Revision as of 17:59, 20 March 2021 editGenQuest (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers63,602 edits →External links: add AC← Previous edit |
Revision as of 18:16, 20 March 2021 edit undoGenQuest (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers63,602 editsm Cleaned up using AutoEdNext edit → |
Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
| ra = {{RA|03|19|51.5}}<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| ra = {{RA|03|19|51.5}}<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| dec = {{DEC|41|34|25}}<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| dec = {{DEC|41|34|25}}<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| z = 0.016898<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| z = 0.016898<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| h_radial_v = 5066 km/s<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| h_radial_v = 5066 km/s<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| gal_v = 5168 km/s<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| gal_v = 5168 km/s<ref name="ned" /> |
Line 15: |
Line 15: |
|
| group_cluster = ]<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Brunzendorf|first1=J.|last2=Meusinger|first2=H.|date=October 1, 1999|title=The galaxy cluster Abell 426 (Perseus). A catalogue of 660 galaxy positions, isophotal magnitudes and morphological types|journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series|language=en|volume=139|issue=1|pages=141–161|doi=10.1051/aas:1999111|issn=0365-0138|bibcode=1999A&AS..139..141B|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="trujilo"/> |
|
| group_cluster = ]<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Brunzendorf|first1=J.|last2=Meusinger|first2=H.|date=October 1, 1999|title=The galaxy cluster Abell 426 (Perseus). A catalogue of 660 galaxy positions, isophotal magnitudes and morphological types|journal=Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series|language=en|volume=139|issue=1|pages=141–161|doi=10.1051/aas:1999111|issn=0365-0138|bibcode=1999A&AS..139..141B|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name="trujilo"/> |
|
| type = S0^+, pec<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| type = S0^+, pec<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| mass = |
|
| mass = |
|
| mass_light_ratio = |
|
| mass_light_ratio = |
|
| stars = |
|
| stars = |
|
| appmag_v = 14.66<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| appmag_v = 14.66<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| absmag_v = |
|
| absmag_v = |
|
| size_v = 1.0 x 0.4<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| size_v = 1.0 x 0.4<ref name="ned" /> |
|
|size = ~{{convert|16.16|kpc|ly|abbr=on|lk=on|order=flip}} (estimated)<ref name="ned" /> |
|
|size = ~{{convert|16.16|kpc|ly|abbr=on|lk=on|order=flip}} (estimated)<ref name="ned" /> |
|
| notes = |
|
| notes = |
|
| names = ] 12434, ] 088 |
|
| names = ] 12434, ] 088 |
|
| references = <ref name="ned"> |
|
| references = <ref name="ned"> |
Line 43: |
Line 43: |
|
|
|
|
|
Subsequent investigations employed ] to acquire a better estimate of the mass of the black hole.<ref name=walsh>{{cite journal|last1=Walsh|first1=Jonelle L.|last2=van den Bosch|first2=Remco C. E.|last3=Gebhardt|first3=Karl|last4=Yildirim|first4=Akin|last5=Richstone|first5=Douglas O.|last6=Gültekin|first6=Kayhan|last7=Husemann|first7=Bernd|title=A 5 x 109 Msun Black Hole in NGC 1277 from Adaptive Optics Spectroscopy|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|date=1 January 2016|volume=817|issue=1|pages=2|doi=10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/2|issn=0004-637X|bibcode=2016ApJ...817....2W|arxiv = 1511.04455 |s2cid=118487689}}</ref><ref name=graham>{{cite journal|last1=Graham|first1=Alister W.|last2=Durré|first2=Mark|last3=Savorgnan|first3=Giulia A. D.|last4=Medling|first4=Anne M.|last5=Batcheldor|first5=Dan|last6=Scott|first6=Nicholas|last7=Watson|first7=Beverly|last8=Marconi|first8=Alessandro|title=A Normal Supermassive Black Hole in NGC 1277|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|date=1 March 2016|volume=819|issue=1|pages=43|doi=10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/43|issn=0004-637X|bibcode=2016ApJ...819...43G|arxiv = 1601.05151 }}</ref> |
|
Subsequent investigations employed ] to acquire a better estimate of the mass of the black hole.<ref name=walsh>{{cite journal|last1=Walsh|first1=Jonelle L.|last2=van den Bosch|first2=Remco C. E.|last3=Gebhardt|first3=Karl|last4=Yildirim|first4=Akin|last5=Richstone|first5=Douglas O.|last6=Gültekin|first6=Kayhan|last7=Husemann|first7=Bernd|title=A 5 x 109 Msun Black Hole in NGC 1277 from Adaptive Optics Spectroscopy|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|date=1 January 2016|volume=817|issue=1|pages=2|doi=10.3847/0004-637X/817/1/2|issn=0004-637X|bibcode=2016ApJ...817....2W|arxiv = 1511.04455 |s2cid=118487689}}</ref><ref name=graham>{{cite journal|last1=Graham|first1=Alister W.|last2=Durré|first2=Mark|last3=Savorgnan|first3=Giulia A. D.|last4=Medling|first4=Anne M.|last5=Batcheldor|first5=Dan|last6=Scott|first6=Nicholas|last7=Watson|first7=Beverly|last8=Marconi|first8=Alessandro|title=A Normal Supermassive Black Hole in NGC 1277|journal=The Astrophysical Journal|date=1 March 2016|volume=819|issue=1|pages=43|doi=10.3847/0004-637X/819/1/43|issn=0004-637X|bibcode=2016ApJ...819...43G|arxiv = 1601.05151 }}</ref> |
|
One group made observations using the Gemini Near Infrared Integral Field Spectrometer to better determine the mass of the black hole at the center of NGC 1277.<ref name="walsh"/> The group used similar models to that of van den Bosch, but with higher spatial resolution. After using stellar dynamics and luminosity models to estimate the mass of the black hole, they came to a mass of {{math|{{val|4.9|e=9|u=solar mass}}}}, similar to the estimate from the follow-up study done by Emsellem,<ref name="Emsellem"/> which estimated a mass between 2–5 billion solar masses. |
|
One group made observations using the Gemini Near Infrared Integral Field Spectrometer to better determine the mass of the black hole at the center of NGC 1277.<ref name="walsh"/> The group used similar models to that of van den Bosch, but with higher spatial resolution. After using stellar dynamics and luminosity models to estimate the mass of the black hole, they came to a mass of {{math|{{val|4.9|e=9|u=solar mass}}}}, similar to the estimate from the follow-up study done by Emsellem,<ref name="Emsellem"/> which estimated a mass between 2–5 billion solar masses. |
|
More recently, a new group<ref name="graham"/> made observations using the larger ] with superior spatial resolution, and calculated that a black hole with mass {{math|{{val|1.2|e=9|u=solar mass}}}} fits best. Moreover, this value is an order of magnitude smaller than first reported by van den Bosch,<ref name="vandenBosch"/> and was noted to probably be an upper limit due to the edge-on rotating disk in NGC 1277. |
|
More recently, a new group<ref name="graham"/> made observations using the larger ] with superior spatial resolution, and calculated that a black hole with mass {{math|{{val|1.2|e=9|u=solar mass}}}} fits best. Moreover, this value is an order of magnitude smaller than first reported by van den Bosch,<ref name="vandenBosch"/> and was noted to probably be an upper limit due to the edge-on rotating disk in NGC 1277. |
|
|
|
|
A follow-up study, based on the same data and published the following year, reached a very different conclusion. The black hole that was initially suggested at 1.7×10 M☉ was not as massive as once thought. The black hole was estimated to be between 2 and 5 billion solar masses. This is less than a third of the previously estimated mass, a significant decrease. Models with no black hole at all were also found to provide reasonably good fits to the data, including the central region.