Misplaced Pages

Stonewall Attack: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:44, 19 May 2018 editBongwarrior (talk | contribs)Administrators158,949 editsm Reverted edits by 114.75.64.9 (talk) to last version by IhardlythinksoTag: Rollback← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:40, 7 September 2024 edit undoAxad12 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,831 edits Reverted 2 edits to last revision by user:Joyous!Tag: Manual revert 
(62 intermediate revisions by 35 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Chess diagram {{Short description|Chess opening}}
{{infobox chess opening
| tright
|openingname = Stonewall Attack
|
|image = {{Chess diagram||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Line 7: Line 8:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | |pl| |pl| | | | | |pl| |pl| |
| | |pl|bl|pl| | | | | |pl|bl|pl|nl | |
|pl|pl| | | | |pl|pl |pl|pl| |nl| | |pl|pl
|rl|nl|bl|ql|kl| |nl|rl |rl| |bl|ql|kl| | |rl
|The Stonewall setup | The Stonewall set-up
}} }}
| moves = d4, e3, Bd3, Nbd2, f4, Ngf3, c3
The '''Stonewall Attack''' is a ]; more specifically it is a variation of the ]. It is characterized by White (generally) playing their pawns to d4 and e3, playing Bd3, Nd2, and then playing pawns to c3 and then f4; although the moves are not always played in that order (see ]). The Stonewall is a ''system''; White heads for a very specific ], rather than trying to memorize long lines of different variations. If White puts up the ] it is called ''Stonewall Attack'', regardless of how Black chooses to defend against it. When Black sets up a Stonewall formation, with ] on c6, d5, e6 and f5, then it is a variation of the ]. ''MCO-15''<ref>See page 511 and column no. 9.</ref> gives the following as a main line: 1.d4 d5 2.e3 Nf6 3.Bd3 c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.f4.
| parentopening = ]
| ECO = D00, A03, A45
}}
The '''Stonewall Attack''' is a ] characterized by White playing pawns to d4 and e3, bishop to d3, knight to d2, and then completing the Stonewall structure by playing pawns to c3 and f4. This set-up is usually achieved by a 1.d4 move order but ] is also possible via ], 1.f4. The Stonewall Attack is a ''system''; White heads for a very specific ], rather than trying to memorize long lines of different variations. Black can set up in various ways in response, but ''MCO-15''<ref>See page 511 and column no. 9.</ref> gives the following as a main line: 1.d4 d5 2.e3 Nf6 3.Bd3 c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.f4.

{{AN chess|pos=toc}} {{AN chess|pos=toc}}


==General remarks== ==History==
The earliest recorded game to feature the Stonewall Attack would appear to have been ] vs ], London, 1842. The first player to use the opening regularly, however, was the ] master ], who frequently opened 1.d4 2.f4 from 1876 to 1882. Employing this unusual move order Ware was often able to reach Stonewall type positions (although later players would usually precede f4 with moves such as e3, Bd3 and Nd2). Ware's greatest success with the opening was at the exceptionally strong ] where he defeated future world champion ].
As the name implies, the Stonewall setup is a solid formation which is hard to overrun by force. If Black fails to react energetically to the Stonewall setup, White may launch a lethal attack on the black ], typically by playing the ] from f3 to e5, advancing the g-pawn to drive away the defending black knight, and making a well-timed ] ] at h7 (see ]) when White can bring one of the {{chessgloss|major pieces}} (] and/or ]) to the h-{{chessgloss|file}}. Often this attack is so powerful that White does not need to develop the ] on b1 and bishop on c1. Traditionally, ]s have been vulnerable to the Stonewall because the positions are usually without clear tactical lines. White simply prepares for an assault by bringing pieces to aggressive posts, without making immediate tactical threats. By the time the computer realizes that its ] is under attack, it is often too late. This, however, is not the case with newer chess computers.


In 1893 ] had notable success with the Stonewall Attack during the two New York tournaments of that year, venturing the opening on six occasions and winning all six. After Pillsbury's success the Stonewall Attack became established in master play and appeared frequently in the games of American masters ] and ], and English master ]. Other prominent players to have used the opening included ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ] and ]. By the early 1920s the Stonewall Attack began to disappear from top level chess, although it remains a popular choice at club level. The most notable modern day practitioner is American ] Yaacov Norowitz who has played the opening extensively in online blitz with considerable success.
The downsides to the Stonewall are the {{chessgloss|hole}} on e4, and the fact that the dark-squared bishop on c1 is completely blocked by its own pawns. If Black defends correctly against White's attack, these strategic deficiencies can become quite serious. Because of this, the Stonewall Attack is almost never seen in ] chess any more, although it is seen occasionally among club players. However, the Stonewall variation of the ] by Black is seen occasionally at master level. (During the 1980s and 1990s, GMs like Yusupov and other Russian players often employed the Stonewall as Black, and effected a major revival of the whole system.)


The Stonewall set-up, when employed by Black, remains one of the main options within the ] and has been used by ] to defeat ] and ].
Black has several ways to meet the Stonewall. One choice which must be made is whether to ] one or both bishops; Black can meet the Stonewall with ...b6 and ...Ba6 aiming to trade off the dangerous white bishop on d3, and a {{chessgloss|kingside}} fianchetto with ...g6 takes away White's idea of attacking h7. An early development of Black's light-squared bishop to f5 also cuts across White's plans.


==''ECO''== ==Description==
White's Stonewall pawn formation gives good control of the central dark squares (particularly e5, which may provide an outpost for a knight). The light squared weaknesses are covered by minor pieces (Bd3, Nd2). If permitted to do so, White may launch a direct kingside attack involving ideas such as Bxh7, Qh5 and Rf3-h3. A 1981 article in Chess Life magazine<ref name=evans>{{cite magazine |author=Larry D. Evans |date=December 1981 |title=Stonewalling |magazine=Chess Life |pages=34–36 |url=http://chesscamp.net/files/page7-1034-full.jpg |access-date=2011-10-16 |url-status=unfit |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120425071320/http://chesscamp.net/files/page7-1034-full.jpg |archive-date=April 25, 2012 }}</ref> gave the following line as an example of how play can develop if Black defends weakly.
Since the Stonewall system is used against a variety of Black defenses, the '']'' (''ECO'') has trouble classifying it. Among the codes used are D00 (when Black has played ...d5), A45, and A03 (the code for ]).

==Example game==
{{Chess diagram
| tright
|
|rd| | | | |rd|kd|
|pd|bd|qd|nd| | |pd|
| |pd|nd|bd|pd| |pl|
| | |pd|pd|pd| | |ql
| | | |pl| |pl| |
| | |pl| |pl| | |rl
|pl|pl| |nl| | | |pl
|rl| |bl| | | |kl|
|Final position after 16.g6
}}
This sample game <ref name=evans>{{cite magazine|author=] |date=December 1981 |title='''Stonewalling''' |magazine=Chess Life |volume= |issue= |pages=34–36 |doi= |id= |url=http://chesscamp.net/files/page7-1034-full.jpg |format= |accessdate=2011-10-16 |deadurl=unfit |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20120425071320/http://chesscamp.net/files/page7-1034-full.jpg |archivedate=April 25, 2012 }}</ref> illustrates what can happen if Black defends poorly.


:1.d4 d5 2.f4 Nf6 3.e3 e6 4.Nf3 c5 5.c3 Nc6 6.Bd3 Bd6 7.0-0 0-0 8.Nbd2 b6 9.Ne5 Bb7 10.g4 Qc7 11.g5 Nd7 12.Bxh7+ Kxh7 13.Qh5+ Kg8 14.Rf3 f6 15.Rh3 fxe5 16.g6 {{chessAN|1–0}} :1.d4 d5 2.f4 Nf6 3.e3 e6 4.Nf3 c5 5.c3 Nc6 6.Bd3 Bd6 7.0-0 0-0 8.Nbd2 b6 9.Ne5 Bb7 10.g4 Qc7 11.g5 Nd7 12.Bxh7+ Kxh7 13.Qh5+ Kg8 14.Rf3 f6 15.Rh3 fxe5 16.g6 {{chessAN|1–0}}

{{clear}}
While such primitive tactics cannot be expected to succeed against experienced chess players, the illustrative games below demonstrate that in the Stonewall's heyday White was often able to develop a dangerous initiative even against master level opposition.

The disadvantages of the Stonewall Attack are a rather inflexible pawn structure, long-term light square weaknesses and the 'bad bishop' on c1, constrained by White's own pawns.
==Illustrative Games==
* ] vs. ], New York (Impromptu Congress) 1893: 1. d4 d5 2. e3 e6 3. Bd3 Bd6 4. f4 c5 5. c3 Nc6 6. Nf3 Nf6 7. O-O O-O 8. Ne5 g6 9. Nd2 Ne8 10. Ndf3 f6 11. Nxc6 bxc6 12. Qe2 f5 13. Bd2 Rb8 14. Rab1 Nf6 15. Kh1 Ne4 16. Be1 c4 17. Bc2 Qa5 18. a3 Qc7 19. g4 fxg4 20. Ne5 Nf6 21. Rg1 c5 22. Bh4 cxd4 23. cxd4 Bxe5 24. fxe5 Ne8 25. Rxg4 Qf7 26. Rg3 Ng7 27. Bf6 Ne8 28. Bxg6 hxg6 29. Qh5 Rb7 30. Qh8# 1-0<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1109073 |title = Pillsbury vs Taubenhaus (1893) |website = ] }}</ref>
* ] vs. ], New York (Masters) 1893: 1. d4 d5 2. e3 e6 3. Bd3 Nf6 4. f4 Bd6 5. Nf3 b6 6. O-O O-O 7. c3 c5 8. Ne5 Qc7 9. Nd2 Nc6 10. Rf3 Bb7 11. Rh3 cxd4 12. Bxh7+ Nxh7 13. Qh5 Rfe8 14. Qxh7+ Kf8 15. exd4 f6 16. Ng6+ Kf7 17. Rg3 Rg8 18. Nf3 Ne7 19. Nfh4 Nxg6 20. Nxg6 Ba6 21. Bd2 Qc4 22. Re1 Qxa2 23. Nh8+ Kf8 24. Qg6 Rxh8 25. Qxg7+ Ke8 26. Rxe6+ Kd8 27. Rxd6+ Kc8 28. Rc6+ Kd8 29. Qc7+ Ke8 30. Re6+ Kf8 31. Qg7# 1-0<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1109070 |title = Pillsbury vs Hanham (1893) |website = ] }}</ref>
* ] vs. ], Leipzig 1894: 1. d4 d5 2. e3 Nf6 3. Bd3 e6 4. Nd2 c5 5. c3 Nc6 6. f4 Be7 7. Nh3 O-O 8. Ng5 h6 9. h4 cxd4 10. exd4 Qd6 11. Ndf3 hxg5 12. hxg5 Ne4 13. Bxe4 dxe4 14. Ne5 Bxg5 15. fxg5 Nxe5 16. Qh5 f6 17. g6 Nxg6 18. Qxg6 Rf7 19. Be3 b5 20. O-O-O Kf8 21. d5 exd5 22. b4 Qe6 23. Rh7 Bb7 24. Bc5+ Ke8 25. Rxg7 Rc8 26. Rh1 1-0<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1293288 |title = Lipke vs Schiffers (1894) |website = ] }}</ref>
* ] vs. ], Hastings 1904: 1. d4 d5 2. e3 Nf6 3. Bd3 e6 4. f4 c5 5. c3 Nc6 6. Nf3 a6 7. Nbd2 Qc7 8. Ne5 b5 9. O-O Bd6 10. Ndf3 h6 11. Nxc6 Qxc6 12. Ne5 Qc7 13. Bd2 Bb7 14. a4 c4 15. Bc2 O-O 16. Rf3 Ne4 17. Be1 Kh7 18. Rh3 f6 19. Nf3 Rad8 20. Nd2 e5 21. fxe5 fxe5 22. Bh4 Rde8 23. axb5 axb5 24. Qh5 g6 25. Qxh6+ Kxh6 26. Bf6# 1-0<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=2181938 |title = Lee vs Mackenzie (1904) |website = ] }}</ref>


==References== ==References==
{{reflist}} {{Reflist}}


'''Bibliography''' '''Bibliography'''
*{{Cite book
|last=Brace|first=Edward <!-- not ] -->
|year=1977
|title=An Illustrated Dictionary of Chess
|publisher=Craftwell
|contribution=Stonewall Formation
|isbn= 1-55521-394-4
|postscript=<!-- Bot inserted parameter. Either remove it; or change its value to "." for the cite to end in a ".", as necessary. -->{{inconsistent citations}}}}
*{{cite book *{{cite book
| author=] | author=Avrukh, Boris
| author-link=Boris Avrukh
| title=]: MCO-14
| title=Grandmaster Repertoire 11: Beating 1.d4 Sidelines (pages 16-18 cover the Stonewall Attack)
| publisher=Quality Chess
| year=2012
| isbn=978-1-907982-12-5}}
*{{cite book
| author=Cox, John
|author-link=John Cox (chess player)
| title=Dealing with d4 Deviations (pages 140-1 cover the Stonewall Attack)
| publisher=Everyman Chess
| year=2005
| isbn=978-1-85744-399-8}}
*{{cite book
| author=de Firmian, Nick
| author-link=Nick de Firmian
| title=Modern Chess Openings: MCO-14
| title-link=Modern Chess Openings
| publisher=Random House | publisher=Random House
| year=1999 | year=1999
| isbn=0-8129-3084-3}} | isbn=0-8129-3084-3}}
*{{cite book
| author=Dembo, Yelena
| author-link=Yelena Dembo
| title=Fighting the Anti-King's Indians (pages 171-4 cover the Stonewall Attack)
| publisher=Everyman Chess
| year=2008
| isbn=978-1-85744-575-6}}
*{{cite book
| author=Fine, Reuben
| author-link=Reuben Fine
| title=The Ideas Behind the Chess Openings (pages 120-1 of the 1989 edition cover the Stonewall Attack)
| publisher=DM McKay (1989 edition)
| year=1943
| isbn=0-8129-1756-1}}
* {{Cite book * {{Cite book
|last=Hooper|first=David|authorlink=David Vincent Hooper |last=Hooper
|first=David
|author-link=David Vincent Hooper
|last2=Whyld|first2=Kenneth|authorlink2=Kenneth Whyld |last2=Whyld
|first2=Kenneth
|author-link2=Kenneth Whyld
|title=] |title=The Oxford Companion to Chess
|title-link=The Oxford Companion to Chess
|year=1992 |year=1992
|edition=2nd |edition=2nd
|contribution=stonewall |contribution=Stonewall
|page=
|page=399
|publisher=Oxford University Press |publisher=Oxford University Press
|isbn=0-19-866164-9}} |isbn=0-19-866164-9
}}
* {{Cite book
|last=Horowitz
|first=I.A.
|author-link=Israel Albert Horowitz
|last2=Reinfeld
|first2=Fred
|author-link2=Fred Reinfeld
|title=How to Think Ahead in Chess (chapters 2-5, pages 6-56, cover the Stonewall Attack)
|year=1952
|publisher=Faber and Faber (1972 edition)
|isbn=0-571-09912-2
}}
*{{cite book
| author=Norowitz, Yaacov
| title=The Yaac Attack: Stonewall for White
| publisher=Chessable.com
| year=2020}}
*{{cite book
| author=Ramirez, Robert
| title=First Strike: The Fighting Stonewall Attack
| publisher=Chessable.com
| year=2024}}
*{{cite book
| author=Soltis, Andrew
| author-link=Andrew Soltis
| title=The Stonewall Attack, Revised 2nd Edition
| publisher=Chess Digest
| year=1993
| isbn=0-87568-165-4}}
*{{cite book
| author=Soltis, Andrew
| author-link=Andrew Soltis
| title=White Opening System combining Stonewall Attack, Colle System, Torre Attack (chapters 2 & 3, pages 34-56, cover the Stonewall Attack)
| publisher=Chess Digest
| year=1993
| isbn=0-87568-165-4}}
*{{cite book
| author=Stewart, William
| title=Chess Psychology: The Will to Win (pages 32-58 cover the Stonewall Attack)
| publisher=Everyman Chess
| year=2013
| isbn=978-1-78194-027-3}}
{{Chess}}


] ]

Latest revision as of 05:40, 7 September 2024

Chess opening Chess opening
Stonewall Attack
abcdefgh
8d4 white pawnf4 white pawnc3 white pawnd3 white bishope3 white pawnf3 white knighta2 white pawnb2 white pawnd2 white knightg2 white pawnh2 white pawna1 white rookc1 white bishopd1 white queene1 white kingh1 white rook8
77
66
55
44
33
22
11
abcdefgh
The Stonewall set-up
Movesd4, e3, Bd3, Nbd2, f4, Ngf3, c3
ECOD00, A03, A45
ParentQueen's Pawn Game

The Stonewall Attack is a chess opening characterized by White playing pawns to d4 and e3, bishop to d3, knight to d2, and then completing the Stonewall structure by playing pawns to c3 and f4. This set-up is usually achieved by a 1.d4 move order but transposition is also possible via Bird's Opening, 1.f4. The Stonewall Attack is a system; White heads for a very specific pawn formation, rather than trying to memorize long lines of different variations. Black can set up in various ways in response, but MCO-15 gives the following as a main line: 1.d4 d5 2.e3 Nf6 3.Bd3 c5 4.c3 Nc6 5.f4.

This article uses algebraic notation to describe chess moves.

History

The earliest recorded game to feature the Stonewall Attack would appear to have been Howard Staunton vs John Cochrane, London, 1842. The first player to use the opening regularly, however, was the Boston master Preston Ware, who frequently opened 1.d4 2.f4 from 1876 to 1882. Employing this unusual move order Ware was often able to reach Stonewall type positions (although later players would usually precede f4 with moves such as e3, Bd3 and Nd2). Ware's greatest success with the opening was at the exceptionally strong Vienna tournament of 1882 where he defeated future world champion Wilhelm Steinitz.

In 1893 Harry Nelson Pillsbury had notable success with the Stonewall Attack during the two New York tournaments of that year, venturing the opening on six occasions and winning all six. After Pillsbury's success the Stonewall Attack became established in master play and appeared frequently in the games of American masters Jackson Showalter and Frank Marshall, and English master F.J. Lee. Other prominent players to have used the opening included Lasker, Capablanca, Alekhine, Chigorin, Rubinstein, Tarrasch, Reti, Tartakower, Maroczy and Breyer. By the early 1920s the Stonewall Attack began to disappear from top level chess, although it remains a popular choice at club level. The most notable modern day practitioner is American IM Yaacov Norowitz who has played the opening extensively in online blitz with considerable success.

The Stonewall set-up, when employed by Black, remains one of the main options within the Dutch Defence and has been used by Magnus Carlsen to defeat Viswanathan Anand and Fabiano Caruana.

Description

White's Stonewall pawn formation gives good control of the central dark squares (particularly e5, which may provide an outpost for a knight). The light squared weaknesses are covered by minor pieces (Bd3, Nd2). If permitted to do so, White may launch a direct kingside attack involving ideas such as Bxh7, Qh5 and Rf3-h3. A 1981 article in Chess Life magazine gave the following line as an example of how play can develop if Black defends weakly.

1.d4 d5 2.f4 Nf6 3.e3 e6 4.Nf3 c5 5.c3 Nc6 6.Bd3 Bd6 7.0-0 0-0 8.Nbd2 b6 9.Ne5 Bb7 10.g4 Qc7 11.g5 Nd7 12.Bxh7+ Kxh7 13.Qh5+ Kg8 14.Rf3 f6 15.Rh3 fxe5 16.g6 1–0

While such primitive tactics cannot be expected to succeed against experienced chess players, the illustrative games below demonstrate that in the Stonewall's heyday White was often able to develop a dangerous initiative even against master level opposition.

The disadvantages of the Stonewall Attack are a rather inflexible pawn structure, long-term light square weaknesses and the 'bad bishop' on c1, constrained by White's own pawns.

Illustrative Games

  • Harry Nelson Pillsbury vs. Jean Taubenhaus, New York (Impromptu Congress) 1893: 1. d4 d5 2. e3 e6 3. Bd3 Bd6 4. f4 c5 5. c3 Nc6 6. Nf3 Nf6 7. O-O O-O 8. Ne5 g6 9. Nd2 Ne8 10. Ndf3 f6 11. Nxc6 bxc6 12. Qe2 f5 13. Bd2 Rb8 14. Rab1 Nf6 15. Kh1 Ne4 16. Be1 c4 17. Bc2 Qa5 18. a3 Qc7 19. g4 fxg4 20. Ne5 Nf6 21. Rg1 c5 22. Bh4 cxd4 23. cxd4 Bxe5 24. fxe5 Ne8 25. Rxg4 Qf7 26. Rg3 Ng7 27. Bf6 Ne8 28. Bxg6 hxg6 29. Qh5 Rb7 30. Qh8# 1-0
  • Harry Nelson Pillsbury vs. James Hanham, New York (Masters) 1893: 1. d4 d5 2. e3 e6 3. Bd3 Nf6 4. f4 Bd6 5. Nf3 b6 6. O-O O-O 7. c3 c5 8. Ne5 Qc7 9. Nd2 Nc6 10. Rf3 Bb7 11. Rh3 cxd4 12. Bxh7+ Nxh7 13. Qh5 Rfe8 14. Qxh7+ Kf8 15. exd4 f6 16. Ng6+ Kf7 17. Rg3 Rg8 18. Nf3 Ne7 19. Nfh4 Nxg6 20. Nxg6 Ba6 21. Bd2 Qc4 22. Re1 Qxa2 23. Nh8+ Kf8 24. Qg6 Rxh8 25. Qxg7+ Ke8 26. Rxe6+ Kd8 27. Rxd6+ Kc8 28. Rc6+ Kd8 29. Qc7+ Ke8 30. Re6+ Kf8 31. Qg7# 1-0
  • Paul Lipke vs. Emanuel Schiffers, Leipzig 1894: 1. d4 d5 2. e3 Nf6 3. Bd3 e6 4. Nd2 c5 5. c3 Nc6 6. f4 Be7 7. Nh3 O-O 8. Ng5 h6 9. h4 cxd4 10. exd4 Qd6 11. Ndf3 hxg5 12. hxg5 Ne4 13. Bxe4 dxe4 14. Ne5 Bxg5 15. fxg5 Nxe5 16. Qh5 f6 17. g6 Nxg6 18. Qxg6 Rf7 19. Be3 b5 20. O-O-O Kf8 21. d5 exd5 22. b4 Qe6 23. Rh7 Bb7 24. Bc5+ Ke8 25. Rxg7 Rc8 26. Rh1 1-0
  • F.J. Lee vs. Arthur Mackenzie, Hastings 1904: 1. d4 d5 2. e3 Nf6 3. Bd3 e6 4. f4 c5 5. c3 Nc6 6. Nf3 a6 7. Nbd2 Qc7 8. Ne5 b5 9. O-O Bd6 10. Ndf3 h6 11. Nxc6 Qxc6 12. Ne5 Qc7 13. Bd2 Bb7 14. a4 c4 15. Bc2 O-O 16. Rf3 Ne4 17. Be1 Kh7 18. Rh3 f6 19. Nf3 Rad8 20. Nd2 e5 21. fxe5 fxe5 22. Bh4 Rde8 23. axb5 axb5 24. Qh5 g6 25. Qxh6+ Kxh6 26. Bf6# 1-0

References

  1. See page 511 and column no. 9.
  2. Larry D. Evans (December 1981). "Stonewalling". Chess Life. pp. 34–36. Archived from the original on April 25, 2012. Retrieved 2011-10-16.
  3. "Pillsbury vs Taubenhaus (1893)". chessgames.com.
  4. "Pillsbury vs Hanham (1893)". chessgames.com.
  5. "Lipke vs Schiffers (1894)". chessgames.com.
  6. "Lee vs Mackenzie (1904)". chessgames.com.

Bibliography

Chess
Outline
Equipment
History
Rules
Terms
Tactics
Strategy
Openings
Flank opening
King's Pawn Game
Queen's Pawn Game
Other
Endgames
Tournaments
Art and media
Related
Category: