Misplaced Pages

Nymphaeales: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:30, 11 October 2006 editKP Botany (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users10,588 edits APG II update.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 20:22, 14 November 2024 edit undoConan Wolff (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,413 edits Fossils: Brasipelta Krassilov 
(154 intermediate revisions by 88 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|Order of flowering plants}}
{{Taxobox
{{Automatic taxobox
| color = lightgreen
| fossil_range = {{fossil range|130|0}}] - Recent
| name = Nymphaeales
| image = {{Multiple image
| regnum = ]ae
| perrow = 2
| divisio = ]
| total_width = 270
| classis = ]
| image1 = 2007 nymphaea lotus.jpg
| ordo = Nymphaeales
| caption1 = '']''
| ordo_authority = ]
| image2 = Trithuria submersa - Flickr - Kevin Thiele.jpg
| caption2 = ''Trithuria submersa''
| image3 = Barclaya longifolia in Thailand crooped.jpg
| caption3 = ''Barclaya longifolia''
| image4 = Euryale ferox kz06.jpg
| caption4 = ''Euryale ferox''
| image5 = Гле́чики жо́вті, лата́ття жо́вте або куби́шка жо́вта (Nuphar lutea) 18.jpg
| caption5 = ''Nuphar lutea''
| image6 = Wild populations of Victoria boliviana sp. nov. (Bolivia, Beni).jpg
| caption6 = ''Victoria boliviana''
| image7 = Brasenia schreberi inat1.jpg
| caption7 = ''Brasenia schreberi''
| image8 = 黃菊花草 Cabomba aquatica -檳城植物園 Penang Botanic Garden- (9213351473).jpg
| caption8 = ''Cabomba aquatica''
| border = infobox
}} }}
| taxon = Nymphaeales
| authority = ] ''ex'' ] & ]<ref name="APG3" />
| subdivision_ranks = Families
| subdivision =
] Rich. ex A.Rich.<br />
] U.Hamann<br />
] Salisb.
| subdivision_ref = <ref name = "Xiong et al., 2023">Xiong, X., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., Su, Q., Zhao, Y., ... & Chen, F. (2023). Tropical Plants, 2(1), 1-8.</ref>
| synonyms =
{{Collapsible_list
|bullets = True
|Barclayales Doweld
|Cabombales Richard
|Euryalales H. L. Li
|Hydatellales Reveal & Doweld
|Hydropeltidales Spenner
|Hydatellanae Reveal
|Nymphaeanae Reveal
|Hydatellidae Doweld
|Nymphaeidae Takhtajan
|Hydropeltopsida Bartling
|Nymphaeopsida Horaninow
}}
| synonyms_ref = <ref name="apweb" />
}}

The '''Nymphaeales''' are an ] of ]s, consisting of three ] of aquatic plants, the ], the ], and the ] (water lilies). It is one of the three orders of ], an ] ] of flowering plants. At least 10 ] ] unite the Nymphaeales.<ref name="apweb">Peter F. Stevens. 2001 onwards. ] At: ] Website. (see ''External links'' below).</ref> One of the traits is the absence of a ], which is required to produce both ] (wood) and ], which therefore are missing.<ref></ref> ] ] are also known.

], created by the ] and ] recognizes about 70 species in 11 genera within the order,<ref name="tpl2010">The Plant List (website). 2010. (See ''External links'' below.)</ref> but a ] study of the genus '']'' implies that the number of species could be more than 90.<ref name="borsch2011">{{cite journal | last1 = Borsch | first1 = Thomas | last2 = Löhne | first2 = Cornelia | last3 = Samba Mbaye | first3 = Mame | last4 = Wiersema | first4 = John H. | year = 2011 | title = Towards a complete species tree of Nymphaea: shedding further light on subg. Brachyceras and its relationships to the Australian water-lilies | journal = ] | volume = 13 | issue = 1–2| pages = 193–217 | doi = 10.7751/telopea20116014 | doi-access = free }}</ref> The difference in species numbers is due almost entirely to the difficulty of ] species in the genus ''Nymphaea''.

All of the ] are ] ] ] with a broad ] and large, showy flowers.

== Fossils ==
The ] record consists especially of seeds, but also pollen, stems, leaves, and flowers. It extends back to the ].<ref>{{cite web | url = http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/anthophyta/paleoherbs/nymphfr.html | title = Nymphaeales: Fossil Record | publisher = ]}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | journal = ] | volume = 410 | pages = 357–360 | date = 15 March 2001 | title = Fossil evidence of water lilies (Nymphaeales) in the Early Cretaceous | author = ], Kaj Raunsgaard Pedersen and Peter R. Crane | doi = 10.1038/35066557 | pmid = 11268209 | issue = 6826 | bibcode = 2001Natur.410..357F | s2cid = 205014988 }}</ref> The ] of the Nymphaeales has been estimated to be about 112 million years old.<ref name="magallon2009">{{cite journal | last1 = Magallón | first1 = Susana | last2 = Castillo | first2 = Amanda | year = 2009 | title = Angiosperm diversification through time | journal = ] | volume = 96 | issue = 1| pages = 349–365 | doi = 10.3732/ajb.0800060 | pmid=21628193}}</ref> Some have suggested that this age might be too old.<ref name="bell2010">{{cite journal | last1 = Bell | first1 = Charles D. | last2 = Soltis | first2 = Douglas E. |author-link2=Douglas E. Soltis | last3 = Soltis | first3 = Pamela S. | author-link3 = Pamela S. Soltis| year = 2010 | title = The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited | journal = American Journal of Botany | volume = 97 | issue = 8| pages = 1296–1303 | doi = 10.3732/ajb.0900346 | pmid=21616882| s2cid = 207613985 }}</ref>

A basal member of Nymphaeales, '']'', is known from ] ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Friis |first1=Else Marie|last2=Pedersen|first2=Kaj Raunsgaard|last3=von Balthazar|first3=Maria |last4=Grimm|first4=Guido W.|last5=Crane |first5=Peter R.|date=May 2009 |title=Monetianthus mirus gen. et sp. nov., a Nymphaealean Flower from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal |url=https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/10.1086/605120 |journal=International Journal of Plant Sciences |language=en |volume=170 |issue=8 |pages=1086–1101 |doi=10.1086/605120 |s2cid=84760466 |issn=1058-5893}}</ref> A fossil member of the ] is '']'' from the Early Cretaceous of ]. Several Cretaceous-age ] genera are also known, including '']'' from ], '']'' from Brazil, and '']'' from ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Taylor |first1=David Winship |last2=Gee |first2=Carole T. |date=1 October 2014 |title=Phylogenetic Analysis of Fossil Water Lilies Based on Leaf Architecture and Vegetative Characters: Testing Phylogenetic Hypotheses from Molecular Studies |url=https://bioone.org/journals/bulletin-of-the-peabody-museum-of-natural-history/volume-55/issue-2/014.055.0208/Phylogenetic-Analysis-of-Fossil-Water-Lilies-Based-on-Leaf-Architecture/10.3374/014.055.0208.full |journal=Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History |volume=55 |issue=2 |pages=89–110 |doi=10.3374/014.055.0208 |s2cid=84253809 |issn=0079-032X}}</ref> The fossil genus '']'', thought to be a close relative of the modern '']'', is known from ]-aged sediments from ], ].<ref>{{Cite journal |last1=Friis |first1=Else M. |last2=Iglesias |first2=Ari |last3=Reguero |first3=Marcelo A. |last4=Mörs |first4=Thomas |date=2017-08-01 |title=Notonuphar antarctica, an extinct water lily (Nymphaeales) from the Eocene of Antarctica |journal=Plant Systematics and Evolution |language=en |volume=303 |issue=7 |pages=969–980 |doi=10.1007/s00606-017-1422-y |s2cid=23846066 |issn=2199-6881|doi-access=free }}</ref> The genus '']'' Krassilov has been described from the late Cretaceous of Israel.<ref name = "IFPNI b">''Brasipelta gregaria'' Krassilov. (n.d.). The International Fossil Plant Names Index (IFPNI). Retrieved November 14, 2024, from https://ifpni.org/species.htm?id=3CD513C8-3746-4D2C-08A8-D0153805A9EC</ref><ref name = "IFPNI a">''Brasipelta'' Krassilov. (n.d.). The International Fossil Plant Names Index (IFPNI). Retrieved November 14, 2024, from https://ifpni.org/genus.htm?id=4530BA8A-59B8-BEF9-F963-99080BD0449A</ref><ref name = "Krasilov, 2005">Krassilov V. A., Lewy Z., Nevo E., & Silantieva N. (2005) Late Cretaceous (Turonian) flora of southern Negev, Israel.</ref> The aquatic plant fossil '']'' from the Early Cretaceous of ], ] possibly also belongs to this group.<ref>{{cite journal | url = http://www.annalsnyas.org/cgi/content/abstract/1133/1/3 | title = The Year in Evolutionary Biology 2008 | date = June 2008 | journal = ] | volume = 1133 | pages = 3–25 | doi = 10.1196/annals.1438.005 | pmid = 18559813 | last1 = Soltis | first1 = D. E. | author-link1 = Douglas E. Soltis | last2 = Bell | first2 = CD | last3 = Kim | first3 = S | last4 = Soltis | first4 = PS | author-link4 = Pamela S. Soltis | issue = 1 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090108184520/http://www.annalsnyas.org/cgi/content/abstract/1133/1/3 | archive-date = 2009-01-08 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.463.7533 | s2cid = 17688086 }}</ref>

== Classification ==
The Nymphaeales currently include three families and about 70 to 90 species.

{| align="left" style="text-align:left; padding:2.5px; background:#eef"
|-
| style="background:#fff; padding:2.5px; font-size:85%" |order '''Nymphaeales'''
: ''']'''
:* '']'' (one species)
:* '']'' (five species)
: ''']'''
:* '']'' (12 species)
: ''']'''
:* '']'' (three or four species)
:* '']'' (one species)
:* '']'' (10-12 species)
:* '']'' (35-50 species)
:* '']'' (three species)

|{{clade| style=font-size:75%;line-height:75%
|label1=Angiosperms
|1={{clade
|1='']''
|2={{clade
|label1='''Nymphaeales'''
|1={{clade
|1=]
|2={{clade
|1={{clade
|1=]
|2=]
}}
}}
}}
|2={{clade
|1=]
|2={{clade
|1={{clade
|1={{clade
|1=]
|2=]
}}
|2={{clade
|1=]
|2={{clade
|1='']''
|2=]
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
}}
|-style="font-size:90%;"
| colspan=2 | The classification of Nymphaeales and ] within the flowering plants, as of APG III (2009).
|}{{Clear}}

This order was not part of the ] 2003 plant classification (unchanged from the ] of 1998), which instead had a broadly circumscribed family ] (including ]) unplaced in any order. The ] did separate the Cabombaceae from the Nymphaeaceae and placed them in the order Nymphaeales together with the Hydatellaceae. The family ] was placed among the monocots in previous systems, but a 2007 study found that the family belongs to the Nymphaeales.<ref>{{cite journal |title=Hydatellaceae identified as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree |journal=Nature |volume=446 |issue=7133 |pages=312–5 |year=2007 |pmid=17361182 |doi=10.1038/nature05612 |last1=Saarela |first1=J. M. |last2=Rai |first2=H. S. |last3=Doyle |first3=J. A. |last4=Endress |first4=P. K. |last5=Mathews |first5=S. |last6=Marchant |first6=A. D. |last7=Briggs |first7=B. G. |last8=Graham |first8=S. W. |bibcode=2007Natur.446..312S |s2cid=4415881 |url=https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3652&context=biosci_pubs |display-authors=1}}</ref> In the ], Hydatellaceae, Cabombaceae and Nymphaeaceae are the three families included in the Nymphaeales.<ref name=APGIV>{{Cite journal|author=Angiosperm Phylogeny Group |year=2016|title=An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV|journal=]|volume=181|issue=1|pages=1–20|issn=0024-4074|doi=10.1111/boj.12385|doi-access=free}}</ref>

Some earlier systems, such as Cronquist's system of 1981, often included the ] and ] in the Nymphaeales. Although, the ] of 1980 separated the ], the new order was retained alongside the Nymphaeales in the superorder Nymphaeanae.

The ] placed the Nymphaeales in subclass ], in class ] ]]. In addition, Cronquist included the ] and split the family Barclayaceae from the Nymphaeaceae. Under the ], the family Cabombaceae was included within the Nymphaeaceae, but could optionally be recognized separately. As of ], the two families are recognized separately.


The ] placed the Nymphaeales with the ] in superorder Nymphaeanae, within subclass Magnoliideae (dicotyledons). ] (and 2000 revision) placed the Nymphaeales as the sole order in the superorder Nymphaeanae within subclass Magnoliideae (=dicotyledons).
'''Nymphaeales''' is a ] at the rank of ]. This order is now accepted by the ], of 2003 (changed from the ] of 1998). It is recognized by some ], but others use different placements for the families.


{| class="wikitable" align="left" style="margin-left:1em"
The place two families in the order, the ] and ], and considers this order to be a basal, or early diverging, group of angiosperms. These families are united by being families of aquatic herbs and are known from the fossil record as early as the Lower Cretaceous.
|+'''Comparison of the Nymphaeales across five systems'''
!style="background:lightgreen" align="center" width="160px" | ]<ref name="APG3">{{cite journal | journal=] | volume=161 | pages=105–121 | author=Angiosperm Phylogeny Group | year=2009 | title=An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III | doi=10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x | issue=2| doi-access=free }}</ref><br/>Nymphaeales
!style="background:lightgreen" align="center" width="160px" | ]<ref name="Takhtajan">{{cite journal | last=Takhtajan | first=Armen L. | year=1980 | title=Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta) | journal=The Botanical Review | volume=46 | issue=3 | pages=225–359 | doi=10.1007/BF02861558 | s2cid=30764910 }}</ref><br/>Nymphaeales
!style="background:lightgreen" align="center" width="160px" | ]<ref name="Cronquist">{{cite book | last=Cronquist | first=Arthur | year=1981 | title=An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants | url=https://archive.org/details/integratedsystem0000cron | url-access=registration | location=New York | publisher=Columbia University Press | isbn=978-0-231-03880-5 }}</ref><br/>Nymphaeales
!style="background:lightgreen" align="center" width="160px" | ]<ref name="Dahlgren">{{cite journal | last=Dahlgren | first=R.M.T. | year=1980 | title = A revised system of classification of angiosperms | journal= Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society | volume=80 | issue=2 | pages=91–124 | doi = 10.1111/j.1095-8339.1980.tb01661.x }}</ref><br/>Nymphaeales
!style="background:lightgreen" align="center" width="160px" | ]<ref name="Thorne 1992">{{cite journal | last=Thorne | first=R. F. | year=1992 | title= Classification and geography of the flowering plants | journal= Botanical Review | volume=58 | pages=225–348 | doi= 10.1007/BF02858611 | issue=3| s2cid=40348158 }}</ref> & (2000)<ref name="Thorne 2000">{{cite journal | last=Thorne | first=R. F. | year=2000 | title= The classification and geography of the flowering plants: Dicotyledons of the class Angiospermae | journal= Botanical Review | volume=66 | issue=4 | pages=441–647 |doi= 10.1007/BF02869011 | s2cid=43430454 }}</ref><br/>Nymphaeales
|-
| ]
| colspan=4 align="center" style="background:lightgrey" | ''among monocots, as Hydatellales''
|-
| ]
| ]
: ''Brasenia'', ''Cabomba''
| ]
: ''Brasenia'', ''Cabomba''
| ]
| ]
: ''Brasenia'', ''Cabomba''
|-
| rowspan=2 | ]
| rowspan=2 | ]
: subf. Barclayoideae, Euryaloideae, Nymphaeoideae
| ]
: ''Barclaya''
| rowspan=2 | ]
| rowspan=2 | ]
: ''Barclaya'', ''Euryale'', ''Nuphar'', ''Nymphaea'', ''Ondinea'', ''Victoria''
|-
| ]
: ''Euryale'', ''Nuphar'', ''Nymphaea'', ''Ondinea'', ''Victoria''
|-
| style="background:lightgrey" | sister to eudicot clade
| ]
| ]
| ]
| rowspan=2 style="background:lightgrey" | in Ranunculanae
|-
| style="background:lightgrey" | in Proteales
| style="background:lightgrey" | in Nelumbonales
| ]
| style="background:lightgrey" | in Magnolianae
|}
{{Clear}}


====Cronquist==== == References ==
{{Reflist}}
The ], of 1981, placed it in subclass ], in class ] ]]
of division ] . It used this circumscription:
* order Nymphaeales
:* family ]
:* family ]
:* family ]
:* family ]
:* family ]


== Further reading ==
====Thorne (1992)====
* Michael G. Simpson. ''Plant Systematics''. Elsevier Academic Press. 2006.
The ] placed it in superorder ] in subclass Magnoliideae in class Magnoliopsida . It used this circumscription:
* Thomas N. Taylor, Edith L. Taylor, and Michael Krings. 2008. Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants, Second Edition. Academic Press (an imprint of Elsevier): Burlington MA, USA. {{ISBN|978-0-12-373972-8}}
* order Nymphaeales
:* family Cabombaceae
:* family Nymphaeaceae


== External links ==
====Dahlgren====
* <span style="color:green;">At:</span> <span style="color:green;">At:</span> <span style="color:green;">At:</span> <span style="color:green;">At:</span>
The ] placed it in superorder Nymphaeanae,
*{{Wikispecies-inline}}
in subclass Magnoliideae , in class Magnoliopsida . It used this circumscription:
* order Nymphaeales
:* family Cabombaceae
:* family Nymphaeaceae
:* family Ceratophyllaceae


{{Angiosperm orders}}
]
{{Taxonbar|from=Q27421}}
{{Authority control}}


]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 20:22, 14 November 2024

Order of flowering plants

Nymphaeales
Temporal range: 130–0 Ma PreꞒ O S D C P T J K Pg N Early Cretaceous - Recent
Nymphaea lotusTrithuria submersaBarclaya longifoliaEuryale feroxNuphar luteaVictoria bolivianaBrasenia schreberiCabomba aquatica
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Kingdom: Plantae
Clade: Tracheophytes
Clade: Angiosperms
Order: Nymphaeales
Salisb. ex Bercht. & J.Presl
Families

Cabombaceae Rich. ex A.Rich.
Hydatellaceae U.Hamann
Nymphaeaceae Salisb.

Synonyms
List
  • Barclayales Doweld
  • Cabombales Richard
  • Euryalales H. L. Li
  • Hydatellales Reveal & Doweld
  • Hydropeltidales Spenner
  • Hydatellanae Reveal
  • Nymphaeanae Reveal
  • Hydatellidae Doweld
  • Nymphaeidae Takhtajan
  • Hydropeltopsida Bartling
  • Nymphaeopsida Horaninow

The Nymphaeales are an order of flowering plants, consisting of three families of aquatic plants, the Hydatellaceae, the Cabombaceae, and the Nymphaeaceae (water lilies). It is one of the three orders of basal angiosperms, an early-diverging grade of flowering plants. At least 10 morphological characters unite the Nymphaeales. One of the traits is the absence of a vascular cambium, which is required to produce both xylem (wood) and phloem, which therefore are missing. Molecular synapomorphies are also known.

The Plant List, created by the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew and Missouri Botanical Garden recognizes about 70 species in 11 genera within the order, but a phylogenetic study of the genus Nymphaea implies that the number of species could be more than 90. The difference in species numbers is due almost entirely to the difficulty of delineating species in the genus Nymphaea.

All of the species are rhizomatous aquatic herbs with a broad leaf base and large, showy flowers.

Fossils

The fossil record consists especially of seeds, but also pollen, stems, leaves, and flowers. It extends back to the Cretaceous. The crown group of the Nymphaeales has been estimated to be about 112 million years old. Some have suggested that this age might be too old.

A basal member of Nymphaeales, Monetianthus, is known from Early Cretaceous Portugal. A fossil member of the Nympheaceae is Jaguariba from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil. Several Cretaceous-age Cabombaceae genera are also known, including Scutifolium from Jordan, Pluricarpellatia from Brazil, and Brasenites from Kansas. The fossil genus Notonuphar, thought to be a close relative of the modern Nuphar, is known from Eocene-aged sediments from Seymour Island, Antarctica. The genus Brasipelta Krassilov has been described from the late Cretaceous of Israel. The aquatic plant fossil Archaefructus from the Early Cretaceous of Liaoning, China possibly also belongs to this group.

Classification

The Nymphaeales currently include three families and about 70 to 90 species.

order Nymphaeales
Cabombaceae
Hydatellaceae
Nymphaeaceae
Angiosperms

Amborella

Nymphaeales

Hydatellaceae

Cabombaceae

Nymphaeaceae

Austrobaileyales

magnoliids

Chloranthales

monocots

Ceratophyllum

eudicots

The classification of Nymphaeales and phylogeny within the flowering plants, as of APG III (2009).

This order was not part of the APG II system's 2003 plant classification (unchanged from the APG system of 1998), which instead had a broadly circumscribed family Nymphaeaceae (including Cabombaceae) unplaced in any order. The APG III system did separate the Cabombaceae from the Nymphaeaceae and placed them in the order Nymphaeales together with the Hydatellaceae. The family Hydatellaceae was placed among the monocots in previous systems, but a 2007 study found that the family belongs to the Nymphaeales. In the APG IV system, Hydatellaceae, Cabombaceae and Nymphaeaceae are the three families included in the Nymphaeales.

Some earlier systems, such as Cronquist's system of 1981, often included the Ceratophyllaceae and Nelumbonaceae in the Nymphaeales. Although, the Takhtajan system of 1980 separated the Nelumbonales, the new order was retained alongside the Nymphaeales in the superorder Nymphaeanae.

The Cronquist system placed the Nymphaeales in subclass Magnoliidae, in class Magnoliopsida . In addition, Cronquist included the Ceratophyllaceae and split the family Barclayaceae from the Nymphaeaceae. Under the APG II system, the family Cabombaceae was included within the Nymphaeaceae, but could optionally be recognized separately. As of APG III, the two families are recognized separately.

The Dahlgren system placed the Nymphaeales with the Piperales in superorder Nymphaeanae, within subclass Magnoliideae (dicotyledons). Thorne's 1992 system (and 2000 revision) placed the Nymphaeales as the sole order in the superorder Nymphaeanae within subclass Magnoliideae (=dicotyledons).

Comparison of the Nymphaeales across five systems
APG III system
Nymphaeales
Takhtajan system
Nymphaeales
Cronquist system
Nymphaeales
Dahlgren system
Nymphaeales
Thorne system (1992) & (2000)
Nymphaeales
Hydatellaceae among monocots, as Hydatellales
Cabombaceae Cabombaceae
Brasenia, Cabomba
Cabombaceae
Brasenia, Cabomba
Cabombaceae Cabombaceae
Brasenia, Cabomba
Nymphaeaceae Nymphaeaceae
subf. Barclayoideae, Euryaloideae, Nymphaeoideae
Barclayaceae
Barclaya
Nymphaeaceae Nymphaeaceae
Barclaya, Euryale, Nuphar, Nymphaea, Ondinea, Victoria
Nymphaeaceae
Euryale, Nuphar, Nymphaea, Ondinea, Victoria
sister to eudicot clade Ceratophyllaceae Ceratophyllaceae Ceratophyllaceae in Ranunculanae
in Proteales in Nelumbonales Nelumbonaceae in Magnolianae

References

  1. ^ Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2009). "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 161 (2): 105–121. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2009.00996.x.
  2. Xiong, X., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., Su, Q., Zhao, Y., ... & Chen, F. (2023). "Water lily research: Past, present, and future." Tropical Plants, 2(1), 1-8.
  3. ^ Peter F. Stevens. 2001 onwards. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website At: Missouri Botanical Garden Website. (see External links below).
  4. Water lily ( Nymphaea thermarum) genome reveals variable genomic signatures of ancient vascular cambium losses | bioRxiv
  5. The Plant List (website). 2010. (See External links below.)
  6. Borsch, Thomas; Löhne, Cornelia; Samba Mbaye, Mame; Wiersema, John H. (2011). "Towards a complete species tree of Nymphaea: shedding further light on subg. Brachyceras and its relationships to the Australian water-lilies". Telopea. 13 (1–2): 193–217. doi:10.7751/telopea20116014.
  7. "Nymphaeales: Fossil Record". University of California Museum of Paleontology.
  8. Else Marie Friis, Kaj Raunsgaard Pedersen and Peter R. Crane (15 March 2001). "Fossil evidence of water lilies (Nymphaeales) in the Early Cretaceous". Nature. 410 (6826): 357–360. Bibcode:2001Natur.410..357F. doi:10.1038/35066557. PMID 11268209. S2CID 205014988.
  9. Magallón, Susana; Castillo, Amanda (2009). "Angiosperm diversification through time". American Journal of Botany. 96 (1): 349–365. doi:10.3732/ajb.0800060. PMID 21628193.
  10. Bell, Charles D.; Soltis, Douglas E.; Soltis, Pamela S. (2010). "The age and diversification of the angiosperms re-revisited". American Journal of Botany. 97 (8): 1296–1303. doi:10.3732/ajb.0900346. PMID 21616882. S2CID 207613985.
  11. Friis, Else Marie; Pedersen, Kaj Raunsgaard; von Balthazar, Maria; Grimm, Guido W.; Crane, Peter R. (May 2009). "Monetianthus mirus gen. et sp. nov., a Nymphaealean Flower from the Early Cretaceous of Portugal". International Journal of Plant Sciences. 170 (8): 1086–1101. doi:10.1086/605120. ISSN 1058-5893. S2CID 84760466.
  12. Taylor, David Winship; Gee, Carole T. (1 October 2014). "Phylogenetic Analysis of Fossil Water Lilies Based on Leaf Architecture and Vegetative Characters: Testing Phylogenetic Hypotheses from Molecular Studies". Bulletin of the Peabody Museum of Natural History. 55 (2): 89–110. doi:10.3374/014.055.0208. ISSN 0079-032X. S2CID 84253809.
  13. Friis, Else M.; Iglesias, Ari; Reguero, Marcelo A.; Mörs, Thomas (2017-08-01). "Notonuphar antarctica, an extinct water lily (Nymphaeales) from the Eocene of Antarctica". Plant Systematics and Evolution. 303 (7): 969–980. doi:10.1007/s00606-017-1422-y. ISSN 2199-6881. S2CID 23846066.
  14. Brasipelta gregaria Krassilov. (n.d.). The International Fossil Plant Names Index (IFPNI). Retrieved November 14, 2024, from https://ifpni.org/species.htm?id=3CD513C8-3746-4D2C-08A8-D0153805A9EC
  15. Brasipelta Krassilov. (n.d.). The International Fossil Plant Names Index (IFPNI). Retrieved November 14, 2024, from https://ifpni.org/genus.htm?id=4530BA8A-59B8-BEF9-F963-99080BD0449A
  16. Krassilov V. A., Lewy Z., Nevo E., & Silantieva N. (2005) Late Cretaceous (Turonian) flora of southern Negev, Israel.
  17. Soltis, D. E.; Bell, CD; Kim, S; Soltis, PS (June 2008). "The Year in Evolutionary Biology 2008". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1133 (1): 3–25. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.463.7533. doi:10.1196/annals.1438.005. PMID 18559813. S2CID 17688086. Archived from the original on 2009-01-08.
  18. Saarela, J. M.; et al. (2007). "Hydatellaceae identified as a new branch near the base of the angiosperm phylogenetic tree". Nature. 446 (7133): 312–5. Bibcode:2007Natur.446..312S. doi:10.1038/nature05612. PMID 17361182. S2CID 4415881.
  19. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (2016). "An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG IV". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 181 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1111/boj.12385. ISSN 0024-4074.
  20. Takhtajan, Armen L. (1980). "Outline of the classification of flowering plants (Magnoliophyta)". The Botanical Review. 46 (3): 225–359. doi:10.1007/BF02861558. S2CID 30764910.
  21. Cronquist, Arthur (1981). An Integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-03880-5.
  22. Dahlgren, R.M.T. (1980). "A revised system of classification of angiosperms". Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society. 80 (2): 91–124. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.1980.tb01661.x.
  23. Thorne, R. F. (1992). "Classification and geography of the flowering plants". Botanical Review. 58 (3): 225–348. doi:10.1007/BF02858611. S2CID 40348158.
  24. Thorne, R. F. (2000). "The classification and geography of the flowering plants: Dicotyledons of the class Angiospermae". Botanical Review. 66 (4): 441–647. doi:10.1007/BF02869011. S2CID 43430454.

Further reading

  • Michael G. Simpson. Plant Systematics. Elsevier Academic Press. 2006.
  • Thomas N. Taylor, Edith L. Taylor, and Michael Krings. 2008. Paleobotany: The Biology and Evolution of Fossil Plants, Second Edition. Academic Press (an imprint of Elsevier): Burlington MA, USA. ISBN 978-0-12-373972-8

External links

Orders of flowering plants (APG IV)
Angiosperms
Mesangiosperms
Magnoliids
Monocots
Commelinids
Eudicots
Core eudicots
Superrosids
Rosids
Fabids
Malvids
Superasterids
Asterids
Campanulids
Lamiids
Taxon identifiers
Nymphaeales
Categories: