/plans-for-major-rail-projects-accelerate-8059742.html |title= Plans for major rail projects accelerate |author=Leftly, Mark |date=19 August 2012 |work= The Independent |location=London}}</ref> Prior to the debate on the HS2 Bill in Parliament, ], chairman of HS2 Ltd, expressed the view that the Camden railway link was "sub-optimal" and recommended that it should be omitted from the parliamentary bill. He stated that HS2 passengers travelling from the North of England to continental Europe would be able to transfer easily from Euston to St Pancras by ] in order to continue their journey on HS1. He also recommended that alternative plans should be drawn up to link the high-speed lines in the future.<ref name=hamhigh-higgins>{{cite news|title=HS2 boss calls for rail link threatening Camden markets to be axed|url=http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/travel_2_3170/hs2_boss_calls_for_rail_link_threatening_camden_markets_to_be_axed_1_3446151|accessdate=12 May 2014|newspaper=Ham & High|date=17 March 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=HS2 chair Sir David Higgins urges project speed-up|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-26604074|accessdate=12 May 2014|newspaper=BBC News|date=17 March 2014}}</ref> The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, proposed that an HS1-HS2 link should be provided by boring a tunnel under Camden to reduce the impact on the local area.<ref>{{cite news|title=London mayor Boris Johnson calls for tunnel to link HS2 at Euston to St Pancras|url=http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/london-mayor-boris-johnson-calls-for-tunnel-to-link-hs2-at-euston-to-st-pancras-9274200.html|accessdate=12 May 2014|newspaper=Evening Standard|date=22 April 2014}}</ref> | |||
{{Main|HS2 rolling stock}} | |||
] | |||
In December 2021, DfT and HS2 announced that the rolling-stock contract had been awarded to the Hitachi–Alstom joint venture.<ref>{{cite web |title=HS2's state-of-the-art fleet of high speed trains a major boost for UK train-building |url=https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/hs2-ltd-awards-landmark-rolling-stock-contracts-to-hitachi-alstom-joint-venture |date=9 December 2021 |website=HS2 |access-date=4 December 2022 |archive-date=6 March 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230306095754/https://mediacentre.hs2.org.uk/news/hs2-ltd-awards-landmark-rolling-stock-contracts-to-hitachi-alstom-joint-venture |url-status=live }}</ref> The trains will be based on an evolution of the ] platform.<ref>{{cite web |title=Case M.9779 – Alstom / Bombardier Transportation |url=https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases1/20215/m9779_2816_2.pdf |date=31 July 2020 |pages=61, 237, 276 |website=European Commission |access-date=4 December 2022 |archive-date=8 February 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220208163828/https://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/cases1/20215/m9779_2816_2.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> The first train is expected to be delivered around 2027.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gill |first1=Oliver |title=HS2 on track to be the 'fastest train in Europe' |work=The Daily Telegraph |issue=51,809 |date=10 December 2021 |location=Business |page=8|issn=0307-1235}}</ref> | |||
In order to mitigate the problems foreseen in Camden and to save £700 million from the budget, the 2 km HS1-HS2 link was removed from the ] at the ] stage.<ref name=bill2014>{{cite web|title=High Speed Rail (London – West Midlands) Bill|url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmhansrd/cm140428/debtext/140428-0002.htm#1404283000001|work=Hansard|publisher=UK Parliament|accessdate=12 May 2014|date=28 April 2014}}</ref> | |||
Vehicle bodies will be welded and fitted out at the Hitachi facility in ], ]s will be manufactured at the Alstom facility in Crewe, and the final assembly of body, bogies, and other systems will take place at Alstom in Derby.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.mynewsdesk.com/uk/hitachi-rail-global/pressreleases/hitachi-and-alstom-win-order-to-build-and-maintain-high-speed-two-trains-in-britain-3149776 | date = 9 December 2021 | title = Hitachi and Alstom win order to build and maintain High Speed Two trains in Britain | publisher = Hitachi-Alstom | access-date = 10 December 2021 | archive-date = 9 December 2021 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20211209111722/https://www.mynewsdesk.com/uk/hitachi-rail-global/pressreleases/hitachi-and-alstom-win-order-to-build-and-maintain-high-speed-two-trains-in-britain-3149776 | url-status = live }}</ref> | |||
====Procurement timeline==== | |||
An alternative solution to the issue of linking HS1 and HS2 was suggested by a former director of projects at ], Dick Keegan, who recommended in January 2013 that HS2 should not terminate at Euston but at {{rws|Stratford International}} instead, offering direct links to HS1 and on to continental Europe and greater capacity. Rapid transit into central London would be provided from ].<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-20922859 |title=Rail expert says Stratford should be HS2 terminus |work=BBC News |date=6 January 2013 |accessdate=28 October 2013}}</ref> | |||
The 2010 DfT government command-paper outlined some requirements for the train design among its recommendations for design standards for the HS2 network. The paper addressed the particular problem of designing trains to continental European standards, which use taller and wider rolling stock, compared to the loading gauges that exist in the rail network in Great Britain, meaning both trains which would remain on the HS2 line, built to larger, continental European profile ('captive' trains), and smaller trains which could leave the line onto the existing network ('conventional-compatible' trains) were proposed.<ref>{{cite web |date=January 2012 |title=Review of the Technical Specification for High Speed Rail in the UK A report to Government by HS2 Ltd |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/8083/hs2-review-of_technical-specification.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190726141105/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/8083/hs2-review-of_technical-specification.pdf |archive-date=26 July 2019 |access-date=4 March 2020 |website=Gov.UK |publisher=HS2 Ltd/Department for Transport}}</ref> | |||
Trains would have a maximum speed of at least {{convert|360|km/h|round=5|abbr=on}} and a length of {{convert|200|m}}; two units could be joined for a {{convert|400|m|adj=on}} train.{{Sfn|DfT|2010|p=129}} | |||
===Crossrail=== | |||
The DfT report also considered the possibility of "gauge clearance" work on non-high-speed lines as an alternative to conventional trains. This work would involve extensive reconstruction of stations, tunnels, and bridges, and the widening of clearances to allow Continental European–profile trains to operate beyond the high-speed network. The report concluded that, although initial outlay on commissioning new rolling stock would be high, it would cost less than the widespread disruption of rebuilding large tracts of Britain's rail infrastructure.{{Sfn|DfT|2010|p=129}} | |||
{{main|Crossrail}} | |||
After leaving Euston, some HS2 services are planned to connect with ] (opening 2018) at ].<ref name=indo812 /> | |||
Alstom, one of the bidders for the contract to build the trains, proposed in October 2016 that HS2 "tilting trains" could run on HS2 and conventional tracks, to increase overall speeds when operating on conventional tracks.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/tilting-trains-could-run-from-hs2-onto-the-rest-of-the-rail-network|title=Tilting trains could run from HS2 onto the rest of the rail network|website=www.imeche.org|access-date=21 May 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180522114511/https://www.imeche.org/news/news-article/tilting-trains-could-run-from-hs2-onto-the-rest-of-the-rail-network|archive-date=22 May 2018|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.ft.com/content/77ba6e10-7c36-11e6-b837-eb4b4333ee43|url-access = subscription| title=Alstom claims tilting train can solve HS2's speed conundrum|work=Financial Times|date=20 September 2016|access-date=20 May 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180521021204/https://www.ft.com/content/77ba6e10-7c36-11e6-b837-eb4b4333ee43|archive-date=21 May 2018|url-status=live|last1=Wright|first1=Robert|last2=Plimmer|first2=Gill}}</ref> | |||
===Possible Crossrail 2=== | |||
The estimated cost of energy for operating HS2 trains on the high-speed network was estimated in 2013 to be £3.90 per km for {{convert|200|m|4=0|adj=on}} long trains and £5.00 per km for {{convert|260|m|4=0|adj=on}} long trains. On the conventional network, the energy costs are £2.00 per km and £2.60 per km, respectively.<ref>{{cite web|work=HS2 Ltd.|title=HS2 Cost and Risk Model Report|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69741/hs2-cost-and-risk-model-report.pdf|access-date=30 December 2015|page=20|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131020074728/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69741/hs2-cost-and-risk-model-report.pdf|archive-date=20 October 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Should proposals for the north-south ] achieve funding, Transport for London have expressed an interest in constructing this to mitigate the distribution of arriving passengers from HS2 at Euston. TfL have examined route options for Crossrail 2 which could potentially incorporate a direct link to HS2, and the Mayor's Office suggested that a direct link between HS1 and HS2 could be achieved by modifying the Crossrail 2 route proposals and providing a direct rail link between the termini for the two high-speed rail lines at ] and ] stations.<ref name=indo812 /> | |||
The first batch of ] for HS2 was specified in the Train Technical Specification issued with the Invitation To Tender (ITT), which was initially published in July 2018, and revised in March 2019, following clarification questions from tenderers.<ref>{{Cite book|url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/794108/HS2-HS2-RR-SPE-000-000007_P11_TTS_Main_Body__External_.pdf|title=Train Technical Specification|publisher=HS2|access-date=8 September 2020|archive-date=25 July 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190725162242/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/794108/HS2-HS2-RR-SPE-000-000007_P11_TTS_Main_Body__External_.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> Bidding for the contract to design, build, and maintain the trains was opened in 2017 and was originally expected to be awarded in 2019. The first batch includes 54 trainsets with a maximum speed of at least {{convert|360|km/h|round=5|abbr=on}} and with the capability to operate on both HS2 and existing infrastructure.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Supplies – 151144-2017 – TED Tenders Electronic Daily|url=https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:151144-2017:TEXT:EN:HTML&tabId=1|access-date=8 September 2020|website=ted.europa.eu|archive-date=16 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200916223350/https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED%3ANOTICE%3A151144-2017%3ATEXT%3AEN%3AHTML&tabId=1|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
As a consequence of Crossrail 2 coming to Euston, major modifications would need to be made to the current redevelopment plans for Euston, geared solely to HS2 which does not provide sufficient capacity to deal with the additional passenger demand from its becoming a stop of Crossrail 2 as well as for certain HS2 services.<ref name=indo812/> | |||
The following suppliers were shortlisted to tender following the initial 5 June 2019 submission:<ref>{{Cite web|date=5 June 2019|title=High Speed 2 rolling stock bids submitted|url=https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/high-speed-2-rolling-stock-bids-submitted/48662.article|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200809143614/https://www.railwaygazette.com/uk/high-speed-2-rolling-stock-bids-submitted/48662.article|archive-date=9 August 2020|access-date=8 September 2020|website=Railway Gazette International|language=en}}</ref> | |||
===High-speed Crewe hub=== | |||
* ] | |||
] | |||
* ] and ] consortium. Bombardier were subsequently acquired by Alstom Transport in January 2021<ref>{{cite web |title= Alstom completes acquisition of Bombardier Transportation |url= https://www.railway-technology.com/news/alstom-acquisition-bombardier-transportation/ |access-date= 26 May 2021 |author= |date= 29 January 2021 |format= |work= Railway-technology.com |publisher= Verdict Media |archive-date= 11 June 2021 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20210611145030/https://www.railway-technology.com/news/alstom-acquisition-bombardier-transportation/ |url-status= live }}</ref> Bombardier and Hitachi were existing suppliers of ] rolling stock for the Italian ] high speed service.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://rail.bombardier.com/en/newsroom/press-releases.html/bombardier/news/2019/bt-20190605_hs2-bombardier-and-hitachi-bid-to-build-trains/en | title = HS2: Bombardier and Hitachi bid to build trains | date = 5 June 2019 | access-date = 10 December 2021 | publisher = Hitachi-Bombardier | archive-date = 10 December 2021 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20211210144110/https://rail.bombardier.com/en/newsroom/press-releases.html/bombardier/news/2019/bt-20190605_hs2-bombardier-and-hitachi-bid-to-build-trains/en | url-status = dead }}</ref> | |||
David Higgins the chairman of HS2 Ltd proposed a high-speed hub at Crewe. Crewe is currently a major rail junction with six radiating classic lines from the junction to: Scotland/Liverpool, Birmingham/London, Chester, Shrewsbury, Stoke and Manchester. The high-speed hub is to be sited to the south of the current Crewe station taking advantage of the classic lines radiating from the Crewe junction. Many more regions and cities can be accessed via a combination of HS2 and classic lines, giving overall superior journey times. The intention is for high-speed trains to run off the northbound HS2 line into the high-speed hub and out onto classic lines without passing though the bottleneck of the existing Crewe station, keeping line speeds as fast as possible. A new station is proposed as a part of the hub. David Higgins aims to have the HS2 line from Birmingham to Crewe and the high-speed Crewe Hub incorporated in the Phase 1 construction plan.<ref>http://www.cheshireeast.gov.uk/council_and_democracy/council_information/media_hub/media_releases/previous_media_releases/media_releases_march_2014/on_the_right_track.aspx</ref><ref>http://stophs2.org/news/12505-change-expected-hs2-phase-2-higgins-plan</ref><ref>http://www.sccci.co.uk/portal/news/769/chamber-chairman-hails-quot-a-new-beginning-for-crewe-quot/</ref> | |||
* ] (CAF) | |||
* ] proposed its ] train used by Spanish operator ].<ref>{{cite news | url = https://news.railbusinessdaily.com/talgo-confirms-avril-as-the-basis-of-its-hs2-bid/ | title = Talgo confirms AVRIL as the basis of its HS2 bid | first1 = Danny | last1 = Longhorn | date = 11 June 2019 | access-date = 10 December 2021 | newspaper = Rail Business Daily | archive-date = 10 December 2021 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20211210205849/https://news.railbusinessdaily.com/talgo-confirms-avril-as-the-basis-of-its-hs2-bid/ | url-status = live }}</ref> | |||
* ] | |||
In September 2021, the HS2 board endorsed the decision to award the rolling stock manufacturing and maintenance contracts.<ref>{{cite web |title=High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd board meeting minutes: 28 September 2021 |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1034767/210928_HS2_Board_Minutes_Redacted.pdf |date=28 September 2021 |website=HS2 Our governance |access-date=5 December 2022 |archive-date=6 October 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221006231043/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1034767/210928_HS2_Board_Minutes_Redacted.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref> In November 2021, it was reported that the decision remained with the DfT for approval.<ref>{{cite magazine|last1=Horgan|first1=Rob|date=24 November 2021|title=HS2 waiting on Shapps approval to award maligned £2.75bn rolling stock contract |url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-waiting-on-shapps-approval-to-award-maligned-2-75bn-rolling-stock-contract-24-11-2021/|access-date=7 December 2021 |magazine=New Civil Engineer |archive-date=7 December 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211207130858/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-waiting-on-shapps-approval-to-award-maligned-2-75bn-rolling-stock-contract-24-11-2021/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Maintenance depots=== | |||
{{update|part=section|date=November 2021|reason=reflecting on the Nov 2021 Integrated Rail Plan}} | |||
A rolling-stock depot will be ], Birmingham, covering all of Phase 1 and Phase 2a.<ref>{{cite web|title=Rolling Stock Maintenance Depot (Washwood Heath Depot) |url=https://hs2inbirmingham.commonplace.is/schemes/proposals/washwood-heath-depot/details |website=hs2inbirmingham.commonplace.is |access-date=31 March 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180401075722/https://hs2inbirmingham.commonplace.is/schemes/proposals/washwood-heath-depot/details |archive-date=1 April 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> In July 2018, the then ], ], announced that the rolling stock depot for the eastern leg of Phase 2b would be at ] near to the M1 motorway in Leeds.<ref>{{cite news |title=HS2 depot to be located in Leeds |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-44695730 |access-date=4 July 2018 |publisher=BBC News |date=4 July 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180721010720/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-44695730 |archive-date=21 July 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=HS2 eastern leg rolling stock depot confirmed for Leeds |url=http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/Rail-News/hs2-eastern-leg-rolling-stock-depot-confirmed-for-leeds |work=Rail Technology Magazine |date=4 July 2018 |access-date=8 July 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180709011405/http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/Rail-News/hs2-eastern-leg-rolling-stock-depot-confirmed-for-leeds |archive-date=9 July 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> An additional depot in ], north of ] and south of ], was announced in 2020.<ref>{{cite web |last=Longhorn |first=Danny |title=HS2's journey north accelerates as public consultation opens on latest proposals |url=https://www.railbusinessdaily.com/hs2s-journey-north-accelerates-as-public-consultation-opens-on-latest-proposals/ |date=7 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210620131749/https://news.railbusinessdaily.com/hs2s-journey-north-accelerates-as-public-consultation-opens-on-latest-proposals/ |archive-date=20 June 2021 |website=Rail Business Daily |language=en-GB |access-date=30 April 2023}}</ref> | |||
The infrastructure maintenance depot (IMD) for Phase 1 will be constructed roughly halfway along the route, north of Aylesbury, between ] and ] in Buckinghamshire. This site is adjacent to the intersection of HS2 and the ] route.<ref>{{cite report |title=HS2 Phase One Environmental Statement – Non-technical summary |date=November 2013 |publisher=DfT |pages=20, 27 |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/259487/NTS_for_web_ES_3.0.0.pdf |access-date=21 October 2018 |ref=Phase1NTS |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181021152935/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/259487/NTS_for_web_ES_3.0.0.pdf |archive-date=21 October 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> In the working draft environmental statement for Phase 2b, the IMD on the eastern leg is proposed for near ], on a former chemical works site, while Phase 2b, the western leg, will have one near ].<ref>{{cite web |title=High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Non-technical Summary |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/745083/HS2_Phase_2b_Working_Draft_ES_Non_Technical_Summary.pdf |website=gov.uk |publisher=DfT |access-date=21 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181021233845/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/745083/HS2_Phase_2b_Working_Draft_ES_Non_Technical_Summary.pdf |archive-date=21 October 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
==Journey times== | ==Journey times== | ||
The DfT's latest revised estimates of journey times for some major destinations have been set out in various government documents, including the business cases for each phase and other related documents. | |||
===HS2 services from London=== | |||
Since the cancellation of phase 2 of HS2, services and journey times will differ from the original plans as outlined in the table below.<ref>{{cite report |date=24 January 2024 |title=HS2 and Euston |website=House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts - 2023–24 |url= https://committees.parliament.uk/publications/43184/documents/214904/default/ }}</ref> Speaking in the House of Lords in December 2024, Rail Minister Lord Hendy stated that HS2 services had not been determined or finalized and that Euston Station will have six HS2 platforms.<ref>{{cite news |url= https://www.modernrailways.com/article/rail-minister-confirms-six-platform-plan-euston-hs2-station |title=Rail Minister confirms six platform plan for Euston HS2 station |date=18 December 2024 |work=Modern Railways |quote=the New HS2 station will consist of six platforms, which can support up to 10 HS2 trains per hour}}</ref> This is also in view of potentially upgrading Pendolino trains to 155mph for use on HS2 and WCML track to improve end-to-end times as suggested by rail consultants. Pendolino trains have a life limit of 2046 with upgrades. | |||
The DfT's latest revised estimates of journey times for some major destinations once the line has been built as far as Leeds and Manchester, set out in the January 2012 document ''High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain's Future – Decisions and Next Steps'', are as follows:<ref>{{cite web |url= http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2-decisions-and-next-steps/hs2-decisions-and-next-steps.pdf |title= High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain's Future – Decisions and Next Steps |publisher=Department for Transport |date=January 2012}}</ref> The intermediate timings given after the section to Birmingham has been built (Phase 1) are taken from an earlier document.{{Citation needed|date=November 2012}} Times given for Manchester and Leeds are for trains via Birmingham: until Phase 2 almost all trains from these cities to/from London will continue to use direct 'classic' lines. | |||
{|class="wikitable" | {|class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
!London to/from |
!London to/from | ||
! |
!Fastest journey time | ||
before HS2 (hrs:min) | |||
! |
!Estimated time with full HS2 | ||
including Phase 2 (hrs:min) | |||
!Standard journey time after HS2 Phase 2: | |||
!Estimated time reduction | |||
with Phase 2 active (min.) | |||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |] | ||
|1:21<ref name=BBC20231006>{{cite news |url= https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16473296 |title=HS2: What is the route and why is the Manchester link scrapped?|work=BBC News |date=6 October 2023}}</ref> | |||
|1:24 | |||
|0:52<ref name=BBC20231006 /> | |||
|1:12<ref group="t">Birmingham: one train per day, in one direction only: 07:30 New Street-08:42 Euston</ref> | |||
|0: |
|0:29 | ||
|- | |||
|''no change'' | |||
|] | |||
|2:03 | |||
|1:50 | |||
|0:13<ref name="assets.publishing.service.gov.uk">{{cite report |date=November 2013 |title=HS2 Phase One - London to West Midlands Environmental Statement |publisher=Department for Transport |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/259487/NTS_for_web_ES_3.0.0.pdf }}</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |] | ||
|2:08 | |2:08 | ||
|1:58<ref group="t">Manchester: one train per day, in one direction only: 07:00 Piccadilly-08:58 Euston</ref> | |||
|1:40 | |1:40 | ||
| |
|0:28 | ||
|- | |- | ||
|] | |] | ||
| |
|4:30 | ||
|4:00 | |||
|1:59<ref group="t">Leeds: one train per day, in one direction only: 07:00 Leeds-08:59 King's Cross</ref> | |||
|0:30<ref name="assets.publishing.service.gov.uk"/> | |||
|''no change'' | |||
|- class="sortbottom" | |||
|1:28 | |||
! colspan="4" | Sources:<ref>{{cite report |url= https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/259487/NTS_for_web_ES_3.0.0.pdf|title=HS2 Phase 1 Environmental Statement Non-technical summary|date=November 2013 |publisher=Department for Transport |page=27 |access-date=16 January 2018 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20161227201132/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/259487/NTS_for_web_ES_3.0.0.pdf|archive-date=27 December 2016|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=August 2019 |title=Our story and key facts |url=https://assets.hs2.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/14094931/our-story-and-key-facts.pdf|url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200521055116/https://assets.hs2.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/14094931/our-story-and-key-facts.pdf |archive-date=21 May 2020 |access-date=28 July 2020 |publisher=High Speed Two Ltd}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=High Speed Two (HS2) Phase Two |url= https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628526/CS866_A_HS2_Phase_2a_Economic_case.pdf |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20190724173348/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/628526/CS866_A_HS2_Phase_2a_Economic_case.pdf|archive-date=24 July 2019 |access-date=27 January 2020}}</ref><ref name="HS2 Journey Planner">{{cite web |title=HS2 Journey Planner |url= https://www.hs2.org.uk/where/journey-planner/ |access-date=10 November 2020 |website=High Speed 2 |archive-date=31 October 2020 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20201031192721/https://www.hs2.org.uk/where/journey-planner/ |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
|- | |||
|} | |} | ||
{{reflist|group="t"}} | |||
==Funding== | |||
Estimated journey times for direct trains running between British cities and Paris were published by HS2 Ltd in 2012.<ref name=foi-journey-times>{{cite web|title=FOI11-356 Existing journey time and the predicted journey time by high speed rail|url=http://www.hs2.org.uk/news-resources/foi/foi11-356-existing-journey-time-and-predicted-journey-time-high-speed-rail|work=]|publisher=HS2 ltd|accessdate=28 May 2014|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20140528163957/http://www.hs2.org.uk/news-resources/foi/foi11-356-existing-journey-time-and-predicted-journey-time-high-speed-rail|archivedate=28 May 2014|date=17 February 2012}}</ref> These estimates assume a high speed rail journey using both HS1 and both completed phases of HS2: | |||
{{update|part=section|date=November 2021|reason=relating to the Nov 2021 Integrated Rail Plan}} | |||
The DfT initially estimated the cost of the first {{convert|120|mi|adj=on|sigfig=2|order=flip}} section, from London to Birmingham, at between £15.8 and £17.4{{nbsp}}billion,<ref name="BBC 11/3/10">{{cite news |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8561286.stm |publisher=BBC News |title=High-speed rail plans announced |date=11 March 2010 |access-date=14 November 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20111026173437/http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8561286.stm |archive-date=26 October 2011 |url-status=live}}</ref> and the entire Y-shaped {{convert|335|mi|adj=on|-1|order=flip}} network at between £30.9 and £36{{nbsp}}billion,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69741/hs2-cost-and-risk-model-report.pdf|title=HS2 Cost and Risk Model Report: A report to Government by HS2 Ltd|work=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited|date=March 2012|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200104085755/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69741/hs2-cost-and-risk-model-report.pdf|archive-date=4 January 2020}}</ref><ref name="BBC 11/3/10" /> not including the Manchester Airport station which would be locally funded.<ref name="manc-airport-2013" /> In June 2013, the projected cost (in 2011 prices) rose by £10{{nbsp}}billion, to £42.6{{nbsp}}billion, with an extra £7.5{{nbsp}}billion budgeted for rolling stock, for a total of £50.1{{nbsp}}billion.<ref>{{cite news |last=Topham |first=Gwyn |date=26 June 2013 |title=Cost of HS2 up £10bn to £42.6bn, transport secretary tells MPs |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/26/hs2-costs-escalate-mps-told |work=] |access-date=1 July 2013 |location=London |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131031004157/http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2013/jun/26/hs2-costs-escalate-mps-told |archive-date=31 October 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> Less than a week later, it was revealed that the DfT had been using an outdated model to estimate the productivity increases associated with the railway.<ref>{{cite news |last=Pickard |first=Jim |date=1 July 2013 |title=Growth of handheld computers hits economic argument for HS2 |url=http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/79412d4e-e276-11e2-87ec-00144feabdc0.html |work=Financial Times |location=London |access-date=1 July 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130704063845/http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/79412d4e-e276-11e2-87ec-00144feabdc0.html |archive-date=4 July 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> In 2014, the most commonly cited cost applied to the project was £56.6{{nbsp}}billion, which corresponds to the June 2013 funding package, as adjusted for inflation by the ] in 2015.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldeconaf/134/13406.htm|title=House of Lords – The Economics of High Speed 2 – Economic Affairs Committee|website=publications.parliament.uk|access-date=31 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170730072749/https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldeconaf/134/13406.htm|archive-date=30 July 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> Over sixty years, the line was estimated to provide £92.2{{nbsp}}billion of net benefits and £43.6{{nbsp}}billion in new revenue. As a result, the ] of the project was then estimated to be 2.30; that is, it is projected to provide £2.30 of benefits for every £1 spent.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldeconaf/134/13412.htm#a37|title=House of Lords – The Economics of High Speed 2 – Economic Affairs Committee|website=publications.parliament.uk|access-date=13 February 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161027144910/http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldeconaf/134/13412.htm#a37|archive-date=27 October 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Cost increases have led to reductions in the planned track; for instance, the link between HS1 and HS2 was later dropped on cost grounds.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.building.co.uk/news/government-decides-to-drop-700m-hs2-to-hs1-link/5067278.article|title=Government decides to drop £700m HS2 to HS1 link|first=Iain|last=Withers|date=17 March 2014|website=Building|access-date=4 October 2023|archive-date=21 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210921234252/https://www.building.co.uk/news/government-decides-to-drop-700m-hs2-to-hs1-link/5067278.article|url-status=live}}</ref> In April 2016, Sir ], a top UK civil servant, was reviewing the HS2 project to trim costs and gauge whether the project could be kept within budget.<ref>{{cite web | first1 = Mark | last1 = Leftly |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/may/02/top-uk-civil-servant-reviews-hs2-project |title=Top UK civil servant reviews HS2 project | UK news |work=The Guardian |date=2 May 2016 |access-date=26 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160818165054/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/may/02/top-uk-civil-servant-reviews-hs2-project |archive-date=18 August 2016 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news | first1 = Andrew | last1 = Gilligan |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/14/hs2-may-not-even-reach-manchester-as-department-for-transport-fa/ | url-access = subscription |title=HS2 may not even reach Manchester as Department for Transport faces having project taken out of its control |work=The Daily Telegraph |date=14 May 2016 |access-date=26 August 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160909064550/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/05/14/hs2-may-not-even-reach-manchester-as-department-for-transport-fa/ |archive-date=9 September 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref> The cost of HS2 is around 25 per cent higher than the international average, which was blamed on the higher population density and cost of land, in a report by ]. The costs are also higher because the line will be built directly into city centres instead of joining existing networks on the outskirts.<ref>{{cite news |last=Paton |first=Graeme |title=HS2 set to cost 25% more than overseas rail schemes |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/hs2-set-to-cost-25-more-than-overseas-rail-schemes-bq35jgqk8 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |work=The Times |date=19 October 2018 |access-date=26 October 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181026104406/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/hs2-set-to-cost-25-more-than-overseas-rail-schemes-bq35jgqk8 |archive-date=26 October 2018}}</ref> By 2019, Oakervee estimated that the projected cost, in 2019 prices, had increased from £80.7{{nbsp}}billion to £87.7{{nbsp}}billion—the budget in 2019 prices was at the time of the Oakervee Review only £62.4{{nbsp}}billion—and the benefit–cost ratio had dropped to between 1.3 and 1.5.<ref name="Oakervee-Review" /> ], the deputy chair of the Oakervee Review, disagreed with Oakervee's findings and suggested that the cost of the project could now be as high as £170{{nbsp}}billion.<ref>{{cite news |last=Paton |first=Graeme |title=HS2 'on track to cost taxpayer £170bn' |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/hs2-on-track-to-cost-taxpayer-170bn-jw090hlw9 |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |work=The Times |date=4 November 2020 |access-date=4 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105014455/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/hs2-on-track-to-cost-taxpayer-170bn-jw090hlw9 |archive-date=5 November 2020}}</ref> As of 2020, the budget envelope set out by the DfT is £98{{nbsp}}billion.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Horgan |first=Rob |title=HS2 {{!}} DfT slams review deputy's £170bn cost estimate as 'baseless' and 'false' |url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-dft-slams-review-deputys-170bn-cost-estimate-as-baseless-and-false-05-11-2020/ |date=5 November 2020 |access-date=6 November 2020|magazine=New Civil Engineer |archive-date=5 November 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201105201912/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/hs2-dft-slams-review-deputys-170bn-cost-estimate-as-baseless-and-false-05-11-2020/|url-status=live}}</ref> HS2 Ltd tapped into a £4.3{{nbsp}}billion contingency fund to meet £1.7{{nbsp}}billion of extra costs resulting from delays caused by the ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Plimmer |first1=Gill |last2=Pickard |first2=Jim |title=HS2 costs rise by further £1.7bn during pandemic |url=https://www.ft.com/content/510f2a02-e9a1-4d21-a5ad-773e1824cb44 |date=20 June 2021 |work=Financial Times |url-access=subscription |access-date=12 July 2021 |archive-date=12 July 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210712003312/https://www.ft.com/content/510f2a02-e9a1-4d21-a5ad-773e1824cb44 |url-status=live}}</ref> The benefit cost ratio for the whole project was last officially estimated at 1.1 for the whole project in July 2022.<ref>{{cite web |title=HS2 Phase 2b Western Leg Crewe – Manchester – Supplement to the Update on the SOBC |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1084080/hs2-phase-2b-western-leg-crewe-to-manchester-supplement-to-the-update-on-the-strategic-outline-business-case.pdf |access-date=25 September 2023 |publisher=Department for Transport |page=22 |archive-date=1 June 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230601120135/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1084080/hs2-phase-2b-western-leg-crewe-to-manchester-supplement-to-the-update-on-the-strategic-outline-business-case.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=10 May 2023 |title=High Speed 2 Line: Cost Benefit Analysis |url=https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-04-24/hl7388 |access-date=25 September 2023 |website=UK Parliament - Written questions, answers and statements |archive-date=25 September 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230925180820/https://questions-statements.parliament.uk/written-questions/detail/2023-04-24/hl7388 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
{| class="wikitable" | |||
|- | |||
!Paris to/from: | |||
!Standard journey time before HS2: | |||
!Fastest journey time using HS1 & HS2: | |||
|- | |||
| Birmingham || 4:42 || 3:07 | |||
|- | |||
| Manchester || 5:37 || 3:38 | |||
|- | |||
| Leeds || 5:47 || 3:38 | |||
|} | |||
Sources of funding other than central government have been mooted for additional links. The City of Liverpool, omitted from direct HS2 access, in March 2016 offered £6{{nbsp}}billion to fund a link from the city to the HS2 backbone {{convert|20|mi|km}} away.<ref name="Topham-2016" /> HS2 received funding from the ]'s ].<ref>{{cite web |title=HS2 secures EU funding |url=https://www.globalrailnews.com/2015/07/15/hs2-secures-eu-funding/ |date=15 July 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170106173153/https://www.globalrailnews.com/2015/07/15/hs2-secures-eu-funding/ |archive-date=6 January 2017| url-status=live |website=Rail UK |access-date=4 December 2022}}</ref> | |||
Faster journey times than those estimated for HS2 have been claimed by advocates of an alternative proposal to build a high-speed ] train line, ]. However, this scheme has not received any governmental support.<ref name="UKU_response">{{cite web|url= http://www.500kmh.com/UKU_response_to_HS2_consultation_110728.pdf|title=UK Ultraspeed: Response to High Speed 2 consultation}}</ref> | |||
===Wales' classification=== | |||
==Planned stations== | |||
HS2's classification as an "]" project had been criticised by MPs,<ref>{{Cite web|date=12 February 2020|title=Wales is paying for HS2 but it will harm our economy - we must receive the £5 billion we are owed|url=https://nation.cymru/opinion/wales-is-paying-for-hs2-but-it-will-harm-our-economy-we-must-receive-the-5-billion-we-are-owed/|access-date=28 November 2021|website=Nation.Cymru|language=en-GB|archive-date=28 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128130451/https://nation.cymru/opinion/wales-is-paying-for-hs2-but-it-will-harm-our-economy-we-must-receive-the-5-billion-we-are-owed/|url-status=live}}</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite news |date=13 June 2024 |title=Plaid Cymru launch General Election manifesto with bid for £4bn HS2 compensation |url=https://www.itv.com/news/wales/2024-06-12/plaid-cymru-pledge-to-fight-for-economic-fairness-for-wales-in-manifesto |work=]}}</ref> and past ] ministers in ], arguing that HS2's classification over Wales has little justification. They argue this is because there is no dedicated high-speed or conventional infrastructure of HS2 planned in Wales and minimal HS2 services to the north of Wales. A DfT study detailed that HS2 was forecasted to have a "negative ]", as well as on ] in England. | |||
Rail infrastructure is not ], therefore devolved authorities are entitled to less of the ], when funding is increased to the ] in proportion to an increase in funding for England or, in this case, England and Wales. The Welsh Government has stated that it wants its "fair share" from HS2's billions in funding, which the Welsh Government stated would be roughly £5{{nbsp}}billion in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Barry|first1=Sion|date=26 August 2020|title=Wales will not get multi-billion pound HS2 consequential says Grant Shapps|url=https://www.business-live.co.uk/economic-development/wales-not-multi-billion-high-18830362|access-date=28 November 2021|website=Business Live|language=en|archive-date=28 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128130518/https://www.business-live.co.uk/economic-development/wales-not-multi-billion-high-18830362|url-status=live}}</ref> By February 2020, the Welsh government received £755{{nbsp}}million in HS2-linked funding, with the UK Government stating it was "investing record amounts in Wales' railway infrastructure" and that the Welsh government has actually received a "significant uplift" in Barnett-based funding due to the UK Government's increased funding of HS2.<ref>{{cite report |last1=Codd |first1=Fintan |last2=Pickett |first2=Lewis |last3=Keep |first3=Matthew |title=Transport funding for Wales and HS2 |url=https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2021-0168/ |date=28 November 2021 |website=UK Parliament |language=en-GB |access-date=4 December 2022 |archive-date=2 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230202080946/https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2021-0168/ |url-status=live}}</ref> ], ], stated that Network Rail would invest £1.5{{nbsp}}billion in Wales' railways between 2019 and 2024.<ref name="BBC News-11/2/20">{{cite news|date=11 February 2020|title=HS2: Outrageous rail project will not benefit Wales, transport expert says|language=en-GB|publisher=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-51460737|access-date=28 November 2021|archive-date=28 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128130453/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-wales-51460737|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===London and Birmingham=== | |||
Following the cancelling of Phase 2, Wales' estimated claim was reduced to £3.9 billion. ] while as First Minister considered legal action in the courts over the issue, however following his replacement, the Welsh Government dropped their calls for legal action. While in June 2024, the Welsh Government reduced the claimed figure to £350 million, stating difficulties with estimating the consequential. Labour's ], ], claimed HS2 is "no longer in existence", when questioned on Wales' funding issue.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Price |first=Emily |date=27 June 2024 |title=Welsh Government recalculates sum owed in HS2 consequentials to just £350m |url=https://nation.cymru/news/welsh-government-recalculates-sum-owed-in-hs2-consequentials-to-just-350m/ |access-date=28 June 2024 |website=Nation.Cymru |language=en-GB}}</ref> | |||
] at St Pancras]] | |||
In 2020, trains between north Wales and London take roughly three{{nbsp}}hours and forty-five{{nbsp}}minutes, with HS2 set to decrease the travel time between Crewe and London by thirty{{nbsp}}minutes. However, with no confirmed services directly between Euston and north Wales, passengers could be required to change at Crewe, and use the ] between Crewe and ], where any improvements have failed to receive funding.<ref name="BBC News-11/2/20" /> | |||
====Central London==== | |||
The DfT study estimated that the ] economy could lose up to £200{{nbsp}}million per year, due to the ] "inferior transport infrastructure". The same study highlighted that north Wales could benefit from faster journey times and a potential boost for the region's economy, with the DfT forecasting a benefit of £50{{nbsp}}million from HS2, although with a potential £150{{nbsp}}million negative economic impact to Wales overall. ] ] described in a letter to ] ] that ] has been "systematically neglected" and that HS2's funding further contributes to it. HS2 has increased calls for Wales' rail infrastructure to be fully ], as it is in Scotland.<ref name="The National Wales" /> | |||
Under the March 2010 scheme, HS2 will start from a rebuilt London Euston. The station will be extended to the south and west with significant construction above. Twenty-four platforms will serve High Speed and classic lines to the Midlands, with six underground lines. The connection with Crossrail at Old Oak Common in West London is designed to mitigate the extra burden on Euston, although Euston too would see its underground station rebuilt and integrated with ].<ref name="DTF CONS">, Department for Transport February 2011</ref><ref>, Greater London Authority 17 May 2011</ref> A rapid transit 'people mover' link between Euston and St Pancras might be provided<ref name="RTL"> Department for Transport Archives</ref> and it is proposed to route the proposed Crossrail 2 (]) via Euston to cope with increased passenger demand.<ref>, House of Commons</ref><ref name="E TEX">{{cite web|url=http://www.transportxtra.com/magazines/local_transport_today/news/?ID=25199 |title=HS2 fuels Crossrail 2 business case |publisher=Transportxtra.com |date= |accessdate=28 October 2013}}</ref> | |||
In July 2021, the ] advised that HS2 should be reclassified as an "England only" project, allowing Wales to be entitled to its Barnett Formula, in line with Scotland and ]; but the committee also called for the establishment of a "Wales Rail Board" instead of devolving rail infrastructure to Wales, and for the upgrading of the North Wales Main Line.<ref>{{Cite web|last1=Barry|first1=Sion|date=14 July 2021|title=HS2 should be reclassed as an England only project says Welsh Affairs Committee|url=https://www.business-live.co.uk/economic-development/high-speed-rail-should-reclassed-21041810|access-date=28 November 2021|website=Business Live|language=en|archive-date=28 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128130506/https://www.business-live.co.uk/economic-development/high-speed-rail-should-reclassed-21041810|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="The National Wales">{{Cite web|title=HS2 rail scheme should be reclassified as 'England only project' say MPs|url=https://www.thenational.wales/news/19440313.hs2-rail-scheme-reclassified-england-project-say-mps/|access-date=28 November 2021|website=The National Wales|language=en|archive-date=28 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128130453/https://www.thenational.wales/news/19440313.hs2-rail-scheme-reclassified-england-project-say-mps/|url-status=dead}}</ref> | |||
A review by ] suggested that HS2 should terminate at Old Oak Common, not Euston.<ref name="No Business Case"/> He questioned the sense of HS2 terminating at Euston, with ] at St Pancras and no through running connection between them.<ref name="No Business Case"/> The plans proposed a link via an upgraded section of the ] to enable three trains per hour to run through to ] and towards the ], bypassing Euston.<ref name="DTF CONS"/> | |||
{{-}} | |||
====West London==== | |||
] Interchange in west London]] | |||
{{Main|Old Oak Common railway station}} | |||
A report published in March 2010 proposed that all trains would stop at a "]" near ], between ] and {{Stnlnk|Acton Main Line}}, with connections for ], ], and the ] to ], ], ] and ]. The station might also have interchange with ] and ] on the ] and ]s and also with ]'s ].<ref>], page 107.</ref> | |||
Mawhinney recommended that HS2 should terminate at Old Oak Common because of its good connections and to save the cost of tunnelling to Euston.<ref name="No Business Case"/> | |||
The HS2 route published on 10 January 2012 included stations at both Euston and Old Oak Common.<ref>].</ref> | |||
{{-}} | |||
====Bickenhill ("Birmingham Interchange")==== | |||
] | |||
The March 2010 report proposed that a new "]" station in rural Solihull, on the other side of the ] from the ], ] and ].<ref>], page 118.</ref> The interchange will be connected by a ] to the other sites; the ] people mover already operates between Birmingham International station and the airport. | |||
According to ]'s chief executive Paul Kehoe, HS2 is a key element in increasing the number of flights using the airport, and patronage by inhabitants of London and the ], as HS2 will reduce travelling times to Birmingham Airport from London to under 40 minutes.<ref name="bnielsenoct2010">{{cite news |url= http://blogs.birminghampost.net/business/2010/10/up-up-and-away---birmingham-ai.html |title= Up, Up and Away – Birmingham Airport spreads its wings as powerful driver of growth and jobs |newspaper= ] Business Blog |date= 29 October 2010 |last=Nielsen |first= Beverley}}</ref> | |||
{{-}} | |||
====Birmingham city centre==== | |||
]]] | |||
{{Main|Curzon Street Station}} | |||
], the main station serving central Birmingham, has been described as operating at full capacity and being unable to accommodate new high-speed services.{{citation needed|date=April 2011}} A new terminus for HS2, termed "]" in the government's ]<ref>], page 112.</ref> and "Birmingham Fazeley Street" in the report produced by High Speed 2 Ltd, would be built on land between Moor Street ] and the site of ]. It would be reached via a spur line from a triangular junction with the HS2 main line at ].<ref>{{cite book |url= http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/hs2ltd/hs2report/pdf/chapter3c.pdf |title= High Speed Rail: London to the West Midlands and Beyond. A Report to Government by High Speed Two Limited. |chapter= 3 |page= 117 |accessdate= 12 March 2010}}</ref> | |||
There are no plans for the Curzon Street/Fazeley Street terminus to be used by other rail services, but the station would be adjacent to ] and could be directly linked. A link to ] via a people mover with a journey time of two minutes is possible.<ref>], page 113.</ref> The walking route between New Street and Moor Street has been considered in the redevelopment of New Street station, which will have a new footbridge at its east entrance<ref>{{cite book |url= http://www.newstreetnewstart.co.uk/home.aspx |title=Transforming Birmingham New Street |author=Network Rail|accessdate=28 October 2012}}</ref> The other city-centre station, ], is just a couple of minutes' train journey from Moor Street station. | |||
Development planning for the Fazeley Street quarter of Birmingham has changed as a result of HS2. Prior to announcement of the HS2 station, ] had planned to build a new campus in ].<ref name="BPost20100316">{{cite news |url= http://www.birminghampost.net/news/west-midlands-news/2010/03/16/birmingham-city-university-wants-30m-refund-after-high-speed-rail-hits-campus-plan-65233-26044757/ |title= Birmingham City University wants £30m refund after high speed rail hits campus plan |date= 16 March 2010 |accessdate= 17 March 2010 |newspaper= ] |first= Jonathan |last= Walker}}</ref><ref>], page 115.</ref> The proposed Eastside development will now include a new museum quarter, with the original stone Curzon Street station building becoming a new museum of photography, fronting on to a new Curzon Square, which will also be home to Ikon 2 a museum of contemporary art.<ref>{{cite book |url= http://www.ikon-gallery.co.uk/Repository/pages/197/0485f379-66d0-48f3-b585-88cce714e9b1.pdf |title=Curzon Square – A vision for Birminghams New Museum Quarter |author=Ikon Gallery|accessdate=28 October 2012}}</ref> | |||
In addition, the Government proposes that there will be a depot at ], where 30 homes will be demolished to enable the development.<ref> page 22</ref> | |||
===Birmingham and Manchester (Phase 2)=== | |||
Proposals for the station locations were announced on 28 January 2013. | |||
====Crewe==== | |||
HS2 will pass through ] and Cheshire, in tunnel under Crewe station but not stopping there.<ref name="brummanc">{{cite news |title=HS2 route: Manchester and Liverpool win while Sheffield loses out |last=Millward |first=David |url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/9783576/HS2-route-Manchester-and-Liverpool-win-while-Sheffield-loses-out.html |newspaper=The Telegraph |date=6 January 2013 |accessdate=27 January 2013 |location=London}}</ref> However, the HS2 line will be linked to the West Coast Main Line via a ] just south of Crewe, enabling "classic compatible" trains exiting the high-speed line to call at the existing Crewe station.<ref name="bbc-stoke" /><ref name=dft-map-crewe>{{cite web |title= Route section HSM09 plan and profile sheet 2 of 2 – drawing number HS2-MSG-WCM-ZZ-DT-RT-60902 |url= https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69055/hs2-msg-wcm-zz-dt-rt-60902.pdf |work=HS2 phase two initial preferred route plan and profile maps |publisher= Department for Transport |accessdate=2 February 2013|date=January 2013}}</ref> The ''Crewe & Nantwich Guardian'' reported on 17 March 2014 that the chairman of HS2 has advocated a dedicated hub station in Crewe.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.creweguardian.co.uk/news/11081872.UPDATE__HS2_in_Crewe_by_2027___chairman_backs_Crewe_hub_station_plan/ |title=UPDATE: HS2 in Crewe by 2027 - chairman backs Crewe hub station plan (From Crewe Guardian) |publisher=Creweguardian.co.uk |date=17 March 2014 |accessdate=29 April 2014}}</ref> | |||
====Manchester Airport==== | |||
] | |||
A Manchester Interchange station is planned to serve ] on the southern boundary of Manchester, next to Junction 5 of the ] on the northern side of the airport and about {{convert|1.5|mi|order=flip}} north-west of ].<ref name="brummanc"/><ref name=dft-map-manchesterairport>{{cite web|title=Route section HSM28 plan and profile sheet 5 of 9 – drawing number HS2-MSG-MA0-ZZ-DR-RT-52805 |url= https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69079/hs2-msg-ma0-zz-dr-rt-52805.pdf |work=HS2 phase two initial preferred route plan and profile maps |publisher=Department for Transport |accessdate=2 February 2013|date=January 2013}}</ref> Manchester Airport is the ] outside the London region and offers more destinations than any British airport. An airport station was recommended by local authorities during the consultation stage.<ref>{{cite web |title=Council chiefs lobby ministers for TWO high speed rail stations |url=http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/trafford-council-chiefs-lobby-ministers-1230363 |newspaper=Manchester Evening News |date=22 January 2013 |accessdate=27 January 2013}}</ref><ref name="manchub">{{Cite news |title=Manchester Airport may be high-speed rail network hub |url=http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/transport/s/1410661_manchester_airport_may_be_highspeed_rail_network_hub |newspaper=Manchester Evening News |date=13 March 2011 |accessdate=11 March 2012}}</ref> The government agreed in January 2013 for an airport station but agreed only on the basis that private investment was involved, such as funding from the ] to build the station. The average journey from London Euston to Manchester Airport would be 59 minutes. | |||
====Manchester city centre==== | |||
] | |||
The route will continue from the airport into ] via a {{convert|7.5|mi|adj=on|order=flip}} bored tunnel under the dense urban districts of south Manchester before surfacing at Ardwick.<ref name="tunnellength">{{cite web |title=Options for Phase 2 of the High Speed rail network |page=96 |date=28 January 2013 |accessdate=31 January 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title=HS2 to enter Manchester via tunnel under city |url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-21230543 |work=BBC News |date=28 January 2013 |accessdate=28 January 2013}}</ref><ref>HS2 Drawings for Greater Manchester Tunnel and </ref> If built, it will represent one of the major engineering feats of HS2 and will be the ] to be built in the United Kingdom, surpassing the {{convert|6.2|mi|adj=on|order=flip}} High Speed 1 tunnel completed in 2004.<ref>{{cite news |title=Tunnel vision |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2005/may/27/transport |newspaper=The Guardian |date=27 May 2005 |accessdate=30 January 2013 |location=London |first=Jonathan |last=Glancey}}</ref> The {{convert|7.6|mi|km|abbr=on|adj=on|order=flip}} twin-bore tunnel be at an average depth of {{convert|33|m|ft|abbr=on}} and trains will travel at {{convert|228|km/h}} through the tunnel. The diameter size of the tunnel is dependent on the train speed and length of the tunnel.<ref>{{cite web |title=Options for Phase Two |page=9 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/68960/options-for-phase-two-of-the-high-speed-rail-network-approach-to-design.pdf |date=28 January 2013 |accessdate=2 February 2013}}</ref> It is envisaged both tunnels will be, as an "absolute minimum", at least {{convert|7.25|m|ftin}} in diameter to accommodate the high-speed trains.<ref>{{cite web |title=HS2 Cost and Risk – Infrastructure rate comparison |page=24 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69741/hs2-cost-and-risk-model-report.pdf |date=28 January 2013 |accessdate=2 February 2013}}</ref> | |||
Up to 15 sites were put forward, including ], ], expanding ] and ] the grade-II listed ] into a station.<ref>{{cite web |title=Options for Phase 2 of the High Speed rail network |page=110}}</ref> Three final sites made the long list: ], ] and a newly built station at Salford Middlewood Locks.<ref>{{cite web |title=Options for High Speed Two Phase 2 |page=120 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/68965/options-for-phase-two-of-the-high-speed-rail-network.pdf |date=28 January 2013 |accessdate=30 January 2013}}</ref> Three approaches were considered, one via the ], one via the ] and the other through south Manchester. Both ] and Salford City Council recommended routing High Speed 2 to Manchester Piccadilly to maximise economic potential and connectivity rather than building a new station at a greater cost and which could be isolated from existing transport links.<ref>{{cite web |title=Options for Phase 2 of the High Speed rail network |page=120}}</ref> | |||
HS2 will terminate at an upgraded ].<ref name="brummanc"/> At least four new {{convert|400|m|ft|adj=mid|-long}} platforms will be built to accommodate the new high-speed trains in addition to the two platforms which are currently planned as part of the ] proposal.<ref name="manchub"/> It is envisaged Platform 1 under the existing listed train shed will also be converted to a fifth HS2 platform. The HS2 concourse will be connected to the existing concourse at Piccadilly. HS2 will reduce the average journey time from central Manchester to central London from 2 hours 8 minutes to 1 hour 8 minutes. | |||
===Birmingham and Leeds branch (Phase 2)=== | |||
HS2 will reduce the average journey time from central Leeds to London from 2 hours 20 minutes to 1 hour 28 minutes. | |||
====East Midlands Hub==== | |||
{{main|East Midlands Hub}} | |||
] | |||
A new station – the ] – at ] in the ] is proposed, which would be a ] station,<ref group="note">In British usage, a parkway station is one with car parking, remote from the location it is intended to serve</ref> to serve ], ] and ].<ref name=ThisIsNotts>{{cite news |url= http://www.thisisnottingham.co.uk/roundup/New-parkway-station-built-East-Midlands/article-1569744-detail/article.html |title= New 'parkway' station could be built in East Midlands |work= Nottingham Evening Post |date= 3 December 2009 |accessdate= 4 January 2010}}</ref> The Derbyshire and Nottingham ] supported high-speed rail coming to the East Midlands but was concerned that a parkway station instead of centrally located city stations would result in no overall net benefit in journey times.<ref name=ThisIsNotts/> ] was recently constructed on the ] south of Derby and Nottingham – close to the proposed site in Toton – and is failing to hit its passenger targets by a substantial margin.<ref name=BBCNewsEMParkwayTargets>{{cite news|title=East Midlands Parkway railway station fails to meet target|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leicestershire-22880488|accessdate=28 November 2013|newspaper=BBC News Online|date=29 June 2013}}</ref> | |||
====Sheffield Meadowhall==== | |||
{{main|Meadowhall Interchange}} | |||
HS2 would continue north to a station at ] in ], serving ] and surrounding large towns such as ]. | |||
====Leeds New Lane==== | |||
{{main|Leeds New Lane railway station}} | |||
].]] | |||
HS2 would then continue north from Meadowhall through West Yorkshire toward York, with a spur to central ] with a new station called ]. This new station will link with ] by a walkway, with the possibility of moving walkways.<ref name="ERM_report"/> | |||
==Development== | |||
===Infrastructure=== | |||
] | |||
The Department for Transport report on High Speed Rail published in March 2010 sets out the specifications for a high-speed line. It will be built to a European ] (as was ]) and will conform to European Union technical standards for interoperability for high-speed rail<ref>], page 127, section 8.4.</ref> (]). HS2 Ltd's report assumed a GC structure gauge for passenger capacity estimations,<ref>], Chapter 2, section 2.3.11, pp.40–41.</ref> with a maximum design speed of {{convert|250|mph|order=flip}}.<ref name="DfTa" /> Initially, trains would run at a maximum speed of {{convert|225|mph|sigfig=2|order=flip}}.<ref name="cc129"/> | |||
The new line would release capacity for freight and more local, regional and commuter services on both the ], ] and ].<ref>], page 130.</ref> | |||
Signalling would be based on the ] (ERTMS) with in-cab signalling, to resolve the visibility issues associated with lineside signals at speeds over {{convert|125|mph|sigfig=2|order=flip}}. | |||
Platform height will be at the European standard of {{convert|760|mm|ftin}}.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.hs2.org.uk/about-hsr |publisher= High Speed 2 Ltd |title= About High Speed Rail |at= Table 3 |accessdate= 9 February 2011}}</ref> | |||
===Rolling stock=== | |||
<!-- Removed irrelevant rolling stock of non HS2 lines --> | |||
] | |||
], an existing example of a high-speed train compatible with British and Continental ]s ''(not specified for HS2)'']] | |||
The ] for HS2 has not yet been specified in any detail. The 2010 DfT government command paper outlined some requirements for the train design among its recommendations for design standards for the HS2 network. A photograph of a French AGV ''({{lang|fr|]}}'') was used as an example of the latest high-speed rail technology. The paper addressed the particular problem of designing trains to continental European standards, which use taller and wider rolling stock, requiring a larger ] than the ]. | |||
The report proposed the development of two new types of train to make best use of the line:<ref name="cc129">], page 129.</ref> | |||
*Wider and taller trains built to a European loading gauge, which would be confined to the high-speed network (including ] and HS2) and other lines cleared to their loading gauge. | |||
*'Classic compatible' trains, capable of high speed but built to a British ] to permit them to leave the high-speed line to join conventional routes such as the ], ] and ].<ref group="note">The ] trains used by ] are an example of a high-speed train that is compatible with French/Belgian high-speed lines and British lines.</ref> Such trains would allow running of HS2 services to the north of England and Scotland. HS2 Ltd has stated that, because of their non-standard nature, these classic-compatible trains were expected to be more expensive.<ref>], para 4.1.23.</ref> | |||
Both types of train would have a maximum speed of at least {{convert|350|km/h|abbr=on}} and length of {{convert|200|m}}. Two units could be joined together for a {{convert|400|m|adj=on}} train, but only platforms specially built or rebuilt would be able to accommodate such long trains.<ref name="cc129"/> It has been reported that these longer trains would have round 1,100 seats and Andrew McNaughton, technical director of HS2 said that "family areas will alleviate the stress of parents worried that their children are annoying other passengers who are maybe trying to work."<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.expressandstar.com/news/2015/03/07/hs2-trains-will-never-be-late-claims-boss/ |title=HS2 trains will never be late, claims boss}}</ref> | |||
The DfT report also considered the possibility of 'gauge clearance' work on non-high-speed lines as an alternative to 'classic compatible' trains. This work would involve extensive reconstruction of stations, tunnels and bridges and widening of clearances to allow European-profile trains to run beyond the high-speed network. The report concluded that although initial outlay on commissioning new rolling stock would be high, it would cost less than the widespread disruption of rebuilding large tracts of Britain's rail infrastructure.<ref name="cc129"/> | |||
===Maintenance depot=== | |||
In April 2010 Arup was asked to develop proposals for the location, engineering specification and site layout of the Infrastructure Maintenance Depot (IMD). The general location of the IMD was identified as adjacent to, or within 10k of the intersection of HS2 and the East West Rail (EWR) route near ]/] in Buckinghamshire. The feasibility of using the MoD site at Bicester as the IMD was also considered. Six potential sites were shortlisted and rated against the specification. The preferred site, called 'Thame Road' (at ]), and a fall-back site, 'Great Pond' were announced in December 2010.<ref name=IMD> Released December 2010</ref> The nearby Calvert Waste Plant has also been identified for heat and power generation.<ref name=IMD /> | |||
===Cost=== | |||
The first {{convert|120|mi|adj=on|sigfig=2|order=flip}} section, from London to Birmingham, was originally costed at between £15.8 and £17.4 billion,<ref name="bare_url">{{cite news| url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8561286.stm | work=BBC News | title=High-speed rail plans announced | date=11 March 2010}}</ref> and the entire Y-shaped {{convert|335|mi|adj=on|-1|order=flip}} network at £30 billion.<ref name="bare_url" /> | |||
Upgrading existing lines from London to Birmingham instead of building HS2 would cost more (£20bn) and would provide only two-thirds the extra capacity of HS2, according to Adonis.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/5bca50e0-4397-11e0-b117-00144feabdc0.html |title=High Speed 2 costs less than main line upgrades (Letter) |author=] |work=Financial Times |location= London |date=1 March 2011 |accessdate=26 March 2013}}</ref> | |||
June 2013 saw the projected cost rise by £10bn to £42.6bn<ref>{{Cite news|author= Topham, Gwyn |date=26 June 2013 |title=Cost of HS2 up £10bn to £42.6bn, transport secretary tells MPs |url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2013/jun/26/hs2-costs-escalate-mps-told |work=] |accessdate=1 July 2013 |location=London}}</ref> and, less than a week later, it was revealed that the DfT had been using an outdated model to estimate the productivity increases associated with the railway, which meant the project's economic benefits were overstated.<ref>{{cite news |author=Pickard Jim |date=1 July 2013 |title=Growth of handheld computers hits economic argument for HS2 |url= http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/79412d4e-e276-11e2-87ec-00144feabdc0.html |work=Financial Times |location= London |accessdate=1 July 2013}}</ref> ], a key advocate of HS2 when the Labour Party was in government, declared shortly thereafter that HS2 would be an "expensive mistake",<ref>Pickard, Jim (2 July 2013). . '']'' (London). Retrieved 24 July 2013.</ref> and also admitted that the inception of HS2 was "politically driven" to "paint an upbeat view of the future" following the financial crash. He further admitted that the original cost estimates were "almost entirely speculative" and that "erhaps the most glaring gap in the analysis presented to us at the time were the alternative ways of spending £30bn."<ref>Batty, David (2 July 2013). . '']'' (London). Retrieved 24 July 2013.</ref> ] similarly warned that the costs of the scheme would be in excess of £70 billion.<ref>{{Cite news |author=Hope, Christopher |date=7 July 2013 |title=HS2 'will cost over £70 billion', says Boris Johnson|url=http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/10165446/HS2-will-cost-over-70billion-says-Boris-Johnson.html|work=The Daily Telegraph |accessdate=24 July 2013 |location=London}}</ref> The ] estimates that it will cost more than £80 billion.<ref name="DT20130817">{{cite news |last=Watts |first=Robert |title= High speed rail scheme cost to double to £80bn, economists warn |newspaper =The Daily Telegraph |date=17 August 2013 |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10249815/High-speed-rail-scheme-cost-to-double-to-80bn-economists-warn.html |accessdate=17 August 2013 |location= London}}</ref> | |||
===Timeline to opening=== | |||
HS2 Ltd suggested<ref>], Chapter 5.2.</ref> that, following ministerial approval, public consultation, parliamentary approval through a ], and detailed design, construction of the London-Birmingham section could begin in mid-2018. This is estimated to require six-and-a-half years, with a further year to finish testing.<ref name="2010 213">], page 213.</ref> Reconstruction of Euston station and preparation of related infrastructure is expected to require the full duration of the construction period to complete. Other major construction elements include the Old Oak Common and Birmingham stations (over four years), and the tunnelling work (Old Oak to Euston, Little Missenden, Ufton Wood, Chalfont and Amersham), all estimated to require over four years for construction.<ref>], p212, Chapter 6 section 5.2.29.</ref> Opening would be at the end of 2025.<ref name="2010 213"/> | |||
The command paper suggested that opening to Birmingham should be possible by the end of 2026.<ref>], page 140.</ref> The timetable included the additional work of preparing the routes to Leeds and Manchester, for approval by Parliament in the hybrid bill. The initial Y-shaped network was to be presented in one bill to simplify planning and minimise the parliamentary time required for the bill.<ref>], page 138-9.</ref> | |||
==Perspectives== | ==Perspectives== | ||
{{See also|High-speed rail in the United Kingdom}} | |||
===New political and financial dynamics=== | |||
Until the start of the ], high-speed rail did not feature high among the priorities of British policy makers and institutional investors: “Britain’s best rail transportation network, the High-Speed 1 line (HS1 or ‘Channel Tunnel Rail Link’) connecting the country to | |||
Paris, a strategic infrastructure asset designed by French engineers, and owned and operated | |||
by Canadian pension funds.” <ref>{{cite news| url= https://www.academia.edu/6494981/Transportation_Infrastructure_and_Country_Attractiveness| work= Revue Analyse Financière| location=Paris | title= Transportation Infrastructure and Country Attractiveness| first= M. Nicolas J. | last= Firzli | date=Q3 2013 | accessdate=26 April 2014}}</ref> But policy attitudes towards modern transport infrastructure started to change in the early 2010s, notably with renewed interest for the notion of UK pension investment in domestic infrastructure projects jointly with the state <ref>{{cite news| url= https://www.ukplansponsor.co.uk/print.aspx?id=6442492094 | work= Plan Sponsor UK| location=London | title= Infrastructure Investment Risks| first= M. Nicolas J. | last= Firzli | date=28 March 2013 | accessdate= 26 April 2014}}</ref> | |||
===Government rationale=== | ===Government rationale=== | ||
A 2008 paper, "Delivering a Sustainable Transport System", identified fourteen strategic national transport corridors in England, and described the London{{spaced ndash}}]{{spaced ndash}}] route as the "single most important and heavily used" and also as the one which presented "both the greatest challenges in terms of future capacity and the greatest opportunities to promote a shift of passenger and freight traffic from road to rail".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dft.gov.uk/about/strategy/transportstrategy/dasts/dastsreport.pdf|title=Delivering a Sustainable Transport System (DaSTS)|date=November 2008|publisher=Department for Transport|archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20081230052656/http://www.dft.gov.uk/about/strategy/transportstrategy/dasts/dastsreport.pdf|archive-date=30 December 2008}}</ref>{{Sfn|DfT|2009|p=12 para. 31}} The paper noted that railway passenger numbers had been growing significantly in recent years—doubling from 1995 to 2015<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.atoc.org/download/clientfiles/files/Rail%20industry%20dataset%20-RDG%20-%20with%20cover.pdf|title=GB rail: dataset on financial and operational performance 1997–98 – 2012–13|work=Association of Train Operating Companies|access-date=1 December 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170706124300/http://www.atoc.org/download/clientfiles/files/Rail%20industry%20dataset%20-RDG%20-%20with%20cover.pdf|archive-date=6 July 2017}}</ref>—and that the Rugby{{spaced ndash}}Euston section was expected to have insufficient capacity sometime around 2025.{{Sfn|DfT|2009|p=5 para. 6}} This is despite the ] on some sections of the track—which was completed in 2008—lengthened trains, and an assumption that plans to upgrade the route with ] would be realised.{{Sfn|DfT|2009|p=12 para. 34}} | |||
According to the DfT, the primary purpose of HS2 is to provide additional capacity on the rail network from London to the Midlands and North.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.transportxtra.com/magazines/local_transport_today/news/?id=29427 |title=HS2 isn't about reducing CO2 or the North-South divide, says DfT |work=TransportXtra |location=London |date=20 January 2012 |access-date=21 January 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130615061444/http://www.transportxtra.com/magazines/local_transport_today/news/?id=29427 |archive-date=15 June 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> It says the new line "would improve rail services from London to cities in the North of England and Scotland,{{Sfn|DfT|2009|p=4 para. 5}} and that the chosen route to the west of London will improve passenger transport links to ]".{{Sfn|DfT|2009|p=17 para. 41}}{{verify quote|reason=This seems to be two separate quotations from different pages smooshed into one but with separate citations. It should be two quotations with one citation each|date=August 2021}} Additionally, the new line will be connected to the ] and ] at ]; this will provide links with East and West London and the Thames Valley.{{Sfn|DfT|2009|p=18 para. 43}} | |||
A 2008 paper, 'Delivering a Sustainable Transport System'<ref>{{cite web |url= http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20081230052656/http://www.dft.gov.uk/about/strategy/transportstrategy/dasts/dastsreport.pdf |title=Delivering a Sustainable Transport System (DaSTS) |publisher=Department for Trnsport |date=November 2008}}</ref> identified fourteen strategic national transport corridors in England, and described the London{{spaced ndash}}]{{spaced ndash}}] route as the "single most important and heavily used" and also as the one which presented "both the greatest challenges in terms of future capacity and the greatest opportunities to promote a shift of passenger and freight traffic from road to rail".<ref>], page 12 paragraph 31.</ref> They noted that railway passenger numbers had been growing significantly in recent years<ref>{{cite web |url= http://dataportal.orr.gov.uk/displayreport/report/html/f6a7fad0-1706-466b-b38c-84798dab55ef |title= Train mileage for passenger operators (millions) |date= 1 November 2011 |publisher= ]}}</ref> and that the Rugby{{spaced ndash}}Euston section was already operating at up to 80% of capacity in the 2009 morning peak,{{dubious|date=April 2011}}<!-- Reference does not say operating at up to 80% of capacity --><ref name="percentcapacity20082009">] Figure 5: Loading levels in the 3-hour morning peak period, 2008/09, page 14.</ref> also that the DfT expected the WCML to have insufficient capacity south of ] some time around 2025.<ref>], page 5 paragraph 6.</ref> This is despite the major ], which was completed in 2008, lengthened trains and an assumption that plans to upgrade the route with ] would be realised.<ref>], page 12 paragraph 34.</ref> | |||
According to the DfT, the primary purpose of HS2 is to provide additional capacity on the rail network from London to the Midlands and North.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.transportxtra.com/magazines/local_transport_today/news/?id=29427 |title=HS2 isn't about reducing CO2 or the North-South divide, says DfT |work=TransportXtra |location =London |date=20 January 2012}}</ref> It says the new line "would improve rail services from London to cities in the North of England and Scotland,<ref>], page 4 paragraph 5.</ref> and that the chosen route to the west of London will improve passenger transport links to Heathrow Airport".<ref>], page 17 paragraph 41.</ref> Additionally, if the new line were connected to the ] (GWML) and ], it would provide links with East and West London, and the Thames Valley.<ref name="Transport, High Speed Two page 18" >], page 18 paragraph 43.</ref> | |||
In launching the project, the DfT announced that HS2 between London and the West Midlands would follow a different alignment from the WCML, rejecting the option of further upgrading or building new tracks alongside the WCML as being too costly and disruptive, and because the ] WCML alignment was not suitable for very high speeds.<ref name="Transport, High Speed Two page 12" >], page 16 paragraph 36.</ref> | |||
In launching the project, the DfT announced that HS2 between London and the West Midlands would follow a different alignment from the West Coast Main Line, rejecting the option of further upgrading or building new tracks alongside the West Coast Main Line as being too costly and disruptive, and because the ] West Coast Main Line alignment was unsuitable for very high speeds.{{Sfn|DfT|2009|p=16 para. 36}} A study by Network Rail found that upgrading the existing network to deliver the same extra capacity released by constructing HS2 would require fifteen years of weekend closures. This does not include the additional express seats added by HS2, nor would it deliver any journey time reductions.<ref name="The Independent-2020">{{Cite web|title=Upgrading existing railways instead of building HS2 would cause 'absurd disruption' for passengers, Network Rail chief warns|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/hs2-network-rail-boris-johnson-train-updgrade-network-travel-disruption-a9292776.html|date=20 January 2020|website=The Independent|language=en|access-date=2 May 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200307091231/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/hs2-network-rail-boris-johnson-train-updgrade-network-travel-disruption-a9292776.html|archive-date=7 March 2020|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The Government expects that over the next 30 years, HS2 will cost £32 billion to build, provide £43.7 billion of economic benefits and generate £27 billion in fares.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://news.uk.msn.com/features/articles.aspx?cp-documentid=157028201 |title=High speed rail concerns 'exaggerated' says Philip Hammond |work= MSN News UK |date=14 April 2011 |accessdate=26 March 2013}}</ref> | |||
===Support=== | ===Support=== | ||
{{Main|List of support for High Speed 2}} | |||
HS2 is officially supported by the ], ], the ], and since September 2024 the ].<ref name="NCE-2019">{{cite magazine |last1=Sholli |first1=Sam |title=General election: Where parties stand on HS2, Heathrow and net zero goal |url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/general-election-where-parties-stand-on-hs2-heathrow-and-net-zero-goal-31-10-2019/ |access-date=25 July 2020 |magazine=New Civil Engineer |date=31 October 2019 |language=en |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191105103546/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/general-election-where-parties-stand-on-hs2-heathrow-and-net-zero-goal-31-10-2019/ |archive-date=5 November 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> The ] formed in May 2010 stated, in its initial programme for government, its commitment to creating a high-speed rail network.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/@dg/@en/documents/digitalasset/dg_187876.pdf |title=The Coalition: our programme for government |page=31 |publisher=HM Government |date=May 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110612015906/http://www.direct.gov.uk/prod_consum_dg/groups/dg_digitalassets/%40dg/%40en/documents/digitalasset/dg_187876.pdf |archive-date=12 June 2011 }}</ref><ref>{{cite press release |author=<!--Not stated--> |title= The North Must Benefit from HS2 Say Greens |url= https://greenparty.org.uk/2024/09/08/the-north-must-benefit-from-hs2-say-greens/ |location= Manchester, United Kingdom|publisher= Green Party of England and Wales |agency= |date= 10 August 2024 |access-date=10 September 2024}}</ref> | |||
<!-- Support and opposition groups should be notable and have a position on _HS2_, not some other flavour of high-speed rail --> | |||
Organisations that support the HS2 project include: | |||
In a report brought out in 2019, the High Speed Rail Industry Leaders group (HSRIL) stated that in order to meet 2050 carbon emissions targets, HS2 must be built.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Devereux |first1=Nigel |title=Leaked draft confirms Oakervee support for full HS2 route |url=https://www.therailwayhub.co.uk/9186/leaked-draft-confirms-oakervee-support-for-full-hs2-route/ |access-date=25 July 2020 |work=The Railway Hub |date=2 November 2019 |archive-date=16 September 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200916223402/https://www.therailwayhub.co.uk/9186/leaked-draft-confirms-oakervee-support-for-full-hs2-route/ |url-status=live }}</ref> Network Rail support the project and state that upgrading the existing network instead of building HS2 would take longer and cause more disruption to passengers.<ref name="The Independent-2020" /> | |||
*The three major UK political parties: ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.conservatives.com/Policy/Where_we_stand/Transport.aspx|title=Transport|work=Conservative party}}</ref> ] (albeit with some criticism of the proposed route)<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/general/2011/11/01-labours-new-hs2-fails-to.html |title=Labour's new HS2 fails to impress supporters or critics |date=1 November 2011 |work=RailNews |location =Stevenage}}</ref> and the ].<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/liberaldemocrats/8775798/Liberal-Democrats-Party-Conference-2011-September-19-as-it-happened.html |title=Liberal Democrats Party Conference 2011: September 19 as it happened |work= The Daily Telegraph |location =London |author =Holehouse, Matthew |date= 20 September 2011}}</ref> | |||
*], a not-for-profit research company which focuses on investigating high-speed rail technology,<ref name=greengauge21>{{cite web|title=About Greengauge 21 |url= http://www.greengauge21.net/about/|work=Greengauge 21 website|accessdate=10 January 2012}}</ref> | |||
*The Campaign for HSR,<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.campaignforhsr.com/about |title=About |work=Campaign for HSR}}</ref> a campaign group led by Professor David Begg which aims to canvas support from businesses across the UK to promote the case for proposed high-speed rail. The campaign currently has support from over 400 UK businesses.{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} | |||
*HSR:UK, a group of city councils: ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>. Retrieved 14 April 2012.</ref> | |||
*Go-HS2,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.go-hs2.com/ |title=Go-HS2 |publisher=Go-HS2 |date= |accessdate=28 October 2013}}</ref> a group comprising ], ], ], ] and the ]. The objective of the group is to promote the benefits that its members believe HS2 will bring to Birmingham and the West Midlands. | |||
*The ] (PTEG), which represents six Passenger Transport Executives.<ref>. Retrieved 14 January 2012.</ref> | |||
*The ], which is generally supportive of the HS2 project and has been engaged in discussions with the ] about the development of a Scottish high-speed railway connecting to London and continental Europe, with the aim of reducing journey times to London from Scotland to under 3 hours.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Built-Environment/planning/National-Planning-Policy/npf/HSRLondon |title= NPF2 Action Programme – Action 3: Develop High Speed Rail Link to London |publisher= The Scottish Government |accessdate= 29 November 2010}}</ref> | |||
*The North East ] and the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce. Support has been confirmed by local authorities in the ] such as ] and ]s<ref>{{cite news | url= http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/5e0dae48-3bb6-11e1-82d3-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1jSQI3qGI |title= Business chiefs welcome green light for HS2 |work= Financial Times |location =London |date = 10 January 2012 |accessdate= 14 January 2012 |author=Bounds, Andrew |author2= Tighe, Chris |author3= Murray Brown, John}}</ref> | |||
*], which reaffirmed its support for the project in January 2012. The council's cabinet member for strategy was reported as saying "HS2 is the fastest way to deliver much-needed new homes, jobs and opportunities in one of London's poorest areas."<ref>{{cite news |title=Old Oak in Shepherd's Bush set for tranformation after rail plan go-ahead |url= http://www.fulhamchronicle.co.uk/fulham-and-hammersmith-news/local-fulham-and-hammersmith-news/2012/01/10/old-oak-in-shepherd-s-bush-set-for-tranformation-after-rail-plan-go-ahead-82029-30092801/#ixzz1jTZO16Vg |work=Fulham & Hammersmith Chronicle |date= 10 January 2012 |accessdate=14 January 2012 |author= Courtney, Adam}}</ref> | |||
===Opposition=== | ===Opposition=== | ||
{{Main|List of opposition to High Speed 2}} | |||
Until September 2024, The ] policy was that the party would scrap HS2 and spend the money saved on local transport links.<ref name="NCE-2019"/> ] and the ] also oppose the scheme.<ref>{{cite news |title=UKIP set to make HS2 an issue in local elections |url=https://www.railnews.co.uk/news/2013/04/07-ukip-set-to-make-hs2.html |access-date=25 July 2020 |work=Rail News |date=7 April 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924084502/http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/2013/04/07-ukip-set-to-make-hs2.html |archive-date=24 September 2015 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Reporters |first1=Telegraph |title=Brexit Party manifesto 2019: key policies, at a glance |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/0/brexit-party-manifesto-2019-general-election-guide/ | url-access = subscription |work=The Telegraph |date=9 December 2019 |access-date=25 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191230052638/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/0/brexit-party-manifesto-2019-general-election-guide/ |archive-date=30 December 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
<!-- Support and opposition groups should be notable and have a position on _HS2_, not some other flavour of high speed rail --> | |||
The ] allowed HS2 Ltd. the power to acquire land. In a document that ran to 50,000 pages it gave local councils the power to petition for design changes and to hold up work if they were unhappy. <ref name=econ2024>{{cite web|author=The Economist|title=The Horror Story of HS2|url=https://www.economist.com/britain/2024/02/15/the-horror-story-of-hs2|publisher=The Economist|date=15 February 2024|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20240215164002/https://www.economist.com/britain/2024/02/15/the-horror-story-of-hs2|archive-date=15 February 2024}}</ref> Eighteen councils affected by the planned route set up the 51M group, named for the cost of HS2 for each individual constituency in millions of pounds.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Jenkins |first1=Simon |title=HS2: the zombie train that refuses to die |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jun/07/hs2-the-zombie-train-that-refuses-to-die |access-date=25 July 2020 |work=The Guardian |date=7 June 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200508083021/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/jun/07/hs2-the-zombie-train-that-refuses-to-die |archive-date=8 May 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> Between 2017 and the beginning of 2024 HS2 had to obtain more than 8,000 planning and environmental consents and has gone to court more than 20 times.<ref name=econ2024 /> Before he became prime minister, Boris Johnson was personally against HS2.<ref name="NCE-2019"/> Other former and current Conservative MPs against HS2 include ] and ].<ref name="Gillan">{{cite news|last1=Bamford|first1=Thomas|date=21 October 2019|title=Dame Cheryl Gillan MP visits Great Missenden HS2 protesters|language=en|work=Bucks Herald|url=https://www.bucksherald.co.uk/news/people/dame-cheryl-gillan-mp-visits-great-missenden-hs2-protesters-821777|access-date=25 July 2020|archive-date=16 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200916223351/https://www.bucksherald.co.uk/news/people/dame-cheryl-gillan-mp-visits-great-missenden-hs2-protesters-821777|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last1=Watts|first1=Joseph|date=4 July 2016|title=Liam Fox will 'scrap HS2' if he becomes PM|language=en|work=Evening Standard|url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/liam-fox-ill-scrap-hs2-if-i-become-pm-a3287531.html|url-status=live|access-date=25 July 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160704225113/http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/liam-fox-ill-scrap-hs2-if-i-become-pm-a3287531.html|archive-date=4 July 2016}}</ref> | |||
High Speed 2 is opposed by: | |||
] was set up in 2010 to co-ordinate local opposition and campaign on the national level against HS2.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Wolmar |first1=Christian |title=What's the point of HS2? |url=https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v36/n08/christian-wolmar/what-s-the-point-of-hs2 |access-date=24 July 2020 |work=London Review of Books |date=16 April 2014 |language=en |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200311092425/https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v36/n08/christian-wolmar/what-s-the-point-of-hs2 |archive-date=11 March 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> In June 2020, it organised a "Rebel Trail" with ], which was a protest march of {{convert|125|mi}} from Birmingham to London, stopping at camps in Warwickshire, Buckinghamshire, and London.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Stretton |first1=Rachel |title=Extinction Rebellion on 125-mile 'Rebel Trail' protest |url=https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/extinction-rebellion-125-mile-rebel-18453819 |access-date=24 July 2020 |work=Coventry Telegraph |date=20 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200719200857/https://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/extinction-rebellion-125-mile-rebel-18453819 |archive-date=19 July 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> Groups such as the ] and the ] oppose the project, based on concerns about destruction of local biodiversity.<ref name="Independent-15-01-20">{{cite news |last1=Drury |first1=Colin |title=HS2 will destroy ancient woodlands and 'huge swathes of irreplaceable' wildlife, report warns |url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/hs2-wildlife-ancient-woodland-environment-endangered-species-report-a9284126.html |access-date=25 July 2020 |work=The Independent |date=15 January 2020 |language=en |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200227055008/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/hs2-wildlife-ancient-woodland-environment-endangered-species-report-a9284126.html |archive-date=27 February 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
*The 51m group, which consists of 19 local authorities along or adjacent to the route. It suggests the project will cost each ] £51 million.<ref> Retrieved 3 June 2011</ref> Constituent members of 51m include ],<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.buckinghamshireexaminer.co.uk/south-bucks-news/highspeedrail/2010/12/08/we-don-t-want-it-here-we-don-t-want-high-speed-rail-anywhere-114018-27797131/ |newspaper= ] |location= Uxbridge |title= We don't want it here, we don't want high speed rail anywhere |first= Lawrence |last= Poole |date= 8 December 2010}}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.uxbridgegazette.co.uk/west-london-news/local-uxbridge-news/2010/12/06/council-to-robustly-resist-high-speed-rail-113046-27775496/ |newspaper= ] |title= Council to 'robustly resist' high speed rail |date= 6 December 2010}}</ref> ],<ref>{{cite press release |url= http://www.warwickshire.gov.uk/corporate/newsstor.nsf/PublicByCategories/4205CBF6C662A7EC802577F9005C201C |title= County council opposes HS2 |date= 15 December 2010 |publisher= ]}}</ref> ],<ref>. Retrieved 3 June 2011.</ref> ],<ref>. Retrieved 29 August 2011 {{Dead link|date=January 2012}}</ref> ]<ref>{{cite news |title= City council unites in opposition to HS2 |url= http://www.coventryobserver.co.uk/story-City-council-unites-in-opposition-to-HS2--31172.html |date= 15 December 2010 |first= Matthew |last= Bates |newspaper= Coventry Observer}}</ref> and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.camden.gov.uk/ccm/navigation/environment/planning-and-built-environment/major-developments/high-speed-2/impact-of-hs2/ |title=Impact of HS2 - Camden Council |publisher=Camden.gov.uk |date=30 July 2010 |accessdate=23 April 2014}}</ref> The other councils that have declared their opposition are ]<ref>{{cite web |publisher= ] |url= http://www.northamptonshire.gov.uk/en/councilservices/environ/bigidea/pages/northamptonshirearc.aspx |title= Northamptonshire Arc |at= High Speed Two (HS2) |quote= the County Council objects strongly to the current published routes and insists that HS2 should only go ahead if a route can be found through consultation which minimises the potential adverse effect on local amenity, landscape and the environment}}</ref> and ]<ref>{{cite press release |url= http://www.lichfieldagainsthighspeedtrains.org.uk/SCC%20media%20release.pdf |date= 18 November 2010 |title= High Speed 2:Staffordshire County Council set to oppose plans |publisher= ]}}</ref> County Councils. | |||
===Opposition to construction=== | |||
*StopHS2, which represents local action groups along the route.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://stophs2.org/about/|title=StopHS2|quote=We oppose the HS2 High Speed Rail link, because the business case is based on unrealistic assumptions, the environmental impact has not been assessed, it is not green, the strategic benefits are questionable, and the money could be better spent on other things.}}</ref><ref><{{cite news |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/9007642/Tory-MPs-face-high-speed-rail-backlash.html |title=Tory MPs face high speed rail backlash |quote=Another campaigner, Penny Gaines, chairman of stop HS2. accused Mrs Gillan of "bottling out" by appearing to welcome the concessions announced by Justine Greening, the Transport Secretary.|work=The Daily Telegraph |date=12 January 2012 |author=Millward,David |location=London}}</ref> | |||
In 2017, a ] was established at Harvil Road in the ] by ]s intending to protect the wildlife habitats of bats and owls. The protesters asserted that freshwater aquifer would be affected by HS2 construction and this would impact London's water supply. The camp included members of the ] and ]. In January 2020, HS2 bailiffs began to evict people from the site, after HS2 has exercised its right to compulsorily purchase the land from ], which had not been prepared to sell the land otherwise.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Taylor |first1=Diane |title=HS2 begins evicting activists from protest site after two years |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/07/hs2-begins-evicting-activists-from-protest-site-after-two-years |access-date=14 July 2020 |work=The Guardian |date=7 January 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200613074802/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/07/hs2-begins-evicting-activists-from-protest-site-after-two-years |archive-date=13 June 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> A prosecution of two activists accused of aggravated trespass had previously collapsed in 2019, when HS2 was unable to prove it owned the land the activists were allegedly trespassing upon.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Taylor |first1=Diane |title=Case against HS2 environmental protesters collapses |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/18/case-against-hs2-environmental-protesters-collapses |access-date=14 July 2020 |work=The Guardian |date=18 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200630201120/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2019/jul/18/case-against-hs2-environmental-protesters-collapses |archive-date=30 June 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
In early 2020, during the clearance of woodland along the route, the group HS2 Rebellion squatted on a site in the Colne Valley, aiming to block construction; the protesters argued that public money would be more suited to supporting the ] during the ].<ref>{{cite news |title=HS2 protesters block sites and call for money to go to NHS |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/04/hs2-protesters-block-sites-and-call-for-money-to-go-to-nhs-coronavirus |access-date=14 July 2020 |work=The Guardian |agency=P. A. Media |date=4 May 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200518054451/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/may/04/hs2-protesters-block-sites-and-call-for-money-to-go-to-nhs-coronavirus |archive-date=18 May 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> HS2 and Hillingdon council both moved to get separate ] allowing them to remove the ].<ref>{{cite news |last=Taylor |first=Diane |title=Anti-HS2 protesters begin 125-mile walk along proposed route |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/20/anti-hs2-protesters-begin-125-mile-walk-along-proposed-route |access-date=14 July 2020 |work=The Guardian |date=20 June 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200705032110/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jun/20/anti-hs2-protesters-begin-125-mile-walk-along-proposed-route |archive-date=5 July 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> In March 2020, another camp was set up, at ] in Buckinghamshire. In October 2020, activists, including "]", were evicted from treehouses there.<ref>{{cite news |last=Humphries |first=Will |title=Swampy is last man standing at HS2 camp |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/veteran-eco-warrior-swampy-forcibly-removed-from-anti-hs2-treetop-protest-by-police-2lthh0f5d | url-access = subscription |work=The Times |access-date=9 November 2020 |date=8 October 2020 |archive-date=11 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201111040209/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/veteran-eco-warrior-swampy-forcibly-removed-from-anti-hs2-treetop-protest-by-police-2lthh0f5d |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
*The HS2 Action Alliance,<ref name="HS2 Action Alliance">{{cite web |url= http://www.hs2actionalliance.org/aboutus.php |title=About us |publisher= HS2 Action Alliance |location= Amersham |year= 2010 |accessdate= 18 May 2010}}</ref> an umbrella group for opposition groups<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/highspeed-rail-route-to-be-announced-2164607.html |title= High-speed rail route to be announced |first= Peter |last= Woodman |date= 19 December 2010 |newspaper= ] |location= London}}</ref> including ''ad hoc'' entities, residents' associations, and parish councils.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.hs2actionalliance.org/yourlocalgroup.php |title= HS2 action groups (and other HS2 active organisations) |year= 2010 |publisher= HS2 Action Alliance |accessdate= 18 May 2010}}</ref> The Alliance's primary aim is to prevent HS2 from happening; secondary aims include evaluating and minimising the impacts of HS2 on individuals, communities and the environment, and communication of facts about HS2, and its compensation scheme.<ref name="HS2 Action Alliance"/> Even after the latest changes made to the scheme to mitigate concerns, it continues to be opposed by some MPs and personalities on the line of route.<ref name=mail-idyll-2012>{{cite news |last= Groves |first =Jason |title=Middle England in revolt: Tory shires furious as high-speed rail link gets go-ahead |url= http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2084959/HS2-Tory-shires-furious-high-speed-rail-link-gets-ahead.html |accessdate=11 January 2012 |newspaper=Daily Mail |location =London |date=10 January 2012}}</ref> A member{{who|date=April 2011}} of the 'HS2 Action Alliance' has criticised the Department of Transport's demand forecasts as being too high, as well as having other shortcomings in the assessment methodology.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmtran/writev/economy/te30.htm |title= Transport and the economy, Memorandum from Wharf Weston (TE 30) |date=November 2010 |publisher= UK Parliament}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmtran/writev/economy/te07.pdf |at=7. Problems with the current forecasting and analysis methodology |title= Memorandum from Bluespace Thinking Ltd (TE 07) |date=September 2010 |publisher= UK Parliament}}</ref> | |||
In January 2021, it was revealed that protesters had ] underneath ]. The protesters were criticised for endangering themselves and emergency services personnel, and for being "costly to the taxpayer".<ref>{{cite news|date=26 January 2021|title=HS2 protesters dig tunnel to thwart Euston eviction|language=en-GB|publisher=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-55796445|access-date=2 February 2021|archive-date=27 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210127105836/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-55796445|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last= |first= |date=27 January 2021|title=HS2 protesters dig 100ft tunnel under London park|url=http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jan/27/hs2-protesters-dig-100ft-tunnel-under-london-park-at-risk-from-rail-project|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210201044239/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jan/27/hs2-protesters-dig-100ft-tunnel-under-london-park-at-risk-from-rail-project|archive-date=1 February 2021|access-date=2 February 2021|website=The Guardian}}</ref> In June 2021, HS2 stated that protests had so far cost the company £75{{nbsp}}million.<ref>{{cite web|last=Topham|first=Gwyn|date=24 June 2021|title=HS2 asks government to help it deal with rising number of protests|url=http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jun/24/hs2-asks-government-help-rising-number-protests|access-date=1 July 2021|website=The Guardian|language=en|archive-date=30 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210630154140/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/jun/24/hs2-asks-government-help-rising-number-protests|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
*The ] (UKIP), which is fully opposed nationally and locally to the proposed HS2 plans. UKIP says there is no business case, no environment case and no money to pay for it.<ref name=nef>{{cite web |title= UKIP Say No To HS2 |url= http://www.ukip.org/content/latest-news/2416-ukip-says-no-to-hs2.|publisher= UK Independence Party |accessdate=5 August 2011 |date=August 2011}}</ref> UKIP has been campaigning against HS2 as it is also part of the EU's Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) Policy. It had previously proposed a much larger and more expensive three-line high-speed network running from London to Newcastle (and on to Scotland), London to Bristol (and on to Wales) and London to Birmingham along with upgrading several other sections of the WCML and Scottish rail to high speed in its 2010 manifesto.<ref>{{cite web|author=Category: 2010 Policy documents |url= http://www.ukip.org/component/content/article/49-policy/2010-policy-documents/538-transport-2010 |title=Transport 2010 |publisher=UK Independence Party |accessdate=28 October 2013}}</ref> | |||
In the spring of 2021, the Bluebell Woods Protection Camp was set up at Cash's Pit, adjacent to the ], on the line of the proposed route as it passes north of the village of ] in the county of ]. | |||
*The ], which voted to oppose the HS2 plans at its Spring 2011 conference on environmental and economic grounds.<ref name="green party hs2-2011">{{cite web |url= http://www.greenparty.org.uk/news/26-02-2011-high-speed-rail-decision.html |title= Greens oppose HS2: "it wouldn't do what it says on the tin" |date= 26 February 2011 |accessdate= 26 February 2011 |publisher= Green Party}}</ref> Alan Francis, the party transport spokesperson, had previously outlined its support for high-speed rail in principle in terms of benefits to capacity, reduced journey times and reduced carbon emissions, but recommended a line restricted to {{convert|300|to|320|km/h}} which would enable it to use existing transport corridors to a greater extent and increase efficiency.<ref name="greenparty22mar2010">{{cite web |url= http://www.chilterngreenparty.org.uk/news/25/54/Concern-over-route-for-HS2.html |title= Updated Green Party proposals on HS2 route |publisher= Green Party |date= 22 March 2010}}</ref> | |||
There have been incidents of violence directed towards HS2 workers.<ref>{{Cite web|title=HS2 construction workers attacked by 30-strong mob|url=https://www.constructionenquirer.com/2021/03/29/hs2-construction-workers-attacked-by-30-strong-mob/|access-date=29 March 2021|website=Construction Enquirer News|language=en-US|archive-date=29 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210329120419/https://www.constructionenquirer.com/2021/03/29/hs2-construction-workers-attacked-by-30-strong-mob/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|last1=Weinfass|first1=Ian|date=10 May 2021|title=HS2 worker temporarily blinded in laser attack|url=https://www.constructionnews.co.uk/hs2/worker-on-hs2-site-temporarily-blinded-by-laser-10-05-2021/|access-date=12 May 2021|website=Construction News|language=en|archive-date=13 May 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210513043944/https://www.constructionnews.co.uk/hs2/worker-on-hs2-site-temporarily-blinded-by-laser-10-05-2021/|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
*The ], a think-tank promoting environmentalism, localism and anti-capitalism. It published a formal response to the public consultation on 5 August 2011<ref>{{cite web |url =http://www.neweconomics.org/publications/response-to-the-hs2-consultation |title= Response to the HS2 Consultation |publisher=New Economics Foundation |date =5 August 2011}}</ref> which concluded that the case for a high-speed rail link was incomplete and that the benefits of the scheme had been "over-emphasised" by its promoters.<ref name="nef">{{cite web |title= Response to the HS2 Consultation |url= http://www.neweconomics.org/sites/neweconomics.org/files/Response_to_the_HS2_Consultation.pdf |publisher= New Economics Foundation |accessdate=10 January 2012 |date=August 2011}}</ref> | |||
==Environmental and community impact== | |||
*The ], an anti-tax pressure group, which describes the project as a ].<ref>{{cite news |url= http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/UK-News/HS2-Rail-Link-Between-London-And-Birmingham-A-White-Elephant-Says-Taxpayers-Alliance/Article/201102115922708?f=vg |title= High Speed Rail Link A 'White Elephant' |date= 4 February 2011 |first= Rob |last= Cole |work= Sky News Online}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.taxpayersalliance.com/highspeedrail.pdf |title= Research Note 82: High Speed Rail |date= 4 February 2011 |author=Stokes, Chris |publisher= Taxpayers' Alliance}}</ref> | |||
The impact of HS2 has received particular attention in the ], an ], where the line passes through the ].<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/mar/11/chilterns-fast-rail-wendover-birmingham |title=Beauty of Chilterns may be put at risk by fast rail link, say critics |newspaper=] |location=London |date=11 March 2010 | first1 = Peter | last1 = Walker |access-date=14 December 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160927191037/https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2010/mar/11/chilterns-fast-rail-wendover-birmingham |archive-date=27 September 2016 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= Historic environment Map 6: The Lee – Kingsash |url= http://www.chilternsaonb.org/uploads/files/high_speed_2/historic-environment-map-6.pdf |work= High Speed 2 – Impact on the Chilterns |publisher= Chilterns AONB |access-date= 10 January 2012}} {{dead link|date=November 2017 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes}}</ref> In January 2011, the government announced that two million trees would be planted along sections of the route to mitigate the visual impact.<ref name="GuardianHS2trees">{{cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/jan/07/high-speed-rail-trees-shelter |title=High-speed rail route to get 2m trees for shelter |newspaper=] |location=London |date=7 January 2011 | first1 = Dan | last1 = Milmo |access-date=14 December 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160919012941/http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2011/jan/07/high-speed-rail-trees-shelter |archive-date=19 September 2016 |url-status=live }}</ref> The route was changed so as to tunnel underneath the southern end of the Chilterns, with the line emerging northwest of ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.chilternsaonb.org/hs2/|title=High Speed 2|publisher=Chilterns Conservation Board|access-date=18 February 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190913223712/https://www.chilternsaonb.org/hs2/|archive-date=13 September 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> The proposals include a re-alignment of more than {{convert|1|km}} of the ], and construction of a {{convert|0.39|mi|order=flip|abbr=on}} viaduct and a cutting<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/hs2ltd/route/westmidmap04.pdf|title=West Midlands Map 4|work=High Speed 2|publisher=Department for Transport|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100401044448/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/hs2ltd/route/westmidmap04.pdf|archive-date=1 April 2010|access-date=15 April 2010}}</ref> through ancient woodland at a ] at ] near Birmingham.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wild-net.org/wildbbc/index.aspx?id=338|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200801222840/http://www.wild-net.org/wildbbc/index.aspx?id=338|url-status=dead|archive-date=1 August 2020|title=Park Hall|publisher=Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country|access-date=18 March 2010}}</ref> The work on the tunnel extension has started, but there is a challenge from local planning authorities that the work does not have permission. The tunnel extension has been referred to the minister of state for a decision. | |||
Amid concerns that HS2 was carrying out preparatory works during ], '']'' presenter and conservationist ] filed for a ] of the decision to proceed and an emergency injunction to prevent construction, having ] £100,000 to cover legal fees. His bid failed before the ], which ruled that a judicial review "had no real prospect of success".<ref>{{Cite news | last1 = Barkham | first1 = Patrick |date=3 April 2020 |title=HS2 wood clearance to go ahead as Chris Packham legal bid fails |work=The Guardian |url= https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/apr/03/hs2-ancient-wood-clearance-go-ahead-chris-packham-legal-bid-fails |access-date=14 July 2020 |location= London |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200629100710/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/apr/03/hs2-ancient-wood-clearance-go-ahead-chris-packham-legal-bid-fails |archive-date=29 June 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> Packham was subsequently given leave to appeal to the ], with ] ruling that there was "considerable public interest".<ref>{{Cite web| last1 = Shaw| first1 = Neil|date=8 July 2020|title=Chris Packham in Court of Appeal in bid to block HS2|url=https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/chris-packham-court-appeal-bid-18559759|access-date=14 July 2020|website=walesonline|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200708173228/https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/uk-news/chris-packham-court-appeal-bid-18559759|archive-date=8 July 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Ibrahim |first1=Magda |title= Springwatch presenter Chris Packham wins right to hearing over HS2 |url= https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/springwatch-presenter-chris-packham-wins-right-to-hearing-over-hs2-qcsm20djv | url-access = subscription |access-date=14 July 2020 |work=The Times |date=28 June 2020 |location= London |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200703100538/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/springwatch-presenter-chris-packham-wins-right-to-hearing-over-hs2-qcsm20djv |archive-date=3 July 2020 |url-status=live }}</ref> On 31 July 2020, Packham lost his case in the Court of Appeal.<ref>{{Cite news |date=31 July 2020 |title=Chris Packham loses appeal against HS2 rail project |url= http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jul/31/chris-packham-loses-appeal-against-hs2-rail-project |access-date=31 July 2020 |newspaper=The Guardian |location= London |archive-date=31 July 2020 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20200731191428/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jul/31/chris-packham-loses-appeal-against-hs2-rail-project |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
*] newspaper, which considers the costs excessive and the benefits uncertain.<ref>{{cite news |title=Editorial: High-speed rail is not the best way to spend £32bn |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/editorial-highspeed-rail-is-not-the-best-way-to-spend-32bn-8470654.html |newspaper=The Independent |location=London |date=28 January 2013 |accessdate=3 February 2013}}</ref> An investigation published on 3 February 2013 claimed that 350 wildlife sites would be destroyed by the new HS2 line<ref>{{cite news |title=IoS investigation: HS2 – the hidden cost to Britain's wildlife |author1= Randall, David |author2=Owen, Jonathan |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/ios-investigation-hs2--the-hidden-cost-to-britains-wildlife-8478609.html|newspaper=The Independent on Sunday |location=London |date=3 February 2013 |accessdate=3 February 2013}}</ref> and an accompanying editorial argued that environmentalists should oppose the project.<ref>{{cite news |title= Editorial: Light green is not green enough |url= http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/editorial-light-green-is-not-green-enough-8478435.html |newspaper=The Independent on Sunday |date=3 February 2013 |accessdate=3 February 2013 |location=London}}</ref> A separate investigation published on 10 March 2013 suggests that the project was unlikely to keep within its £33bn budget.<ref>{{cite news |title=Revealed: HS2's £33bn budget already derailed before a track is laid |url= http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/revealed-hs2s-33bn-budget-already-derailed-before-a-track-is-laid-8527920.html |newspaper=The Independent on Sunday |date=10 March 2013 |accessdate=10 March 2013 |location=London |first1=Mark |last1=Leftly |first2=Jane |last2=Merrick}}</ref> | |||
* Lord Mandelson, a supporter of HS2 when in office, admitted in July 2013 that the cost estimates were "almost entirely speculative" and said the Labour Government had only proposed it to "paint an upbeat view of the future" during the financial crash.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk-news/2013/jul/02/lord-mandelson-hs2-expensive-mistake |location=London |work=The Guardian |first=David |last=Batty |title=Lord Mandelson warns HS2 will be an 'expensive mistake' |date=2 July 2013}}</ref> | |||
* Alistar Darling, former Labour chancellor and transport secretary, withdrew support for the project, stating to go ahead would be "foolish".<ref>{{cite news |url= http://news.sky.com/story/1132304/hs2-project-attacked-by-alistair-darling |title=HS2 Project Attacked By Alistair Darling |work=Sky News |date=24 August 2013 |accessdate=28 October 2013}}</ref> | |||
* Boris Johnson, Mayor of London, and who has a large house just 10m from the new track, has repeatedly criticised the project, and stated that the costs would spiral over £70 billion.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/10165446/HS2-will-cost-over-70billion-says-Boris-Johnson.html |location=London |work=The Daily Telegraph |first=Christopher |last=Hope |title=HS2 'will cost over £70billion', says Boris Johnson |date=7 July 2013}}</ref><ref name = "FT Johnson again">{{Cite news |last = Pickard |first = Jim |date = 27 March 2014 |title = London mayor criticises cost of HS2 |url = http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/bec122b6-b5a2-11e3-81cb-00144feabdc0.html |work = ] |accessdate = 27 March 2014 }}</ref> | |||
===Property demolition, land take and compensation=== | |||
===Other=== | |||
{{anchor|Demolition of property}} | |||
Phase 1 is estimated to result in the demolition of more than 400 houses: 250 around Euston; 20–30 between ] and ]; around 50 in ]; and the remainder in pockets along the route.<ref name="appraisalofsustainability">{{cite web |url= http://highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/sites/highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/files/hs2-aos-non-technical-summary.pdf |publisher= Department for Transport |date= December 2009 |title= Appraisal of Sustainability: A Report for HS2 Non Technical Summary |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20120417213149/http://highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/sites/highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/files/hs2-aos-non-technical-summary.pdf |archive-date= 17 April 2012 }}</ref> No Grade I or Grade II* listed buildings will be demolished, but six Grade II listed buildings will be, with alterations to four and removal and relocation of eight.<ref>{{cite book |title=HS2 Phase One Environmental Statement Non-technical summary |date=November 2013 |publisher=Department for Transport |page=45 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/259487/NTS_for_web_ES_3.0.0.pdf |access-date=14 January 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161227201132/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/259487/NTS_for_web_ES_3.0.0.pdf |archive-date=27 December 2016 |url-status=live }}</ref> These included a 17th-century farm in ] once visited by Queen Elizabeth I in 1602,<ref>{{cite news |title=Couple lose seven-year fight against HS2 as 17th century home to be demolished |url=https://news.sky.com/story/couple-lose-seven-year-fight-against-hs2-as-17th-century-home-to-be-demolished-12040136 |access-date=4 June 2021 |work=Sky News |language=en |archive-date=16 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210616230316/https://news.sky.com/story/couple-lose-seven-year-fight-against-hs2-as-17th-century-home-to-be-demolished-12040136 |url-status=live }}</ref> and the Eagle and Tun pub, which was the set for the ] music video for ].<ref>{{cite news |last1=Richardson |first1=Andy |title=Famous UB40 pub forced to close down by HS2 |url=https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/famous-ub40-eagle-tun-pub-17326563 |access-date=4 June 2021 |work=BirminghamLive |date=27 November 2019 |language=en |archive-date=4 June 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210604182246/https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/famous-ub40-eagle-tun-pub-17326563 |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="intarch.ac.uk">{{cite journal|last1=Sparrow|first1=T|last2=Bain|first2=K|last3=Kimber|first3=M|last4=Wilson|first4=AS|title=Visualising Heritage: using 3D immersive technologies to innovate, document and communicate rich narratives for HS2|journal=Internet Archaeology|date=2024|issue=65|doi=10.11141/ia.65.7|doi-access=free|url=http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue65/7/}}</ref> In ], the ] student residence and the ], a derelict pub, were demolished;<ref>], page 118.</ref> Birmingham City University requested £30{{nbsp}}million in compensation after the plans were announced.<ref name="BPost20100316" /> Once original plans had been released in 2010, the Exceptional Hardship Scheme (EHS) was set up to compensate homeowners whose houses were to be affected by the line at the government's discretion. Phase 1 of the scheme came to an end on 17 June 2010 and Phase 2 ended in 2013.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hs2-phase-two-exceptional-hardship-scheme |title=EHS Phase Two |access-date=28 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131006211338/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hs2-phase-two-exceptional-hardship-scheme |archive-date=6 October 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Ancient woodland impact=== | |||
Organisations with noncommittal, ambiguous or dissatisfied positions include: | |||
The ] states that 108 ]s will be damaged due to HS2, 33 ] will be affected, and 21 designated nature reserves will be destroyed.<ref name="Independent-15-01-20" /><ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/get-involved/campaign-with-us/our-campaigns/hs2-rail-link/?dm_i=2D76%2C14F73%2C6Y3D64%2C3FFDO%2C1 |title=Phase 2a – Take action now |publisher=Woodland Trust |access-date=19 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180210004302/https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/get-involved/campaign-with-us/our-campaigns/hs2-rail-link/?dm_i=2D76%2C14F73%2C6Y3D64%2C3FFDO%2C1 |archive-date=10 February 2018 |url-status=live }}</ref> In England, the term "ancient woodland" refers to areas that have been constantly forested since at least 1600. Such areas accommodate a complex and diverse ecology of plants and animals and are recognised as "irreplaceable habitat" by the government.<ref>{{cite web |title=Ancient woodland, ancient trees and veteran trees: protecting them from development |url=https://www.gov.uk/guidance/ancient-woodland-and-veteran-trees-protection-surveys-licences |website=gov.uk |access-date=23 November 2020 |archive-date=25 November 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201125150128/https://www.gov.uk/guidance/ancient-woodland-and-veteran-trees-protection-surveys-licences |url-status=live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite Hansard |jurisdiction=United Kingdom |house=House of Commons |title=Protection of Ancient Woodland and Trees |url=https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-10/debates/15121049000001/ProtectionOfAncientWoodlandAndTrees |date=10 December 2015 |column=414WH–442WH |volume=603 |access-date=26 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627005657/https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-10/debates/15121049000001/ProtectionOfAncientWoodlandAndTrees |archive-date=27 June 2018 |url-status=live }} {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180627005657/https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/2015-12-10/debates/15121049000001/ProtectionOfAncientWoodlandAndTrees |date=27 June 2018 }}</ref> 52,000 such sites exist.<ref name="DoT-2020" /> According to the Trust, {{convert|56|ha|sqkm|1}} are threatened with total loss from the construction of phases 1 and 2.<ref>{{cite web| last1 = Smith| first1 = Dee|date=14 February 2019|title=HS2 Ltd "guilty of institutional amnesia"|url=https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/press-centre/2019/02/hs2-ltd-guilty-of-institutional-amnesia/|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190924180240/https://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/press-centre/2019/02/hs2-ltd-guilty-of-institutional-amnesia/|archive-date=24 September 2019|access-date=3 October 2021|website=Woodland Trust}}</ref> Rare species such as the ] and ] could see a decreased population or even localised extinction upon the realisation of the project.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51115637|title=HS2 could threaten irreplaceable natural habitats, report warns|date=15 January 2020|publisher=BBC News|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200115164516/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-51115637|archive-date=15 January 2020}}</ref> To mitigate the loss, HS2 Ltd says that seven million trees and shrubs will be planted during Phase 1, creating {{convert|9|sqkm|ha|order=flip}} of new woods. A further {{convert|33|km2}} of natural habitats are also planned.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hs2-launches-plans-for-unprecedented-green-corridor-stretching-alongside-the-railway|title=HS2 launches plans for unprecedented 'green corridor' stretching alongside the railway|date=25 June 2018|access-date=26 June 2018|publisher=gov.uk|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180625111500/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hs2-launches-plans-for-unprecedented-green-corridor-stretching-alongside-the-railway|archive-date=25 June 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> HS2 Ltd disputes the Trust's figure, saying it includes ancient woodlands several kilometres from the route and that only 43 ancient woodlands are directly impacted, of which over 80% will remain intact.<ref>{{cite web|title=Twitter – @HS2ltd: Challenge the lie that HS2 will destroy 108 woodlands|url=https://twitter.com/hs2ltd/status/1357679107824304128|access-date=24 July 2021|date=5 February 2021|website=Twitter |archive-date=24 July 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210724191941/https://twitter.com/hs2ltd/status/1357679107824304128|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Carbon dioxide emissions=== | |||
*The Right Lines Charter, an umbrella group established in 2011 for several environmental and other organisations that support the principle of a high-speed rail network but believe that the current HS2 scheme is unsound. Members include the Campaign for Better Transport,<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.bettertransport.org.uk/campaigns/trains/high-speed-white+paper |title=Briefing on White Paper on High Speed Rail, White Paper Response |publisher= Campaign for Better Transport |date=n.d.}}</ref> the Campaign to Protect Rural England, ],<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.foe.co.uk/resource/briefings/high_speed_rail.pdf |publisher=] |title=High Speed Rail: Friends of the Earth's views |date=October 2010}}</ref> Greenpeace, and Railfuture.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://rightlines.org.uk/about/ |title= About the Charter |publisher=Right Lines Charter |year=2011}}</ref> | |||
In 2007, the DfT commissioned a report, "Estimated Carbon Impact of a New North-South Line", from ], to investigate the likely overall ] associated with the construction and operation of a new rail line to either Manchester or Scotland, including the extent of carbon dioxide emission reduction or increase from a shift to rail use, and a comparison with the case in which no new high-speed lines were built.{{sfn|BAH|2007}} The report concluded that there was no net carbon benefit in the foreseeable future, taking only the route to Manchester. Additional emissions from building a new rail route would be larger in the first ten years, at least, when compared to a model where no new line was built.{{sfn|BAH|2007|p=6, s.1.20}} | |||
*], which did the engineering work to identify routes for HS2 Ltd., has opposed the chosen route for HS2 (route 3) calling it "deeply flawed"<ref>{{cite news |work=The Sunday Times |location =London |date=30 January 2011 |title= Secret rival to high-speed rail link – Government engineers have warned that the current route is flawed |author= McGee, Simon |author2= Henry, Robin |page=15 |quote=Details of a "secret" alternative route for the £34 billion London to Birmingham highspeed railway line have emerged for the first time, showing the government's own engineers bitterly oppose the current plan. (....) An alternative route, which was considered and rejected behind closed doors, takes the line further west, past Heathrow, and then northwest alongside the M40 and the existing Chiltern railway line, weaving around Princes Risborough, Bicester and Banbury.}} {{subscription required}}</ref> It says the route should link to Heathrow and then follow the M40 motorway and Chiltern railway line, improving the business case, lowering construction costs and creating less impact on the countryside.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://thamesandchilterns.county-homesearch.co.uk/2011/02/01/secret-rival-to-high-speed-rail-route/ |title= Secret rival to high speed rail route |publisher=County Homesearch Thames and Chilterns |date= 1 February 2011}}</ref> | |||
The 2006 ''Eddington Report'' cautioned against the common argument of modal shift from aviation to high-speed rail as a carbon-emissions benefit, given that only 1.2% of UK carbon emissions are due to domestic commercial aviation, and that rail transport energy efficiency is reduced as speed increases.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.thepep.org/ClearingHouse/docfiles/Eddington.Transport.Study%20-%20Rod.pdf|title=The Eddington Transport Study, The case for action: Sir Rod Eddington's advice to Government|date=December 2006|at=Figure 15: The case for new very High Speed Lines (HSLs) p.49 (also p.33)|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110728101550/http://www.thepep.org/ClearingHouse/docfiles/Eddington.Transport.Study%20-%20Rod.pdf|archive-date=28 July 2011}}</ref> The 2007 government ] "Delivering a Sustainable Railway" stated that trains that travel at a speed of {{convert|220|mph|abbr=on|order=flip}} used 90% more energy than at {{convert|125|mph|abbr=on|order=flip|round=5}},<ref name="deliverignsustainablerailway">{{cite web|url=http://www.dft.gov.uk/about/strategy/whitepapers/whitepapercm7176/hitepapersustainablerailway1.pdf |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100409060247/http://www.dft.gov.uk/about/strategy/whitepapers/whitepapercm7176/hitepapersustainablerailway1.pdf |archive-date=9 April 2010 |title=Delivering a Sustainable Railway |publisher=Department for Transport |at=Section 6.14 – 6.17, pp.62–3 |date=July 2007 }}</ref> which would result in carbon emissions for a London to Edinburgh journey of approximately {{convert|14|kg}} per passenger for high-speed rail compared to {{convert|7|kg}} per passenger for conventional rail. Air travel emits {{convert|26|kg}} per passenger for the same journey. The paper questioned the value for money of high-speed rail as a method of reducing carbon emissions, but noted that with a switch to carbon-free or carbon-neutral electricity production the case becomes much more favourable.<ref name="deliverignsustainablerailway" /> | |||
*Railfuture, a railway campaigning organisation, which supports high-speed rail in principle, but stated in its submission to the Transport Select Committee Inquiry that it sees no benefit in trains running at up to {{convert|250|mph|sigfig=2|order=flip}} and therefore is not in favour of the current proposal and route, and suggests that alternatives be investigated.<ref> UK Parliament. May 2011. Retrieved 7 July 2011.</ref> | |||
The "High-Speed Rail Command Paper", published in March 2010, stated that the project was likely to be roughly carbon neutral.{{Sfn|DfT|2010|p=53, s.2.57}} The House of Commons ] report in November 2011 (paragraph 77) concluded that the government's assertion that HS2 would have substantial carbon reduction benefits did not stand up to scrutiny. At best, the select committee found, HS2 could make a small contribution to the government's carbon-reduction targets. However, this was dependent on making rapid progress in reducing carbon emissions from UK electricity generation.<ref name="TransSelect" /> Others argue these reports do not properly account for the carbon reduction benefits coming from the modal shift to rail for shorter-distance journeys, due to the capacity realised by HS2 on existing mainlines resulting in better local services.<ref>{{cite web |date=1 March 2021 |title="An analysis of carbon emissions following modal shift on to HS2 services" |url=https://hs2.green/an-analysis-of-carbon-emissions-following-modal-shift-on-to-hs2-services/ |access-date=2 June 2022 |website=Greens4HS2 |language=en-US |archive-date=23 May 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220523091249/https://hs2.green/an-analysis-of-carbon-emissions-following-modal-shift-on-to-hs2-services/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Deborah |title=Modal shift matters – and HS2 delivers it – High-Speed Rail Group |date=20 January 2022 |url=https://www.rail-leaders.com/publications/modal-shift-matters-and-hs2-delivers-it/ |access-date=2 February 2023 |language=en-GB |archive-date=2 February 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230202153851/https://www.rail-leaders.com/publications/modal-shift-matters-and-hs2-delivers-it/ |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
*The ],<ref name="CPRE20101104">{{cite press release |url= http://www.cpre.org.uk/news/view/709 |title= Is High Speed 2 on the Wrong Track? |publisher= Campaign to Protect Rural England |date= 4 November 2010 }}</ref> which believes that lower speeds would increase journey times only slightly, while allowing the line to run along existing motorway and railway corridors, reducing intrusion.<ref name="CPRE20101104"/> | |||
The Phase 1 environmental statement estimates that 5.8–6.2{{nbsp}}million{{nbsp}}tonnes of ] emissions will be involved in the construction of that section of the line, with operation of the line estimated to be carbon negative thereafter; operational emissions, ], and other environmental mitigations—such as tree planting and decarbonisation of the electrical grid—are expected to provide a saving of 3{{nbsp}}million{{nbsp}}tonnes of {{CO2}}-equivalent emissions over sixty years of operation. The carbon dioxide emissions per passenger-kilometre in 2030 are estimated to be 8{{nbsp}}grams for high-speed rail, as opposed to 22{{nbsp}}grams for conventional intercity rail,<ref group="note">High Speed 2's estimates for intercity rail emissions assume a mix of electric and diesel traction on the intercity network, taking into account current electrification plans.</ref> 67{{nbsp}}grams for private car transport, and 170{{nbsp}}grams for domestic aviation.<ref>{{Cite web|date=23 February 2017|title=High Speed Two phase one information paper E10: Carbon|url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/672382/E10_-_Carbon_v1.7.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190725223712/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/672382/E10_-_Carbon_v1.7.pdf|archive-date=25 July 2019|website=gov.uk}}</ref> | |||
*] opposes the current route of the proposed High Speed 2 rail link because of its impact on ancient woodland. It reports that 33 ancient woods – areas continuously wooded since 1600 – face destruction, with 34 more indirectly at risk from disturbance, noise and pollution.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/hs2 |date= August 2013 |title=High Speed 2}}</ref> | |||
The government stated that one-third of the carbon footprint from constructing Phase 1 results from tunnelling, the amount of which has been increased following requests from local residents to mitigate the impact of the railway on habitats and its visual impact.<ref name="DoT-2020" /> | |||
*], which have criticised the proposals, stating that the former Government's policy on High Speed Rail (March 2010) underestimated the effect on wildlife habitats (with 4 ]s and over 50 of other types of nature site affected), as well as noting that the proposals had not comprehensively shown any significant effect on transport carbon emissions and questioning the economic benefits of a line. The trusts called for additional research to be done on the effects of a high-speed line.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.warwickshire-wildlife-trust.org.uk/media/57738/hs2%20twt%20position%20statement%20oct%202010%20final.pdf |title= The Wildlife Trust's position statement on High Speed Rail 2 (HS2) |publisher= ] |date= October 2010}}</ref> | |||
===Noise=== | |||
*The ], which has expressed scepticism over the need for high-speed rail, stating that roads expenditure was more useful for its members.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.birminghampost.net/news/2010/12/03/business-call-for-high-speed-rail-cash-to-be-spent-on-roads-65233-27762155/ |title= Business call for high speed rail cash to be spent on roads |newspaper= ] |date= 3 December 2010 |author=Walker, Jonathan |archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20120928111131/http://www.birminghampost.net/news/2010/12/03/business-call-for-high-speed-rail-cash-to-be-spent-on-roads-65233-27762155/ |archivedate=28 September 2012}}</ref> | |||
HS2 Ltd stated that 21,300 dwellings could experience a noticeable increase in rail noise and that 200 non-residential receptors (community, education, healthcare, and recreational/social facilities) within {{convert|300|m|yd|abbr=off}} of the preferred route have the potential to experience significant noise impacts.<ref name="appraisalofsustainability"/> The government has stated that trees planted to create a visual barrier will reduce noise pollution.<ref name= GuardianHS2trees/> | |||
===Public consultations=== | |||
*The Coventry and Warwickshire Chamber of Commerce, which opined that HS2 offered no benefit to its area.<ref>{{cite news |title= HS2 route will only benefit Birmingham, says Coventry business boss |url=http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/2010/11/24/hs2-route-will-only-benefit-birmingham-says-coventry-business-boss-92746-27707036/#ixzz17T8QC95l |newspaper= ] |date=24 November 2010 |archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20110315001614/http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/2010/11/24/hs2-route-will-only-benefit-birmingham-says-coventry-business-boss-92746-27707036/ |archivedate= 15 March 2011}}</ref> | |||
HS2 Ltd announced in March 2012 that it would conduct consultations with local people and organisations along the London-to-West-Midlands route, through community and planning forums, and an environment forum.<ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120918120141/http://www.hs2.org.uk/consultation-engagement |date=18 September 2012}}. Retrieved 1 July 2012</ref> It confirmed that the consultations would be conducted in line with the terms of the ].<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hs2.org.uk/consultation-engagement |title=HS2 Consultation & Engagement |publisher=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120918120141/http://www.hs2.org.uk/consultation-engagement |archive-date=18 September 2012 |access-date=1 July 2012}}</ref> HS2 Ltd set up 25 community forums along the Phase 1 route in March 2012. The forums were intended to allow local authorities, residents associations, special interest groups, and environment bodies in each community forum area to engage with HS2 Ltd.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/forums/community-forums |title=High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain's Future – Community forums |publisher=Department for Transport |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120704035249/http://highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/forums/community-forums |archive-date=4 July 2012 |access-date=1 July 2012}}</ref> ], ] for ], stated that in his area the community forums were not a success since HS2 had not provided clear details about the project and took up to 18 months to respond to his constituents.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Wright |first1=Jeremy |title=Follow-up inquiry on PHSO investigation into HS2 complaints |url=https://www.jeremywright.org.uk/follow-inquiry-phso-investigation-hs2-complaints |website=Jeremy Wright MP |access-date=14 July 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200110084545/https://www.jeremywright.org.uk/follow-inquiry-phso-investigation-hs2-complaints |archive-date=10 January 2020 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Since the announcement of Phase 1, the government has had plans to create an overall 'Y shaped' line with termini in Manchester and Leeds. Since the intentions to further extend were announced, an additional compensation scheme was set up.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hs2.org.uk/have-your-say/consultations/phase-one/property-compensation-consultation |archive-url=https://archive.today/20130423191032/http://www.hs2.org.uk/have-your-say/consultations/phase-one/property-compensation-consultation |archive-date=23 April 2013 |title=Property and Compensation Consultation |publisher=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited |date=28 January 2013}}</ref> Consultations with those affected were set up over late 2012 and January 2013, to allow homeowners to express their concerns within their local community.<ref name="High Speed Two HS2 Limited">{{cite press release |url=http://www.hs2.org.uk/press/property-and-compensation-event-programme-continue-2013 |title=Property and compensation scheme consultation schedule |publisher=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited |date=28 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130615234334/http://www.hs2.org.uk/press/property-and-compensation-event-programme-continue-2013 |archive-date=15 June 2013}}</ref> | |||
*] was disappointed at the chosen location for the ] station in ], preferring a route that would make use of the existing ].<ref name=DerbyTelegraphReRoute>{{cite news|last=Johnson|first=Robin|title=HS2 Derby route to "be considered"|url=http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/HS2-Derby-route-considered/story-19534585-detail/story.html|accessdate=12 December 2013|newspaper=Derby Telegraph|date=18 July 2013}}</ref> These plans are opposed by ],<ref name=DerbyTelegraphCountyVeto>{{cite news|last=Jones, Severn|first=Chris, Joey|title=County council veto for HS2 alternative|url=http://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/County-council-veto-HS2-alternative/story-19499822-detail/story.html|accessdate=12 December 2013|newspaper=Derby Telegraph|date=10 July 2013}}</ref> ],<ref name=NottPostTotonBest>{{cite news|last=Henesey|first=Bryan|title=Toton 'still best choice' for high-speed rail line|url=http://www.nottinghampost.com/Toton-best-choice-high-speed-rail-line/story-19494242-detail/story.html|accessdate=12 December 2013|newspaper=Nottingham Post|date=9 July 2013}}</ref> and Rushcliffe Borough Council.<ref name=NottPostParkwayBack>{{cite news|title=Parkway backed for HS2 station|url=http://www.nottinghampost.com/Parkway-backed-HS2-station/story-20251972-detail/story.html|accessdate=12 December 2013|newspaper=Nottingham Post|date=3 December 2013}}</ref> | |||
The results of the consultations are not yet known, but Alison Munro, chief executive of HS2 Ltd, has stated that it is also looking at other options, including property bonds.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.civicvoice.org.uk/news/high-speed-rail/ |title=High Speed Rail |publisher=Civic Voice |date=n.d. |access-date=6 July 2010 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100501221550/http://www.civicvoice.org.uk/news/high-speed-rail/ |archive-date=1 May 2010 |url-status=live}}</ref> The statutory blight regime would apply to any route confirmed for a new high-speed line following the public consultations, which took place between 2011 and January 2013.<ref>{{cite Hansard |jurisdiction= United Kingdom |title=House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 28 Jun 2010 (pt 0003) |url=https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm100628/text/100628w0003.htm |speaker=Philip Hammond |position=Secretary of State for Transport |house= House of Commons |date=28 June 2010 |column=364W |access-date=31 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170709174221/https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm100628/text/100628w0003.htm |archive-date=9 July 2017 |url-status=live}} {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170709174221/https://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm100628/text/100628w0003.htm |date=9 July 2017}}</ref><ref name="High Speed Two HS2 Limited"/> | |||
*The ]<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/8114604/National-Trust-anger-over-High-Speed-2-railway.html |title= National Trust anger over High Speed 2 railway |newspaper= ] |location= London |date= 7 November 2010 |first= Michael |last= Howie}}</ref> | |||
===Political impact=== | |||
*The Commons Transport Committee, which in November 2011 reported that the scheme had "a good case" and offered "a new era of inter-urban travel in Britain."<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-15619461 |work=BBC News |title=HS2: Good case for high-speed rail link, say MPs |date=8 November 2011}}</ref> However, it also said there should be a firm commitment made now to extend the line to Manchester and Leeds and that other investment in rail should not suffer, and noted a poor level of public debate which had failed to address the facts and had resorted to name-calling and accusations of ]ism.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmtran/1185/118502.htm |title= Transport Committee – Tenth Report: High Speed Rail |publisher =UK Parliament |date =1 November 2011}}</ref> While questioning some data, it found a good economic case for the project bringing more benefits than a conventional rail line, that the noise impact would be less than feared and that while it would not reduce carbon dioxide emissions they would be smaller than under further motorway or air traffic expansion and that the business case for diverting via Heathrow had not been made. The report's findings were welcomed by the Association of Train Operating Companies, the Campaign for Better Transport, the Countryside Alliance and the Campaign to Protect Rural England. Action Groups Against High Speed Two (AGHAST) condemned the authors as a 'partisan committee' though they welcomed some of the findings, saying it poked holes in the Government's arguments. | |||
The revision of the route through South Yorkshire, which replaced the original plans for a station at ] with a station off the HS2 tracks at Sheffield, was cited as a major reason for the collapse of the ] devolution deal signed in 2015; Sheffield City Council's successful lobbying for a city-centre station—in opposition to ], ], and ]'s preference for the Meadowhall option—caused Doncaster and Barnsley councils to seek an all-Yorkshire devolution deal instead.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/how-hs2-sheffield-station-saga-helped-derail-devolution-hopes-1-8766602 |last=Burn |first=Chris |title=How HS2 Sheffield Station saga helped derail devolution hopes|work=]|date=21 September 2017|access-date=24 September 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170925035307/http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/how-hs2-sheffield-station-saga-helped-derail-devolution-hopes-1-8766602|archive-date=25 September 2017|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thestar.co.uk/news/sir-steve-houghton-snubbing-devolution-in-sheffield-city-region-was-not-revenge-for-hs2-442865|title=Sir Steve Houghton: Snubbing devolution in Sheffield City Region was not revenge for HS2|work=]|location=Sheffield|date=11 December 2017|access-date=17 September 2019|archive-date=16 September 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200916223410/https://www.thestar.co.uk/news/sir-steve-houghton-snubbing-devolution-sheffield-city-region-was-not-revenge-hs2-442865|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
=== Archaeological discoveries === | |||
==Hybrid bill== | |||
] | |||
Between 2018 and early 2022, HS2 examined more than 100 archaeological sites along the railway route.<ref name=Suliman>Adela Suliman, {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220111163557/https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2022/01/11/roman-ruins-hs2-blackgrounds-britain/ |date=11 January 2022}}, ''The Washington Post'' (11 January 2022).</ref> | |||
Early discoveries during construction were two ] glass jar ]s found during the demolition of the derelict ] in ], dating from 1879 and 1884. The capsules contained newspapers, the hospital's rules, pro-] material, and official records.<ref>{{cite news |last=Low |first=Valentine |title=Time capsules at Euston temperance hospital make for sobering news |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/time-capsules-at-euston-temperance-hospital-make-for-sobering-news-fd0ls8hsq |url-access=subscription |newspaper=The Times |date=30 October 2017 |access-date=12 February 2023}}</ref><ref> {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220112000652/https://molaheadland.com/temperance-time-capsules-reveal-history-uks-first-sober-hospital/ |date=12 January 2022}}, MOLA Headland.</ref> | |||
To implement the HS2 proposals the government will introduce on behalf of HS2 Ltd two hybrid bills, one for each phase, as the railway will impact on private individuals and organisations along the route or elsewhere. Each bill is required to address the environmental impact and how this will be mitigated, and to allow individuals affected to petition parliament to seek amendments or assurances.<ref name=TransSelect/> The timeline requires for the legislation relating to the construction and operation of phase 1 to be introduced to parliament towards the end of 2013 and to pass into law by the spring of 2015. Parliament's second reading of the hybrid bill for phase 1 took place on 28 April 2014 and was approved by 452 votes to 41.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27184269 |title=BBC News - MPs reject calls for HS2 rail plans to be halted |publisher=Bbc.co.uk |date=28 April 2014 |accessdate=28 April 2014}}</ref> The hybrid bill for phase 2 will be prepared for January 2015.<ref>. Retrieved 1 July 2012</ref> | |||
The "Hillingdon Hoard" of more than 300 ] ]s was discovered in by archaeologists working on the railway project in ], ].<ref>Jenna Lomax, {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220112002721/https://www.geplus.co.uk/news/hs2-iron-age-coins-found-at-archeological-dig-at-hillingdon-site-14-07-2021/ |date=12 January 2022}}, ''Ground Engineering'' (14 July 2021).</ref> Archaeologists working on the railway had previously discovered ] flint tools from a much earlier (early ]) site in the eastern ] within the ], evidence of what may be the earliest settlers of what is now Greater London.<ref>{{cite news |last=Knapton |first=Sarah |title=London's earliest settlers to be uncovered in Britain's biggest archaeological dig ahead of HS2 |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/10/26/londons-earliest-settlers-uncovered-britains-biggest-archaeological/ |url-status=live |url-access=subscription |work=The Telegraph |location=London |date=26 October 2018 |access-date=12 January 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220112000647/https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2018/10/26/londons-earliest-settlers-uncovered-britains-biggest-archaeological/ |archive-date=12 January 2022}}</ref> | |||
A legal requirement of the hybrid bill is the production and deposition of an ] (EIA) to identify the significant impacts on the community, property, landscape, visual amenity, biodiversity, surface and ground water, archaeology, traffic, transport, waste and resources. Proposals to avoid, reduce or remedy significant adverse impacts through mitigation measures are also required. HS2 Ltd announced its intention to consult on the 'scope and methodology' of the EIA in April 2012 and based on this will publish a draft environmental statement on which it intends to consult with national bodies and local authorities and community forums along the route, in the spring of 2013.<ref>. Retrieved 1 July 2012</ref> | |||
Before construction could begin on the new Euston station, archaeologists had to remove roughly 40,000 skeletons from the former burial ground of ], which was in use between 1790 and 1853 and lies on the site of the new station.<ref>{{cite web |date=6 August 2017 |title=St. James Gardens – A Casualty Of HS2 |url=https://alondoninheritance.com/london-parks-and-gardens/st-james-gardens-a-casualty-of-hs2/ |access-date=22 October 2020 |website=A London Inheritance |archive-date=26 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190126002313/https://alondoninheritance.com/london-parks-and-gardens/st-james-gardens-a-casualty-of-hs2/ |url-status=live}}</ref> Many of the skeletons were identifiable by surviving lead ]s, including the long-lost remains of explorer Captain ],<ref>{{cite press release |title=Remains of Captain Matthew Flinders discovered at HS2 site in Euston |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/remains-of-captain-matthew-flinders-discovered-at-hs2-site-in-euston |publisher=HS2 Ltd |access-date=26 January 2019 |date=25 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190126013509/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/remains-of-captain-matthew-flinders-discovered-at-hs2-site-in-euston |archive-date=26 January 2019 |url-status=live}}</ref> who is to be re-buried in his home town of ]. The rest of the remains are to be reburied at ], ].<ref>{{cite press release |date=17 September 2020 |title=London's deceased from Euston's St James's Gardens to be reburied at Brookwood Cemetery |url= https://www.woking.gov.uk/news/london%E2%80%99s-deceased-euston%E2%80%99s-st-james%E2%80%99s-gardens-be-reburied-brookwood-cemetery |url-status=live |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20201019213813/https://www.woking.gov.uk/news/london%E2%80%99s-deceased-euston%E2%80%99s-st-james%E2%80%99s-gardens-be-reburied-brookwood-cemetery |archive-date=19 October 2020 |access-date=22 October 2020 |publisher=Woking Borough Council}}</ref> There were also excavations to remove roughly 6,500 skeletons from a burial ground on the site of the new Curzon Street Station in Birmingham. Other notable finds in the burials were grave goods such as coins, plates, toys, and necklaces,<ref>{{cite web |last=Balloo |first=Stephanie |title='HS2 – The Biggest Dig' reveals how 6,500 skeletons were found in Brum |url=https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/hs2--biggest-dig-reveals-18981107 |website=BirminghamLive |date=23 September 2020 |access-date=22 October 2020 |archive-date=26 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201026200916/https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/hs2--biggest-dig-reveals-18981107 |url-status=live}}</ref> as well as evidence of ]. Excavations in Birmingham also uncovered the world's oldest ].<ref>{{cite web |title=Curzon Street station archaeology |url=https://www.hs2.org.uk/building-hs2/archaeology/curzon-street-station-archaeology/ |access-date=22 October 2020 |website=High Speed 2 |language=en-GB |archive-date=23 October 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201023131232/https://www.hs2.org.uk/building-hs2/archaeology/curzon-street-station-archaeology/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="intarch.ac.uk"/> | |||
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2014}} | |||
In July 2020, archaeological teams announced a number of discoveries near ], ]. The skeleton of an ] man was discovered face-down in a ditch with his hands bound together under his pelvis, suggesting that he may be a victim of a murder or execution. Archaeologists also discovered the remains of a ] buried in a lead coffin, and stated that he may have been someone of high status due to the expensive method of burial. One of the most significant finds was that of a large circular monument of wooden posts {{convert|65|m}} in diameter with features aligned with the ], similar to that of ] in ]. A golden ] from the 1st century BC was also discovered, with archaeologists stating that it was almost certainly minted in Britain.<ref>{{cite web|title=Wellwick Farm archaeology|url=https://www.hs2.org.uk/building-hs2/archaeology/wellwick-farm-archaeology/|access-date=11 July 2020|website=High Speed 2|language=en-GB|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200713232540/https://www.hs2.org.uk/building-hs2/archaeology/wellwick-farm-archaeology/|archive-date=13 July 2020|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Mee |first=Emily |date=11 July 2020 |title=Skeleton of 'murdered' Iron Age man found during HS2 works in Buckinghamshire|url=https://news.sky.com/story/skeleton-of-murdered-iron-age-man-found-during-hs2-works-in-buckinghamshire-12026231|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200711204304/https://news.sky.com/story/skeleton-of-murdered-iron-age-man-found-during-hs2-works-in-buckinghamshire-12026231|archive-date=11 July 2020|access-date=11 July 2020|publisher=Sky News}}</ref> | |||
==Preparation bill== | |||
In ], Warwickshire, the remains of large manor and ornamental gardens, laid out by ] in the 16th century, were excavated.<ref>{{Cite news|date=28 January 2021|title=HS2 dig finds 16th Century gardens in Warwickshire|language=en-GB|publisher=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-55840474|access-date=2 February 2021|archive-date=31 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210131061810/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-55840474|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The High Speed Rail (Preparation) Bill was passed by 350 votes to 34 in the ] on 31 October 2013. The bill will undergo further scrutiny in the ]. This legislation releases funds to pay for surveys, buy property and compensate evicted residents.<ref>{{cite news |author= Landale, James |url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24753394 |work=BBC News |title= HS2: Cameron hails 'vital programme' as MPs approve funding |date=31 October 2013 |accessdate=31 October 2013}}</ref> | |||
In September 2021, archaeologists from LP-Archaeology, led by Rachel Wood, have announced the discovery of the remains of old St Mary's Church in ], Buckinghamshire, while working on the route of the HS2 railway. The ] ] structure, which dates back to 1080, fell into ruin after 1866, when a new church was built elsewhere in the area.<ref name=AngloSaxonChurch>{{Cite news|date=8 September 2021|title=HS2: Anglo-Saxon church found at Stoke Mandeville excavation site|language=en-GB|publisher=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-58477080|access-date=12 September 2021|archive-date=12 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210912142324/https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-58477080|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=Graffiti>{{cite news|date=21 October 2020|title=HS2: Medieval graffiti to 'ward off evil spirits' found|language=en-GB|publisher=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-54629930|access-date=22 October 2020|archive-date=23 October 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201023121813/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-54629930|url-status=live}}</ref> Discovered in the ruins of the Norman church were medieval markings in the form of drilled holes on two stones; these are variously interpreted as ], or as an early ].<ref name=Graffiti/> Researchers' discovery of flint walls forming a square structure, enclosed by a circular borderline, indicate that the Norman church as built on an earlier ]. As part of excavations, approximately 3,000 bodies were moved to a new burial site. Evidence of a settlement from the ] was also discovered nearby.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Walls of Possible Anglo-Saxon Church Unearthed in England|url=https://www.archaeology.org/news/9984-210909-buckinghamshire-anglo-saxon|access-date=12 September 2021|website=Archaeology Magazine|date=8 September 2021 |archive-date=10 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210910164433/https://www.archaeology.org/news/9984-210909-buckinghamshire-anglo-saxon|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|date=8 September 2021|title=Archaeologists discover evidence of Anglo-Saxon church|url=https://www.heritagedaily.com/2021/09/archaeologists-discover-evidence-of-anglo-saxon-church/141330|access-date=12 September 2021|website=HeritageDaily|language=en-US|archive-date=12 September 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210912142720/https://www.heritagedaily.com/2021/09/archaeologists-discover-evidence-of-anglo-saxon-church/141330|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name=AngloSaxonChurch/> | |||
==Community engagement== | |||
In early 2021, a significant site called "Blackgrounds" (for its rich dark soil) was discovered on what was previously pastureland near the village of ] in ], close to ].<ref name=Suliman/><ref name=Sherwood>Harriet Sherwood, {{webarchive |url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220111234705/https://www.theguardian.com/science/2022/jan/11/roman-town-found-northamptonshire-field-hs2-route |date=11 January 2022}}, ''The Guardian'' (11 January 2022).</ref> While the existence of an archaeological site in the region had been previously known, the excavations showed an unexpectedly significant site.<ref name=Sherwood/> A team of 80 with the MOLA Headland Infrastructure archaeological consortium, which is working with HS2 Ltd, excavated the site, which consisted of a small ] village that became a Roman town.<ref name=Suliman/> The population grew, from about 30 ]s during the Iron Age, into a significant Roman settlement with a population in the hundreds.<ref name=Sherwood/> Discoveries included a particularly large ]; more than 300 ]s; and jewelry, glass vessels, and decorative pottery (including ] imported from ]), as well as signs of cosmetics. Roman-era workshops and kilns were discovered, along with at least four wells.<ref name=Suliman/><ref name=Sherwood/> A pair of ] was also unearthed.<ref name=Sherwood/> Taken together, the evidence was indicative of a prosperous trading site.<ref name=Suliman/><ref name=Sherwood/> | |||
HS2 Ltd announced in March 2012 that it will conduct consultations with local people and organisations along the London to West Midlands route through community forums, planning forums and an environment forum. Between them the forums will discuss the development of the route, the identification of potential impacts and look at the best approaches to mitigate these.<ref>. Retrieved 1 July 2012</ref> HS2 has also confirmed that the consultations will be conducted in line with the terms of the ] which commits organisations to provide access to environmental information they hold, and enable participation and challenge as part of decision making processes.<ref>. Retrieved 1 July 2012</ref> | |||
=== Archaeological legacy === | |||
===Community forums=== | |||
HS2 Phase One represents the largest single programme of historic environment work undertaken in the UK<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Halsted|first1=J|title=Collecting Information and Developing Narratives: the use of data on HS2 Phase One, UK|journal=Internet Archaeology|date=2024|issue=65|doi=10.11141/ia.65.4|doi-access=free|url=http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue65/4/}}</ref> and has generated a vast amount of digital archaeological data. The digital data, including ] and ] data,<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Aryankhesal|first1=F|title=The role of BIM and GIS in HS2 historic environment data management, an overview of HS2 Phase One, UK|journal=Internet Archaeology|date=2024|issue=65|doi=10.11141/ia.65.5|doi-access=free|url=http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue65/5/}}</ref> specialist reporting and reports all hold potential for future analysis, public engagement and legacy and will be held in a digital archive hosted by the ].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Zoldoske|first1=T|title=Metadata for Discovery. Planning for an Information Network|journal=Internet Archaeology|date=2024|issue=65|doi=10.11141/ia.65.6|doi-access=free|url=http://intarch.ac.uk/journal/issue65/6/}}</ref> | |||
===Environmental mitigation=== | |||
HS2 Ltd set up 25 community forums along Phase 1 in March 2012. The forums provide for representatives of local authorities, residents associations, special interest groups and environment bodies in each community forum area to 'engage' with HS2 Ltd to:- "discuss potential ways to avoid and mitigate the environmental impacts of the route, such as screening views of the railway; managing noise and reinstating highways; highlight local priorities for the route design; identify possible community benefits."<ref>. Retrieved 1 July 2012</ref> Forum meetings will take place every 2–3 months and will have an independent chairman appointed by HS2. | |||
A scheme has been announced to use the chalk excavated from the Chiltern tunnel to ] a section of the ]. The {{Convert|127|ha|acres|abbr=on|adj=on}} scheme will take its inspiration from the ], and will stretch along the line from the viaduct at ] to the Chiltern tunnel's southern portal.<ref>{{cite news|last1=Barkham|first1=Patrick|date=3 March 2021|title=HS2 to 'rewild' 127 hectares around its 10-mile Chilterns tunnel|work=The Guardian|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/03/hs2-to-rewild-127-hectares-around-its-10-mile-chilterns-tunnel|access-date=3 March 2021|archive-date=3 March 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210303061027/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/mar/03/hs2-to-rewild-127-hectares-around-its-10-mile-chilterns-tunnel|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
== Cancelled phases == | |||
===Planning forums=== | |||
{{main|High Speed 2 Phase Two}} | |||
] | |||
Phase 2 was intended to extend HS2 north to ] (a village northwest of Lichfield) then divide into two branches. The western branch would have travelled north past ] before again splitting into two branches near ], one terminating at ] and the other joining the West Coast Main Line (WCML) at ], south of ]. A station may have been built to serve ]. The eastern branch would have been built through the East Midlands and connect to the ] north of ], then continue to ]; it would then have formed two branches, one terminating in central Leeds and the other connecting to the ] near ]. | |||
Phase 2 was split into three sub-phases: | |||
Six planning forums aligned to local council boundaries along Phase 1 of the route were announced by HS2 in April 2012. Membership would comprise HS2 Ltd and officers from highway and planning authorities. Meeting every two months, their particular focus would include, location specific constraints, design and impacts, including construction; spatial planning considerations; the planning regime to be set out in the hybrid bill; and proposals for mitigations.<ref>. Retrieved 1 July 2012</ref> | |||
* Phase 2a, West Midlands to Crewe;<ref>{{cite web|title=HS2 Phase 2a: High-Speed Rail (West Midlands to Crewe) Act 2021|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/high-speed-rail-west-midlands-to-crewe-bill|access-date=28 November 2021|website=gov.uk|date=24 June 2019 |archive-date=28 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128014941/https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/high-speed-rail-west-midlands-to-crewe-bill|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title=West Midlands to Crewe (Phase 2a) |url=https://www.hs2.org.uk/the-route/west-midlands-to-crewe/ |access-date=29 September 2023 |website=HS2 |language=en-GB |archive-date=3 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231003201631/https://www.hs2.org.uk/the-route/west-midlands-to-crewe/ |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
* Phase 2b west, Crewe to the West Coast Main Line near Wigan with a branch to Manchester;<ref>{{cite web |title=Crewe to Manchester (Phase 2b – Western Leg) |url=https://www.hs2.org.uk/the-route/crewe-to-manchester/ |access-date=29 September 2023 |website=HS2 |language=en-GB |archive-date=3 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231003201629/https://www.hs2.org.uk/the-route/crewe-to-manchester/ |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
* Phase 2b east, a branch from the West Midlands to the East Coast Main Line near York with a branch to Leeds.<ref>{{cite web |title=West Midlands to Leeds (HS2 East) - HS2 % |url=https://www.hs2.org.uk/the-route/west-midlands-to-leeds/ |access-date=29 September 2023 |website=HS2 |language=en-GB |archive-date=3 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231003201633/https://www.hs2.org.uk/the-route/west-midlands-to-leeds/ |url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="Topham-2021">{{cite news |last=Topham |first=Gwyn |title=HS2 rail leg to Leeds scrapped, Grant Shapps confirms |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/nov/18/hs2-rail-leg-to-leeds-scrapped-grant-shapps-confirms |date=18 November 2021 |access-date=4 October 2023 |issn=0261-3077 |archive-date=4 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231004161141/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2021/nov/18/hs2-rail-leg-to-leeds-scrapped-grant-shapps-confirms |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Phase 2b east was truncated in November 2021, with the branch expected to end at ], south of ].<ref name="Topham-2021" /> In June 2022, the link to the WCML at Golborne, a part of phase 2b west, was cancelled.<ref>{{cite news |last=Topham |first=Gwyn |date=7 June 2022 |title=Rail industry groups outraged as HS2 Golborne link quietly scrapped |language=en-GB |work=The Guardian |url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/07/rail-bosses-outraged-as-hs2-golborne-link-quietly-scrapped |access-date=4 October 2023 |issn=0261-3077 |archive-date=4 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231004173354/https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/jun/07/rail-bosses-outraged-as-hs2-golborne-link-quietly-scrapped |url-status=live}}</ref> In October 2023, phase 2a and the remainder of phase 2b were cancelled, leaving phase 1 the only extant element of the project.<ref name="BBC News 0401023">{{cite news |title=Rishi Sunak speech: PM scraps HS2 link, saying 'facts have changed' |work=] |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-67001483 |url-status=live |access-date=4 October 2023 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20231004115347/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/uk-politics-67001483 |archive-date=4 October 2023}}</ref> | |||
===Environment forum=== | |||
===Phase 2a: West Midlands to Crewe=== | |||
An environment forum involving HS2 Ltd and national representatives of environmental organisations and government departments has been formed to assist with the development of the HS2 environmental policy.<ref>. Retrieved 1 July 2012</ref> | |||
Phase 2a would have extended the line northwest to the Crewe Hub from the northern extremity of Phase 1, north of Lichfield. At Lichfield, HS2 would also have connected to the West Coast Main Line.{{citation needed|date=October 2023}} Phase 2a was approved by the House of Commons in July 2019,<ref>{{cite web |title=Rail leaders respond as HS2 vote passes |url=http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/HS2/rail-leaders-and-mps-clash-as-hs2-vote-passes |url-status=live |website=www.railtechnologymagazine.com |date=16 July 2019 |access-date=17 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190717055549/http://www.railtechnologymagazine.com/HS2/rail-leaders-and-mps-clash-as-hs2-vote-passes |archive-date=17 July 2019}}</ref> and received Royal Assent on 11 February 2021.<ref>{{cite web |last=Harrabin |first=Roger |title=HS2: Next phase of controversial rail network gets green light |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-56017605 |publisher=BBC News |access-date=12 February 2021 |date=11 February 2021 |archive-date=12 February 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210212010654/https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-56017605}}</ref> | |||
] looking NE, showing the six converging conventional railway lines in August 2005]] | |||
==Environmental and community impact== | |||
The Crewe Hub would have been an important addition to the HS2 network, giving additional connectivity to existing lines radiating from the Crewe junction.<ref>{{cite web |title=Government confirms commitment to Crewe Hub vision |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-confirms-commitment-to-crewe-hub-vision |website=GOV.UK |publisher=Department for Transport |access-date=19 May 2019 |date=9 March 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190730002138/https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-confirms-commitment-to-crewe-hub-vision |archive-date=30 July 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> The components were: | |||
===Land value=== | |||
* An upgraded station at Crewe, to cope with high-speed trains. | |||
* A tunnel under the station to allow HS2 trains to bypass the station while remaining on high-speed tracks. | |||
* Branches onto the West Coast Main Line immediately to the south and north of the station, to allow HS2 trains to enter the station.<ref name="fromcrewe">{{cite web |title=High Speed Two: From Crewe to Manchester, the West Midlands to Leeds and beyond |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/568268/high-speed-two-crewe-manchester-west-midlands-leeds-print-version.pdf |website=GOV.UK |publisher=Department for Transport |access-date=19 May 2019 |date=November 2016 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161117213053/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/568268/high-speed-two-crewe-manchester-west-midlands-leeds-print-version.pdf |archive-date=17 November 2016 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
===Phase 2b: Crewe to Wigan & Manchester, western section=== | |||
Currently the impact of HS2 is land value – values of homes close to the route have already fallen, by as much as 40 per cent,<ref name="DT20130817"/> and despite expectations that property prices would increase close to proposed stations on the route, evidence suggests this has not happened although the government has pointed to the number of businesses relocating their headquarters from London to Birmingham as having a positive impact on property prices.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.obas.com/group/blog/no-hs2-effect-for-regional-house-prices/ | title=No HS2 effect for the regional house prices | publisher=]}}</ref> | |||
HS2 track would have continued north from Crewe. As the line passed through Cheshire at ], it would have branched to Manchester using a ]. At this junction, the line would also have branched to Warrington on ] (NPR) track.{{citation needed|date=June 2022}} The Manchester branch was intended to veer east and proceed through a station at Manchester Airport, with the line then entering a {{convert|10|mi|adj=on}} tunnel under the suburbs of south Manchester. It was proposed that the tunnel would be served by four large ventilation shafts, to be built along the route.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Abbit |first1=Beth |last2=Cox |first2=Charlotte |title=The four possible sites of massive HS2 ventilation shafts in south Manchester |url=https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/hs2-high-speed-rail-manchester-14787261 |access-date=13 July 2022 |work=Manchester Evening News |date=15 June 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210314180517/https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/hs2-high-speed-rail-manchester-14787261 |archive-date=14 March 2021 |url-status=live}}</ref> Trains would have emerged from the tunnel at ], where the line would have continued to its terminus at {{stnlnk|Manchester Piccadilly}}.<ref>{{cite web |title=HS2 between Davenport Green and Ardwick |url=https://www.hs2.org.uk/in-your-area/local-community-webpages/hs2-between-davenport-green-and-ardwick/ |website=HS2 |access-date=9 June 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220429165552/https://www.hs2.org.uk/in-your-area/local-community-webpages/hs2-between-davenport-green-and-ardwick/ |archive-date=29 April 2022 |url-status=live}}</ref> Manchester Piccadilly High Speed station would have accommodated HS2 and NPR high-speed trains. | |||
===Phase 2b: West Midlands to Midland Main Line branch, eastern section=== | |||
] | |||
East of Birmingham, the phase 1 line was intended to branch at the ] junction, progress approximately {{convert|32|mi|km}} northeast, roughly parallel to the ], and end at ] near Nottingham. The line would have branched onto the Midland Main Line with trains only progressing north from the branch.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/68971/hs2-phase-two-initial-preferred-scheme-sustainability-summary.pdf |title=HS2 Phase Two Initial Preferred Scheme : Sustainability Summary, section 4.2.13 |author=Nick Giesler et al., for Environmental Resources Management (ERM) |publisher=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited |page=21 |access-date=5 May 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140505201209/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/68971/hs2-phase-two-initial-preferred-scheme-sustainability-summary.pdf |archive-date=5 May 2014 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
=== |
=== HS1 to HS2 link === | ||
{{see also|Regional Eurostar}} | |||
] | |||
Early proposals for HS2 outlined the construction of a {{convert|2|km|mi|spell=in|adj=mid|-long}} link between HS2 and ], which would have allowed high-speed trains to operate directly from the North and Midlands to destinations in continental Europe via the ].<ref>{{cite press release |url=http://nds.coi.gov.uk/clientmicrosite/Content/Detail.aspx?ClientId=202&NewsAreaId=2&ReleaseID=417186&SubjectId=36 |title=New High Speed Rail Proposals Unveiled |date=20 December 2010 |publisher=] |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20101224170410/http://nds.coi.gov.uk/clientmicrosite/Content/Detail.aspx?ClientId=202&NewsAreaId=2&ReleaseID=417186&SubjectId=36 |archivedate=24 December 2010}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Arup |date=20 December 2010 |title=Review of HS1 to HS2 Connection Final Report |url=http://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/assets.dft.gov.uk/hs2-hs1connection.pdf |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110707125904/http://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/assets.dft.gov.uk/hs2-hs1connection.pdf |archivedate=7 July 2011 |publisher=Department for Transport |at=Section 2.1 "Structural modifications", p.4}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |date=5 January 2012 |title=Plan of the route connecting HS2 to HS1 showing which map covers which area – drawing number HS2-ARP-00-DR-RW-05140 |url=http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2-maps-20120110/hs2arp00drrw05140issue2.pdf |accessdate=12 May 2014 |publisher=Arup/DfT |archive-date=5 November 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141105234304/http://assets.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2-maps-20120110/hs2arp00drrw05140issue2.pdf |url-status=live }}</ref> The link, which was to be built through ] in North London, was abandoned in 2014 on grounds of cost and insufficient capacity for trains on HS2 track.<ref>{{cite web |date=May 2013 |title=3. HS1-HS2 Link |url=http://assets.hs2.org.uk/sites/default/files/inserts/Design%20Refinement%20Consultation%20-%20Complete.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140512215708/http://assets.hs2.org.uk/sites/default/files/inserts/Design%20Refinement%20Consultation%20-%20Complete.pdf |archive-date=12 May 2014 |access-date=12 May 2014 |work=HS2 London – West Midlands Design Refinement Consultation |publisher=Department for Transport |page=21}}</ref><ref name="HS1-HS2 report">{{cite web |title=HS2-HS1 report |url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/480372/HS2-HS1_report.pdf |access-date=13 February 2020 |archive-date=25 July 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190725154009/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/480372/HS2-HS1_report.pdf |url-status=live}}</ref> Following the cancellation of this link, it was proposed that passengers would transfer between these two lines via ], ] or an "enhanced walking route" between Euston and St Pancras stations.<ref name="HS1-HS2 report" /> | |||
Various alternative schemes have been proposed for an HS2–HS1 link, including a tunnel under Camden,<ref>{{cite news |date=22 April 2014 |title=London mayor Boris Johnson calls for tunnel to link HS2 at Euston to St Pancras |newspaper=Evening Standard |url=https://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/london-mayor-boris-johnson-calls-for-tunnel-to-link-hs2-at-euston-to-st-pancras-9274200.html |access-date=12 May 2014 |archive-date=12 May 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140512221428/http://www.standard.co.uk/news/transport/london-mayor-boris-johnson-calls-for-tunnel-to-link-hs2-at-euston-to-st-pancras-9274200.html |url-status=live}}</ref> as well as the rejected ] scheme.<ref>{{cite magazine |last=Smale |first=Katherine |title=HS4Air plan to link Heathrow and Gatwick rejected |magazine=New Civil Engineer |url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/exclusive-hs4air-plan-to-link-heathrow-and-gatwick-rejected/10038092.article |url-status=live |access-date=11 December 2018 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20181211143812/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/exclusive-hs4air-plan-to-link-heathrow-and-gatwick-rejected/10038092.article |archive-date=11 December 2018}}</ref> | |||
The visual impact of HS2 has received particular attention in the ], an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty.<ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/mar/11/chilterns-fast-rail-wendover-birmingham |title=Beauty of Chilterns may be put at risk by fast rail link, say critics |newspaper= ] |location= London |date=11 March 2010 |first= Peter |last= Walker}}</ref> The Government announced in January 2011 that 2m trees would be planted along sections of the route to mitigate the visual impact.<ref name=GuardianHS2trees>{{cite news |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2011/jan/07/high-speed-rail-trees-shelter | |||
|title=High-speed rail route to get 2m trees for shelter |newspaper= ] |location= London |date=7 January 2011 |first= Dan |last= Milmo}}</ref> | |||
===Previously proposed phases=== | |||
===Property demolition and land take=== | |||
There is one DfT proposal to build a {{convert|20|mi|km|adj=mid|-long}} high-speed line from Leeds south to Clayton branching into the Midland Main Line. Whether this was to be a part of HS2 or NPR has not been determined.{{sfn|IRP North and Midlands|2021}}{{Failed verification|date=October 2023}} | |||
====Liverpool==== | |||
{{anchor|Demolition of property}} | |||
No direct HS2 track access was planned for the ], with the nearest HS2 track passing {{convert|16|mi|km}} from Liverpool city centre. In February 2016, the Liverpool City Council offered £2{{nbsp}}billion towards funding a direct HS2 line into the city centre.<ref name="Topham-2016">{{cite news|last1=Topham|first1=Gwym|title=Liverpool offers £2bn to be included in HS2 network|url=https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/23/liverpool-offers-2bn-hs2-network|access-date=14 March 2016|work=The Guardian|date=23 February 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160312224446/http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/23/liverpool-offers-2bn-hs2-network|archive-date=12 March 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
], the ], announced the creation of a Station Commission to determine the size, type, and location of a new "transport hub" in Liverpool's city centre, a station that would have linked the HS2 mainline with the local transport infrastructure. The station would have served HS2 and NPR trains. The North's Strategic Transport Plan recognised the need for a new station to accommodate HS2 and NPR trains.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://lbndaily.co.uk/liverpool-needs-new-station-high-speed-rail-says-steve-rotheram/|title=Liverpool needs a new station for high-speed rail, says Steve Rotheram|date=13 March 2019|access-date=13 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190913235108/https://lbndaily.co.uk/liverpool-needs-new-station-high-speed-rail-says-steve-rotheram/|archive-date=13 September 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.liverpoolcityregion-ca.gov.uk/steve-rotheram-announces-commission-to-deliver-new-station-for-liverpool-city-centre/|title=Steve Rotheram Announces Commission to Deliver New Station for Liverpool City Centre | Liverpool City Region Combined Authority – News|date=13 March 2019|website=Liverpool City Region Combined Authority|access-date=13 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190914000123/https://www.liverpoolcityregion-ca.gov.uk/steve-rotheram-announces-commission-to-deliver-new-station-for-liverpool-city-centre/|archive-date=14 September 2019|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.wirralglobe.co.uk/news/17495197.plans-to-build-new-train-station-to-connect-city-centre-to-hs2/|title=Plans to build new train station to connect city centre to HS2|website=Wirral Globe|date=13 March 2019 |access-date=13 March 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190914073810/https://www.wirralglobe.co.uk/news/17495197.plans-to-build-new-train-station-to-connect-city-centre-to-hs2/|archive-date=14 September 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Phase 1 would result in the demolition of more than 400 houses; 250 around Euston station, 20–30 between ] and ], a number in Ealing, around 50 in ], and the remainder in pockets along the route.<ref name="appraisalofsustainability">{{cite web |url= http://highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/sites/highspeedrail.dft.gov.uk/files/hs2-aos-non-technical-summary.pdf |publisher= Department for Transport |date= December 2009 |title= Appraisal of Sustainability: A Report for HS2 Non Technical Summary}}</ref> This includes nine Grade II listed buildings and possibly a Grade II* listed farmhouse at Hampton in Arden.{{Citation needed|date=December 2010}} It is unknown if the historic building will be moved, and owners get more compensation that lower value of house.<ref>Mount, Harry (14 January 2012). . ''Daily Mail'' (London).</ref> | |||
In the HS2 plan, after phase 2a had opened, Liverpool trains would have used the HS2 track from London as far as Crewe, before changing to the existing conventional rail track on the West Coast Main Line to proceed to ], with a stop at ]. | |||
] | |||
Near Nottingham, Trent Cottages, a row of railway workers housing built in the 1860s would also have to be demolished.<ref>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-21241878</ref> | |||
The Integrated Rail Plan proposed to connect Liverpool to HS2 on a reused and upgraded ], from ] in ] to a new station at ], which would have been shared with ] trains, then onto high-speed track from Warrington to London.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/liverpool-hs2-link-axed-says-mayor-steve-rotheram-jsh0j0mhz | url-access = subscription |title=Government looking to axe Liverpool's HS2 link| last1 = Collins| first1 = David|date=26 May 2019|work=The Sunday Times|access-date=27 May 2019|issn=0956-1382|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190526151215/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/liverpool-hs2-link-axed-says-mayor-steve-rotheram-jsh0j0mhz|archive-date=26 May 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> ]'s preferred option was a new high-speed line from Liverpool to the HS2 track into Manchester from Millington junction, with a stop at Warrington, which would also have doubled as a connection from Liverpool to HS2 via Millington. The revised plans under the Integrated Rail Plan had a high-speed line only east of Warrington, with HS2 and ] trains reaching ] from Warrington on upgraded conventional rail track. Metro mayor Steve Rotheram, along with Greater Manchester's mayor ], was critical of the Integrated Rail Plan.<ref>{{Cite web|url = https://www.business-live.co.uk/regional-development/a-cheap-nasty-solution-andy-22201747|title = North West leaders react to HS2 U-turn and Northern Powerhouse Rail news|date = 18 November 2021|access-date = 24 November 2021|archive-date = 24 November 2021|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20211124001943/https://www.business-live.co.uk/regional-development/a-cheap-nasty-solution-andy-22201747|url-status = live}}</ref> | |||
<!-----INADEQUATE REFERENCE, needs at least title of news item and preferably a URL-------According to the '']'', five houses were listed for demolition in the ] village of ] and it was due to pass "within metres of houses and a primary school" in ].<ref>{{cite news |newspaper= ] |date= 30 September 2010 |title= ??????? }}</ref>-------> | |||
<!-----INADEQUATE REFERENCE, needs at least title of news item and preferably a URL-------According to '']'', homes will also be demolished in ], Buckinghamshire.<ref>] (6 October edition)</ref>-------> | |||
In ], the new ] student residence would have to be demolished<ref>], page 118.</ref> and ] wanted a £30 million refund after the plans were revealed.<ref name="BPost20100316"/> | |||
=== |
====Scotland==== | ||
In 2009, the then transport secretary ] outlined a policy for high-speed rail in the UK as an alternative to domestic air travel, with particular emphasis on travel between the major cities of Scotland and England, "I see this as the union railway, uniting England and Scotland, north and south, richer and poorer parts of our country, sharing wealth and opportunity, pioneering a fundamentally better Britain".<ref>{{cite news|title=HS2 will be the 'Union Railway' of England and Scotland – Adonis|url=http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/2009/09/29-hs2-will-be-the-union.html|access-date=24 September 2015|work=Railnews|date=29 September 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150924185506/http://www.railnews.co.uk/news/2009/09/29-hs2-will-be-the-union.html|archive-date=24 September 2015 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
In June 2011, business and governmental organisations — including Network Rail, ], and ] (the transport agency of the ]) — formed the Scottish Partnership Group for high-speed rail to campaign for the extension of the HS2 project north to ] and ]. In December 2011, it published a study that outlined a case for extending high-speed rail to Scotland, proposing a route north from Manchester to Edinburgh and Glasgow as well as an extension to ].<ref>{{cite book|url=http://www.transport.gov.scot/sites/default/files/documents/rrd_reports/uploaded_reports/j202923/j202923.pdf|title=Fast Track Scotland: Making the Case for High Speed Rail Connections with Scotland|date=December 2011|publisher=Scottish Partnership Group for High Speed Rail|isbn=9781908181213|page=10|access-date=6 August 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160810090420/http://www.transport.gov.scot/sites/default/files/documents/rrd_reports/uploaded_reports/j202923/j202923.pdf|archive-date=10 August 2016|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
''High Speed Rail: woods, trees and wildlife'' published by ] explains that 33 ancient woods may be bisected or reduced in area due to HS2, with 34 more near enough to suffer secondary effects from disturbance, noise and pollution. Ancient woods are areas that have been continuously wooded since at least 1600 and are our richest land-based habitat. These ancient woods under threat have had relatively little disturbance over centuries and have therefore developed complex and diverse ecological communities of plants and animals. Only 2% of the UK is covered in ancient woodland and ancient woods are home to 256 species of conservation concern.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.woodlandtrust.org.uk/en/campaigning/woodwatch/woods-under-threat/Documents/High%20Speed%202%20communtiy%20toolkit.pdf |title= High Speed Rail: Woods, trees and wildlife |publisher= Woodland Trust |date=n.d.|accessdate=29 October 2013}}</ref> | |||
In November 2012, the Scottish Government announced plans to build a {{convert|46|mi|adj=on|abbr=on|order=flip}} high-speed rail link between Edinburgh and Glasgow. The proposed link would have reduced journey times between the two cities to under 30{{nbsp}}minutes and was planned to open by 2024, eventually connecting to the high-speed network being developed in England.<ref>{{cite news|title=High-speed rail plan for Glasgow to Edinburgh line|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-20296195|access-date=30 January 2013|publisher=BBC News|date=12 November 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130129085801/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-20296195|archive-date=29 January 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> The plan was cancelled in 2016.<ref>{{cite news|title=High speed Glasgow-Edinburgh rail link plans 'shelved'|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-35323728|access-date=16 January 2017|publisher=BBC News|date=15 January 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170312033024/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-35323728|archive-date=12 March 2017|url-status=live}}</ref> In May 2015, HS2 Ltd had concluded that there was "no business case" to extend HS2 north into Scotland, and that high-speed rail services should proceed north on upgraded conventional track.<ref>{{cite news|last=Leftly|first=Mark|title=SNP fury as HS2 finds 'no business case' for taking fast train service to Scotland|url=https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/snp-fury-as-hs2-finds-no-business-case-for-taking-fast-train-service-to-scotland-10272342.html|access-date=24 September 2015|work=The Independent|date=24 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150724140826/http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/snp-fury-as-hs2-finds-no-business-case-for-taking-fast-train-service-to-scotland-10272342.html|archive-date=24 July 2015}}</ref> | |||
===Loss of wildlife habitat, and recreation space=== | |||
====Bristol and Cardiff==== | |||
], MP for ], raised concerns that the route could damage the {{convert|29|mi|order=flip}}-wide ] ], the ] on the outskirts of London, and other areas of ].<ref>{{cite hansard |jurisdiction=United Kingdom |url= http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200910/cmhansrd/cm091208/halltext/91208h0006.htm |house= House of Commons |date= 8 December 2009 |column= 31WH—continued |accessdate=4 January 2010}}</ref> | |||
The DfT conducted a study on towns and cities that would lose economically from HS2, highlighting ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|date=19 October 2013|title=Revealed: the towns and cities set to lose millions over HS2|url=https://www.channel4.com/news/hs2-bristol-cambridge-towns-losers-train-government|access-date=28 November 2021|website=Channel 4 News|language=en-GB|archive-date=28 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128132010/https://www.channel4.com/news/hs2-bristol-cambridge-towns-losers-train-government|url-status=live}}</ref><ref name="BBC News-11/2/20" /><ref>{{cite news |last1=Paton |first1=Graeme |first2=Kasia |last2=Sobocinska |first3=Yasmin |last3=Butt |title=X-shaped HS2 plan will link cities in southwest|newspaper=] |url=https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/x-shaped-hs2-plan-will-link-cities-in-southwest-frlwptq2g |url-access=subscription|access-date=28 November 2021|issn=0140-0460|archive-date=28 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128132008/https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/x-shaped-hs2-plan-will-link-cities-in-southwest-frlwptq2g|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Arthur|first=Andrew|date=8 February 2021|title=HS2 rail links through Bristol and South West proposed by report|url=https://www.business-live.co.uk/regional-development/x-shaped-hs2-network-could-19779680|access-date=28 November 2021|website=Business Live |archive-date=28 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128132019/https://www.business-live.co.uk/regional-development/x-shaped-hs2-network-could-19779680|url-status=live}}</ref> With decreased journey times between London and Northern England under HS2, Cardiff in particular would be set to lose much of its competitive edge that arose from its proximity to London's financial and legal service companies, due to improved rail connections between London and northern England.<ref>{{cite news |author=Stuart Cole |title=The Impact of HS2 on Wales |url=https://businessnewswales.com/stuart-cole-the-impact-of-hs2-on-wales/ |work=Business News Wales |date=17 February 2020 |access-date=25 August 2022 |archive-date=25 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220825143927/https://businessnewswales.com/stuart-cole-the-impact-of-hs2-on-wales/ |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
Proposals were put forward to build a high-speed line between Birmingham to Cardiff or Bristol, creating an X-shaped high-speed network, with Birmingham at its centre.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Kennedy|first=Catherine|date=26 August 2021|title=How to redesign HS2 to benefit Wales|url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/how-to-redesign-hs2-to-benefit-wales-26-08-2021/|access-date=28 November 2021|magazine=New Civil Engineer |archive-date=28 November 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20211128132010/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/how-to-redesign-hs2-to-benefit-wales-26-08-2021/|url-status=live}}</ref> There were also proposals for a new high-speed rail project in South Wales, beyond just Cardiff, to connect with the HS2 network.<ref>{{cite magazine |title=Renewed calls to level up Wales by building high-speed rail services |url=https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/renewed-calls-to-level-up-wales-by-building-high-speed-rail-services-04-08-2022/ |magazine=New Civil Engineer |date=4 August 2022 |access-date=25 August 2022 |archive-date=11 August 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220811114246/https://www.newcivilengineer.com/latest/renewed-calls-to-level-up-wales-by-building-high-speed-rail-services-04-08-2022/ |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
The route passes through the ] in Buckinghamshire via the ]. Initially through a tunnel beneath ]<ref name=chalfont-map>{{cite web |title=Historic Environment Map 1:Chalfont St Giles |url= http://www.chilternsaonb.org/uploads/files/high_speed_2/historic-environment-map-1.pdf |work=High Speed 2 – Impact on the Chilterns |publisher= Chilterns AONB |accessdate=10 January 2012}}</ref> emerging just after ], then past ] and ].<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.chilternsaonb.org/hs2/ |publisher= Chilterns Conservation Board |title= High Speed 2}}</ref> Its proposals include a re-alignment of more than {{convert|1|km}} of the River Tame, and construction of a {{convert|0.39|mi|order=flip}} long viaduct and a cutting<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/hs2ltd/route/westmidmap04.pdf |title=West Midlands Map 4 |work=High Speed 2 |accessdate=15 April 2010 |publisher= Department for Transport}}</ref> through ancient woodland at a ] at ] on the edge of Birmingham.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.wild-net.org/wildbbc/index.aspx?id=338 |title=Park Hall |publisher= Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country |accessdate=18 March 2010}}</ref> | |||
=== |
===Branches to other lines=== | ||
Prior to the cancellation of the northern phases, the original HS2 scheme specified connections from the new high-speed tracks onto existing conventional tracks at junctions at the following locations:<ref name="cmd-paper-summary2013">{{cite web|title=High speed rail: investing in Britain 's future phase two – the route to Leeds, Manchester and beyond summary|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69739/hs2-phase-two-command-paper-summary.pdf|publisher=DfT|access-date=13 May 2014|date=23 January 2013|pages=5, 16–17|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130615064236/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69739/hs2-phase-two-command-paper-summary.pdf|archive-date=15 June 2013|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
]<ref name=cmd-paper-summary2013/> | |||
In 2007 the DfT commissioned a report, ''Estimated Carbon Impact of a New North South Line'', from ] to investigate the likely overall carbon impact associated with the construction and operation of a new rail line to either Manchester or Scotland including the extent of carbon reduction or increase from population shift to rail use, and the comparison with the case in which no new high-speed lines were built.<ref>]</ref> The report concluded that there was no net carbon benefit in the foreseeable future taking only the route to Manchester. Additional carbon from building a new rail route would be larger in the first ten years at least than a model were no new rail line was built.<ref>], section 1.20 , page 6.</ref> | |||
* north of {{rws|Crewe}}; | |||
* south of {{rws|Crewe}}. | |||
* east of {{rws|Lichfield Trent Valley}}, {{convert|2.2|mi|order=flip}} northeast of ]. | |||
] | |||
* at ] in ]. | |||
] | |||
* at ]. | |||
=== Cancelled stations (Birmingham-to-Manchester) === | |||
The ''High Speed Rail Command paper'' published in March 2010 stated that the project was likely to be roughly carbon neutral.<ref>], Section 2.57, page 53.</ref> | |||
Proposals for these station locations were announced on 28 January 2013. Following the cancellation of Phase 2 announced in October 2023, these stations are no longer in the scope of the HS2 project.<ref name="BBC News 0401023" /> | |||
====Crewe==== | |||
The ''Eddington Report'' cautioned against the common argument of modal shift from aviation to high-speed rail as a carbon-emissions benefit, since only 1.2% of UK carbon emissions are due to domestic commercial aviation, and since rail transport energy efficiency is reduced as speed increases.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.thepep.org/ClearingHouse/docfiles/Eddington.Transport.Study%20-%20Rod.pdf |at= Figure 15: The case for new very High Speed Lines (HSLs) p.49 (also p.33) |title= The Eddington Transport Study, The case for action: Sir Rod Eddington's advice to Government}}</ref> | |||
HS2 was planned to pass through ] and ]. The line would have been tunnelled under the Crewe junction, bypassing the existing Crewe station.<ref>{{cite news |last=Millward |first=David |title=HS2 route: Manchester and Liverpool win while Sheffield loses out |url=https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/9783576/HS2-route-Manchester-and-Liverpool-win-while-Sheffield-loses-out.html |url-access=subscription |newspaper=The Telegraph |date=6 January 2013 |access-date=27 January 2013 |location=London |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130108235514/http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/9783576/HS2-route-Manchester-and-Liverpool-win-while-Sheffield-loses-out.html |archive-date=8 January 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> The HS2 line would have been linked to the West Coast Main Line via a ] just south of Crewe, enabling "conventional compatible" trains exiting the high-speed line to call at Crewe station.<ref>{{cite news |title=Stoke-on-Trent 'ignored' under HS2 rail route plans |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-21232583 |access-date=2 February 2013 |publisher=BBC News |date=28 January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130202071756/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-stoke-staffordshire-21232583 |archive-date=2 February 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |title= Route section HSM09 plan and profile sheet 2 of 2 – drawing number HS2-MSG-WCM-ZZ-DT-RT-60902 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69055/hs2-msg-wcm-zz-dt-rt-60902.pdf |work=HS2 phase two initial preferred route plan and profile maps |publisher=Department for Transport |access-date=2 February 2013 |date=January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131006203136/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69055/hs2-msg-wcm-zz-dt-rt-60902.pdf |archive-date= 6 October 2013 |url-status=live}}</ref> In 2014, the chairman of HS2 advocated a dedicated hub station in Crewe.<ref>{{cite web |title=UPDATE: HS2 in Crewe by 2027 – chairman backs Crewe hub station plan |url=http://www.creweguardian.co.uk/news/11081872.UPDATE__HS2_in_Crewe_by_2027___chairman_backs_Crewe_hub_station_plan/ |url-status=live |work=Crewe Guardian |date=17 March 2014 |access-date=29 April 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140429222133/http://www.creweguardian.co.uk/news/11081872.UPDATE__HS2_in_Crewe_by_2027___chairman_backs_Crewe_hub_station_plan/ |archive-date=29 April 2014}}</ref> In November 2015, it was announced that the Crewe hub completion would be brought forward to 2027.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34958154 |title=HS2 Birmingham to Crewe link planned to open six years early |publisher=BBC News |date=30 November 2015 |access-date=1 December 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160121010338/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34958154 |archive-date=21 January 2016 |url-status=live}}</ref> In November 2017, the government and Network Rail supported a proposal to build the hub station on the existing station site, with a junction onto the West Coast Main Line north of the station. This would have enabled through-trains to bypass the station via a tunnel under the station, progressing directly onto the West Coast Main Line.<ref name="fromcrewe"/> <!--Note that while Phase 2a will be extended to Crewe, there has been no decision take on whether there will be a hub station there by 2027.--> | |||
====Manchester Airport==== | |||
The Government White Paper ''Delivering a Sustainable Railway'' states trains that travel at a speed of {{convert|220|mph|order=flip}} currently use 90% more energy than at {{convert|125|mph|order=flip|sigfig=2}};{{Citation needed|date=January 2012}} which results in carbon emissions for a London to Edinburgh journey of approximately {{convert|14|kg}} per passenger for high-speed rail compared to {{convert|7|kg}} per passenger for conventional rail. Air travel uses {{convert|26|kg}} per passenger for the same journey. The paper questioned the value for money of high-speed rail as a method of reducing carbon emissions, but noted that with a switch to carbon-free or neutral energy production the case becomes much more favourable.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dft.gov.uk/about/strategy/whitepapers/whitepapercm7176/hitepapersustainablerailway1.pdf |title= Delivering a Sustainable Railway |publisher=Department for Transport |at=Section 6.14 – 6.17, pp.62–3 |date=July 2007}}</ref> | |||
{{main|Manchester Airport High Speed station}} | |||
]<ref>{{cite web |title=Route section HSM28 plan and profile sheet 5 of 9 – drawing number HS2-MSG-MA0-ZZ-DR-RT-52805 |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69079/hs2-msg-ma0-zz-dr-rt-52805.pdf |work=HS2 phase two initial preferred route plan and profile maps |publisher=Department for Transport |access-date=2 February 2013 |date=January 2013 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131006202716/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69079/hs2-msg-ma0-zz-dr-rt-52805.pdf |archive-date=6 October 2013 |url-status=live }}</ref>]] | |||
] was a planned HS2 through-station serving ]. It was recommended in 2013 by local authorities, during the consultation stage. Construction was dependent on part-funding by private investment from the ].<ref>{{cite web|title=Council chiefs lobby ministers for TWO high speed rail stations |url=http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/trafford-council-chiefs-lobby-ministers-1230363|newspaper=Manchester Evening News |date=22 January 2013 |access-date=27 January 2013 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130518065740/http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/trafford-council-chiefs-lobby-ministers-1230363 |archive-date=18 May 2013 }}</ref><ref>{{Cite news|title=Manchester Airport may be high-speed rail network hub |url=http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/local-news/manchester-airport-may-be-high-speed-rail-network-856086|newspaper=Manchester Evening News |date=13 March 2011 |access-date=11 March 2012 |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110316215516/http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/transport/s/1410661_manchester_airport_may_be_highspeed_rail_network_hub |archive-date=16 March 2011}}</ref> | |||
The House of Commons Transport Select Committee Report in November 2011 (paragraph 77) concluded that the Government's claim that HS2 would have substantial carbon reduction benefits did not stand up to scrutiny. At best, the Select Committee found, HS2 could make a small contribution to the Government's carbon-reduction targets. However this was dependent on the government making rapid progress on reducing carbon emissions from UK electricity generation.<ref name=TransSelect/> | |||
The proposed site was located on the northwestern side of the airport, to the west of the ], at junction 5, and approximately {{convert|1.5|mi|abbr=on}} northwest of the existing ]. A sub-surface station was planned, approximately {{convert|8.5|m|ftin}} below ground level, consisting of two central {{convert|415|m|ft|adj=on}} platforms, a pair of through-tracks for trains to pass through the station without stopping, a street-level passenger concourse, and a main entrance on the eastern side, facing the airport.<ref>{{cite web|title=High Speed Two Phase 2b Crewe to Manchester Route Engineering Report: 4.2 Manchester Airport High Speed Station |url = https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/629037/CS868_P15_Crewe_to_Manchester_Route_Engineering_Report_170714.pdf |publisher=Dft/High Speed Two (HS2) Limited|access-date=26 May 2018|page=53|date=July 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180526191339/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/629037/CS868_P15_Crewe_to_Manchester_Route_Engineering_Report_170714.pdf|archive-date=26 May 2018|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Noise=== | |||
Proposals did not detail passenger interchange methods; various options were being considered to integrate the new station with existing transport networks, including extending the ] to connect the HS2 station with the existing airport railway station.<ref name="manc-airport-2013">{{cite web|title=Manchester Airport High Speed Station|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/382000/HS2_Phase_Two_Manchester_Airport_High_Speed_station_factsheet.pdf|website=UK Government website|publisher=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited|access-date=18 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171218104221/https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/382000/HS2_Phase_Two_Manchester_Airport_High_Speed_station_factsheet.pdf|archive-date=18 December 2017|date=2013 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=] |title=High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain's Future – Phase Two, the Route to Leeds, Manchester and Beyond |date=2013 |publisher=The Stationery Office|page=38|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sOfRI8yd2-gC&q=Manchester%20Airport%20HS2%20station%20interchange&pg=PA38 |access-date=18 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171222054142/https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=sOfRI8yd2-gC&lpg=PA38&ots=bw1AjgZVef&dq=Manchester%20Airport%20HS2%20station%20interchange&pg=PA38|archive-date=22 December 2017|url-status=live |isbn=9780101850827}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|title=Hopes for 'western loop' tram line|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-29842268|access-date=18 December 2017|publisher=BBC News|date=31 October 2014|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171218171210/http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-29842268|archive-date=18 December 2017 |url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Cox|first=Charlotte|title=This is how Manchester Airport's HS2 station could look |url=https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/manchester-airport-hs2-train-station-14424392|access-date=26 May 2018|work=Manchester Evening News|date=19 March 2018|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20180526094333/https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/manchester-airport-hs2-train-station-14424392|archive-date=26 May 2018 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
HS2 Ltd stated that 21,300 dwellings could experience a noticeable increase in rail noise and 200 non-residential receptors (community, education, healthcare, and recreational/social facilities) within {{convert|300|m}} of the preferred route have the potential to experience significant noise impacts.<ref name="appraisalofsustainability"/> The Government has announced that trees planted to create a visual barrier will reduce noise pollution.<ref name= GuardianHS2trees /> | |||
If the station had been built, it is estimated that the average journey time from London Euston to Manchester Airport would have been 59{{nbsp}}minutes.<ref>{{cite web|last=Arnett|first=George|title=How will HS2 change journey times to and from London?|url=https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/mar/17/hs2-change-journey-times-london|website=The Guardian|access-date=18 December 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20171218110527/https://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2014/mar/17/hs2-change-journey-times-london|archive-date=18 December 2017|date=17 March 2014 |url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
===Geology and water supply=== | |||
====Manchester Piccadilly==== | |||
Research presented by Dr Haydon Bailey, geological adviser to the Chiltern Society, showed that HS2 tunnelling could cause long-term damage to the chalk aquifer system responsible for water supply for the North Western Home Counties and North London.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.chilternsociety.org.uk/hs2/paper02.php |title= Concerns arising from the Geology and Hydrology of the ground underlying the High Speed (HS2) routes through the Chilterns |publisher= ]}}</ref> | |||
{{main|Manchester Piccadilly station|l1=Manchester Piccadilly High Speed station}} | |||
A new Manchester Piccadilly High Speed station was planned to be built on a viaduct parallel to the north side of the existing station.<ref>{{Cite web|date=24 January 2022|title=Phase 2b Western Leg Information Paper F1: Manchester Piccadilly Station|url=https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1048865/F1_Manchester_Piccadilly_Station_v1.pdf|access-date=28 January 2022|website=]|archive-date=28 January 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220128205233/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1048865/F1_Manchester_Piccadilly_Station_v1.pdf|url-status=live}}</ref> The station was to have six platforms on three islands for both terminating High Speed 2 trains from London and Birmingham as well as ] trains to Liverpool, Warrington, Huddersfield, Leeds, and beyond. It was proposed to relocate the present ] ] stop is from ground-level, below the existing station platforms, to a new larger four-platform stop located underground below the high-speed station. Provision for a second ground-level Metrolink stop at the eastern end of the high-speed station—to service future Metrolink extensions—to be called Piccadilly Central, also formed part of the plans. | |||
===Compensation=== | |||
{{Update|inaccurate=yes|section|date=September 2012}} | |||
From the beginning of the HS2 consultation period, the government has factored in several plans to compensate people who will or may be affected. Once original plans had been released in 2010, the Exceptional Hardship Scheme (EHS) was set up, however this was at the government's discretion and Phase 1 came to an end on 17 June 2010. With EHS Phase 2 running throughout 2013. Both EHS are intended to compensate homeowners who have difficulty selling their home because of the HS2 route announcement, to protecting those whose property value may be seriously affected by the 'preferred route option' and who urgently need to sell.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/government/news/hs2-phase-two-exceptional-hardship-scheme | title= EHS Phase Two}}</ref> | |||
====Exceptional Hardship Scheme criteria==== | |||
With Phase 1 applications intended to run from about August 2010 until the route was chosen in 2012 and Phase 2 throughout 2013; homeowners are/were advised to apply to the Secretary of State to buy their home, as long as all of the following criteria are met: | |||
# Residential owner-occupier. | |||
# Pressing need to sell. This means a change in employment location, extreme financial pressure, to accommodate enlarged family, move into sheltered accommodation, or medical condition of a family member. | |||
# On or in 'close vicinity' of the 'preferred route' (that is mainly those who will later on be covered by statutory blight provisions). | |||
# Have tried to sell – been on the market for at least three months with no offers within 15% of full market value (as if no HS2). | |||
# Can demonstrate inability to sell is due to HS2. | |||
# No knowledge of HS2 before acquiring the property. | |||
Decisions on individual applications will by made by a panel of experts.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.dft.gov.uk/consultations/closed/2010-18/consultation.pdf |title= HS2 Exceptional Hardship Scheme consultation document |publisher= Department for Transport}}</ref> | |||
====Public consultations==== | |||
Since the announcement of Phase 1 the government has had plans to create an overall 'Y shaped' line with termini in Manchester and Leeds. Since the intentions to further extend were announced an additional compensation scheme was set up.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.hs2.org.uk/have-your-say/consultations/phase-one/property-compensation-consultation |title= Property and Compensation Consultation |publisher= HS2 Ltd |date=28 January 2013}}</ref> Consultations with those affected were set up over late 2012 and January 2013, to allow homeowners to express their concerns within their local community.<ref name="High Speed Two HS2 Limited">{{cite press release |url= http://www.hs2.org.uk/press/property-and-compensation-event-programme-continue-2013 |title= Property and compensation scheme consultation schedule |publisher= HS2 Ltd |date=28 January 2013}}</ref> | |||
The results of the consultations are not yet known, but Alison Munro, chief executive of HS2 Ltd, has stated that it is also looking at other options, including property bonds.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.civicvoice.org.uk/news/high-speed-rail/ |title= High Speed Rail |publisher=Civic Voice |date=n.d.}}</ref> | |||
The statutory blight regime would apply to any route confirmed for a new high-speed line following the public consultations, which took place between 2011 and January 2013.<ref>{{cite Hansard |jurisdiction= United Kingdom |url= http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmhansrd/cm100628/text/100628w0003.htm |speaker= Philip Hammond |position= Secretary of State for Transport |house= House of Commons |date= 28 June 2010 |column= 364W}}</ref><ref name="High Speed Two HS2 Limited"/> | |||
The government has said it plans to introduce a new discretionary hardship scheme to ensure the housing market along the route is not unduly disrupted. | |||
HS2 Action Alliance's alternative compensation solution for property blight was presented to DfT/HS2 Ltd and Secretary of State for Transport Philip Hammond, in response to the consultation on the EHS. The Alliance also presented DfT and HS2 Ltd with a pilot study on property blight.<ref>{{cite web |url= http://www.hs2aa.org/ehscompensation.php |title= The EHS announcement |year=2010 |publisher= HS2 Action Alliance |archiveurl= http://web.archive.org/web/20110911135243/http://www.hs2actionalliance.org/ehscompensation.php |archivedate=11 September 2011}}</ref> | |||
==Alternative plans== | |||
===Upgrade existing lines=== | |||
A ]-commissioned study into alternatives identified the following options: | |||
* lengthen existing trains and platforms, cost £3.5bn | |||
* remodel infrastructure to increase service frequency, cost £13bn | |||
* increase capacity and reduce journey times by bypassing slow track sections, cost £24bn | |||
According to ], these options would cause massive disruption to passengers for limited improvement.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16473296 |work=BBC News |title= Q&A: High-speed rail 2 |date= 29 October 2013 |accessdate=31 October 2013}}</ref> | |||
===Great Central option=== | |||
] MP, together with some hauliers and supermarket groups, has drawn up plans to reopen the former ] as an alternative to HS2.<ref>{{cite news |url= http://www.itv.com/news/update/2013-10-27/rival-plan-to-hs2-would-reopen-great-central-line/ |title= Rival plan to HS2 would 'reopen the Great Central line' |work= ITV News |date=27 October 2013 |accessdate=28 October 2013}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last=Ross |first=Tim |last2=Gilligan |first2=Andrew |url= http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/conservative/10406859/HS2-Labour-to-examine-cheaper-rival-plan.html |title=HS2: Labour to examine cheaper rival plan |work=The Sunday Telegraph |location= London |date= 27 October 2013 |accessdate=29 October 2013}}</ref> The cost of the Great Central option has been estimated by supporters at £6 billion, compared with £42.6 billion for HS2.<ref>{{cite news |author=Martin, Arthur |url= http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2478093/Railway-line-shut-Beeching-save-36bn-Critics-forward-alternative-route-using-track-closed-1960s.html |title=Railway line shut by Beeching 'can save us £36bn': Critics put forward alternative route using track closed in the 1960s |work=Daily Mail |location= London |date= 28 October 2013 |accessdate=30 October 2013}}</ref> A previous attempt to re-open the Great Central as an ] railway under the name ] was made in about 1990. Much of the former Great Central railway alignment has been built on where it passes through towns and cities, so any reopening would require extensive demolition.{{citation needed|date=April 2014}} | |||
===HighSpeed UK (HSUK)=== | |||
HighSpeed UK (HSUK) is an ] which proposes an alternative route to HS2 which broadly incorporates the proposed ] scheme. Its recommended route would follow the ] corridor northwards out of London, heading up the eastern side of the ] towards Edinburgh and Glasgow, roughly following the route of the existing ]. The route would use a combination of newly constructed track and existing lines. Cities in the English Midlands and Northern England would be connected to this line via a series of spurs diverging west, with a branch serving Birmingham and another branch serving Manchester and Liverpool. The Manchester branch would be linked to the main HSUK line via a ] connection which would allow trains also to serve Sheffield and Leeds, covering much of the proposed HS3 route. The HSUK proposal is not officially approved or funded by government.<ref name=HSUK>{{cite web|title=About HSUK|url=http://www.highspeeduk.co.uk/abouthsuk.html|website=High Speed UK|publisher=High Speed North Limited|accessdate=21 April 2015|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20150415135428/http://highspeeduk.co.uk/abouthsuk.html|archivedate=15 April 2015|deadurl=no}}</ref> | |||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
* ] | |||
*] | * ] | ||
*] | * ] | ||
* ], a rejected proposal for a ] line between London and Glasgow. | |||
*] | |||
* ], an unofficial name generally used to refer to the Northern Powerhouse Rail project. | |||
*] | |||
* ], a rejected proposal to link HS2 with High Speed 1 at ] station in Kent, via ] and ] airports. | |||
*] | |||
* ], an alternative proposal for high-speed services from London to Manchester and Liverpool, but via ] and ]. | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
*] | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
{{reflist|group="note"}} | {{reflist|group="note"}} | ||
{{notelist}} | {{notelist}} | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | |||
{{Reflist|30em}} | |||
==Sources== | ==Sources== | ||
{{Citation style|section|date=August 2015|details=Use {{tl|harvid}} instead of {{tl|anchor}}}} | |||
{{Refbegin}} | {{Refbegin}} | ||
* {{Cite web | date = 18 November 2021 | title = Integrated Rail Plan for the North and Midlands | url = https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1034360/integrated-rail-plan-for-the-north-and-midlands.pdf | website = UK Government | access-date = 29 December 2021 | ref = {{SfnRef|IRP North and Midlands|2021}} | archive-date = 18 November 2021 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20211118113149/https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1034360/integrated-rail-plan-for-the-north-and-midlands.pdf | url-status = live }} | |||
*{{anchor|bah2007}} {{cite web |url= http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/researchtech/research/newline/carbonimpact.pdf |author=Booz Allen Hamilton |title= Estimated Carbon Impact of a New North South Line |publisher= ] |year=2007}} | |||
* |
* {{cite web |url=http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/researchtech/research/newline/carbonimpact.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100120035214/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/researchtech/research/newline/carbonimpact.pdf |archive-date=20 January 2010 |author=] |title=Estimated Carbon Impact of a New North South Line |publisher=] |year=2007 |ref={{SfnRef|BAH|2007}} }} | ||
* |
* DfT (2009): {{cite book |url= http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/infrastructure/pdf/hs2.pdf |archive-url= http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100513152949/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/infrastructure/pdf/hs2.pdf |archive-date= 13 May 2010 |title= Britains Transport Infrastructure High Speed Two |publisher= ] |isbn= 978-1-906581-80-0 |year= 2009 |access-date= 8 March 2017 |ref= {{SfnRef|DfT|2009}} }} | ||
* |
* DfT (2010): {{cite book |url= http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm78/7827/7827.pdf |title= High Speed Rail – Command Paper |author= ] |publisher= ] |isbn= 978-0-10-178272-2 |date= 11 March 2010 |access-date= 13 March 2010 |ref= {{SfnRef|DfT|2010}} |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110302204705/http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm78/7827/7827.pdf |archive-date= 2 March 2011 |url-status= live }} | ||
* |
* HS2 (2010): {{cite web |url=http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/hs2ltd/hs2report/ |title=High Speed Rail London to the West Midlands and Beyond: A Report to Government by High Speed Two Limited |work=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited |date=11 March 2010 |publisher=Department for Transport |access-date=16 March 2010 |ref={{SfnRef|HS2 Report|2010}} |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100317151917/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/hs2ltd/hs2report/ |archive-date=17 March 2010 }}{{webarchive |format=addlarchives |url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100513152957/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/commandpaper/pdf/cmdpaper.pdf |date=13 May 2010}} | ||
*'''Detailed maps:''' | |||
**{{anchor|HS2012Maps}} '''HS2 Phase 1''' (2012 Maps): {{cite web |url= http://www.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2-maps-20120110/ |title= HS2 revised line of route maps |author= High Speed Two Ltd |date= 10 January 2012 |publisher= Department for Transport |accessdate=30 October 2012|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20140317181757/https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-revised-line-of-route-maps|archivedate=17 March 2014|deadurl=no}} | |||
**{{anchor|HS2phase2Maps}} '''HS2 Phase 2''' (2013 Maps): {{cite web |url= https://www.gov.uk/hs2-phase-two-initial-preferred-route-plan-and-profile-maps |title= HS2 Phase Two initial preferred route plan and profile maps |author= High Speed Two Ltd |date= 28 January 2013 |publisher= Department for Transport |accessdate=10 May 2014|archiveurl=http://web.archive.org/web/20140214080401/https://www.gov.uk/hs2-phase-two-initial-preferred-route-plan-and-profile-maps|archivedate=17 February 2014|deadurl=no}} | |||
===Detailed maps=== | |||
* '''HS2 Phase One''' (2012 Maps): {{cite web |url=http://www.dft.gov.uk/publications/hs2-maps-20120110/ |title=HS2 revised line of route maps |work=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited |date=10 January 2012 |publisher=Department for Transport |access-date=30 October 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140317181757/https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/hs2-revised-line-of-route-maps |archive-date=17 March 2014 |ref={{SfnRef|HS2 2012 Maps|2012}} }} | |||
* '''HS2 Phase Two''' (2013 Maps): {{cite web |url=https://www.gov.uk/hs2-phase-two-initial-preferred-route-plan-and-profile-maps |title=HS2 Phase Two initial preferred route plan and profile maps |work=High Speed Two (HS2) Limited |date=28 January 2013 |publisher=Department for Transport |access-date=10 May 2014 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140214080401/https://www.gov.uk/hs2-phase-two-initial-preferred-route-plan-and-profile-maps |archive-date=14 February 2014 |url-status=live |ref={{SfnRef|HS2 Phase 2 Maps|2013}} }} | |||
{{Refend}} | {{Refend}} | ||
== |
==Further reading== | ||
*{{cite magazine|title=High Speed 1 won... can High Speed 2, too?|first=Paul|last=Prentice|magazine=Rail|pages=54–59|issue=710|date=28 November – 11 December 2012|location=Peterborough|publisher=Bauer|issn=0953-4563|oclc=49953699}} | |||
== External links == | |||
{{Commons category|High Speed 2}} | |||
{{Commons category}} | |||
*{{cite web |url=http://www.hs2.org.uk |title= High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd |work=www.hs2.org.uk |publisher=High Speed Two Ltd}} | |||
* {{Official website}} | |||
*{{cite web |url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/pi/highspeedrail/hs2ltd/hs2report// |title= High Speed Rail London to the West Midlands and Beyond: A Report to Government by High Speed Two Limited |author= High Speed Two Ltd |publisher= ] – Deposited in ] |work=www.dft.gov.uk |date= 11 March 2010}} | |||
* {{cite web |title=HS2: costs and controversies: How much has the HS2 project cost since its inception? |first1=Gemma |last1=Tetlow |first2=Jeremy |last2=Pattison |website=] |date=5 October 2023 |url=https://www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/hs2-costs |access-date=26 November 2023}} | |||
*{{cite web |url=http://www.hs2facts.co.uk |title= High Speed Two (HS2) Facts |work=hs2facts.co.uk |publisher=HS2 Facts}} | |||
* {{cite web |publisher=Department for Transport |url=http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/researchtech/research/hspeedlinestudysummaryreport.pdf |archive-url=http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100409090644/http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/rail/researchtech/research/hspeedlinestudysummaryreport.pdf |archive-date=9 April 2010 |title=High Speed Line Study: Summary Report |author=] |year=2009 |access-date=13 March 2010 }} | |||
{{High Speed 2 articles}} | |||
{{High-speed rail}} | {{High-speed rail}} | ||
{{High-speed railway lines}} | {{High-speed railway lines}} | ||
{{Current rail infrastructure projects in the United Kingdom}} | {{Current rail infrastructure projects in the United Kingdom}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2014}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 22:15, 4 January 2025
British high-speed rail project "HS2" redirects here. For other uses, see HS2 (disambiguation).
High Speed 2 (HS2) is a high-speed railway which has been under construction in England since 2019. The line's planned route is between Handsacre, in southern Staffordshire, and London, with a spur to Birmingham. HS2 is to be Britain's second purpose-built high-speed railway after High Speed 1, which connects London to the Channel Tunnel. London and Birmingham are to be served directly by new high-speed track. Services to Glasgow, Liverpool and Manchester are to use a mix of new high-speed track and the existing West Coast Main Line. The majority of the project is planned to be completed by 2033.
The new track is being built between London Euston and Handsacre, near Lichfield in southern Staffordshire, where a junction connects HS2 to the north-south West Coast Main Line. Stations are planned for Old Oak Common in northwest London, Birmingham Interchange, near Solihull, and Birmingham city centre. The trains are being designed to reach a maximum speed of 360 km/h (220 mph) when operating on HS2 track, dropping to 201 km/h (125 mph) on conventional track.
The length of the planned new line has been reduced substantially since the first announcement in 2013. The scheme was originally to split into eastern and western branches north of Birmingham Interchange. The eastern branch would have connected to the Midland Main Line at Clay Cross in Derbyshire and the East Coast Main Line south of York, with a branch to a terminus in Leeds. The western branch would have had connections to the West Coast Main Line at Crewe and south of Wigan, branching to a terminus in Manchester. Between November 2021 and October 2023 the project was progressively cut until only the London to Handsacre and Birmingham section remained.
The project has both supporters and opponents. Supporters of HS2 believe that the additional capacity provided will accommodate passenger numbers rising to pre-COVID-19 levels while driving a further modal shift to rail. Opponents believe that the project is neither environmentally nor financially sustainable.
History
Main article: History of High Speed 2 See also: High-speed rail in the United KingdomIn 2003, modern high-speed rail arrived in the United Kingdom with the opening of the first part of High Speed 1 (HS1), then known as the 67-mile-long (108 km) Channel Tunnel Rail Link between London and the Channel Tunnel. In 2009, the Department for Transport (DfT) under the Labour government proposed to assess the case for a second high-speed line, which was to be developed by a new company, High Speed Two Limited (HS2 Ltd).
In December 2010, following a review by the Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition, a route was proposed, subject to public consultation, based on a Y-shaped route from London to Birmingham with branches to Leeds and Manchester, as originally put forward by the previous Labour government, with alterations designed to minimise the visual, noise, and other environmental impacts of the line.
In January 2012, the Secretary of State for Transport announced that HS2 would go ahead in two phases and the legislative process would be achieved through two hybrid bills. The High Speed Rail (London - West Midlands) Act 2017, authorising the construction of Phase 1, passed both Houses of Parliament and received Royal Assent in February 2017. A Phase 2a High Speed Rail (West Midlands - Crewe) Bill, seeking the power to construct Phase 2 as far as Crewe and to make decisions on the remainder of the Phase 2b route, was introduced in July 2017. Phase 2a received royal assent in February 2021. The High Speed Rail (Crewe - Manchester) Bill for Phase 2b was paused under the Sunak ministry.
One of the stated aims of the project is to increase the capacity of the railway network. It is envisaged that the introduction of HS2 will free up space on existing railway lines by removing a number of express services, thus allowing additional local train services to accommodate increased passenger numbers. Network Rail considers that constructing a new high-speed railway will be more cost-effective and less disruptive than upgrading the existing conventional rail network. The DfT has forecast that improved connectivity will have a positive economic impact, and that favourable journey times and ample capacity will generate a modal shift from air and road to rail. In December 2024 the DfT stated there will be no WCML extensions from HS2 until the current project is completed.
Oakervee Review
On 21 August 2019, the DfT ordered an independent review of the project. The review was chaired by Douglas Oakervee, a British civil engineer, who had been HS2's non-executive chairman for nearly two years. The review was published by the DfT on 11 February 2020, alongside a statement from the Prime Minister confirming that HS2 would go ahead in full, with reservations. Oakervee's conclusions were that the original rationale for High Speed 2—to provide capacity and reliability on the rail network—was still valid, and that no "shovel-ready" interventions existed that could be deployed within the timeframe of the project. As a consequence, Oakervee recommended that the project go ahead as planned, subject to a series of further recommendations. After concluding that the project should proceed, the review recommended a further review of HS2 that would be undertaken by the Infrastructure and Projects Authority and would concentrate on reducing costs and over-specification.
On 15 April 2020, formal approval was given to construction companies to start work on the project.
In July 2023 the Infrastructure Projects Authority annual report gave Phases 1 and 2A project a "red" rating, meaning "Successful delivery of the project appears to be unachievable. There are major issues with project definition, schedule, budget, quality and/or benefits delivery, which at this stage do not appear to be manageable or resolvable. The project may need re-scoping and/or its overall viability reassessed." Measures such as reducing the speed of trains and their frequency, and general cost-cutting predominately affecting Phase 2b, would be assessed.
The House of Commons Public Accounts Committee, in a January 2024 report, in relation to the revised planned route, stated that:
"HS2 now offers very poor value for money to the taxpayer, and the Department and HS2 Ltd do not yet know what it expects the final benefits of the programme to be".
This report was clarified to mean following the cancellation of Phase 2.
Integrated Rail Plan
On 18 November 2021, the government's delayed Integrated Rail Plan was published. The plan significantly affected parts of the HS2 programme, including curtailing much of the eastern leg.
Under the original proposal for the eastern leg, the high-speed line would have been built with a link to the East Coast Main Line south of York for trains to continue to Newcastle. A branch would take trains into Leeds. There would also have been a branch to the Midland Main Line north of Derby for trains to continue to Sheffield. The original scheme also included a through station at Toton, between Nottingham and Derby. The HS2 eastern section was largely eliminated, leaving a branch from Coleshill near Birmingham to East Midlands Parkway station, just south of Nottingham and Derby, where the HS2 track would end, with trains continuing north onto the Midland Main Line to serve the existing stations at Nottingham, Derby, Chesterfield, and Sheffield. HS2 trains would serve the centres of Nottingham and Derby, unlike in the previous proposal.
Upgrades to the East Coast Main Line were proposed to offer time improvements on the London to Leeds and Newcastle routes. Services from Birmingham to Leeds and Newcastle were planned to use the remaining section of the HS2 eastern leg. The London to Sheffield service will remain on the Midland Main Line, equalling the proposed original HS2 journey times. The integrated Rail Plan proposed a study to determine the best method for HS2 trains to reach Leeds.
In June 2022, the Golborne spur was removed from the Crewe-to-Manchester Parliamentary Bill. Without this link, trains to Scotland would join the existing West Coast Main Line further south at Crewe, instead of south of Wigan. The Department of Transport stated that the government was considering the recommendations of the Union Connectivity Review, which gave alternatives such as a more northerly HS2 connection to the West Coast Main Line than Golborne and upgrades to the West Coast Main Line from Crewe to Preston. The Department of Transport will publish its response subject to the funding allocated in the integrated Rail Plan.
Phase 2
Main article: High Speed 2 Phase TwoCancellation of Phase 2, October 2023
In October 2023, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak announced at the Conservative Party conference that Phase 2 would be abandoned. The cancellation left a new high-speed track from London to Handsacre, northeast of Birmingham, with a branch to central Birmingham. The construction of Euston station would depend on private sector funding: if funding were to be secured for the station access tunnel, construction would be the responsibility of HS2 Ltd. Euston station was initially proposed to have 11 platforms to accommodate HS2 trains. There is a reduction to six platforms, as a proposal from October 2023 will cap the throughput to 9–11 trains per hour, rather than the 18 of which the HS2 track would otherwise be capable.
Sunak said the £36 billion saved by not building the northern leg of HS2 would instead be spent on roads, buses, and railways in every region of the country, under the title Network North. The locations of these projects would range from southern Scotland to Plymouth. Money would be distributed in the North, Midlands and South of England according to where the reduction of costs (not benefits) will lie. Around 30 per cent of the cost savings would be spent on railway projects. After it was found that the list of projects included schemes that had already been built or were swiftly deleted, Sunak said the list was intended to provide illustrative examples.
In January 2024, opposition leader Keir Starmer said it would not be possible for any future Labour government to reinstate Phase 2, since contracts would have been cancelled. This was confirmed in April 2024 by Louise Haigh, the shadow transport minister.
Ongoing review in 2024 for revival to Manchester
In January 2024, Andy Burnham, Mayor of Greater Manchester, and Andy Street, Mayor of the West Midlands, held talks to "revive the high speed rail project with private investment" after meeting private investors, Mark Harper (Secretary of State for Transport), and Huw Merriman (Minister of State for Rail and HS2). Harper said that he was considering the plans with an "open mind". Burnham told the Transport Select Committee of the House of Commons that the gist of the plans were to revive the part of Phase 2 between Handsacre and High Legh in Cheshire; trains would then proceed on Northern Powerhouse Rail to Manchester Piccadilly. Burnham said the cost could be "considerably less" than earlier plans if the maximum speed of trains was reduced. The Phase 2b Bill remains in the House of Commons but the Committee paused its work after the October 2023 announcement.
A provisional report commissioned by the mayors concluded in March 2024 that the best option would be a new line between Handsacre and Manchester Airport, to meet Northern Powerhouse Rail. The cost could be covered by a combination of government funding and private finance.
Route
See also: Geographic data related to proposed route of HS2, phase 1 at OpenStreetMap.London to Handsacre and Birmingham
HS2 parallels the West Coast Main Line (WCML), merging with the WCML at Handsacre. The line will be between Euston railway station in London and a junction with the WCML outside the village of Handsacre north of Lichfield in Staffordshire. There will be a branch to a new station at Birmingham Curzon Street. There will also be new stations at Old Oak Common, in northwest London, and Birmingham Interchange, near Solihull. The section between Old Oak Common and the West Midlands is scheduled to open around 2030, with the link to Euston following between 2031 and 2035. The high speed track, including the branch to Birmingham, is 225 kilometres (140 mi) long. It is flanked by the WCML and the Chiltern Line.
Upon opening, HS2 and West Coast Main Line compatible trains will operate from London, reaching Birmingham in 49 minutes and Birmingham Interchange in 38 minutes. Trains will journey to other destinations on a mix of HS2 and conventional track. Journeys to Liverpool will take 1 hour 50 minutes, to Glasgow 4 hours, and to Manchester 1 hour 40 minutes. Trains will progress on HS2 track to Handsacre, then use the West Coast Main Line.
The route to the north begins at Euston station in London, entering a twin-bore tunnel near the Mornington Street Bridge at the station's throat. After continuing through to the Old Oak Common station, trains proceed through a second, 8-mile (13 km) tunnel, emerging at its northwestern portal. The line crosses the Colne Valley Regional Park on the Colne Valley Viaduct and then enters a 9.8-mile (15.8 km) tunnel under the Chiltern Hills, to emerge near South Heath, northwest of Amersham. The route will roughly parallel the A413 road and the London to Aylesbury Line, to the west of Wendover. This is a green cut-and-cover tunnel under farmland, with soil spread over the final construction in order to reduce visual impact and noise, and allow use of the land above the tunnels for agriculture. After passing west of Aylesbury, the route will pass through the corridor of the former Great Central Main Line, joining the alignment north of Quainton Road to travel through rural Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire up to Mixbury, south of Brackley, from where it will cross the A43 and open countryside through South Northamptonshire and Warwickshire, passing immediately south of Southam. After progressing through a tunnel bored under Long Itchington Wood, the route will pass through rural areas between Kenilworth and Coventry, crossing the A46 to enter the West Midlands.
Birmingham Interchange Station will be on the outskirts of Solihull, close to the strategic road network, including the M42, M6, M6 toll, and A45. These roads will be crossed on viaducts. The station is adjacent to Birmingham Airport and the National Exhibition Centre. North of the station west of Coleshill there will be a complex triangular branch junction, with six tracks at one section, will link the HS2 Birmingham city centre spur with the main spine. The spine continues north from the branch to the northerly limit of the high speed track which is a connection onto the WCML at Handsacre. The Birmingham city centre spur will be routed along the Water Orton rail corridor, the Birmingham to Derby line through Castle Bromwich, and through a tunnel past Bromford.
Branches to other lines
West Coast Main Line
A key feature of the HS2 proposals is that the new high-speed track will be connected to the existing West Coast Main Line track at Handsacre, north of Birmingham, taking trains north on the existing track. This is the only connection between the new and existing track. This connection allows HS2 services to serve the cities of Liverpool, Manchester and Glasgow on a mix of new high-speed track and the existing West Coast Main Line. Purpose-built trains will be capable of operating on new and existing tracks.
Stations
Central London
Main article: London Euston railway stationHigh Speed 2 is to share a southern terminus with the West Coast Main Line at London Euston, which is to be remodelled to integrate six new HS2 platforms and concourse with the current conventional rail station. There will be an improved connection to the adjacent Euston Square tube station, which serves the Circle, Hammersmith & City, and Metropolitan lines. The government announced that this aspect of the project would only commence if the private sector were to agree funding.
West London
Main article: Old Oak Common railway stationOld Oak Common station, between Paddington and Acton Main Line station, is under construction and scheduled to be completed before Euston. It will be the temporary London terminus of HS2 until Euston is completed. There will be connections with the Elizabeth Line, Heathrow Express to Heathrow Airport, and the Great Western Main Line to Reading, South West England, and South Wales. Old Oak Common railway station will also be connected, via out of station interchanges, with London Overground stations at Old Oak Common Lane on the North London line and Hythe Road on the West London line.
Birmingham Airport
Main article: Birmingham InterchangeBirmingham Interchange will be a through station situated in suburban Solihull, within a triangle of land enclosed by the M42, A45, and A452 highways. A people mover with a capacity of over 2,100 passengers per hour in each direction will connect the station to the National Exhibition Centre, Birmingham Airport, and the existing Birmingham International railway station. The AirRail Link people-mover already operates between Birmingham International station and the airport. In addition, there is a proposal to extend the West Midlands Metro to serve the station.
In 2010, Birmingham Airport's chief executive, Paul Kehoe, stated that HS2 is a key element in increasing the number of flights using the airport, with added patronage by inhabitants of London and the South East, as HS2 will reduce travel times from London to Birmingham Airport to under 40 minutes.
Birmingham city centre
Main article: Birmingham Curzon Street railway stationBirmingham Curzon Street will be the terminal station at the end of a branch that connects to the HS2 spine via a junction at Coleshill. A station of the same name existed on the Curzon Street site between 1838 and 1966; the surviving Grade I listed station building will be retained and renovated.
The site is immediately adjacent to Moor Street station, and approximately 400 metres (0.25 mi) northeast of New Street station, which is separated from Curzon and Moor streets by the Bull Ring. Passenger interchange with Moor Street would be at street level, across Moor Street Queensway; interchange with New Street would be via a pedestrian walkway between Moor Street and New Street (opened in 2013). In September 2018, one of Birmingham's oldest pubs, the Fox and Grapes, was demolished to make way for the new developments. The West Midlands Metro will be extended to serve the station.
Development planning for the Fazeley Street quarter of Birmingham has changed as a result of HS2. Prior to the announcement of the HS2 station, Birmingham City University had planned to build a new campus in Eastside. The proposed Eastside development will now include a new museum quarter, with the original station building becoming a new museum of photography, fronting onto a new Curzon Square, which will also be home to Ikon 2, a museum of contemporary art.
Clearing the site for construction commenced in December 2018. Grimshaw Architects received planning permission for three applications in April 2020. The new station is expected to have a zero-carbon rating and over 2,800 square metres (30,000 sq ft) of solar panels.
Interchanges with other lines
London Old Oak Common
The plan makes provision for HS2 service passenger interchanges to the Elizabeth Line and Great Western Line.
London Euston
The plan makes provision for HS2 service passenger interchanges on foot to the West Coast main Line and London Underground ("Tube") services via the adjacent Euston tube station and Euston square tube station.
Birmingham Curzon Street
The West Midlands Metro, a tram service, is to serve Curzon Street, providing access to onward services from Birmingham Snow Hill, Birmingham New Street and Wolverhampton.
Tunnelling
There are five twin-bore tunnel sections on the route from London to Birmingham. The Euston tunnel will take passengers from Euston railway station to Old Oak Common station. The Northolt tunnel will cover the area between Old Oak Common and the Colne Valley Viaduct in West Ruislip. The Chiltern tunnel will be the longest tunnel on the route and will travel 10 miles (16 km) underneath the Chiltern Hills. The Long Itchington Wood tunnel is the shortest on the route and will take passengers underneath an ancient woodland. The Bromford tunnel will take trains into Birmingham city centre.
Euston tunnel
Main article: Euston tunnelIn April 2023, HS2 announced that work on the Euston tunnels linking Old Oak Common to Euston was being deferred and that tunnel-boring had been rescheduled to start in summer 2025. In October 2023, the Government announced that any Euston terminus would not be government-funded. However, in May 2024, the Government was reportedly prepared to pay the upfront tunnelling cost of around £1bn to avoid further costly delays to the project. It would then recoup costs from the wider development of the Euston station site.
Northolt tunnel
Main article: Northolt tunnelThe Northolt tunnels are being constructed with four TBMs; two tunnelling West to East and two tunnelling East to West, with the plan to meet in the middle. TBM Sushila and Caroline, the first two of the four TBMs to be used, were launched from the West Ruislip portal in October 2022. The third launched in February 2024 and the fourth followed in April 2024, with the all the tunnels planned to be finished by the end of 2025. Sushila broke through in December 2024.
Chiltern tunnel
Main article: Chiltern tunnelThe 10-mile (16 km) Chiltern tunnels was scheduled to take three years to dig, using two 2,000-tonne (2,000-long-ton; 2,200-short-ton) tunnel boring machines (TBM). In July 2020, work was completed on a 17-metre (56 ft)-high headwall at the southern portal of the twin-bore tunnel. The tunnels are lined with concrete that is cast in sections at a purpose-built facility at the southern portal; the first sections were cast in March 2021. Tunnelling began in May 2021, with TBM Florence, moving at a speed of up to 15 m (49 ft) per day. The second TBM, Cecilia, was launched in July 2021. Florence, the first of two TBMs, completed tunnelling and broke through in late February 2024, and in March 2024, the second TBM, Cecilia, completed tunnelling.
Long Itchington Wood tunnel
In December 2021, TBM Dorothy was launched, tunnelling under Long Itchington Wood. It completed the first bore in July 2022, and was returned to its initial position to complete the second, parallel bore. Dorothy started the second bore in November 2022, and finished it in March 2023.
Bromford tunnel
Main article: Bromford tunnelThe Bromford tunnels from Water Orton in North Warwickshire to Birmingham are being bored by TBMs Mary Ann and Elizabeth. Mary Ann started tunnelling in June 2023 and will finish in 2024, while Elizabeth started in March 2024 and will finish in Autumn 2025.
Main construction
The main stages of construction officially began on 4 September 2020, following previous delays. The civil engineering aspect of the construction of Phase 1 is worth roughly £6.6 billion, with preparation including over 8,000 boreholes for ground investigation.
Euston station in London
In October 2018, demolition began on the former carriage sheds at Euston station. This will allow the start of construction at the throat of the station at Mornington Street Bridge, and twin-bore 8-mile (13 km) tunnels to West Ruislip. In January 2019, the taxi rank at Euston was moved to a temporary site at the front of the station so that demolition of the One Euston Square and Grant Thornton House tower blocks could commence. The demolition period was scheduled to last ten months. In June 2020, workers finished the demolition of the western ramp and canopy of the station. This part of the station had housed the parcels depot, which fell into disuse after parcel traffic shifted to being serviced by road.
In March 2023, the government postponed works on Euston station, saying that this was necessary to "manage inflationary pressures and work on an affordable design for the station". Delivery of services between Birmingham and Old Oak Common would instead be prioritised, with the Elizabeth line providing passenger transfer between Old Oak Common and central London until at least 2035, the earliest time at which Euston would be available under the new plans.
Colne Valley Viaduct
Main article: Colne Valley ViaductThe Colne Valley Viaduct is a 2.1-mile (3.4 km)-long bridge to carry the line over the Colne Valley Regional Park in Hillingdon, West London. The viaduct is situated between the Northolt and Chiltern tunnels. The bridge-building machine was launched in May 2022, signalling the start of construction. The final deck segment was put into place in September 2024. The viaduct is expected to be fully complete in May 2025.
Other sites
Construction of Old Oak Common station began in June 2021.
Operation
Earlier government proposals were that by 2033 HS2 would provide up to 18 trains an hour to and from London. The 2020 business case contained a suggested service pattern, although this was never finalised. Some services were to operate as two connected units that would be subsequently detached to serve multiple northern destinations.
Previously proposed service patterns
This section needs to be updated. The reason given is: HS2 phases 2A and 2B have been cancelled. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (October 2023) |
After an initial period with reduced services north from Old Oak Common, a full nine-train-per-hour service from London Euston was proposed to operate after the opening of Phase 1.
London to Birmingham | |||
---|---|---|---|
Route | tph | Calling at | Train length |
London Euston – Birmingham Curzon Street | 3 | Old Oak Common, Birmingham Interchange | 400 m |
London to the North West and Scotland | |||
Route | tph | Calling at | Train length |
London Euston – Manchester Piccadilly | 3 | Old Oak Common, Wilmslow (1tph), Stockport | 200 m |
London Euston – Macclesfield | 1 | Old Oak Common, Stafford, Stoke-on-Trent Would only operate if phase 2a was open. |
200 m |
London Euston – Liverpool Lime Street | 1 | Old Oak Common, Stafford, Runcorn Would call at Crewe in lieu of Stafford if phase 2a was open. |
200 m |
1 | Old Oak Common, Crewe, Runcorn Would operate combined with the Lancaster train (see below) between London and Crewe if phase 2a was open. |
200 m | |
London Euston – Lancaster | 1 | Old Oak Common, Crewe, Warrington Bank Quay, Wigan North Western, Preston Would operate combined with the Liverpool train (see above) between London and Crewe if phase 2a was open. |
200 m |
London Euston – Glasgow Central | 1 | Old Oak Common, Preston, Carlisle | 200 m |
Operator
The ongoing servicing and maintenance of High Speed 2 is included within the West Coast Partnership franchise, which was awarded to Avanti West Coast—a joint venture between FirstGroup and Trenitalia—when the franchise commenced in December 2019. Avanti West Coast will be responsible for maintaining all aspects of the service, including ticketing, trains, and the maintenance of the infrastructure. The initial franchise contract is for the first three-to-five years of HS2's operation.
Fares
The government has stated that it would "assume a fares structure in line with that of the existing railway", and HS2 should attract sufficient passengers to not have to charge premium fares. Paul Chapman, in charge of HS2's public relations strategy, suggested that there could be last-minute tickets sold at discount rates. He said, "when you have got a train departing on a regular basis, maybe every five or ten minutes, in that last half-hour before the train leaves and you have got empty seats...you can start selling tickets for £5 and £10 at a standby rate."
Capacity
This section needs to be updated. The reason given is: reflecting on the Nov 2021 Integrated Rail Plan. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (November 2021) |
Type | Current capacity | Capacity post‑HS2 |
---|---|---|
Slow commuter | 3,900 | 6,500 |
Fast commuter | 1,600 | 6,800 |
Intercity | 5,800 | 1,800 |
High-speed | 0 | 19,800 |
Total | 11,300 | 34,900 |
HS2 will carry up to 26,000 people per hour, with anticipated annual passenger numbers of 85 million. The line will be used intensively, with up to 17 trains per hour travelling to and from Euston. As all trains will be capable of the same speed, capacity is increased as faster trains will not need to reduce speed for slower freight and commuter trains.
By diverting the fastest services to HS2, capacity is released on the West Coast Main Line, East Coast Main Line, and Midland Main Line, allowing for more slow freight trains and local, regional, and commuter services. Andrew McNaughton, Chief Technical Director, said, "Basically, as a dedicated passenger railway, we can carry more people per hour than two motorways. It's phenomenal capacity. It pretty much triples the number of seats long-distance to the North of England".
Infrastructure
The DfT report on High Speed Rail published in March 2010 sets out the specifications for a high-speed line. It will be built to a Continental European structure gauge (as was HS1) and will conform to European Union technical standards for interoperability for high-speed rail. HS2 is being built with a UIC GC loading gauge (also assumed for passenger capacity estimations) with a maximum design speed of 400 km/h (250 mph). Initially, trains would reach a maximum speed of 360 km/h (225 mph).
Signalling will be based on the European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) with in-cab signalling, in order to resolve the visibility issues associated with lineside signals at speeds over 200 km/h (125 mph). ETCS Level 2 will be used on the line, with automatic train operation (ATO) operating at GoA2 (Grade of Automation 2), where trains will be semi-automatic (on the HS2 line alone, with drivers operating the doors, driving the train if needed and handling emergencies). GSM-R will be used for operational communications.
Electrification at 25 kV 50 Hz AC will be provided by overhead lines, designed to SNCF Reseau's V360 standard, on licence to contractors.
The line will use pre-cast slab track on most open sections, with the Slab Track Austria system supplied by PORR, except in tunnels and stations where cast in situ track will be used.
At first, platform height was to be 760 millimetres (2 ft 6 in), which is one of the European standard heights; however, new HS2 stations will use a platform height of 1,115 millimetres (3 ft 7.9 in) to improve accessibility and allow for step-free, level access. Trains continuing on to the conventional rail network will encounter platforms at the standard UK height of 915 millimetres (3 ft 0 in) with some variation.
Rolling stock
Main article: HS2 rolling stockIn December 2021, DfT and HS2 announced that the rolling-stock contract had been awarded to the Hitachi–Alstom joint venture. The trains will be based on an evolution of the Zefiro V300 platform. The first train is expected to be delivered around 2027. Vehicle bodies will be welded and fitted out at the Hitachi facility in Newton Aycliffe, bogies will be manufactured at the Alstom facility in Crewe, and the final assembly of body, bogies, and other systems will take place at Alstom in Derby.
Procurement timeline
The 2010 DfT government command-paper outlined some requirements for the train design among its recommendations for design standards for the HS2 network. The paper addressed the particular problem of designing trains to continental European standards, which use taller and wider rolling stock, compared to the loading gauges that exist in the rail network in Great Britain, meaning both trains which would remain on the HS2 line, built to larger, continental European profile ('captive' trains), and smaller trains which could leave the line onto the existing network ('conventional-compatible' trains) were proposed.
Trains would have a maximum speed of at least 360 km/h (225 mph) and a length of 200 metres (660 ft); two units could be joined for a 400-metre (1,300 ft) train.
The DfT report also considered the possibility of "gauge clearance" work on non-high-speed lines as an alternative to conventional trains. This work would involve extensive reconstruction of stations, tunnels, and bridges, and the widening of clearances to allow Continental European–profile trains to operate beyond the high-speed network. The report concluded that, although initial outlay on commissioning new rolling stock would be high, it would cost less than the widespread disruption of rebuilding large tracts of Britain's rail infrastructure.
Alstom, one of the bidders for the contract to build the trains, proposed in October 2016 that HS2 "tilting trains" could run on HS2 and conventional tracks, to increase overall speeds when operating on conventional tracks.
The estimated cost of energy for operating HS2 trains on the high-speed network was estimated in 2013 to be £3.90 per km for 200-metre (656 ft) long trains and £5.00 per km for 260-metre (853 ft) long trains. On the conventional network, the energy costs are £2.00 per km and £2.60 per km, respectively.
The first batch of rolling stock for HS2 was specified in the Train Technical Specification issued with the Invitation To Tender (ITT), which was initially published in July 2018, and revised in March 2019, following clarification questions from tenderers. Bidding for the contract to design, build, and maintain the trains was opened in 2017 and was originally expected to be awarded in 2019. The first batch includes 54 trainsets with a maximum speed of at least 360 km/h (225 mph) and with the capability to operate on both HS2 and existing infrastructure.
The following suppliers were shortlisted to tender following the initial 5 June 2019 submission:
- Alstom Transport
- Bombardier Transportation and Hitachi Rail Europe consortium. Bombardier were subsequently acquired by Alstom Transport in January 2021 Bombardier and Hitachi were existing suppliers of Frecciarossa 1000 rolling stock for the Italian Frecciarossa high speed service.
- Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles (CAF)
- Patentes Talgo proposed its AVRIL train used by Spanish operator Renfe.
- Siemens Mobility
In September 2021, the HS2 board endorsed the decision to award the rolling stock manufacturing and maintenance contracts. In November 2021, it was reported that the decision remained with the DfT for approval.
Maintenance depots
This section needs to be updated. The reason given is: reflecting on the Nov 2021 Integrated Rail Plan. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (November 2021) |
A rolling-stock depot will be built in Washwood Heath, Birmingham, covering all of Phase 1 and Phase 2a. In July 2018, the then Transport Secretary, Chris Grayling, announced that the rolling stock depot for the eastern leg of Phase 2b would be at Gateway 45 near to the M1 motorway in Leeds. An additional depot in Annandale, north of Gretna Green and south of Kirkpatrick Fleming, was announced in 2020.
The infrastructure maintenance depot (IMD) for Phase 1 will be constructed roughly halfway along the route, north of Aylesbury, between Steeple Claydon and Calvert in Buckinghamshire. This site is adjacent to the intersection of HS2 and the East West Rail route. In the working draft environmental statement for Phase 2b, the IMD on the eastern leg is proposed for near Staveley, Derbyshire, on a former chemical works site, while Phase 2b, the western leg, will have one near Stone, Staffordshire.
Journey times
The DfT's latest revised estimates of journey times for some major destinations have been set out in various government documents, including the business cases for each phase and other related documents.
HS2 services from London
Since the cancellation of phase 2 of HS2, services and journey times will differ from the original plans as outlined in the table below. Speaking in the House of Lords in December 2024, Rail Minister Lord Hendy stated that HS2 services had not been determined or finalized and that Euston Station will have six HS2 platforms. This is also in view of potentially upgrading Pendolino trains to 155mph for use on HS2 and WCML track to improve end-to-end times as suggested by rail consultants. Pendolino trains have a life limit of 2046 with upgrades.
London to/from | Fastest journey time
before HS2 (hrs:min) |
Estimated time with full HS2
including Phase 2 (hrs:min) |
Estimated time reduction
with Phase 2 active (min.) |
---|---|---|---|
Birmingham | 1:21 | 0:52 | 0:29 |
Liverpool | 2:03 | 1:50 | 0:13 |
Manchester | 2:08 | 1:40 | 0:28 |
Glasgow | 4:30 | 4:00 | 0:30 |
Sources: |
Funding
This section needs to be updated. The reason given is: relating to the Nov 2021 Integrated Rail Plan. Please help update this article to reflect recent events or newly available information. (November 2021) |
The DfT initially estimated the cost of the first 190-kilometre (120 mi) section, from London to Birmingham, at between £15.8 and £17.4 billion, and the entire Y-shaped 540-kilometre (335 mi) network at between £30.9 and £36 billion, not including the Manchester Airport station which would be locally funded. In June 2013, the projected cost (in 2011 prices) rose by £10 billion, to £42.6 billion, with an extra £7.5 billion budgeted for rolling stock, for a total of £50.1 billion. Less than a week later, it was revealed that the DfT had been using an outdated model to estimate the productivity increases associated with the railway. In 2014, the most commonly cited cost applied to the project was £56.6 billion, which corresponds to the June 2013 funding package, as adjusted for inflation by the House of Lords' Economic Affairs Committee in 2015. Over sixty years, the line was estimated to provide £92.2 billion of net benefits and £43.6 billion in new revenue. As a result, the benefit–cost ratio of the project was then estimated to be 2.30; that is, it is projected to provide £2.30 of benefits for every £1 spent.
Cost increases have led to reductions in the planned track; for instance, the link between HS1 and HS2 was later dropped on cost grounds. In April 2016, Sir Jeremy Heywood, a top UK civil servant, was reviewing the HS2 project to trim costs and gauge whether the project could be kept within budget. The cost of HS2 is around 25 per cent higher than the international average, which was blamed on the higher population density and cost of land, in a report by PwC. The costs are also higher because the line will be built directly into city centres instead of joining existing networks on the outskirts. By 2019, Oakervee estimated that the projected cost, in 2019 prices, had increased from £80.7 billion to £87.7 billion—the budget in 2019 prices was at the time of the Oakervee Review only £62.4 billion—and the benefit–cost ratio had dropped to between 1.3 and 1.5. Lord Berkeley, the deputy chair of the Oakervee Review, disagreed with Oakervee's findings and suggested that the cost of the project could now be as high as £170 billion. As of 2020, the budget envelope set out by the DfT is £98 billion. HS2 Ltd tapped into a £4.3 billion contingency fund to meet £1.7 billion of extra costs resulting from delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The benefit cost ratio for the whole project was last officially estimated at 1.1 for the whole project in July 2022.
Sources of funding other than central government have been mooted for additional links. The City of Liverpool, omitted from direct HS2 access, in March 2016 offered £6 billion to fund a link from the city to the HS2 backbone 20 miles (32 km) away. HS2 received funding from the European Union's Connecting Europe Facility.
Wales' classification
HS2's classification as an "England and Wales" project had been criticised by MPs, Plaid Cymru, and past Welsh Government ministers in Wales, arguing that HS2's classification over Wales has little justification. They argue this is because there is no dedicated high-speed or conventional infrastructure of HS2 planned in Wales and minimal HS2 services to the north of Wales. A DfT study detailed that HS2 was forecasted to have a "negative economic impact on Wales", as well as on Bristol in England.
Rail infrastructure is not devolved to Wales, therefore devolved authorities are entitled to less of the Barnett Formula, when funding is increased to the devolved administrations in proportion to an increase in funding for England or, in this case, England and Wales. The Welsh Government has stated that it wants its "fair share" from HS2's billions in funding, which the Welsh Government stated would be roughly £5 billion in 2020. By February 2020, the Welsh government received £755 million in HS2-linked funding, with the UK Government stating it was "investing record amounts in Wales' railway infrastructure" and that the Welsh government has actually received a "significant uplift" in Barnett-based funding due to the UK Government's increased funding of HS2. Simon Hart, Secretary of State for Wales, stated that Network Rail would invest £1.5 billion in Wales' railways between 2019 and 2024.
Following the cancelling of Phase 2, Wales' estimated claim was reduced to £3.9 billion. Mark Drakeford while as First Minister considered legal action in the courts over the issue, however following his replacement, the Welsh Government dropped their calls for legal action. While in June 2024, the Welsh Government reduced the claimed figure to £350 million, stating difficulties with estimating the consequential. Labour's Shadow Secretary of State for Wales, Jo Stevens, claimed HS2 is "no longer in existence", when questioned on Wales' funding issue.
In 2020, trains between north Wales and London take roughly three hours and forty-five minutes, with HS2 set to decrease the travel time between Crewe and London by thirty minutes. However, with no confirmed services directly between Euston and north Wales, passengers could be required to change at Crewe, and use the North Wales Main Line between Crewe and Holyhead, where any improvements have failed to receive funding.
The DfT study estimated that the South Wales economy could lose up to £200 million per year, due to the region's "inferior transport infrastructure". The same study highlighted that north Wales could benefit from faster journey times and a potential boost for the region's economy, with the DfT forecasting a benefit of £50 million from HS2, although with a potential £150 million negative economic impact to Wales overall. First Minister of Wales Mark Drakeford described in a letter to UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson that Wales' railway system has been "systematically neglected" and that HS2's funding further contributes to it. HS2 has increased calls for Wales' rail infrastructure to be fully devolved, as it is in Scotland.
In July 2021, the Welsh Affairs Committee advised that HS2 should be reclassified as an "England only" project, allowing Wales to be entitled to its Barnett Formula, in line with Scotland and Northern Ireland; but the committee also called for the establishment of a "Wales Rail Board" instead of devolving rail infrastructure to Wales, and for the upgrading of the North Wales Main Line.
Perspectives
Government rationale
A 2008 paper, "Delivering a Sustainable Transport System", identified fourteen strategic national transport corridors in England, and described the London – West Midlands – North West England route as the "single most important and heavily used" and also as the one which presented "both the greatest challenges in terms of future capacity and the greatest opportunities to promote a shift of passenger and freight traffic from road to rail". The paper noted that railway passenger numbers had been growing significantly in recent years—doubling from 1995 to 2015—and that the Rugby – Euston section was expected to have insufficient capacity sometime around 2025. This is despite the West Coast Main Line upgrade on some sections of the track—which was completed in 2008—lengthened trains, and an assumption that plans to upgrade the route with cab signalling would be realised.
According to the DfT, the primary purpose of HS2 is to provide additional capacity on the rail network from London to the Midlands and North. It says the new line "would improve rail services from London to cities in the North of England and Scotland, and that the chosen route to the west of London will improve passenger transport links to Heathrow Airport". Additionally, the new line will be connected to the Great Western Main Line and Crossrail at Old Oak Common railway station; this will provide links with East and West London and the Thames Valley.
In launching the project, the DfT announced that HS2 between London and the West Midlands would follow a different alignment from the West Coast Main Line, rejecting the option of further upgrading or building new tracks alongside the West Coast Main Line as being too costly and disruptive, and because the Victorian-era West Coast Main Line alignment was unsuitable for very high speeds. A study by Network Rail found that upgrading the existing network to deliver the same extra capacity released by constructing HS2 would require fifteen years of weekend closures. This does not include the additional express seats added by HS2, nor would it deliver any journey time reductions.
Support
Main article: List of support for High Speed 2HS2 is officially supported by the Labour Party, Conservative Party, the Liberal Democrats, and since September 2024 the Green Party. The Conservative–Liberal Democrat coalition government formed in May 2010 stated, in its initial programme for government, its commitment to creating a high-speed rail network.
In a report brought out in 2019, the High Speed Rail Industry Leaders group (HSRIL) stated that in order to meet 2050 carbon emissions targets, HS2 must be built. Network Rail support the project and state that upgrading the existing network instead of building HS2 would take longer and cause more disruption to passengers.
Opposition
Main article: List of opposition to High Speed 2Until September 2024, The Green Party policy was that the party would scrap HS2 and spend the money saved on local transport links. Reform UK and the UK Independence Party also oppose the scheme. The 2017 act allowed HS2 Ltd. the power to acquire land. In a document that ran to 50,000 pages it gave local councils the power to petition for design changes and to hold up work if they were unhappy. Eighteen councils affected by the planned route set up the 51M group, named for the cost of HS2 for each individual constituency in millions of pounds. Between 2017 and the beginning of 2024 HS2 had to obtain more than 8,000 planning and environmental consents and has gone to court more than 20 times. Before he became prime minister, Boris Johnson was personally against HS2. Other former and current Conservative MPs against HS2 include Cheryl Gillan and Liam Fox.
Stop HS2 was set up in 2010 to co-ordinate local opposition and campaign on the national level against HS2. In June 2020, it organised a "Rebel Trail" with Extinction Rebellion, which was a protest march of 125 miles (201 km) from Birmingham to London, stopping at camps in Warwickshire, Buckinghamshire, and London. Groups such as the Wildlife Trusts and the National Trust oppose the project, based on concerns about destruction of local biodiversity.
Opposition to construction
In 2017, a protest camp was established at Harvil Road in the Colne Valley Regional Park by environmental activists intending to protect the wildlife habitats of bats and owls. The protesters asserted that freshwater aquifer would be affected by HS2 construction and this would impact London's water supply. The camp included members of the Green Party and Extinction Rebellion. In January 2020, HS2 bailiffs began to evict people from the site, after HS2 has exercised its right to compulsorily purchase the land from Hillingdon council, which had not been prepared to sell the land otherwise. A prosecution of two activists accused of aggravated trespass had previously collapsed in 2019, when HS2 was unable to prove it owned the land the activists were allegedly trespassing upon.
In early 2020, during the clearance of woodland along the route, the group HS2 Rebellion squatted on a site in the Colne Valley, aiming to block construction; the protesters argued that public money would be more suited to supporting the National Health Service during the COVID-19 pandemic. HS2 and Hillingdon council both moved to get separate injunctions allowing them to remove the squatters. In March 2020, another camp was set up, at Jones' Hill Wood in Buckinghamshire. In October 2020, activists, including "Swampy", were evicted from treehouses there.
In January 2021, it was revealed that protesters had dug a tunnel underneath Euston Square Gardens. The protesters were criticised for endangering themselves and emergency services personnel, and for being "costly to the taxpayer". In June 2021, HS2 stated that protests had so far cost the company £75 million.
In the spring of 2021, the Bluebell Woods Protection Camp was set up at Cash's Pit, adjacent to the A51 road, on the line of the proposed route as it passes north of the village of Swynnerton in the county of Staffordshire.
There have been incidents of violence directed towards HS2 workers.
Environmental and community impact
The impact of HS2 has received particular attention in the Chiltern Hills, an Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty, where the line passes through the Misbourne Valley. In January 2011, the government announced that two million trees would be planted along sections of the route to mitigate the visual impact. The route was changed so as to tunnel underneath the southern end of the Chilterns, with the line emerging northwest of Amersham. The proposals include a re-alignment of more than 1 kilometre (0.62 mi) of the River Tame, and construction of a 0.63 km (0.39 mi) viaduct and a cutting through ancient woodland at a nature reserve at Park Hall near Birmingham. The work on the tunnel extension has started, but there is a challenge from local planning authorities that the work does not have permission. The tunnel extension has been referred to the minister of state for a decision.
Amid concerns that HS2 was carrying out preparatory works during nesting season, Springwatch presenter and conservationist Chris Packham filed for a judicial review of the decision to proceed and an emergency injunction to prevent construction, having crowdfunded £100,000 to cover legal fees. His bid failed before the High Court of Justice, which ruled that a judicial review "had no real prospect of success". Packham was subsequently given leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal, with Lord Justice Lewison ruling that there was "considerable public interest". On 31 July 2020, Packham lost his case in the Court of Appeal.
Property demolition, land take and compensation
Phase 1 is estimated to result in the demolition of more than 400 houses: 250 around Euston; 20–30 between Old Oak Common and West Ruislip; around 50 in Birmingham; and the remainder in pockets along the route. No Grade I or Grade II* listed buildings will be demolished, but six Grade II listed buildings will be, with alterations to four and removal and relocation of eight. These included a 17th-century farm in Uxbridge once visited by Queen Elizabeth I in 1602, and the Eagle and Tun pub, which was the set for the UB40 music video for Red Red Wine. In Birmingham, the Curzon Gate student residence and the Fox and Grapes, a derelict pub, were demolished; Birmingham City University requested £30 million in compensation after the plans were announced. Once original plans had been released in 2010, the Exceptional Hardship Scheme (EHS) was set up to compensate homeowners whose houses were to be affected by the line at the government's discretion. Phase 1 of the scheme came to an end on 17 June 2010 and Phase 2 ended in 2013.
Ancient woodland impact
The Woodland Trust states that 108 ancient woodlands will be damaged due to HS2, 33 sites of Special Scientific Interest will be affected, and 21 designated nature reserves will be destroyed. In England, the term "ancient woodland" refers to areas that have been constantly forested since at least 1600. Such areas accommodate a complex and diverse ecology of plants and animals and are recognised as "irreplaceable habitat" by the government. 52,000 such sites exist. According to the Trust, 56 hectares (0.6 km) are threatened with total loss from the construction of phases 1 and 2. Rare species such as the dingy skipper and white clawed crayfish could see a decreased population or even localised extinction upon the realisation of the project. To mitigate the loss, HS2 Ltd says that seven million trees and shrubs will be planted during Phase 1, creating 900 hectares (9 km) of new woods. A further 33 square kilometres (13 sq mi) of natural habitats are also planned. HS2 Ltd disputes the Trust's figure, saying it includes ancient woodlands several kilometres from the route and that only 43 ancient woodlands are directly impacted, of which over 80% will remain intact.
Carbon dioxide emissions
In 2007, the DfT commissioned a report, "Estimated Carbon Impact of a New North-South Line", from Booz Allen Hamilton, to investigate the likely overall carbon impact associated with the construction and operation of a new rail line to either Manchester or Scotland, including the extent of carbon dioxide emission reduction or increase from a shift to rail use, and a comparison with the case in which no new high-speed lines were built. The report concluded that there was no net carbon benefit in the foreseeable future, taking only the route to Manchester. Additional emissions from building a new rail route would be larger in the first ten years, at least, when compared to a model where no new line was built.
The 2006 Eddington Report cautioned against the common argument of modal shift from aviation to high-speed rail as a carbon-emissions benefit, given that only 1.2% of UK carbon emissions are due to domestic commercial aviation, and that rail transport energy efficiency is reduced as speed increases. The 2007 government white paper "Delivering a Sustainable Railway" stated that trains that travel at a speed of 350 km/h (220 mph) used 90% more energy than at 200 km/h (125 mph), which would result in carbon emissions for a London to Edinburgh journey of approximately 14 kilograms (31 lb) per passenger for high-speed rail compared to 7 kilograms (15 lb) per passenger for conventional rail. Air travel emits 26 kilograms (57 lb) per passenger for the same journey. The paper questioned the value for money of high-speed rail as a method of reducing carbon emissions, but noted that with a switch to carbon-free or carbon-neutral electricity production the case becomes much more favourable.
The "High-Speed Rail Command Paper", published in March 2010, stated that the project was likely to be roughly carbon neutral. The House of Commons Transport Select Committee report in November 2011 (paragraph 77) concluded that the government's assertion that HS2 would have substantial carbon reduction benefits did not stand up to scrutiny. At best, the select committee found, HS2 could make a small contribution to the government's carbon-reduction targets. However, this was dependent on making rapid progress in reducing carbon emissions from UK electricity generation. Others argue these reports do not properly account for the carbon reduction benefits coming from the modal shift to rail for shorter-distance journeys, due to the capacity realised by HS2 on existing mainlines resulting in better local services.
The Phase 1 environmental statement estimates that 5.8–6.2 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent emissions will be involved in the construction of that section of the line, with operation of the line estimated to be carbon negative thereafter; operational emissions, modal shift, and other environmental mitigations—such as tree planting and decarbonisation of the electrical grid—are expected to provide a saving of 3 million tonnes of CO2-equivalent emissions over sixty years of operation. The carbon dioxide emissions per passenger-kilometre in 2030 are estimated to be 8 grams for high-speed rail, as opposed to 22 grams for conventional intercity rail, 67 grams for private car transport, and 170 grams for domestic aviation.
The government stated that one-third of the carbon footprint from constructing Phase 1 results from tunnelling, the amount of which has been increased following requests from local residents to mitigate the impact of the railway on habitats and its visual impact.
Noise
HS2 Ltd stated that 21,300 dwellings could experience a noticeable increase in rail noise and that 200 non-residential receptors (community, education, healthcare, and recreational/social facilities) within 300 metres (330 yards) of the preferred route have the potential to experience significant noise impacts. The government has stated that trees planted to create a visual barrier will reduce noise pollution.
Public consultations
HS2 Ltd announced in March 2012 that it would conduct consultations with local people and organisations along the London-to-West-Midlands route, through community and planning forums, and an environment forum. It confirmed that the consultations would be conducted in line with the terms of the Aarhus Convention. HS2 Ltd set up 25 community forums along the Phase 1 route in March 2012. The forums were intended to allow local authorities, residents associations, special interest groups, and environment bodies in each community forum area to engage with HS2 Ltd. Jeremy Wright, Member of Parliament for Kenilworth and Southam, stated that in his area the community forums were not a success since HS2 had not provided clear details about the project and took up to 18 months to respond to his constituents.
Since the announcement of Phase 1, the government has had plans to create an overall 'Y shaped' line with termini in Manchester and Leeds. Since the intentions to further extend were announced, an additional compensation scheme was set up. Consultations with those affected were set up over late 2012 and January 2013, to allow homeowners to express their concerns within their local community.
The results of the consultations are not yet known, but Alison Munro, chief executive of HS2 Ltd, has stated that it is also looking at other options, including property bonds. The statutory blight regime would apply to any route confirmed for a new high-speed line following the public consultations, which took place between 2011 and January 2013.
Political impact
The revision of the route through South Yorkshire, which replaced the original plans for a station at Meadowhall with a station off the HS2 tracks at Sheffield, was cited as a major reason for the collapse of the Sheffield City Region devolution deal signed in 2015; Sheffield City Council's successful lobbying for a city-centre station—in opposition to Barnsley, Doncaster, and Rotherham's preference for the Meadowhall option—caused Doncaster and Barnsley councils to seek an all-Yorkshire devolution deal instead.
Archaeological discoveries
Between 2018 and early 2022, HS2 examined more than 100 archaeological sites along the railway route.
Early discoveries during construction were two Victorian-era glass jar time capsules found during the demolition of the derelict National Temperance Hospital in Camden, dating from 1879 and 1884. The capsules contained newspapers, the hospital's rules, pro-temperance movement material, and official records.
The "Hillingdon Hoard" of more than 300 late Iron Age potins was discovered in by archaeologists working on the railway project in Hillingdon, West London. Archaeologists working on the railway had previously discovered hunter-gatherer flint tools from a much earlier (early Mesolithic) site in the eastern Colne Valley within the London Borough of Hillingdon, evidence of what may be the earliest settlers of what is now Greater London.
Before construction could begin on the new Euston station, archaeologists had to remove roughly 40,000 skeletons from the former burial ground of St James's Church, which was in use between 1790 and 1853 and lies on the site of the new station. Many of the skeletons were identifiable by surviving lead coffin plates, including the long-lost remains of explorer Captain Matthew Flinders, who is to be re-buried in his home town of Donington, Lincolnshire. The rest of the remains are to be reburied at Brookwood Cemetery, Surrey. There were also excavations to remove roughly 6,500 skeletons from a burial ground on the site of the new Curzon Street Station in Birmingham. Other notable finds in the burials were grave goods such as coins, plates, toys, and necklaces, as well as evidence of body snatching. Excavations in Birmingham also uncovered the world's oldest railway roundhouse.
In July 2020, archaeological teams announced a number of discoveries near Wendover, Buckinghamshire. The skeleton of an Iron Age man was discovered face-down in a ditch with his hands bound together under his pelvis, suggesting that he may be a victim of a murder or execution. Archaeologists also discovered the remains of a Roman buried in a lead coffin, and stated that he may have been someone of high status due to the expensive method of burial. One of the most significant finds was that of a large circular monument of wooden posts 65 metres (213 ft) in diameter with features aligned with the winter solstice, similar to that of Stonehenge in Wiltshire. A golden stater from the 1st century BC was also discovered, with archaeologists stating that it was almost certainly minted in Britain.
In Coleshill, Warwickshire, the remains of large manor and ornamental gardens, laid out by Robert Digby in the 16th century, were excavated.
In September 2021, archaeologists from LP-Archaeology, led by Rachel Wood, have announced the discovery of the remains of old St Mary's Church in Stoke Mandeville, Buckinghamshire, while working on the route of the HS2 railway. The Norman parish church structure, which dates back to 1080, fell into ruin after 1866, when a new church was built elsewhere in the area. Discovered in the ruins of the Norman church were medieval markings in the form of drilled holes on two stones; these are variously interpreted as ritual protective marks, or as an early sundial. Researchers' discovery of flint walls forming a square structure, enclosed by a circular borderline, indicate that the Norman church as built on an earlier Anglo-Saxon church. As part of excavations, approximately 3,000 bodies were moved to a new burial site. Evidence of a settlement from the Roman period was also discovered nearby.
In early 2021, a significant site called "Blackgrounds" (for its rich dark soil) was discovered on what was previously pastureland near the village of Chipping Warden in South Northamptonshire, close to River Cherwell. While the existence of an archaeological site in the region had been previously known, the excavations showed an unexpectedly significant site. A team of 80 with the MOLA Headland Infrastructure archaeological consortium, which is working with HS2 Ltd, excavated the site, which consisted of a small Iron Age village that became a Roman town. The population grew, from about 30 roundhouses during the Iron Age, into a significant Roman settlement with a population in the hundreds. Discoveries included a particularly large Roman road; more than 300 Roman coins; and jewelry, glass vessels, and decorative pottery (including samian pottery imported from Gaul), as well as signs of cosmetics. Roman-era workshops and kilns were discovered, along with at least four wells. A pair of shackles was also unearthed. Taken together, the evidence was indicative of a prosperous trading site.
Archaeological legacy
HS2 Phase One represents the largest single programme of historic environment work undertaken in the UK and has generated a vast amount of digital archaeological data. The digital data, including BIM and GIS data, specialist reporting and reports all hold potential for future analysis, public engagement and legacy and will be held in a digital archive hosted by the Archaeology Data Service.
Environmental mitigation
A scheme has been announced to use the chalk excavated from the Chiltern tunnel to rewild a section of the Colne Valley Western Slopes. The 127 ha (310-acre) scheme will take its inspiration from the Knepp wilding, and will stretch along the line from the viaduct at Denham Country Park to the Chiltern tunnel's southern portal.
Cancelled phases
Main article: High Speed 2 Phase TwoPhase 2 was intended to extend HS2 north to Fradley (a village northwest of Lichfield) then divide into two branches. The western branch would have travelled north past Crewe before again splitting into two branches near Knutsford, one terminating at Manchester Piccadilly railway station and the other joining the West Coast Main Line (WCML) at Golborne, south of Wigan. A station may have been built to serve Manchester Airport. The eastern branch would have been built through the East Midlands and connect to the Midland Main Line north of Derby, then continue to Leeds; it would then have formed two branches, one terminating in central Leeds and the other connecting to the East Coast Main Line near York.
Phase 2 was split into three sub-phases:
- Phase 2a, West Midlands to Crewe;
- Phase 2b west, Crewe to the West Coast Main Line near Wigan with a branch to Manchester;
- Phase 2b east, a branch from the West Midlands to the East Coast Main Line near York with a branch to Leeds.
Phase 2b east was truncated in November 2021, with the branch expected to end at East Midlands Parkway railway station, south of Nottingham. In June 2022, the link to the WCML at Golborne, a part of phase 2b west, was cancelled. In October 2023, phase 2a and the remainder of phase 2b were cancelled, leaving phase 1 the only extant element of the project.
Phase 2a: West Midlands to Crewe
Phase 2a would have extended the line northwest to the Crewe Hub from the northern extremity of Phase 1, north of Lichfield. At Lichfield, HS2 would also have connected to the West Coast Main Line. Phase 2a was approved by the House of Commons in July 2019, and received Royal Assent on 11 February 2021.
The Crewe Hub would have been an important addition to the HS2 network, giving additional connectivity to existing lines radiating from the Crewe junction. The components were:
- An upgraded station at Crewe, to cope with high-speed trains.
- A tunnel under the station to allow HS2 trains to bypass the station while remaining on high-speed tracks.
- Branches onto the West Coast Main Line immediately to the south and north of the station, to allow HS2 trains to enter the station.
Phase 2b: Crewe to Wigan & Manchester, western section
HS2 track would have continued north from Crewe. As the line passed through Cheshire at Millington, it would have branched to Manchester using a triangular junction. At this junction, the line would also have branched to Warrington on Northern Powerhouse Rail (NPR) track. The Manchester branch was intended to veer east and proceed through a station at Manchester Airport, with the line then entering a 10-mile (16 km) tunnel under the suburbs of south Manchester. It was proposed that the tunnel would be served by four large ventilation shafts, to be built along the route. Trains would have emerged from the tunnel at Ardwick, where the line would have continued to its terminus at Manchester Piccadilly. Manchester Piccadilly High Speed station would have accommodated HS2 and NPR high-speed trains.
Phase 2b: West Midlands to Midland Main Line branch, eastern section
East of Birmingham, the phase 1 line was intended to branch at the Coleshill junction, progress approximately 32 miles (51 km) northeast, roughly parallel to the M42 motorway, and end at East Midlands Parkway near Nottingham. The line would have branched onto the Midland Main Line with trains only progressing north from the branch.
HS1 to HS2 link
See also: Regional EurostarEarly proposals for HS2 outlined the construction of a two-kilometre-long (1.2 mi) link between HS2 and HS1, which would have allowed high-speed trains to operate directly from the North and Midlands to destinations in continental Europe via the Channel Tunnel. The link, which was to be built through Camden Town in North London, was abandoned in 2014 on grounds of cost and insufficient capacity for trains on HS2 track. Following the cancellation of this link, it was proposed that passengers would transfer between these two lines via shuttle bus, automated people mover or an "enhanced walking route" between Euston and St Pancras stations.
Various alternative schemes have been proposed for an HS2–HS1 link, including a tunnel under Camden, as well as the rejected HS4Air scheme.
Previously proposed phases
There is one DfT proposal to build a 20-mile-long (32 km) high-speed line from Leeds south to Clayton branching into the Midland Main Line. Whether this was to be a part of HS2 or NPR has not been determined.
Liverpool
No direct HS2 track access was planned for the Liverpool City Region, with the nearest HS2 track passing 16 miles (26 km) from Liverpool city centre. In February 2016, the Liverpool City Council offered £2 billion towards funding a direct HS2 line into the city centre.
Steve Rotheram, the Metro Mayor of the Liverpool City Region, announced the creation of a Station Commission to determine the size, type, and location of a new "transport hub" in Liverpool's city centre, a station that would have linked the HS2 mainline with the local transport infrastructure. The station would have served HS2 and NPR trains. The North's Strategic Transport Plan recognised the need for a new station to accommodate HS2 and NPR trains.
In the HS2 plan, after phase 2a had opened, Liverpool trains would have used the HS2 track from London as far as Crewe, before changing to the existing conventional rail track on the West Coast Main Line to proceed to Liverpool Lime Street, with a stop at Runcorn.
The Integrated Rail Plan proposed to connect Liverpool to HS2 on a reused and upgraded Fiddlers Ferry freight line, from Ditton junction in Halebank to a new station at Warrington Bank Quay Low-Level, which would have been shared with Northern Powerhouse Rail trains, then onto high-speed track from Warrington to London. Transport for the North's preferred option was a new high-speed line from Liverpool to the HS2 track into Manchester from Millington junction, with a stop at Warrington, which would also have doubled as a connection from Liverpool to HS2 via Millington. The revised plans under the Integrated Rail Plan had a high-speed line only east of Warrington, with HS2 and Northern Powerhouse Rail trains reaching Liverpool Lime Street from Warrington on upgraded conventional rail track. Metro mayor Steve Rotheram, along with Greater Manchester's mayor Andy Burnham, was critical of the Integrated Rail Plan.
Scotland
In 2009, the then transport secretary Lord Adonis outlined a policy for high-speed rail in the UK as an alternative to domestic air travel, with particular emphasis on travel between the major cities of Scotland and England, "I see this as the union railway, uniting England and Scotland, north and south, richer and poorer parts of our country, sharing wealth and opportunity, pioneering a fundamentally better Britain".
In June 2011, business and governmental organisations — including Network Rail, CBI Scotland, and Transport Scotland (the transport agency of the Scottish Government) — formed the Scottish Partnership Group for high-speed rail to campaign for the extension of the HS2 project north to Edinburgh and Glasgow. In December 2011, it published a study that outlined a case for extending high-speed rail to Scotland, proposing a route north from Manchester to Edinburgh and Glasgow as well as an extension to Newcastle upon Tyne.
In November 2012, the Scottish Government announced plans to build a 74 km (46 mi) high-speed rail link between Edinburgh and Glasgow. The proposed link would have reduced journey times between the two cities to under 30 minutes and was planned to open by 2024, eventually connecting to the high-speed network being developed in England. The plan was cancelled in 2016. In May 2015, HS2 Ltd had concluded that there was "no business case" to extend HS2 north into Scotland, and that high-speed rail services should proceed north on upgraded conventional track.
Bristol and Cardiff
The DfT conducted a study on towns and cities that would lose economically from HS2, highlighting Bristol and Cardiff. With decreased journey times between London and Northern England under HS2, Cardiff in particular would be set to lose much of its competitive edge that arose from its proximity to London's financial and legal service companies, due to improved rail connections between London and northern England.
Proposals were put forward to build a high-speed line between Birmingham to Cardiff or Bristol, creating an X-shaped high-speed network, with Birmingham at its centre. There were also proposals for a new high-speed rail project in South Wales, beyond just Cardiff, to connect with the HS2 network.
Branches to other lines
Prior to the cancellation of the northern phases, the original HS2 scheme specified connections from the new high-speed tracks onto existing conventional tracks at junctions at the following locations:
- north of Crewe;
- south of Crewe.
- east of Lichfield Trent Valley, 3.5 kilometres (2.2 mi) northeast of Lichfield.
Cancelled stations (Birmingham-to-Manchester)
Proposals for these station locations were announced on 28 January 2013. Following the cancellation of Phase 2 announced in October 2023, these stations are no longer in the scope of the HS2 project.
Crewe
HS2 was planned to pass through Staffordshire and Cheshire. The line would have been tunnelled under the Crewe junction, bypassing the existing Crewe station. The HS2 line would have been linked to the West Coast Main Line via a grade-separated junction just south of Crewe, enabling "conventional compatible" trains exiting the high-speed line to call at Crewe station. In 2014, the chairman of HS2 advocated a dedicated hub station in Crewe. In November 2015, it was announced that the Crewe hub completion would be brought forward to 2027. In November 2017, the government and Network Rail supported a proposal to build the hub station on the existing station site, with a junction onto the West Coast Main Line north of the station. This would have enabled through-trains to bypass the station via a tunnel under the station, progressing directly onto the West Coast Main Line.
Manchester Airport
Main article: Manchester Airport High Speed stationManchester Airport High Speed station was a planned HS2 through-station serving Manchester Airport. It was recommended in 2013 by local authorities, during the consultation stage. Construction was dependent on part-funding by private investment from the Manchester Airports Group.
The proposed site was located on the northwestern side of the airport, to the west of the M56 motorway, at junction 5, and approximately 1.5 mi (2.4 km) northwest of the existing Manchester Airport railway station. A sub-surface station was planned, approximately 8.5 metres (27 ft 11 in) below ground level, consisting of two central 415-metre (1,362 ft) platforms, a pair of through-tracks for trains to pass through the station without stopping, a street-level passenger concourse, and a main entrance on the eastern side, facing the airport.
Proposals did not detail passenger interchange methods; various options were being considered to integrate the new station with existing transport networks, including extending the Manchester Metrolink airport tram line to connect the HS2 station with the existing airport railway station.
If the station had been built, it is estimated that the average journey time from London Euston to Manchester Airport would have been 59 minutes.
Manchester Piccadilly
Main article: Manchester Piccadilly High Speed stationA new Manchester Piccadilly High Speed station was planned to be built on a viaduct parallel to the north side of the existing station. The station was to have six platforms on three islands for both terminating High Speed 2 trains from London and Birmingham as well as Northern Powerhouse Rail trains to Liverpool, Warrington, Huddersfield, Leeds, and beyond. It was proposed to relocate the present Piccadilly Metrolink stop is from ground-level, below the existing station platforms, to a new larger four-platform stop located underground below the high-speed station. Provision for a second ground-level Metrolink stop at the eastern end of the high-speed station—to service future Metrolink extensions—to be called Piccadilly Central, also formed part of the plans.
See also
- Rail transport in Great Britain
- High-speed rail in the United Kingdom
- High-speed rail in Europe
- UK Ultraspeed, a rejected proposal for a magnetic-levitation line between London and Glasgow.
- High Speed 3, an unofficial name generally used to refer to the Northern Powerhouse Rail project.
- HS4Air, a rejected proposal to link HS2 with High Speed 1 at Ashford International station in Kent, via Heathrow and Gatwick airports.
- HighSpeed UK, an alternative proposal for high-speed services from London to Manchester and Liverpool, but via Leicester and Sheffield.
Notes
- High Speed 2's estimates for intercity rail emissions assume a mix of electric and diesel traction on the intercity network, taking into account current electrification plans.
References
- ^ "HS2 Phase One full business case". DfT. Archived from the original on 19 April 2020. Retrieved 17 April 2020.
- "What is HS2". HS2. Archived from the original on 19 February 2020. Retrieved 29 October 2021.
- Britain's Transport Infrastructure High Speed Two (PDF). DfT. January 2009. p. 5. ISBN 978-1-906581-80-0. Archived from the original (PDF) on 3 February 2010. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- "Transport secretary unveils HS2 compensation plan". Railnews. Stevenage, UK. 29 November 2010. Archived from the original on 6 December 2010. Retrieved 10 December 2010.
- ^ "London-to-Birmingham high speed train route announced". BBC News. 20 December 2010. Archived from the original on 10 April 2018. Retrieved 21 June 2018.
- "'Redrawn' high speed rail plan unveiled". Channel 4 News. 20 December 2010. Archived from the original on 22 December 2010. Retrieved 21 December 2010.
- "High Speed Rail – Oral Answers to Questions – Education – House of Commons debates". 20 December 2010. question to the Minister by Maria Eagle, shadow secretary for Transport, 1st para. Archived from the original on 7 July 2017. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
- ^ "Britain to have new national high-speed rail network". gov.uk. 10 January 2012. Archived from the original on 5 January 2016. Retrieved 27 December 2015.
- ^ Transport Select Committee HS2 Report – House of Commons, November 2011 Archived 9 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 1 July 2012
- "HS2 Hybrid Bill receives Royal Assent". 23 February 2017. Archived from the original on 28 July 2019. Retrieved 28 July 2019.
- "Oral statement to Parliament, HS2 update: Phase 2a and Phase 2b". GOV.UK. 18 July 2017. Archived from the original on 10 February 2018. Retrieved 17 December 2017.
- "Phase 2a Act to bring HS2 to the north". gov.uk. 11 February 2021. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 11 February 2021.
- ^ "Committee publishes Second Special Report - High Speed Rail (Crewe - Manchester) Bill Select Committee (Commons)". UK Parliament - Committees. Retrieved 31 January 2024.
- "Capacity - helping reduce overcrowding". High Speed 2. Archived from the original on 11 October 2020. Retrieved 26 September 2020.
- ^ "Upgrading existing railways instead of building HS2 would cause 'absurd disruption' for passengers, Network Rail chief warns". The Independent. 20 January 2020. Archived from the original on 7 March 2020. Retrieved 2 May 2020.
- Vaughan, Richard (8 December 2024). "HS2 'lite' replacement between Manchester and Birmingham kicked into long grass". The i Paper.
- "Government announces independent review into HS2 programme" (Press release). Department for Transport. 21 August 2019. Archived from the original on 21 August 2019. Retrieved 21 August 2019.
- "HS2 independent review: terms of reference". gov.uk. Archived from the original on 21 August 2019. Retrieved 21 August 2019.
- ^ "Oakervee Review of HS2". Department for Transport. 11 February 2020. Archived from the original on 19 February 2020. Retrieved 12 February 2020.
original rationale for HS2 – still holds: there is a need for greater capacity (both more trains on tracks and more seats on trains and reliability on the GB rail network)
- "PM confirms HS2 will go ahead alongside revolution in local transport" (Press release). Department for Transport. 11 February 2020. Archived from the original on 11 February 2020. Retrieved 12 February 2020.
- Walker, Jonathan (26 February 2020). "New review of HS2 will look at cutting the speed of the trains". Birmingham Mail. Archived from the original on 27 February 2020. Retrieved 27 February 2020.
- "Construction on HS2 can begin, government says". The Guardian. London. 15 April 2020. Archived from the original on 15 April 2020. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
- "House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts - HS2 and Euston - Tenth Report of Session 2023–24". UK Parliament. 7 February 2024. Retrieved 8 February 2024.
- "HS2 verdict: Scheme now very poor value for money after Northern leg cancellation". UK Parliament - Committees. Retrieved 21 February 2024.
- ^ IRP North and Midlands 2021.
- Dhillon, Aran (8 April 2022). "Will controversial HS2 Golborne spur be scrapped?". Warrington Guardian. Archived from the original on 11 April 2022. Retrieved 11 April 2022.
- "Government takes action to ensure Scotland receives best possible HS2 service" (Press release). Department for Transport. 6 June 2022. Archived from the original on 6 June 2022. Retrieved 6 June 2022.
- "Will controversial HS2 Golborne spur be scrapped?". 8 April 2022. Archived from the original on 11 April 2022. Retrieved 11 April 2022.
- "Government takes action to ensure Scotland receives best possible HS2 service". GOV.UK. Archived from the original on 6 June 2022. Retrieved 6 June 2022.
- "North West to benefit from £19.8 billion transport investment". gov.uk. Archived from the original on 4 October 2023. Retrieved 5 October 2023.
- Lydall, Ross (9 November 2023). "Digging for victory: HS2 contractor has Euston tunnel vision". Evening Standard. Archived from the original on 10 November 2023. Retrieved 10 November 2023.
- Weinfass, Ian (16 October 2023). "HS2 Euston: uncertainty over awarded contracts after plans scrapped". Construction News. Archived from the original on 17 October 2023. Retrieved 23 October 2023.
Prime minister Rishi Sunak announced two weeks ago that the Euston station project would be privately funded and removed from the responsibilities of HS2 Ltd.
- Hakimian, Rob (9 August 2023). "HS2 | Euston with only 7 platforms is not fit for the future network, experts say". New Civil Engineer. Archived from the original on 9 August 2023. Retrieved 23 October 2023.
- Spocchia, Gino (5 October 2023). "Grimshaw's Euston HS2 station loses more platforms under Sunak rethink". Architects' Journal. Archived from the original on 7 October 2023. Retrieved 23 October 2023.
- Network North: Transforming British Transport – CP 946 (PDF). Department for Transport. October 2023. p. 4.
- Williams, Alan (January 2024). "Warning! This Government may damage rail's health". Modern Railways. 81 (904). Stamford: Key Publishing: 96, 97.
- Walker, Peter (9 October 2023). "List of projects to be funded by HS2 money 'only illustrative', Sunak says". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 17 January 2024.
- Ames, Chris (12 January 2024). "HS2 Phase 2 'not possible', Starmer claims". The Transport Network. Retrieved 17 January 2024.
- Browning, Oliver (11 April 2024). "Labour's HS2 plans confirmed by shadow transport secretary". Independent. Retrieved 27 April 2024.
- ^ Scott, Jennifer (31 January 2024). "Mayors hold 'constructive' HS2 talks with transport secretary". Sky News. Retrieved 31 January 2024.
- Scott, Jennifer (23 January 2024). "Transport secretary to look at HS2 revival plans with 'open mind'". Sky News. Retrieved 31 January 2024.
- Timan, Joseph (31 January 2024). "HS2 is not coming back - but a new business-backed train line could replace it". Manchester Evening News. Retrieved 31 January 2024.
- "Alternatives to HS2 would cost 'considerably less' – Andy Street". www.shropshirestar.com. 7 February 2024. Retrieved 9 February 2024.
- "New Staffordshire-Manchester rail line proposed". BBC News. 21 March 2024. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
- Williams, Jennifer (21 March 2024). "City mayors put forward alternative to axed HS2 northern leg". Financial Times. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
- Brock, Alexander (21 March 2024). "New rail line between Midlands and Manchester proposed". Birmingham Live. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
- "Transport Secretary confirms work will continue on HS2 in and around Lichfield". Lichfield Live. 5 October 2023.
- "London to West Midlands (Phase One)". HS2. Archived from the original on 1 October 2023. Retrieved 4 October 2023.
- Knibbs, Jessica; Hewitt, Sian; Naz Hassan, Beril; Mata, William (26 September 2023). "Will HS2 be cancelled? Government refuses to guarantee Manchester branch". Evening Standard. Archived from the original on 20 September 2023. Retrieved 21 September 2023.
- "HS2 route map" (PDF). HS2 Ltd. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 July 2019. Retrieved 21 January 2021.
- "High Speed Rail – Department for Transport" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 29 April 2020.
- "Liverpool". HS2 Ltd. 4 May 2022. Archived from the original on 1 October 2023. Retrieved 21 September 2023.
- "London-West Midlands Environmental Statement" (PDF). November 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 October 2018. Retrieved 21 October 2018.
- "HS2 tunnel extended under west London to cut chaos". Evening Standard. 23 April 2013. Archived from the original on 28 July 2019. Retrieved 28 July 2019.
- "Glossary of terms and list of abbreviations". gov.uk. DfT. Archived from the original on 16 October 2018. Retrieved 15 October 2018.
- Savage, Michael (2 February 2010). "Adonis in all-party talks on high-speed rail link". The Independent. London. Archived from the original on 5 January 2010. Retrieved 4 January 2010.
- DfT 2009, p. 16 para. 37.
- Rogers, Alexandra. "HS2 won't be high speed between Manchester and Birmingham". Sky News. Archived from the original on 5 October 2023. Retrieved 5 October 2023.
- https://www.modernrailways.com/article/rail-minister-confirms-six-platform-plan-euston-hs2-station
- Smale, Katherine (20 November 2018). "HS2 Euston station design development released". New Civil Engineer. Archived from the original on 13 February 2020. Retrieved 13 February 2020.
- ^ Race, Michael; Austin, Katy (5 October 2023). "HS2 will not go to Euston without private funds". BBC News.
- DfT 2010, p. 107.
- "Old Oak Strategic Transport Study" (PDF). June 2018. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 February 2020.
- "Planning permission granted for Britain's largest new-build railway station". The Construction Index. 20 May 2020. Archived from the original on 7 June 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- DfT 2010, p. 118.
- "High Speed Two Phase One Information Paper H2: Birmingham Interchange Station" (PDF). gov.uk. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. 23 February 2017. pp. 3, 10. Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 May 2018. Retrieved 23 May 2018.
- "East Birmingham to Solihull Metro Extension – Midland Metro Alliance". Archived from the original on 29 November 2019. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- Nielsen, Beverley (29 October 2010). "Up, Up and Away – Birmingham Airport spreads its wings as powerful driver of growth and jobs". Birmingham Post Business Blog. Archived from the original on 29 November 2010. Retrieved 10 December 2010.
- "3". High Speed Rail: London to the West Midlands and Beyond. A Report to Government by High Speed Two Limited (PDF). p. 117. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 April 2010. Retrieved 12 March 2010.
- ^ Ing, Will (23 April 2020). "First HS2 station approved: Grimshaw's Curzon Street plans waved though". Architects Journal. Archived from the original on 15 July 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- "The first half of the new concourse at Birmingham New Street station will open on 28 April 2013". Network Rail. Archived from the original on 22 June 2013. Retrieved 2 November 2013.
- "High Speed Two Information Paper H4: Birmingham Curzon Street Station" (PDF). gov.uk. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. pp. 4.1 and 6.3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 4 September 2018. Retrieved 23 May 2018.
- Network Rail. Transforming Birmingham New Street. Archived from the original on 28 August 2010. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
- Young, Graham (14 September 2018). "Outrage at demolition of landmark city centre pub". Birmingham Mail. Archived from the original on 27 July 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- "Birmingham Eastside Metro Extension – Midland Metro Alliance". Archived from the original on 6 September 2019. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- ^ Walker, Jonathan (16 March 2010). "Birmingham City University wants £30m refund after high speed rail hits campus plan". Birmingham Post. Archived from the original on 23 March 2010. Retrieved 17 March 2010.
- DfT 2010, p. 115.
- Ikon Gallery. Curzon Square – A vision for Birminghams New Museum Quarter (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 May 2013. Retrieved 28 October 2012.
- "HS2 begins search for contractors to build Curzon Street station". 20 November 2018. Archived from the original on 3 October 2019. Retrieved 3 October 2019.
- "Notice of land preparation works – Curzon Street Station site". Archived from the original on 3 October 2019. Retrieved 3 October 2019.
- Vickers, Noah (5 September 2024). "New HS2 station could be redesigned to allow level boarding for Elizabeth line services". The Standard. Evening Standard Ltd. Archived from the original on 5 September 2024. Retrieved 22 October 2024.
- Smart, Belinda (18 April 2023). "HS2 confirms that work on the Euston Tunnel is to be paused". New Civil Engineer. EMAP Publishing. Archived from the original on 6 May 2023. Retrieved 23 April 2023.
- "HS2 Presentation Euston Tunnel May 2023 Update" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 9 June 2023. Retrieved 9 June 2023.
- Morby, Aaron (8 May 2024). "Government set to fund £1bn final HS2 London tunnel drive". Construction Enquirer. Retrieved 8 May 2024.
- "HS2 launches third giant tunnelling machine under capital building the Northolt Tunnel". HS2 News and Information. Retrieved 25 February 2024.
- Hakimian, Rob (8 April 2024). "HS2 | Fourth TBM launched to bore 13.5km Northolt tunnel under London". New Civil Engineer. Retrieved 8 April 2024.
- "It's in the can! – HS2 tunnelling machine finishes its 5-mile journey".
- "Progress at Chiltern tunnel site as HS2 prepares for arrival of first tunnelling machines". Archived from the original on 16 September 2020. Retrieved 30 July 2020.
- Wareham, Stephanie (1 October 2021). "Video shows what the first mile of the HS2 Chilterns tunnel looks like". Bucks Free Press. Archived from the original on 4 April 2022. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
- ^ "HS2 high-speed rail project begins underground tunnel". BBC News. 13 May 2021. Archived from the original on 12 May 2021. Retrieved 13 May 2021.
- "HS2 Casts First of 112,000 Chiltern Tunnel Wall Segments". Railway-News. 19 March 2021. Archived from the original on 23 March 2021. Retrieved 19 March 2021.
- "Momentum builds as HS2 launches second giant tunnelling machine". HS2 News and Information. Archived from the original on 1 July 2021. Retrieved 1 July 2021.
- "Historic breakthrough for HS2's longest tunnel". HS2 News and Information (Press release). Retrieved 27 February 2024.
- "HS2 hails 'remarkable achievement' as it completes excavation of longest tunnel". The Independent. 21 March 2024. Retrieved 21 March 2024.
- "HS2 6-monthly report to Parliament: March 2022". 16 March 2022. Archived from the original on 16 March 2022. Retrieved 16 March 2022.
- "Breakthrough! Dorothy completes HS2 tunnel bore". 29 October 2021. Archived from the original on 30 August 2022. Retrieved 30 August 2022.
- Griffiths, Eliot (24 November 2022). "Dorothy's second tunnel boring mission begins underneath Long Itchington Wood". Rail Technology Magazine. Archived from the original on 25 January 2023. Retrieved 26 January 2023.
- "HS2 Tunnelling team celebrate milestone TBM breakthrough in Warwickshire". Archived from the original on 21 June 2023. Retrieved 21 June 2023.
- "The last HS2 tunnel boring machine in the West Midlands starts digging towards Birmingham". HS2 News and Information.
- "HS2 rail project work begins with pledge of 22,000 jobs". BBC News. 4 September 2020. Archived from the original on 4 September 2020. Retrieved 4 September 2020.
- Simpson, Jack (19 July 2018). "HS2 civils start delayed another three months". Construction News. Archived from the original on 12 October 2018. Retrieved 11 October 2018.
- "First look at HS2's Euston tunnel portal site". High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. 4 October 2018. Archived from the original on 6 October 2018. Retrieved 11 October 2018.
- "Euston Station Throat (C221-MMD-CV-DPP-010-200500-FPD)" (PDF). gov.uk. Archived (PDF) from the original on 13 October 2018. Retrieved 13 October 2018.
- "Euston HS2 works ramp up with towers demolition". New Civil Engineer. 8 January 2019. Archived from the original on 28 July 2019. Retrieved 28 July 2019.
- "Construction preparation for HS2 Euston station reaches milestone". Global Railway Review. 25 June 2020. Archived from the original on 5 September 2020. Retrieved 5 September 2020.
- Sapién, Josephine Cordero (26 June 2020). "HS2 Euston Station Demolition Milestone Reached". Railway-News. Archived from the original on 5 September 2020. Retrieved 5 September 2020.
- "HS2 Euston delays to cost more, National Audit Office warns". BBC News. 27 March 2023. Archived from the original on 6 May 2023. Retrieved 23 April 2023.
- "Work begins to form HS2's Colne Valley Viaduct foundations". Global Railway Review. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
- "HS2 celebrates start of construction on UK's longest railway bridge". HS2 News and Information. Archived from the original on 1 June 2022. Retrieved 2 June 2022.
- "Colne Valey Viaduct becomes UK's longest rail bridge". Sir Robert McAlpine. Retrieved 26 October 2024.
- "Progress at HS2 Superhub station Old Oak Common as construction of main station box begins". HS2 News and Information. Archived from the original on 2 June 2022. Retrieved 2 June 2022.
- "High Speed Two From Concept to Reality July 2017" (PDF). GOV.UK. Department for Transport. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 December 2017. Retrieved 18 November 2017.
- ^ "Full Business Case: High Speed 2 Phase One" (PDF). Department for Transport. 15 April 2020. pp. 132–133. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 April 2020. Retrieved 15 April 2020.
- "West Coast Mainline and HS2 franchise race started". New Civil Engineer. 29 March 2018. Archived from the original on 2 April 2018. Retrieved 2 April 2018.
- "New West Coast rail franchise to run HS2 services". BBC News. 4 November 2016. Archived from the original on 7 November 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
- West Coast Partnership: stakeholder briefing document Archived 30 March 2018 at the Wayback Machine Department for Transport 27 March 2018
- McArdle, Helen (25 October 2016). "West Coast franchise winner 'will run first HS2 trains'". The Herald, Scotland. Archived from the original on 16 August 2017. Retrieved 27 September 2019.
- "High-speed rail's long journey". BBC News. 17 March 2014. Archived from the original on 30 April 2018. Retrieved 21 June 2018.
- "HS2 tickets could cost as little as five pounds". Manchester Evening News. 20 November 2013. Archived from the original on 17 November 2015. Retrieved 15 November 2015.
- McCann, Kate (15 October 2016). "HS2 should be renamed 'Grand Union Railway'". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 24 August 2017. Retrieved 14 August 2017.
- "Competition is key as high-speed rail keeps growing". Railway Gazette. DVV Media International Ltd. Archived from the original on 28 July 2019. Retrieved 28 July 2019.
- DfT 2010, p. 130.
- "HS2 – The story so far". Rail Engineer. 5 November 2015. Archived from the original on 5 January 2016. Retrieved 27 December 2015.
- DfT 2010, p. 127 s.8.4.
- HS2 Report 2010, p. 40–41 Chapter 2, section 2.3.11.
- DfT 2010, p. 127.
- ^ DfT 2010, p. 129.
- ^ "Railway systems contracts – scope document 'Compendium Version'" (PDF). High Speed 2. 27 April 2022.
- "SNCF catenary design adopted as HS2 begins electrification procurement". Railway Gazette International. 2 July 2020. Retrieved 16 November 2023.
- "PORR slab track technology for High Speed Two (HS2)". porr-group.com. Retrieved 16 November 2023.
- "About High Speed Rail". High Speed 2 Ltd. Table 3. Archived from the original on 14 March 2010. Retrieved 9 February 2011.
- "High Speed 2 Railway Line:Written question – HL3980". Archived from the original on 21 February 2020. Retrieved 21 February 2020.
- "Written questions and answers - Written questions, answers and statements - UK Parliament". questions-statements.parliament.uk. Archived from the original on 3 December 2021. Retrieved 3 December 2021.
- "HS2's state-of-the-art fleet of high speed trains a major boost for UK train-building". HS2. 9 December 2021. Archived from the original on 6 March 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
- "Case M.9779 – Alstom / Bombardier Transportation" (PDF). European Commission. 31 July 2020. pp. 61, 237, 276. Archived (PDF) from the original on 8 February 2022. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
- Gill, Oliver (10 December 2021). "HS2 on track to be the 'fastest train in Europe'". The Daily Telegraph. No. 51, 809. Business. p. 8. ISSN 0307-1235.
- "Hitachi and Alstom win order to build and maintain High Speed Two trains in Britain". Hitachi-Alstom. 9 December 2021. Archived from the original on 9 December 2021. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
- "Review of the Technical Specification for High Speed Rail in the UK A report to Government by HS2 Ltd" (PDF). Gov.UK. HS2 Ltd/Department for Transport. January 2012. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 July 2019. Retrieved 4 March 2020.
- "Tilting trains could run from HS2 onto the rest of the rail network". www.imeche.org. Archived from the original on 22 May 2018. Retrieved 21 May 2018.
- Wright, Robert; Plimmer, Gill (20 September 2016). "Alstom claims tilting train can solve HS2's speed conundrum". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 21 May 2018. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
- "HS2 Cost and Risk Model Report" (PDF). HS2 Ltd. p. 20. Archived (PDF) from the original on 20 October 2013. Retrieved 30 December 2015.
- Train Technical Specification (PDF). HS2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
- "Supplies – 151144-2017 – TED Tenders Electronic Daily". ted.europa.eu. Archived from the original on 16 September 2020. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
- "High Speed 2 rolling stock bids submitted". Railway Gazette International. 5 June 2019. Archived from the original on 9 August 2020. Retrieved 8 September 2020.
- "Alstom completes acquisition of Bombardier Transportation". Railway-technology.com. Verdict Media. 29 January 2021. Archived from the original on 11 June 2021. Retrieved 26 May 2021.
- "HS2: Bombardier and Hitachi bid to build trains". Hitachi-Bombardier. 5 June 2019. Archived from the original on 10 December 2021. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
- Longhorn, Danny (11 June 2019). "Talgo confirms AVRIL as the basis of its HS2 bid". Rail Business Daily. Archived from the original on 10 December 2021. Retrieved 10 December 2021.
- "High Speed Two (HS2) Ltd board meeting minutes: 28 September 2021" (PDF). HS2 Our governance. 28 September 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 October 2022. Retrieved 5 December 2022.
- Horgan, Rob (24 November 2021). "HS2 waiting on Shapps approval to award maligned £2.75bn rolling stock contract". New Civil Engineer. Archived from the original on 7 December 2021. Retrieved 7 December 2021.
- "Rolling Stock Maintenance Depot (Washwood Heath Depot)". hs2inbirmingham.commonplace.is. Archived from the original on 1 April 2018. Retrieved 31 March 2018.
- "HS2 depot to be located in Leeds". BBC News. 4 July 2018. Archived from the original on 21 July 2018. Retrieved 4 July 2018.
- "HS2 eastern leg rolling stock depot confirmed for Leeds". Rail Technology Magazine. 4 July 2018. Archived from the original on 9 July 2018. Retrieved 8 July 2018.
- Longhorn, Danny (7 October 2020). "HS2's journey north accelerates as public consultation opens on latest proposals". Rail Business Daily. Archived from the original on 20 June 2021. Retrieved 30 April 2023.
- HS2 Phase One Environmental Statement – Non-technical summary (PDF) (Report). DfT. November 2013. pp. 20, 27. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 October 2018. Retrieved 21 October 2018.
- "High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Non-technical Summary" (PDF). gov.uk. DfT. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 October 2018. Retrieved 21 October 2018.
- HS2 and Euston. House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts - 2023–24 (Report). 24 January 2024.
- "Rail Minister confirms six platform plan for Euston HS2 station". Modern Railways. 18 December 2024.
the New HS2 station will consist of six platforms, which can support up to 10 HS2 trains per hour
- ^ "HS2: What is the route and why is the Manchester link scrapped?". BBC News. 6 October 2023.
- ^ HS2 Phase One - London to West Midlands Environmental Statement (PDF) (Report). Department for Transport. November 2013.
- HS2 Phase 1 Environmental Statement Non-technical summary (PDF) (Report). Department for Transport. November 2013. p. 27. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 December 2016. Retrieved 16 January 2018.
- "Our story and key facts" (PDF). High Speed Two Ltd. August 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on 21 May 2020. Retrieved 28 July 2020.
- "High Speed Two (HS2) Phase Two" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 24 July 2019. Retrieved 27 January 2020.
- "HS2 Journey Planner". High Speed 2. Archived from the original on 31 October 2020. Retrieved 10 November 2020.
- ^ "High-speed rail plans announced". BBC News. 11 March 2010. Archived from the original on 26 October 2011. Retrieved 14 November 2011.
- "HS2 Cost and Risk Model Report: A report to Government by HS2 Ltd" (PDF). High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. March 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 January 2020.
- ^ "Manchester Airport High Speed Station" (PDF). UK Government website. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 December 2017. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- Topham, Gwyn (26 June 2013). "Cost of HS2 up £10bn to £42.6bn, transport secretary tells MPs". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 31 October 2013. Retrieved 1 July 2013.
- Pickard, Jim (1 July 2013). "Growth of handheld computers hits economic argument for HS2". Financial Times. London. Archived from the original on 4 July 2013. Retrieved 1 July 2013.
- "House of Lords – The Economics of High Speed 2 – Economic Affairs Committee". publications.parliament.uk. Archived from the original on 30 July 2017. Retrieved 31 August 2017.
- "House of Lords – The Economics of High Speed 2 – Economic Affairs Committee". publications.parliament.uk. Archived from the original on 27 October 2016. Retrieved 13 February 2020.
- Withers, Iain (17 March 2014). "Government decides to drop £700m HS2 to HS1 link". Building. Archived from the original on 21 September 2021. Retrieved 4 October 2023.
- Leftly, Mark (2 May 2016). "Top UK civil servant reviews HS2 project | UK news". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 August 2016. Retrieved 26 August 2016.
- Gilligan, Andrew (14 May 2016). "HS2 may not even reach Manchester as Department for Transport faces having project taken out of its control". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 9 September 2016. Retrieved 26 August 2016.
- Paton, Graeme (19 October 2018). "HS2 set to cost 25% more than overseas rail schemes". The Times. Archived from the original on 26 October 2018. Retrieved 26 October 2018.
- Paton, Graeme (4 November 2020). "HS2 'on track to cost taxpayer £170bn'". The Times. Archived from the original on 5 November 2020. Retrieved 4 November 2020.
- Horgan, Rob (5 November 2020). "HS2 | DfT slams review deputy's £170bn cost estimate as 'baseless' and 'false'". New Civil Engineer. Archived from the original on 5 November 2020. Retrieved 6 November 2020.
- Plimmer, Gill; Pickard, Jim (20 June 2021). "HS2 costs rise by further £1.7bn during pandemic". Financial Times. Archived from the original on 12 July 2021. Retrieved 12 July 2021.
- "HS2 Phase 2b Western Leg Crewe – Manchester – Supplement to the Update on the SOBC" (PDF). Department for Transport. p. 22. Archived (PDF) from the original on 1 June 2023. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
- "High Speed 2 Line: Cost Benefit Analysis". UK Parliament - Written questions, answers and statements. 10 May 2023. Archived from the original on 25 September 2023. Retrieved 25 September 2023.
- ^ Topham, Gwym (23 February 2016). "Liverpool offers £2bn to be included in HS2 network". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 12 March 2016. Retrieved 14 March 2016.
- "HS2 secures EU funding". Rail UK. 15 July 2015. Archived from the original on 6 January 2017. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
- "Wales is paying for HS2 but it will harm our economy - we must receive the £5 billion we are owed". Nation.Cymru. 12 February 2020. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- "Plaid Cymru launch General Election manifesto with bid for £4bn HS2 compensation". ITV News. 13 June 2024.
- Barry, Sion (26 August 2020). "Wales will not get multi-billion pound HS2 consequential says Grant Shapps". Business Live. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- Codd, Fintan; Pickett, Lewis; Keep, Matthew (28 November 2021). Transport funding for Wales and HS2. UK Parliament (Report). Archived from the original on 2 February 2023. Retrieved 4 December 2022.
- ^ "HS2: Outrageous rail project will not benefit Wales, transport expert says". BBC News. 11 February 2020. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- Price, Emily (27 June 2024). "Welsh Government recalculates sum owed in HS2 consequentials to just £350m". Nation.Cymru. Retrieved 28 June 2024.
- ^ "HS2 rail scheme should be reclassified as 'England only project' say MPs". The National Wales. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- Barry, Sion (14 July 2021). "HS2 should be reclassed as an England only project says Welsh Affairs Committee". Business Live. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- "Delivering a Sustainable Transport System (DaSTS)" (PDF). Department for Transport. November 2008. Archived from the original (PDF) on 30 December 2008.
- DfT 2009, p. 12 para. 31.
- "GB rail: dataset on financial and operational performance 1997–98 – 2012–13" (PDF). Association of Train Operating Companies. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 July 2017. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
- DfT 2009, p. 5 para. 6.
- DfT 2009, p. 12 para. 34.
- "HS2 isn't about reducing CO2 or the North-South divide, says DfT". TransportXtra. London. 20 January 2012. Archived from the original on 15 June 2013. Retrieved 21 January 2012.
- DfT 2009, p. 4 para. 5.
- DfT 2009, p. 17 para. 41.
- DfT 2009, p. 18 para. 43.
- DfT 2009, p. 16 para. 36.
- ^ Sholli, Sam (31 October 2019). "General election: Where parties stand on HS2, Heathrow and net zero goal". New Civil Engineer. Archived from the original on 5 November 2019. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
- "The Coalition: our programme for government" (PDF). HM Government. May 2010. p. 31. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 June 2011.
- "The North Must Benefit from HS2 Say Greens" (Press release). Manchester, United Kingdom: Green Party of England and Wales. 10 August 2024. Retrieved 10 September 2024.
- Devereux, Nigel (2 November 2019). "Leaked draft confirms Oakervee support for full HS2 route". The Railway Hub. Archived from the original on 16 September 2020. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
- "UKIP set to make HS2 an issue in local elections". Rail News. 7 April 2013. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
- Reporters, Telegraph (9 December 2019). "Brexit Party manifesto 2019: key policies, at a glance". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 30 December 2019. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
- ^ The Economist (15 February 2024). "The Horror Story of HS2". The Economist. Archived from the original on 15 February 2024.
- Jenkins, Simon (7 June 2016). "HS2: the zombie train that refuses to die". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 8 May 2020. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
- Bamford, Thomas (21 October 2019). "Dame Cheryl Gillan MP visits Great Missenden HS2 protesters". Bucks Herald. Archived from the original on 16 September 2020. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
- Watts, Joseph (4 July 2016). "Liam Fox will 'scrap HS2' if he becomes PM". Evening Standard. Archived from the original on 4 July 2016. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
- Wolmar, Christian (16 April 2014). "What's the point of HS2?". London Review of Books. Archived from the original on 11 March 2020. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
- Stretton, Rachel (20 June 2020). "Extinction Rebellion on 125-mile 'Rebel Trail' protest". Coventry Telegraph. Archived from the original on 19 July 2020. Retrieved 24 July 2020.
- ^ Drury, Colin (15 January 2020). "HS2 will destroy ancient woodlands and 'huge swathes of irreplaceable' wildlife, report warns". The Independent. Archived from the original on 27 February 2020. Retrieved 25 July 2020.
- Taylor, Diane (7 January 2020). "HS2 begins evicting activists from protest site after two years". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 June 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- Taylor, Diane (18 July 2019). "Case against HS2 environmental protesters collapses". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 30 June 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- "HS2 protesters block sites and call for money to go to NHS". The Guardian. P. A. Media. 4 May 2020. Archived from the original on 18 May 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- Taylor, Diane (20 June 2020). "Anti-HS2 protesters begin 125-mile walk along proposed route". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 5 July 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- Humphries, Will (8 October 2020). "Swampy is last man standing at HS2 camp". The Times. Archived from the original on 11 November 2020. Retrieved 9 November 2020.
- "HS2 protesters dig tunnel to thwart Euston eviction". BBC News. 26 January 2021. Archived from the original on 27 January 2021. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
- "HS2 protesters dig 100ft tunnel under London park". The Guardian. 27 January 2021. Archived from the original on 1 February 2021. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
- Topham, Gwyn (24 June 2021). "HS2 asks government to help it deal with rising number of protests". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 30 June 2021. Retrieved 1 July 2021.
- "HS2 construction workers attacked by 30-strong mob". Construction Enquirer News. Archived from the original on 29 March 2021. Retrieved 29 March 2021.
- Weinfass, Ian (10 May 2021). "HS2 worker temporarily blinded in laser attack". Construction News. Archived from the original on 13 May 2021. Retrieved 12 May 2021.
- Walker, Peter (11 March 2010). "Beauty of Chilterns may be put at risk by fast rail link, say critics". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 27 September 2016. Retrieved 14 December 2016.
- "Historic environment Map 6: The Lee – Kingsash" (PDF). High Speed 2 – Impact on the Chilterns. Chilterns AONB. Retrieved 10 January 2012.
- ^ Milmo, Dan (7 January 2011). "High-speed rail route to get 2m trees for shelter". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 19 September 2016. Retrieved 14 December 2016.
- "High Speed 2". Chilterns Conservation Board. Archived from the original on 13 September 2019. Retrieved 18 February 2020.
- "West Midlands Map 4" (PDF). High Speed 2. Department for Transport. Archived from the original (PDF) on 1 April 2010. Retrieved 15 April 2010.
- "Park Hall". Wildlife Trust for Birmingham and the Black Country. Archived from the original on 1 August 2020. Retrieved 18 March 2010.
- Barkham, Patrick (3 April 2020). "HS2 wood clearance to go ahead as Chris Packham legal bid fails". The Guardian. London. Archived from the original on 29 June 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- Shaw, Neil (8 July 2020). "Chris Packham in Court of Appeal in bid to block HS2". walesonline. Archived from the original on 8 July 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- Ibrahim, Magda (28 June 2020). "Springwatch presenter Chris Packham wins right to hearing over HS2". The Times. London. Archived from the original on 3 July 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- "Chris Packham loses appeal against HS2 rail project". The Guardian. London. 31 July 2020. Archived from the original on 31 July 2020. Retrieved 31 July 2020.
- ^ "Appraisal of Sustainability: A Report for HS2 Non Technical Summary" (PDF). Department for Transport. December 2009. Archived from the original (PDF) on 17 April 2012.
- HS2 Phase One Environmental Statement Non-technical summary (PDF). Department for Transport. November 2013. p. 45. Archived (PDF) from the original on 27 December 2016. Retrieved 14 January 2018.
- "Couple lose seven-year fight against HS2 as 17th century home to be demolished". Sky News. Archived from the original on 16 June 2021. Retrieved 4 June 2021.
- Richardson, Andy (27 November 2019). "Famous UB40 pub forced to close down by HS2". BirminghamLive. Archived from the original on 4 June 2021. Retrieved 4 June 2021.
- ^ Sparrow, T; Bain, K; Kimber, M; Wilson, AS (2024). "Visualising Heritage: using 3D immersive technologies to innovate, document and communicate rich narratives for HS2". Internet Archaeology (65). doi:10.11141/ia.65.7.
- High Speed 2(2010), page 118.
- "EHS Phase Two". Archived from the original on 6 October 2013. Retrieved 28 January 2013.
- "Phase 2a – Take action now". Woodland Trust. Archived from the original on 10 February 2018. Retrieved 19 August 2017.
- "Ancient woodland, ancient trees and veteran trees: protecting them from development". gov.uk. Archived from the original on 25 November 2020. Retrieved 23 November 2020.
- "Protection of Ancient Woodland and Trees". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). Vol. 603. United Kingdom: House of Commons. 10 December 2015. col. 414WH–442WH. Archived from the original on 27 June 2018. Retrieved 26 June 2018. Archived 27 June 2018 at the Wayback Machine
- Smith, Dee (14 February 2019). "HS2 Ltd "guilty of institutional amnesia"". Woodland Trust. Archived from the original on 24 September 2019. Retrieved 3 October 2021.
- "HS2 could threaten irreplaceable natural habitats, report warns". BBC News. 15 January 2020. Archived from the original on 15 January 2020.
- "HS2 launches plans for unprecedented 'green corridor' stretching alongside the railway". gov.uk. 25 June 2018. Archived from the original on 25 June 2018. Retrieved 26 June 2018.
- "Twitter – @HS2ltd: Challenge the lie that HS2 will destroy 108 woodlands". Twitter. 5 February 2021. Archived from the original on 24 July 2021. Retrieved 24 July 2021.
- BAH 2007.
- BAH 2007, p. 6, s.1.20.
- "The Eddington Transport Study, The case for action: Sir Rod Eddington's advice to Government" (PDF). December 2006. Figure 15: The case for new very High Speed Lines (HSLs) p.49 (also p.33). Archived from the original (PDF) on 28 July 2011.
- ^ "Delivering a Sustainable Railway" (PDF). Department for Transport. July 2007. Section 6.14 – 6.17, pp.62–3. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 April 2010.
- DfT 2010, p. 53, s.2.57.
- ""An analysis of carbon emissions following modal shift on to HS2 services"". Greens4HS2. 1 March 2021. Archived from the original on 23 May 2022. Retrieved 2 June 2022.
- Deborah (20 January 2022). "Modal shift matters – and HS2 delivers it – High-Speed Rail Group". Archived from the original on 2 February 2023. Retrieved 2 February 2023.
- "High Speed Two phase one information paper E10: Carbon" (PDF). gov.uk. 23 February 2017. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 July 2019.
- High Speed Rail: Consultation & Engagement HS2 Ltd Archived 18 September 2012 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved 1 July 2012
- "HS2 Consultation & Engagement". High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. Archived from the original on 18 September 2012. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
- "High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain's Future – Community forums". Department for Transport. Archived from the original on 4 July 2012. Retrieved 1 July 2012.
- Wright, Jeremy. "Follow-up inquiry on PHSO investigation into HS2 complaints". Jeremy Wright MP. Archived from the original on 10 January 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2020.
- "Property and Compensation Consultation". High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. 28 January 2013. Archived from the original on 23 April 2013.
- ^ "Property and compensation scheme consultation schedule" (Press release). High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. 28 January 2013. Archived from the original on 15 June 2013.
- "High Speed Rail". Civic Voice. n.d. Archived from the original on 1 May 2010. Retrieved 6 July 2010.
- Philip Hammond, Secretary of State for Transport (28 June 2010). "House of Commons Hansard Written Answers for 28 Jun 2010 (pt 0003)". Parliamentary Debates (Hansard). United Kingdom: House of Commons. col. 364W. Archived from the original on 9 July 2017. Retrieved 31 August 2017. Archived 9 July 2017 at the Wayback Machine
- Burn, Chris (21 September 2017). "How HS2 Sheffield Station saga helped derail devolution hopes". Yorkshire Post. Archived from the original on 25 September 2017. Retrieved 24 September 2017.
- "Sir Steve Houghton: Snubbing devolution in Sheffield City Region was not revenge for HS2". The Star. Sheffield. 11 December 2017. Archived from the original on 16 September 2020. Retrieved 17 September 2019.
- ^ Adela Suliman, 'Exceptional' ruins of Roman settlement discovered in England including large road, coins and makeup Archived 11 January 2022 at the Wayback Machine, The Washington Post (11 January 2022).
- Low, Valentine (30 October 2017). "Time capsules at Euston temperance hospital make for sobering news". The Times. Retrieved 12 February 2023.
- Temperance time capsules reveal history of UK's first 'sober' hospital Archived 12 January 2022 at the Wayback Machine, MOLA Headland.
- Jenna Lomax, S2: Iron Age coins found at archeological dig at Hillingdon site Archived 12 January 2022 at the Wayback Machine, Ground Engineering (14 July 2021).
- Knapton, Sarah (26 October 2018). "London's earliest settlers to be uncovered in Britain's biggest archaeological dig ahead of HS2". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 12 January 2022. Retrieved 12 January 2022.
- "St. James Gardens – A Casualty Of HS2". A London Inheritance. 6 August 2017. Archived from the original on 26 January 2019. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
- "Remains of Captain Matthew Flinders discovered at HS2 site in Euston" (Press release). HS2 Ltd. 25 January 2019. Archived from the original on 26 January 2019. Retrieved 26 January 2019.
- "London's deceased from Euston's St James's Gardens to be reburied at Brookwood Cemetery" (Press release). Woking Borough Council. 17 September 2020. Archived from the original on 19 October 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
- Balloo, Stephanie (23 September 2020). "'HS2 – The Biggest Dig' reveals how 6,500 skeletons were found in Brum". BirminghamLive. Archived from the original on 26 October 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
- "Curzon Street station archaeology". High Speed 2. Archived from the original on 23 October 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
- "Wellwick Farm archaeology". High Speed 2. Archived from the original on 13 July 2020. Retrieved 11 July 2020.
- Mee, Emily (11 July 2020). "Skeleton of 'murdered' Iron Age man found during HS2 works in Buckinghamshire". Sky News. Archived from the original on 11 July 2020. Retrieved 11 July 2020.
- "HS2 dig finds 16th Century gardens in Warwickshire". BBC News. 28 January 2021. Archived from the original on 31 January 2021. Retrieved 2 February 2021.
- ^ "HS2: Anglo-Saxon church found at Stoke Mandeville excavation site". BBC News. 8 September 2021. Archived from the original on 12 September 2021. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
- ^ "HS2: Medieval graffiti to 'ward off evil spirits' found". BBC News. 21 October 2020. Archived from the original on 23 October 2020. Retrieved 22 October 2020.
- "Walls of Possible Anglo-Saxon Church Unearthed in England". Archaeology Magazine. 8 September 2021. Archived from the original on 10 September 2021. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
- "Archaeologists discover evidence of Anglo-Saxon church". HeritageDaily. 8 September 2021. Archived from the original on 12 September 2021. Retrieved 12 September 2021.
- ^ Harriet Sherwood, Roman town's remains found below Northamptonshire field on HS2 route Archived 11 January 2022 at the Wayback Machine, The Guardian (11 January 2022).
- Halsted, J (2024). "Collecting Information and Developing Narratives: the use of data on HS2 Phase One, UK". Internet Archaeology (65). doi:10.11141/ia.65.4.
- Aryankhesal, F (2024). "The role of BIM and GIS in HS2 historic environment data management, an overview of HS2 Phase One, UK". Internet Archaeology (65). doi:10.11141/ia.65.5.
- Zoldoske, T (2024). "Metadata for Discovery. Planning for an Information Network". Internet Archaeology (65). doi:10.11141/ia.65.6.
- Barkham, Patrick (3 March 2021). "HS2 to 'rewild' 127 hectares around its 10-mile Chilterns tunnel". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 3 March 2021. Retrieved 3 March 2021.
- "HS2 Phase 2a: High-Speed Rail (West Midlands to Crewe) Act 2021". gov.uk. 24 June 2019. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- "West Midlands to Crewe (Phase 2a)". HS2. Archived from the original on 3 October 2023. Retrieved 29 September 2023.
- "Crewe to Manchester (Phase 2b – Western Leg)". HS2. Archived from the original on 3 October 2023. Retrieved 29 September 2023.
- "West Midlands to Leeds (HS2 East) - HS2 %". HS2. Archived from the original on 3 October 2023. Retrieved 29 September 2023.
- ^ Topham, Gwyn (18 November 2021). "HS2 rail leg to Leeds scrapped, Grant Shapps confirms". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 4 October 2023. Retrieved 4 October 2023.
- Topham, Gwyn (7 June 2022). "Rail industry groups outraged as HS2 Golborne link quietly scrapped". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Archived from the original on 4 October 2023. Retrieved 4 October 2023.
- ^ "Rishi Sunak speech: PM scraps HS2 link, saying 'facts have changed'". BBC News. Archived from the original on 4 October 2023. Retrieved 4 October 2023.
- "Rail leaders respond as HS2 vote passes". www.railtechnologymagazine.com. 16 July 2019. Archived from the original on 17 July 2019. Retrieved 17 July 2019.
- Harrabin, Roger (11 February 2021). "HS2: Next phase of controversial rail network gets green light". BBC News. Archived from the original on 12 February 2021. Retrieved 12 February 2021.
- "Government confirms commitment to Crewe Hub vision". GOV.UK. Department for Transport. 9 March 2018. Archived from the original on 30 July 2019. Retrieved 19 May 2019.
- ^ "High Speed Two: From Crewe to Manchester, the West Midlands to Leeds and beyond" (PDF). GOV.UK. Department for Transport. November 2016. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 November 2016. Retrieved 19 May 2019.
- Abbit, Beth; Cox, Charlotte (15 June 2018). "The four possible sites of massive HS2 ventilation shafts in south Manchester". Manchester Evening News. Archived from the original on 14 March 2021. Retrieved 13 July 2022.
- "HS2 between Davenport Green and Ardwick". HS2. Archived from the original on 29 April 2022. Retrieved 9 June 2022.
- Nick Giesler et al., for Environmental Resources Management (ERM). "HS2 Phase Two Initial Preferred Scheme : Sustainability Summary, section 4.2.13" (PDF). High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. p. 21. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 May 2014. Retrieved 5 May 2014.
- "New High Speed Rail Proposals Unveiled" (Press release). Department for Transport. 20 December 2010. Archived from the original on 24 December 2010.
- Arup (20 December 2010). "Review of HS1 to HS2 Connection Final Report" (PDF). Department for Transport. Section 2.1 "Structural modifications", p.4. Archived from the original (PDF) on 7 July 2011.
- "Plan of the route connecting HS2 to HS1 showing which map covers which area – drawing number HS2-ARP-00-DR-RW-05140" (PDF). Arup/DfT. 5 January 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on 5 November 2014. Retrieved 12 May 2014.
- "3. HS1-HS2 Link" (PDF). HS2 London – West Midlands Design Refinement Consultation. Department for Transport. May 2013. p. 21. Archived from the original (PDF) on 12 May 2014. Retrieved 12 May 2014.
- ^ "HS2-HS1 report" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 July 2019. Retrieved 13 February 2020.
- "London mayor Boris Johnson calls for tunnel to link HS2 at Euston to St Pancras". Evening Standard. 22 April 2014. Archived from the original on 12 May 2014. Retrieved 12 May 2014.
- Smale, Katherine. "HS4Air plan to link Heathrow and Gatwick rejected". New Civil Engineer. Archived from the original on 11 December 2018. Retrieved 11 December 2018.
- "Liverpool needs a new station for high-speed rail, says Steve Rotheram". 13 March 2019. Archived from the original on 13 September 2019. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
- "Steve Rotheram Announces Commission to Deliver New Station for Liverpool City Centre | Liverpool City Region Combined Authority – News". Liverpool City Region Combined Authority. 13 March 2019. Archived from the original on 14 September 2019. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
- "Plans to build new train station to connect city centre to HS2". Wirral Globe. 13 March 2019. Archived from the original on 14 September 2019. Retrieved 13 March 2019.
- Collins, David (26 May 2019). "Government looking to axe Liverpool's HS2 link". The Sunday Times. ISSN 0956-1382. Archived from the original on 26 May 2019. Retrieved 27 May 2019.
- "North West leaders react to HS2 U-turn and Northern Powerhouse Rail news". 18 November 2021. Archived from the original on 24 November 2021. Retrieved 24 November 2021.
- "HS2 will be the 'Union Railway' of England and Scotland – Adonis". Railnews. 29 September 2009. Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 24 September 2015.
- Fast Track Scotland: Making the Case for High Speed Rail Connections with Scotland (PDF). Scottish Partnership Group for High Speed Rail. December 2011. p. 10. ISBN 9781908181213. Archived (PDF) from the original on 10 August 2016. Retrieved 6 August 2016.
- "High-speed rail plan for Glasgow to Edinburgh line". BBC News. 12 November 2012. Archived from the original on 29 January 2013. Retrieved 30 January 2013.
- "High speed Glasgow-Edinburgh rail link plans 'shelved'". BBC News. 15 January 2016. Archived from the original on 12 March 2017. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
- Leftly, Mark (24 May 2015). "SNP fury as HS2 finds 'no business case' for taking fast train service to Scotland". The Independent. Archived from the original on 24 July 2015. Retrieved 24 September 2015.
- "Revealed: the towns and cities set to lose millions over HS2". Channel 4 News. 19 October 2013. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- Paton, Graeme; Sobocinska, Kasia; Butt, Yasmin. "X-shaped HS2 plan will link cities in southwest". The Times. ISSN 0140-0460. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- Arthur, Andrew (8 February 2021). "HS2 rail links through Bristol and South West proposed by report". Business Live. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- Stuart Cole (17 February 2020). "The Impact of HS2 on Wales". Business News Wales. Archived from the original on 25 August 2022. Retrieved 25 August 2022.
- Kennedy, Catherine (26 August 2021). "How to redesign HS2 to benefit Wales". New Civil Engineer. Archived from the original on 28 November 2021. Retrieved 28 November 2021.
- "Renewed calls to level up Wales by building high-speed rail services". New Civil Engineer. 4 August 2022. Archived from the original on 11 August 2022. Retrieved 25 August 2022.
- ^ "High speed rail: investing in Britain 's future phase two – the route to Leeds, Manchester and beyond summary" (PDF). DfT. 23 January 2013. pp. 5, 16–17. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 June 2013. Retrieved 13 May 2014.
- Millward, David (6 January 2013). "HS2 route: Manchester and Liverpool win while Sheffield loses out". The Telegraph. London. Archived from the original on 8 January 2013. Retrieved 27 January 2013.
- "Stoke-on-Trent 'ignored' under HS2 rail route plans". BBC News. 28 January 2013. Archived from the original on 2 February 2013. Retrieved 2 February 2013.
- "Route section HSM09 plan and profile sheet 2 of 2 – drawing number HS2-MSG-WCM-ZZ-DT-RT-60902" (PDF). HS2 phase two initial preferred route plan and profile maps. Department for Transport. January 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 October 2013. Retrieved 2 February 2013.
- "UPDATE: HS2 in Crewe by 2027 – chairman backs Crewe hub station plan". Crewe Guardian. 17 March 2014. Archived from the original on 29 April 2014. Retrieved 29 April 2014.
- "HS2 Birmingham to Crewe link planned to open six years early". BBC News. 30 November 2015. Archived from the original on 21 January 2016. Retrieved 1 December 2015.
- "Route section HSM28 plan and profile sheet 5 of 9 – drawing number HS2-MSG-MA0-ZZ-DR-RT-52805" (PDF). HS2 phase two initial preferred route plan and profile maps. Department for Transport. January 2013. Archived (PDF) from the original on 6 October 2013. Retrieved 2 February 2013.
- "Council chiefs lobby ministers for TWO high speed rail stations". Manchester Evening News. 22 January 2013. Archived from the original on 18 May 2013. Retrieved 27 January 2013.
- "Manchester Airport may be high-speed rail network hub". Manchester Evening News. 13 March 2011. Archived from the original on 16 March 2011. Retrieved 11 March 2012.
- "High Speed Two Phase 2b Crewe to Manchester Route Engineering Report: 4.2 Manchester Airport High Speed Station" (PDF). Dft/High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. July 2017. p. 53. Archived (PDF) from the original on 26 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018.
- Department for Transport (2013). High Speed Rail: Investing in Britain's Future – Phase Two, the Route to Leeds, Manchester and Beyond. The Stationery Office. p. 38. ISBN 9780101850827. Archived from the original on 22 December 2017. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- "Hopes for 'western loop' tram line". BBC News. 31 October 2014. Archived from the original on 18 December 2017. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- Cox, Charlotte (19 March 2018). "This is how Manchester Airport's HS2 station could look". Manchester Evening News. Archived from the original on 26 May 2018. Retrieved 26 May 2018.
- Arnett, George (17 March 2014). "How will HS2 change journey times to and from London?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 18 December 2017. Retrieved 18 December 2017.
- "Phase 2b Western Leg Information Paper F1: Manchester Piccadilly Station" (PDF). gov.uk. 24 January 2022. Archived (PDF) from the original on 28 January 2022. Retrieved 28 January 2022.
Sources
- "Integrated Rail Plan for the North and Midlands" (PDF). UK Government. 18 November 2021. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 November 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
- Booz Allen Hamilton (2007). "Estimated Carbon Impact of a New North South Line" (PDF). Department for Transport. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 January 2010.
- DfT (2009): Britains Transport Infrastructure High Speed Two (PDF). Department for Transport. 2009. ISBN 978-1-906581-80-0. Archived from the original (PDF) on 13 May 2010. Retrieved 8 March 2017.
- DfT (2010): Department for Transport (11 March 2010). High Speed Rail – Command Paper (PDF). The Stationery Office. ISBN 978-0-10-178272-2. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 March 2011. Retrieved 13 March 2010.
- HS2 (2010): "High Speed Rail London to the West Midlands and Beyond: A Report to Government by High Speed Two Limited". High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. Department for Transport. 11 March 2010. Archived from the original on 17 March 2010. Retrieved 16 March 2010.Additional archives: 13 May 2010.
Detailed maps
- HS2 Phase One (2012 Maps): "HS2 revised line of route maps". High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. Department for Transport. 10 January 2012. Archived from the original on 17 March 2014. Retrieved 30 October 2012.
- HS2 Phase Two (2013 Maps): "HS2 Phase Two initial preferred route plan and profile maps". High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. Department for Transport. 28 January 2013. Archived from the original on 14 February 2014. Retrieved 10 May 2014.
Further reading
- Prentice, Paul (28 November – 11 December 2012). "High Speed 1 won... can High Speed 2, too?". Rail. No. 710. Peterborough: Bauer. pp. 54–59. ISSN 0953-4563. OCLC 49953699.
External links
- Official website
- Tetlow, Gemma; Pattison, Jeremy (5 October 2023). "HS2: costs and controversies: How much has the HS2 project cost since its inception?". Institute for Government. Retrieved 26 November 2023.
- Atkins (2009). "High Speed Line Study: Summary Report" (PDF). Department for Transport. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9 April 2010. Retrieved 13 March 2010.
High Speed 2 | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Infrastructure |
| ||||||
Places affected | |||||||
Reception | |||||||
Stations |
| ||||||
Related high speed projects |
High-speed rail | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of rail transport | |||||||||||||
Technologies |
| ||||||||||||
High-speed trains |
| ||||||||||||
High-speed railway line | |||||||||||||
By countries and territories planned networks in italics |
|
High-speed railway lines | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Africa |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asia |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Europe |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North America |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oceania | None | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
South America | None
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* An asterisk indicates overlap with conventional services. |
Rail infrastructure projects in the United Kingdom | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
- High Speed 2
- Department for Transport
- High-speed railway lines in the United Kingdom
- High-speed railway lines under construction
- Private companies limited by guarantee of the United Kingdom
- Proposed railway lines in England
- Proposed railway lines in London
- Proposed railway lines in the United Kingdom
- 2020s in rail transport
- 2030s in rail transport