| Revision as of 08:37, 3 August 2004 view source146.124.141.250 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:41, 3 August 2004 view source 146.124.141.250 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| This constitution also defines various constitutional rights (also named liberal rights) in order to protect the individual liberties and the rights of minorities in society, such as ] and ], ], the right to private property and privacy, as well as equality before the law and ] under the ], and many more. | This constitution also defines various constitutional rights (also named liberal rights) in order to protect the individual liberties and the rights of minorities in society, such as ] and ], ], the right to private property and privacy, as well as equality before the law and ] under the ], and many more. | ||
| Such constitutional rights are guaranteed through various controled institutions and various statutory laws in order to protect the rights of individuals and minorities from |
Such constitutional rights are guaranteed through various controled institutions and various statutory laws in order to protect the rights of individuals and minorities from an elected representative, a dictator or any kind of future majority that is willing to overthrown the constitutional regime. | ||
| Some would argue that liberal democracy isn't democratic or liberal at all. They would argue that "liberal democracy" does not respect the majority rule (except when citizents are asked to vote for their representatives), and also that its "liberty" is restricted by the constitution decided by an old (even sometimes dead) generation. They would argue that, by prohibiting citizents to cast votes for all subjects (and especially for serious subjects like going to war, like constitutional amendents or constitution abolishment e.t.c), this turns "liberal democracy" the antechamber of oligarchy. | Some would argue that liberal democracy isn't democratic or liberal at all. They would argue that "liberal democracy" does not respect the majority rule (except when citizents are asked to vote for their representatives), and also that its "liberty" is restricted by the constitution decided by an old (even sometimes dead) generation. They would argue that, by prohibiting citizents to cast votes for all subjects (and especially for serious subjects like going to war, like constitutional amendents or constitution abolishment e.t.c), this turns "liberal democracy" the antechamber of oligarchy. | ||
Revision as of 08:41, 3 August 2004
Liberal democracy is a form of representative democracy where majority rule (also called 'Majoritarianism'] is not valid most of the times and where elected representatives are moderated by a constitution which defines the major procedures the regime has to follow in order to function.
This constitution also defines various constitutional rights (also named liberal rights) in order to protect the individual liberties and the rights of minorities in society, such as freedom of speech and assembly, freedom of religion, the right to private property and privacy, as well as equality before the law and due process under the rule of law, and many more.
Such constitutional rights are guaranteed through various controled institutions and various statutory laws in order to protect the rights of individuals and minorities from an elected representative, a dictator or any kind of future majority that is willing to overthrown the constitutional regime.
Some would argue that liberal democracy isn't democratic or liberal at all. They would argue that "liberal democracy" does not respect the majority rule (except when citizents are asked to vote for their representatives), and also that its "liberty" is restricted by the constitution decided by an old (even sometimes dead) generation. They would argue that, by prohibiting citizents to cast votes for all subjects (and especially for serious subjects like going to war, like constitutional amendents or constitution abolishment e.t.c), this turns "liberal democracy" the antechamber of oligarchy.
Others would say that only a liberal democracy can guarantee the individual liberties of its citizens and prevent the development into a dictatorship. Unmoderated majority rule could - in this view - lead to an oppression of minorities.
All liberal democracies are representative democracies. Part of these democracies have additional systems of referenda to give the electorale a possibility to overrule decisions of the elected legislature or even to take decisions by plebiscite without giving the leigslature a say in that decision. Switzerland is one of the few liberal democracies with a representative system completed with referenda and plebiscites. More countries have referenda in their political systen. Adding referenda to a political system could help preventing the evolution of a liberal democracy in an olicharchy.
Australia, Canada, the member states of the European Union, Iceland, New Zealand, Norway and the United States are all examples of liberal democracy (though of course it is sometimes argued that none is perfect with respect to the above rights).
This article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |