Misplaced Pages

John Dalton: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:39, 24 August 2006 view sourceOmicronpersei8 (talk | contribs)52,319 editsm Reverted edits by 72.67.30.211 (talk) to version 71514178 by Omicronpersei8 using VS← Previous edit Latest revision as of 01:06, 16 December 2024 view source Jonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors375,582 edits Legacy: fix author name in citation 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|British chemist and physicist (1766–1844)}}
{{otheruses}}
{{pp-semi|small=yes}}
]
{{Other people}}
'''John Dalton''' (], ] – ], ]) was a ] ] and ], born at Eaglesfield, near ] in ]. He is most well known for his advocacy of the ].
{{Use dmy dates|date=March 2022}}
{{Use British English|date=February 2020}}
{{Infobox scientist
| honorific_suffix = ]
| image = John Dalton by Thomas Phillips, 1835.jpg
| caption = Dalton by ], 1835
| birth_date = {{birth date|1766|9|6|df=y}}
| birth_place = ], Cumberland, England
| death_date = {{death date and age|1844|7|27|1766|9|6|df=y}}
| death_place = ], Lancashire, England
| notable_students = ]
| known_for = {{ubl|]|]|]|]<br>]<br>]}}
| author_abbrev_bot = Jn.Dalton
| author_abbrev_zoo =
| prizes = ] (1826)<br>] (1822)
| signature = John Dalton Signature c1827.svg
}}


'''John Dalton''' {{post-nominals|FRS}} ({{IPAc-en|ˈ|d|ɔː|l|t|ən}}; 5 or 6 September 1766 – 27 July 1844) was an English ], ] and ].<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |last1=Ross |first1=Sydney |title=John Dalton |url=https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Dalton |access-date=6 September 2022 |encyclopedia=] |archive-date=3 September 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220903215223/https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Dalton |url-status=live }}</ref> He introduced the ] into chemistry. He also researched ]; as a result, the umbrella term for red-green congenital colour blindness disorders is ''Daltonism'' in several languages.{{efn|Including French, Russian, and Spanish, but very rarely in English.}}<ref>{{OEtymD|color-blindness}}</ref>
==Biography==
===Early life===
John Dalton was born ], ] in ] and received his early education from his father and from John Fletcher, a teacher of the ] school at Cumberland, on whose retirement in ] he himself started teaching. This youthful venture was not successful, the amount he received in fees being only about five shillings a week, and after two years he took to farm work. But he had received some instruction in mathematics from a distant relative, Elihu Robinson, and in ] he left his native village to become helper to his cousin George Bewley, who kept a school at ]. There he passed the next twelve years, becoming in ], through the retirement of his cousin, joint manager of the school with his elder brother Jonathan. Dalton was unable to attend both Oxford and Cambridge university because they were only open to members of the Church of England.


== Early life ==
About ] he seems to have thought of taking up ] or ], but his projects met with no encouragement from his relatives and he remained at Kendal until, in the spring of ], he moved to ]. Mainly through John Gough, a blind philosopher to whose aid he owed much of his scientific knowledge, he was appointed teacher of mathematics and ] at the ]. He remained in that position until the relocation of the college to ] in ], when he became a public and private teacher of ] and ]. Among his pupils were: ] and ].
]
]


John Dalton was born on 5 or 6 September 1766 into a ] family in ], near ], in ], England.<ref name="CHF" /><ref name="odnb"/> His father was a weaver.<ref>{{Cite web | url=https://www.biography.com/people/john-dalton-9265201 | title=John Dalton | access-date=2 February 2019 | archive-date=27 March 2019 | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190327085827/https://www.biography.com/people/john-dalton-9265201 | url-status=live }}</ref> He received his early education from his father and from Quaker John Fletcher, who ran a private school in the nearby village of ]. Dalton's family was too poor to support him for long and he began to earn his living, from the age of ten, in the service of wealthy local Quaker Elihu Robinson.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.cockermouth.org.uk/dms-showpage.php?tid=606|title=Pardshaw – Quaker Meeting House|access-date=18 January 2015|archive-date=23 September 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150923205251/http://www.cockermouth.org.uk/dms-showpage.php?tid=606|url-status=live}}</ref>
===Meteorology, vision and miscellany===


== Early career ==
In the early portion of Dalton's teaching career Dalton's way of life was influenced by a prosperous Quaker, a competent meteorologist and instrument maker, who got him interested in the problems of mathematics and meteorology. During his years in Kendal, Dalton had contributed solutions of problems and questions on various subjects to the ''Gentlemen's and Ladies' Diaries'', and in ] he began to keep a ] ] in which, during the succeeding fifteen years, he entered more than 200,000 observations. His first separate publication was ''Meteorological Observations and Essays'' (]), which contained the germs of several of his later discoveries. However, in spite of the originality of his treatment, the book met with only a limited sale.
{{unreferenced section|date=May 2021}}
When he was 15, Dalton joined his older brother Jonathan in running a Quaker school in ], ], about {{convert|45|mi}} from his home. Around the age of 23, Dalton may have considered studying law or medicine, but his relatives did not encourage him, perhaps because being a ], he was barred from attending English universities. He acquired much scientific knowledge from informal instruction by ], a blind philosopher who was gifted in the sciences and arts. At 27, he was appointed teacher of mathematics and ] at the "Manchester Academy" in ], a ] (the lineal predecessor, following a number of changes of location, of ]). He remained for seven years, until the college's worsening financial situation led to his resignation. Dalton began a new career as a private tutor in the same two subjects.


== Scientific work ==
Another work by him, ''Elements of English Grammar'', was published in ]. In ] he was elected a member of the ], the ''Lit & Phil'', and a few weeks after election he communicated his first paper on ''Extraordinary facts relating to the ] of ]s'', in which he postulated that shortage in color perception was caused by discoloration of the liquid medium of the eyeball. Although Dalton's theory lost credence in his own lifetime, the thorough, methodical nature of his research was so broadly recognized that ] became a common term for ]. Besides the ] and ] of the ] he was able to recognize only one colour, ], or, as he says in his paper, "that part of the image which others call ] appears to me little more than a shade or defect of ]. After that the ], yellow and ] seem one colour which descends pretty uniformly from an intense to a rare yellow, making what I should call different shades of yellow".


=== Meteorology ===
This paper was followed by many others on diverse topics on ] and ] and the origin of ], on ], the colour of the ], ], the ]s and ]s of the ] and the ] and ] of light.
]
Dalton's early life was influenced by a prominent Quaker, Elihu Robinson,<ref name="odnb">{{cite ODNB|id=53552|title=Robinson, Elihu|first=Peter|last=Davis}}</ref> a competent ] and instrument maker, from Eaglesfield, ], who interested him in problems of mathematics and meteorology. During his years in Kendal, Dalton contributed solutions to problems and answered questions on various subjects in '']'' and the '']''. In 1787 at age 21 he began his meteorological diary in which, during the succeeding 57 years, he entered more than 200,000 observations.<ref>{{cite book | last = Smith | first = R. Angus | title = Memoir of John Dalton and History of the Atomic Theory | publisher = H. Bailliere | location = London | year = 1856 | page = 279 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ZOsAAAAAYAAJ&q=angus+smith+john+dalton&pg=PP17 | access-date = 24 December 2007 | isbn = 978-1-4021-6437-8 | archive-date = 15 August 2022 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20220815124542/https://books.google.com/books?id=ZOsAAAAAYAAJ&q=angus+smith+john+dalton&pg=PP17 | url-status = live }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/john-dalton-atoms-eyesight-and-auroras|title=John Dalton: atoms, eyesight and auroras|website=Science and Industry Museum|access-date=21 June 2021|archive-date=24 June 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210624202420/https://www.scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/john-dalton-atoms-eyesight-and-auroras|url-status=live}}</ref> He rediscovered ]'s theory of atmospheric circulation (now known as the ]) around this time.<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150503131015/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/251166/George-Hadley |date=3 May 2015 }} '']''. Accessed 30 April 2009.</ref> In 1793 Dalton's first publication, ''Meteorological Observations and Essays'', contained the seeds of several of his later discoveries but despite the originality of his treatment, little attention was paid to them by other scholars. A second work by Dalton, ''Elements of English Grammar'' (or ''A new system of grammatical instruction: for the use of schools and academies''), was published in 1801.<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://dla.library.upenn.edu/dla/print/pageturn.html?id=PRINT_992146153503681|title=Other: Dalton, John, 1766–1844 – Elements of English grammar, or A new system of grammatical instruction : for the use of schools and academies / by John Dalton ...|website=dla.library.upenn.edu|access-date=26 November 2019|archive-date=23 February 2023|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230223025231/http://dla.library.upenn.edu/dla/print/pageturn.html?id=PRINT_992146153503681|url-status=live}}</ref>


===Atomic theory=== ==== Measuring mountains ====
After leaving the ], Dalton returned annually to spend his holidays studying meteorology, something which involved a lot of hill-walking. Until the advent of aeroplanes and ]s, the only way to make measurements of temperature and humidity at altitude was to climb a mountain. Dalton estimated the height using a ]. The ] did not publish maps for the Lake District until the 1860s. Before then, Dalton was one of the few authorities on the heights of the region's mountains.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.geog.port.ac.uk/webmap/thelakes/html/West/WS21P190.htm |title=Thomas West's Guide to the Lakes, 1778/1821 |access-date=18 January 2015 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20141125161603/http://www.geog.port.ac.uk/webmap/thelakes/html/West/WS21P190.htm |archive-date=25 November 2014 }}</ref> He was often accompanied by Jonathan Otley, who also made a study of the heights of the local peaks, using Dalton's figures as a comparison to check his work. Otley published his information in his map of 1818. Otley became both an assistant and a friend to Dalton.<ref>Thomas Fletcher Smith ''Jonathan Otley, Man of Lakeland'', publ. Bookcase, 2007 ISBN 978-1-904147-23-7</ref>
In ] he became a secretary of the ''Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society'', and in the following year he presented the important paper or series of papers, entitled ''Experimental Essays'' on the constitution of mixed ]es; on the ] of steam and other ]s at different ]s, both in a ] and in ]; on ]; and on the ] of gases.


=== Colour blindness ===
The second of these essays opens with the striking remark,
In 1794, shortly after his arrival in Manchester, Dalton was elected a member of the ], the "Lit & Phil", and a few weeks later he communicated his first paper on "Extraordinary facts relating to the vision of colours", in which he postulated that shortage in colour perception was caused by discoloration of the liquid medium of the eyeball. As both he and his brother were ], he recognised that the condition must be hereditary.<ref name="daltoncb">{{Cite news |title=Life and work of John Dalton – Colour Blindness |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/03/sci_nat_the_life_and_work_of_john_dalton_(1766_1844)/html/4.stm |work=BBC News |access-date=9 November 2011 |archive-date=9 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809043457/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/spl/hi/pop_ups/03/sci_nat_the_life_and_work_of_john_dalton_(1766_1844)/html/4.stm |url-status=live }}</ref>


Although Dalton's theory was later disproven, his early research into colour vision deficiency was recognized after his lifetime.{{efn |Dalton believed that his vitreous humour possessed an abnormal blue tint, causing his anomalous colour perception, and he gave instructions for his eyes to be examined on his death, to test this hypothesis. His wishes were duly carried out, but no blue colouration was found, and Dalton's hypothesis was refuted. The shrivelled remains of one eye have survived to this day, and now belong to the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society."<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1136/bjo.82.2.203d |title=John Dalton's Colour Vision Legacy |journal=British Journal of Ophthalmology |volume=82 |issue=2 |pages=203d |year=1998 |last1=Regan |first1=B.|pmc=1722488 }}</ref>}} Examination of his preserved eyeball in 1995 demonstrated that Dalton had ], a type of ] in which the gene for medium wavelength sensitive (green) ]s is missing.<ref name="daltoncb" /> Individuals with this form of colour blindness see every colour as mapped to blue, yellow or gray, or, as Dalton wrote in his seminal paper,<ref>{{cite journal |last=Dalton |first=John |title=Extraordinary facts relating to the vision of colours: with observations |journal=Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester |year=1798 |volume=5 |pages=28–45 |url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/011812155 |access-date=8 August 2017 |archive-date=9 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809042409/https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/011812155 |url-status=live }}</ref>
:"There can scarcely be a doubt entertained respecting the reducibility of all elastic fluids of whatever kind, into liquids; and we ought not to despair of affecting it in ] and by strong pressures exerted upon the unmixed gases further."


{{blockquote|That part of the image which others call red, appears to me little more than a shade, or defect of light; after that the orange, yellow and green seem one colour, which descends pretty uniformly from an intense to a rare yellow, making what I should call different shades of yellow.}}
After describing experiments to ascertain the pressure of steam at various points between 0 ° and 100°] (32° and 212°]), he concluded from observations on the ] of six different liquids, that the variation of vapor pressure for all liquids is equivalent, for the same variation of temperature, reckoning from vapor of any given pressure.


{{multiple image
In the fourth essay he remarks,
| align = none
| image1 = Вечір на "інтегралі" - річка Південний Буг.jpg
| width1 = 300
| alt1 = A photograph of a river through the forest at sunset, with orange lichen-covered rocks in the foreground, a purple and yellowish pink sunset sky, a river reflecting the sky colors, and bright green trees and plants.
| caption1 = Normal vision
| image2 = Deuteranopia sight.jpg
| width2 = 300
| alt2 = The same photograph with its colors modified to simulate red–green color blindness. The orange areas of rocks, yellowish pink areas of the sky, and green plants now appear to have similar yellowish color, while purple parts of the sky and river look blue or gray.
| caption2 = Simulated red–green color blindness
| footer =
}}


=== Gas laws ===
:"I see no sufficient reason why we may not conclude that all elastic fluids under the same pressure expand equally by heat and that for any given expansion of ], the corresponding expansion of air is proportionally something less, the higher the temperature. It seems, therefore, that general laws respecting the absolute quantity and the nature of heat are more likely to be derived from elastic fluids than from other substances."
{{external media | width = 210px | float = right | headerimage=] |
video1 = {{YouTube|d2WWgTGJsIw|Profiles in Chemistry:How John Dalton's meteorological studies led to the discovery of atoms}}, ]}}


In 1800, Dalton became secretary of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, and in the following year he presented an important series of lectures, entitled "Experimental Essays" on the constitution of mixed gases; the ] of steam and other ]s at different temperatures in a ] and in ]; on ]; and on the ] of gases. The four essays, presented between 2 and 30 October 1801, were published in the ''Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester'' in 1802.
He thus enunciated ], stated some months later by ]. In the two or three years following the reading of these essays, he published several papers on similar topics, that on the absorption of gases by water and other liquids (]), containing his law of ]s.


The second essay opens with the remark,<ref>{{cite journal |last=Dalton |first=John |title=Essay II. On the Force of Steam or Vapour from Water and Various other Liquids, both is a Vacuum and in Air |journal=Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester |series=2nd |year=1802|volume= 5 |pages=550–551 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA550}}</ref>
The most important of all Dalton's investigations are those concerned with the ]ic theory in chemistry, with which his name is inseparably associated. It has been proposed that this theory was suggested to him either by researches on ] (''olefiant gas'') and ] (''carburetted hydrogen'') or by analysis of ] (''protoxide of azote'') and ] (''deutoxide of azote''), both views resting on the authority of ]. However, a study of Dalton's own laboratory notebooks, discovered in the rooms of the ''Lit & Phil''<ref>Roscoe & Harden (1896)</ref>, concluded that so far from Dalton being led to the idea, that chemical combination consists in the interaction of atoms of definite and characteristic weight, by his search for an explanation of the ], the idea of atomic structure arose in his mind as a purely physical concept, forced upon him by study of the physical properties of the ] and other ]es. The first published indications of this idea are to be found at the end of his paper on the absorption of gases already mentioned, which was read on ] ] though not published till ]. Here he says:


{{blockquote|There can scarcely be a doubt entertained respecting the reducibility of all elastic fluids of whatever kind, into liquids; and we ought not to despair of effecting it in ] and by strong pressures exerted upon the unmixed gases further.}}
: "Why does not water admit its bulk of every kind of gas alike? This question I have duly considered, and though I am not able to satisfy myself completely I am nearly persuaded that the circumstance depends on the weight and number of the ultimate particles of the several gases."


After describing experiments to ascertain the pressure of steam at various points between {{convert|0|and|100|C|F}}, Dalton concluded from observations of the ] of six different liquids, that the variation of vapour pressure for all liquids is equivalent, for the same variation of temperature, reckoning from vapour of any given pressure.
He proceeds to give what has been quoted as his first table of ]s, but in his laboratory notebooks<ref>Laboratory notebooks for ]&ndash;], under the date ] ], on ''p.''248</ref> there is an earlier one dated ] in which he sets out the relative weights of the atoms of a number of substances, derived from analysis of ], ], ], etc. by chemists of the time.


In the fourth essay he remarks,<ref>{{cite journal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3qdJAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA600 |last=Dalton |first=John |title=Essay IV. On the Expansion of Elastic Fluids by Heat |journal=Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester |series=2nd |year=1802 |volume= 5 |page=600}}</ref>
It appears, then, that confronted with the problem of calculating the relative diameter of the atoms of which, he was convinced, all gases were made, he used the results of ]. Assisted by the assumption that combination always takes place in the simplest possible way, he thus arrived at the idea that chemical combination takes place between particles of different weights, and this it was which differentiated his theory from the historic speculations of the ].


{{blockquote|I see no sufficient reason why we may not conclude, that all elastic fluids under the same pressure expand equally by heat—and that for any given expansion of ], the corresponding expansion of air is proportionally something less, the higher the temperature. ... It seems, therefore, that general laws respecting the absolute quantity and the nature of heat, are more likely to be derived from elastic fluids than from other substances.}}
The extension of this idea to substances in general necessarily led him to the law of multiple proportions, and the comparison with experiment brilliantly confirmed his deduction<ref>Roscoe & Harden (1896), ''pp.'' 50,51</ref>. It may be noted that in a paper on the proportion of the gases or elastic fluids constituting the atmosphere, read by him in November ], the law of multiple proportions appears to be anticipated in the words: "The elements of oxygen may combine with a certain portion of nitrous gas or with twice that portion, but with no intermediate quantity", but there is reason to suspect that this sentence was added some time after the reading of the paper, which was not published till ].


He enunciated ], published in 1802 by ] (Gay-Lussac credited the discovery to unpublished work from the 1780s by ]). In the two or three years following the lectures, Dalton published several papers on similar topics. "On the Absorption of Gases by Water and other Liquids" (read as a lecture on 21 October 1803, first published in 1805)<ref name=Dalton1805>{{cite journal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2Pg5AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA271 |last=Dalton |first=John |title=On the Absorption of Gases by Water and other Liquids |journal=Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester |series=2nd |year=1805 |volume= 6 |pages=271–287}}</ref> contained his law of partial pressures now known as ].
Compounds were listed as binary, ternary, etc. in the ] depending on the number of atoms a compound had in its simplest, empirical form.


=== Atomic theory ===
He hypothesized the structure of compounds can be represented in whole number ratios. So, one atom of element X combining with one atom of element Y is a binary compound. Furthermore, one atom of element X combining with two elements of Y or vice versa, is a ternary compound. Many of the first compounds listed in the ] were listed correctly, although others have not.
Arguably the most important of all Dalton's investigations are concerned with the ] in chemistry. While his name is inseparably associated with this theory, the origin of Dalton's atomic theory is not fully understood.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1086/350077 |title=The Origin of Dalton's Chemical Atomic Theory: Daltonian Doubts Resolved |journal=Isis |volume=57 |pages=35–55 |year=1966 |last1=Thackray |first1=Arnold W.|s2cid=144818988 }}</ref><ref name="In Search of El Dorado: John Dalton">{{cite journal |jstor=40972005 |last1=Rocke |first1=Alan J. |title=In Search of El Dorado: John Dalton and the Origins of the Atomic Theory |journal=Social Research |year=2005 |volume=72 |issue=1 |pages=125–158 |doi=10.1353/sor.2005.0003 |s2cid=141350239 }}</ref> The theory may have been suggested to him either by researches on ] (''olefiant gas'') and ] (''carburetted hydrogen'') or by analysis of ] (''protoxide of azote'') and ] (''deutoxide of azote''), both views resting on the authority of ].<ref>{{cite book |last1=Thomson |first1=Thomas |title=The Elements of Chemistry |date=1810 |publisher=J. & A.Y. Humphreys |page=480 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=FZsIAAAAIAAJ&q=Thomas%20Thomson%20element%20of%20chemistry&pg=PA483 |access-date=18 October 2020 |archive-date=21 December 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20221221083309/https://books.google.com/books?id=FZsIAAAAIAAJ&q=Thomas%20Thomson%20element%20of%20chemistry&pg=PA483 |url-status=live }}</ref>


From 1814 to 1819, Irish chemist ] claimed that Dalton had plagiarised his ideas, but Higgins' theory did not address relative atomic mass.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The life and work of William Higgins, chemist, 1763–1825 including reprints of "A comparative view of the phlogistic and antiphlogistic theories" and "Observations on the atomic theory and electrical phenomena" by William Higgins|last1=Wheeler |first1=T. S |last2=Partington |first2=J. R.|publisher=Pergamon Press|year=1960}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1098/rsnr.2010.0020 |title=William Higgins at the Dublin Society, 1810–20: The loss of a professorship and a claim to the atomic theory |journal=Notes and Records of the Royal Society |volume=64 |issue=4 |pages=417–434 |year=2010 |last1=Grossman |first1=M. I.|s2cid=146292636 |doi-access= }}</ref> Recent evidence suggests that Dalton's development of thought may have been influenced by the ideas of another Irish chemist ], who was William's uncle. Bryan believed that an atom was a heavy central particle surrounded by an atmosphere of ], the supposed substance of heat at the time. The size of the atom was determined by the diameter of the caloric atmosphere. Based on the evidence, Dalton was aware of Bryan's theory and adopted very similar ideas and language, but he never acknowledged Bryan's anticipation of his caloric model.<ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1098/rsnr.2014.0025 |title=John Dalton and the London atomists: William and Bryan Higgins, William Austin, and new Daltonian doubts about the origin of the atomic theory |journal= Notes and Records |volume=68 |issue=4 |pages=339–356 |year=2014 |last1=Grossman |first1=M. I.|pmc=4213434 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |doi=10.1017/S0007087417000851 |pmid=29065936 |title=John Dalton and the origin of the atomic theory: Reassessing the influence of Bryan Higgins |journal=The British Journal for the History of Science |volume=50 |issue=4 |pages=657–676 |year=2017 |last1=Grossman |first1=Mark I.|s2cid=206212671 }}</ref> However, the essential novelty of Dalton's atomic theory is that he provided a method of calculating relative atomic weights for the chemical elements, which provides the means for the assignment of molecular formulas for all chemical substances. Neither Bryan nor William Higgins did this, and Dalton's priority for that crucial innovation is uncontested.<ref name="In Search of El Dorado: John Dalton" />
Dalton used his own symbols to visually represent the atomic structure of compounds. These have made it in ] where John Dalton listed a number of elements, and common compounds.


A study of Dalton's laboratory notebooks, discovered in the rooms of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society,{{sfn|Roscoe|Harden|1896}} concluded that so far from Dalton being led by his search for an explanation of the ] to the idea that chemical combination consists in the interaction of atoms of definite and characteristic weight, the idea of atoms arose in his mind as a purely physical concept, forced on him by study of the physical properties of the ] and other gases. The first published indications of this idea are to be found at the end of his paper "On the Absorption of Gases by Water and other Liquids"<ref name=Dalton1805 /> already mentioned. There he says:
Many of Dalton's ideas were acquired from other chemists at the time, such as ] and ]. However, he was the first to put the ideas into a universal atomic theory, which was undoubtedly his greatest achievement.


{{blockquote|Why does not water admit its bulk of every kind of gas alike? This question I have duly considered, and though I am not able to satisfy myself completely I am nearly persuaded that the circumstance depends on the weight and number of the ultimate particles of the several gases.}}
Five main points of Dalton's Atomic Theory
* Elements are made of tiny particles called atoms
* All atoms of a given element are identical
* The atoms of a given element are different from those of any other element
* Atoms of one element can combine with atoms of other elements to form compounds. A given compound always has the same relative numbers of types of atoms.
* Atoms cannot be created, divided into smaller particles, nor destroyed in the chemical process. A chemical reaction simply changes the way atoms are grouped together.


He then proposes relative weights for the atoms of a few elements, without going into further detail. However, a recent study of Dalton's laboratory notebook entries concludes he developed the chemical atomic theory in 1803 to reconcile ]’s and ]’s analytical data on the composition of nitric acid, not to explain the solubility of gases in water.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Grossman|first=Mark I.|date=2 January 2021|title=John Dalton's "Aha" Moment: the Origin of the Chemical Atomic Theory|url=https://doi.org/10.1080/00026980.2020.1868861|journal=Ambix|volume=68|issue=1|pages=49–71|doi=10.1080/00026980.2020.1868861|issn=0002-6980|pmid=33577439|s2cid=231909410}}</ref>
Unfortunately, Dalton had an additional statement that prevented his theory from being accepted for many years.


The main points of Dalton's atomic theory, as it eventually developed, are:
:When atoms combine in only one ratio, "..it must be presumed to be a binary one, unless some cause appear to the contrary"
# Elements are made of extremely small particles called ]s.
# Atoms of a given element are identical in size, mass and other properties; atoms of different elements differ in size, mass and other properties.
# Atoms cannot be subdivided, created or destroyed.
# Atoms of different elements combine in simple whole-number ratios to form ].
# In ], atoms are combined, separated or rearranged.


In his first extended published discussion of the atomic theory (1808), Dalton proposed an additional (and controversial) "rule of greatest simplicity". This rule could not be independently confirmed, but some such assumption was necessary in order to propose formulas for a few simple molecules, upon which the calculation of atomic weights depended. This rule dictated that if the atoms of two different elements were known to form only a single compound, like hydrogen and oxygen forming water or hydrogen and nitrogen forming ammonia, the molecules of that compound shall be assumed to consist of one atom of each element. For elements that combined in multiple ratios, such as the then-known two oxides of carbon or the three oxides of nitrogen, their combinations were assumed to be the simplest ones possible. For example, if two such combinations are known, one must consist of an atom of each element, and the other must consist of one atom of one element and two atoms of the other.<ref>{{Cite book|title = Transforming Matter: A History of Chemistry from Alchemy to the Buckyball|last = Levere|first = Trevor|publisher = The Johns Hopkins University Press|year = 2001|isbn = 978-0-8018-6610-4|location = Baltimore, Maryland|pages = 84–86}}</ref>
Dalton had no evidence to support this statement from his theory and it caused him to wrongly assume that the formula for water was OH and ammonia was NH. Because of this Daltons experimental data did not support most of the conclusions he drew from it.


This was merely an assumption, derived from faith in the simplicity of nature. No evidence was then available to scientists to deduce how many atoms of each element combine to form molecules. But this or some other such rule was absolutely necessary to any incipient theory, since one needed an assumed molecular formula in order to calculate relative atomic weights. Dalton's "rule of greatest simplicity" caused him to assume that the formula for water was OH and ] was NH, quite different from our modern understanding (H<sub>2</sub>O, NH<sub>3</sub>). On the other hand, his simplicity rule led him to propose the correct modern formulas for the two oxides of carbon (CO and CO<sub>2</sub>). Despite the uncertainty at the heart of Dalton's atomic theory, the principles of the theory survived.
Amazingly, all but two of the statements in Dalton's Atomic Theory are still believed to be true by scientists today. The statement "Atoms cannot be created, divided into smaller particles, or destroyed" is inconsistent with the existence of nuclear fusion and fission, although such processes are nuclear reactions, not chemical reactions. In addition, the statement "all atoms of a given element are identical" is not precisely true, as the different isotopes of an element have varying numbers of neutrons in their nuclei, though the number of protons remains consistent.


=== Relative atomic weights ===
===Later years===
]s as depicted in John Dalton's ''A New System of Chemical Philosophy'' (1808)]]
Dalton communicated his atomic theory to Thomson who, by consent, included an outline of it in the third edition of his ''System of Chemistry'' (]), and Dalton gave a further account of it in the first part of the first volume of his ''New System of Chemical Philosophy'' (]). The second part of this volume appeared in ], but the first part of the second volume was not issued till ], though the printing of it began in ]. This delay is not explained by any excess of care in preparation, for much of the matter was out of date and the appendix giving the author's latest views is the only portion of special interest. The second part of vol. ii. never appeared.
Dalton published his first table of relative ]s containing six elements (hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, sulfur and phosphorus), relative to the weight of an atom of hydrogen conventionally taken as 1.<ref name=Dalton1805 /> Since these were only relative weights, they do not have a unit of weight attached to them. Dalton provided no indication in this paper how he had arrived at these numbers, but in his laboratory notebook, dated 6 September 1803,{{sfn|Roscoe|Harden|1896|page=83}} is a list in which he set out the relative weights of the atoms of a number of elements, derived from analysis of water, ammonia, ], etc. by chemists of the time.


The extension of this idea to substances in general necessarily led him to the ], and the comparison with experiment brilliantly confirmed his deduction.{{sfn|Roscoe|Harden|1896|pages=50–51}} In the paper "On the Proportion of the Several Gases in the Atmosphere", read by him in November 1802, the law of multiple proportions appears to be anticipated in the words:
Dalton was president of the ''Lit & Phil'' from 1817 until his death, contributing 116 memoirs. Of these the earlier are the most important. In one of them, read in 1814, he explains the principles of ], in which he was one of the earliest workers. In ] a paper on the ]s and ]s, often regarded as a weaker work, was refused by the ], and he was so incensed that he published it himself. He took the same course soon afterwards with four other papers, two of which (''On the quantity of ]s, ]s and ]s in different varieties of salts'' and ''On a new and easy method of analysing ]'') contain his discovery, regarded by him as second in importance only to the atomic theory, that certain ]s, when dissolved in water, cause no increase in its volume, his inference being that the salt enters into the ]s of the water.


{{blockquote|The elements of oxygen may combine with a certain portion of nitrous gas or with twice that portion, but with no intermediate quantity.}}
===Dalton's experimental method===
As an investigator, Dalton was content with rough and ] instruments, though better ones were readily attainable. Sir ] described him as "a very coarse experimenter", who almost always found the results he required, trusting to his head rather than his hands.


But there is reason to suspect that this sentence may have been added some time after the reading of the paper, which was not published until 1805.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Dalton |first=John |title=On the Proportion of the Several Gases in the Atmosphere |journal=Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester |series=2nd |year=1805 |volume= 6 |pages=244–258 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2Pg5AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA244}}</ref>
In the preface to the second part of vol. i. of his ''New System'' he says he had so often been misled by taking for granted the results of others that he determined to write "as little as possible but what I can attest by my own experience", but this independence he carried so far that it sometimes resembled lack of receptivity. Thus he distrusted, and probably never fully accepted, Gay-Lussac's conclusions as to the combining volumes of gases. He held peculiar and quite unfounded views about ]. Even after its elementary character had been settled by Davy, he persisted in using the atomic weights he himself had adopted, even when they had been superseded by the more accurate determinations of other chemists. He always objected to the chemical notation devised by ], although by common consent it was much simpler and more convenient than his own cumbersome system of circular symbols. His library, he was once heard to declare, he could ''carry on his back'', yet reputedly he had not read half the books it contained.


Compounds were listed as binary, ternary, quaternary, etc. (molecules composed of two, three, four, etc. atoms) in the ''New System of Chemical Philosophy'' depending on the number of atoms a compound had in its simplest, empirical form.
===Public life===
Before he had propounded the atomic theory, he had already attained a considerable scientific reputation. In ] he was chosen to give a course of lectures on natural philosophy at the ] in ], where he delivered another course in ]&ndash;]. However, he was deficient, it would seem, in the qualities that make an attractive lecturer, being harsh and indistinct in voice, ineffective in the treatment of his subject, and singularly wanting in the language and power of illustration.


Dalton hypothesised the structure of compounds can be represented in whole number ratios. So, one atom of element X combining with one atom of element Y is a binary compound. Furthermore, one atom of element X combining with two atoms of element Y or vice versa, is a ternary compound. Many of the first compounds listed in the ''New System of Chemical Philosophy'' correspond to modern views, although many others do not.
In 1810 he was asked by Davy to offer himself as a candidate for the fellowship of the Royal Society, but declined, possibly for financial reasons. However, in ] he was proposed without his knowledge, and on election paid the usual fee. Six years previously he had been made a corresponding member of the ] ], and in ] he was elected as one of its eight foreign associates in place of Davy.


Dalton used his own symbols to visually represent the atomic structure of compounds. They were depicted in the ''New System of Chemical Philosophy'', where he listed 21 elements and 17 simple molecules.
In 1833 ]'s government conferred on him a pension of ]150, raised in 1836 to £300.


=== Other investigations ===
Dalton never married And didn’t really have many friends throughout his life. He lived for more than a quarter of a century with his friend the Rev. W. Johns (1771&ndash;1845), in George Street, Manchester, where his daily round of laboratory work and tuition was broken only by annual excursions to the ] and occasional visits to London. In ] he paid a short visit to ], where he met many distinguished resident scientists. He attended several of the earlier meetings of the ] at ], ], ] and ].
Dalton published papers on such diverse topics as rain and dew and the origin of springs (hydrosphere); on heat, the colour of the sky, steam and the ] and ] of light; and on the grammatical subjects of the ]s and ]s of the English language.


=== Experimental approach ===
==Death and legacy==
As an investigator, Dalton was often content with rough and ] instruments, even though better ones were obtainable. Sir ] described him as "a very coarse experimenter", who "almost always found the results he required, trusting to his head rather than his hands."<ref>{{EB1911|wstitle= Dalton, John |volume= 7 | pages = 777–779; see page 778, final para }}</ref> On the other hand, historians who have replicated some of his crucial experiments have confirmed Dalton's skill and precision.
Dalton died in Manchester in 1844 of paralysis. The first attack he suffered in 1837, and a second in 1838 left him with a speech impediment, though he remained able to make experiments. In May 1844 he had another stroke; on July 26 he recorded with trembling hand his last meteorological observation, and on the 27th he fell from his bed and was found lifeless by his attendant. A bust of him, by Chantrey, was publicly subscribed for him and placed in the entrance hall of the Manchester Royal Institution.


In the preface to the second part of Volume I of his ''New System'', he says he had so often been misled by taking for granted the results of others that he determined to write "as little as possible but what I can attest by my own experience", but this independence he carried so far that it sometimes resembled lack of receptivity. Thus he distrusted, and probably never fully accepted, ]'s conclusions as to the combining volumes of gases.
Dalton had requested that his eyes be examined after his death, in an attempt to discover the cause of his colour-blindness; he had hypothesised that his aqueous humour might be coloured blue. Postmortem examination showed that the humours of the eye were perfectly normal. However, an eye was preserved at the Royal Institution, and a 1990s study on DNA extracted from the eye showed that he had lacked the pigment that gives sensitivity to green; the classic condition known as a deuteranope.


He held unconventional views on ]. Even after its elementary character had been settled by Davy, he persisted in using the atomic weights he himself had adopted, even when they had been superseded by the more accurate determinations of other chemists.
In honor of his work with ratios and chemicals that led to the idea of atoms and atomic weights, many chemists and biochemists use the (as of yet unofficial) unit Dalton (abbreviated Da) to denote one atomic mass unit, or 1/12 the weight of a neutral atom of Carbon-12.


He always objected to the chemical notation devised by ], although most thought that it was much simpler and more convenient than his own cumbersome system of circular symbols.
In his book ], ] ranks Dalton as the 32nd most influential person in history.


== Other publications ==
==References==
For '']'' Dalton contributed articles on Chemistry and Meteorology, but the topics are not known.
<references />


He contributed 117 ''Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester'' from 1817 until his death in 1844 while president of that organisation. Of these the earlier are the most important. In one of them, read in 1814, he explains the principles of ], in which he was one of the earliest researchers. In 1840 a paper on ]s and ], often regarded as a weaker work, was refused by the ], and he was so incensed that he published it himself. He took the same course soon afterwards with four other papers, two of which ("On the quantity of ]s, ] and salts in different varieties of salts" and "On a new and easy method of analysing sugar") contain his discovery, regarded by him as second in importance only to atomic theory, that certain ]s, when dissolved in water, cause no increase in its volume, his inference being that the salt enters into the pores of the water.
==Bibliography==
*Henry, ''Life of Dalton'', Cavendish Society (1854)
*Angus Smith, ''Memoir of John Dalton and History of the Atomic Theory''
*Roscoe and Harden, ''A New View of the Origin of Dalton's Atomic Theory'' (1896)
*Arnold Thackray, ''John Dalton: Critical Assessments of His Life and Science'', Harvard University Press, (1972) ISBN 0674475259
*DM Hunt, KS Dulai, JK Bowmaker, JD Mollon, "The Chemistry of John Dalton's Color Blindness", ''Science'', ] ]


== Public life ==
==External links==
Even before he had propounded the atomic theory, Dalton had attained a considerable scientific reputation. In 1803, he was chosen to give a series of lectures on natural philosophy at the ] in London, and he delivered another series of lectures there in 1809–1810. Some witnesses reported that he was deficient in the qualities that make an attractive lecturer, being harsh and indistinct in voice, ineffective in the treatment of his subject, and singularly wanting in the language and power of illustration{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}.
*
*
*
*{{nndb name|id=278/000049131|name=John Dalton}}
*
*
*


In 1810, Sir Humphry Davy asked him to offer himself as a candidate for the ], but Dalton declined, possibly for financial reasons. In 1822 he was proposed without his knowledge, and on election paid the usual fee{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}. Six years previously he had been made a corresponding member of the French ], and in 1830 he was elected as one of its eight foreign associates in place of Davy{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}. In 1833, ]'s government conferred on him a pension of ]150, raised in 1836 to £300 (equivalent to £{{Inflation|UK|150|1833|fmt=c}} and £{{Inflation|UK|300|1836|fmt=c}} in {{Inflation/year|UK}}, respectively){{citation needed|date=April 2024}}. Dalton was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the ] in 1834.<ref name=AAAS>{{cite web|title=Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter D|url=http://www.amacad.org/publications/BookofMembers/ChapterD.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060618085614/http://amacad.org/publications/BookofMembers/ChapterD.pdf |archive-date=2006-06-18 |url-status=live|publisher=American Academy of Arts and Sciences|access-date=7 August 2014}}</ref>
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]


A young ], who later studied and published (1843) on the nature of heat and its relationship to mechanical work, was a pupil of Dalton in his last years{{citation needed|date=April 2024}}.
]

]
== Personal life ==
]
], ], London (1835)]]
]
Dalton never married and had only a few close friends. As a Quaker, he lived a modest and unassuming personal life.<ref name="CHF">{{Cite web |title=John Dalton |website=Science History Institute |url=https://www.sciencehistory.org/historical-profile/john-dalton |access-date=20 March 2018 |date=June 2016 |archive-date=11 August 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190811221915/https://www.sciencehistory.org/historical-profile/john-dalton |url-status=live }}</ref>
]

]
For the 26 years prior to his death, Dalton lived in a room in the home of the Rev W. Johns, a published botanist, and his wife, in George Street, Manchester. Dalton and Johns died in the same year (1844).<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Smith|first1=Robert Angus|title=Memoir of John Dalton and History of the Atomic Theory up to his time|journal=Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester|date=1856|volume=13|pages=298|series=Second|language=en |hdl=2027/mdp.39015016080783|hdl-access=free}}</ref>
]

]
Dalton's daily round of laboratory work and ] in Manchester was broken only by annual excursions to the ] and occasional visits to London. In 1822 he paid a short visit to Paris, where he met many distinguished resident men of science. He attended several of the earlier meetings of the ] at ], ], Dublin and ].
]

]
== Disability and death ==
]
Dalton suffered a minor stroke in 1837, and a second in 1838 left him with a speech impairment, although he remained able to perform experiments. In May 1844 he had another stroke; on 26 July, while his hand was trembling, he recorded his last meteorological observation. On 27 July, in Manchester, Dalton fell from his bed and was found dead by his attendant.
]

]
Dalton was accorded a civic funeral with full honours. His body lay in state in ] for four days and more than 40,000 people filed past his coffin. The funeral procession included representatives of the city's major civic, commercial, and scientific bodies.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |encyclopedia=Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography |title=Dalton, John |url=https://www.encyclopedia.com/people/science-and-technology/chemistry-biographies/john-dalton |access-date=8 August 2017 |year=2008 |publisher=Charles Scribner's Sons |archive-date=9 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170809040824/http://www.encyclopedia.com/people/science-and-technology/chemistry-biographies/john-dalton |url-status=live }}</ref><ref name="bbcbio">{{Cite news |title=Science celebrates 'father of nanotech' |last=King |first=Kristine |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3178890.stm |work=BBC News |date=10 October 2003 |access-date=9 November 2011 |archive-date=16 August 2017 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170816170900/http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3178890.stm |url-status=live }}</ref> He was buried in Manchester in ]; the cemetery is now a playing field, but pictures of the original grave may be found in published materials.<ref>{{cite book | last = Patterson | first = Elizabeth C. | title = John Dalton and the Atomic Theory | url = https://archive.org/details/johndaltonatomi00patt | url-access = registration | publisher=Doubleday | location = Garden City, New York | year = 1970 }}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|author=Elliott, T. Lenton |title=John Dalton's Grave |journal=Journal of Chemical Education |year=1953 |volume=30 |issue=11 |page=569 |url=http://search.jce.divched.org/JCEIndex/FMPro?-db=jceindex.fp5&-lay=wwwform&combo=dalton&-find=&-format=detail.html&-skip=12&-max=1&-token.2=12&-token.3=10 |access-date=24 December 2007 |doi=10.1021/ed030p569 |bibcode=1953JChEd..30..569E |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081208024526/http://search.jce.divched.org/JCEIndex/FMPro?-db=jceindex.fp5&-lay=wwwform&combo=dalton&-find=&-format=detail.html&-skip=12&-max=1&-token.2=12&-token.3=10 |archive-date=8 December 2008 }}</ref>
]

]
== Legacy ==
]
], 1854]]
]
]]]
]
] on John Dalton Street in Manchester from the ]]]
]
*Much of Dalton's written work, collected by the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, was damaged during ]. It prompted ] to say, "John Dalton's records, carefully preserved for a century, were destroyed during the World War II bombing of Manchester. It is not only the living who are killed in war". The damaged papers are in the ].
]
*A bust of Dalton, by ], paid for by public subscription<ref>{{cite book | last = Millington | first = John Price | title = John Dalton | publisher = J. M. Dent & Company | location = London | year = 1906 | pages = 201–208 | isbn = 978-0-7222-3057-2 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=S0cDAAAAYAAJ&q=Henry+Roscoe+John+Dalton&pg=PA167 | access-date = 24 December 2007 | archive-date = 23 February 2023 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20230223025219/https://books.google.com/books?id=S0cDAAAAYAAJ&q=Henry+Roscoe+John+Dalton&pg=PA167 | url-status = live }}</ref> was placed in the entrance hall of the ]. Chantrey's large statue of Dalton, erected while Dalton was alive was placed in ] in 1877. He "is probably the only scientist who got a statue in his lifetime".<ref name="bbcbio" />
]
* The Manchester-based Swiss ] and sculptor ] made a cast of the interior of Dalton's cranium and of a ] therein, having arrived at the ] too late to make a cast of the head and face. A cast of the head was made, by a Mr Politi, whose arrival at the scene preceded that of Bally.<ref name="dalton">{{cite news |newspaper=The Manchester Guardian |date=3 August 1844 |page=5 |title=The Late Dr Dalton}}</ref>
]
*John Dalton Street connects ] and ] in the ].
]
*The John Dalton building at ] is occupied by the Faculty of Science and Engineering. Outside it stands ]'s statue of Dalton, erected in ] in 1855, and moved there in 1966.
]
*A ] commemorates the site of his laboratory at 36 George Street in Manchester.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://openplaques.org/plaques/732|title=John Dalton blue plaque|website=openplaques.org|access-date=26 August 2017|archive-date=26 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170826154435/http://openplaques.org/plaques/732|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-blue-plaque-for-john-dalton-36-george-st-manchester-74275923.html|title=Stock Photo – Blue plaque for John Dalton, 36 George St. Manchester|first=Bourne|last=Tom|website=Alamy|access-date=26 August 2017|archive-date=26 August 2017|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170826160804/http://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-blue-plaque-for-john-dalton-36-george-st-manchester-74275923.html|url-status=live}}</ref>
]
*The ] established two Dalton Chemical Scholarships, two Dalton Mathematical Scholarships, and a Dalton Prize for Natural History. A hall of residence is named ].
]
*The Dalton Medal has been awarded only twelve times by the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society.
]
*The ] on the Moon was named after Dalton.
]
*"Daltonism" is a lesser-known synonym of colour-blindness and, in some languages, variations on this have persisted in common usage: for example, 'daltonien' is the French adjectival equivalent of 'colour-blind', and 'daltónico'/'daltonica' is the Spanish and the Italian.
]
*The inorganic section of the UK's ] is named the Dalton Division, and the society's academic journal for inorganic chemistry is called ].
]
*In honour of Dalton's work, many chemists and biochemists use the unit of mass ] (symbol Da), also known as the unified atomic mass unit, equal to 1/12 the mass of a neutral atom of ]). The dalton is ].
]
*Quaker schools have named buildings after Dalton: for example, a schoolhouse in the primary sector of ], is called Dalton.
]
*] in southern Ontario was named after him. In 2001 the name was lost when the township was absorbed into the City of ] but in 2002 the Dalton name was affixed to a new park, ].
]
*Asteroid ] was named after him.<ref>{{Cite web |title=IAU Minor Planet Center |url=https://minorplanetcenter.net/db_search/show_object?object_id=12292 |access-date=2024-07-01 |website=minorplanetcenter.net}}</ref>
]

{{botanist|Jn.Dalton}}

== Works ==
* {{cite book | last = Dalton | first = John | title = Meteorological Observations and Essays | publisher=Harrison and Crosfield | location = Manchester | year = 1834 | edition = 2 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Ot8KAAAAIAAJ| access-date =24 December 2007}}
* {{cite book | last = Dalton | first = John | title = Foundations of the Atomic Theory | publisher=William F. Clay | location = Edinburgh | year = 1893 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=V5sEAAAAYAAJ | access-date =24 December 2007}}– Alembic Club reprint with some of Dalton's papers, along with some by ] and ]
* Dalton, John (1893.) ''''. Edinburgh: William F. Clay, 1893. Retrieved 15 August 2022 – with essays by ] and ]
* {{cite book | last = Dalton | first = John | title = A new system of chemical philosophy | year = 1808 | url = https://archive.org/details/newsystemofchemi01daltuoft | access-date =8 July 2008 | isbn = 978-1-153-05671-7| publisher = London }}
* at ], Manchester.
*Dalton, John (1808–1827). '''' (all images freely available for download in a variety of formats from ] Digital Collections at ).
*Dalton, John (1794). ''.'' .
<gallery>
File:Dalton-5.png|1793 copy of Dalton's ''"Meteorological Observations and Essays"''
File:Dalton-4.jpg|First page of ''"Meteorological Observations and Essays"''
File:Molecular theory-3.jpg|First page of a 1893 copy of "Foundations of the Molecular Theory" including Dalton's "''Extracts from a New System of Chemical Philosophy''"
File:Molecular theory-4.jpg|Second page of "''Extracts from a New System of Chemical Philosophy''"
File:Molecular theory-5.jpg|Third page of "''Extracts from a New System of Chemical Philosophy''"
</gallery>

== See also ==
* ]

== Notes ==
{{Notelist}}
{{Clear}}

== References ==
{{Reflist|30em}}

== Sources ==
* {{cite book | last = Greenaway | first = Frank | title = John Dalton and the Atom | publisher=Cornell University Press | location = Ithaca, New York | year = 1966 }}
* {{cite book | last = Henry | first = William C. | title = Memoirs of the Life and Scientific Researches of John Dalton | publisher=Cavendish Society | location = London | year = 1854 | url = https://archive.org/details/memoirsoflifesci00henruoft | access-date =21 July 2018}}
* {{Cite journal | last1 = Hunt | first1 = D. M. | last2 = Dulai | first2 = K. S. | last3 = Bowmaker | first3 = J. K. | last4 = Mollon | first4 = J. D.| title = The Chemistry of John Dalton's Color Blindness | journal=Science | year = 1995 | volume = 267 | pages = 984–988 | doi = 10.1126/science.7863342| pmid = 7863342 | issue = 5200 |bibcode = 1995Sci...267..984H | s2cid = 6764146 }}
* {{cite book | last = Lonsdale | first = Henry | author-link = Henry Lonsdale | title = The Worthies of Cumberland: John Dalton | publisher=George | location = George Routledge and Sons | year = 1874 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=pog6AAAAMAAJ | access-date =24 December 2007}}
* {{cite book | last = Millington | first = John Price | title = John Dalton | publisher=J. M. Dent & Company | location = London | year = 1906 | url = https://archive.org/details/johndalton00milliala | access-date = 21 July 2018}}
* {{cite book | last = Patterson | first = Elizabeth C. | title = John Dalton and the Atomic Theory | publisher=Anchor | location = Garden City, New York | year = 1970 }}
* {{cite journal |jstor=40972005 |last1=Rocke |first1=Alan J. |title=In Search of El Dorado: John Dalton and the Origins of the Atomic Theory |journal=Social Research |year=2005 |volume=72 |issue=1 |pages=125–158 |doi=10.1353/sor.2005.0003 |s2cid=141350239 }}
* {{cite book | last = Roscoe | first = Henry E. | title = John Dalton and the Rise of Modern Chemistry | publisher=Macmillan | location = London | year = 1895 | isbn = 9780608325361 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=kmcSAAAAIAAJ | access-date =24 December 2007}}
* {{cite book | last1 = Roscoe | first1 = Henry E. |last2=Harden |first2=Arthur | name-list-style=amp | title = A New View of the Origin of Dalton's Atomic Theory | publisher=Macmillan | location = London | year = 1896 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=0YwEAAAAYAAJ | access-date =24 December 2007 | isbn = 978-1-4369-2630-0 }}
* {{cite book | last = Smith | first = R. Angus | title = Memoir of John Dalton and History of the Atomic Theory | publisher=H. Bailliere | location = London | year = 1856 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ZOsAAAAAYAAJ&pg=PP17 | access-date =24 December 2007 | isbn = 978-1-4021-6437-8}}
* {{cite book | last = Smyth | first = A. L. | title = John Dalton, 1766–1844: A Bibliography of Works by and About Him, With an Annotated List of His Surviving Apparatus and Personal Effects | year = 1998 | publisher = Manchester Literary and Philosophical Publications | isbn = 978-1-85928-438-4 }}- Original edition published by Manchester University Press in 1966
* {{cite book | last = Thackray | first = Arnold | title = John Dalton: Critical Assessments of His Life and Science | publisher = Harvard University Press | year = 1972 | isbn = 978-0-674-47525-0 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/johndaltoncritic00arno }}

== External links ==
{{Wikiquote}}
* {{commons category-inline}}
* {{wikisource author-inline}}
* {{Librivox author |id=14153}}
* {{cite DNB |wstitle=Dalton, John (1766-1844) |display=Dalton, John (1766–1844) |volume=13 |short=x}}
* at ]

{{s-start}}
{{s-npo|pro}}
{{s-bef|before= ]}}
{{s-ttl|title=President of the ] |years=1816–44 }}
{{s-aft|after= ] }}
{{s-bef|before= John Hull }}
{{s-ttl|title=Secretary of the ] |years=1800–09 }}
{{s-aft|after= William Johns }}
{{s-end}}

{{Atomic models|state=collapsed}}
{{Scientists whose names are used as non SI units|state=collapsed}}
{{Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society|state=collapsed}}
{{Dalton Medallists|state=collapsed}}
{{Portal bar|United Kingdom|Biography|Science}}
{{Authority control}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Dalton, John}}
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 01:06, 16 December 2024

British chemist and physicist (1766–1844)

For other people named John Dalton, see John Dalton (disambiguation).

John DaltonFRS
Dalton by Thomas Phillips, 1835
Born(1766-09-06)6 September 1766
Eaglesfield, Cumberland, England
Died27 July 1844(1844-07-27) (aged 77)
Manchester, Lancashire, England
Known for
AwardsRoyal Medal (1826)
FRS (1822)
Scientific career
Notable studentsJames Prescott Joule
Author abbrev. (botany)Jn.Dalton
Signature

John Dalton FRS (/ˈdɔːltən/; 5 or 6 September 1766 – 27 July 1844) was an English chemist, physicist and meteorologist. He introduced the atomic theory into chemistry. He also researched colour blindness; as a result, the umbrella term for red-green congenital colour blindness disorders is Daltonism in several languages.

Early life

Historical plaque marking birthplace of John Dalton
Modern plaque marking birthplace of John Dalton

John Dalton was born on 5 or 6 September 1766 into a Quaker family in Eaglesfield, near Cockermouth, in Cumberland, England. His father was a weaver. He received his early education from his father and from Quaker John Fletcher, who ran a private school in the nearby village of Pardshaw Hall. Dalton's family was too poor to support him for long and he began to earn his living, from the age of ten, in the service of wealthy local Quaker Elihu Robinson.

Early career

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (May 2021) (Learn how and when to remove this message)

When he was 15, Dalton joined his older brother Jonathan in running a Quaker school in Kendal, Westmorland, about 45 miles (72 km) from his home. Around the age of 23, Dalton may have considered studying law or medicine, but his relatives did not encourage him, perhaps because being a Dissenter, he was barred from attending English universities. He acquired much scientific knowledge from informal instruction by John Gough, a blind philosopher who was gifted in the sciences and arts. At 27, he was appointed teacher of mathematics and natural philosophy at the "Manchester Academy" in Manchester, a dissenting academy (the lineal predecessor, following a number of changes of location, of Harris Manchester College, Oxford). He remained for seven years, until the college's worsening financial situation led to his resignation. Dalton began a new career as a private tutor in the same two subjects.

Scientific work

Meteorology

1793 copy of Dalton's first publication, "Meteorological Observations and Essays"
1793 copy of Dalton's first publication, "Meteorological Observations and Essays"

Dalton's early life was influenced by a prominent Quaker, Elihu Robinson, a competent meteorologist and instrument maker, from Eaglesfield, Cumberland, who interested him in problems of mathematics and meteorology. During his years in Kendal, Dalton contributed solutions to problems and answered questions on various subjects in The Ladies' Diary and the Gentleman's Diary. In 1787 at age 21 he began his meteorological diary in which, during the succeeding 57 years, he entered more than 200,000 observations. He rediscovered George Hadley's theory of atmospheric circulation (now known as the Hadley cell) around this time. In 1793 Dalton's first publication, Meteorological Observations and Essays, contained the seeds of several of his later discoveries but despite the originality of his treatment, little attention was paid to them by other scholars. A second work by Dalton, Elements of English Grammar (or A new system of grammatical instruction: for the use of schools and academies), was published in 1801.

Measuring mountains

After leaving the Lake District, Dalton returned annually to spend his holidays studying meteorology, something which involved a lot of hill-walking. Until the advent of aeroplanes and weather balloons, the only way to make measurements of temperature and humidity at altitude was to climb a mountain. Dalton estimated the height using a barometer. The Ordnance Survey did not publish maps for the Lake District until the 1860s. Before then, Dalton was one of the few authorities on the heights of the region's mountains. He was often accompanied by Jonathan Otley, who also made a study of the heights of the local peaks, using Dalton's figures as a comparison to check his work. Otley published his information in his map of 1818. Otley became both an assistant and a friend to Dalton.

Colour blindness

In 1794, shortly after his arrival in Manchester, Dalton was elected a member of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, the "Lit & Phil", and a few weeks later he communicated his first paper on "Extraordinary facts relating to the vision of colours", in which he postulated that shortage in colour perception was caused by discoloration of the liquid medium of the eyeball. As both he and his brother were colour blind, he recognised that the condition must be hereditary.

Although Dalton's theory was later disproven, his early research into colour vision deficiency was recognized after his lifetime. Examination of his preserved eyeball in 1995 demonstrated that Dalton had deuteranopia, a type of congenital red-green color blindness in which the gene for medium wavelength sensitive (green) photopsins is missing. Individuals with this form of colour blindness see every colour as mapped to blue, yellow or gray, or, as Dalton wrote in his seminal paper,

That part of the image which others call red, appears to me little more than a shade, or defect of light; after that the orange, yellow and green seem one colour, which descends pretty uniformly from an intense to a rare yellow, making what I should call different shades of yellow.

A photograph of a river through the forest at sunset, with orange lichen-covered rocks in the foreground, a purple and yellowish pink sunset sky, a river reflecting the sky colors, and bright green trees and plants.Normal visionThe same photograph with its colors modified to simulate red–green color blindness. The orange areas of rocks, yellowish pink areas of the sky, and green plants now appear to have similar yellowish color, while purple parts of the sky and river look blue or gray.Simulated red–green color blindness

Gas laws

External videos
video icon Profiles in Chemistry:How John Dalton's meteorological studies led to the discovery of atoms on YouTube, Chemical Heritage Foundation

In 1800, Dalton became secretary of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, and in the following year he presented an important series of lectures, entitled "Experimental Essays" on the constitution of mixed gases; the pressure of steam and other vapours at different temperatures in a vacuum and in air; on evaporation; and on the thermal expansion of gases. The four essays, presented between 2 and 30 October 1801, were published in the Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester in 1802.

The second essay opens with the remark,

There can scarcely be a doubt entertained respecting the reducibility of all elastic fluids of whatever kind, into liquids; and we ought not to despair of effecting it in low temperatures and by strong pressures exerted upon the unmixed gases further.

After describing experiments to ascertain the pressure of steam at various points between 0 and 100 °C (32 and 212 °F), Dalton concluded from observations of the vapour pressure of six different liquids, that the variation of vapour pressure for all liquids is equivalent, for the same variation of temperature, reckoning from vapour of any given pressure.

In the fourth essay he remarks,

I see no sufficient reason why we may not conclude, that all elastic fluids under the same pressure expand equally by heat—and that for any given expansion of mercury, the corresponding expansion of air is proportionally something less, the higher the temperature. ... It seems, therefore, that general laws respecting the absolute quantity and the nature of heat, are more likely to be derived from elastic fluids than from other substances.

He enunciated Gay-Lussac's law, published in 1802 by Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac (Gay-Lussac credited the discovery to unpublished work from the 1780s by Jacques Charles). In the two or three years following the lectures, Dalton published several papers on similar topics. "On the Absorption of Gases by Water and other Liquids" (read as a lecture on 21 October 1803, first published in 1805) contained his law of partial pressures now known as Dalton's law.

Atomic theory

Arguably the most important of all Dalton's investigations are concerned with the atomic theory in chemistry. While his name is inseparably associated with this theory, the origin of Dalton's atomic theory is not fully understood. The theory may have been suggested to him either by researches on ethylene (olefiant gas) and methane (carburetted hydrogen) or by analysis of nitrous oxide (protoxide of azote) and nitrogen dioxide (deutoxide of azote), both views resting on the authority of Thomas Thomson.

From 1814 to 1819, Irish chemist William Higgins claimed that Dalton had plagiarised his ideas, but Higgins' theory did not address relative atomic mass. Recent evidence suggests that Dalton's development of thought may have been influenced by the ideas of another Irish chemist Bryan Higgins, who was William's uncle. Bryan believed that an atom was a heavy central particle surrounded by an atmosphere of caloric, the supposed substance of heat at the time. The size of the atom was determined by the diameter of the caloric atmosphere. Based on the evidence, Dalton was aware of Bryan's theory and adopted very similar ideas and language, but he never acknowledged Bryan's anticipation of his caloric model. However, the essential novelty of Dalton's atomic theory is that he provided a method of calculating relative atomic weights for the chemical elements, which provides the means for the assignment of molecular formulas for all chemical substances. Neither Bryan nor William Higgins did this, and Dalton's priority for that crucial innovation is uncontested.

A study of Dalton's laboratory notebooks, discovered in the rooms of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, concluded that so far from Dalton being led by his search for an explanation of the law of multiple proportions to the idea that chemical combination consists in the interaction of atoms of definite and characteristic weight, the idea of atoms arose in his mind as a purely physical concept, forced on him by study of the physical properties of the atmosphere and other gases. The first published indications of this idea are to be found at the end of his paper "On the Absorption of Gases by Water and other Liquids" already mentioned. There he says:

Why does not water admit its bulk of every kind of gas alike? This question I have duly considered, and though I am not able to satisfy myself completely I am nearly persuaded that the circumstance depends on the weight and number of the ultimate particles of the several gases.

He then proposes relative weights for the atoms of a few elements, without going into further detail. However, a recent study of Dalton's laboratory notebook entries concludes he developed the chemical atomic theory in 1803 to reconcile Henry Cavendish’s and Antoine Lavoisier’s analytical data on the composition of nitric acid, not to explain the solubility of gases in water.

The main points of Dalton's atomic theory, as it eventually developed, are:

  1. Elements are made of extremely small particles called atoms.
  2. Atoms of a given element are identical in size, mass and other properties; atoms of different elements differ in size, mass and other properties.
  3. Atoms cannot be subdivided, created or destroyed.
  4. Atoms of different elements combine in simple whole-number ratios to form chemical compounds.
  5. In chemical reactions, atoms are combined, separated or rearranged.

In his first extended published discussion of the atomic theory (1808), Dalton proposed an additional (and controversial) "rule of greatest simplicity". This rule could not be independently confirmed, but some such assumption was necessary in order to propose formulas for a few simple molecules, upon which the calculation of atomic weights depended. This rule dictated that if the atoms of two different elements were known to form only a single compound, like hydrogen and oxygen forming water or hydrogen and nitrogen forming ammonia, the molecules of that compound shall be assumed to consist of one atom of each element. For elements that combined in multiple ratios, such as the then-known two oxides of carbon or the three oxides of nitrogen, their combinations were assumed to be the simplest ones possible. For example, if two such combinations are known, one must consist of an atom of each element, and the other must consist of one atom of one element and two atoms of the other.

This was merely an assumption, derived from faith in the simplicity of nature. No evidence was then available to scientists to deduce how many atoms of each element combine to form molecules. But this or some other such rule was absolutely necessary to any incipient theory, since one needed an assumed molecular formula in order to calculate relative atomic weights. Dalton's "rule of greatest simplicity" caused him to assume that the formula for water was OH and ammonia was NH, quite different from our modern understanding (H2O, NH3). On the other hand, his simplicity rule led him to propose the correct modern formulas for the two oxides of carbon (CO and CO2). Despite the uncertainty at the heart of Dalton's atomic theory, the principles of the theory survived.

Relative atomic weights

Various atoms and molecules as depicted in John Dalton's A New System of Chemical Philosophy (1808)

Dalton published his first table of relative atomic weights containing six elements (hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, carbon, sulfur and phosphorus), relative to the weight of an atom of hydrogen conventionally taken as 1. Since these were only relative weights, they do not have a unit of weight attached to them. Dalton provided no indication in this paper how he had arrived at these numbers, but in his laboratory notebook, dated 6 September 1803, is a list in which he set out the relative weights of the atoms of a number of elements, derived from analysis of water, ammonia, carbon dioxide, etc. by chemists of the time.

The extension of this idea to substances in general necessarily led him to the law of multiple proportions, and the comparison with experiment brilliantly confirmed his deduction. In the paper "On the Proportion of the Several Gases in the Atmosphere", read by him in November 1802, the law of multiple proportions appears to be anticipated in the words:

The elements of oxygen may combine with a certain portion of nitrous gas or with twice that portion, but with no intermediate quantity.

But there is reason to suspect that this sentence may have been added some time after the reading of the paper, which was not published until 1805.

Compounds were listed as binary, ternary, quaternary, etc. (molecules composed of two, three, four, etc. atoms) in the New System of Chemical Philosophy depending on the number of atoms a compound had in its simplest, empirical form.

Dalton hypothesised the structure of compounds can be represented in whole number ratios. So, one atom of element X combining with one atom of element Y is a binary compound. Furthermore, one atom of element X combining with two atoms of element Y or vice versa, is a ternary compound. Many of the first compounds listed in the New System of Chemical Philosophy correspond to modern views, although many others do not.

Dalton used his own symbols to visually represent the atomic structure of compounds. They were depicted in the New System of Chemical Philosophy, where he listed 21 elements and 17 simple molecules.

Other investigations

Dalton published papers on such diverse topics as rain and dew and the origin of springs (hydrosphere); on heat, the colour of the sky, steam and the reflection and refraction of light; and on the grammatical subjects of the auxiliary verbs and participles of the English language.

Experimental approach

As an investigator, Dalton was often content with rough and inaccurate instruments, even though better ones were obtainable. Sir Humphry Davy described him as "a very coarse experimenter", who "almost always found the results he required, trusting to his head rather than his hands." On the other hand, historians who have replicated some of his crucial experiments have confirmed Dalton's skill and precision.

In the preface to the second part of Volume I of his New System, he says he had so often been misled by taking for granted the results of others that he determined to write "as little as possible but what I can attest by my own experience", but this independence he carried so far that it sometimes resembled lack of receptivity. Thus he distrusted, and probably never fully accepted, Gay-Lussac's conclusions as to the combining volumes of gases.

He held unconventional views on chlorine. Even after its elementary character had been settled by Davy, he persisted in using the atomic weights he himself had adopted, even when they had been superseded by the more accurate determinations of other chemists.

He always objected to the chemical notation devised by Jöns Jacob Berzelius, although most thought that it was much simpler and more convenient than his own cumbersome system of circular symbols.

Other publications

For Rees's Cyclopædia Dalton contributed articles on Chemistry and Meteorology, but the topics are not known.

He contributed 117 Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester from 1817 until his death in 1844 while president of that organisation. Of these the earlier are the most important. In one of them, read in 1814, he explains the principles of volumetric analysis, in which he was one of the earliest researchers. In 1840 a paper on phosphates and arsenates, often regarded as a weaker work, was refused by the Royal Society, and he was so incensed that he published it himself. He took the same course soon afterwards with four other papers, two of which ("On the quantity of acids, bases and salts in different varieties of salts" and "On a new and easy method of analysing sugar") contain his discovery, regarded by him as second in importance only to atomic theory, that certain anhydrates, when dissolved in water, cause no increase in its volume, his inference being that the salt enters into the pores of the water.

Public life

Even before he had propounded the atomic theory, Dalton had attained a considerable scientific reputation. In 1803, he was chosen to give a series of lectures on natural philosophy at the Royal Institution in London, and he delivered another series of lectures there in 1809–1810. Some witnesses reported that he was deficient in the qualities that make an attractive lecturer, being harsh and indistinct in voice, ineffective in the treatment of his subject, and singularly wanting in the language and power of illustration.

In 1810, Sir Humphry Davy asked him to offer himself as a candidate for the fellowship of the Royal Society, but Dalton declined, possibly for financial reasons. In 1822 he was proposed without his knowledge, and on election paid the usual fee. Six years previously he had been made a corresponding member of the French Académie des Sciences, and in 1830 he was elected as one of its eight foreign associates in place of Davy. In 1833, Earl Grey's government conferred on him a pension of £150, raised in 1836 to £300 (equivalent to £17,981 and £35,672 in 2023, respectively). Dalton was elected a Foreign Honorary Member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1834.

A young James Prescott Joule, who later studied and published (1843) on the nature of heat and its relationship to mechanical work, was a pupil of Dalton in his last years.

Personal life

Dalton in later life by Thomas Phillips, National Portrait Gallery, London (1835)

Dalton never married and had only a few close friends. As a Quaker, he lived a modest and unassuming personal life.

For the 26 years prior to his death, Dalton lived in a room in the home of the Rev W. Johns, a published botanist, and his wife, in George Street, Manchester. Dalton and Johns died in the same year (1844).

Dalton's daily round of laboratory work and tutoring in Manchester was broken only by annual excursions to the Lake District and occasional visits to London. In 1822 he paid a short visit to Paris, where he met many distinguished resident men of science. He attended several of the earlier meetings of the British Association at York, Oxford, Dublin and Bristol.

Disability and death

Dalton suffered a minor stroke in 1837, and a second in 1838 left him with a speech impairment, although he remained able to perform experiments. In May 1844 he had another stroke; on 26 July, while his hand was trembling, he recorded his last meteorological observation. On 27 July, in Manchester, Dalton fell from his bed and was found dead by his attendant.

Dalton was accorded a civic funeral with full honours. His body lay in state in Manchester Town Hall for four days and more than 40,000 people filed past his coffin. The funeral procession included representatives of the city's major civic, commercial, and scientific bodies. He was buried in Manchester in Ardwick Cemetery; the cemetery is now a playing field, but pictures of the original grave may be found in published materials.

Legacy

Bust of Dalton by Chantrey, 1854
Statue of Dalton by Chantrey
A blue plaque on John Dalton Street in Manchester from the Royal Society of Chemistry
  • Much of Dalton's written work, collected by the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society, was damaged during bombing on 24 December 1940. It prompted Isaac Asimov to say, "John Dalton's records, carefully preserved for a century, were destroyed during the World War II bombing of Manchester. It is not only the living who are killed in war". The damaged papers are in the John Rylands Library.
  • A bust of Dalton, by Chantrey, paid for by public subscription was placed in the entrance hall of the Royal Manchester Institution. Chantrey's large statue of Dalton, erected while Dalton was alive was placed in Manchester Town Hall in 1877. He "is probably the only scientist who got a statue in his lifetime".
  • The Manchester-based Swiss phrenologist and sculptor William Bally made a cast of the interior of Dalton's cranium and of a cyst therein, having arrived at the Manchester Royal Infirmary too late to make a cast of the head and face. A cast of the head was made, by a Mr Politi, whose arrival at the scene preceded that of Bally.
  • John Dalton Street connects Deansgate and Albert Square in the centre of Manchester.
  • The John Dalton building at Manchester Metropolitan University is occupied by the Faculty of Science and Engineering. Outside it stands William Theed's statue of Dalton, erected in Piccadilly in 1855, and moved there in 1966.
  • A blue plaque commemorates the site of his laboratory at 36 George Street in Manchester.
  • The University of Manchester established two Dalton Chemical Scholarships, two Dalton Mathematical Scholarships, and a Dalton Prize for Natural History. A hall of residence is named Dalton Hall.
  • The Dalton Medal has been awarded only twelve times by the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society.
  • The Dalton crater on the Moon was named after Dalton.
  • "Daltonism" is a lesser-known synonym of colour-blindness and, in some languages, variations on this have persisted in common usage: for example, 'daltonien' is the French adjectival equivalent of 'colour-blind', and 'daltónico'/'daltonica' is the Spanish and the Italian.
  • The inorganic section of the UK's Royal Society of Chemistry is named the Dalton Division, and the society's academic journal for inorganic chemistry is called Dalton Transactions.
  • In honour of Dalton's work, many chemists and biochemists use the unit of mass dalton (symbol Da), also known as the unified atomic mass unit, equal to 1/12 the mass of a neutral atom of carbon-12). The dalton is officially accepted for use with the SI.
  • Quaker schools have named buildings after Dalton: for example, a schoolhouse in the primary sector of Ackworth School, is called Dalton.
  • Dalton Township in southern Ontario was named after him. In 2001 the name was lost when the township was absorbed into the City of Kawartha Lakes but in 2002 the Dalton name was affixed to a new park, Dalton Digby Wildlands Provincial Park.
  • Asteroid (12292) Dalton was named after him.
The standard author abbreviation Jn.Dalton is used to indicate this person as the author when citing a botanical name.

Works

  • 1793 copy of Dalton's "Meteorological Observations and Essays" 1793 copy of Dalton's "Meteorological Observations and Essays"
  • First page of "Meteorological Observations and Essays" First page of "Meteorological Observations and Essays"
  • First page of a 1893 copy of "Foundations of the Molecular Theory" including Dalton's "Extracts from a New System of Chemical Philosophy" First page of a 1893 copy of "Foundations of the Molecular Theory" including Dalton's "Extracts from a New System of Chemical Philosophy"
  • Second page of "Extracts from a New System of Chemical Philosophy" Second page of "Extracts from a New System of Chemical Philosophy"
  • Third page of "Extracts from a New System of Chemical Philosophy" Third page of "Extracts from a New System of Chemical Philosophy"

See also

Notes

  1. Including French, Russian, and Spanish, but very rarely in English.
  2. Dalton believed that his vitreous humour possessed an abnormal blue tint, causing his anomalous colour perception, and he gave instructions for his eyes to be examined on his death, to test this hypothesis. His wishes were duly carried out, but no blue colouration was found, and Dalton's hypothesis was refuted. The shrivelled remains of one eye have survived to this day, and now belong to the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society."

References

  1. Ross, Sydney. "John Dalton". Encyclopædia Britannica. Archived from the original on 3 September 2022. Retrieved 6 September 2022.
  2. Harper, Douglas. "color-blindness". Online Etymology Dictionary.
  3. ^ "John Dalton". Science History Institute. June 2016. Archived from the original on 11 August 2019. Retrieved 20 March 2018.
  4. ^ Davis, Peter. "Robinson, Elihu". Oxford Dictionary of National Biography (online ed.). Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/ref:odnb/53552. (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  5. "John Dalton". Archived from the original on 27 March 2019. Retrieved 2 February 2019.
  6. "Pardshaw – Quaker Meeting House". Archived from the original on 23 September 2015. Retrieved 18 January 2015.
  7. Smith, R. Angus (1856). Memoir of John Dalton and History of the Atomic Theory. London: H. Bailliere. p. 279. ISBN 978-1-4021-6437-8. Archived from the original on 15 August 2022. Retrieved 24 December 2007.
  8. "John Dalton: atoms, eyesight and auroras". Science and Industry Museum. Archived from the original on 24 June 2021. Retrieved 21 June 2021.
  9. George Hadley Archived 3 May 2015 at the Wayback Machine Britannica.com. Accessed 30 April 2009.
  10. "Other: Dalton, John, 1766–1844 – Elements of English grammar, or A new system of grammatical instruction : for the use of schools and academies / by John Dalton ..." dla.library.upenn.edu. Archived from the original on 23 February 2023. Retrieved 26 November 2019.
  11. "Thomas West's Guide to the Lakes, 1778/1821". Archived from the original on 25 November 2014. Retrieved 18 January 2015.
  12. Thomas Fletcher Smith Jonathan Otley, Man of Lakeland, publ. Bookcase, 2007 ISBN 978-1-904147-23-7
  13. ^ "Life and work of John Dalton – Colour Blindness". BBC News. Archived from the original on 9 August 2017. Retrieved 9 November 2011.
  14. Regan, B. (1998). "John Dalton's Colour Vision Legacy". British Journal of Ophthalmology. 82 (2): 203d. doi:10.1136/bjo.82.2.203d. PMC 1722488.
  15. Dalton, John (1798). "Extraordinary facts relating to the vision of colours: with observations". Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester. 5: 28–45. Archived from the original on 9 August 2017. Retrieved 8 August 2017.
  16. Dalton, John (1802). "Essay II. On the Force of Steam or Vapour from Water and Various other Liquids, both is a Vacuum and in Air". Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester. 2nd. 5: 550–551.
  17. Dalton, John (1802). "Essay IV. On the Expansion of Elastic Fluids by Heat". Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester. 2nd. 5: 600.
  18. ^ Dalton, John (1805). "On the Absorption of Gases by Water and other Liquids". Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester. 2nd. 6: 271–287.
  19. Thackray, Arnold W. (1966). "The Origin of Dalton's Chemical Atomic Theory: Daltonian Doubts Resolved". Isis. 57: 35–55. doi:10.1086/350077. S2CID 144818988.
  20. ^ Rocke, Alan J. (2005). "In Search of El Dorado: John Dalton and the Origins of the Atomic Theory". Social Research. 72 (1): 125–158. doi:10.1353/sor.2005.0003. JSTOR 40972005. S2CID 141350239.
  21. Thomson, Thomas (1810). The Elements of Chemistry. J. & A.Y. Humphreys. p. 480. Archived from the original on 21 December 2022. Retrieved 18 October 2020.
  22. Wheeler, T. S; Partington, J. R. (1960). The life and work of William Higgins, chemist, 1763–1825 including reprints of "A comparative view of the phlogistic and antiphlogistic theories" and "Observations on the atomic theory and electrical phenomena" by William Higgins. Pergamon Press.
  23. Grossman, M. I. (2010). "William Higgins at the Dublin Society, 1810–20: The loss of a professorship and a claim to the atomic theory". Notes and Records of the Royal Society. 64 (4): 417–434. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2010.0020. S2CID 146292636.
  24. Grossman, M. I. (2014). "John Dalton and the London atomists: William and Bryan Higgins, William Austin, and new Daltonian doubts about the origin of the atomic theory". Notes and Records. 68 (4): 339–356. doi:10.1098/rsnr.2014.0025. PMC 4213434.
  25. Grossman, Mark I. (2017). "John Dalton and the origin of the atomic theory: Reassessing the influence of Bryan Higgins". The British Journal for the History of Science. 50 (4): 657–676. doi:10.1017/S0007087417000851. PMID 29065936. S2CID 206212671.
  26. Roscoe & Harden 1896.
  27. Grossman, Mark I. (2 January 2021). "John Dalton's "Aha" Moment: the Origin of the Chemical Atomic Theory". Ambix. 68 (1): 49–71. doi:10.1080/00026980.2020.1868861. ISSN 0002-6980. PMID 33577439. S2CID 231909410.
  28. Levere, Trevor (2001). Transforming Matter: A History of Chemistry from Alchemy to the Buckyball. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press. pp. 84–86. ISBN 978-0-8018-6610-4.
  29. Roscoe & Harden 1896, p. 83.
  30. Roscoe & Harden 1896, pp. 50–51.
  31. Dalton, John (1805). "On the Proportion of the Several Gases in the Atmosphere". Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester. 2nd. 6: 244–258.
  32.  This article incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Dalton, John". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 7 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 777–779, see page 778, final para.
  33. "Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter D" (PDF). American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Archived (PDF) from the original on 18 June 2006. Retrieved 7 August 2014.
  34. Smith, Robert Angus (1856). "Memoir of John Dalton and History of the Atomic Theory up to his time". Memoirs of the Literary and Philosophical Society of Manchester. Second. 13: 298. hdl:2027/mdp.39015016080783.
  35. "Dalton, John". Complete Dictionary of Scientific Biography. Charles Scribner's Sons. 2008. Archived from the original on 9 August 2017. Retrieved 8 August 2017.
  36. ^ King, Kristine (10 October 2003). "Science celebrates 'father of nanotech'". BBC News. Archived from the original on 16 August 2017. Retrieved 9 November 2011.
  37. Patterson, Elizabeth C. (1970). John Dalton and the Atomic Theory. Garden City, New York: Doubleday.
  38. Elliott, T. Lenton (1953). "John Dalton's Grave". Journal of Chemical Education. 30 (11): 569. Bibcode:1953JChEd..30..569E. doi:10.1021/ed030p569. Archived from the original on 8 December 2008. Retrieved 24 December 2007.
  39. Millington, John Price (1906). John Dalton. London: J. M. Dent & Company. pp. 201–208. ISBN 978-0-7222-3057-2. Archived from the original on 23 February 2023. Retrieved 24 December 2007.
  40. "The Late Dr Dalton". The Manchester Guardian. 3 August 1844. p. 5.
  41. "John Dalton blue plaque". openplaques.org. Archived from the original on 26 August 2017. Retrieved 26 August 2017.
  42. Tom, Bourne. "Stock Photo – Blue plaque for John Dalton, 36 George St. Manchester". Alamy. Archived from the original on 26 August 2017. Retrieved 26 August 2017.
  43. "IAU Minor Planet Center". minorplanetcenter.net. Retrieved 1 July 2024.
  44. International Plant Names Index.  Jn.Dalton.

Sources

External links

Professional and academic associations
Preceded byThomas Henry President of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society
1816–44
Succeeded byEdward Holme
Preceded byJohn Hull Secretary of the Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society
1800–09
Succeeded byWilliam Johns
Atomic models
Historic models
Current models
Scientists whose names are used as units
SI base units
SI derived units
Non-SI metric (cgs) units
Imperial and US
customary
units
Non-systematic units
List of scientists whose names are used as units · Scientists whose names are used in physical constants · People whose names are used in chemical element names
Manchester Literary and Philosophical Society
Presidents
18th Century
19th Century
20th Century
21st Century
  • Iain E. Gillespie
  • Angus G. D. Yeaman
  • Keith D. Buckley
  • Vivienne Blackburn
  • Mary, Lady Mallick
  • David J. Higginson
  • Prof. Kenneth M. Letherman
  • Prof. Sir Netar P. Mallick (II)
  • Dr Diana M. Leitch
  • Dr Susan R. Hilton
  • Ian Cameron
Awards
Lectures
Publications
Dalton Medallists
Recipients
Category
Portals: Categories: