Misplaced Pages

Cimoliopterus: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:28, 13 February 2021 editFunkMonk (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers102,706 edits Some image edits.← Previous edit Revision as of 02:10, 17 February 2021 edit undoFunkMonk (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, Pending changes reviewers102,706 edits Paragraph on sculptures, added some links to sources used.Tag: citing a blog or free web hostNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
| image = Cimoliopterus.jpg | image = Cimoliopterus.jpg
| image_caption = ] snout tip of ''C. cuvieri'' (specimen NHMUK PV 39409) shown from the right side and below | image_caption = ] snout tip of ''C. cuvieri'' (specimen NHMUK PV 39409) shown from the right side and below
| display_parents = 4 | display_parents = 3
| taxon = Cimoliopterus | taxon = Cimoliopterus
| authority = Rodrigues & Kellner, ] | authority = Rodrigues & Kellner, ]
Line 34: Line 34:
The history of ''Cimoliopterus'' and related ] from the UK is considered confusing, since many of them were described from very fragmentary remains, and named using convoluted nomenclatural schemes of the ].{{Sfn|Witton|2013|pp=152–163}}<ref name="Unwin"/> In 1851, the British naturalist ] described a large ] snout he had obtained, which was found in a pit in the ] at ], ], in ]. Pterosaur fossils had earlier been discovered in the same pit, including the front part of some jaws Bowerbank had used as the basis for the species '']'' in 1846, as well as other bones. Based on the new snout, Bowebank named the new species ''Pterodactylus cuvieri''; at this time, the ] '']'' was used for ] which are now thought to be distantly related to each other.<ref name="Bowerbank1851">{{cite journal | last1 = Bowerbank | first1 = J. S. | year = 1851 | title = On the pterodactyles of the Chalk Formation | url =https://archive.org/details/lietuvostsrmoksl50liet/page/14/mode/2up | journal = Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London | volume = 19 | pages = 14–20 | doi=10.1111/j.1096-3642.1851.tb01125.x}}</ref>{{Sfn|Witton|2013|p=98}} The ] honours the French palaeontologist ], who recognised that pterosaurs were flying reptiles.<ref name="Martill">{{cite journal |last1=Martill |first1=D. M. |title=The early history of pterosaur discovery in Great Britain |journal=Geological Society, London, Special Publications |date=2010 |volume=343 |issue=1 |pages=287–311 |doi=10.1144/SP343.18}}</ref><ref name=Helm>{{cite book | last= Jobling | first= J. A. | year= 2010| title= The Helm Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names | publisher= Christopher Helm | location = London | isbn = 978-1-4081-2501-4 | page = 125 | url=https://archive.org/details/Helm_Dictionary_of_Scientific_Bird_Names_by_James_A._Jobling/page/n125/mode/2up}}</ref> The history of ''Cimoliopterus'' and related ] from the UK is considered confusing, since many of them were described from very fragmentary remains, and named using convoluted nomenclatural schemes of the ].{{Sfn|Witton|2013|pp=152–163}}<ref name="Unwin"/> In 1851, the British naturalist ] described a large ] snout he had obtained, which was found in a pit in the ] at ], ], in ]. Pterosaur fossils had earlier been discovered in the same pit, including the front part of some jaws Bowerbank had used as the basis for the species '']'' in 1846, as well as other bones. Based on the new snout, Bowebank named the new species ''Pterodactylus cuvieri''; at this time, the ] '']'' was used for ] which are now thought to be distantly related to each other.<ref name="Bowerbank1851">{{cite journal | last1 = Bowerbank | first1 = J. S. | year = 1851 | title = On the pterodactyles of the Chalk Formation | url =https://archive.org/details/lietuvostsrmoksl50liet/page/14/mode/2up | journal = Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London | volume = 19 | pages = 14–20 | doi=10.1111/j.1096-3642.1851.tb01125.x}}</ref>{{Sfn|Witton|2013|p=98}} The ] honours the French palaeontologist ], who recognised that pterosaurs were flying reptiles.<ref name="Martill">{{cite journal |last1=Martill |first1=D. M. |title=The early history of pterosaur discovery in Great Britain |journal=Geological Society, London, Special Publications |date=2010 |volume=343 |issue=1 |pages=287–311 |doi=10.1144/SP343.18}}</ref><ref name=Helm>{{cite book | last= Jobling | first= J. A. | year= 2010| title= The Helm Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names | publisher= Christopher Helm | location = London | isbn = 978-1-4081-2501-4 | page = 125 | url=https://archive.org/details/Helm_Dictionary_of_Scientific_Bird_Names_by_James_A._Jobling/page/n125/mode/2up}}</ref>


The ] snout, today catalogued as NHMUK PV 39409 at the ], consists of the front {{convert|7|in|cm|abbr=on|order=flip}} of a partial upper jaw, including a crest located on the ], the frontmost bone of the upper jaw. Eleven ] (tooth sockets) are preserved on each side. It was originally reported to preserve a single tooth in the right first alveolus (tooth socket at the front of the snout), but this had disappeared when the holotype was examined in 2007 and 2009. Two complete teeth were also originally reported to be preserved in the same block of chalk as the snout. Bowerbank also believed some large bones in three other collections may either have belonged to the same species, to ''P. giganteus'', or to a third possible species.<ref name="Rodrigues & Kellner 2013"/><ref name="OwenReptiles">{{cite book |last1=Owen |first1=R. |title=A History of British Fossil Reptiles |location=London |date=1849-1884 |volume=1 |publisher=Cassell & Company Limited |pages=242–244 |doi=10.5962/bhl.title.7529 |url=https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/31792#page/266/mode/1up}}</ref><ref name="Bowerbank1851"/> The ] snout, today catalogued as NHMUK PV 39409 at the ], consists of the front {{convert|7|in|cm|abbr=on|order=flip}} of a partial upper jaw, represented entirely by the ], the frontmost bones of the upper jaw, including part of a premaxillary crest. Eleven ] (tooth sockets) are preserved on each side. It was originally reported to preserve a single tooth in the right first alveolus (tooth socket at the front of the snout), but this had disappeared when the holotype was examined in 2007 and 2009. Two complete teeth were also originally reported to be preserved in the same block of chalk as the snout. Bowerbank also believed some large bones in three other collections may either have belonged to the same species, to ''P. giganteus'', or to a third possible species. The British biologist ] assigned one long bone to ''P. cuvieri'' based on its size and the character of its surface, and identified it as a possible ] of the elongated wing-finger.<ref name="Rodrigues & Kellner 2013"/><ref name="OwenReptiles">{{cite book |last1=Owen |first1=R. |title=A History of British Fossil Reptiles |location=London |date=1849-1884 |volume=1 |publisher=Cassell & Company Limited |pages=242–258 |doi=10.5962/bhl.title.7529 |url=https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/31792#page/266/mode/1up}}</ref><ref name="Bowerbank1851"/>


In the 1850s the British artist ] created full-sized sculptress of ] for ] in ], under the supervision of Owen. Among them were two species of pterosaur, including two ''P. cuvieri'' sculptures made of dark stone, and two smaller statues of '']''. The larger statues are today in disrepair due to their delicate nature, and the smaller ones have been lost. The British palaeontologist ] stated in 2019 that the anatomy of the sculptures was probably based on the more completely known ''Pterodactylus antiquus'', and have rather bird-like proportions.<ref name="OwenCrystalPalace">{{cite book |last1=Owen |first1=R. |title=Geology and Inhabitants of the Ancient World |date=1854 |publisher=Crystal Palace library |location=London |isbn=978-1166913045 |pages=5-7, 11-13 |volume=8 |url=https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/62414}}</ref><ref name="CPD">{{cite web |last1=Witton |first1=M. |title=Pterosaur – information about the Crystal Palace statues |url=https://cpdinosaurs.org/visit/statue-details/pterosaur |website=cpdinosaurs.org |access-date=16 February 2021 |date=2019}}</ref><ref name="WittonBlog">{{cite web |last1=Witton |first1=M. |title=The science of the Crystal Palace Dinosaurs, part 2: Teleosaurus, pterosaurs and Mosasaurus |url=http://markwitton-com.blogspot.com/2019/05/the-science-of-crystal-palace-dinosaurs.html |website=Mark Witton.com Blog |access-date=16 February 2021 |date=2019}}</ref>
In 1869, ] renamed the species into ''Ptenodactylus cuvieri'',<ref>Seeley, H.G., 1869, ''Index to the fossil remains of Aves, Ornithosauria, and Reptilia, from the Secondary System of Strata arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge''. Deighton, Bell and Co., Cambridge, xxiii + 143 pp</ref> at the same time disclaiming the name which makes it invalid by modern standards. In 1870, Seeley had realised that the generic name ''Ptenodactylus'' had been preoccupied and renamed the species into ''] cuvieri''.<ref>Seeley, H.G., 1870, ''The Ornithosauria: an elementary study of the bones of pterodactyls, made from fossil remains found in the Cambridge Upper Greensand, and arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge''. Deighton, Bell, and Co., Cambridge, xii + 135 pp</ref> In 1874, ] renamed it into ''] cuvieri'';<ref>Owen, R. 1874, ''Monograph on the fossil Reptilia of the Mesozoic Formations''. Palaeontographical Society, London, 14 pp</ref> in 2001, ] considered it as a species of '']'': ''A. cuvieri''.<ref name="Unwin">{{cite journal | last1 = Unwin | first1 = D. M. | year = 2001 | title = An overview of the pterosaur assemblage from the Cambridge Greensand (Cretaceous) of Eastern England | journal = Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe | volume = 4 | pages = 189–221 | doi=10.1002/mmng.4860040112}}</ref>

In 1869, ] renamed the species into ''Ptenodactylus cuvieri'', at the same time disclaiming the name which makes it invalid by modern standards.<ref name="Seeley1869">{{cite journal |last1=Seeley |first1=H. G. |title=Index to the fossil remains of Aves, Ornithosauria, and Reptilia, from the secondary system of strata arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge, |date=1869 |pages=xvi |doi=10.5962/bhl.title.159380 |url=https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/266877#page/24/mode/1up}}</ref> In 1870, Seeley had realised that the generic name ''Ptenodactylus'' had been preoccupied and renamed the species into ''] cuvieri''.<ref name="Seeley1870">{{cite book |last1=Seeley |first1=H.G. |title=The Ornithosauria: an elementary study of the bones of pterodactyls, made from fossil remains found in the Cambridge Upper Greensand, and arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge |date=1870 |publisher=Deighton, Bell, and Co. |location=Cambridge |page=113 |url=https://www.gutenberg.org/files/52655/52655-h/52655-h.htm}}</ref> In 1874, ] renamed it into ''] cuvieri''.<ref name="Owen1874">{{cite book|last1=Owen |first1=R. |title=A Monograph on the Fossil Reptilia of the Mesozoic Formations |publisher=The Palæontographical society |date=1874 |volume=1 |location=London |pages=6-8 |doi=10.1017/CBO9781316151099.003}}</ref> In 2001, ] considered it as a species of '']'': ''A. cuvieri''.<ref name="Unwin">{{cite journal | last1 = Unwin | first1 = D. M. | year = 2001 | title = An overview of the pterosaur assemblage from the Cambridge Greensand (Cretaceous) of Eastern England | journal = Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe | volume = 4 | pages = 189–221 | doi=10.1002/mmng.4860040112}}</ref>


In 1919 and 1922, the Austrian naturalist ] lamented that the scientific literature had accepted the many ''Ornithocheirus'' names that had only been mentioned in a catalogue made by Seeley for the benefit of students. In his opinion names were worthless without an illustration of the specimens they were based on, or better still a complete restoration of the relevant skeleton. For this reason, he provided a drawing of the skull of ''Ornithocheirus cuvieri'', one of the few species for which the known jaw material proved its validity.<ref name ="Arthaber1922">{{cite journal | last1 = von Arthaber | first1 = G. | year = 1922 | title = Über Entwicklung, Ausbildung und Absterben der Flugsaurier | journal = Paläontologische Zeitschrift | volume = 4 | pages = 1–47 }}</ref> In 1919 and 1922, the Austrian naturalist ] lamented that the scientific literature had accepted the many ''Ornithocheirus'' names that had only been mentioned in a catalogue made by Seeley for the benefit of students. In his opinion names were worthless without an illustration of the specimens they were based on, or better still a complete restoration of the relevant skeleton. For this reason, he provided a drawing of the skull of ''Ornithocheirus cuvieri'', one of the few species for which the known jaw material proved its validity.<ref name ="Arthaber1922">{{cite journal | last1 = von Arthaber | first1 = G. | year = 1922 | title = Über Entwicklung, Ausbildung und Absterben der Flugsaurier | journal = Paläontologische Zeitschrift | volume = 4 | pages = 1–47 }}</ref>


In 2013, ] and ] created a separate genus: ''Cimoliopterus''. The generic name combines Κιμωλία, ''Kimolia'', the white clay of the island ] (''kimolia'' means "chalk" in ]) with a Latinised Greek πτερόν, ''pteron'', "wing". The ] remains ''Pterodactylus cuvieri'', the resulting '']'', new combination name, is ''Cimiliopterus cuvieri''.<ref name="Rodrigues & Kellner 2013"/> In 2013, ] and ] created a separate genus: ''Cimoliopterus''. The generic name combines Κιμωλία, ''Kimolia'', the white clay of the island ] (''kimolia'' means "chalk" in ]) with a Latinised Greek πτερόν, ''pteron'', "wing". The ] remains ''Pterodactylus cuvieri'', the resulting '']'', new combination name, is ''Cimiliopterus cuvieri''.<ref name="Rodrigues & Kellner 2013"/>

===Additional species and specimens===


{{multiple image {{multiple image
Line 61: Line 65:
==Description== ==Description==
] showing ''C. cuvieri'' (right) ] from '']'']] ] showing ''C. cuvieri'' (right) ] from '']'']]
Bowerbank, extrapolating from the remains of ''P. giganteus'', estimated a ] for ''P. cuvieri'' of about {{convert|16.6|ft|m|order=flip}}, making it the largest flying animal, extinct or extant, known in 1851.<ref name="Bowerbank1851"/> This claim at the time was met with considerable scepticism, though today, larger pterosaurs are known to have existed.<ref>{{cite journal|authors=Witton, M.P., Martill, D.M. and Loveridge, R.F.|year=2010|title=Clipping the Wings of Giant Pterosaurs: Comments on Wingspan Estimations and Diversity.|journal=Acta Geoscientica Sinica|volume=31|pages=79–81|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287830761_Clipping_the_wings_of_giant_pterosaurs_comments_on_wingspan_estimations_and_diversity}}</ref> Currently, the only known remains of ''Cimoliopterus'' are fragments of the skull.<ref name="Pêgas2019"/> Bowerbank, extrapolating from the remains of ''P. giganteus'', estimated a ] for ''P. cuvieri'' of about {{convert|16.6|ft|m|order=flip}}, making it the largest flying animal, extinct or extant, known in 1851.<ref name="Bowerbank1851"/> This claim at the time was met with considerable scepticism, though today, larger pterosaurs are known to have existed.<ref>{{cite journal|authors=Witton, M.P., Martill, D.M. and Loveridge, R.F.|year=2010|title=Clipping the Wings of Giant Pterosaurs: Comments on Wingspan Estimations and Diversity.|journal=Acta Geoscientica Sinica|volume=31|pages=79–81|url=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/287830761_Clipping_the_wings_of_giant_pterosaurs_comments_on_wingspan_estimations_and_diversity}}</ref> Currently, the only known remains of ''Cimoliopterus'' are fragments of the skull.<ref name="Pêgas2019"/> As a pterosaur, ''Cimoliopterus'' would have been covered in hair-like ], and had extensive wing-membranes, which were distended by a long wing-finger.{{Sfn|Witton|2013|pp=51–52}}


The holotype of the species ''Cimoliopterus cuvieri'' consists of an incomplete upper jaw, which is narrow in the preserved portion. The crest of ''C. cuvieri'' is, on the premaxilla (the frontmost cranial bone), placed far back, at the level of the seventh tooth pair, however, it begins before the nasoantorbital ] (the skull opening where the ] and the bony nostril are combined). In the anterior (front) part of the jaw of ''C. cuvieri'' there are three alveoli (tooth sockets) per {{convert|3|cm|in}} of jaw margin, and two alveoli per {{convert|3|cm|in}} of jaw margin at the back of the jaw. The front portion of the ridge on the midline of the ] (upper part of the mouth) reaches the level of the third tooth pair, the palate itself is curved upwards and there is no expansion of the jaw at the front. The second tooth pair is about the same size as the third, and both of them are larger than the fourth tooth pair. To the rear part of the jaw, the distance between the teeth gradually increases.<ref name="Rodrigues & Kellner 2013"/> The holotype of the species ''Cimoliopterus cuvieri'' consists of an incomplete upper jaw, which is narrow in the preserved portion. The crest of ''C. cuvieri'' is, on the premaxilla (the frontmost cranial bone), placed far back, at the level of the seventh tooth pair, however, it begins before the nasoantorbital ] (the skull opening where the ] and the bony nostril are combined). In the anterior (front) part of the jaw of ''C. cuvieri'' there are three alveoli (tooth sockets) per {{convert|3|cm|in}} of jaw margin, and two alveoli per {{convert|3|cm|in}} of jaw margin at the back of the jaw. The front portion of the ridge on the midline of the ] (upper part of the mouth) reaches the level of the third tooth pair, the palate itself is curved upwards and there is no expansion of the jaw at the front. The second tooth pair is about the same size as the third, and both of them are larger than the fourth tooth pair. To the rear part of the jaw, the distance between the teeth gradually increases.<ref name="Rodrigues & Kellner 2013"/>
Line 75: Line 79:
==Classification== ==Classification==
] ]
] based on large ] pterosaurs such as ''C. cuvieri'']] ] in ] based on ''C. cuvieri'']]


''Cimoliopterus'' was by Rodrigues and Kellner (and Myers in 2015) assigned to the ], in an uncertain position ('']''). ] analyses indicated a position in the evolutionary tree above '']'' but below a ] formed by more derived forms.<ref name="Rodrigues & Kellner 2013"/> ''Cimoliopterus'' was by Rodrigues and Kellner (and Myers in 2015) assigned to the ], in an uncertain position ('']''). ] analyses indicated a position in the evolutionary tree above '']'' but below a ] formed by more derived forms.<ref name="Rodrigues & Kellner 2013"/>
Line 169: Line 173:


{{col-end}} {{col-end}}

==Palaeobiology==
The tooth-arrangement seen in the group ''Cimoliopterus'' belongs to has been referred to as "fish-grabs".{{Sfn|Witton|2013|pp=152–163}}


==Palaeoenvironment== ==Palaeoenvironment==

Revision as of 02:10, 17 February 2021

Genus of pteranodontoid pterosaur from the Cretaceous period Not to be confused with Cimolopteryx.

Cimoliopterus
Temporal range: AlbianCenomanian
~112–94 Ma PreꞒ O S D C P T J K Pg N
Holotype snout tip of C. cuvieri (specimen NHMUK PV 39409) shown from the right side and below
Scientific classification Edit this classification
Domain: Eukaryota
Kingdom: Animalia
Phylum: Chordata
Order: Pterosauria
Suborder: Pterodactyloidea
Clade: Ornithocheirae
Clade: Targaryendraconia
Family: Cimoliopteridae
Genus: Cimoliopterus
Rodrigues & Kellner, 2013
Type species
Pterodactylus cuvieri
Bowerbank, 1851
Species
  • C. cuvieri
    (Bowerbank, 1851)
  • C. dunni
    Myers, 2015
Synonyms
Synonyms of C. cuvieri
  • Pterodactylus cuvieri
    Bowerbank, 1851
  • Ornithocheirus cuvieri
    (Bowerbank, 1851)
  • Coloborhynchus cuvieri
    (Bowerbank, 1851)
  • Anhanguera cuvieri
    (Bowerbank, 1851)
  • Ornithocheirus brachyrhinus?
    Seeley, 1870
  • Pterodactylus fittoni?
    Owen, 1859
  • Ornithocheirus fittoni?
    (Owen, 1859)
  • Anhanguera fittoni?
    (Owen, 1859)

Cimoliopterus is a genus of pterodactyloid pterosaur from the Cretaceous of England, United Kingdom and Texas, United States.

The type species, Cimoliopterus cuvieri, was previously considered parts of several different genera depending on author, but received its own genus in 2013.

History of discovery

Lithograph showing the C. cuvieri holotype and the lost teeth, as figured in Bowerbank's 1851 description

The history of Cimoliopterus and related pterosaurs from the UK is considered confusing, since many of them were described from very fragmentary remains, and named using convoluted nomenclatural schemes of the Victorian era. In 1851, the British naturalist James Scott Bowerbank described a large pterosaur snout he had obtained, which was found in a pit in the Chalk Formation at Burham, Kent, in South East England. Pterosaur fossils had earlier been discovered in the same pit, including the front part of some jaws Bowerbank had used as the basis for the species Pterodactylus giganteus in 1846, as well as other bones. Based on the new snout, Bowebank named the new species Pterodactylus cuvieri; at this time, the genus Pterodactylus was used for many different pterosaur species which are now thought to be distantly related to each other. The specific name honours the French palaeontologist Georges Cuvier, who recognised that pterosaurs were flying reptiles.

The holotype snout, today catalogued as NHMUK PV 39409 at the Natural History Museum in London, consists of the front 18 cm (7 in) of a partial upper jaw, represented entirely by the premaxillae, the frontmost bones of the upper jaw, including part of a premaxillary crest. Eleven alveoli (tooth sockets) are preserved on each side. It was originally reported to preserve a single tooth in the right first alveolus (tooth socket at the front of the snout), but this had disappeared when the holotype was examined in 2007 and 2009. Two complete teeth were also originally reported to be preserved in the same block of chalk as the snout. Bowerbank also believed some large bones in three other collections may either have belonged to the same species, to P. giganteus, or to a third possible species. The British biologist Richard Owen assigned one long bone to P. cuvieri based on its size and the character of its surface, and identified it as a possible phalanx bone of the elongated wing-finger.

In the 1850s the British artist Benjamin Waterhouse Hawkins created full-sized sculptress of prehistoric animals for the Crystal Palace in London, under the supervision of Owen. Among them were two species of pterosaur, including two P. cuvieri sculptures made of dark stone, and two smaller statues of Pterodactylus bucklandi. The larger statues are today in disrepair due to their delicate nature, and the smaller ones have been lost. The British palaeontologist Mark Witton stated in 2019 that the anatomy of the sculptures was probably based on the more completely known Pterodactylus antiquus, and have rather bird-like proportions.

In 1869, Harry Govier Seeley renamed the species into Ptenodactylus cuvieri, at the same time disclaiming the name which makes it invalid by modern standards. In 1870, Seeley had realised that the generic name Ptenodactylus had been preoccupied and renamed the species into Ornithocheirus cuvieri. In 1874, Richard Owen renamed it into Coloborhynchus cuvieri. In 2001, David Unwin considered it as a species of Anhanguera: A. cuvieri.

In 1919 and 1922, the Austrian naturalist Gustav von Arthaber lamented that the scientific literature had accepted the many Ornithocheirus names that had only been mentioned in a catalogue made by Seeley for the benefit of students. In his opinion names were worthless without an illustration of the specimens they were based on, or better still a complete restoration of the relevant skeleton. For this reason, he provided a drawing of the skull of Ornithocheirus cuvieri, one of the few species for which the known jaw material proved its validity.

In 2013, Taissa Rodrigues and Alexander Wilhelm Armin Kellner created a separate genus: Cimoliopterus. The generic name combines Κιμωλία, Kimolia, the white clay of the island Kimolos (kimolia means "chalk" in New Greek) with a Latinised Greek πτερόν, pteron, "wing". The type species remains Pterodactylus cuvieri, the resulting combinatio nova, new combination name, is Cimiliopterus cuvieri.

Additional species and specimens

Holotype snout tips of the dubious species P. fittoni and O. brachyrhinus, which may belong to C. cuvieri

Ornithocheirus brachyrhinus Seeley 1870 and Pterodactylus fittoni Owen 1859 share several features with C. cuvieri, and it can therefore not be excluded that they are the same taxon. However, they are too incomplete to be definitely referred to C. cuvieri, so were by Rodrigues and Kellner considered nomina dubia.

In 2015, a new species was described: Cimoliopterus dunni, which was discovered in the Britton Formation on the north-central Texas, United States, and its fossil remains date to the Cenomanian stage, of the early Late Cretaceous. The holotype specimen consists in a partial rostrum with the 26 preserved alveoli and bears a thin premaxillary crest that begins over the fourth alveoli, the tip of the snout is blunt and the rostrum have an angle of 45° respect to the anterior part of the palate. This find extends the distribution of the genus to North America and shows that the pterosaur faunas from Europe and North America still had contact during the middle Cretaceous. The phylogenetic analysis included in the description of this species indicates that Cimoliopterus is a basal pteranodontoid closely related with Aetodactylus, which has also been found in Cenomanian strata from Texas.

Description

Life restoration showing C. cuvieri (right) stealing prey from Lonchodectes

Bowerbank, extrapolating from the remains of P. giganteus, estimated a wingspan for P. cuvieri of about 5.1 metres (16.6 ft), making it the largest flying animal, extinct or extant, known in 1851. This claim at the time was met with considerable scepticism, though today, larger pterosaurs are known to have existed. Currently, the only known remains of Cimoliopterus are fragments of the skull. As a pterosaur, Cimoliopterus would have been covered in hair-like pycnofibres, and had extensive wing-membranes, which were distended by a long wing-finger.

The holotype of the species Cimoliopterus cuvieri consists of an incomplete upper jaw, which is narrow in the preserved portion. The crest of C. cuvieri is, on the premaxilla (the frontmost cranial bone), placed far back, at the level of the seventh tooth pair, however, it begins before the nasoantorbital fenestra (the skull opening where the antorbital fenestra and the bony nostril are combined). In the anterior (front) part of the jaw of C. cuvieri there are three alveoli (tooth sockets) per 3 centimetres (1.2 in) of jaw margin, and two alveoli per 3 centimetres (1.2 in) of jaw margin at the back of the jaw. The front portion of the ridge on the midline of the palate (upper part of the mouth) reaches the level of the third tooth pair, the palate itself is curved upwards and there is no expansion of the jaw at the front. The second tooth pair is about the same size as the third, and both of them are larger than the fourth tooth pair. To the rear part of the jaw, the distance between the teeth gradually increases.

The C. cuvieri holotype as figured by Owen in 1850, with the now lost teeth 5–7), cross-section of the hind part (2), and front view of the tip (3)

The holotype of C. dunni, SMU 76892, is composed of 18.5 centimetres (7.3 in) of the anterior portion of the rostrum (snout), and comprises both the premaxilla and the maxilla, which appear to have been broken until the thirteeth pair of alveoli. Both C. dunni and C. cuvieri do not show the pronounced lateral expansion of the rostral tip, this feature is a key characteristic of a lot of other toothed pteranodontoids. In both species, this lateral rostral expansion is developed so weakly that it had even been considered to be absent once, and in comparison to the pronounced rostral expansions of other pterosaurs such as those of Anhanguera, Coloborhynchus, and Ornithocheirus, the rostral expansions seen in both C. cuvieri and C. dunni bear so little resemblance to them. This is also why C. cuvieri can be distinguished from the three former genera; it has a low rostrum compared to the genus Ornithocheirus, it also possess a forward-facing first pair of alveoli, unlike Ornithocheirus; C. cuvieri can furthermore be distinguished from the genus Anhanguera because it does not possess an anterior expansion of the rostrum, as mentioned before, which is seen in members of the family Anhangueridae, it also does not have the fourth and fifth alveoli at a smaller size than the third and sixth, which is a key feature in Anhanguera. Due to the more posteriorly positioned premaxillary crest of Cimoliopterus cuvieri, unlike the premaxillary crests seen in anhanguerids, it may perhaps indicate that the crests that C. cuvieri bore had evolved in a separate way.

Reconstructed skull of the more completely known relative Tropeognathus for comparison; note that the crest begins at the tip of the snout, unlike in Cimoliopterus

In C. dunni, the premaxillary crest begins just above the fourth alveoli, and it slightly curves upward, this forms a front edge that is concave. The upper edge of the crest seems to descend moderately just before a broken portion, this suggests that the premaxillary crest of C. dunni was, in a lateral view, symmetrical. Supposing that the pterosaur's crest was symmetrical in shape, the complete crest of it would have had a length that was approximately 15 to 16 centimetres (5.9 to 6.3 in). The maximum height of the premaxillary crest of C. dunni is 38 millimetres (1.5 in), the region of the crest where this height is reached is located above the ninth and tenth alveoli. The cortical bone (the hard outer layer of bones) is well-preserved in C. dunni, however, on the left side of the crest, the conjoinment between premaxilla and maxilla is not visible, and on the right side there are several regions where cortical bone is either damaged or missing.

An upward angle of 8 degrees relative to the flat area of the posterior palate can be assumed based on the anterior portion of the palate being dorsally reflected, and an inflection point (the point where a curve changes from convex to concave) close to the level of the eighth alveoli can also be seen. At less than 1 millimetre (0.039 in) high, a narrow palatal ridge extends anteriorly from the broken portion on posterior end of the premaxillary crest. In palatal view of the palate, the anterior end of the rostrum of C. dunni posteriorly expands to a maximum width of 1.6 centimetres (0.63 in) above the third alveoli, narrowing to a minimum width of 1.5 centimetres (0.59 in) at the level of the fourth alveoli. The width of the rostrum continues to increase afterwards, until it reaches a maximum of 1.8 to 1.9 centimetres (0.71 to 0.75 in) at the broken part of the posterior edge of the crest. The spaces between the alveoli of C. dunni gradually increase backward along the row of teeth of the pterosaur, the minimum between the spaces measuring 1.6 millimetres (0.063 in), and the maximum measuring 11.5 millimetres (0.45 in). In total, there are thirteen pairs of alveoli, this is indicates a minimum of twenty-six teeth in the upper jaw.

Classification

Von Arthaber's 1919 reconstruction of the C. cuvieri holotype
Sculptures in the Crystal Palace based on C. cuvieri

Cimoliopterus was by Rodrigues and Kellner (and Myers in 2015) assigned to the Pteranodontoidea, in an uncertain position (incertae sedis). Cladistic analyses indicated a position in the evolutionary tree above Istiodactylus but below a polytomy formed by more derived forms.

In 2018, Jacobs et al. performed a phylogenetic analysis where they placed Cimoliopterus within the family Ornithocheiridae, as the sister taxon of Camposipterus. They published their analysis in 2019. In the same year however, Pêgas et al. reassigned Cimoliopterus to the clade Targaryendraconia, more specifically to its own family, the Cimoliopteridae, and sister taxon to both Aetodactylus and Camposipterus.

Topology 1: Jacobs et al. (2019).

 Ornithocheiridae 

Coloborhynchus clavirostris

Uktenadactylus wadleighi

Coloborhynchus reedi

Coloborhynchus capito

Coloborhynchus fluviferox

Coloborhynchus NHMUK R481

Siroccopteryx moroccensis

Ornithocheirus simus

Tropeognathus mesembrinus

Camposipterus segwickii

Camposipterus colorhinus

Camposipterus nasutus

Cimoliopterus cuvieri

Cimoliopterus dunni

Topology 2: Pêgas et al. (2019).

Ornithocheirae

Ornithocheirus

Targaryendraconia
Targaryendraconidae

Aussiedraco

Barbosania

Targaryendraco

Cimoliopteridae

Aetodactylus

Camposipterus

Cimoliopterus

Anhangueria
Hamipteridae

Hamipterus

Iberodactylus

Anhangueridae

Tropeognathus

Coloborhynchinae

Anhanguerinae

Palaeobiology

The tooth-arrangement seen in the group Cimoliopterus belongs to has been referred to as "fish-grabs".

Palaeoenvironment

Map showing formations in the Chalk Group; C. cuvieri was found in the Grey Chalk Subgroup, in the area marked as "chalk"

The holotype of C. cuvieri, NHMUK PV 39409, had been found in the Grey Chalk Subgroup dating from the Cenomanian-Turonian.

See also

References

  1. ^ Myers, Timothy S. (2015). "First North American occurrence of the toothed pteranodontoid pterosaur Cimoliopterus". Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology. 35: e1014904. doi:10.1080/02724634.2015.1014904.
  2. ^ Rodrigues, T.; Kellner, A. (2013). "Taxonomic review of the Ornithocheirus complex (Pterosauria) from the Cretaceous of England". ZooKeys. 308: 1–112. doi:10.3897/zookeys.308.5559. PMC 3689139. PMID 23794925.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  3. ^ Witton 2013, pp. 152–163.
  4. ^ Unwin, D. M. (2001). "An overview of the pterosaur assemblage from the Cambridge Greensand (Cretaceous) of Eastern England". Mitteilungen aus dem Museum für Naturkunde in Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe. 4: 189–221. doi:10.1002/mmng.4860040112.
  5. ^ Bowerbank, J. S. (1851). "On the pterodactyles of the Chalk Formation". Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 19: 14–20. doi:10.1111/j.1096-3642.1851.tb01125.x.
  6. Witton 2013, p. 98.
  7. Martill, D. M. (2010). "The early history of pterosaur discovery in Great Britain". Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 343 (1): 287–311. doi:10.1144/SP343.18.
  8. Jobling, J. A. (2010). The Helm Dictionary of Scientific Bird Names. London: Christopher Helm. p. 125. ISBN 978-1-4081-2501-4.
  9. Owen, R. (1849–1884). A History of British Fossil Reptiles. Vol. 1. London: Cassell & Company Limited. pp. 242–258. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.7529.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: date format (link)
  10. Owen, R. (1854). Geology and Inhabitants of the Ancient World. Vol. 8. London: Crystal Palace library. pp. 5–7, 11–13. ISBN 978-1166913045.
  11. Witton, M. (2019). "Pterosaur – information about the Crystal Palace statues". cpdinosaurs.org. Retrieved 16 February 2021. {{cite web}}: no-break space character in |title= at position 12 (help)
  12. Witton, M. (2019). "The science of the Crystal Palace Dinosaurs, part 2: Teleosaurus, pterosaurs and Mosasaurus". Mark Witton.com Blog. Retrieved 16 February 2021.
  13. Seeley, H. G. (1869). "Index to the fossil remains of Aves, Ornithosauria, and Reptilia, from the secondary system of strata arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge,": xvi. doi:10.5962/bhl.title.159380. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  14. Seeley, H.G. (1870). The Ornithosauria: an elementary study of the bones of pterodactyls, made from fossil remains found in the Cambridge Upper Greensand, and arranged in the Woodwardian Museum of the University of Cambridge. Cambridge: Deighton, Bell, and Co. p. 113.
  15. Owen, R. (1874). A Monograph on the Fossil Reptilia of the Mesozoic Formations. Vol. 1. London: The Palæontographical society. pp. 6–8. doi:10.1017/CBO9781316151099.003.
  16. von Arthaber, G. (1922). "Über Entwicklung, Ausbildung und Absterben der Flugsaurier". Paläontologische Zeitschrift. 4: 1–47.
  17. "Clipping the Wings of Giant Pterosaurs: Comments on Wingspan Estimations and Diversity". Acta Geoscientica Sinica. 31: 79–81. 2010. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)
  18. ^ Pêgas, R.V.; Holgado, B.; Leal, M.E.C. (2019). "On Targaryendraco wiedenrothi gen. nov. (Pterodactyloidea, Pteranodontoidea, Lanceodontia) and recognition of a new cosmopolitan lineage of Cretaceous toothed pterodactyloids". Historical Biology. doi:10.1080/08912963.2019.1690482.
  19. Witton 2013, pp. 51–52.
  20. Von Arthaber, G. (1919). "Studien über Flugsaurier auf Grund der Bearbeitung des Wiener Exemplars von Dorygnathus banthensis Theod Sp". Denkschriften der königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse. 97: 391–464.
  21. ^ "A new species of Coloborhynchus (Pterosauria, Ornithocheiridae) from the mid-Cretaceous of North Africa" (PDF). Cretaceous Research. 2019. doi:10.1016/j.cretres.2018.10.018. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |authors= ignored (help)

Bibliography

  • Witton, M. P. (2013). Pterosaurs: Natural History, Evolution, Anatomy (1st ed.). Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-15061-1.
Pterosauria
Avemetatarsalia
Pterosauria
    • see below↓
Pterosauria
Pterosauria
Preondactylia
Caviramidae?
Austriadraconidae
Eopterosauria
Eudimorphodontoidea
Raeticodactylidae
Eudimorphodontidae
Eudimorphodontinae
Zambellisauria?
Macronychoptera
Dimorphodontidae
Lonchognatha?
Novialoidea
Campylognathoididae
Breviquartossa
Rhamphorhynchidae
Rhamphorhynchinae
Rhamphorhynchae
Angustinaripterini
Rhamphorhynchini
Digibrevisauria?
Scaphognathidae?
Pterodactylomorpha
    • see below↓
Campylognathoides liasicus

Scaphognathus crassirostris

Dorygnathus banthensis
Pterodactylomorpha
Pterodactylomorpha
Monofenestrata
Darwinoptera
Wukongopteridae
Wukongopterinae
Pterodactyliformes
Caelidracones
Anurognathidae
Anurognathinae
Batrachognathinae
Pterodactyloidea
Lophocratia
    • see below↓
Jeholopterus ninchengensis Kryptodrakon progenitor
Lophocratia
Archaeopterodactyloidea
Germanodactylidae
Euctenochasmatia
Ctenochasmatoidea
Gallodactylidae
Aurorazhdarchia
Aurorazhdarchidae
Ctenochasmatidae
Moganopterinae?
Gnathosaurinae
Ctenochasmatinae
Pterodaustrini
Eupterodactyloidea
Ornithocheiroidea
    • see below↓
Pterodactylus antiquus Plataleorhynchus streptorophorodon
Ornithocheiroidea
Ornithocheiroidea
Tapejaroidea
Dsungaripteridae
Dsungaripterinae
Azhdarchoidea
Tapejaromorpha
Thalassodromidae?
Tapejariformes
Caupedactylia?
Tapejaridae
Sinopterinae
Tapejarinae
Tapejarini
Caiuajarina
Neoazhdarchia
Dsungaripteromorpha?
Azhdarchomorpha
Neopterodactyloidea
Chaoyangopteridae
Chaoyangopterinae
Azhdarchiformes
Alanqidae?
Azhdarchidae
Azhdarchinae
Quetzalcoatlinae
Pteranodontoidea
    • see below↓
Bakonydraco galaczi

Tupandactylus imperator

Quetzalcoatlus
Pteranodontoidea
Pteranodontoidea
Pteranodontia
Pteranodontidae
Nyctosauromorpha
Aponyctosauria
Nyctosauridae
Ornithocheiromorpha
Lonchodectidae
Lanceodontia
Lonchodraconidae
Istiodactyliformes
Mimodactylidae
Istiodactylidae
Istiodactylinae
Ornithocheiriformes
Boreopteridae
Ornithocheirae
Ornithocheiridae
Ornithocheirinae
Targaryendraconia?
Cimoliopteridae
Targaryendraconidae
Anhangueria
Hamipteridae?
Anhangueridae
Coloborhynchinae?
Anhanguerinae
Tropeognathinae?
Tropeognathini
Mythungini
Pteranodon longiceps

Nyctosaurus gracilis

Ludodactylus sibbicki
Taxon identifiers
Cimoliopterus
Portals: Categories: